condition with whom in an especial manner he had to do and this in perfect Harmony with the Wisdom of the Holy Ghost in other portions of Scripture So that on this account also its Station in the Holy Canon is secured § 32 Moreover Besides the Peculiar Excellency which is found in the Style of the holy Scripture either evidencing its Divine Original or at least manifesting that there is nothing in it unworthy of such an extract the Authority of its principal Author exerts it self in the whole of it unto the consciences of men And herein is this Epistle an especial sharer also Now this Authority as it respects the minds of men is in part an exurgency of the Holy Matter contained in it and the Heavenly Manner wherein it is declared They have in their Conjunction a peculiar Character differencing their Writings from all Writing of an humane Original and manifesting it to be of God Neither can it otherwise be but that things of Divine Revelation expressed in words of Divine Suggestion and determination will appear to be of a Divine Original And partly it consists in an Ineffable Eâ—anation of Divine Excellency communicating unto his own Word a distinguishing property from its Relation unto him We speak not now of the work of the Holy Ghost in our hearts by his Grace enabling us to believe but of his work in the Word rendring it credible and meet to be bâ—lieved not of the Seal and Testimony that he gives unto the hearts of individual Persons of the Truth of the Scripture or rather of the things contained in it but of the Seal and Testimony which in the Scripture he gives unto it and by it to be his own Work and Word Such a character have the Works of other Agents whereby they are known and discerned to be theirs By such properties are the Works of men discâ—rned and oftentimes of Individuals amongst them They bear the likeness of their Authors and are thereby known to be theirs Neither is it possible that there should be any work of God proceeding so immediately from him as do Writings by Divine Inspiration but there will be such a communication of his Spirit and likeness unto it such an impression of his Greatness Holiness Goodness Truth and Majesty upon it as will manifest it to be from him The false Prophets of old pretended their Dreams Visions Predictions and Revelations to be from him They prefixed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 he saith unto all the Declarations of them Jer. 23.31 and therefore doubtless framed them to as great a likeness unto those that were by inspiration from him as they were able And yet the Lord declares that all their imaginations were as discernable from his Word as Chaff from Wheat and this by that Authority and power wherewith his Word is accompanied whereof they were utterly destitute vers 28 29. And this Authority do all they who have their senses exercised in it find and acknowledge in this Epistle wherein their minds and consciences do acquiesce They hear and understand the voice of God in it and by that Spirit which is promised unto them discern it from the voice of a Stranger And when their minds are prepared and fortified against Objections by the former considerations this they ultimately resolve their perswasion of its Divine Authority into For From this Authority they find a Divine Efficacy proceeding a powerful operation § 33 upon their souls and consciences unto all the Ends of the Scripture A Reverence and awe of God from his Authority shining forth and exerting its self in it being wrought in them they find their minds effectually brought into captivity unto the obedience taught therein This Efficacy and power is in the whole Word of God Is not my Word as a Fire saith the Lord and like an Hammer that breaketh the rocks in pieces Jer. 23.29 that is living and powerful and sharper than any two-edged sword piercing even to the dividing asunder of the soul and spirit and of the joints and marrow and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart Heb. 4.12 As it hath an 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or Authority over men Matth. 7.29 So it hath a 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or powerfull Efficacy in and towards them Acts 20.32 James 1.21 yea it is the Power of God himself for its proper end Rom. 1.16 and therefore said to be accompanied with the demonstration of the Spirit and power 1 Cor. 1.4 a Demonstration 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as Basil drawing the Soul to consent beyond the Efficacy of Rational or Logical Arguments or Geometrical Demonstrations as he adds in the same place And this Divine Power and Efficacy of the Word as to all the ends of it proceeding from the Authority of God in it with his designation of it unto those ends which is that which giveth energie unto all things enabling them to produce their proper Effects and setting limits and bounds to their operation as it is testified unto in innumerable places of the Scripture its self so it hath and doth sufficiently manifest and evidence its self both in the fruits and effects of it on the souls of particular persons and in that work which it hath wrought and doth yet carry on invisibly in the world in despight of all the opposition that is made unto it by the power of Hell in conjunction with the unbelief darkness and lusts of the minds of men as may elsewhere be more at large declared A Learned Man said well Non monent non persuadent Sacrae literae sed cogunt agitant vim inferunt Legis rudia verba agrestia Sed viva sed animata flammea aculeata ad imum spiritum penetrantia hominem totum potestate mirabili transformantia expressing the summ of what we discourse From hence is all that supernatural Light and knowledge that conviction and restraint that Conversion Faith Consolation and Obedience that are found amongst any of the Sons of men 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 saith Basil 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The whole Scripture is divinely inspired and profitable being written by the Holy Ghost for this purpose that in it as a common healing Office for souls all men may chuse the Medicine suited to cure their own distempers Such is the Nature Power and Efficacy of this Epistle towards them that do believe It searches their hearts discovers their thoughts principles their consciences judges their Acts inward and outward supports their Spirits comforts their souls enlightens their minds guides them in their hope confidence and love to God directs them in all their communion with him and obedience unto him and leads them to an enjoyment of him And this Work of the Holy Ghost in it and by it seals up its Divine Authority unto them so that they find rest spiritual satisfaction and great assurance therein When once they have obtained this Experience of its Divine Power it is in vain for Men or Devils
supream Principles of things a good one and a bad one Thus for the most part the first Question of a Romanist is How do you know the Scriptures to be the Word of God and then the next word is the Cabala the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Orall Law Tradition these are the Foundation of it And in their progress they fail not to assert two Principles both borrowed from the Jews First That the Scripture is imperfect and doth not give us a full and compleat account of all things that are to be believed or practised that God may be glorified and our own souls saved Secondly That what is delivered therein can no way be rightly and truly understood but by the help of those Traditions which they have in their custody But although these are good usefull Inventions and they are men that want not Ability to find out what is conducing unto their own advantage yet they cannot be allowed the Credit of being their first Authors seeing they are expresly borrowed of the Jews § 19 Fourthly When these two Laws the Law of God and their own do come in competition the Jews many of them do expresly prefer that of their own invention before the other and that both as to certainty and use Hence they make it the foundation of their Church and the only safe means to preserve the Truth So are we informed by Isaac Corbulensis in 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Do not think saith he that the written Law is the Foundation for the Foundation is the Orall Law For by that Law was the Covenant made as it is written according to these words do I make a Covenant with thee Exod. 34.27 where he takes his Argument from that Expression 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 wresting foolishly as they do all his Orall Law from those words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifie nothing but according to nor are any other words intended but those delivered to Moses and written by him And these he adds are the Treasures of the Holy Blessed God For he knew that Israel should be carried Captive among other People and that the Nations would transcribe their Books and therefore would not commit their secret Law to Writing It seems these things were left them in secret Tradition because God was not willing that any besides themselves should know his Mind and Will but they have at last shewed themselves more full of benignity towards mankind than they would allow God to be in as much as they have committed this Secret Law to Writing And to this purpose is their Confession in 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Golden Altar 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 It is impossible for us to stand or abide upon the Foundation of our holy Law which is the written Law unless it be by the Orall Law which is the Exposition thereof Wherein they not only declare their Judgements concerning their Traditions but also express the Reason of their obstinate adherence unto them which is that without it they cannot maintain themselves in their present Judaism And so indeed is the case with them innumerable Testimonies of the Scriptures rising up directly against their Infidelity they were not able to keep their station but by an horrible corrupting of them through their Traditions On this account it is a common thing with them in the advise they give unto their Disciples to prefer the Study of the Talmud before the Study of the Scripture and the sayings of their Wise men before the sayings of the Prophets and plainly express an utter disregard of the Written Word any farther than as they suppose the sense of it explained in their Orall Law Neither are they here forsaken by their Associates The principal design of all the Books which have been lately published by the Romanists and they have not been a few hath been to prove the Certainty and Sufficiency of their Traditions in matters of their Faith and Worship above that of the Written Word § 20 Fifthly There are some few remaining among the Eastern Jews who reject all this Story concerning the Orall Law and professedly adhere unto the Written Word only These the Masters of their present Religion and Perswasion do by common consent brand as Hereticks calling them Scripturists or Scripturarians or Biblists the very name of reproach wherewith the Romanists stigmatize all those who reject their Traditions These are their 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is Biblists or Scripturarians and every where they term them 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Hereticks and endeavour to prove them guilty 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of Heresie in the highest degree Some of them would have them to be the Offspring of the old Sadducees to deny the Resurrection and the World to come as men care not much usually what they impute unto those whom they esteem Hereticks But the falsity hereof is notorious and so acknowledged by others and confuted by the Writings of the Karaeans themselves Yea the Author of Cosri affirms that they are more studious in the Law than the Rabbins and that their Reasons were more weighty than theirs and lead more towards the naked sense of the Scripture But this is that which they charge upon them namely that rejecting the sure Rule of their Traditions they run into singular Expositions of the Law and so divided it and made many Laws of it having no certain means of Agreement among themselves So saith Rabbi Jehuda Levita the Author of the fore-mentioned Cosri 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Karaeans multiply Laws according to their own Opinion which he inveighs against them for after he had commended them And the same is objected against them by Maimonides on Pirke Aboth As though it were not known that the greatest part of their Talmud the Sacred Treasury of their Orall Law is taken up with differences and Disputes of their Masters among themselves with a multitude of various Opinions and contradictory conceptions about their Traditions Thus deal the Romanists also which their Adversaries this they charge them withall They are Hereticks Biblists and by adhering to the Scripture alone have no certainty among themselves but run into diversities of Opinions as having deserted the unerring Rule of their Cabala when the world is filled with the noise of their own conflicts notwithstanding the pretended relief which they have thereby It remains that we consider how these Traditions come to be communicated unto others out of the secret Store-house wherein Originally they were deposited This as I have elsewhere and partly before declared was by their being committed unto writing by Rabbi Juda Hakkadosh whose collections with their Expositions in their Talmud do give us a perfect account if we may believe them of that secret Law which came down unto them by Orall Tradition from Moses And something like hereunto is by the Romanists pretended Many of their Traditions they say are recorded in the Rescripts of Popes Decrees of Councils and Constitutions of the Canon Law and the like sacred means of
the Effects of Satans Temptation and that to be wrought by the Messiah or as they speak in his dayes And hence they have a common saying that in the last dayes which is the Old Testament Periphrasis of the Dayes of the Messiah all things shall be healed but the Serpent and the Gibeonites by whom they understand all Hypocrites and Unbelievers Satan therefore is to be conquered by the bruising of his Head and conquered he is not nor can be unless his work be destroyed In the destruction of his work consists the Delivery of mankind from the twofold evil mentioned And this is to be effected by the seed of the Woman to be brought forth into the world unto that end and purpose For when the Production of this Seed is restrained unto the Family and Posterity of Abraham it is said expresly that in or by it all the Kindreds of the earth should be blessed which they could not be without a removal and taking away of the Curse We may now therefore take the summ of this Discourse and of the whole matter § 26 that we have insisted on about the Entrance of sin into the world and the Remedy provided in the Grace and Wisdom of God against it It appears upon our Enquiry First That the Sin of our First Parents was the Occasion and Cause of all that Evil which is in the world of all that is felt or justly feared by mankind For as those who knew not or received not the Revelation of the Truth in these things made unto us in the Scripture could never assign any other cause of it that might be satisfactory unto an ordinary rational Enquiry so the Testimonies of the Scripture make it most evident and especially that insisted on Secondly It hath been evinced tha◠mankind could not recover or deliver themselves from under the power of their own innate corruption and disorder nor from the effects of the Curse and Wrath of God that came upon them Neither is there any ground of Expectation of Relief from any other part of Gods Creation But yet that God for the praise of the glory of his Grace Mercy and Goodness would effect it and bring it about Thirdly That this Relief and Deliverance is first intimated and declared in those words of God unto the Serpent I will put Enmity between thee and the Woman and between thy seed and her seed it shall bruise thy head and thou shalt bruise his heel Which appears First Because in and with the Serpent Satan who was the Head of all Apostasie from God and by whom our first Parents were beguiled is intended in these words This we have made evident from the Confession of the Jews with whom in this matter principally we have to do And to what hath been already observed unto that purpose we may add the Testimonies of some other of them to the same Purpose Rabbi Bechai he whom they call 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Bechai the Elder in his Comment on the Law unto these words Gen. 3. v. 15. speaks to this purpose We have no more enmity with the Serpent than with other creeping things Wherefore the Scripture Mystically signifies him who was hid in the Serpent For the body of the crafty Serpent was a fit instrument for that force or vertue that joyned its self therewithall That was it which made Eve to sin whence death came on all her Posterity And this is the Enmity between the Serpent and the seed of the Woman And this is the Mysterie of the Holy Tongue that the Serpent is sometimes called Saraph according to the name of an Angel who is also called Saraph And now thou knowest that the Serpent is Satan and the evil Figment and the Angel of Death And Rabbi Judah in 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Many Interpreters say that the Evil Figment hath all its force from the Old Serpent or Satan To the same purpose the Author of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Caphtor Vapaerach The Devil and the Serpent are called by one name And many other Testimonies of the like importance might be collected out of them We have also asurer word for our own satisfaction in the Application of this place unto Satan in the Divine Writings of the New Testament as 2 Cor. 11.3 2 Tim. 2.14 Rom. 5.11 12 13 15. Heb. 2.14 15. 1 John 3.8 Revel 12.9 and Chap. 20. v. 2 3. but we forbear to press them on the Jews Besides it is most evident from the thing it self For 1. Who can be so sottish as to imagine that this great Alteration which ensued on the works of God that which caused him to pronounce them accursed and to inflict so sore a Punishment on Adam and all his Posterity should arise from the Actings of a Brute Creature Where is the glory of this dispensation How can we attribute it unto the Wisdom and Greatness of God What is there in it suitable unto his Righteousness and Holiness Whereas supposing this to be the work of him who was in himself the beginning of all Apostasie and who first brake the Law of his Creation all things answer the Excellency of the Divine Perfections Moreover is it imaginable that the nature of man then flourishing in the vigour of all its intellectual Abilities Reason Wisdom Knowledge in that Order and Rectitude of them which was his Grace should be surprized seduced and brought into subjection unto the Craft and Machinations of an inferiour Creature a Beast of the Field and that unto its own Ruine Temporal and Eternal The whole nature of the inferiour creatures James tells us is tamed by the nature of Man Chap. 3. v. 7. and that now in his lessened and depraved condition and shall we think that this Excellent Nature in the blossom of its strength and right unto Rule over all should be tamed corrupted subdued by the nature of a Beast or a Serpent And yet again whereas in the whole action of the Serpent there is an open design against the glory and honour of God with the welfare and happiness of mankind and that managed with Craft Subtilty and Forecast how can we imagine that such a contrivance should befall a brute Worm uncapable of Moral Evil and newly framed out of the dust by the power of its Creator Hitherto it had continued under the Law and Order of its Creation and shall we now think that suddenly on an instant it should engage thus desperately against God and man And further the actings of the Serpent were by Reason and with Speech And doth not a supposal that he was endowed with them plainly exempt him from that Order and kind of Creatures whereof he was and place him among the number of the intellectual and rationall parts of the Creation And is not this contrary to the Analogie of the Scripture and the open truth of the thing its self he being cursed among the Beasts of the Field To say as Aben Ezra seems to do that God gave him Reason
they believe that their Messiah is to be a meâ—r man born after the manner of all other men yet they never speak of his Birth or Natiâ—ity as a thing that they looked for only they speak of his coming but most commonly of his being revealed and their great expectation is when he shall be discovered and revealed And this proceedeth out of a secret self-conviction that he was born long since even at the time promised and appointed only that he is hidden from them as indeed he is though not in the sense by them imagined But what makes the Application of the night of the Passeover to the coming of the Messiah They cannot imagine that he shall come unto them whilest they are celebrating that Ordinance for that is not lawfull for them unless they were at Jerusalem whither they believe they shall never return untill he come and go before them It is then from some Tradition amongst them that their Deliverance out of Aegypt was a Type of the Deliverance by the Messiah whose Sacrifice and suffering was represented in the Paschal Lamb which gave occasion unto this Gloss. Exod. 40. v. 9. Targum of Jonathan Thâ—u shalt sanctifie it for the Crown of the Kingdom § 8 of the house of Judah 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and the King Messiah who shall deliver Israel in the End of the Dayes The end of the Vnction there mentioned in the Text is that the things annointed might be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 holiness of holinâ—sses unto the Lord. Now it was the Messiah alone who truly and really was this most Holy One Dan. 9. v. 24. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to annoint or to make Messiah of the Holiness of Holinesses the most Holy One as he is called in the New Testament 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Holy One 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Acts 3.14 Chap. 4. v. 30. 1 John 2.20 Revel 3. v. 7. And hence as it should seem is this place applyed unto him by the Targumist and an intimation given that in all their Holy things their Tabernacle Sanctuary and Altar he was represented for as he was the most holy and his body the Temple wherein the fulness of the Godhead dwelt Col. 2. v. 9. so 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 he Tabernacled amongst us John 1. v. 14. And is our Altar Heb. 13. v. 10. Numb 11. v. 26. But there remained two of the men in the Camp the name of the one § 9 was Eldad and the name of the other was Medad and the Spirit rested upon them and they were of the men that were written but went not out unto the Tabernacle and they Prophesied in the Camp Here seemeth not to be any thing immediately relating unto the Messiah yet two of the Targums have brought him into this place but attended with such a story as I should not mention were it not to give a signal instance in it how they raise their Traditions Eldad and Medad prophesied in the Camp as the Text assures us What or whereabout they prophesied is not declared This the Targumists pretend to acquaint us withall Eldad they say prophesied of the Death of Moses the Succession of Joshua and their entrance into Canaan under his conduct This caused One to run and inform Moses which gave occasion to those words of his v. 29. Enviest thou for my sake for what if he do prophesie that I shall dye and thereon he would not rebuke them Medad prophesied of the coming of the Quailes to feed them but both of them prophesied and said 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 In the latter dayes Gog and Magog shall ascend with their Host against Jerusalem and they shall fall by the hand of the Messiah whereon in Jonathan there followeth a story of the delicious fare and dainties which they fancy unto themselves in those dayes But what is the Reason that Eldad and Mâ—dad must be thought to prophesie thus concerning Gog Ezek. 38. v. 17. we have these words Thus saith the Lord God unto Gog art not thou he of whom I have spoken in old time by my servants the Prophets of Israel which prohesied in those dayes and years that I would bring thee against them Not finding any express prophesie in the Scripture as they suppose concerning Gog because that name is not elsewhere used they could not fasten these words any where better than on Eldad and Medad concerning whom it is said that they Prophesied but nothing is recorded of what is spoken by them whereon they think they may assign unto them what they please although there is not the least reason to suppose that their Prophecying consisted in Predictions of things to come Speaking of the things of God and praising him in an extraordinary manner is called Prophecying in the Scripture So those words of the Children of the Prophets who came down from the High Place with Psalteries and Harps 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 1 Sam. 10. v. 5. and they are Prophecying is rendred in the Targum 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and they are praising or singing Praises unto God which both their company and their instruments declare to have been their Employment But such occasions as these do they lay hold of for the raising of their Figments which in process of time grow to be Traditions § 10 Numb 23. v. 21. Chap. 24. v. 7 17 20 24. All the Targum agree that the Messiah is intended in these Prophesies of Baalam Especially on those words Chap. 24. v. 17. There shall come a Star out of Jacob and a Scepter out of Israel A King say they jointly shall arise out of Jacob 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and the Messiah shall be annointed And an illustrious Prophesie it is no doubt concerning his Coming and Dominion who is the Root and the Offspring of David the bright and Morning Star Rashi interprets the place of David who smote the Corners of Moab as he was in many things a Type of Christ. Aben Ezra confesseth that many interpret the words concerning the Messiah And Maimonides distributâ—s the Prophesie between David and the Messiah assigning some things unto one some to another Tractat. de Regib in 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 also they grant it to be the Prophesie of the Messiah And there is no doubt of the sense of their antient Masters from the story of Bar Coziba whom after they had accepted of for their Messiah from this place they called Bar Chocheba Akiba applying this Prediction of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or the Star unto him And Fagius on the Targum in this place observes that in the name 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Chochab applyed unto the Messiah the Cabbalists observe two things First That the two first Letters signifie the same number with the Letters of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Name of God that is twenty six and the two latter twenty two the number of the Letters of the Law The observation is sufficiently Talmudical but the intendment of it that the Messiah hath in
change of place And thence Aben Ezra interprets that expression Chap. 20. v. 22. Ye have seen that I have talked with you from Heaven God was still in Heaven when his Glory was on the Mount Yet those words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 do rather refer to his descent before described then denote the place where he spake For in giving the Law God spake on Earth Heb 12.25 That God in this glorious manifestation of his presence on Mount Sinai made use of the ministry of Angels both the nature of the thing declares and the Scripture testifies Psalm 68.17 The voices fire trembling of the Mountain smoke and noise of the Trumpet were all effected by them And so also was the forming of the words of the Law conveyed unto the ears of Moses and the People Hence the Law is not only said to be received by them 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Acts 7. v. 53. by the disposition or orderly ministries of the Angels and to be disposed by them into the hand of Moses Gal. 3. v. 19. but is also called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Heb. 2. v. 2. the word spoken or pronounced by Angels that is outwardly and audibly As to him that presided and ruled the whole action some Christians think it was a created Angel representing God and speaking in his name But if this be so we have no certainty of any thing that is affirmed in the Scripture that it may be referred directly and immediately unto God but we may when we please substitute a delegated Angel in his room For in no place not in that concerning the Creation of the world is God himself more expresly spoken of Besides the Psalmist in the place mentioned affirms that when those Chariots of God were on Mount Sinai Jehovah himself was in the middest of them And this Presence of God the Hebrews call 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 whereby they now understand a Majestaticall and Sanctifying Presence indeed it intends him who is the Brightness of the Fathers glory and the express image of his Person who was delegated unto this work as the great Angel of the Covenant giving the Law in the strength of the Lord in the Majesty of the name of the Lord his God Exod. 23. v. 20 21 22. Behold I send an Angel before thee to keep thee in the way and § 16 to bring thee into the place that I have prepared Beware of him and obey his voyce provoke him not for he will not pardon your transgressions for my name is in him But if thou shalt indeed obey his voice and do all that I speak then will I be an enemy unto thine enemies and an adversary unto thine adversâ—ries The Angel here promised is he that went in the midst of the People in the Wilderness whose Glory appeared and was manifested among them And moreover another Angel is promised unto them v. 23. For mine Angel shall go before thee and bring thee into the Amorites and I will cut them off It is a ministring Angel to execute the Judgements and vengeance of God upon the enemies of his people And that this Angel of v. 23. is another from that of v. 20. appears from Chap. 33. v. 2 3. compared with v. 13 14 15 16. of the same Chapter v. 2. I will send an Angel before thee and I will drive out the Canaanite and the Amorite which is the Promise and the Angel of Chap. 23. v. 23. But saith he v. 3. I will not go up in the middest of thee which he had promised to do in and by the Angel of v. 20 21. in whom his name was This the people esteemed evil tidings and mourned because of it v. 4. Now God had not promised to go in the middest of them any otherwise than by the Angel mentioned which both Moses and the People were abundantly satisfied withall But whereas he here renews his Promise of the Ministry and Assistance of the Angel of v. 23. yet he denies them his own presence in the Angel of v. 20. For which Moses reneweth his request v. 13. whereunto God replies My presence shall go with thee v. 14. concerning which Presence or Face of God or which Angel of his Presence we must a little more particularly enquire § 17 First It is said to the People concerning him 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 beware of him or rather take heed to thy self before him before his Face in his Presence v. 21. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in Niphal is sibi cavit cave tibi And this is the caution that is usually given the People requiring that Reverence and awe which is due unto the Holiness of the Presence of God 2. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and obey his voice This is the great Precept which is solemnly given and so often reiterated in the Law with reference unto God himself 3. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 provoke him not or rebell not against him This is the usual word whereby God expresseth the Transgression of his Covenant a rebellion that can be committed against God alone 4. Of these Precepts a twofold Reason is given whereof the first is taken from the Soveraign Authority of this Angel for he will not pardon your transgressions that is as Joshua afterwards tells the same people he is an holy God he is a jealous God he will not forgive your transgressions nor your sâ—ns Joshua Chap. 24. v. 19. Namely sins of rebellion that break and disannul his Covenant And who can forgive sins but God To suppose here a created Angel is to open a door unto Idolatry for he in whose power it is absolutely to pardon and punish sin may certainly be worshipped with Religious Adoration The second Reason is taken from his Name for my Name is in him A more excellent Name than any of the Angels do enjoy Heb. 1. v. 4. He is God Jehovah that is his Name and his nature answereth thereunto Hence v. 22. it is added if indeed thou obey his vâ—ice and do all that I speak His voice is the voice of God in his speaking doth God speak and upon the Peoples obedience thereunto depends the accomplishment of the Promise Moreover Chap. 33. v. 14 15. God sayes concerning this Angel 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 my presence my Face shall go with thee which Presence Moses calls his Glory v. 18. his essential Glory which was manifested unto him Chap. 34. v. 6. though but obscurely in comparison of what it was unto them who in his humane nature wherein dwelt the fulness of the Godhead bodily Col. 2. v. 9. behâ—ld his Glory the Glory as of the only begotten of the Father John 1. v. 14. For this Face of God is he whom who so seeth he seeth the Father John 14. v. 19. because he is the Brightness of his Glory and the express image of his Person Heb. 1. v. 3. who accompanied the people in the Wilderness 1 Cor. 10. v. 4. and
Some of them say that this Prophecy indeed concerneth the Messiah but not Messiah Ben David who shall be alwayes victorious but Messiah Ben Joseph who shall be slain in Battel against Gog and Magog But 1. This figment wholly overthrows the faith of the true Messiah and they may as well make twenty as two of them 2. That Ben Joseph whom they have coyned in their own brains is to be a great Warrior from his first appearance and after many Victories to be slain in a Battle or at least be reputed so to be But this Prophecy is concerning a man poor destitute despised afflicted all his life bound imprisoned rejected scorned condemned and slain under a pretence of Judgement no one thing whereof they do or can ascribe unto their Ben Joseph 2. Others feign that the true Messiah was born long ago and that he lived amongst the leprous people at the Gates of Rome being himself leprous and full of sores which as they say is foretold in this Prophecy Such monstrous imaginations as these might not be repeated without some kind of participation in the folly of their Authors but that poor immortal souls are ruined by them and that they evidence what a foolish thing man is when left unto himself or judicially given up to blindness and unbelief We are ready to admire at the senseless stupidity of their fore-fathers they do so themselves who chose to worship Baal and Moloch rather then the true God who had so eminently revealed himself unto them but it doth no way exceed that of those who have lived since their rejection of the true Messiah nor do we need any other instance then that before us to make good our Observation And yet neither doth this Prodigie of folly this leprosy in any thing answer the words of the Prophecy nor indeed hath any countenance from any one word therein that single word they reflect upon signifying any kind of infirmities or sorrows in general 3. Some of them apply this Prophecy to Jeremiah concerning whom Abarbinel affirms and that truly that no one Line or Verse in the whole can with any colourable pretence be applyed unto him which also I have in particular manifested on another occasion Himself applies it two wayes 1. To Josia 2. To the whole body of the people contradicting himself in the Exposition of every particular instance and the truth in the whole But it is the whole people in their last desolation that they chiefly desire to wrest this Prophecy unto But this is 1. Contrary to the Testimony of their Targum and Talmud all their antient Masters and some of the wisest of their latter Doctors 2. To their own principles profession and belief for whereas they acknowledge that their present misery is continued on them for their sins and that if they could but repent and live to God their Messiah would undoubtedly come this place speaks of the perfect Innocency and Righteousness of him that suffers no way on his own account deserving so to do which if they once ascribe unto themselves their Messiah being not yet come they must for ever bid adiew to all their expectations of him 3. Contrary to the express words of the Text plainly describing one individual Person 4. Contrary to the Context distinguishing the people of the Jews from him that was to suffer by them among them and for them v. 3 4 5 6. 5. Contrary to every particular assertion and passage in the whole Prophecy no one of them being applicable unto the body of the people And all these things are so manifest unto every one who shall but read the place with attention and without prejudice that they stand not in need of any farther confirmation Hence Johannes Isaac confesseth that the consideration of this place was the means of his conversion § 49 Again The whole work promised from the foundation of the world to be accomplished by the Messiah is here ascribed unto the person treated of and his sufferings Peace with God is to be made by his Chastisement v. 5. and healing of our wounds by sin is from his stripes He bears the iniquity of the Church v. 6. that they may find acceptance with God In his hand the pleasure of the Lord for the Redemption of his people was to prosper v. 10. And he is to justifie them for whom he dyed v. 11. If these and the like things here mentioned may be performed by any other the Messiah may stay away there is no work for him to do in this world But if these are the things which God hath promised that he shall perform then he and none other is here intended § 50 Neither are the Cavils of the Jews about the Application of some expressions unto the Lord Jesus worth the least consideration For besides that they may all of them be easily removed the whole being exactly accomplished in him and his passion set forth beyond any instance of a Prophetick description of a thing future in the whole Scripture let them but grant that the true and only Messiah was to converse among the people in a despised contemned reproached condition that he was to be rejected by them to be persecuted to suffer to bear our iniquities and that from the hand of God to make his soul an Offering for sin by that means spiritually to redeem and save his people and as themselves know well enough that there is an end of this Controversie so the Lord Jesus must and will on all hands be acknowledged to be the true and only Messiah § 51 But that we may not seem to avoid any of their pretences or exceptions that they make use of when they are pressed with this Testimony I shall briefly consider what their latter Masters who think themselves wiser in the Authors of their Targum and Talmud and all their antient Doctors who with one consent acknowledge the Messiah to be intended in this Prophecy and wrest it unto the People of the Jews themselves unto whom not one line or word of it is applicable do object unto our interpretation of the place First Then they say it is not the Prophet from the Lord nor in the Persons of the people of the Jews but the Kings of the Earth which formerly had afflicted them who are mentioned Chap. 52. v. 15. who utter and speak the words of this Chapter in an admiration of the blessed estate that the Jews shall at length attain unto Answ. Any man that shall but view the Context will easily see the shamefull folly of this evasion For 1. Where is there any instance in the whole Scripture of the like introduction of Aliens and Forreigners and the Prophets personating of them in what they say and why should such a singular imagination here take place 2. How could they say Who hath believed our report or the Doctrine that we had heard and taught concerning this person or these persons Had the Kings and Nations so preached the
in novo faedere praecipit But these things agree neither with the truth nor with the design of the Apostle in this place nor with the Principles of them by whom they are asserted It is acknowledg'd that God hath other sons besides Jesus Christ and that with respect unto him for in him we are adopted the only way whereby any one may attain unto the priviledge of Sonship but that we are sons of God with or in the same kind of sonship with Jesus Christ is 1. False because 1. Christ in his Sonship is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the only begotten Son of God and ther◠〈◊〉 is impossible that God should have any more sons in the same kind with him for if he had certainly the Lord Christ could not be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 his only begotten Son 2. The only way of Filiation the only kind of Sonship that Believers share in is that of Adoption in any other kind of sonship they are not partakers Now if Christ be the Son of God in this kind he must of necessity antecedently unto his Adoption be a Member of another Family that is of the Family of Sathan and the World as we are by Nature and from thence be transplanted by Adoption into the Family of God which is Blasphemy to imagine So that neither can Believers be the sons of God with that kind of sonship which is proper to Christ he being the only begotten of the Father nor can the Lord Christ be the Son of God with the same kind of Sonship as Believers are which is only by Adoption and their translation out of one Family into another So that either to exalt Believers into the same kind of Sonship with Christ or to depress him into the same rank with them is wholly inconsistent with the Analogy of Faith and Principles of the Gospel 3. If this were so that the Lord Christ and Believers were the Sons of God by the same kind of Sonship only differing in degrees which also are imaginary for the formal Reason of the same kind of Sonship is not capable of variation by degrees what great matter is in the condescension mentioned by the Apostle chap. 2.11 that he is not ashamed to call them brethren which yet he compares with the condescension of God in being called their God chap. 11.16 2. This conceit as it is Vntrue so it is contrary to the design of the Apostle For to assert the Messiah to be the Son of God in the same way with men doth not tend at all to prove him more excellent than the Angels but rather leaves us just ground of suspecting their preference above him 3. It is contrary unto other declared Principles of the Authors of this Assertion They else-where affirm that the Lord Christ was the Son of God on many accounts as first and principally because he was conceived and born of a Virgin by the power of God now surely all Believers are not partakers with him in this kind of Sonship Again they say he is the Son of God because God raised him from the dead to confirm the Doctrine that he had taught which is not so with Believers Also they say he is the Son of God and so called upon the account of his sitting at the Right Hand of God which is no less his peculiar priviledge than the former So that this is but an unhappy attempt to lay hold of a word for an advantage which yields nothing in the issue but trouble and perplexity Nor can the Lord Christ which is affirmed in the last place be called the Son of God and the first-born because in him was that Holiness which is required in the new Covenant for both all Believers under the Old Testament had that Holiness and likeness unto God in their degrees and that Holines consists principally in Regeneration or being born again by the Word and Spirit out of a corrupted estate of death and sin which the Lord Christ was not capable of Yea the truth is the Holiness and Image of God in Christ was in the kind of it that which was required under the first Covenant an Holiness of perfect Innocency and perfect Righteousness in Obedience So that this last invention hath no better success than the former It appeareth then that the Lord Christ is not called the first-begotten or the first-born with any such respect unto others as should include him and them in the same kind of Filiation To give therefore a direct account of this Appellation of Christ we may observe that indeed the Lord Christ is never absolutely called the first-begotten or first-born with respect either to his Eternal Generation or to the Conception and Nativity of his Humane Nature In respect of the former he is called the Son and the only begotten Son of God but no where the first-born or first-begotten and in respect of the latter indeed he is called the first-begotten Son of the Virgin because she had none before him but not absolutely the first-born or first-begotten which Title is here and else-where ascribed unto him in the Scripture It is not therefore the thing it self of being the first-born but the Dignity and Priviledge that attended it which are designed in this Appellation So Col. 1.15 he is said to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the first-born of the creation which is no more but he that hath Power and Authority over all the creatures of God The word which the Apostle intends to express is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which oft-times is used in the sense now pleaded for namely to denote not the birth in the first place but the priviledge that belonged thereunto So Psal. 89.27 God is said to make David his 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 his first-born which is expounded in the next words higher than the Kings of the earth So that the Lord Christ being the first-born is but the same which we have insisted on of his being Heir of all which was the priviledge of the first-born And this priviledge was sometimes transmitted unto others that were not the first-born although the natural course of their nativity could not be changed Gen. 21.10 chap. 49. v. 3 4 8. The Lord Christ then by the appointment of the Father being entrusted with the whole Inheritance of Heaven and Earth and Authority to dispose of it that he might give out portions to all the rest of God's family is and is called the first-born thereof There remains now but one word more to be considered for the opening of this Introduction of the ensuing Testimony and that is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 he saith that is God himself saith they are His words which shall be produced What ever is spoken in the Scripture in his name it is his speaking and he continueth to speak it unto this day He speaks in the Scripture unto the end of the world This is the foundation of our faith that which it riseth from and that which it is râ—solved into
God speaketh and I suppose we need no interposition of Church or Tradition to give Authority or Credit unto what he says or speaks This then is the sum of these words of the Apostle Again in another place where the Holy Ghost fore-tells the bringing forth into the world and amongst men him that is the Lord and Heir of all to undertake his work and to enter into his Kingdom and Glory the Lord speaks to this purpose Let all the Angels of God worship him To manifest this testimony to be apposite unto the confirmation of the Apostles assertion three things are required 1. That it is the Son who is intended and spoken of in the place from whence the words are taken and so designed as the Person to be worshipped 2. That they are Angels that are spoken unto and commanded to worship him 3. That on these suppositions the words prove the Preheminence of Christ above the Angels For the two former with them that acknowledge the Divine Authority of this Epistle it is sufficient in general to give them satisfaction The place is applied unto Christ and this passage unto the ministring Angels by the same Spirit who first wrote that Scripture But yet there is room left for our enquiry how these things may be evidenced whereby the strength of the Apostles Reasonings with them who were not yet convinced of the infallibility of his Assertions any farther than they were confirmed by testimonies out of the Old Testament and the faith of the Antient Church of the Hebrews in this matter may be made to appear as also a check given to their boldness who upon pretence of the impropriety of these Allegations have questioned the Authority of the whole Epistle And our first enquiry must be whence this testimony is taken Many of the Antients as Epiphanius Theodoret Euthymius Procopius and Anselm conceive the words to be cited from Deut. 32.42 where they expresly occur in the Translation of the LXX 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Rejoyce ye Heavens with him and let all the Angels of God worship him But there are two considerations that put it beyond all pretensions that the words are not taken from this place of the LXX 1. Because indeed there are no such words in the Original Text nor any thing spoken that might give occasion to the sense expressed in them but that whole Verse is inserted in the Greek Version quite besides the scope of the place Now though it may perhaps be safely granted that the Apostles in citing the Scripture of the Old Testament did sometimes use the words of the Greek Translation then in use yea though not exact according to the Original whilst the sense and meaning of the Holy Ghost was retained in them yet to cite that from the Scripture as the word and testimony of God which indeed is not therein nor was ever spoken by God but by humane failure and corruption crept into the Greek Version is not to be imputed unto them And indeed I no way question but that this addition unto the Greek Text in that place was made after the Apostle had used this testimony For it is not unlikely but that some considering of it and not considering from whence it was taken because the words occur not absolutely and exactly in the Greek any where inserted it into that place of Moses amidst other words of an alike sound and somewhat an alike importante such as immediately precede and follow the clause inserted 2. The Holy Ghost is not treating in that place about the Introduction of the First-born into the world but quite of another matter as is evident upon the first view of the Text so that this testimony is evidently not taken from this place nor would nor could the Apostle make use of a testimony liable unto such just exceptions Later Expositors generally agree that the words are taken out of Psal. 97. v. 7. where the Original is rendred by the LXX 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which with a very small variation in the words and none at all in the sense is here expressed by the Apostle And let all the Angels of God worship him The Psalm hath no Title at all in the Original which the Greek Version noteth affirming that it is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but it addes one of its own namely 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 A Psalm of David when his land was restored Hence it is referred by some to the time of his return unto Hierusale◠after he had been expelled the Kingdom by Absolom by others with more probability to the time of his bringing the Ark into the Tabernacle from the house of Obed-edom when the land was quieted before him And unquestionably in it the Kingdom of God was shadowed out under the Type of the Kingdom of David which Kingdom of God was none other but that of the Messiah It is evident that this Psalm is of the same Nature with that which goes before yea a part of it or an Appendix unto it The first words of this take up and carrie on what is affirmed in the tenth verse or close of that so that both of them are but one continued Psalm of Praise Now the Title of that Psalm and consequently this is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 A new song v. 1. which Psalms as Rashi confesseth are to be referred unto the World to come that is the Time and Kingdome of the Messiah So Kimchi affirms that this Psalm and that following respect the time when the people shall be delivered from the Captivity out of all Nations that is the time of the Messiah And Rakenati affirms that the last verse of it He cometh to judge the earth can respect nothing but the coming and reign of the Messiah Thus they out of their Traditions Some of the Antients I confess charge them with corrupting this Psalm in the version of the 10 verse affirming that the words sometimes were 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Lord reigned from the Tree denoting as the say the Cross. So Justin Martyr in his Dialogue with Trypho And after him the same words are remembred by Tertullian ad Judae cap. 10. ad Marci lib. 3. And Augustin Enarr in Psal. 95. And though the fraud and corruption pretended be improbable indeed impossible nor are the words mentioned by Justine acknowledged by the Targum or any Greek Translator or Hierom yet it is evident that all parties granted the Messiah and his Kingdom to be intended in the Psalm or there had been no need or colour for the one to suspect the other of corruption about it It is then evident that the Antient Church of the Jews whose Tradition is herein followed by the Modern acknowledged this Psalm to contain a description of the Kingdom of God in the Messiah and on their consent doth the Apostle proceed And the next Psalm which is of the same importance with this is entituled by the Targumist 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 A Prophetical Psalm namely
of the Kingdom and Reign of the Messiah But the matter of the Psalm it self makes it manifest that the Holy Ghost treateth in it about God's bringing in the first-born into the world and the setting up of his Kingdom in him A Kingdom is described wherein God would reign which should destroy Idolatry and false-worship a Kingdom wherein the Isles of the Gentiles should rejoyce being called to an interest therein a Kingdom that was to be preached proclaimed declared unto the encrease of Light and Holiness in the world with the manifestation of the glory of God unto the ends of the earth every part whereof declareth the Kingdom of Christ to be intended in the Psalm and consequently that it is a Prophesie of the bringing in of the first-begotten into the world 2. Our second enquiry is Whether the Angels be intended in these words They are as was before observed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 omnes dii and are so rendred by Hierom Adorate eum omnes dii and by ours Worship him all ye gods The preceding words are Confounded be all they that serve graven images 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that boast themselves in or of idols Vanities Nothings as the word signifies whereon ensues this Apostrophe Worship him 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 all ye gods And who they are is our present enquiry Some as all the Modern Jews say that it is the gods of the Gentiles those whom they worship that are intended so making 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 gods and vain idols to be the same in this place But 1. It cannot be that the Psalmist should exhort the idols of the Heathen some whereof were Devils some dead men some inanimate parts of the Creation unto a reverential worshipping of God reigning over all Hence the Targumist seeing the vanity of that Interpretation perverts the words and renders them Worship before him all ye Nations which serve idols 2. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Elohim is so far in this place from being exegetical of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 gods or vain idols that it is put in direct Opposition unto it as is evident from the words themselves 3. The word Elohim which most frequently denoteth the true God doth never alone and absolutely taken signifie false gods or idols but only when it is joyned with some other word discovering its application as his god or their gods or the gods of this or that people in which case it is rendred by the LXX sometimes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 an idol sometimes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 an idol made with hands sometimes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 an abomination but here it hath no such limitation or restriction Whereas therefore there are some Creatures who by reason of some peculiar Excellency and likeness unto God or subordination unto him in his work are called gods it must be those or some of them that are intended in the expression now these are either Magistrates or Angels First Magistrates are somewhere called Elohim because of the Representation they make of God in his Power and their peculiar subordination unto him in their working The Jews indeed contend that no other Magistrates but only those of the Great Sanedrin are any where called gods but that concerns not our present enquiry some Magistrates are so called but none of them are here intended by the Psalmist there being no Occasion administred unto him of any such Apostrophe unto them Secondly Angels also are called Elohim 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 1 Cor. 8.5 They have the Name of God attributed unto them as we have shewed before in some instances And these alone are they whom the Psalmist speaks unto Having called on the whole Creation to rejoyce in the bringing forth of the Kingdom of God and pressed his Exhortation upon things on the Earth he turns unto the ministring Angels and calls on them to the discharge of their duty unto the King of that Kingdom Hence the Targumist in the beginning of Psal. 96. which is indeed in the beginning of this expresly mentioneth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 his high Angels joyning in his praise and worship using the Greek word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for distinction sake as on the same account it often occurs in the Targum We have thus evinced that the Psalm treats about the bringing in of the first-born into the world as also that they are the ministring Angels who are here commanded to worship him For the command it self and the nature of it it consisted in these two things 1. A declaration of the state and condition of the Messiah which is such as that he is a meet Object of Religious Adoration unto the Angels and attended with peculiar motives unto the discharge of their duty The former he hath from his Divine Nature the latter from his Work with his State and Dignity that ensued thereon 2. An intimation of the pleasure of God unto the Angels not that Divine Worship was absolutely due unto the Son of God which they knew from the first instant of their Creation but that all Honour and Glory were due unto him on the account of his Work and Office as Mediator and King of his Church 3. It remaineth only that we shew that this testimony thus explained was suitable unto the Apostles design and purpose and did prove the Assertion in the Confirmation whereof it is produced Now this is a matter of so full and clear an evidence that it will not at all detain us For it is impossible that there should be any more clear or full demonstration of this truth That the Lord Christ hath an unspeakable Preheminence above the Angels than this that they are all appointed and commanded by God himself to adore him with Divine and Religious Worship We may now therefore consider what Observations the words will afford us for our own instruction It appears then from hence 1. That the Authority of God speaking in the Scripture is that alone which Divine Faith rests upon and is to be resolved into He saith It was the begetting of faith in some of the Hebrews and the increase or establishment of it in others that the Apostle aimed at That which he proposeth to them as the Object of their faith that which they were to believe was that Excellency of the Person and Kingly Authority of the Messiah wherein they had not as yet been instructed And hereof he endeavours not to beget an Opinion in them but that Faith which cannot deceive or be deceived To this end he proposeth that unto them which they ought to submit unto and which they may safely rest in For as Faith is an Act of Religious Obedience it respects the Authority of God requiring it and as it is a Religious infallible assent of the mind it regards the Truth and Veracity of God as its Object On this alone it rests God saith And in what ever God speaks in the Scripture his Truth and Authority manifest themselves to
and Works of God are ascribed unto him Nor was it now in question whether Christ was God or no but whether he were more Excellent than the Angels that gave the Law And what more effectual course could be taken to put an end to that Enquiry than by proving that he made the Heaven and Earth that is producing a testimony wherein the creation of all things is assigned unto him is beyond the wisdom of man to invent 3. He addes That Christ might be spoken of in this place either in respect of his Human◠Nature or of his Divine if of the former to what end should he make mention of the creation of Heaven and Earth Christ as a man and as made above the Angels made not Heaven and Earth If as God how could he be said to be made above the Angels But the answer is easie Christ is said to be made above and more excellent than the Angels neither absolutely as God nor absolutely as man but as he was God-Man the Mediator between God and man in which respect as Mediator for the discharge of one part of his Office he was a little while made lower than they and so the Creation of Heaven and earth does demonstrate the Dignity of his Person and the Equity of his being made more excellent than the Angels in his Office And this fully removes his following exceptions that the remembring of his Deity could be no argument to prove that the Humanity was exalted above the Angels for it is not an argument of the Exaltation of his Humanity but the demonstration of the Excellency of his Person that the Apostle hath in hand 4. He alledgeth That it is contrary to the perpetual use of the Scripture to affirm absolutely of Christ that he created any thing When any creation is ascribed unto him it is still applied to him as the immediate cause and said to be made by him or in him he is no where absolutely said to create And if he created the world why did not Moses as plainly attribute that unto him as the Writers of the New Testament do the new Creation Answ. Were it affirmed in this only place that Christ made all things yet the words being plain and evident and the thing it self agreeable to the Scripture in other places and not repugnant to any testimony therein contained there is no pretence for them who truly reverence the Wisdom and Authority of the Holy Ghost in the Word to deny the words to be spoken properly and directly Nor if we may take that course will there be any thing left sacred and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the Scripture Besides we have shewed already the vanity of that distinction of God's making things by Christ as though it denoted any subordination in causality nor will the Socinians themselves admit of any such thing but confute that notion in the Arians But this is not the only place wherein it is affirmed that Christ made all things that are in the Heaven and the Earth Joh. 1.1 2. Col. 1.16 v. 3. of this Chapter with sundry other places affirm the same For what they exact of Moses did we not believe that God knew what Revelation of himself became that dark dispensation better than they we might consider it But yet there are even in Moses himself many and his Expositors the Prophets more Testimonies of the Creation of the world by the Word that is the Son of God which have elsewhere been opened and vindicated 5. He concludes That the Order and Method of the Apostles procedure do evince that this Creation of Heaven and Earth is not attributed unto him For we see that he proves the excellency of Christ above Angels from his name that he is by the way of eminency called the Son of God and then he proceeds to his adoration by Angels and in the third place he goes on to the Kingly Honour and Throne of Christ after which he produceth the testimony we insist upon and then adds the end of that Kingdom which Christ now administreth in the Earth to what end in this discourse should he mention the Creation of Heaven and Earth when if that be omitted all the series of the discourse agrees and hangs well together For having declared the Kingdom of Christ with the continuance of his person for ever he asserts an eminent effect of the Kingdom in the abolition of Heaven and Earth and then the end of that Kingdom it self But this Analysis of the Apostles discourse agreeth not to the mind of the Apostle or his Design in the place nor to the Principles of the men that formed it nor is indeed any thing but vain words to perswade us that the Apostle did not say that which he did say and which is written for our instruction It is not first agreeable to their own Principles For it placeth the naming of Christ the Son of God and his Adoration by the Angels as antecedent to his being raised to his Kingly Throne both which especially the latter they constantly make consequent unto it and effects of it Nor is it at all agreeable to the Apostles design which is not to prove by these Testimonies directly that Christ was exalted above Angels but to shew the Dignity and Excellency of his person who was so exalted and how reasonable it is that it should be so which is eminently proved by the Testimonie under consideration For the proof of this Excellency the Apostle produceth those Testimonies that are given unto him in the Old Testament and that as to his Name his Honour and Glory and his Works in this place Neither is there any Reason of ascribing the Destruction of Heaven and Earth unto the Kingly Power of Christ excluding his Divine Power in their Creation for the Abolition of the world if such it is to be or the change of it is no less an effect of Infinite Power than the Creation of it nor doth it directly appertain to the Kingdom of Christ but by accident as do other works of the Providence of God These Exceptions then being removed before we proceed to the Interpretation of the words we shall see what Evidence may be added unto what we have already offered from the Psalm to evince and prove that this whole Testimony doth belong unto him which were there no other as there are very many Testimonies to this purpose were abundantly sufficient to determine this Controversie 1. We have the Authority of the Apostle for it ascribing it unto him the word And in the beginning of the Verse relates confessedly unto but unto the Son he saith v. 8. as if he had said but unto the Son he saith thy Throne O God is for ever and ever and to the Son he said Thou O God in the beginning hast founded the earth Again the whole Testimony speaks of the same person there being no colour of thrusting another person into the Text not intended in the beginning so that if any
Eternity and their fear of Eternity embitters all things that they should use for the relief of their frailty and that security which they provide against both encreaseth their misery by sin here and suffering hereafter 2. This also will teach us how to use these earthly things how dying Persons should use dying creatures That is to use them for our present service and necessity but not as those that look after rest or satisfaction in them which they will not afford us Vse the world but live on Christ. 3. Not to despond under a sense of our present frailty we see what blessed relief is provided against our fainting on that account Verse XIII THe next Verse contains the last Testimony produced by the Apostle for the confirmation of the Preheminence of the Lord Christ above Angels in the words ensuing Ver. 13. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 There is no difference about the reading of these words As they are here expressed by the Apostle so are they in the Translation of the LXX and the Original Text is exactly rendred by them Verse 13. But unto which of the Angels said he at anytime Sit thou on my right hand until I make put place thine enemies thy foot-stool the foot-stool of thy feet The usefulness of this testimony for the confirmation of the Dignity and Authority of the Messiah is evidenced by the frequent quotation of it in the New Testament as by our Saviour himself Matth. 22.42 by Peter Acts 2.34 35. and twice by our Apostle in this place and 1 Cor. 15.28 As the words are here used we may consider the Introduction of the Testimony and the Testimony it self The Introduction of the Testimony is by way of Interrogation Vnto which of the Angels said he at any time And herein three things may be observed 1. That in the Interrogation a vehement negation is included He said not at any time to any Angels he never spake these words or the like concerning them there is no testimony unto that purpose recorded in the whole Book of God The way of Expression puts an emphasis upon the denial And the speaking here relates unto what is spoken in the Scripture which is the only means of our knowledge and rule of our faith in these things 2. That he makes application of this testimony to every Angel in heaven severally considered For whereas he had before sufficiently proved the Preheminence of the Messiah above the Angels in general to obviate their thoughts about the especial Honour and Dignity of any one or more Angels or Angels in a singular manner such as indeed they conceived he applies the present testimony to every one of them singly and individually considered Vnto which of the Angels said he at any time 3. A tacit Application of this testimony unto the Son or the Messiah unto the Angels he said not but unto the Son he said Sit thou on my right hand That the testimony it self doth clearly prove the intendment of the Apostle provided the words were originally spoken of him or to him unto whom they are applied is beyond all exceptions For they contain an Elogium of him of whom they are spoken and an assignation of Honour and Glory to him beyond what ever was or can be ascribed unto any Angel what ever It remains therefore that this be first proved and then the importance of the testimony it self explained 1. For those that believe the Gospel the Authority of the Lord Christ and his Apostles applying this testimony unto him is sufficient for their conviction By our Saviour as was observed it is applied unto the Messiah in Thesi Matth. 22.42 43 44. And had not this been generally acknowledged by the Scribes and Pharisees and whole Church of the Jews as it had not been to his purpose to have mentioned it so they had not been reduced unto that conviction and shame by it as they were The Apostles apply it unto the true Messiah in Hypothesi and herein doth our faith rest 2. But a considerable part of the controversie which we have with the Jews relating much unto this Psalm we must yet farther clear the application of it unto the Messiah from their exceptions Of the Targum or Chaldee Paraphrase there are two Copies one printed in Arias Bible the other in the Basil Edition by Buxtorf The Title of the Psalm in both of them is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 A song by the hand of David And the beginning of it is thus rendred by the former of them The Lord said by his word that he would give me the Kingdom because I studied the doctrine of the Law of his right hand wait thou until I make thine enemies thy foot-stool By the other thus The Lord said by his word that he would appoint me the Lord of all Israel but he said unto me again Stay for Saul who is of the Tribe of Benjamin until he die for a Kingdom will not admit of a Companion and after that I will make thine enemies thy foot-stool Besides what appears from other considerations it is hence sufficiently evident that this Targum was made after the Jews began to be exercised in the controversie with Christians and had learned to corrupt by their glosses all the testimonies given in the Old Testament unto the Lord Christ especially such as they sound to be made use of in the New Their corrupting of the sense of the Holy Ghost in this place by a pretended Translation is openly malitious against evident light and conviction The Psalm they own from the Title to be written by David but they would have him also to be the subject of it to be spoken of in it And therefore those words The Lord said unto my Lord they translate The Lord said unto me which assertion is contrary to the Text and false in it self for who ever were the Pen-man of the Psalm he speaks of another person The Lord said unto my Lord say they The Lord said unto me And thereunto are annexed those imaginations about studying the Law and waiting for the death of Saul which in no case belongs to the Text or matter in hand Others therefore to avoid this Rock affirm that the Psalm speaks of David but was not composed by him being the work of some other who calls him Lord. So David Kimchi on the place And this he endeavours to prove from the inscription of the Psalm 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is saith he A Psalm spoken to David for it denotes the third and not the second Case or variation of Nouns But this is contrary to the use of that Prefix throughout the whole Book of Psalms and if this observation might be allowed all Psalms with this Title 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 le David which are the greatest part of those composed by him must be adjudged from him contrary to the received sense and consent of Jews and Christians But fully to manifest the folly of this pretence and that the Author
from the beginning of the world unto the end of it think otherwise and will glorifie Godto eternity for the righteousness of his judgments on them thatobey not the Gospel But Secondly Suppose the destruction of these persons be in itself righteous yet there may be some remedy and relief provided for them that they maynot actually fall under it there may yet some way of escape remain for them and so their ruine not be so unavoidable as is pretended It hath been shewed that itwas a righteous thing that the transgressors of the Law should perish and yet a way of escape is providedfor them God is merciful and things may be found atthe last day otherwise than now they are reported at least allthat Faith Diligence Obedience and Holiness which is spoken of is not required to free men from being neglecters of the Gospel so that they who come short of them may nevertheless escape I answer that we are not now discoursing of the Nature of that Faith and Obedience which is required tointerest men in Gospel salvation But certain it is that it will be found to be that which the Word requires and no other even that faith which purifieth the heart that faith which reformeth the life that faith which is fruitful in good works that faith which bringeth forth universal Holiness without which no man shall see God A faith consisting with the love and service of sin with neglect of Gospel duties with conformity to the Word with a sensual profane or wicked life will stand men in no stead in this matter But this is not the subject of our present discourse It may suffice in general that the Faith and Obedience which the Gospel requireth are indispensably necessary to free men from being Gospel despisers what they are is all our concernment to enquire and learn for where they are wanting there is no relief nor remedy what ever wind and ashes of vain hopes men may feed upon and deceive themselves withall It is true there was a remedy provided for the transgression of the Law and this remedy was 1. Reasonable in that there was no mixture of mercy or grace in that dispensation And God saw meet to glorifie those properties of his Nature as well as those which before shone forth in the Creation of all things and giving of the Law Pardoning mercy was not sinned against in the breach of the Law and therefore that might interpose for a relief which was done accordingly And yet 2. Neither would this have been either reasonable or righteous if that only and last way of satisfying the Righteousness and the Law by the sufferings and Sacrifice of the Son of God had not intervened Without this Mercy and Grace must have eternally rested in the bosome of God without the least exercise of them as we see they are in respect unto the Angels that sinned whose Nature the Son of God assumed not thereby to relieve them And 3. This relief was declared immediately upon the entrance of sin and the promises of it renewed continually until it waswrought and accomplished And hereby it became the subject of the whole Book of God and the principal matter of all entercourse between God and sinners But all these things fully discover that there neither is nor can any relief be provided for them that sin against the Gospel For 1. From what spring what fountain should it proceed Mercy and Grace are principally sinned against in it and their whole design of it therein defeated The utmost of mercy and grace is already sinned against and what remaineth now for the relief of a sinner Is there any other Propertie of the Divine Nature whose consideration will administer unto men any ground of hope Is there any thing in the Name of God in that Revelation that he hath made of himself by his Works or in his Word to give them encouragement Doubtless nothing at all But yet suppose that God had not laid out all the riches and treasures of his Wisdom Grace Love and Goodness in Gospel salvation by Jesus Christ which yet he affirmeth that he hath suppose that in Infinite Mercy there were yet a reserve for pardon by what way and means 2. Should it be brought forth and made effectual We have seen that God neither would nor could ever have exercised pardoning mercy towards sinners had not way been made for it by the Bloud of his Son what then Shall Christ die again that the despisers of the Gospel may be saved Why besides that the Scripture affirms positively that henceforth he dieth no more and that there is no more sacrifice for sin this is the most unreasonable thing that can be imagined Shall he die again for them by whom his death hath been despised Is the Bloud of Christ such a common thing as to be so cast away upon the lusts of men Besides when should he make an end of dying They who have once neglected the Gospel may do so upon a second trial nay undoubtedly would do so and thence should Christ often die often be offered and all still in vain Neither hath God any other Son to send to die for sinners he sent his only begotten Son once for all and he that believeth not on him must perish for ever In vain then will all mens expectations be from such a mercy as there is nothing to open a door unto nor to make way for its exercise Nay this mercy is a meer figment of secure sinners there is no such thing in God All the mercy and grace that God hath for his creatures is engaged in Gospel salvation and if that be despised in vain shall men look for any other Neither 3. Is there any word spoken concerning any such relief or remedy for Gospel neglecters Pardon being provided for transgressions of the Law instantly it is promised and the whole Scripture is written for the manifestation of it but as for a provision of mercy for them that despise theGospel where is any one word recorded concerning it Nay doth not the Scripture in all places fully and plainly witness against it He that believeth not shall be damned There remains no more sacrifice for sin He that believeth not the wrath of God abideth on him And will men yet feed themselves with hopes of mercy whilst they neglect the Gospel Well fare them who being not able to retrieve secure sinners against this light and evidence of the want of any relief reielved for them have carried the whole matter behind the curtain and invented a Purgatory for them to help them when they are gone from hence and cannot return to complain of them by whom they are deceived But this also as all other reliefs will prove a broken reed to them that lean on it for they who neglect the Gospel must perish and that eternally for the mouth of the Lord hath spoken it Thirdly Then all hopes of escaping must arise from hence That he whose right it is
〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Syriack quite omits 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and reads only 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 non enim for he did not V.L. nusquam enim 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 he renders usquam any where and on the consideration of the negative particle is nusquam no where Beza non enim utique as Ours for verily he took not not reaching the force or use of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Arias non enim videlicet which answers not the intent of this place Erasmus fully and properly non enim sane usquam for verily not any where That is in no place of the Scripture is any such thing testified unto which way of Expression we observed our Apostle to use before Chap. 1.5 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Syr. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ex Angelis assumpsit he took not of or from among the Angels that is of their nature V.L. Arias angelos apprehendit he doth not take hold of Angels Beza Angelos assumpsit he assumed not he took not Angels to himself 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by an Enallage of time which ours follow He took not on him the nature of Angels But this change of the Tense is needless For the Apostle intends not to express what Christ had done but what the Scripture saith and teacheth concerning him in this matter That no where affirms that he takes hold of Angels The remaining words are generally rendered by Translators according to the Analogie of these Sed apprehendit assumit assumpsit semen Abrahae he laid hold of he takes he took the seed of Abraham only the Aethiopick reads them did he not exalt the seed of Abraham departing from the sense of the words and of the Text. The constant use of this word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the New Testament is to take hold of And so in particular it is elsewhere used in this Epistle Chap. 8.9 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the day that I took them by the hand In other Authors it is so variously used that nothing from thence can be determined as to its precise signification in this or any other place The first and proper sense of it is acknowledged to be to take hold of as it were with the hand And however the sense may be interpreted the Word cannot properly be translated any otherwise than to take For what some contend that the Effect or end of taking hold of that is to help to vindicate into liberty whence by Castalio it is rendered opitulatur yet it belongs to the design of the place not the meaning of the word which in the first place is to be respected Verse 16. For verily not any where doth he take Angels but he takes the seed of Abraham In the words there is first the Reference that the Apostle makes unto somewhat else whereby that which he declareth is confirmed For verily not any where that is that which he denyeth in the following words is no where taught in the Scripture as Chap. 7.5 For unto which of the Angels said he at any time That is there is no Testimony extant in the Scripture concerning them to that purpose So here no where is it spoken in the Scripture that Christ taketh Angels And what is so spoken he is said to do And thus also the Affirmative clause of his Proposition but he taketh the seed of Abraham is to be referred to the Scripture There it is promised there it is spoken and therein it is done by him Secondly That which he asserteth hath the nature of a discrete axiom wherein the same thing is denyed and affirmed of the disparates expressed and that univocally in the same sense he took not Angels but he took the seed of Abraham And this we being referred to the Scripture for the proof and confirmation of gives light and perfect understanding into the meaning of the words For how doth Christ in the Scripture take the seed of Abraham in such a sense as that therein nothing is spoken of him in reference unto Angels It is evident that it was in that he was of the Posterity of Abraham according to the flesh that he was promised to Abraham that he should be of his seed yea that he should be his seed as Gal. 3.6 This was the great Principle the great expectation of the Hebrews that the Messiah should be the seed of Abraham this was declared unto them in the Promise and this accordingly was accomplished And he is here said to take the seed of Abraham because in the Scripture it is so plainly so often affirmed that he should so do when not one word is any where spoken that he should be an Angel or take their nature upon him And this as I said gives us the true meaning of the words The Apostle in them confirms what he had before affirmed concerning his being made partaker of flesh and bloud together with the children This saith he the Scripture declares wherein it is promised that he should be of the seed of Abraham which he therein takes upon him and which was already accomplished in his being made partaker of flesh and bloud See Joh. 1.14 Rom. 9.5 Gal. 4.4 chap. 3.16 This then the Apostle teacheth us that the Lord Christ the Son of God according to the Promise took to himself the nature of man coming of the seed of Abraham that is into personal union with himself but took not the nature of Angels no such thing being spoken of him nor concerning him any where in the Scripture And this exposition of the words will be farther evidenced and confirmed by our examination of another which with great endeavour is advanced in opposition unto it Some then take the meaning of this Exposition to be that the Lord Christ by his participation of flesh and blood brought help and relief not unto Angels but unto men the seed of Abraham And they suppose to this purpose that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is put for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to help to succour to relieve to vindicate into liberty Of this mind are Castalio and all the Socinians among those of the Roman Church Ribera Estius also and A Lapide speak doubtfully in the case Of Protestants Camero and Grotius who affirms moreover that Chrysostom and the Greek Scholiasts so interpret the place and words which I should have marvelled at had I not long before observed him greatly to fail or mistake in many of his Quotations Chrysostom whom he names in particular expresly referreth this whole verse unto the Lord Christs Assumption of the nature of man and not of the nature of Angels The same also is insisted on by Theophylact and Oecumenius without any intimation of the sense that Grotius would impose upon them The Socinians embrace and endeavour to confirm this second Exposition of the words and it is their concernment so to do For if the words express that the Lord Christ assumed humane nature
Psalms and Prophets was very antient in their Church We have mention of it Luke 24.44 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that are written in the law of Moses and in the Prophets and in the Psalms that is in the whole Canonical Scripture And evident it is that this distribution is taken from the subject matter of those principal parts of it This reason of that distribution which they have by Tradition they not knowing or neglecting have feigned the rise of it in a different manner of Revelation and cast the particular books arbitrarily under what heads they pleased as is evident from sundry of them which they reckon unto the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Cethubim or Hagiographa which are with them of least esteem But we have a more sure rule both overthrowing that feigned distinction and perfectly equalizing all parts of divine Scripture as to their spring and original St. Peter calls the whole 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 2 Pet. 1.19 the word of Prophesie and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 v. 20. Prophesie and therefore it belongs not unto any peculiar part of it to be given out by Prophesie which is an affection of the whole And St. Paul also terms the whole Scriptuâ—◠〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Rom. 16.26 prophetical Scriptures or writings of the Prophets And when he demanded of Agrippa whether he believed the Scriptures he doth it in the same manner 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Acts 28.23 believest thou the prophets that is the Scriptures written by the spirit of Prophesie or by the inspiration 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 1 Pet. 1.12 of the spirit of Christ that was in them God of old spake 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Heb. 1.1 in his Revelation of himself unto them and in them and equally spake 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Luke 1.70 unto them by the mouth of his holy Prophets from the beginning And thus not this or that part but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 2 Tim. 3.16 all Scripture was given by inspiration And herein all the parts or books of it are absolutely equall And in the giving out of the whole 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 2 Pet. 1.21 holy men of God spake as they were moved by the holy Ghost So that whatever different means God at any time might make use of in the communication of his mind and will unto any of the Prophets or penmen of the Scripture it was this 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and being acted by the holy Ghost both as to Things and Words that rendred them infallible Revealers of him unto the Church And thus the foundation of the Canonical authority of the books of the Scripture is absolutely the same in and unto them all without the least variety either from any difference in kind or degree § 9 The same is their condition as to their being Canonical they are all so equally Some of the Antients used that term ambiguously and therefore sometimes call books Canonical that absolutely are not so as not being written by divine inspiration nor given by the Holy Ghost to be any part of the Rule of the Churches faith and obedience Thus the Constantinopolitan Council in Trulla confirms the Canons both of the Synod of Laodicea and the third of Carthage which agree not in the Catalogues they give us of books Canonical which without a supposition of the ambiguity of the word could not be done unless they would give an assent unto a plain and open contradiction And the Council of Carthage makes evident its sense in their Appendiâ—e annexed to the one and fortieth Canon wherein they reckon up the books of the holy Scripture Hoc etiam say they fratri consacerdoti nostro Bonifacio vel aliis earum partium Episcopis pro confirmando isto Canone innotescat quia a patribus ista accepimus legenda liceat etiam legi passiones Martyrum cùm Aniversarii dies celebrantur They speak dubiously concerning their own determination and intimate that they called the books they enumerated Canonical only as they might be read in the Church which priviledge they grant also to the stories of the sufferings of the Martyrs which yet none thought to be properly canonical The same Epiphanius testifies of the Epistles of Clemens But as the books which that Synod added to the Canon of Laodicea are rejected by Melito Origen Athanasius Hilarius Gregorius Nazianzen Cyrillus Hierosolimitamus Epiphanius Ruffinus Hierome Gregorius magnus and others so their reading and Citation is generally declared by them to have been only for direction of manners and not for the confirmation of the faith even as St. Paul cited an Iambick out of Mâ—nandâ—r or rather Euripides 1 Cor. 15.33 an hemistichium out of Aratus Acts 17.28 and a whole Hexameter out of Epimenides Tit. 1.12 non sunt canonici sed leguntur Catechumenis saith Athanasius They are not Canonical but are only read to the Cateâ—humeni And Hierome the Church reads them ad aedificationem plebis non ad Authâ—ritatem Ecclesiasticarum dogmatum confirmandam for the edification of the people but not for the confirmation of any points of faith But although some books truly Canonical were of old amongst some 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as Epiphanius speaks doubted of and some were commonly read that are certainly 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and rejectitious yet neither the mistake of the former nor later practice can give any countenance to an Apprehension of a second or various sort of books properly canonical For the interest of any book or writing in the canon of the Scripture accrewing unto it as hath been shewed meerly from its divine inspiration and giving by the Holy Ghost for a Rule measure and standard of faith and obedience unto the Church whatever advantage or worth to commend it any writing may have Yet if it have not the propertiâ—s mentioned of Divine inspiration and Confirmation it differs in the whole kind and not in degrees only from all those that have them so that it can be no part regulae regulantis but regulatae at the best not having 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or a self-credibility on its own account or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a self-sufficing Authority but is truth only materially by vertue of its Analogie unto that which is absolutely universally and perfectly so And this was well observed by Lindanus Impio saith he sacrilegio se contaminant qui in scripturarum christianarum corpore quosdam quasi gradus conantur locare quod unam eandemque spiritus sancti vocem impio humanae stultitiae discerniculo audent in varias impares discerpere disturbare Autoritatis classes They desile themselves with the impiety of Sacriledge who endeavour to bring in as it were divers degrees into the body of the Scriptures for by the impious discretion of humane folly they would cast the one voice of the Holy Ghost into various forms of unequal Authority As then whatever difference there may be as to the subject
of the Sacred Style is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 if Truth Gravity Authority and Majesty can render it so nor can any instance be given to the contrary And Secondly it every where becometh the Subject Matter it treateth of which because it is various it is impossible that the Style wherein it is expressed should be Vniform when yet notwithstanding all its variety it every where keeps its own property to be in Gravity and Authority still like unto its self and unlike to or distinct from all other Writings whatsoever Whence Austin rightly of the Holy Penmen Audeo dicere omnes qui rectè intelligunt quod illi loquuntur simul intelligere non eos aliter loqui debuisse I dare say that whosoever understands what they speak will also understand that they ought not to have spoken otherwise And Origen of the Writings of St. Paul in particular If any one saith he give himself to the diligent Reading of his Epistles 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 I know full well that either he will admire his great Conceptions and Sentences under a plain and vulgar Style or he will shew himself very ridiculous The things treated of in the Scripture are for the most part Heavenly Spiritual Supernatural Divine and nothing can be more fond than to look for such things to be expressed in a Flourish of Words and with various Ornaments of Speech fit to lead away the minds of men from that which they are designed wholly to be gathered unto the Admiration and Contemplation of Bodies that have a native Beauty and Harmony in the Composition of their parts are advantaged more by being clothed with fit Garments than by the Ornaments of gay Attire And the Spiritual Native Beauty of Heavenly Truths is better conveyed unto the minds of men by Words and Expressions fitted unto it plainly and simply than by any Ornaments of enticing Speech whatever and therefore we say with Austin that there is not any thing delivered in the Scripture but just as it ought to be and as the Matter requires Thirdly The Style of the holy Penmen is in a gracious condescension suited unto them and their capacity whereof far the greatest part of them with whom they had to do consisted This Origen at large insists upon in the beginning of his Fifth Book against Celsus The Philosophy and Oratory of the Heathen was suited principally if not solely to their capacity that were learned this the Authors and Professors of it aimed at namely that they might approve their skill and ability unto those who were able to judge of them The Scripture was written for the good of mankind in general and without the least design of any contemporation of it self to the Learning and Wisdom of men And this 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or Condescension unto the common Reason Sense Usage and Experience of mankind in general is very admirable in the holy Pen-men and absolutely peculiar unto them In this universal suitableness unto all the concernments of it consists that excellent simplicity of the Scripture Style whereby it plainly and openly without fraudulent Ornaments in common and usual Speech declares things Divine Spiritual and Heavenly with an holy accommodation of them to the understanding and capacities of men in such occasional variety as yet never diverts from those properties and characters wherein the Vniformity of the whole doth consist § 30 Besides all these Excellencies of the Style of Holy Writ with others that may be added unto them there is in it a secret Energy and efficacy for the subjecting of the minds of men unto its intention in all things Whether this prâ—ceed only and be imparted unto it from the matters treated of which are holy and heavenly or whether it be communicated unto it immediately by an impression of his Authority upon it by whom it is given out or whether it arise from both of them all that are conversant in it with faith and reverence do find the Truth of our Assertion by experience And Origen amongst others speaks excellently to this purpose 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The holy Scripture teacheth us that what is spoken though in it self it be true and fit to perswade is not able to conquer the minds of men unless power from God be communicated to the Speaker and Grâ—â—e from him do flourish in the things spoken themselves and it is not withâ—ut Divine influency thâ—t they speak with efficacy Hence ariseth the Spiritual peculiar 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of the Divine â—riters termed by St. Paul 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the demonstration of the Spirit and of power And herein as on other accounts the Word of God is quick and powerfull and sharper than any two edged sword Heb. 4.12 by which living Energy and Authority it evacuated and brought to nought all the Wisdom of this World that is all Philosophical Conceptions with all the Ornaments of Eloquence and Oratory The excellent Discourse of Austin on this Subject de Doctri Christiana lib. 4. cap. 6. is very well worthy consideration whither I refer the Reader that I may not too far divert from my present particular design § 31 What ever hath been thus spoken concerning the Style of the Sacred Scripture in General it is as applicable unto this Epistle unto the Hebrews as to any one portion of Holy Writ what ever That Simplicity Gravity Vnaffectedness suitableness to its Author Matter and End which commends the whole unto us are eminent in this part of it that Authority Efficacy and Energy which are implanted on the whole by him who supplied both sense and words unto the Penmen of it exert themselves in this Epistle also No defect in any of these can be charged on it that should argue it of any other extract than the whole Nothing so far singular as to be inconsistent with that harmony which in all their variety there is among the Books of the Holy Scripture as to the style and kind of Speech is any where to be found in it If any where as in the beginning of the first Chapter the Style seems to swell in its current above the ordinary banks of the Writings of the New Testament it is from the greatness and sublimity of the Matter treated on which was not capable of any other kind of Expression Doth the Penman of it any where use Words or Phrases not commonly or rarely or perhaps no where else used in the sense and way wherein they are by him applied it is because his Matter is peculiar and not elsewhere handled at least not on the same Principles nor to the same purpose as by him Doth he oftentimes speak in an Old Testament Dialect pressing Words and Expressions to the service and sâ—nse they were imployed in under the Tabernacle and Temple after they had been manumitted as it were and made free from their Typical importance in the Service and Spiritual Sense of the Gospel it is from the consideration of their state and
Exception insisted on though perhaps not containing the true at least the whole Cause of the Omission of an Apostolical Salutation in the entrance of it If then we would know the True and Just Cause of the Omission of the Authors § 19 name and mention of his Apostolical Authority in the entrance of this Epistle we must consider what were the Just Reasons of prefixing them unto his other Epistles Chrysostome in his Proem unto the Epistle to the Romans gives this as the only Reason of the mentioning the Name of the Writer of any Epistle in the Frontispiece of it otherwise than was done by Moses and the Evangelists in their Writings namely because they wrote unto them that were present and so had no cause to make mention of their own Names which were well enough known without the premising of them in their Writings whereas those who wrote Epistles dealing with them that were absent were necessitated to prefix their Names unto them that they might know from whom they came But yet this Reason is not absolutely satisfactory for as they who prefixed not their Names to their Writings wrote not only for the use and Benefit of those that were present and knew them but of all succeeding Ages who knew them not so many of them who did Preach and Write the Word of the Lord unto those that lived with them and knew them yet prefixed their Names unto their Writings as did the Prophets of Old and some who did write Epistles to them who were absent omitted so to do as St. John and the Author of this Epistle The real cause then of prefixing the Names of any of the Apostles unto their Writings was meerly the Introduction thereby of their Titles as Apostles of Jesus Christ and therein an Intimation of that Authority by and with which they wrote This then was the true and only reason why the Apostle St. Paul prefixed his Name unto his Epistles sometimes indeed this is omitted when he wrote unto some Churches where he was well known and his Apostolical Power was sufficiently owned because he joyned others with himself in his Salutation who were not Apostles as the Epistle to the Philippians chap. 1. and the second of the Thessalonians Unto all others he still prefixeth this Title declaring himself thereby to be one so authorized to reveal the Mysteries of the Gospel that they to whom he Wrote were to acquiesce in his Authority and to resolve their faith into the Revelation of the Will of God made unto him and by him the Church being to be built on the foundation of the Prophets and Apostles And hence it was that when something he had taught was called in question and opposed Writing in the Vindication of it and for their establishment in the Truth whom before he had instructed he doth in the entrance of his Writings singularly and Emphatically mention this his Authority Gal. 1.1 Paul an Apostle neither of man nor by man but by Jesus Christ and God the Father that raised him from the dead so intimating the absolute obedience that was due unto the Doctrine by him revealed By this Title I say he directs them to whom he wrote to resolve their assent into the Authority of Christ speaking in him which he tenders unto them as the proof and foundation of the Mysteries wherein they were instructed In his dealing with the Hebrews the case was far otherwise They who believed amongst them never changed the old foundation or Church-State grounded on the Scriptures though they had a new addition of Priviledges by their Faith in Christ Jesus as the Messiah now exhibited And therefore he deals not with them as with those whose Faith was built absolutely on Apostolical Authority and Revelation but upon the common Principles of the Old Testament on which they still stood and out of which Evangelical Faith was educed Hence the beginning of the Epistle wherein he appeals to the Scripture as the foundation that he intended to build upon and the Authority which he would press them withal supplies the Room of that intimation of his Apostolical Authority which in other places he maketh use of And it serves to the very same purpose For as in those Epistles he proposeth his Apostolical Authority as the immediate reason of their Assent and Obedience so in this he doth the Scriptures of the Old Testament And this is the true and proper cause that renders the prefixing of his Apostolical Authority which his Name must necessarily accompany needless because useless it being that which he intended not to ingage in this business And for himself he sufficiently declares in the close of his Epistle who he was for though some may imagine that he is not so certainly known unto us from what he there sayes of himself yet none can be so fond to doubt whether he were not thereby known to them to whom he wrote so that neither hath this Objection in it any thing of real weight or moment § 20 We have spoken before unto the Haesitation of the Latin Church which by some is objected especially by Erasmus and given the Reasons of it manifesting that it is of no force to weaken our Assertion unto which I shall now only add that after it was received amongst them as Canonical it was never questioned by any Learned Man or Synod of old whether St. Paul was the Author of it or no but they all with one consent ascribed it unto him as hath been at large by others declared The remaining Exceptions which by some are insisted on are taken from some passages in the Epistle it self that principally of Chap. 2. and the Third where the Writer of it seems to reckon himself among the number not of the Apostles but of their Auditors But whereas it is certain and evident that the Epistle was written before the Destruction of the Temple yea the beginning of those Wars that ended therein or the death of James whilest sundry of the Apostles were yet alive it cannot be that the Penman of it should really place himself amongst the generation that succeeded them so that the Words must of necessity admit of another Interpretation as shall be manifested in its proper place for whereas both this and other things of the same nature must be considered and spoken unto in the places where they occurr I shall not here anticipate what of necessity must be insisted on in its due season especially considering of how small importance the Objections taken from them are And this is the summ of what hath as yet by any been objected unto our assignation of this Epistle unto St. Paul by the consideration whereof the Reader will be directed into the Judgement he is to make on the Arguments and Testimonies that we shall produce in the Confirmation of our Assertion and these we now proceed unto under the several Heads proposed in the entrance of our Discourse § 21 Amongst the Arguments usually insisted on to prove
this Epistle to have been written by St. Paul the Testimony given unto it by St. Peter deserves Consideration in the first place and is indeed of it self sufficient to determine the Enquiry about it His Words to this purpose Epist. 2. Chap. 3. v. 15 16. are And account that the Long-suffering of our Lord is Salvation even as our beloved Brother Paul also according unto the Wisdom given unto him hath written unto you as also in all his Epistles speaking in them of these things in which are some things hard to be understood which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest as they do also the other Scriptures unto their own destruction To clear this Testimony some few things must be observed in it and concerning it As 1. That St. Peter wrote this Second Epistle unto the same Persons that is the same Churches and People to whom he wrote his First This to omit other Evidences of it himself testifies Chap. 3.1 This Second Epistle Beloved I now write unto you it was not only absolutely his Second Epistle but the Second which he wrote to the same Persons handling in both the same general Argument as himself in the next words affirms 2. That his First Epistle was written unto the Jews or Hebrews in the Asian Dispersion 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. to the Elect Strangers of the Dispersion of Pontus Galatia Cappadocia Asia and Bithynia Chap. 1.1 that is the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as St. James styles the same Persons Chap. 1.1 the twelve Tribes or Hebrews of the twelve Tribes of Israel in their Dispersion These 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 are those whom the Jews of Jerusalem called the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 John 7.35 the Dispersion or those of their Nation that were dispersed among the Gentiles Those especially they intend in the Greek Empire These they called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the dispersion or scattering of Israel when they were sifted amongst all Nations like the sifting of a Sieve Amos 9.9 Psal. 147.2 they are called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which the LXX according to the Phrase in their dayes render 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the dispersions or those scattered abroad of Israel as Isaiah calls them 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Chap. 27. v. 13. So that there is no question but that these were they whom St. Peter calls the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of Pontus Galatia c. As St. James extending his Salutation to the same people in all places the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of the Twelve Tribes Besides many things insisted on by St. Peter in these Epistles were peculiar to the Hebrews who also were his especial Care See 1 Epist. Chap. 1.10 11 12. Chap. 2.9 21. Chap. 3.5.6 Chap. 4.7 17. Eph. 2.19 20 21. Chap. 2.1 11 c. Chap. 3.10 11 12 13 14. and many other particular places of the same nature may be observed in them To summ up our Evidence in this particular Peter being in an especial manner the Apostle of the Circumcision or Hebrews Gal. 2.7 having by his first Sermon converted many of these strangers of Cappadocia Pontus and Asia Acts 2.9 10 41. ascribing that Title unto them to whom he wrote which was the usual and proper Appellation of them in all the World 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 James 1.1 John 7.35 treating with them for the most part about things peculiar to them in a special manner and that with Arguments and from Principles peculiarly known unto them as the places above quoted will manifest there remains no ground of Question but it was those Hebrews unto whom he wrote Nor are the Exceptions that are made to this Evidence of any such importance as once to deserve a remembrance by them who design not a protracting of their Discourses by insisting on things unnecessary Now it is plain in this Testimony asserted That St. Paul wrote a peculiar Epistle unto § 22 them unto whom St. Peter wrote his that is to the Hebrews he hath written unto you as also in all his Epistles that is in all his other Epistles Besides his other Epistles to other Churches and Persons he hath also written one unto you So that if St. Peters Testimony may be received St. Paul undoubtedly wrote an Epistle unto the Hebrews But this may be say some another Epistle and not this we treat on particularly that to the Galatians which treateth about Judaical Customs and Worship But this Epistle mentioned by St. Peter was written particularly unto the Hebrews in distinction from the Gentiles This to the Galatians is written peculiarly to the Gentiles in opposition to the Jewes so that a more unhappy instance could not possibly have been fixed upon Besides he treats not in it of the things here mentioned by St. Peter which are indeed the main Subject of the Epistle to the Hebrews But say others Paul indeed might write an Epistle to the Hebrews which may be lost and this that we have might be written by some other But whence this Answer should proceed but from a resolution 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 against Light and Conviction I know not May we give place to such rash and presumptuous Conjectures we shall quickly have nothing left entire or stable For why may not another as well say it is true Moses wrote Five Books but they are lost and these that we have under his Name were written by another It is not surely one jot less intolerable for any one without ground proof or Testimony to affirm that the Church hath lost an Epistle written to the Hebrews by St. Paul and taken up one in the room thereof written by no man knoweth whom This is not to deal with that Holy Reverence in the things of God which becomes us St. Peter declares that St. Paul in that Epistle which he wrote unto the Hebrews had § 23 declared the Long-suffering of God whereof he had minded them to be salvation We must see what was this Long-suffering of God how it was Salvation and how Paul had manifested it so to be The Long-sufferance Patience or Forbearance of God is either absolute toward man in general or special in reference unto some sort of Men or some kind of Sins or Provocations that are amongst them The first of these is not that which is here intended Nor was there any reason why St. Peter should direct the Jews to the Epistles of St. Paul in particular to learn the Long-suffering of God in General which is so plentifully revealed in the whole Scripture both of the Old and New Testament and only occasionly at any time mentioned by St. Paul There was therefore an Especial Long-suffering of God which at that time he exercised towards the Jews waiting for the Conversion and the gathering of his Elect unto him before that total and final destruction which they had deserved should come upon that Church and State This he compares to the Long-suffering of God
and Grace it will yield men no satisfaction which makes them constantly turn aside to other means and wayes of knowing and serving God This being so eminent in the Jews and the Medium they have fixed on to supply that want which they suppose to be in the Scripture but is indeed in themselves proving to be the great Engine of their hardening and obstinacy in their Infidelity I shall first declare what it is that they intend by the Orall Law and then briefly shew the absurdity and falseness of their pretensions about it though it must not be denyed that it is one of the most Antient Fables that is credited amongst any of the Sons of men at this day in the world § 6 This Orall Law they affirm to be an unwritten Tradition and Exposition of the written Law of Moses given unto him in Mount Sinai and committed by him to Joshua and the Sanhedrim to be by them delivered over by Orall Tradition unto those who should succeed them in the Government of that Church It doth not appear that in the dayes of Christ or his Apostles whilest the Temple was standing that there was any stated opinion amongst them about this Orall Law though it is evident that not long after it began to be received by the body of the People Nay it is evident that there was no such Law then acknowledged For the Sadduces who utterly reject all the main Principles of it were then not only tolerated but also in chief Rule one of them being High Priest That they had multiplyed many superstitious Observances amongst them under the name of Traditions is most clear in the Gospel and it doth not appear that then they knew whom to assign their original unto and therefore indefinitely called them the Traditions of the Elders or those that lived of old before them After the Destruction of their Temple when they had lost the life and spirit of that Worship which the Scripture revealed betaking themselves wholly unto their Traditional figments they began to bethink themselves how they might give countenance to their Apostacy from the Perfection and Doctrine of the written Law For this end they began to fancy that these Traditions were no less from God than the written Law it self For when Moses was forty dayes and forty nights in the Mountain they say that in the day time he wrote the Law from the mouth of God and in the night God instructed him in the Orall Law or unwritten Exposition of it which they have received by Tradition from him For when he came down from the Mount after he had read unto them the Written Law as they say he repeated to Aaron and Eleazer and the Sanhedrim all that secret instruction which he had received in the night from God which it was not lawfull for him to write but in especial he committed the whole to Joshua Joshua did the same to Eleazer as he did to his Son Phiâ—eas after whom they give us a Catalogue of several Prophets that lived in the ensuing generations all whom they employ in this service of conveying down the Orall Law to their Successors The High Priests also they give a place unto in this work of whom there were eighty three from the first Institution of that Office to the destruction of the Temple Joseph lib. 20. cap. 18. From Aaron to the building of Solomons Temple thirteen from thence to the Captivity eighteen all the rest take up the troublesome time of the Apostacy of their Church unto the finall ruine of it their Rulers being many because of their wickedness as themselves observe The last Person whom they would have to preserve the Orall Law absolutely pure was that Simeon whom they call 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Just mentioned by Jesus the Son of Syrach Chap. 50. And it is very observable that the latter Jews have left out Simeon the Son of Hillel whom their antient Masters placed upon the Roll of the Preservers of this Treasure supposing he might be that Simeon who in his old age received our Saviour in his arms when he was presented in the Temple Luke 2.25 a crime sufficient among the Jews to brand him with a perpetual ignominy neither are they alone in turning mens glory into reproach and shame After the destruction of the Temple and City when the evil Husbandmen were slain § 7 and the Vineyard of the Lord let out to others the Kingdom given to another Nation and therewith the Covenant sanctified use of the Scripture the remaining Jews having lost wholly the mind of God therein betook themselves to their Traditions and as I said before began to fancy and contend that they came from God himself whereas their Predecessors durst not plead any thing for them but that they came unto them from thâ—m of old that is some of the Masters of preceding Generations Hereupon a while after as I have elsewhere shewed at large one of them whom they call Rabbi Judâ— Humâ—si and Hakkadosh the Prince and the Holy took upon him to gather their scattered Traditions and to cast them into form order and method in Writing that they might be unto the Jews a Rule of Life and Worship for ever The Story of his work and undertaking is given us by Maimonides in Jad Chazacha the Authors of Sedar Olâ—â—n Halicoth Olam Tzemach David and many others and they all agree that this their great Master lived about the times of Marcus Antoninus two hundred years or thereabouts after the destruction of City and Temple This Collection of his they call 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Mishne or Mishnaioth being as is § 8 pretended 〈◊〉 repetition of the Law in an Exposition of it indeed a farrago of all sorts of Traditions true and false with a monstrous mixture of Lyes useless foolish and wicked The things contained in it are by themselves referred to five heads 1. The Orall Law received by Moses on Mount Sinai preserved by the means before declared 2. Orall Constitutions of Moses himself after he came down from the Mount 3. Constitutions and Orders drawn by various wayes of arguing 13. as Rambam tells us out of the written Law 4. The Answers and Decrees of the Sanhedrim and other wise men in former Ages 5. Immemoriall Customs whose original being unknown are supposed to be divine The Whole is divided into six parts noted with the initial letter of the word which § 9 signifies the chief things treated on in it As the first by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 z that is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Zeraim Seeds which is divided into eleven Massicktot or Treatises containing all of them seventy five Chapters The second by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 m that is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Moad or appointed feasts which is distributed into Twelve Massicktot containing in them eighty eight Chapters The Third by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of Women and is distributed in
Law is perfect and requiring no more in his Worship but what is in that Law prescribed See Psal. 19.8 Prov. 30.5 6. Deut. 4.1 2. And this perfection of the Written Law though it be perfectly destructive to their Tradions not only the Karaei among themselves do earnestly contend for but also sundry of their Gemarists do acknowledge especially when they forget their own concernments out of a desire to oppose the Gospel And to this head belong all the Arguments that Divines make use of to prove the perfection of the Scripture against the New Talmudists in Christianity 5. God every where sends his people to the Written Law of Moses for the Rule of their Obedience no where unto any Kabal Deut. 11.32 and chap. 10.12 13. Chap. 28.1 Josh. 1.7 8. Chap. 23.6 2 Chron. 30.18 Isa. 8.20 If there be such an Orall Law it is one that God would not have any man to observe which he calls none to the Obedience of nor did ever reprove any man for its Transgression And many more Arguments of the like nature may be added to prove the vanity of § 14 this pretence And yet this Figment is the bottom of the present Judaical Religion and obstinacy When the Apostle wrote this Epistle their Apostacy was not yet arrived at this rock of offence since their falling on it they have increased their blindness misery and ruine Then they were contented to try their cause by what God spake to their Fathers in the Prophets which kept open a door of hope and gave some advantages for their Conversion which are now shut up and removed untill God shall take this vail away from their faces that they may see to the end of the things that were to be done away By this means principally have they for many generations both shut out the § 15 Truth and secured themselves from Conviction For what ever is taught and revealed in the Scripture concerning the Person Office and Work of the Messiah seeing they have that which they esteem a Revelation of equall Authority herewithall teaching them a Doctrine quite of another nature and more suited unto their carnal Principles and Expectations they will rather rest in any evasions than give way to the Testimony thereof And whilest they have a firm perswasion as they have received by the Tradition of many Generations that the written Word is imperfect but an half Revelation of the mind of God in its self unintelligible and not to be received or understood but according to the sense of their Orall Law now recorded in their Talmuds what can the most plain and cogent Testimonies of it avail unto their Conviction And this hath been the fatall way and means of the grand Apostacy of both Churches Judaical and Christian. How far that of the Jews was overtaken with it in the dayes of our Lords Conversation on the Earth the Gospel doth abundantly declare and how they have brought it unto its height we have given now some brief account That of the Roman Church hath been the very same and hath at length arrived unto almost the same issue by the same degrees This some of them perceiving do not only defend the Pharisaical Opinion among the Jews about the Orall Law and Succession of their Traditions as consonant to the pretensions of their own Church but also openly avow that a very great number of their several respective Traditions are either the same or that they nearly resemble one another as doth expresly Josephus de Voysin in his Proaemium to the Pugio fidei of Raimundus Martini And because it is evident that the same have been the way and means whereby both the Judaical and Roman Church have apostatized and departed from the Truth and that they are the same also whereby they maintain and defend themselves in their Apostacy and refusal to return unto the Truth I shall 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 manifest their Consent and Agreement in this Principle about their Traditions and Authority of them which have been the Ruine of them both First The Jews expresly contend that their Orall Law their Mass of Traditions was § 16 from God himself Partly they say it was delivered unto Moses on Mount Sinai and partly added by him from Divine Revelations which he afterwards received Hence the Authority of it with them is no less than that of the Written Word which hath all its Authority from its Divine Original and the usefulness of it is much more For although they cannot deny but that this and that particular Tradition that is Practice Custom or Exposition of any place of Scripture was first introduced expressed and declared at such or such seasons by such Masters or Schools amongst them yet they will not grant that they were then first invented or found out but only that they were then first declared out of the Cabalistical Abyss wherein they were preserved from their first Revelation as all of them agree who have written any thing about the nature propagation and continuance of their Orall Law And this is the perswasion of the Romanists about their Cabal of Traditions They plead them to be all of a Divine Original partly from Christ and partly from his Apostles What ever they have added unto the written Word yea though it be never so contrary thereunto still they pretend that it is part of the Orall Law which they have received from them by living Tradition Let one Convention of their Doctors determine that Images are to be adored another that Transubstantiation is to be believed a third add a New Creed with an equall number of Articles unto the old let one Doctor advance the Opinion of Purgatory another of Justification by Works all is one these things are not then first invented but only declared out of that unsearchable Treasure of Traditions which they have in their Custody Had they not inlaid this Perswasion in the minds of men they know that their whole Fabrick would of its own accord have long since sunk into Confusion But they highly contend at this day that they need no other Argument to prove any thing to be of an Heavenly Extract and Divine Originall but that themselves think so and practise accordingly § 17 Secondly This Orall Law being thus given the Preservation of it seeing Moses is dead long ago must be enquired after Now the Jews assign a threefold Depository of it First The whole Congregation Secondly The Sanhedrim and Thirdly The High Priest To this End they affirm that it was three times repeated upon the descent of Moses from Mount Sinai as to what of it he had then received and his after additions had the same promulgation First It was repeated by himself unto Aaron Secondly By them both unto the Elders and Thirdly By the Elders unto the whole Congregation or as Maimonides in Jad Chazakah Moses delivered it unto Eleazar Phineas and Joshuah after the Death of Aaron by whom the Consistory was instructed therein who taught the People
those that follow He affirms they may be expounded by that of Philo de Coloniis 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 But whether this Platonical Declaration of the Nature and Work of the Word of God employed by him as an Instrument in the Making and Government of the World would have been accepted in the Primitive Church when this Place was vexed by the Arians and studiously vindicated by the Orthodox Fathers I much question But to return If the Law and the observance of it be the only Remedy provided of God against the sin and misery of man the only means of Reconciliation with him all that dyed before the giving of it must perish and that eternally But the contrary appears from this very consideration and is undeniably proved by our Apostle in the Instance of Abraham Gal. 3. v. 17. For he received the Promise and was taken into Covenant with God four hundred and thirty years before the giving of the Law And that Covenant conveyed unto him the Love and Favour of God with Deliverance from Sin and the Curse as themselves will not deny There was therefore a Remedy in this case provided long before the giving of the Law on Mount Sinai and therefore the Law was not given unto that purpose but for other Ends at large declared by our Apostle Either then they must grant that all the Patriarchs and he in especiall of whom they boast perished eternally or else that there was a means of Deliverance provided before the giving of the Law and consequently that the Law was not given for that End The first they will not do nor can without an absolute Renunciation of their own Sacred Writings wherein none have obtained a larger Testimony that they pleased God than they The latter therefore followeth undeniably If they shall say they had a way of Deliverance but God provided another afterwards as this would be spoken without Warrant or Authority from the Scripture so I desire to know both what that way was and why it was rejected Of Gods appointment it was and effectual it was unto them that embraced it and why it should be laid aside who can declare Again as was before observed there are two parts of the Law The Moral Precepts § 20 of it and the instituted Worship appointed in it Unto this latter part do the Sacrifices of it belong But neither of these are sufficient unto the End proposed nor jointly can they attain it Two things are evidently necessary from what hath been discoursed unto the Deliverance enquired after First That Man be reconciled unto God by the removal of the Curse and the Wrath due unto him for his Apostacy Secondly That his Nature be freed from that Principle of Sin and enmity against God the evil figment that it is tainted yea possessed withall And neither of these can be effected by the Law or either part of it For First The Moral Precepts of it are the same with those that were written in the heart of man by Nature or the Law of his Creation which he transgressed in his first Rebellion And he must be delivered from that guilt before any new Obedience can be accepted of him His old debt must be satisfied for before he can treat for a new Reward which inseparably follows all acceptable Obedience But this the Precepts of the Law take no notice of nor direct unto any way for its removal only supposing the doing of it by some other means it requires exact Obedience in them that come to God thereby Hence our Apostle concludes that it could not give life but was weak and insufficient in its self unto any such purpose Besides secondly it could not absolutely preserve men in its own Observation for it required that Obedience which never any sinner did or could in all things perform as the Scriptures of the Old Testament abundantly manifest For they tell us there is is no man that sinneth not 1 Kings 8. v. 46. 2 Chron. 6. v. 36. That if the Lord should mark iniquity no man could stand Psal. 130. v. 3. And that if he enter into Judgement according to the Law no man living can be justified in his sight Psal. 143. v. 2. To this Purpose see the excellent Discourse and invincible Reasonings of our Apostle Rom. chap. 3. 4. This the Holy Men of Old confessed this the Scripture bears testimony unto and this Experience confirmes seeing every sin and transgression of that Law was put under a Curse Deut. 27. v. 26. Where then there is no man that sinneth not and every sin is put under the curse the Law in the Preceptive part of it can be no means of delivery from the one or other but is rather a certain means of increasing and aggravating of them both Neither is there any Testimony given concerning any one under the Old Testament that he was any other way justified before God but by Faith and the Pardon of Sins which are not of the Works of the Law See Gen. 15. v. 6. Psal. 32. v. 1 2. Of Noah indeed it is said that he was upright and perfect in his Generation that is sincere in his Obedience and free from the open wickedness of the Age wherein he lived But as this was before the giving of the Law by Moses so the Ground of his Freedom and Deliverance is added to be the Gracious Love and Favour of God This the Jews themselves confess in Bereshith Rabba Sect. 29. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Even Noah himself who was left of them was not every way as he should be but that he found Grace or Favour in the eyes of the Lord. And to the same purpose they speak concerning Abraham himself elsewhere 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Thou findest that Abraham our Father inherited not this world and the world to come any otherwise than by Faith as it is said he believed God This part therefore of the Law is plainly convinced to be insufficient to deliver sinners from an Antecedent guilt and Curse due thereunto § 21 It remains then that the Sacrifices of the Law must yield the Relief enquired after or we are still at a loss in this matter And these the Jews would willingly place their chief confidence in they did so of old Since indeed they have been driven from their Observation they have betaken themselves unto other Helps that they might not appear to be utterly hopeless But they sufficiently manifest their great reserve against the Accusation of their Consciences to be in them by the ludicrous wayes of representing or rather counterfeiting of them that they have invented 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifies a man and among the Rabbins a Cock also Hence Ben Vzziel renders 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Ezion Geber The name of a City Deut. 2.8 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the City of a Cock And Isa. 22. v. 17. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is rendered by Hierom Gallus Gallinaceus Granting therefore that the Punishment of Geber is required unto
indignation against their obstinacy for any one seriously to consider how wofully they wrest the words up and down to make a tolerable application of them unto Hezekiah whom they would fix this Prophesie upon and on the occasion given us by the Targum I shall take a little view of their sentiments on this place of the Prophet That of old they esteemed a Prophesie of the Messiah not only the Targum as we have seen but the Talmud also doth acknowledge Besides also they manifest the same conviction in their futilous Traditions In Tractat. Saned Distino Cholech They have a Tradition that God thought to have made Hezekiah to be the Messiah and Senacherib to have been Gog and Magog but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Property of Judgement interposed and asked why David rather was not made the Messiah who had made so many Songs to the praise of God And Rabbi Hillel as we shall see afterwards contended that Israel was not any more to look for a Messiah seeing they enjoyed him in Hezekiah Now these vain Traditions arose meerly from the concessions of their old Masters granting the Messiah to be here spoken of and the craft of their later ones wresting the words unto Hezekiah so casting them into confusion that they knew not what to say nor believe But let us see how they acquit themselves at last in this matter Four things are here promised concerning this Child or Son that should be given § 33 unto the Church 1. That the Government should be on his shoulder 2. That his name should be callâ—d Wonderful Counsellor the mighty God the Everlasting Father the Prince of Peace 3. That of the increase of his Government there should be no end 4. That he should sit on the Throne of David to order it for ever And we may see how well they accommodate these things unto Hezekiah their endeavours being evidently against the Faith of the antient Church the Traditions of their Fathers and it may be doubted their own light and conviction First The Government shall be on his shoulder saith Sol. Jarchi Because the Rule and yoke of God shall be upon him in the study of the Law This pleaseth not Kimchi as it is indeed ridiculous and therefore he observeth that mention is not made of the Shoulder but with reference unto Burden and weight whence he gives this interpretation of the words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Because Ahaz served the King of Assyria and his burden was on his shoulder he sayes of this Child he shall not be a servant with his shoulder but the Government shall be on him And this it seems is all that is here promised and this is all the concernment of the Church in this Promise Hezekiah shall not serve the King of Assyria Neither is it true that Ahaz served the King of Assyria under tribute and it may seem rather that Hezekiah did so for a season seeing it is expresly said that he rebelled against him and served him no more 2 Chron. 18. v. 7. Yea plainly he did so and paid him by way of tribute three hundred Talents of Silver and thirty talents of Gold 2 Kings 18. v. 14. So He. Aben Ezra passeth over this expression without taking notice of it Secondly As to the name ascribed unto him they are for the most part agreed and § 34 unless that one evasion which they have fixed on will relieve them they are utterly silent Now this is as was before declared that the words are to be read The Wonderfull Counsellor the mighty God the Everlasting Father shall call his Name the Prince of Peace so that the Prince of Peace only is the name of the promised Child all the rest are the Name of God But 1. If words may be so transposed and shufled together as they are to produce this sense there will nothing be left certain in the Scripture nor can they give any one instance of such a disposal of words as they fancy in this place 2. The very reading of the words rejects this Gloss He shall call his Name Wonderfull 3. It is the name of the Child and not of God that gives him which is expressed for the comfort of the Church 4. What tolerable Reason can be given for such an accumulation of Names unto God in this place 5. There is nothing in the lâ—ast not any distinctive accent to separate between the Prince of Peace and the expressions foregoing but the same Person is intended by them all so that it was not Hezekiah but the mighty God himself who in the Person of the Son was to be incarnate that is here spoken of Besides on what account should Hezekiah so eminently be called The Prince of Peace § 35 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 A Prince is never used in the Scripture with reference unto any thing but he that is so called hath chief Power and Authority over that whereof he is the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Prince Chief or Captain as 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is the General or Chief Commander of the Army under whose Command and at whose disposal it is By the Greeks it is rendered 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as the Apostle calls our Lord Jesus Christ 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Acts 13.15 the Prince of Life and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Heb. 2. v. 10. The Prince or Captain of Salvation Nor is the word once in the Old Testament applied unto any one but he that had Power and Authority over that which he was the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or Prince of to give grant or dispose of it as he thought meet And in what sense then can Hezekiah be called the Prince of Peace Had he the Power of Peace of any sort in his hand Was he the Lord of it Was it at his disposal The most of his reign he spent in War first with his Neighbours the Philistins 2 Kings 18. v. 8. And afterwards with the King of Assyria who took all the Cities of Juda one or two only excepted 2 Kings 18. v. 13. And in what sense shall he be called the Prince of Peace The Rabbins after their wonted manner to fetch any thing out of a word whether it be ought to their Purpose or no answer that it was because of that saying Isa. 39. v. 8. For there shall be Peace and Truth in my dayes But this being spoken with respect unto the very latter part of his Raign and that only with reference unto the Babylonian Captivity which was afterwards to ensue is a sorry foundation to entitle him unto this illustrious Name the Captain Prince or Lord of Peace which bespeaks one that had all Peace and that in the Scripture Language is all that is Good or prosperous both temporal and spiritual in reference unto God and man in his power and disposal And yet this is the utmost that any of them pretend to give countenance unto this Appellation § 36 Abarbinel who heaps together
great is the Mysterie of § 9 Godliness God was manifest in the flesh justified in the Spirit seen of Angels Preached unto the Gentiles believed on in the World received up into Glory All things which concern the Messiah his Person Office and Work are exceedingly Mysterious as containing the principal effect of the Eternal Wisdom and Goodness of God and the sacred depths of the counsel of his Will Hence the things spoken of him in the Old Testament are unto carnal Reason full of seeming inconsistencies As for instance it is promised of him that he should be the seed of the Woman Gen. 3. v. 15. of the seed of Abraham Gen. 22. v. 18. and of the Posterity of David And yet that his name should be the Mighty God the Everlasting Father the Prince of Peace Isa. 9. v. 6. and of him it is said Thy Throne O God is for ever and ever Psal. 45. v. 6. that he is the Lord our Righteousness Jer. 23. v. 6. that he is the Lord of Hosts Zech. 2. v. 8. Moreover it is declared that he shall sit upon his Throne for ever and reign whilest his enemies are made his footstool Isa. 9. v. 7. Psalm 2.7 8. Psalm 45.6 7. and yet that he shall be cut off Dan. 9. v. 26. that he shall be pierced in his hands and feet Psalm 22. v. 16. slain by the sword of God Zech. 13. v. 7. and that in his death he shall have his grave made among the wicked and with the rich Isa. 53. v. 9. Alâ—o That he shall come with great Glory and the clouds of Heaven Dan. 7. v. 13 14. and that he shall come lowly riding on an Ass and a Colt the Foal of an Ass Zech. 9. v. 9. That the soul of the Lord was well pleased with him and alwayes delighted in him Isa. 42. v. 1. and yet that it pleased him to bruise him and put him to grief Isa. 53. v. 10. to forsake him Psalm 22. v. 1. That he was to be a King and a Priest upon his Throne Zech. 6. v. 13. and yet these things were inconsistent the Kingdom being annexed unto the family of David and the Priesthood to the Posterity of Aaron by Divine Constitution That he should be honoured and worshipped of all Nations Psal. 45. v. 11 12. Psal. 72. v. 10 11 15. and yet that he should be rejected and despised as one altogether undesirable Isa. 53. v. 3. That he should stand and feed or Rule in the Name and Majesty of God Micah 5. v. 4. and yet complains I am a worm and no man a reproach of Men and despised of the People Psal. 22. v. 6. All which with sundry others of the like nature concerning his Office and Work are clearly reconciled in the New Testament and their concurrence in the Person of our Lord Jesus Christ openly and fully declared § 10 At the time of his coming the Jews were generally as ignorant of these things as Nicâ—demus was of Regeneration they knew not how they might be And therefore when ever our Saviour intimated unto them his Divine Nature they were filled with rage and madness John 8. v. 58 59. They woâ—ld stone him because being a man he declared himself to be God John 10. v. 30 31 33. and yet when he proved it to them that the Messiah was to be so inasmuch as that being Davids Son yet David in Spirit calâ—ed him Lord they were confounded not being able to answâ—r him a word Matth. 22. v. 42 43 44 45 46. when he told them that the Son of Man the Messiah must be lifted up that is in his death on the Cross they objâ—cted unto him out of the Law that Christ abideth for ever John 12. v. 34. and they knew not how to reconcile these things Hence some of his own Disciples thought he could not be the Mâ—ssiah when they saw that he dyed Luke 24. v. 20 21. and the bâ—st of them seemed to have expected an outward temporal Kingdom But of all these difficulties as was said and seeming inconsistencies there is a blessed Reconciliation revealed in the Gâ—spel and an Application made of them to the Person of the Lord Jâ—sus the Office he bare and the Work that he accomplished This the Jews refusing by unbelief they have invented many fond and lewd imaginations to free themselves from these difficulties and entanglements Some things they deny to be spoken concerning the Mâ—ssiah some things they wrest and pervert to their own apprehensions and somewhat they allow and look for that is truly promised § 11 First For his Person and the things spoken concerning it they apply thereunto the Principal Engine which they have invented for their relief For whereas the Scripture hath declared unto us such a Messiah as should have the natures of Gâ—d and man in one Person which Person should in the nature of man suffer and dye and reign for spiritual ends and purposes thâ—y have rejected the Divine Nature of this Person and split that which remaineth into two Persons to the one wherâ—of they assign one part of his work as to sorrow suffer and dye to the other another part namely to Conquer Rule and Reign according unto their carnal Apprâ—hensions of these things They have I say feigned two Messiah's between whom they have distributed the whole work of him that is promised according unto their understanding of it And one of these is to come as they say before the other to prepare his way for him This first they call Messiah Ben Joseph because he is to be of the Tribe of Ephraim the other Messiah Ben David of whom afterwards Both of them are mentioned together in the Targum on Cant. 4.5 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Thy two Deliverers which shall deliver thee Messiah the Son of David and Messiah the Son of Ephraim are like to Moses and Aaron The same words are repeated again Chap. 7. v. 3. And in those places alone in the whole series of Targums is there any mention of this fictitious Messiah the Author of that Paraphrase on the Canticles being Josephus Caecus who lived after the finishing of the Talmuds whereof he maketh mention In other parts of the Targum he appeareth not But in the Talmud he is frâ—quently brought on the Stage So Tractat. de Fâ—â—to Tâ—bernaâ—ul Distinct. Hachalil Chamesha It is a Tradition of our Masters that the Holy Blessed God shall say unto Messiah the Son of David who shall redeem us let him do it suddainly in our dayes ask somewhat of me and I will give it thee as Psal. 2. And when he shall hear that Messiah the Son of Joseph is ssain he shall say before the Lord Lord of the world I only ask life of thee for it seems that he shall be much terrified with the death of Ben Joseph Unto this Messiah they assign all things that are dolorous and include suffering in them which they call 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that are in the Scripture assigned to
Joseph or Ephraim Armillus having received § 15 a defeat by Nehemiah Ben Husiel 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 he shaâ—â— gather the forces of all the Nations of the world into the vallâ—y of decision 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and shall fight with Israel 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And they shall slay of them of Armillus his Army heaps or multitudes on heaps and they shall finite a few of Israel and they shall slay the Messiah of the Lord. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And the ministring Angâ—lls shall come and perfuming his body shall lay it up with the antient Fathers where it is to be kept many dayes without putrefaction as Hâ—ctors Body was in Homer after he was slain by Achilles And it is not unlikely but that they may allude somewhat to the Prophesie of the two Witnesses Rev. 11. who were to be slain and afterwards called up to Heaven Thus do they at their pleasure dispose of this creature of their own for having framed him themselves he is their own to do with him what they will alive and dead But that which is the poyson and sting of this Fable is that the death of this fictitious Messiah must amongst them bear all that is spoken in the Scripture or continued by Tradition concerning the Humiliation suffering and death of the true Messiah of the Lord. § 16 We need not stay long in the removall of this Mormo out of our way Should they invent twenty other Messiahs as they have done this and which on the same grounds and with as good Authority they may the case would still be the same Who gave them power to substitute themselves in the place of God to give New Promises to appoint New Saviours and to invent new wayes of Deliverance The Scripture is utterly silent of any such person nor have they any Antetalmudical Tradition concerning him And what their Masters have invented in the Talmuds is of no more Authority then what they coyn every day themselves The truth is this whole story of Armillus and Ben Joseph is a Talmudical Romance the one the Giant the otheâ— the Knight But these fictions seria ducunt Poor creatures are hardened by them unto their eternal destruction But is the world bound to believe what every one whom they are pleased to call Rabbi can imagine though never so contrary to the Principles of that Religion which themselves pretend to own and profess so indeed some of them say that if their Masters teach the right hand to be the left yea Heaven to be Hell yet their Authority is not to be questioned and as I remember others say some such things of the Pope But God I hope of his Goodness will not suffer poor mankind to be alwayes so deluded All the Promises of God all the Prophesies from the foundâ—tion of the world concern only one Messiah of the Seed of Abraham of the Tribe of Judah and of the family of David All the faith of the Church of old as we have proved respected that one only And who will lay any weight upon what is spoken foretold or promised concerning him if the Jews have power to invent another at their pleasure § 17 Again Their Masters have not only dealt dishonestly and blasphemously but foolishly also in this matter in that they have not suited their own creature unto the Ends for which they have made him The End as was shewed before why they advanced this imagination was to give countenance unto what is spoken in the Scriptures or retained by themselves in Tradition concerning the sufferings of the Messiah And it is somewhat strange to me that having raised up this Ben Joseph they did not use him worse then they have done but by a little foolish Pity have spoiled their own whole design They have a Tradition among themselves that the Messiah must bear a third part of all the afflictions or persecutions that ever were or shall be in the world And what proportion doth a mans being slain in battel where his Army is victorious which is all the hardship this Ben Joseph is to meet withall bear unto the Afflictions which befall the Church in every Age And for the Scripture it is meer lost labour to compare the death of this Warriour with what is delivered therein concerning the sufferings of the Messiah Every one not judicially blinded must needs see that there is no affinity between them The fifty third Chapter of Isaiah is acknowledged by their Targum and sundry of the principal Masters of their faith to be a Prophesie concerning him and we shall afterwards undeniably prove it so to be Now the Person there spoken of is one whom the Jews are to reject and despise whom God is to aâ—flict and bruise by causing the sins of the whole Church to meet upon him One who by his sufferings is to fulfill the pleasure of the Lord making his Soul an Offering for sin justifying the Elect and conquering Satan by his Death This fictiâ—â—ous Messiah is to be honoured of all the Jews to raise Armies to fight a Battel and therein after the manner of other men to be slain So that a story was never worse told nor to less purpose No other use can be made of it that I know of but only to consider in it the blindness of poor obstinate sinners given up unto hardness of heart and a spirit of folly for the rejection of him whom God sealed annointed and sent to be the Saviour of the world Leaving them therefore in the embraces of this cloud we may consider the other expected Messiah whom they call Ben David in whom principally they place their confidence § 18 The Endless Fables of the Jews about their Messiah as they have been in part discovered by others so I design not here at large to recount them The chief Masters of them in the Talmud are full of disputes and contradictions about him and those of after Ages succeed them in their uncertainties Such will the conceptions of all men be when they take up fancies and opinions of their own in matters of Divine Revelation But some things there are wherein they all generally agree and those relating unto his Person Work and Office which it shall suffice to give an account of as answering our present Design First Therefore they contend that he shall be a meer man and there is nothing that they strive to avoid more then the Testimonies of Scripture which shew that the promised Messiah was to be God and man in one Person as hath been already evidenced They contend also that he shall be born after the manner of all men not of a Virgin but of a married Woman begotten by her Husband About the place of his birth they are not fully agreed for although they all acknowledge the Prophesie of Micah about Bethlehem to relate unto him Chap. 5.2 yet knowing that Town now to have been desolate for many Generations and waste without inhabitant which would seem to
Explication and Vindication of this Prophesie I have only by the way more particularly considered the Evasions of this man who is called amongst the Masters of the present Judaical Profession the Wise that the Reader may know what thoughts to entertain concerning the Expositions and Objections of others of them who have not attained that reputation The subject here spoken of is Judah and that not as meerly declaring the person of § 8 the fourth Son of Jacob but the Tribe and Family that sprang and was to spring from him So are the whole Tribes every where called in Scripture by the name of him from whom they sprang and that principally from the Prophesie and Blessing in this Chapter wherein the common stream of Patriarchal blessing hitherto running in one channell is divided into twelve branches each Son of Jacob being constituted a distinct spring of Benediction unto his posterity Now that the Tribe of Judah and not his person but only as from him the whole received its denomination and as he is included therein is intended in this Prophesie is evident For 1. The things mentioned in this great Patriarchal Benediction were such as should befall the Posterity of his Children to whom he spake 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the latter dayes or in the end of the dayes as were all the blessings of them that went before Jacob also Now that expression in general signally denotes the times of Messsiah as we shall afterwards declare and as hath in part already been made manifest And as it relates in particular unto any of the Tribes it denotes the whole continuance of their times untill that season should be accomplished So that it cannot be restrained unto the persons of any of them 2. Nothing that is spoken of any of the rest of the Sons of Jacob belonged unto them personally no though it had its foundation in their persons or in an allusion unto their personal Actings Thus the dividing of Simeon and Levi in Jacob and the scattering of them in Israel belonged not unto their persons though what befell their posterity of that nature had a special eye unto their personal miscarriage v. 5 6 7. Neither was any thing here spoken of Judah in any measure fulfilled in his person who spent his dayes in Aegypt without any pre-eminence among his Brethren or Rule with Conquest and terror like a Lion over others It is then the Family Tribe or Posterity of Judah that by that name is here intended Now this Tribe of Judah may be considered either absolutely in its self as it was in § 9 it s separated stations and condition in the Wilderness without the mixture of any not of his posterity or with respect unto that accession which was afterwards made unto it occasionally from the other Tribes And this was fourfold First From the Lot of Simeon falling within its lot in the first inheritance of the Land Josh. 19.1 whence that Tribe though still keeping its distinct Genealogie was reckoned unto Judah and became one people with them Secondly By the cleaving of the Tribe of Benjamin whose lot lay next unto it and mixed with it in the very City of the Kingdom to the reigning house of David in the fatal division of the people 1 Kings 12.20 21 27. upon which both those Tribes were after called by the name of Judah v. 20. and the people of both 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Judaei or Jews Thirdly By the falling off of the Tribe of Levi with multitudes of other good men unto it out of all the Tribes of Israel upon the Idolatries and persecution of Jeroboam 2 Chron. 11.13 14 15 16 17. verses by which means that one Tribe quickly became more numerous and potent then all the rest Fourthly By the mixture and addition of those great numbers which out of all the Tribes of Israel joyned themselves unto them upon their return from Babylon and the restitution of the Worship of God amongst them in its proper place Now it is Judah with all these accessions that is intended in this Prophesie and Benediction yet so as that in many things as namely in the production of the Messiah the natural Genuine Off-spring of Judah was still to have the pre-eminence § 10 That which is foretold concerning this Judah is that it should have 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a Scepter and Law-giver or a Writer of Laws for others observation That Rule Power and Government are hereby intended shall be afterwards evinced What time this should come to pass is not limited only after it did so it was not to cease untill the Shilo came The foundation of the execution then of this Promise in the erection of Polity and Government in that Tribe was not laid untill about six hundred and twenty years after this time So certain is that which we before observed that this Patriarchal Benediction concerned not the persons of his Sons and their then present condition but that of their posterity in the latter dayes And this was done when the Kingdom was given to David of the Tribe of Judah Neither is the kind of Government or Rule which should be erected in that Tribe expressed in the words only a Rule and Polity is promised unto it or that they should be a people having the Principle of Rule or Government in and among themselves Whilest they continued such the Scepter and Scribe departed not from them and this they did as with great variety in the outward form of Goverment though the Law and Polity amongst them were still the same so not without some intercision of Rule untill the time specified was accomplished And where the Law and Polity are still the same Accidental alterations in the Modes and manner of Governing make no Essential Change in the State of the people or nature of the Government Thus the first Constitution of Rule in that Tribe was in a way of Government absolutely Monarchical This being imprudently managed by Rehoboam lost the ten Tribes who would never afterwards submit unto the Regal Family of Judah It s retrival after an intercision made of it in the Babylonish Captivity was Ducal or by an honorary President with a mixture both of Aristocracy and of the power of the pâ—ople Upon the ceasing of these Rulers extraordinarily called the Aristocracy in the Sanâ—â—â—drin prevailed whereunto succeeded a mixt Monarchy in the Hasmonaeans into their power and place their interest being ruined by intestine Divisions Herod by craft and external force intruded himself Neither did his Usurpation make any Essential Change in the Rule or Polity of the Nation Although in his own person he were a Forreigner for even during the turbulent Government of the Herodians with the interposition of the Roman Arms the Nation with that which constitutes a people its Laws and Polity was still continued though the Administration of Superiour Rule was not alwayes in the hands of Jews In this state things continued amongst them
shall take or remove away the continual Offering that is hinder the observation of it and attendance unto it when it ought to be observed Of the Prince Chap. 9. v. 27. it is said 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 he shall cause to cease Sacrifice and Offering so that de jure they ought no more to be observed § 18 In the same time saith he the said Prince is said v. 27. for the overspreading of abominations to make desolate a phrase attributed unto Antichrist Chap. 8.12 13. 11.31 there said to set up the abominations making desolate Answ. Although great desolations and destructions being treated of in all these places it would not be strange if the same Author should express the alike events in the same terms yet those which we are referred unto are not the same in the Original nor of any considerable correspondency And the like may be said of another instance which he adds in the ninth place between an expression Chap. 9. v. 27. and Chap. 11. v. 36. wherein is no agreement at all and the places treat directly of things different yea contrary § 19 It is added in the last place That as in the seventy Weeks the division of the seven from the sixty and of both from the one Week are unapplicable to the material restauration out of real Babylon so they will exactly and precisely agree to the Restauration out of Antichristian Babylon as shall be shewed Answ. That the distribution of the LXX Weeks mentioned in the Text is applicable unto the continuance of the Judaical Church and State with the coming of the Messiah and the accomplishment of his work hath been in part already shewed and shall be fully cleared in our ensuing Exposition of the place 2. Unto the exact answering of it unto the Restauration of the Church from Antichristianism I shall only say that if men may be allowed to fix Epocha's arbitrarily at their pleasure and make applications of what is spoken in any place of Scripture unto what things and persons they please there is no doubt but that they may make their own imaginations to adhere and agree well enough together § 20 This brief view we have taken of the Reasons of this Reverend Author both those whereby he endeavours to prove that in this Prophecy the coming of the Messiah is not intended and those whereby he would induce a perswasion that the whole of it is not only applicable unto but also doth directly intend the state and condition of the Church in these latter dayes whereby whether he hath evinced his intention and whether his Arguments are sufficient to dispossess us of the Catholick Faith of the Church in all Ages concerning the sense and importance of this Angelical Message unto Daniel is left unto the Judgement of men sober and learned For my part I shall take it for granted that they are all of them so far removed out of our way as that we may proceed with our designed Explication and Vindication of this Prophecy from the exceptions of the Jews without any disturbance from them § 21 There are three things that in thiâ— illustrious Prophecy offer themsâ—lves unto our consideration First The general Testimony given unto the coming of the Messiah and the limitation of time wherein he should so come Secondly The especial sense of the words in the several passages of it and the distinct Prophecies contained in them Thirdly The Chronological computation of the time designed in an exact account of the space of time limited from the beginning unto the end The First of these is that wherein principally we have to do with the Jews namely to prove from hence that there was a time limited and determined for the coming of the Messiah which is long since expired And all things herein we shall find clear and evident Both the space of time limited and the several coincidencies of its expiration are sufficiently manifest In the second also we have to deal with them in order unto the confirmation of the former In both these the latter Masters have studiously endeavoured to cast difficulties and perplexiâ—ies on the words which must be removed by the consideration of their use and genuine importance wâ—th tâ—e scope of the Prophecy and the help unto the understanding of it which is conâ—ribâ—ted from other places of Scripture The third is attended with sundry entanglementâ— which although they are not absolutely inextricable yet are such in respect oâ— some minute parts of calculation as will not suffer us to so demonstrative a certainty as that all men should be compelled to acquiesce therein This is sufficiently manifested in the different calculations of the most Learned of the antient and later Writers who have laboured in this subject In reference therefore hereunto I shall do these two things First Manifest that our Argument from this place is not at all concerned in the exact Chronological Computation of the times whereunto the accomplishment of this Prophecy relates And Secondly Shall demonstrate that this difficulty is conquerable by giving a clear and satisfactory account of the time specified and limited such as is not liable unto any Material Objection â—irst It is evident in general that here is given out by the Holy Ghost himself a § 22 computation of the Time wherein the Messiah was to come and to perform the work allotted unto him And this gives warrant unto the kind and nature of Argument which we now insist upon No small part this was of the Churches Treasure of old and a blessed Guide it would have been unto the Faith and Obedience of them concerned therein had it been diligently attended unto But having sinfully neglected it in its season they have ever since wickedly opposed it To Daniel it was granted as a great favour relief and priviledge upon his deep humiliation and fervent supplications as himself records Whilest saith he I was speaking and praying with fasting sackloth and ashes v. 3. and confessing my sins and the sins of my people Israel and presenting my supplications before the Lord my God for the holy Mountain of my God yea whilest I was speaking in prayer the man Gabriel whom I had seen in the Vision at the beginning being caused to fly swiftly touched me about the time of the evening Oblation and he informed me and talked with me and said O Daniel I am now come forth to give thee skill and understanding At the beginning of thy supplications the commandment came forth and I am come to shew thee for thou art greatly beloved therefore understand the matter and consider the Vision seventy weeks c. v. 20 21 22 23. This was the Answer that God gave him upon his great and fervent prayer for the Church and that for his relief comfort and supportment whence it is evidently manifest that the great blessing of the Church was enwrapped in it And the computation of time mentioned was granted as a light to guide the Jews that they
Word so as to answer the spring from whence it comes namely wiâ—h Authority Love to and Care for the souls of men And 5. Consider to whom they are to give an account of the work they are called to the discharge of and entrusted with Heb. 13.7 And for them to whom the Word is preached Let them consider 1. With what Reverence and godly fear they ought to attend unto the dispensation of it seeing it is a proper effect and issue of the Authority of God Heb. 12.25 And 2. How they will escape if they neglect so great Salvation declared unto them from the Love and Care of God Heb. 2.3 And 3. With what holiness and spiritual subjection of Soul unto God they ought to be conversant in and with all the Ordinances of Worship that are appointed by him Heb. 12.28 29. Other Observations I shall more briefly pass over God spake in them II. The Authority of God speaking in and by the Pen-men of the Scriptures is the sole bottom and foundation of our assenting to them and what is contained in them with Faith Divine and Supernatural He spake in them he then continues to speak by them and therefore is their word received 2 Pet. 3.20 21. But this is elsewhere handled at large III. Gods gradual Revelation of himself his Mind and Will unto the Church was a fruit of infinite Wisdom and Care towards his Elect. These are parts of his wayes sayes Job but how little a portion is heard of him Job 26.14 Though all his wayes and dispensations are ordered in infinite Wisdom yet we can but stand at the shoar of the Ocean and admire its glory and greatness Little it is that we can comprehend Yet what may be our instruction that may further our Faith and Obedience is not hidden from us And these things lye evident unto us in this gradual discovery of himself and his Will 1. That he over-filled not their Vessels He gave them out light as they were able to bear though we know not perfectly what their condition was yet this we know that as no generation needed more light than they had for the discharge of the duty that God required of them so more light would have unfitted them for somewhat or other that was their duty in their respective generations 2. He kept them in a Continual dependance upon himself and waiting for their Rule and Direction from him which as it tended to his glory so it was exceedingly suited to their safety in keeping them in an humble waiting frame 3. He so gave out the Light and Knowledge of himself as that the great work which he had to accomplish that lay in the stores of his infinitely Wise Will as the end and issue of all Revelations namely the bringing forth of Christ into the world in the way wherein he was to come and for the Ends which he was to bring about might not be obviated He gave light enough to believers to enable them to receive him and not so much as to hinder obdurate sinners from crucifying him 4. He did this work so that the Preheminence fully to reveal him and ultimately might be reserved for him in whom all things were to be gathered unto an head All Priviledges were to be kept for and unto him which was principally done by this gradual Revelation of the mind of God 5. And there was tender Care conjoyned with this infinite Wisdom None of his elect in any age were left without that Light and instruction which were needful for them in their seasons and generations And this so given out unto them as that they might have fresh consolation and supportment as their occasions did require Whilest the Church of old was under this dispensation they were still hearkning when they should hear new tydings from Heaven for their teaching and refreshment And if any difficulty did at any time befall them they were sure not to want relief in this kind And this was necessary before the final hand was set to the work And this discovers the woful state of the present Jews They grant that the Revelation of the Will of God is not perfected and yet notwithstanding all their miseries darkness and distresses they dare not pretend that they have heard one word from heaven these 2000 years that is from the days of Malachi and yet they labour to keep the vail upon their eyes IV. We may see hence the absolute Perfection of the Revelation of the will of God by Christ and his Apostles as to every end and purpose what ever for which God ever did or ever will in this world reveal himself or his mind and will For as this was the last way and means that God ever designed for the discovery of himself as to the worship and obedience which he requires so the Person by whom he accomplished this work makes it indispensably necessary that it be also absolutely perfect from which nothing can be taken to which nothing must be added under the penalty of the extermination threatned to him that will not attend to the voice of that Prophet Return we now again unto the words of our Apostle Having declared the Son to be the immediate Revealer of the Gospel in pursuit of his design he proceeds to declare his Glory and Excellency both that which he had in himself antecedent to his susception of the Office of Mediator and what he received upon his in-vestiture therewith Two things in the close of this verse he assigns unto him 1. That he was appointed heir of all 2. That by him the worlds were made Wherein consists the first Amplification of his Proposition concerning the Revealer of the Gospel in two parts both acknowledged by the Jews both directly conducing to his purpose in hand 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 posuit fecit constituit Syr. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 posuit he placed set made appointed I. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 whom that is the Son in whom the Father spake unto us and as such as the Revealer of the Gospel 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 God and Man The Son as God hath a natural dominion over all To this he can be no more appointed than he can be to be God On what account he hath his Divine Nature on the same he hath all the Attributes and Perfections of it with all things that necessarily on any supposition attend it as supreme Dominion doth Nor doth this denotation of him respect meerly the Humane Nature for although the Lord Christ performed all the Acts of his Mediatory Office in and by the Humane Nature yet he did them not as Man but as God and Man in one Person Joh. 1.14 Acts 20.20 And therefore unto him as such do the Priviledges belong that he is vested with on the account of his being Mediator Nothing indeed can be added unto him as God but there may be to him who is God in respect of his condescension to discharge an Office in an other Nature
Relation unto God in and through him they received by his means God gathering up all things to a consistency and permanency in him Ephes. 1.10 And hence also it became equal that the Rule and power over them should be committed unto him by whom although they were not like us recovered from ruine yet they were preserved from all danger of it So that in their subjection unto him consists their principal Honour and all their safety And as this act of God in appointing Christ Lord of Angels hath these equitable foundations so it hath also sundry glorious Ends. 1. It was as an addition unto that Glory that was set before him in his undertaking to redeem sinners A Kingdom was of old promised unto him and to render it exceedingly glorious the Rule and Scepter of it is extended not only to his Redeemed ones but to the holy Angels also and the sovereignty over them is granted him as a part of his Reward Phil. 2.8 9 10 11. Ephes. 1.20 21. 2. God hereby gathers up his whole family at first distinguished by the Law of their Creation into two especial kinds and then differenced and set at variance by Sin into one Body under one Head reducing them that originally were twain into one entire family Ephes. 1.10 In the fulness of time he gathered together in one all things in Christ both which are in heaven and which are in earth in him as was before declared Before this the Angels had no immediate created Head for themselves are called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Gods Psal. 97.7 1 Cor. 8.5 Who ever is the Head must be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the God of Gods or Lord of Lords which Christ alone is and in him or under him as One Head is the whole Family of God united 3. The Church of Mankind militant on the earth whose conduct unto Eternal Glory is committed unto Christ stands in need of the ministery of Angels And therefore hath God granted Rule and Power over them unto him that nothing might be wanting to enable him to save unto the uttermost them that come unto God by him So God hath given him to be head over all things to the Church Ephes. 1.22 that he should with an absolute sovereignty use and dispose of all things to the benefit and advantage of the Church This is the first branch of the Lordship and Dominion of Christ according to the distribution of the severals of it before laid down He is Lord of Angels and they are all of them his servants the fellow-servants of them that have the testimony of Jesus And as some men do wilfully cast themselves by their Religious adoration of Angels under the curse of Canaan to be servants unto servants Gen. 8.25 so it is the great honour and priviledge of true believers that in their worship of Christ they are admitted into the society of an innumerable company of Angels Heb. 12.22 Rev. 15.11 13. for they are not ashamed to esteem them their fellow-servants whom their Lord and King is not ashamed to call his Brethren And herein consists our communion with them that we have one common Head and Lord and any intercourse with them but only on this account or any worship performed towards them breaks the bond of that communion and causeth us not to hold the Head Col. 2.19 The priviledge the safety and advantage of the Church from this subjection of Angels to its Head and Saviour are by many spoken unto II. There is another sort of Angels who by sin left their primitive station and fell off from God of whom their Sin Fall Malice Wrath Business Craft in evil and Final judgment the Scripture treateth at large These belong not indeed to the possession of Christ as he is the Heir but they belong unto his Dominion as he is a Lord. Though he be not a King and Head unto them yet he is a Judge and Ruler over them All things being given into his hand they also are subjected unto his power Now as under the former head I shall consider 1. The Right or Equity and 2. The End of this Authority of Christ over this second sort of the first Race of Intellectual Creatures the Angels that have sinned 1. As before this Right is founded in his Divine Nature by vertue whereof he is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 fit for this Dominion He made these Angels also and therefore as God hath an absolute Dominion over them The Creatures cannot cast off the Dominion of the Creator by rebellion though they may lose their moral Relation unto God as obedient creatures yet their natural as creatures cannot be dissolved God will be God still be his creatures never so wicked and if they obey not his Will they shall bear his Justice And this Dominion of Christ over faln Angels as God makes the grant of Rule over them to him as Mediator just and equal 2. The immediate and peculiar Foundation of his Right unto Rule over faln Angels rendring the special grant of it equal and righteous is Lawful Conquest This gives a special Right Gen. 48.22 Now that Christ should conquer faln Angels was promised from the foundation of the world Gen. 3.15 The seed of the woman the Messias was to break the Serpents head despoil him of his power and bring him into subjection which he performed accordingly Col. 2.15 He spoiled principalities and powers divested faln Angels of all that Title they had got to the world by the sin of man triumphing over them as Captives to be disposed of at his pleasure He stilled or made to cease as to his power this Enemy 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and self-avenger Psal. 8.2 leading captivity captive Psal. 6.18 breaking in pieces the Head over the large earth Psal. 110.6 binding the strong man armed and spoiling his goods And the Scripture of the New Testament is full of instances as to his executing his Power and Authority over Evil Angels They take up a good part of the Historical Books of it Man having sinned by the instigation of Satan he was by the just Judgement of God delivered up unto his power Heb. 2.14 The Lord Christ undertaking to recover lost man from under his power by destroying his works 1 Joh. 3.8 and to bring them again into favour with God Satan with all his might sets himself to oppose him in his Work and failing in his enterprise being utterly conquered he became absolutely subjected unto him trodden under his feet and the prey he had taken delivered from him This is the next Foundation of the Authority of Christ over the Evil Angels He had a great Contest and War with them and that about the Glory of God his own Kingdom and the Eternal Salvation of the Elect prevailing absolutely against them he made a Conquest over them and they are put in subjection unto him for ever They are subjected unto him as to their present actings and future condition He now rules them and will
that is the Creation of the whole world and all things contained in it hath been elsewhere proved and must be granted or we may well despair of ever understanding one line in the Scripture or what we ordinarily speak one to another 3. John doth not mention any particular of the old Creation affirming only in general that by the Word all things were made whereof he afterwards affirms that it was the Light of men not assigning unto him in particular the Creation of Light as is pretended 3. He tells us the Article preposed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 intimates that it is not the old Creation that is intended but some new especial thing distinct from it and preferred above it Answ. 1. As the same Article doth used by the same Apostle to the same purpose in another place Acts 14.15 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 who made the Heaven the Earth and Sea which were certainly those created of old 2. The same Article is used with the same word again in this Epistle Chap. 11.3 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by faith we understand that the worlds were made where this Author acknowledgeth the old Creation to be intended 4. He adds that the Author of this Epistle seems to allude to the Greek Translation of Isa. 9.6 wherein 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Father of Eternity or eternal Father is rendred the Father of the world to come Answ. 1. There is no manner of Relation between 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Father of the world to come and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by whom he made the worlds unless it be that one word is used in both places in very distinct senses which if it be sufficient to evince a cognation between various places very strange and uncouth interpretations would quickly ensue Nor 2. Doth that which the Apostle here treats of any way respect that which the Prophet in that place insists upon his name and nature being only declared by the Prophet and his works by the Apostle And 3. It is presumption to suppose the Apostle to allude to a corrupt Translation as that of the LXX in that place is there being no ground for it in the Original for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the eternal Father and what the Jews and LXX intend by the world to come we shall afterwards consider 5. His last refuge is in Isa. 51.16 Where the work of God as he observes in the reduction of the people of the Jews from the Captivity of Babylon is called his planting the Heavens and laying the foundation of the Earth And the Vulgar Latin Translation as he farther observes renders the word ut corlum plantes ut terram fundes ascribing that to the Prophet which he did but declare and in this sense he contends that God the Father is said to make the worlds by his Son Answ. 1. The work mentioned is not that which God would do in the reduction of the people from Babylon but that which he had done in their delivery from Aegypt recorded to strengthen the faith of Believers in what for the future he would yet do for them 2. The expressions of planting the Heavens and laying the foundation of the Earth are in this place of the Prophet plainly Allegorical and are in the very same place declared so to be First In the circumstance of time when this work is said to be wrought namely at the coming of the Israelites out of Aegypt when the Heavens and the Earth properly so called could not be made planted founded or created Secondly By an adjoyned Exposition of the Allegory I have put my words into thy mouth and said unto Zion thou art my people This was his planting of the Heavens and laying the foundation of the Earth even the erection of a Church and Political State amongst the Israelites 3. It is not to the Prophet but to the Church that the words are spoken and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 are not ut plantes ut fundes but ad plantandum to plant and ad fundandum to lay the foundation and our Author prejudicates his cause by making use of a Translation to uphold it which himself knows to be corrupt 4. There is not then any similitude between that place of the Prophet wherein words are used Allegorically the Allegory in them being instantly explained and this of the Apostle whose discourse is didactical and the words used in it proper and suited to the things intended by him to be expressed And this is the substance of what is pleaded to wrest from believers this illustrious Testimony given to the eternal Deity of the Son of God We may yet further consider the reasons that offer themselves from the Context for the removal of the interpretation suggested 1. It sinks under its own weakness and absurdity The Apostle intending to set out the Excellency of the Son of God affirms that by him the worlds were made that is say they Christ preaching the Gospel converted some to the faith of it and many more were converted by the Apostles preaching the same Doctrine whereupon blessed times of Light and Salvation ensued Who not overpowered with prejudice could once imagine any such sense in these words especially considering that it is as contrary to the design of the Apostle as it is to the importance of the words themselves This is that which Peter calls mens wresting the Scripture to their own perdition 2. The Apostle as we observed writes didactically plainly expressing the matter whereof he treats in words usual and proper To what end then should he use so strained an Allegory in a point of Doctrine yea a fundamental Article of the Religion he taught and that to express what he had immediately in the words foregoing properly expressed For by whom he made the worlds is no more in these mens apprehensions than in him hath he spoken in these latter dayes Nor is this Expression any where used no not in the most allegorical Prophecies of the Old Testament to denote that which here they would wrest it unto But making of the world signifies making of the World in the whole Scripture throughout and nothing else 3. The making of the worlds here intended was a thing then past 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 he made them that is he did so of old and the same word is used by the LXX to express the old Creation But now that which the Jews called the world to come or the blessed state of the Church under the Messiah the Apostle speaks of as of that which was not yet come the present worldly State of the Judaical Church yet continuing 4. The word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which are so rendred taken absolutely as they are here used do never in any one place in the Scripture in the Old or New Testament signifie
and consequently to be preferred above them do not at all prove that Solomon of whom they were spoken meerly as he was a Type should be esteemed to be preferred above all Angels seeing he did only represent him who was so and had these words spoken unto him not absolutely but with respect unto that Representation And this removes the fourth Objection made in the behalf of the first Interpretation excluding Solomon from being at all intended in the Prophecy for what was spoken of him as a Type required not a full accomplishment in his own person but only that he should represent him who was principally intended 5. That there is a two-fold Perpetuity mentioned in the Scripture the one limited and relative the other absolute and both these are applied unto the Kingdom of David First there was a Perpetuity promised unto him and his Posterity in the Kingdom as of the Priesthood to Aaron that is a limited perpetuity namely during the continuance of the typical state and condition of that People whilst they continued the Rule by right belonged unto the House of David There was also an absolute perpetuity promised to the Kingdom of David to be made good only in the Kingdom and Rule of the Messiah and both these kinds of Perpetuity are expressed in the same words giving their sense according as they are applied If applied to the successors of David as his Kingdom was a Type of that of Christ they denote the limited Perpetuity before mentioned as that which respected an Adjunct of the Typical state of that People that was to be regulated by it and commensurate unto it but as they were referred to the Kingdom of Christ represented in the other so an Absolute Perpetuity is expressed in them And this takes away the third Reason excluding Solomon from being intended in these words the Perpetuity promised being unto him limited and bounded These considerations being premised I say the words insisted on by the Apostle I will be unto him a Father and he shall be unto me a son belonged first and nextly unto Solomon denoting that fatherly Love Care and Protection that God would afford unto him in his Kingdom so far forth as Christ was represented by him therein which requires not that they must absolutely and in all just consequences from them belong unto the person of Solomon principally therefore they intend Christ himself expressing that eternal unchangeable Love which the Father bore unto him grounded on the Relation of Father and Son The Jews I confess of all others do see least of Typicalness in Solomon But the reason of it is because that his sin was the Occasion of ruining their carnal earthly Glory and Wealth which things alone they lust after But the thing was doubtless confessed by the Church of old with whom Paul had to do and therefore we see that the Writer of the Book of the Chronicles written after the return of the People from their Captivity when Solomon's line was failed and Zerubbabel of the house of Nathan was Governour amongst them yet records again this Promise as that which looked forward and was yet to receive its full accomplishment in the Lord Christ. And some of the Rabbins themselves tell us that Solomâ—â— because of his sin had only the name of peace God stirring up Adversaries against him the thing it self is to be looked for under Messiah Ben-david The allegation of these words by the Apostle being thus fully and at large vindicated I shall now briefly enquire into the sense and meaning of the words themselves It was before observed that they are not produced by the Apostle to prove the Natural Sonship of Jesus Christ nor do they signifie it nor were they urged by him to confirm directly and immediately that he is more excellent than the Angels of whom there is nothing spoken in them nor in the place from whence they are taken But the Apostle insists on this testimony meerly in confirmation of his former Argument for the preheminence of the Son above Angels taken from that more excellent Name which he obtained by inheritance which being the Name of the Son of God he hereby proves that indeed he was so called by God himself Thus then do these words confirm the intention of the Apostle For to which of the Angels said God at any time I will be to him a Father and he shall be to me a Son The words contain a great and signal priviledge they are spoken unto and concerning the Messiah and neither they nor any thing equivalent unto them were ever spoken of any Angel especially the Name of the Son of God so emphatically and in way of distinction from all others was never assigned unto any of them And this as hath been already shewed proves an Eminency and Preheminence in him above all that the Angels attain unto All this I say follows from the peculiar signal Appropriation of the Name of the Son of God unto him and his especial Relation unto God therein expressed Briefly we may adjoyn the intention of the words as in themselves considered and so complete the Exposition of them Now God promiseth in them to be unto the Lord Christ as exalted into his Throne a Father in love care power to protect and carry him on in his Rule unto the end of the world And therefore upon his Ascension he says that he went unto his God and Father Joh. 20.17 And he rules in the Name and Majesty of God Mic. 5.4 This is the importance of the words they intend not the Eternal and Natural Relation that is between the Father and Son which neither is nor can be the subject of any Promise but the Paternal care of God over Christ in his Kingdom and the dearness of Christ himself unto him If it be asked on what account God would thus be a Father unto Jesus Christ in this peculiar manner it must be answered that the radical fundamental cause of it lay in the Relation that was between them from his Eternal Generation but he manifested himself to be his Father and engaged to deal with him in the love and care of a Father as he had accomplished his work of Mediation on the Earth and was exalted unto his Throne and Rule in Heaven And this is the first Argument of the Apostle whereby he proves that the Son as the Revealer of the Mind and Will of God in the Gospel is made more excellent than the Angels whose Glory was a refuge to the Jews in their adherance to Legal Rites and Administrations even because they were given unto them by the Disposition of Angels According unto our proposed method we must in our progress draw hence also some Instructions for our own use and edification As 1. Every thing in the Scripture is instructive The Apostles arguing in this place is not so much from the thing spoken as from the manner wherein it is spoken even that also is highly Mysterious So are
The Apostle proceedeth to the farther confirmation of it in the same way and that by ballancing single Testimonies concerning the Nature and Offices of the Angels with some others concerning the same things in the Lord Christ of whom he treats And the first of these relating unto Angels he layes down in the next verse Verse 7. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 There is not much of Difficulty in the words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 unto the Angels Syr. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of or concerning the Angels 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is often used for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and on the contrary and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 so that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to the Angels is as much as 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of or concerning the Angels But as concerning the Angels or and of the Angels he saith for these words are not spoken unto the Angels as the following words are directly spoken unto the Son He is the Person as well spoken to as spoken of but so are not the Angels in the place from whence this Testimony is taken wherein the Holy Ghost only declareth the Providence of God concerning them 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 he saith that is God the Father saith or the Holy Ghost in the Scripture saith as was before observed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is Minister publicus a publick Minister or Agent from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is the same with 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as Hesychius renders it publick He that is employed in any great and publick work is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Hence of old Magistrates were termed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as they are by Paul 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Rom. 13.4 The Ministers of God And Chap. 8. v. 2. of this Epistle he calls the Lord Jesus in respect of his Priestly Office 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the publick Minister of Holy Things and himself in respect of his Apostleship 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Rom. 15.16 A Minister of Jesus Christ. So the name is on this account aequipollent unto that of Angels For as that denoteth the Mission of those spirits unto their work so doth this their Employment therein This Testimony is taken from Psal. 104. v. 4. where the words are to the same purpose 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Translation now in the Greek is the same with that of the Apostle only for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a flame of fire some Copies have it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a flaming fire more express to the Original and the change probably was made in the Copies from this place of the Apostle Symmachus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a devouring Fire Verse 7. But unto of the Angels he saith who maketh his Angels Spirits and his Ministers a flame of fire or flaming fire The Apostle here entereth upon his Third Argument to prove the Preheminence of the Lord Christ above Angels and that by comparing them together either as to their Natures or as to their Employments according as the one and the other is set forth declared and testified unto in the Scriptures of the Old Testament And this first Place which he refers unto Angels we shall now explain and vindicate And in so doing enquire both Who they are of whom the Psalmist speaks and what it is that he affirmeth of them There is a threefold sense given of the words of the Psalmist as they lye in the Hebrew Text. 1. The First is that of the Modern Jews who deny that there is any mention made of Angels affirming the Subject that the Psalmist treats of to be the Winds with Thunder and Lightning which God employes as his Messengers and Ministers to accomplish his Will and Pleasure So he made the Winds his Messengers when he sent them to raise a storm on Jonah when he fled from his Presence and a flaming fire his Minister when by it he consumed Sodom and Gomorrah and this Opinion makes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which it interprets Winds and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a flaming fire to be the Subject of the Proposition of whom it is affirmed that God employes them as his Messengers and Ministers That this Opinion which is directly contradictory to the Authority of the Apostle is so also to the Design of the Psalmist sense of the Words Consent of the Antient Jews and so no way to be admitted shall afterwards be made to appear 2. Some averr that the Winds and Meteors are principally intended but yet so as that God affirming that he makes the Winds his Messengers doth also intimate that it is the Work and Employment of his Angels above to be his Messengers also and that because he maketh use of their Ministry to cause those Winds and Fires whereby he accomplisheth his Will And this they illustrate by the Fire and Winds caused by them on Mount Sinai at the giving of the Law But this Interpretation whatever is pretended to the contrary doth not really differ from the former denying Angels to be intentionally spoken of only hooking in a respect unto them not to be seen to contradict the Apostle and therefore will be disproved together with that which went before 3. Others grant that it is the Angels of whom the Apostle treats but as to the Interpretation of the words they are of two Opinions 1. Some make Spirits to be the subject of what is affirmed and Angels to be the Predicate In this sense God is said to make those spiritual Substances Inhabitants of Heaven his Messengers employing them in his service and them whose nature is a flaming fire that is the Seraphims to be his Ministers and to accomplish his pleasure And this way after Austin go many Expositors making the Term Angels here meerly to denote an Employment and not the Persons employed But as this Interpretation also takes off from the Efficacy and Evidence of the Apostles Argument so we shall see that there is nothing in the words themselves leading to the Embracement of it It remains therefore that it is the Angels that are here spoken of as also that they are intended and designed by that name which denotes their Persons and not their employment 1. That Angels are primarily intended by the Psalmist contrary to the first Opinion of the Modern Jews and the second mentioned leaning thereunto appears 1. From the scope and design of the Psalmist For designing to set out the Glory of God in his works of Creation and Providence after he had declared the framing of all things by his Power which come under the name of Heaven v. 2 3. before he proceeds to the Creation of the Earth passing over with Moses the creation of Angels or couching it with him under the production of Light or of the Heavens as they are called in Job he declareth his Providence and Soveraignty in employing his Angels between Heaven and Earth as his servants for the accomplishment of his pleasure Neither doth it at all suit
Congruency and Conveniency unto an antecedent discharge of Office in the Lord Christ and are of the same importance with 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Psal. 2.9 and so can respect nothing but his glorious Exaltation which is thus expressed The last thing considerable in the words is the Prerogative of the Lord Christ in this Priviledge He is anointed above his fellows Now these Fellows Companions or Associates of the Lord Christ may be considered either generally for all those that partake with him in this Unction which are all Believers who are Co-heirs with him and thereby heirs of God Rom. 8.17 or more especially for those who were employed by God in the Service Building and Rule of his Church in their subordination unto him such as were the Prophets of old and afterwards the Apostles Ephes. 2.20 In respect unto both sorts the Lord Christ is anointed with the Oyle of gladness above them but the latter sort are especially intended concerning whom the Apostle gives an especial instance in Moses Ch. 3. affirming the Lord Christ in his work about the Church to be made partaker of more Glory than he In a word he is incomprehensibly exalted above Angels and Men. And this is the first Testimony whereby the Apostle confirms his Assertion of the preheminence of the Lord Christ above Angels in that comparison which he makes between them which also will afford the ensuing Observations I. The conferring and comparing of Scriptures is an excellent means of coming to an Acquaintance with the Mind and Will of God in them Thus dealeth the Apostle in this place he compareth what is spoken of Angels in one place and what of the Son in another and from thence manifesteth what is the mind of God concerning them This duty lyes in the command we have to search the Scriptures John 5.39 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 make a diligent Investigation of the Mind of God in them comparing spiritual things with spiritual What God hath declared of the mind of the Spirit in one place with what in like manner he hath manifested in another God to try our Obedience and to exercise our Diligence unto a study in his Word day and night Psal. 1.2 and our continual Meditation thereon 1 Tim. 4.15 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Meditate on these things be wholly in them hath planted his Truths with great Variety up and down his Word yea here one part and there another of the same Truth which cannot be throughly learned unless we gather them together into one view For instance In one place God commands us to circumcise our Hearts and to make unto our selves new hearts that we may fear him which at first consideration seems so to represent it not only as our Duty but also within our Power as though we had no need of any help from Grace for its Accomplishment In another he promiseth absolutely to circumcise our hearts and to give us new hearts to fear him as though it were so his work as not to be our concernment to attempt it But now these several places being spiritually compared together make it evident that as it is our Duty to have new and circumcised hearts so it is the Effectual Grace of God that must work and create them in us And the like may be observed in all the important Truths that are of Divine Revelation And this 1. Discovers the Root of almost all the Errors and Heresies that are in the World Men whose hearts are not subdued by Faith and Humility unto the Obedience of the Truth lighting on some Expressions in the Scripture that singly considered seem to give countenance to some such Opinion as they are willing to embrace without farther search they fix it on their minds and imagination untill it is too late to oppose any thing unto it For when they are once fixed in their perswasions those other places of Scripture which they should with Humility have compared with that whose seeming sense they cleave unto and from thence have learned the mind of the Holy Ghost in them all are considered by them to no other End but only how they may pervert them and free themselves from the Authority of them This I say seems to be the way of the most of them who pertinaciously cleave unto false and foolish Opinions They rashly take up a seeming sense of some particular places and then obstinately make that sense the Rule of interpreting all other Scriptures what ever Thus in our own dayes we have many who from the outward sound of those words Joh. 1.9 He is the true light which lighteneth every man that comes into the world having taken up a rash foolish and false imagination that Christ is that Light which is remaining in all men and therein their Guide and Rule do from thence either wrest the whole Scripture to make it suit and answer that supposal or else utterly slight and despise it when if they had compared it with other Scriptures which clearly explain and declare the mind of God in the things which concern the Person and Mediation of the Lord Christ with the Nature and Works of natural and saving spiritual light and submitted to the Authority and Wisdom of God in them they might have been preserved from their delusion It shews also 2. The Danger that there is unto men unskilled and unexercised in the Word of Truth when without the Advice Assistance or Directions of others who are able to guide them and instruct their Enquiry after the mind of God They hastily embrace Opinions which it may be some one Text or other of Scripture doth seemingly give countenance unto By this means do men run themselves into the fore-mentioned Danger every day especially where any seducing Spirit applyes himself unto them with swelling words of vanity boasting of some misunderstood word or other Thus have we seen multitudes lead by some general Expressions in two or three particular places of Scripture into an Opinion about a general Redemption of all mankind and every Individual thereof when if they had been wise and able to have searched those other Scriptures innumerable setting forth the Eternal Love of God to his Elect his purpose to save them by Jesus Christ the nature and end of his Oblation and ransom and compared them with others they would have understood the vanity of their hasty Conceptions 3. From these things it appears what Diligence Patience Waiting Wisdom is required of all men in searching of the Scriptures who intend to come unto the acknowledgement of the Truth thereby And unto this end and because of the greatness of our concernment therein doth the Scripture it self abound with Precepts Rules Directions to enable us unto a right and profitable discharging of our Duty They are too many here to be inserted I shall only add that the Diligence of Heathens will rise up in judgement and condemn the sloth of many that are called Christians in this matter For whereas they had no
thus stedfast upon the account of its being spoken from God and stands in no need of the contribution of any strength Authority or Testimony from men Church Tradition or ought else that is extrinsecal unto it The Testimonies given hereunto in the Scripture it self which are very many with the general Grounds and Reasons hereof I shall not here insist upon and that because I have done it elsewhere I shall only mention that one consideration which this place of the Apostle suggests unto us and which is contained in our second Observation from the word stedfast Take this word as spoken from God without the help of any other Advantages and the stedfastness of it is the Ground of Gods inflicting Vengeance on them that receive it not that obey it not Because it is his Word because it is cloathed with his Authority if men believe it not they must perish But now if this be not sufficiently evidenced unto them namely that it is his Word God could not be just in taking vengeance of them for he should punish them for not believing that which they had no sufficient Reason to believe which suits not with the Holiness and Justice of God The Evidence then that this Word is from God that it is his being the foundation of the Justice of God in his proceeding against them that do not believe it it is of indispensible necessity that he himself also do give that Evidence unto it For whence also should it have it from the Testimony of the Church or from Tradition or from probable moral inducements that men can tender one to another Then these two things will inevitably follow 1. That if men should neglect their duty in giving Testimony unto the Word as they may do because they are but men then God cannot justly condemn any man in the world for the neglect of his Word in not believing it or not yielding obedience unto it And the Reason is evident because if they have not sufficient Grounds to believe it to be his without such Testimonies as are not given unto it it is the highest Injustice to condemn them for not believing it and they should perish without a cause For what can be more unjust than to punish a man especially eternally for not doing that which he had no just or sufficient Reason to do This be far from God to destroy the innocent with the wicked 2. Suppose all men aright to discharge their duty and that there be a full Tradition concerning the Word of God that the Church give Testimony unto it and Learned men produce their Arguments for it if this all or any part hereof be esteemed as the sufficient Proposition of the Scripture to be the Word of God then is the Execution of infinite divine Justice built upon the Testimony of men which is not divine or infallible but such as might deceive For God on this supposal must condemn men for not believing with faith divine and infallible that which is proposed unto them by Testimonies and Arguments humane and fallible quod absit It remaineth then that the Righteousness of the Act of God in condemning unbelievers is built upon the Evidence that the Object of Faith or Word to be believed is from him And this he gives unto it both by the Impression of his Majesty and Authority upon it and by the Power and Efficacy wherewith by his Spirit it is accompanied Thus is every Word of God stedfast as a Declaration of his Will unto us by what means soever it is made known unto us V. Every Transaction between God and man is alwayes confirmed and ratified by promises and Threatnings Rewards and Punishments every trespass VI. The most glorious Administrators of the Law do stoop to look into the Mysteries of the Gospel See 1 Pet. 1.12 VII Covenant transgressions are attended with unavoidable penalties every transgression that is of the Covenant disannulling of it received a meet recompence of reward VIII The Gospel is a Word of Salvation to them that do believe IX The Salvation tendered in the Gospel is great Salvation X. Men are apt to entertain thoughts of escaping the wrath of God though they live in a neglect of the Gospel This the Apostle insinuates in that interrogation How shall we escape XI The neglecters of the Gospel shall unavoidably perish the wrath of God How shall we escape if we neglect so great salvation These last Observations may be cast into one Proposition and so be considered together namely That the Gospel is great Salvation which who so neglecteth shall therefore unavoidably perish without remedy We shall first enquire how the Gospel is said to be Salvation and that Great Salvation and then shew the equity and unavoidableness of their Destruction by whom it is neglected and therein the vanity of their hopes who look for an escaping in the contempt of it By the Gospel we understand with the Apostle the Word preached or spoken by Christ and his Apostles and now recorded for our use in the Books of the New Testament not exclusively unto what was declared of it in the Types and Promises of the Old Testament But by the way of Eminency we appropriate the whole name and nature of the Gospel unto that delivery of the Mind and Will of God by Jesus Christ which included and perfected all that had preceded unto that purpose Now the Gospel is salvation upon a double account First Declaratively In that the Salvation of God by Christ is declared taught and revealed thereby So the Apostle informs us Rom. 1.16 17. It is the power of God unto salvation because therein the righteousness of God is revealed from faith to faith that is the Righteousness of God in Christ whereby Believers shall be saved And therefore it is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Titus 2.11 the saving or salvation bringing Grace of God The Grace of God as that which teacheth and revealeth his Grace And thence they that abuse it to their lusts are said to turn the grace of God into lasciviousness Jude 4. that is the Doctrine of it which is the Gospel And therefore under the Old Testament it is called the Preaching or declaring of glad tydings tydings of peace and salvation Nahum 2.1 Isa. 52.7 and is described as a Proclamation of Mercy Peace Pardon and Salvation unto sinners Isa. 61.1 2. And life and immortality are said to be brought to light thereby 2 Tim. 1.10 It is true God had from all Eternity in his infinite Grace contrived the salvation of sinners but this Contrivance and the Purpose of it lay hid in his own Will and Wisdom as in an infinite Abysse of darkness utterly imperceptible unto Angels and men untill it was brought to light or manifested and declared by the Gospel Ephes. 3.9 10. Coloss. 1.25 26 27. There is nothing more vain than the supposals of some that there are other wayes whereby this Salvation might be discovered and made known The Works of Nature
though we saw not those Miracles yet we have them left on infallible Record for our use that by them we might be yet stirred up to value and attend unto the Word in a due manner God hath so ordered things in his holy Providence that none can neglect the Word without shutting his eyes against such Light and Evidence of conviction as will leave them abundantly inexcusable at the last day Now from these and the like considerations the duty proposed may be enforced Verse V VI VII VIII IX THe Apostle in these Verses proceeds in the pursuit of his former design From the Doctrine of the first Chapter he presseth the Exhortation at the beginning of this which we have passed through The Foundation of that Exhortation was the Preheminence of the Lord Christ the Author of the Gospel above the Angels by whom the Law was spoken and delivered This he now farther confirms and that by an instance suited to his present Purpose and not as yet by him insisted on And he doth it the rather because by the Testimonies wherewith he proves his Assertion he is lead to the Consideration of other concernments of the Mediation of Christ which he thought meet to declare unto these Hebrews also And this method he is constant unto throughout this whole Epistle In the midst of his Reasonings and Testimonies for the Explanation or Confirmation of what he delivers dogmatically he layes hold on some Occasion or other to press his Exhortation unto Faith Obedience with Constancy and Perseverance in the Profession of the Gospel And in the Arguments which he enterweaveth and Testimonies which he produceth for the enforcement of his Exhortations something still offers it self which accordingly he layes hold upon leading him to some farther Explication of the Doctrine which he had in hand so insensibly passing from one thing unto another that he might at the same time inform the Minds and Work upon the Affections of them with whom he dealt All which will appear in our ensuing Exposition of these Verses Verse 5. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 subjecit in ordinem coegit put into subjection brought into order under rule 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Vul. orbem terrae futurum the habitable earth to come Arias habitatam futuram to the same purpose improperly Syr. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Mundum or seculum futurum The world or age to come Bez◠mundum illum futurum that world to come And indeed the repetition of the Article with the words following concerning which we speak require that it be so expressed That world to come or the world that is to come 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Heb. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 So most commonly expressed by the LXX as sometimes though seldom by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the earth and sometimes by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the things under the Heavens The Apostle useth this word from Psal. 8. where it denotes a mixture of Inhabitants there described 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 That is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 concerning which we treat about which we reason The Vulgar Latin adds Deus to the Text. Deus non subjecit God hath not put in subjection needlesly as is acknowledged De quo Christo saith the interlinear Gloss but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is not of Christ. Verse 5. For unto the Angels hath he not made subject that world to come whereof we speak concerning which we treat Verse 6. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Syr. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 But as the Scripture witnesseth and saith limiting what was spoken indefinitely by the Apostle needlesly the words themselves declaring who spake them and where 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Vul. in quodam loco in a certain place Beza alicubi somewhere that is Psal. 8.5 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 quid homo mortalis 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 frail mortal man or the Son of man 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 filius hominis terreni 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 è terra editus man of the earth or an earthly man Verse 6. But one a certain man testified hath witnessed in a certain place somewhere that is in the Scripture from whence he is arguing saying what is man that thou art mindful of him or the Son of man that thou visitest him Ver. 7. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The latter words which are commonly placed at the beginning of the eighth Verse I have added unto this seventh the sense and Hebrew Text so requiring it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 so the Apostle renders 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the Psalmist and that properly Vul. Minuisti which is not thou hast made less but thou hast lessened which hath another sense than that here intended Syr. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 depressisti thou hast depressed or made him less or lower than he was Beza fecisti eum inferiorem thou hast made him lower and so ours Rhemists thou didst minish him a little less obscurely 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is imminuo diminuo to make less to take from as to state and condition So in Isocrates 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is to lessen the Dignity State and Condition of the People As in Latin Capitis diminutio is lessening of State or dignity as by loss of Liberty For when one was made a captive by the enemy he lost his dignity untill he recovered it jure postliminii So Regulus is termed by the Poet Capitis minor when a Prisoner to the Garthaginians or by change of Family as when Clodius a Patrician was adopted by a Plebeian or by Banishment all such are 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 lessened in State or Dignity 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the word used by the Psalmist hath the same signification and though it be variously rendered by the LXX yet they never much depart from its native signification 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to minish make less take from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the same 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to become indigent 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to be in want 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 all to the same purpose 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to deprive 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to want to be indigent to come short and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to make empty that is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the word used Phil. 2.7 I observe this various rendering of the Word by the LXX only to shew that it doth constantly denote a diminution of state and condition with an addition of Indigency which will give us light into the Interpretation of the place 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 breve quiddam Vul. paulo minus Syr. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 paululum a little or paulisper a little while 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is frequently by the LXX rendered 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 parvum paululum a little intending quantity Sometimes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which they refer to number a few and sometimes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and then it constantly respects
that the Apostle had with the Jews and is of great use and importance unto the faith of the Saints in all ages I shall first free the words from false glosses and interpretations and then explain the Truth asserted in them both absolutely and with relation to the present purpose of the Apostle That which some men design in their wresting of this place is to deface the illustrious Testimony given in it unto the Eternal Deity of the Son of God and to this purpose they proceed variously 1. By 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by whom they say 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for whom is intended And so the sense of the place is that for Christ for his sake God made the world so Eniedinus and Grotius embraceth his notion adding in its confirmation that this was the opinion of the Jews namely that all things were made for the Messiah and therefore 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 he renders by condiderat as signifying the time long since past before the bringing forth of Christ in the world as also that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is put for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in Rom. 6.4 Rev. 4.11 Chap. 1.14 and therefore may be here so used According to this Exposition of the words we have in them an expression of the Love of God towards the Messiah in that for his sake he made the worlds but not any thing of the Excellency Power and Glory of the Messiah himself It is manifest that the whole strength of this interpretation lyes in this that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 may be taken for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by whom instead of for whom but neither is it proved that in any other place those expressions are equipollent nor if that could be supposed is there any reason offâ—red why the one of them should in this place be put for the other For 1. The places referred unto do no way prove that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 with a Genitive doth ever denote the final cause but the efficient only With an Accusative for the most part it is as much as propter signifying the final Cause of the thing spoken of and rarely in the New Testament is it otherwise used 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Rev. 4.11 At thy will or pleasure the efficient and disposing not the final Cause seems to be denoted And Chap. 13.14 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by the signs that were given him to do the formal cause is sigfied But that joyned with a Genitive Case it any where signifies the final Cause doth not appear Beza whom Grotius cites sayes on Rom. 6.4 that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by the glory of the Father may be taken for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 unto the glory But the case is not the same where things as where Persons are spoken of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 here relates unto a Person and yet is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 joyned with it asserted to denote the end of the things spoken of which is insolent Besides 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in that place is indeed the glorious power of the Father the efficient of the Resurrection of Christ treated of So that whereas 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is used six hundred times with a Genitive Case in the New Testament no one instance can be given where it may be rendered propter for and therefore cannot be so here 2. On supposition that some such instance might be produced yet being contrary to the constant use of the Word some cogent Reason from the Text wherein it is used or the thing treated of must be urged to give that sense admittance And nothing of that nature is or can be here pleaded 3. As 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 are distinguished the one expressing the efficient the other the final cause Rom. 11.36 so also are 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in this very Epistle Chap. 2.10 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for whom are all things and by whom are all things and is it likely that the Apostle would put one of them for the other contrary to the proper use which he intended immediately to assign severally unto them 4. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by whom here is the same with 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by him Joh. 1.3 which the same Person interprets properly for the Efficient Cause On these accounts the foundation of this Gloss being removed the superadded Translation of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by condiderat is altogether useless and what the Jews grant that God did with respect to the Messiah we shall afterwards consider 2. The Socinians generally lay no exception against the Person making whom they acknowledge to be Christ the Son but unto the Worlds said to be made These are not say they the things of the Old but of the new Creation not the fabrick of Heaven and Earth but the Conversion of the souls of men not the first institution and forming of all things but the Restauration of mankind and Translation into a new condition of life This Sclictingius at large insists on in his Comment in this place bringing in the justification of his interpretation the summ of what is pleaded by any of them in answer not only to this Testimony but also to that of Joh. 1.3 and that also of Coloss. 1.16 17. 1. The old Creation he sayes is never said to be performed by any intermediate Cause as the Father is here said to make these worlds by the Son But 1. This is petitio principii that this expression doth denote any such intermediate cause as should interpose between the Father and the Creation of the world by an operation of its own divers from that of the Father Job 26.13 God is said to adorn the Heavens 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by his Spirit which they will not contend to denote an intermediate cause and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 here is but what the Hebrews express by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 2. In the Creation of the world the Father wrought in and by the Son the same creating act being the act of both Persons Joh. 5.17 their Will Wisdom and Power being essentially the same 2. He adds There is an allusion only in the words unto the first Creation as in John Chap. 1.1 2 3. where the Apostle sets out the beginning of the Gospel in the terms whereby Moses reports the Creation of the world And therefore mentions light in particular because of an allusion to the light at first created by God when of all other things wherein there is no such allusion he maketh no mention Answ. 1. The new Creation granted by the men of this perswasion being only a moral Swasion of the minds of men by the outward Doctrine of the Gospel I know not what Allusion can be fancied in it unto the Creation of the world out of nothing 2. It is granted that the Apostle speaks here of the same Creation that John treats of in the beginning of his Gospel but that