we hav no power to doc good or pleas God without his grace preventing us that we may hav a good wil and working when we hav that wil. Article 11. We are accompted righteous before God only for the merit of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ by Faith not for our own works or deservings which is a most wholsom doctrin very ful of comfort Article 12. Albeit works which are fruits of Faith and follow justification cannot put away our sins and endure the severity of Gods judgement yet are they pleasing and acceptable to God in Christ and doo spring necessarily from a tru lifely Faith insomuch that by them a lifely Faith may be so evidently known as a Tree discerned by the fruit Article 13. Works doon before the Grace of Christ and justification of his Spirit are not pleasant to God for as much as they spring not from Faith in Jesus Christ nor doo they make men meet to receiv Grace or as School-writers say deserv Grace of congruity yea rather becaus they are not doon as God hath willed and commanded to be doon we doubt not but they hav the nature of sin Article 14. Voluntary works over and abov Gods Commandements caled works of supererogation cannot be taught without arrogance and impiety for by them men declare they doo not only render to God so much as they are bound to doo for themselfs but doo more for his sake then of duty is required which shal transcend to sav others wheras Christ saith plainly When yee hav doon al which is commanded say we be unprofitable servants Article 15. Christ in truth of our Nature is made like to us in al things except only sin from which he was cleerly void both in Life and Spirit he is the Lamb without spot who by sacrifice of himself once made took away the sins of the World and no sin as saint John saith was in him but we although baptised and born again yet offend in many things and if we say we hav no sin we deceiv our selfs and no truth remains in us Article 16. Not every deadly sin willingly committed after Baptism is sin against the holy Ghost and unpardonable wherfore the grant of Repentance may not be denied to such as fal into Sin after Bâ—ptism After we hav received the holy Ghost we may depart from Grace given and fal into sin and by Gods grace we may rise again and â—mend our lifes therfore they are to be condemned which say they can sin no more so long as they liv here being once justified or deny place of forgivnes to such as truly repent Article 17. Predestination to life is Gods everlasting purpos wherby before the worlds foundation he constantly decreed by his Counsil secret to us to deliver from curs and damnation thos whom he hath chosen in Christ out of mankind and to bring them by Christ to everlasting Salvation as vessels made to honor Therfore they which are induâ—d with so excellent a benefit be caled according to Gods purpos by his Spirit working in du season they through Grace obey the caling are justified freely made sons of God by Adoption like the Image of his only begotten Son Jesus Christ walk Religiously in good works and at length by Gods mercy attain everlasting felicity as the godly consideration of Predestination and Election in Christ is ful of sweet pleasant unspeakable comfort to godly persons and such as feel the working of Christs Spirit mortifying the works of the flesh and their earthly members and drawing up their minds to high Heavenly things aswel becaus it doth greatly establish and confirm their faith of eternal Salvation to be enjoied by Christ as bicaus it fervently kindles their lov toward God so for curious carnal persons lacking his Spirit to hav the Sentence of Gods Predestination continualy before their eys is a most dangerous downfal wherby the Devil thrusts them into desperation or rechlesnes of most unclean living no less perilous then despair Farthermore we must receiv Gods promises as they be generaly set forth in holy Scripture and that wil of God is to be folowed in our doings which is expresly declared to us in his word Article 18. They are also to be had accursed who presum that every man shal be saved by the Law or Sect which he professeth so that he be devour and diligent to frame his life according to that Law and Light of Nature for holy Scripture sets out unto us only the name of Jesus Christ wherby we must be saved Article 19. Christs visible Church is a congregation of faithful men in which Gods Word is purely preached and Sacraments duly administred according to Christs Ordinance in al things of necessity râ—qu sit to the same As the Church of Jâ—â—usalem Alexandria and Antioch hav erred so hath that of Rome not only in their living and matter of Ceremonies but also in many matters of Faith Article 20. The Church hath power to decree Rites or Ceremonies and authority in controversies of Faith yet is it not lawful for the Church to ordain any thing contrary to Gods Word nor may it so expound any place of Scripture that it be repugnant to another wherfore tho the Church be a witnes and Keeper of holy writ yet as it may not decree any thing against the same so ought it not to enforce any thing besid it as an Article to be beleeved for necessity of Salvation Article 21. General Councils may not be gathered without command and wil of Princes when they are gathered being but an Assembly of men and al not guided by the Spirit and Word of God they may er and som times hav erred in matters pertaining to God Wherfore things ordained by them as necessary to Salvation hav neither strength nor authority unles it may be declared that they are taken out of holy Scripture Article 22. The Romish Doctrins touching Purgatory Pardons Worshipping both Images and Reliques and Invocation of Saints is a fond thing vainly invented and grounded on no warranty of Scripture but rather repugnant to Gods word Article 23. It is not lawfull for any man to undertake the office of public Preaching or ministring the Sacraments before he be lawfully caled and sent to execut the same such we ought to judg lawfully caled and sent which be chosen or caled to this work by men that hav public authority given them in the Congregation to cal and send ministers or laborers into the Lord's Vineyard Article 24. 'T is flatly repugnant to Gods word and primitiv Churches practis to hav public Praier or Sacraments ministred in a toung not understood of the People Article 25. Sacraments ordained by Christ be not only baâ—ges or tokens of Christian mens profession but rather sure witnesses and effectual signs of Grace and Gods good will toward us by which he works invisibly in us and not only quicken but also strengthen and confirm our faith in him There be two Sacraments ordained by
or discussed not boldly decided or determined Spiritus an jugiter genitus sit five creatus Quim Deus infudit lis violenta manet Whether Mans Soul which God breath'd and created Be stil infus'd or bred 't is much debated In dubio lis est an Mens ex Traduce nata Aliter Sit cujusque Hominis sive creata magis 'T is doubt whether ech Mans Soul be generated From Parents Souls or rather by God created Particula in nobis divinae Spiritus aurae Alias Quaeriter an genitus sive creatus inest The Soul 's in us a Part by God inspired Whether begot or creat 't is inquired Nescit Homo an sua mens generetur sive creetur Secus Se tamen ostentat noscere cuncta miser Poor Man knows not if's Soul be bred or moulded Yet boasts that he hath al things els unfolded Appendix Additionalis An additional Appendix THe ensuing Theory is taken mostly from Mr. Henry Woolnots Treatis intituled The tru original of Mans Soul which is brifly extracted God hath a duple voice one speaking in Scriptures which is his written word of Grace another in the Preamble Creatures which is his wrought Word of Nature For as Natural Works are his ordinary power and miraculous extraordinary so Nature is his ordinary Voice and divine Oracles extraordinary What God spake in his Word he hath wrought in the World whos Words and Works agree for secret things belong to him but reveled to us and our Children Wher he hath no toung to speak we may not hav an ear to hear nor heart to inquire but as Creatures we must submit to our Creator and as Christians beleev wher reason cannot reach Now to the Question The Rational Soul whether produced immediatly from Thesis God or mediatly by Man is of immortal Nature yet stained with our first Parents first sin by propagation but how can we know how 't is made before it be in being sith we cannot conceiv what it is being made For though we know 't is a spiritual substance realy subsisting in a Body yet what maner of metaphysical matter 't is made of none knows No marvel then if we be ignorant of the origin which is harder to explore For 't is spiritual and such are difficiler to discern or disquire then corporals subject to sens specialy sith ours is an incomplet Spirit or part of a Creature Man being composed of a mortal Body and immortal Soul the one indued with senses to receiv al corporeal Images the other furnished with a faculty of Reason which from thos Images draws discurses and consequents wherby it gets knowledg of causes and effects wherof Sens is incapable Hence it happens that when we discurs of spiritual Natures which transcend Sens we are put out of our usual way and wander as half lost in incertainty without any exact knowledg to content the Mind Whatever excellences be in inferior Natures are much more perfectly in superiors as thos of other Animals more eminent in Man chiefly in his Soul thos of his Soul more conspicuous in Angels and al perfections of al most trascendent in God So the knowledg of inferior Natures is comprehended in superior but not contrarily Nor can any sav God who hath no superior know it self purely or properly but only by reflexion as the Ey which sees al things cannot behold it self sav in a Glass Nor can we know our own Soul but as 't is shewed in a myrrhour of the Works and as by it we know other things so by them we hav a glimps of it To omit several Opinions of Pagan Philosophers and Christian Opinions Heretics The orthodox jointly agree that Mans Soul is either immediatly created by God or mediatly generated by Man both which are bipartit In point of Creation Hilary with others hold it to be formed without the Body and then infused But the general Tenet is that 't is created and infused in the Body which runs most current So for propagation Som suppose it a corporeal substance and begot in bodily maner which is generaly exploded Others hold it spiritual so produced like light from light which was the mind of most Western Doctors but S. Austin and Eucherius stood in suspens between both inclining chiefly to Creation The case is very dubious and difficil For how can Spiritual substances beget one another If it be daily created of nothing how can it stand with Gods rest from farther creating or his setled cours of al things to multiply their Kinds 't is a silly shâ—ft to say That he rests from creating new Kinds and Compounds but not from Individuals or principal Parts for the words imply no such limitation nor any place els in Scripture so 't is spoken gratis without warrant and a bare begging of the Question or meer fiction for they grant it tru in al things els except only this their own exception which they obtrud without reason when Moses makes it general of al Gods Works A greater obstacle occurs how it can stand with original sins propagation This made the Pelagians and Anabaptists who hold Soul-creation to deny ther is any such sin sav by imitation yea divers Divines seeing the absurdities arising therhence assert Traduction This makes the cheif Patrons of Creation stagger who decline it as a curious Question sith they cannot giv sufficient satisfaction exhorting to Faith beyond Reason and forbid farther disquisition for if the Soul flow immediatly from God how is it defiled being created sinless the Body cannot doo it being drawn into sin by it Nor can this contagion com from the union sith that is Gods Work who wil not put a Soul in it self simply good and his own workmanship into an unclean Vessel purposly to make it guilty of death and damnation for anothers fault shal not the judg of the World doo right 't is a poor position that 't is created in infusing and infused in creating which is al one as to say 't is made in marring and marred in making Nor is it safe to say God so willed or decreed sith it cannot be proved and being unjust is justly disproved It stands not with his Justice that Adams sin should be imputed to us or reputed ours sav as 't is our own by sinning potentialy in him as the root nor is it ours by imputation sav only in respect to propagation but inhesion for if we were simply sinless as a new created Soul is his sin cannot justly hurt us God may punish al for Adams sin yet not soly for it sith he saith The Son shal not bear the Fathers iniquity Ezek. 18. 2â— but becaus by his sin they becam sinful or rather sinned in him they are justly punished for their own sin so propagation is the sole source of original corruption Now if we receiv the worst part only from Adam which is not the subject of sin sith not the parts but whol Person sinned How can a Man
Spirit of Wisdom and mad Men are said to be possessed with a Spirit Thes are al the acceptions and wheâ— none can answer or satisfy that words Sens in Scripture it fals not under Human understanding and Faith consists not in our Opinion but submission specialy wher God is said to be a Spirit or wher by Spirit is meant God For his Nature is incomprehensible and we know not what he is but that he is The Spirit of God moved on the Waters If God heself be meant hereby then is motion and place proper to Bodies only Spirit of God Gen 1. v. 2. Gen. 3. 1. ascribed to him but the like words are used at the universal Deluge I wil bring my Spirit Wind Air or moving Spirit and the Waters shal be diminished Both which may be caled Gods Spirit being his special work Pharach cals Josephs Wisdom Gen. 41. 38. the Spirit of God And God saith Speak to al that are wise hearted whom I hav filled with the Spirit of Wisdom to make Exod 28. 3. Aaron garments to consecrat him 2. Isaiah speaks thus of the Messiah The Spirit of the Lord shal abide on him the Spirit of Wisdom and Vnderstanding the Spirit of Counsil and Fortitud the Spirit of the fear of the Lord. Isai 1. 2. 3. Wher is manifestly meant so many Gifts or Graces of God not Ghosts or Goblins 3. Extraordinary Zele and courage in defens of Gods People is stiled the Spirit of God Judg. 3. 10. ch 6. 34. ch 11. 29. ch 13. 25. ch 14. 6. So 't is said The Spirit of God cam on Saul 1 Sam. 11. 6. 1 Sam. 19. v. 20. against the Amonits and his Anger was kindled greatly no Ghost but a vehement heat of vengeance So Gods Spirit cam upon him being among the Prophets that praised God in songs which was no Ghost but a sudden unexpected zele to join with them in holy Hymns or musical harmony 4. A fals Prophet said to Michaiah which way went the Lords Spirit from me to thee This cannot be any Ghost for Micai 1 Kings 22 24. declared the event of that Battel before as from a Vision not from a Spirit speaking in him So though Prophets spake by Gods Spirit or special gift of Prediction yet their knowledg was not by any Ghost within them but by som supernatural Dream or Vision Was not that inspiration by God 5. 'T is said God made man of dust and breathed into his Nostrils Quaere Spiraculum vitae the breath of life and he was made a living Soul This breath only signifies life not any Individual inspired Soul As Job saith So long as Gods 〈◊〉 is in my Nostrils that is so long as I liv or breath So Ezeâ—â—â—l The Spirit of Life was in the wheels not any Soul but they had life Again The spirit entred Ipse dixit Job 27. 3. Ezek. 1. 20. into me not any Ghost or Spiritual substance possessed his Body and set me on my feet meaning I recovered vital strength to go 6. God saith I wil take of the Spirit upon thee and put it on them the seventy Elders and they shal bear the burden of the People with thee Whereupon two of them Eldad and Medâ—d Prophecied whom Josua not knowing they had authority praied Moses fo forbid but he refused wishing God Nâ—mb 11. 17 25. would put his Spirit on al the People to make them Prophets or giv them authority subordinat to his own So Josuae was ful of the Spirit of Wisdom becaus Moses laid his hands on him viz. ordained him to prosecut the work of bringing Gods People into the promised Land which he-self began but could not Dâ—ut 34 9. finish So Saint Paul saith If any man hath not Christs Spirit not his Ghost but submission to his Gospel he is none of his So saith St. John hereby ye shal know the Spirit of God every Spirit which confesseth that Jesus Christ is com in the flesh is of God Rom. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 meaning the Spirit of Christianity or main Article of Faith that Jesus is the Christ but not of any Ghost or Goblin Thos words Luke 4. 1. Jesus ful of the holy Ghost are expresd or expounded Mat. 4. 1. Marc. 1. 12. by Spirit which means zele to doo the work for which God the Father sent him into the World but to interpret it of the third Person in holy Trinity is to say God was filled with God which is most improper oâ— insignificant Spirit literaly implies a thin real substance and metaphoricaly som extraordinary ability of Body and affection of Mind but to translat it Ghost which imports imaginary Inhabitants oâ— Mens Brains ther is no reason or Censure cauâ— By his leav Saint Lukes words ful of the holy Ghost which the other Evangelist hav not refer to Christs Person for it folows he returned to Jordan and was led by the Spirit into the Wildernes al which three relat alike to Christ but our Interpreters generally expound this of the third Person in Trinity nor is it incongruous to say God-Man was â—d by God but 't is more presumptuous if one Writer wâ—l seem wiser then al his Felows 7. The Disciples seing 〈◊〉 walk on the Sea supposed him a Spirit or Aerial Body 〈◊〉 Phantasm for al saw him which Mat. 14 26 Marc 6 49. could not be a delusion of the Brain incident to one at once or a very few surprised with like fear but a Body only compact â—â—cts 12. 15. of Air. When Saint Peter was excarcerated by an Angel and the Maid said he knoâ—kd at dore the rest thought hiâ— mad and said it was his Angel which is a corporeal substance compact upon occasions els the Disciples folowed the Jews and Gentils Opinion that ther be real Apparitions or Spectres which the one stiles Spirits or Angels Good and Evil the other Demons both evil and good For God can form subtle substantial Bodies to use as Ministers or Messengers so Angel signifies in extraordinary metaphysical maner Cannot the Devil doo the like Did he not assum the similitud â—â—are of Samuel when the Witch of Endor caused him to confer with Saul for Samuels Soul it could not be though Saul surmised it to be hâ—s Ghost Such Angels so formed are Corporal substances which take up room as Air doth and mov from place to place in time but are no Spiritual Ghosts in no place or no wher or definitly here as not to be elswher seeming somwhat yet be Nothing For thos thin Substances though invisible as Air hav the same real dimensions greater or lesser as material grosser Bodies Thus the Spirit of God is taken 1. For Wind or Breath See the seven Marginal â—gures 2. For extraordinary gifts 3. For vehement Affections 4. For the gift of Prediction 5. For Life 6. For subordination to Authority 7. For Aerial Bodies Now for Angel 't is generaly a Messenger or spicialy Gods
Angel what Messenger which relats any thing that makes known his extraordinary presence or power principaly by Dream or Vision The Scripture speaks not of their Creation but cals them ministring Spirits and Spirits as is said somtime signify thin imperceptible Bodies as Air Wind vital or animal Spirits somtime Images of the phansy in Dreams and Visions which are no real substances but intentional or accidental appeerances in the brain yet when God raiseth them supernaturaly to signify his Wil they are termed his Messengers or Angels Were not multituds of real individual Angels created by Qâ—â—â— God as Divines deem or define to wait on his Wil Or are the Good only formed on occasions and dissolved again If so then doth not God ceas from his work but creats new thin Aerial Bodies continualy Here he hath a large discurs that the Jews from the Gâ—ntils not by any proof or pressure in the old Testament hâ—ld thos apparances which God somtime raiseth in Mens phâ—â—sy for his service caled Angels to be real substances or permanent Creatures wherof som which they thought behoâ—ful or beneficial they caled Angels of God but such as they deemed hartful evil Angels foul Fiends Spirits or Devils For they â—sâ— eâ—ed Pythonists mad-Men Lunatics Epilectics or the like Demoniacs Then he shews how the word Angel in the old Testament is only an Image supernaturaly raised in Mans imagination to signify Gods presence in executing som supernatural work but no permanent Creature or incorporeal Ghost Touching Angels names in Daniel Michael Gabriel by the Dan. 12. 2. first is meant Christ under the title of a great Prince but the last was a supernatural Vision by which Daniel deemed or Dan. 8. 16. dreamed as divers doo that two Saints talked together and one said to the other Gabriel make this Man to understand Dan 9. 21 the Vision but God needs not to difference his servants by names which are helps only for weak short mortal memories nor can it be proved in the old Testament that Angels except when they are put for Men made Messengers or Ministers of Gods Wil Words or Works are permanent or incorporeal individuals as the Schools say The chief places alleged in the Mat. â—5 41. new Testament are thes Go ye cursed saith Christ into everlasting fire prepared for the Devil and his Angels This indeed provs their permanence but not immateriality sich no simple 2 Pet. 2. 4. spirits are patible of material fire St. Paul saith know ye not that we shal judg the Angels St. Peter if God spared not Jâ—dâ— v. 6. the Angels that sinned but cast them into Hel St. Jude the Angels which kept not their first estate he reservs in everlasting chains under darknes unto the Judgment of the great Day Thes prov both the permanence of Evangelical nature and immateriality also For as incorporeal is taken for not Body not for a subtle invisible Body an incorporeal substance is a contradiction and to an Angel or Spirit in that sens incorporeal substance is a Cambridg Bul and in effect to say ther is no Angel or Spirit at al. He was of Opinion that Angels were only supernatural apparitions of the Phansy raised by God to notify his presence and precepts to Mankind specialy to his chosen People but confesseth that upon so many pregnant places and Christs plain words he beleevs ther be real substantial permanent Angels yet not incorporeal immaterial indefinit or nothing 'T is wel he sees his error in this point which argues he may overween in others and it were to be wished he would review sundry strange singularities to retract what he finds faulty or erroneous but not seduce or lead on the silly sort who are apt to clasp any shadows Was not the Angel Gabriel who audibly annunciated to Quaere the Virgin Mary hir present Conception by the holy Ghost Rev. 12 7. the same with Daniels so caled And Michael who with his Angels fought against the great red Dragon and his Angels the same Inspiration literaly as Spirit is a thin Air implies a blowing Inspiration into Man som thin air vapor or wind as one fils a bladder with his breath but if Spirits exist only in the phansy 't is but the blowing in of a Phantasm which is improper or impossible to say of such things as only seem to be somwhat yet are nothing The word is used in Scripture Metaphoricaly soly as when God inspired into Adam the breath of Life vital Gen. 2. 7. motion is meant Why not rather his rational Soul the fountain of Life and Quaere motion which was infused at creating and created in infusing as St. Austin asserts St. Paul saith Al Scripture is given by inspiration of God 2 Tim 3 16. speaking of the old Testament which is tru of the new Testament but 't is a Metaphor that God inclined the Spirit or mind of thos writers to pen infallibly tru as they did by his special dictat or direction St. Peter saith Prophecy cam not in old time by 2 Pet 1. 21. Mans Wil but thos holy Men spake at the holy Spirit moved them Here holy Spirit signifies Gods voice by supernatural Dream or Vision which is not inspiration nor when Christ breathed on his Disciples saying Receiv the holy Spirit was that John 20. 22. breath the very holy Ghost but only a sign of thos spiritual Graces he gav them So when 't is said of our Saviour or others he was ful of the holy Spirit 't is not meant any infusion of Gods substance but accumulation of his gifts whether supernaturaly attained as the firy cloven toungs sat on the Acts 2. 3 4. Apostles filling them with the holy Ghost or ordinarily acquired by industry as Men get learning by study which in al Cases are Gods gifts alike Thou then that hast received more then others must be most thankful Infusion and inspiration are not taken properly as if good or bad Spirits entred into Men but only for Gods imparting his Graces or Virtues which are not to be poured in as Bodies into Barrels but instilled ordinarily or supernaturaly Gods Kingdom is taken by most Divines metaphoricaly Kingdom of God Chap. 35. for eternal felicity after this life in the highest third Heaven which they cal the Kingdom of Glory or somtime for sanctification the earnest of it clyped the Kingdom of Grace but properly in Scripture 't is Gods real Monarchy or Soveraignty over any Subjects by their own consent or Covenant so the Israelits peculiarly chose God for their King upon his promising them the Land of Canaan but very seldom metaphoricaly and then 't is used for dominion over sin in the new Testament only becaus such a dominion every subject in Gods Kingdom shal hav without prejudice to the Soveraign From the Creation God reigned over al Men naturaly by his might and commanded his peculiar Subjects by voice as
or thin For Mans Soul they say 't is created by pouring in and poured in by creating what 's that For the caus of Sens they make an ubiquity of Species or shews of objects which appeering to the Ey make sight to the Ear hearing to the Palat tast to the Nostril smelling and to the rest of the Body feeling For the caus of willing to doo any act they make the faculty or wil it self doo somtime one thing somtime another making the Power caus of the act as if on should assign Mens ability to doo any things the very â—aus of good or evil acts Yet oftimes they put their own ignorance to be caus of natural events or effects but disguised in other words as when they make Fortune a caus of contingents wherof they know no caus or when they ascribe effects to occult qualities not known to them nor as they sâ—rmise to any els or to Sympathy Antiphaty Antiperistasis specifical properties which neither signify the agent producing nor operation produced being only Clokes to cover ignorance Their Moral and Politic Philosophy hath the like or greater Politics absonances for if any doo injury or injustice contrary to Law they say God is prime Caus of the Action but not of the injustice or deviation this is vain Philosophy as to say that one makes a right and crooked line but another the incongruity or inconformity This distinction was devised to defend the doctrin of Free wil not subject to Gods wil. Why not to vindicat God from being Author of sin notwithstanding Quaere his absolut irrespectiv Decree to Reprobat men who must needs sin Aristotle defines Good and Evil by mens appetit which may seem tru sith every one is ruled by his own list or lore but in a Common-wealth the measure is fals wher not mens privat appetits but public Law of the State is sole Rule yet their doctrin soly practised wher every one doth what seems good in his own eys To make lawful mariage unchast or impure as they doo who deny it to the Clergy under color of continual chast continence to attend at the Altar and administer the holy Eucharist is vain Philosophy wherby they make mariage a moral vice and themselfs by abstaining spiritual like the Angels in Heaven From Aristotles Civil Polity they cal al Common-wealths sav the popular such as then Athens was Tyranny and al Kings Tyrans so they termed thirty Legislators set up by the Lacedemonians who subdued Athens thirty Tyrans and Democraty liberty yet Tyran truly taken signifies simply a Monarch but when that Government grew odious in all Greece it was branded with the Popular hatred of Tyranny and when Kings were expeld from Rome they did the like So when the same men are displeased with Democraty or Aristocraty they nickname the first Anarchy the last Oligarchy or Tyranny of a few Hence riseth another error of Aristotle that Laws not men should govern as if men wil be ruled by words or paper and not by men which hav power by the Sword to punish or put them to death giving life to the Laws this is a pestilent pernitious error wherby they seduce men so oft as they like not their Governors to rais war against them which the Clergy cherisheth Another error in Civil Philosophy which they never learned of Pagans is to extend the Law the Rule only of actions to mens very thoughts and Consciences by examination or inquisition of what they hold tho they conform in Words and Actions Herby they are forced to answer the truth of their thoughts or an untruth for fear of punishment Another error not drawn from Heathens is that a privat Man without the CoÌ„mon-wealths authority may interpret the Law by his own Spirit but are not Scriptures wher they are a Law made a Law by the CoÌ„monwealths authority and consequently a part of the Civil Law So they which impropriat Preaching to one certain Order of Men wher the State leavs it free commit the like error for if the State forbids me not to Preach none els can If I be among Judians or Infidels shal I being not in Orders think it sin to Preach Christ Jesus or expound Scriptures In such cases of necessity say they wher is no Ministry it may be doon without mission as wherever a dispensation is du for necessity ther needs none when no Law forbids it Ergo to deny thes functions to whom the civil Soveraign denies them not is to take away lawful liberty The Schoolmens writings are mostly insignificant terms or trains of strange barbarous words otherwise used then in common Latin language which would pose Cicero Varro or any Grammarian of antient Rome For let any try whether he can translat them into any modern Toung which if he cannot how can that be intelligible in Latin which is not so in other languages Howbeit this insignificance of speech is no fals Philosophy but both a quality to hide the truth and make Men think they hav it being skild in School-notions and so desist from farther serch of it in others He saith elswher what kind of felicity God ordains for them that devoutly serv him one shal no sooner know then enjoy being Quaere jois now so incomprehensible as the School-mens words beatific Vision unintelligible but doth not that signify to enjoy the perpetual presence of the divine Trinity as Men delight in ech others company face to face Which if Christ must reign on a new finit Earth with his Saints for ever none ever shal doo For beatific Vision is to see the blessed Trinity face 4 Caus to face in his eternal mansion The last caus of spiritual Darknes is to mix uncertain Traditions and untru Histories like the golden legion of fals fictious miracles in Saints lifes of Ghosts Goblins and Apparitions alleged by Romish Doctors to varnish their Doctrins of Hel Purgatory Exoâ—cisms and such like Which tho som pious Fathers Pope Gregory 1. St. Bernard c. broched yet they were Men and might take it on trust from others as Beda also did but if any speak it of their own knowledg 't is no confirmation of such vanity but a detection of their fraud fallacy or frailty The suppression of tru Philosophy by Men that hav no authority nor sufficient study may be joind with the introduction of falsâ— for our late Navigators and al learned Men acknowledg Antipodes as it appeers daily more that yeers and dais are determined by the Earths motions yet such as only supposed it heretofore were punishd by Ecclesiastic power What reason had they Is it becaus 't is contrary to tru Religion That cannot be if the opinions be truâ— let the truth be first disquired by competent Judges or refuted by such as pretend to know the contrary Is it becaus they disturb Government or Religion established Let the Teachers be silenced or punished by civil Rulers who can chastise disobedience in thos that teach
sour Grapes grow out The grounds thus laid and materials brought in place the building will be better framed But for fuller disquisition the Infusiastists Arguments with the Traductists Answers shal first be fairly filed then their Objections with the others Solutions orderly mustered Arg. Dust saith Salomon shalreturn to earth as it was Eccls 12. 7. and the Spirit to God that gav it Ergo every Soul or Spirit coms from God Answ This evidently relats to the first creation of both for no mans body since Adams is made of dust as his was but of Seed and Blood and God gav or inspired his Soul whence al others derivativly or secundarily com and shal return to the original Giver as the body shal to earth its Mother so this provs the Souls immortality but no way disprovs the Traducibility sith every particular Soul proceds mediatly from God the first Fountain Arg. The Lord saith Zechary spred the Heavens laid the Zech. 12. 1. Earths foundation and formed Mans Spirit within him Ergo God created it in the Body Answ This is the pregnantst place and best proof in al sacred Scripture for intrinsecal infusion by creation but intends apertly as the former did covertly the protoplasm or primordial production for when God spread the Heavens and founded the Earth he then formed Mans Soul within him but ever since ceased to creat either new Spirits or Souls so this is no plain evidence for jugial creation of every particular Soul Arg. S. Paul makes an Antithesis between the Father of Heb. 12 9. our Bodies and Father of Spirits Ergo God is sole Author and Creator of Souls not the Pâ—â—â—â—ts Answ God is the Father of Spirits as wel in regard of Angels and Saints which is not the Apostles aim as spiritual regeneration ther intended without reference to Soul-creation yet becaus he breathed the first Soul whence al since are derived he may be caled the primitiv Father of Souls though one immediatly beget another Arg. God in Isaiah saith I have made the breath meaning Isaâ— 57. 16. Mans Soul which he originaly breathed in Ergo he only creats it nor is it carnaly generated Answ This is meant in S. Pauls sens in him we liv mov and hav our being or it may be referred to the first Souls inspiration without successiv creation Arg. Zedekiah swore to Jeremy As the Lord livs that made Jer. 38. 16. us thes Souls I wil not sâ—ay thee Ergo 'tis evident that he makes al mens Souls Answ Som interpret it by Synecdoche like the seventy Souls issued from Jacobs loins the principal part for the person as the Lord livs that made us both som literaly of life as the Lord livs by whom we liv I wil not bereav thy life Yet the words may be granted to imply the Souls creation though he meant not properly or purposly the Souls production rather then persons or lifes for 't is a greater emphasis in the Oath as the Lord liveth who created our Souls I wil not take away tâ—ine which he created Howbeit in this sens he could not destroy the Soul it self sav only sever it from the body but life the effect therof Take it either way or any way the words may be aptly applyed to the Souls primitiv creation sans exception or contradiction Arg. Godfashions Mens Hearts saith David and understands Psal 133. 14. al their Works Ergo he forms our Souls ther understood by Hearts as 't is usual in Scripture Answ The inference is infirm for by Hearts here is meant the Wil and Affections but by fashioning disposing Other Scriptural Texts are pressed but of no moment Arg. Whatever is generated shal be corrupted which is an irrefragable principle in Philosophy and Theology Ergo Mans Soul if procreated must be mortal Answ This authentic Axiom properly concerns compounds which are the adâ—quat subjects of generation and corruption not principal parts which are only ingenerated or congenerated but 't is verified in al things bred of a corruptible matter els not For God the Son is begoâ— of his Father and the holy Ghost proceds from both yet eternal without beginning so Angels and Mans Soul were created ex nihilo yet eviternal without ending but al the rest intire composed of the common Chaos Heavens Elements Meteors Mixtils Vegetals Animals and Mans Body which are corruptible in whol or parts and of thes that Maxime is rightly understood not of Mens Souls which are generated of Parents Souls having al a divine faculty by divine blessing to beget an immortal essence like itself Arg. 'T is a disparagement to Man the noblest Creature that his divine part should proced of impure seed like Beasts Ergo this opinion is to be exploded Answ 'T is his chief dignity that he hath power of or in himself to beget both parts specialy one so noble and divine els were he wors then Beasts in that behalf nor doth it proced of seed but from an Animific virtu of the Parents Souls conveied with the seed If then it be immortal as undoubtedly 't is what skils it in that respect whether it be created or generated and what difference whether God be immediat Plastes or giv man power with his general blessing to produce it by successiv propagation having the same power of immortality which the first had by himself infused and power to beget the like incorruptible essence by his special benediction Repl. If any Animific virtu be conveied with the seed then must it be reduced to act instantly at first conception which is most imperfect or gradualy which argues divisibility But both thos are absurd and abhorrent in Nature Ergo no such virtu can be conveied with the seed much less proced from it Answ Both Soul and Body are begot in an instant as every conception is made but as bodily lims and lineaments are gradualy shaped and strengthned from weak waterish rudiments to more maturity so the Soul exerciseth hir vegetativ functâ—ons of nutricion sensitiv of motion and intellectiv of reason daâ—ly by slow degrees as organs are apparated or accommodâ—â—ed whiâ—h argues no divisibility For al things in Nature as God proceded at Creation attain to perfection by divisible degrees yet no division in the Forms or Souls which are conceived in a moment Arg. If ther be virtu in or with the seed to beget a Soul then when 't is shed spilt or spent upon barren or gravid wombs so many Souls are lost which is harsh and horrid to hold Ergo no such Animific energy is conveied with the seed but al Souls proced from God Answ No Souls are lost by loss or sterility of seed but only a power or possibility to produce and procreat them which being not reduced into act perisheth or is frustrat so is the said virtu void to beget so many Bodies and prepare them for reception of Souls which is alone and no absurdity ariseth of either but presseth both sides alike Arg. If Souls be begot
same condition that Adam and his Posterity were since his fal sav that God graciously promised a Redeemer to such as should repent and beleev but not to thos that dy in their sins impenitent as Reprobats doo so they may liv as they did before with gross corruptible Bodies as al Men now hav and haply beget Children continualy which no 1 Cor. 15. Scripture gainsais St. Paul treats only of the Resurrection Luk. 20 34. c. to life eternal not a word of that to pnuishment nor Christ who saith the Children of this World which liv in the estate Adam left them shal marry and generat successivly by an immortality of Kind not of Persons who are not worthy to be counted among thos that shal rise and obtain the World to com that is life to com not a terren World which alone are Heirs of eternal life equal to Angels and Children of God So a secund eternal death remains to Reprobats when after the Resurrection shal com a time of torment or punishment which by succession of sinners shal last so long as the kind of Man by propagation shal endure that is eternaly but not so every single Person nor shal the Tormenters be Fâ—ends or evil Angels Touching the Souls natural immortality that 't is a spiritual substance subsisting by it self after separation he answers som objections Ob. Salomon saith Dust shal return to Dust as it was and Eccles 12. 7. the Spirit to God that gav it Ergo God created the Soul distinct Spirit Sol. He shews how Mans Body made of dust must return to dust but God only knows what becoms of his Spirit Chap. 3. 20. Breath or Life He hath a sentence of semblable sens Al Man and Beast go to one place al are of dust and turn to dust Who knows except the Omniscient that Mans Spirit goes Ibid. v. 19. upward and a Beasts downward Sith 't is said That which befals the Sons of Men betides Beasts as one dies so doth the other yea they hav al one breath before spirit so that a Man hath no preeminence abov a Beast for al is vanity He praiseth Châ—p 4 2 3. the dead beyond the living and ads Better is he which hath not yet bin nor seen the evil work doon under the Sun then both the dead and living which cannot hold current if Mans Soul be immortal that no Soul were better then it only for a little oppression in this life Lastly he saith The living know they shal dy but the Dead know nothing naturaly before the Body shal rise nor hav any more a reward for their memory is forgot Al which places prostern the Souls immortality and by Spirit is meant Breath or Life as often foresaid Ob. Christ saith Abraham Isaac and Jacob are living Ergo their Souls separat subsist stil for their bodies lay buried many ages before Sol. This purports Gods promiss and certitud of their Resurrection not any actual life as God said to Adam on the day he should eat the forbidden fruit he shal certainly dy so from that day he was a dead Man by Sentence but not by actual execution til 930. yeers after Ob. The wicked shal rise to Judgment and go into everlasting fire torment or punishment wher the worm of Conscience never dieth which is caled a secund everlasting Death and general everlasting Life in torments far wors then Death as appeers in the new Testament Ergo c. Sol. Al this is tru yet it no wher appeers that the Damned shal liv in torments everlastingly for God the Father of Mercies and fountain of Goodnes who doth al what he wil and holds al Mens hearts at his disposing working them to wil and doo without whos free gift no Man hath any inclination to good or repentance of evil wil not punish Mens transgressions committed by inevitable ignorance natural frailty or wilful obstinacy sans end of time or with extremity of torture more then Men can conceiv or imagin Then he proceds to answer Bellarmins places or proofs in both Testaments touching Purgatory which he that lists may read p. 346. c. The next Caus of spiritual Darknes is heathen Demonology 2 Caus or doctrin of Devils as St. Paul cals it which their Poets as principal Priests diffused divulged or dissipated over the World witnes Hesiods goodly Genealogy of Gods For they caled al Spirits good and bad Demons but the Jews gav the name Demon only to evil Spirits stiling the good which Prophets or others inspired had the Spirit of God So they caled Lunatics Maniacs Lycanthrops Epileptics Hysterics or the like direct Demoniacs possest with evil Spirits They said unclean Persons had an unclean spirit dumb Men a dumb Devil aspersing John Baptist and our Saviour himself to hav Devils but Devils specified in Scripture are meer Diseases If any ask why Christ did not cross comptrole or teach Quest the contrary but confirms it by bidding Dâ—vils go out of Men which is improper to speak unto any Diseas that cannot hear He answers that Christs command to any Diseas is no more Answ improper then to rebuke the Fever Wind or Sea which obeied him yet can hear no more then the rest Nor are such speeches improper becaus they import or impart the power of Gods word to command such contumacious Diseases under the appellation of Devils as they were then generaly deemed to depart out of Mâ—ns Bodies So Devils Spectres or evil Spirits which they dreamed of are meer Phantasms or Inhabitants of their own Brains nor are any Ghosts of the Dead or ever were extant in the Air Heaven Hel or any real place as som surmise Al this must be taken upon his bare Phythagorean Ipse dixit Was that legion of Devils who besought Christ to enter 〈◊〉 into the Gergesens Swine and caried a whol Herd headlong into Sea only a Diseas Can Metaphors discurs or doo such mischeef When Christ cast out a dumb Spirit the traducing Pharisees denied not the dispossessing or matter of fact but said he did it by Beelzebub Prince of Devils can Christians then deny it Christ saith St. Matthew was led by or of the Spirit into Maâ— 4. 1. Maâ—â— 1. 12. Luk 4. 1. the Wildernes which Spirti drov him into the Desart saith St. Marc but Luke that he being ful of the holy Ghost which descended on him as a Dov newly before at Baptism was led of the Spirit into the Wildernes al which imply the holy Ghost nor can this be a possession of one substance by another sith Christ and the holy Ghost are one self same substance 'T is said after the Devil took him up into the holy City and set him on a Pinnacle but anon after caried him on a very high Mountain to shew him al the Worlds Kingdoms but certes the Devil did not transport him by force nor is any Mountain so high to shew him one Hemisphere of the World The meaning then must be
so high as his Heavenly Throne or abov his earthly Footstool how can it consist with the dignity of Christ our King that his Saints shal sit at Table som at his right hand som on his left to eat and drink wiâ—h him freely and familiarly for ever Let this suffice for Scriptural confirmation of the elects eternal reign with our blessed Saviour in Heavenly habitations De aeterno Christi regno Of Christs eternal reign THat Christ at the Judgment day and general Resurrection of al Flesh shal resign up the Kingdom of Glory wher he now sits in Majesty to his Father and reign personaly on Earth at his Metropolis of Jerusalem to be new built with his Saints eternaly never to see Heaven again which is to suscipere gradum Simeonis from a Câ—lical infinit Kingdom to a Terrestrial finit Paradise Thus Scriptures seem to hav several sensâ—s according to Mens various interpretations of arbitrary authority This openly oppugns my last Opinion of the Worlds annihilation 8 Thesis against renovation of the old or substitution of a new wherto this Position of Christs eternal Personal reign at new built Jerusalem principaly tends but I defend that this present finit World which was at first made of meer nothing shal in fine be utterly abolished or resolved into nothing when 't is once dissolved or destroied by fire This is expresly evinced or evidenced by thes texts of sacred Scripture current coin David saith Heaven and Earth shal perish Ps 102 26. Mat. 24 3â— Job 14. 12. Christ They shal pass away Job They shal be no more Isaiah they shal vanish like smoke al their Host shal be dissolved and Isai 51. 6. Isai 34 4 2 Pet. 3. 10 Rev 20 11. roled together as a scrole they shal fal down as a leaf from the Vine and a faling fig from the figtree St. Peter they shal pass away with great nois St. John they fled away and no place found for them Al which phrases to perish pass away be no more vanish like smoke roled up as a scrole fal down as a Vine-leaf or fig from a figtree fly away and their place no more found strongly imply abolition or at least impugn a perfecter condition to be the place for our Saviours perpetual personal reign with his Saints yeelding up the Kingdom of Glory the third Heaven never to return 'T is a sory unequal exchange to quit a Celical infinit increat mansion for a Terrestrial finit created habitation nor can any of the premised terms plainly purport or senisibly signify melioration as if the new Heaven and Earth shal be bettered or beautified sith in al language of Men or Grammatical construction perfection is advers to perdition and to perish or pass away asystat to perfection If the World is to be renewed or repaired it shal hav no end but 't is said the end of al things is at hand and the ends of the World are com upon us In nature is nothing but time place and space but afterward al eternity ubiquity and infinity as in Man corruption shal put on incorruption mortality immortality weaknes power and dishonor glory Many most pressing reasons and authentic authorities are alleged on behalf of annihilation in the eighth or last Thesis which 't is not my guise or property to reaccumulat Howbeit having gleaned or gathered sundry select speculations scattered through his whol work som veracious som fucatious som dubious som suspitious som erroneous I presume to present them in public sans answer or animad version Specimina diversimoda Several sorts of Essais MAster Hobbs is a great general Scholar who hath an excellent Entelechy to devise novities but deems them al verities and would faiâ— hav the World dance after his Pipe which wil never be For Men may catch Ruddicks or Thrushes in Pitfals and Woodcocks in Springals but bigger Birds are too wild wily and wary then to be snapd in such silly snares Real inventions if good are very laudable and verbal too if veritable but novel Opinions contrary to common current Tenets of al Authors most suspitious and mostly erroneous Not to linger any longer in the Porch thes which folow are som of his sporadical Positions Touching the signification of som words in Scripture he saith they depend not Chap. 34. on the writers wil or vulgar use but on their tru proper sens in Gods word Body and Spirit in Schools language are stiled Substances Body what Corporeal and Incorporeal but a Body naturaly imports that which fils up som space room or place being a real part of the visible univers which is an aggregat of al Bodies and no part of it but a Body nor is any thing a Body which is not part of it and contained or included in it This Body being subject to change in various apparence to Animals senses is caled Substance or Subject of sundry Accidents as somtime to mov somtime to stand stil somtime hot somtime cold somtime of one color sound smel tast or touch somtime of another Which several seemings produced by diversity of Bodily operations on our Senses Organs we cal Accidents of thos Bodies according to which acception Body and substance signify the same so to conjoin or cal ought an Incorporeal Substance is to destroy ech other as if one should say an incorporeal Body Thus much for the interpretation of the word Body Now the vulgar doth not denomin al the univers Body but Spirit what only such parts as they find by feeling to resist their force or by seeing to hinder farther prospect but Air and such subtle substances not subject to the Ey they term wind breath or latinly spirits as that which in any Animal givs life and motion is caled the Vital and Animal spirits Wheras thos Idols of the brain representing bodies wher they are not either in Dream or to a distempered brain waking are nothing as St. Paul cals al Idols nothing at al wher they seem to be and in the brain it self nothing but tumult rising from the objects confused action or Organs disorderly agitation Hence som which search not their Causes but rely on others knowledg cal them thin Bodies supernaturaly compact of Air becaus the depraved sight judgeth them Corporeal and som term them Spirits or Spectres becaus the Touch descries nothing wher they appeer that resists their fingers So the genuin signification of Spirit in common speech is either a subtle fluid invisible Body or a Ghost Idol or Phantasm of the Brain but metaphorical meanings are many Somtimes it signifies a Mans disposition or inclination of Mind as one having a humor to comptrol others is said to hav the Spirit of contradiction if one be addicted to uncleannes an unclean Spirit If to peevish perversnes a froward Spirit If to sullennes a dumb Spirit If to holines the Spirit of God Somtimes any eminent ability or extraordinary passion or diseas of Mind as great prudence is clyped the