or they do not If they do then they worship false Gods and are guilty of gross Idolatry there being no similitude or likeness of the true God If they do not then is ignorance the Mother of that Dâ— votion and with the Samaritans they worship they know not what Or if they do worship the true God they worship him ignorantly and know not the manner of the God that made the Heavens and the Earth Deut. 4. 12 15. Isa. 40. 18. Ioh. 4. 22. Acts 17. 23. 2 Kings 7. 26. Q. Why can there be no manner of similitude of the true God A. Because he dwelleth not in Temples made with hands and is the unapproachable invisible God Acts 17. 24. 1 Tim. 6. 16. Q. The Papists worship God by Images the Protestants worship God without them which way therefore are we to worship the true God A. The way the only infallible Judge of Controversies hath declared unto us Q. Is the Pope this infallible Iudge A. There is no infallible Judge upon Earth and the Pope being but the Hâ—ad of a Party the supream Head of the Romanists neither he nor they can be Judge in their own Cause Iam. 4. 12. Mat. 23. 9 10. Prov. 18. 17. Q. Who then is the infallible Iudge of Controversies A. Christ the only begotten Son which is in the bosom of the Father He is the only infallible Judge of Controversies who hath told us all things and wâ— have his Determinations upon Record Q. Where are his Determinations Recorded A. In the holy Scriptures Q. What are his Determinations concerning God and the manner of his worship A. They are 1. Negative that God dwelleth not in Temples neither is to be worshipped by Images made with mens hands Acts 17. 24. with 1 Kings 8. 27. Acts 17. 25. 2. They are affirmative viz. That God is a Spirit and that they that worship him must worship him in Spirit and truth Ioh. 4. 23 24. Q What other sin is chiefly forbidden in this Commandment A. Superstition Q. What is Superstition A. Superstition in the proper and strict notion of the word is the worshipping of Idols or dead men Act. 17. 22. But this is the same with that Idolatry the giving that worship and glory to others which is due to God alone which is forbidden in the first Commandment Q. What is therefore Superstition in the 〈◊〉 generally received notion and as it is forbidden in this Commandment A. It is when things are either abhorred or observed with a zealous or fearful but erroneous relation to God by means of which the superstitious serve either the true God with needless Offices or defraud him of necessary Duties or bestow such honours and service upon others as is proper for and should be peculiar for him only Or More plainly thus It is the worshipping of God in any other way or by any other means than what he hath appointed in his Word called Ordinances the Commandments and Doctrines of men Q. How manifold is this Superstition A. Twofold Affirmative and Negative Q. What is Affirmative Superstition A. That whereby the Superstitious serve the true God with needless Offices Q. And what the Negative A. That whereby men out of a sâ—â—â—pulous Conscience or ignorant fear of displeasing God abstain from things lawful and laudable as sinful and ungodly Q. Doth the Scripture warrant this distinction A. Yes Q. 1. What is the Idolatry and Superstition of the Church of Rome A. The worshipping of the Bread and Wine in the Eucharist out of a false and groundless perswasion that they are substantially changed into the Body and Blood of Christ. 2. The worshipping and invocation of Saints and Angels and particularly of the Virgin Mary which hath now for some Ages been a principal part of their Religion 3. Their worshipping of Images Which practice notwithstanding all their distinctions about it which are no other but what the Heathens used in the same case flies as full in the face of the second Commandment as deliberate and malicious killing of a man is against the sixâ—h Acts 17. 29. Rom. 1. 23. 4. Their superstitious Fasting and ab staining from Flesh in Lent Their superstitious Holy-daies Their adding Cream Oyl and Spittle to the water in Baptism and their Baptizing of Bells Their praying upon Beads and mary more superstitious customs For which there is not the least command in the Scriptures Q. What if the Doctrine of Transubstantiation be not true A. Then by the confession of several of their own learned Writers they are guilty of gross Idolatry Q. Doth not the Bread in the Communion remain Bread after the words of Consecration A. Yes the Scripture expresly calls it so after the words of Consecration 1 Cor. 11. 26 27 28. Q. But what if the Bread be transubstantiâ—te and turned into the very Body of Christ A. Then all mens senses are deceived in a plain sensible matter wherein 't is as hard for them to be deceived as in any thing in the world Q. Why so A. For two things can hardly be imagined more different a little bit of Waâ—er and the whole Body of â— man Q. But what if the Testimony of sensâ— be not to be relied upon A. Then no man is sure that Christianâ—ty it self is true Q. Why so A. For the utmost assurance that the Apostles had of the Truth of Christianity was the Testimony of their own senses concerning our Saviours Miracles Q. And what if the Testimony of sense 〈◊〉 to be relied upon A. Then it plainly follows that no man no not the Apostles themselves had more reason to believe Christianity to be true than every man hath to believe Transubstantiation to be false Q. But if the case be so plain a man would think that at least the Teachers and Guides of that Church should be sensible of it A. Why they are so and afraid the People should be so too and therefore by their corrupt Glosses and Phâ—risaiâ—al Traditions in their interpreting the holy Scriptures they tye up and keep the Pâ—ople in ignorance of the true meaning of those places which do more expresly condemn their damnable Idolatrous practises and their superstitious customs and in their ordinary Caâ—â—chisms and Manuals of Devotion they leave out the second Commandment and divide the tenth into two to make up the Number lest if the common people should know it their Consciences should startle at the doing of a thing so directly contrary to the plain command of God Q. And is it not well observed by the learned from Deut. 11. 28. That he that professeth Idolatry is as if he denied the whole Law A. Yes Q. But because after all the unanswerable Objections and Arguments of the Protestants against Transubstantiation that Monster aâ—d shame of humane nature and the other Blasphenies and absurd Doctrines of the Papists they do all unanimously betake themselves to the authority of their Church as their main and last Refuge and tell us
supposition renders it most probable be it known to all such unnatural Parents as reject Infant Baptism that they harden their hearts against their own flesh Q Why so A. Because Children are parts of Parents and by this contempt of Baptism they reject the Counsel of God against themselves and their Children Q What other reason have you for Infant Baptism A. 3. Children were ever admitted to the sign and Seal of this Covenant which of old was Circumcision and Baptism succeeds in the room of Circumcision Q. How doth that appear A. 1. It appears in that the Apostle of the Circumcision commands Baptism upon the same ground that Circumcision was 2. Because St. Paul in Col. 2. gives to Baptism the very Name of Circumcision to teach us that it succeeds iâ— Object But if Baptism ought to be administred to all those to whom Circumcision was administred because Baptism succeeds Circumcision by the same reason the Eucharist ought to be administred to all those who did eat the Paschal Lamb seeing the Eucharist succeeds the Iewish Passover But you stay longer before you admit your Children to the Lords Supper than the Iews did before they admitted their Children to the eating of the Paschal Lamb. A. The Jews admitted their Children to eat of the Paschal Lamb so soon as they were able to eat flesh and to ask their Fathers the reason of that legal ceremony and we defer the admitting of ours to the Lords Supper until they be capable of those dispositions which God requires and are able to examine themselves according to the command of the Apostle 1 Cor. 11. Let a man examine himself and so let him eat of that Bread and drink of that Cup. Q. 96. What is the Lords Supper A. The Lords Supper is a Sacrament wherein by giving and receiving Bread and Wine according to Christs appointment his Death is shewed forth and the worthy receivers are not after a corporal and carnal manner but by Faith made partakers of his Body and Blood with all his benefits unto their spiritual nourishment and growth in Grace Explic. Q. What is the other Sacrament of the New Testament called A. The Lords Suâ—pâ—â— Q. Why so A. Because it was instituted at that time after the Paschal Supper was endâ—d Q. Are we therefore bound to celebrate it alwaies at the same time A. No because there is no command for it nor is there the same reason for it now as then this circumstance of time not obliging us to do it after Supper any more than the fashion of lying along binds us to the using of the same posture both of them being upon occasion of the Paschal Supper then Q. Why do you super add the circumstance and limitation of that present time A. Because the first Paschal Supper in Egypt was eaten standing but afterwards sitting and lying along leaning one on anothers breasts in sign of their rest and security otherwise than they had in Egypt Q. What are the sacramental Elements in the Lords Supper A. Bread and Wine Q What are the sacramental actions A. Breaking the Bread giving and receiving the Bread and Wine Q. What is signified by the Bread and Wine A. The Body and Blood of Christ. Q. What are the Ministers actions A. Breaking the Bread and giving the Bread and Wine not withholding the Cup from the people as the Papists sacrilegiously do Q. What is signified by the Ministers breaking the Bread A. Christs Body being broken for us Q. Why must the people partake of the Elements of both kinds A. Because all that were present at the first Sacrament given by the Lord Jesus himself did so Q How dâ—th that appear A. By the plain express words of Scripture Mat. 26. 26 27. Mark 14. 22. 23. Q. But all present at the first Sacrament were the twelve whom Christ sent forth as Apostles to Preach the Word and administer the Sacraments and therefore they and their Successors only had the priviledâ—e to drink of the Cup A. 1. By this argument the Bread may be taken away from the people too and so they would have no right to any part of this Sacrament And what is this but egregious sacriledge in robbing the people of their highest Church-priviledge 2. The practice and writings of the ancient Church in this matter which is the best way to explicate any such difficulty in Scripture is a clear Testimony that both the Bread and the Wine belong to all the people in the Name of the twelve Disciples at that time Q. What is signified by the giving of the Bread and Wine A. Gods giving all Christ to us Q. What is the peoples action A. Receiving eating and drinking the Bread and Wine Q. What is signified by the peoples receiving A. Their taking a whole Christ. Q. Why are the Bread and Wine given apart and not together A. To shew forth Christs Blood in the parting of his Blood from his Body Q. What is the rule of Administration and Participation A. All must be done according to Christs appointment Q. For what end is this Supper celeâ—rated A. Hereby Christs death is shewed â—orth Q. How many sorts of Receivers are there A. Two worthy and unworthy Q. What do the unworthy Receivers partake of A. They pertake of the outward Elements only Q. What do the worthy Receivers partake of A. They partake of Christs Body and Blood Q. After what manner do not these worthy Receivers partake of Christs Body and Blood A. Not after a corporal and carnal manner they partake not of the substance of his flâ—sh and blood Q. Why so A. For that is in Heaven Q. But do not you affirm with the Paâ—ists that in this Sacrament the Body and Blood together with the Divinity of Iesus Christ are truly really and substantially present and that the whole substance of the Bread is converted into his Body and the whole substance of the Wine into his Blood A. Nâ— should we do it our Senses our Reason and the Word of God would give us the Lye We perceive by our Senses that the Bread and Wine are the same they were before Consecration And we are not more certain that there is a God who created us and a Sun that gives us light than we are fully perswaded that the Divinity of Jesus Christ is every where and his humane nature at the right hand of God from whence he shall come to Judge the quick and the dead Q. And why are you afraid to affirm that the Elements of Bread and Wine art transubstantiate and changed into the substance of the Body and Blood of Christ when the Scripture is plain and express that Christ took the Bread and said This is my Body And after the same manner took the Cup which Protestants as well as Papists interpret figuratively for the Wine in the Cup and said This is my blood of the New Testament c. as you mâ—y read in the following Texts Mat. 26. 26
unchangeableness of Gods elective Love 2. From the All-sufficiency of his Power 3. From his Faithfulness in his Promises 4. From Christs unchangeable Priesthood and continual Intercession for them 5. From the nature of Grace and the means thereof Q. May not any Believers by falling into sin fall from Grace A. Some Believers may through the remainders of corruption in them and the violence of Satans temptations fall into sin foully and so fall from degrees and measures of Grace but they shall never fall totally and finally from Grace And when we see any to fall totally and finally from the profession they formerly made we may know they were never that in sincerity which they professed themselves to be Q. 37. What benefits do Believers receive from Christ at their Death A. The souls of Believers are at their Death made perfect in holiness and do immediately pass into Glory and their Bodies being still united to Christ do rest in their Graves till the Resurrection Explic. Q. How manifold are the benefits of Believers at their Death A. Twofold 1. In respect of their Souls 2. In respect of their Bodies Q. 1. What benefits have Believers in respect of their Souls at Death A. They are made perfect in holiness and do immediately pass into Glory Q. Are not Believers perfect in this life A. No Q. Do not the Souls of Believers sleep in the Grave with their Bodies or stay in Purgatory A. No. Ibid. Q What do Papists mean by Purgatory A. They mean a state of Temporary punishments after this life from which men may be released and translated into Heaven by the Prayers of the living and the Sacrifice of the Mass. Q. 2. What benefits have Believers in respect of their Bodies at Death A. 1. Their Bodies are still united to Christ. For though Death doth for a while separate their Souls from their Bodies yet it cannot separate Christ from either but as when Christ died his Hypostatical or Personal union still remained his Divine Nature being united both to his Soul in Heaven and to his Body in the Tomb on Earth So when Believers die their mystical union unto Christ still remaineth and Christ is united both to their Souls with him in Glory and to their Bodies which are his Members even when they are rotting in the Grave 2. They rest in their Graves as in their Beds till the Resurrection Q. What is the Resurrection here spoken of A. The last and general Resurrection of all the dead that have lived in all Ages from the beginning of the Creation which will be first of the righteous and then of the wicked at the last day Q How do you prove that there shall be such a general Resurrection A. It may be undeniably proved from the Scriptures and the power of God If God be of infinite power and therefore can raise the dead and infinitely true and in the Scriptures hath revealed that he will raise all the dead then there shall be a general Resurrection but God is infinite in power and in the Scriptures hath revealed that he will raise all the dead therefore there shall be a general Resurrection The ground of the Sadduces errour who denied the Resurrection was their ignorance of these two great foundations of this Doctrine namely the Scriptures and the power of God Q. Shall the Dead the raised with the same body which they had when aliu before A. Yes Q. How do you prove that the Dead shal be raised with the same Body A. Because otherwise it could in no proper sense be called a Resurrection but a new Creation 2. Because 't is fit the same Body that was an instrument of righteousness or sin should share in the like Reward or Punishment Q. Will not the Bodies when they are raised differ from what they are now A. They will not differ from what they are now in regard of their substance and essence But they will exceedingly differ in regard of their qualities Q. 38. What benefits do Believer receive from Christ at the Resurrection A. At the Resurrection Believers being raised up in Glory shall be openly acknowledged and acquitted in the day of Judgement and made perfectly blessed in full enjoying of God to all Eternity Explic. Q. How many waies may the benefits which Believers receive from Christ at the Resurrection be considered A. Three waies 1. In respect of the Resurrection it self 2. In respect of the day of Judgement after their Resurrection 3. In respect of Heaven after the day of Judgement Q. What is the benefit of Believers in respect of the Resurrection it self A. Believers shall be raised up in Glory Q. What benefits shall Believers have at the day of Iudgement A. They shall be acknowledged and acquitted Q. What mean you by their being acknowledged A. Their being owned by Jesus Christ as his Q. What mean you by their being acquitted and from what shall they be acquitted A. They shall be fully freed from all their sins and finally discharged from the sentence of Condemnation Q. After what manner shall they be acknowledged and acquitted A Openly viz. before the Father and the holy Angels and the general Assembly of the whole world Q. What is the benefit of Believers in Heaven after the day of Iudgement A. They shall then be made perfectly blessed Q. Wherein doth that blessedness consist A. In full enjoying or God to all Eternity Hitherto are the matters of Faith which make up the first Part of the Catechism or what man is to believe concerning God Now follows the second Part concerning the duty which God requires of Man Q. 39. What is the Duty which God requireth of Man A. The Duty which God requireth of Man is obedience to his revealed Will. Explic. Q. Doth God require any thing to be performed by man to himself A. God requireth Duty from Man Q. What is that Duty A. Obedience to obey Q. What is the Rule of Mans obedience in General A. Gods revealed Will. Q. What mean you by that A. The written Word or the holy Scriptures wherein the main purport of them is not to reveal to us the existence or non-existence of our actions but their moral conveniency nor yet future contingences whatsoever shall come to pass in the world but what may and ought to be done by intelligent creatures and what by preventive love and enforcing obligations God will expect from us Q What do you mean by those obligations that enforce the Duty which God requireth of man A. Those beneficial resultances or benefits which flow from Gods relation to Man as his Creator Redeemer and Sanctifier Q. 40. What did God at first reveal to man for the Rule of his Obedience A. The Rule which God at first revealed to man for his obedience was the Moral Law Explic. Q. Is not Gods secret Will the Rule of Mans obedience A. No. Q. How prove
most promptly and apertly manifest the native and genuine sense In which part without boasting it may be said that the Protestants exceed the Papists and carry away the Palm Because their Interpreters are wont 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as Occumenius saith in Eph. 5. to evert the propriety of speech and to turn all things into the uncertain conjectures of Allegories That what Epiphanius in Nicolaitis said of Origen we may say of them 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Allegorice explicâ—t quicquid potest He allegorized whatsoever he could Indeed it is said that he interpreted literally Matthew 19. 12. and in the same sense became an Eunuch himself And so the Papists in like manner interpret mostly in the Allegorie excepting that known place This is my Body with a far greater and more dangerous mistake than that of Origen's of that kind of Eunuchs But this Head is too general to be laid down without some necessary cautions Take these few 1. Augustini Regula tenenda est lib. 3. de doctrina Christiana Cap. 5 10 and 11. Cavendum est nè figuratam locutionem ad literam accipiamus vice versa nè locutio propria in figuratum sensum torqueatur Let 's take heed of taking figures literally and of wresting the proper sense into figures 2. It is to be supposed that some places of Scripture are true both in the Type and Antitype both in the literal and mystical sense And Verba sacrae Scripturae sunt praegnantia pariunt gemellos sensum geminum admittunt The words of Sâ—cred Writ are pregnant with matter very fruitful and sometimes bear twins and admit a double sense And 't is an unerring Rule in Divinity Scripture is alwaies to be expounded in the largest sense unless there be in or about the Text some particular restriction to limit it and thus those words Let another take his Office are true both of Doeg and Iudas 3. It is to be observed that in Prophecies some particulars agree to the Type and not to the Truth some to the Truth and not to the Type or to the Type in one sense to the Truth in another Take this Head because somewhat large in its particular branches 1. Some particulars agree to the Type and not to the Truth Psal. 40. 12. 2. Some to the Truth and not to the Type Psal. 16. 10. with Acts 2. 29. and 13. 35 36 37. 3. Or to the Type in one sense and to the Truth in another So in those Psalms wherein David is a Type of Christ As Psal. 2. and 16. and 22. and those in which Solomon as psal 45. and 72. Some things are spoken that must of necessity be understood of them in one Notion of Christ in another Of Pharaoh's Daughter espoused to Solomon and the Church to Christ the one typified by the other Psal. 45. the same may be said Gatak in Isa. 42. But how may we know when we are to interpret in the literal and when in the mystical sense These three Rules will in some measure direct us 1. The first is Augustines golden Rule Si praeceptiva locutio est aut flagitium aut facinus vetans c. If it be a precept forbidding any lewdness or commanding something profitable or beneficial there is no figure in the words Take eat this do in remembrance of me This do ye as oft as ye drink it in remembrance of me Indeed This is my Body c. cannot be taken in the literal sense for the reasons to be mentioned afterwards But take eat c. because a preceptive speech and commanding a necessary profitable duty and I am afraid a much neglected duty too we are not to suppose a figure in the words If there be sins of Omission as without controversie there are then those who have not communicated in this Ordinance or not frequently cannot but be found guilty of a dangerous sinful neglect Nothing but ignorance and Phanaticism in the most proper and literal sense can turn this divine precept into an Allegory Some are so fond as to think that this Precept imports no more than feeding upon Christ out of and in contempt of this Sacrament Such self-conceited Gnosticks cannot rationally expect the Churches welcom Eat O Friends drink yea drink abundantly O beloved And if ever such Spiritualists were really fed by Christ they were no doubt better fed than taught But if any man seem to be contentious we have not so learned Christ neither the Churches of God 2. When the Text taken properly affords a fit sense nor doth ought appear in the Context or other places collated that may cross it it is not safe running into metaphorical senses And thus we understand those Buyers and Sellers whom our Saviour cast out of the Tâ—mple Mat. 21. 12. in the Letter and not in the Allegory although some Novellists of our times giving way to their own luxuriant fancies have turned this and all the History of the Gospel into a mysterie or rather a groundless conceit of their own brains 3. Indeed when the words taken in the Letter are absurd and contradictory to sense and reason we must of necessity apply our selves to the figurate sense And surely he is bruitish and hath not the understanding of a man that will Interpret against all sense and reason Reason doth not contradict sense nor Faith reason but only correct them when they exercise themselves in great matters and in things too high for them and beyond their Sphear And 't is fit that sense should give place to reason and reason to Faith as it did in Abraham's case who Rom 4. 18. against Hope or rather beyond Hope as the words may be better rendred i. e. above all causes arguments and appearances of natural Hope such as reason and humane understanding could afford or reach to believed in Hope i. e. in Hope grounded upon the truth and power of God For although there be in Scripture 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 some things hard to be understood yet there is nothing in it repugnant to right reason Although in this life and imperfect state we see 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 through a glass darkly and do know 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but in part And Quoad nos there may not alwaies be ratio rei â—creditae yet there is alwaies ratio credendi Because infinite wisdom cannot be deceived and infinite goodness will not deceive And according to the forementioned Rules we may be satisfied against the Papists literal interpretation of that known place This is my Body 1. Because the letter is contrary and repugnant to our senses which the Scripture it self intimates to be of infallible certainty 2. It is absurd and contradictive of right reason 3. There appears much in the context to cross it nothing at all to countenance it 4. Because other places collated expresly thwart and contradict it 2. Rule Let the fuller Scripture make out the shorter We must compare the shorter place with the