Selected quad for the lemma: sense_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
sense_n	body_n	bread_n	figure_n	1,915	5	9.0793	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A61799	A consultation about religion, or, What religion is best to be chosen with an appendix upon this question, whether every one may be saved in his own religion / translated out of Latin in which it was written by an eminent professor of divinity.	Lechmere, Edmund, d. 1640?	1693 (1693)	Wing S5928A; ESTC R27505	93,395	238

de unitati Ecclesiae Ninthly They both deny Prayer for the Dead Fasts in Lent or at any other time c. This heretofore taught the Arrians Witness Epiphanius Heres 75. and St. Aul de Heres c. 33. Tenthly Both of them deny Veneration to Sacred Images of Christ and his Saints and to Holy Relicks and call it Idolatry The same of old did Vigilantius as St. Hierome witnesseth and so did the Iconomachists witness Zonoras Cedrinus Nicephorus Iconomachis Hereby is clearer than the Sun at Noon day that the Chief Tenets of Luther and Calvin's Religion are old Heresies long ago condemned by the Church and were always taken for Heresies in the Church The same might be easily proved of other Sects Hence it follows that these New Religions are nothing but the Filth and Scum of old Heresies formerly condemned Vid. Bel. de nov Eccl. c. 9. Coccium de sign Eccl. l. 8. c. 30. The Eleventh Reason from the want of a Rule of Faith THese New Religions have no certain Rule of Faith which you may follow Therefore they are not to be allowed For Points of Religion ought to be defined certain and immutable That they have no certain Rule of Faith whereby can be determined what is necessary to be believed and what not is manifest First Because they will not allow the Traditions of the Church nor the Authority of General Councils nor of the Ancient Fathers and Doctors of the Church who were before our Debates Luther rejects all Traditions in the First Chapter to the Galat. And Calvin l. 4. Instit And both of them teach That nothing is to be believed nor received which is not contained in Holy Seripture L. 4. c. 8. s 6 7 8. in Antidoto ad 4. Sess Coneil Triden General Councils which have had hitherto in the Church the highest Authority for they are as the Assemblies of Princes and Noblemen in Christ's Kingdom Luther so contemns that whatsoever they have defined he would have it all to be subject to the judgment of every private Person Nay he says 'T is a great madness that Councils should conclude what we are to believe In Art 115. c. Moreover what we ought to believe and what not is to be left to the judgment of every Spiritual Man The same Calvin insinuates saying ' The ' Church ought not to judge what Books are Canonical and what not but this belongs to the private Spirit L. 1. c. 7. s 1.24 Lastly as touching the Fathers Luther ' cares not for a thousand Augustines ' nor a thousand Cyprians L● cont Reg. Augl Calvin also in many places contemns them and averrs that they erred Therefore none of these is a Rule of Faith to them Whether the Scripture is a sufficient Rule of Faith but they say The Scripture it self is their Rule of Faith for this cannot err But 't is easie to shew that this Rule is not sufficient First Because by this Rule we cannot judge of Scripture it self that it is Scripture So that this Rule is uncertain to us which ought to be the most certain of all things For it cannot appear out of Scripture that this or that Book is truly the Scripture that it is not supposititious or counterfeited by some Impostor that this or that Sentence is not perverted c. Lastly that there is nothing added or diminished pertaining to the substance of Doctrine All this cannot appear out of Scripture but is only proved by some humane and weak Conjectures if you exclude the Tradition of the Church and so the whole Foundation of our Faith will depend upon a few uncertain Conjectures Then again the force of Scripture consists not in the sound of Words but in the Sence which is the Life and Soul of Scripture But there may be a thousand Controversies of the Sence which cannot be decided out of Scripture if you exclude Tradition and Exposition of the Fathers as 't is manifest by experience For touching the sence of these Words This is my Body and of many others there is a great dispute between the Lutherans and Calvinists If you say with Calvin that the Judge of Scriptures Whether the judgment of Scripture belongs to the private Spirit and the Sence thereof belongs to the inward Spirit this is nothing else but to constitute the dictamen of the Interior Spirit that is the private judgment of every one to be the chief Rule of Faith For every one may say that he has the Spirit and by his inspiration judges this part to be Holy Scripture and not that this to be the right sence of Scripture and not that So a Lutheran according to his Spirit judges the Epistle of St. James to be straw and the Revelations of St. John to be of doubtful Authority But a Calvinist by his Spirit judges both to be the Word of God So Luther judges by his Spirit to abolish the false Opinion That there are Four Gospels In the Prologue of the New Testament for the Gospel of St. John is the only true beautiful and principal Gospel and to be preferred far before the other three Likewise the Epistles of Baul far excel Peter's The thee Gospels of St Matthew Mark and Luke he would willingly have renounced because they are clearly for Merits necessity of Good Works and Observation of the Commandments and commend Chastity and Poverty But since he durst not totally reject them he is willing to disparage their Authority and to insinuate that they were not written by the Spirit of God In like manner Calvin by his Spirit judges this to be right sence of these Words This is my Body That is This Bread is the Figure of my Body But Luther according to his Spirit judges otherwise and says these Words of Christ This is my Body are thus to be understood This Bread is truly my Body I omit many other sayings whereby it is manifest that according to them the private Spirit of every one makes a Rule of Faith or which is the same thing the Scripture is expounded according to every Ones private judgment Secondly That is not to be held a proper Rule of Faith which is equally accommodated or fitted to all contrary Opinions For all the Sects of this time although they are at Daggers-point about many principal Tenets adopt the Scriptures to be their Rule and fit it for their purpose For the Lutherans say they rely upon Scripture so do the Calvinists and likewise the Anabaptists nor is it any wonder because every one receives the Scripture not according to the common understanding of the Church or exposition of the Fathers as Catholicks do but according to the sentiment of every one's private Spirit So you may easily adapt the Scripture for all Heresies Whence it is plain that a Rule thus framed can be of no moment being referred to every one's private judgment Thirdly If there should be a Judge that should so give sentence in any