Selected quad for the lemma: scripture_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
scripture_n	spirit_n	word_n	write_a	2,319	5	11.0747	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A10250	Propositions and principles of diuinitie propounded and disputed in the vniuersitie of Geneua, by certaine students of diuinitie there, vnder M. Theod. Beza, and M. Anthonie Faius ... Wherein is contained a methodicall summarie, or epitome of the common places of diuinitie. Translated out of Latine into English, to the end that the causes, both of the present dangers of that Church, and also of the troubles of those that are hardlie dealt vvith els-vvhere, may appeare in the English tongue.; Theses theologicae. English	Bèze, Théodore de, 1519-1605.; La Faye, Antoine de, 1540-1615. aut; Penry, John, 1559-1593.	1591 (1591)	STC 2053; ESTC S101754	189,778	296

elect in particuler are common vnto all the Saints in respect of the vse which is the communion of Saints in this life 15 Yea and the vse of these graces if it may be ought to reach euen vnto them that are without as farre as the glorie of God and the edification of the Church doth permit both because often times many of the elect lie hid amongst them and also because wee must bee like our heauenly Father who maketh his Sunn to rise vpon the good and bad 16 This Communion begun here vpon earth shal then after that those thinges which belong vnto the vse of this life are abollished be perfected in that aeternall kingdom when as faith being chaunged into a full knowledge hope into the injoying of the thinges hoped for and charitie being made perfect God shall be all in all his Saints Now the Communion of Merites either amongst the Saints liuing heere togeather or betweene the Militant and the Triumphant church is both most false and also blasphemous as also the very opinion of merrites is a meere forged vntruth Defended by IOHN WTENBOGAERT a Low-country man of Vtrick PRINCIPLES CONCERNING THE WORD OF GOD. LII 1 VVE haue dealt in the former principles with the Church and it hath bene said that the notes of the true Church were the Word of God and the Sacraments now wee will deale with these notes and first of all with the former of them 2 The word of God which is the first note wee cal in this place not whatsoeuer GOD hath spoken but those things onlie which the Prophetes and Apostles inspired by Gods Spirite haue in times past as taught by worde so committed to writing those things which being comprehended in the bookes of the ould and new Testament are as yet vnto this day after so manie warres slaughters ouerthrowes extant in Gods Church in which bookes God hath declared both what he will haue vs to know cōcerning him and what is to be done of vs. 3 God onelie is to bee acknowledged the authour of these bookes whence the whole Scripture is said by PAVL to bee giuen by the inspiration of God and is also called the word of God And therefore it is vnlawfull to call into question or to refuse anie thing that is contained therein as also to bring in anie thing that is not written in the same Detestable therefore was that peruersnes of the Marcionites Manichaees the Valentinians and of all such as refused either all or some of the bookes of the newe Testament 4 These writings by the singular prouidence of God haue long since beene brought by the Church into a certaine order and Cannon that they might bee discerned from counterfaite yea and all other bookes and that they should bee a rule of faith and obedience that should haue credite of it self and hence they are called Cannonicall Other bookes whosoeuer haue beene the authours of them though they contain manie wholsome profitable things are yet but accounted the writings of priuate men neither haue they their credite of themselues but as far as they agree with the former bookes and no otherwise They therefore both haue and at this day doe most greuouslie offend who take away this difference and affirme that the bookes of the APOCRYPHA are to haue no lesse credite in the establishing of Religion then the Cannonical Scripture of which number are the Tridentine conspiratours 5 This Scripture we acknowledge to be cannonicall and authentick not so much by the common consent of the Church as by the testimonie of the Spirite of God who teacheth vs that they are to be embraced as beeing most vndoubtedlie true and such as haue proceeded from Gods own mouth 6 Now these holie books do whollie containe al those thinges that are needfull for our saluation in somuch that it is altogether vnlawfull to exspect for anie supplie of this doctrine for the Scripture as PAVLE doth expreslie teach is able to make the man of God absolute Most greeuous therefore is their errour who thinke that the liuelie and the sauing knowledge of God is to be else where sought then in the written word and doe therefore thrust vnto vs their vnwritten falshoods out of the which they will haue necessarie arguments to bee drawne in the cause of faith and religion 7 The naturall and proper interpretation of this holy Scripture is to be drawne from the analogie of faith and the conference of places For that which is darcklie in one place is in an other clearelie taught that which heere is shortlie is elsewhere largelie set down and so the Woord is the rule and the interpretour of it selfe They are deceauers therefore who say that the right and authoritie of expounding the worde of God is in their power as though it were lawfull for them to interpret anie place as they think good 8 Neither are the expositions of auncient Doctors to bee receaued as vndoubted anie farther then they agree with the truth for PAVLE doth command vs that we giue eare or consent vnto none whosoeuer he be that teacheth anie other doctrine Wee cannot allow therefore of their opinion who wil haue the interpretation of the fathers as they call thē to haue credite of themselues 9 It is true indeed that some places of the Scripture remaine euen vnto this day so obscure and hard to bee interpreted as the verie best and most faithfull interpretours haue not agreed among themselues vpō their proper meaning but in these things euery man is to acknowledge his owne ignorance sluggishnes or some other fault and the Scripture is so plentifull that the one and the selfe same place can admit diuers interpretations and yet all agreable with the doctrine of faith 10 This notwithstanding is most certaine that the grounds and necessarie heades of Christian Religion are so clearely set downe by the Prophets and Apostles as the Spirite of God woorking in the Saincts they are manifestlie perceaued in the Church And therefore wee doe not agree vnto them who thinke the Scripture so obscure as it needeth to be made cleare by some other light Nowe this light they will haue without exception to bee drawne from that pretended Catholick Church that is either from the fathers from the Synods or from some long custome of time as though the Scripture had not beene vnderstood before either the Fathers or the Synodes were 11 This Word of God is to be dailie meditated vppon and all men of what estate soeuer they bee ought most diligentlie to read the same for no man is to be bereaued of that meanes whereby hee is to be instructed in the knowledge and the sure way of his saluation Wee cannot therefore but condemne the Papistes in this point also who holde it vnlawfull for laie-men as they call them to employ themselues in the reading of the Word 11 Now that the vnlearned and vnskilfull may with fruit bee conuersant in the reading heereof it is needfull that

therefore feare not but his power and his wrath is against all them that forsake him Briefelie that thou maiest profite by this booke I craue of thee to take this paines in it bestow an hower a day in the reading thereof and in so doing after the first time thou maiest well read it ouer once euerye moneth The which course if thou shalt take I dout not but in one yeare thou shalt so benefite thy selfe as there shall be no point of waight in religion wherof thou shalt not be able to resolue thine owne conscience and also to edifie others according vnto thy calling in verye good measure But in anie case take heede that thy knowledge gotten by reading rather encrease then diminish thy care in the hearing of the word preached And thus thou mayest exspect for the blessing of the Lord vnto whom I betake thee my selfe and all his now and euer Amen GROVNDS AND PROPOSITIONS OF RELIGION propounded and disputed in the vniuersitie of Geneua by certaine students of diuinitie there and determined by M. THEODOR BEZA and M. ANTHONIE FAIVS professors of diuinitie FIRST CONCERNING GOD. 1 SEing that the whole summe of all wisedome and felicitie doth consist in the true knoledge of God it is most meet that all our endeuors should be spent in seeking to attain vnto that knowledge as far as we may be capable of it 2 Not that a full a perfect knowledge of his Majestie who is far greater then the capacitie of men and Angels can reach vnto may be any waies comprehended within our vnderstanding but that wee should bend all the powers of our soules and bodies to knowe that one God who is the author and giuer both of soule and body 3 And although humaine reason bee able to affoord vs some proofs wherby we may be taught that there is a God and but onely one and whereby also his attributes may bee in some sort made knowen vnto vs. Yet notwithstanding those proofes are more sure and strong yea and altogeather the most vndoubted which for this purpose are fetched and drawen out of Gods word that is out of the sacred writings of the holie Prophets and Apostles contained in the old and new Testament 4 For howbeit that the knowledge of God which is deriued from the consideration of his workes and power hath many notable vses yet is it nothing comparable with that light which is gotten from the holy Scriptures both because this knowledge reuealed by the word doth wholie flow and proceede from God him selfe and also in asmuch as God in this his written woorde hath manifested howe and after what manner he will be knowen and worshipped of men Now whether there be a God or no we are to be so farre from making any question thereof that wee are bound most firmely with all our hearts without all wauering and doubting to beleeue that point And therfore we auouch that the rauing madnes of all Atheists who make a question whether there be a God or no ought not so much to be confuted by words and reason as it ought to bee cleane rooted out of the societie of men by the Magistrat and the stiffe maintainers of it taken from amongest men For though al men by nature as it is now corrupt be void of the true God neuerthelesse there are certaine motions and sparks of the knowledge of God imprinted in the mind of euery man which cannot altogeather be put out And as these motions doe testifie that man was borne to worshippe God So vnles a more full light bee joyned vnto them they leaue man straying and groping in the darke and are smallie or nothing behoofull vnto him Therefore as the knowledge which man hath by nature is not altogeather of no vse vnto saluation so is it verie farre from being of it selfe sufficient therunto It bereaueth them indeede of all excuse who quench that small lighr of nature though neuer so corrupt which is left in them 5 True it is indeed that he who goeth beyond al bounds can in no wise be defined and that that exceeding brightnes of God which no man can attaine vnto cannot bee comprehended by our darknes yet hee may be as it were shadowed out by this discription and so wee may say that God is hee who hath his beeing in himselfe whose nature is of himselfe inuisible without beginning without ending infinite incomprehensible indiuisible vnchangeable no bodily substance but a being most pure most simple and euery way most perfect wise mightie good iust mercifull free who hath created all things of nothing c. And therfore we do detest the multitude of Gods acknoledged among the Gentils the grosnes of the * Heretiks so called because they held God to haue a body and members like a man Anthropomorphites the furie of the Manichaeis and all such like And here it is to be obserued that those things which are attributed vnto God by the former Epithites and attributes are not to betaken as qualities inhaerent in him for we are to knowe that there is nothing in God which is not God himselfe 6 As where it is sayd that God is iust good merciful c. That is so to bee vnderstood as if hee were said to be iustice goodnes and mercy it selfe And therefore although that when we speake of God we must not conceiue of him as hauing any liknes or affinitie with the nature of man or of any creature yet such is the excellencie of the Lorde and mans weaknes that when wee speake of his Majesty we are enforced to vse borrowed speaches from creatures And herein hee is so far from disliking of vs that he himselfe descending as it were into our capacitie doth euery where thus speake of himselfe Defended by SAMVEL AVIENVS of Berne THE SECOND SORT OF PRINCIPLES CONCERNING THE HOLY AND VNSEARCHABLE TRINITIE 1 THat knowledge of God which we attaine vnto by his written word doth far surpas al that whatsoeuer it be whereunto the light of nature doth or can lead vs. 2 For that God is one in substance and three in persons is no where els to bee learned saue onely out of the worde The truth of which Doctrine it setteth downe most clearlie and vndoubtedly but so as it leaueth the reason thereof as a matter altogeather vnsearchable and a mysterie not to bee sought out by humain arguments but to be reuerenced and embraced by faith onely 3 These words Trinitie Essence or Substance Person and Coessentiall though they bee not in expresse syllables the word a Heb. 1.3 Person onely excepted to be found in the Canonicall Scriptures yet notwithstanding they were not without just causes brought into vse by the godly auncient Fathers neither are they to be rejected as adding any thing vnto the word but rather to bee still profitablie and wholsomelie retained in the Church 4 By the word TRINITY we vnderstand the nōber of the persons contained in the diuine essence which is one onely 5 By

indeed from all aeternitie or els because they will haue the fleshe of Christ to be taken out of the substance of the Godhead or as some do nowe affirme because all the proprieties of the Deity were poured into the humane nature when the worde was incarnate or to be briefe by what other dotage soeuer they goe about to obscure the coaeternall generation of the Sonne Defended by IOHN HENRY SCHINTYER of Tigurine THE FOVRTH SORT OF PRINCIPLES CONCERNING THE HOLY GHOST HITHERTO CONCERNING THE PERSONS of the Father and the Sonne it followeth now that we speake of the holie Spirit 1 VVHereas the word SPIRIT is diuersly taken in the scriptures we in this doctrine do vnderstand by the holie spirit the third person in Trinitie 2 The holie Spirit is that Essentiall and working power who is essentially subsisting in the Father and the Son from whome the whole Deity wherein also they doe subsist being communicated vnto him after an vnspekable maner though he procedeth or if we may so speake is as it were breathed yet is he not at all seperated in respect of this his proceding but is in regard of the maner of his being distinguished from the persons of the Father and the Sonne And therefore he is not without cause reckoned the third person in nomber seing in consideration of his being hee is referred vnto the Father and the sonne yet not as vnto two beginnings but as vnto one 3 The Deity thus communicated by issuing and proceeding is not multiplied in substance seing he is most simple and single Whence it is that the holie Ghost in regard of his person is and euer hath bin coessentiall and coaeternall with the Father and the sonne and in regarde of his substance is that one onely true God in himselfe Wherevpon also the name of God is sometimes personally attributed vnto him The holy Ghost is therefore to be worshipped by the one and the same faith and inuocation that the Father and Son are 4 And although the works of the Trinnitie which they cal outward or external are vnseperable yet in the effecting of them wee are to obserue a distinction not onelye of the persons but also of the personall actions 5 The proper and the peculiar action of the holie Spirit in all the workes of the Deity bee they naturall and ordinary or els extraordinary was and is to effect in his time and maner those things which the father from all aeternitie hath decreed in his owne wisdome that is in his Son and the Son hath ordered and disposed to come to passe 6 Yet is not the holy spirit any instrumental cause affording his helpe as a seruaunt vnto the Father or the Son but working together with them without any inferioritie or inaequallitie 7 But the power and working of the holy spirit is especiallie seene in the planting and gouerning of the Church In which particular respect he is called the holie spirit even because that he who is most holie doth stirr vp and nourish all the holie motions that are in the elect For he it is by whose inspiration all the holie prophets haue spoken it is he that giueth eares to heare and a hart to beleeue who appointeth Pastors and doth enable them with necessary gifts who stirreth vp the slouthfull and being the true comforter indeed doth comfort the afflicted soule By whome those that are borne againe of him do cry Abba father he also formed the fleshe of Christ in the wombe of the virgine and did most aboundantlie anoint his humane nature to conclude it is he by whose strength we stand vntill we overcome Wherefore we doe abhor and renounce the SABELLIANS who confound the persones with the substance of the Godhead the ARRIANS and the MACEDONIANS who deny the holie Ghost to bee coessentiall with the Father and the Son the GRECIANS of later time who affirme that hee doth onlie proceed from the father and those also who by the holie Ghost will haue nothing els to be ment saue certaine motions and inspirations onely together with those who deny that he is to be invocated by the one and the selfesame faith with the Father and the Sonne and to be briefe we detest all those that any waies oppugne the Deity of the holy Ghost either in his substance or person Defended by IOHN IAMES COLER of Tygurine THE FIFT SORT OF PRINCIPLES CONCERNING THE ATTRIBVTES OF GOD IN GENERALL HITHERTO WE HAVE SPOKEN OF GOD both as far as wee are able to attaine vnto bee the light of nature also as he is laied before vs in the holy Scripturs to be three in person and one in substance now it followeth that we intreat of his attributes wherby in a sort we are taught what maner of God he is 1 ALthough there be no composition in God nor yet any accidentall qualitie seeing hee is a substance most single and euery way one yet to the end that according vnto our capacitie we might vnderstande what a God hee is he himselfe in the scriptures is accustomed to attribute vnto himselfe many things as qualities 2 By attributes in this place then we vnderstande the essentiall proprieties of the Deity which are attributed vnto him in the scriptures 3 These things are so attributed vnto him that notwithstanding they place nothing in him that is cōpoūd or diuers from his substance but look whatsoeuer they point him out to be the very same he is in his owne most simple substance 4 For both these proprieties and also their actions doe in very deede differ no whit from the substance of the Godhead but onely in some consideration we are to holde them diuers both from the diuine substance and also the on from the other 5 Now these things are attributed vnto the Deity sometimes substātiuely somtims adjectiuely as they speak that we may thereby knowe him to be a being that subsisteth indeede and that he is such a one not by participation and imperfectlie but of himselfe and that most perfectlie 6 Of attributes we make two kinds the one is of them which are so proper vnto the Deitie that they can bee in no sort communicated vnto creatures neither haue they anie other respect vnto creatures saue that by them the Deitie is distinguished from creatures of this kind are aeternity simplenes vnmeasurablenes omnipotencie 7 The other kind is of those who although simply and as far as they are in the Deitie they cannot be communicated yet creatures may be partakers of them not properly but by analogie and a kinde of agreement and that not essentially but in regarde of qualitie and but in part neither such ar wisedome goodnes and the rest of that kind Therefore OSIANDER erred grosly whoe taught that the essentiall righteousnes of God was communicated vnto vs and at this day their error is intollerable who recalling back again the blasphemie of EVTYCHES holde that al the proprieties of the Deitie were powred by personall vnion into the flesh which

day which went before the Sabaoth lay in the graue the whole Sabboth according to the custome of the Iewes which account a naturall day from Euening to Euening and rose againe the beginning of the next which was the first daye of the weeke 13 Concerning this Article of the descension of Christ into Hell it is manifest that there is no mention made of either in the Nicene or in any other of the ancient creeds and RVFFINVS witnesseth that it was not read in the Church of Rome 14 No man therefore ought to wonder if some question be made of the meaning thereof 15 That the Creede which is called the Apostles was written by the Apostles themselues before they departed from Ierusalem euerie one of them bringing in his seueral Article it is a meere fabulous tale as the very number of these Articles do shew 16 Yet it is cleare that they were faithfullie and truely gathered out of the preaching of the Apostles acounted euen frō the most ancient time as a square a rule of faith 17 Now their opinion is verie probable who doe take these words he descended into Hel if this Article was at the first in the common creed expressed in so many words not for any distinct Article but for a summary comprehension of the last and lowest degree of Christes humiliation which should bee pointed out by the wordes of suffering crucifiyng death and burial as this kind of speach is somtimes in the Scriptures Metaphorically vsed for the lowest estate of anguish and dejection So that He suffered was dead buried and descended into Hell should be but one Article of faith 18 But who can beleeue that the Fathers of Nicene and so many Synods that afterward followed and the very Church of Rome it self would haue rashly blotted out this Article if it had bin written in so many words in the common Creed 19 Either of the two therefore must needs bee necessarie namelie that either this kinde of speach in that sense that wee haue spoken though familiar vnto the Hebrues was not yet receiued in all Churches as being ambiguous and not necessary seeing it was sufficiently vnderstood by the former and so by a little and a little grewe out of vse or that this Article also was then inserted into the common Creed when as their opinion which hath bene of ancient time had by degrees taken place who thought that the soule of our Sauiour Christ beeing separated from his bodie went into I know not what place where the Spirits of the beleeuing Fathers should haue their aboad 20 But this opinion though it hath bin of a long time receaued by a common and an olde growen error cannot bee confirmed any wise by any testimonie of the Euangelicall Historie but is manifestlie ouerthrown thereby seeing it is very apparant by the woordes of the Euangelists that the Spirite of Christ being departed out of his bodie was there receaued into whose hands hee committed it when hee gaue vppe the Ghost that is into the place of aeternall blessednes whereof speaking vnto the Theefe he said this day shalt thou be with me in Paradise 21 Nowe that there was any place allotted vnto the Spirits of the Fathers that departed before the incarnation of Christ whence afterward the Spirite of Christ comming thither indeed shuld bring them with him into heauen it can in no wise bee confirmed by any colourable testimonie of the Scriptures Neither would the Euangelists haue omitted any such thing in the storie of the passion of Christ But this opinion seemeth to arise partlie in that manye are written to haue risen either by Christ or with Christ partly out of the PSALME 16.8 which PETER citeth Act. 2.25 and out of two other places also of 1. PET. 3. wrongfullie interpreted 22 Out of this error arise two other that are more absurd the one of those who beeing ledde by the misvnderstanding of the words of PETER thought that the soule of Christ went indeed into Hell to the ende that as in bodie hee had preached the Gospell vpon earth vnto those that were liuing so also he should preach the said Gospel in his Spirit vnto the Spirites of those that were dead as though that after death there were any place left for preaching repentance 23 The other errour is of those who dreamed that the Spirite of Christ should goe vnto the soules of the damned that hee might there also suffer in his soule the paines ordained in hell for the damned as though that the soule of Christ whilest it was in his bodie did not beare those punishmentes for our sake as both that horrible agonie which hee sustained in the Garden and also that fearefull crie My God my God c. which vpon the Crosse made Heauen and earth to tremble doe beare witnesse or as though that speache It is finished wherein our whole hope consisteth were vntrue 24 But wee omitting the whole controuersie concerning the putting in or the blotting out of this Article do simplie vnderstand by the Descension of Christ into hell those things which Christ being made a curse for vs suffered in his soule for our sake in those torments especiallie which were so greeuous as nothing could be no not imagined more horrible 25 By the word DESCENSION therefore is not ment any remoouing from a higher place to a lower because that can properlie agree neither vnto the Deitie which is euery where nor vnto the bodie which of it selfe lay dead in the Graue neither vnto the soule which beeing commended vnto the Father was straight way in Paradise after it was separated from the body 26 Now the word HELL which in the Scripture is diuersly taken signifieth neither the Graue because that explanation should bee superfluous and obscure neither yet the place of the damned as it is cleare out of the former Principles 27 Therefore this Descension of Christ into Hel which had an ende at his death went before the Article of his buriall but yet it is placed after the same in the order of speach euen because it was thought meet to set downe in one tenor of speach whatsoeuer did belong to the humiliation of his body Defended by HILLARIE FANTRART an English-man of Guernzy PRINCIPLES CONCERNING THE RESVRRECTION OF IESVS CHRIST XLV 1 HItherto wee haue heard Christes combate with death wherein he might seeme to be ouercome by death because it so far preuailed against him as it threw his dead bodie into the graue 2 Now we are to speake of Christs victorie ouer death the beginning whereof was the preseruation of his dead bodie in the graue vncorrupted and that without the help of anie art of the Apothicarie 3 His full victorie manifested it selfe in the resurrection of his bodie seeing that life is directlye opposite vnto death 4 Now that onlie is said to rise again which lay down and therefore neither the Deitie nor the soule of Christ rose againe Yet notwithstanding the resurrection after a