or some other future temporal calamity proper to that Nation and age 5. Argu. S. Mat 12.3 Have ye not read c. Spoken by our Saviour to the people there and else where often Answer 1. Never once but to Teachers only and as such And one reason I have for saying so is because when a lay Pharisee demanded of him the way to heaven he sent him not to the Scripture as he did the Lawyer Luk. 10.26 but to his Catechism Thou knowest the Commandments Mar. 10.19 2. Grant spoken to the people it supposes they did expresses no intent they should read it Argu. 6. S. Ioh. 5.39 Search the Scriptures Plainly expressing intent the people should read them Answer No such thing For 1. It is not certain be spake to the people nay it is probable that not to them but to the Rulers My reason is because he spake it to those v. 10. who had perhaps convented afore them for certain publikely rebuked the man for carrying his bed on the Sabbath day and examined him touching his author or counsellor to whom he submissively gave the best account he then could of who it was and as soon as he knew went to give them a better who thereupon prosecuted our Saviour for his life All which look like proceedings of men fitting in Moses Chair nor is it to the contrary that they are there called bare the Iews for by that name this Evangelist often without question meant them in authority Ioh. 4.19 9.21 18.12 2. Grant spoken to the people perhaps he said not to them as your Translators render it Search but onely you do search For the Original is indifferent to either sense and the later as agreeable to the scope and coherence of the Text as the former 3. Grant the speech as you render it search it doth not necessarily infer their reading it because they might search by their Priests in their copy And it is the more possible because the Bible was then a Book of too costly a price for the ordinary peoples purse to purchase 7. Argu. Acts 8.28 The Enuch reading Scripture is set forth for an example Answer Perhaps not no more then his sudden embracing a new Religion upon no more prudencial motives then are set down especially when supposing it true as you hold he had no ground in Gods word for his reading it 8. Argu. Acts 17.11 The Bereans at least are expressely commended for it Answer 1. It may be not vid. supra par 2. c. 1. ob 6. 2. Grant they were it implies other people in such a case as that was lawfully may do the same expresses no intent they should no more then the commending of Solomon for building such a magnificent Temple David for intending it 3. Grant that also their searching it doth not nenecessarilie include their reading it no more then the King 's writing a copie of it doth the writing it himself Deu. 17.19 See what is said in the answer above to the 6. Arg. § 3. 9. Argu. Rom. 15.4 Scripture was written for our instruction Answer Most certain But strange if written for the peoples reading it should never tell them so 10. Argu. 2 Cor. 1.13 Eph. 3.4 VVhereby when ye read c. Spoken to the people Answer 1. Perhaps not no more then divers other things in the Epistles are 1 Cor. 5.4 1 Thes 5.27 but to the Pastors properlie And as is ordinarie in writing to a community to say when you read this when none is meant properlie or in his own person but the Clerk or other Officer to the Companie 2. Grant to the people it implies a supposal they did or would expresses no intent they should read it Argu. 11. Col. 4.16 Read the Epistle from Laodicea Answer Spoken to the Pastor to cause it to be read among the people or in the Church as he said in the vvords afore 12. Argu. 2 Ioh. 1. At least the Lady Elect was to read the Epistle to her written Answer No doubt it was so intended But little to your purpose For 1. She was but one person and a person to whom in particular it was written nor is there any intimation of intent she should give a copie of it or impart it to any other 2. Nor vvas it then a part of the Bible 3. Nor did it contain any doctrinal instruction further then by way of admonition or motive to beware of Hereticks n. 2. That God Almighty ordained or expressed any intent there should be any copy or transcript of any one sacred book more then that the King of the Iews when there should be one should have a copy of Moses Law Deut. 17.18 n. 3. That God Almighty ordained or expressed any intent H. Scripture or any part of it should be so much as read to the people more then the book of Deuteronomy once in 7 years namely in the year of Iubilee Deut. 31.9 once a piece of Ieremy exhorting to repentance and denouncing miseries else to come upon them Ier. 36.6 once the first Epistle to the Thessalonians to them 1 Thess 5.27 that to the Colosians to them and the Laodiceans and that from Laodicea to the Colosians Col. 4.16 §. 2. From the Old Testament n. 1. That in 700. years together viz. from Iosuah's reading it Ios 8.34 until Iosiah's 2 Chron. 34.30 any part of the Scripture more then once the piece of Ieremy abovementioned was ever read to the people or the Priests ever blamed for neglecting it Argu. 2 Chron. 17.9 It was read to them in Iehosaphat's time Answer Like enough But the text faith not so and our trial now is by expresse Text. n. 2. That there was in that Nation any copy more then the original one in the Temple of any one Sacred Book Argu. 2 Chro. 17.9 Was not that a copy as the Priests in Iehosaphat's time carried about with them Answer It may be so but perhaps not §. 3. From the Prophets That any one of them foresaw that any one title of the Gospel should be written Argu. Ezek. 1.5 Your self will say Ezekiels four Beasts presignifying the four Evangelists Answer I will not say it is certain And though I would our trial is now by express Text. § 4. From the New Testament n. 1. That anie lay-Christian ever read a word in the Bible Argu. 1. Acts 17.11 The Bereans did Answer But they were then no Christians 2. Argu. 1 Cor. 1.13 The Corinthians did Answer It may be not See sup ans to 10. arg 3. Argu. 2 Pet. 3.16 Those did that wrested it to their damnation Answer 1. Perhaps those were Teachers 2. If people they might do that without reading it n. 2. That our B. Saviour or anie Apostle took anie care or order for the means necessarie to the reading of Scripture by the people namelie preserving the Original or some Authentical Copie of it transcribing and dispersing copies of it throughout the world translating it into vulgar languages compiling the pieces of the
his Exposition warranted evidently to sense and reason from God Almighty by the token of miracles beyond all that appeared then in the Synagogue Acts 2.22 10.38 And without that signe he desired not any one much less vvould he oblige him to believe him or his Interpretation of Scripture Iohn 5.31 15.24 Consequently for all the same reasons it is as improper at this day to decide any controversie or resolve any case of conscience c. but in the hand of one credited for an Interpreter of it by the same token from God Almighty either in his person as he was if he pretend to mission extraordinary or Prophetical or in the Church that sends him if he pretend to ordinary mission And I pray mark this well CHAP. V. Vrging the fift Argument Scripture not simply necessary MY fift Reason is Because neither was it written of any necessity nor since its writing is it necessary to the teaching of faith where by not written of any necessity I mean not to exclude the necessity of command for the writing some few pieces in the Old and the Apocalypse in the New Testament For 1. There were as great believers and holy Saints afore Scripture was Heb. 11 4 c. as any were after 2. After Moses Law was written we finde not it was read either by or so much as to the people in 700. years together Nor was there for the first 1000. years any more then one copy of it and that too once lost and God knows for how many years together 2 Chron. 34.14 and yet the people were taught the good knowledge of the Lord 2 Chro. 30.22 3. In the Church there were as great believers and holy Saints afore any new Scripture was Acts 2.46 4.32 9.36 c. as any since 4. After its writing you cannot finde it was ever read by or so much as to the people or intended it should be more then some epistles once to the particular Church they were written to and one neighbour-Church 1 Thess 5.27 Col. 4.16 5. The Church was compleatly settled in all her form essential of doctrine worship discipline c. and in the means for preserving that form uncorrupt unto world's end divers years afore any tittle of the New Testament was written and neer 70. afore it was all written vid. sup par 1. c. 4 5. 6. The writers of it expressely say they wrote what they did not of any command but of their own charity prudence or discretion because it seemed good or meet to them Lu. 1.3 2 Pet. 1.13 upon particular occasions reasons or motives hapning as it were by accident 1 Tim. 3.15 2 Pet. 3.1 1 Ioh. 5.13 Iud. 3. Nay S. Iohn saith plainly He had many things to write which he would not 2 Ioh. 12. 3. Ioh. 13. Sure then both he wrote at his own discretion and what he wrote was not necessary to be written 7. When S. Paul wrote to the Corinthians there were two Gospels of S. Mathew and Mark extant and had been twelve or thirteen years afore yet he being to urge to them the words used by our Saviour in the institution of the B. Eucharist would not urge them out of either of those Gospels but onely from tradition 1 Cor. 11.23 By that example giving all Christians for ever to understand how it suffices to their faith and practice in the highest mysteries of Religion if they hear from their Pastor I have received from the Lord what I deliver or have delivered unto you Nor is the case different as to substance because they cannot mean receiving it from Christ immediately For 1. Perhaps neither did he For though he received some doctrines by inspiration Gal. 11.2 yet not all perhaps and namely not those of the Catechism as this was he being taught them by the ordinary means and as is like by Ananias afore he was baptized Act. 9.6 at least afore he had any vision or revelation 2 Cor. 12.1 2. Grant he meant it as received immediately as Pastors succeed to him in the office of teaching with divine authority so their receiving their doctrine from Christ by the mouth of his Church which H. Scripture sometimes calls Christ 1 Cor. 1.13 12.12 succeeds to his receiving it by inspiration 8. For ought appears 1. Seven of the Apostles were not able to write 2. If they were left nothing in writing with the Churches of their planting which was a very considerable part of Christendom 3. Nor did any of those that wrote dedicate their writings unto the whole Church but unto particular persons or Churches only or at most the faithful indefinitely and without any intimation of intent or desire to those they wrote to to disperse or impart them to other Churches So as at the Apostles death the New Testament was not extant or perhaps heard of but in a small part of Christendome in which the two chief Apostles laboured viz. in the lesser Asia from Ierusalem westward and in the South of Europe from Rome eastward Rom. 15.19 1 Pet. 1.1 9. It hath ever been and now is subject to all sorts of casualties as all other books are I mean not the parts onely but the whole which could not be if it simply necessary For 1. The Book of the Law and it 's probable all the copy then was of it was lost for divers years 2 Chron. 34.14 2. All the copy that was of a considerable part of Ieremie's Prophecy was burnt by Iehoiakim Ier. 36.23 3. So were all the copies of the Old Testament that could be found by Antiochus 1 Mac. 1.50 4. Divers pieces of the Old Canon are utterly lost that we know of 1 Sam. 10.25 2 Chron. 9.29 26.22 c. and perhaps that Prophet quoted by S. Mathew Mat. 2.23 5. So are divers of the New namely a former Epistle of S. Paul to the Corinthians 1 Cor. 5.9 Ephesians Ephes 3.3 Philippians Phil. 3.1 that from Laodicea Col. 4.16 and of S. Iohn to some Church in Asia 3 Ioh. 9. 6. There is not for ought I can hear at this present in the world any original yea or perhaps perfectly authentical copy of any one sacred Book 10. Finally it self assures us that the new Ierusalem shall have no need of Sun or Moon any created means of light though naturally incorruptible because the Lamb is to be her light according to his promise Mat. 28.20 Apoc. 21.23 And that to believe and follow what is taught us by our Pastors is sufficient to any ones salvation Lu. 11.28 Act. 11.14 Rom. 1.16 1 Tim. 4.20 Iam. 1.21 CHAP. VI. Vrging the last Argument Scripture not sufficient c. MY sixth and last Reason is Because it contains not expressely every particular of the Gospel For 1. It contains not every particular 1. Of the things commanded by our Saviour to his Apostles to be taught all creatures as his Gospel Mat. 28.20 Mar. 16.15 2. Much less of those he reserved the teaching of unto the
words you to worlds end Consequently as the present Church baptises with all the same office and authority as the Apostles did so she teaches also with all the same as they did in vertue of this Commission For whatsoever other powers or priviledges they had of infallibility in more then one the gift of miracles authority of writing Canonicall Scripture c. in any one was not in vertue of this Commission A more plain and full proof H. Scripture hath not for any point of Christian faith nor am I able to devise what other answer you can give to it then this what need any more witnesses But for more aboundant confirmation let 's hear more CHAP. IV. Proving it from the Acts. THe best interpreter of figures and prophesies is their fulfilling and the best comment upon Christ's commission is the practice and proceeding in the execution of it registred in the History of the Primitive Church In which as there is no doubt but the H. Ghost recorded the things of most importance for the knowledge and direction so nor but that he recorded those he did for the patterne and imitation of future ages Consequently what it sets forth to have been then the means for teaching the Gospell is to be supposed to have been left by them in that office Now that the Church was that means is manifest from aboundance of passages in it whereof I shall name some 1 Proofe Act. 2.3 5. The gift conferred from heaven on the Apostles on the day of Pentecost as necessary and sufficient to enable them to their office of teaching the Gospell was not penns though none of them were any great Scribes and the greater part of them for ought appeares not able to write a word but tongues A signe they were to teach religion not by their writing but their speech or utterance 2 Proofe Act 2.14 c. 1. The first and all the means taken notice of in this History used by them in their own persons for bringing Infidells to faith was preaching Peter with the eleven standing up c. v. 14. 2. Such as were moved by it to embrace the Christian Law sought it at their mouth Men and brethren what shall we doe v. 37. 3. Peter taught them their Catechisme Repent and be baptized c. v. 38. without bringing any Scripture proofe as he did afore when he taught them as Infidels v. 16 25 34. 4. The rule afterward of faith worship discipline c. unto the believing people was the doctrine and institutes of their Pastors They continued stedfastly in the Apostles doctrine and felowship and in breaking of bread and in prayer v. 41. Loe here the Church settled and compleated in all her forme of doctrine Worship Sacraments c. afore any syllable of the Gospell was written or for ought appeares intended to be Loe here in the Mother-Church Mount Zyon Gal. 4.26 the assembly of the first-borne Heb. 12.22 the pattern according to which all Churches afterward were to be gathered setled and governed to worlds end 3 Proofe Act. 6.6 7. 8.4 c. All the meanes taken notice of in this History besides their own persons provided used settled declared and left by them for teaching the Gospell was the preaching of others whom they took into their body to that end and sent them abroad over the world Act. 11.19 13.4 and placed some one or more of them in every City and Towne where the Gospell took roote Act. 9.10 13.1 14.22 to instruct and guide the people of those Townes in all things pertaining to religion in the same manner as a sheapheard doth his flock Act. 20.28 4 Proofe Act. 8.4 14 25. 13.4 20.28 These others were Teachers divinely authorised as well as the Apostles they being sent to preach and set over the flock to feed it by the same H. Ghost the Apostles were and their teaching Gods word in the substance of it no lesse then that of the Apostles only with this difference accidentall that in the Apostles mouth it was so originally supreamly absolutely and infallibly in the others subordinately fallibly and no longer or further then they taught what they received from the Church Act. 15.24 Nor therefore can you say that the teaching of these other was called the word of God because they preached Scripture or consonantly to it being here called so Act. 8.14 many years afore a word of the new Testament was written and they could not ground Evangelicall doctrine Christ is come Iesus is he is risen c upon the Old Testament 5 Proofe Act. 8.29 9.6 10.6 16.9 18.9 When God Almighty would have any taught the Gospell he either sent them to the Church or the Church to them Nor was there any difference in the meanes whether Apostles or other Pastors Saul being sent in all the same manner to Ananias as Cornelius to S. Peter and S. Philip to the Eunuch as S. Paul to the Macedonians 6 Proof Act. 11.14 The word thus preached by the Church in which it was by accident if any Scripture were cited to believers was sufficient to save the soules of the people 7 Proofe Act. 15.2 c. 16.4 5. 1. In case the Teachers differed the peoples remedy was to have recourse not to the Scripture then being albeit it conteined rules proper to have decided the question viz. VVhether circumcision was necessary to all that were to be within the covenant of grace made with Abraham and one party of the Teachers founded their doctrine upon the expresse words of it viz. that it was a law given to him for all generations for ever Gen. 17.13 Psal 105.9 and the other party were no lesse then Apostles in extraordinary but to the Church or eminent body of the Pastors in ordinary then by accident residing at Ierusalem 2. These coming together to consider of and decide it founded the decision not upon scripture though in a very fundamentall point of faith but meerly upon their own illumination and guidance by the H. Ghost It seemed good to the H. Ghost and to us v. 28. So their decree his decree theirs as his mouth his as the principall Law-giver and consequently to resist it no lesse sin then to resist the H. Ghost Nor can you say they intitled it to him because part of the assembly were Apostles For as it were purposely to preclude you from this evasion the H. Ghost took care to note 1. That the Apostles sate and voted there in quality of Presbyters as it was a name common then to Priests and Bishops only they the chief therefore named first and singularly 2. That there was much disputing upon the point v. 7. Consequently the Apostles proceeded not to the sentence as Apostles or taught by inspiration but as Pastors or by the ordinary authority of the Church as it was to continue in their successors 3. S. Paul and Barnabas though Apostles thought it an honour to themselves to be officers
hope to see the face of God if he pertinaciously refuse to believe do approve or avoid any one least thing taught or commanded by the Church as necessary to salvation to be believed done approved or avoided although in Scripture not mentioned and die in that state of soule 3. If both be it the part or share of each in the office is to be set out and certainly known by every creature that they may have recourse to each for that which pertaines to its office to the Scripture for its to the Church for its §. 4. The Protestants Tenet in it In the answer to this Question you and we as near as some imagine the two religions to be one to the other differ extreamly For albeit you grant that Christ left a Church to continue for ever in some office of teaching religion and that office of hers proper and in some respects sufficient and necessary yet you will not allow it to be either simply necessary or sufficient or any other then a meer ministery to the Scripture or so much as that with divine authority Consequently your Tenet is Christ left or appointed the Scripture for the meanes to teach us his Gospell This is the prime and maine principle of your religion in proper or as it is distinguished against ours by the name of Protestant or Reformed upon the truth therefore and certainty whereof depends in fine the whole truth and certainty of your religion and consequently of your hope of salvation in or by it as the firmnesse of any whole building does upon the firmnesse of its foundation § 5. What Catholicks acknowledge to H. Scripture We are as forward as any of you can be to give unto H. Scripture what is its Namely 1. That some of the Apostles wrote the New Testament which and the Old make up that holy book called the Scripture or Bible 2. That it is all and every word of it given by inspiration of God and therefore the very word of God of truth most infalible of authority most supreme as to all creatures even the Church her selfe yea in quality and degree of the authority superiour to that of the Church and the only divine written rule now being or ever to be 3. That they left it unto or with the Church as a sacred depositum in the nature following Viz. 1. A rule which she is bound to have an eye unto in all her doctrines and lawes and not only that they be not repugnant to it in more or lesse either by adding to or taking from either the words sense or law of it any one least tittle for supposing that possible and her a Church all of Apostles or heavenly Angels she were instantly to be detested by all as a Synagogue of Satan and all such her doctrines and lawes to be abhorred as will-worship and traditions of men but that they be consonant to it as neer as she may judge of the sense or intent of the H. Ghost as we find the Apostles had such an eye to it in theirs Acts 1.20 15.15 And in acknowledgement hereof in all her Generall Councels she placeth it in the most sumptuous throne at the uppermost end of the assembly above Pope and all as that which is to have the chiefest regard and swaying vote in all her debates and resolutions 2. A meanes excellent proper yea the incomparably principall in the sort and order of inanimate instruments as it is unto the ends for which it was ordained Namely 1. To corroborate by its concurring testimony the authority and doctrine of the Church and our faith to it 2. To preserve in way of a record a world of most admirable truths rules examples admonitions exhortations motives histories genealogies prophecies formes of prayer c. perteining to faith and holines In respect whereof it is a meanes profitable superlatively beyond all that can be said of it by tongues of men or Angels to furnish the man of God or Divine perfectly for doctrine yea of faith for reproof of the adversaries for correction for instruction in righteousnesse and for every other good work proper or perteining to his function 2. Tim. 3.16 And therefore not only doe our Divines give diligent attendance to the reading and study of it and make use of it incomparably for above any other meanes to all these ends yea and to the instructing and guiding themselves for and in the knowledge of truth and resolving cases of conscience and our Bishops in and for the making lawes or determining causes Ecclesiasticall but the Church her self in all General Councells makes her first and chief repaire to it for light and direction nay all her debate and search into former Councells Fathers Schoolmen tradition practice and sense of the Church is to no other end generally speaking then the better to find out and determine its true sense or intent 3. A meanes not only as in the hand of the man of God but as in the hand of every Christian rightly principled firme in faith 2. Pet. 3.16 and reading it in obedience to them that are over him in the Lord Heb. 13.7 with the humble spirit of the Eunuch Acts 8.31 unto the ends for which it was ordeined if ordeined as to him to wit to confirm advance and perfect himself in faith Joh. 20.31 saving wisedome 2. Tim. 3.15 hope Rom. 15.4 charity 1. Th. 4.9 and other Christian vertues singularly proper unto those ends as having from its divine author speciall force and vertue beyond all possible enditings of humane brain to inlighten the eyes and convert the heart of the simple And therefore speaking of it per se or as in the hands of such a one blessed is he that reades and meditates in it day and night Ps 1.1 and makes it a lanthorne to his feet and a light unto his paths Ps 119.105 4. A meanes since its writing necessary unto the Church as by which God will guide her into the truths there recorded without it when it may be had not 5. A meanes perfectly sufficient unto the ends for which it was ordained which is all the perfection of an instrument 6. A record conteining all that man is to believe doe or avoid to the obteining eternall salvation and expresly all the principall In regard of which many and admirable properties and uses of it it is the same in a manner to us as the pillar of cloud by day and fire by night was to the Israelites guiding Moses in the way to Canaan and by him them In a word it deserves to be called by way of excellency the Word Law doctrine oracles or Gospell of God Christ salvation c. the guide of faith the rule of religion the light of the world c. §. 6. The Catholick tenett But then we deny it to be either a proper principall necessary or sufficient meanes to teach religion And so to give unto the Church also what is hers our tenett is that The Church was
left by Christ for the meanes of teaching his Gospell Conclusion of the praeface YOu see the true state of the quaestion the tenetts of each side and the importance of what you hold in it That which remaines for this Praeface is to admonish you that your principle is notoriously false repugnant to holy writt and mother of all the sects in these parts of Christendome and therefore to beseech you dear Christian brother as you desire to please God heere and see his blessed face hereafter to search the Scriptures with the noble Bereans whether those things be so or no as your Ministers have taught you out of it touching the Scriptures being left for your rule and guide To help you in it if God shall put it in your heart that you may not be gull'd as now you are with the meer sound or superficies of words but dive to the depth of the sense of it for that is properly to search it is all the businesse of this ensuing treatise Wherein I shall first prove our tenet then defend it against your objections in the third place examine what may be said for yours and in the last refell it And when you have thus the whole matter laid afore you you will be able to judge righteous judgement which now you give upon hearing one tale told or at least the other but by halves and for the greatest part falsely Be the event of it what it will it cannot but be worth so small a paines either by confirming you in following for your guide and rule that which you doe or by its own mouth shewing you to that which you should And I shall be bold to adde thus much for a further encouragement that if you can finde any one text for your Tenet and not a multitude most plainly and expressely against it if any one against ours and not a multitude most plainly and expressely against it if any one against ours and not a multitude most plainly and expressely for it I will advise you to keep your own still and take all your perill upon my head hoping if you doe not you will think it reason to forsake it and embrace ours And I suppose you cannot say but as the Israelites did to Elijah in somewhat a like proposall Thou hast well spoken 1 Kin 18.24 THE First Treatise SHEWING That Christ left the Church for the meanes to teach us his GOSPELL THE FIRST PART Proving it CHAP. I. Proving it from the Law WEe say Christ left the Church for the meanes to teach us his Gospel And are able to prove it from the Lavv the Prophets the Gospels the Acts and the Epistles To begin with the Lavv. 1. It is certain all things happened to the old people in figure of something but more excellent to correspond to it in the nevv 1 Cor. 10.11 So their meanes of teaching a figure of ours and figures require fulfilling as vvell as Prophecies S. Ioh. 3.14 19.36 2. Presumption of reason is that vvhat sort of meanes the divine vvisdome saw most proper and therefore made choice of and used as the meanes of teaching Religion from the begining of the vvorld untill Christs time the same he vvould aftervvard unto the vvorlds end untill he that denies it shevv reason to the contrary Novv I am sure you vvill grant me that afore the vvriting of the Lavv some company of men vvas the meanes to that end And if afore after it Because 1. You vvill not find that that Lavv made any alteration in the office more then this 1. That it determined it to the family of Aaron vvhereas till then it had been one of the rights of Primo geniture Gen. 25.31 2. and added 1. To the matter to be taught 2. To the Teachers the help of a Record 2. That Lavv expresly settles it in Aaron and his posterity That ye may teach my Statutes c. Lev. 10.11 Thou shalt go to the Priests to enquire and they shall shevv thee Deu. 17.8 They shall teach thy Lavv c. Deu. 33.10 3. Hereunto accord the sayings of the Prophets Ezek. 44.23 Mal. 2.5 and the practice of that Nation noted aftervvard upon divers occasions The Priests taught the people 2 Chr. 17.9 They caused the people to understand the Lavv Neh. 8.8 See more if you please to the same purpose Eccl. 12.9 Agg. 2.11 4. Both Law and practice continued the same as vvell after the old Canon vvas finished as afore See S. Mat. 2.4 19.26 S. Mar. 10.17 12.14 S. Lu. 4.20 Act. 15.22 22.3 And appeares particularly by our B. Saviours ovvn both practice vvhen he vvent into the Temple to hear the Doctors and ask them questions S. Lu. 2.46 and rule given by him to the people They sit in Moses Chaire all things therefore c. S. Mat. 23.2 vvherein I pray note vvell 1. That Moses Lavv had setled in the Priests and others by them authorized a Chair for teaching Religion untill Christ should erect his in place of it 2. That the authority of that Chair vvas divine and consequently equall in the substance of the authority unto that of Moses Lavv it being his Chair as much as the other his Lavv. 3. That the people therefore vvere bound to obey its reaching absolutely and universally all things vvhatsoever 4. And not for its consonancy vvith the Scripture but sufficiently for the meer authority of the Chair All things therefore CHAP. II. Proving it from the Prophets THe Lavv hath testified vvell to our Tenent But vve have a more sure vvord of Prophecy To instance in a fevv of the plainest First proof Esa 2.2 Micah 4.1 Esay and Micah thus In the last daies shall the Mountain of the Lords house be established in the top of the Mountains and all Nations shall flovv unto it saying Come ye and let us go up to the mountain of the Lord to the house of the God of Jacob and he vvill teach us of his vvayes c. for out of Zyon shall go forth the Lavv and the vvord of the Lord from Ierusalem Where 1. by the last daies it cannot be doubted but he meant the daies of the Gospel Heb. 1.1 1 Cor. 10.11 2. Nor but that by the Lords house he meant the Church so called 1 Tim. 3.15 vvhich he calls the Mountaine of Gods house and namely Mount Zion because she vvas to be born or compleatly severed from her mothet the Synagogue on that Mount Psa 87.1 5. as she vvas on the day of Pentecost Act. 2.1 vvhen the H. Ghost as her ultimate soul vvas infused into her it being certain by consent of all Writers Christian that upon that hill vvas scituate the house in vvhich the Apostles the B. Virgin and other first-born in Christ Heb. 12.22 after his Ascension assembled to holy duties In regard vvhereof as the Synagogue Mother of the Ievves by reason she began as to her last and compleat state at the publishing of the Law on that Mount was called
as in that so in this of all things of the sort there spoken of viz. Prophecyings the word next afore 8. Object 1 Cor. 10.15 Iudge ye what I say Leaving his doctrine to be judged of by the people Solution By a judgement of pure approbation For else you must say which I think you will not presume that people are judges even of Scripture it self for so was that which he then bad them judge Object 1 Cor. 4.6 Not to think of men above what is written Solution That is whereas he had named no man but under the borrowed names of himself and Apollos they should not think or guess who he meant by him or him 10 Object 1 Pet. 4.11 If any man speak as the oracles of God Solution That is if any man have the gift of utterance or eloquent speech let him use it as Gods words speech or gift that he may be glorified 11. Object Apoc. 22.18 If any man shall adde unto the words c. Solution Either by corrupting them or holding any thing contrary to them for example that Antichrist shall be a Christian or reign 1000. years or honor Gods Tabernacle or them that dwell in heaven Apoc. 13.6 c. CHAP. II. Solving Objections against her Infallibility 1. Object Exod. 32.4 THey said These are thy Gods O Israel Idolatry taught by the Priests High Priest and all Solution No such matter For 1. Perhaps that was not the Priests saying but the Peoples 2. If the Priests not Aarons 3. If his also enticing to Idolatry migh be without teaching it 4. If he taught it he was not then the Supreme Pastor but Moses 2. Object Ier. 50.6 Their shepherds have caused them to go astray Solution But he doth not say by their teaching 3. Object Mal. 2.8 You have caused many to stumble at the Law Solution But he saith not by your teaching 4. Object Mat. 7.15 24.5 24. Take heed of false Prophets Many shall arise and deceive many c. Solution But he never said Take heed of your Pastors they shall seduce you 5. Object Mat. 13.25 The Church is compared to a field sown at first with good seed afterward over run with tares of errors Solution 1. Perhaps not the Church but particular Churches or souls 2. Grant the Church those tares meant not errors in doctrin but in life or practice 3. Grant erronous doctrines yet 1. Not sown by her or any of hers but the enemy 2. Nor springing up within her doctrine but only within the same field or countrey where it was sown or is growing 6. Object Mar. 14.64 Ioh. 9.22 The very Chair of Moses taught false doctrine viz. that Iesus was not the Christ. Solution But Moses Chair was not then in office further then it was authorized by him who albeit he did authorize it as formerly in all things until his own should be erected yet it is manifest he excepted himself who put all things under it 7. Object Luke 18.8 VVhen the Son of man comes shall he finde faith in the earth Solution Little perfect faith in the world but he shall true and perfect faith believed and professed by all lively members of his church consequently taught by her Pastors that company of his Elect spoken of Psal 89.4 Mat. 16.18 24.24 8. Object Acts 20.30 Even Pastors were to arise speaking perverse things and drawing away disciples after them Solution True particular persons e.g. Luther Cranmer Calvin c. Therefore he said not your selves but of or among your selves Nor did he give any item touching false Pastors to come but unto Pastors onely 9. Object Rom. 11.21 Even the Church of Rome her self is warned of her being in danger of falling from grace and not onely by wickedness of life but by Infidelity as the Synagogue had done Solution Not the Church of Rome for that includes the Pastor of it which then was S. Peter but the generality of particular persons among the Gentiles 10. Object Gal. 2.11 Even Peter himself erred Solution But not in teaching false doctrine 11. Object 2 Thess 2.3 Afore Antichrist's coming there was to be a notable falling away Solution But he doth not say from faith much less of the Church 12. Object 2 Pet. 2.1 There shall be false Teachers among you c. Solution But he doth not say the Church shal become a false Teacher or speak or mean of Teachers coming in quality of her Pastors but of Prophets 13. Object 1 Ioh. 4.1 Try the spirits whether they are of God c. Solution But he doth not say Try every spirit believe none nor doth he mean the spirits of Teachers authorized by the Church much less her spirit but the spirits of such as come in quality of Prophets Now that Christ and his Apostles should so often and so plainly warn people of false Teachers to come in after ages and always speak of them under the name of Prophets and never once give any least intimation of danger possible by believing the Church or their Pastors if any such danger were to be but on the contrary advise and encourage them absolutely to believe and obey them is against the very light of reason Conclusion of the second Part. You see how nothing is to be said against our Principle now let us examine yours THE THIRD PART Examining Protestant Proofs CHAP. I. Examining Proofs for the Tenet YOu say The Scripture was left for the means of teaching the Gospel See if you can finde where it saith any such thing of it self in words or sense 1. Argu. Deut. 30.10 Moses Law is called the Law in simple sense Answer Not in simple sense but onely the Law by him written for else it would exclude the Prophets with which it is often joyn'd Mat. 5.17 nay the Book of Iob which was then written and a multitude of Divine Precepts then not written namely those commanding faith hope contrition for sin c. forbidding drunkenness fornication c. 2 Argu. Deut. 31.10 Thou shalt read this law in their hearing that they may learn to fear the Lord. Answer But he doth not say that it may teach it them nor any of those things above named that contain or imply the sense of your principle compare it with them one by one and you will finde it true as I say 3. Argu. Mark 1.1 S. Mark 's is called the Gospel of Christ in simple sense Answer Not but onely the Gospel by him written for els it would exclude the other three 4. Argu. Iohn 5.39 Search the Scriptures for in them ye think to have eternal life and they are they which testifie of me Answer But he doth not say in them you may have eternal life or they will teach you or any other of the words you are to prove or to the same sense 5. Argu. Rom. 3.2 To them were committed the oracles of God Meaning the Scriptures Answer Not necessarily much less solely there having been many oracles given to them more then
were written namely 1. Divers we meet withal in the New Testament 2 Tim. 3.8 Heb. 9.19 11.37 Iud. 6 9 14. 2. All those given by the High-Priest viva voce from Adam's time until Christ's to them that consulted him he being a constant or ordinary oracle Gen. 25.22 Iudg. 1.1 1 Sam. 23. 2. Ioh. 11.51 6. Argu. Rom. 15.4 The Scripture was written for our instruction Answer No doubt of it and it is an excellent means thereunto But this is none of the things you are to prove 7. Argu. 2 Th. 2.15 VVhich you have been taught by our Epistle Answer But he doth not say nor mean which it hath taught you but onely which you have been taught by us whether by word or epistle 8. Argu. 2 Tim. 3.15 VVhich are able to make thee wise to salvation by faith c. Answer But he doth not say which are able to make you wise meaning Christians in general nor which are able to make thee wise to salvation absolutely but by faith in Christ That is by bringing thee to faith or confirming or perfecting thee in it Better proofs then these I am sure you have not and the best of these as you may see a little alreadie will more anon is verie short of a proof And no wonder when the Scripture cannot contradict it self in sense as it would if in one place as I have named an hundred it should set forth the Church for our Teacher Guide or Rule and in another it self CHAP. II. Examining the proofs of Scripture's having the four requisites to the office And first in this Chapter VVhether a proper means TO shew you more manifestlie the falseness of your Tenet by giving you larger scope of proof I named above four requisites to the means we speak of proper principal necessary sufficient Whereof therefore if Scripture vvant but any one it cannot possibly be it See if you can prove it hath I do not say all but so much as any one of them And first that it is proper useful or intended to give the first instruction Which as it is the first so the incomparably principal and most necessary act of the office of Teaching 1. Argu. Deut. 31.11 Thou shalt read this law afore the children that have not known any thing that they may hear and learn to fear the Lord. Therefore proper to give no vices their first instruction Answer It follows not 1. Because this place speaks not of novices but of the ignorant sort of people young or old For those words any thing are not Moses's but an addition of your Translators confessed in some editions by a smaller character to help the sense when they mar it as they do in divers other places and instead of the H. Ghost's give their own sense for Scripture which is properly that adding to it as is forbidden and accursed Apoc. 21.22 the text being no more then this children c. that have not known that is are ignorant of the dreadful majestie sanctity power justice and other perfections of God Almighty and of the great awe and obedience due to him from his creatute set forth in that Book 2. Nor therefore by learning to fear God did he mean the first but the perfecting knowledge And it is the more probable because this reading of the Law was appointed to be but once in seven years whereas children were to be instructed touching God Almighty assoon as two or three year old 2. Argu. Psal 19.7 119.30 The law of God gives light to the simple and little ones Answer True but impertinent For 1. He doth not name the Scripture nor I think mean it but the Gospel as preached by the Church among the Gentiles to the conversion of Nations spoken of from the first ver of this Psalm S. Paul himself being the interpreter Rom. 10.18 2. Nor had he meant it do those simple or little ones mean novices but humble upright souls such as himself was Psal 131.11 Iacob Gen. 25.27 Iob Iob 1.1 the Apostles Mat. 11.25 and as all Christians yea the greatest Divines in the world must be ere God reveal his mysteries to them either by Scripture or any other means Mat. 18.3 1 Pet. 2.1 3. Argu. S. Ioh. 20.31 These are written that ye may believe that Iesus is the Christ. Implying his Gospel was proper to give instruction in that point the first principle of Christian faith Answer Short still For he spake not that either 1. to novices but to Christians catechised 2. or touching any doctrines in his Gospel but the miracles of Christ related in it Many other signs he did which are not written but these i.e. signs are c. 3. or of instructing in that point but confirming in the belief of it these are written that ye may believe c. 4. Argu. 2 Tim. 3.14 Timothy knew the Scriptures of a childe Sure then profitable to instruct him in his childehood Answer No doubt singularly profitable but not to give him his first instruction 5. Argu. 5. 1 Ioh. 2.13 S. Iohn wrote to little children Answer Such children as knew the Father nay needed no man to teach them the doctrine of the Catechisme ver 20 27. CHAP. III. Examining the proofs for Scripture's being a principal means SEcondly that which is call'd the meanes to any end must be the principal means to it as principal opposes instrumental Now H. Scripture we say is a most superlatively excellent proper means and in its kind the principal to give the perfecting instruction but we will not say it is at all proper to it as principal that is of or by it self or as in the hand of any one the profoundest Divine but only as an instrument in the hand of the Church or one of her Schollars As a pen is proper to write but not as a principal means but as an instrument onely in the hand of one that hath strength and skill to use and guide it to its end You say or must renounce your principle it is self-proper to this end as in the hand of any or every understanding Christian. See if you can prove it 1. Argu. Deut. 17.19 He shall read therein that he may learn to fear the Lord that is that by it he may instruct and direct himself in his duty to God Answer True if you understand it of the King in the discharge of his civil office But if you will understand it of him as one of the faithful in the discharge of his duty to God in matters of faith and holiness it was not meant of every or any one but one trained up in the true Religion by or under Orthodox Pastors 2. Argu. Deut. 30.11 This commandment is not hidden from thee c. Implying the Scripture is not dark to any one in matters necessary Answer It implies no such thing For 1. It speaks not of Scripture but of the words by him commanded viva voce And so was a figure of the Gospel to be preached Rom.
of Scripture as we shal see anon rather discouraged namely from S. Pauls Epistles by reason of some things in it hard to be understood 2 Pet. 3.16 I cannot think it likely he would encourage them to the reading of this of least use and more abounding with things hard to be understood and easie to be wrested by them to their damnation then any one of S. Pauls Epistles or any other Book in Scripture 2. Grant he meant lay-Christians yet not any or every one not a Nicolaitan Apoc. 2.6 not one of Diotrephes Congregation 3 Io. 9. for certainly such a one would read it but to his greater damnation but such a one as was under his Angel or Catholick Pastor whose hearer he was as well as its reader Blessed are such readers of it woe to others CHAP. IV. Examining the proofs for the necessity of Scripture THirdly nothing can be called the means to any end to which it is not simply necessary See then if you can prove that H. Scripture is simply necessary to the teaching of Religion viz. either that there was any necessity for its writing more then necessity of command for some few pieces of the Old Testament and the Apocalipse in the New Apoc. 1.10 or that since its writing Religion cannot be taught or subsist without it 1. Argu. 2 Pet. 1.20 Holy men of old wrote as they were moved c. Answer True but moving is not commanding 2. Argu. S. Iude 3. It was needful for me to write Answer But 1. Needful is short of necessary 2. Nor did he mean needful absolutely but onely that resolving to write he saw it needful to write to them to that end or of that subject to exhort them to contend earnestly c. CHAP. V. Examining the proofs for Scripture's being sufficient FInally nothing can be called the means to any end but it must be sufficient to it Which Scripture cannot possibly be to the teaching of the Gospel unless it contain expressely every particular of it I think it vain to say importing to salvation because the Gospel can consist of none but do so in some kinde or other I say expresly because els there will need some other means with authority for as good none at all as not w th authority to deduce the inferences apply the general rules or examples of it to particular doubts or cases which is the main part of the office of teaching and so it could not deserve to be called the means If then you think H. Scripture does not contain every particular of the Gospel expressely renounce your principle If you think it do see if you can prove it 1. Argu. S. Luke 1.3 Acts 1.1 S. Luke calls his Gospel a Treatise of all things that Iesus taught or were believed among Christians And the Gospel cannot consist of more Answer 1. Yes it may namely of those as are in S. Iohn's Gospel or Epistles revealed long after S. Lukes death 2. Grant it did not he did not mean all in proper or logical sense for all absolutely but in vulgar sense onely for the generality greater or notable part usual in Scripture and particularly in him Luke 24.14 27. Acts 1.19 2. 12. 3.11 c. it being evident he wants divers particulars that are in the other Evangelists and some of them of the most fundamental in Christian Religion namely the divinity of Christ the number and names of the persons in the Godhead the institution of the two Sacraments of Baptism and Penance 2 Argu. 2 Tim. 3.16 17. Scripture is profitable for doctrine c. that the man of God may be perfect throughly furnished to every good work Therefore it contains expresly every particular of the Gospel Answer A very weak inference there being a great distance 1. betwixt every particular of the Gospel and every good work which are but a part of the particulars 2. betwixt every good work absolutely and every good work of the sorts there spoken of pertaining to a Divine viz doctrine correction c. 3. Betwixt profitable to furnish for them and containing them expressely CHAP. VI. Examining the proof of things less yet VVHat do I speak of proving such things as these See if you can prove but so much as any of these that follow namely §. 1. From Old or New Testament n. 1. That God Almighty ever ordained or expressed any intent the lay people should read the Bible or have it to read in if they pleased to instruct themselves in Religion 1. Argu. Deut. 6.7 Thou shalt write these words upon thy walls teach them thy children c. Answer Nothing to the purpose For 1. He doth not speak of or mean perhaps words written but commanded by him 2. Grant words written he doth not say thou shalt read them If you say he meant it give a reason why then he should not name it as well as he named the other teaching meditating writing and as well as he named it with the other when he spake of the Law as to be used by the chief Ruler Deut. 17.19 Ios 1.8 Nor can you say he necessarily implyed it in those commands of writing teaching and meditating on it for they might be performed sufficiently to their intent as now they are by pious Catholicks without reading it namely by being taught the commandments and other the principal parts of Gods Law most useful for them by the Priests Exod. 24.12 Deut. 31.9 19.21 2. Argu. Deut. 27.3 Thou shalt set up great stones and write upon them all the words of this law plainly Sure to the end people should read them Answer It may be so But it expresses no such intent It doth this and that 's all it expresses that it should there remain as a witness Nor is it likely that he meant the whole book of Deuteronomy much less Genesis and the rest of the Pentateuch for what a wall would that ask sure longer then that hill Ebal could contain but onely the ten Commandments with perhaps some other moral precepts admonitions and exhortations most useful for the people and needing no interpreter and the blessings on the obedient curses on the transgressors Ios 8.34 Now such a writing in that manner set forth is a different thing from the Bible H. Church at this day permitting people the one in Primars c. when she will not the other 3. Argu. Deut. 31.9 Moses delivered the Law into the hand of the Elders as well as the Priests Sure vvith intent they should read it Answer Very likely but not as to instruct themselves in Religion but to guide themselves by it in judicature as it contained the Civil Law of that Nation 4. Argu. Esa 24.16 Seek ye out of the Book of the Lord and read c. Spoken to the people Answer 1. It may be not 2. Grant it it names not nor perhaps meant the Bible nor any Book as to instruction in Religion but onely some Prophecy then written touching the Captivity
New Testament written straglinglie some in one Countrie some in another 500 miles asunder into some one volume c. § 5. From the Gospels n. 1. That our B. Lord ever spake word touching H. Scripture unto anie Christian more then to bring proofs out of it to his incredulous Disciples Luke 24.27 44. or as to anie use wherein it was to be after his ascension Argu. S. Ioh. 5.39 Search the Scripture Was not that spoken to Christians Answer No but to Infidel-Iews and as such as appears by the words immediately afore and after you believe not in me you will not come to me and by the end for which he sent them to Scripture namely to bring them to faith Consequently neither spoken nor meant to any properly or necessarily but infidel Iews n. 2. That he ever intended or foresaw otherwise then as he was God that any one tittle of his Gospel should ever be written And pray note this well §. 6. From the Acts. That any Apostle wrote or intended or knew of or foresaw the writing of any one syllable of the Gospel §. 7. From the Epistles n. 1. That any Apostle at his death knew there was any tittle of the Gospel then written more then by himself except that S. Peter knew of some of S. Pauls Epistles 2 Pet. 3.15 or to be written Argu. 2 Cor. 8.18 S. Paul speaks of S. Luke as famous then for his Gospel throughout Christendom Answer It is certain he spake not of and perhaps meant not either S. Luke or his Gospel or any written Gospel but some companion of his Silas Barnabas or some other famous for his zeal and painfulness in preaching n. 2. That he that dyed last of them S. Iohn left at his death any such volume as is now called the Bible or New Testament or any two Books of the New Testament in one volume yea or in one Countrey except where two Eptstles were written to one Church or person or any original yea or perfectly authentical copy of any one book of Old or New Testament If you can prove none of these you cannot but see how far you are from any hope or likelihood of proving any such thing as your principle THE FOVRTH PART Confuting the Protestant Tenet CHAP. I. Vrging the first argument The silence of Scripture I Hope you see how far the Scripture is from affirming your tenet Which you wil not wonder at when you shal see how much may be said out of it against it which is my next and last work I say then it is against reason to think Scripture was left for the means of teaching the Gospel My reasons are six The first because as appears by the former part it affirmes no such thing touching it self For though a negative argument from it not in Scripture therefore not true be not alwayes good it s always good against you who use it as good against us and in such a tenet as this of yours condemned by the Church and in such a point as this the most fundamental in Religion This silence if it be well considered will appear so strange to any rational man as he cannot imagine it possible had your tenet been true Considerations aggravating the silence §. 1. Of the Prophets First the silence of the Prophets is very strange For 1. There is not any eminent particular pertaining to the exterior form of the Church but we may finde it foretold in some one or other of them and some very plainly and in divers of them this touching the means of teaching the Gospel according to our opinion in almost every one of them and to some minute circumstances when it was to begin in what City in what part of the City in what manner and by what means to spread over the world how long to continue c. strange if Scripture were to be it it should never be so much as mentioned 2. And yet how many how just occasions were there for mentioning it if to be as you say namely when they name the School the master the word or Law of God yea the Gospel though by your Translators rendred profanely good tidings Esa 40.9 compared with Rom. 10.15 when Ieremy came so near the Scripture as to promise the writing of the new Law and to name by whom with and in what it was to be written But then indeed he saith it was not to be by any creature or with ink or in any material tables much less stony ones as the old was but in a more excellent way befitting a more excellent Law by God himself with grace in the hearts of the Pastors teaching it from hand to hand of the people believing it Ier. 31.31 3. Again Ezekiel in his eight last Chapters describing at large the beauty and perfection of the Church whose glory was to exceed that of the Synagogue Agg. 2.9 names all the eminent particulars wherein it was to consist under the name of their types in the Temple of Solomon and among the rest her Pastors very largely and particularly under the name of Sadoc and his sons Ezek. 44.15 c. But upon all the list we finde not the tables of Moses Law albeit that was one of the preciousest jewels of the Temple 1 King 8.9 and the proper type of the New Testament §. 2. Of the Gospels More strange is the silence of our B. Saviour in the Gospels 1. When the Law was to be written good God! what care taken 1. For its writing The principal part of it written by an Angel representing God's person Exo. 24.12 The residue by his special command by Moses 2. For its custody Layed up in the Ark the sacredst Cabinet the world ever saw there kept under the wings of the same Cherubins as kept Paradise Deut. 10.5 3. For the giving copies of it to whom c. Deut. 17.28 4. For the reading of it to the people and at what times necessarily Deut. 31.9 And all these thought fit to be recorded and within the book it self And yet that was to be the law but of that one Nation to endure but a short while to be but a small part of their Scripture was â—either necessary nor available to justifie the observers Rom. 3.20 and beside it they were to have not onely a constant race of Teachers divinely authorized but Prophets all along until the Messiah's coming Mat. 11.13 Christ's Law was to oblige every creature to endure to world's end to be necessary sufficient to justification And can it then be thought in reason he would go hence and leave it to be committed to writing and that writing to be after the Apostles death the onely means as you say of teaching it with authority and never speak any syllable concerning it 2. Nor can his silence touching it be imputed to accident or incogitancy for he could wel remember to take care for the preaching of it who were to preach it to whom what was to be taught c.
3. And how many how tempting occasions had he to have mentioned the Scripture if to be as you say at least in some kinde or other If not as the means of reaching or the matter to be taught or the rule or condition of it yet as a part of the means matter or rule at least as a Record helpful to the office namely when giving the Commission and Instructions to his Church for the teaching of his Gospel when naming the matter to be taught and the means by which he intended for ever to guide her into all truth Ioh. 14.16 16.13 when charging all creatures absolutely to believe and obey her teaching denouncing hell to them that should not assuring heaven to them that thould Mat. 16.16 4. And how easilie how soon had a word been spoken of it in some one or other of these occasions For example to have said write the Gospel or Teach Scripture or it shall guide you into truth or he that believes you or the Church teaching out of or according to it c. Nor can you say he did or might mean that condition though he named it not For besides that this is properlie that adding to and taking from Gods word written which S. Iohn denounces that heavy curse to Apoc. 22.18 by this no greater authoritie is given to the Church that City or House of God of which such glorious things are spoken in Scripture then must be given to any Tinker Woman Childe Heretick nay to the verie Devil himself for we ought to believe him teaching according to Scripture And certainlie any man considering the multiplicitie of Sects in these parts of Christendom and all grounding themselves in Scripture when he the author and finisher of our faith Heb. 12.2 never so much as mentioned it in order to Christians or his Law may wel ascribe it to his singular wisdom and goodness that he waved all mention of it for what would have been had he ever referrd us to it in any kinde whatsoever Surely had he ever mentioned it in any of those kindes abovenamed and the New Testament in the form wherein it is and the people judges of the sense of it he had left his Church in a more defective and miserable condition then ever any Prince or Law-giver left Common-wealth §. 3. Of the Acts. No lesse strange is the silence of the Historie of the Primitive Church 1. It was written purposely for a record of what the Apostles did in order to the good of religion most importing posterity to be recorded Among which certainly nothing can import us more then what they did in planting settling and declaring the means for teaching it after their decease throughout all future ages 2. Nor could any thing more or more early deserve and require their industry and sollicitude then the providing and settling the means considering among other reasons their own mortality It cannot be therefore but if a VVriting or Book were to be it one of their first cares and diligences would have been imployed in procuring it to be written the old Scripture being improper to this purpose declaring and recommending it for such to Pastors and people causing copies of it to be transcribed and dispersed over the world securing some original of it in Ierusalem Antioch Rome or other safest City translating it into vulgar Languages for the use of the common people delivering it to Presbyters at their Ordination as the Matter and Rule of their teaching finally causing record to be made of what they did in it either within the book it self or in the history of their Acts nothing possibly to be written of them being of the thousand part of that concernment for the knowledge of future ages as this 3. If they neglected or deferred the doing any thing in it for some years at first whiles together in health at liberty and the Teachers all of one minde yet afterward when they saw S. Iames beheaded and S. Peter without a miraculous rescue like to have been so too Acts 22.1 when they saw Sects springing up apace so as there was need of holding a Council to decide the controversie Act. 15.2 when that was like to be the last time of their ever meeting together in the world when admonished by that example how seasonable and necessary it then was for them to settle and declare the judge and guide of faith if to be any other then the Church how could they delay any longer to do something in it or if they did the Historian not thinking it worth the writing 4. He could note the great zeal and pains of Peter and Paul in visiting the Churches confirming them leaving among them the decrees of the Church to keep ordaining Pastors to feed and guide them instructing those Pastors for the discharge of their office after their death recommending and naming to them the proper and sufficient means to that end Acts 8.32 14.21 23. 15.36 16.4 20 20 28.32 what occasions were these for him to have said something of what they did in writing Scripture or distributing it to the Churches for to keep or recommending it to the Pastors for to teach especially when they came so neer to it as to recommend them the word of God's grace Acts 20.32 5. And yet afore the finishing of this History there were written beside S. Luke's own two of the Gospels S. Mathew's and S. Mark 's most of S. Paul's Epistles and some of them written in that very City and at that very time when he was with S. Paul Col. 4.14 2 Tim. 4.11 and as is likely writing this History yet he takes no notice at all of them §. 4. Of the Epistles Most strange of all is the Apostles own silence in their Epistles 1. They were vvritten some to the Pastors some to the people to give them the best advices and instructions they could either for them in present or to be left upon record for all Pastors and people in future ages Among which none could be more important then to declare and recommend to them the Guide and Rule of Religion after their own decease 2. And how frequent how proper occasions had they to have named the Scripture for it if it were to be Namely when advising the Pastors to teach the Word naming the matter they were to teach the rule they vvere to teach by and coming so neer the Scripture as to cal it the word of truth c. 1 Tim. 1.3 2 Tim. 1.13 2.15 4. 2. Tit. 2.1 c. when describing and enumerating the qualifications of the Teachers 1 Tim. 2.2 Tit. 1.7 what was to be committed to them in their Ordination to teach 2 Tim. 2.2 when monishing the people touching false Teachers and giving the marks whereby to know them Rom. 16.17 2 Thess 3.6 1 Ioh. 4.2.6 when charging them absolutely to obey their Pastors follow their faith receive their teaching as God's word with the meekness of new born babes
Heb. 13.7 Iam. 1.21 1 Pet. 2.2 when naming the rule of faith Rom. 12.6 the ground of truth 1 Tim. 3.15 the means left by Christ for the perfecting of the Saints Ephes 4.11 finally when naming the end vvherefore Scripture vvas given by God and to which it is profitable 2 Timoth. 3.16 3. And how easily how soon had it been named in one or other of these occasions For example to have said to Timothy or Titus Teach Scripture or according to it c. or to the people Prove all things by Scripture or Make it your rule or guide or Obey your Pastors teaching out of or according to it or it was given or is profitable that the Christian man may be perfect c. 4. At least they might have given the people some advice or encouragement in plain words to read to sometimes or the Pastors some charge to read it sometimes to them 5. Nor was it of forgetfulness that they balked the giving these instructions For in their Epistles to the Pastors they could well remember to advise and encourage them to give diligence to the reading it 1 Tim. 4.13 2 Tim. 3.16 and in some Epistles to some Churches to charge the reading of some particular Epistles in some particular Congregations once 1 Thess 5.27 Col. 4.16 and S. Peter could once take occasion to speak of his brother Paul's Epistles and by that occasion of Scripture in general but what he saith of it is so far from encouraging people to read it much less to make it their guide or rule as it is enough to scare any one either people or Divines from meddling with it without a good interpreter 2 Pet. 3.16 6. Some of these Epistles were written by them when now ready to be offered 2 Tim. 4.6 2 Pet. 1.14 by S. Iohn when now 100. year old and all the other Apostles dead and perhaps rotten long afore and he saw the Churches round about him swarming with Sects and wrote to that end chiefly to confirm Catholicks in faith and nourish them against Sects and shew them the best means and way to discern and avoid them Nor could he but know in what a sad condition the sacred writings were like to be left by him Some corrupted by Hereticks Apoc. 22.18 some counterfeit 2 Thess 2.1 some uncertain Luk. 1.1 some lost vid. infr c. 5. arg 9. § 4. some in one Countrey some in another perhaps 500. miles asunder not so much as a Catalogue of their names or number c. yet he left the world as the rest had done afore him without any least mention of the New Testament or any part of it more then what he wrote himself or that as to any office of teaching Religion CHAP. II. Vrging the second Argument Scripture not for the people MY second reason is because it was never ordained or meant so much as for the peoples reading further then the Church should see expedient to permit it but given into the hand of the Church for her to teach it to them and to be an instrument helpful to her in her office of teaching As is manifest For 1. When God Almighty had written the ten Commandments the first piece of Scripture that was written though it were the plainest both for stile and matter and most proper and useful for the people and to be the principal part of their Catecism yet he delivered it not to them but to Moses with these words expressely declaring the whole intent of it as to the people I give thee the Law which I have written that thou maist teach it to them Exod. 24.12 2. In like manner when Moses had written the Law he delivered it not to the people though the whole Nation were then present afore him in Assembly but finally or supremely unto Iosuah or Eleazar the one chief Ruler or Pastor in ordinary the other in extraordinary with these words expressely declaring the whole intent of it as to the people and the right they were to have to it At the end of every seven years thou shalt read this c. Deut. 31.9 3. This copy delivered by Moses into the High-Priests hand was there to remain without any one to have a copy of for ought appears until there should be a King who was to share the supream office with the High-Priest who was not to be in 500. years after and he was to write him a copy of it out of that which was before the Priests Deut. 87.19 4. In their custody it remained 2 Chron. 17.9 Neh. 8.1 without any copy of it for certain in all the land of Israel after Ieroboam's schism 2 Chr. 15.3 and if not after most likely nor afore for we do not finde that he meddled at all with the Bible and but one in the Church of Iudah until after the Captivity to wit that in the Priests custody in the Temple as should seem by the great matter was made of the finding it when it had been lost some years and by Iosiah's proceeding thereupon to a Reformation by it which afore it seems he could not for want of it 2 Chron. 34.14 c. The same may be said for the New Testament For 1. S. Iohn's Apocalypse the onely book of it written by command was expressely written to the Angel or Pastor of the Churches to which it was to be sent and to him alone immediately Apoc. 2.1 c. 2. His Gospel was likewise without all question delivered by him to some Pastors to be by them taught and published as appears by their testimony to it Ioh. 21.24 3. Three of S. Pauls Epistles for certain were written to Pastors alone the first and second to Timothy and that to Titus and very probably a fourth to Philemon whom he calls his fellow labourer Phil. 1. 4. So were also probably S. Lukes Gospel and Acts Theophilus to whom they were dedicated being by some ancient Writers said to have been a Bishop 5. Two other of S. Paul's Epistles though dedicated to Churches yet were delivered immediately into the hand of the Pastor to be by him read to the people or else that charge of reading them to them had been superfluous Col. 4.16 1 Thess 5.27 So in his hand they remained also after the reading and at his discretion whether he would read them the second time and much more whether permit any of the people copies of them And by parity of reason the same is to be presumed of the other Gospels and Epistles dedicated to Churches or without dedication But what need I prove it thus by inferences and presumptions When the text affirms it expressely that the Scripture was written purposely for the Church and immediately for her alone to be an instrument in her hand for teaching the people and furthering and helpful to her for the better discharge of her office 6. So saith S. Paul touching his Epistle to Timothy These things write I unto thee that thou maist know how thou oughtest to behave
Mar. 16.16 6. Did Christ send some to search it as a witness to his person He sent all to hear her as the Teacher of his Gospel 7. Is he blessed that reads it So is he that hears her word Lu. 11.28 And no reader of it but he that is also her hearer Apoc. 1 3. 8. Is it able to make some Christians wise to salvation by faith in Christ Her vvord is able to save all creatures souls by receiving it Mar. 16.19 1 Tim. 4.16 Iam. 1.21 9. Is it profitable for doctrine c. that the man of God may be perfect throughly furnished to every good work She is necessary and sufficient for doctrine c. that every creature may be perfect throughly furnished to every thing pertaining to faith or holiness 10. In a word is it profitable in any kinde to any use vvhatsoever It is only as an instrument in the hand of her or her Scholars So whatsoever can be said of it the same or more excellent may be said of her or the word by her preached But then there are abundance of glorious things spoken of her Psal 87.3 none whereof can be said of it namely all those named supra pag. 13 14 15. The House of God the Angel of the Lord the Light of the VVorld the Power of God unto Salvation the Ground of Truth the Rule of Faith c. VVhich I say not of any intent to extoll her above it absolutely but to beget in you a due esteem of her as in some respects excelling it as it does her in many other 4. Is it because it vvarnes you of some danger possible in making her your guide not a syllable in it to any such sense it doth of danger in making it so 2 Pet. 3.16 5. Is it because it tells you you need not believe or obey her further then she teaches out of or consonantly to it It tells you no such thing but the quite contrary when it calls her the ground of truth For if she the ground of truth we are not to judge of the truth of her doctrine by it but contrarily of its true sense by her doctrine It being possible for it to have divers senses but not possible for it to have any true one repugnant to her doctrine as neither possible for her being the ground of truth to misunderstand it so as to teach any thing repugnant to it Would then any of your Ministers undertake to prove to me by it that she may yea hath at sometime or other since the Apostles death yea at this present does erre in her teaching I would ask him if he would prove it by the express words of it or no. If nay would tell him no implications or deductions though never so evident to reason were to be of force against such express promises as are made to her and those not conditional only so much as implicitely but Prophetical such as that Day and night shall not cease while the earth remains Gen. 8.22 for so saith it If you can break my Covenant of the day and my Covenant of the night and that there should not be day and night in their season then may also my Covenant be broken with David my servant that he should not have a Son to sit upon his throne and you will not I hope say that Christ's throne was to judge errors and with the Levites the Priests my Ministers c. Ier. 33.20 Nay God Almighty for our greater assurance in this point expressely declares that no default or wickedness of the Pastors of the Church should ever defease his Covenant with her If his children forsake my law in practice of life c. I will visit their transgressions with the rod c. But my loving kindeness will I not utterly take from him nor suffer my faithfulness to fail c. Psalme 89.30 Such expresse promises are made to her for her immunity from all error in doctrine so long as the world endures Namely for instance these My spirit which is upon thee and my words which I have put into thy mouth shall not depart out of thy mouth nor out of the mouth of thy seed nor out of the mouth of thy seeds seed saith the Lord from henceforth and for ever Esa 59.21 Again The spirit of truth shall abide with you for ever therefore he spake not to the Apostles but the Church Ioh. 16.3 and guide you into all truth Ioh. 14.16 Now all truth excludes any one least error If he say yea and should which is impossible bring a Text in expresse words against some doctrine or avowed practice of hers I would ask him if those vvords were to be understood in their proper literal grammatical or ordinary Ecclesiastical sense If he say yea afore I admitted him for an Interpreter I vvould ask him for his token vvithout vvhich not our Lord Christ himself vvould desire any one to submit to his Interpretation of it against the Synagogue Ioh. 5.31 15.24 And if which is also impossible he should shew it I mean not a sign Deut. 13.1 Mat. 24.24 but a true miracle Psal 136. 4. Ioh. 3.2 Ioh. 9.31 I would answer him that from thenceforward I would neither believe her nor it Not her because teaching contrary to that which she told me was the word of God Not it because teaching contrary to her who it told me was the ground of truth and her preaching the word of God Weigh then vvell as I said with your self dear Christian Brother what reason you have to make it your guide Nay what an absurd senseless thing it will be in you after this admonition and demonstration to you to leave the fountain of living water for a broken cistern the ground of truth for a quick-sand of errour I mean the Church for the Scripture not in its due nature or use God forbid any such thing in the mouth or thought of a Christian but in its abuse as interpreted to you by your self a man not onely subject to all kinde of error but false principled or by Ministers or Synods such as yours as subject to error and false principled as your self to leave the Teacher unto which our B. Saviour said Do you teach the Gospel to every creature and of which he said to you and me and every creature He that believes her or her teaching and is baptized shall be saved that not believes her or her teaching shall be damned Mar. 16.16 for a book of which he never spake syllable unto Christians or in order to teaching his Law nay of which it appears not that as Pastor of his Church or according to his humane nature he ever intended or so much as foresaw the writing of one tittle of it and of which he to whom he committed for ever after the feeding of his flock Ioh. 21.15 speaking unto Christians purposely of some part of the New Testament then written and by that occasion of the Scripture in general as in the
thy self in the Church which is the ground of truth 1 Tim. 3.15 7. Nay touching the whole Scripture universally All Scripture is given by God and is profitable for doctrine c. that the man of God c. that is The whole Scripture is given by God unto the Pastor and is profitable to this end to furnish him perfectly for doctrine reproof correction instruction of the people in righteousness as you call it and for every other good work proper or pertaining to his function 2 Tim. 3.16 17. CHAP. III. Vrging the third Argument Scripture not proper c. MY third Reason is Because it is not proper to give the first instruction vvhich is the first incomparably principal and most necessary act of Teaching As appears 1. From that of S. Paul How shall any one believe in him of whom they have not heard or hear without a Preacher Rom. 10.14 2. From that of S. Peter The unlearned wrist the Scripture to their destruction 2 Pet. 3.16 Therefore to a profitable and safe use of it it requires and supposes a reader somewhat pre-instructed in Religion 3. From the form of it because not Catechistical but Historical c. 4. From the dedication of all the books in it vvhich have any vvhich is not to any but either Pastors or Catholick Churches the Romans Corinthians c. or at least Catholick persons walking in the truth 2 Ioh. 4. 3.3 5. From the stile of it vid. inf c. 4. § 2. 6. From divers passages in it expresly supposing the reader one needing no catechising 1 Ioh. 2.20 27. Insomuch as they check some in the Churches they vvrote to for needing it Heb. 5.12 nay they suppose him one not needing necessarily any instruction Luk. 1.4 Rom. 15.14 1 Cor. 1.5 Col. 3.16 c. And therefore declare the end of their vvriting those that declare any to be not to teach Catechistical or Fundamental doctrines but the higher perfecting mysteries 1 Cor. 3.1 Heb. 6.1 to exhort admonish stir up to remembrance encourage comfort establish rectifie some errours and abuses crept in among them to give the Pastors some advices and such like ends pertaining to doctrine Concionatory or perfecting Luk. 1.4 Ioh. 20.31 1 Cor. 11.23 15.2 1 Thess 4.1 9. 2.15 1 Tim. 3.15 Heb. 13.22 2 Pet. 1.12 3.1 Iude 3. Apoc. 3.2 3.3 c. Consequently it is so far from being useful or intended to teach us Doctrinally or Catechistically the articles of our Creed the form of Church-Government VVorship Sacraments c. as it is but incidently and as it were by accident that it mentions any thing of them CHAP. IV. Vrging the fourth argument Scripture not the principal A Fourth Reason is Because it is not the principal as to the effect of teaching but onely an instrument in the hand of the Church and one of her Scholars And consequently improper but as in their hand to give any Christian yea or Divine so much as his perfecting instruction And I shall give four proofs for it §. 1. Scripture for the Church The first shall be Because the Church was not ordained for it but it for her as it 's end to be helpful and furthering to her in and for the better discharge of her office As is proved supra cap. 2. §. 2. Not proper to Catechise The second because as appears by the former Chapter it is not proper to give the first instruction Consequently nor the second but to him the first right For the first instruction gives us our first and transcendent rule notion or instrument by which we measure and judge of all things we read or hear of afterward generally speaking in Religion Consequently one false principled is in as bad nay many times worse a condition for understanding Scripture then a novice as the eye is more deceived using a false spectacle then none at all and one that hath a wrong direction given him is many times worse for finding the way then he that hath none at all Now for giving men their first instruction right no means precedent to Scripture is imaginable but the Church Or briefer thus Because it supposes its reader a Catholick And therefore cannot be proper for any one's use but a Catholicks §. 3. VVants sense and reason The third and vvhich though I name it here onely is of as much or more force in giving the first instruction because it vvants understanding and sense faculties absolutely necessary to discharge the office of teaching Because 1. Every one is of a several capacity rank or form as I may call it in knovvledge so as vvhat is plain to one is dark to another And vve are all by nature 1 Cor. 2.11 dull of hearing in spiritual things Heb. 5 11. and very apt to understand them in carnal sense as vve see in Nicodemus Ioh. 3.4 the vvoman of Samaria Ioh. 4.15 the Capernaltes Ioh. 6.52 yea after vve have been a good vvhile in Christ's School to think vve understand them as vve ought vvhen God knovvs many times very sorrily and erroneously as vve see in the Apostles themselves Mat. 13.36 Luk. 24.45 Act. 1.6 And therefore that vvhich is to teach must be able to consider the scholars need capacity and apprehensions and accordingly to fit his instruction to every one severally to one thus to another thus to babes milk to men stronger meat 1 Cor. 3.1 Heb. 5.11 And to that end must be able to be interrogated by the scholar Mat. 13.36 Lu. 2.46 Acts 2.37 8.34 yea if need be again and again until he understand the instruction aright and fully as he ought yea and to interrogate him too to see if he do 2. Again every one is of a several calling quality humor state of soul or conscience degree in vertue c. So that which is useful counsel or doctrine to one is impertinent to another nay vvhat is one mans meat is often anothers poyson For many vices are like vertues and contrarily vertues like vices so as it is very apt for men vvithout good judgement and experience in such matters Heb. 5.14 to mistake one for the other And H. Scripture relates many things done ill by Saints well by wicked men without giving judgement which was well which ill done so as it will be very easie to erre in making it a rule by it self Besides the extreams come very neer another that which parts them many times no broader then the edge of a rasor nay vertue must be many times compos'd of somewhat of each extream duty tempered Mat. 10.16 Besides cases are altered by circumstances so as what is sound doctrine in one case may in another by the alteration of some one circumstance imperceptible to an ordinary or unexperienced judgement be false and pernitious And these circumstances varying cases are of that infinite variety as they are incomprehensible within any written rule although it should consist of more volumes then the world contain And therefore that which is to