foundation in Scripture Cum habeamus omnium exactissimam perfectissimam regulam ex divinarum Scripturarum assertione â—ro vos omnes ut relinquatis quid huic quid illi videatur de bis a Scripturis haec oâ—n a in quirite Chrys Nihil sinè nihilixira nihil praeter nihil ultra divinam Scripturam admittendum est Consul MortoÌ„ p. 2. l. 3. cap. 25. every heretick will alledge Scriptures but the Scripture will not patronize errours you may cast them upon Scripture but the Scripture will not father these unlawfull births of your owne which are begotten between ignorance and corrupt affections The Scripture it self is a pure fountain without mud an infallible rule without errour or deceit and nothing else is 6 Prop. That which is the rule whereby opinions are to be tryed is to be a just exact measure capable of no addition nor no detraction neither of lengthning nor of lessening But that is only proper to the Word of God Mens judgements of things are capable of addition they are not so full to which nothing more can be or ought to be added nor are they so perfect from which nothing can be taken away Never were the results of men so full that there was place for no addition nor so perfect that they had not after cause to retract in some thing But now the Scripture is such a Rule which is exact compleat and perfect and this is largely handled by our Divines against the Papists in opposition to their supply of unwritten traditions they are able to make the man of God perfect there needs no traditions of men there is a sufficiency a perfection in Scripture Nay and they are not onely compleat perfect but intire in this perfection to which nothing must be added nor from which nothing must be substracted and taken away as you see it Deut. 4.2 Yee shall not add to the Word which I command you nor shall ye diminish ought fâ—â—m it so the 12. Deut. 32. and Deut. 5.32 Yee shall doe whatever the Lord hath commanded you shall not turne aside to the right hand or to the left Neque pastor neque concilium imo neque Argelus in â—ebus fidei recipiendus est non dico solum conâ—ra scripturas sed etiam obsque scripturis vel praeter scripturas Bil. Con. Apol. p. 2. p. 266. Diabolicum est extra divinarum Scripturarum authoritatem aliquid divinum putare Theoph. Gal. 1.8 If an Angell from Heaven should preach another Gospell let him be accursed And Rev. 22.18 19. which shuts up not onely Johns Prophecy but the whole â—anon of Scripture If any man shall add to this prophecy God shall add to him the plagues that are written in this book and if any man shal take away from the words of this book God shall take away his part out of the book of life and holy City c. and therefore the Scriptures being so exact a rule so compleat and entirely perfect capable of no addition nor diminution it must needs follow that the Scripture is the alone rule whereby we are to try opinions that lapis lydius or touch-stone whereby we are to prove all the doctrines of men And so much for the first Argument Arg. 2. That which is to be our Judge after death is surely to be our Rule in life this is plain if we are to be judged by it surely we are to be ruled by it if it must be our Judge hereafter then our Law here But the Scripture shall be our Judge after death Joh. 12.48 He that rejecteth me and receiveth not my Word hath one that judgeth him Mort. Ap. C at p. 2 l. 1. c. 48 53 c. Cons Park de polit eccl l 2. c. 2. p. 148 149. Non aliter impios haereticos perfrictae frontis possâ—mus convincere nisisacros habeamus codices ex quibus clara veritas elucescit Mort. def Apo l. p 1 c. 9. See Reynolds conf p. 97. Cons Park l. 2. c. 2. p. 130. the Word which I have spoken the same shall judge him in the last day So 2 Thess 1.8 He shall come in flaming fire taking vengeance on them that know not God and that obey not the Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ Rom. 2.16 He shall judge men according to my Gospel Arg. 3. That which is the touch-stone to discover truth and to manifest errour is certainly the rule to trie opinions But the Scripture is the touch-stone to discover truth and to manifest errour therefore For the truth of this minor proposition that the Scripture is the touch-stone it is easily made good thus That whereon all truths are founded and by which all truths are confirmed and wherein all errours are convinced and condemned is surely the touch-stone whereby all opinions are to be tryed But in the Scripture are all truths founded and by it are all truths confirmed errours convinced and condemned Ergo. Arg. 4. That unto which God himself doth demit us and send us to try opinions that surely is the rule to try opinions But to the Scripture doth God demit and send us for the tryall of opinions for the finding out of truth from errour and discovering errour from truth therefore surely this is the rule Now that God doth demit and send us thither for the tryall of opinions and for the discovery of truth from errour you shall see Isa 8.20 To the Law and to the testimonies if they speak not according to this word it is because there is no light in them When the Question was to be resolved against the Sadduces concerning this point of the resurrection Christ doth reduce them to the Scripture and tels them if they had searched and enquired there they would have been convinced of their errour Consul Whitak cont 1. q 5 cap. 13. Matth. 22.29 Jesus said unto them Ye erre not knowing the Scriptures nor the power of God So when he would prove to the Jews that he was the Messiah for proof of that he reduceth them to the Scriptures Joh. 5.39 Search the Scriptures for in them ye thinke ye have eternall life and they are they which testifie of me It should be our enquiry in all our opinions what saith the answer of God men say this others say that but what saith the answer of God a De câ—â—lo quaeâ—â—ndâ—â— est judex sed quid pâ—â—sanuâ— ad coe um cum habeâ—mâ—â— hiâ— in Evangelio â—estamentum The Judge is to be sought from heaven but what need we knock at heaven when we have his Word his minde in Scriptures b Coelestis judex non â—u nubibuâ— sed ex Scripturis quaerendus You are not to seek the heavenly Judge from the clouds but from the Scriptures In terâ—â—inamlis controversiiâ— Theologicis sacrae diviâ—â—que Scripturae solummodo relinquatur locus So then that unto which God doth demit us and that wherewith we are to consult in all controversies of faith of
of stability 69 3 Too much credulity 71. to 77 Where five grounds are laid down of our credulity 72. to 78 2 Wickednes proper to the wicked 77 Qu. 4. Who those are that are in danger to be carried away and led aside with errours 78 Four things first premised 78. to 84 The answer laid down in seven particulars 1 All such who have not retained the notions of God in a holy and pure heart 84 2 All such who have not entertained the truth with love of it ibid. 3 All such who have not walked sutably to those truths which God hath revealed to them 85 4 All such who have embraced former truth out of partiall respects 86 5 All such who are not grounded and established in the truth 87 6 Such who have rejected truths received upon corrupt grounds 88 7 All such who have the world for their god ibid. Four sorts of men noted who will never hold to truth 89 Means of establishment in the truth held forth from the Scripture 90 Qu 5. What may be the examenâ— of opinions This branched into four lesser Questions 1 Who are to examine 90 2 By what rule we are to examine 90 3 Who is to judge 90 4 What arâ— the Diagnosticks 90 qu 1. Who are to examine opinions The errour of the Papists and some distinctions â—ouching examination premised 90 to 91 A main position laid down in answer to the Question viz. That every one is bound to examine not only private opinions but even the sentences definitions determinations of Councels Synods c. and to embrace them or reject them as they are consonant or dissonant to the word of God 94 1 This position first clear'd by Scripture 94 95 2 Confirmed by arguments 96-103 3 Strengthned by testimony 103. to 106 4 Objections are answered 106. to 112 And this main position applied to our times 112. to 118 Quest 2. What is the rule by which we must examine After some generals are premised the answer is laid down that the Scripture is the rule and touch-stone whereby opinions must be tried 118 119 This confirmed by divers arguments wherein the properties of a rule are laid down 119. to 126 Some objections answered 126 to 130 Quest 3. Who shall judge that this is Gods minde in Scripture Some generals premised together with some distinctions of judges and truths and doctrines to be judged 130. to 134 And some generall answers laid down 134 to 137 Some more particular answers formed out of those premised distinctions with some directions to finde out truths doubtfull 137. to 144 Quest 4. What are the Diagnosticks where 1 The false marks 2 The true 1 The false marks or the commonly received Characters of truth and errour are 1. Examined in six Queries viz. Qu. 1. Whether antiquity or the ancientnesse of an opinion is not a true Charâ—cter of truth 145 After some distinctions the answer is laid down 145 146 c. Qu 2. Whether the newnesse of an opinion is not a sufficient mark to discover it an errour 147 Four distinctions premised to the answer of this and the Query answered in two conclusions with some admonitions to us in these times 147-154 Qu 3. Whether the wickednesse of them that maintain it be not sufficient to evidence an opinion to be erroneous Some generall answers laid down to which are annexed four rules requisite to be observed if you would judge of an opinion to be erroneous by the wickednesse of the maintainers 154. to 163 Qu. 4. Whether the holinesse of those who are the publishers and receivers of an opinion be not sufficient to discover their doctrine to be truth Some generall distinctions are premised and the Query answered in four conclusions 163. to 169 Qu. 5. Whether this be not sufficient to evidence an opinion to be true that it in maintained by learned men and on the contrary an opinion to be an errour because maintained by those that are illiterate and unlearned 169 1 The divers distinctions and acceptations of learning 169. to 175 And thereupon ansvvers framed 175. to 182 Qu. 6. VVhether the multitude or pancity of them who are the divulgers and entertainers of an opinion be not sufficient to characterize an errour or truth After the terms explained the Query is answered at large in many particulars 182. to 190 The mysterious workings and energy of errour laid forth in seven branches 190. to 204 2 The true and infallible Characters of divine truth 1 Character Divine truth is word-revelation 205 This branched into three maximes 1 What ever the word of God doth plainly and evidently hold forth that is infallibly truth 206 2 What ever may be collected by way of manifest consequences or made out by evident deductions from the word is certainely a truth 107 Yet three Cautions are laid down concerning this 207. to 209 3 Maxim What ever may be made evident to be consonant to Gods minde or the main end of God in Scripture though there be no particular place for it yet doubtlesse it is a truth 210 2 Charact. That which doth really and truly advance all God in Christ is certainly a truth of God This branched forth into four particulars and many opinions in our daies examined by it 210. to 216 3 Char. That which doth really advance the whole work of grace in the hearts and lives of Saints that is certainly a truth of God 217 This branched into four particulars and fix eminent operations of truth said down 217. to 214 As 1. It hath a soul-humbling power upon which some Objections are answered 221. to 228 2 It hath a heart-changing power 228 3 It hath a sin-subduing power 230 4 It hath a heart-quickning power ibid. 5 It hath a heart-inflaming power 231 6 It hath a heart-raising spiritualizing power ibid Use The whole applied to our times 233 The application branched into some 1 Cautions 2 Directions 235 1 Cautions where are four laid down 1 Beware of being too credulous where three great grounds of mens credulousnesse are noted 235-236 2 Beware of prejudices 237 3 Beware of being biassed with corrupt affections where four great biasses are laid down 239. to 243. 4 Beware of wilfulnesse and perversnesse Two directions 1 Consult impartially and diligently with the Word of God and God in the Word 244 This branched forth into four particulars and seven mediums laid down to enable us to finde out the right sense of Scripture 244. to 250 Direct 2. Get an humble heart 25â— Direct 3. Labour to be renewed in the spirits of your mindes ib. Direct 4. Get a heart prepared for the entertainment of truth 5 Enquire diligently 252 6 Walk answerably 252 Quest 6. What waies God hath left us in his Word for the suppressing of errour and reducing of erroneous persons 253 Some generals premised The answer comprised under two heads 1 Ecclesiastical 255 2 Civil 255 Ecclesiasticall are 1 Fraternall 257 2 Pâ—stâ—â—all 3 Judiciall 1 Congregationall 1 Admonition 258
this passage Then doe we sufficiently know that the doctrine is of God when we perceive it to be propounded to us by our lawfull Pastor especiall a Councell assenting to it And if any will not rest here in the doctrine propounded but will try further and arrogate judgement over their judges and call to question whether those things are truths which are propounded by the Church by whom the spirit of God would teach us let such an one know he doth transgresse Gods bounds and the way and manner of trying of spirits commanded of God The same man saith further It is not fit that any private man should arrogate to himselfe to judge of the doctrines or opinions of his Priest Quic simpliciter omnes jubebantur sacerdoti de rebus controversis aâ—â—quid statuentâ— acquiescere Greg. Ecclesiae ministerio credimus simpliciter absolutè si ministri ecclesiae in aliquo dubio definiendo errarent populus Christianus errare posset imo deberet Stapl. because every one are simply and absolutely commanded to rest in the determinations of the Priest I will but name another who yet riseth higher We doe simply and absolutely believe the ministry of the Church And the people are so subjected to the sentences of their Pastors that if the Priest doe erre in any thing the people may and ought to erre in obedience of them So that you see if you aske the judgement of the Papists in this point you are in a poore case you are to stand to the determinations and definitions of Synods Councells without any doubt or examination whether they be true or no and that they might the better bring in this implicite faith and blinde obedience They tell you that they are infallible that you might the rather put out your owne eyes and be led by their light they tell you that they are unerring guides and in indeed if this were true the people might better shut their eyes and goe by theirs they might rather tye their boate to their ship follow the dictates definitions of them without either doubt or examination but they must believe the one that they cannot erre and then they must doe the other that is stand to all their sentences and determinations But we will passe this onely we shew you that they take away all power in any Christian man of judging or examining and prooving the doctrines which are propounded by their Councells and Bishops and doe require a blinde faith and obedience to them all saying that every particular person ought to stand to the determinations of the Church and to beleeve them to be truth because the Church hath an unerring spirit And this belief suits well with the people say they to believe as the Church believes for he that doth believe him that doth believe is not improperly said to believe though he know not what he doth believe An opinion which doth a Papistae in religione recipienda ethnicorum imo pecuduÌ„ more ducuÌ„tur beast men and denude them of all reason and what is of man in them Against which Luther speaks in these words b Hoc uno scelere meritos esse Praelatos Romanenses ut ex ecclesiae coetu tanquam lupi tyranni pellereÌ„tur Tom. 2. p. 375. Qu. Who are to examine opinions For this one wicked opinion viz. that absolute dominion which they claim over the faith and consciences of men the Roman Prelates deserve to be driven out of the number of the faithfull as Wolves and tyrants And under this censure we will leave them and come to the answer of the Question Qu. Who are those who are to examine opinions You have heard what the Papists say viz. that none ought to doubt of or examine the opinions definitions and determinations of the Church Before we come to give you our answer we will premise some distinctions as touching examination 1. First then there is an examination in foro publico or externo And 2. There is an examination in foro privato or interno that is 1. There is a publike and authoritative examination 2. There is a private and Christian examination Or 1. There is an examination in reference to publike censure 2. There is an examination in reference to private settlement The first is authoritative and is that which comes up to that which Divines call judicium ministeriale or ministeriall judgement which is when many Ministers are authoritatively called convened and met together there they are not onely inquisitors and examiners of opinions but Judges that is ministeriall and subordinate Judges or determinators of doctrines and opinions and may passe censure upon such opinions as are found erroneous And of this kinde is conceived to be that great solemn convention of the Disciples and Elders Act. 15. Where there was an examination and debate of things and thereupon a passing of censure and judgement And of this kinde were those ancient and famous Councels and Synods in the Primitive times of the Church famous against those errours and heresies in those daies And this is the first kinde authoritative examination 2. The second is a private and conscientious examination of opinions in a mans own Court the Court of conscience whereby a man doth try and debate whether those things which are prescribed or those things which are preached written c. be truths and agreeable to the Word of God And this doth amount to that which Divines call judicium discretionis or the judgement of discretion in which men have power to examine debate and to passe judgement in reference to their own practice and walking Every man is not only to be an inquisitor or examiner of all opinions nay of the definitions and determinations of Councels but he is to judge of them and this he ought to doe in respect of his own practice though his judgement is not binding to others or concerns not others no further then others shall finde that there appeares truth in it Now having premised this I shall come to the answer and passing by the first leaving it to another place viz. authoritative examination We shall only deal with the second and say That every Christian who hath care of his salvation ought to examine not only private opinions but even the sentences definitions determinations of Synods of Councels and to bring all to the rule of faith the Word of God the true touchstone of doctrines and to receive them and reject them as they are conceived to be agreeable or disagreeable thereto This position that we have here laid down in answer to the question I shall 1. Cleare it by Scripture 2. Confirme it by argument And 3. Strengthen it by the testimonie of Divines against the Papists And 4. Answer objections and so goe to the second 1. I shall clear it by Scripture and you have one here in the text Mat. 24.4 Take heed that no man deceive you c. 1 Thess 5.21 Prove all things and hold fast
truth and reject errour not because the one is truth the other errour but because the one is commanded the other is condemned authority carries all And what will be the issue they will be as ready to reject as now to receive if authority come in as it was said of Israel they willingly followed the counsell of Jeroboam He no sooner comes with his authority but all stoop to it when they heard the trumpet blow all fell down to worship his Calves Oh that my voice would goe thorow England now that things are upon the wheels reformation in the birth things in a way of setling that they would be prepared to receive things as men as Christians that they would be ready to receive things knowingly subject not your souls meerly to any authority believe God prove all things and then you will hold to what is good I see a spirit in men some look what will authority settle others in what way will preferment lie And as the winde follows the abundance of exhalations so they where there is most abundance for the world I see others standing and enquiring which way such men go men so holy men so learned and few that will take the pains to enquire what is the minde of God They aske indeed with Pilate what is truth what is the way of God but they will not digge into the myne of Scripture to finde this treasure they will not take pains to search They best they hope that godly men and learned men will not settle any thing but what is good and there they rest what is this but resolving our faith into the determinations of men this we are not to doe though the best of men because it is sinfull it is not certain it is not safe nor is it a way like men This is the position that it is our duty to examine the doctrins determinations of Synods Councels c. And let it be our practice And as I would not have you to embrace any thing out of corrupt affections or ignorance so not to reject the sentences determinations of Synods unlesse you have firme ground Take heed they are weighty things though they may erre yet thou art liker and therefore take heed 1. Beware of pride 2. Of faction 3. Of partiality 4. Of corrupt affections 5. Of profanenâ—sse of spirit Ministeriall judgement is their due and the judgement of discretion rationall judgement is yours You are not to embrace without ground much lesse to dissent without cause lest thou be found to be a troubler of Israel a disturber of the peace of the Churches of God As I would not have you shut your eyes and goe by the light of others So I would not have thee put out their light and goe by the darke lanthorne of thine owne understanding I would have you to embrace knowingly and not to reject ignorantly I would give as much to such an Assembly as to any judgement upon earth I would give to such an Assembly as much as to man but not so much as to God They have not unerring judgements indeed their definitions and determinations are not infallible yet to be reverenced I say they are to be reverenced though not adored though their determinations are understandingly to be scanned yet not proudly and ignorantly to be sleighted Consul Whitak cont 1. q 5. c 9. p. 362. b. vel ad sinem cap. It is good to see a ground of assenting and be sure also to see good reason of dissenting In brief this is all I commend to you receive not their determinations with blinde judgements neither doe you reject them with perverse wils Prove all things and hold fast to that which is good Men may erre the best men Councels of the best men and therefore prove thou may erre much more and therefore be not peremptory Though they may erre being but men yea holy men yet if I should rationally seek out for truth I should seek it among an Assembly of holy learned experienced men acquainted with much of Gods minde I would neither have you to sleight their judgements nor enslave your own Not to contemn the light they hold forth to you nor to give up your own eyes and resigne your selves meerly to their guidance Ministeriall judgement is theirs and their determinations are to be reverenced Rationall judgement is thine and their definitions are to be examined and in that we give reverence to them In receiving of their determinations shew your selves to be men in rejecting of them shew your selves to be Christians And thus much for the first great Question We now come to the second Qu. 2. What is the rule by which we must examine or the touch-stone by which we must try opinions And here again if you will consult with the Papists they will tell you that the dâ—finitions of Synods the determinations of the Pope these are the unerring rules these are the infallible Judges of controversies and opinions as for the Scriptures they say of that it is but nasus cereus a nose of wax which may be wrested any way and will receive what interpretation men will give it a Scriptura non potest esse judex controversiarum circa fidem Non Scriptura Dei vox sed ecclesiae praesentis vox est fidei nostrae magister judex injallihilis Not the Scripture say they which is the voice of God but the voice of the present Church is Master and infallible Judge of our faith But I purpose not to lanch into this vast â—ea of controversie but waving the long disputes about this poinâ— as succinctly and clearly as I can I shall give you the truth And that I may proceed more distinctly and clearly in the resolution of this Question give me leave by way of premisall to tell you what we mean by opinions and what we mean by rule 1. By opinions I mean b Dogmata fidei cultus divini the doctrines of faith and of divine worship or truths to be believed and things to be done 2. By Rule I mean the law or sentence of the supreme Judge set up for this end to be the touch-stone to reveal truth and discover errour This we meane by opinions and this by rule We now come to the answer of the Question viz. Qu. 2. What is the rule by which we must examine or the touch-stone by which we must try opinions That there is a rule all grant but what is the rule here is all the controversie We shall not now speak to this controversie according to the vastnesse and largenesse of it as it is handled by our learned c Consul doctiss Whit. con 1. q. 3 per totam praecipuè q 5. c. 8. 13. Consul Daven de judic norm fid per totam primaÌ„ partem Cons Parâ— de polit eccl l. 2 c. 2. ubi noniâ— argumentiâ— confirmatur Scripturam solam esse judicemâ— necnon Morton Apol. Cath. Bilson Reinold Jewel
Divines against the Papists It would be too vast and intricate The result of all would be but this one Position that the Word of God and God in his Word the Scripture and God in Scripture is the only infallible supreme authoritative Rule and judge of matters of doctrines and worship of things to be believed and things to be done And this I shall make good to you in brief by Scripture-arguments and by the suffrage of learned and holy men and answer some Objections and come to the third Question That alone to which all the properties of a Rule doe belong is surely the rule and touch-stone whereby we should try opinions But to the Scripture alone doe all the properties of a Arg. 1 Rule belong And therefore surely the Scriptures are alone the Rule and touch-stone of opinions I suppose the first Proposition is clear all the difficulty lies in the second That to the Scriptures alone doe all the Properties of a Rule belong And this I will evince to you by the enumeration of some of the chief properties of that which is to be a Rule which I shall shew you are incommunicable to any thing but Scripture I will number six of them Prop. 1 The Rule of divine and heavenly things ought to have the authority of God who you know is alone acknowledged the Law-giver to his Church As in Common-wealths it is not in every Lawyer to make Laws these are established by the supreme authority so in divine things it is not for any man to constitute rules of faith and worship but it is proper to God alone Vide Dav. de jud norm fidei p. 46. who hath the supreme authority in his Church The Rule of divine things ought to have Gods authority and that alone the Scripture hath as it is confessed by all And therefore the Word only can be the Rule Prop. 2 The Rule of divine and heavenly things ought to be known and evident and clear to all who are to live by it You know in Common-wealths * Ignorantia juris neminem excuset the ignorance of the Law doth not excuse any man that breaks it because all are bound to know it And so ignorance of the minde of God in Scripture doth not excuse any because all are bound to search and enquire all are bound to know it and if so then must it be supposed to be evident and clear in things pertaining unto life .. And that is implied in those words of Christ Luk. 16.29 They have Moses and the Prophets let them hear them As if he had said they need no miracles they need not one to rise up from the dead the Word is nigh unto them they have Moses and the Prophets let them hear them and like to that is Rom. 10.6 7 8. Say not in thy heart who shall ascend up to heaven that is to bring Christ down from above or who shall descend into the deep that is to bring up Christ again from the dead But what saith it the word is nigh thee even in thy mouth and in thy heart that is the word of faith which we preach Prop. 3 The Rule of divine things ought to be constant stable immutable and unmoveable Consul Whitak cont 1. q. 5 c. 12. Misner de eccl Sect. 4 c. 7. Thes 3. Morton Apol Cath. p. 2. l. 5. c 9 10. c. But this only belongs to the Word men are fickle unstable like water Councels may alter be one to day another to morrow to day determine this and afterwards upon better grounds recede from their former thoughts and determine the contrary But now the Scripture that is ever the same it is an unalterable Rule it is unmoveable and unchangeable like God himself ever the same yesterday and to day and the same for ever The grasse withereth the flower fadeth but the Word of the Lord continues for ever Prop. 4. That which is to be the Rule to try opinions by Consul Whit. con 1. q. 6 pâ—â— totam Morton Apol. Cath. p. 2. l. 1. c. 53 54. Necesse est Scriptur dâ— sanct as in testimoniuÌ„ vocate naÌ„ sine his testibus enarratione c. Orig. Non afferamus stateras dolosâ—â— ubi appendamuâ— quod voâ—â—mus quo modo volumus pro arbitrio nostro sed stateram divinam de Scripturis sanctis c. Aug. Peccurro ad illam stateram dominicam ubi non ex bâ—mano sensu sed ex authoritate divina rerum monâ—eÌ„ta pensantur Aug. de cap. l. 2. c. 6 14. or the touch-stone to prove and examine opinions by it must be able and sufficient to doe it it must be adequate and proportionable to the things which are to be â—ryed it must be able to discover all truths and to evidence all errours Otherwise it is not a compleat Rule But that alone is the Scripture neither Men nor Councels are able to doe this some things may appear to them to be errours which are truths and to be truths which are errours and therefore men cannot be the touch-stone or the rule of tryall but now the Scripture is able this is a compleat rule this is proportionable and adequate to the things to be tried and doth reveal errour by discovering it to be dissonant to it and truth by declaring it agreeable to it self Prop 5. That which is the rule of tryall must be infallible it be such a Rule as cannot deceive if we come to aâ—ke for bread and it should give us a stone for truth and it should deceive us with errour it cannot be said to be a just Rule of tryall The rule must be unerring it must be infallible But this can no man be none can plead an unerring priviledge none can say that their determinations are infallible we know but in part and the best the most learned may not only come short in things they ought to know but may fail may mistake in the things they thinke to know As might be evidenced at large in many famous Councels therefore men cannot be the rule they are not infallible But now the Scriptures are they are the Word of the living God they are the standard of truth and truth it self We may deceive our selves in the search but the Scriptures are infallible they cannot deceive if a man have never so juct a measure yet he may deceive himselfe in the measuring but yet this deceit is not to be charged upon the measure but upon our selves So the Scriptures are a just infallible unerring rule yet may a man be deceived in the measuring of things by it but this deceit is not to be charged upon the rule but upon our selves Either we err not knowing the Scriptures or we err in the partiall search enquiry into theÌ„ we are not faithfull in the scrutiny All fayling ariseth either from ignorance from neglect or from corrupt affections and not from the Scriptures themselves All errours doe pretend to have then
doctrine or worship that certainly is the rule But to the Word doth God demit us and with the Word we are to consult in all controversies of faith we I say not only private men but Synods Councels and therefore certainly this is the rule whereby opinions ought to be tried c. I will but adde one Argument more Arg. 5. That which is the supreme Judge of controversies and opinions is sure the rule by which we are to try opinions * Davenâ— de jud nor 65. p. Vid. Whit. cont 1. q 5. cap. 8. per â—otum But the Scripture is the supreme Judge of controversies 1. It is full of wisdome and able to judge It is called the Word of wisdome 2. It is full of truth infallibly true It is called the Word of truth 3. It is full of power it is the authority of heaven thus saith the Lord and this authority Mencâ—â—h all disputes this puts an end to all controversies 4. It is the great Law-giver that which gives out all truths to be believed and all commands to be obeyed It hath alone supreme authority to constitute doctrine of faith and worship and therefore supreme authority of determining interpreting and resolving doubts which arise from them nay and God was infinitely wise to fore-see all errours and all doubts that might arise or that should arise and hath furnished the Scriptures with sufficiency to determine to convince to condemn appearing errours Consul Whitak cont 1 q. 5. c. 8. arg 10 1â— c. Quasi nos manâ—averimus taÌ„tâ— ante Prophetis Apostolis ut in libris suis nullâ— testimonia ponereâ—t quibus pars Donati ecclesia Christi esse doceatur Reynolds Confer c. 8 div 1. p. 461 462. It is one reason why our Divines say that no man nor coetus mortalium no company of men Synods Councels that can be supreme Judges of opinions because they are not able to fore-see what errours and doubts may arise yea and even out of their own determinations they determin of things only pro re natâ those doubts and controversies which doe arise in their time but cannot fore-see what may arise afterward but now God he fore-sees all he knew all that would arise and did furnish the Scriptures with sufficiency to determine of all doubts and to resolve of all truths necessary for our salvation I remember a passage to this purpose which learned Reynolds doth produce out of Augustine in his conference with Hart it is this St Augustine making mention how the Donatists hated him for preaching of the truth and confuting their heresie as though saith he we had commanded the Prophets and Apostles who were so long before us that they in their books should set down no testimonies whereby the Donatists might be proved to be the Church of Christ 5. It is that at which we are to enquire and with which we are to * Vbicunque locus ad disputandum constitutus fuerit saciaâ—â—s codices Canonicos praesto esse si quae proferâ—â— possunt ex utraque parte documentâ— post positis caeteâ—is â—â—mâ—â—â—tâ—â— ad inquisitâ—â—â—â— terminum perducamus Aâ—gust consult in all doctrines of faith and worship and not only we but Councels Synods they are to goe to the Word and to the testimonies and their judgment no further valid then as it is founded upon the sure foundation the Word of God And therefore it must needs be the supreme Judge Au â—â—antur deâ—â—eâ—io chartae nostrae proceâ—a in mediuâ— coâ—ex Dei audi Christum dicentem â—uâ—i veritatem â—oquenteâ— Aâ—g and by consequent the only rule whereat we are to enquire in all points of faith and worship Abundance more might be said of this point It is the great controversie which our great Champions have combated with the Papists in and the great truth which they held out in their generations Whitaker Reynolds Davenant in whom you may see more at large And it was not new to them it hath been the constant tenent of all the learned in all ages of the Church a Nolo argumento credas nostrae disputationi Scripturas interrogemus Apostolos interrogemus Prophetas interrogemus Christum interrogemus Amb. Doe not believe the argument and our dispute but let us search the Scriptures enquire of the Apostles aske of the Prophets enquire of Christ let them determine b Non adeo perdite confidens sum ut aufim aliquid affirmare quod sacrae Scriptura silentio praeterit Ego in sola divina Scriptura acquiesco Theod. Theod. I am not so desperately confident that I dare affirm any thing which the holy Scriptures have passed with silence I rest onely in the Word of God It is a devillish spirit to thinke any thing divine which is out of the authority of Scripture We will now come having setled the truth upon the Scripture to answer some Objections one or two only Object 1. That which doth receive divers senses and interpretations cannot be the rule whereby we should judge of opinions but the Scripture doth receive divers senses yea and it self is not able to tell which is the right and therefore it is not the supreme Rule and judge of opinions Answ * Scriptura non varios incertos sensus recipit Ex conditione rei affirmatae aut ex intentione affirmantis sed ex inscitia aut pertinacia detorquentis Daven The divers senses the Scripture receives is not from the minde of the Inditer but from the ignorance of the enquirers nor from the things affirmed but from the darknesse or perversenesse of the searchers I say it is not because the Spirit of God did give the Word ambiguously and doubtfully nor because the things affirmed are dark and doubtfull Consul Whitak Contr. 1. q. 5 c. 7. but because we are ignorant or slothfull or else perverse and wilfull Because the Rule may be bended the Scriptures wrested shall we therefore deny them to be a Rule to be the Scriptures some pervert the Scriptures saith Peter 2 Pet. 3.16 to their owne destruction and yet we know they are the word of life to Salvation The divers senses of Scripture do arise either from our ignorance or our perversenes or our corrupt affections oâ— our sloth that we doe not enquire and search we doe not compare Scripture with Scripture but it doth not arise from the minde and intention of the spirit nor from the nature of the things that are affirmed in it The ambiguity of Scripture * Non infringit judiciariam Scripturae authoritatem sed ostendit necessitatem spiâ—â—tus ilâ—inâ—ntis Daâ— Dicimus verbuÌ„ Dei non â—â—â—ilâ—ere judiciariaÌ„ authoritateÌ„ quia hoâ—â—â—â—nes ineâ—â—o re demeâ—si non sâ—mper inteâ—â—igâ—nt contrasâ—â— judicatum ess◠〈…〉 NoÌ„ liquidâ— percipiunt 〈◊〉 se daâ—â—â—tos â—â—encsententia verbidivâ—â—ni doâ—â—ec câ—ram Christo judice in novissimore statâ—â—niur aperâ—o libro câ—â—â—â—â—â—ertur Daâ—â—â—â—â— It doth not infringe the authority of the
of touch in application we come now to the Query Qu. 3. If the Scripture be the Rule God in Scripture Judge yet the great Question is Who shall judge that this is Gods minde in Scripture Here lies all the controversie There is great cause of propounding this Question in regard that the Scriptures they are not in all things so clear but that you see they are capable of many interpretations Capable I say not that these divers senses doe arise from the nature of the things affirmed or from the minde and intention of the declarer but from the ignorance or perverseness of the searchers and inquirers as was said before There is nothing more known then that there are divers senses various interpretations of the same Word of God of the same texts in Scripture Had it never been known before yet our daies had given us plentifully sad experience of it which is the root of all the divisions and differences among the people of God The Papists indeed have a way for union though not Gods way they take away from the people first the Scriptures and then the judgement of discretion or rationall judgement and give them no power to examine and try their Councels sentences determinations but contrarily tell them they are bound with implicite faith and blinde obedience to submit to and receive the doctrines and determinations of the Church and their safety lies in submitting their judgements to their guides though they lead them in a way of errour not considering that which Christ saith If the blinde doe lead the blinde they shall both fall into the ditch Thus they doe they take away the Scriptures from them the light of the Sunne and then put out their eyes too take from them a common and rationall light tell them they have no power to examine their sentences and determinations and then they bid them follow them in the dark give up their faith and consciences to be ruled and guided by them thus after they have made them as beasts they put them under the yoak and deal with them as beasts And now when they have done this they boast of the unity that is among them and tell us they are all of one minde they are not divided into so many factions and different opinions as Protestants are Indeed they have a blinde agreement The Protestant Churches goe not this way for to bring men to union they render us the Scriptures in our own tongue Whitak cont 3. q. 6. Daven de judic nor fidei p. 110 111 112. c. 136 142. they tell us it is our duty to search and examine them they tell us that Councels are not infallible that every Christian hath the judgement of discretion and is bound to try all things they tell us that we are not bound to submit to the determinations of any no further then they shall be made evident to be consonant and agreeable to the Word of God Consul Whitak cont 1. q. 5. c 8. Mort. Apol. Cath. p. 2. l. 5. c 11 12. And if this occasion difference which it doth not of it self yet it is better knowingly to differ then brutishly to agree It is better to differ as men nay as Christians for so we doe in a kinde every one holds forth light and conscience to be the ground of difference though this conscience may be misled and this light may be darknesse I say it is better to differ as men as Christians then to agree as beasts if we differ we differ Christianly if they agree they agree brutishly A conscientious dissent is better then a blinde union if the one be ours I am sure the other is theirs But I am too injurious to you We will come to the Question Qu. The Scripture is granted to be the rule whereby we are to try opinions and God in Scripture is agreed to be the supreme Judge of them But here is the Question who shall judge that this is the meaning of the spirit that this is the minde of God in Scripture It is granted * Scriptura est sui ipsâ—m interpres Whit. cont 1. q. 5. cap. 13. Scriptura se clarissimè laculentissimè interpretatur si nos ScripturaÌ„ sese interpretantem attendere volumus si non in omnibus ubique locis ficut dubitationis â—ihil relinquatur tamen in pâ—urimis maximeque necessariis in sum mis fidei nostrae capitibus Whitak loc cit Consul Paâ—k l. 2. c. 2 p. â— 151 152. Mort Apol. Cath. p. 2. l. 5. c. 9. Scriptura eam stidiosè perscrutantibus est sui interpres Consul Dave de judic ac nor fidei c c. 17. q 4. p. 95 96. c. Vâ—de Whitak cont 3. q 6. An Concilia possint errare per totam quaestionem that the Scriptures are the best interpreters of themselves and thither all must goe for the discovery of the truth or falshood of opinions not only private men but Synods and Councels if they speak not according to this Word it is because the truth is not in them And there are eight severall Rules laid down by that learned Whitaker which if they were observed by all in the tryall of opinions and searching out the minde of God in Scripture abundance of controversies would come to a fair end you may peruse them in his 1. Cont. q. 5. cap. 9. de medijs inveniendi verum Scripturae sensum But it will be said if every man is to be Judge then so many men so many mindes there will be nothing but differences divisions and confusions If it be said a Synod or a Councell are to judge then are men either to submit to their sentences and determinations before they have examined them or they are to examine them before they submit to them If we say the first that we are to submit to them before or without examination then doe men give up their faith and consciences to men and yeeld implicite faith and blinde obedience to humane authority If we say the second that we are to examine before we are to submit which certainly is the truth no Councell upon earth is infallible if not infallible it may erre if it may erre then certainly there is a liberty left for every one to examine and if a liberty to examine then the like liberty to assent or dissent from their determinations as they shall be made evident to his own understanding and conscience to be consonant or dissonant to the Word of God the supreme Judge of doctrine But I am not in this Question to deal with the consequences or the severall inferences that will be made upon the answer of it I have reserved that to the next which is the sixth generall Question viz. What are the remedies against errours and erronious opinions I shall therefore at this time only lay down the answer and so passe on Qu. The Question is who is to judge that this is the minde of
the History of truth the historicall knowledge of things but the godly have the mysterie the mysticall conceptions of them To you it is given to know the mysteries of the kingdom of God Others have the bark and outward rine of truth Illi corticem pij medullam veritatis 1 Cor. 2. ult but the Saints have the marrow and spirit of it We have the minde of Christ 1 Cor. 2. ult Unregenerate men may have the out-side but there are secrets in truth in every truth which they know not The Apostle speaks plain The carnall man is not able to understand the things of the Spirit of God and upon this ground because they are spiritually discerned 1 Cor. 2.14 1 Cor. 2.14 he may discern of them as a man but not as a Christian he may discern of them rationally but not spiritually As there is need of a naturall eye and light to see naturall things and of a rationall understanding to conceive of rationall things So there is need of a spirituall eye and light to discern of spirituall things there is as much disproportion between spirituall and rationall things and a spirituall and rationall eye as there is between an animal or sensitive eye and a rationall eye the rationall perception of things is not so farre above sensitive as the spirituall is above the rationall perception of things I say man is not so much above a beast as a Christian above a man there is something of animality of the beast in man but there is nothing of a Christian faith and spirituall understanding of things in him faith is as much above reason as reason is above meer sense Which might have been a 3d restriction that unrenewed men or men of corrupt life they may be of right judgement for a time in many things but as men not as Christians by the light of reason not the demonstration of the spirit And therefore you see though it be a probable signe of errour when the entertainers of it are men of loose and corrupt lives yet it is not an infallible evidence for even such men may for a time be right in judgement in main things The Raven might bring good meat to Elijah though she her self was an unclean bird the bird was unclean but the meat it brought was good indeed it was but once we never read of a second time that either the Raven brought it or Elijah received it and it was when he was in the wildernesse too when we are in the wildernesse and straits we may receive bread from a Raven God may make use of a Raven to bring bread but we are to expect and receive our daily bread from better hands Indeed it 's true Non quis sed quid affertur Morton Apol. Cath. p. 2. l. 5. c. 9 Isa 8.20 we are not to look so much upon him that brings it as the meat that is brought we are not so much to look upon persons as doctrines we should rather judge of truth and errour by Rule and Scriptures then by life and practice thither God sends us Isai 8.20 To the law and to the testimonies if they speak not according to this truth it is because the light is not in them Men of corrupt life may deliver to you many excellent truths either out of evidence of reason convictions of conscience or for mercinary ends or for applause and ostentation the Apostle told us of some that preached Christ out of envie Phil. 1.15 Phil. 1.15 Certainly there is an errour of both hands we may have mens persons in too much admiration as the Apostle speaks Jude vers 16. Jude v. 16. You esteem too much of men when you will drinke in and receive an opinion because such bring it and you esteem too little of God and truth when you reject the minde of God because such reveal it it was the speech of Christ concerning the Pharisees Mat. 23.2 3. Mat. 23.2 3. They sit in Moses chair all therefore whatsoever they bid you observe that observe and doe but doe not after their works That which Christ spake concerning the Pharisees I conceive to be restrained to those times and to that subject of the Law 1. It was to be restrained to that subject of the Law they were the Interpreters and preachers of the Law Christ would have the people hear thē of it certainly he would not have them hear them upon other subjects if they had preached that Jesus was not the Christ that he was not the Messiah they were to expect a Messiah to come in visible royalty and glory to deliver them from their enemies as they understood that 110. Psalm and other places but as for Christ they knew who he was Is not Joseph his father and Mary his mother say they Joh. 6.41 and is not he the Carpenter No question this was the doctrine they preached and therefore Christ restrain'd them to the subject hear them while they preach the Law 2. Yea and it was to be restrained to the time too as yet the Mosaicall Law was not repealed those rites and Ceremonies were not yet abrogated and therefore as yet they might hear them and walk in the practice of those things but afterwards it would not be suffered they who preached this doctrine were called false teachers and the Apostle cals such deceivers seducers false teachers who preached observance of those things and told the people they were bound to be circumcised and to keep the whole Law of Moses This is certain * Veritas à quocunque dicatur à spiritu sancto est Au. truth by whomsoever spoken is of the holy Ghost We believe truth though the devil speak it but we doe not believe it because he speaks it nor doe we goe to him for the Revelation of it It was a truth which he said I know thee who thou art thou art Christ the Sonne of God but we doe not believe it because he said it but because God revealed it nor yet do we doubt of it because he published it who yet is a lyar and might perhaps speak this truth that we might the rather suspect it because a lyar said it but though he spake it yet we doe not doubt it because God hath revealed it So corrupt men may speak the truth I doe not say they ought to be speakers of the truth men of sinfull lives and practices are not to be in that office as dispencers of the Word and Sacraments but take it as I mean it may for ability in office nor for right to office I say corrupt men may speak the truth but we doe not believe it because they say it but because God reveals it nor doe we doubt of it because they publish it seeing God hath declared it Indeed I would not goe to a lyar to know the truth nor should I reject truth though it come from a lyar So I doe not goe to men of sinfull lives to know
balance of the multitude but in the balance of truth the Word of God This is certain b Veritas neque à nultis neque à paucis pendet Park l. 2. p. 253. Truth doth neither depend on many nor few And therefore we are not to goe by number of votes and voices in finding out of truth but by the authorities of Scripture we are not here to goe by the pol but by the line the Word of God To the Law and to the testimonies if they speak not according to this the light is not in them most voices are not here to carry it but enquire What saith the answer of God You know if the diall be not set by the Sunne you care not what it saith So if men be not guided by the Word it 's no matter what they say though they be myriads of men that speak it Indeed we may give too little and too much to multitude 1. We give too little when the concurrent opinions and deliberate thoughts of a number of godly learned and holy men is of no weight with us when we will reject their results ignorantly wilfully without an impartiall debate and examination of them an honour that you give to the opinions I may say the errours of men of no name Certainly as you are not to submit to the judgement of any Assembly or company of the learnedst and holiest men with a blinde obedience So neither are you to reject their results and determinations with a perverse will you are to try them and be so farre from unprejudiced thoughts that you are charitably to judge that probably so many holy and learned men are not in an errour probably they are in the truth and if you thinke otherwise before triall and debate you give too little to them and it is your sin 2. We give too much to multitude and number 1. Either when we judge of an opinion to be truth because the promiscuous multitude doth adhere to it 2. Or when we blindly subscribe to an opinion for truth because many learned and holy men are the Patrons and maintainers of it 1. When we judge of an opinion to be truth because the promiscuous multitude abundance in the Church adhere to it And this is indeed the great errour men are carried away with the crowd they are not able to stand against the stream they are carried down with the multitude and the number of them in the way is the great argument that concludes them in it also Christ tells us here in the text That many shall come in his Name and say they are Christ and shall deceive many Here you are told there may be a multitude of seducers and a multitude of seduced they shall deceive many And it is the worst of arguments to prove truth by multitude It is a passage of Chrysostom * In theatris multitudo quaeratur Multitudo nota ecclesiae ac proindè veritatis noÌ„ est quia ecclesia saepe in paucis confistit deinde quia multitudo malorum impiorum major est post reâ—â—ò faâ—sa Religio majora occupavit spatia quaÌ„ vera Chry. ad pop Antioch â—om 26. The multitude can be no true Character of the truth and he gives three reasons 1. Because the Church of God doth consist in a few 2. Because the number of wicked men are the greatest 3. Because errour hath gotten more ground then truth the possessions and territories of errour doe farre exceed the bounds of truth you know there are more tares then wheat in Gods field more Goats then sheep in his fold more chaff then corn in his floor more bad fishes then good in his net if Atheisticall prophane men unbelievers proud ambitious men coverous and worldly persons hypocrites and formall professours were singled out the residue would be but few you would see ground why Christ calls his flock a little flock a small remnant and to take up the complaint of the Prophet that the number was but as the gleanings of grapes after the vintage is over but as the shaking of an Olive-tree after the fruit is gathered even one of a City two of a Tribe and to say with Christ Broad is the gate that leads to death and many there be that enter thereat but narrow and strait is the gate which leads to life and few there be which enter therein So that you see if we take up judgement of truth by the number of men in the Church that adhere to it we may be mistaken we are commanded not to follow a multitude to evil * Quae nam precor utilitas est multuÌ„ esse foenum quaÌ„ paucos lapides praeciosos non in numeri multitudine sed in virtutis probitate multitude consistit There is much drosse little gold much hay and stubble and little precious stones If there be any validity in this argument of number it is not in the weight but in the worth a Non in quantitate molis sed in qualitate virtutis Non salvat Christianum quod pontifex dicit praeceptum suum esse justum sed oâ—o tet illud examinare atque se iuxta regulaÌ„ superius dataÌ„ dirigere Ger. Laicus temerè doctoribus ecclesia credere non debeat sed coriaÌ„ doctrinas examinare praesertiuâ— cum populi aures sacerdotum cordibus sape sanctiores sim Hieronâ— Epist. not in the bulk or quantity but in the worth and quality of the persons that are the maintainers of it And yet therein we may erre also which is the second way whereby we give too much to multitude When we blindely subscribe to an opinion for truth because many learned and holy men are the Patrons and maintainers of it I have clear'd this to you at large that it is the duty of every Christian to examine not only the private opinions of private men but the sentences definitions debates of Synods and Councels and to embrace or reject them as they shall appear consonant and dissonant to the rule of truth the Word of God And the Scriptures are plain for it we are commanded to try all things 1 Thess 5.21 And not to believe every spirit 1 Joh. 4.1 and to search the Scriptures Joh. 5.39 Isa 8.20 And the Bereans were commended for the same notwithstanding the doctrine they examined was the doctrine of the Apostles Act. 17.11 And it will not be sufficient for you to say you followed the doctrines of your leaders Christ tells you If the blinde lead the blinde both shall fall into the ditch And therefore we shall give too much to a number of holy and learned men to drinke in and receive what ever they doe propound to subscribe our judgement to their positions without further debate and examination of them though the things be truths yet we erre in our way of closing with them we give blinde obedience and implicit faith to them we make men the masters of our faith which wrongs God and injureth
the sword of the Spirit the power of Excommunication John Bapt. 63 p. Another also who writes for the same We grant it evident that the power of redressing emerging enormities in a Church in every kinde is committed by Christ to every particular Church respectively within it self and so they ought to be cut off by that particular Church that is troubled by them if there be no remedy otherwise By all which you see it is evident upon the confession of all That God hath not left his Church without some means for the suppressing of errour and the reducing of erroneous persons That if a man be obstinate in his opinion and will not be reclaimed he may he ought to be cast out of the Church whereof he is a member And thus we have finished the first judiciall means for the suppressing of errour 2. Means to suppres errour viz. Synodicall we are now come to the second judiciall or authoritative means for the suppressing of errour and the reducing of erroneous persons which I told you was Synodicall if fraternall if pastorall if Congregationall means have been used and those found insufficient and too short there is yet another means which God hath ordain'd and set up in his Churches more powerfull and effectuall then the former and that we call a Synod or combination of Churches which was appointed by Christ practised by the Apostles continued by their successours for 300. years before ever there was any Christian Emperour or any other means and assistances to the Church for thâ—â—e ends And indeed the light of Nature the equity of rules and examples in Scripture do teach That particular Churches may Amos Medul l. 1. c. 39. ib. 17. and ought often to enter into a mutuall confederation and consociation among themselves in Classes and Synods that they may use common consent and mutuall help in those things especially which are of greater moment and beyond the power of particular Congregations to determine and conclude In the Discourse upon which that I may the more avoid all Collaterall and impertinent controversies and disputes and speak to it mainly as it relates to the Question propounded I shall restrain my Discourse to these four particulars 1. I shall shew you what a Synod is 2. That God hath ordain'd and set up this as a means for the suppressing of errour and reducing of erroneous persons 3. That this means hath been blessed of God with power and efficacy for such ends 4. What is the power wherewith God hath endued and enabled it to be subservient to these ends The great burthen of the Discourse will lie upon the last And therefore I shall be briefer upon the rest Quest 1. What a Synod is It is a consociation or combination of Churches in their officers and delegates conveened in the Name and authority of Christ to determine according unto Scripture all controversies of doctrine government manners for the comfort peace and order of the Churches 1. In which description you have 1. What it is It is a consociation or union of Churches One Church cannot make a Synod a Synod is a Collection a combination of Churches There is a two-fold Church 1. Ecclesia prima 2. Ecclesia orta A prime Church and a Church arising out of the prime Churches 1. * Collectio singulorum fidelium in unum congregationeÌ„ gâ—neralâ— nomine eâ—clesia dicitur The prime Church is a collection of divers faithfull persons into one Congregation and in a generall name is called a Church 2. The Church arising from the prime * Ecclesia oâ—ta est â—ollâ—ctio coâ—binatio EcclesiaruÌ„ primaâ—um plurium in unum coetuÌ„ appellatur Synodus It is a collection or combination of more Churches into one Assembly and it is called a Synod So there is the nature of a Synod It is a consociation of Churches 2. You have in the definition the persons whereof a Synod is constituted or made and that is not of all the members of every Church but of officers and delegates or persons chosen out and sent by the Churches Indeed no faithfull persons who desire are excluded a liberty or presence of reasoning or speaking provided they doe it orderly and wisely but they are not there as partes constituentes as constituting parts or members of such an Assembly they are there rather by permission then by commission as consenters not determiners and rather spectatours auditours witnesses then as officers Yet it will be easily granted and Act. 15. seems to hold forth some footsteps of it 1. That the brethren by a solemn Church-act should designe and choose their officers and commissioners they send thither So you see they did at Antioch Act. 15.2 they send the whole Church 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 determined they made a Church-ordinance to send Paul and Barnabas 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And certain others of them to the Apostles and Elders at Jerusalem 2. That the severall Churches should have liberty to convey with them whom they have chosen their burthens doubts scandals and desires and so you see in Act. 15.2 they sent their doubts with the persons they determined they should go up 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 about this Question not that this was the only end of their going to have the Question resolved or that this was the only subject of the Apostles disputes and determinations In the 6. verse It is said the Apostles and Elders came together for to consider 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of this matter not only of the Question but of the scandall the rent and division among them and how to heal that as well as remove the scandall And their determinations make it plain ver 22 23 24. 3. The brethren especially such as are most eminent among the brethren and others so farre as the conveniency of the place and other circumstances will admit have a liberty of presence to hear the debates and take notice how things are transacted in the Synod This is seen in the 12. vers of that Chapter 4. These brethren may have liberty of speech in case they dâ—sire it or if interessed and concerned more especially in the determinations of the Synod There is something of this in the 7. and 12. verses of that Chapter 5. Their approbations and concurrence may be desired to the results and determinations of the Synod and that they might joyn in consent and handing them to the Churches for the more receptive entertainment of them Relique ecclesiae hanc non secus ac matrem colebant Calv in Act. 15.2 Thus you see it was in that Synod vers 22 23. Though indeed there be not so great reason for other Churches concurrence as there was here for Jerusalem because this was the most eminent Church and of great esteem and account among the Churches of Christ consisting of many eminent members able to be teachers to others and therefore there was some more reason why their concurrence might be desired But
we passe this and we come to the third thing in the description 3. You have the form of this Convention expressed in these words Met together in the Name and Authority of Christ As he tells us Mat. 18.20 Where two or three are met together in my Name which is spoken of Churches as well as members The Papists raise up great disputes upon these words In my Name and say they denote him who hath authority of calling and appointing such conventions which say they doth not belong to Emperours or Kings or Magistrates but to the Pope to whom Christ in Peter did commit the government of the Church And so by these words in my Name according to their interpretation is signified the efficient cause not the form of such a Convention But to leave that to * Chamier Tom. 2 l. 1â— c. 10. Sect. 5.6 7 8. Ob Christi gloriam honorem convenire those who enter the long disputes with them Chrysostome expounds it To meet together in Christs Name is to meet together for the honour and glory of Christ a Nomen Christi pâ—cem charitatem interpretatur Hâ—lar Another To meet together in the peace and love of Christ Another b Propter me est meâ cauâ—a quia res facit ad honorem meum Lucâ—s Bruâ—eÌ„s To meet together for me and for my cause and for my glory Another c Nâ—hâ—l aliud est in Christi nomine congregari quam una fide uno redemptore unoque consensu quae alâ—aeternam vitam pertinent mutuo conferre saith To meet together in Christs Name is to meet in one faith in one Christ with one consent mutually to conferre about the things which doe belong to eternall life Take but one more To meet together in Christs Name is d Ita congregari ut solâ—s Christus praefideat ut nulluâ— collegam habeat sed omnes subjectos Calâ—â— so to meet that Christ alone may be president and he may have no fellow but all his Subjects So that now to gather all this together To meet together in Christs Name is to meet in the cause in the faith in the love for the glory of Christ to consult about spirituall and divine things in which they desire to make Christ their Counsellour and Law-giver and give up themselves to be guided and directed by him * Quomodo possunt duo aut tres in nomine Christi colligi quos constat à Christo ab ejus Evangelio separari Cypr. In Christo nomine non congregantur qui abjecto Dei mandato pro arbitrio quidvis statuunt Calv. by which many a Convention is evidenced not to be of Christ nor to meet in his name 4. You have the proximate or immediate end of this convention and that is to determine In which you have 1. The object of those determinations 2. The rule by which they are to be determined 1. The object and there you have it's Extents Restraints 1. It 's extents all controversies to determine of all controversies 2. It 's restraints yet not of all but Church-controversies only which are summed in these three heads viz. 1. Doctrine 2. Government 3. Manners 2. The rule by which they are to be determined viz. The Scriptures all determinations of Councels and Synods c. are to be rejected so farre as they are not consonant and agreeable to Scripture 5. You have the ultimate end of all which is 1. Supreme the glory of God 2. Subordinate viz. 1. The Comfort of the Churches of Christ 2. The Peace of the Churches of Christ 3. The Order of the Churches of Christ And all this you shall see in some degree in that great Synod which we read of in Act. 15. which is left for an example and patern of Synods to us 1. There was a consociation of Churches we reade of two Churches consociated Jerusalem and Antioch and how many more is not evident only it is probable there were others also 1. De jure it ought to have been so the case was no lesse theirs in Syria and Cilicia then theirs in Antioch it was every way their case they were alike concerned in the case and cure they were troubled with the same doctrine and their souls were subverted as well as Antioch as it appears by Act. 15.23 24. And being alike interessed and their case the like and knowing of the remedy it may be probable I say that the Churches of Syria and Cilicia had their Elders there as well as Antioch 2. The acts determinations and decrees are sent unto them all conjunctly I say to them even as to Antioch and messengers appointed to report the determinations of the Assembly to them as to the other as you see vers 23. And therefore as they ought to be here in their delegates and messengers as well as Antioch that which concerns all ought in this case to be handled of all and by the Letters sent to them as to Antioch it is probable they joyn'd in the referring the Question and cause to the results of that Assembly Besides they sent to these Churches but we read not that they sent to other Churches but yet other Churches were bound by this decree and why therefore did they send to these and not to other if that these and not the other had not deferr'd the same cause and sent their Commissioners to Jerusalem with Antioch Neither have we any thing in Scripture to the contrary to prove they were not there and therefore it may be probable they were there in their delegates But this shall suffice to shew you here was a consâ—ciation 2. Here were Officers and delegates sent you see that in Act. 15.2 They determined that Paul and Barnabas and certain other if them should goe up they determined they made a Church-ordinance as I said before to send Paul and Barnabas as Church-messengers or Church-commissioners to the Assembly It was not an Apostolicall journey performed by Paul as an Apostle but he went as a Messenger of the Church of Antioch and as a Messenger Paul returneth with Barnabas and giveth an account of his Commission to the Church who sent him vers 30. as in the 14th Chapter 27. And besides them here is certain other They determined that Paul and Barnabas 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and certain other of them should go up to Jerusalem There is some controversie about these certain other some would have them to be the opposite party whom they sent with the Apostles to speak for themselves or that they might have a fair hearing and there is something to countenance this in the 10th verse where Peter saith Now therefore why tempt you God by which words there seem something to strengthen such a conjecture as this that this was spoken to the opposite party therefore they were present Rutherf Due right p. 40â— But I rather concurre with the learned Professour of Scotland and with Junius that by these other doe
conceive might be meant Pastours and Elders of Antioch who were delegated and chosen by the Church for that service And it may be so conceived because it is said certain others of them which seems to relate to some other in office or to some other of the same spirit now officiated or sent as Messengers from the Church But that shall suffice for the second Here were officers and delegates sent Obj. But you will say here was more then officers and delegates sent here was the whole Church vers 23. and not only present but had their liberty in decision Ames Bel. enerv de concil l. c. 2. and the letters and decrees to the Churches were sent in their name also Answ 1. It was not possible that the whole Church consisting of so many thousands were able to meet in such a place as this is rendered to be being but a private house and therefore not of that large reception to receive the whole Church 2. It was not fit and convenient they should the presence of great multitudes is not proper for the decision of causes and d terminations of Questions But yet 3. Admit there were many present which I am not unwilling to doe the 12th verse tells us The whole multitude kept silence Beza which although some doe interpret not to be meant of the number of believers but of the company of Officers and Commissioners sent from the Churches yet I am willing to allow that many of the Church were present here at this time and in this Assembly but certainly not as Commissioners but rather spectatours and hearers though they were present yet it doth not follow that they had the power of voting and determining that was peculiar to the Apostles and Elders neither was their presence necessary but only occasionall in respect of their vicinity and neighbourhood of place where the businesse was debated if their presence had been necessary then had it been alike necessary for the Church of Antioch and the other Churches to be there being more neerly interessed in the decision then they were And 4. For the other part of the Objection That the letters were written and the decrees sent in their name as vers 23. The Apostles Elders and Brethren send greeting 1. It will be said There is a difficulty what these Brethren are Judas sirnamed Barsabas and Silas were two of them and they are called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 chief or leading men among the Brethren vers 22. If you look into the 23. verse you shall see what these were they were Prophets and Teachers men in office 2. But admit they were such Brethren as were members not in office yet it will not follow that they joyned in the imposition of these decrees upon the Churches but only were drawn forth being choice Disciples to expresse their liking and assent unto those determinations to advantage the reception of them among the Churches nor can we conceive of it in the former sense For as ordinary members they had no power to send decrees to binde their fellow-members nay if it had been the whole Church together they had no power to lay burthens upon other Churches no more then other Churches to impose burthens on them Sister and equall Churches have no power or authority one over another But so much for the second I will be brief in the rest 3. Here was in this Synod the form of the Convention they met in the Name of Christ they were two or three not persons but Churches met in Christs Name They met in the cause in the faith in the love for the glory of Christ to consult about such things as made for his glory and the peace edification and stability of the Churches 4. You have here the proximate end of this meeting or convention which was as is granted on all hands dogmatically to determine In which you have also two things observable 1. The object 2. The rule of these determinations 1. The object of them which was not meerly a Question of faith but also how the Churches were to be regulated what they were to observe for the avoiding of scandall and peace of the Churches 2. The rule by which they determined that was Apostoli haec decreta ex Scripturis sanxerunt Whitak Do â—ec abso scandalo penitiâ—â— omitti queant Chamier Tom. 3. l. 15. c. 10. § 4. Ex lege haec omnia dicunt Chrys See Whit. contr 3 q 6 c. 2 p. 610. a. by the written Word of God So you see vers 15 16 17. And those decrees imposed were no new law established but an old one repeated till without scandall it might be left wholly off and buried All the determinations of this Councell were according to the Word And if other Councels doe determine and define nothing but what is in the Scriptures as this Councell did not if they follow the voice of Scripture in all their determinations they may then say with the Apostles here It seems good to the holy Ghost and us 5. Lastly We have here the ultimate end of a Synod which is 1. Supreme the glory of God 2. Subordinate viz. 1. The Comfort 2. The Peace 3. The Order of the Churches And so much shall serve for the first Query what a Synod is we will now come to the second * Possunt alia legitima concilia similiter asserere decreta sua esse decreta spiritus sancti si huic coâ—cilio simâ—â—â—a suerunt si eandem regulam servaveriâ—t quam in hoc concilio servarunt secuti sunt Apostoli Whitak ibid. Si nihil nisi ex Scripturis statuerunt c. 2. That God hath set up this Ordinance as a means for the suppressing of errour and reducing of erroneous persons That God hath set up this means for this end you read in Mat. 18.15 17. If thy brother trespasse against thee go and tell him his fault where I told you by trespassing was not meant civil injury but spirituall scandals it is not expressed by such a word as signifies injustice but sin not is it meant of scandals only in life and conversation but of scandals also in Doctrine and opinion And the remedy for them as well as the other when more private and brotherly means will not doe then they are to gâ—e and tell the Church Ob. But you will say this Church here spoken of is a particular Congregation where do you read you are to tell it to a Synod Answ There is the same reason in one as in the other mark the proportion Christ commands that from the admonition of one being despised you proceed to the admonition of two or three if that be contemned to the censure of the Church and therefore by proportion if the Church be despised why ought we not to complain to a Synod of Churches a Church of Churches as some of the brethren call it there is the same proportion if indeed thy brother wil hear thee thou ought not
or exception And we use to say Non distinguendum ubi Scriptura non distinguit we are not to distinguish when the Scripture doth not distinguish and therefore the Scripture not distinguishing of evil doers such persons may well fall under the Category of evil doers And should we restrain this unto evil doers only in a civil sense then the state of the Church in regard of the civil Magâ—strate should be worse under the new Testament then under the old for if then he was to maintain it by his civil power and now he neither doe nor can then it must needs follow the condition of the Church in respâ—ct of the civil Magistrate is worse now under the new Testament then under the old Besides it would be strange that it is the duty of the Magistrate to punish injuries done to the state but not injuries done to God that he is to punish those who destroy mens bodâ—es buâ— not those who destroy mens soules that who ever draws away the people from the obedience of the Magistrate and the laws of the Land must be punished but they who will draw away a people from the truth of the Gospel and from the waies of God as Hymenaeus and Philetus who ovâ—rthew the faith of some 2 Tim. 2.17 18. they must not be censured And therefore seeing the new Testament declares the power of the Magistrate and makes the object of this power evil doing in generall and requires submission in such generall tearms therefore may we conclude that the Lord did leave his people for their subjection to the Magistrate to the light of nature and to the equity of those generall rules in Scripture in former times Other places might be alleadged as 1 Pet. 2.13 14. Submit your selves to every ordinance of man for the Lords sake whether it be to the King as to the supremâ— or unto Governours which are sent for the punishment of evil doers and the praise of them that do well So in the 2 Tim. 2.1 2. where the Apostle exhorts us to pray for Kings and them in authority and he gives this reason That we may lead a quiet and peaceable life in all godlinesse and honesty By which is evident that the object of his power is not only things concerning externall peace but such things as concern godlinesse also he is to be the promoter of the one as well as the preserver of the other And this was prophesied of Magistrates under the Gospel Isa 49.23 Kings shall be thy nursing fathers and Queens thy nursing mothers And the preservation of the civil peace is not enough to afford such a denomination nor adequate to the appellation or title of nursing fathers and nursing mothers to the Church under the Gospel And it is said Revel 21.24 of the future times of the Gospel That the Kings of the earth shall bring their glory and honour to the Church There will be such a time which declares that they are to be more then meer protectours of their external civil peace Nor will this which is usually alleadged weaken this assertion that if this power do belong to the civil Magistrate as civil then to every civil Magistrate then to Pagan as well as to Christian Magistrates For we say though this power doe belong to Magistracy in generall and to all Magistrates yet all are not fit and ablâ— to exercise it the authority belongs to the Pagan as well as the Christian Magistrate say Divines but in a different sense one hath this power in actu signato the other in actu exercito one hath the right but he wants the ability to exercise it because being ignorant of Christ and the principles of Christian religion and thereby wanting the directive power he cannot use the commanding and executive power And thus much shall serve for answer to the third Quâ—stion I have purposely waved Objections that I might not unnecessarily lengthen out this Discourse knowing this maxime to be true Rectum est index sui obloqui We come to the Quest 4. Whether such a power be needfull to the Church To which I shall give an answer in these few Conclusions Conclus 1. This civil coercive power iâ— not only unnecessary but unlawfull to be exercised in the planting of the Church and bringing men to the faith of Christ Churches are not to be planted by weapons Lactant instit l. 5. c. 10. but by doctrines not by the power of the sword but by the efficacy of the Word not by carnall weapons but by spirituall means The Commission that Christ gave his Apostles for the spreading and planting of the Gospel was only this Goe and teach all Nations baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Sonne and of the holy Ghost Mat. 28.19 20. the like in Mark 16.15 And Christ tells us his Kingdome is not of this world for then his servants would fight for him Joh. 18.36 but that was not the way to plant or advance his kingdom Christ hath no need of such carnall weapons for the planting of his Church or the setling him in his kingdome the Apostles had a warfare to fight but the weapons of their warfare were not carnall but spirituall and yet strong to pull down the strongest helds of sin and Satan and to bring every thought in obedience to Christ 2 Cor. 10.3 4. They had a sword to weild but that sword was no other but the Word of God the sword of the Spirit Ephes 6.17 Revel 19.15 here were Armies to subdue even Nations to Christ but these were armies of teachers not of souldiers as the Psalmist alludeth Psal 68.11 Externall force is not the way of Christ for the spreading his Gospel and planting of his kingdome It is true here Religio suaderi potest cogi non potest Men may be perswaded into a religion but they can never be compelled All externall acts of power are not able to beget internall acts of faith That is the first Conclus 2. This civil coercive power is not absolutely simply and indispencibly necessary to the being of the Church of Christ upon earth The Church of Christ had being and was perfect in it's being and operations when they wanted the priviledge and comfort of a civil Magistrate The Church of Corinth when the Magistrate was Pagan 1 Cor. 6.1 2 3. was yet a Church sanctified in Christ Jesus called to be Saints 1 Cor. 1.2 4 5 7. had power of Excommunication 1 Cor. 5. 7 13. was a perfect body of Christ 1 Cor. 12. was able to edifie the whole body 1 Cor 14 12 25 26 27. and had power of the seals of the Covenant 1 Cor. 11.20 21. All which shews this power was not absolutely necessary to the being of the Church of Christ Conclus 3. This civil coercive power is not absolutely ne-necessary to the propagating and increasing of the Church and kingdome of Christ And this we see clear 1. Vsque ad Constantini tempora
empersecutionem subcamus parati s uâ—nus om neâ—in martyrâ—um non in obâ—e â—uium Atha in epist ad solitar vitaÌ„ agentes 1. Principâ—s deâ—et â—ogere subditos ad illam religionem quam ipsi in conscrentiis sais â—ud caâ—t esse veraÌ„â—â— Subdeti non debent profiterâ— reâ—giâ—nem à â—rincipe inperatam nâ—si ipsi simul judi caveâ—int illam esse sanam â—â—thoâ—oxaÌ„ Of which more in the next particular This is certain there is no power against God and his truth if therefore the Kings of the earth either out of pride or negligence or ignorance should establish errour in stead of truth we are to say with the Apostles It is better to obey God then you as Athanasius said If the Kings of the earth should command that we should undergo persecution for the profession of the truth we are prepared for martyâ—dom rather then other obedience Brentius hath two propositions which by many are said to be asystata inconsistent 1. That Princes ought to compell their Subjects to that Religion which they in their consciences doe judge to be true 2. That the people ought not to professe that Religion which is commanded of the Prince unlesse they doe also judge it to be sound and orthodox Indeed these two seem repugnant one to another But certainly he doth not mean by the first proposition that the Prince is to compell his people to the practice of that which he doth simply judge to be truth but what God in his word doth assert for truth if the Prince be in an errour he is not to enforce his erroneous judgement upon his people but to lay down his errour and search out the truth yet this perplexity he stands in if he doe enforce his people to errour he sins directly against the law of God and if he doe not doe it he sins against his conscience because he neglecteth to advance that which his conscience tells him is a truth And upon this ground I conceive he saith that a Prince is bound to enforce his people to that religion which he in his conscience doth thinke to be truth because unlesse another medium which I thinke may be given he sins if he do not do it either against the law of God if he be in the truth or against his conscience though he be deceived 2. The second Proposition is more clear That the people are not bound to professe that Religion which is commanded unlesse they doe also judge it to be according to truth The power of the Magistrate doth not binde to obedience unlesse his commands be consistent with the will of God It his commands be contrary to Gods will Quando re ges pro erâ—ore contra veritatem constituâ—nt maâ—as leges probantur benè â—relentes coroâ—aÌ„tur perseverâ—ntes Aug. de correct Don. â— c. 13. Patiendum potius quod Rex minatur quam faciendum quod ab illo jubetur It is better to suffer what he threatens then to doe what he commandeth Hence Augustine hath this passage When Kings doe make laws for errour against the truth beleevers are tried and perseverers are crown'd So much for the first 2. This power is to be dispenced knowingly not only rightly but knowingly We have no Altar to the unknown God blinde worship and ignorant service is a sinfull service though you doe not sin in the matter done you may doe rightly yet you sinne in the manner of doing if you doe not do it knowingly that word that hath put power into the hand of the Magistrate must be his light and guide in the managing of it It is a high abuse of this power to exercise it rashly and inconsiderately with what reason or religion can others be commanded to the obedience of that which we our selves have not the clear and undoubted demonstration is of God If it be required that we are to be fully perswaded in our own minde before we doe much more is it requisite that there should be a full perswasion a clear evidence from the Word before we doe command others to doe lest we be partakers of others sins and in this run the hazard of opposing God Those things which we do not knowingly we can never do surely a man may strike his friend as well as his enemy in the dark and not to do surely here is to do sinfully In matters of fact the Magistrate hath done his duty and is clear in the doing of it though the witnesse prove false Deut. 17 6. At the mouth of two or three witnesses shall he that is worthy of death be put to death And the Magistrates going according to this evidence in matters of fact is clear though the witnesse be false But I cannot thinke it so in matters of faith he is to goe by another rule and by surer demonstrations It is not here what this man saith or that man saith but what God saith He must enquire and know fully before he require any thing of his people It is his duty to study what is Gods will to read Scripture to compare Scripture with Scripture to conferre and labour to be resolved of difficulties he must pray and he had need to assemble godly humble unbyassed uninteressed men to enquire and finde out the minde of God there cannot be too much done before actions of such a high nature are attempted If notwithstanding the best and fullest means upon earth used a Magistrate may be mistaken then how fearfull a thing is it to attempt actions of this nature without any considerations at all Upon what dangerous rocks and precipices do the powers of the earth run themselves under Popery who never enquire into the truth but blindely lend their utmost power to establish and maintain by fire and sword Par in Ro. 13. prop. 3. what ever the Pope commands Indeed they had need to beleeve him to be infallible and that he cannot erre who are to execute his commands because he requires them Those who act such things because any man or men on earth say it had need of such a belief Certainly a Magistrate in the execution of this power had need of better security then either man or men can give him Former times do tell us how miserably the powers of the earth have been abused even when they have been desirous to establish the truth and suppresse errour yet they have been deceived with a shadow of truth and in stead of truth have established errour Fefellerunt Aâ—iâ—niâ— ignorantem regem ac persua seruÌ„t ut falsam credendi formulaÌ„ eâ—clesijs impoâ—eret Hâ—lar de Synod advers Ar à . It was so in the dayes of some of the Emperours when Arianisme raigned and many ages have made it good since by wofull experience And therefore certainly there had need to be good security before such a power be exercised It hath been usually said that a Synod is to goe before disquirendo dirigendo docendo in enquâ—ring directing teaching and