Selected quad for the lemma: sense_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
sense_n	call_v	scripture_n	word_n	5,563	5	4.4592	4	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A67839	The foxonian Quakers dunces lyars and slanderers, proved out of George Fox's journal, and other scriblers; particularly B. C. his Quakers no apostates, or the hammerer defeated: amanuensis, as is said, to G.C. (as he sometime wrote himself) Gulielmus Calamus, alias, William Penn. Also a reply to W.C. (a church-man, the Quakers advocate) his Trepidantium malleus intrepidanter malleatus, &c. By Trepidantium Malleus.	Trepidantium Malleus.	1697 (1697)	Wing Y80; ESTC R218927	36,337	100

large Folio also They the Quakers can tell who are are Saints who are Devils who Apostates without speaking a word He denies p. 99. That Christ has a Humane Body or a Humane Soul Asserts plainly That the Soul of man is a part of God that it came from him and goes to him again p. 272. and p. 99. That Christ is not distinguisht from the Father if as Penn pleads he meant Separate then George though Inspired was ignorant of words and in the name of the Lord condemned them that rightly used them You are says he p. 114. conceived in sin David did not say You are but I was Profoundly answered His answer to Dr. Owen's Chatechism is fit only for Laughter He answers John Gilpin's Book a book worth reading of Quakers bewitch That he was Drunk after he left the Quakers and a Warrant was out for him the usual Answer Page 244. The Immortal Seed are the Saints and then they are not Dust and Ashes Abraham was so In his Battle-door we have a large book about Thou and You what it is in Latin Greek Hebrew Syriack Samaritan Dutch German French all Languages to me saith he is dust who was before all Languages were O Blasphemy the whole of this Book is a Cheat this Fool understood not English much less what he wrote of which was anothers words He could write Hebrew Letters and many were hung up in Friends Houses to make them believe he did all by Revelation an Ungodly Cheat. I shall only propose to the Quakers a few Questions 1. Seeing the Papists pretend to Infallibility Miracles and Prophesies and the Muggletonians too why should you be credited more than they Had any one man of you the gift of Tongues George Fox himself when he was sent abroad when in America he sent for one Emperor and two Kings to Preach to them they understood not his English he was a barbarian to those barbarians if you say the Testimony was inward I pray be sure keep it there trouble not us with it 2. Can any Atheist or Papist speak worse of the Holy Scriptures than you It is well known Sam. Fisher said They were not capable of being but a Lesbian Rule a nose of wax and askt this question How could any on be Infallible that they were not a cunning devised sable I have not seen his works in Folio these many years but I remember such playing on this subject and that in verse too as is not fit to be named 3. How abominable is it in Disputations and Discourse to use words Janus like with two faces or a double sence one to quiet an Objecter another to satisfie Friends privately You are good at Hocus Pocus the old phrase from the Papists Hoc est Corpus turning a Wafer into a Body yet you will call a man Lyar if he repeat your sense if not exact words should you say a Shilling and I repeat it 12 pence if to se●●e ● turn you would say you never said so How often do Friends answer to what is not asked and evade what is You sometime ask us What Scripture for Absolute and Relative yet use such words your selves 4. How much are you unlike the People you were Muggleton long since cursed you That your Visions and Revelations should fail Blessed said you of old for your Quakings are they that tremble at my Word yet some said The Devil ' trembled in them What is he blessed then Now you tell us That as when a man taketh Physick he is much disordered in his Body till his distemper be gone so you till sin was purged out What have none that turn Quakers for almost forty year past any sin in them to be purged out as well as the first Quakers Nothing was more common at first then this Scripture They shall not teach every man his Neighbour saying know the Lord for they shall all know me from the greatest to the least yet G. Fox taught them every where and it hath been often said in Meetings Friends you are to take notice William Penn will be here next First Day But how could they tell on their Principle whether he should be moved to speak to them I close this part of my Work with the words of Mr. Rogers a Bristol Quaker he wrote a Poem call'd A Scourge for George Waitehead an Apostate Quaker in the close of which he hath these words Let George Fox and they that uphold him Remember 't was Jereboam that caus'd Israel to sin and as his name was branded to Posterity so shall thei●s 〈◊〉 We cannot own them to be Head and Law-givers their Church Government Orders Canons Ecclesiastical are become a Reproach Taunt By-word in the Nation as a just recompence of their Pride Apostacy and deep Hipocrisie The QUAKERS No Apostates Or the Hammerer Defeated c. Examin'd MY Learning is talk'd of by this Man to make Trophies for his Victory yet it seems my Arguments are light If by light said one in the like case you mean clear I wonder you cannot see them if by light you mean trivial I wonder you cannot answer them I thought I had in my first Book so smitten the Quakers that I need not to have smitten them a second time Because Repetitions are tedious especially of Impertinencies I shall not trouble you with many of his words neither shall I actum agere of what is my own I see I have so broken their Teeth that they cannot bite though they can bark This Man of impotent malice having lost his reason falls a Raving and Lying prodigiously beyond all Men as shall be proved I had taken no notice of him nor W. C. the Church-man had it not been for my foregoing work being the seeblest Adversaries I ever had Reader know for the veneration this man and some few more seem to pretend to for the Scripture it is nothing they deny it to be the word of God any more than their own Books which are Writings of Truth Are they good subjects that deny King William to be Lawful King of England because they grant him lawful Prince of Orange As vast a difference is there between the light of Nature and that of Scripture as between the light of a Glow-worm and the light of the Moon in the Night time I brought a writ of Error against the Quakers and see how frantick they grow their Errors are so many that if one should ask a Quaker What is thy Name instead of the blasphemous answer of one my name is I am he might reply in the words of the Demonaick in the Gospel to Jesus Legion for we are many ask their Principles one tells you one thing another another and all from the same Infallible Spirit nay the same man shall transform himself into several shapes they cannot stand before Scripture or Reason when the Sun appears the night of Bats and Owls is come I profess my self to be ashamed to meddle with this Accuser who is so

West-Countrey Wise-A-ker Crackbrain'd Reprimand to a late Book call'd Mr. Keith no Presbyterian nor Quaker but George the Apostate Hammered about his own Numscul being a Joco Satyrrical Return to a late Tale of a Tub emitted by a Reverend Non-Con at present residing not far from Bedlam By W.C. NOw Monsieur I hope I have pleas'd you to the heart and no more will you send a Hue and Cry after me for taring away a Rag of the Title of your Book What a Blustering Title is here I must not examine its Grammar or Oratory because the Writer is a great stranger to both as will be soon enough discovered In the mean while I remember I have heard that when K. James I. was about to Knight one Williams of Essex he asked him what his Christen Name was He answered penny ruden buden budibras penny knip knap clip clap clun clap I think said the King the Old Nick was thy Gadfer that gave thee such a name Sir Ruden I cannot tell what Williams arise said he whoever gave him his name let the world judge who made your Title for you who is the Father of Eye the Slanderer of the Brethren Well Mr. Trepidantium Malleus Intrepidantur Malleatus I can't tell what let me parly with you Empty Casks make great Sounds Your Title that Blazing Comet doth it presage any mischief certainly it s own disappearing You tell the World strange news of me that I assure you I never heard till now Had you it from the Infallible Spirit and Writings of Friend B. C. of my Love Melancholy and being at Box mentioned and hinted 10 times in your little Pamphlet Always on the same Tune you know what Creature is so When was this when was I at Box or any such place Oh I have hit it it was when the Presbyterian said If ever Jesus Christ was D it was when he made the Lords Prayer which W. C. makes no bones of to write plainly though a Turk would hardly wirte so of his Mahomet What will not Church and Quakerish Jacobites say W. C. a Church-man he says and perhaps the first letter may stand for Wicked Well Mr. W. C. you Wicked Church-man I promise any of your Brethren Five Pound if they can before me prove your Charge You say You are afraid lest by answering me you should be forced to go to Bedlam too c. Sure here are had simptomes of hastniag there but alone for me and in the close of all you anticipate an objection to your Readers What think you Sirs am not I almost as mad as my Antagonist to answer his rambling stuff How doth W. C. answer by granting the thing but promising Reformation Excuse it this once I will trouble you no more Well then You have been once mad if this be granted your Readers are mad too if they regard such a mans promise out of his fit much more if in it I never heard what the fate was that besel me for my High Demands for Preaching Had you it from B. C. you are grown a great Church-Friend to Friends you write of Mr. Penn Mr. Whitebead and other Quakers with great veneration and devoir and have many a good word for them They Allegorize not away the Literal Sense if Scripture though it is so noto●●ous they have done it often though to serve a turn they shall call for the Literal Sense Take it up look on it lay it aside again but Mr. Keith and I are both fit for Bedlam it is pitty the Hospital in Moor-fields should part-us c. Nay which is more strange Mr. Bugg a Reformed-Quaker and now a Zealous Pious Church-man cannot escape the Lash He Mr. Pennyman and Mr. Crisp left the Quakers on disgusts and particular Pecques why had you not told what they were for fear of a Confutation All know they left them only for their Blasphemies Heresies and Abominable Practices But that which is almost unpardonable is your Vilifying the Man whom all the World Admires an high Episcopal Man too the Author of the Snake in the Grass All that wrote against the Quakers before play'd with them till he wrote that unanswerable piece p. 17. That his writings are collections of those Gentleman 's before named which is say you as if we should take an account of the Presbyterians from Bishop Laud or Heylen or of our Church from Bellarmine and Harding Well macht Mr. Churchman say I but the mischief is his Collections are not in their Books in good truth Sir you might well ask your Reader Whether he did not think you mad Mr. Snake consulted the Authors he cites and it would have been a most Injurious Charge to so great a Man to be so unworthily Reflected on had it not been by such a D as all must see that are Schollars and read your Book He Mr. Keith and I in our Three New Ways of Dealing with the Quakers help not one another to Materials after you censure us all as if Fools or Madmen you tell us Such Fools as you think to make Fools of them Quakers You ask us How doth it appear Mr. Keith is Reformed He desires you to appear so do I there is no end of Printing in your way Cite at large and then dispute what is the sense of this word and that word but neither you nor William Penn will meet Mr. Keith or me Come torth you Cowardly Defamers shew your Faces if you dare Because Mr. Keith changed not in any one Article of Faith may he not therefore be ●●anged in other things You say You set as a looker on That the Joy of all Ministers about G. K. is groundless and they be all mistaken What is the Bishop Lord Mayor and Clergy mad too as well as G. K. and Trepidantium Mallous Conformists know not who you are You seem to own your self to be a Jacobite though not a Socinim and that I have hit the mark about your being paid by the Quakers for the Service you do them and ask me Why may not I as well as Dr. Stubbe It is an old question Why may not one man play the Knave as well as another Perhaps you are of the opinion of H. P. in the time of the War when one call'd him Knave said If thou wert not a Fool thou wouldst be one too now Yet you tell me I would unsay all I have written against the Quakers for Money Well Brother I am then no fool tho' so often call'd so You ask me Whether when I had a Priviledge Place I ever put on my Surplice No Sir when I was at the worst I was never so Mad yet as to put my Shirt on all my Cloaths I will not only as soon but sooner take Du Moulins Fools Coat which though he would wear all would not Would not a Fools Coat well become a Minister of the Gospel when I was a Preacher at Brislington and Charleton I had Presbyterian Ordination I baptized according to the Directory I