things of great consequence as he says afterwards in our times are grown in number so many and in matter so intricate that few haue time and leasure fewer strength of vnderstanding to examine them Vvhat remaineth for men desirous of satisfaction in things of such consequence but diligently to search out which amongst all the Societies of the world is that blessed Company of Holy Ones that Houshold of Faith that Spouse of Christ and Church of the liuing God vvhich is ihe Pillar and ground of Truth that so he may embrace her Communion follow her Directions and rest in her Iudgment Thus doctor Field who in his last words rest in her Iudgment speaks home enough and discouers the only efficacious way of curing Sects And see also vvhether this doth not confront the Doctors 29. Principle Church-Infallibility there being changed into Church-Auctority and the Principle being applyed to priuate mens Practise And what need is there of Bishops Presbyters or any Ecclesiastical Pastors among Protestants as to the Office of teaching or expounding these Writings if these in all necessaries are clear to all Persons who sincerely endeauour to know the meaning of them I mean exclusiuely to their repairing to these Pastors for the learning of it And doth not the Doctor here to euacuate the infallibility of the Churches Gouernors introduce an infallibility or Inerrabillity of euery particular Christian in all points necessary if such Christians will that is if only he shall sincerely endeauour to know the meaning of them And moreouer of the sincerity of this his endeauour also I suppose the Doctor will allow any one may be certain else how can the mind of a poore illiterate Countrey-man be at rest who can neyther trust to the Faith of his Guides nor the sufficiency of his own industry For surely this sincere is not all possible endeauour such as is learning the Languages perusing Commentators c. But as Mr Chillingworth who anchored his whole Religion vpon it states this Point namely such a measure thereof as humane Prudence and ordinary Discretion their abilities and opportunities and all other things considered shall aduise And thus such a clearness in necessaries must the Scriptures haue as suits with the very lowest capacities Such a Clearnesse I say euen to all Articles of the Athanasian Creed if these be esteemed Necessaries and euen as to the Consubstantiality of the Son with God the Father In which notwithstanding the whole Body of Socinians dares to oppose all Antiquity vpon pretence of cleare Scripture to the contrary But then the Doctor is desired to consider That if euery Christian may become thus Infallible in Necessaries from 1. a clear Rule 2. a due Industry vsed 3. and a certainty that it is so vsed May not the Church-Gouernors still much rather be allowed infallible and so retain still their infallible Guide-ship and the People also the more clear the Rule of Faith is proued to be the more securely be referred to their direction And haue we not all reason to presume that the chief Guides of the Church euen a General Councill of them or if it be but a major part of this Councill t is sufficient in their consults concerning a Point necessary to saluation deliuered in Scripture vse at least so much endeauour for more needs not as a plain Rustick doth to vnderstand the meaning of it and also the like sincerity For what they define for others they define for themselues also and their Saluation is as much concern'd as any other mans is in their mistakes And next Why may not these Gouernors vpon such certainty of a sincere endeauour and clearness of the Rule take vpon them to define these Points and enjoyn an assent to and belief of them to their Subjects especially since it is affirmed that all those from whom they require such Obedience if they please to vse a sincere endeauour may be certain thereof as well as they And are we not here again arriued at Church-Infallibility if not from extraordinary Diuine assistance yet from the clearness of the Rule Only we must suppose such sincere endeauour in the Church as the Doctor allows may be in euery priuat man And thus does not his conditionall Infallibility of particular persons in necessaries the condition being so easy necessarily inferr a Morall Impossibility of the Churches erring in them Which ought the rather to be admitted by them Since some of their Divines to make this their Problem the more iustifiable that the Scriptures in all necessaries are clear to all persons think it a safe way in the next place to contract these necessaries to the Apostles Creed But after all supposing these Gouernors in stating some Points fallible enough I cannot hence gather any just relaxation of their Subjects submission of their judgment to them vpon pretence of clearness because such Fallibility of their Superiors in some Points can reasonably be supposed to arise from nothing else but some obscurity in the Rule which must be greater still to their Subjects and then what more fitting and ordinary then in matters of consequence to follow a prudent and experienced though fallible persons Direction rather then our own Lastly suppose this granted That the Scriptures may be vnderstood by all persons in all things necessary and so an infallible Guide vselesse yet I see not what aduantage the Doctor can make of this Principle for the Protestant Religion For since the sence of Scripture is now de facto debated between Catholiks and Protestants about so many necessary Points of Faith the Doctor cannot with truth or charity affirm the sense of these Scriptures clear to be vnderstood on the Protestants side to all those who sincerely endeauour to know their meaning where the Major part of Christendom vnderstands their meaning contrary as he must grant they doe in all those hee accounts the common Errours both of the Greek and Roman Church a large Catalogue of which may be found in many Protestant Authours And will he charge all these as defectiue in a sincere endeauour But rather such sincere endeauour being indifferently allowd to all parties he ought to pronounce the sence of Scripture to be clear if on any on that side as the Major part doth apprehend it Which certainly is not the Protestant For Example How can the Doctor rationally maintain this Text Hoc est Corpus meum so often repeated with out any variation of the Terms to bear a sense clear on the Protestants side that is That the Eucharist is not in a litterall or Proper sence the Body of Christ when as they are vnderstood in a litterall sence by much the Major part of the Christian world not onely the Western but Eastern Churches also as Monsieur Claude concedes to his worthy Aduersary Monsieur Arnaud to which also may be added half the Body of the Protestants namely all the Lutherans Now all these haue vsed their senses and weighed the
arguments drawn from them as well as Protestants But if the Doctor put this Text so much controuerted among Obscure Scriptures which therefore not containing any Point necessary to saluation saluation is not endangered by it if a Christian should err or be mistaken in their sense then how comes this great Body of Christians meerly by the mistake of its sence in thinking that our Lord meaneth as the words sound that the Eucharist is his very proper Body and so in adoring as they ought should it be so how come they I say to committ such grosse Idolatry as the Doctor in his Book chargeth them with and so all without repentence miscarry in their Saluation And if from a Major part of the present Church interpreting Scripture an Appeal be made to a Major part of the Ancient Church pretended to interpret them on the Protestants side neither will this relieue the Doctor because since this also on what side Antiquity stands is a thing in Controuersy for deciding of it we are to presume here likewise that a sincere endeauour being allowd to all Parties to vnderstand the sense of the former Church this also stands on that side as the Major part apprehends it Now the present Catholick Church being a Major part professes to follow the sence of the Ancient in interpreting Scripture XIV PRINCIPLE 14. To suppose the bookes so written to be imperfect that is that any things necessary to be heleeued or practised are not contained in them is either to charge the first Author of them with fraud and not deliuering his whole mind or the writers with insincerity in not setting it downe and the whole Christian Church of the first Ages with folly in belieuing the fullnesse and perfection of the scriptures in order to saluation The two inferences made here by the Doctor are faulty For 1. Neither can the first Author of scripture be charged with fraud if he haue deliuered part of his mind only by writing and part some other way as the Doctour Prop. 7. 8. 9. acknowledges he might vnless it be manifest that he hath obliged himselfe by a Promise of delivering his whole mind by writing which is not shewed 2. Neither can the Writers of scripture be charged with insincerity if so much as they were inspired with to set downe and register there they haue done it Meanwhile as touching the Perfection of Holy scriptures Catholiks now as the Holy Fathers anciently do grant that they contain all Points of Faith which are simply necessary to be of all Persons belieued for attaining saluation And of this Doctor Field may be a Witness who saith For matters of Faith we may conclude according to the judgment of the best and most learned of our Adversaries themselues that there is nothing to be belieued which is not either expresly contained in scripture or at least by necessary consequence from thence and by other things euident in the Light of Nature or in the matter of Fact to be concluded XV. PRINCIPLE 15. These Writings being owned as containing in them the whole Will of God so plainly reuealed that no sober enquirer can misse of what is necessary for saluation there can be no necessity supposed of any infallible society of men either to attest and explain these Writings among Christians any more then there was for some Ages before Christ of such a Body of men among the Iewes to attest and explain to them the Writings of Moses or the Prophets The Consequence here is good viz. That supposing the Will of God is so clearly reuealed in these Writings that no sober Enquirer can misse of knowing what is necessary to saluation there can be then no necessity of any Infallible society But the supposition of such a clearenesse fayles as the 13. Prosiosition on which it is grounded doth It failes I say in the sense the Doctor deliuers it who referrs his sober enquirer only to the Writings themselues for information in all Necessaries Without consulting his spirituall Pastours for the right explication of them Nor doth the Doctors Language any where run thus That the will of God is so plainly revealed in these Writings for then he should say so obscurely rather that no sober man not who repairs to the Writings but who enquires of and learns from his spirituall Pastours the right sence of them shall miss c. But if the supposition in the Doctors sence be allowed for true there seems to follow something more then the Doctor deduceth and which perhaps he would not admit viz. the non-necessity of any society at all fallible or infallible to explain these Writings as to Necessaries all Christians being herein clearly taught from God in these scriptures or this their Rule vnless perhaps these Teachers may be said to be left by our Lord for others to supersede their endeauours or for instructing them in non-necessaries As touching that which the Doctor in the clause of this Princ. speaks of Moses and the Prophets certain it is that Moses his Writings and the Law were not penned with such Clarity But that Doubts and Controuersies might arise concerning the sence of it so we find mention made of doubts between Law and Commandement statutes and Iudgments And 2. such Doubts arising their address was to be made to the supreme Iudges appointed for deciding them 3. Whateuer their sentence was according to the sentence of the Law that these should teach them and according to the judgment that they should tell and inform them they were to do and that vpon pain of death To do I say according to such sentence not only when they were to vndergo some mulct or punishment imposed by these Judges for a fault but when they were enjoyned the obseruance of some Law formerly misunderstood by them and so broken and disobeyed This seems clear enough from the words of the Text for who can reasonably interpret them thus Thou shalt not decline from the sentence which they shall shew thee to the right hand or to the left vers 11. that is Thou shalt not decline in not paying the mulct in which they shall fine thee or not vndergoing the corporall punishment they shall inflict on thee Thou shalt obserue to do according to all that they shall informe thee and according to the sentence of the Law that they shall teach thee vers 10. that is thou shalt suffer what they impose but not obey what they enjoyn Again they were to do according to such sentence vpon pain of death not then only when the Litigants do aknowledge their sentence to be juxta Legem Dei conformable to Gods Law for then what sentence of the Iudge would stand good but so often as the Judge should declare it to be conformable to Gods Law And when will a Judge declare his sentence to bee otherwise Lastly not to debate here the Infallibility of these supreme Judges as to all necessaries in the Law
before they can look on themselues as obliged to giue it And therefore He and the Archbishop so farr as any such Councills are fallible allow only an Externall Obedience or silence to them Now for Obedience to these first four Generall Councills in a submission of judgment to them vpon such an Vniuersall Acceptation of them the Doctor in another place thus writes The Church of England looks vpon the keeping the Decrees of the fower first Generall Councills as her Duty and professeth to be guided by the sence of scripture as interpreted by the vnanimous consent of the Fathers and the fowr fist Generall Councills that is shee professeth to take that which such Counciils deliuer for the sence of scripture Not then to admit their Definitions if first they accord with the scripture taken in our own sence So also else where he saith The Church of England doth not admit any thing to be deliuered as the sense of scripture which is contrary to the consent of the Catholick sense of the fowr first Ages that is in their Oecumenicall Councills as he expresseth it in the preceding page And here also he giues the Ground of such submission viz. a strong presumption that nothing contrary to the necessary Articles of Faith should be held by the Catholick Church whose very being depends vpon the belief of those things that are necessary to saluation And when saith he those correspondencies were maintained between the seuerall parts of it that what was refused by one was so by all In another place also speaking in generall of Councills vniuersally accepted he saith That both the Truth of Gods Promises the Goodness of God to his People and his peculiar care of his Church seem highly concerned that such a Councill should not be guilty of any notorious errour Here you see he saith that the Truth of Gods Promises is concerned that these Councills should not fall into any notorious Errour Therefore such Promises are made absolute to some Church-Gouernors after the Apostles And then where the Errour is not intollerable saith the Archbishop at least Obedience of Non-contradiction will be due to all such Councills Now a notorious Errour it must needs be if an Errour in Fundamentalls And such notorious Errour in particular would this be If they should hold themselues when they are not infallible in their Decrees and so should require a Generall Assent such as that in the Athanasian Creed from Christians to them as to Diuine Reuelations and make them DE FIDE thereby in case any Decree be not true obliging all the Members of the Church to an Vnity in errour Thus farr then as to Fundamentall Errours it seems Gods Prouidence secures both such Councills and their subjects And then also for their erring in Non-fundamentalls both He and the Archbishop put this among the RARO CONTINGENTIA The Archbishop also is much in justifying the Catholick Church infallible not only in its Being but Teaching and that must be by its Councills Doctor White saith he had reason to say That the Visible Church had in all Ages taught that vnchanged Faith of Christ in all Points Fundamentall And again It is not possible the Catholick Church that is of any one Age should teach against the word of God in things absolutely necessary to saluation Where the word teach shews that he intends the Gouernors of the Church in euery Age. Likewise in another place If we speak saith he of plain and easy scripture the whole Church cannot at any time be without the knowledge of it And If A. C. meane no more then that the whole Vniuersall Church of Christ cannot vniuersally erre in any one Point of Faith simply necessary to mens saluation be fights against no Aduersary that I know but his own fiction Where it follows But if he mean that the whole Church cannot erre in any one point of Diuine Truth in generall if in these the Church shall presume to determine without her Guide the scripture then perhaps it may be said that the whole Militant Church hath erred in such a Point Here then the first of the whole Church not erring in Fundamentalls as well as the second are spoken of the Church determining And so is that saying of his viz. That though the Mother-Church Prouinciall or National may erre Yet if the Grand mother the whole Vniuersall Church that is in her Generall Councills vniuersally accepted controlling the other Prouincial or National cannot erre in these necessary things all remains safe and all occasions of disobedience that is to the Grand-mothers commands taken from the possibility of the Churches erring namely as to all necessaries are quite taken away Thus he But safe c. it could not be if the Catholick Church the Grand mother as she held so could not also witness all the necessary Truths against such inferiour Councills But how these things will te reconciled with what the Doctor saith else where I know not Let him take care of it as name ly where he writes thus You much mistake when you think we resolue our faith of fundamentalls into the Church as the infallible witness of them For though the Church may be infallible in the belief of all things fundamentall for otherwise it were not a Church if it did not belieue them it doth not follow thence necessarily that the Church must infallibly witness what is fundamentall and what not And again That all infallible assistance makes not an infallible Testimony or makes not the Testimony of those that haue it infallible surely Teaching declaring its consent condemning Doctrins contrary to Fundamentalls is Witnessing or giuing Testimony XVII PRINCIPLE 17. Nothing can be more absurd then to pretend the necessity of such an infallible Commission and Assistance to assure us of the Truth of these Writings and to interpret them and at the same time to proue that Commission from those Writings from which we are told nothing can be certainly deduced such an assistance not being supposed or to pretend that infallibility in a Body of men is not lyable to doubts and disputes as in those Bookes from whence only they deriue their Infallibility I. For the former part of this Principle viz. Nothing can be more absurd then to pretend the necessity of c. If the Doctor in the words at the same time to proue that Commission from these Writings means here to proue such Commission or Assistance only or in the first place from these Writings the truth of Which Writings are first or onely proued from such Commission c. the Absurdity vrged by him I grant 1. As all Articles of Faith are not by all Persons learnt at once so neither by all exactly in the same order as is frequently obserued by Catholick Writers A Christians Faith therefore may begin either at the Infallible Authoriry of scriptures or of the Church and this Infallible Authority of
otherwise reclaimed that in the last place the matter should be brought to the Hearing of the Church and such Person if not hearing the Church to be excommunicated Now I ask to what end either of these if such persons be no nearer to Vnity of Opinion or conuiction and ending their Disputes by submitting their judgments to the sentence of these Iudges or this Church then before they were in the same submission of theirs to the Rule Infallibility alone ends not Controuersies but clearness Clearness in the Point controuerted Which if the scripture hath how comes Controuersy about it and Controuersies between so great Parties Churches Nations In this sense of scripture Catholiks dissenting repair to the Decision of the Church w ch if any way obscure is capable of being made by it afterward more intelligible submit to its Iudgment and so become vnited in Opinion in all those Points the Church decides wherein Protestants rejoyce in their Liberty still to disagree Vnited in Opinion I say true or false here matters not We speak here of Vnion not of Truth But now when the sense of scripture is the like matter of Controuersy between two sects of Protestants as frequently it is What Course do they take for Vnity of Opinion Repair they again to the scriptures they controvert But these can neuer decide which of the seuerall senses they take them in is the true Repair they to synods So the Arminians and Antiarminians did Then surely this they do because that Vnity prouided there be a submission of Iudgment to both is attainable by the sentence of the synod or Church which is not by that of the scripture Which is the thing here denyed by the Doctor And hence it proceeds that Catholicks must be much more vnited in Opinion or Iudgment then Protestants in as much as they all owne submission of Iudgment to so many Councills which the other reject These not accepting the Decrees of aboue fowr or siue of those Councills whilst the Catholiks admit of fowr or suppose three times so many and namely of one the Councill of Trent of which Soaue affirms That in all the Councills held in the Church from the Apostles times vntill then there were neuer so many Articles decided as in only one session of it And Protestants aggrauate the Tyranny of the Church of Rome in tying all her subjects vnanimously to belieue and that as necessary to saluation so many Points of Faith wherein the Protestants leaue to all men liberty of Opinion And moreouer as for those Differences that remain still or shall arise hereafter they are also conclusiue among them by the same way of Councills vpon the acknowledged obligation of a common submission of their judgments I say not all their differences whatsoeuer are conclusiue which causeth some wonder in the Doctor that this thing is not done in an Infallible Church but so many of them wherein the Church finds on any side sufficient euidence of Tradition or for the grauity of the matter a Necessity of Decision The same Diuine Prouidence that preserues his Church perpetually Infallible in all things necessary to be determined disposing also that for all such necessaries there shall be a sufficient euidence of Tradition either of the Conclusion it selfe or its Principles But as for seuerall other matters of Diuine Reuclation where what is to be held as de fide is not sufficiently yet cleared either by reason of the sense of scripture or of the sense of some Conciliary Decree still disputed among Catholicks in matters that are called indeed by the one or other Party de fide as they variously apprehend this sense of scripture or Councill No such agreement I say in matters of Faith thus taken is at all pretended And their accord in the rest sufficiently transcends that of Protestants But euen these also are capable of the same settlement when the Church shall pass a new sentence concerning them Here then may be resumed that Expression selected by Doctor Tillotson to make sport with viz. That in this their Faith namely as to Points thereof determined by the Church it is impossible that Catholiks should differ one from another and that there should be any Schism among them The Reason is plain because in all such Points they vnanimously Submit their judgment to their Mother the Church or if any doth not he ceaseth to be a Catholick Whereas Protestants not acknowledging any necessary Obligation of such Submission to any Superiours among them it is impossible that debates and Schisms should be auoyded by them XVIII PRINCIPLE 18. There can be no hazard to any person in mistaking the meaning of any particular place in those Bookes supposing he use the best means for understanding them comparable to that which euery one runs who belieues any person or society of men to be infallible who are not For in this later he runs vnauoydably into one great errour and by that may be led into a thousand but in the former God hath promised either he shall not erre or he shall not be damned for it God hath made no such Promise concerning any one who vseth his best endeanours for vnderstanding scripture that either he shall not erre or not be damned for it if such endeauour be vnderstood exclusiuely to his consulting and embracing the expositions of the Church which if the Doctor includes then Catholicks also affirme that in necessaries such persons cannot mistake Neither can such Promise be pretended necessary since God hath referred all in the dubious sense of his scriptures to the Directions and Doctrine of his Ministers their spirituall Guides whom he hath set ouer them to bring them in the Vnity of the Faith to a perfect man and that they may not be tossed to and fro and carryed about with euery wind of Doctrine by the sleight of those that lye in wait to deceiue And without which Guide S. Peter obserues that in his time some persons for any thing we know diligent enough yet through want of learning and the instability of adhering to their Guides being unlearned saith he and vnstable wrested some places of scripture hard to be vnderstood to their own destruction Therefore these scriptures are also in some great and important Points hard to be vnderstood Now therefore let the Doctor giue me leaue to put these two other Propositions in the other scale to counterpoise his The first That a Person in belieuing any society of men to be Infallible that are so hath a security incomparably beyond that of another Person who is supposed to use the best other means his condition is capable of to understand the scriptures and so follows his own judgment the capacity of most Christians being very little abstracting from the Directions of a Guide their mean condition voyd of learning or leasure and it being a thing vncertain also when they haue vsed a due endeauour And this a prejudice
Externall Proponent to be infallible The Obseruations made vpon the three immediatly foregoing Propositions the matter of which is repeated in this do shew that they no way serue him for the vse he would here make of them The sense of which Propositions as far as they haue any truth in them may be returned vpon him thus since the Infallibility af any particular person as to the assent he either doth or may giue to this Point of the Churches Infallibility is asserted by those who plead for the Infallibility of a Church And since such infallibility of a particular person as to this point doth not therefore render at all the Infallibility of a Church vseless to him viz. as to his learning still from her all those other Points of Faith of which he hath no infallible knowledge or certainty otherwayes in which therefore he not being infallible that he may not erre in them it is necessary that the representatiue Church be so And so since the Infallibility of the Church is still of most important effect both to those who haue and to those who as yet haue not any infallible certainty of this her Infallibility toguide both these in a true right and sauing Faith as to those Points where of they haue no certainty Therefore there needs no Enquiry after a further Certainty for that our Faith in which we haue one already from this Infallible Proponent the Church XXIV PRINCIPLE 24. There are different degrees of Certainty to be attained according to the different degrees of Euidence and measure of Diuine Assistance but euery Christian by the use of his reason and common helpes of Grace may attain to so great a degree of Certainty from the conuincing arguments of the Christian Religion and authority of the scriptures that on the same grounds on which men doubt of the truth of them they may as well doubt of the truth of those things which they judge to be most euident to sense or reason Here if the Doctor means That euery Christian by the use of his Reason and common helps of Grace that is as he hath expressed it already Principle 13. and 18. by his perusing the scriptures and sincerely endeauouring to know their meaning exclusuely to his necessary repair to any externall infallible Guide or Proponent as he pretends in Principle 13. 15. 23. may attain to so great a degree of certainty as to all necessary Points of Faith ONELY from the conuincing arguments of the Verity of the Christian Religion and Authority of scriptures as that such a person may as litle doubt of them as of the things most euident to sense or Reason This Principle is denyed And for the reason of this denyall I referr to what is said before to Principle 13. and 18. And I appeal also to what Doctor Stillingfleet himselfe elsewhere tells us in his Rationall Account It seems reasonable saith he that because Art and subtilty may be vsed by such who seek to peruert the Catholick Doctrin and to wrest the plain places of scripture which deliuer it so far from their proper meaning that very few ordinary capacities may be able to clear themselues of such Mists as are cast before their eyes the sense of the Catholick Church in succeeding times may be a very usefull way for vs to embrace the true sense of scripture especially in the great Articles of the Christian Faith as for instance in the Doctrine of the Deity of Christ or the Trinity c. Now should not the Doctor instead of saying the sence of the Catholich Church in succceding Ages may be a very vsefull way for vs haue said is very necessary for vs if his cause would permit him And will not the Socinian thank him for this his mitigation But if according to this Principle euery Christian without this externall Guide can not in some perhaps but in all these Points of Faith attain such certainty as he hath in things most euident to sense or Reason how doth he stand in need of consulting or conforming to the sense of the Primitiue Catholick Church XXV PRINCIPLE 25. No man who firmly assents to any thing as true can at the same time entertain any suspition of the falshood of it for that were to make him certain and vncertain of the same thing It is therefore absurd to say that those who are certain of what they belieue may at the same time not know but that it may be false which is an apparent contradiction and ouerthrowes any faculty in vs of judging of truth or falshood 1. This Principle is euident and granted But such certainty is not applicable to the belief of euery Christian as to all Points of Faith if he be supposed not assisted by any Externall Infallible Guide 2. It is true also that a full and firme Assent free from doubting as where no Reasons offer themselues to perswade vs to the contrary may be yielded to a thing as true which is really false and at the same time no suspicion be entertained of the falshood of it XXVI PRINCIPLE 26. Whateuer necessarily proues a thing to be true doth at the same time proue it impossible to be false because it is impossible the same thing should be true and false at the same time Therefore they who assent firmly to the Doctrine of the Ghospell as true do therby declare their Belief of the Impossibility of the falshood of it This Proposition is granted But one who assents firmly in generall to the whole Doctrine of the Ghospell what euer it be as true and so to the impossibility of the falshood of it or any part of it doth not therefore being vnasisted by any Externall Guide know what this Doctrine is in euery such Point of Faith where the sense of the Letter of this Ghospell is controuerted and to vse the Apostles Phrase hard to be vnderstood and that in matters too hazarding damnation if mistaken Therefore me thinks the Doctor should here allow thus much at least That all those who after their perusing the scriptures think themselues not certain of its sense are obliged notwithstanding the silence of these Protestant Principles herein to repair to the Direction of these Externall Guides and these too not taken at aduenture and to follow their Faith Now such non-pretenders to Certainty according to the Doctors tryall of it sett down below in Consid. on Princ. 29. I suppose are the greatest part of Protestants XXVII PRINCIPLE 27. The nature of Certainty doth receiue seuerall names either according to the nature of the Proof or the degrees of the Assent Thus MORALL certainty may be so called either as it is opposed to MATHEMATICALL Euidence but implying a firme assent vpon the highest Euidence that Morall things can receiue Or as it is opposed to a higher degree of certainty in the same kind so MORALL Certainty implies only greater Probabilities of one side then the other In the former
a Hill in the most extended Vnity of an Externall Communion which no other Christian Society can equall a Candle on a Candlestick a Perpetuall erected Visible Pillar and Monument of Truth frustra Haereticis circumlatrantibus Where also according to the disparity of seuerall mens capacities I suppose nothing more necessary then that this Euidence receiued eyther from all or only some of these Notes to those who haue not ability to examin others be such as that it out-weigh any arguments mouing him to the contrary and the like Euidence to which is thought sufficient to determin vs in other Elections And then this Church thus being found he may be resolued by it concerning the Sence of other Diuine Reuelations more dubious and generally all other Scrupules in Religion to witt so farr as this Church from time to time seeth a necessity of such Resolution and the Diuine Reuelation therein is to her sufficiently clear only if such person not spending so much of his own judgment will afford instead of it a little more of his Obedience III. CONSEQUENCE 3. The less conuincing the Miracles the more doubtfull the Marks the more obscure the Sence of eyther what is called the Catholick Church or declared by it the less reason hath any Christian to belieue vpon the account of any who call themselues by the name of the Catholick Church All this is true vpon supposition that matters stand as the Doctor would pretend but such supposition being groundless he must giue me leaue to inuert his Consequence and say The more conuincing the Miracles if any credit for these may be giuen to Church-History the more euident the Marks euen now giuen by S. Augustin and modern Catholick Writers the more clear and manifest euen to simple persons who with much difficulty in seuerall places comprehend the Sense of controuerted Scripture is the Catholick Church whose Representatiue are the subordinate Councills and whose Gouernors the seuerall Degrees of the Ecclesiasticall Hierarchy ascending to the Prime See of S. Peter and the more clear also the Points declared by it viz. in these Councills whose Decrees suppose that of Trent if questioned for their Truth are not for their perspicuity and particularly in the Points of Controuersy they assembled to determin between Protestants and Catholicks the more reason hath any Christian to belieue vpon the account of those who call themselues by the Name and challenge the High Priuiledges which no other Separated Socityes of Christians do of the Catholick Church IV. CONSEQUENCE 4. The more absurd any Opinions are and repugnant to the first Principles of Sense and Reason which any Church obtrudes vpon the Faith of men the greater reason men still haue to reject the pretence of Infallibility in that Church as a grand Imposture The Higher any Points of Faith be and the more remote from Sense and naturall Reason or not comprehensiue by them which such Church as is named before and in the highest capacity of it Generall Councils proposeth to the Faith of Christians the more noble exercise they haue of their Faith whilst they haue an abundant certainty also that such Leaders can misguide them in nothing necessary to Saluation And no reason haue they vpon such improbabilities or contradictions to Sense or naturall Reason to suspect or be jealous of the Churches Infallibility as an Imposture which Church they see through what euer obstacles faithfully adheres to the Diuine Oracles how incredible soeuer to Nature and may be thought because it seems not swayed or hindred by these at all to vse more integrity in her judgment and fidelity to the Diuine Reuelations Yet this is not sayd as if the judgment of our Sences appointed by God the Instruments by hearing or reading them of conueying Faith and his Diuine Reuelations to vs affords not a sufficient Naturall Certainty or Infallibility whereon to ground our belief in all those things subject to our Senses wherein the Diuine Power doth not interpose But only 1. That where the Diuine Power worketh any thing Supernaturally that is contrary to our Senses as it may no doubt here we are not to belieue them And this I think none can deny 2. And next That we are to belieue this Diuine Power doth so so often as Certain Diuine Reuelation tells vs so Though by the same senses if tells us so we belieuing our Senses that it tells vs so when we do not belieue the same Senses for the thing which is contrary to what it tells vs The truth of which Diuine Reuelation we are to learn from Gods Church infallibly assisted in necessary Faith For otherwise Lot and his Daughters were not to credit the Diuine Reuelation supposing that Diuine History then written and extant that the seeming Men who came to Sodome were Angells because this was against their Senses Now here would he argue well who because Lots sight was actually deceiued vpon this Supernaturall accident in taking the Angells to be Men as certainly it was from hence would inferr that the Apostles had no sufficiēt Certainty or ground from their seeing our Lord to belieue him risen from the Dead Or that no Belief could euer be certainly grounded vpon our Senses Nor that Christians haue any certain Foundation of their Faith For a Naturall or Morall Certainty though such as is per potentiam Diuinam fallible and errable and is to be belieued to err where euer we haue Diuine Reuelation for it not else I say a Certainty though not such an one as cannot possibly be false but which according to the Laws of Nature and the common manners and experience of men is not false is sufficient on which to ground such a Faith as God requires of vs in respect of that Certainty which can be deriued from humane Sense or Reason and which serues for an Introductiue to the relyance of this our Faith vpon such Reuelation as is belieued by vs Diuine and which if Diuine we know is not possibly fallible In respect of its relying on which Reuelation an infallible Object and not for an Infallible Certainty as to the Subject it is that this our Faith is denominated a Diuine Faith Now this Naturall or Morall Certainty is thought sufficient for the first Rationall Introductiue and security of our Faith not only by the Doctor in his 27. Principle but also by Catholick Diuines in their Discourses of the Prudentiall Motiues V. CONSEQUENCE 5. To disown what is taught by such a Church is not to question the Veracity of God but so firmly to adhere to that in what he hath reuealed in Scriptures that men dare not out of loue to their souls reject what is so taught To disown what is taught by such a Church as we have here represented it will be to desert what God hath reuealed in the Scriptures the true meaning of which Reuelations when controuerted we are to receiue from it And so men ought not