him that is ordained a Bishop which is the Tenet of all catholick writers that assert Episcopacy to deriue it's institution from Christ and to be an ecclesiasticall order taken in the proper sense for the Council of Tent sess 23. c. 4. can 4. doth define the Sacrament of Order to imprint a character which definition being absolute without restriction or distinction between one order and an other it doth euidently follow that all orders doe imprint a character which is a spirituall signe deriued into the soul wherby a man is muested with power to exercise certain ecclesiasticall functions in order to the ministery of the Eucharist and it matters not that the priestly is more worthy and excellent then the Episcopall character as distinct from it for the impression of a new and distinct character is not grounded in the more or less perfection and excellency of a precedent character but in the distinction of powers and abilities in reference to exercising the ministery of the Euchariste neither Matters it that Fathers and Councils when they number the Sacraments of the new law do acknowledg seuen only comprehending holy order for one for in so numbring of them they consider holy Order in (l) According to the Ancient Fathers ordination of a Bishop and a Priest is said to be one and the same that is taken in the generall sense and holy order so taken is but one Sacrament onely but a Bishop taken in the proper sense euen according to S. Hierom. Dial. con Lucif hath in the Church the preeminence which Aaron had in law of Moses and to meer Priests he giues that Degree of preeminence onely into which the sons of Aaron were inuested Besides s. Epiphan l. de Sacerdot dignit c. 6. calleth Episcopacy a Deified Order and cap. 7. assert's difference between a Bishop and a meer Priest being God exact's not the same thing 's from a Priest as from a Bishop that has preeminence aboue him a genericall signification as it containeth all it's sundry species or kinds Wherfore in as much as according to the rules of Logick what can be rightly affirmed of a thing taken in the generall sense may be also affirmed of all the sundry species contained therin it doth plainly follow that since ecclesiasticall order taken in its genericall signification is a Sacrament and doth imprint a Character euery true species therof is a Sacrament and imprinteth a Character In like manner Fathers and Councils reckoning seuen Orders they do coÌ„prehend Episcopacy vnder Priesthood And for as much as Christ had but one spouse which is the Church a Bishop and a Priest that supplieth his room and representeth his Person in the ministery ought to be married to the Church only * S. Hieron in sua Apolog con Jouin Apostoli inquit vel virgines vel post nuptias contineÌ„tes fuerunt id est absquo vxorum consortio wherfore the Apostles after they were ordained Bishops and Priests led their life 's in all godliness purity and chastity and this apostolicall practice Bishops and Priests down from them to these times haue religiously obserued S. Hierom L. in vigilantium exclaimeth against some Modern Hereticks of those times for taking such of the people only to be Priest's as had (m) According to the second Council of Carthage continency was enioyned to Bishops and Priests the ancient Fathers there assembled declaring with one accord that they ought to obserue it being the Apostles taught it and antiquity kept it Besides the first Council of Nice put forth an ordinance that Bishops Priest's and Deacons should entertaine no woman in their families except Mothers Grand-mothers sisters and Aunts making no mention of wifes From whence S. Basil Epis 17 infer's that to take wifes after the receiuing of holy Order was not permitted And indeed Clergy-men of those dayes had so great a reuerence to chastity that euen the Arian Bishop's ordain'd no man that was marryed as witnesseth S. Epiphan her 37. moreouer it was neuer permitted in the Church of Christ that a Bishop or Priest might marry as appear's by the Testimonies of ancient Fathers of the Greek Church though now this Church faln into schism differs from the Latins in opinion and practice as to such as had wifes before their ordination wiues contrary to the custome of both the Eastern and western Churches that allwaies promoted to the Maior-orders Virginia or such as were esteemed chast and pure from all carnall vncleaness and though in the primitiue times when there was great scarcity of single persons as proper and fit to be ordained Bishops Priest's Deacons and Sub-Deacons the Church-gouernours tooke of married men for the exercising those functions neuertheless these did not accompany with their wiues after their ordination but led their liues in all purity and chastity as did their wiues also according to a mutuall promise of continency and since the Priests of the old law to whom marriage was permitted as it were of necessity to multiply the people of God and who did sâ—adow only in their ministery what the Priests of the new law do really offer in their sacrifices viz. the true and reall body and blood of Christ in memory of his death and passion did abstain not only from the carnall embracement's of their wiues but also from the houses wherin they resided before they were to enter into the Temple for the performance of their spirituall functions respectruely it is most consonant as to reason that Priest's of the new law doe obserue continency together with purity and holyness Besides the vnmarried careth for the things of our lord how he may please him but he that is married careth for the things of the world how he may please his wife 1. Cor. 7. Wherfore such as leaue the world to be ordained Bishops Priest's Deacons and Sub Deacons ought to leade a single life without wifes and truly in regard therof there is less danger of dissipating ecclesiasticall goods and conuerting them to the making vp of inheritance for Clergy-mens children Furthermore Priests vnmarried are in a better condition to reproue the vices of lay-people then if they were married and for as much as they are single men they be less vnquiet contentious and troublesome to their flock not seeking to enrich children which they haue not Iouinianus and VigilaÌ„tius were the first sectaries that stood vp in defence of Priests marriages and Luther and Caluin raysed vp againe that heresy after that it had been dead and buried for many ages teaching that it is not only lawfull for Peiests to marry before but euen after their ordination These are followd by all the sectaries of the present times And knowing well that the opinion contradicteth all antiquity they labour to make it agree with the holy scriptures whence they cut out weak interpretations and form coniecturall deductions only abusing sundry text's for Example God says Gen. 1. bring forth fruit and multiply whence they very weakly
the Apostles to loose the cordes wherwith he was tyed doe represent Christian penance and the power that Christ gaue the Church to loose and remit sins as doe euidence the testimonies of ancient Fathers who also doe expresly assert Christ by his actions to haue prefigured the mysteries of christian religion Howeuer no man can deny without running into manifest errour but that the seuen afore named ecclesiasticall order haue had their begining from Christ's own institution and it matters not that euery Church in the primitiue times was not serued with so many for then in regard of the scarcity of belieuers and want of members to promote to the ministery there could not be so many ordained in so much that for the most part one Church was gouerned by one Priest only or by one Bishop and a Deacon yet after a happy encrease of belieuers and persons proper to exercise ecclesiasticall functions euery Church was supplied with all the seuen orders of ministers and serued according to their distinct offices As touching * Catechismus Trid. cap. de ordine parag 13. ait Parochū debere docere primam Tōsuram esse praeparat ionem quandā ad sacros ordines suscipiendos sicut sunt Exorcismi ad Baptismum sponsalia ad matrimoniū docēt autem Beda l. 4. His. Aug. Baronius Tom. 1. Annal an Christi 58. antiquitatem vsum significationem clericalis Tōsurae clericall Tonsure it is no ecclesiasticall order taken in the proper sense being only a disposition or preparation vnto ordination as exorcisme is to Baptisme or spousalls vnto Matrimony that is to say it is the first step only to ecclesiasticall promotion howeuer the vsage thereof is ancient as is also the clipping of the haire in the crowne of his head that receiues it wherby literally is signifyed the crowne of royall Priesthood wherunto a Clergy-man is disposed and deputed by Clericall tonsure or the crowne of glory which he expecteth in vertue of Christs death and passion or mystically is represented therby worldly employments and superfluous cares and entertainement's which a Clergy-man ought to cast from him as he doth the haire of his head in the receiuing of Tonsure But Episcopacy as a function distinct from Priesthood hath a good title to ecclesiasticall order taken in the proper sense for the consecration of Bishops is called ordination and the Hierarchy of the Church which is a subordination of ecclesiasticall ministers in respect whereof some are more eminent then others in the administration of diuine things doth consist of Bishops Priests and other inferiour ministers wherefore Episcopacy is essentially required thereunto as the noblest Hierarchicall member and indeed that which the Apostle gaue to Timothy by laying on of his hands was Episcopall dignity or Episcopacy according to the interpretation of S. Chrysostome Hom. 13. in 1. Epis ad Timoth. Theophilactus S. Anselm and others Besides the ancientest Fathers doe call Episcopacy an holy Order Anacletus Ep. 3. cap. 1. Caius Pope in the numbring of orders acknowledgeth two orders of Priests the one of Maior Priests that is Bishops and the other of Minor Priest's that is meer Priests Likewise S. Epiphan Haeres 75. Yet the degrees and states of Primates and Patriarchs as distinct offices from Episcopacy lay no claim to the Churches Hierarchy being in respect of Episcopall function one and the same order and the maiority that these can challenge aboue meer Bishops proceedes from human constitution only As the ordination of Priests Deacons and Sub-Deacons c. is a Sacrament taken in the proper sense so is (g) According to the Current of catholick writers since the Council of Trent Episcopacy is a Sacrament taken in the proper sense and the contrary opinion counted erroneous And truly S Austin con Parmeni and other ancient Fathers while they call holy Order a Sacrament they instance in Episcopacy which has diuine institution Act. 20. the holy Ghost appointed Bishops to gouerne the Church and though according to the 2. Toletan Council meer Priest's laid their hands together with the Bishop in the heads of those which were ordain'd which was the custome of some Churches of those dayes neuertheless that imposition of hands as to meer Priest's had nothing of the proper matter and at the most was a condition only requir'd to the validity of the Sacrament of holy Order as now the personall presence of the Parish Priest or some other by him substituted is an essentiall requisit to the validity of Marriage ordination of bishops hauing all necessary requisits therunto viz. outward sensible Rites Grace conferred therby and Christs (b) The Sacrament of holy Order as to Episcopacy Christ instituted Io. 20. when he said to his Apostles As my Father sent me so send I you receiue the holy Ghost And indeed as to reason t' is not probable that Episcopall Order was instituted afore for then doubtless Christ had instituted it at his last supper by the word 's hoc facite do this But these particles according to the Council of Trent sess 21. can 2. were meant of power giuen vnto Priest's in order to the celebrating of the Euchariste own institution which do plainly appeare by the words of the Apostle 2. Tim. 1. stir vp the grace of God which is in thee by the putting on of mine hands that is by ordaining thee a Bishop according to the interpretation of the ancient Fathers Again diuine institution of Episcopacy is deducible sufficiently enough from the Hierarchy of the Church instituted by diuine ordination Episcopacy being the noblest member therof for the Hierarchy (i) According to S. Epiphanius haer 57. or 77. Orders of Church-ministers were perfected by litle and litle onely and he obserueth that the Apostle Epis ad Timot. ad Tit. mention's a Bishop and a Deacon onely because those primitiue Churches had onely those two orders of Ministers in regard there was then exceeding great scarcity of persons fit to be ordain'd and the Council of Trent doth not exact the whole number of Ministers but in such Churches as can conueniently be furnisht with all the Orders doth consist of Bishops Priests and (k) The principall Church Ministers after the Priest's are Deacons according to S. Denys l. de Eccles Hierar c. 23. and 5. the function proper to them is to serue in order to the holy Euchariste Also according to S. Ignat. Epis ad Trullo Deacons were not dispensers of meat and drink but of christian Sacraments Besides according to S. Justin in fine Apologet. Deacons were wont to minister the Enchariste to those which were present and to carry it to such as were absent Again this catholick doctrine appear's evidently by the History of S. Lawrence which S. Ambrose set's down l. 1. offic c. 41. and doubtless to haue care of the poore was the secundary and not the primary office of Deacons ministers Hereby it is cleare that Episcopacy doth imprint a spirituall character in
from equalling or adjusting of things due by right Iustice deriues its name which in order to God is meet exhibiting of praise and seruice in regard of his diuine perfections and thanksgiuing in reference to the infinit benefits he hath confer'd on mankind and a meet satisfying for sin whereby God is injured It is meet and just that we praise and serue God who is our soueraign lord of whom we hold all our goods both temporall and spirituall and which-indeed are rather his goods then ours he hauing deliuered them to us only vpon condition we render him faithfull seruice that is * Ad Epes 6. non ad oculum seruientes quasi hominibus placentes sed vt serui Christi facientes voluntatē eiuo ex animo not seruice to the eye as men-pleasers but as good seruants doing his will with a perfect heart and willing mind * S. Chrysos cum tali inquit vultu respicit Deus ea quae facis cum quali facis For God regardeth our seruice according to the manner we doe it he glorifyeth the good and casteth the euill seruants into vtter darknes wherfore whosoeuer will be for himselfe and not for God * S. Gregor de nihilo Deus fecit omniae qui sibi vult esse non tiói nihil vult esse inter omnia will be nothing amongst all things which God made of nothing besides it is meet and just that we praise and serue God in regard he is our Father we are the clay and he our potter and we all are the work of his hands Isa 64. if a child is bound to honour and serue his earthly Father in deed in word and in all patience Eccle. 30. from whom he receiueth his body much rather he ought to honour and serue his heauenly Father that both formes the same body and breathes into it a breath of life vnto making him a liuing soul and exalting him to a heauenly inheritance wherfore doubtless euery good Christian when he saith our Father which art in Heauen hath a great sense of his condition and taketh thought for pleasing God his heauenly Father lest he come to heare the heauy sentence of Iudgment declared to the wicked Iewes I haue nourished and brought vp children but they haue rebelled against me Isa 50. or that other Io. 8. ye are of your Father the deuil and the lustes of your Father ye will doe Again t is meet and just that we celebrate the remembrance of Gods immense benefits bestowed on us with thanks-giuing for he * Ephes 2. Deus qui diues est in misericordia propter nimiam suam charitatem qua dilexit nos which is rich in mercy through the great aboundance of his loue where with he loued us euen When we were by nature the children of wrath and dead in sin hath quickened us together in Christ by whose grace we are deliuered from bondage death and made partakers of eternall life to the end we may raigne with him celestially Eph. 20. One of the ten lepers Luc. 17. was just fell down on his face at the feet of Christ and gaue him thankes for the healing of his corporall leprosy much rather we Christians ought to exalt the great mercy of God with thanks-giuing for as much as he hath cured vs through IESUS-CHRIST of our spirituall leprosy which is sin vnless we will be like the other euill nine lepers which returned not to praise God that had clensed them or like the pagan Philosophers Rom. 10. which God gaue vp to their vaine thoughts deceitfull vanities and their hearts filthy lusts because though they knew yet they did not glorify him neither were thankfull Again t is meet and just that we acknowledge our sins to God vnto repairing of the injuries done him thereby and when we (c) An humble confession of our sins appeaseth Gods wrath I did confess saith the Royall Prophet against my selfe my iniustice to our lord and he forgaue the impiety of my sin confess with a contrite heart against our selues our wickednes his mercy forgiues the punishment of our guilt * Ezechiel 18. si impius egerit poenitiam ab omnibus peccatis suis quae operatus est .... omnium iniquitatum eius non recordabor neither will God remember the iniquities of him that turnes from them and makes him a new heart and a new spirit Iustice in order to our neighbour is to pay to all men loue respect honour and duty that is to doe to euery man whatsoeuer we would * Haecest lex naturae Quod tibi nō vis facere alteri nefeceris that euery man should doe to vs for euery man is euery mans neighbour there being nothing of * Aug. in Psal 118. omnis homo omni homini est proximus nec vllae cogit anda est longinquitas generis vbi est natura communis distance as to birth or kindred where nature is common alike Besides Gods law of charity excepts none his will being to saue and bring all men vnto the knowledg of his truth (d) According to the generall practice of the Catholick Church publick prayers are offered on good friday for all men of what condition or profession soeuer they be which holy custome plainly demonstrates the sence of the whole Church in order to Christs offering his passion for the redemption of the world that is the Church beleiues that Christ excluded none from that oblation Pagans Iews and hereticks through the great mercy of God may cast from them their iniquities vnto iustification of life in respect wherof the Apostle Timo. 2. exhorteth that supplications prayers intercessions and giuing of thanks be made for all men in consequence of the premises as we would that our neighbour should doe to vs so must we doe to him likewise as we would that our neighbour should giue to vs loue respect honour and duty so must we giue to him likewise as we would that our neighbour should not prejudice us in word counsell or deed so must we doe to him likwise as we would that all men should keep their faith pawned to us so must likewise wee performe faithfully our ingagement with all men Furthermore Iustice in order to our neighbour is to fullfill (e) S. Gregor l. 4. Dial. c. 58. aduiseth vs as a thing more safe and profitable to procure in our life time those benefits and aduantages which after our death we exspect from those which are intrusted with our pious legacies saying t is better to depart out of this world vnliable to imprisonment then afterwards in prison to seek liberty the will of the dead according to the trust put in us and to powre out our prayers to giue of our aboundance alms and to vnder goe voluntary afflictions for the faithfull departed to the end that such as after their remouall out of their bodies stand liable (f) S. Bernard auerreth that the torments of faithfull souls
an other place or receptacle besids the Heauen of the blessed and the Hell of the damned Caluin that he might the rather deny Purgatory he deny'd Limbus and that he might the better deny Limbus he denyed that Christ descended into hell otherwise then by suffering on his Cross the torments of a damned soul which saith Caluin in cap. 26. mat vvere so grieuous that euen vvords of dispaire came from him So impudently this great reformer of religion blasphem'd against Christ but the Catholick Church teacheth that Christ truly and properly descended into hell that is the soul of Christ remoued out of his body with its proper presence penetrated the lower receptacles of the earth where good souls were detained as prâ—sonners and brough with him from thence such as were ripe and fit for the kingdom of Heauen Lege S. Jgnat Epis ad Trallia Clem. Alex. l. 2. 6. stromatum Basil in Psal 48. visited the lower parts of the earth comforting such as were departed in perfect grace afore his coming thither From his sepulcher he leapt again into the world from whence after that he had setled a Priestly ministery that should be of perpetuall vse in his vineyard that is the Church like a hunter that gladly rejoyces in his obtained prey went with joy home leading captiuity captiue that is rendering happy the captiuity of just souls detained as it were in a prison vnder ground and carrying them with him in glorious triumph for he opened the gates of his Fathers Pallace which were euer afore shut against them As clamorous hunting so couetous playing * Aleae lusus Clericis interdictus à Concilijs Patribus Canonibus Aristoteles Aleatores latronum praedonumque societati inserit at cardes or dice for mony is an exercise vnworthy Priests which ought to seek no other lucre then the gaining of souls vnto Iesus-Christ who is their proper treasure and * Sacerdos dicit Christo tu es qui restituis haereditatem meam mihi heritage and mony betrayed him sould Ioseph and damned Iudas * Augustinus vocat Theatra cauâ—as turpitudinis publicaâ— professiones flagitiorum laudantur Massilienses quod sic abhorrebant à spectaculis vt mimis locum in scaena non concederâ—nt Again stage-playes as they be commonly exhibited in our country are incoÌ„sistent with Priestly function for as much as the outward words and counterfeited Gestures of the players representing reciprocall passages of wicked louers tend to carnall wantonnes and vncleanes and such a a Theater Saith S. Chrysostom is the chair of pestilence schole of incontinency and shop of luxury that sets out to sale the lusts of the flesh howeuer stage-playes are laudable recreations in order to lay-people while they represent but heroicall actions of gallant persons vnto imitation and vn godly enterprises of wicked men vnto detestation therof or while they exhibite delightfull fictions without obscenes Furthermore Missionary Priests must not affect to be counted * 2. Timoth. 2. homo militans Deo non se implicet negotijs saecularibus statesmen they being priuat persons professing a spirituall vocation which hath not any relation to the temporall affaires of state The supream prouidence hath set bounds to euery vocation * Tractent fabrilia fabri nec sutor vltra crepidam vt fert vetus pronerbium nor ought any man to put his sickle on strang ground Let Priests mannage what is theirs and Christs business and the affaires which pertaine to Caesar let them leaue to Caesar and the ministers of his Council yet there are some wanton witts which like the raging sea transcend their prefixed limits lifted vp aboue the hight of the clouds with an opinion of their own science fancying to themselues knowledg of all things though indeed the greatest part of what they know * Sapiens ille Mercurius Trismigistus maxima â—orum inquit quae scimus est minima pars eorum quae nescimus is the least part of what they know not and thus wantonly carried away entangle themselues with publick affaires of ciuill Magistrats before they be called thereto Howeuer Priests ought to know nothing * Apostolus Paulus profitetur se nihil scire praeter Iesum Christum hunc Crucifixum but Iesus-Christ and him crucified and if the supream prouidence hath bestowed on one alone a better memory and witt then on others contemporary with him he is to vse his aboundant abilities according to charity temperance and sobriety for otherwise he shall by his high attempts vnhappily verifie the old Prouerb much witt little iudgment Besids great wanton wits are not without a mixture of madnes And truly experience shewes that common wealths are vnfortunat when the things named witts manage the affaires therof t is iudgment not flashes of witt that makes gouernements happie FINIS I. BOOK The faultes escaped in printing a curteous Reader will easily correct and pardon THE SECOND BOOK OF HOLY CHARACTERS containing a Miscelany of Theologicall discourses THAT IS THEOLOGY Positiue Scholasticall Polemicall and Morall Built vpon the foundation of Scriptures Traditions Councils Fathers CHAR. I. OF SACRIFICE THE CONTENTS Proper sacrifice defined no Preists Priesthood taken in the proper sense if proper sacrifice be laid aside asserting of improper metaphoricall sacrifice onely bringeth confusion and rendereth priestly function common to all alike SAcrifice taken in a spirituall generall sense is euery * Aug l 10. de ciuit Dei c. 6. ait sacrificium generaliter sumptum esse omne opus quod agitur vt sancta sociâ—tate inbaereamus Deoâ— work that a belieuer imployeth to the end that he may continue in holy society and freindship with God There are (a) According to S. Thomas two kinds of sacrifice taken in the generall sense are offered vpon the altar of Christ whereof one is called deuotion in order to God the other pity or compassion in order to our neighbour two kinds thereof the one is deuotion towards God comprehending all such actioÌ„s inward and outward of the minde and body as tend to the honouring and praysing of God the (b) The Apostle Hebrae 13. exhorteth vs to do works of Almes and charity saying that such sacrifices promerite God that is procure his grace and fauour and according to Ecclesiastes cap. 5. Those offer sacrifice which shew mercy other is pity or compassion towards our neighbour including the works of mercy and iustice to both kinds of spirituall sacrifice the Royall Prophet Dauid exhorteth all God's people of whatsoeuer condition or sex saying * Psal 15. tibi sacrificabo hostiam laudis Et psal 4. sacrificate sacrificium iustitiâ— Offer to God hosts of prayses and sacrifice sacrifices of Iustice and according to the Apostle spiri uall sacrificers of these kinds are * 1. Pet. 4. vos autem genus electum vegale SacerdotiuÌ„ Idem habetur Apoc. 5. kings and Preists investedwith the honour of royall Preisthood and indeed deuout
reason lay claim to that passage as a proof of their forbidden doctrine in order to communion in both kind's in regard they deny that any part of the said chapter of S. Iohn is meant of sacramentall eating or drinking lest by assenting thereto they might be forced to grant Christs reall presence in the Sacrament which the chapter plainly declares if it shall beare an interpretation of sacramentall eating and drinking Howeuer the precept so interpreted doth not euince communion vnder both kinds to be enjoyned of necessity in order to each Christian in particular since according to scripture vsage the particle * Julius Paulus insignis Jurisconsultus ait comparatum esse vt coniuncta pro disiunctis accipiantur Di gestis de verborum significatione l. saepe And is frequently taken in a disiunctiue sense only For example S. Peter Act. 3. sayes Siluer and Gold haue I none where the particle And is taken disiunctiuely the true meaning thereof being Siluer or gold haue I none In like manner it is written Exod. 21. He that smiteth his Father and Mother so it is read in Hebrew shall die the death Where And is taken for or Again Math. 20. it is said by thy words thou shalt be iustified and by thy words thou shalt be condemned Where likewise the particle And is taken disiunctiuely for Or and Aristotle also taketh And in the disiunctiue sense when he defineth Nature to be Authour or cause of motion and rest all his interpreters vnderstanding the particle And in that definition to signify Or and truly by the latter particle And in the cited passage of scripture vêªt videlicet Except ye cate the flesh of the son of man and drink his blood See doubtless was meant Or as doe plainly demonstrate other word 's of Christ there set down wherby he explaines that precept saying v. 47. I am the bread of life v. 50. This is that bread that came down from Heauen If any man eate of this bread he shall liue for euer and the bread that I shall giue is my flesh which I shall giue for the life of the world Whereby is plainly euident that Christ did ascribe the effect of this Sacrament as common alike to the bread alone and to the bread and wine ioyntly Howeuer sectaries haue nothing of aduantage if the latter particle And in S. Iohn ought to be taken in the copulatiue sense for the precept euen so meant and indeed so catholick writers do vnderstand it importes an obligation only in order to the whole Church wherin there is neuer want of Priests that be obliged to communicate in both kinds as often as they offer sacrifice and not to each member therof In the old law God hauing iustituted Circumcision added this precept in generall tearmes viêªt videlicet Ye shall circumcise the foreskin of your flesh and notwithstanding only such had right to exercise that function as were deputed therunto by the Church or Synagegue which sheweth plainly that though the precept did oblige the whole Church or Synagogue yet it did not reach to each member thereof howeuer it seemes as if it had been enioyned in order to all vniuersally Again when God instituted the pascall lambe as a Sacrament and sacrifice also he imposed two precepts Exod. 12. the one Let euery man take vnto him a lambe the other all the multitude of the children of Israel shall kill it which two precepts though they be expressed in generall words to the obliging the whole Synagogue yet euery particular member therof had not right to choose and take vnto him a lamb and sacrifice it but the heads of each family only which executed Priestly function as to that sacrifice being a priuiledge giuen to them before Priesthood was appropriated to the family of Aaron as appeareth manifestly by the said chapter of Exod. As to the passages which some sectaries alledge out of S. Innocent Ep. 26. and S. Augustin lib. 7. against Iulian the Pelagian to proue a necessity of communion vnder both kinds in regard that these ancient Fathers expresly assert that Infants cannot be saued except they eate Christ's flesh and drinke his blood they make not a jot for them who require a presonall act of inward faith to the eating of Christ's body and drinking of his blood Infant 's being vncapable of exercising any such acction in consequence where of the alledged * Agunt Innocen Aug. contra Pelagium qui negabat peccatum originale in infantibus authorities afforde them nothing of aduantage But as to the true sense of these primitiue Fathers doubtless their meaning is only to shew that Infants cannot enter into the kingdome of God except they receiue sanctifying grace in baptism through the merits of Christ's body and blood that were offered for all men vnto remission of sins (d) According to Origin hom 29. in num we are said to drink of Christ's blood not only when we receiue the Sacrament but when wee heare his diuine word preach'd wherein is life according to Christ's own saying the Words vvhich I have spoken are spirit and life in as much as they be dispositions to diuine grace which is the life of the soul through the merits of Christ Again such as hear Mass deuoutly and ioyne in heart with the Priest receiue life and fruit by the Sacrament though they neither eate of Christ's body nor drink of his blood sacramentally Fourthermore in as much as Infants through baptism be made members of that Church which eateth Christ's flesh and drinketh his blood the same Church as it doth furnish them * Aug. Tom. 10. ser 10. de verbis Apostoli Mater Ecclesia inquit accommodat parvults alioruÌ„ pedes vt veniant ad Ecclesiam altorum cor vt credant alioruÌ„ linguam vt fatcantur it a Ecclesia accommodat aliorum ora vt comedant bibant with the feet of others to come vnto it with the heart of others to belieue and with the tongues of others to professe the christian faith in like manner according to a spirituall metaphoricall form of speech it may be said to furnish them with the mouths of others to eate Christ's flesh and drink his blood CHAR. X. OF PENANCE THE CONTENTS Penance hath a iust claim vnto all requisits necessary to a speciall Sacrament of the new law Christ after the similitude of an outward Court of iustice instituted an inward Tribunall where by diuine dispensation Priest's sit as Iudges of sinns committed after baptism whatsoeuer Priests judge here below God approu's aboue the power Christ gaue to the Apostles and heir successors in priestly function and authority was not onely to declare but effect indeed remission of hones in vertue of the word of reconciliation ioynt vnto a sinners sincere sorrow and humble Confession of his sinnes together with a full purpose to sin no more PEnance is a (a) There are three requisits necessary to the nature of a Sacrament of the
appears that Christ 10.2 did not giue to the Apostles and their successors in the function of Priesthood power and authority only to preach remission of sins because the form of speech and circumstances of that action therein expressed doe euidently demonstrate that Christ both spoke and meant of a new power that he had not conferred before his passion but Christ afore his Resurrection inuested his Apostles with power to preach remission of sins Mat. 10. as ye goe saying the kingdom of Heauen is at hand which words euen Caluin in his euangelicall Harmony doth interpret of preaching saluation through remission of sins Wherefore S. Chrysostom hom 85. explaining that passage of S. Iohn compareth the collation of the power that Christ there bestowed on the Apostles to the authority giuen to officers of a tempoall Prince wherby they are enabled to imprison or deliuer out of prison such as be accused of transgressing his lawes and addeth withall these express words Great dignity of Priest's whosoeuers sins sayes be Christ ye shall remit are remitted Again power to preach the Gospell to all nations was giuen to the Apostles Mat. 28. as a distinct office from the power that Christ conferred on them Io. 20. as plainly will appeare to any rationall and iudicious man that shall consider both Texts together with the circumstances therin expressed Neither did Christ confer vpon his apostles and their successors power only to declare remission of sins since he did not say Io. 20. Whosoeuers sins ye shall declare remitted are remitted but whosoeuers sins ye shall remit Besides these words ye shall remit ought to be interpreted in the same sense as those others Are remitted For other wise the form of Christ's speech had been extream improper in regard that both of them shall be remitted and are remitted be vttered in one and the same sentence But the latter particles viz are remitted doe not signify meer declaration of remission of sins for so Christ's words would carry this sense Whosoeuers sins ye shall declare to be remitted are declared to be remitted and consequently since such a declaration is speculatiue only and not practicall effecting nothing in order to remission of sins a man to whom sucÌ„h a declaration is intimated shall remain in sin as much after as before Again Christ after he inuested the Apostles and consequently their successors with the power mentioned Io. 20. said to them as my Father sent me so I send you but Christ was sent by his Father endued with power to remit sins indeed and not to declare remission only Wherfore Mat. 9. that ye may know saith Christ the son of man hath authority in earth to forgiue sins c. Whereby it is plainly euident that he sent his Apostles inuested with power to remit sins giuing vnto them the ministery of reconciliation 2. Cor. 5. Furthermore by the premises is plain that penance is not * Aug. l. 2. de adulterinis contugijs c. 26. distinguit baptismum a pâ—nitentia St inquit à Cathecun eno factum scilicet vxorcidium baptismo abluitur si à baptizato poenitentia reconciliatione a meer remembrance of baptism receiued afore and indeed setting aside * Trident. dicit nos per poenitentia SacramentuÌ„ sine magnis nostris fletibus â—aboribus ad nouitatem integritateÌ„ quam per baptismum adepti eramus peruenire no posse voluntary acts of corporall affliction and inward contrition together with a full purpose of amendment the meer Sacrament of penance hath not power enough to restore the integrity and newness of life got by baptism and lost through actuall sin Again penance hath all requisits necessary to a Sacrament viz. sensible Rites promise of grace and the institution of Christ as by the premises appear's so that together with baptism it makes two Sacraments of the new law and may often (e) The ancient Fathers S. Cyprian Epis 52. S. Ambrose in 2. Cor. 5. S. Austin con Epis parmeni affirme that the Sacrament of Penance may be oft reiterated and it is an article of christian faith grounded on the words of Christ Luc. 17. Mat. 18. where he bid's his Apostles to remit sinnes as often as through humane frailty they are committed which is meant in order to such onely as are sorry to haue sinned for without true sorrow remission cannot be obtain'd be reiterated but baptism cannot For it is impossible that they who are once lightned if they fall away can be renewed again to penance Hebrae 6. where the particle lightned doth signify baptized according to the interpretation of primitiue Fathers who also doe name baptism a light and consequently the words impossible to be renewed again to penance beate this meaning viêªt videlicet Impossible to be baptized again for the particle Again doth import a repetition of what was meant afore by the words lightened and indeed otherwise the particle once had been impertinent and inserted to no purpose at all since once and Again put in the same period or sentence ought to relate to one and the same thing and therefore seeing that by the first place baptism is vnderstood the Apostles doubtless by the latter meant baptism too This cited scripture Hebr. 6. the * Nouatiani pratextu disciplinae Ecclesiasticae lapsis ad Ecclesiam redditum per poenitentiam negarunt ex qua haresi multarum animarum interitus secutus est Nouatians made the ground of their heresy teaching that no man falling into mortall sin after baptism could rise again by penance vnto iustification and Calvin therin growndeth his heresy impiously asserting that it is impossible for any one that deserteth his faith entirely and becometh an apostate to be renewed again by penance vnto remission of his fins therby denying God's generall mercy and so proud contentious men that follow only the meer words of scripture together with their own sense without respect of the Churches judgment and interpretation of ancient Fathers after which euery scripture ought to be expounded plunge themselves into damnable errours CHAR. XI OF CONTRITION THE CONTENTS Two kinds of contrition the one perfect the other imperfect perfect contrition which is formerly or includeth a formall act of charity wherby God in regard of his infinit goodnesse and supreame excellency is preferd before all earthly enjoyments and sin detested was of absolute necessity before the establishing of the law of Christ imperfect contrition called attrition whereby a sinner detesteth his sin because of the deformity thereof or feare of euerlasting punishment joynt to the Sacrament of penance equalleth perfect contrition as to the effect thereof if perfect contrition were of absolute necessity in the new law christians should be in a worse condition then were the Iewes vnder the old law Those which assert absolute necessity of perfect contrition at all tymes in the law of Christ prejudice christian faith Contrition is * Trident. definit contritioneÌ„ per dolorem animae est
exercise of good works opposite therto namely fasting praying Alms deeds c. S. Iohn did not require of the sinfull Iewes inward detestation of their transgressions only but exacted likewise the exercise of painfull works outwardly as to compensation or satisfaction thereof wherefore as fruit's do suppose the Tree that produceth them so good work 's which be fruites of penance suppose sinnes pardoned afore through penance taken in the sense mentioned in consequence whereof they suppose somthing of temporall paine due therunto otherwise they ought not to be called fruit's worthy of penance since after the remission of sinn's in order to the guilt thereof nothing remaineth that requireth fruit's worthy of penance if temporall pain be laid aside for the malice of sin which is it's mortall guilt cannot be taken away in part to wit partly by contrition and partly by painfull works outwardly exercised being indiuisible and without parts so that to exclude temporall punishments as due to sins remitted afore is to ascribe nothing to outward works of satisfaction in reference to penance which is contrary to the word 's vttered by S. Iohn Do fruites worthy of penance And hereby is required besid's meer works of penance proportion between the works and the sin 's committed as plainly shew's the word worthy * S. Grego hom 20. non debet inquit esse par fructus boni operis eius qui minus eius qui amplius peccauit For example one that sinneth little is liable to less satisfaction then another that sinneth much Caeteris paribus and although sacramentall satisfaction be proper only to the new law established by Christ yet taken in the generall sense in order to temporall paine that remain's after the guilt of sin is blotted out was in all times a necessary requisite for the obtaining eternall life as doe clearly euidence the scripture-testimonies sett down Howeuer no satisfaction is worthy vnless the Penitent that satisfyes be in the state of grace and therby incorporated into Christ for satisfaction is made worthy only through the merits of his death and passion the application wherof is an effect of his supernaturall friendship which is not between him and a sinner continuing in the state of mortall sin in consequence of which outward works worthy penance do suppose sanctifying grace in him that worketh worthily vnto remission of temporall paine Furthermore this catholick doctrine is euen agreable to the dictates of naturall reason for as much as amongst men it is not enough that he who wound 's the honour of his neigh hour conceiue inward griefe of that offence only but he ought also to exercise an outward action to the restoring of the honour taken away which hath something of satisfaction in order to the party offended and something of pain in order to him that offendeth so (e) According to S. Leo. ser 7. de Epiph. Domini No man is so clens'd from sin as that neither iustice can findein him what to condemne nor mercy what to pardon it is expedient for him that is a penitent besids an act of inward detestation of his sins to endure something to the satisfying of God as to the dishonour done him therby and as by sinning he hath vsed ill the creatures of God taking inordinate delight therin so he ought to suffer from creatures something of affliction to the repairing of the injury that God suffereth on that score the diuine iustice exacting that satisfaction of penitent sinners whom he chasteneth after their admittance into his fauour God scourgeth euery son Hebrae 12. whom be receiueth for his better correction and amendment Again since euery sin how great and malicious soeuer is remitted as to the guilt therof by (f) Contrition necessary to iustification requires not any certain degree of intensness or certain endurance of tyme for contrition how remiss soeuer it be and how litle soeuer it endures is either formally and indeed an act of perfect charity or importes as much in consequence of which the least measure or degree of true contrition that includes the loue of God aboue all things is inconsistent with deadly-sin euery contrition how litle-soeuer contained within the bound of true contrition and since most sin's haue an * Haecinaequalitatis ratio deprōpta est ex Concil Trid. quod sic ait qui non peccarunt per ignorantiā quique semel a peccari daemonis seruitute liberati accepto Spiritus sancti dono sciētes Templum Dei violare Spiritum sanctum cōtristare non formidarūt minori venia indulgentia digni sunt vnequiall and different malice one being greater then an other reason requires in conformity to diuine equity and iustice that a sinner who through lesser contrition is reconciled to God and becom's Heire of blessedness doth so receiue remission of sins that neuertheless he suffer withall something of affliction to compense the remissnes of his contrition In respect of this painfull satisfaction endured after the remission of the guilt of sins the Sacrament of penance is called by holy Father 's a Laborious baptism whereby it is distinguished from the Sacrament of baptism which washeth away at once both the pain and guilt of sinns as often as it is worthily receiued and the reason of difference in order to their effects respectiuely beside the will of God that hath invested these two Sacrament's with an vnequall power of working is because such as after the receiuing of sanctifying grace through baptism whereby they be deliuered out of the seruitude of sin and the diuell doe knowingly and by a voluntary act of their own will sinne again pollute the Temple of God which is their soul and grieue the Holy Ghost as far as lyeth in their reach deserue less pardon and indulgence in consequence whereof the application of Christ's merits made in the Sacrament of penance ought to be less perfect in order to remission then the application of the same merits made in the Sacrament of haptism yet it would not be less as to perfection if meer contrition or the meer Sacrament of penance should at all tymes procure full remission in order to the guilt eternall and temporall paine of sins committed after baptism (g) S. Chrysos hom 5. in Epis ad Hebrae makes this difference between the wicked that receiue from God in this life riches dignities c. and the good which endure miseries and afflictions to wit God so carries himself toward 's the wicked that albeit he let 's them haue full enjoyment of worldly fortunes neuertheless will punish them in the next life But during the present life God is wont to punish the good that deliuer'd thereby from the vncleaness of sin they may depart out of the world without reproach Wherefore the Sacrament of penance doth not so remit sins but that in remitting the eternall pain corresponding to the malice of them it changeth eternall into temporall paine that remaines behinde as a iust
immortality of the soul vsing that scripture-testimony I am God of Abraham God of Isaack God of Iacob and subsumeth thus there is no God of the dead but of the liuing arguing therby that the dead rise again since their souls doe not die with their bodyes Besides it is obseruable (o) Oachinus an Apostata Capucin cutteth an argument out of the cited Chap. Macchabae 2. against Purgatory arguing thus If there were a Purgatory though there were no Resurrection of the dead neuertheless prayers offered for the dead might not be in vaiue because the souls thereby might obtain deliuerance from their pain 's that Ochinus an Apostat Capucin fryer abused the fore mentioned scripture-testimony 2. Macchab. 12. to destroy Purgatory and after the very same way of arguing Mr. White abuseth it to ouerthrow a catholick assertion that teacheth the deliuerance of souls out of Purgatory in vertue of holy Churches suffrages Likewise sundry hereticks haue made vse of the same Text to weaken the authority of the books of Machabies pretending that the words If those that were shain should not rise again containe a manifest errour namely that soul's die with their bodies and rise again wherby is plainly euident that it is no difficult business for a man that is wantonly ambitious to be singular in teaching to cut out of scripture abortiue interpretations and to fit them to his vain vnquiet fancy by which he is biassed But how happens it that Mr. White alledgeth scripture-authority vnto the deteyning of good souls in Purgatory till the generall Resurrection * Mr. White in Dimenso 2. affirmamus itaque nos euideter conuinci ex hoc testimonio non solus poenis Purgatorij animas ante Resurrectionem and to lay claime to euidence in his deduction from thence It is not his custome to fly to that sanctuary for protection of his Nouelties nor to acknowledg euidence enough in the scriptures themselues to determine any controuersy for he expresly writeth that It were as ridiculous to seeke the decision of controuersyes out of the Bible as to cut with a Beatle or knock with a straw howeuer it seemes he hath a good minde to cloath his doctrines in the scripture colour's when that holy liuery how vnhandsomly soeuer put on may serue him for a disguise From the premises is euidenced how little reason Mr. White hath to boast of the two mentioned scripture-Testimonies viz. 2 Machab 12. 1. Cor. 15. vauntingly saying These two texts therfore remaine inviolable as first not to be resisted without manifest violence secondly pointing at the very knot of the controuersy that souls once engaged are not capable of that eminent good of being deliuered from their pain 's before the Resurrection And from these pitifull inferences he passeth vnto other scripture-Testimonies wherby he endeauour's to proue that euen blessed souls haue need of prayers but of his vnnaturall and irrationall arguments as to this point the Character of the Church triumphant shall giue euidence enough CHAR. XVI OF HOLY ORDER THE CONTENTS As God in the old law constituted superiour and inferiour Ministers to serue in the Temple so in the new law he hath appointed Bishops Priests Deacons Sub-Deacons c. one more eminent then an other to dispense diuine misteries in the Church of Christ Though euery Bishop is a Priest neuertheless enery Priest is not a Bishop to confer the Sacraments of holy Order and Confirmation is proper to Episcopall authority onely there be seuen Ecclesiasticall Orders taken in the proper sense corresponding to as many distinct functions exercised in relation to the celebrating of the holy Euchariste clericall tonsure can make noe good claim to an Ecclesiasticall Order taken in the proper sense Episcopacy in an holy Order the noblest part of the Churches Hierarchy a proper Sacrament and imprint's a speciall character in the soul of him that is ordain'd a true Bishop Bishops and Priests down from the Apostles till these tymes embraced a single life answeres to sundry Arguments made in fauour of Priest's Marriages HOly Order taken in the restrained Ecclesiasticall sense (a) 1. Timoth. 4. Neglect not the grace S. Paul saith that is in thee vvhich vvas giuen thee by prophesy and imposition of hand 's of Priesthood S. Chrysostom hom 13. commenting vpon this sacred Text affirmes that the Apostle meant by imposition of hand 's the Sacrament of holy Order which Timothy receiu'd of him after the same manner Theodoret interprets the sacred Text 2. Timot. 1. Stirr vp the grace of god vvhich is in thee by the imposition of mine hands That is by my ordaining thee who am a Bishop and S. Ambrose writing vpon the same Text implyes in the imposition of hands all the outward actions and words which were done and said ouer himselfe when he was ordain'd a Priest Besides in the primitiue Church when a Bishop confer'd the holy Order of Priesthood he vsed to bless the party ordain'd lye his hands on his head and giue him power to offer sacrifice for the liuing and the dead in the name of our lord that is in the room of Christ In consequence of the premises since in the ordination of Priests grace is giuen by an outward sensible sign holy Order is a Sacrament of the new law and so is desin'd by the Council's of Florence In the Decree of Pope Eugenius And Trent sess 23. can 4. is a proper Sacrament of the new law whereby a reasonable creature of the male sex * Baptismus requiritur in eo qui ordinatur quia baptismus in re suscept us est Janua aliorū Sacramentorum cuius proinde characterem character Ordinis supponit vt patet ex cap. si quis presbyter and baptised is ordained and enabled to perform the ministery of the Euchariste or in the celebration therof to serue after a speciall manner (b) Diaconesses mentioned Epis ad Timoth. could make no more claim to an Ecclesiasticall Order taken in the proper sense then the Religions men and women of those dayes being they had no power or iurisdiction as to the accomplishing or administring of a Sacrament And although Deanship Arch-Deaconship Priorship and Abbat-ship lay claim to something of Ecclesiasticall iurisdiction neuertheless by vertue of their institution and consecration they receiue no power to administer a Sacrament or to serue specially in the administration therof and t' is the same as to Arch Bishops and Patriarchs considered precisely in order to the dignity they haue ouer and aboue the Order of Bishops in vertue of his ordination * Hieron Epis 57. quae est ad Euagrium vt sciamus inquit traditiones Apostolicas sumptas de veteri Ecclesia puta ex Vaticinio Jsaiae cap. 6. Assumam exijs in Sacerdotes Leuitas quod Aaron filij eius Leuita in Templo fuerunt hoc sibi Epistopi Presbyteri Diaconi vendicant in Ecclesia S. Hieron locum Isaiae intelligit ad literam de Apostolis