the Lords day c. Hence it is thus argued this day is called the Lords day as the last Supper of Christ is called the Lords Supper now as Christ did substitute the last Supper in roome of the Passeouer so he substituted the Lords day in roome of the Sabbath I answere 1. it doth not followe it must be called the Lords day in the same sense as Christs Supper is called the Lords Supper for it may be called the Lords day 1. in reference to God the Creator meaninge there by the Lords Sabbath of the 7th day since thes Sabbathes were caled the Lords dayes as the lords Holy day Isa 58 13. now if the Sabbath be the Lords holy day then is it the Lords day 2. In reference to God the Redeemer it might be called the Lords day as the day is wherein Christ will come to Indgment Luk 17 24 30. that is a day wherein Christ will shewe himselfe Maruailouse to the world so did Christ in the day of his Incarnation Passion Resurrection and Ascention in euery of thes he did a remarkable worke and euery of thes might be called the Lords day and which of them Iohn had respect vnto Scripture is altogether silent and therfore can we not builde vpon infallible growndes herein and we must not set vp Sabbathes tyeinge mens consciences vpon probabilities and contingencies furthermore who wold argue from Luk 17 24. that because the day of Iudgment is called Christs day Therfore that day must then be kept for a Sabbath day but admit S. Iohn meant the day of Christs Resurrection that is a day wherein he would declare himselfe mightely to be the Sonne of God by the resurrection from the dead Rom 1 4. What is this to a Sabbath which men must celebrate how doth it appeare Christ rose one this day and called it the Lords day with this intendement that men shold for euer after keepe it a Sabbath shewe me an institution of a Sabbath day by Christs riseing one this day or by S. Iohns calling it the Lords day finally say it were a Sabbath day how will it appeare in the Canon of Holy Scripture that the Lords day was in the Apostles dayes a weekly day kept euery 7th day as now it is or rather an annuall day as Easter day is for properly Easter day is the Lords day I answere further there is not like reason of thes two the Lords day and the Lords Supper for a day and a Supper differ much so as a day may be called the Lords in one sense and a Supper may be called the Lords in an other sense I answere secondly it will not follow that there must be the same reason and likenesse betweene the Lords day and the Sabbath which was betwene the Lords Supper and the Passeouer for the Passeouer was a branche of the Ceremoniall Law and a Ceremony and a type of Christ and therfore to be abolisht at Christs comeing But the Sabbath was a branch of the Morall Law and a Morall neither euer was it made a death to life now that God Sanctified the first day of the weeke for Christ to rise on I deny not nor doe I refuse to reioyce there on and be thankfull to God for so greate a worke euen euery day in the weeke and yeere or more solemnely once in a yeere as at Easter or ofter if the Church see it expedient But that this Text doth prophecy of this day for euer to be kept for our sole Sabbath in a Rest all day long and in holy duties euery 7th day this I denye since this Text saith not this day was Sanctified for men but it was Sanctified for Christ yea we may reioyce and be glad in it annually as the Iewes were in theire annuall dayes of purim Ester 9.26.27 and yet not keepe it in a stricte Rest all day long as on a Sabbath I answer secondly by day in the Psalme is not necessarily vnderstod a shorte ordinary day of 12. or 24. howres but rather a long space of tyme as all the tyme after Dauid came to the Crowne and so it may be applied to type out the whole tyme of Christ vpon the earth ruleing as King in the Kingdom of his Church thus Abraham sawe Christs day Ioh. 8.56 thus t is called the day of Saluation 2. Cor. 6.2 If then by day here be meante the day of grace or the tyme of Christs abode one the earth then heer is no footing for a Sabbath day of 12. or 24. howres long 4. A 4th Text they produce is Act. 2.1.14 where Peter preached one Pentecost which is one our white Sunday and administred the Sacramentes of Baptisme and the Lords Supper after he had converted 3000. soules wherfore this must nedes be a Sabbath day because in it were performed the workes of a Sabbath c. Here to I answere 1. That Peters actions are no diuine institutions vnlesse backt by some precept now nor Christ nor his Apostles gaue any precept for performance of thes duties one this day 2. Peters sermone was extraordenary for it was vpon the extraordenary comeing downe of the Holy Ghost then and to remoue away the false slander of drunkenesse v. 13. and it was occasioned by the greate concourse of people extraordenarily met and assembled not to heare a sermone but to heare the Apostles myraculously speake straunge tounges v. 6. now extraordenary things binde not to ordenary practise 3. Preaching and administration of Sacraments be not proper duties of a Sabbath but commone to any day of the weeke Christ administred Lords Supper one a Thursday night the night before he was Crucified Phillip baptized the Eunuch one a trauileing day Act. 8.38.39 and for preaching it was an euery dayes worke if occation serued preach the word in season and our of season 2. Timoth. 4.2 Christ preached to the Samaritane Ioh. 4. on a working day for his Disciples were gone in to the citty to buye meate v. 8. He preached one the Mountaine Mat. 5.1 and out of a shippe at an other tyme Luk. 5.1.2.3 which dayes were no Sabbaths for on the Sabbaths Christ and the people mett in theire Synagogues Luk. 4.14 Paul preacht daily in the Temple and from house to house Act. 5.42 and daily in the schoole of Tyrannus Act. 19.9 Now vnles thes duties of preaching and administration of the Sacraments were so proper to the Sabbath as they were vsed vpon no day else how can thes duties be markes of a Sabbath no no nothing but a Commandement will establish a Sabbath day doe not we preache reade Scriptures praye administer the Sacrament and performe as many Sabbath duties on Christmas day when it falls on a weeke day as we doe on any Sabbath day and yet vvho vvill therfore gather vve keepe that Christmas day for a Sabbath 4. Note Walaeus vpon the 4th Com pag. 161. saith it is called in to question of some whither this day of Pentecost then fell vpon the Lords day
put to this and not too others a reason wold be sought such a one as agrees to this Com. and not to others now if I may take leaue to deliuer mine opinion I cannot finde out a better reason than this God foreseeing that after a longe time that is about 364. yeeres after Christ this his Sabbath wold be not in part violated but vtterly and altogether blotted out of remembrance in the Church for 1200 yeeres together and so this 4th Comm forgotten and not the other 9. or this 4th aboue or rather then the other 9. therfore was a Memorandum set to this and not to the other or to this aboue the other to bring men into the Remembrance and practise of it againe I said this Sabbath was blotted out in the yeere of Christ 364. that is by the Laodicean Counsaile as hereafter you shall heare c. from thence vntill this present howre it is not Remembred for we profane it buy sell market fayer and worke in it I pray God bring this to our remembrances and close home to our consciences I said also this Comm is forgotten aboue the other 9. for thers no one thing in all the other 9. commanded that is wholly and altogether forgotten as is this seauenth day and though Papistes haue forgotten foulely the second Comm yet blessed be God the Reformed Church of Protestantes remember it well but as for the seauenth day Sabbath and the Command vpon it Remember the Sabbath day this is forgotten at all hands vtterly by both Protestantes and Papistes and so much of the word Remember 4. The next pointe to be considered is the name of this sacred Time and day t is called Sabbath Remember the Sabbath c. In this name two thinges are considerable 1. that it is vsed as a proper name for the seauenth and last day of the weeke with the Iewes of this I say no more referring you to what I haue else where afore said touching the Sabbath as a proper name c. 2. That the word Sabbath signifieth Rest The first vse I will raise bence shall be from the consideration of both those ioyned togeather and may be for information sheweing that the Hebrew word Sabbath may be translated into Englishe wordes if vve doe but ioyne these two together that is the proper name and the signification of it so for Sabbath as t is a proper name of the last day of the weeke put Saturday and then hereto add that signification of the word Sabbath Rest and then thus it may be rendred Saturday-Rest Remember Saturday-Reste to keepe it holy c. the profit that wold come of this is that there vvold be no scruple in mindes of the ignorant which day of the weeke it is that God requireth in his 4th Comm to be Sanctified Further it wold reforme the confusion of such as call our first day of the vveeke or Lords day The Sabbath day thus doeing they woefully confound thinges as times and dayes iust as if vve novv a dayes shold begine to call our Sunday by the name Saturday what a confusion wold this breede of time transplaceing the proper name of the seauenth day of the weeke vnto the first day of the weeke Hence in part is that delusion of well minded ignorant people that when they reade the 4th Comm Remember the Sabbath day c. and then bethink themselues that vve call our Sunday Sabbath day surely then conclude they our Sunday or Lords day is the day that God appointed by this his 4th Comm which is a grosse errour since vve all say the Sabbath day is changed into that which we call the Lords day and if the Sabbath day be changed as is said into the Lords day why doe vve not put away the ould name and take vp only the new name like as the name of that Father of the faithfull it was of ould Abram but when God changed his name into Abraham the Lord said neighther shall thy name be called any more Abram but thy name shall be called Abraham Genesi 17.5 and so let vs no more calle it Sabbath day but Lords day But if you will retaine the proper name Sabb. still as is not vnmeete you should since it is a name that may perpetually be kept in the Church it being a particle of the Morall Law which is perpetuall why then I beseech you let euery day haue its owne proper name doe not miscall dayes by wronge names Let our Satuday be called Sabbath day for so it of all the dayes in the weeke answeres to the Iewes Sabbath day vvitnesse the Iewes when they liued in England they kept Saturday for theire Sabbath day and as they doe likewise in other partes of the World where they live at this day and witnesse the Lattines vvho to this day call Saturday Sabbath day Dies Sabbathi I doubt not but this exhortation might preuaile were it not for an inconuenience which wold be this then that if vve called Saturday Sabbath day then our people wold growe to thinke that Saturday shold be Sanctified by Gods will in his 4th Comm. for our Sabbath day and if vve call the first day of the weeke Sunday or Lords day only then the people vvold not so easily be made beleeue that the 4th Comm. bindes them to the Lords day because the Comm. binds only to the day called Sabbath day not speaking one vvord of the day called Lords day But if vve call the Lords day Sabbath day once then it goes downe the stomacke without any lett or scruple that the 4th Comm pointes directly to our first day of the weeke or Lords day and so a wrong day is kept one day being taken for another so Superstition is vsed for Religion and one day God shall say who required this at your handes who may the people say why our watch men our ministers taught vs so and called it so and told vs it ought to be so as for vs we were not learned in the tounges and Artes we must beleeue our Ministers The Priests lippes must preserue knowledge and we must aske the Law at theire mouthes but this plea cannot altogeather free the people see Ezek 33.6 nor can the Ministrie be altogether free of a shrewde taxatiō were it not hitherto done of ignorance and of a good intente in asmuch as they are guilty of this transgression partly by misenameing of dayes which causeth an errour in the people But hereto it will be said Sabbath signifies a Rest now on our Lords day we Rest and therfore we may call it a Sabbath day I answer t is true Sabbath signifieth Rest so the Lords day might be called Sabbath day but yet in no other sense then euery common Holy day wherein we worke not may be called Sabbath day that is Resteing day now if the nameing of Holy dayes Sabbath dayes shold beget an inclination in the ignorant to sanctifie them as Sabbaths were it not time to forbeare such names Furthermore
note that we may call the Lords day or first day of the weeke and other common Holy dayes Resting dayes but we must know with all that thus to call and to name them is meerly humane and of our owne deuise for God neuer named or called the Lords day nor common holy dayes Resteing dayes if therfore we will call dayes as God calleth them then must vve call only the 7th day Sabbath day or Resting day for said God Exod. 20.10 The 7th day is the Sabbath or Resting day I answere 2. Sabbath day may be vsed in reference to the 4th Com or not in any reference vnto it if it be vsed not in reference to the 4th Comm I am not against it for so may we call Christmas day when t is one a weeke day Sabbath day and so may we call dayes of publike thanksgiuing and reioycing Sabbath dayes as coronation dayes Gunpowder Treason dayes c. but if vve call any day Sabbath day religiously in relation to the 4th Comm as in that sense we call our Lords day Sabbath day then know it cannot be called Sabbath day for that this name Sabbath day in reference to 4th Com it must haue these properties 1. it must be set vpon its proper day our Saturday the which is named by God Sabbath day or Resting day 2. it must be the 7th day from the creation or last day of the vveeke 3. it must be the day which God blessed and sanctified Genes 2.3 Exod. 20.11 now none of these thinges agree to our Lords day 5. The next point to be treated one is the vvord Day Remember the Sabbath day now as before vve haue heard of the Sabbath day vvhich it is for order and place as vvhither the first or 2d c. or 7th or 8th day so now vve are to heare of the duration and length of that Sabbath day A day is commonly diuided into a day naturall of 24. howres or artificiall of 12. howres but I must craue leaue to departe from this distinction though a common receiued one because how euer it may haue its vse in ciuill affaires yet is it not Canonicall and Diuine and therfore not to be a rule in expounding the word Day in Scripture that I may not seeme sleightily to deny a common distinction note the reasons moueing me here too are 1. Because it is no vvhere founde in Scripture that they had any day of 24. howres a day of 12. howres I reade of I confesse but I neuer reade of a day of 24. howres it is not safe therfore by Day in 4th Com to interpret it of a day of 24. howres 2. By a day naturall of 24. howres vve vnderstand both the light and the darknesse the day and the night vvhich fale within compasse of these 24. howres novv I pray what a woefull confusion and jumbling of things together is here vvhat is this but to put light for darkenesse vvhen ye call the night or darknesse Day may you not as vvell put darknesse for light and call the day or light Nighte may vve not as vvell comprize Hell vnder the vvord Heauen as darkenes vnder the vvord Day vnles it be Ironically I thinke this is matchlesse But hereto it will be said doth not Scripture thus Genes 1.5 So the Euening and the morning vvere the first day by Euening here is meante the night and by morning the day or light and both these made vp the first day I answere the Euening doth no vvhere in Scripture betoken the night or darkenesse and that I am not singular in this see Perkins cases of conscience at end of 2d booke but by Euening vve are to vnderstand the afternoone as vve in this land doe saying Good euene to you Sir if once it be past noone that euening is takē for the afternoone and tyme of perfect light and before Sune set appeares by the phrase of euening sacrifice which was celebrated about 3. or 4. a clocke in after noone see these textes Ex. 29.38.39 Deu. 23.11 losh 8.29 Ezra 9.4.5 Iere. 6.4 Deut. 16.6 so then according to Scriptures sense by Euening I vnderstand the afternoone and by morning the forenoone and thus the Euening that is the afternoone and the Morning that is the forenoone made the first day Genes 1.5 Hauing thus giuen my reasons why I reiect a day naturall of 24. howres consisting of day and night both In next place I am to shewe vvhat I meane by Day in 4th Com By Day I vnderstand the tyme of light only namly all that space of tyme and light from day peepe or day breake in the morning vntill day be quite off the skye at night that by Day is meante the light see Gene. 1.5 God vvhoe know best to name things called the Light Day see 1. Thes 5.5.8 1. Cor. 3.13 and that the day begines euen vvhilst it is but a little light and much darke see Ioh. 20.1 and see Mark. 1.35 this last text is to be reade as Chemnitius vvell obserues thus In the morning vvhilst it vvas very much night c. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and so Beza reades it too of dayes I may say there are 2. kindes according to Scripture 1. a naturall day and this is from first aproche of light vpon our horizon before Sune rise vnto the last departure of light after Sune sett from off our horizon 2. is an artificiall day and this consistes of 12. howres Joh. 11.9 are there not 12. howres in the day the naturall day is variable now longer as in Sommer novv shorter as in Winter The artificiall day is constantly of the same lenght 12. howres long I conclude by Day in 4th Com I rather thinke the the naturall day to be meante then the artificiall day for it is the safest to giue God the longer of the two that is the day from day breake to last shutting in of the day so long as is any light in the skye Here a case of conscience would be discussed that is if our Sabbath be but from day breake to shutting vp of day hovv shall vve doe in depth of vvinter at vvhat tyme vve haue not 12. howres of day light novv your opinion vvas euen novv that it is the safest to giue God the longer of the two dayes rather the naturall than the artificiall but in depth of vvinter the artificiall day of 12. howres is the longer day I ansvvere 1. though for that tyme the artificiall day be longer than the naturall day yet it is so but for a little vvhile during the depth of the winter only vvhich tyme excepted all the yeere after the naturall day is the longer and so these 2. dayes compared together in all tymes vve giue God the longer day vvhen vve giue him the naturall day 2. For so much as it is not likely that God would haue vs measure him his day by two diuers metevvands that is by the day naturall at one tyme of the yeere and by the day artificiall
still liuing and so vvhat if 4th Comm did not binde that country vvhere they haue not night a day so successiuely and commodiously in short tyme following eache other to a day light doth it not therfore binde vs vvho haue not the like case And thus you haue seene their artificiall reasons against the tyme and day of the Sabbath answered now it remaineth that vve answere to their inartificiall reasons and testimonies the vvhich are fetched from the Primitiue Churchs 1. The first Testimony and Authority they produce against the 7th day Sabbath is that of Ignatius in his Epistle to the Magnesianes saith he Let not vs keepe Sabbath in a Jewish sorte reioycing in idlenesse for who so doth not work let not him eate as saith the Scripture vvhere Ignatius vvould haue them not Sabbatize but work rather on that day I answere let the vvords be well weighed and they make nothing at all against the Sabbath to this end note a little before he had dehorted the Magnesians that they would not suffer themselues to be seduced or deceiued with other doctrines nor with fables nor vvith genealogies nor vvith Jewish smoke thus in generall next he descends to particulares first he inueighes against the Iudiciall Law and Circumcision c. and this done next he bringes in the vvords citod aboue Let not vs keepe Sabbath c. now it is to be noted vnto vvhich of those generalles aboue said from which Ignatius dehorted the Magnesians these words haue relation for my part I must thinke they haue reference to those words fables and Iewish smoke as if he had ioyned them thus Suffer not your selues to be seduced with fables nor Iewish smoke or vanity but cleaue vnto Christ and let not vs keepe Sabbath as doe the Iewes c. thus he counted their Sabbatizing such as it was there no cleaning to Christ but a vaine Iudiciall vanity now that this relation must stand thus I proue 1. Because he spake of other doctrines and of fables now its fitest to referre Circumcision to Doctrines because it vvas a Drctrine once and to referre those things he dehortes from on the Sabbath as idlenesse and daunceinges to the words fables and Iewish smoke 2. Because he dehorted them from obseruance of the Iudaicall Law now those fables Iewish vanities of idlenesse and daunceinges on the Sabbath were neuer any ceremoniall Law and therfore cannot be referred to that forespoken of the Law Now if Ignatius in this passage did not dehorte from any thing vvritten in the Law touching the Sabbath but from other fables and traditions of their owne then Ignatius did not disswade from keeping the Sabbath as it is commanded in the Law of 4th Com but from keeping of it according to their fabulouse and vaine manner let these two things therfore be noted 1. that Ignatius did dehorte from things neuer commanded the Iewes in the Morall Law 2. That the things he did disswade from they vvere fabulouse and vaine things as from eating meates dressed the day before and from drinking lukewarme drinkes what he meanes by lukewarme drinkes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 I cannot imagine I neuer reade of any such drinkes forbiden in the Law and from reioycing in dauncinges and vnciuill howtings or clapping of hands in the Sabbath day and other like he disswades from vvhich things are meerely Iewish fables and neuer found in Gods Law vvherfore I conclude that Ignatius did not forbidd an holy keeping of the Sabbath day such as stood with the Law of God but he only forbad that carnall and superstitious keeping of it fore mentioned such as vvas neuer commanded by any law That this is so yet more plainly appeares in that 1. in this very place and text He doth exhorte the Magnesians to keepe the Sabbath Spiritually in meditation of Gods Law and in admiration of the workes of God 2. In that Iguatius doth not disswade from keeping the Sabbath simply but after a sorte and in some manner He saith not Let not vs keep Sabbath but thus Let not vs keepe Sabbath 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 after a Iewish sorte and fashion as reioycing in idlenesse 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 so you see it is a carnall sensuall rest from labours that this good man inuaigheth against Only one thing in his disswasion vvould be cleered vvhich is that he addeth these words Who so doth not labour let not him eate c. these vvords are not to be taken simply as if he would they should work in their ordenary callings on the Sabbath day for so we make him contrary to himselfe who exhorted them to keep the Sabbath day Spiritually by meditation of Gods Law and Gods vvorkes now to work and to rest from vvorke which the word Sabbatizing signifieth are contraries besides how can a man so meditate on Gods Law and the vvorks of God as in a Sabbath one should whilst the boby is in vnquiet labour yea in many callings mens workes are such as they cannot at all both doe their works and also meditate Gods Law as in the trades of grocers and other retailing shopkeepers who sell by little parcelles and are euer in bargayning so scriueners who are euer wrighting and the like trades which occupie the minde specially if they kept market on Sabbath day as we doe how could their mindes in the market be occupied about Gods Lawes and it is to be noted Ignatius did not oppose Spirituall Sabbatizing or Resting to Sabbatizing or Resting simply but thus he opposed Spirituall Sabbatizing to Judiciall Sabbatizing fabulously 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 vvherfore to salue all seming contradiction a fit sense may be giuē of the words taking them to be comparatiuely spoken as that they should rather work on the Sabbath in an honest calling then so fabulously carnally and irreligiously to spend the Sabbath in daunceing and vnciuile showting and the like and here it seemes to me he alludeth to the like manner of speech in Isa 1.13 I cannot suffer saith the Lord your new Moones nor Sabbathes my soule hateth your appointed Feastes c. now here God did not simply forbid Sabbaths but that irreligiouse prophane judiciall keeping of Sabbaths Thus you see Ignatius his vvordes makes nothing against the Sabbath being vvell considered of but rather nesse of the abolishing of this Sabbath because these had their hands in it then I should haue done if I neuer had heard that they had any hand in it Thus you see neither their textes alleaged out of Scripture nor yet their reasons nor their testimonies can proue the Rest in the Lords Sabbath day to be partly ceremoniall nor yet the tyme and 7th day to be abrogated So then in the last place I addresse my selfe to giue some possitiue reasons to shew that the 7th day Sabbath is still in force euen to this day and so consequently must be to the worlds end The 7th day Sabbath is still in force IN the first place I would free the Sabbath day from a prejudicate opinion arising in mindes of men from calling it the Iewes Sabbath day Touching which name were it vsed in a good or in an indifference sense I should say nothing but since I finde it so termed in a reprochfull sense to rescue it herefro I vvould faine know a reason why the Sabbath day
now there vvas also Sabbaths vvhich were signes of the creation vveekly Sabbaths euery 7th day now these vvhich were Sabbaths and signes of things past as was the creation these be no where abolished great is the difference twixt Sabbathes as signes of things to come and Sabbathes as signes of things past 3. It is of as great necessity if not of greater that vve now should haue all or any such speciall helpes and meanes to keepe in remembrance the vvorlds creation as had those Israelites in Moses tyme for vve are a people as forgetfull of Gods workes of wonder as were they yea and we be in greater danger of forgetting the vvorlds creation then those Israelites by how much vve liue longer after the creation then they did ould done things weare out of memory For proofe of the Minor to vvit that the Sabbath was an helpe to keep memory of the creation 1. All men grant it when they thus argue that the Lords day was instituded for the memory of the resurrection as was the Sabbath day for memory of the creation 2. I proue it from Exod. 31.16.17 where 2. thinges be to be marked 1. that the Sabbath is called a signe 2. whereof it is a signe and what is the thing signifyed For the latter the thing signifyed by the Sabbath considered as a signe is the creation of the vvorld in 6. dayes and Gods rest vpon the 7th day since euery signe must signifie some thing and this Text mentioneth nothing but the creation and againe where God giueth a signe he vseth to shew vvhereof it is a signe and here he mentioneth nothing but the creation therfore the creation is the thing signified and this truth may yet farther be showne by the very Text v. 17. for in 6. dayes c. vvhere note that the Hebrew vvord translated for may also be translated that as those skilfull in the tounge know well and finde sondry examples in Scripture yea the vvord for must be translated that to make good sense so then reade the Text thus that in 6. dayes c. and you haue good sense also you see it plaine that the Sabbath was a signe that in 6. dayes God created and rested and the creation vvas the thing signified by the signe The other thing to be considered in the text is that the Sabbath is called a signe and hence I thus argue If signes be helpes and meanes to bringe to minde or keep in memory the things where of they be signes then doth the Sabbath day helpe vs to minde and keep in memory the vvorlds creation but signes be helpes meanes to bringe to minde and to keep in memory the things whereof they be signes therfore the Sabbath day doth helpe vs to minde and to keepe in memory the worlds creation the consequence is good it proceeding from the genus to the species the Sabbath day being one kinde of signes and what belongeth to all signes appertaineth to euery or any signe I proue the Minor by an induction of particulares the raine-bowe in the cloudes Genes 4. it is called a signe or a token v. 13. and the Lord said He vvould looke vpon the bowe that he might remember the couenant which vvas the thing signifyed by the bovv v. 16. The Passeouer vvas a signe or token Exod. 12.13 vvhich when the Angell of the Lord saw then he remembred the couenant and spared them Circumcision Genes 17.11 it vvas a signe and token to put them in minde of Gods couenant made vvith Abraham c. and see Exod. 31.13 a text pregnant to the same purpose The Sacrament of the Lords Supper it is a signe and this signe is to be vsed in remembrance of the thing signified vvhich is Christ 1. Cor. 12.24 neither can any example be showne to the contrary for it is the very nature of a signe to bring to minde the thing signified I conclude as the Lords Supper is a signe of the work of redemption So the Sabbath is a signe of the work of creation 10. My 10th Argument is because the Sabbath day putteth vs in minde vvho it is that is our Sanctifier namely the Lord our God This argument is taken out of Exod. 31.13 and it may be thus framed That thing vvhich in the tyme of Moses vvas vsed as an helpe and meanes to put the children of Israel in minde vvho it vvas that sanctified them that meanes and helpe ought now and for euer to be in the Church to shew vs vvho is our Sanctifyer But the 7th day Sabbath was vsed in the tyme of Moses as an helpe and meanes to minde the children of Israel vvho it was that sanctifyed them Therfore the 7th day Sabbath ought now and for euer to be vsed in the Church as a meane helpe to shew vs vvho is our Sanctifyer For proofe of the Maior 1. vvhat reason can be rendered or instance giuen to the contrary to shew that our churchs and people should not now haue the same meanes and helpes to put vs in minde shew vnto vs vvho is the authour of our sanctification the which the children of Israel and Church of the Jewes had 2. No helpe or meanes once appointed of God to minde the Israelites vvho did sanctify them vvas ener yet abolished and if neuer abolished then must they remaine True it is Sabbathes ceremoniall and annuall which were signes of Christ and of justification such were abolished in Col. 2.16.17 but Sabbathes Morall and weekly vvhich vvere signes of God the Father and of sanctification such were neuer yet abolished besides the Sabbathes abolished in Col. 2.16 were such as were signes of things to come afterwards as of Christ but the Sabbathes Morall in Exod. 31.13 were signes of things present as of God presently sanctifying as you may see in the Textes 3. Wee now in these tymes haue as much neede of that help to put vs in minde of God our Sanctifyer as they had in former tymes for instance let a Christian pray feruently giue almes bountifully hate syne vnfainedly doe the duties of his calling conscionably preach powerfully and in a word liue holily and blamelesly in this euill vvorld vvhereby he out strippeth the men of this world and is as a light set vpon an hill is not this man in greate danger to be puffed vp vvith pride as vvere those Israelites Deut. 8.17 arrogating to themselues the glory of their aboundance forgetting God the author and is not this man in danger to vse his giftes as if he had not receiued them and to glorie in them as his owne 1. Cor. 4.7 surely vpon a serch we can not but confesse vvee Christians are as subiect to spirituall pride and as backward sluggish to giue vnto God the glory of his mercifull work of sanctifying vs as euer were the Israel of God now vvhat helpe could be better to foreward vs in this Diuine vvork of hallowing Gods name then to haue once in euery 7. dayes that 7th day
the Sabbath day it is a proper name for an other of our weeke dayes that is for Sunday or for the first day of the weeke 2. Because the Com enioyneth the 7th day which is the last daye of the weeke but the Lords daye is the 8th daye or the first daye of the weeke by the accounte of all men And it is no lesse absurde to presse the 4th Com. which enioynes the 7th day for a Sabbath to the 8th daye or to the first daye then it had been for the Israelites out of that Com Levit 25.2.3.4 The 7th yeere shall be a Sabbath of rest vnto the Land c. to presse this Com vnto the 8th yeere or to the first yeere for the lands rest 3. Because the Com enioyneth that day which the Lord God himself rested on the which he blessed hallowed Exod 20 11. but our Lords daye is not the day God rested on nor did God in the creatione blesse sanctify hallowe our Lords daye or first daye of the weeke nay he wrought one it himselfe appointed it for a workeing daye to man when he saide 6. dayes shalt thou labour doe all thou hast to doe Exod 20 9. of which 6. dayes our Lords day is one the first But here vnto it will be replied true the 4th Com did once enioyne the 7th daye Sabbath but since the daye is altered changed by Christ his Apostles so that now the 4th Com is changed too bindes to the newe daye though not properly yet Analogically by waye of resemblance I answere the word Change betokeneth two thinges the one is an abolition or remoueing the ould the other is an assumption or takeing vp of a newe as 2. Sam. 12.20 David changed his apparell that is he put off his mourning attire and he put one other apparell now I deny that euer Christ or his Apostles did thus change the Sabbath day either by there precept or practise did the Apostles so preache one the Lords day as they ceased preaching one the Sabbath day the day before the Lords day can this be proued for this is a change properly is not the contrary manifest to wit that the Apostles did constantly preach one the Sabbath dayes see Act. 13.14.42.44 Act. 16.13 Act. 17.2 Act. 18.4 if then they also preached one the Lords dayes too why this is no alteration or change though it is but an addition of a day and a settinge vp of another Sabbath daye a newe and so you may haue two Sabbathes in euery weeke if you will 2. I answere admit the Sabbath was changed into the Lords day yet may you not safely say the 4th Com was changed for so you say the 4th Comm was abolisht and a newe Comm erected the word change implying so much Nor can you saye the 4th Com being an ould Com bindes to a newe day long since erected how will this be proued specially since that it was not the manner of Scripture to establish newe thinges by od preceptes Baptisme that came in roome of Circumcision it stands not by force of the ould precept to Abraham Genes 17.10 Let euery man child among you be circumcised c. but by a newe precept Matth 28.19 goe teach all Nations baptizing them c. The Supper of the Lord come in roome of the Passeover it stands not by virtue of the ould Law Ex 12.3 c. but by a newe Law 1. Cor. 11.23 As well may we faine that the Law made by Queene Elizabeth to stint vsury at 10. in the 100. is that Law which now a dayes stintes vsury at 8. in the 100. as if Queen Elizabeths Lawes did add force to and did commande things enacted by King Charles many yeeres after as to imagine the 4th Comm enacted for the 7th day shold now binde to the 8th day which is longe since risen vp as is said I answere thirdly by deniall that the 4th Com doth binde to another daye then it mentioneth Analogically and by resemblance similitude by this deuise may we binde Christians to Baptize Children only one the 9th day and to eate the Lords Supper only vpon the 15th day of the month once a yeere and say we are bounde to thes dayes by the Lawes of Circumcision and Passeover which did properly binde to the 8th day and to the 14th day but now they binde vs Analogically to the 9th and 15th dayes 2. This deuise is matchlesse for of all the other 9. Com none doe binde to other things then thos mentioned in the Com analogically and by similitude nay in this 4th Com where we haue 3. things enioyned 1. the tyme the Sabbath 2. Holinesse 3. Rest it bindes not analogically to Holinesse or Rest but only to the day and tyme as they saye since all other partes and parcelles of the 10. Com be expounded properly why shold this one particle only the 7th day or the Sabbath day be expounded improperly and analogically Sure I am it is against the receiued rule in exposition of Scriptures to giue an improper sense where a proper may be had Yet furthermore others replye thus the 4th Com enioyneth a Sabbath day which signifies a Restinge day now our Lords day is a Sabbath day for so much as it is a restinge day and so the 4th Com enioyneth it and is firme for it I answere 1. by like reason you may thus expounde the name Iesus Heb 4 8. of Ihesus the Sauiour of the world which is meante of Iesus which is Ioshua that saued the Israelites from the Canaanites as if because Iesus signifies a Sauiour therfore whersoeuer ye finde a man that was a Sauiour you may thinke he was meante by the name Iesus though the context shewes it is meante of an other Iesus 2. True it is the word Sabbath signifieth a Reste but Synecdochically for that speciall Reste specified in the 4th Com to wite that Rest which is on the 7th day not that on the 8th daye for the 7th day is the Sabbath Exod 20 10. and this is the day that goes before the Lords day furthermore the Restinge day in the 4th Com is such a restinge day as is distinguished from all other dayes in the weeke by his proper name Sabbath day which with the Iewes was neuer taken to be the Lords day or first day of the weeke no more then Saturday with vs can be mise vnderstode to be Sunedaye wherfore to auoide this shifte it were to be wished that the Hebrew name Sabbath were translated into an English name as nere as might be though by a circumlocution rendringe day for day and call it Saturday-Reste Remember Saturday-reste to Keepe it holy c. Exod 20 8. And thus the simplest cold not mistake which is the day the Lord meante in his 4th Com Thus you see the 4th Com cannot be vnderstode to enforce the Sanctification of the Lords day 2. A second Text produced is Reu 1 10. I was rauished in the Spirit one
is theire part to proue Paul begane his Sermon in the morneinge vvhoe say Paul kept this daye a Sabbath daye by preaching in it yea moreouer they must proue that the disciples here at Troas did refraine all servile labour and the ordinary vvorkes of theire caleinge all this first day of the vveeke or Lords day from morneinge to the end of this day if they vvill prove this day kept as a Sabbath for to refraine all workes and Rest is a branch of the 4th Com and one parte of a Sabbath dayes dutie but how they can prove this oute this text passeth myn vnderstanding 5. I deny that Paul preacht now at this tyme in conscience of the 4th Com and this they must proue or else they say nothing might not Paul preach at this extraordinary tyme in conscience of that Com 2. Tim. 4.2 preache the word in season and out of season surely this text was warrant sufficient for Paul to take all occasions of preaching the word euery day or night Sabbath day or other dayes finally how will it be proued that Paul kept this Lords day here for a Sabbath day by his preaching since that preachinge it is an euery dayes worke as hath bene showne afore can it be proved that Pauls intent and purpose in preaching was to celebrate thereby that day for a Sabbath this must be proved 6 A 6th Text produced is 1. Cor. 16.2 vpon the first day of the weeke let euery one of you put aside by himselfe c. here say they vvas a constant weekely collection for the poore now collections vsed to be after the word preached and Sacramentes administred all which were done one the Sabbath day as appeares in the histories of the Church ergo this first day of the weeke was a Sabbath I answere 1. indeed our oulde translatiō gaue some waye to vs to thinke this collection was weekly when it reade the text thus Euery first day of the weeke let euery one of you put aside c. but our newe Translatores haue well amended it and doe reade it thus vpō the first day of the weeke c. as of a single action once to be done onely and this further appeares to be true by those words in latter ende of v. 2. that so there be no gatheringe when I come so as Paul wold haue this collection cease when he came emongst them but had it bene weekly Paul wold rather haue had it reuined a freshe at his presence whoe was a furtherer of all holy performances This collection therefore was extraordinary tyeth vs not to ordenary practise for if it did then were we bound euery Lords day in euery Congregation to gather for the poore as a Sabbath dayes dutie 2. This collection was extraordenary in that it was not for their owne poore at Corinthe but for the poore of other Churches and therfore this mony collected was to be sente vpon the first day of the weeke If any shall demande which first day of the weeke the Church vvas to lay aside their almes one because there were many first dayes of the weeke in a yeere I answere since I finde it not differenced from others in the text I therefore thinke it must be vnderstoode of the first Lords day or first first day of the vveek vvhich came next after the Corinthians receiued this Epistle like as if I say to a frend come to my house one Saturday it is to be vnderstoode of the next Saturday first cominge after my invitation of him 7 A 7th and last text produced is Ioh. 20.19.26 where Christs frequent apparitiones to his disciples vpon the Lords day is made an argument to proue it a Sabbath daye but by what authority or rule of just consequēce Christs apparitions must constitute a Sabbath day nor can I conceiue nor euer haue I heard nor doe I thinke euer shall heare I answere 2. whereas the frequency and constancy of Christs apparitions one the Lords day is so much vrged I wold faine see where Christ appeared one the Lords day euer aboue once onely and that in Ioh. 20.19 as for his seconde apparition in v. 26. eight dayes after vvhich is supposed to be the next Lords daye after his first apparition it is quite other wise for in the originall it goes thus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and after eight dayes c. now after 8. dayes cold not be the same daye sennight vpon the 8th daye but after the 8th day as on the 9th or 10th dayes after and so this seconde apparition was not vpon the Lords daye I grante there is a phrase Mark 8.31 that Christ after three dayes must rise againe and yet it must be vnderstood thus vpon the third he must rise againe But herein we must knowe thus to reade it is a departing from the naturall and proper sense of the words which is not sufferable saue in a case of necessity as to recōcile two textes of Scripture or the like as in this instance last propounded because other textes of Scripture say Christ rose vpon the thirde day 1. Cor. 15.4 and this text Mark. 8.31 saith after 3. dayes c. therfore to recōcile these two we vnderstand this latter text and the word after to be no more but vpon but now to apply this is there the like necessity in Ioh. 20.26 to vnderstand by after vpon is there any other text affirminge that vpon the 8th day Christ appeared to Thomas and the Disciples or is there any inconveniency or absurdity to take the words in their commō proper sense if neighther of these can be showne then the readinge which I vrge is sound and good I answere 3. if Christs apparition to his disciples cold be an argument of a Sabbath day Then of Gods word for the keeping of an other day then God apointed in his morall Law or 4th Com least I partake of that brande of a wicked man prophecied of Daniel 7.25 in changing tymes and the Law now since it is a propriety of God to change tymes and seasons Dan. 2.21 had not I need be carefull there be no new day as is the Lords day set vp for a Sabbath vnles it can be expresly infallibly demonstratiuely proued to be of Gods owne doeing least I say I be accessary to the sin of changeing Godes tymes Dan. 7.25 Thus haue I answered their textes of Scripture brought for the Lords daye to be a Sabbath and the common objections now let vs in next place examine their reasons whereby the Lords day is proued a Sabbath 1 The first reason is drawne from the frequēt and constant practise of Christ and of his Apostles celebration of the Lords day the which is authority sufficient for justification of the Lords day to be a Sabbatth I answere 1. admit Christ and his Apostles did preache on the Lords day thereby honour this day aboue any of the 6. working dayes yet how doth it appeare they did this on this day to
Tables of stone to notify its perpetuity they hauing no plaine and direct Text of Scripture necessarily abolishing it it can be nothing then but their bare vvilles and pleasures to haue it abolisht and this grownded vpon the custome of the church because shee hath abolisht it now a long tyme. They haue not thus done vvith it though for they haue also certain reasons argumēts more vvhich vve novv come to my minde against the tyme and day where by they would proue the Sabbath day abolisht The first is taken from Christ himselfe Say some men vvhy Christ himselfe abolished the Sabbath day and that euen in his owne tyme whilst he vvas vpon the earth for He gaue leaue to vvork vpon the Sabbath as to leade beastes to water to toile about lifting a beast out of a ditche yea himselfe made clay on the Sabbath to open the eyes of the blinde man in so much as the Pharises taxed him for a breaker of the Sabbath and for a godlesse man for it saying This man is not of God because he keepeth not the Sabbath day Ioh. 9.16.14 Hereto I answer 1. what matters it what those superstitious Pharises censured of Christ vvho were the blind leaders of the blinde and of enuy could not endure Christ should doe any thing but they would carpe and cauill at it if possiblie they could though here they would not endure Christ so much as to cure a blinde man on the Sabbath yet it appeareth it was but enuy but superstition in them for Christ approued his owne facte of healing on the Sabbath day by a common practise among the Jewes themselues at that day of the like saying what man among you if his sheepe fall on the Sabbath into a pitt doth not take it and lift it out Mat. 12.10.11 yea it appeareth the Pharises and Doctoures of the Law euen vnder the Law allowed other men though not Christ nor his Disciples to doe works of charity and necessity on the Sabbath as to lift a sheep out of the ditch and for the Priest to kill the Sacrifices on the Sabbath Matt. 12.5.11 I answere 2. let not vs attend to the Scribes and Pharises censures but hearken we to Christ the true expounder obseruer of the Law now he allowed workes of mercy and workes of necessity to be done on the Sabbath day as those instances afore mentioned doe proue but for any to suppose Christ meante hereby to abolish the Sabbath is a simple conceipte for Christ saith of the Morall Law vvhereof the Sabbath day is a branch He came not to destroy the Law but to fulfill it Mat. 5.17 But suppose the Sabbath had beene a branch of the ceremoniall Law why yet t is absurde to think that Christ would abrogate any thing of it so long as he liued for the ceremoniall Law was equally in force with the Morall Law vntill Christs death So then these things did not argue any abolition of the Sabbath day then but rather giues vs to vnderstand how we Christians are to keepe the Lords Sabbath to the worlds end not in any superstitious strictnes as if vve might not on that day doe works of mercy and necessity but the contrary for if Christ allowed it to the Jewes euen before his death whilst no man doubtes but all Lawes morall ceremoniall were in force why should vve thinke but that he allowed as much libertie to Christians to the vvorlds end 2. A 2d reason is fetcht from that phrase Mat. 12.8 The Sonne of man is Lord of the Sabbath day whence it is thought that since Christ is called the Lord of the Sabbath that therefore Christ may change the Sabbath day secondly that Christ as Lord of the day did abolish the day I answere first to the former Say I should graunt that Christ the Lord of the Sabbath may or might change the Sabbath what 's that to our question vve dispute not of what Christ may or might doe but what Christ did doe I answere to the latter that neither the context nor yet the phrase of Christ being Lord of the Sabbath will afforde any such matter see the absurdety of such collections from a like phrase Rom. 14.9 Christ died and rose againe that he might be Lord both of the deade and of the liuing can any hence collect that because Christ is called Lord of the liuing that therfore Christ might or did abolish or destroy the liuing 2. to suppose Christ here did abolish the Sabbath day as a ceremony is altogether growndlesse for both at this tyme when Christ spake these vvordes all ceremonies vvere in full force and also so they remained euer after vntill the day of his death and passion for not vntill then was the handwriting of ordinances taken out of the vvay Col. 2.14 nor vntill his death did Christ euer abolish any ordinance formerly in vse in the Iewish church To conclude no more can be gathered out of this text Mat 12.8 but the right vse of the Sabbath Christ freeing it from the superstitions of the Pharises who held that no worke might be done in no case vpon the Sabbath day but Christ shewed that in a case of necessity his Disciples might plucke and rubb a fewe eares of corne to satisfie present hunger Christ did beare them out in it allowing a dispensation in such a ease for as he vvas Lord of all the commandements as touching his Godhead so of the Sabbath day also and therfore he might dispense vvith that law and that day or rather he might therfore be betrusted to haue giuen the true sense and exposition of the commandement and to haue showne them the right vse of a Sabbath day as if he had thus said since I am Lord of the Sabbath doe not you Pharisies think that I vvill giue way no not to my Disciples to doe any vnlawfull facte on this day nor suffer them to prophane this sacred tyme for it is myne I am Lord of it if therfore their plucking eares of corne had bene blame worthy you should haue found me so farre from defending them as I vvould haue bene the first that would haue rebuked them for it but herein I see they haue done no more then I doe allowe them to doe the Lord of a corne field vvill allow his seruants to make a footpath through his corne in case of a necessity 3. A 3d reason is because all things are become new now in the Kingdome of Christ 2. Cor. 5.17 and therfore the ould Sabbath is abolished say they Where vnto I answere 1. if all things be become new now in Christs Kingdome I pray shew me then vvhere you haue a new commandement for the 8th day or first day of the weeke or for the Lords day in steade of the ould 4th commandement for the 7th day or Sabbath day and where the Israelites vvere commanded in the first comm to serue the true God only shew me vvhere now we are commanded to serue any
commanded in the 4th Com should rather be called the Iewes Sabbath day then the Lord our God whom wee are commanded to worship in the first Com should be called the Iewes Lord God I can see no reason but that the one may be so called as well as the other Nor any reason but if we may call the Iewes God our God so vve may call the Iewish Sabbath day our Sabbath day and if vve doe not call it our Sabbath day because we keepe it not the faute is only in our selues wherfore to auoide all difference about the name let it not be called the Jewes Sabbath day nor the Christians Sabbath day as proper to eighther but let vs call it the Lords Sabbath day as common to Jewes and to Christians both and as appertaining vnto all nations vnto whome soeuer the 10. Comm doe appertaine This name you shall finde justify able by Moses in Exod. 20.10 where he calles it the Lord Gods Sabbath when he said The 7th day is the Sabbath of the Lord thy God 1. My first argument to proue the 7th day Sabbath is still in force is because the 8th day Sabbath or Lords day is not in force and thus it may be framed If our now Sabbath called the Lords day which is eighther on the 8th or on the first day of the week be not in force Then must the 7th day which is the day next foregoeing the Lords day be now in force But our now Sabbath called the Lords day which is on the 8th or first day of the vveeke is not in force Therfore the 7th day vvhich is next foregoeing the Lords day is now in force More briefly thus If the 8th day be not in force Then the 7th day is in force But the 8th day is not in force Ergo the 7th day is in force I proue the consequence to be good because eighther the 7th or the 8th day must be Sabbath the one of them for of all the seuen dayes in the weeke there is no scruple or question betwene them and me saue only about these two dayes so as one of these two dayes must be Sabbath by both our consents especially since we all hould it morall that one day in euery 7. must be a Sabbath which to deny were great impiety I proue the Minor that is That the 8th day or Lords day is not in force and this I proue because ther is neither precept nor practise neither of Christ nor of any of his Apostles in Scripture to put the Lords day in force and this taske I haue particularly and largely made good in the first parte of my Booke where I haue shown by way of answere That the Lords day is not a Sabbath day by Diuiue Institution 2. My 2d argument is because the 7th day Sabbath is not abolished and it may thus be framed That which is not abolished that is now in force But the 7th day Sabbath is not abolished Therfore the 7th day Sabbath is now in force I need not proue the Maior since t is plaine to euery eye for the Minor this I haue proued particularly and largly in the 3d parte of my booke where by way of answere I haue shewed That the 7th day Sabbath is not abolished 3. My 3d argument is because the 7th day Sabbath was neuer changed and it may thus be framed That which was neuer altred nor changed by Christ or by his Apostles That is still in force to this day But the 7th day Sabbath vvas neuer altred nor changed by Christ or by his Apostles Therfore the 7th day Sabbath is still in force to this day The Maior is cleere of it selfe since things once instituted by God in the ould Testament if euer they vvere altred it must be by Christ or his Apostles in the New Testament For the Minor note that the vvord change intimates two things th one is the abolishing of the ould thother is the bringing in of a new as Dauid 2. Sam. 12.20 he changed his apparell that is he left or laid of his mourning apparell and he put on other apparell now thus did neither Christ nor his Apostles change the Sabbath by abolishing it and by setting vp a new if they did change it it was by precept for by practise but not by precept for they as they did not blot For the truth of the Maior 1. the vvrighting of this Law in Tables of stone by God vvhat could it intimate vnto posterity if not this for one namly that those Lawes should be perpetuall else they might haue beene vvrote on paper or parchement or the like vanishing things 2. what reason can be rendered why God should put such an apparant difference twixt the 10. Com and the ceremoniall Law as that he would vvright the one vvith his owne finger but the other he vvould not but set Moses to vvright it the one he deliuered by his audible voice vnto the people the other was deliuered solely by the voice of Moses vvhat may be judged to be the reason hereof but that God did more esteeme of the one then the other and so vvould haue it more durable 3. This Maior is the common receiued truth at the hand of all Diuines witnes Doctour Ames in his Theologicall Thesis pag. 499. Haec enim regula est certissima inter optimos omnes Theologos recepta praecepta moralia a ceremonialibus in eorum traditione sic fuisse discriminata ut omnia sola moralia publice fuerint coram toto populo Israelis ex monte Sinai ipsius Dei Voce proclamata postea etiam proprio Dei quasi digito scripta rescripta idque in tabulis lapideis ad perpetuam immutabilem ipsorum durationem indicandam For this saith he is a most certaine rule and receiued by all best Diuines that the Morall Commandements vvere thus differenced in their deliuery from the ceremonials that all and only the Morals vvere proclaimed publikly before all the people of Israel from Mounte Sinay by the Voice of God himselfe after also were wrighten and againe written as it were by the singer of God and that in Tables of stone to declare their perpetuall and immutable continuance As for the Minor this you haue it in the 4th Comm and deliuered as a commandement in preceptiue and commanding termes Remember the Sabbath day c. In it thou shalt not doe any work c. now if you aske vvhich day we must remember the Lord in the same Com telleth vs it is the 7th day But the seauenth day is the Sabbath c. So the 7th Sabbath vvas commanded and so it most plaine Exod. 35.2 5. My 5th
in the Sabbath all their labour vvill be lost as I trust in God it will appeare at the last what they say against the 7th day Sabbath I reduce to two heades the former shall consist of textes of Scripture and artificiall arguments the latter of testimonies and authorities of men for their Textes of Scripture whereby they would proue the 7th day Sabbath is abolisht 1. The first text shall be that of Isai 66.23 from month to month or from new Moone to new Moone and from Sabbath to Sabbath shall all flesh come to worship before me c. whence it is collected by them that the weekly 7th day Sabbath was a signe and that of the euerlasting Sabbath in Heauen and therfore the ceremoniall and temporary Hereto I answere 1. that this phrase of speech in this text is obscure and dark some to vs for vvhat shall be meante by these words from Month to Month whereof are these a signe now t is vnmeet that so plaine a text as is the 4th Com touching the Sabbath which is deliured in plaine and proper vvords should be contradicted and blotted out by an other text which is in Metaphoricale phrases of a doubtfull sense 2. if this Sabbath was a signe of heauen it is so farre from being a temporary ceremony as rather it is perpetuall Morall to last till Heauen comes as hath beene said before for the signe or shadowe is to last vntill the body a substance be comne or admit this Sabbath a signe both of the whole tyme of the Church of the New Testament on earth and also of the Church triumphant in heauen as some would why yet I hope the body of Heauen hath as much force to moralize the Sabbath as hath the body of the new Church on earth to ceremonialize and temporize it yea more by how much better but it is not worth our labour to spend more words about this text it hauing so little culler to any thing in it for their purpose 2. A 2d text to proue the Sabbath a ceremony and so abolisht is Numb 28.9.10 where it was commanded the Isralites to offer two lambes for for a sacrifice on the Sabbath day Hereto I answere 1. why should the sacrificing of two lambes on the Sabbath make the Sabbath a ceremony and abolisht any more then the sacrificing of one lambe euery day for a daily burnt offring Numb 28.4.6 make the working dayes of the weeke ceremoniall and abolisht 2. Hath not the Morall works in the Sabbath as Rest and Holinesse and remembrance of Gods Rest after creation as much and more power ouer the tyme and day wherein they were done to moralize and eternize the Sabbath as hath the sacrificing two lambes to ceremonize and temporize the Sabbath or if sacrifices could abolish the tyme of the Sabbath which was commanded why did they not also abolish the duties in the tyme as Rest and Holinesse 3. The Sabbath was a Sabbath in nature and institution before there was any sacrifices for it was in tyme of Adams innocency before the fall wherfore as the Apostle Gal. 3.17 reasoneth of the promise and of the Law that the Law could not disanulle the promise to Abraham which came 430. yeeres after the promise so say I Sacrifices cannot disanulle the Sabbath since the Sabbath was before any Sacrifices and since Sacrifices came after the Sabbath as therfore the Sabbath had a being before sacrifices and ceremonies so may it haue its being after all sacrifices and ceremonies be abolisht 3. A 3d Text is in Deuter. 5.15 where the Lord telleth the Israelites He brought them out of Egypte and therfore the Lord commanded them to keepe the Sabbath vvhence they would argue to this effect since that the Sabbath is an effect of or hath necessary dependance vpō their deliuerance out of Egypt it followeth if that deliuerance out of Egypt be but ceremoniall as a thing proper to the Iewe Then so is the Sabbath also I answere 1. The Sabbath may be said to be an effect or haue dependance of an other thing two wayes one as touching its obseruation the other as touching its institution now this deliuerance out of Egypt was not cause of the Sabbaths institution for the Sabbath was before they euer went downe into Egypt Genes 2.3 neither vvas or could the deliverance out of Egypt be the sole cause nor the cheife cause of the Sabbaths institution for Gods owne rest vpon that day Genes 2.3 was the cheife cause and next the Sabbath was made for man Mark. 2.27 that is for the ease and benifite of his body and for the good and edification of his soule in duties of holinesse But as touching the Sabbaths obseruation the deliuerance from Egypt might be a cause and was and ought to be a motiue to obedience in obseruance keeping the Sabbath day and so all blessings whatsoeuer should be motiues to obedience as Deut. 6.20.21.23.24 Deuter. 28.47.48 but vvhat if these blessings faile and God giue others in roome of them shall our obedience and obseruance faile and vanishe vvhat and if we Christians haue not that one particular blessing of deliuerance from Egypt which the Jewe had haue vve no many other blessings and deliuerance to moue vs to obedience as from that Armade in 88. from the Gunpowder plott and I know not how many more I conclude that since the deliuerance out of Egypt vvas not the cause of the Sabbaths institution but only of its after obseruation therfore though that deliuerance was ceremoniall yet was not the Sabbath ceremoniall 2. I answere if this motiue of Isralites deliuerance from Egypt because not belonging to vs Christians therfore shewes the Sabbath belongs not to vs neither Then may we by as good reason abolish not the Sabbath alone but the whole morall law also and then as vve vvill none of the Jewes Sabbath to be ours no more need vve vvill the Iewes God to be ours commanded in the first Com for the reason to induce to obedience and hauing the true God for their God was this I Law as therfore vvhen the Apostle saith Ephes 2.15 Christ abrogated the Law of Commandements vve vnderstand it only of the ceremoniall law of commandements not of the morall So vvhere here the Apostle takes away the difference of dayes I vnderstand him to abolish only ceremoniall dayes but not the Morall 7th day Sabbath I answere 3d. if all difference of all dayes be abolisht vvhy then keepe we the Lords day now for a Sabbath in a religiouse manner if you say you keep it not as a ceremony or type shaddow of Christ to come which was the reason of the Sabbaths abolition but in other respects as in remembrance of Christ alredy comne vvhy then by like reason may not the 7th day Sabbath be now kept by vs so be we lay aside that supposed typicall shaddowish respect vvhich it had of Christ to come and vve keeping it in other respects as in remembrance of