he saith thus And I would not speake vnto you Brethren as vnto spirituall mem but as vnto carnall men euen as to Babes in Christ I giue you milke to drinke and not meat for you were not yet able to beare it where he layeth the spirituall man against the carnall man that in regard of carnall affection perceiueth not the things of the spirit of God wherfore it seemeth a strang thing that Sectaries should infer from this text of scripture that euery belieuer hath a priuat (b) S. Irenaeus l. 3. cap. 2. con haer sharpely rebuks Valentinus for leauing tradition and following the priuat spirit thereby constituting himselfe sole iudge and rule of faith reuealing spirit of truth wherby he is enabled with authority to discern matters of faith and iudge all controuersies and to be iudged of no man himselfe vnto the excluding of all outward Teachers As to the second Text the true meaning of it is not that his vnction only doth teach but that the doctrines of christian religion which men teach outwardly by speaking * Aug. trac 3. in Epis Joan. magisteria inquit forensecus adiutoria quaedam sunt admonitiones cathedram autem in caelo habet qui corda dotet his vnction teacheth inwardly by inspiring grace wherby men are made apt to harken to what the Church ministers teach and indeed this docility or aptness to harken to the word of God is a speciall prerogatiue giuen by the spirit of grace vnto the children of the new law and prophesied of in the old law by Ieremy and Isaias As concerning the third Text set down the true sense is this that whosoeuer beliueth in the son of God aright hath in himselfe inward faith which is a diuine gift and therfore called the testimony of God in as much as it witnesseth that no man can * Mat. tues Christus Filius Dei viui caro sanguis non reuelauit tibi sed pater meus come vnto the son Iesus-Christ except it be giuen vnto him by the Father and albeit that the inward testimony of God hath been the Iole cause to draw some men vnto the maruelous light of faith for example Saint Peter beliued the mistery of the incarnation in vertue of an inward inspiration proceeding from God immediatly neuertheless the outward testimony of the Church is the ordinary necessary requisit to the conceiuing of christian faith according to the ordinance of Christ that hath constituted outward Teachers to be of necessary and perpetuall vse in his Church to the worlds end that we be not carryed about with euery wind of doctrine which hath been extreme needlesse if he had thought it expedient to supply euery particular belieuer with a priuat reuealing spirit Furthermore from the premises is clearly deducible that the holy scripture cannot lay clame to the dignitie of a supream Iudge because the office therof which is a primary end intended of necessity * Plato in libris quos de repub scripsit Aristoteles in policicis docent in constitutione formatione alicuius reipub vnum ex ijs quae debent 1. per se intentendi esse ipsum IudiceÌ„ pro dirimendis litibus ciuium ad pacem in rep seruandam in the forming of euery common wealth is to declare laws punish peruerse offenders and pronounce sentence of iudgment for the determining all matter in debate that therby vnity and peace may be preserued but the scripturs can chaleng nothing of iuridicall power in order to iudging defining and deciding controuersies of faith these actions importing life hearing and speaking which the scripturs cannot exercise being vnliud things that neither heare nor speak clearly and consequently vnfit to Iudg matters in debate between one and another besids these were not intended in â—he forming of the Church as requisits absolutly necessary to the Gouerment of it for Christ during the time he conuersed on earth writ nothing himselfe nor commaunded his Apostles or disciples to writ and indeed of themselues they were not much (i) According to Eusebius l. 3. hist Eccles cap. 18. the Apoles and disciples of Christ were not greatly solicitous to put down in writing the misteries of christian faith being the employment inioyned them was to preach the Gospel in so much that according to the same Eusebius it was a tradition of those days that they were after a manner necessitated to write and according to S. Hierom de viris illus S. Iohn writ his Gospel in regard of Cherintus and Ebion which denyed the diuinity of Christ And indeed t is euident that the Apostles did not write down the principles of christian religion hauing receiued command ad commission from Christ to preach without any commission to write set vpon writing because of their ingagement in an higher imployment namely preaching of the Gospell and it seems that those few which haue written were vrged or necessitated therunto as was Saint Iohn that writ his Gospell to confute the hereticks Cherintus and Ebion who denied the diuinity of Christ Again among the twelue Apostles Saint Matthew and Saint Iohn only and among the 62. Disciples Saint Luke only only writ the Gospell euen diuers years after Christs Ascention into Heauen insomuch that the christiaÌ„ Church had institutioÌ„ exercised iuridicall authority made lawes exacted obedience vnto them along while before the new scripturs were in being and contrary to the old scripture pronounced sentence of iudgment to the anulling of Circumcision which was a controuersy of faith Wherfore doubtless scripturs were neither primarly intended nor primarly giuen as suprem iudges of all matters in debate concerning faith and religion moreouer Saint Irenaeus who florished in the yeare of our lord 160. expresly (k) Irenaeus l. 3. con haer cap. 4. denyes expresly that christian faith had perished if the Apostles had not left vs the scriptures asserteth that the people of sundry countries without the help of paper or inck had preserued christian faith down from the Apostles to his time the vnwritten supplying the room of the written word for this ancient Father writeth and ascribeth that preseruation vnto apostolicall tradition obserued by the ancient Churches together with the help of inward grace proceeding from the holy Ghost Wherfore as those primatiue Churches did perseruer in the profession of the christian faith for the space of many years without scripturs so the present Church assisted with the like meanes might continue pure without spot or wrinckle although it had nothing of written doctrine and consequently the primary end for which scripturs were intended was not to doe the office of suprem Iudg howeuer all things which were written were written for our learning that wee through patience * L. 1. Machabae cap. 11 Ionathas summus Sacerdos scribens spartiatis dicit se suos in rebus aduersis pro solatio habere libros sacros quod ostendit vsum in quem datae sunt nobis
controuersies in debate for as much as they relate to faith Furthermore God who is not an accepter of persons Rom. 15. who is not God of men only but of women also and who desireth to saue all of each sex doubtless instituted a remedy against originall sin in fauour of men and women for as much as the expiation thereof is absolutely necessary vnto saluation wherfore in regard circumcision was the remedy proper to men and could not be applied to women some other expedient was ordained for their cure and although no express mention thereof be made in any part of the old Testament neuertheless that God instituted a remedy for the deliuerance of women * Quod qualeue fuerit illud remedium à Deo institutum ad subueniēdum faeminis quae nascebantur in peccato originali nullibi explicatur in sacris litteris nec porest deduci ex illis from the guilt of originall sin the Iews belieued as an article of faith necessary to saluation and indeed so it was as appeareth from the necessity of it and from the prouidence God hath ouer both men and women and truly to auerre that God was defectiue then in necessary requisits to the saluation of women is a manifest blasphemy wherby it is clear that euen the Iews in the old law held vnwritten besides written tradition as necessary vnto saluation neither is the said unwritten tradition preiudiced by the reply of some sectaries saying that the oblation of women in the Temple according to the law of Moyses did free them of originall sin For that legall offring was common alike to women and men and Christ was both circumcised and offered in the Temple nor by recurring for this deliuerance vnto the circumcision of Parents there being not any passage in the whole Testament of the old law that carrieth the least sound that way or that hath relation to the deliuerance of women from originall sin in vertu of their parents circumcision besides S. Austin and other ancient Fathers expresly teach that baptism is to Christians as circumcision was to the Iewes but no Christian sectary will say that women are sanctified and consecrated to God through their parents baptism for if it were enough for the purging out of originall sin to baptise the male there would be no need at all to baptise the female sex hereby it is clear again that the Iews of the old law allowed and professed vnwritten besides written traditions as necessary to saluation From the premises appeareth that the word of God taken precisely comprehendeth both vnwritten and written traditions in consequence of which vnwritten traditions are not additions to the word of God they being a part therof Wherfore neither Moyses Deut. 4. saying to the people of Israel Ye shall adde nothing to the word which I speake to you neither shall ye take ought from it Nor S. Paul Gal. 1. saying to the Galatians though that we or an Angel from Heauen preach vnto you (h) According to S. Austin tom 7. con liter petiliani l. 3. cap. 6. and tom 9. trac 98. in Io. the particle praeterquam besids in the cited Text imports the particle contra against or contrary so that the meaning is that nothing must be preached against or contrary to the holy scripture And truly this explication appears euidently by the Apostles arguing against those that asserted Iudaism to be consistent with christianism which assertion because it was contrary to the law of Christ the Apostle added the curse set down in the same sentence of the Text. Moreouer the Greek 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which the Latin Interpreter translateth praeterquam is vsed by the Apostle for contra not only in the Epistle alledged ad Gal. but also Rom. 4. besids what we haue preached vnto you let him be accursed condemne vnwritten traditions as sectaries do calumniate the Catholick Church besides sectaries very vnhandsomly and weakly do infer from these two scripture testimonies that no doctrines of faith ought to be receiued saue such as be contained expresly in or by euident consequence deduced from the written word of God for neither of both doe mention the written word of God The word says Moyses which I speake vnto you and that we haue preached vnto you says the Apostle but if it were granted vnto them what they cannot proue viz that Moyses then spoke what he had written afore notwithstanding they could not ouerthrow therby vnwritten traditions vnless they could proue which they can neuer doe that they be additions destructiue of or contrary to the written word of God for such additions only he meant and excluded by the cited scriptures and indeed if S. Paul had meant otherwise he should haue cursed S. Iohn the Euangelist that many yeares after his martyrdome writ reuelations which S. Paul had not preached to the Galatians likwise the Anathema had touched S. Paul himselfe that deliuered sundry passages in the acts of the Apostles which happened after his preaching to the Galatians Howeuer catholicks doe not deny but that traditions which are the vnwritten word be contained implicitly in the written word of God that is to say as in a generall principle from whence they are deducible and the whole word of God is contained in scriptutes yea in this sole Article of the Apostles Creed I belieue in the holy Catholick Church in as much as all the matters pertaining to faith and generall manners and not clearly expressed in holy scriptures are contained expresly in the doctrine of the Church which the scriptures commend vnto vs as infallible and indeed the whole word of God is expounded vnto vs in Christs command Math. 18. If he refuse to heare the Church let him be vnto thee as an heathen man and publican in regard wherof ancient Fathers do auerre all doctrines of faith to be contained in scriptures that is as in a generall principle from whence they can be deduced CHAR. XXJ. OF THE CHVRCH TRIVMPHANT THE CONTENTS Souls that remoue out of their earthly habitations cleansd from all vncleanes are instantly translated into Heauen the clear sight of God wherein consisteth heauenly beatitude is not deferd till the generall Resurrection though the office of mediation aduocation and intercession is proper to Christ alone as to the noblest manner therof neuertheless according to the Catholick Church all the Saints mediate and intercede in the sight of God for the faithfull on earth in subordination to Christ the Church of god does not nor neuer did teach that the faithfull on earth ought to mediate and intercede for the blessed in Heauen S. Paul did not mediate or intercede for Onesiphorus that he might obtaine mercy after his soule was beatifyed the ancient Liturgies of the Church approue not of prayers vnto helping of the blessed THe Church triumphant is a holy Congregation of blessed Saints reigning with Iesus-Christ innocēt souls not liable to any guilt of sin as soon (a) 2. Cor. 5. we know
can sacro-sancta the Apostolicall sea did not receiue supremacy and preeminence from the Apostles but from our Sauiour himselfe and indeed Christ founded and built his Church vpon S. Peter Mat. 16. Thou art Peter and on this rock I vvill build my Church .... and J vvill giue vnto the the keys of the kingdome of heauen Again Christ praid especially for S. Peter and after his resurrection appointed him to feed all his sheepe and lambs Moreouer S. Peter as head and Prince of the other Apostles called the first Councill which was celebrated between the Ascention and Pentecost And in the second Council mentioned act 15. spoke first and decided the matter in debate Bishop of Rome as lawfull successour of S. Peter in suprem authority and there is not any except the Roman Church that hath published and planted the one holy apostolicall faith from the rising of the sun to the goeing down therof which denoteth its vniuersality an order to place there is not any except the Roman Church that can rockon pastours and Teachers in a continuall line of succession down from S. Peter to the present times which sheweth its vniuersality in order to time there is not any Church-Gouernour saue the Bishop of Rome to whose definitiue sentence of iudgment (x) S. Anaclete Epis 1. commanded that euery hard question should be referd to the sea Apostolick because saith he the Apostles so appointed by speciall command from Christ Wherefore Tertullian calleth the Pope king of the world and stiles Rome the Chief and Apostolicall seat whether saith he wee ought to recur in all doubtfull matters relating to faith Besids S. Austin that was a member of the African Church Epis 9. addressing himselfe to Pope Innocent in order to the Pelagians whom he impugned writeth thus ... that errour and impiety of the Pelagians the authority of the sea apostolick must anathematize Again the Council of Alexandria cals Pope Felix prophanarum haresium depositor the deposer of prophan heresies hard controuersies of faith haue been referred in all ages Furthermore it is essentiall to the true Church to begett children in Iesus-Christ through the Gospell 1. Cor. 4 that is to say to bring whole countries out of darkness of infidelity into the maruelous light of Christian faith which not any except the Roman Church hath performed Sectaries like partriges haue gathered children * Ieremiae cap. 17. perdix fouet seu congregat quae non peperit Vnde S. Aug. assimilat haereticos perdici which they haue not brought forth but the Roman Church hath begotten vnto Christ a world of children both in the primatiue times for the first 500. yeares and since For Germans Bauarians Vandals Polans Sweds Danes Noruegians Hungarians Normans English and sundry other Countryes since the yeare 600. were begotten in Iesus-Christ through the Gospell by Priests and Bishops of the Roman Church as plainly appears by the ancient and modern histories written of each people respectiuely And as touching our country of Englād that embraced the catholick faith through the preaching of S. Austin a Priest and Bishop of the Roman Church after its conuersion which happened in the reign of S. Ethelbert for near a thousand yeares continued obedient to the Bishop of Rome and constant in the profession of the catholick religion as do euidence our ancient Cronicles laws common laws ordinances Records foundations of Bishopricks Cathedrall Churches vniuersities colleges and hospitalls which remain monuments of these dayes to beare clear witnes of catholick religion wherfore it is a wonder how English Magistrats come to look with so enuious an eye vpon their catholick subiects as to persecute them for conforming their conscience to the full and constant profession of all their christian progenitours CHAR. XX. OF TRADITIONS THE CONTENTS Down from the Apostles to these times the true Church of God hath been directed and gouernd by the written and vnwritten word as by laws and customs doctrines necessary to saluation which the Apostles receiued either from the mouth of Christ or from the holy Ghost by inspiration were deliuered to the faithfull of those dayes partly in written and partly in vnritten traditions if the Churches authority and vnwritten traditions were laid a side scriptures would haue nothing of waight with them vnto euincing christian religion Answeres vnto seuerall obiections propounded against the Churches traditions TRaditions are vnwrtten doctrines deliuered by the mouth of Christ or his Apostles and committed vnto the keeping of the Church (a) 1. Cor. 11. as I haue deliuered vnto you saith S. Paul keep my precepts From this sacred Text Theophilact infers that both S. Paul and the other Apostles deliuered many things which they did not set down in writing called traditions not because they are not at all written but in regard there is no express mention thereof in the holy scriptures for t is certaine that the traditions receiued from the Apostles and deliuered as it were from hand to hand for sundry ages are now written as precepts of faith and generall manners necessary vnto saluation Though the whole scripture is giuen by inspiration of God and is profitable to teach to conuince to correct and to instruct in iustice 2. Tim. 3. Yet it is not the same thing to be a profitable guide in the way of iustce and saluation and to be the sole expedient necessary therunto for a head is both profitable and necessary to preserue a man aliue neuertheless it alone without the society and ministery of the body is not sufficient enough to continue him aliue likewise the Sacrament of Eucharist conduceth to the purchase of eternall blessedness yet cannot effect it without the help of baptism and faith and the Chapter set down expresly asserteth that euen the old scriptures instruct to saluation and notwithstanding the Apostle requireth of Timothy perseuerance in the doctrines which he had heard of him besides what he had learned from them wherin he had been versed from (b) By the particles from his infancy euidently appeares that the Apostle spoke of these scriptures which Timothy had learned in his youth that is he meant the old testament being the new scriptures were not written when Timothy was a youth Wherefore when the Apostle writ vnto him that all scripture is profitable c. he could not vnderstand the whole body thereof as some sectaries vnaduisedly interprete him translating whole for all And indeed when the Apostle writ that Epistle to Timothy the whole body of scripture was not composed S. Iohn had not then put forth his Gosple and his Apocallps he writ after the death of S. Paul him infancy again albeit the scriptures be a great light neuertheless they doe not giue light to all a en within the house of God whose written doctrines they are vnless they be put vpon the candlestick of the Churches definitions and vnwritten traditions for setting these aside scriptures are but a light shining in a dark place 2.
Pet. 10. in order to many diuine ordinances in regard they doe not shew plainly clearly and euidently all the mysterious precepts of Christian faith that require necessary obseruance wherefore it is an extream weakness to infer from the light of the written a negation of light in the vnwritten word of God as to instruction in iustice and saluation and indeed down from the begining of the Church christian religion hath in all times * Trid sess 4. cap. 1. declarat veritatem disciplinä Ecclesiae contineri in libris scriptis sine scripto traditionibus qua ex ipsius Christi ore ab Apostolic acceptae aut ab ipsis Apostolis Spiritu sancto dictāte quasi per manus traditae ad nos vsque peruenerūt huiusmodi traditionū contemptoros anathemati subiecit Sectarij vero communiter reijciuns eruditiones apostolicas affirmantes omnia qua sine dispendio sulutis possunt ignorari apertè contineri in scripturis been directed and gouerned by both of the said lights that is by the written and vnwritten word as by laws and customs which kind of gouerment is common alike to euery common wealth instituted aright That this double light (c) According to S. Irenaens p. 3. con haer c. 3. 4. Tertull. l. de coro militum cap. 3. S. Basil l. ad Amphilochium de Spiritu sancto cap. 29. S. Austin Epis ad Janua there is full parity between traditions ad scriptures warrantable authority being common alike to the one and the other Wherefore S. Chrys hom 4. in 2. ad Thess saith Est traditio nihil quaras amplius T' is tradition seeke no further of written and vnwritten Traditions is of necessary and perpetuall vse in the Church appeareth by the second Epistie to the Thesalonians where S. Paul enioyneth the keeping of both saying stand fast keepe the Traditions which you haue been taught either by word or our Epistle All the doctrines necessary to saluation which the Apostles receiued either from the mouth of Iesus-Christ or by inspiration of the holy Ghost they deliuered to the faithfull of those dayes partly in written and partly in vnwritten traditions which down from the primatiue Church to the present times haue passed as from hand to hand in a continuall line of priestly succession Moreouer it appeareth clearly by the second Chapter of S. Iohns canonicall Epistle that the Apostles thought it not expedient to set forth in writing all matters of christian religion necessary to saluation for he expresly saith although I had many things to write vnto you yet would I not write with paper and inck for I trust to come vnto you and speak mouth to mouth that your ioy may bee full which he repeateth in the end of his third canonicall Epistle saying I haue many things to write but I will not with ynck and pen write vnto thee and doubtless as Christ when he said to his Disciples Io. 16. I haue yet many things to say vnto you but ye cannot beare them now meant of many mysteries of faith distinct from those he had already taught them so S. Iohns meaning was that he had other doctrines of christian faith or manners to deliuer by word of mouth then those he had written with ynck and pen and truly the particles That your ioy may be full doe import as much being meant of spirituall ioy such as faithfull christians commonly receiue when they are instructed in things pertaining to iustice and saluation and it is not in reason probable that S. Iohn should vnderstand temperall ioy in order to wordly aduantages the intent of his Epistle being to stir vp a Mother and her son vnto a vertuous life in Iesus-Christ neither is it as to reason credible that so many things which S. Iohn purposely omitted to write were set down in writing either by himself afterward or by the other Apostles afore there being no scripture testimony wheron to ground those coniectures inuented meerly by the aduersaries of vnwritten traditions Besids it is plainly euident that sundry vnwritten doctrines of christian religion which are not contained expresly in any part of the new or old Testament are of necessary credence For example we must belieue with diuine faith the receiued catalogue or canon of both Testaments to be the true and vncorrupted word of God For otherwise those holy writings would haue nothing of weight with vs as theron to relie our saluation notwithstanding not any part of either Testament expresseth the receiued catalogue or canon for example we must belieue that the true sense of the written letter is a necessary and essentiall requisit to faith because in the sense that giueth life and not in the letter that bringeth death the true word of God consists but the true sense of the written letter that is to say how (d) The Caluinists in a publick disputation with the Antytrinitarians in the presence of Iohn the second elected king of Hungary engag'd to proue by scripture the mystery of the B. Trinity but failing in their engagement the king of a Caluinist became an Anti-trinitarian the written letter ought to be taken whether in a proper or figuratiue signification is not known but by the interpretation and tradition of the Church Again we must belieue that in one God there is a Trinity of diuine persons which be really distinct one from an other and no more yet not any writing of the Apostles or Euangelists (e) According to S. Chrys hom 4. operum imperf as in Heauen so in scripture God lies hid vnseen Wherefore as all men behold this corporall Heauen and not God that dwels within it so though many read the holy scriptures neuertheless they perceiue not the God of truth that lies hid in the inward seuse thereof expresly assertes a reall distinction or excludeth expresly a quaternity of persons and truly though S. Iohn saith in his canonicall Epistle cap. 4. that there be three which beare testimony in Heauen the Father the word and the holy Ghost neuertheless he doth not say expresly * Simplex affirmatio ternarij in aliquo non excludit vel negat ibi esse aliquod quartum cū in quaternario includatur ternarium qui asserit esse tres vbi sun◠quatuor non falsum dicit three only or that these three are really distinct one from an other for he addeth these three are one in so much that the great Sabellian heretick Praxeas taught that God was but one sole person that carried three distinct names in order to three seuerall effects naming him Father in as much as he createth all things son because be was borne of the Virgin Mary inuested with human nature and holy Ghost in regard he sanctifieth all creatures Wherfore if the Apostles had not deliuer'd to the faithfull of those days by word of mouth a reall distinction in God as to personality and a reall identity as to nature and substance and the Church
HOLY CHARACTERS CONTAINING A MISCELANY OF THEOLOCICALL DISCOVRSES THAT IS THEOLOGY Positiue Scholasticall Polemicall and Morall Built vpon the foundation of Scriptures Traditions Councils Fathers DEVIDED INTO TWO BOOKS Written by GEORGE LEYBVRN Doctor of Diuinity Bevvare lest there be any man that deceiue you through Philosophy and crafty handling according to the traditions of men according to the rudiments of the vvorld and not according to Christ Coloss 2. Of your selues shall men rise speaking peruerse thinges to dravv Disciples after them Act. 20. PRINTED AT DOWAY By BALTAZAR BELLIER An. 1662. With Priviledge TO THE RIGHT HONORABLE LORD PERCY HERBERT LORD POWYS OF POWYS c. MY LORD S. Clement in the eleuenth booke of Apostolicall constitutions writeth that Selene the great beauty of Rome in those dayes when she shewed her selfe from a high Tower vnto the people of that Citty Simon the Magician by sleight conueyances represented as many Selenes as were windowes in the same Tower Howeuer there was no more then one true Selene the rest being meer outward resemblances hauing nothing of inward substance contriu'd by naturall magicke vnto deluding the Eye-sight of the Beholders in like manner though true Theology is not diuided nor has many faces being the science of one God that shew's her selfe front the high Tower of one diuine faith which supports her neuertheless through the subtill dealings of Satan is represented with as many faces as there be new models of Christian doctrine that is as many or rather more then ages down from Christ till these dayes euery age respectiuely hauing coind new opinions in order to the mysteries of Christian Religion Heady and high-mynded schollars once they come to be blown vp with the actiuity of their own witt and thereby become inordinate a 2. Timoth. 3. erunt homines seipsos amantes louers of their own thoughts leaue the loue of truth As a troubled eye so the vnderstanding deluded with opinions which goe beyond the boundaries of nature cannot see the light of truth Mittit illis Deus operationem erroris quoniam charitatem veritatis recipere noluerunt 2. Thes 2. In regard heady schollars are carried on the wings of Pride and will not embrace the loue of truth the supream prouidence giues them vp to their heart's lust vnto vncleaness of errour that is God b Secundum S. Aug. l. 20. ciuit c. 19. Deus mittit quatenus diabolum facere ista permittit permitt's Satan to send them strong delusion vnto belieuing lies and taking pleasure therein which together with pertinacy so by degrees blind's them that they still encrease in madness till at lengh through faction sedition and schism they endeauour to ruine as it were all true Christian doctrine and Religion witness Nestorius Arius Pelagius Donatus and sundry other anciēt and modern schollars which vpon what designs of ambition c S. Austin l. de vtil cred c. 1. saith that he is an Heretick that for temporall interest either coineth or followeth new opinions and interest is needless to express through new coind Theologies haue laboured to turne the Church of God into vtter disorder and confusion As all rebellion is to ciuill so all schism is to ecclesiasticall gouernement dangerous and pernicious In the old law lest the people of God might be deceiu'd with false coyne and weights the originall Cycli and originall weights were conseru'd in the Sanctuary of the Temple and no money or weights allow'd which were not conform to the original's of the same Sanctuary Likewise that the same people might not be deluded with false coyns and weights of doctrine the chaire of Moyses by diuine dispensation was cloathed with infallibility The high Priest how wicked soeuer could not vtter wicked doctrine from Moyses chaire as appears euidently from Christs own words Mat. 23. The scribes and Pharises sit in Moyses Chaire c. From which sacred Text S. Austin l. 6. con Faus Manichae c. 29. infers thus In Cathedra Moysis mali sedentes bona dicere cogebantur Besides when God erected Moyses his Chaire Deutro 17. he promised that all definitions Decrees and decisions of matters in debate as comming from that seate should be of vndoubted truth Moreouer the children of Israël were bound to submit to the sentence of the high Priest the law condemning of pride and punishing with death those which disobeyed the commandement of the Priest that ministred to our lord and the Decree of the Judges In the new law lest Christians might be carried away with euery winde of doctrine S. Peter and his Chaire by diuine dispensation were invested into much better priuiledges then Moyses and his Chaire For our Sauiour tooke speciall care that S. Peter might not fall away from the true faith as does euidence his prayer Luc. 22. Oraui pro te Petre vt non deficiat fides tua I haue prayed for thee Peter that thy faith faile not and doubtless his prayer was effectuall according to the Apostle Hebrae 5. Exauditus est Christus pro sua reuerentia Our lord prouided for S. Peter that his faith might not faile to the end saith S. Leo ser 3. de Assumpt The head being made invincible the state of all the rest might be more sure that is the rest thereby might be strengthned and confirm'd in faith S. Peter according to S. Ambrose l. 9. Noui Testam 9.75 Tom 4. after his denying of Christ was constituted the supream Pastour of souls because it was said to him afore When thou art conuerted confirm thy Brethren neither was Christ's prayer offered in order to the person of S. Peter only but likewise in reference to his office according to the inter pretation of the best antiquity so that the effect of the same prayer will continue as long as the Church of Christ shall endure on Earth and indeed euen as Christ commaunds S. Peter to feed his sheepe Ioa. 21. soe he commaunds him to confirm his Brethren Luc. 22. but that saying of Christ Feed my sheep did not relate to the person of S. Peter onely according to all Orthodox Writers but also to the office of supream Pastour which was conferd vpon S. Peter with intent to continue it in his successours being of necessary vse in the Church wherfore Christ saying to S. Peter confirme thy Brethren ought to carrie the same interpretation and in earnest it were manifest weaknes to giue vnto the successors of Moyses greater prerogatiues as to power authority and infallibility in the gouernement of the Synagogue then to the Successors of S. Peter in the gouernement of the Church of Christ for this were to prefer the law of bondage before the law of grace In consequence of the premises the Roman faith of S. Peters successors cannot faile not to fall away from faith is a priuiledge proper to the Church of Rome that is to the Bishops of that seate as also plainly appears by the clear Testimonies of primitiue Fathers For example S. Cyprian
and the holy Ghost and this was done with intent to render the name of Christ more honourable but S. Cyprian denyes expresly that remission of sinnes can be procured without naming of the three diuine persons which is the opinion of S. Austin l. 1. de baptismo con donat the Holy Trinity As there is fecundiâ—y in carnall parents to beget carnall children so by diuine dispensation fecundity is giuen to elementary water in baptism to bring forth spirituall children and as no man comes into the world that is not born of carnall parents So no man enters into the kingdom of Heauen that is not born again by sacramentall washing of water vnto iustification whosoeuer will put himselfe in a capacity to obtaine celestiall enjoyments must put of the old and terrene man and put on the new and spirituall creature he must purge out the old leauen of originall sin and by christian circumcision cast of the sinfull body of the flesh Col. 2. which is inconsistent with heauenly endowments that is to say he must be buried with Christ by baptism Rom. 6. christian circumcision vnto remission of sms and newness of life consisting therin Wherefore since that all men by the law * Apostolus dicit omnes peccasse in Adamo primo nostro Parente esse conceptos in peccato of their conception or birth are liable to the guilt of sin that only baptism de facto in deed or in desire receiued can wash away it is most euident that baptism is a requisite absolutely necessary vnto saluation And so i is defined 10. 3. Except that a man be born again of water and of the holy Ghost he canot enter into the kingdom of God Where the definition extend's euen to (c) Ancient Councils namely Carthag and Mileuit conuince those of foolishness which teach that euen young children can haue full enjoyment of Heauenly blessednes without baptism and so it is defined in the Council of Trent sess 5. decret de pecta originali and this catholick assertion was counted so certain in S Austins dayes that he l. con Iulia. c. 10. and 12. writeth that Pelagius out of feare of his own damnation damned such as exclude vnbaptis'd children from eternall life Yet though the Pelagians denyed that children contracted originall sin and in consequence thereof that Baptism as to them was no requisit necessary vnto the washing away of originall guilt neuertheless they taught that children without baptism could not be made Heires of the kingdom of Heauen infants that dye in their infancy vnbaptized according to the Church-interpretation expressing the want therof to import the loss of Heauens blessedness so that it is extream blindnes to assert the reception of children into Heauen vnless baptism be applyed vnto them indeed or by some extraordinary means employed aboue the common and ordinary law of Christ who hath instituted no other ordinary remedy then * Ambro. l. 2. de Abra. cap. 11. post citata verba Domini 10. 3. it a subiungit vtique nullum excipit non infantem non aliqua praeuentum necessitate IteÌ„ Aug. Epis ad Optatum mortis inquit transmissae ab Adamo chyrographo nullus omnino antequaÌ„ per baptismum liberetur non tenetur obnoxius sacramentall washing of water for the remission of originall sin as plainly shews the scripture-Testimony set down and the constant tradition and vniuersall practice of the catholick Church since the first age for 1662. years and truly children ought not to be exempted from a diuine law generally giuen with reference to all men joynt and seperat without warrantable authority of scripture (d) According to the ancient Fathers Orig. l. 5. in c. 6. ad Rom. S. Chrysostom hom ad Theoph. S. Austin l. 1. de Baptismo con dona the baptising of young children is an Apostolicall tradition in consequence of which it is no humane inuention introduced by Pope Higinus or Pope Syrisius as some sectaries vnaduisedly write and indeed it can lay claime to the best antiquity as plainly appeares by the Testimonies set down Besides Act. 16. Paul and Silas baptised the keeper of the prison and all his House and 1. Cor. 1. the family of Stephanus was baptised and euen young children are members of a family Church-tradition or speciall reuelation wherof not one example can be produced in all antiquity that euen such as are born of faithfull and godly parents can be made of Adams children Gods children and bee cleansed and purged of originall sin without the washing of water in the word (e) S. Paul Eph. 5. saith that Christ sanctifyed his Church cleansing it by the washing of water in the vvord of life Which sacred Text S. Chrys interpreting hom 20. ad Ephes asketh in what word and answeres to the question saying in the name of the Father the son and holy Ghost and S. Austin l. 6. con donat c. 25. affirmes that God is present with the Euangelicall words without which baptism has nothing of efficacy and l. 3. de baptismo explaining his meaning vnderstand's by Euangelicall words Christs own words set down in the Euangile of S. Mat. cap. 28. In the name of the Father the son and holy Ghost Whereby t' is euident that by the word required to the administring of baptism is not meant preaching vnto or instructing of those which receiue that Sacrament as some sectaries vnaduisedly expound that scripture-Text in opposition to the baptism of children that are not capable of instruction of life that is to say through the euangelicall inuocation of the most blessed Trinity Father son and holy Ghost and though Christ by his absolute power could haue instituted other remedies then the Sacrament of baptism to purge out the leauen of originall sin yet it is euident that his will was only to apply that and none other as the ordinary cure thereof Wherfore the faith and sanctity of faithfull and holy parents is not enough to sanctify their children vnto saluation without baptism hereunto being necessarily required iustifying grace through diuine faith the collation wherof is the prerogatiue of Christs merit 's The grace that does sanctify parents souls does not sanctify their childrens souls euery soul is sanctifyed by its own inherent sanctity and not by the sanctity of an other in the formall sense Parents can only through their sanctity dispose and prepare vnto spirituall sanctity for as much as they can procure for their children christian baptism wherof they be neither the formall nor efficient causes so the holy prayers of S. Steuen did dispose vnto the marueilous grace that sanctifyed S. Paul Act. but did not effect it notwithstanding in regard of this holy preparation practised by faithfull Parents the same S. Paul nameth their children holy 10. ad Cor. that is to say * Tertull. l. de monologia vocat liberos parentum fidelium sanctitati destinatos Et Hierom. Epis 153. ad Paulinum Christianae fidei candidatos as to
scripturae and comfort of the scripturs may haue hope Rom. 15. although they doe not define and iudge all matters of faith and religion yet they (l) The Apostle 2. Timot. 3. Saith that all scripture is giuen by inspiration from God and is profitable to teach argue correct and instruct in iustice That is according to the ancient Fathers to resiste conuince and condemne false doctrines Wherfore according to the same Apostle ad Tit. l. a Bishop must be vnreproueable embracing the faithfull word and sound doctrine that he may be able to exhort and conuince those which say against it conduce mainly therunto tending specially to christian instruction and erudition besides they stir vs vp to ioyne vertue with faith and with vertue knowledg and with knowledg temperance and with temperance patience and with patience godliness and with godliness loue 2. Epis 2. Pet. which is the consistency and plenitude of the law Scripturs are liud * S. Ambros Epis 19. vocat sacras scripturas fontes viuos qui saliunt in vitam aeternam fountains springing vp vnto euerlasting life but the keeping and dressing of them is cōmitted only to the Church of Christ that was the rock whence they sprāg it is the christian catholick Church taught of the holy Ghost that cōprehēdeth the bredth lenght depth and hight of these heauenly fountaines which is to say it is a speciall prerogatiue giuen to the Church of Christ to interpret infallibly and iuridically the holy scripturs (m) According to S. Hierom Epis ad Paulum S Chrys hom 40. in Ioa. S. Austin l. 4. de doct christ cap. 3. the hardness of holy scrpitures proceeds from the profoundnes copiousnes compendiousnes therof in consequence of which a right vnderstanding of sundry passages of necessary depends of tradition as well obserues S. Austiu l. de fide oper and S. Hierom in his scripture prologue ingeniously confesseth that he could not vnderstandand the holy Prophets Isaias Ieremy and Daniel again S. Irenaeus l. 3. cap. 7. Orig. in explic Epis ad Rom. and S. Austin l. de fide oper cap. 14. confess with one accorde that S. Paul is hard to be vnderstood and especially in regard he vseth frequent hyperboles which proceeded from the vehemency of the spirit that guided his pen. which profoundness of misteries plenteousness of senses shortness of sentences haue rendred obscure hard and intricate as plainly appeareth by the holy writers of the old law namely Isay Ieremy Ezechiel Daniel and of the new law Saint Paul especially according to the testimony of Saint Peter 2. Pet. 3. wherein he speaketh of his writings thus * S. Irenaue l. 3. cap. 7. scribens de Haereticis testatur Paulū hyperbolis vti frequenter propter impetu spiritus qui in ipso fuit Idē sentiūt Origines explicat Epistolae ad Rō Aug. de fide operibus cap. 14. 15. our Brother Paul in all his Epis mentioneth things in which Epistles some things are hard to be vnderstood which they that are vnlearned and vnstable wrest as they doe also others scripturs vnto their own perdition for further proofe of this catholick assertion may be alledged the perpetuall contention between one sectary and an other concerning the interpretation of scripture Texts in reference to controuersies of faith for example from the words This is my body Luc. 22. Lutherans doe argue the true and real presence of Christs body in the Sacrament together with the substance of bread contrariwise Caluinists infer a meer figure of Christs body Anabaptists deduce out of the commission Christ gaue vnto his Apostles Math. 18. goe and teach all nations baptizing them in the name of the Father c. That baptism ought not to be administrated but to such as are de facto apt to receiue instruction And the Arians misinterpreting that saying of Christ Io. * Apud S. Joan. dicit Christus Pater maior me est alibi ego Pater vnum sumus Posterior textus explicatur ab Arianis de vnitate consensus conformitate voluntatū My Father is greater then I denied his Godhead the holy scriptures are a great light of christian doctrine for they are the dictates of the holy Ghost yet not sufficient enough to let vs see the way to euerlasting life vnless they be set on the cādlestick of the * Vt luceat omnibus qui in domo sūt Mat. 5. Church it is not the same thing to be a light and to enlighten a light vnder a bushell is a light and shineth there howeuer it doth not giue light to all that are in the house but when it is put on the candlestick Math. 5. euen so the scripturs light put vnder a bushell that is vnder the interpretation of priuate wits continueth a shining light in it selfe neuertheless doth not enlighten vnto euerlasting life but when it is put on the candlestick of infallible authority proper to the Church of Christ Again the scripture is a booke written within and on the backside Apoc. 5. the outward writing is the letter that killeth the inward the spirit that giueth life 2. Cor. 3. as the soul quickneth the body (n) S. Austin ser 70. de tempore expounding the sacred Text Epis ad Cor. the letter killeth the spirit quikneth If saith he thou follow the true sense of scripture which is the spirit that giues life to the soule it will bring thee vnto saluation but if thou shalt neglect the true sense adhering to the outward letter presuming the true sense to be therein it will often tymes lead thee into errour And according to Tertul. l. de resur carnis Heresies spring vp in regard the scriptures are misinterpreted And he speaking of S. Pauls Epistles affirms that it ought not to seem a hard thing or any way strang that from thence errours should arise since heresies must be 1. Cor. 11. which notwithstanding would not be if the scriptures were interpreted aright Heresies must be not becaus God hath appointed that they should be but because he permitted that they might be and mans free will together with pride and malice makes them to be against Gods positiue will howeuer the supream prouidence from euil heresies draws good things soe the spirit or sense of the scriptures quickneth the letter but to come vnto the spirit of necessity there is required the opening of the booke which the Church onely can doe trusted with the key of authority that openeth it wherfore in as much as many men down from the begining of christianity to these times haue adhered rather to the letter then to the sense of scripture and thence cut out vnauthorized interpretations of their own many heresies haue sprung vp to the distruction of infinit souls wherof Christ prophesying said heresies must be He fore saw that euen of such as were incorporated into his Church would men rise * S. Cypri Epis 55. ad Cornelium Nec aliunde
likwise defined that vnwritten Tradition the faithfull of these dayes might haue been * S. Basil dicit Sabellianismum esse queÌ„dam Iudaismum Sabellius voro qui omnibus hareticis impietate antecelluit eirca annum 260. haresim Trinitatis propagauit quod Prâ—xeas omniuÌ„ primus humo Romanae inuexit proximè accessit ad errorem Iudaeorum Sabellians or Iewes as for any clear speaking scripture to hinder them Again we belieue that the holy Ghost is not the son of God nor that his procession is generation taken in the proper sense notwithstanding without tradition and interpretation of the holy Church it cannot be proued sufficiently that is to say by express scripture-testimony nor matters it that the Euangelists doe name the second person of the blessed Trinity the only begotten son for hence it follows not by necessary consequence that the holy Ghost is no son for Salomon is styled the only begotten son Prouerb 4. Howeuer it plainly appeareth by the first booke of Paralipomenon or cronicles that he had many brothers yet he was named the only begotten son in regard he was beloued as if he had been the only begotten We must belieue that such (f) The Council of Nice hath defined that such as are baptized by hereticks must not be rebaptized And in regard the Donatists impugned this assertion which is grounded vpon tradition and the Churches definition they were counted hereticks and S. Aust I. de vtilitate credendi cap. 22. expresly affirms that the said assertion is not contained in any express scripture and indeed practice and tradition of the Church only was obiected against S. Cypri that asserted rebaptizing of such as were baptized by hereticks as appeares by his own Epistle ad Iubaian 74. ad Pompeium he conceiuing that he had scripture authority on his side left the Churches tradition and practice yet S. Austin in sundry places of his writings excuseth him from heresie because he was not obstinate in defending of his opinion neither did he break vnion with the Church Besid that controuersy rose before any generall Council defined validity of baptism conferred by Hereticks as are baptized by hereticks ought not to be baptized again wee must belieue that we are bound to keepe holy our lords day which is sunday and we must belieue that there is a necessary obligation to receiue the Apostles Creed yet for as much as none of all these doctrines be contained expresly in or can be deduced out of the holy scriptures by immodiate necessary and euident consequences they would haue nothing of weight with vs in the conuincing of our vnderstanding if the tradition and definition of the Church were laid a side Moreouer the Lutherans and Caluinists in regard they reject Church tradition adhering to the meer letter of scripture and their own interpretations thereof cannot as yet after frequent disputes euince against the Anabaptists that the SacrameÌ„t of Baptism ought to be administred vnto infants where they alledge the words of Christ set down Math. 19. suffer little children and forbid them not to come to me for of such is the kingdom of Heauen as also the practice of the Apostles that baptized whole housholds Act. 19. it is plainly euident that from neither of these testimonies they can as much as deduce by any necessary consequence what they assert as a doctrine of their faith namely that baptism ought to be applied to young children that want the vse of reason especially supposing (g) Caluin l. 4. insti c. 16. and the whole sect of Lutherans though they denyed baptism to be a requisit necessary to the saluation of children neuertheless in their conferences with Anabaptists ingeniously confessed that baptism might lawfully and indeed ought to be ministred vnto children what Lutherans and Caluinists hold as an other article of their reformed religion viz. that baptism is not absolutly necessary to saluation for as to the first testimony though by litle children Christ meant not such only as can goe and speake but also infants sucking their Mothers breasts neuertheless the words of Christ declare them only capable of blessedness without mentioning baptism at all Since then Lutherans and Caluinists doe teach that baptism is not an expedient absolutly necessary to blessedness they can infer nothing of moment and efficacy from these words of Christ to conuince the Anabaptists because the blessedness that is to say the kingdom of Heauen whereof Infants are declared capable may be obtained without baptisin according to Lutherans Caluinists and Anabaptists yet for as much as catholick faith teacheth absolute necessity of baptism out of S. Iohn Cap. 3. that except a man be borne againe of water he cannot enter into the kingdom of Heauen Catholicks can by a clear inference from the said words of Christ proue that Baptism ought euen of necessity to be administred to children because Christs words declare theÌ„ capable of the kingdom of Heauen and consequently of baptism that being an expedient absolutly necessary vnto the obtaining of it whosoeuer is capable of any end is likwise capable of the expedient or medium which is of absolute necessity in order to the purchasing of it As touching the latter scripture testimony though it containes a most pregnant coniecture or presumption that the Apostles when they baptized whole families baptised children with all neuertheless it is not sufficient enough to the grounding of an euident and necessary consequence vnto prouing that de facto they did so because experience sheweth that many whole housholds haue no children at all Wherefore it is cleare that neither of the scripture testimonyes do proue effectually the baptism of Infants laying aside the tradition and definition of the Church And truly Lutherans and Caluinists haue only meer coniectures and remote inferences drawn from the interpretation of their own priuat spirits which is the Mother of heresies to euince the foundamentall and essentiall doctrines of their reformed religion namly that faith alone iustifieth that there are but two Sacraments that no addresses of intercession ought to be made vnto Saints or prayers offered for the benefit of soules departed c. and it is a foundamentall article of Caluinism that the Sacrament of the Eucharist signifieth only the body of Christ being a meer figure thereof contrary wise it is a foundamentall article of Lutherans that the body of Christ is really contained in the Sacrament together with the substance of bread and though both Caluinists and Lutherans teach that the scriptures speake and propounde clearly doctrines of faith howeuer they haue not as yet reconciled that controuersy which notwithstanding the many conferences and disputes held about it continueth in debate Caluinists impute to the Lutherans an heresie or errour in faith for admitting and the Lutherans ascribe heresie vnto the Caluinists for denying the reall presence of Christs body and bloud in the Eucharist whereby appeareth plainly the necessity of Church tradition and interpretation for the deciding all hard