him that is ordained a Bishop which is the Tenet of all catholick writers that assert Episcopacy to deriue it's institution from Christ and to be an ecclesiasticall order taken in the proper sense for the Council of Tent sess 23. c. 4. can 4. doth define the Sacrament of Order to imprint a character which definition being absolute without restriction or distinction between one order and an other it doth euidently follow that all orders doe imprint a character which is a spirituall signe deriued into the soul wherby a man is muested with power to exercise certain ecclesiasticall functions in order to the ministery of the Eucharist and it matters not that the priestly is more worthy and excellent then the Episcopall character as distinct from it for the impression of a new and distinct character is not grounded in the more or less perfection and excellency of a precedent character but in the distinction of powers and abilities in reference to exercising the ministery of the Euchariste neither Matters it that Fathers and Councils when they number the Sacraments of the new law do acknowledg seuen only comprehending holy order for one for in so numbring of them they consider holy Order in (l) According to the Ancient Fathers ordination of a Bishop and a Priest is said to be one and the same that is taken in the generall sense and holy order so taken is but one Sacrament onely but a Bishop taken in the proper sense euen according to S. Hierom. Dial. con Lucif hath in the Church the preeminence which Aaron had in law of Moses and to meer Priests he giues that Degree of preeminence onely into which the sons of Aaron were inuested Besides s. Epiphan l. de Sacerdot dignit c. 6. calleth Episcopacy a Deified Order and cap. 7. assert's difference between a Bishop and a meer Priest being God exact's not the same thing 's from a Priest as from a Bishop that has preeminence aboue him a genericall signification as it containeth all it's sundry species or kinds Wherfore in as much as according to the rules of Logick what can be rightly affirmed of a thing taken in the generall sense may be also affirmed of all the sundry species contained therin it doth plainly follow that since ecclesiasticall order taken in its genericall signification is a Sacrament and doth imprint a Character euery true species therof is a Sacrament and imprinteth a Character In like manner Fathers and Councils reckoning seuen Orders they do coÌ„prehend Episcopacy vnder Priesthood And for as much as Christ had but one spouse which is the Church a Bishop and a Priest that supplieth his room and representeth his Person in the ministery ought to be married to the Church only * S. Hieron in sua Apolog con Jouin Apostoli inquit vel virgines vel post nuptias contineÌ„tes fuerunt id est absquo vxorum consortio wherfore the Apostles after they were ordained Bishops and Priests led their life 's in all godliness purity and chastity and this apostolicall practice Bishops and Priests down from them to these times haue religiously obserued S. Hierom L. in vigilantium exclaimeth against some Modern Hereticks of those times for taking such of the people only to be Priest's as had (m) According to the second Council of Carthage continency was enioyned to Bishops and Priests the ancient Fathers there assembled declaring with one accord that they ought to obserue it being the Apostles taught it and antiquity kept it Besides the first Council of Nice put forth an ordinance that Bishops Priest's and Deacons should entertaine no woman in their families except Mothers Grand-mothers sisters and Aunts making no mention of wifes From whence S. Basil Epis 17 infer's that to take wifes after the receiuing of holy Order was not permitted And indeed Clergy-men of those dayes had so great a reuerence to chastity that euen the Arian Bishop's ordain'd no man that was marryed as witnesseth S. Epiphan her 37. moreouer it was neuer permitted in the Church of Christ that a Bishop or Priest might marry as appear's by the Testimonies of ancient Fathers of the Greek Church though now this Church faln into schism differs from the Latins in opinion and practice as to such as had wifes before their ordination wiues contrary to the custome of both the Eastern and western Churches that allwaies promoted to the Maior-orders Virginia or such as were esteemed chast and pure from all carnall vncleaness and though in the primitiue times when there was great scarcity of single persons as proper and fit to be ordained Bishops Priest's Deacons and Sub-Deacons the Church-gouernours tooke of married men for the exercising those functions neuertheless these did not accompany with their wiues after their ordination but led their liues in all purity and chastity as did their wiues also according to a mutuall promise of continency and since the Priests of the old law to whom marriage was permitted as it were of necessity to multiply the people of God and who did sâ—adow only in their ministery what the Priests of the new law do really offer in their sacrifices viz. the true and reall body and blood of Christ in memory of his death and passion did abstain not only from the carnall embracement's of their wiues but also from the houses wherin they resided before they were to enter into the Temple for the performance of their spirituall functions respectruely it is most consonant as to reason that Priest's of the new law doe obserue continency together with purity and holyness Besides the vnmarried careth for the things of our lord how he may please him but he that is married careth for the things of the world how he may please his wife 1. Cor. 7. Wherfore such as leaue the world to be ordained Bishops Priest's Deacons and Sub Deacons ought to leade a single life without wifes and truly in regard therof there is less danger of dissipating ecclesiasticall goods and conuerting them to the making vp of inheritance for Clergy-mens children Furthermore Priests vnmarried are in a better condition to reproue the vices of lay-people then if they were married and for as much as they are single men they be less vnquiet contentious and troublesome to their flock not seeking to enrich children which they haue not Iouinianus and VigilaÌ„tius were the first sectaries that stood vp in defence of Priests marriages and Luther and Caluin raysed vp againe that heresy after that it had been dead and buried for many ages teaching that it is not only lawfull for Peiests to marry before but euen after their ordination These are followd by all the sectaries of the present times And knowing well that the opinion contradicteth all antiquity they labour to make it agree with the holy scriptures whence they cut out weak interpretations and form coniecturall deductions only abusing sundry text's for Example God says Gen. 1. bring forth fruit and multiply whence they very weakly
not been depriued of wisdom nor Sampson of his mighty strength if he had taken diligent ligent heed * Mat. 10. Iuda vna cuÌ„ alijs Apostolis dixit Iesus euntes praedicare dicentes quia appropinquauit Regnum calorum infirmos curate mortuos suscitate leproses mundate demones eijcite and what auaileth Iudas his election to the high dignity of an Apostle his familiarity with Christ his society with other Apostles and the power giuen him against vnclean spirits to cast them out to heal euery sicknes and to raise vp the dead Mat. 10. seeing his good begining ended in wicked treachery to the deliuering vp of his diuine lord vnto death many begin well that end ill many depart from Egypt and come to the wildernes which do not enter into the land of promise that is many are brought to the marueilous light of Christian faith euen vnto iustification of life that come not vnto glorification he that endureth to the end shall be saued Without (e) S. Bernard Epis 29. ad Ianuenses assureth that without perseuerance neither those which fight can gain the victory nor those which ouercome obtaine the prize perseuerance neither he that striueth to get the victory nor he that ouercometh obtaines the prize And although perseuerance be a diuine gift freely giuen * Aug. I de prad SS aliqua inquit danda praeparari à Deo non orantibus vt initium fidei alia vero non nisi orantibus vt donuÌ„ persenerantiae neuertheless the feruent (f) According to S. Austin I. de dono perseu c. 6. an humble prayer can merit the gift of perseuerance merito de congruo duntaxat and he means finall perseuerance And indeed t is but meet that a friend grant assurance of his friendship to his friend that humbly intercedes for it prayer of a just man conduceth some thing to the hauing of it Hereby is plainly euident that true fortitude does not consist in the arme of flesh or in the outward gallantry of euery man but in the spirit of a just Christian that ouercometh the lusts of the flesh vnto sanctifying and glorifying the soul in consequence of which the fortitude of Mutius Sceuola of Cocles of Attilius Regulus so much renowned and extoiled by the Roman writers was but a shadow of true fortitude in regard their braue enterprises and gallant sufferings tended meerly to get a name vnto perpetuating a memoriall of their own praise that therby the remembrance of their gallantry might be as hony sweet in all mouthes for the future No man how glorious soeuer his actions or passions appeare in the sight of the world can lay claim to true fortitude when they doe not tend to the glory of the soul Many heathen Captains which haue been renowned to the ends of the earth for valiantnes are not now crowned in heauen for fortitude for though with their courage they mastred fortresses of earth vnto winning of Cities yet they did not ouercome the works of the flesh vnto the obtaining of blessednes wherin is the consistency of true fortitude CHAR. XXVIIJ OF SIN THE CONTENTS God that made all things of nothing made not sin which is nothing The deuil is the sole author of sin wherby he maketh those his seruants which he ouercom's through a voluntary condescension thereto to whomsoeuer a man giueth himselfe to obey his seruant he is exceeding great miseries accompany the seruitude of sin to be deliuered from the bondage of sin is a worke of diuine grace whereby a finner turneth to God his maker whith a penitent heart confessing his wickednes against himselfe SIn taken in the formall sense (a) God made all things and vvithout him vvas made nothing 10. 10. where according to S. Austin by the particle nothing is meant sin which God made not and indeed sin taken in the formall sense hath nothing of a reall entity being a meer priâ—â—tion of that conformity to the law of God which ought to be in all in ward and outward human actions that is to say in all our outward deeds and inward thoughts Wherefore S. Austin l. 22. con Faustum Manichae defineth sin to be That vvich is done or said or coueted contrary to the eternall lavv so that outward deeds or sayings or inward thoughts are the acts only whereby sinnes are committed is nothing yet not that nothing of which God created all things that were very good but that nothing of which the deuil hath made all things which are very euill For example the deuil through sin ouercame man and thereby brought him into seruitude for of whomsoeuer one * 2. Pet. 2. à quouis superatus est huius seruus is ouercome euen vnto the same is he in bondage which is an euil thing because a slaue is tyed to the will of his master wherefore a sinner * S. Chris homo obligatus peccato per propriam voluntatem iaÌ„ non agit quod vult sed quod diabolus vult of necessity as it were walketh after the flesh in the lusts of vncleanes being it is the deuils will whose slaue he is that he doe so A stag that is once mastred by an other stag afterwardes resisteth him no more * Sic referuÌ„t naturales de ceruo victo but boweth down his head whensoeuer he passeth in presence of his conquerour in token of his subiection a maid that once suffereth her selfe to be deflowred will go whether it pleaseth the deflourer euen so he that is once ouercome of the deuil through voluntary condescention vnto sin afterwards is vnwilling to resist him some times it is in the power of man to make king whomsoeuer he pleases but once made he cannot vnking him at his pleasure for To whomsoeuer we giue our selues as seruants to obey his seruants we are to whom we obey whether it be of sin vnto death or of obedience vnto iustice Rom. 6. Wherfore as a seruant cannot cast of the yoke of seruitude when or as he pleaseth so neither can a sinner according to the form of morall speech (b) The Apostle in his Epistle to the Rom. cap. 7. saith Not the good things vvhich I vvould but the euill vvhich I vvould not that doe I novv if I doe that I vvould not it is no more I that do it but the sin that dvvelleth in me whereby is meant that the iustest man carryed by the violence of carnall concupiscence which he calleth sin taken in a larg sense may do or suffer many things in his outward parts or faculties without the consent of his will in consequence whereof a man put in that condition is so far from sinning sin taken in the proper sense for a voluutary act of the will that according to S. Austin he neuer need say to God forgiue us our sins for sin vnless it be voluntary contractes nothing of guilt that is ther 's no sin taken in the proper sense without a free consent of the
proper to things spirituall Christ meant the orall eating of his flesh and orall drinking of his blood saying The words that I speak vnto you that is those things my flesh and blood are * Trid. sess 13. ait Christum instituisse SacrameÌ„tum Eucharistiae taÌ„quam spiritualem animaruÌ„ cibum spirit and life and that is to say are spiritually cloathed after the imitation of spirituall substances exempted from the carnall proprieties which naturally adhere to flesh and blood in this mortall life but are no essentiall requisits there vnto whereby it is plain that the eating of Christs body and drinking of his blood in the Sacrament of the Eucharist may be said spirituall in reference to the spirituall being they haue therein Besides Christs body and blood be indeed spirituall supersubstantiall meate and drink wherby the substance of humane souls is supported and nourished spiritually As corporall meate doth repaire materiall breaches which naturall heate mak's in a materiall body so this spirituall meate doth repaire the spirituall ruines that the fire of concupiscence doth cause in a spirituall soul Also the eating of Christs body and drinking of his blood may bee termed spirituall through faith for as much as a Christian that eateth and drinketh worthily is vnited to Christ by faith which is aspirituall quality Again the eating of Christs body and the drinking of his blood may be styled spirituall because of Christs death and passion figured therein and this Sacrament imports * QuotiescuÌ„quo ait Apostolus manducabitis panem hunc calicem bibetis mortem Domini annunciahitis donec veniat a commemoration thereof so that a Christian receiuing worthily doth communicate with Christs passion suffered on the cross and this manner of spirituall locution is vsed sometimes by ancient Fathers who neuertheless expresly affirm Christ to bee truly (e) The second Council of Nice Act. 6. declares euidently that the Sacrament of the Eucharist ought not to be called the Image of Christs body because he did not say take eate the Image of my body also declares that in the Sacrament is the true body of Christ because he said This is my body really and substantially in the Sacrament of the Eucharist neither is the literall sense of words inconsistent with the spirituall signification of thinges which they express taken in the literall sense For example though Isaac and Ismael doe literally signify the two sons of Abraham as the history of Genesis plainly sheweth neuertheless the Apostle Gal. 4. by Ismael that was born of Agar a seruant spiritually and figuratiuely vnderstands the old Testament that was a law of bondage and likewise by Isaac that was born of Sara a free woman spiritually and figuratiuely vnderstandeth the new Testament which is a law of liberty and grace and indeed all Sacraments whatsoeuer besides * Aug. l. 2. con aduers legis c. 9. ait Christi locutionem nisâ— manducaueritis c. codem modo esse figuratam ac duo filij Abraha fuâ—â—unt duo Test amenta Jsaac Ismael secuÌ„dum literam vere de facto fuerunt filij Abraha figurabant tamen duo Testamenta Idem Aug. l. 3. de doct Christ c. 16. ait illam Christi locutionem nisi manducaueritis c. figuratam esse quatenus praecipit communicandum passioni Christi vtiâ—â—ter recondendum in memoria quod pro nobis caro Christi crucifixa sit Non negat tamen dictam locutionem in sensu literali etïam intelligi de reali oralâ— manducatione corporit Christi bibition◠〈◊〉 sanguinis sub spocicbus consecratis panis vins their literall doe admit a spirituall or figuratiue construction being defined visible figures or signes of spirituall invisible grace The Sacrament of Circumcision according to the literall meaning thereof did signify corporall circumcision as to the foreskin of the flesh called prepuce and according to it 's spirituall and figuratiue signification did import spirituall circumcision as to the foreskin of the heart which is of spirituall vices as also did shadow grace giuen in the new law In like manner the words vttered in baptism I baptise thee taken in the literall sense which is expressed immediatly by the said words doe signify reall washing of naturall water as to the body and taken in the spirituall sense they signify spirituall washing of grace * Aug. vnde tanta vis aquae vt corpus tangat cor vero abluat as to the soul Furthermore the words whereby Christ instituted the Sacrament of the Eucharist in full performance of the promise afore mentioned Io. 6. giue cleare euidence of Christs meaning in recognition of a reall eating of his body and reall drinking of his blood The words of institution according to the consenting Testimonies of all ancient and modern writers are these This is my body which is giuen for you Luc. 22. This is my body which shall be deliuered for you This Chalice is the new Testament in my blood 1. Cor. 11. This is the blood of the new Testament which shall be shed for you Mar. 14. This is my blood of thenew Testament that shall be shed for many vnto remission of sins Mat. 26. Which words of Christ being as plainly and clearly vttered as to the litterall sense as those of God the Father in the Transfiguration of Christ to wit This is my son Mat. 30. and consequently there beeing no more reason to wrest the former then the latter words to a figuratiue signification it is a manifest blindnes in the Caluinists and other ancienter sectaries to wrest the proper cleare words and to substitute in their room improper obscure tropes and figures without any ground of reason for what can be more vnreasonable then to think that Christ saying This is my body which shall bee deliuered for you 1. Cor. 11. This is my blood which shall bee shed for many vnto remission of sins Mat. 26. meant a figure (f) Both canon and ciuil lawers treating of Testaments legasies and contracts teach that we must not recede from the words of the Testament nor from the rigour thereof and that we ought to presume of the Testatours intent and meaning according to the signification of the words taken in their proper sense of his body only and a figure of his blood only since a figure was not deliuered in a Sacrifice but Christ's true reall substantiall body nor a figure was shed vnto remission of sins but Christs true reall and substantiall blood Besides a thing that is mysterious vnheard of afore and instituted for an article of faith as is the Sacrament of the Eucharist of necessity ought to bee propounded (g) According to S. Chrysostome Hom. 83. in Mat. because Christ said This is my body we must not doubt of but belieue it to be so And S. Austin Tom. 8. in psal 33. saith expresly that when Christ gaue the Sacrament of the Eucharist he did that which no other could do for Christ saith
successoribus corum in officio sacerdotali As God in the old law took of his people to be Priests and Leuits that is constituted superiour and inferiour Ministers for the administring of diuine things in the Temple so in the new law he hath ordained diuers degrees or states of Ministers one more eminent then an other for example Bishops Priests Deacons and other Clergy men to (c) The Apostle saith Rom. 4. Let a man think of us as of the Ministers of Christ and the Dispensers of the Misteries of God that is of the Sacraments From whence the Council of Trent infers that it is in the Churches power to dispose appoint ordaine in the dispensing of Sacrament's what she shall think expedient for the benefit of those which receiue them and the greater reuerence of the same Sacraments so that no alteration be made as to the substance thereof dispense diuine Mysteries that is to say the Sacraments in the Church of Christ as concerning Bishops the scripture maketh mention of them as diuinely instituted Act. 20 rake heed vnto your selues and of all the flock wherof the holy Ghost hath made you Bishops to rule the Church of God and the name Bishop according to the consenting testimonies of all Interpreters and Fathers signifys an Ecclesiasticall person that by common vsage of speech is called a Bishop (d) According to the Apostles doctrine set down Act. 20 Bishops receiue their power of gouernment in Order to the Church from the holy Ghost wherfore they be Pastores Ecclesiae Pastors taken in the proper sense seing that Church-gouernment is proper to them Again according to the same Apostle 1. Timot. 3. 2 Bishop is cloth'd with power of iurisdiction aboue a meer Priest So that according to diuine right a Bishop is aboue a meer Priest as appears by the Council of Trent sess 21. c. 1. and indeed a Bisphop by vertue of his ordination and character hath power to confer the Sacraments of holy Order and Confirmation validly in consequence of which he is by diuine dispensation aboue a meer Priest because both his ordination and character haue institution from Christ nor matters it that a meer Priest by speciall priuiledge may be enabled to confer the Sacrament of Confirmation being his ordination and character gine him no such power which is a Church-gouernour invested with superiority ouer meer Priest's in respect both of ordination and iurisdiction Again the scripture nameth Priests as distinct from Bishops 1. Timoth. 5. against Priests receiue none accusation but vnder two or three witnesses where doubtless the Apostle meaneth Priest's as wanting Episcopall dignity and ordination both because Timothy exercised authority ouer them as also in regard that in the same Chapter he gaue a command to Timothy whom he had ordained a Bishop afore to cherish and feed those Priests for as much as they were vnder his charge and as substitutes administred the Sacraments vnto the faithfull of the Church vnder him which command cannot be meant in order to Bishops since these are not (e) Aerius made no difference between a Bishop and a Priest which errour wickless the first English Heretick espoused and after him Luther and is now an assertion generally taught by sectaries of these dayes near vnto this heresy is the opinion of certain singular schollars who teach that the ordination of a Bishop and a Priest is the same and although S. Hierom assert's that the primitiue Churches were gouerned by common Counsell of Priests neuertheless he neuer assert's parity between a Bishop and a meer Priest as to the power of iurisdictiou which is the matter in debate between catholick's and sectaries howeuer catholick Bishops confer with meer Priests and embrace their Counsels in the gouernment of their seuerall Churches respectiuely but from thence no man ought to infer equality between Bishops and meer Priests as to unrisdiction for a meer Priest cannot ordaine a Priest or confer the Sacrament of confirmation as meer Priests subject to the iurisdiction and committed to the care of an other Bishop Furthermore the scripture mentioneth Deacons 1. Timoth. 3. Deacons must be chast hauing the mistery of saith in pure conscience and the condition of their office doth euidence plainly enough their inferiority and subordination not only to Bishops but also to meer Priests and the Apostle Act. 6. declares also as much Likewise this catholick assertion doth appeare by the ecclesiasticall Hierarchy instituted by diuine ordination * Trid sess 23. can 6. definit esse in Ecclesia catholica Hieâ—â—rchiaÌ„ ordinatione diuina institutam quae constas ex Episcopis Prasbyteris ministris Et can 2. eiusdem sess dicit anathema negantibus esse in Ecclesia catholica prater Sacerdotium alios ordines majores minores per quos veluti per gradus tendatur in Sacerdotium to consist of Bishops Priests and Ministers Trid. sess 23. can 6. which manifest's a reall difference in the offices of each of them Howeuer the scripture sometimes doth call Bishops * Per impositioneÌ„ manuum Presbyterij S. Timoth. 4. Apostolus noÌ„ intelligit nomine presbyterij Officium dignitateÌ„ siue authoritatem presbyteri vel Sacerdotis sed catum vel collegium presbyteroruÌ„ sic tamen vt nomine presbyteroruÌ„ etiam Episcopos includat quod est iuxta consuetudinem scriptura liquet Apostolum ibi locutum fuisse de Episcopis de illis enim presbyteris loquitur quorum ille erat vnus Nam cap. 2. Epis 1. loquens de eadem ordinations Timothei ait per impositionem manuum mearum proinde ipse Paulus erat vnus ex Episcopis qui ordinauerunt Timotheum Deinde iuxta vetorem Ecclesia morem non simplices presbyteri sedsoli Episcopi manus imponebant Episcopo ordipando vt notut S. Chrysost 1. Concil Nicanum lege Lata sanciuit vt Episcopus non nisi à tribus Episcopis consecraretur ideo in ordinations Episcopi plures Episcopi manus imponunt ordinando vero presbytero vnus sufficit Episcopus by the name of Priests promiscuously for example in the Epistle to Titus the Apostle sayes I left Titus in Creet that be should ordaine Priests in euery Citty that is Bishops for so the Apostle in the same Chapter doth interpret his meaning adding after that appointment these words For a Bishop must be without fault vnreprouable where the particle for doth import a coniunction causatiue which doth euidence that the Apostle vnderstood by Priests Bishops But hence no man ought to infer full parity or equallity between a Bishop and a Priest since the distinction of Bishops from and the preeminence aboue Priests is by continuall vsage receiued and preserued in the catholick Church down from the Apostles to the present times And though euery Bishop is a Priest neuertheless euery Priest is not a Bishop as euery Cherubin and Seraphin in the celestiall Hierarchy is an Angell this name being common to all alike but euery
the Apostles to loose the cordes wherwith he was tyed doe represent Christian penance and the power that Christ gaue the Church to loose and remit sins as doe euidence the testimonies of ancient Fathers who also doe expresly assert Christ by his actions to haue prefigured the mysteries of christian religion Howeuer no man can deny without running into manifest errour but that the seuen afore named ecclesiasticall order haue had their begining from Christ's own institution and it matters not that euery Church in the primitiue times was not serued with so many for then in regard of the scarcity of belieuers and want of members to promote to the ministery there could not be so many ordained in so much that for the most part one Church was gouerned by one Priest only or by one Bishop and a Deacon yet after a happy encrease of belieuers and persons proper to exercise ecclesiasticall functions euery Church was supplied with all the seuen orders of ministers and serued according to their distinct offices As touching * Catechismus Trid. cap. de ordine parag 13. ait Parochū debere docere primam Tōsuram esse praeparat ionem quandā ad sacros ordines suscipiendos sicut sunt Exorcismi ad Baptismum sponsalia ad matrimoniū docēt autem Beda l. 4. His. Aug. Baronius Tom. 1. Annal an Christi 58. antiquitatem vsum significationem clericalis Tōsurae clericall Tonsure it is no ecclesiasticall order taken in the proper sense being only a disposition or preparation vnto ordination as exorcisme is to Baptisme or spousalls vnto Matrimony that is to say it is the first step only to ecclesiasticall promotion howeuer the vsage thereof is ancient as is also the clipping of the haire in the crowne of his head that receiues it wherby literally is signifyed the crowne of royall Priesthood wherunto a Clergy-man is disposed and deputed by Clericall tonsure or the crowne of glory which he expecteth in vertue of Christs death and passion or mystically is represented therby worldly employments and superfluous cares and entertainement's which a Clergy-man ought to cast from him as he doth the haire of his head in the receiuing of Tonsure But Episcopacy as a function distinct from Priesthood hath a good title to ecclesiasticall order taken in the proper sense for the consecration of Bishops is called ordination and the Hierarchy of the Church which is a subordination of ecclesiasticall ministers in respect whereof some are more eminent then others in the administration of diuine things doth consist of Bishops Priests and other inferiour ministers wherefore Episcopacy is essentially required thereunto as the noblest Hierarchicall member and indeed that which the Apostle gaue to Timothy by laying on of his hands was Episcopall dignity or Episcopacy according to the interpretation of S. Chrysostome Hom. 13. in 1. Epis ad Timoth. Theophilactus S. Anselm and others Besides the ancientest Fathers doe call Episcopacy an holy Order Anacletus Ep. 3. cap. 1. Caius Pope in the numbring of orders acknowledgeth two orders of Priests the one of Maior Priests that is Bishops and the other of Minor Priest's that is meer Priests Likewise S. Epiphan Haeres 75. Yet the degrees and states of Primates and Patriarchs as distinct offices from Episcopacy lay no claim to the Churches Hierarchy being in respect of Episcopall function one and the same order and the maiority that these can challenge aboue meer Bishops proceedes from human constitution only As the ordination of Priests Deacons and Sub-Deacons c. is a Sacrament taken in the proper sense so is (g) According to the Current of catholick writers since the Council of Trent Episcopacy is a Sacrament taken in the proper sense and the contrary opinion counted erroneous And truly S Austin con Parmeni and other ancient Fathers while they call holy Order a Sacrament they instance in Episcopacy which has diuine institution Act. 20. the holy Ghost appointed Bishops to gouerne the Church and though according to the 2. Toletan Council meer Priest's laid their hands together with the Bishop in the heads of those which were ordain'd which was the custome of some Churches of those dayes neuertheless that imposition of hands as to meer Priest's had nothing of the proper matter and at the most was a condition only requir'd to the validity of the Sacrament of holy Order as now the personall presence of the Parish Priest or some other by him substituted is an essentiall requisit to the validity of Marriage ordination of bishops hauing all necessary requisits therunto viz. outward sensible Rites Grace conferred therby and Christs (b) The Sacrament of holy Order as to Episcopacy Christ instituted Io. 20. when he said to his Apostles As my Father sent me so send I you receiue the holy Ghost And indeed as to reason t' is not probable that Episcopall Order was instituted afore for then doubtless Christ had instituted it at his last supper by the word 's hoc facite do this But these particles according to the Council of Trent sess 21. can 2. were meant of power giuen vnto Priest's in order to the celebrating of the Euchariste own institution which do plainly appeare by the words of the Apostle 2. Tim. 1. stir vp the grace of God which is in thee by the putting on of mine hands that is by ordaining thee a Bishop according to the interpretation of the ancient Fathers Again diuine institution of Episcopacy is deducible sufficiently enough from the Hierarchy of the Church instituted by diuine ordination Episcopacy being the noblest member therof for the Hierarchy (i) According to S. Epiphanius haer 57. or 77. Orders of Church-ministers were perfected by litle and litle onely and he obserueth that the Apostle Epis ad Timot. ad Tit. mention's a Bishop and a Deacon onely because those primitiue Churches had onely those two orders of Ministers in regard there was then exceeding great scarcity of persons fit to be ordain'd and the Council of Trent doth not exact the whole number of Ministers but in such Churches as can conueniently be furnisht with all the Orders doth consist of Bishops Priests and (k) The principall Church Ministers after the Priest's are Deacons according to S. Denys l. de Eccles Hierar c. 23. and 5. the function proper to them is to serue in order to the holy Euchariste Also according to S. Ignat. Epis ad Trullo Deacons were not dispensers of meat and drink but of christian Sacraments Besides according to S. Justin in fine Apologet. Deacons were wont to minister the Enchariste to those which were present and to carry it to such as were absent Again this catholick doctrine appear's evidently by the History of S. Lawrence which S. Ambrose set's down l. 1. offic c. 41. and doubtless to haue care of the poore was the secundary and not the primary office of Deacons ministers Hereby it is cleare that Episcopacy doth imprint a spirituall character in
causeth her to commit adultery and whosoeuer shall mary her that is diuorced doth commit adultery and it matters not that Christ insertes that exception except for fornication for it hath reference only to the first part of the sentence viz. Whosoeuer shall put away his wife Christ signifying therby that it is lawfull for an husband (m) S. Austin con Adamant cap. 3. and Theophilac expounding that Chapter of S. Matthew teach that whosoeuer putteth his wife away otherwise if afterwards she comit adultery he is the cause of it and doubtless Christ in the Chapter set down speak's of a Husband that shall put his wife away as to dwelling and bedding with him which kinde of diuorce according to the Council of Trent sess 24. can 8 may be done lawfully when a iust cause interuem's for example fornication eminent danger of some great euill whether spirituall or temporall or enormious crime c. and indeed Christ in that Chapter speaks not at all of dissoluing the bond of marriage for that kind of putting away is a deuorce giuing power toeach of both to marry again without waiting till the one or the other chance to dye to depart from an adulteres wife or for a wife to depart from an husband that is an adulterer which is it is lawfull for an innocent husband not to bed or liue together with a wife that committes adultery and doubtless Christ intent was not to inuolue the said exception in the latter part of the sentence for so Christ's meaning should be this viz whosoeuer shall marry her that is diuorced except for fornication committed adultery and consequently should signify thereby fornication to be a sufficient lawfull ground to dissolue the very bond of marriage vnto giuing leaue to a wife put away for adultery to marry again which sense carryeth an extream absurdity for so the condition of an adulteress wife were better then that of an innocent wife the adulteress being made free in regard of her adultery to take a new husband in consequence of which if that were the true sense of Christ's words euery married woman that is weary of her husband might easily commit adultery to get liberty to marry an other if adultery could dissolue the bond of marriage Besides S. Mark cap. 1. and S. Luke cap. 16. relating this forementioned passage and the sentence Christ pronounced Math. 5. dâ—e clearly and absolutly assert putting no exception at all that whosoeuer shall marry her that is diuorced committeth adultery wherfore though after consummation of marriage a wife may lawfully depart from her husband that committeth adultery and a husband may lawfully depart from his wife that committeth dultery as to bedding and liuing together neuerthelesse neither of them is at liberty to mary again as long as both doe liue As to administring the Sacrament of christian marriage albeit that the Councill of Trent requireth the presence of the parish Priest vnto the celebration therof in all places and Countries wherin their ordinance is promulgated yet he is no Minister of the Sacrament that is (n) According to the Council of Florence the efficient cause of marriage is the mutuall consent of the parties that marry expres'd in words of the present Tense For example the man faith I Thomas take thee Anna for my vvedded vvife and again I Anne take thee Thomas for my vvedded Husband no efficient cause of it since in order to such as marry together he applyeth neither matter nor form in the administration thereof these consisting in a reciprocall deliuering vp and a reciprocall accepting of bodies by mutuall codescention expressed in words of the present sense which is the true efficient cause of marriage in consequence of which those that contract are the proper ministers of the Sacrament they yeelding their bodyes to each other with an vnanimous consent reciprocally in so much that it is not absolutly (o) According to the holy congregations of Cardinals that expounded that first Chapter of the 24. session in the Councill of Trent which requires to the validity of marriage the presence of the parish Priest it is not necessary that the parish Priest assisting at a marriage vtter any words his presence and his knowledge of the transaction is sufficient though he should forbid and dissent from it necessary that a Parish Priest assisting at a marriage vtter any words at all his presence together with his notice of what is done there being sufficient enough and though he should dissent from the doing of it the validity of the Sacrament would receiue no preiudice therby for Christ instituting marriage a Sacrament changed nothing of the ciuill contract which necessarily it includeth but only eleuated the said contract in as much as it is performed by persons baptised vnto the dignity of a Sacrament Wherfore seeing that in all other ciuill contracts the parties that doe contract are the efficient causes therof it plainly follows that a Christian man and a christian woman marrying together are efficient causes or ministers of the Sacrament of marriage Neither is the validity of the Sacrament preiudiced though both parties while they administer stand liable to mortall sin for the vnworthiness of the minister doth not destroy the essence of a Sacrament Baptism administred by a Pagan that applyeth the true matter and form with an intention conform to Christ's intention is a Sacrament taken in the proper sense howeuer no man can participate the fruits of any Sacrament that ieceiues it vnworthily CHAR. XVIIJ OF EXTREM-VNCTION THE CONTENTS Holy vnction which Christ instituted after his resurrection and S. James the Apostle promulgated ought to be ministred to the faithfull in extremity of sicknes onely and thence is called Extrom-vnction The Sacrament of holy vnction is made and perfected in as much as a Priest anointeth the sick in the room of Christ with oyle of Oliue blessed and consecrated by a Bishop and prayeth ouer him The guirt of healing by anoynting or laying on of hands practiced in the primitiue Church was not the holy vnction that S. Iames prescribeth in his catholick Epistle saying If any be sick among you let him bring in the Priest's of the church and let them pray ouer him anointing him vvith oyle in the name of our lord Priest's in the administring of sacramentall vnction anointe the Organs of the siue senses vsing the form of words prescribed by the Roman Church which doubtless is the best EXtrem-vnction is a (a) According to the Councils of Floren in the Decree of Eugenius and of Trent sess 14. Extrem-vnction is a Sacrament of the new law and the greek Church euen after their fall into deadly shism fell not from the definition of the Councils set down as to Extrem-vnction for their Patriarch Ieremy reckoneth it amongst the Sacraments of the new law proper Sacrament of the new law wherby a christian belieuer constituted in eminent * Habetur in Concilio Floren quod SacrameutuÌ„ sacrae vnctionis
hereditary vice that passed from our first parent vpon (a) The Apostle Rom. 5. teacheth that as by one man sin entred into the world and death by sin soe death went ouer all men in whom all men haue sinned all mankind The preuarication of Adam did not prejudice himselfe only (b) Concil Araus 2. can 2. condemnes such as assert Adams transgression to haue preiudiced himselfe only and not his posterity This Canon is set down in the Council of Treat sess 6. but also the posterity God did not giue him originall iustice so peculiarly as that it was not intended to all others descending from him yet his diuine wisdom put in his will the cause of hauing or wanting it (c) God had constituted Adam head of all mankind as to hauing or wanting Originall Iustice in consequence of which the will of Adam he being head of all human nature contained the wills of all men taken in the morall sense as to keeping or losing Originall grace God hauing plac'd in his will the cause that might preserue or lose it yet though the will of Adam taken in the proper reall sense was the same when he sinned and when he repented howeuer it was not the same morally because he sinned as a publick and repented as a priuate person only and therfore his repentance profited himselfe alone whom he had constituted chief head of all men and his disobedient carriage depriued all of the intended grace (d) S. Anselm l. de Concep Vir. c. 26. nameth Originall sin nakednes of Justice due that is a priuation of Originall Iustice iustifying grace being due to euery man from the integrity of creation and lost by Adams preuarication the wanting where of is originall sin so named because it proceeds originally from Adam by the conveiance of * CoÌ„cil Trid. definit peccatum originale in omnes traÌ„sfundi per propagationem propagation accompanied vith carnall concupiscence as the conduit of its passage to all his race (e) S. Austin l. 3. oper imperf teaches that originall sin is not only a sin but also the pain of sin whereby t' is euident that originall sin is not the actuall personall sin that Adam committed which could not be the pain of sin for sin a fore was not come into the world Whereby plainly appeares that the actuall and personall sin of Adam that preceded propagation is not originall sin contracted by propagation Besides this passeth vpon all men and consequently is common but personall and common are diuers and inconsistent together Howeuer it is the effect of the personall sin yet so * Sap. 10. eduxit illum Adam à delicto sico that the washing away of that was not to proue a cure for this It was in Adams power to hurt but not to cure the wound He made his own peace with his Creator by the vertue of true repentance (f) S. Austin l. 3. de lib. arb saith that it were not as to equity consonant that Adam should beget children better then himselfe but could not therin include his family as he did in his fall wherfore though justifying grace had cleard him of the guilt of sin notwithstanding he begot children that were sinners Euen so pure grain sown in the ground produces corne with chaff and straw good grapes bring forth wild grapes good oliue trees wild oliue trees and circuncised Iewes vncircuncised children As originall grace is the life of the soul so is originall sin which is the priuation therof the death of the soul and therby distinct (g) S. Austin l. de pec ment remis expresly teacheth that carnall concupiscence which the Apostle calleth lex in membris remaines after baptism in consequence whereof t' is noe sin sin taken in the proper sense for baptism leaueth nothing of vncleaues in him that is baptised aright Again lib. de nup. concup and in sundry other places of his writings he declares that baptism doth not wash away concupiscence thereby distinguishing originall sin which baptism fully destroyeth from concupiscence Moreouer S. Austin l. 2. de nup. concupis plainly affirmes that the conflict or rebellion that comes of carnall concupiscence is not damnable though troublesome because of the extream vnquietnes which it foment's from carnall concupiscence which is not mortall and damnable because it doth not perfect sin though it is very troublesom because it foments disquietnes * Gal. 5. care concupiscit uduersus spiritum for it is the law in the flesh that resist's the law of the mind And albeit that baptism washeth originall sin out of the soul yet it doth not wash concupiscence out of the flesh * Aug. illa concupiscentia ex nobis ipsis inobedieÌ„tia iustissimo reciprocatu inobedientibus reddita est which is a disobedience laid vpon all flesh by just reciprocation for the disobedience of the first flesh Whereby is plainly evidenced that concupiscence (h) S. Austin l. 3. coun Iulian. teaches that concupiscence does not proceed from God but from sin wherefore S. Paul sometymes call's concupiscence sin for as much as it came of sin and inclines to sinning And indeed t is noe sin sin taken in the proper sense for à free voluntary act of transgression against the law of God Wherefore the Council of Trent hath defin'd that it is not properly a sin as it is left in the regenerated through baptism because as S. Austin teacheth concupiscence does not perfect iniquity and it is left after baptism to a good intent namely to be the seed of a spirituall warfaire vnto exercising of the soul in humility vertue and godlines is not made by God but by the sin of the flesh Howeuer the supreame prouidence lets it raign in the flesh euen after baptism that the flesh may minister matter of vertue to the spirit Though the Children of Israël Gods chosen people passed the red sea which is a Type of Christian baptism came safe to the land of promise which is a figure of sanctifying grace that baptism confers and droue away the Cananites their enemies that possessed it afore which denotates the Deuil that the Sacrament of baptism cast's out of the baptized neuertheless the supream providence left in the mids of them a Iebusaeus whereby is represented carnall concupiscence that daiiy four ented disquietnes continually quarielling fighting and prejudicing them extreaâ—ely After the same manner the desires of the flesh fight whith and sometymes ouercome the spirit not by strengh but by flattery The flesh is like the alluring Dalila that through fawning sweet enticing words mastered Sampson who exceeded her farre in strength carnall concupiscence is a faire spoken lady that tempteth the spirit as Eue did Adam and if it finde not the spirit circumspect watchfull without sleeping and extream swift in flying from its allurements as Ioseph did from the wanton lady of Egipte it will gaine the victory infallibly in consequence of which euery Christian
in Purgatory are shortned through the fasting praying and almes deeds of the faithfull on earth and moreouer saith ser 66. in Canti that the same happy souls perceiue the prayers and sacrifices of the liuing by the mediation of Angels which comfore them to temporall punishments due to their sins committed when they liued on earth may receiue refreshment vnto shortning of their painfull accounts S. Bernard writeth in the life of S. Malachias that this holy monck had so great an abhorrence of the wicked courses which a certain sister of his own imbraced that he made a vow neuer to see her in the flesh But saies S. Bernard she being remoued out of the body he was freed from his vow and whom he detested to see in the flesh (g) S. Austin l. de cura pro mor. c. 10. assertes apparitions of souls departed Jf vve shall ansvvere saith he that such apparitions vvere false vve shall seem impudently to contradict sundry faithfull vvriters and euen the sense of such as attest they haue seen them Other ancient Fathers and S. Bede especially affirm that such apparitions haue been alwaies counted amongst diuine 〈◊〉 racles besides Moyses and Elias truly and really appeared in 〈◊〉 Transfiguration of Christ and the true Samuell 1. Reg. according to the common opinion of orthodox writers appeared to Saul whereby is euidenced the impudency and manifest weaknes of those who name such apparitions old wiues tales saw in spirit for in a dream he heard a voice that said vnto him thy sister is in the court before thy door and hath receiued nothing of nourishment for the space of thirty daies wherwith being raised from sleep he apprehended suddenly the meaning of the vision and computing the time of her want of food with the time he had omitted to offer for her the sacrifice of mass he foūd the number of daies to be the very same then he saith S. Bernard that hated the sins but not the soul of his sister began againe to offer for her refreshment the heauenly bread of the altar the sacrifice wherof he had omitted during thirty daies afore and not in vain according to the same S. Bernard for a very litle while after he saw her before the doore of the Church clothed in a mourning weed yet not suffer'd to enter in and perseuering in his great work of piety saw her afterwards in a whitish habit admitted into the Church but not admitted to touch the Altar at lenght in a third vision he saw her inuested with a faire whit garment together with sundry others clothed in white robes which gaue euidence of her deliuerance out of the bitter afflictions which she had endured in Purgatory Wherby appeareth how much * Iacob 5. assidua iusti oratio multum valet the prayer of a just man auaileth if it be feruent truly the kingdom of God suffereth violence and the violent take it by force Mat. 11. The extream feruor of S. Malachias piety as it were by force opened the gates of Heauen to his distressed sister whoobtained through the constant violence of his prayers a speedy enjoyment of hlessednes that was before denyed to her own merits CHAR. XXVJ OF TEMPERANCE THE CONTENTS Temperance is a bridle to the flesh wherby it is hindred from formenting of disquietnes and trouble to the mind the property of temperance is to purge out of mans body the malignant humours which tend to the preiudice of his soul human flesh is the euill seruant that requireth whipps correction and employment the rebellion of the flesh comes of idlenes and disorder many good fruits proceede from abstinence which is the daughter of temperance TEmperance is a morall vertue that enableth the soul to bridle the body as a bitt is put into the mouth of an horse that he may obey the rider so temperance is the bodyes bitt vnto obeying the soul in regard it suppresseth the iust of the flesh that foments disquietnes and trouble to the mind As God through wisdome hath form'd and tempered man in measure number and weight Sap. 11. disposing sweetly the members euery one of them in the body with proportion decency and order so through temperance he hath ordered him in measure number and weight moderating all his affections therby that he be not caried about with inordinat lustes of the flesh Astrologers teach that the planet called Mercury raignes in the house of the sign named Virgo and ruleth ouer the sign Gemini the two twins temperance is like this planet for in the House of Virgo she keepeth her Court that is to say virginity is the certain token and chief habitation of temperance again she beareth rule ouer Gemini viz the senses of the body which are two eyes two eares two nostrills c. as twins borne at one birth and committed to the care iurisdiction and gouernment of temperance it being proper to this vertue to obstruct the wanton waies of wickednes wherto the senses lead The only daughter of temperance and nurce to all other morall virtues is abstinence which coueteth nothing but what is consonant to the light of reason and rejecteth all things tending to the prejudice either of the body or soul a For it driueth out malignant humours vnto keeping the body in health purgeth away the leauen of originall concupiscence vnto preseruing the soul in sanctity and as hunger forceth a wolfe out of the wood he lurks in so it chaseth the diuid out of the soul he lodgeth in although no man in Iustice can destrov his own flesh neuertheless in reason he ought to keept it vnder * Hieron nihil magis aestuaet quā iuueniles medullae vino dapibus inflamatae For when it is inflamed through much aboundance of wine and meat it is like to a wild vnruly horse and cannot be tamed but with the bridle of abstinence The flesh is the euill seruant * Eccles 33. seruo maleuolo carni tortura compedes mitte illum in operationem ne vaeet that needs whipps correction and work lest it grow idle seek liberty become insolent and breed much sorow truble and vexation the fatter any ground is the more thistles it breedeth euen so the flesh the more it is pampered vp with dilicacies the more desires it bringeth forth to the (b) Boetius saith that we haue exceeding great need of integrity and honesty because we can doe nothing out of the sight of the judge that seeth all things and S. Bernard exhorteth us to reuerence our Angell in euery corner and forbiddeth to do that thing in our Angels presence which we dare not attempt in the presence of him or any other man disquieting * S. Pet. 2. obsecro vos abstinere a carnalibus desiderijs quae militāt aduersus spiritum of the spirit He saith Salomon that delicatly bringeth vp his seruant the flesh from youth at lengh it will become disobedient Besides such as from youth be delicatly nourished celebrat
the feast before the vigil that is they feast before they fast the present and the next life are as it were two dayes wherof one is the vigil the other the feast the present time is after the similitude of a vigil the time of rest to come after death is as a festiuall solemnity good Christians wisely consider this Wherfore in this present life as in a vigil they suffer many tribulations exercising often watching in hungre and thirst and often fasting in cold and nakednes but when the festiuall tyme of the next life is come they doe then feast for euer and are clothed in white robs of glory but the wicked which inuert the order that the supream prouidence hath appointed feasting in the vigil that is in the tyme of this life wheras they should haue prayed fasted watched put on sackcloath and suffered tribulation in punishment of their sins when the festiuall day shall come they will be spoiled of their rich garments depriued of their pleasures and cast into vtter darknes of hell to keep an euerlasting fast in torments Yet in regard the soul of man is a nobler part then the body the best abstinence is in order to it wherfore S. Paul 1. Coloss 4 declareth that it is the will of God our sanctification that is the command of God who hath not called vs vnto vncleanes but to holynes of life that we abstaine from fornication and S. Peter 1. Pet. 20. in the person of God beseecheth and exhorteth that we will abstaine from fleshly lustes which fight against the soul and indeed to fast from and without sin * Cor sapiens inzelligibile abstinebit à peccatis is the true fast vnto saluation for he that fasteth with the guilt of a mortall offence offereth the body to God * Rom. 12. obsecro vos per misericordiā Dei vt exhibeatis corpora vestra hostiam vinentem nō mortuam as a dead carkeise only that wanteth the spirit of life but he that fasteth both from and without sin giueth the body a liuing sacrisice holy and acceptable vnto God Hereby appeareth the manifest blindnes of many carnall and sensuall men which say that they cannot abstaine from the pleasures of this life that t' is impossible to fast from vnclean affections that t' is not in the power of any whosoeuer to stop the course of the law of wantonnes written in the flesh to the mastring of fleshly lustes carnall loue when it engrosseth all power to it selfe and beareth rule maketh men foolishly mad for euen then the most carnall man can fast from meates which he thinkes will prejudice the body but not from sin though he know it will * Aug. omn◠seminarium voluptatis venenū puta ' id est voluptas est animae mortifera poyson the soul likewise shame can refrain him from the exercise of his fleshly lustes in the sight of a temporall Prince (a) S. Hierom compareth abstinence to a wine-press in as much as it purgeth out of our souls the aboundant humours of sin and indeed abstinence is able to driue away the deuil for according to S. Ambrose as fasting spitle is poyson to a serpent so abstiinence is to the deuil And some kind of deuils cannot be cast out but by prayer and fasting Mat. 17. howeuer he is not ashamed to commit fornication in the presence of God who is the Prince of Princes But the spirituall man that is wise and vnderstanding will abstaine from sin Eccle. 30. CHAR. XXVIJ OF FORTITVDE THE CONTENTS Fortitude taken in the proper sense inclineth neither to the right nor left hand that is attempteth nothing of danger out of vashnes and escheweth nothing of difficulty out of pusillanimity many enterprises begin happely which end vnhappely the gift of perseuerance only is able to crown the vertue of fortitude FOrtitude taken in the proper sense is strength whereby a iust man is enabled to ouercome the works of the flesh which are adultery fornication vncleanes wantonnes emmulations contentions seditions heresies euuy murder drunkennes glutony and such like Gal. 5. (a) S. Ambrose and S. Gregory ascribe true fortitude to such only as bear rule ouer their passions feight against all vices and endure persecution for Iustice sake cheerfully fortitude is the conquerer of all vices and the defender of all vertues in as much as it quencheth the heat of fleshly lustes extinguisheth the fire of vnclean delights refraineth the inbrdinat pleasures of this life moderateth the sweetnes of prosperity sweeteneth the bitternes of aduersity (b) S. Hierom. com in Esa counteth those which turn to the right rash and those which incline to the left hand faint hearted and S. Austin Epis ad Hierom teacheth that such as haue the vertue of fortitude neither attempte rashly nor feare vnaduisedly declineth neither to the right or left hand that is attempteth nothing of danger out of rashnes and flyeth nothing of difficulty out of feare loueth persecution for iustice vnto obtaining a crown of reward for merit but as fortitude is the armour of all vertues so all vertues respectiuely are the support of fortitude for example as fortitude is the sheild that defendeth faith (c) According to S. Austin faith is the ground of all good things and the root of all other vertues so faith is the root that bringeth forth fortitude for God giues fortitude to those who with a prefect heart beleiue in him 20. parae 16. as fortitude is the preseruer of hope so hope is the renewer of fortitude for they that hope in our lord shall renue their strength Esa 40. as fortitude rendreth * Cantico 8. fortis est vt mors dilectio charity as strong as death Can. 8. so charity giueth fortitude power (d) The Apostle 1. Cor. 13. denyeth that there is any meritorious work without charity and indeed Charitas est principium meriti and according to S. Austin if a man hath charity he can do what pleaseth him for nothing of wickednes can proceed from the root of charity for the meriting of life 1. Colos 13. yet there is but one vertue that crowneth fortitude which is perseuerance for he only that continueth strong in the exercise of good works to the end shall be saued Perseuerance is the coat of Ioseph reaching down to the feet the preistly garment coming down to the ancles the rump of the peace offering due to God the heel of good works that protecteth against the bite of serpents Augus ser 8. ad fratres in Erenio tom 10. no man that striueth for a prize is crowned except he striueth as he ought to doe perseuering to the end a good begining without a good ending hath nothing of profit Saul when he began to raign was humble and innocent as a child of one year 1. Reg. 13. Saul falling of from humility and innocency lost his kingdom together with his life if Salomon had perseuered in godlines he had
an other place or receptacle besids the Heauen of the blessed and the Hell of the damned Caluin that he might the rather deny Purgatory he deny'd Limbus and that he might the better deny Limbus he denyed that Christ descended into hell otherwise then by suffering on his Cross the torments of a damned soul which saith Caluin in cap. 26. mat vvere so grieuous that euen vvords of dispaire came from him So impudently this great reformer of religion blasphem'd against Christ but the Catholick Church teacheth that Christ truly and properly descended into hell that is the soul of Christ remoued out of his body with its proper presence penetrated the lower receptacles of the earth where good souls were detained as prâ—sonners and brough with him from thence such as were ripe and fit for the kingdom of Heauen Lege S. Jgnat Epis ad Trallia Clem. Alex. l. 2. 6. stromatum Basil in Psal 48. visited the lower parts of the earth comforting such as were departed in perfect grace afore his coming thither From his sepulcher he leapt again into the world from whence after that he had setled a Priestly ministery that should be of perpetuall vse in his vineyard that is the Church like a hunter that gladly rejoyces in his obtained prey went with joy home leading captiuity captiue that is rendering happy the captiuity of just souls detained as it were in a prison vnder ground and carrying them with him in glorious triumph for he opened the gates of his Fathers Pallace which were euer afore shut against them As clamorous hunting so couetous playing * Aleae lusus Clericis interdictus à Concilijs Patribus Canonibus Aristoteles Aleatores latronum praedonumque societati inserit at cardes or dice for mony is an exercise vnworthy Priests which ought to seek no other lucre then the gaining of souls vnto Iesus-Christ who is their proper treasure and * Sacerdos dicit Christo tu es qui restituis haereditatem meam mihi heritage and mony betrayed him sould Ioseph and damned Iudas * Augustinus vocat Theatra cauâ—as turpitudinis publicaâ— professiones flagitiorum laudantur Massilienses quod sic abhorrebant à spectaculis vt mimis locum in scaena non concederâ—nt Again stage-playes as they be commonly exhibited in our country are incoÌ„sistent with Priestly function for as much as the outward words and counterfeited Gestures of the players representing reciprocall passages of wicked louers tend to carnall wantonnes and vncleanes and such a a Theater Saith S. Chrysostom is the chair of pestilence schole of incontinency and shop of luxury that sets out to sale the lusts of the flesh howeuer stage-playes are laudable recreations in order to lay-people while they represent but heroicall actions of gallant persons vnto imitation and vn godly enterprises of wicked men vnto detestation therof or while they exhibite delightfull fictions without obscenes Furthermore Missionary Priests must not affect to be counted * 2. Timoth. 2. homo militans Deo non se implicet negotijs saecularibus statesmen they being priuat persons professing a spirituall vocation which hath not any relation to the temporall affaires of state The supream prouidence hath set bounds to euery vocation * Tractent fabrilia fabri nec sutor vltra crepidam vt fert vetus pronerbium nor ought any man to put his sickle on strang ground Let Priests mannage what is theirs and Christs business and the affaires which pertaine to Caesar let them leaue to Caesar and the ministers of his Council yet there are some wanton witts which like the raging sea transcend their prefixed limits lifted vp aboue the hight of the clouds with an opinion of their own science fancying to themselues knowledg of all things though indeed the greatest part of what they know * Sapiens ille Mercurius Trismigistus maxima â—orum inquit quae scimus est minima pars eorum quae nescimus is the least part of what they know not and thus wantonly carried away entangle themselues with publick affaires of ciuill Magistrats before they be called thereto Howeuer Priests ought to know nothing * Apostolus Paulus profitetur se nihil scire praeter Iesum Christum hunc Crucifixum but Iesus-Christ and him crucified and if the supream prouidence hath bestowed on one alone a better memory and witt then on others contemporary with him he is to vse his aboundant abilities according to charity temperance and sobriety for otherwise he shall by his high attempts vnhappily verifie the old Prouerb much witt little iudgment Besids great wanton wits are not without a mixture of madnes And truly experience shewes that common wealths are vnfortunat when the things named witts manage the affaires therof t is iudgment not flashes of witt that makes gouernements happie FINIS I. BOOK The faultes escaped in printing a curteous Reader will easily correct and pardon THE SECOND BOOK OF HOLY CHARACTERS containing a Miscelany of Theologicall discourses THAT IS THEOLOGY Positiue Scholasticall Polemicall and Morall Built vpon the foundation of Scriptures Traditions Councils Fathers CHAR. I. OF SACRIFICE THE CONTENTS Proper sacrifice defined no Preists Priesthood taken in the proper sense if proper sacrifice be laid aside asserting of improper metaphoricall sacrifice onely bringeth confusion and rendereth priestly function common to all alike SAcrifice taken in a spirituall generall sense is euery * Aug l 10. de ciuit Dei c. 6. ait sacrificium generaliter sumptum esse omne opus quod agitur vt sancta sociâ—tate inbaereamus Deoâ— work that a belieuer imployeth to the end that he may continue in holy society and freindship with God There are (a) According to S. Thomas two kinds of sacrifice taken in the generall sense are offered vpon the altar of Christ whereof one is called deuotion in order to God the other pity or compassion in order to our neighbour two kinds thereof the one is deuotion towards God comprehending all such actioÌ„s inward and outward of the minde and body as tend to the honouring and praysing of God the (b) The Apostle Hebrae 13. exhorteth vs to do works of Almes and charity saying that such sacrifices promerite God that is procure his grace and fauour and according to Ecclesiastes cap. 5. Those offer sacrifice which shew mercy other is pity or compassion towards our neighbour including the works of mercy and iustice to both kinds of spirituall sacrifice the Royall Prophet Dauid exhorteth all God's people of whatsoeuer condition or sex saying * Psal 15. tibi sacrificabo hostiam laudis Et psal 4. sacrificate sacrificium iustitiâ— Offer to God hosts of prayses and sacrifice sacrifices of Iustice and according to the Apostle spiri uall sacrificers of these kinds are * 1. Pet. 4. vos autem genus electum vegale SacerdotiuÌ„ Idem habetur Apoc. 5. kings and Preists investedwith the honour of royall Preisthood and indeed deuout
Christians in as much as they dayly serue God and haue dominion ouer their concupiscenâ—es declining whatsoeuer inclineth to sin are kings in a spirituall metaphoricall signification and in as much as they daily offer themselues a liuing sacrifice holy and acceptable vnto the diuine Majesty are Preists in a spirituall metaphoricall signification their works so offered being sacrifices in a spirituall metaphoricall signification Sacrifice taken in a speciall and proper sense is (c) Catholick definition of a sacrifice taken in the proper sense an outward oblation of a sensible visible thing by lawfull authority exhibited to God only no other object interuening vnto destruction or reall change of the thing offered in recognition of his supream excellency and dominion ouer all creatures In this Catholike definition of sacrifice are obseruable seuen sundry requisits's necessarily concurring vnto the compleating of a true proper sacrifice 1. Oblation for in euery sacrifice taken in the proper sense some sensible visible thing is offered to God and consequently euery true proper sacrifice is an oblation though * Secundum S. Thomam omne sacrificium est oblatio sed non è contra euery oblation is not a sacrifice in the proper sense for many things were offered in the old law namely brass siluer gold oile which were only sacrifices improperly and metaphorically 2. Outward oblation of a sensible thing for proper sacrifice is an act of heighest worship called by (d) This vsage and practise hath continued warrantable down from the begining of Christian Religion till these tymes Quem penes arbitrium est vis sorma loquendi vse 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 wherby God is honoured aÌ„d worshipped in respect of his supream excellency in consequence whereof proper sacrifice is the chiefest kind of adoration which consisteth of some externall thing signifying the internall esteem that such as adore haue of the thing adored 3. The sensible thing must be permanent because a proper sacrifice is an exhibition of tribute due to God as king of Heauen and earth but tribute is a permanent during thing as experience teacheth in the payment of tribute vnto temporall Princes which is not a meer locution or other action enduring only for a litle while but brass siluer gold or some other permanent thing that is not flitting as are naked words 4. Oblation instituted by lawfull authority For proper sacrifice if the will of God and his institution were excluded is not an act euen of morall vertue hauing of and in it's self no goodness worthy praise nor worthiness deseruing esteem For example in the old law the slaughter or death of Lambes sheep and calfes was not more laudable then the killing of dogs wolues and hogs nay it had been far less laudable to kill those then these if God had not instituted in the old law sacrifices of Lambs sheep and calues excluding the others Furthermore the death and passion of Christ that was the most excellent and proper sacrifice considered in it self only abstracting from the (e) According to S. John the Euangelist cap. 10. Christ after he had declared to the Pharisies his power to lay down his life immediately added This commandement haue I receiued from my Father command he had from his diuine Father to giue his life for the redemption of the world is not an action of vertue because the death of Christ participated it's goodness and worthiness from the diuine command and his own will and indeed Abraham's willingnes to kill his son Isack who was a type of Christ had been a detestable wickedness if he had not had God's warrantable authority for it who is Author of life and death 5. Exhibited by a lawfull Minister for euery man is not a proper Minister of proper sacrifice but he onely who is by lawfull authority designed ordained and consecrated for that speciall charge and * Hebrae 5. nec quisquaÌ„ sumit sibi honorem sed qui vocatur à Deo tanquam Aaron sic Christ is noÌ„ semetipsum clarificauit vt Pontisex fieret sed qui locutus est ad eum tu es Sacerdos in aeternum secuÌ„dum ordinem Melchisedech no man should take this honour vnto himself but he that is called of God as was Aaron neither did Christ take vnto himselfe the office of High-Priest For he gaue it him that said vnto him thou art a Priest for euer after the order of Melchisedech And though God declared vnto the children of Israel that if they would heare his voice and keepe his Couenant he would make them * Exod. 19. si audieritis voceÌ„ meam eritis mihi in Regnum Sacerdotale gens sancta a priestly kingdom and a holy nation neuertheless they were not all royall Priest's taken in the proper sense but (f) According to S. Hierom. in quaes Hebraicis it was a tradition amongst the ancient Iew 's that down from Noe vnto Abraham the eldest son of each family was a Priest by diuine dispensation but the family of Aaron was invested with priestly dignity long after the institution of the pascall Lamb Exod. 12. and 28. so that in order to that sacrifice the ancient priuiledge granted to the eldest son of the family continued in force only such as descended from Aaron and both Saul and * 2. Paralip 26. 4. Reg. 14. Osias lepra punitus Osias were seuerely reprehended and punishad for attempting to offer sacrifice to which they were not specially deputed If euery priuate man should turn Priest and minister of proper sacrifice such vnnaturall proceeding against the law of God and nature would cause as dangerous and execrable confusion in the spirituall Church-gouerment as in ciuill State-gouerment if euery priuate man should turne king affecting to rule as king howeuer euen such Priest's as assume to themselue speciall and proper priesthood and deny speciall and proper sacrifice acknowledging spirituall and metaphoricall only open a door to the said confusion giuing occasion to euery priuate man to count himselfe as lawfull a Priest as such are being by baptism designed and consecrated to offer spirituall sacrifice and consequently as to the proper function of a Priest which is to * Hebrae 5. omnis Sacerdos Pontifex institutus vt offerat dona sacrificia offer sacrifice there is no distinction between a priuate man so baptised and such Priest's afore mentioned 6. Exhibited to God only because the end and motiue of proper sacrifice which is omnipotency or supream dominion in recognition wherof sacrifice is offered is found in God only although the catholick Church (g) According to S. Austin c. 20. con Faustum c. 21. Though Altars were erected in memory and honour of Martyrs neuertheless it was not the custom to offer sacrifice to Martyrs but to the God of Martyrs erecteth Altars in memory and honour of Martyrs and other blessed Saint's neuertheless she doth not offer sacrifice but to the sole God of both Martyrs and
deuotion wheras the feruour and humility in the vnlearned doe compence euen the want of an exact and distinct vnderstanding howeuer it is very expedient that euery belieuer say our lords prayer in the tongue he knowes for it is not enough to vnderstand confusedly that the petitions therin contained are good and profitable but likewise to know them distinctly Wherfore sundry constitutions set forth by Synods of Bishops require vnderstanding of words and sense as to our lords prayer CHAR. III. OF MELCHISEDECH THE CONTENTS Melchisedech a type of Christ by diuine dispensation invested in holy Priesthood offered a proper sacrifice of thanksgiuing in bread and wine Melchisedech's sacrifice figured the sacrifice Christ offered of his body and blood vnder the elements of bread and wine Christs vnbloody sacrifice sulfilled the figuratiue of Melchisedech Those which deny that Christ appointed Priests as his Vicars to offer in his room daily sacrifice of his body and blood vnder the forms of bread and wine of necessity destroy his euerlasting Priesthood according to the order of Melchisedech the practice of Priestly blessing MElchisedech was king of * Fuit salem vrbs terrae Chananaeae vt constat ex historia Genesis quae fuit filijs Israel à Deo promissa iam dicta Iudaea Palestina seu terra sanctae salem that it by interpretation of iustice and Peace (a) According to holy scriptures Melchisedech was a Priest priesthood taken in the proper sense for he is called the Priest of God most high Gen. 1. and Hebrae 7. and this catholick assertion the ancient Fathers haue vnanimously taught as likewise Philo Iudae l. de Abraham a Priest of God most high counted without Father and mother without kindred without beginning of daies or end of life the holy Scriptures no where making mention of his genealogic He met the great Patriarch Abraham as be returned from the slaughter of the kings brought forth bread and wine which he (b) All the ancient Fathers that florish'd in the years 100.200.300.400 namely S. Irenaeus S. Hypolitus S. Chrysostomus S. Ambrose S. Hierom S. Austin c. teach that Melchisedech offered a sacrifice of bread and wine and S. Cyprian Epis 63. ad Caecil saith expresly that Melchisedech Priest of God most high made an offering of bread and wine and in an other place he calleth the sacrifice of Melchisedech the Image of Christs sacrifice offered vnder the forms of bread and wine so that according to S. Cyprian Melchisedech said Mass figuratiuely his sacrifice being a Type or figure of the sacrifice of the Eucharist and doubtless Melchisedech brought forth bread and wine with an intent to offer a sacrifice of thanksgiuing for the great victory Abraham had won and not precisely to refresh the souldiers who needed no meat hauing refresh'd themselues afore Gen 14. Howeuer t' is probable that Melchisedech did distribute amongst the souldiers of Abraham the bread and wine which he had consecrated in representation of the sacrifice Christ offered at his last supper wherin he consecrated bread and wine and after gaue them to his Apostles and indeed Clemens Alexand. l. 4. stroma Calleth the meat Melchisedech distributed sanctifyed nourishment and S. Epipha ser 55. affirmes that Melchisedech gaue to Abraham and his souldiers consecrated bread and wine offered in sacrifice to giue thanks to him whose Priest he was for the obtained victory and afterward blessed him which shews his excellency aboue Abraham who was a Priest also and consequently aboue Leui and all the Priests of the old law that came out of the loyns of Abrahā (c) S. Paul Hebrae 7. saith that without all contradiction the less is blessed of the better signifying therby that Melchisedech was a greater Priest then Abraham whom he blessed moreouer the Scripture Text teacheth that to bless after a sacred manner is proper to Priestly function in consequence of which without all contradiction a Priest is greater in dignity then any temporall Prince that wanteth authority to giue sacred benediction As Melchisedech blessed Abraham so Priests num 6. were commanded to bless the people and Christ Mark 10. blessed young children and his Disciples Luk 24. and after the same manner the Bishops and Priests of the catholick Church bless lay-people and other creatures namely Agnus Dei bead's Crosses medal's candles Ashes Palmes Belles new shippes c. all which creatures are sanctifyed by the word of God and prayer for so the Church blesseth all such things by express invocation of God alwaise vsing this preface Adiutorium nostrum in nomine Domini Our helpe is in the name of our lord and so beseecheth God to bless consecrate and sanctifie his creatures in vertue of his passion and death suffered on the Cross that so they may be deliuered from the power of Satan and become beneficiall to men and the Church concludes all benedictions Per Christum Dominum nostrum For it is the prerogatiue of the greatest Priest to blesse the lesser besid's Abraham gaue him tithe which doth euidence the others exceeding dignity yet in these excellencies Melchisedech was a type only of Christ in whom the reall verity was contained Melchisedech as king of iustice and peace by interpretation was but a shadow of Christ who was and is actually and indeed king and Authour of both for he came into the world * Zachar. 9. Ecce Rex tuus venit iustus Saluator a just and peaceable king that * 1. Cor. 1. qui factus est nobis iustitia sanctificatio redemptio justified and reconciled man to God and his Angells Melchisedech as Priest of God that offered a sacrifice of bread and wine was a figure of Christ the son of God who being anointed Priest by the holy ghost offered (d) S. Austin in psal 33. saith that Christ instituted a sacrifice of his body and blood according to the Order of Melchisedech that is vnder the forms of bread and wine And l. 6. de ciuit c. 22. speaking of Melchisedech's sacrifice therin saith he first appeared the sacrifice which Christians offer to God and therby is fulfilled the propheticall saying Thou art a Priest according to the Order of Melchisedech a sacrifice of his own body and blood vnder the forms of bread and wine at his last supper Melchisedech as Priest without beginning of daies or end of life signifieth the continuance of Christ his Priesthood for euer in as much as Priests instituted by and substituted vnder Christ as his proper Vicars shall continually offer to the end of the world the vnbloody sacrifice that Christ himselfe celebrated in his last supper neither can any man in reason deny but that Christ euen then offered an vnbloody sacrifice for that were to auerre that Christ did not fullfill the figuratiue sacrifice of Melchisedech and consequently that he was no Priest according to his order or similitude since it cannot be proued that Christ at any other time did offer a
coÌ„plexans LESVS eos paruulos imponens manus super illos benedicebat Huius caeremoniae meminit Aug. l. 2. de pec merit c. 16. Imposition of hands and the Priests benediction with all after the imitation of Christ Mar. â— Ninthly * Unctionis ex oleo benedicto in pectore scapùlis meminit Aug. ser 206 de Tempore anoiming breast and shoulders with holy oile wherby is signifyed that who euer is haptized is prepared to fight the deuill the world and the flesh Ceremonies employed in administring of baptism that is to say which accompany the doing of the SacrameÌ„t are first the * Nomina Gentilium imponere prohibitum est can 33. Concil Nicaeni naming of the person that is to be baptized a ceremony not at all times practised Secondly (o) God-Fathers and God mothers Tertull l. de baptis c. 18. nameth sure ties because of their engagement in order to such as they chrisen and indeed thereby they are bound to instruct their God-sons and God-daughters in all requisits necessary to christian Religion Trident. sess 24. cap. de reform But their obligation is far less when the children they chrisen abide vnder the conduct of catholick Parents From the Sacrament of Baptism ariseth a spirituall kindred between the God-father or God-mother and the party baptised and again between the God-father or God-mother and the Parents of the party baptised In regard of this spirituall kindred t' is vnlawfull without speciall dispensation for either God-father or God-mother to marry with the party they chrisen and the marriage is invalide Howeuer now since the publication of the Councill of Trent no such spirituall kindred ariseth to the anulling of marriage between the God-father and God-mother And from hence it comes that Fathers and Mothers ought not to baptise their own children if their baptism can be supplyed otherwise neither ought they to be God-fathers or God-mothers of their own children according to the Churches canons can 30. q. 1. ad simina God-Fathers and God-mothers so called in regard of their concurrence vnto the spirituall regeneration by baptism wherby they contract spirituall kindred with the baptised and parents therof only in as much as they vndertake the spirituall conduct of the baptised as to instruction in the rudiments of christian doctrine and therby contract an obligation according to iustice to the performance therof they be named suerties Thirdly blessing of water fourthly immersion or washing of water considered as it is a ceremony only and not as it is the immediate matter of this Sacrament for taken in that sense it is more then an accidentall ceremony being an essentiall part of baptism Ceremonyes employed after baptism is ministred that is to say which be subsequent therunto are first anoynting of the crown of the head in the person baptised with chrism consecrated by a Bishop which ceremony doth signify that the baptised in Christ hath put on Christ and incorporated himselfe into him as to his head Fourthly the putting of a wax candle lighted into the hand of the baptised which is a mysticall representation of the marueilous light of faith the baptised is called vnto Fiftly a white garment which expresseth the innocency and spirituall candor of him that is baptised whose sins though they be as crimson or scarlet by baptism be made white as snow and wool CHAR. VII OF CONFIRMATION THE CONTENTS To lay hand 's on the heads of such as are baptized anointing their foreheads with Chrism and signing them with the sign of the cross wherein consisteth the true matter and form of sacramentall Confirmation is a function proper to Bishops onely Although the Sacrament of Confirmation is not of so exceeding great necessity as baptism neuerthelesse it produceth an additionall sanctity vnto perfecting the grace that baptism brought forth afore baptism begetteth christian souldiers and sacramentall confirmation improu's and strengthens them in professing Christ As to confirme sacramentally so to consecrate Chrism is an office proper to Bishops onely Episcopall ceremonies practiced in the consecration of Chrism COnfirmation is a (a) The Councils of Florence in the Decree of Pope Eugenius and of Trent sess 7. can 7. define Confirmation to be a Sacrament of the new law Neither matters it that it is not set down expresly in the holy Euangile for according to S. Iohn cap. vlt. IESVS did many things which the Euangelists neuer committed to writing and indeed t' is meer accidentall to a Sacrament that either the iustitution or any essentiall part thereof be expressed plainly in the holy scriptures for before the new Testament was written both batpism and the Eucharist were Sacraments taken in the proper sense Sacrament of the new law taken in the proper sense the ordinary Minister wherof is a Bishop S. Philip Deacon and disciple of Christ though he did confer the Sacrament of baptism Act. 8. neuertheless he did not lay his hand 's on the heads of those whom he dad baptised anointing their forehead 's with Chrism and signing them with the sign of the cross in the name of the Father son and holy Ghost wherein is this Sacraments consistency that being an act proper (b) Though a meer Priest has power to baptise and anoint the baptised with the oyle of Chrism consecrated by a Bishop neuertheless he wantes authoritie to signe with the same oyle the forehead of the baptized that function being proper to Bishops when they giue the holy Ghost to the baptized howeuer by speciall priuiledge of the sea Apostolick Abbates that are no Bishops and meer Briests also may minister the Sacrament of Confirmation where there is no Bishop to perform that office and de facto Pope Gregory dispensed as appear's by his own writings l. 5. Epis 26. to the Episcopall function Wherefore when the Apostles that wâ—re at Ierusalem heard that the Samaritans through S. Philips preaching had embraced christian religion and were baptised with all they sent * S. Chrysos in 8. Act. hom 18. Epiphan haer 21. expressè negant S. Philippum cum esset Diaconus dumtaxat fuisse sufficientem muneri imponeÌ„di manus vt Samaritani reciperent SpirituÌ„ sanctum proinde intentio ob quaÌ„ missi fuerunt Petrus Ioannes ad id officium praestandum fuit quod essent Episcopi vnde constat Episcopum esse ministrum ordinarium sacramentalis confirmationis Vnde S. Dionys Eccl. Hierar cap. a. Sacerdotes inquit offerebant baptisatum Episcopo vt eum posset signare diuino Deifico vnguento S. Peter and S. Iohn which were Apostles and Bishops too to lay their hands on the heads of those which were baptised that they might receiue the holy Ghost that is they sent vnto them Bishops to minister the Sacrament of confirmation vnto giuing of sanctifying grace so the * Theodor. in cantica ad illa verba vnguentum effusum nomen tuum dicit baptizatos sub visibili vnguenti specie huius Sacramenti invisibilem
remissions of their punishments But now in the declination of charity and fall of deuotion christians commonly haue an abhorrence from much sufferings notwithstanding that their sinnes are far greater then euer afore in respect wherof our holy Mother the Chnrch not ignorant of Satans crafty enterprizes lest in these delicate times * 2. Cor. 2. vt non circumueniamur à Satana he might circumuent and bring them either to despair or to forsake Christ and his Religion hath moderated the Church discipline condescending to the great weakness of her children and truly Christ did not put in the power of his Ministers dispensations of such discipline only but also * Cū Christus sit supremus Dominus Judex potest tum per se tum per ministros misericorditer relaxarepoenas debitas quoad suū Tribnnal vt costat ex cap. 21. Ioan. inuested them with authority to proceede with sinners more or less rigorously and to inflict longer or shorter punishments as in their wisdome they should thinke fitting in regard of places times persons and circumstances Neither does this great moderation cause any substantiall differences between the ancient and modern Indulgences as these so those importe remission of temporall paines not only in the ecclesiasticall but also in the diuine Court of Iustice before God (l) An Indulgence taken in the formall sense in a meer releasing of temporall paine due vnto sin wherfore it supposeth remission of the guilt which it cannot take away In consequence whereof the state of grace is of necessity required vnto obtaining the fruit or benefit of Indulgences which is the essentiall consistency of Indulgences that neuer doe remit eternall paine due to mortall offence because this is allwayes forgiuen together with the guilt thereof through the infusion of sanctifying grace which is a necessary supposall to remission of temporall paine Wherfore when Church-gouernours grant their letters of Indulgences they say expresly that they doe grant them to such * Clemens 6. extra vnige de peccat remis ait eos qui vsi sunt hoc Ecclesiae thesauro fuisse in amicitia Dei quae supponit remissionem culpae quam Indulgentia non remittit ideoque status gratiae praesupponitur ad fructū Indulgentiae percipiendū as are contrite and confessed which supposeth the state of grace as an essentiall requisite for the receiuing fruit therby neither doth it lie in the power of the supream Pastour to forgiue a sinner the temporall paines corresponding to his sinnes vnless the guilt of these be forgiuen afore for he is only the dispenser of Christ's treasure in consequence whereof he hath not absolute dominion ouer it and it is nt probable as to reason that Christ's will is that his Minister should confer the gracious benefit's which proceed meerly from his bounteous liberallity to such as be his enemies and perseuer in ingratitude towards him In regard that Indulgences doe release temporall paines wherunto a penitent sinner is liable euen in order to the diuine Court of Iustice that is to say before God when dayes Months and yeares of temporall paines are remitted in vertue of them the pains of Purgatory are remitted withall according to a meet proportion corresponding to that space of tyme for by the Church practice appeareth that the supreame Pastour granteth sometimes many more years of pardon then perhaps any soul shall remain in purgatory wherfore the said years of Indulgence are to be vnderstood and explicated in reference to those yeares which great sinners * Iob. 15. perditissimi peccatores bibunt iniquitatem sicut aquam that drink in this life iniquity as water ought to endure vnto full satisfaction for their sinn's in order (m) It was the custome of the primitiue Church to remit penances enioyned by the Churches Canons as appeares euidently by the ancient Council's namely Nicae can 10. 11. Ancyra can 5. Lardisae can 5. Carthag 4. can 75. 76. and indeed the concessions of Popes which giue faculty to grant many dayes and many year's Indulgences to those Priests which shall say Mass for peace amongst christian Princes exaltatiō of the Church c. as likewise to such as shall assist in the same Mass of necessity are meant in order to the penance inflicted by the Churches Canons in primitiue tymes for they cannot be vnderstood of common penances few whereof continue for many years or many dayes to the penitentiall Canons if they should continue aliue for so long a series of yeares for example in ertue of a thousand year's Indulgence such a quantity of the pains in purgatory is remitted as doth correspond to the paine prescribed in the penitentiall Canons yet no man can know precisely what portion of time in purgatory doth correspond to the space of one or more yeares of temporall pain 's inflicted by the said ancient Canons because laying aside diuine reuelations no man can haue a true knowledg of the proportion that is between the paines of purgatory and the afflictions of this life Howeuer it is an vndoubted truth that by a much shorter paine of this life may be released the longest paines of purgatory supposing parity in all circumstances For a man while be liueth vpon earth is in a capacity of obtaining greater measures of grace and mercy then in the next life where there is no meritorious working of blessedness The supposall of parity is added in respect of the extreme intensnesse of purgatory paines wherby they be sufficient enough in a short space of time to equall a long continuance of this lifes afflictions As concerning the sundry additionall particles or names frequently expressed in the concessions of Indulgences for example plenary more plenary most plenary and also Iubily this variety of words doth not cause any reall or substantiall difference in order to the prime effect of an Indulgence which is remission of temporall paine due to sin for he that forgiueth all excludeth nothing wherfore since a plenary Indulgence remitteth all the paine a sinner stands liable vnto there remaineth nothing of it pardonable by a more plenary or most plenary Indulgence yea or by a Iubily Howeuer these additions are prudently expressed for to take away scruple◠therby or to explicate more clearly what is granted and the weightiness of the motiues on which a plenary Indulgence is grounded yet they may be distinguished in respect of certaine priuiledges which are annexed to one Indulgence and not to an other But this is accidentall to an Indulgence which taken in the proper formall sense is remission only of temporall paine due to sin The Priuiledges are power to absolue from censures and reserued Cases liberty to make choyce of any ghostly Father approued and faculty to change vowes which priuiledges are not granted in vertue of each plenary Indulgence being proper to the Indulgence called a (n) The Name of Iubily comes of the Hebrew word Jobel which according to Saint Hierome and Saint Ifidore
immortality of the soul vsing that scripture-testimony I am God of Abraham God of Isaack God of Iacob and subsumeth thus there is no God of the dead but of the liuing arguing therby that the dead rise again since their souls doe not die with their bodyes Besides it is obseruable (o) Oachinus an Apostata Capucin cutteth an argument out of the cited Chap. Macchabae 2. against Purgatory arguing thus If there were a Purgatory though there were no Resurrection of the dead neuertheless prayers offered for the dead might not be in vaiue because the souls thereby might obtain deliuerance from their pain 's that Ochinus an Apostat Capucin fryer abused the fore mentioned scripture-testimony 2. Macchab. 12. to destroy Purgatory and after the very same way of arguing Mr. White abuseth it to ouerthrow a catholick assertion that teacheth the deliuerance of souls out of Purgatory in vertue of holy Churches suffrages Likewise sundry hereticks haue made vse of the same Text to weaken the authority of the books of Machabies pretending that the words If those that were shain should not rise again containe a manifest errour namely that soul's die with their bodies and rise again wherby is plainly euident that it is no difficult business for a man that is wantonly ambitious to be singular in teaching to cut out of scripture abortiue interpretations and to fit them to his vain vnquiet fancy by which he is biassed But how happens it that Mr. White alledgeth scripture-authority vnto the deteyning of good souls in Purgatory till the generall Resurrection * Mr. White in Dimenso 2. affirmamus itaque nos euideter conuinci ex hoc testimonio non solus poenis Purgatorij animas ante Resurrectionem and to lay claime to euidence in his deduction from thence It is not his custome to fly to that sanctuary for protection of his Nouelties nor to acknowledg euidence enough in the scriptures themselues to determine any controuersy for he expresly writeth that It were as ridiculous to seeke the decision of controuersyes out of the Bible as to cut with a Beatle or knock with a straw howeuer it seemes he hath a good minde to cloath his doctrines in the scripture colour's when that holy liuery how vnhandsomly soeuer put on may serue him for a disguise From the premises is euidenced how little reason Mr. White hath to boast of the two mentioned scripture-Testimonies viz. 2 Machab 12. 1. Cor. 15. vauntingly saying These two texts therfore remaine inviolable as first not to be resisted without manifest violence secondly pointing at the very knot of the controuersy that souls once engaged are not capable of that eminent good of being deliuered from their pain 's before the Resurrection And from these pitifull inferences he passeth vnto other scripture-Testimonies wherby he endeauour's to proue that euen blessed souls haue need of prayers but of his vnnaturall and irrationall arguments as to this point the Character of the Church triumphant shall giue euidence enough CHAR. XVI OF HOLY ORDER THE CONTENTS As God in the old law constituted superiour and inferiour Ministers to serue in the Temple so in the new law he hath appointed Bishops Priests Deacons Sub-Deacons c. one more eminent then an other to dispense diuine misteries in the Church of Christ Though euery Bishop is a Priest neuertheless enery Priest is not a Bishop to confer the Sacraments of holy Order and Confirmation is proper to Episcopall authority onely there be seuen Ecclesiasticall Orders taken in the proper sense corresponding to as many distinct functions exercised in relation to the celebrating of the holy Euchariste clericall tonsure can make noe good claim to an Ecclesiasticall Order taken in the proper sense Episcopacy in an holy Order the noblest part of the Churches Hierarchy a proper Sacrament and imprint's a speciall character in the soul of him that is ordain'd a true Bishop Bishops and Priests down from the Apostles till these tymes embraced a single life answeres to sundry Arguments made in fauour of Priest's Marriages HOly Order taken in the restrained Ecclesiasticall sense (a) 1. Timoth. 4. Neglect not the grace S. Paul saith that is in thee vvhich vvas giuen thee by prophesy and imposition of hand 's of Priesthood S. Chrysostom hom 13. commenting vpon this sacred Text affirmes that the Apostle meant by imposition of hand 's the Sacrament of holy Order which Timothy receiu'd of him after the same manner Theodoret interprets the sacred Text 2. Timot. 1. Stirr vp the grace of god vvhich is in thee by the imposition of mine hands That is by my ordaining thee who am a Bishop and S. Ambrose writing vpon the same Text implyes in the imposition of hands all the outward actions and words which were done and said ouer himselfe when he was ordain'd a Priest Besides in the primitiue Church when a Bishop confer'd the holy Order of Priesthood he vsed to bless the party ordain'd lye his hands on his head and giue him power to offer sacrifice for the liuing and the dead in the name of our lord that is in the room of Christ In consequence of the premises since in the ordination of Priests grace is giuen by an outward sensible sign holy Order is a Sacrament of the new law and so is desin'd by the Council's of Florence In the Decree of Pope Eugenius And Trent sess 23. can 4. is a proper Sacrament of the new law whereby a reasonable creature of the male sex * Baptismus requiritur in eo qui ordinatur quia baptismus in re suscept us est Janua aliorū Sacramentorum cuius proinde characterem character Ordinis supponit vt patet ex cap. si quis presbyter and baptised is ordained and enabled to perform the ministery of the Euchariste or in the celebration therof to serue after a speciall manner (b) Diaconesses mentioned Epis ad Timoth. could make no more claim to an Ecclesiasticall Order taken in the proper sense then the Religions men and women of those dayes being they had no power or iurisdiction as to the accomplishing or administring of a Sacrament And although Deanship Arch-Deaconship Priorship and Abbat-ship lay claim to something of Ecclesiasticall iurisdiction neuertheless by vertue of their institution and consecration they receiue no power to administer a Sacrament or to serue specially in the administration therof and t' is the same as to Arch Bishops and Patriarchs considered precisely in order to the dignity they haue ouer and aboue the Order of Bishops in vertue of his ordination * Hieron Epis 57. quae est ad Euagrium vt sciamus inquit traditiones Apostolicas sumptas de veteri Ecclesia puta ex Vaticinio Jsaiae cap. 6. Assumam exijs in Sacerdotes Leuitas quod Aaron filij eius Leuita in Templo fuerunt hoc sibi Epistopi Presbyteri Diaconi vendicant in Ecclesia S. Hieron locum Isaiae intelligit ad literam de Apostolis
Angell is not a Cherubin or Seraphin that being a peculiar Order of Angells distinct from the rest And albeit that S. Hierom and but he alone among all the ancient ecclesiasticall writers doth assert in his Epistle 85. to Euagrius that in the primitiue times a Bishop and a Priest were one and the same thing also that Bishops got superiority ouer meer Priests rather in respect of ecclesiasticall constitution then diuine institution yet no man must argue thence that S. Hierom did deny a Bishop taken in the ordinary ecclesiasticall sense to be distinct from a meer Priest without hauing him contradict what himselfe hath written in sundry other places which were to play the part of an vniust Iudg. Besides it is not consonant at all as to reason that so great a learned Prelate as S. Hierom should be ignorant of bishops superiority ouer meer Priests in regard of iurisdiction and order as to diuine right since Timothy whom all interpreters and Fathers call Bishop was inuested with iudicatory authority ouer meer Priests as doth plainly appeare by the Apostles own words 1. Timoth. 3. Against Priests receiue none accusation but vnder two or three witnesses Moreouer S. Hierom doth not deny in the epistle afore alleadged the superiority of Bishops ouer meer Priest's to be grounded in the truth of our lord's disposall for he doth assert only that maiority to proceede rather or more from ecclesiasticall custome then from a true ordinance of Christ for as much as ecclesiasticall constitutions haue rendred the dignity of Bishop's more eminent then it was in primary times adding thereunto preeminence of places in the Church peculiar ornaments and priuiledges to consecrate diuerse thing 's which meer Priest's cannot doe Howeuer S. Hierom doth assert expresly ordination that is power to ordain Priests proper to Episcopall function only in his said Epistle to Euagrius and likewise power to confer the Sacrament of Confirmation in a Dialogue writen against Luciferus But it is conceiued by coniecturall deductions from the writings of S. Hierom that in his Epistle 85. to Euagrius * Credibile etiam est S. Hieron prae oculis habuisse Ioannem Ierosolymae Episcopum qui iniustè afflixerat eum fratrem ipsius voluit deprimere fastum eius Legatur Epis 61. ipsius Hieron he playd the Oratour vsing the figure hyperbole being heartily angry with certain Deacons that ambitiously preferred themselues before Priests or at least suffered themselues to be preferred wherfore to suppress their inordinate ambition and extream insolence he made a parity between Bishops and meer Priest's which doubtless he meant only in respect of the great and maine function in order to the celebration of the holy Eucharist that is equall and common alike to both of them * Est propositio de fide quod sint 7. ordines communiter dicti presbyte ratus Diaconatus c. vt patet ex Concilijs Roma sub Syluestro can 7. Carthag 4. cui interfuit S. Aug. Trid. sess 32. catechismus Trid. cap. de ordine recenset omnes 7. ordines sigillatim As touching the number of ecclesiasticall Orders it is a constant Tenet of catholick faith that there be seuen orders taken in the proper sense viz of Priests Deacons sub-Deacons Acolists Lectours Exorcists and doorekeepers corresponding to as many sundry functions which are exercised in reference to the celebrating of the Eucharist The first is the consecration therof proper to Priest's alone the second administration of the Sacrament which belongeth to Deacons The third is the preparing of the sacramentall matter wherunto Sub-Deacons are ordained the fourth is the presenting of the matter at the Altar and vnto this function doth relate the order of Acolits But the other three orders regarde the disposition of such as be attendants only at the time of celebrating the Eucharist among which some are vnbelieuers and doore-Keepers are ordained to debarre and keeper of such Persons others haue a desire to belieue aright but are not sufficiently enough instructed for the perfecting of these Lectours are ordained Others though they are true belieuers and want no instructions yet in as much as they be possessed with deuills or otherwise vexed by them Exorcists are ordained for their meet help (f) According to Pope Innocent the third and other Orthodox writers before him namely Steph. Eduensis In opus de Sacra Altaris pr. 6. all the functions proper to the seuen orders were represented in the outward actions of Christ And S. Austin and other ancient Fathers affirme that Christ represented the Sacrament of penance in the raising of Lazarus for as much as he commanded the Apostles to vntye the cords that bound him Again S. Austin Comment In Ioan. c. 9. says that the washing of the mans eyes that was blind from his birth in the water of Siloe was a figure of christian baptism And all these seuen ecclesiasticall orders are figured and represented by sundry actions which Christ exercised on earth For example Christ Io. 3. made a scourge of small cordes and droue out of the Temple of Ierusalem those that sold oxen sheep Doues and changer's of money wherby are figured Door-keepers whose office is after Christ's example to shut the Church doores againsT the vnworthy and open them to the worthy Christ Luc. 4. read the Prophesie of Isaias wherin the Order of Lectours is signified their office being to read the holy Prophesies Christ Mark 8. cast out Deuills wherby Exorcists are represented Christ Io. 8. sayes I am the light of the world Wherunto doe relate Acolites the carrying of burning candles to enlighten being their function Christ Io. 13. preparing to celebrate the Eucharist tooke a Towell girded himselfe and powered water into a bason to wash his disciples feet in which action Sub-Deacons be expressed for one office of these Ecclesiasticall Ministers is to prepare water for celebrating of the Eucharist and to wash the Corporalls as is prescribed in the Roman Pontificall Christ Mat. 26. at his last supper distributed to his Apostles the Sacrament of the Euchariste and afterward Io. 13. preached vnto them in these two actions are shadowed deacons whose office is to preach and sometimes to distribute the Sacrament of the Euchariste as doth appeare plainly by the hystory of S. Steuen and S. Lawrence which as Deacons exercised the said actions Again Christ at his last supper did offer the sacrifice of the Euchariste that is of his body and blood which is proper to Priestly function * S PP Aug. Gregor alâ—â— testaÌ„tur Christum actione illa qua suscitauit LazaruÌ„ iussitque eum vinculis quibus erat ligatus ab Apostolis dissolui adumbrasse nostraÌ„ poeniteÌ„tiam potestateÌ„ traditaÌ„ Ecclesiae pro remitteÌ„dis peccatis Et Aug. comment in Euang Ioan. dicit ablutionem oculorum caeci naii ad natatoria Siloe tepraesontasse ablutionem nostri Baptismi In like manner Christs actions expressed in raysing vp of Lazarus and in commanding
According to S. Austin l. de bono coniug c. 24. euery marriage is in order to generation but christian marriage onely is inuested with the dignity of a Sacrament haue nothing of a Sacrament taken in the proper sense viz for an outward practicall sign of sanctifying grace that is for a sensible ceremony that in vertue of it's institution can effectually sanctify which is an effect proper only to the Sacrament's of the new law wherof Baptism is the doore howeuer they be ciuill contracts conformable to the law of nature and by no diuine law forbidden and therfore lawfull * 2. Cor. 6. Nolite ducere iugum cū infidelibus yet the marriage of a christian belieuer with an infidell of what kinde soeuer when there appeareth danger of subuersion therby is against the dictates of nature which oblige euery one to auoide whatsoeuer tendes to his ruine in consequence whereof such marriages be vnlawfull in respect wherof the Apostle 2. Cor. 6. forbiddeth the Corinthians conuerted to the faith of Christ to beare the yoake with Infidells which is meant in regard of the danger as to subuersion and indeed no diuine ordinance making such marriages vnlawfull appeares either by the old or new Testament for Salomon euen at that time when the old scripture reported him to be loued of God and to walk in all the commandements of his Father Dauid married the daughter of Pharao and though God Exod. 34. prohibited Moses to make any compact with the Amorites and the Cananites which adored false Gods or to take wiues of their daughters for his sons (i) S. Austin l. de fide operibus c. 19. treating of marriages between Catholick's and Hereticks affirm's that in his dayes they were not counted as sinnes because in the new Testament nothing is commanded in Order to such marriages neuerthelesse that diuine prohibition according to the precise form of speech was in reference only to the danger of subuersion which by the law of nature euery man is obliged to auoide for God maketh the eminent danger of their ruine to be the ground of his prohibition adding these words Lest their daughters goe a fornicating after their Gods and make thy sons goe a fornicating after their Gods neither doth the new Testament expresse any speciall law that prohibiteth christians to marry with Infidells Besides in the primitiue times (k) Clodoueus king of France was conuerted to the faith of Christ by the means of his Queen that was a christian Again S. Monica S. Austins Mother preuail'd with her husband and S. Cicily with her spouse Valerianus to embrace the christian Religion which verifies what the Apostle saith 1. Cor. 7. The vnbelieuing husband is sanctifyed by a belieuing wife sundry gallant women for vertue and sanctity were yoked with vnbelieuing husbands and the supream prouidence blessed their marriages with happy success vsing them as a means to bring their said husbands to the marueilous light of christian faith Notwithstanding the catholick Church wisely considering that many spirituall subuersions and other great inconueniences arose from such marriages hath euen anciently prohibited and annulled them that is hath disenabled christians to beare the yoke with Infidells wherby is euident that the marriage of a Catholick with an Heretick is vnlawfull in respect of an ecclesiasticall constitution only * Ex cap. ex literis extra de consuetudine talis cōsuetudo quae est in Polonia aequipollet legi sed lex posterior potest abrogare priorē which in Poland and germany seemeth to be abrogated by a contrary custome introduced with the tacite consent at least of the Churches chief Pastor the Churches consent express or tacite being a necessary requisite to the introducing of a Custome vnto the abrogating of an ecclesiasticall law in regard of Catholicks and hereticks promiscuous liuing together and the toleration of them both (l) As to the marriages of Catholicks with Hereticks that matter of controuersy was at sundry tymes disputed before Pope Clement the 8. by many learned Cardinalls and other famous diuin's which with one accord declar'd that his Holines might lawfully grant leaue vnto a Catholick to marry with an Heretick or Infidel and in Poland and Germany where there is toleration of one and the other profession and where Catholicks and Hereticks liue promiscuously together such marriages are vsuall and common either in regard in those countryes it is a Custome introduced through a tacite consent of the sea Apostolick which hath abrogated the ecclesiasticall law that forbiddeth such marriages and they be forbidden in the Councils Laodis sub Syluestro Carthag 3. and others or because in those Countries which giue freedom in the exercise of euery Christian profession there is no morall apparent danger of subuersion as to to Catholicks And it matters not that when a catholick man or woman marrying with an Heretick knowes that the party he or she that marryes will minister and receiue the Sacrament vnworthily for the marriage thereby no more ceases to be a Sacrament then Baptism ceaseth to be a Sacrament vnworthily receiu'd neither doth the Catholick sinne therby because Vtitur iure suo duntaxat For example a man that through necessity borrow's money of an vsurer whom he knows morally will exact vnlawfull lucre doth not offend because he vseth but his own right and the vsurer if he would might cōmit no sin being in his power to pleasure his neighbour in an vrgent necessity without exacting or expecting gain for the loan of his money which probably taketh away eminent dāgerof subuersion in order to a Catholick man or woman so marrying and his or her children howeuer it doth not lie in the Churches power to loose the knot of christian marriage after consummation hath tied it vpon any occasion whatsoeuer either for adultery or any other enormous crime so as to giue leaue to the innocent party to marry again whiles the other liueth for no humane authority can put a sunder that which God coupled together wherfore the Apostle saies 1. Cor. 7. And to the married I command not I but our lord let not the wife depart from her husband where he expresseth a double departure the one vniust forbidden by the words set downe the other iust in respect of a lawfull cause namely fornication which he alloweth vpon condition only adding But if she depart let her remain vnmarried or he reconciled vnto her husband signifying therby the bond of marriage to be vndissoluble Again Christ Math. 5 reuoking the bill of diuorcement that God had granted to the Iews during the old law because of the hardness of their hearts and reducing marriage to the institution it had in the begining of creation said to the Pharisies Whosoeuer shall put away his wife except for * Nomine adulterij siue formeationis intelligitur omnis copula illicita violans sidem matrimonij per diuisionē carnis cōtra illud erūt duo in carne vna fornication
inquit haereses obortae sunt aut nata sūt schismata quam quod Sacerdoti Dei non obtemperatur nec vnus in Ecclesia ad tē pus Sacerdos Iudex vice Christi cogitatur teaching peruerse things to draw disciples after them wherby is euidenced that no priuat man is an infallible interpreter of holy scriptures neither can know certainly that scriptures are the word of God laying aside the Churches authority For example credence is not giuen to the canon or caralogue of scriptures because of scripture testimony which no where attestes that catalogue in so much that Luther and Caluin down from the begining of their defection to the departure out of the world contended about the number of canonicall scriptures and their adherents of these dayes respectiuely continue in the pursuance of the same dispute Moreouer there is greater reason that the christian faith should rely rather on the Church which * S. Cypri in trac de vnitate Ecclesiae adulterari inquit nō potest sponsae Christi incorrupta est pudicae is an infallible ground and piller of truth then of sole scriptures which are liable to mutations corruptions and false interpretations howeuer scriptures cōsidered in themselues precisely do chaleng equall authority with the Church the same diuine spirit that directeth the tongues of the supream pastours in speaking (o) God by his absolute and extrrordinary power can himselfe alone or by an Angel instruct men and reueale matters of faith and christian religion without the ministery of the Church And doubtless the Apostles had noe other master but God himselfe as to sundry mysteries of christian faith and Christ himselfe confesseth that S. Peter came to the knowledge of his diuine nature by reuelation from God the Father Caro Sanguic non reuelauit tibi sed Pater meus guided the pennes of the Apostles and Euangelists in writing and as the Church beareth witnesse of the scriptures infallible doctrine so the scriptures do witness the Churches infalible authority yet so as that faith in order to its acte of assent is resolued into the Church and not into the scriptures for noe man can prudently belieue any scripture to be the word of God if the Church that is the ground and piller of truth should not declare it for such howeuer Catholicks who doe infer the Churches infallibility from the testimony of scripture and the authority of scripture from the testimony of the Church are noe more guilty of committing (p) According to Euclide a mathematicall circle taken in the proper sense is the passing of one and the same line from and the repassing vnto the same point and by the same way a circle of errour then are Philosophers that assert mutuall causalities or doe argue from a cause its proper effect and from an effect its proper cause for example from the rising of the sun is proued the existence of the day and againe the existence of the day proueth the risiing of the sun wherin there is noe circle of errour which properly consisteth in the coming again of the same thing vnto the same thing from whence it came and by the same way it came but the way of one cause is not the way of an other cause nor the way of an effect is the way of the cause wherof it is the effect in like manner the way of the Church which is a cleare speaking Iudge is not the way of the scriptures which consiste in mute elements of characters and although we belieue that the Church is an infallible proposer of all matters pertaining to faith because of the scripture testimony neuertheless if the scriptures had borne noe witness therof there is euidence of credibility enough to induce vs prudently to belieue the Churches infallibility which euen before the writing of scriptures was beliued neither do we recur to scriptures to proue it (q) In disputs or conferences with such as deny holy scriptures motiues of credibility haue weight with them and that one which S. Austin vseth l. con Epis Faus cap. 4. seems of greattest moment Many things saith he keepe me fast in the bosom of the Catholick Church for example the vnanimous accord of people and nations authority confirmed by miracles .... by antiquity strengthned and the succession of Bishops dovvn from S. Peter the Apostle to vvhom our lord committed the feeding of his sheepe vnto the present Episcopacy but when we haue to doe with such as admit them and euen then we doe not alledge scriptures as the formall cause the Churches infallibility is known by for that is diuine reuelation but as witness of it only for we doe not belieue precisely that the Church is infallible because the scripturs do say it but in regard of many other motiues which do moue vs to giue our assent thereto neither was the church intended for the vse of the scriptures but scriptures for the vse of the Church besides no man without manifesting extream weakness can except against the mutuall testimony that Christ and S. Iohn Baptist gaue of one another or against the disciples of both who belieued their masters to be such as their masters reciprocally had declared theselues to bee The principall marks or tokens of the true Church * Quatuor illa signa dilucide constant ex sacra scriptura ex symbolis Apostolorum Nicae S. Athanasij expressè habentur in sym Constātinop cuius Patres voce apostolicam diuinitus addiderunt are foure set douwn in that Article of christian faith viz I belieue one holy catholick and apostolick Church Albeit that the true Church consisteth of many members yet it is but one body 1. Cor. 12. of Christ in vnity of faith and baptism One lord one faith one baptism Ep. 4. nor can Christ be an author of diuision that is a God of vnion Likwise it is holy for as much as it is the body of Christ that is the fountain of all holyness and enioyes a sacrifice and Sacraments which confer sanctity neither matters it that sundry members of his body are guilty of mortall transgressions For as such as profess any art are counted artificers though they doe not act according to the principalls or rules there-of so the said members in regard they put on Christ (r) According to S. Austin in psal 85. if all christians and true belieuers are baptized in Christ they haue put on Christ as the Apostle reacheth Gal. 3. and if they be made members of his body and say they are not holy they do an iniury to the head whose members are holy by Baptism and become the chosen people of God by faith are called holy although they doe not obserue the ordinances and lawes of either For example 1. Cor. 1. the Corinthians are said to be sanctified in Christ IESVS and holy neuertheless there were among them both the naturall and carnall men The true Church militant is (ſ) According to the Euangelist