Congregation met together on a Religious account for the Service of God But let it be called if he please a Religious Discourse of the Holy Apostle to a Congregation of Christians met together for such a purpose He would then have it thought a favour or condescention to admit this breaking of bread to be meant of the Lords Supper and not barely a Common eating But since he doth not deny it we will accept the favour and take it so to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Disciples being congregated or assembled to break Bread 'T is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Disciples not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 some of them and they were perhaps not every one but the generality of them as at other meetings 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 congregated or assembled and it seems to be a good full Congregation by Eutychus's being mounted to the third loft whatever he meant by that third loft though but the third scaffold so high that by a fall from thence he was in great danger of being killed Now it is not likely that such a Congregation of Christians were thus assembled for common eating He says Paul was to go away on the Morrow True But it is not said they came together to take leave of Paul but came together to Break Bread Paul's going away on the Morrow might be the reason and I believe was why they continued there so long but the End for which they came together was to Break Bread and the occasion of their so coming because it was the first day of the Week On which it should seem they were wont so to do for that end And if he candidly consider it methinks it should seem so to him Paul came to them at Troas in five days where he abode seven days And on the first day of the week when the Disciples came together to break Bread Paul preachea to them Doth not the fair prospect of the place import thus much that they were then met to break Bread as being the first day of the week What other occasion was there of mentioning what day of the Week it was It had been otherwise a fairer transition to have said He staid there Seven days and on the Seventh day or the last of those Seven the Disciples came together to take leave of Paul and Sup with him over night who was to depart on the morrow Now if it had been said on the Seventh day though meaning but the last of those Seven it would no doubt have been urged as a great argument of Paul's keeping a Seventh day Sabbath and the Disciples with him not as a Iewish but as a Christiam Assembly for breaking of bread which was a Christian not a Iewish Service For then breaking of bread would certainly have been the Lords Supper But because it was on the first day of the Week it must now be but common eating to take leave of Paul and to Sup with him as he tells us p. 57. Friends commonly do when a Minister or any other special Acquaintance intends to take a Iourney in the morning to sup with him over night But if he thinks this to be all which is there meant by the Disciples coming together on the first day of the Week to Break Bread he must excuse me if I cannot be of his Opinion But because he is content to admit upon some terms their meeting might be upon a Religious account for the Lords Supper as no doubt it was I shall press him no further therein but accept of his condescension When he tells us that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is Greek for one and therefore 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 may as well be rendered One day of the Week as the First day of the Week Surely he is not in earnest Such trifling doth more hurt than help his cause No doubt but when ever they met it was one day of the Week we need not be told it nor need the word Week be added he might as well have said one day nor need he have said so much But this Author cannot think nor doth he that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 doth any where signify other than the first day of the Week In the whole story of Christs Resurrection and what followed on that day in all the Four Evangelists we have no other word for it but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 nor have we any other word for it that I know of there or any where else I do not know that it is any where called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Such shifting doth not look well 'T is somewhat like the Story of a man who bought a Horse for Five Pounds to be paid the next day And accordingly on the next day he sent Five Pounds of Candles Perhaps in the Bargain it was not said expresly in words at length Five Pounds of Lawful Money of England But by common intendment it must be so understood And an honest English Iury upon a Tryal would so Find it The Latin word Pridie is a Derivative or Compound rather from prae prior and Postridie from post posterior and accordingly in Latin pridie Calendarum and postridie Calendarum must signify a day before and a day after the Calends But can any man think it is meant of any day No but the next day before and the next day after So if we say Christ was Crucified one day before the Sabbath and Rose again one day after the Sabbath This one day is the next day And so any man who hath not a mind to Cavil will understand it And so 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 one day after the Sabbath must needs be understood of the next day after the Sabbath Nor is it ever used in any other sense If it were to be understood of any indefinitely it should be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 some day after the Sabbath not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 one day after But the most pleasant shift of all is when he would have us think that this Evening which is called the first day of the Week was the Evening after the Seventh day that is Saturday night and the next morning when Paul was to go away was Sunday morning and he to travel that Sunday And that the Evening of Saturday was the beginning of Sunday and was therefore called the First day of the Week Because it is said Gen. 1. the evening and the morning was the First day and so of the rest and therefore the evening was the beginning of every day See what shift a man will make rather than quit an Opinion he hath once taken up We are taught that on the Fourteenth day of the first month at even the Pass-over was to be killed Doth he think that this Fourteenth day at even was the end of the Thirteenth day the Fourteenth day then beginning I think every body else takes it to be the evening at the end of the fourteenth day and the Fifteenth day on the morrow was the first day of
judge hardly But the natural result of what he argues is as I told you He doth not think that Iohn was on the Lords day Rev. 1. 10. keeping the Anniversary of Christs Incarnation nor of his Resurrection No more do I. But why not Because saith he he may say as in the case of Moses's dead body No man knows of his Sepulchre to this day Now as to the Incarnation I am apt to think that no man doth At this day know certainly either on what day of the Year or what day of the Week Christ was born nor is it any matter whether we do or no. But I should rather say no man knows At this day than as he no man knoweth To this day as if no man hitherto had known it for certainly there have been those who knew it heretofore while he was alive though it be now forgotten and at this day no man knows it But will he say so as to the Resurrection I think it is plain that Christ was Crucified on the fourteenth day lay in the Grave the fifteenth and rose again the sixteenth day of the first month And that he rose on the first day of the week no man doubts He should rather have put it thus As no man knows To this day where is the Body of Moses that it might not be worshiped So no man knows At this day which is the Seventh in course from the Creation that we might not contend about it However I am contented to admit if that will please him that the Lords day there mentioned was neither meant of Christmass-day nor Easter-day nor Whit-sunday nor the day of Iudgment but think it to be meant of the first day of the week which is the Christian Sabbath Not of any of those other days mentioned nor of the Iewish Sabbath as he would have it 'T is I think a new notion of his own at least I know none other of his mind that it should be meant of the Iewish Sabbath He grants there is nothing from the Circumstances of the place to determine it to this day Nor doth he pretend to shew that the Jewish Sabbath was ever so called But he thinks it might have been so called For he says God blessed and sanctified the seventh day that is the Seventh day after Six days of Labour therefore it might have been called the Lords day and so may as well the Christian Sabbath as the Iews Sabbath That the Son of Man is Lord also of the Sabbath day And so he is of every day in the Week and of the Christian Sabbath when that is the Sabbath as well as of the Iewish That the seventh day is the Sabbath of the Lord our God that is the Seventh day after Six days of Labour but whether the Seventh day in course from the Creation is no where said That Isai. 58. 13. The Sabbath is called my holy day True on what ever day the Sabbath be First or Seventh of the Week or whatever day God appoints to be kept Holy As for instance the first and seventh day of the Feast of Unleavened bread Ex. 12. 16. The First day shall be a Holy Convocation and the Seventh day shall be a Holy Convocation and each of them was the Lords Holy day on what ever day of the week they happened And the like for other days So Levit. 23. 2 4 7 8 21 24 25 27 28 30 32 35 36 39. and Num. 28. 18 25 26. Num. 29. 1 7 12 35. All the days here mentioned are the Lords Holy days yet I do not take any of them to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And all he can pretend to from these or whatever he produceth is no more but that the Iewish Sabbath while it was the Sabbath might have been so called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Lords day he doth not pretend to shew that ever it was so called Now I would desire this Gentleman if he can but a little while lay aside his prejudice to consider first that the Lords day was the proper name of a day whereby it might be known as distinguished from other days else to what purpose is it said I was in the spirit on the Lords day whereas the proper name of the Iewish Sabbath and of that onely as he would have us think p. 64. was the Sabbath day and there is no appearance of reason why if he meant that day he should not rather have said I was in the spirit on the Sabbath day or the seventh day This therefore must needs be meant of some other day known by another name 2. I would have him next consider that the Lord in the Old Testament is the usual name of God indefinitely without particularizing this or that of the Three persons and the Sabbath of the Lord thy God doth not appropriate it to the second Person more than to the first and third And though I do not deny that our Christ was the God who gave the Ten Commandments for all the three Persons are the same God yet I do not think it to be Christ onely as contradistinguished to the other two And when it is said I am the Lord thy God thou shall have no other God but me the meaning is not I the second Person am so the Lord thy God that thou shalt own no other Person for thy God beside me the second Person But 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Lord in the New Testament is for the most part applied peculiarly to our Lord Christ God and Man and is understood 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of him As he is called elsewhere 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Son of Man And accordingly 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 must be a day peculiarly appropriate 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to our Lord Christ which the Jewish Sabbath was not nor that of the Fourth Commandment which is the Sabbath of the Lord thy God that is of God indefinitely for 't is in that notion that God speaks in the Ten Commandments not as one person contradistinct to the other two It is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Lords day in a like sense as 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Lords Supper 1 Cor. 11. 20. and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Cup of the Lord the Table of the Lord 1 Cor. 10. 21 22. 1 Cor. 11. 27. In all which by the Lord is meant the Lord Christ God and Man And because there being a double Sabbath then in use the Iewish Sabbath and the Christian Sabbath and the word Sabbath indefinitely having been a long time applied to the Iewish Sabbath and would be apt to be understood of it therefore by way of distinction that of the Christians though a Sabbath also within the sense of the Fourth Commandment was called the Lords day as being the Day or Sabbath appropriate to our Lord Iesus Christ. And therefore when he tells us so often the World was made by our Lord Iesus Christ and the Law given on Mount Sinai by our Lord
Chap. 4. 9 10 11. he rebukes them severely that after they had known God or rather were known of God they should turn again to the weak and beggarly rudiments or elements Ye observe saith he days and months and times and years I am afraid of you lest I have bestowed upon you labour in vain 'T is not indeed here said in particular what those days were that are here meant yet it is most likely and scarce to be doubted to be meant of the Iewish Sabbath For though other Observation of Times be here reckoned up there being the same reason of all yet there was no occasion for the others in Galatia For the Jews themselves did not think themselves obliged nor do the Jews at this day to the observation of their other Feasts or Fasts out of their own land But to that of Circumcision and of the Iewish Sabbath and the distinction of Meats they thought themselves obliged even out of their own land And of such we must understand this to the Galatians These being the things there in question not those other which were confined to the land of Canaan But he objects here that though Days be mentioned yet not Sabbath days and fansies it might be meant of some other days not of Sabbaths To gratify him therefore in this also I will proceed to that of Colos. 2. 16. Where Sabbaths are expresly named To the Colossians who were also Christian Gentiles he pursues the same notions Least any one should beguile them with inticing words Col. 2. 4. thereby to bring them under the Mosaick Law He bids them Beware lest any spoil them through Philosophy and vain deceit Whereby I suppose he means the Mosaick doctrines or Philosophy of the Jews which Clemens Alexandrinus doth all along call 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in contradistinction to that of the Greeks after the traditions of men after the rudiments or elements of the world and not after Christ ver 8. and that particularly of Circumcision ver 11. in the room of which Baptism is come ver 12. Christ by his Death having blotted out the hand-writing of ordinances meaning the Jewish Law and took it out af the way nailing it to his Cross ver 14. and amongst other things Let no man therefore judge you in meat or in drink as if some were now clean others unclean as under the Mosaick Law or in respect of an holy day 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a Festival or of the new Moon or of the Sabbath days 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ver 16. Where by Sabbath must be meant the Iewish Sabbath the day which in common speech was understood by the word Sabbath For this he hath two or three evasions He doth commonly press hard in other places that by Sabbath is to be understood the Jews Seventh-day-Sabbath and no other day The holy Spirit doth call the seventh-Seventh-day the Sabbath and no other day of the week both in the Old and in the New Testament throughout p. 46. And I think he is not much out therein that it doth usually so signify where it doth not come with some intimation to direct us to some other sense And why it should not be thought so to signify here I see no reason For though I take our Christian Sabbath to fall as properly under the word Sabbath in the Fourth Commandment as that of the Iews yet the word in common use having by this time become the proper name of that Day which the Jews so called it was necessary to avoid confusion to give the Christian Sabbath another name as that of the Lords Day or the first day of the week And consequently that the Sabbaths here mentioned are to be understood according to the then use of the word of those Sabbaths Not as if all days of Holy Rest where hereby forbidden but onely the nicety of confining it particularly to that day which was then in common speech so called But he would not have it here understood of the Seventh-day Sabbath as every where else but some other Ceremonial Sabbaths but what those are he doth not tell us That there were some other Feasts observed by the Jews which in the Old Testament are sometimes called Sabbaths but very seldome I do not deny nor that those come under the general Words in this place But those do not seem to be here principally intended because it is manifest to be understood of the Sabbath there in dispute Now there was no occasion of a dispute concerning the observance of those other Sabbaths amongst the Gentiles out of the Holy-land These observations being not thought obligatory even to the Jews but in their own Land onely And it is expresly provided Deut. 16. that these were not to be kept in any place promiscuously not within any of the Gates which the Lord thy God giveth thee But in the place which the Lord thy God shall chuse to place his name there So of the Pass-over ver 5 6. So of the Feast of Pentecost ver 11. So of the Feast of Tabernacles ver 15. And of altogether ver 16. And therefore not out of their own Land I do not deny but that they might in private houses eat the Paschal Lamb as Christ did with his Disciples but not Sacrifice the Pass-over For it was to be sacrificed in the Temple onely and the Feast of the Pass-over to be there solemnly kept Not in private houses and much less out of their own Land Nor do I remember that any where in all the New Testament the word Sabbath is used for any such Sabbaths Nor can reasonably be supposed to be here meant of those Feasts because it is put in contradistinction to them Let no man judge you in respect of a Feast of the New-moon or of the Sabbaths Which yet I do not understand as if no Sabbath might now be kept but that the Obligation to that Sabbath was now at an end Another evasion is this He would have 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Sabbata in the plural number to signify Weeks not Sabbath-days The Sabbath-day being called in the singular number 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Sabbatum For he will rather play at small game than stand out If we should allow him this it would not advance his purpose at all For if the business of Weeks be at an end that we are no longer to distribute our time into Weeks than that of the Sabbath much more which he would have to be the seventh day of the Week But suppose we do allow that one Sabbath is to be called Sabbatum what are we to call two or more Sabbaths Must not they be Sabbata And if this be his meaning then are we not to observe such Sabbaths any longer But what must we then say to Mat. 28. 1. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which we render In the end of the Sabbath meaning thereby the Seventh day Sabbath then past 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as it began to draw towards the first day of the
shewed to the High-Priests the things which were done who calling a Councel gave the Souldiers Money to say His Disciples came and stole him away while they were asleep undertaking to secure them in case the Governour should come to hear it Upon this news being brought by the Women to the Disciples Two of them from the rest went to the Sepulchre to enquire into the business and brought an account of it to the rest who were Astonished at it And all this happened before the Two Disciples began their Journey to Emmaus for they discoursed of it by the way and told it to Iesus who fell into their Company Luk 24. 19 20 21 22 23 24. Now their Journey from Ierusalem to Emmaus was about Threescore Furlongs ver 13. which our Author rightly computes to be about Seven miles and an half of our miles which they Travelled on foot for 't is said they walked Mark 16. 12. and Iesus in their company Preaching to them out of Moses and the Prophets the Doctrine of Christ's Death and Resurrection When they came near to Emmaus it was towards Evening and the day far spent Luk. 24. 29. they did there abide for some time and Iesus with them continuing to Preach on the same Subject and was at length known to them by breaking of Bread ver 30. 35. After which they returned to Ierusalem and told these things to the Disciples then gathered together ver 33. By which time having now walked another Seven miles and an half we may reasonably suppose it to be pretty late at night For when they first approached to Emmaus it was then so late as that it was not thought convenient unless upon some such great occasion to Travel further ver 28. Yet after they were come back to Ierusalem Christ then appeared himself to the Disciples blessing them reproaching their unbelief confirming their Faith giving them Instructions and Commission for Preaching the Gospel and Planting the Christian Church And it was yet but the same day at evening being the First day of the Week Joh. 20. 19. on which he rose but now late at night when the doors were shut that is if I mistake not so late as that it was time to shut up doors as men use to do towards bed-time Not as if Christ came in through the Key-hole any more than did the Two Disciples that came from Emmaus or did Penetrate the doors as the Papists would have us think in favour of their Transubstantiation For they were not so shut but that they could be opened again upon occasion to let him in as they had been to let in those Two that came from Emmaus as well as to let in Peter late at night Act. 12. 16. So that from very early in the Morning while it was dark till very late night and about Mid-night was the same day the first day of the Week 'T is manifest therefore that about our Saviours time according to the Computation of the New Testament both the Jews and the Four Evangelists did reckon their days from mid-night to mid-night And if they did not so reckon Christ could not be said Mat. 12. 40. to be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth For it was Evening when Ioseph begged the Body of Iesus and later yet before he had buried it and yet this must be reckoned part of the Sixth day olse he had not been three days in the Grave or heart of the earth And I think they were so reckoned in the times of the Old Testament also Which though it be not so much to the present purpose yet if you will pardon this digression I will tell you why I think so It is I know an Opinion taken up by some and I find it is grown pretty current even amongst Learned men that the Jews in the time of the Old Testament did reckon their days from Evening to Evening whether they mean from Sun-set to Sun-set or from Six a Clock to Six a Clock I cannot tell nor perhaps are they all agreed as to that point But I take it to be a mistake which being at first taken up without sufficient ground hath since passed without further examination from hand to hand We find Exod. 12. 6. the Pass-over was to be killed in the First month on the Fourteenth day in the Evening which I think is agreed by all to be the Evening at the end of the Fourteenth day not that at the end of the Thirteenth for the next morning was the Fifteenth day which evening therefore belonged to the Fourteenth day But it is noted in the Margin of our Bibles that it is in the Hebrew between the two Evening s. You 'l ask perhaps what are those two Evenings I 'le tell you what I think they are The word Day you know is taken in a double sense Sometimes for what we call the Natural day as it is contradistinguished to night from Sun-rising to Sun-setting sometimes for what we call the Artificial day or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 so as to take in both day and night Our Saviour tells us there are Twelve hours in the day meaning the Natural day But in the Artificial day of which we are now speaking there be Four and Twenty hours Some please to call that the Natural day which I call the Artificial for all do not use the words in the same sense But that matters not so long as we understand one another Now by the word Evening is understood the end of the day Which as to the Natural day is at Sun-set but as to the Artificial day it is I think at Mid-night And consequently between the two Evenings is as much as to say after Sun-set and before Mid-night And this is what in our Language we commonly call the Evening which is in the Hebrew between the two Evenings that is between the end of the Natural day and the end of the Artificial day and within this time was the Passover to be Killed Rosted and Eaten Nothing of it was to remain till the Morning that is not after Mid-night for as soon as Mid-night is past Morning begins And within this time all Leaven was to be put away that is before the Mid-night of the Fourteenth day Which is so fair an account of it as that we need not scruple to embrace it And it was the Fifteenth day that was the first day of the Feast of Unlevened bread all Leven being put away before Mid-night and this Fifteenth day was to be kept as a Sabbath and a Holy Feast to the Lord ver 14. on what ever day of the Week it chanced to fall And so was the One and Twentieth day which was the last of those Seven days Seven days shall ye eat Unleavened bread even the first day ye shall put away or shall have put away leaven out of your house And in the First day there shall be an Holy Convocation and in the Seventh day there shall be an Holy
Week must we read it at the end the Sabbaths because 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is in the plural number when the Sabbaths meaning the Seventh-day Sabbaths were now at an end and the First-day Sabbath coming on in their place If that reading please him it will serve us as well But he is mistaken in his criticism 'T is true that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the plural number seems to be sometime put for a Week but not Weeks that I know of as he would have it And so it is commonly taken to be where we find 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for the first day of the Week but may as well be rendered the first day after the Sabbath And so is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the singular as Luke 18. 12. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 I fast twice in the week I suppose he would not have us render it I fast twice on the Sabbath day though it be in the singular number as if he did fast twice upon one day But thus rather I keep two Fasts to one Sabbath which is the same in sense with I fast twice in the Week In like manner as the Olympiad may be taken sometime for that particular year on which were the Olympick Games which were wont to return every fifth year inclusively that is as we use to speak the fourth year after the last Olympick sometime for the interval of four years from the end of one Olympick to the end of the next following So here Sabbatum may be sometime taken strictly for the Sabbath-day and sometime for the whole septiduum or week from Sabbath to Sabbath And so is Sabbata in the plural number taken also for a Sabbath-day Thus I take it to be here Mat. 28. 1. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 when the Sabbath-day was ended in the same sense with that of Mark 16. 1. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 speaking of the very same time when the Sabbath was past And in like manner Matth. 12. 1. At that time Iesus went on the Sabbath day through the Corn 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Sabbatis in the plural number And so it is in Mark 2. 23. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Yet it is meant but of one day as appears by the parallel place where the same is again related Luk. 6. 1. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And so Mat. 12. 5 10 12. Mar. 3. 4. Luk. 4. 31. Luk. 6. 2 9. And 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the Septuagint is commonly put for the Sabbath-day I will not say Allways because I have not examined it but in all the places which I consulted And even in the body of the Ten Commandments Exod. 20. 8. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Remember the day of the Sabbaths in the plural number And again ver 10. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but the seventh day Sabbaths to the Lord thy God So Ex. 16. 13. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Sabbaths a holy Rest unto the Lord to morrow And Levit. 23. 3. six days shall work be done but the seventh is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Sabbaths of Rest ye shall do no work therein 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 it is the Sabbaths of the Lord. Which are the signal places wherein the Sabbath is commanded And the like very often if not always in the Septuagint whose language the New Testament doth usually follow So that his criticism comes to nothing but only to shew how careless he is of what he says if at least he may seem to say somewhat Such is that when he tells us p. 136. that God who hath reserved a Tenth of our Substance hath reserved But a Seventh of Time As though he thought a tenth part to be more than a seventh part And many such negligences which I spare to mention But whether we render it Sabbath-day or Sabbath-days the sense is still the same And the Apostles design in all these places seems to be this that though to the Iews to whom it had once been a Law he doth allow a liberty till they should be better satisfied for each to follow his own judgment without censuring others as well in this of the Iewish Sabbath as in the business of Circumcision and the abstinence from Meats and their other Rites yet he would by no means suffer these to be brought upon the Gentiles as a new Yoke to which before they had not been subject I say as a new Yoke to which they had not been subject For though I do admit that by natural light or the Law of Nature man ought to allow a competent time for the solemn service of God and by a positive Law that it should be at least one day in seven that is after six days of Labour the seventh to be a day of Rest and so much to be intended in the Fourth Commandment Yet I do not think it to be so determined to this day in order as to be unchangable to after Ages We can be no ways sure that the seventh day in order from the first raining of Manna Ex. 16. was the seventh in order from the Creation And as they did observe it then in order from thence so when Christ or his Apostles by direction from him did put it into a new order this new order doth as well sute the words of the Fourth Commandment as that former I do the rather say that this to the Gentiles is a new Yoke because I find this to be given as a sign a covenant or distinctive mark given to the Jews as Gods peculiar People in contradistinction to other Nations just as Circumcision was So Exod. 31. 13. My Sabbaths ye shall keep for it is a Sign between me and you throughout your generations and ver 16. The Children of Israel shall keep the Sabbath to observe the Sabbath throughout their generations for a perpetual Covenant and ver 17. It is a Sign between me and the Children of Israel for ever So Ezek. 20. 12. I gave them my Sabbaths to be a Sign between me and them and ver 20. They shall be a Sign between me and you that ye may know that I am the Lord your God Just as it is said of Circumcision Gen. 17. 7. I will establish my Covenant between me and thee saith God to Abraham and thy seed after thee for an Everlasting Covenant to be a God unto thee and thy seed after thee and ver 10 11. This is my Covenant which ye shall keep between me and you and thy seed after thee every male-child among you shall be Circumcised and it shall be a Token of the Covenant between me and you and ver 13. My Covenant shall be in your flesh an everlasting Covenant not as if Circumcision were to be for ever obligatory but rebus sic stantibus so long as things continued in that estate And so it is called Rom. 4. 11. He received the Sign of Circumcision a Seal of the Righteousness of Faith And such was the Bloud of the Paschal Lamb on the Door-posts
day inclusively reckoning the day of Birth for the first and the day of Circumcision for the last of the Eight days which with Six whole days between make Eight Whereas if Eight whole days had been fully past Christ had been Circumcised the Tenth day The Sense being the same with that concerning Iohn the Baptist Luk. 1. 59. On the Eighth day they came to Circumcise the Child So here After Eight days that is on the Eighth day or after the Eighth day was come And this I think is the constant Language of Scripture every where And his Objection needs no other Answer but that St. John did not speak English And I cannot but think however he please thus to object that himself doth believe this after Eight days to be here meant of the First day of the next Week and he should have been so candid as to own it And that post Octo dies is the same in sense with Octo post diebus that is the Eighth day after reckoning the present day for one and that it is so to be understood in this place We should not in a serious Enquiry press what possibly might be but what we truly think is the meaning A Lawyer at the Bar may fairly propose For his Client what possibly may be the Sense of such or such a Clause But a Judge on the Bench and a Counsellor To his Client is to consider what really Is the Sense of Words in question I dare appeal to himself whether in his own thoughts he do not think after Eight days here to signifie the same as after Eight days were accomplished Luk. 2. 21. And if so then this is rather to Wrangle than to Dispute fairly Before I dismiss this place it is not amiss to take more particular notice about what time it was that Mary Magdalen and the other Women came to the Sepulchre on the day of Christs Resurrection 'T is said Luke 23. 55 56. When they beheld the Sepulchre and how the body was laid on the sixth day day at night whereon he was Crucified they returned and prepared Spices and Ointments and rested the Sabbath day according to the Commandment And in the next words Luk. 24. 1. Now upon the First day of the Week very early in the morning they came to the Sepulchre bringing the Spices which they had prepared In Mat. 28. 1. In the end of the Sabbath when it began to dawn toward the First day of the Week In Mark 14. 15. When the Sabbath was past very early in the morning the First day of the Week they came to the Sepulchre at the rising of the Sun or by Sun-rising And Ioh. 20. 1. The First day of the Week early when it was yet dark they came to the Sepulchre Perhaps all the Women did not come just at the same time but were all there by Sun-rising But the Body was raised before they came as is agreed by all the Evangelists Where I observe First that the Sabbath according to their Account did not end till toward the morning of the next day The end of the Sabbath or when the Sabbath was past was early in the morning before the Sun-rising while the day did begin to dawn and while it was yet dark Very early indeed in the morning but yet not till morning not in the Evening over night And therefore without disputing how the day was reputed to begin in the time of Moses 't is manifest that at this time as well the Sabbath as other days was by them reckoned not from the beginning of the Evening to the beginning of the Evening but rather according to the Rom. account from Midnight to Midnight For 't is manifest that it was toward Evening of the Sixth day before the Crucifixion was over For it was some while after the Ninth hour that is after our Three a Clock that he cryed with a loud voice and gave up the Ghost Mark 15. 34 37. And it was yet later when they brake the Legs of the two Thieves that they might not remain on the Cross upon the Sabbath but only pierced his side because he was already dead Joh. 19. 31 32 33 34. And later yet when Ioseph of Arimathea begged his Body and buried it For 't is expresly said When Even was come there came a rich man of Arimathea named Ioseph and begged the body of Iesus and when he had taken the Body he wrapped it in a clean linnen Cloth and buried it in his own new Tomb Mat. 27. 57 58 59 60. Mark 15. 42 43 44 45 46. Luk 23. 51 52 53. But though Even were come before this time yet the Sabbath was not begun for so it followeth Luk. 23. 54. that day was the Preparation and the Sabbath drew on And after this ver 55 56. the Women who beheld the Sepulchre and how the Body was laid returned and prepared Spices and Ointments the same night but rested the Sabbath day according to the Commandment And by this time it must needs be pretty late at night while yet the Sabbath was not begun That is I suppose not till Midnight of the Sixth day Nor was the Sabbath ended when Evening began on the Seventh day For if so the Women might that night have brought and applyed their Spices and Ointments which they had prepared the night before For they had as much time so to do after the Evening was begun that night if the Sabbath were now ended as they had to do what was done the night before after that Evening was then begun Nothing hindered them but because the Sabbath was not yet done and they were to rest the Sabbath day according to the Commandment But so soon as well they could when the Sabbath was ended they came early the next morning while it was yet dark And might as well have come the night before if the Sabbath had ended when the evening began I add farther If the Sabbath had ended at the evening of the Seventh day and the First day of the Week had then begun as this Author would have it Christ might have risen that night for it would then have been the Third day and not have stay'd in the grave for the third day till the next morning which yet we know he did 'T is manifest therefore that the First day of the Week did begin from the middle of the night not from the First Evening of the Seventh day And that Christ was risen very early in the morning of that First day while it was yet dark We are next to Consider how long that First day lasted After Christ was risen early in the morning while it was yet dark how early that was we cannot tell but it was in the Morning not over night he appeared first to Mary Magdalen and the Women who went to the Sepulchre they as they were directed carried news of it to the Disciples and when they were going Mat. 28. 11. the Watch came into the City and
will say some what to it Whether 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 be good Greek or no as to the common analogy of that Tongue or what is the reason of that Syntax I need not trouble my self to enquire because it is nothing to the purpose for we are not inquiring whether it be good Greek but what it here signifies There are I presume in all Languages by negligence or corruption some harsh expressions as to the analogy of the Language which yet are allowable by common usage and well enough understood He would think it perhaps a little harsh to say in Greek 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is in Latine tres decimum quatuor decimum for what we say in English thirteenth fourteenth yet so they speak And somewhat harsh 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Rev. 2. 26. Rev. 3. 21. and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Rev. 3. 12. instead of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 yet so it is And 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 yet so we find it Rev. 1. 4. And many such may be shewed In Latine idcirco quocirca posthac quapropter controvertor paterfamilias omne genus homines Aethiops albus dentes pridie catendas and many more are scarce to be accounted for as regular save that they are so used but because they are so used they are accounted elegant enough In English Methinks for I think three pound ten shillings for three pounds c. three foot nine inches many a one a few Pottage and the like are scarce regular yet are so used When a Merchant marks his Parcels and so calls them number one number two c. he means first and second So in the Year of our Lord one thousand six hundred and ninety one One thousand six hundred ninety two is commonly said when yet we mean ninety first ninety second so one a clock two a clock for the first and second hour after Twelve And other the like cases where the Cardinal number is put for the Ordinal As it is also in Gen. 1. The evening and morning were jom echad day one which the Septuagint renders 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 doth there signify 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Yet no wise man will cavil as to the sense of such expressions what ever they may do as to the Grammatical construction when we know what is meant by them So here 't is true 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 doth properly signify one in common construction but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 doth never signify other than the first of the week either in the New Testament or any where else not any day of the week any more than one a clock doth signify any other hour than the first after twelve When a thing is said to be done at one a clock he that shall object this may be any hour for every hour is one would be laugh'd at And when a Merchant bids his Prentice bring him number one if he bring him what else he pleases because every number is number one or one number he deserves to be knockt Now when every one knows who understands any thing of this nature that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is the proper name of that day which is next after the Iewish Sabbath as much as one a clock is the proper name of that hour which is next after Twelve it must either be great ignorance or somewhat worse so to object I appeal to himself whether ever he met with that name in any Author in any other sense He seems to take it very unkindly pag. 66. of those who should think that by son of man should be meant an ordinary Man in Mar. 2. 27 28. The Sabbath was made for Man and not Man for the Sabbath Therefore the Son of Man is Lord also of the Sabbath Where I think it is plain that in the former verse the Sabbath was made for Man c. it is manifestly spoken of ordinary Men. And though in the latter verse the Son of Man is Lord also of the Sabbath by Son of Man I suppose is meant Christ yet is that Title given also to ordinary Men elsewhere very often As Iob 25. 6. How much less Man who is a Worm and the Son of Man which is a Worm And Isai. 51. 12. Who art thou that shouldst be afraid of a Man that shall dy and of the Son of Man which shall be made as Grass So Ps. 8. 4. What is Man that thou art mindful of him and the Son of Man that thou visitest him And to the same purpose Ps. 144. 3. And to name no more in the Book of Ezekiel the Prophet Ezekiel is in that one Book called Son of Man oftener than Christ is so called in the whole Bible And if we would argue as he doth we might plausiby object It might be so meant here though I think it is not But he cannot shew that ever the Iewish Sabbath was called the Lords day however he thinks it might have been nor though 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 be Greek for One that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is ever used for other than the first day of the week or the next after the Jewish Sabbath Nor doth he think it Such trifling to give it no harder name may do well enough in Drollery or Burlesque but not in a plain honest Enquiry But if he would be curious as to the Phrase 't is plain enough that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is not properly the Genitive case governed of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 For then it should have been 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 because 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is of the Neuter Gender And 't is a mistake therefore when p. 58. he renders it by One of the Sabbaths as if it had been 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 But 't is governed rather of some Praeposition or Particle understood as 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or the like and then as in Latin pridie calendas that is pâ—ioâ— dies ante calendas is the next day before the Calends so is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the next day after the Sabbath The full construction is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 being understood in the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 understood in the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 That is one day after the Sabbath which being the proper Name of a day cannot be meant of any other but the Next day after 'T is certain therefore that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the first day of the Week or the first day after the Iewish Sabbath was from the Resurrection of Christ and after eminently signalized as a day of special Observation 'T was honoured with Christs Resurrection on that day with his first appearance to Mary Magdalen and the other Women then to the Two Disciples going to Emmaus and his Religious Assembling with them there after that to the Disciples at Ierusalem and assembling with them the same day and
and to rise from the dead the Third day and that Repentance and Remission of Sins was to be Preached in his Name among all Nations whereof they were to be his Witnesses and Apostles ver 44 45 46 47 48. And did renew his Promise of sending the Holy-Ghost and Power from on high v. 49. He did moreover at the same meeting not only upbraid them for their unbelief Mark 16. 14. but did Authorize them with a solemn Commission for the Work they were to be sent abqut to Go into all the World and Preach the Gospel to every Creature that he who believeth and is baptized shall be saved but he who believeth not shall be damned ver 15 16 and a Power to work Miracles ver 17 18 in confirmation of that Doctrine And to the same purpose Iohn 20 19. The same day at Evening in which he before appeared to Mary Magdalen and the rest being the First day of the Week the very day of his Resurrection where the Disciples were assembled at a private meeting for fear of the Iews the door being shut Iesus came and stood in the midst of them and gave them his Solemn Benediction saying unto them Peace be unto you And in Confirmation of his Resurrection shewed them his hands and his side ver 20. And then a Second time gives them his Solemn Blessing together with his Ordination or Commission for Preaching the Gospel and Planting the Christian Church Iesus saith to them Again Peace be unto you As my Father hath sent me even so send I you And when he had said this he breathed upon them and said unto them Receive the Holy Ghost Who 's soever Sins ye remit they are remitted to them and who 's soever Sins ye retain they are retained ver 21 22 23. All which being put together seems to me very like the Celebration if not the Consecration of a Christian Sabbath or day of Holy Rest and Religious Service 'T is all of it Sabbatical Work and there is a great deal of it 'T is not indeed expresly said That he did bid them thus to meet on such other First day of the Week as neither is it expresly said Gen. 2. 3. that God did then bid Adam and Eve to keep a Weekly Sabbath or that he did bid them to offer Sacrifice but it is very likely Christ might so order it and more likely than that he did not For that they did so meet we are sure and therefore 't is very likely if not a strong presumption that they were bid so to do For so we find it Ioh. 20. 26. After Eight days that is as we commonly speak in English on that day Sennight his Disciples were again within and Thomas with them who before was absent the door being shut then Iesus came and stood in the midst and said Peace be unto you as he had done the Week before and satisfyed Thomas who before doubted So that we have here Two Solemn meetings of the Disciples Two Weeks together the Two first after his Resurrection on the First day of the Week and Christ with them on both And I am sure we have not more for the First Sabbath Gen. 2. 3. On how many more such Sabbaths he so met with them I cannot tell That he oft appeared to them during the Forty days of his abode on Earth after his Resurrection we cannot doubt and its like it might be on these days The Cavil which here he makes to this place is so weak that I am sorry to see it from one who would seem to be serious As if Eight days after or after Eight days were not the same as what we would say a Week after or that day Sennight after For he must needs know that 't is not only the Common Scripture Language but the general Language of Latine and Greek Writers to reckon Inclusively that is to take in both the extreams and so it is even at this day I think in most Languages except English What we call a Sennight the French call huict jours Eight days and what we say a Fortnight is with them Quinze jours Fifteen days and so in all manner of reckoning A Fourth a Fifth an Eighth a Fifteenth and other Intervals in Musick are always so reckoned What we call a Third-day-Ague the Latins call a Quartan and what we call every other day they call a Tertian So they call Secundo Calendas i. e. Secundo die ante Calendas what we would say one day not two days before the Calends and they call tertio Calendas what is with us two days not three days before the Calends So nudius tertius is what we would say two days ago and nudius quartus is in our Language Three days ago not Four So Mark 8. 31. where Christ speaks of himself that the Son of Man should be killed and After three days rise again that is on the Third day after inclusively taken or after the Third day is come whereas according to the sense this Author would put upon the words it should rather have been said after one day for there was but one day between his Death and Resurrection And it is the same in sense with what he says Ioh. 2. 19. Destroy this Temple speaking of his Body And in Three days I will raise it up 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or as Mat. 26. 61. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is the Third day after inclusively And Mat. 27. 63. they tell Pilate This Deceiver said After Three days I will rise again 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 meaning thereby the Third day after inclusively and therefore they pray that the Sepulchre may be made sure till the Third day Whereas if as our Author would reckon upon his fingers by after Three days were to be understood when Three whole days after that should be past they need not set their Watch before the Fourth or Fifth day Thus Christ's Ascension is said to be Forty days after his Resurrection speaking of a Scripture Computation in Scripture Language which in our ordinary manner of Speech is but Nine and Thirty For Ascension-Thursday if Easter-day be not reckoned for one is but 39 days after Easter Upon a like Account that Christ tells us Mat. 12. 40. that as Jonas was three days and three nights in the Whales Belly so shall the Son of Man be three days and three nights in the heart of the Earth Not Three whole days and Three whole nights but till the Third was begun For by day and night is here understood the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or what we now call the Artificial day consisting of 24 hours day and night and till such Third day or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 was begun Christ rested in the Grave otherwise though he were in the Grave part of Three days yet but Two nights So Luke 2. 21. When Eight days were accomplished for the Circumcision of the Child they called his name Iesus that is upon the Eighth