lapsus peccati statu alijsque peccatis excepta sola impenitentia considerantur c. Sicut fidelibus quatalibus fructus impetratae gratiae proprié obtingit ita infidelibus rebellibus qua talibus gratia impetrata non est c. pag. 312. The second sort of Divines distinguish the sufficiency and efficiency of Christs death In respect of the worth and greatnesse of the price he died for all men because it was sufficient for the redemption of every man in the world if they did repent and believe and God might without impeachment of justice have offered Salvation to every man in the world upon that condition if it had been his pleasure In the efficiency as every man or any man hath fruit by the death of Christ so Christ died for him But this is not of one kind some fruit is common to every man for as Christ is Lord of all things in heaven and earth even the earthly blessings which infidels injoy may be tearmed fruits of Christs death Others proper to the members of the visible Church and common to them as to be called by the word injoy the Ordinances of grace live under the Covenant partake of some graces that come from Christ which through their fault be not saving and in this sence Christ died for all that be under the Covenant But other fruits of Christs death according to the will of God and intention of Christ as Mediatour be peculiar to the sheep of Christ his brethren them that be given unto him of the Father as faith unfained regeneration pardon of sinne adoption c. and so they hold Christ died efficiently for his people only in this sence namely so as to bring them effectually to faith grace and glory Now let us come to examine what the Scriptures teach in this particular The Apostle writeth expressely that by the grace of Heb. 2. 9. God Christ tasted of death for all men or distributively for every man Some referre this to the sufficiency of Christs death but all men cannot be referred to man-kinde considered in the common masse or lapse for the words must be understood of the death of Christ as it was suffered in time and not as it was decreed of God and of men considered as at that time But at what time Christ suffered mankind could not be considered as in the transgression of our first Parents The Jewes were of opinion that Christ the Messiah was promised a Saviour to them only How to impetrate Salvation No but to be applied as in Covenant Now to beate downe their pride the Apostle saith Christ tasted of death for all sc both Jew and Gentile who stood in relation by virtue of the Covenant as the Jewes did So that the Apostle speakes of the application of Christs death which is not absolutely common to all and every man in the world and by every man is meant every man who heareth receiveth and is partaker of the fruit and benefit of Christs death offered in the word of reconciliation every man who is under the new Covenant as it is propounded of God in the Gospell and accepted of them But every man under the new Covenant as he is under the Covenant is partaker of the fruit benefit of Christs death That the passage is to be understood of them that apply and possesse the fruit of his death is manifest by divers reasons from the verses precedent and subsequent The world to come verse 5. may well be that all or every man for whom Christ tasted death but that world to come is that happy age which the Prophets did foretell should begin at the comming of Christ whose accomplishment or fulfilling we expect as yet Beza an not in Heb. 2. 5. Corvin in Mal. cap. 29. § 1. Heb. 2. 10 11. 13 Isa 53. 10. Heb. 2. 16. They for whom Christ died are in the same Chapter described to be one that is of the same nature and spirituall condition with Christ to be his brethren such as trust in God the children of God given unto Jesus Christ the generation or posterity of Christ as the Prophet speaketh whom Christ tooke by the hand and lifted up from their fall the seed of Abraham But these things agree to them only that possesse the fruits and benefits of Christ for whom he died by way of application If the maintainers of universall redemption consider their owne grounds it will be hard to fit this Text to their purpose or rather from them the former exposition may be confirmed For either by all men they must understand mankind in the common lapse as fallen in Adam and then Christ by his death hath restored them into the favour of God they stand actually reconciled they be regenerated and if they die before by actuall sinne committed in their owne person they fall from that estate are undoubtedly saved or they must understand all men considered as obstinate impenitent rebellious unbelievers And then Christ died for all and every man as obstinate impenitent and unbelievers which I cannot find that any of them hath or dare affirme or by all men they must understand all beleevers who apply and possesse the benefits of Christs death which is that we affirme They say how truly I dispute not his dominion over all men that they are bound to obey him and live unto him is grounded upon his dying for every one But if that be granted is it not necessary that his death should be applied to every one in some sort at least made knowne unto them in the word of life For men are bound to obey and live unto Christ as they will grant not because he hath impetrated righteousnesse and salvabilitie but because he hath entred into Covenant with them made knowne unto them the way of life imparted unto them his blessings and they have accepted of the condition and received him to be their Saviour And these words By the grace of God I should thinke import more to them then that velleity or common mercy or generall affection of doing good which Armin. and Corvin make naturall and as they teach God beareth towards them that he hateth Corvin in Molin cap. 29. Sect. 2. which was the cause why he gave Christ to die for all men even that free grace and love whereby he quickens them that were dead in trespasses and saveth them that believe Ephes 2. 5. As for the particle All or every one examples are usuall in Scripture where it is used with fit limitation though neither all precisely nor the most part be signified and that confessed by all sides But what need paralell places to prove it may be when the circumstances of the text shew it must be limited and they that most presse universall redemption are enforced to acknowledge a limitation in this matter It is objected that the holy Ghost speaketh generally in the beginning of the Chapter What is man But how to frame any Heb.
the Church by his Ministery The curse of Gods revenging justice had now seized upon mankind for many generations even thousands of yeares so that now it was time for God to remember mercy in the midst of wrath and to breake out into a clearer expression of this free gratious Covenant extended to a people sprung up into a great number and to be joyned together in an outward policie The Covenant of free grace running downe in Abrahams seed was daily cast out and grew wilde as in the Ishmaelites Edomites Syrians c. therefore God was now pleased to knit the seed of Abraham together in a stronger and as I may call it a state Covenant that things might grow better and not worse The body of the people to whom the Covenant pertained was now growne populous and numerous so that either it must grow wild and come to nothing by it owne weight or else be brought under the Covenant of God into a state and nationall Church The Covenant which God made with Israel is called the Old Testament or the Law not because it was first as some suppose but because it was to wax old and to give place to the more excellent Covenant succeeding and finally to be abolished Heb. 8. 13. But here at the first we meet with a great difficulty How and whether at all the Covenant of Grace was manifested by Moses Some make the Old and New Testament as the Covenant of workes and grace opposite in substance and kind and not in degree alone and that to introduce an unsound distinction viz. of promise set against Covenant or Testament as though God conferred Grace unto the Fathers only by promise and not by Covenant leaving all that Moses puts under Covenant to be the Covenant of works and old Testament not considering that God calleth his promise of Grace to Abraham a Covenant Gen. 17. 1. being in every branch a compleat Covenant not adverting that the Apostle who knew how to speake according to the sence of the old Scriptures cals the promise made unto Abraham a Covenant or Testament Gal. 3. 17. and the Covenant of promise distinguishing the degrees of manifestation Ephes 2. 12. Neither can it be proved that ever God made the Covenant of works with the creature fallen but whensoever the Scripture speakes of Gods entring into Covenant with man fallen and plunged into sinne and for sinne deserving wrath it must be understood of the Covenant of Grace as shall be shewed hereafter Others make the Old Testament a Covenant subservient to the Covenant of Grace and describe it to be that which God made with Israel in Mount Sinai to prepare them to faith and to inflame them with a desire of the promise and Evangelicall Covenant which otherwise had languished in their minds and to restrain them from wickednesse as it were with a bit and bridle untill the time wherein God should send the Spirit of adoption into their hearts and governe them by the Law of liberty This they make to agree with the Covenant of nature in this that in both the one partie contracting is God the other man both hath a stipulation annexed and that the same in respect of the morall Law the promise is the same in generall and both leade unto Christ But to differ from it in this that the Covenant of nature was made with all men but this with the Israelites alone that was made with man created and perfect in Paradise and had no preludia this was made long after with some part of mankind sinners in Mount Sinai and had many preludia that bound to obedience due by the Law of nature this to the Ceremonies also in that the injoyment of life in Paradise was promised here in the Land of Canaan the Covenant of nature leads to Christ by accident as it shewes what man doth owe unto God and what punishment remaines if he pay not his debt of duty the old Covenant leads unto Christ by it selfe for that is the true and proper scope thereof God exacting his due of man for none other end but that the creature convicted of his imbecillity should flie to Christ The Covenant of Nature leanes upon the Creation and generall conservation the old Covenant upon the Election of Israel his deliverance out of Egypt and conservation in the Land of Canaan The Covenant of Nature was written in the heart but the old Gal. 4. 24. Covenant did beget to servitude and so did compell and restraine by force as when we leave undone what we would doe or doe what we would not for feare that is eternall this temporary written in Tables of stone The thirst after Christ which the Covenant of Nature doth stirre up in man is allayed by the application of Christ either in the Promise or in the Gospell but the thirst which the old Covenant stirred up could not be allayed but by the comming of Christ in the flesh With the Covenant of Grace it agreeth that the Author of both is God both contracted with man a sinner both doth shew sinne both restraine from sinne both leade to Christ both the Symbole of the Church both made by a Mediatour and life promised in both They differ in these that in the Covenant subservient God is considered as reproving sinne and approving righteousnesse in the Covenant of Grace as pardoning sinne and renewing man in righteousnesse the stipulation of the old Covenant is Doe this and live Gal. 3. 12. Of the New Beleeve and thou shalt not come into judgement Joh. 3. 18. The Old Testament was added to the Promise of Grace which went before Gal. 3. 16 17. and shewes sinne not primarily but by experience of humane weaknesse in keeping Covenant But the Covenant of Grace doth this primarily for it teacheth expressely that all men are sinners Rom. 3. 9 23. and that his happinesse doth consist in the remission of sinnes Rom. 4. 6. The old Covenant did restrain from sinne by compulsion Rom. 7. 23. 24. the Covenant of Grace with a free inclination of mind and soule Rom. 6. 12. The Covenant of Grace leads to Christ directly the old Covenant indirectly The old Covenant is the carnall Symbole of the Church of the Jewes the new Covenant a spirituall Symbole of the Church both of Jewes and Gentiles Moses is the Mediatour of the old Covenant Christ God and man Mediatour of the new In the old Covenant is given the spirit of bondage but the Spirit of Adoption in the new Rom. 8. 15. The old Covenant was a meane to the end the new the end it selfe The old Covenant did terrifie the consciences the new doth comfort Man a sinner fallen a sleep is the object of the old Covenant the conscience terrified with sinne the object of the new The old Covenant shewed the manner of worshipping God but gave not ability the new Covenant doth both The old Covenant was an hand-writing against us Col. 2. 14. the new an easie yoke
be inseparable And this doth take away the objection which they raise from the words following And hath committed vers 19 20 unto us the word of reconciliation Now therefore we beseech you we pray you in Christs stead be ye reconciled to God For not to say the Apostle speakes to the Corinthians at that time beleevers and in the state of persons reconciled hath not God committed the word of reconciliation to the Ministers who are to beseech mankind actually restored into grace and admitted into the new Covenant to be reconciled The word of reconciliation is of use both to them that be not restored into grace that they might be called and to them that be reconciled that they might continue and be builded forward That passage of the Apostle 1 Joh. 2. 1 2. If any man sinne we have an Advocate with the Father Jesus Christ the righteous And he is the propitiation for our sinne and not for ours only but also for the sinnes of the whole world is like to the former as all men confesse and hath the same answer For as Christ is our Advocate by office to plead our cause and defend us against the accusation of all our enemies so is he our propitiation But Christ is not the Advocate of every man simply but of his people And as he is the propitiation of the beleeving Jewes so he is of the whole world 1 Joh 4. 10. but he is the propitiation of the beleeving Jewes in that God is propitious unto them in Christ and not propitiable or reconcileable only He is their propitiation through faith in his bloud Rom. 3. 25. by whom their sinnes are covered not coverable and Cyril in Ioh. â— 11. cap. 19. Aug. tract 87. in Iob. Autor de vocat Gent. l. 2. c. 1. Euseb Hist l. 4. c. 15. Estius in 1 Ioâ— 2. 2. expiated and done away not expiable only Therefore the Apostle speakes of the application of Christs death and by the whole world man-kind in common considered as under the fall cannot be understood but the whole world of the Gentiles now called to the faith and admitted into Covenant Thus Vorstius himself though in his common places upon this Chapter he would understand these words as if Christ sufficiently and efficiently quantum in se was the propitiation for the sinnes of all mankind yet in his paraphrase he giveth this sence of the Text Where fore let Vorst in 1 John 2. 2. him consider that the Lord Jesus is the propitiation for our sins as who hath purchased full remission of them all for us And not only for us who at this time embrace his doctrine but for all men of the whole world as many as by faith receive or appehend the blessing of the Gospell offered unto them In this sence the world is taken as they themselves confesse Rom. 11. 12 15. Their fall is Scrip. Syn. pag. 307 308. See Chemnit Har. Evang. cap. 8. Quod gaudium erit omni populo the riches of the world and their casting off the reconciliation of the world that is of the Gentiles converted to the faith which did make a great part of the world and before conversion were worldly and profane men The rejection of the Jewes was an occasion by which the Gentiles hitherto without that gratious communication was made rich and being converted to the faith did returne into favour with God And the same argument they bring out of the former Text to confute the distinction of Christs death effectually for some sufficiently for all because then the adversative particle doth loose his emphasis if the Apostles words be thus understood Christ died effectually for us and not only so but sufficiently for the sinnes of the whole world doth confirme the other interpretation for the adversative should loose it weight if the sentence be thus resolved Christ is our propitiation by faith in whom God is actually reconciled and not only so but he is reconcileable to the whole world that lieth not in infidelity The maintainers of universall redemption thinke it may strongly be proved by this reason All men are bound to beleeve in Christ but Christ died for all men that are bound to believe in him which some propound in this forme Every man is bound to beleeve that Christ died for him but whatsoever a man is bound to beleeve that is true therefore he died for every man But if by beleeving in Christ they understand nothing but bare assenting to this proposition that Christ died for all men and for me as a man for the impetration of righteousnesse quantum in se or to purchase the grace of the Father and pardon of sinnes no man is bound to beleeve it because it is not revealed in Scripture much lesse made knowne to every man in the world by meanes sufficient Every man called whether he hearken to God calling or not is bound to beleeve that Christ is offered unto him as a Saviour so as if he beleeve he shall be saved but that Christ died for him in particular for the impetration of righteousnesse and for every particular man in the world that he is not bound to beleeve because it is not found in Scripture nor can he beleeve it according to their grounds that urge this argument neither can such perswasion be the ground of justifying faith I say every man in the world good or bad cannot beleeve it as they teach For either they be considered as in the common Masse as all Infants and then they be actually restored into grace or as impenitent and unbeleevers fallen from the Covenant themselves or as Arminius addeth in their parents and then Christ died not for them as such If they be admitted into Covenant and continue therein Script Rem advers coll Hag. art 2. Christ died for them in respect of application if they be fallen from that state by impenitency obstinacy rebellion Christ died not for them as such If they be cast off and not so much as outwardly called how can they beleeve that Christ died for them specially when by transgression they have departed from that Covenant and fallen from that state unto which they say they were admitted Neither can this perswasion be the ground of faith justifying for many ungodly men are perswaded that Christ died for all mankind that neither will nor can nor ought as such to beleeve in Christ or rest upon him for Salvation and many beleeve it not that beleeve truly in Christ and know they beleeve and that they ought to beleeve If by beleeving in Christ be meant faith justifying the proposition may be granted with two limitations First that under this terme they be not comprehended who never heard of Christ or had possible at least probable meanes to come to the knowledge of Christ or were admitted into Covenant So Vorstius seemes to limitit unlesse saith he Christ had died for all that are called in vaine should they all
them the people of God sonnes or children of God the sonnes of the living God a peculiar people reconciled unto God justified unto life the daughters of Zion and of Jerusalem who have the Jerusalem that is above for their spirituall mother the seed of Abraham who is the Father of us all And as Jerusalem which is above is the mother of us all so is Christ said to die for us all and God to have mercy upon all Rom. 8. 32. He that spared not his own Sonne but delivered him up for us all Rom. 11. 32. God hath concluded them all in unbeliefe that he might have mercy upon all Rom. 5. 18. By the righteousnesse of one the free gift came upon all men unto justification of life that is of all them which pertaine to the posterity of Christ by spirituall regeneration It may well be that all to whom Paul wrote that Epistle did not unfainedly believe but as they professed the Doctrine of Salvation and in some measure walked according to the policie of the new Jerusalem and as they enjoyed the Ordinances of grace whereby Christ was applied so the Apostle speakes of them as Saints and beloved and faithfull And in the same sense in other places they are reckoned amongst the faithfull beloved and elect who believe for a time and professe the doctrine of Salvation and partaÌ„ke the seales of the Covenant though afterwards they fall away and as they are called beleevers converts disciples members of Christ temples and sonnes of God as they are said to be justified sanctified and redeemed so is Christ to have died for them as he is applyed in the Ordinances of grace and they partake of the benefits of his death But as for them that be not in Covenant we shall never reade that their sinnes are pardoned Act. 10. 43. Joh. 5. 24. Joh. 15. 2. Act. 15. 9. Rom. 5. 1. Rom. 9. 25 26. Col. 1. 21. Joh. 3. 36. 2 Cor. 6. 15 16 17. that they are delivered from death purged from their sinnes reconciled unto God received into favour nay the contrary is plainly affirmed of them that they are not the people of God that they have no communion with Christ that they are enemies in their minds by wicked works alienated from God that the wrath of God abideth on them that they are without God in the world which is never said of them for whom Christ died The Scripture speaketh expressely that Christ died for his Church his sheep his children his people the people or children of God those that are given unto him of the Father his brethren As the Father knoweth me even so know I the Father and I lay downe my life for my sheep Joh. 10. 15. Take heed unto your selves and to all the flocke to feed the Church of God which he hath purchased with his own bloud Act. 20. 28. Christ is the head of the Church and he is the Saviour of the body Eph. 5. 23. Christ loved the Church and gave himselfe for it ver 25. He shall save his people from their sinnes Matth. 1. 21. Who gave himselfe for us that he might redeeme us from all iniquity and purifie unto himself a peculiar people Tit. 2. 14. As thou hast given him power over all flesh that he should give eternall life to as many as thou hast given him Joh. 17. 2. He prophesied that Jesus should die for that Nation and not for that Nation only but also that he should gather together in one the children of God that were scattered abroad Joh. 11. 51 52. For both he that sanctifieth and they who are sanctified are all one for which cause he is not ashamed to call them brethren saying I will declare thy Name to my brethren Heb. 2. 11 12. The Church and people of God in themselves considered were sinners ungodly enemies alienated from God and Christ died for them not that he found them friends or brethren or children but that Rom. 5. 6 10. he might make them such as by the participation of the benefits of his death they are made such indeed The faithfull are the seed or children of Christ which he hath brought forth with pain and travell Isai 53. 10 11. The inheritance of Christ which he hath purchased by his death given unto him of the Father that they might be redeemed from death and possessed of him for their Salvation Psal 2. 8. as the Psalmist elsewhere expounds it All the ends of the world shall remember and turne unto the Lord and all Psal 22. 27. Psal 72. 11. and 86. 9. the kinreds of the Nations shall worship before thee And if Christ died thus for his people seed inheritance sheep and Church he died not equally for all and every man for then in his death he considered none to be made his sheep or brethren before others nor did he purchase grace that one should be made the child of God rather then another For though grace be distributed in different degrees yet that being so common to them that beleeve and them that beleeve not that sometimes the greater measure is given to them that reject and cast it off it cannot be the cause why one man differs from another Many things are answered to this argument As first that it is Synodal circ Art 2. paâ— 3 17. Vorst amica collat cum Piscat sâ—ct 26. Gal. 2. 20. not said Christ died for his sheep or brethren only and that his dying for them doth not exclude others as Paul saith Christ died for him applying the death of Christ to himself but not excluding others But the instance is not like for these words for me are not disjunctive to distinguish Paul from the rest of the faithfull but from unbeleevers or them that were not in the same state or kind This is a priviledge common to Paul with all beleevers that Christ died for him in respect of them then it is not disjunctive but in respect of them who be not partners in that prerogative it is disjunctive Therefore the example doth rather prove the speech to be restrictive then otherwise for as these words of Paul Who loved me and gave himself for me distinguish Paul from the company of unbeleevers and so are exclusive in like manner are these words of our Saviour I lay down my life for my sheep restrictive and exclusive In those Texts there is no exclusive particle expressed but the proposition for sense is restrictive For when difference or distinction is contained in some terme the Proposition is for sense exclusive no lesse then if it was expressely noted Thou shalt feare the Lord thy God him shalt thou Deut. 10. 20. serve and to him shalt thou cleave here is no restriction or exclusion expressed but in sense it is exclusive Call upon me in the time of Psal 50. 15. trouble and I will heare thee only is not added and yet for the sense the words are exclusive In thy seed shall all
it teacheth that without faith it is impossible to please God And if man stand in need of a Saviour he is lost in himselfe so the prescribing of the remedy doth discover the malady Without hope of pardon there is no true turning unto God but the Gospell propoundeth mercy to them that humble their soules and conâ—esse their sinnes If men may be perswaded and drawn to come unto Christ allured and inticed by faire and sweet promises then the Gospell is the sole instrument of Hos 2. 14. Epâ— 2. 17. conversion but conversion is a faire or slattering perswasion if I may so call it Terrours drive no man unto God of themselves but rather from him unlesse he be pleased to work by them and gentle perswasions may prevaile if God vouchsafe to put in with them God doth freely give his Word to whom he please as long as he please and in what manner it seemeth best unto him in his infinite wisdome He gave his Law unto Jacob his Statutes and Judgements unto Israel he hath not dealt so with every Nation The Psal 147. Act. 17. 30. times of ignorance God regarded not Greater things were done in Capernaum Chorazin and Bethsaida then were done in Mat. 11. 23 24. Tyre and Sidon Sodome or Gomorrah Paul was forbidden to preach the word in Asia and the Disciples to enter into the Act. 16. 6. Mat. 10. 5. wayes of Samaria Greater meanes God doth vouchsafe to them that are worse and more meanes to them that be more obdurate Ezek. 2. 7. and 3. 7 8 11. Act. 13. 46. in their sinnes like to them that are unlike and lesser to them that be not so deeply plunged into profanenesse For God doth exhort them that they might be inexcusable that they might know a Prophet had been amongst them that it might be for Ezek. 2. 5. Matt. 24. 14. Isai 6. 9 10. Mat. 13. 14 15 16. Rom. 9. 23. Luke 2. 34. a testimony against them that they might be hardened and that the glory of God might be manifested in the vessels of wrath Thus Christ is set up for a signe that shall be spoken against and for a rock of offence 1 Pet. 2. 7 8. The Word is a morall instrument of conversion which God is pleased to use without which he doth not ordinarily work but it hath no power of it self to work and therefore conversion is the immediate work of the holy Ghost notwithstanding the meanes which God useth in the turning of a sinner Naturall instruments being moved have some power to worke of themselves or by their own faculty morall not so The Word is a fit instrument though of it selfe it have no power to produce the effect For though conversion be not a bare morall perswasion yet it is effected by perswasion or at least not without perswasion In the change God dealeth with man as a reasonable creature or instrument which is to be renewed by grace and allured by promises sweet pleasant profitable firme and sure Now the Word is very fit to convey those admirable and most forcible perswasions from the eare unto the soule The Word is more generally published in the times of the Gospell and Kingdome of the Messiah then it had been in former ages God is in Christ reconciling the world unto himselfe 2 Cor. 5. 19. and hath committed unto us the word of reconciliation the Gospell which hath been preached unto every creature under Heaven Col. 1. 23. that is to all Nations Jewes and Gentiles and to all sorts and sexes noble base learned or unlearned bond or free And thus Col. 1. 6. Mat. 28. 19 20. Rom. 10. 21. it did come unto them they not minding it or having it once in their thoughts And hereof this is an argument that it commeth not where it is sought but where it is gainsaid The Spirit was more abundantly poured forth upon the Church after the Resurrection of Christ The Pastours of the Primitive Churches were faithfull and diligent the primitive Christians did 1 Thes 1. 8. not hide their candle under a bushell but did shine as lights to others and labour their conversion and the Gospell like the Sunne for clearnesse did spread forth the beames of light more abundantly The Gospell is more glorious then the Law or truth of God manifested in the old Testament that was as a Candle that could not spread it light farre this as the Sunne disperseth his 2 Cor. 3. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11. beames farre and nigh It is the ministration of life a quickning spirit the ministration of righteousnesse which shall endure for ever and in this respect it doth exceed in glory it is a Gospell full of glory If the types of Evangelicall things were glorious how much more glorious must the Gospell it self needs Gal. 1. 27. Jam. 2. 8. 2 Cor. 3. 8 9. 1 Thes 2. 12. 1 Pet. 1. 12. be The Gospell is called a glorious Mystery a royall Law a ministration of glory nay glory it self a glory which draweth the study and amazement of the most glorious creatures unto it The publisher of the Gospell is Jesus Christ the only begotten Sonne of God who being in the bosome of the Father the truth Joh. 1. 18. it selfe and most familiarly acquainted with all his Counsells hath revealed and brought it to light The matter it selfe is great Salvation such as eye hath not seen Heb. 2. 3. 1 Cor. 2. 9. care hath not heard nor ever entered into the heart of man to conceive Newes from heaven touching righteousnesse and life eternall through faith in Jesus Christ Gods wisdome power goodnesse mercy grace longsuffering c. are gloriously set forth in the Gospell The maine subject is Christ the brightnesse of his Fathers glory Heb. 1. 1 2 3. Col. 1. 19. the Image of the invisible God This word propounded by the ministery of man is not only preparatory as if an other word which may be called consummatory must be suggested by the Spirit unto the minde For the holy Ghost doth not inlighten the soule by his internall action into any other acknowledgement of Christ then that which is contained in the Word externally proposed or affect the heart with other senses then which are proposed out of the same Word Faith is Rom. 10. 14 15 16. 17. by hearing that is by preaching and preaching by the Word of God that is by commission or edict from God But this preaching did perfectly containe all things consummatory for the sanctification Joh. 17 17 20. Joh. 14. 16. Joh. 15. 15. 17. 8. Joh. 1. 18. 3. â—2 Joh. 16. 13. of the Church even all things which Christ taught to his disciples which he had heard of the Father and were delivered unto him who was in the bosome of the Father all truth whereby not the Apostles only but the whole Church even to the end of the world shall be sanctified The wisedome of