verse to the 14. the covenant of Circumcision in the flesh the new covenant is expressed in the third verse where he saith As for me my covenant shall be with thee and thou shalt be a Father of many nations or of a multitude of nations and thy name shall be no more called Abram but Abraham for a Father of a multitude of nations have I made thee this is by the Apostle Paul in Rom. 4.17 18. held out to be the Covenant of life which he doth clearly hold distinct and different from the covenant of Circumcision in that place denying that Abraham or his spiritual seed had their justification in the covenant of Circumcision but bringing in this that Abraham should be a Father of many nations and so shall thy seed be as that in which Abraham and his spiritual seed whether of Jews or Gentiles were and should be justified And this promise or covenant is made with Abraham in Gen. 18.18 In thee shall all the Nations of the Earth be blessed So long as Christ was according to the flesh in Abrahams loyns the promise runs thus In thee meaning that through Christ which then was in him should all nations of the earth be blessed But assoon as Isaac was come out of Abrahams loins as in Gen. 22.18 then saith he In thy seed shall all the nations of the Earth be blessed whereby seed most strictly is to be understood Christ as the Apostle Paul intimates in Gal. 3.16 where he expounds this word seed to be not seeds as of many but seed as of one which is Christ So this blessedness in the seed Christ is here expounded to be Gods confirming his Covenant in Christ and note that this blessedness which David holds out to be the Covenant confirmed of God in Christ it was not entailed upon the flesh of Abraham and his fleshly seed but made in Abraham as a Father of all the spiritual seed in all nations and confirmed in the seed Christ to all nations Here the Jews after the flesh have no more interest than any other nation except it be by faith for faith only unites to this seed and gives an in-being in the same This blessedness is expounded by David in Psalm 32. last ver To ly in remission of sins and purgation of the heart from guile and expounded by the Apostle in Acts 3. last ver To be a turning every one from his iniquities for so there Peter expounds this blessedness confirmed in Abraham and his seed And though Christ did fulfill this covenant to the Elect of the Jews yet the rest were hardned and were never in this sense blest either in the point of Justification or purgation from sin because they were never in Christ the true seed by faith nor never were thereby the spiritual seed of Abraham walking in the steps of his faith as all his spiritual seed did Rom. 4.12 and Gal. 3.29 If you be in Christ then are you Abrahams seed and heirs according to the promise Thus I have given you from clear light of Scripture that there were two covenants a covenant of Grace and a covenant of Works the covenant of Grace belonging to Abraham and his spiritual seed in Christ and all along from Adam to all the spiritual seed of the Woman that were born of promise as the Apostle describes the spiritual seed in Rom. 9.8 for he saith such are accounted the seed that are so born of promise And so at this day all nations both Jews and Gentiles that are born again they are the seed and children that only have an Interest in the promise of salvation And so much for this first head Circumcision proved to be no covenant of eternal Life but a typical and carnal covenant Now I come in the next place to prove that the covenant of Circumcision is no covenant of eternal life but a typical covenant yea a covenant of works which is also called by the Lord a Covenant in the flesh Gen. 17.13 and therefore to be sure no covenant of eternal life But for the better clearing of the truth of this I shall first expound some words in the covenant How the word Eve lasting is taken in the Law and that is the word Everlasting Covenant that word seems to some to hold it forth a covenant of life because it is said to be everlasting wheras the word everlasting used in this Covenant is to be understood only for the Ever of the Law for the time of the Jewish State as alwaies the word is to be understood when applyed to the Jews in their generation As for example In the 16. of Leviticus it is said the Priest should make an attonement for the holy Sanctuary an attonement for the Tabernacle of the Congregation and for the Altar and he shall make an attonement for the Priests and for all the people of the Congregation and this shall be an everlasting Statute to you to make an attonement for the children of Israel for all their sins once a year which everlasting here must needs be understood but till Christ came and so in Numb 25.13 He shall have it and his seed after him even the Covenant of an Everlasting Priesthood because he was zealous for his God and made an attonement for the Children of Israel speaking here only of a Ceremonial Priesthood typing out Jesus Christ the substance that was to put an end to it And so this covenant of Circumcision is to be understood as everlasting as Canaan and the possession thereof which was until Christs comming who was the substance thereof this being a Maxim That wheresoever the word Everlasting or Ever hath this joined with it to you or to your seed in their generations that then it is to be understood only for the Ever of the Law and the time and period of that Ministration till Christ come and no longer Exod. 40.15 Thou shalt annoint them as thou didst annoint their Fathers that they may minister unto me in the Priests office for their annointing shall surely be an everlasting Priesthood throughout their generations And so you have it in Exod. 30.20 21. Moses saying When they go into the Tabernacle of the Congregation they shall wash with water that they dy not and when they come near the altar to minister to burn offerings made by fire unto the Lord so they shall wash their hands and their feet that they dy not and it shall be a Statute for ever to them even to him and to his seed throughout their generations The next word that I would speak to is I will be to thee a God and to thy seed after thee which to some seems to hold forth a covenant of grace in that he gives himself as a God in this covenant To which I answer That God either gives and makes himself over in a covenant of works which is upon a condition of works done in the creature or else he gives himself in an absolute covenant of
grace in Christ Jesus the Mediator without all condition of works to be fulfilled in the creature I shall make it clear That God no otherwise gives himself in the covenant of Circumcision but conditionally 1. Argument to prove Circumcision a covenant of Works which is the first argument that I shall use to prove the covenant of Circumcision to be a covenant of works not a covenant of eternal life because it is conditional what God promiseth to be or to give to Abraham and his fleshly seed in their generations it was upon a condition that Abraham and his seed should keep his covenant on their parties as clearly appears Gen. 17.7 8 to verse 14. where you find the Lord engageth himself to Abrahamn and his fleshly seed to be their God and to give them the whole Land of Canaan In that sense he would be their God to possess them of that good land and all the blessings of the same upon condition that they should keep his covenant on their part both he and his generation after him And the subject matter of the covenant that they should keep is That he should be circumcised and circumcise all born in his house and bought with money But though Circumcision only be here mentioned yet all the works of the Law at that time made known to Abraham are there included as the Apostle expounds it who best understood that Scripture Rom. 2.25 For Circumcision verily profiteth if thou keep the Law but if thou be a breaker of the Law thy circumcision shall be made uncircumcision and so you have it Gal. 5.1 2 3. Stand fast saith the Apostle in the Liberty wherewith Christ hath made you free and be not intangled again with the yoke of bondage which in Acts 15. it is said Neither they nor their Fathers were able to bear but verse 2. Behold I Paul say unto you That if you be circumcised Christ shall profit you nothing for I testify again to every man that is circumcised that he is a Debtor to do the whole Law And so much is clearly held forth in Gal. 6.12 13. Where saith the Apostle As many as desire to make a fair shew in the flesh they constrain you to be circumcised only least they should suffer persecution for the Cross of Christ for neither they themselves who are circumcised keep the Law but desire you to be circumcised that they may glory in your flesh Where you may observe That for men to be circumcised themselves and not to keep the Law or otherwise to press it upon others the Apostle holds it to be absurd if withall they did not keep the Law that were thus circumcised And in the Text before quoted it is clear That Circumcision in the nature of it binds them over to keep the Law And to this purpose you find in Acts 15. There were certain Teachers that taught the Brethren That except they were circumcised they could not be saved Upon which the Apostles come together and in the 10. verse Peter saith Why tempt you God to lay a yoke upon the Disciples necks which neither our Fathers nor we are able to bear And what was this yoke but that they were to be circumcised and to keep the Law So that Circumcision was that which did comprehend under it the covenant of works or the yoke of bondage that Paul in Gal. 5.1 2 3. bids Christians stand fast in their liberty or freedom from that covenant or yoke of bondage which Jesus Christ had freed them from So that you may see that all the observation of the Law which we are set at liberty from by Christ Jesus his death was included in the Law of Circumcision So that in effect here you have the covenant Abraham as if God should say I will be a God to thee and to thy seed after thee in their generations to protect defend and deliver thee to bless thee and thy seed with the blessing of Canaan to bless thee and the fruit of thy womb in the Basket and in their store in all their outward blessings upon condition that thou and they will be circumcised and keep the Law Thus God makes a covenant upon condition So that if they fail on their part then he is left at liberty to fail on his part as that notable expression in Jer. 11.2 3 4 5. Hear the word of this Covenant and speak unto the men of Judah to the Inhabitants of Jerusalem and say thou unto them Thus saith the Lord God of Israel Cursed be the man that obeyeth not the words of this Covenant which I commanded unto your Fathers when I brought them from the Land of Egypt from the Iron Fornace saying Obey my voice and do according to all these things which I command you so shall ye be my people and I will be your God that I might confirm the Oath that I have sworn unto your Fathers to give them a Land which floweth with Milk and Honey as appeareth this day Whence you may clearly observe That God gives himself to be their God and the blessing of Canaan upon condition that they would keep the Law So shall ye be my people and I will be your God Now you must mind that Abraham had a new covenant of life made with him when he was 75. years old Gen. 12.4 which was 24. years before this time that he had the covenant of Circumcision and his happiness with all his spiritual seed was and is in that absolute covenant confirmed of God in Christ which stands in force still to believers in all Nations But this covenant of Circumcision was conditional and not absolute therefore no covenant of life but a covenant of works 2. Argument to prove Circumcision a Covenant of works The second ground why the covenant of Circumcision must needs be a covenant of Works a Typical covenant is because it was a National covenant a covenant in the flesh as in Gen. 17.13 He that is born in thy house and he that is bought with thy money must needs be circumcised so my covenant shall be in your flesh for an everlasting Covenant To be sure such is not the covenant of grace to eternal life for that was confirmed of God in Christ as you hear to all Nations In thee shall all the Nations of the Earth be blessed Gen. 12.3 and in thy seed shall all the Nations of the Earth be blessed Gen. 22.18 as I have formerly spoken to But the Lord saith of this Covenant of Circumcision that it shall be in their flesh for an everlasting covenant It is manifest by the Apostle Paul that this is therefore a covenant of Works Rom. 4.1 2 saith he What shall we say then that Abraham our Father as appertaining to the flesh hath found for if Abraham was justified by works he hath whereof to glory but not before God These words are inserted by the Apostle Paul for the prevention of an objection that might justly be in the mind
infatuated and had no ears to hear his plain word They of this opinion do defend the contrary to what purpose should any man seek the conversion of any of Believers children whether formerly of the nation of the Jews or now the nations of the believing Gentiles seeing they are born heirs of a covenant of eternal life and so are in as good a state without conversion and believing and being born again as any other soul by believing and by new birth can be brought into This doctrine tends to justify the Rebellious Jews against John Baptist and against Christ the Sadduces and Pharisees came to Johns Baptism Matthew 3. Saith John O ye Generation of Vipers who hath forwarned you to fly from the wrath to come bring for 〈◊〉 fruits meet for repentance and think not to say within your selves we have Abraham to our Father John you see would have this people to be converted to intitle them to this covenant of Grace and so to baptism which is an Ordinance of the same covenant and not so much as think so erroneously as if being children to Abraham according to the flesh should intitle them to the same therefore saith he think not within your selves we have Abraham to our Father and we are his children according to the flesh and therefore we need not a work of conversion or true Repentance to intitle us to the privileges of the covenant such as was baptism And also in John 8.31 and forwards saith Christ unto some Jews unto whom he spake If you abide in my words then are you my Disciples indeed and you shall know the truth and the truth shall make you free and then you shall be free indeed They answered him We be Abrahams children and never were in bondage to any How sayest thou then We shall be made free Where you may observe these wicked obstinate Jews were of the same opinion that they were in a state of happiness good enough by generation by being Abrahams seed according to the flesh Jesus answereth Who so committeth sin is the servant of sin and the Servant abideth not in the house for ever We find Christ afterwards tells these Sons of Abraham that they were so far from being the adopted sons of God in a covenant of life that they were of their Father the Devil and these same persons Christ speaks to in verse the 24. telling them Except they believed Christ was he they should dy in their sins Christ was far from this opinion as to think that covenant of Circumcision to be a covenant of life but he doth throughly reprehend them for this groundless confidence which error was the main obstacle that hindered the Jews from faith and repentance because they thought it intituled them to happiness enough to be of the stock of Abraham and to be born heirs of the covenant of Circumcision This very rotten opinion was to them one of the Devils sleights to lull them asleep in a carnal and unconverted condition they thought that needed not which thought of theirs had been true enough provided all the children of Abraham had by generation interest in the covenant of life which other men could have no interest in without regeneration But Christ you see presseth a necessity of conversion to these children of Abraham that at the present were as fully interessed in the covenant of Circumcision as Abraham himself even to Nicodemus which was a Ruler of the Jews Christ presseth a necessity thereof to him and also labours by a parable in Luke 16. to convince those sottish Jews that one might be the seed of Abraham according to the flesh and yet be irrecoverably damned and therefore he brings in the rich man in Hell speaking thus Father Abraham I pray thee send Lazarus to dip the tip of his finger in water to cool my tongue And Abraham is brought in owning him to be his Son speaking thus My Son remember that thou in thy life time receivedst thy good things Where you may observe That the man in Hell irrecoverably damned owns Abraham to be his Father and Abraham also doth acknowledge him to be his Son My Son saith Abraham where you clearly see man may be a Son of Abraham and yet damned thou hadst thy good things in this life but Lazarus his evil things Ezekiel 18.9 10. where a just man is presupposed to beget a son that is a Robber and a Shedder of blood and that goes out in all manner of wickedness and that in Israel Wherein observe Abraham owns no other privilege belonged to the rich man by virtue of being the Son of Abraham but what was in this life or in this world Hell was his best portion in the world to come which if he had been born heir to the covenant of life how then could Abrahams affirmation have been true Beloved Let all ingenuous Spirits that are not willing to walk blind-fold consider how contrary to the whole tenor of the Gospel this opinion is and how destructive to this fundamental principle of the Gospel the necessity of Christ of Regeneration and destroys all sense of the necessity of conversion and helps to harden men to destruction as it did the blind Jews who as it appears were fully blinded in the receipt of that opinion that being Abrahams seed according to the flesh interessed them in happiness and eternal life Fourthly This opinion destroys the doctrine of the new covenant and the nature of it and the manner of Gods making of it with the soul for to make a new covenant with the soul is to write the Law of God in a mans heart and in his mind and to infuse saving knowledge and faith by which God unites the soul to himself and so pardons all his sins and without any condition considered in the creature binds over himself to be their God freely in Christ and binds over himself to own them to be his people And only thus and no otherwise is God said to make his new covenant with a poor soul Whereas this dream would seem to bear you in hand that a whole nation may be in a new covenant and have it made with them and yet have none of all this work wrought in their hearts Fifthly This opinion destroys the doctrine of Justification by faith in Christ only seeing that it doth hold out another way than by faith to come to Justification which is by carnal birth of beleeving parents for if a soul be admitted into a Covenant of life I hope you are not ignorant that Justification is a great privilege in the new covenant and really the portion of all that are in that covenant Sixthly This opinion destroys the Doctrine and foundation of all Gospel Churches where it is held which will appear by two things First It destroys the matter of the Church you know that this is a fundamental truth that the matter of the Church ought now under the Gospel to be Saints by calling 1 Cor. 1.2 Spiritual
unclean but now are they holy As if Paul should say the reason why I would have the believing husband to abide with the unbelieving wife is this because the unbeliever now since the partition-wall is down between Jew and Gentile may justifiably be a wife to a believing Husband there being now no Law in the New Testament against such marriages especially considering their marriage was transacted when they were both Idolatrous Heathen Now it being taken for granted their marriage was lawful in these words The unbelieving wife is sanctified to the believing Husband and that it be understood that the unbelieving husband is by the Law of Marriage sanctified to or set apart or separated to or made holy to the believing wife the Law of marriage having separated him from all other women in the world to be to her and her only else were your children unclean Mark saith the Apostle Else were your children unclean but now are they holy that is if the Law of God did not set the unbeliever apart to the believer and so justify their fellowship in the marriage bed then would the children begotten in that fellowship be unclean and base born but now they are holy that is now they are begotten in holy wedlock according to the holy law of marriage not as those children were in Ezraes time which were unclean So that from the unbelievers lawful and sanctified abode with the believer doth the Apostle conclude the children to bâ— clean or holy And thus all children of Heathen are in the same sense holy that are begotten in holy wedlock for as the fellowship of man and woman in the bed being not according to the Law is called fornication uncleanness and unholiness so the fellowship of any two persons even of Heathen being according to that Law of marriage it is then clean or holy and so the children begotten in that fellowship are said to be clean or holy begotten But there was none doubted of the holiness of the Heathen they never having any law to prohibit their marriage together but now the Jews having an express Law against marying with any other nation it was legally unclean or unholy to match with any such or to bed with any such that were not Jews or Proselytes Now that Law you must mind was part of the partition-wall between Jew and Gentile which is abolished since Christs full exhibition so then take the sense of the text thus That first the Apostle bids the Believers continue with the unbelievers or Idolaters Secondly adding this reason because their fellowship is holy Thirdly From an absurdity which would else follow and that is Else were your children unclean but now are they holy An answer to that text Rom. 11.16 17. In the next place let us speak to that in the 11. of the Romans 16 17. made use of by some to prove a covenant of eternal life in the flesh the words are these For if the first fruits are holy then the Lump is also holy and if the Root be holy so are the Branches and if some of the Branches are broken off and thou being a wild Olive-tree art grafted in among them and with them partakest of the Root and fatness of the Olive c. The usual exposition is That this root is Abraham and these first-fruits are Abraham Isaac and Jacob and these Branches are to be understood the body of Israel that came of their Loins as the root and the branches And so the Jews through unbelief with their generation were broken off and so also the Gentiles with their Generation and seed are brought in This last Clause which mainly serves for their purpose they bring in by head and shoulders that the Gentile and his seed is brought in What is there in that text which will countenance that clause if it be truly examined But let us consider this Text and see what it will afford to prove a covenant of eternal life to life to run in the flesh of believing Gentiles for that is it the Text must prove without the which in vain it is alleged And for the better examining of the same we will take for granted that by root is meant Abraham and by First-fruits is meant Abraham Isaac and Jacob which are spoken of If so then you must of necessity distinguish Abraham as the Apostle doth as begetting and working Abraham and as believing and faithful Abraham and so thus you must understand Abraham in a two-fold Covenant as hath been before cleared Wherein he was in a double sense holy as he was in that absolute covenant of grace so considered he was spiritually holy and considered as in the covenant of works that conditional covenant made with him he was legally holy Now all the Nation of the Jews being separated by God from all other Nations in and by the same Covenant are in this sense holy as Abraham was and as he was holy in a Covenant of life with a spiritual holiness so only those of the spiritual and believing seed as his branches in that sense can be said to be holy And the like may be said of these Patriarchs who as the first fruits consider them in the spiritual covenant so they as the first fruits may be said to be spiritually holy So by the Lump you must understand that seed in that covenant to be only spiritually holy as the first fruits were But if you consider them in the covenant of works the external National covenant as the first fruit in that covenant were legally holy so were the whole lump that is the whole Nation of the Jews thus holy till that covenant was abolished and put an end to and then this covenant intailed on the flesh of Abraham being put an end to or abolished it must needs be that the branches must be broken off viz. such as only by nature or birth had an Interest to that covenant or joining only to the family And the distinctions of the Covenants and seeds being here observed it will inlighten the soul to understand this place We find this distinction carryed on in the beginning of the chapter viz. two covenants and two seeds and both in the Church of Israel such as some would call the covenanting seed There were two seeds amongst the external covenanting seed there was the covenant of works and the covenant of grace as for example The Apostle speaks of the whole body of Israel then of a select number out of Israel which God foreknew and therefore brings in the case of Elias 1 Kings 19. where God had in Israel 7000. selected from the rest of the same body of Israel in the outward covenant with him And also in the Apostles time he saith That there were a select number according to the election of grace which God had chose out of Israel Then saith he If by grace then not by works if by works then not by grace Where you hear the Apostle clearly distinguisheth two seeds in Israel
Teachers perswaded the Gallatians to be a Covenant of life and that they could not be saved without it which covenant the Apostle Paul called the flesh in Gal. 3.3 meaning that Covenant which God had established in their flesh for an everlasting Covenant as he so calls it Gen. 17.13 This shall be my Covenant in your flesh saith the Lord for an everlasting Covenant Therefore saith Paul in Rom. 4.1 What shall we say that Abraham our Father as appertaining to the flesh hath found if Abraham were justified by works Mark his Exposition of that Covenant appertaining to the flesh to be a Covenant of works which in â—â—e 10. verse he clears to be Circumcision in opposition to that Gospel promise which Abraham had before he was circumcised and so he doth all along in that Chapter Herein the 3. of Gal. he doth set the Covenant of grace and that of works in opposition the one he calls the Spirit the other flesh which he most evidently explains in Chap. 5.1 2 3. where saith he Stand fast in that liberty which Christ hath made you free and be not intangled again with the yoake of bondage Here observe again that he calls it as Peter doth Acts 15.10 a yoke of bondage which is evident that they were set at freedom and liberty from as that which was abolished and they freed from as a yoak which neither they nor their Fathers were able to hear as appears in Gal. 5.1 2 3. Behold I Paul say to you if ye be circumcised Christ shall profit you nothing Nay in v. 3. For I testify to every one that is circumcised that he is a Debtor to do the whole Law and in ver 4. He sets it in opposition to the covenant of grace and this is explained more in Gallatians chap. 6.12 13. verses Now all this considered you may clearly see the Covenant of Circumcision made to Abraham and his seed in their Generation that he would give them Canaan with the blessings thereof and in that sense be their God to protect preserve and externally to privilege them with the means of grace and tenders of the Gospel and the external blessings of Canaan upon condition they would be circumcised and keep the Law All these things are typical this deliverance out of Egypt typing out the deliverance out of Hell That temporal Israel after the flesh that were redeemed out of Egypt typed out the spiritual Israel that were redeemed out of the spiritual bondage and as before hath been said Moses then a temporal Redeemer Mediator or Saviour typed out Christ the spiritual Mediator and Saviour therefore in the 1 Cor. 10.6 The Apostle tells us these were our figures or types So this being premised we have the sense of the Text here plain that as the spiritual disciple or Israelite when he believes and confesseth his faith thereby shewing his interest in Jesus Christ is baptized into Christ Jesus the Mediator of that Covenant which he is in by faith So the temporal Israel by birth or being bought with money or cohabitation in that family of Israel comming to have a right to the Covenant of Circumcision whereof Moses was the Mediator they were likewise baptized unto Moses in the Cloud and in the Sea that being as real a confirmation to them of the temporal deliverance from Egypt into Canaan by the hand of Moses as our baptism is a confirmation to the spiritual Israel of their spiritual deliverance by Jesus their Mediator from death and condemnation to eternal life And whereas the Apostle calls that meat spiritual meat and that drink spiritual drink he here speaks figuratively as before affirmed Not that the Manna eaten by the whole Nation of Israel was in it self spiritual but it was a figure of the spiritual bread therefore Christ saith to the Jews in John 6.32 33. Verily verily I say unto you Moses gave you not that bread from heaven but my Father giveth you the true bread from heaven Observe that word Giveth not did give but giveth for the bread of God is that which cometh down from heaven and giveth life to the world And therefore saith he My Father giveth you the true bread from heaven that is the substance of that shadow and so that rock was Christ meaning a figure or type of Christ What is all this Beloved to the proving of a Covenant of life running in the flesh either then or now to the Gentiles under the Gospel seeing it is clear that all these Ordinances as the Apostle calls them Heb. 9. Carnal Ordinances did type out or figure out spiritual and substantial things For their sacrifices for sin typed out Christ but they were not Christ and their typical remissions which they had by their sacrifice That remission I say which the whole body of Israel had by offering up their sin-offering can be understood to be no other but typical A man might be under that typical Remission and yet ne under the wrath of God and be damned and a poor Gentile at the utmost part of the Earth believing as Rahab did in Canaan as truly justified though he had none of this typical remission and none of these before mentioned figures so that we conclude the whole Nation of the Jews had not a covenant of eternal life in the flesh made unto them though they had a temporal typical covenant as I have all along called it that is consisting of such Laws and privileges that had not Christ in them but did point at him to come therefore they are called in Heb. 9. Patterns of Heavenly things but not the very things themselves They are called by the Apostle Beggarly Elements or Rudiments of the World or a School-master to lead to Christ The Jews literal obedience to the Law typing out the obedience to faith Deut. 30.12 13 14. with Rom. 10. from v. 6. to the 10. ver Now beloved the literal obedience in it self performed by the carnal Jew though it figured out the substantial obedience viz. faith in Christ and though the Rest in Canaan typed out the spiritual Rest in Christ yet I hope no man will be so absurd but he will confess that this litteral obedience it was not the spiritual obedience and that this rest in Canaan it was but a shadow of that rest in Christ not the very rest it self But some may say so of baptism and the Supper that these are the signs of inward and spiritual things but it doth not follow that these are the spiritual things Beloved Observe warily for here lies the ground of this great mistake the want of distinguishing between these figures that type out Christ to come and these Sacramental signs that do confirm and ratifie his being already come Those typical signs and figures then which typed out Christ to come did properly belong to that typicall seed the body of Israel that typed out the spiritual seed to come But now these signs I say these Sacramentall signs that are instituted
was a National Election and a National rejection and he saith The Elder shall serve the younger this saying the Elder shall serve the younger is interpreted by Mal. 1. to be a loving of Jacob and a hating of Esau laying his Mountain wast that is his Church-power or privilege that he seemingly had expected to have been heir of and the loving of Jacob is meant the external electing Love into the covenant of Circumcision according to that in Deut. 7.7 Speaking thereof the whole Nation The Lord did not set his love upon you not chuse you because you were more in number than any people for you were the fewest of all people but because the Lord loved you This Election and this love is equal alike to the whole nation of Israel therefore so considered you must mind this is as I said before only an external election of Jacob and these in his lines into the National covenant of Circumcision as before in Genesis 18. he saith In Isaac shall thy seed be called the meaning as the 17. Chapter expounds is this that the seed in their Generations that God would continue the Covenant of Circumcision upon was that seed which was to come out of Isaac and not that which came out of Ishmael and the six Sons of Keturah none of them or their seed were to be of that great Nation which God promised to make of Abraham for the Lord saith to Abraham Gen. 18.18 I will make a mighty nation of thee Now by this Nation you must understand is meant the National Church taken into the Covenant of Circumcision whereas in the spiritual covenant all the Nations were to be blest in him and he is to be the Father of multitudes of Nations Gen. 12.3 17.4 5. but this Covenant of Circumcision must not relate to any but to those that came out of Isaac with his family and then those that came out of the Loins of Jacob with his Family though this be a true literal interpretation of these Texts and really the proper mind of God yet there is a mystical and spiritual sense pointed and driven at which Paul that infallible Apostle did clearly give out from those Texts in Romans 9. That as Isaac typed out Christ so this temporal seed elected in Isaac typed out this spiritual election in Christ the temporal seed in a temporal covenant elected in Jacob points out the choice of Christ and all his seed into a spiritual covenant So a spiritual election in these Texts was typed and figured out as the Apostle doth clearly maintain The Apostles not being the Ministers of the Letter but the Spirit 2 Cor. 3. but most true it is That Jacob and the whole Nation in him were elected into an outward Covenant and Esau and his seed were not but were refused and past by And consider now in the womb was Jacob and his posterity any more the seed of a Believer than Esau and his seed were Sure it is he was not Therefore away with that error taken for granted that the covenant of Circumcision was made to believers and their seed This covenant of Circumcision you may clearly see was not made to Abraham nor to his seed considered as a Believers but upon this ground or reason that the Messiah was to come of Abraham not of Lot the Messiah was to come out of Isaac and not of Ishmael nor of the six Sons of Keturah and Christ was to come out of Jacob and his posterity and not out of Esau Here you may nakedly see how greatly they mistake that think the covenant was made to Abraham and his seed considered as believers and believers seed If a National covenant was made with Abraham and his seed according to the flesh out of which flesh the Messiah was to come and that upon this reason then you cannot conclude that the covenant can belong to any Gentile and his seed but upon the same ground Therefore if you would tell where to find a Gentile now among many others that were to have Christ to come out of his loins according to the flesh then you would have the same ground to say that in like manner a Church covenant should run upon him and his seed untill Christ were come out of that flesh or line But when Christ was come and fully exhibited in the flesh then the ground upon which this Covenant was given being ceased To defend a Covenant of life entailed on the flesh is vertually to deny that Christ is come in the flesh the covenant also ceaseth Therefore for any man to go about to defend a covenant in the flesh it is a doctrine virtually denying that Christ is come and fully manifested in the flesh Therefore you may from all that hath been spoken draw this Conclusion That there was never a Covenant of eternal life made with any but with such as did and do believe all along till Christ not since Therefore see that objection answered that the spiritual privileges are not less under the Gospel than under the Law though we deny all the carnal Generation to have any right to the covenant of Grace or privileges thereof both then as well as now the offers and tenders of the Gospel we must confess were to that Nation and in that sense they were called the children of the Prophets and of the covenant Acts 3. and latter end and in that respect now the privileges are larger because all nations are in the same sense the children of the Prophets and of the covenant now since Christ came the Prophet and Minister of God having Commission now to publish the Gospel or new Covenant to all Nations None have right to the Covenant of Grace but such as are united to Christ by faith But further to prove that none have right to a covenant of Grace or life but such as had and have union with Christ by faith is most plain First Because as you have heard the new Covenant was confirmed of God in Christ only Gal. 3.17 And all the promises are in Christ Yea and Amen Therefore this Covenant cannot belong to any soul out of Christ because they are Yea and Amen in him 1 Cor. 11.25 This Cup is the New Testament in my blood saith Christ If the New Testament be in Christs blood then what hath any carnal or unbelieving wretch to do with this Testament that have not faith in his blood And further we do find in Matth. 3.17 the Lord saith This is my beloved Son in whom I am well pleased mark the words in whom then to be sure out of him he is not well pleased that is in respect to this especial well pleasedness or electing love in the covenant of life according to that in Ephesians 1.6 He hath made us accepted in the Beloved out of the beloved there can be no acceptation Therfore it is said God accepted Abel and his offering Gen. 4.4 The Author to the Hebrewe ch 11.4 tells you Abel by
and Hagar the covenant of Works both these women continued in Abrahams house together for a time the first child he begat by the strength of nature without faith in a promise of a bond-woman The other he begat by faith in a promise without strength of nature of a free-woman and the free-woman continued in Abrahams house with the bond-woman and her son without any Scruple till Isaac was born and also weaned And when the son of the bond-woman persecuted Isaac the free-woman testifyes against the bond-woman and her son and will have them no longer to abide in the house with her son Abraham likewise had first the free-woman and the last the bond-woman The free-woman was sometime barren in Abrahams house but the bond-woman was fruitfull Now the mystery that the Apostle hints to be held forth in this History is clear from which he speaks in this 4. of the Gallatians which must be this That God in like manner first made a covenant of Grace even as Abraham first had a free-woman which covenant in a great measure was barren bringing forth no seed or else totally barren as Sarah was in respect of that substantial seed Christ Jesus which Isaac typed forth as soon as God had made this covenant he in the same house or Church hath also a Hagar that is a Covenant of works in which God hath abundance of seed becoming his by strength of nature without faith in a promise and the Covenant of grace as Sarah in a sense becomes barren All which time the covenant of grace and covenant of works both agree very well to be in Gods house together but at the last as the free-woman brought forth Isaac so the covenant of Grace brings forth Christ Jesus without strength of nature by faith in a promise as in Matth. 1.21 Luke 1.35 and when this substantial seed is come then the covenant of grace and works remain in Gods Church together but afterwards when Christ the true Isaac was as it were weaned that is come to maturity so as to appear that he was now in the office of the Ministery the Scribes and Pharisees with the high Priests all the sons of Hagar the old covenant persecuted Christ and those in him Whereupon the free-woman or rather the free Covenant of grace doth testify that a covenant of Works with her seed shall no longger remain with her in the Church of God But now the free covenant and her sons that is the Covenant of grace only and her children born by faith in a promise onely must for a time forward remain in the house of God So that now rejoice thou barren that barest not the Covenant of grace becomes fruitfull having seed in all nations therefore the Apostle saith the Jerusalem which is above which is free is the Mother of us all and those us or we that were members of the primitive Church were born from above by faith in a promise Therefore it is plain from hence that there were no carnal babes in that Church But when Christ the true seed of the Covenant was persecuted by the Jews which were the children of the covenant of Works the Gospel doth plentifully testifie the abolishing the Covenant of Works and the casting forth of those bond-children out of Gods Church Acts 13.45 46. But when the Jews saw the multitude they were filled with envy and spake against those things which were spoken by Paul contradicting and blaspheming Then Paul and Barnabas waxed bold and said It was necessary that the word of God should first have been spoken to you but seeing ye put it far from you and judge your selves unworthy of everlasting life lo we turn to the Gentiles for so hath the Lord commanded us And as appears in the 11. chap. of the Romans and as that 4. chap. of Gall. in express words saith in the 25. verse this Hagar is meant Mount Sinai in Arabia and answereth to Jerusalem that now is and is in bondage with her children this being so clear that the bond-woman and her son that is to say the covenant af works and all those related to Abraham only in a covenant of works are cast out of the house of God How opposite then is their opinion to the truth that still would have a fleshly generation to be in the house of God with their children But seeing the natural branches that truly were descended of the Line of faithfull Abraham might not have that honor How much less the unbelieving seed of the Gentiles that are wild by nature Thus you see in brief this objection answered and that there is no ground for childrens baptism but an imagination through thick darkness upon the minds of people they setting up this idol in their hearts God hath answered them accordingly as the Prophet speaks in Ezekiel 14.2 3 4 5. verses And the word of the Lord came unto me saying Son of man these men have set up their idols in their heart and put their stumbling block of their iniquity before their face should I be inquired of at all by them therefore speak unto them thus saith the Lord Every man of the house of Israel that setteth up his Idols in his heart and putteth the stumbling block of his iniquity before his face and commeth to the Prophet I the Lord will answer him that commeth according to the Multitude of his Idols that I may take the house of Israel in their own heart because they are all estranged from me through their Idols Where you see that when souls set up an idol in their heart God doth answer them according to their idol as he hath in this case suffering blind blindnes and uncertainty of judgment to befall them For such as defend childrens baptism and the ablest I have met with do grant they have no command or example in the New Testament for their practice but ground the same on a consequence which you have heard evidently proved is drawn from an error For to affirm or maintain that the covenant of eternal life is made with believers carnal seed is a dangerous error and therefore the consequence must needs be as false and rotten as that error from whence it is drawn then judge you what a pitiful consequence that must be Take the whole result thus Childrens baptism hath no ground from the word of God either Command or Example for it but a consequence as before so that it is meerly a tradition of men setting up in the place and room of the Commands of God to wit baptizing of Believers This groundless tradition which makes void the commandment of God even as the wicked Jews did in Mark 7.7 Howbeit in vain saith the Lord they worship me teaching for doctrines the commandments of men and in verse 9. He said unto them Full well you reject or frustrate the commandments of God that you may keep your own Traditions and in verse 13. Make the word of God of none effect through your traditions which