when ye become men ye must put away these childish things Blow at the Root p. 82 83. The expresse testimonies of Scripture forbidding even Angels to adde any thing to those things which are commanded by the Lord do prove the perfection of the Scripture Deut. 4. 5 12. and 12. 32. and 30. 10. and 5. 12 13 14. and 28. 58. Ioshua 1. 7 8. Prov. 30. 5. wherefore the Apostle commands That no man presume above that which is written 1 Cor. 4. 6. 2 Tim. 3. 15 16. Divers reasons may be drawn from this last place to prove the perfection of the Scripture 1. The Apostle teacheth That the Scriptures are able to make a man wise to salvation therefore there needeth no further counsel nor direction thereunto but out of the Scriptures 2. The Scriptures are able to make the man of God that is the Minister of the Word perfect and compleat unto every work of his Ministery whether it be by teaching true Doctrine or confuting false by exhorting and putting forward to that which is good or dehorting from that which is evil Paul would not have us think that all and every writing viz. of Plato Aristotle is divinely inspired for in ver 15. he not only useth the plural number calling them the holy writings thereby to note the word of God and not one sentence or Book but all the sentences and Books of the Scripture and also useth the Article which hath force of an universal note therefore the Greek words the whole Scripture signifieth the whole altogether and not every part severally in this place 2. No one part of holy Scripture is able to make the Minister perfect therefore it must needs be understood of the whole body of holy Scripture wherein this sufficiency is to be found The Ancient Fathers and other Divines have from this place proved the perfection and sufficiency of the Scripture in all things necessary to salvation We do not reason thus as the Papists charge us it is profitable therefore it is sufficient but because 1. The Scripture is profitable for all these ends viz. to teach sound Doctrine to refute false opinions to instruct in holy life and correct ill manners therefore it is sufficient or it is profitable to all those functions of the Ministery that a Minister of the Church may be perfect therefore much more for the people Argumentum non nititur unica illa voce utilis sed toto sententiae complexu Chamierus Hitherto of the perfection of the Scripture absolutely considered now follows the sufficiency thereof in opposition to unwritten traditions or verities as the Papists speak D Davenant premiseth these things for the better understanding of the sufficiency of the Scripture 1. We speak of the state of the Church saith he in which God hath ceased to speak to men by the Prophets or Apostles divinely inspired and to lay open new Revelations to his Church 2. We grant that the Apostles living and preaching and the Canon of the New Testament being not yet sealed their Gospel delivered Viva Voce was no lesse a rule of Faith and Worship then the writings of Moses and the Prophets 3. We do not reject all the traditions of the Church for we embrace certain Historical and Ceremonial ones but we deny that opinions of faith or precepts of worship can be confirmed by unwritten traditions 4. We call that an opinion of Faith to speak properly and strictly when a Proposition is revealed by God which exceeds the capacity of nature and is propounded to be believed as necessary to be known to Salvation Fundamentall opinions are those which by a usuall and proper name are called Articles of Faith 5. What is not in respect of the Matter an Article of Faith may be a Proposition to be believed with a Theological Faith if you look to the manner of revealing as that the Sun is a great light the Moon a lesse Gen. 1. 16. that Rachel was beautifull Leah blear-eyed The Papists do not cease to accuse the Scripture of imperfection and insufficiency as not containing all things necessary to salvation The Councel of Trent Sess. 4. decret 1. saith That the Truth and Discipline is contained in libris scriptis sine scripto traditionibus The Papists generally divide the word of God into the word written and traditions They affirm that there are many things belonging to Christian faith which are neither contained in the Scriptures openly nor secretly This opinion is maintained by the Papists but it was not first invented by them The Jewish Fathers did use the traditions of the Elders and it hath been said of old Mark 75. Matth. 5. 21. for their errors and superstitions yea at length they affirmed that God gave to Moses in Mount Sinai the Scripture and the Cabala or a double Law the one written the other unwritten The Tridentin Fathers Sâ—s 4. do command Traditions to be received with the same reverend affection and piety with which we imbrace the Scripture and because one Bishop in the Councel of Trent refused this he was excluded In the mean space they explain not what those Traditions are which must be so regarded none of them would ever give us a List and Catalogue of those Ordinances which are to be defended by the authority of unwritten Traditions not of the Word committed to writing onely they affirm in general whatsoever they teach or do which is not in the Scripture that it is to be put into the number of Traditions unwritten The cause of it self is manifest That at their pleasure they might thrust what they would upon the Church under the name of Traditions Vide Whitak de Script contro Quaest. 6. c. 5. See also Moulins Buckler of Faith p. 51. Lindan the Papist was not ashamed to say That it had been better for the Church if there had been no Scripture at all but onely Traditions For saith he we may do well enough with Traditions though we had no Scripture but could not do well enough with Scripture though we had no Traditions Baldwin saith a Testament may be either Scriptum or Nuncupativum set down in writing or uttered by word of mouth But a Nuncupative Testament or Will made by word of mouth without writing must be proved by solemn witnesses The solemn witnesses of Christs Testament are the Prophets and Apostles Let Papists if they can prove by them that part of the Testament of Christ is unwritten Any indifferent Reader will conceive that the Scriptures make most for them who stand most for their Authority and perfection as all the reformed Divines do not only affirming but also confirming that the Scripture is not only a most perfect but the onely infallible rule of faith Titus 1. 2. Rom. 3. 4. God cannot lie and Let God be true and every man a lier that is subject to errour and falshood Every Article of Divine Faith must have a certain and
infallible ground there is none such of supernatural truth but the Scripture Because our Adversaries do contend for Traditions not written hotly and zealously against the total perfection of the Scripture that they might thrust upon us many points by their own confession not contained in Scripture and usurp to themselves irrefragable authority in the Church it shall not be amisse largely to consider of this matter And first to enquire of the signification of the words Greek and Latine which are translated Tradition and then to come to the matter which is controverted between us and the Papists The Greek word signifying Tradition 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which in the New Testament is used onely in these places Matth. 15. 2 3 6. Mark 7. 3 5 8 9 13. 1 Cor. 11. 2. Gal. 1. 14. Colos 2. 8. 2 Thess. 2. 15. and 3. 6. and in the vulgar Latine is rendred Traditio Mat. 15. 2 3 6. Mark 7. 3 5 8 9 13. Gal. 1. 14. Col. 2. 6. 2 Thess. 2. 15. and 3. 6. and Praecepta 1 Cor. 11. 2. Whereto the Rhemists translation which seemeth to be but a bare translation of the Vulgar Latin doth wholly agree using the word Tradition every where excepting 1 Cor. 11. 2. where they use the word Pâ—ecepts but set in the margent the word Tradition Arias Montanus in his interlineal Translation doth render it Traditio Beza doth commonly express it by the word traditio In the English Geneva Bible we translate it by the word Instruction Tradition calling mens precepts Traditions the Apostles Doctrine Ordinances or Instructions not that we feared the word Tradition but because we would not have the simple deceived as though the unwritten verities of the Papists were thereby commended or as though we had some honourable conceit of them and what we did herein the signification of the word doth give us free liberty to do in our last English Translation we use the word Tradition as often as the Vulgar Latine or the Rhemists have done not that we were driven by fear or shame to alter what was done before but because we would cut off all occasion of carping at our Translation though never so unjust First We contend not about the name Tradition the word may lawfully be used if the sense affixed thereto be lawful 2. All Traditions unwritten are not simply condemned by us 3. The Apostles delivered by lively voice many observations dispensable and alterable according to the circumstances of time and persons appertaining to order and comelinesse only we say That they were not of the substance of Religion that they were not general concerning all Churches 4. We receive the number and names of the Authors of Books Divine and Canonical as delivered by tradition but the Divine Truth of those Books is in it self clear and evident unto us not depending on the Churches Authority The Books of Scripture have not their Authority quoad nos from the approbation of the Church but win credit of themselves and yield sufficient satisfaction to all men of their Divine Truth whence we judge the Church that receiveth them to be led by the Spirit of God yet the Number Authors and Integrity of the parts of those Books we receive as delivered by Tradition 5. The continued practice of such things as are neither expresly contained in Scripture nor the example of such practice expresly there delivered though the Grounds Reasons and cause of the necessity of such practice be there contained and the benefit and good that followeth of it we receive upon Tradition though the thing it self we receive not for Tradition Of this sort is the Baptism of Infants which may be named a Tradition because it is not expresly delivered in Scripture that the Apostles did baptize â—nfants nor any expresse precept there found that they should so do yet is not this so received by bare and naked Tradition but that we finde the Scripture to deliver unto us the ground of it Bellarmine and Maldonat both do confesse That the Baptism of Infants may be proved by the Scripture and therefore Maldonat concludes Nobis verò traditio non est Bellarmine as Whitaker shews contradicts himself for first he saith That the Baptism of Infants is an unwritten Tradition and after That the Catholicks can prove Baptism of Infants from the Scriptures To this head we may referre the observation of the Lords-day the precept whereof is not found in Scripture though the practice be And if for that cause any shall name it a Tradition we will not contend about the word if he grant withall that the example Apostolical hath the force of a Law as implying a common equity concerning us no lesse then it did them If any man shall call the summary comprehension of the chief heads of Christian Doctrine contained in the Creed commonly called The Apostles Creed a Tradition we will not contend about it For although every part thereof be contained in Scripture yet the orderly connexion and distinct explication of those principal Articles gathered into an Epitome wherein are implied and whence are inferred all Conclusions Theological is an Act humane not divine and in that sense may be called a Tradition But let it be noted withall that we admit it not to have that credit as now it hath to be the Rule of Faith for this is the priviledge of holy Scripture The Creed it self was gathered out of Scripture and is to be expounded by the Scripture therefore it is not given to be a perfect Canon of faith and manners By Tradition is noted 1. Whatsoever is delivered by men divinely inspired and immediately called whether it be by lively voice or by writing 2. In special it notes the word of God committed to writing 1 Cor. 15. 3. 3. It signifies Rites expresly contained in writing Act. 6. 14. 4. It betokens that which is not committed to writing but only delivered by lively voice of the Apostles 5. It signifieth that which is invented and delivered by men not immediately called In Scripture Tradition is taken 1. In good part for any Rite or Doctrine of God delivered to his Church either by word or writing whether it concern faith and good works or the external Government of the Church 2 Thess. 2. 15. 1 Cor. 11. 15. and 23. 2. In ill part it noteth the vain idle and unwarrantable inventions of men whether Doctrine or Rites Mat. 15. 3. Mar. 7. 8 9. When the Fathers speak reverently of Traditions by the word Tradition either they understand the holy Scripture which also is a Tradition it is a Doctrine left unto us Or by Traditions they understand observations touching Ecclesiastical policy Du Moulin Reasons confirming the sufficiency of Scripture against Popish Traditions 1. The whole Church is founded upon the Doctrine of the Prophets and Apostles which were not true if any Doctrine was necessary to Salvation not revealed by the Prophets and Apostles 2.
saith Dr Twisse Bucer also was an excellent Divine He hath written a two-fold Exposition on all the Psalms one more large and Paraphrastical the other briefer and ad verbum Francis Iunius the very Oracle of Textual and Scholastical Divinity as Dr Hall cals him Epist. 7. Decad. 1. Vatablus his Annotations upon the Old Testament and Beza's on the New are commended by Zanchy in his Miscellanies But Arnoldus Boot in his Index Autorum before his Animadversiones Sacrae saith Robert Stephens and not Vatablus was the Author of those Scholia which are in Vatablus his Bible Doctus Vatablus prae caeteris quos adhuc videre contigit omnibus abstrusa quaequ◠in Psalmis explicuit partim suo sano judicio partim doctissimorum Hebraeorum testimonio quem etiam admirandus Calvinus studiose sequitur ferè ubique quasi à sententia Vatabli non tutum esset discedere Foord in Ps. 45. 1. Quid hac phrasi denotetur optimè exposuit D. Beza suis in Novum Testamentum nunquem satis laudatis notis Constantin L'Empereur in Dan. 2. 8. See more of him in Zanchies Epistles Amama Paulus Fagius Drusius Ludovicus Capellus Livelie Cameron Ludovicus de Dieu have been great Lights and by their skill in the Tongues have excellently interpreted Scripture Peter Martyr Lavater Musculus Zanchy Paraeus Rollock Rivet are sound Expositors Ex omnibus antiquis recentioribus medullam variarum interpretationum circa eos disceptationem collegit Willetus in hexaplis ad Genesin Exodum Leviticum Danielem Epistolam ad Romanos in libros Samuelis sibi dissimilis est compendio atque alia plane methodo commentatur optandum esset telam illam à Willeto tam foeliciter coeptam eadem methodo in reliquos Scripturae libros pertexi Voetius Biblioth Theol. lib. 1. cap. 14. 4. For Popish Expositors Aquinas is esteemed by the Papists as the Oracle of the Romish School whom for his profound learning and search into the mysteries of all Divinity they sirnamed Angelical He was the first thorow-Papist of name that ever wrote and with his rare gifts of wit learning and industry did set out Popery most Maximo altissimo ingenio vir cui ad plenam absolutamque totius tam divinae quam humanae eruditionis gloriam solus defuit linguarum eloquentiae usus quem eruditi istius saeculi utpote sublimioribus studiis intenti neglexere Sixtus Senensis Vide plura ibid. Luther on Gen. 9. chiefly commends Lyra for following the literal sense Nicolau◠Lyranus Vir tanta tamque pura vera germana Sacrae Scripturae scientia praeditiu ut in illa exponenda nullum habeat illius temporis parem Rainold de lib. Apoc. Tom. 1. praelect 21. Vide plura Tom. 1. praelect 42. He was a Jew converted Ex antiquioribus tanquam universales communes Commentatores habiti fuerunt Lyranus Glossa Voetius in Biblioth Theol. Jansenius eruditus moderatus Interpres Neque Pontificiorum quisquam doctius interpretatus est Evangelicam historiam Rainold de lib. Apoc. Tom. 2. Praelect 194. Cajetane went over all the Scripture saving the Canticles and Prophets which dying he left begun and the Revelation Quam de industria attingere noluit He was both a learned and moderate Papist as Chamier and Whitaker both shew He was chiefly intent on the literal sense and that according to the Hebrew truth of which Tongue he had little knowledge but had by him those that were skill'd in the Hebrew who would interpret ad verbum not onely exactly but superstitiously and often absurdly which often drew the like Expositions from the Cardinal Tostatus was admirable for his deep skill and almost incredible pains in interpreting holy Scripture There are now five Papists joyned together in several Volumes on the whole Scripture Immanuel Sa Estius Gagneius Tirinus and Menochius the last of which Grotius commends in his Preface to his Annotations on the Old Testament Estius doth excellently on all the Epistles The Commentaries of Immanuel Sa the Jesuite upon the Bible are shorter then the Text it self Familiam ducant inter Commentatores Jansenius Maldonatus Montac Analecta Exercit. 6. Sect. 4. Maldonate doth well on the Evangelists but was a most supercilious Writer and no marvel since he was for his Countrey a Spaniard and his Profession a Jesuite Masius hath written learnedly on Ioshua Quanta vir ille linguae Graecae sed praesertim Hebraicae Rabbinicae Syriacae cognitione fuerit imbutus nemini docto opinor incognitum Morinus lib. 1. exercitat 9. c. 6. exercit 1. c. 4. Andraeas Masius linguae Hebraicae Syriacae peritissimus atque in lectione Rabbinica egregiè exercitatus The Popish Postils are the burden of many Camels as Lipsius speaks of the Books of the Law and are sitly stiled by godly Divines Pigrorum pulvinaria Vide Zepperi Artem Habendi Andiendi conciones sacras lib. 1. cap. 4. pag. 38 39. c. Ministers to all the means formerly mentioned for the interpreting of Scripture must adde a conscionable practice of what they know and must in all humblenesse of minde seek the peoples edification The means to be used by the people to understand the Scripture and finde out the sense and meaning of it 1. If they be learned they may make use of most of the former means prescribed to Ministers 2. Such as are unskilfull and know not how to make use of those means are 1. Diligently to read the Scripture in which are to be considered 1. Antecedent Preparation that they come to the reading and study of the Scriptures with Prayers and greatest Reverence relying on the Divine Promises for the inlightening of their minds by the holy Ghost The Scripture may well be called The Revelation of Christ Rev. 1. 1. See Rev. 5. 5. 2. The Adjuncts of reading which are 1. Chiefest Attention in reading and a pious disposition and spiritual frame of the heart that they may not understand only but cordially affect what they understand 2. Application of all things to the Examination Correction and amendment of their own lives 3. Diligent Meditation 4. Conferring of it with others and catechizing 2. They ought to have recourse to those that are more skilfull then themselves and to consult with the best Commentaries and Expositions of the Scripture and reade them judiciously We teach concerning our Means that they all together do make a perfect way whereby we may finde the right sense of the Scripture Our Adversaries prescribe this method and course to be taken in expounding of Scripture which consists in four Rules The general Practice of the Church The Consonant Interpretation of the Fathers The Decrees of general Councels Lastly The Rule of Faith consisting partly of the Scriptures partly of Traditions unwritten In all these means the Pope is implicitely understood for the Rule of Faith is that which the
then they should give him also their Cloak 2. Papists who 1. Set up Images and Pictures in stead of the Scripture the Scriptures they say may teach men errors but may not Pictures 2. Equal the Apocrypha and unwritten verities or rather vanities with the sacred Scriptures 3. Charge the Scriptures with insufficiency and obscurity allow it not to be a perfect Rule 4. Make it of no force to binde our consciences unlesse the Pope ratifie it 5. Give the Pope power to dispense with things therein forbidden yea and with oaths and vows which no Scripture dispenseth withall 6. Teach that the vulgar Latine is to be received as Authentick 7. Wrest and turn it which way they please Isa. 28. 16. Cardinal Bellarmine in praefat lib. de Summo Pontifice and Baronius say That by precious and corner stone in this place the Pope of Rome although lesse principally is meant who is a stumbling stone to Hereticks and a rock of offence but to Catholicks a tried precious corner stone yet Peter 1. 2. 6. 8. expoundeth those words not of himself but of Christ. Bellarmine from Matth. 21. Feed my Lambs and Sheep would infer the Popes universal Dominion Baronius from the Acts Kill and cat Psalm 8. 6. under his feet that is say they of the Pope of Rome Sheep i. Christians Oxen that is Jews and Hereticks Beasts of the field i. Pagans Fowls of the air i. Angels Fishes of the Sea i. souls in Purgatory They have Tapers in their Churches in the day time because Christ saith I am the light of the world or because they had such at midnight Acts 20. 8. where Paul preached This is the great fault of the School-Divines that they handle Paul and Aristotle Suae curiositati litantes potius quam pietati so that he is counted most learned amongst them who dares to seek and presumes to define most things out of the Scripture What Distinctions Orders Degrees and Offices do they make of Angels What curious Questions do they raise What use would there have been of Sexes if Adam had not sin'd Whether Christ should have been incarnate if there had been no sin and infinite such like The Schoolmen perverting the Scriptures have prophaned Divinity with Philosophy or rather Sophistry and yet are called School-Divines when they are neither Scholars in Truth nor Divines Behold two Swords Luk. 22. 38. therefore the Pope hath two Swords one Spiritual another Temporal 1 Cor. 2. 15. ergo The Pope judgeth of all things and is judged of none The Papists stile the Scripture Regulam Lesbiam Nasum cereum Evangelium nigrum Theologiam atramentariam A Lesbian Rule a Nose of wax the black Gospel inky Divinity Bishop Bonners Chaplain called the Bible his little pretty Gods Book Giford and Raynolds said it contained some things prophane and Apocryphall Leo the tenth the Pope when he admired at the Money gotten by Indulgences he is reported to have said to Cardinal Bembus Bembe quantum nobis profuit fabula de Christo The same man when Bembus brought a place out of the New Testament to comfort him dying said Apage istas nugas de Christo. Paraei Medulla Hist. Ecclâ—s Many wicked men abuse Scripture they say they must not be too precise and urge Eccles. 7. 18. they bring that place Eccles. 3. 4. to justifie mixt dancing that Matth. 25. 27. For usury that 1 Cor. 9. 20. for temporizing and complying with all companies and many that were Professors formerly deny Scripture they call it a fancy a meer forgery the Bible a Riddle The Rebels in Ireland took the Bibles threw them into the chanels and cast them into the fire and called it Hell-fire and wished they could serve all the rest so But I may say of the Gospel as the French Lady of the Crosse Never dog barkt at the Crosse but he ran mad Contra rationem nemo sobrius contra Ecclesiam nemo Pacificus contra Scripturas nemo Christianus Thirdly The Brownists vainly and idly quote the Scripture filling their margents with many Texts of Scripture but nothing to the purpose and misapply it they alledge those Texts of Isa. 52. 51. and Revel 18. 4. to draw men from all the Assemblies of Gods people whither any wicked men do resort Fourthly The Antinomians or Antinomists who cry down the Law of God and call those that preach the Law Legal Preachers and stand for Evangelical grace the Law is part of Canonical Scripture and hath something peculiar in it being written with the finger of God and delivered with Thunder and Lightning See Master Gatakers Treatise on Numb 23. 21. and Master Burgesse his Lectures on 1 Tim. 1. 8 9. Master Bedfords Examination of Antinomianism Those that under a colour of advancing free grace cry down the Law of God are enemies to God to the people of God to the Gospel 1. To God in crying down his Law this is to let every one be at liberty and do what he list â— To the people of God the Law is to them a Light a Guide a Rule a Councellor 3. To the Gospel the Law is subservient to it 1. In discovering of sinne by the Law comes the knowledge of sin and the malignity of it against God and the souls of men 2. In driving men to Christ Gal. 3. 24. 3. In exalting free-grace 1 Tim. 1. 13 14. and the value of Christs bloud Fifthly Stage-players who jest with Scriptures Witches and others which use charms writing a piece of St Iohns Gospel to cure a disease or the like are to be condemned for abusing the Scripture Per voces sacras puta Evang. Iohannis Orationem Dominicam frequenter cum Ave Maria recitatam Symbolum Apostolicum c. morbos curare magicum est Voetius Sixthly Printers who print the Bible in bad Paper a blinde print and corruptly are likewise to be blamed Seventhly The Heathens and Jews Tacitus cals the Doctrine of the Gospel Superstitionem quandam exitiabilem The Modern Jews call Evangelium Avengilion a volume of lies word for word the iniquity of the Volume The blasphemous Jews mean I suppose the volume of iniquity Elias Levita in Thisbi mentions this Etymology or rather Pseudology of the word but P. Fagius abhorred to translate it The Jews think they shew great reverence to the Bible if they place it not under but above all other books if they do not touch it with unwashen hands especially after they have been disburdening of nature if they kisse it as often as they open and shut it if they sit not on that seat where the Bible is but they are not in the mean while sollicitous to do and perform what the Bible teacheth viz. Faith Charity Justice Innocency of life which are the chief parts of Piety They bend all their thoughts not to draw out the true and genuine sense of the holy Ghost out of the Scriptures but how they may by usury and other
I maintain against the Antiscripturists and such as go about to take away all the Old Testament It was necessary that God should give us some outward signification of his will All creatures have a rule without themselves to guide them in their operations The Scripture is the Rule of Faith and Life Isa. 8. 20. All extraordinary wayes of revelation are now ceased we are to pray for a further Discovery of Gods minde in his Word Ephes. 1. 17. not to expect new Revelations ex parte objecti but ex parte Subjecti a farther clearing of the Scriptures to us Some say the Old Testament is a dead letter so is the New without the Spirit how can we convince the Iews but by the Old Testament the same Spirit spake in both Testaments Some turn the whole word into Allegories Others deny consequences out of Scripture to be Scripture nothing is Scripture say they but what is found there expresly What is necessarily inferred is Scripture as well as what is literally exprest Levit. 10. 1. The Apostle proves the Resurrection by consequence Paul and Apollo Act. 17. 3. 18. 28. proved to the Iews by the Scriptures that Jesus was the Christ although in those Scriptures these very words are not found but are deduced by a necessary consequence In the second Book I treat of God That place Exod. 34. 6 7. is as full a description of Gods Attributes as any in all the Scripture The Hebrew Doctors note that there are thirteen Attributes and but one that speaks of Iudgement that he will punish the sins of Fathers upon their Children all the other twelve are meerly wholly mercy and his Iustice is mentioned to invite men to lay hold on mercy All Principles Rules and Motions to Duty are to be found in God Gen. 17. 1. Joel 2. 13. The Heathens extolled the knowledge of a mans self E Coelo descendit 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 But Christians must chiefly study to know God 1 Chr. 28. 9. Jer. 9. 24. Joh. 17. 3. The understanding of the Angels is perfected by the Contemplation of the Excellencies that are in God We shall not be properly Comprehensores in Heaven although the Schoolmen sometimes say so yet we shall know God in a far more perfect manner then in this life 1 Cor. 9. 12. 2 Cor. 5. 7. If God were more known he would be more loved seared honoured trusted God is primum verum which satisfies the understanding and Summum bonum which satisfies the will Deo solo nos debemus frui rebus aliis â—â—i We ought to enjoy God alone and use the world We are said to enjoy a thing with which we are delighted for iâ— self to use that which we referre to another thing I will conclude this with that excellent Speech of Austine concerning Gods knowledge Non enim more nostro ille vel quod futurum est prospicit vel quod praesens est aspicit vel quod praeteritum est respicit sed alio mo do quodam à nostrarum cogitationum consuetudine longe alteque diverso In the third Book I handle the Works of God The serious considering of Gods Works is a great part of sanctifying his Name Besides the natural there is a spiritual use to be made of all the creatures Revel 12. 1. The Sunne points to Christ the Moon to the World the Starres to the Ministers of the Gospel How frequently did our Saviour take occasion from earthly things to teach men heavenly truths In the fourth Book I speak of the Fall of Man and so of Original and Actual Sins Some Divines hold that there are three parts of Original Sin 1. The guilt of Adams sin 2. The privation of original righteousness 3. The corruption of nature Of the imputation of Adams sinne to us Garissolius a learned and pious French Minister hath written a large Book He shews there the consent also of Reformed Churches therein but how great an agreement there hath been of Churches and Ecclesiastical Writers ancient and modern in this matter Andrew Rivet hath taught in a peculiar Book published upon that Argument Every man by nature hath likewise lost the Image of God and is born empty of Grace and Righteousness and wholly corrupt Rom. 3. 23 24. 5. 12. Rom. 1. 29. to the end Ephes. 2. 1. 4. 25. to the end 5. 3 4 9. 2 Tim. 3. 2. to the 6. Some say we are dead as we come out of the old Adams hand but through the undertaking of Iesus Christ all men are restored unto a State of Grace and Favour and that through common grace they may believe if they will But all unregenerate men are still under the state of death and there is no such intrinsecal power in them this man is regenerated say the Arminians and not that because he hath better improved his abilities but the work of Regeneration is an effect of special discriminating grace Some of our Divines say God hath left some few relicks of his Image in us since the Fall to leave us without excuse and as a Monument of his Bounty and in pity to humans Societies some Knowledge and some restraint upon the Conscience Others dislike this opinion and say That Righteousnesse in Adam was connatural but consisted not in any natural Abilities and that these remainders of Gods Image must be of the same kinde with what is lost and so good in Gods account and then man shall not be wholly flesh and so there will be something for Grace to graff upon which the Arminians lay hold on In the fifth Book I speak of Mans Recovery by Christ Phil. 2. 6. to the 1â— Heb. 9. 11. to the 15. Heb. 1. 3. Mark 10. 33 34. as he had the grace of Union and Unction so we through him when we are united to him we partake of his fulnesse Iohn 1. 14. By the first Adam we lost Gods Image Favour and Communion with him By the second Adam Gods Image is restored in us we are reconciled to God and have accesse to him yet he died not for all 1. The reason why none can lay any thing to the charge of Gods elect is Because Christ died for them Rom. 8. 33 34. if therefore Christ died for all none can lay any thing to the charge of a reprobate more then to the charge of Gods elect 2. Christ prayed only for those who either did or should believe in him and for whom he prayed for them only he sanctified himself John 17. 9 19. that is offered up himself in Sacrifice upon the Cross for them 3. If he died for all from the beginning of the world then he died for all those that already were damned 4. Then he hath merited salvation for all and shall they then fail of salvation In the sixth Book I speak of the Church and Antichrist There is much spoken in these dayes of the admitting of Members and of the
vers 14. 1 Pet. 3. 15. Christians should be ready to give an answer to every man which doth ask them a reason of the hope which is in them the foundation is that which is first and surest laid and hath an influence into all the building Men should do all upon trial and solid conviction 1 Thess. 5. 21. 1 Ioh. 4. 1. The Papists would have the people take things upon trust they say those places concerne the Doctours of the Church not the people but compare the 20 and 21. vers in the Thessalonians and 1. vers with 6. in Iohn and we shall see the contrary This trial is profitable First Because truth then will have a greater force on the conscience Secondly This is the ground of constancie 2 Pet. 3. 17. Thirdly Hereby we shall be able to maintain the truth Matthew 11. 19. The Scriptures are fundamentum quo the fundamental writings which declare the salvation of Christians Iohn 5. 37. Christ fundamentum quod the fundamental means and cause which hath purchased and doth give it Iohn 4. 42. The person we must build on is Christ 1 Cor. 3. 11. He is called the foundation of foundations Isa. 28. The doctrinal foundation is the written Word of God which is not only the object and matter of our faith but the rule and reason of it Hold Christ as your Rock build on him the Scripture as your rule and the reason of your believing this is general there are some particulars First Some things are simply necessary It were a notable work for one to determine this how much knowledge were required of all Secondly Not absolutely necessary Some make the foundation too narrow some again too wide some say that if a man nean well and go on according to the light he hath though he know not Christ he shall be saved Others say that all are bound to know distinstly the Articles of the Creed Fundamental truths are all such points of Doctrine which are so plainly delivered in Scripture that whosoever doth not know or follow them shall be damned but he that doth know and follow these though erring in other things shall be saved All the principles of Religion are plain and easie delivered clearly in 1. Scripture they are to be a rule to judge of other Doctrines 2. They are very few say some reduced to two heads by Iohn Baptist Mark 1. 15. and by Paul 2 Tim. 1. 13. 3. In all principles necessary to salvation there hath been agreement among all the Churches of Christ Ephes. 4. 5. though they may differ in superstructures Quod ubique quod semper quod ab omnibus creditur Catholicam est Vincent Lyrin These Fundamentals said a Reverend Divine now with God are twelve three concerning God three concerning Man three concerning the Redeemer three concerning the means of attaining good by this Redeemer Concerning God 1. There is one God which is an Infinite Perfect and Spirituall Essence 2. This one God is distinguished into three Persons or manners of subsistence after an incomprehensible way which we believe but cannot perfectly understand The Father begetting the Son begotten and the holy Ghost proceeding 3. This one God the Father Sonne and holy Ghost is the Maker Preserver and Governour of all things by his Wisdom Power Justice Providence Concerning man 1. That he was made by God of a visible body and an immortal and spiritual soul both so perfect and good in their kindes that he was perfectly able to have attained eternal life for himself which was provided as a reward of his obedience 2. That being thus made he yielded to the temptations of the Devil and did voluntarily sin against God in eating of the Tree forbidden and so became a childe of wrath and heir of cursing an enemy to God and slave to the Devil utterly unable to escape eternal death which was provided as a recompence of his disobedience 3. That he doth propagate this his sinfulnesse and misery to all his posterity Concerning Christ. 1. That he is perfect God and perfect Man the second Person in the Trinity who took the Nature of man from the Virgin Mary and united it to himself in one personal Subsistence by an incomprehensible Union 2. That in mans Nature he did die and suffer in his Life and Death sufficient to satisfie Gods Justice which man had offended and to deserve for mankinde Remission of sins and Life everlasting and that in the same Nature he Rose again from the Dead and shall also Raise up all men to receive Judgement from him at the last Day according to their Deeds 3. That he is the only sufficient and perfect Redeemer and no other merit must be added unto this either in whole or part Lastly Concerning the Means of applying the Redeemer they are three 1. That all men shall not be saved by Christ but onely those that are brought to such a sight and feeling of their own sinfulnesse and misery that with sorrow of heart they do bewail their sins and renouncing all merits of their own or any creature cast themselves upon the mercies of God and the only merits of Jesus Christ which to do is to repent and believe and in this hope live holily all the remainder of their life 2. That no man is able thus to see his sinnes by his own power renounce himself and rest upon Christ but God must work it in whom he pleaseth by the cooperation of his Spirit regenerating and renewing them 3. That for the working of this Faith and Repentance and direction of them in a holy life he hath left in writing by the Prophets and Apostles infallibly guided to all truth by his Spirit all things necessary to be done or believed to salvation and hath continued these writings to his people in all ages Observe those places Act. 15. 11. 1 Tim. 1. 15. Let a man hold this that there was nothing but death in the world till Christ came and that he is come to save sinners Ioh. 17. 3. Secondly There are practical places 1 Cor. 6. 9. Titus 3. 8. Let us 1. See our selves dead without Christ and wholly trust in him 2. Let us be exemplary in our lives and conversations There are other Fundamentals which are only comparatively necessary that is expected from one man which is not expected from another and more from those that live in the Church Have these six Principles of the Apostle not only in your heads but hearts 1. That a man is dead in himself 2. That his remedy lies out of himself 3. Know the Doctrine of the Sacraments 4. The Word of God 5. Have some apprehension of the life to come 1. That there is a passage from death to life 2. That there is a fixed and irrevokable estate after this life 6. Hold the Doctrine of Faith so that Christ may live in you and you be delivered up into that forme of Doctrine lay hold on
God 2. Epicurism scoffing at Divinity 3. Heresie depraving and corrupting Divinity VI. The Excellency of Divine Knowledge or the study of Divinity appeareth in these particulars 1. In the subject Matter of it which is Divine either in its own Nature as God and Christ Psal. 70. 7. Ioh. 5. 46. or in relation to him as the Scripture Sacraments It is called The wisdom of God Prov. 2. 10. 3. 13. 1 Cor. 2. 6 7. and That wisdom which is from above Jam. 3. 17. If to know the nature of an Herb or the Sun and Stars be excellent how much more to know the Nature of God Aristotle held it a great matter to know but a little concerning the first mover and Intelligences Paul desired to know nothing but Christ and him crucified 1 Cor. 2. 2. that is he professed no other knowledge Si Christum discis satis est si caetera nescis Si Christum nescis nihil est si cetera discis In this Mystery of Christ God is revealed in the highest and most glorious way 2 Cor. 4. 6. there is more wisdom holinesse power justice discovered in the Mystery of the Gospel then was known before to men and Angels Christ is the summe of all divine revealed truths Luk. 24. 27. Acts 10. 43. Here is the onely knowledge which is necessary to make the man of God perfect Col. 2. 3. The Metaphysicks handle not things properly divinely revealed but that which the Philosophers by the light of nature judged to be Divine 2. In the End The principal and main end of Divinity is the glory of God that is the Celebration or setting forth of Gods infinite Excellency the secondary end is mans blessednesse Iohn 17. 3. 3. In the Certainty of it Gods Word is said to be sure and like Gold seven times refined there is no drosse of falshood in it The Academicks thought every thing so uncertain that they doubted of all things 4. In the Cause of it These truths are such as cannot be known but by Gods revealing them to us All Scripture was given by Divine Inspiration Flesh and bloud hath nor revealed this unto thee a humane light is enough to know other things 5. In the Holinesse of it Psal. 19. 5. By them thy servant is fore-warned 1 Tim. 3. 15. The word of God is able to make us wise to Salvation and to furnish to every good work Christ makes this a cause of the errour and wickednesse in mans life that they do not read and understand the Scriptures 6. In the Delight and Sweetnesse of it Iob 23. 12. preferred the Word of God before his food David before thousands of Gold and Silver before the honey and the honey-comb Psal. 19. 10. 119. 103. and when he ceaseth to compare he beginneth to admire Wanderfull are thy Testimonies Archimedes took great delight in the Mathematicks Augustine refused to take delight in Tullies Hortensius because the name of Jesus Christ was not there Nomen Iesu non erat ibi He saiâ—â— in his Confessions Sacrae Scripturae tuae sunt sanctae deliciae meae 7. In the Excellency of the Students of it 1. The Saints of God in the Old Testament the Patriarks and Prophets 1 Pet. 1. 10 11. 2. The Saints of God in the New Testament Matth. 11. 25. Col. 1. 27. 3. It is the study of the Angels and Saints of God sn heaven 1 Pet. 1. 12. Ephes. 3. 10. 1. The natural knowledge and enquiry of the Angels could never have discovered to them the Mystery of Christ in the Gospel 2. They know it by the Church that is saith Oecumenius by the several dispensations of God to his people under the Gospel 8. In that the Devil and Hereticks oppose it The Papists would not have the Bible translated nor Divine Service performed in the vulgar tongue CHAP. II. Of the Divine Authority of the Scriptures TWo things are to be considered in Divinity First The Rule of it the Scripture or Word of God Secondly The Matter of Parts of it concerning God and man Principium essendi in Divinity is God the first Essence Principium cognoscendi the Scripture by which we know God and all things concerning him I shall handle both these principles but begin with the Scripture as many Systematical Writers do IT is necessary that the true Religion have a rule whereby it may be squared else there could be no certainty in it but there would be as many Religions as men It appears by the light of nature the Heathen had known rules for their Rites Ceremonies and Services the Turks have their Alcoran the Iews their Talmud the Papists their Decretals every Art hath its Rule neither can any thing be a Duty which hath not a Rule There are three general Characters whereby we may know any Word to be the Word of God and a Religion to be the true Religion 1. That which doth most set forth the glory of God 2. That which doth direct us to a rule which is a perfect rule of holinesse toward God and righteousnesse toward man 3. That which shews a way sutable to Gods glory and mens necessity to reconcile us to God The word of God sets forth Gods glory in all the perfections and is a compleat rule of holinesse to God and righteousnesse to men All the wisdom of the world cannot shew what is more sutable to the glory of God and the nature of man to reconcile God and men then for him that is God and man to do it God revealed himself divers wayes to the Fathers Heb. 1. 1. The manner of revealing Gods will is three-fold according to our three instruments of conceiving viz. Understanding Phantasie and Senses to the understanding God revealed his Will by engraving it in the heart with his own finger Ier. 31. 33. by Divine inspiration 2 Pet. 1. 21. 2 Chron. 15. 1. Heb. 8. 11. Iohn 14. 26. and by intellectual Visions Numb 11. 5. to the phantasie God revealed his Will by imaginary Visions to Prophets awake and by dreams to Prophets asleep Gen. 40. 8. 41. 8 9. Acts 16. 10. 10. 3. Numb 14. 4. to the Senses God revealed his Will and that either by Vision to the Eye or lively Voice to the Ear Gen. 3. 9. 4. 6. 15. 4 5. Exod. 20. 1 2. 3. 1 2 3. 33. 17. And lastly by writing This Revelation was sometimes immediate by God himself after an unspeakable manner or by means viz. Angels Urim and Thummim Prophets Christ himself and his Apostles The written Word for the Matter contained in it is called The word of God Rom. 9 6 for the manner of Record The Scripture John 10. 35. 2 Tim. 3. 16. 1 Pet. 2. 6. or Scriptures Matth. 22. 29. John 5. 39. Rom. 15. 4. 2 Pet. 3. 16. By an Antonomasie or an excellency of phrase as the most worthy writings that ever saw the light sometimes with an
Argument then the testimony of the Church which say they doth infallibly propound unto us what is to be believed what is not to be believed and Hermanus saith That the Scripture is no more worth then Aesops Fables without the testimony of the Church As in other Sciences there are alwaies some principles per se nota indemonstrabilia whence other things are proved so in Divinity all conclusions in point of belief and practice are proved by the Scripture The Scriptures prove themselves by their own natural light manifesting their divine original whence they are and their right meaning how they must be understood They are like light primum visibile which maketh all other things manifest and it self too by its own proper qualities 1. The Church rather depends on the Scripture which is an object not principle of Divinity the Church ought to be subject to Christ Ephes. 5. 24. the Scripture is the word of Christ Col. 3. 16. 2. All the words of the Scripture are words of truth Dan. 10. 21. some words of the Church are words of error Isa. 1. 21 24. 3. 8 9. 5. 13. But the authority of him that speaks alwaies truth is greater then of him who sometimes lies Ergo The Authority of the Scripture is greater then that of the Church Goodnesse it self cannot deceive wisdom it self cannot be deceived God is both Tit. 1. 2. The voice of the Scripture is the voice of God 2 Tim. 3. 16. but the voice of the Church is the voice of men Act. 14. 14. 15. 17. 17. 30. 3. Faith and a firm consolation in temptations ought to relie on a sure that is a divine foundation for every humane testimony is uncertain 4. In vain shall we dispute against the wicked concerning Religion and Divine truth if we shall say it comes from God because we affirm so 5. This is proved by Scriptures Iohn 5. 34 35. Christ in his Humiliation did not receive the testimony of Iohn much lesse will he receive the testimony of others now he is glorified Ioh. 5. 34 35 36. 1 Cor. 2. 4 5. 1 Ioh. 5. 9. 6. The Authority proving is greater more certain and more known then the conclusion proved by the same Authoritas probans is greater then probata The Papists to prove the Authority of the Church flie to the Scriptures For I demand Whence do we understand that the Church erres not in delivering the Canon of the Scripture they answer It is governed by the Holy Ghost and therefore cannot erre in it's decrees But how appears it that it is so governed alwaies They answer God hath promised it and then they alledge those places to prove it Obj. 1. The Church is ancienter then the Scripture because it was before Moses Ergo It hath greater Authority Ans. 1. The Prophets and Iohn Baptist were ancienter then Christ yet not of greater Authority 2. Consider the Word 1. Quoad formale externum as written and cloathed with words so the Church was before the Scripture 2. Quoad formale internum the matter and sense or meaning so the Scripture was more ancient than the Church because the Church is gathered and governed by it 1 Pet. 1 23. Ioh. 17. 20. Iam. 1 18. Semen semper sobole illa cujus est sâ—men antiquius esse necâ—sse est In the thing it self the being and substance of the Word was before the Church although in this circumstance and manner of being it was after Obj. 2. Non crederem Evangelio nisi me commoveret Ecclesiae Catholicae Authoritas saith Augustine Ans. These words saith Whitaker are so well known to the Papists that one can hardly exchange three words with them but they will produce them It is true indeed that we may at the first be much moved to receive and hearken to the Scriptures because the Church gives testimony of them as the woman of Samaria by her speeches of Christ was a means of moving the Samaritans to believe but when the men of Samaria had heard Christ himself speak They believed in him more for his own words then the womans Iohn 4. 39 41. In which sense those words of Augustine so frequently quoted by the Papists are to be interpreted Augustine spake this of himself being a Manichee when he was a Manichee he was first moved by the Authority of the Church to believe the Gospel His meaning is that he had uever believed the Gospel if the Authority of the Church had not been an introduction unto him not that his faith rested upon it as a final stay but that it caused him so farre to respect the Word of the Gospel to listen unto it and with a kinde of acquisite and humane faith to believe it that he was thereby fitted to a better illumination by force whereof he might more certainly believe it to be of God But that the testimony of one Father in one place in a matter of such consequence should be of that force it is strange We deny not the Ministery of the Church as an external means to move us to imbrace the Word of God but we deny the Authority of the Church to be the principal means When we call the Scriptures Canonical we call them not so passively because they are received into the Canon by men and accepted of but actively because they prescribe a Canon and Rule to us The Office of the Church in respect of the Scripture stands in four things 1. To distinguish Canonical Scripture from that which is not Canonical although the determination of the Church be not the only or chiefest cause why the Apocrypha are rejected 2. To be a faithful keeper of those Books which are inspired by God like a notary which keepeth publick writings 3. To publish declare and teach the truth as a Crier with a loud voice ought to pronounce the Kings Edicts but to pretermit adde or alter nothing Matth. 28. 19 20. Acts 8. 35. 1 Tim. 3. 15. This Church here is not that Church which the Papists make to be the Judge of controversies neither the Church representative which is a general Councel nor the Church virtual which they imagine to be the Pope but the Church Essential the Congregation of all faithfull believers The house of God as he calleth it The Apostle here speaks of a pillar not more Architectonico understanding by it some essential piece of the building but more forensi such a post or pillar on which Tables and Proclamations use to hang. In old time the Gentiles used to write their Laws in Tables and so hang them upon pillars of stone that the people might read them as Proclamations are nailed to Posts in Market Towns The Apostle describing the Church likeneth it to one of these Pillars whose use was to shew what hung thereon It is a Pillar not because it holds up but holds forth the truth as
determine all controversies 2. It is true and certain verity is affirmed of the Scriptures primarily interternally and by reason of it self which is called the truth of the object which is an absolute and most perfect agreement of all things delivered in the Scripture with the first truth or divine will of which the Scripture is a symbole and lively image so that all things are delivered in it as the Holy Ghost hath dictated whence those honorable Titles are given to it the Scripture is called A sure word 2 Pet. 1. 19. Psal. 19. 7. The Scripture of truth Dan. 10. ult words of truth Eccles. 1â— 10 Yea truth it self Iohn 17. 17. having the God of truth for the Author Christ Jesus the truth for the witness the Spirit of truth for the Composer of it and it worketh truth in the hearts of those which hear it 2 Pet. 2. 2. The Apostle prefers the Scripture before the revelation made by Angels Gal. 1. 8. Christ commendâ— the certainty of it above all other sorts of revelation 1 Pet. 1. 19. above information from the dead Luke 16. 31. The word of God is not onely true but eminently true truth it self Primâ— veritas and pura veritas The Scripture hath a twofold truth 1. Of assection it containeth no error 2. Of promise there is no unfaithfulness in it The first truth refer to the matter which is signified properly called Truth oâ— Verity The second refers to the inâ—ention of the Speaker which is properly called veracity or fidelity the latter is implyed Psal. 19. Thy Testimonies are sure and so thâ— sure mercies of David the former is implyed in that the word is purer then gold seven times refined There are two signs of truth in the Scripture 1. The particularity of it it names particulars in geneolagies dolosus versatâ—r in generalibus 2. Impartiality toward friends and their adversaries the most holy men have their faults described they give due commendation to their adversaries The truth of Scripture is 1. More then any humane truth of sense or reason 2. Above all natural reason as the Doctrine of the Trinity the â—ncarnation of Christ Justification by faith in Christ. 3. A truth which evidenceth it self 4. The standard of all truth nothing is true in Doctrine or Worship which is not agreeable to this 3. The Scripture is the rule of faith and manners It is termed Canonical generally by the Fathers of the word Canon which signiâ—ieth a rule because it contains a worthy rule of Religion faith and godliness according whereunto the building of the house of God must be fitted These properties saith Suarez are required in a rule 1. That it be known and easie the Scripture is a light 2. That it be first in its kinde and â—o the measure of all the rest 3. It must be inflexible 4. Universal 1. It is a perfect rule of faith and obedience able to instruct us sufficiently in all points of faith or doctrinals which we are bound to believe and all good duties or practicals which we are bound to practise Whatsoever is needful to believe or to do to please God and save our souls is to be found here whatsoever is not here found is not needful to beleive and practise for felicity Christ proveth the resurrection of the dead being an Article of our faith against the Sadduces Mat. 22. 32. and the use of the Sabbath being a rule of life against the Pharisees by an inference made from the Scripture Mat. 12. 7. The heads of the Creed and Decalogue are plainly laid down in Scripture therefore there we have a perfect rule of faith and manners It is a rule 1. For Faith Ierome in his controversie with Helvidius saith Credimus quia legimus non credimus quia non legimus We believe because we read we do not believe because we do not read Christ often saith Have ye not read is it not written what is written in the Law Luke 10. 26. Faith and the word of God must run parallel This we first believe when we do believe saith Tertullian that we ought to believe nothing beyond Scripture When we say all matters of Doctrine and Faith are contained in the Scripture we understand as the Ancient Fathers did not that all things are literally and verbally contained in the Sripture but that all are either expressed therein or by necessary consequence may be drawn from thence All controversies about Religion are to be decided by the Scripture Deut. 12. 32. and 4. 2. Iosh. 1. 7. Franciscus de Salis a Popish Bishop saith The Gospel was honored so much that it was brought into the Councel and set in the midst of them and to determine matters of faith as if Christ had been there Erasmus in his Epistles tells us of a Dominican that when in the Schools any man refuted his conclusion by shewing it contrary to the words of Scripture he would cry out Ista est argumentatio Lutherana protestor me non responsurum This is a Lutheran way of arguing I protest I will not answer to it 2. It is a perfect rule for our lives and practice Psal. 19. 11. and Psal. 119. 9. In Scriptures there are delivered remedies against all vices and means are there laid down for the attaining of all vertues We must follow the Scriptures exactly and not swerve to the right hand or left a metaphor taken from a way or rule saith Chamier When Linacer a learned English man heard the beginning of the 5 of Matthew read Blessed are the poor in spirit c. he broke forth into these words Either these sayings are not Christs or we are not Christians 1. It is a perfect not a partial and insufficient rule as the Papists make it As God is a perfect God so his word is a perfect word if it be but a partial rule then it doth not perfectly direct and he that should perfectly do the will of God revealed in Scripture should not yet be perfect Secondly if the Scripture be a partial rule then men are bound to be wise above that which is written that is above the Law and Gospel Regula fidei debet esse adaequata fidei aut regula non erit Whitakerus 1. All addition and detraction are forbidden to be made by any man to the word Deut. 4. 2. and 12. 32. Deut. 5. 32. Gal. 1. 8. 2. The Scripture is said to be perfect to beget heavenly and saving wisdom Psal. 19. 8. 2 Tim. 3. 15 16 17. 3. Men in the matter of Faith and Religion are sent to the Scripture onely 2. The Scripture is an infallible rule Luke 1. 4. of which thou hast had a full assent Regula rectè definitur mensura infallibilis quae nullam vel additionem vel detractionem patitur 3. It is a just rule Lastly It is an universal and perpetual rule both in regard of time and person ever since the Scripture hath been it hath been the onely
there promised is happinesse It is a wonderful thing that all the particulars which the Canticles contain being taken from marriage are handled so sincerely that no blemish or spot can be found therein Therefore the Scriptures should be preached read and heard with holy affections and should be reverently mentioned The Jews in their Synagogues will not touch the Bible with unwashed hands they kiss it as often as they open and shut it they sit not on that seat where it is laid and if it fall on the ground they fast for a whole day The Turk writes upon the outside of his Alcorar Let no man touch this Book but he that is pure I would none might meddle with ours Alcoran signifieth but the Scripture you need not be afraid of the word but such as indeed are what other men do but think themselves 6. The Scripture is Perfect The perfection of the Scripture is considered two ways 1. In respect of the matter or the Books in which the holy doctrine was written all which as many as are useful to our salvation have been kept inviolable in the Church so that out of them one most perfect and absolute Canon of faith and life was made and this may be called the integrity of the Scripture 2. In respect of the form viz. Of the sense or meaning of these Canonical Books or of Divine truth comprehended in them which Books contain most fully and perfectly the whole truâ—h necessary and sufficient for the salvation of the Elect and therefore the Scriptures are to be esteemed a sole adequate total and perfect measure and rule both of faith and manners and this is the sufficiency of the Scriptures which is attributed to it in a twofold respect 1. Absolutely in it self and that in a threefold consideration 1. Of the principle for every principle whether of a thing or of knowledge ought to be perfect since demonstration and true conclusions are not deduced from that which is imperfect therefore it is necessary that the holy Scripture being the first onely immediate principle of all true doctrine should be most perfect 2. Of the subject for it hath all Essential parts matter and form and integral Law and Gospel and is wholly perfect Both 1. Absolutely because for the substance it either expresly or Analogically contains the doctrine concerning faith and manners which is communicable and profitable for us to know which may be proved also by induction that all necessary opinions of faith or precepts of life are to be found in the holy Scâ—ipture 2. Relatively because as it hath a perfection of the whole so of the parts in the whole that perfection is called essential this quantitative For all the Books are sufficient with an essential perfection although integrally they have not a sufficiency of the whole but onely their own yet so that at distinct times every part sufficed for their times but all the parts in the whole are but sufficient for us 3. In its effect and operation it makes men perfect 2 Tim. 3. 16 17. Rom. 15. 4. Iohn 2. ult 5. 39. 2. As opposed to unwritten Traditions all which it excludes by its sufficiency but we do not understand by Traditions generally a Doctrine delivered in Word and Writing but specially all Doctrine not written by Prophets or Apostles whether Dogmatical Historical or Ceremonial for a perfect reason of the primary opinions belonging to Faith and Manners is delivered in Scripture and those things which are out of beside or against the Scripture do not binde the Conscience 2. Historical the Sayings and Deeds of Christ and the Apostles are perfectly contained in the Scriptures as many as suffice us for our salvation Iohn 20. 30 31. Those things which are delivered out of Scripture are to be esteemed mans writings 3. Ceremonial or secondary opinions concerning Ecclesiastical Rites and Customs are for Essentials Substantials and Fundamentals generally contained in the word of God the accidentals accessaries and circumstantials are free and mutable If Traditions agree with the Scripture they are confirmed by it if they oppose it they are disproved by it The perfection of the Scriptures is not First Infinite and unlimitted That is an incommunicable property of God every thing which is from another as the efficient cause is thereby limitted both for the nature and qualities thereof Secondly we do not understand such a perfection as containeth all and singular such things as at any time have been by Divine inspiration revealed to holy men and by them delivered to the Church of what sort soever they were for all the Sermons of the Prophets of Christ and his Apostles are not set down in so many words as they used in the speaking of them for of twelve Apostles seven wrote nothing which yet preached and did many things neither are all the deeds of Christ and his Apostles written for that is contradicted Iohn 20. 30 31. and 21. 25. but we mean onely a Relative perfection which for some certain ends sake agreeth to the Scripture as to an instrument according to which it perfectly comprehendeth all things which have been are or shall be necessary for the salvation of the Church Thirdly The several Books of Scripture are indeed perfect for their own particular ends purposes and uses for which they were intended of the Lord but yet not any one Book is sufficient to the common end the whole Scripture is compleat in all the parts thereof one speaking of that which another doth wholly pass over in silence one clearly delivering what was intricâ—te in another Paul speaks much of Justification and Predestination in the Epistle to the Romans nothing of the Eucharist or Resurrection Fourthly Since God did reveal his will in writing those writings which by divine hand and providence were extant in the Church were so sufficient for the Church in that age that it needed not Tradition neither was it lawful for any humane wight to adde thereto or take therefrom but when God did reveal more unto it the former onely was not then sufficient without the latter Fifthly The holy Scripture doth sufficiently contain and deliver all doctrines which are necessary for us to eternal salvation both in respect of faith and good works and most of these it delivereth to us expresly and in so many words and the rest by good and necessary consequence The Baptism of Infants and the consubstantiality of the Father and of the Son are not in those words expressed in Scripture yet is the truth of both clearly taught in Scripture and by evident proof may thence be deduced That Article of Christs descent into Hell totidem verbis is not in the Scripture yet it may be deduced thence Acts. 2 27. Some Papists hold That we must not use the principles of Reason or Consequences in Divinity and require that what we prove be exprest in so many words in scripture These are opposed by Vedelius in
Christ had told them of nor the Scriptures had taught them yet this is rather against the Papists For that which the holy Ghost taught them they undoubtedly left in record unto the Church as being faithful stewards and revealing the whole counsel of God unto the people 4. It hath been the practice of Hereticks as Augustine affirmeth at all times to cover their dreams and phantasies with this sentence of our Saviour Christ. Lastly If it be asked What were those grave and great mysteries which the Apostles could not for their rudeness bear they are forsooth oyl and spittle in Baptism Candles light at noon dayes which was not in the darker time of the Law baptizing of Bels and such like gue-gaws as the grossest and carnallest men are fittest to receive Object 2 Thess 2. 15. Therefore Brethron stand fast and hold the Traditions which ye have been taught whether by word or our Epistle From these words say our Adversaries it appears that all things were not written Et nullum Papistae in Scripturis locum probabiliorem inveniunt saith Whitaker The Hereticks say the Rhemists on this place purposely guilefully and of ill conscience refrain in their Translations from the Ecclesiastical and most usual word Tradition evermore when it is taken in good part though it expresse most exactly the signification of the Greek word but when it soundeth in their fond phantasie against the Traditions of the Church as indeed in true sense it never doth there they use it most gladly Here therefore and in the like places that the Reader may not so easily like of Traditions unwritten commended by the Apostle they translate Instructions Constitutions Ordinances and what they can invent else to hide the Truth from the simple or unwary Reader whose Translations have none other end but to beguile such by Art and Conveyance Thus farre the Rhemists Paul taught the Thessalonians some things by word of mouth which he taught them not in his two Epistles which he wrote unto them therefore he taught some Doctrins which he wrote not as if that Paul wrote no more Epistles then these two whereby that which he taught not them in writing unto them he taught them by writing unto others Secondly How followeth this Argument Paul wrote not all the Doctrines of God unto the Thessalonians therefore they are not all written in the Prophetical and Evangelical writings whereas it is plainly testified that the Old Testament containeth a perfect Rule of the Doctrine of salvation the New being written for a Declaration of the fulfilling and further clearing of that in the Old Testament Thirdly It appeareth manifestly in the Acts what was the summe of that which Paul taught the Thessalonians by word of mouth For there it is witnessed that Paul taught out of the Scriptures that it behoved Christ to suffer and rise again from the dead and that Jesus was Christ this teaching then by word is there limited to the Scriptures of the Law and Prophets Neither ought it to seem strange that this was the summe of all which the Apostle taught at Thessalonica where he he tarried so small a while when amongst the Corinthians where he remained longest of any place and consequently taught most he sheweth that he taught nothing but Christ and him crucified Fourthly The Apostle himself in this very place calling vers 14. whatsoever he taught by word or wrote by the name of the Gospel doth declare evidently that he taught nothing but that which is contained in Scripture seeing the Apostle defineth the Gospel which he preached to be that which is contained in the Scriptures Fifthly That the Thessalonians had some part of Christian Doctrine delivered by word of mouth that is by the Apostles preaching at such time as he did write unto them and some part by his Epistles the Text enforceth us to grant But that the Church at this day or ever since the Testament was written had any Tradition by word of mouth necessary to salvation which was not contained in the Old and New Testament we will never grant The Papists do commonly abuse the name of Tradition which signifieth properly a delivery or a thing delivered for such a matter as is delivered onely by word of mouth and so received from hand to hand that is never put in writing but hath his credit without the holy Scripture of God as the Jews had their Cabala and the Scribes and the Pharisees their Traditions besides the Law of God For the justifying of our Translation it is true that we alter according to the circumstances of the place especially considering that the word Tradition which of it self is indifferent as well to that which is written as to that which is not written hath been of us and them appropriated to note forth onely unwritten Constitutions therefore we must needs avoid in such places as this the word Traditions though our last Translation useth it where the simple might be deceived to think that the Holy Ghoâ—t did ever commend any such to the Church which he would not have committed to writing in the holy Scriptures and in stead of the word so commonly taken although it do not necessarily signifie any such matter we doe use such words as doe truely expresse the Apostles meaning and the Greek word doth also signifie therefore we use these words Ordinances or Instructions Institutions or the Doctrine delivered all which being of one or near sense the Greek word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 doth signifie and the same doth Tradition signifie if it be rightly understood Object 1 Timothy 6. 20. O Timothy Keep that which is committed to thy trust By the name of pledge saith Bellarmine not the Scripture but the treasure of unwritten Doctrine is understood Depositum say the Rhemists is the whole Doctrine of Christianity being taught by the Apostles and delivered their Successors Answ. Though other learned men interpret this pledge or gage to be the gift of the Holy Ghost yet we willingly acknowledge that it is to be understood of the Doctrine of Christianity as that which hath best ground both by circumstance of this and conference of other places Whence we inferre That the Doctrine of truth is not the Churches Decrees but the Lords given to the Church to keep only wherewith the Title of a pledge cannot stand unlesse one may lay to pledge a thing in his own hands since in Popery the Church her self maketh the Doctrine which her self taketh to pledge Herein they handle it like a pledge that they lock it up fast where the people of God for whose use it is given to be kept cannot come unto it What had become of the Law of God if others had not been more faithful keepers of it then the Priests to whom the principal Copy thereof written with the finger of God himself was committed There are some points of faith not contained in the Scripture neither in the Old nor New
the person if it be publick in regard of the means is not forbidden for it is lawful for one man with Scripture Toti resistere mundo saith the Glosse of the Canon-Law the meaning of this place is That the Prophets were no Interpreters or Messengers of their own mindes but Gods The Catholicks hold saith Chamier meaning still by that Title the Protestants that the Scripture is to be interpreted by private labour and industry viz. of Augustine Ierom Chrysostom but not in a private sense that is in a sense arising from the brain of the Interpreter It is true saith Cartwright against the Rhemists that the Scriptures cannot be expounded of every private spirit nor which is more of any private spirit nor yet of all private spirits together but only of those which are inspired of God viz. the Prophets and Apostles which are here opposed unto private Interpretation And therefore it is evident That the Exposition of the Scripture ought not to be fetched from Ecclesiastical either Fathers or Councels which speak not by Inspiration but from the Scriptures themselves what he meaneth he declareth in the next verse where he sheweth the reason of his saying namely that it must be interpreted as it was written and by as high Authority Seeing therefore it was first spoken by holy men which spake as they were led by the holy Spirit and were inspired of God it followeth that it must be interpreted by the same Authority The Interpretation therefore that is brought out of the Apostles and Prophets is not private although it be avowed by one man only On the other side that Interpretation which is not brought from thence although it have the allowance of whole general Councels is but private This is a principal meaning of our Saviour Christ when he willeth that we should call no man Father or Master in the earth that is in matter of Doctrine we should depend upon the Authority of no man nor of all men in the earth but only upon Christ and upon God Our reasons by which we prove that the chiefest Judgment and Authority of interpreting Scriptures is to be given not to the Church but to the Scriptures themselves and the holy Ghost 1. That which only hath power to beget faith that only hath the chiefest Authority of interpreting Scripture and of determining all Controversies concerning Faith and Religion but the Scriptures onely and the Holy Ghost have this force Rom. 10. 17. The Holy Ghost onely can infuse saving Faith into our hearts which is called by the Schoolmen Infusa Fides The Faith which we have from the Church is acquired and sufficeth not to a certain perswasion 2. The Scriptures cannot be interpreted but by the same Spirit wherewith they were written that Spirit is found no where but in the Scripture whosoever have promises from God to understand the Scripture may interprett it but so have all the faithfull 3. Christ himself makes the Scripture a Judge Iohn 12. 48. and still appealed to it 4. Although the Fathers were men indued of God with excellent gifts and brought no small light to understanding of the Scriptures yet learned men in our dayes may give a right sense of sundry places thereof which the Fathers saw not yea against the which perhaps they consent Hath any man living read all the Fathers Nay have all the men living read them Nay Can they shew them Can they get them I had almost said Can they name them In the Exposition of those words Tu es Petrus super hanc petram almost every one of the Fathers at least the most part of them and the best expound it of Peters faith yet the Papists understand it non de fide sed de persona Petri. Here they disagree themselves from the Fathers Iohn 10. 16. by the title of one Shepheard Augustine Chrysostome Ierome Cyril Theodoret Theophylact Euthimius Rupertus Cyprian and other Fathers agree that Christ is theredesigned but Stapleton saith the Pope is there meant In the Division of the Law they go clean contrary to the greatest part of the Fathers for they divide the Commandments as we do but the Papists make the two first one and the tenth two 2. They have no father to countenance them in this but Augnstine Revet de Authoritate Patrum c. 5 6 7. There were no writings of the Fathers for a time many of them wrote 400 years after Christ but some 500 and 600 years after Christ what rule had they before that time of interpreting Scriptures The Fathers were given too much to allegorizing Cajetane therefore in the Preface of his Commentaries upon the Books of Moses saith That the exposition of the Scripture is not tied by God to the sense of the Fathers therefore he admonisheth his Readers not to take it ill if he sometime dissent from the stream of the Fathers 4. The Doctrine of the Church must be examined by the Scriptures Acts 17. 11. If Pauls doctrine much more may the decrees of the Pope Church Councels be examined by the Scriptures 5. The interpretation of the Scripture is a gift freely given by God for the edification of the Church Rom. 12. 6. 1 Cor. 12. 10. therefore it is not tied to a certain kinde of men but common to the faithful 6. The faithful are commanded diligently to try and examine every doctrine 1 Thess. 5. 21. 1 Iohn 4. 1. which cannot be altogether done without interpretation What means must be used in the interpretation of Scripture The end of the Scripture we heard was to direct the Church to all saving truth The means to be used for the attaining of that end by the Minister is diligent study and humble Prayer by the People attentive reading hearing prayer and meditating First the Teachers must pray earnestly to God for his spirit to inlighen them Mat. 7. 7 8 9. Rom. 15. The Scriptures are understood by that spirit that dictated them Secondly The Pastors and Teachers of the Church must diligently and painfully study the Scriptures giving themselves to read compare place with place Iohn 5. 39. Search the Scriptures it is a metaphor taken from such as search for Gold and Silver Oar in the earth who will search and sift and break every clod to finde out the gold Solomon useth the same metaphor Prov. 2. 4. and to this diligence in searching doth the Apostle exhort Timothy 1 Tim. 4. 13. This diligence of often exprest in Scripture in the Old Testament by the phrase of meditating in the word Iosh. 1. 8. Psal. 1. 2. Thirdly they must labour for a competent knowledge in the original tongues the Hebrew and Greek in which the Scripture was written that so they may consult with the Hebrew Text in the Old and the Greek in the New Testament and see with their own not anothers eyes as Gen. 3. 15. The Papists read it corruptly She shall break here the original soon determines the
Pope approves The Practice of the Church is that which the Pope observes the Interpretation of the Fathers is that which the Pope follows the Determination of Councels what the Pope confirms so that the Pope must interpret all Scripture But divers Reasons may be alledged to shew that the true Interpretation of Scripture is not to be sought for from the Popes of Rome 1. Because the Popes of Rome have frequently and grosly erred in interpreting of Scripture as in Rom. 8. 8. Those that are in the flesh cannot please God that is Those that are married said Siricius the Pope Innocent so expounded those words Iohn 6. Unlesse you eat the flesh of the Son of man and drink his bloud you shall have no life in you that he thence concluded That there is no salvation without receiving the Eucharist and that it is to be given to Infants Pope Boniface interpreted Luke 22. 38. of the Temporall and Spirituall Sword delivered to the Pope 2. Because the Popes of Rome doe differ among themselves in interpreting of Scripture as Matth. 16. 18. Some Popes say rightly that by the Rock Christ or the Confession of Faith given by Peter concerning Christ is meant others interpret it of the person of Peter the Apostle others expound it to be the Romane Seat or Chair 3. Because many of the Popes of Rome have not only erred but been grosse and wicked Hereticks Liberius the Pope about the year 350 was an Arian and subscribed to the unjust condemnation of Athanasius and afterward as an obstinate Heretick was deposed Honorius the first was a Monothâ—lite he held that Christ had but one will and so but one nature and for this Heresie was condemned in three General Councels Some Popes were Atheists as Leo the tenth who called the Gospel Fabulam de Christâ— One cals the Pope that great Heteroclite in religion another saith The Pope is the worst of Cardinals who are the worst of Priests who are the worst of Papists who are the worst of Christians That the general consent of Fathers is no good Rule for interpreting Scriptures See Iaâ—â—â—us Laurentius his singular Tractate entituled Reverentia Eccles. Rom. erga S. Pat. veteres subdola Artic. 2. Proposit. 9. In his Auctarium he proves that the Protestants do more esteem the Fathers then the Papists and Jesuites For Councels Gregory the Pope equalizeth the four first General Councels to the four Gospels not in respect of Authority but in respect of the verity of the Articles defined in them He saith not They could as little erre but they did as little erre in their decisions or to speak more properly That their Doctrine was as true as Gospel because the Determinations in those first General Councels against Hereticks are evidently deduced out of holy Scriptures Dr Featley's Stricturae in Lyndomastigem concerning the 7 Sac. For if these four general Councels be of equal Authority with the four Gospels the Popes Authority as Papists say being above the Authority of the Councels it followeth That his Authority is greater then the Evangelists then which what can be more blasphemously spoken We say the true Interpretation of Scripture is not to be sought from general Councels First Because even universal Councels have erred the Chalcedonian Councel one of the four so much magnified by Pope Gregory in rashly preferring the Constantinopolitane Church before that of Alexandria and Antioch Those that condemned Christ were then the universal visible Church Matth. 26. 65. Iohn 11. 47. See Act. 4. 18. Secondly General Councels have been opposite one to another that of Constance to the other of Basil whereof one setteth down that Councels could erre and so also the Pope and that a Councel was above the Pope the other affirmeth the quite contrary Thirdly There were no general Councels after the Apostles for three hundred years till the first Councel of Nice when yet the Church had the true sense of the Scriptures Fourthly The general Councels interpreted Scripture by Scripture as Athanasius and Ambrose teach concerning the first Councel of Nice Fifthly Because they cannot be so easily celebrated to declare any doubtfull sense of Scripture They have expounded but few places of Scripture neither is it likely the Pope will assemble them to expound the rest The Papists say That the Scripture ought to be expounded by the Rule of Faith and therefore not by Scripture only But the Rule of Faith and Scripture is all one As the Scriptures are not of man but of the Spirit so their Interpretation it not by man but of the Spirit like wise Let Councels Fathers Churches give their sense of the Scripture its private if it be not the sense and interpretation of the Spirit Let a private man give the true sense of the Scripture it s not private because its Divine the sense of the holy Ghost and private in 2 Pet. 1. 20. is not opposed to publick but to Divine and the words are to be read No Scripture is of a mans own Interpretation that is private contrary to Divine The word is interpreted aright by declaring 1. The Order 2. The Summe or Scope 3. The Sense of the words which is done by framing a Rhetorical and Logical Analysis of the Text. In giving the sense three Rules are of principal use and necessity to be observed 1. The literal and largest sense of any words in Scripture must not be imbraced farther when our cleaving thereunto would breed some disagreement and contrariety between the present Scripture and some other Text or place else shall we change the Scripture into a Nose of wax 2. In case of such appearing disagreement the holy Ghost leads us by the hand to seek out some distinction restriction limitation or figure for the reconcilement thereof and one of these will alwayes fit the purpose for Gods word must always bring perfect truth it cannot fight against it self 3. Such figurative Sense Limitation Restriction or Distinction must be sought out as the Word of God affordeth either in the present place or some other and chiefly those that seem to differ with the present Text being duly compared together The End of the first Book THE SECOND BOOK OF GOD. CHAP. I. That there is a God HAving handled the Scripture which is principium cognoscendi in Divinity I now proceed to Treat of God who is principium essendi or thus The Scripture is the rule of Divinity God and his works are the matter or parts of Divinity This Doctrine is 1. Necessary 1. Because man was made for that end that he might rightly acknowledge and worship God love and honor him 2. It is the end of all Divine Revelation Iohn 5. 39. 3. To be ignorant of God is a great misery Being alienated from the life of God through the ignorance that is in them 2. Profitable Our welfare and happiness consists in the knowledge of God Ier. 9. 23. Iohn 17. 3. the knowledge of God
the fall and therefore good 1 Tim. 4. 4. Regeneration restores not the substance of man but the qualities Dr. Ames saith that Grevinchovius denied original sin and Dr. Twisse proves by this argument that the Arminians deny it As many as teach that all the posterity of Adam have as much power to every thing that is good as Adam in innocency they deny original sin But the Arminians teach that all the posterity of Adam have as much power to every thing that is good as Adam had in the state of innocency for they hold that all Adams posterity have such power to every good work that they want no other help but the perswasion and the concourse of God which Adam himself needed to every good work The Semipelagians also the Socinians and Anabaptists deny this original venome or blot to be a sin the Anabaptists that they might wholly take away Pedobaptisme denied original sin that there might not be a cause why infants should be baptized The denying of this fundamentall Article of Original sin is dangerous What need then of the Gospel what need of Christ himself if our nature be not guilty depraved corrupted these are not things in quibus possimus dissentire salva pace ac charitate Aug. about which we may dissent without losse of peace or charity The Papists say 1. Original corruption hath not rationem peccati but is only a privation of original righteousness The Councel of Trent decreeth it not to have the nature of sin Bellarmine saith it is a simple thing to be humbled for original sin Pighus saith it is no sin at all Andraedeus it s the least of sin 2. That the concupiscence and lust which riseth from the corruption of our nature the motions unto evil that we feel in our selves are no sins but are called so abusively or metonymically because they are from and incline to sin till we consent unto them and obey them till they reign in us See the Rhemists in their Annotat. Rom. 7. 7. and Iames 1. 15. Bellarm de statu peccati c. 9. 10. When our Divines urge that concupiscence is called sin several times in the sixth seventh and eighth Chapters to the Romans Bellarmine saith the Apostle doth not say it is peccatum propriè De statu peccati c. 8. 3. That original sin after Baptism is done away Si quis asserit non tolli in baptisâ—â—ate totum id quod veram propriam rationem peccati habet anathema sit Decret 5. Sectionis Concil Trid. 4. That the Virgin Mary was not conceived in sin Piè ac rectè existimatur B. virginem Mariam singulari Deo privilegio ab omni omnino peccato fuisse immunem Bellarm. de Amiss grat statu pecc l. 4. c. 15. The Spirit of God in the holy Scripture expressely calleth the corruption of our nature sin as Psal. 51. 5. and in the sixth seventh and eight Chapters of the Romans fourteen times at the least Heb. 12. 2. 2. The Scripture saith expressely our original corruption is the cause of all our actual sins Iames 1. 14. 2 Peter 1. 4. 3. Infants that are baptized which have no other sin but original and who never consented to it nor obeyed it in the lusts thereof do dye Rom. 5. 14. therefore it must needs be sin and may be truly and properly so called for sin is the only cause of death Rom. 5. 12. Whatever holdeth not conformity with the rule of righteousnesse the law of God is sin it hath the nature of sin in its irregularity and defect of good and the effects of sin 2. The Scripture expressely teacheth us that this concupiscence even in the regenerate these evil motions that rise in us though we consent not unto them though we resist them are yet a swerving from the law of God and a breach of it Luke 10. 27. nay in the regenerate this corruption of our nature doth not only swerve from the law of God but opposeth and resisteth the Spirit of God Rom. 7. 23. Gal. 5. 17. therefore it must needs be sin This argument convinced Pauls conscience Rom. 7. 7. He means those motions unto evil which the heart doth not delight in nor consent unto When the Apostle saith Rom. 6. Let not sin reign in your mortall bodies By sin saith their Cardinal Bellarmine all men understand concupiscence and Ribera on Heb. 12. 1. saith That by sin the Apostle understandeth concupiscence calling it so with an article 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is the sin a note of singularity Cajetan in Rom. 7. calleth it formally a sin Vide Cassand Consult art 2. Tit. de Concupisc p. 4. The proper definition of sin being this a transgression of Gods law therefore concupiscence is sin see Exod. 20. 17. Object Cant 4. 7. Iohn 13. 10. Ezek. 36. 25. Ephes. 14. Therefore the regenerate have no sin left in them Answer The Church in this present world is said to be all fair as it wholly shines with its Spouses beauty which it puts on Concupiscence in respect of its own nature is a sin but in respect of the person who is a party regenerate in whom the guilt is pardoned it is as no sin When the Fathers say that lust is taken away in the regenerate they understand according to the guilt not the thing 3. Original sin after Baptism is not done away children are perverse death cannot seize where there is no sin How comes it to passe that infants baptized die before they come to actual offending if Baptism have abolished in them their original stain 4. The Virgin Mary was not conceived without original sin in her song she rejoyceth in God her Saviour Luke 1. 47. 2. 22. Christ came to save that which was lost Matth. 18. 11. See Iob 14. 4 1 Cor. 15. 22. Rom. 5. 12 16. 3. 9. Gal. 3. 22. All the ancient Fathers as far as we can learn out of their Writings believed that the blessed Virgin Mary was conceived in original sin Vide Rivet de Patrum autoritate c. 7. Daille Of the right use of the Fathers l. 2. c. 6. The Dominicans generally hold that she was conceived in sin All are infected with Adams sin 1. The Heathens Pagans Infidels Rom. 1. 18 21 24 26 28 to the last 2. The Jews Rom. 2. latter end 3. Christians Rom. 3. from 9. to 19. 4. Infants Rom. 5. 12 13. They are innocent in respect of actual transgression not in respect of original pollution are born blinde lame 5. Children of beleeving parents All men are equally guilty of original sin 1. In reference to Adam Rom. 5. 12 14. 2. They are equally deprived of Gods image Rom. 3. 9 11. Reprobate to every good work 3. Are equally depraved and corrupted Rom. 3. 12 13 14. Reasons 1. All men are equally in Adam one was not more in his loyns then another Rom. 5. 12 19. 2. All men equally partake of
Arch-bishops four thousand Bishops and five thousand Saints approved by the Church yet if they be compared to the Jesuites or to the weak and unperfect types of them the Franciscans it is no great matter that they have done Dr. Donnes Ignatius his Conclave A rich Merchant in Paris in meriment told the Friers of Saint Francis that they wore a Rope about their bodies but Saint Francis should once have been hanged but was redeemed by the Pope on this condition that all his life after he should wear a Rope but they in earnest got judgement against him that he should be hanged for it Doctor Taylors Romish Fornace The Monks and Friers are no where mentioned in Scripture unlesse Apoc. 9. 3. Locusts issued out of the bottomlesse pit they by their smoaky Tradiditions obscure the light of the Gospel To prove their Cardinals a Divine Ordinance they urge that place 1 Kings 2. Domini erunt Cardines terrae See Polyd. Virg. de Invent. rerum lib. 4. cap. 9. pag. 270. They consist for most part of personages nobly descended they are admitted to kisse the Popes mouth they onely elect the Pope and from them onely the Pope elected must be selected Saint Peter had no Cardinals about him A certain Friar wittily preached to the people at Lions in France when he said That the Hogonots so the Protestants are called in France did agree with the Church of Rome in all the Articles of Faith but that there was one wicked word Solùm Onely at the noise of which the warre was kindled for they Onely beleeved what the Rule of Faith hath from the holy Scriptures but the Romane Church required something more to be beleeved then what is contained in the Rule of Faith or holy Scriptures because the Authority of of the Church will have it so Junius de Eccles. cap. 17. de Eccles. Roman Corollaries from the Church and Antichrist First From the Church Christs great interest here below is the Church it is his Hephzibah his delight is in her it is as Shew-bread continually before him the people of God are his Segullah his peculiar treasure his jewels Mal. 3. 17. all the rest of the world being but as lumber in comparison for them the world stands The Church is the fulnesse of Christ Ephes. 1. 22. The great blessings are out of Sion The interest of Christ extends to all Churches where a people love the Lord Jesus in sincerity The Donatists would include the Church in their parts of Africk the Papists say they only are the Church Christs interest is not limited to any forms 2 Cor. 11. 28. None are true members of the invisible Church of Christ but only those which have the Spirit of Jesus Christ in them really holy and united to Christ the Head There is a great controversie about qualification of Church-members therefore Apollonius and Spanhemius have begun their Dispute with this Question Some say The members of every particular Church are obliged at their first admission to shew to the whole Congregation convincing signs of their Regeneration and true Grace Some urge that the Scripture in the description of a godly man rests not in the negative Rom. 8. 1. and that a bare profession is not enough or to say I know no evil by him or that he is not scandalous they urge 1 Thes. 1. 1. and 2 Thes. 1. 1. they say the Church is not only termed holy from the better part but the particular members are commended for holinesse 2 Thes. 1. 3. Phil. 1. 7. We are strict say they in taking a wife or servant enquire after them and are not satisfied that we hear no ill so a judgement of severity is to be used in admitting Church-members and because we may be deceived therein the more care is to be used Others say If they be willing to give up their names to Christ it is enough because the Church is a School there they are admitted Non quia docti but ut sint docti not because they are learned but because they are willing to learn Would you have Church-members real Saints crosse to the Texts the Floor and Drag-net or such as by the exactest scrutiny that can be made we may judge to be Saints really I desire your Texts for this D. Ames saith Falsum est internas virtutes à nobis requiri ut aliquis sit in Ecclesia quoad visibilem ejus statum Bellarm. Enerv. Tom. 2. l. 2. c. 1. Sect. 5. The Apostles at the first gathering of the Church of the New Testament never required any more then the profession of the faith of Christ in fundamentals and that they were willing for the time to come to walk in Gospel-rules Iohn Baptist received Publicans and sinners souldiers Scribes Pharisees when they confessed their sins and desired to be admitted into the faith of him whom Iohn preached See Act. 2. 41 47. Vide Calvin ad Mat. 3. Many a one that may have real grace yet out of bashfulnesse and because he hath but weak parts may not be able to evidence it to others and others who have greater gifts may carry it away when they are not inwardly wrought upon I suppose therefore those are to be received into Church communion which prosesse the faith of Christ and subject to the rules of the Gospel if they be freed from damnable errors and scandalous conversation Some conceive the gathering of Churches out of Churches to be unwarrantable and think it is confusion 1 Cor. 14. 33. Where is there say they any warrant from Moses and the Prophets or from Christ and his Apostles for any such thing though yet in their times many Church-members were as ignorant and prophane as now To be a member of the Church of Christ is a great priviledge the Communion of Saints is the only good fellowship The Communion of the Saints consists in three things First In the Communion of their Graces what Graces they have they have not only for their Salvation but in trust for the good of the body the members of the body should be helpful to one another Secondly In the use of Gods Ordinances this was the beauty of the primitive times Act. 2. 42. there was no such separation then Thirdly In the performance of all mutual Offices of love Serve one another in love Our Union with Christ is the ground of this Communion As all men are one in the first Adam so all the Saints are one in the second Adam This Union is wrought on Gods part outwardly by the Word and inwardly by the Spirit on mans part Outwardly by our profession Inwardly by faith Rom. 11. 20. By Communion of Saints is meant their common partaking in Christ their Head and all his Benefits and their mutuall interest one into another There is no such good fellowship in the world as in the Church of Christ. Secondly From Antichrist That the Popish Doctrine tends to the extream dishonour of Gods Word
Aretius Zanchius to that purpose to shew that â—raction may be omitted in the very act of the Supper But Zanchy in an Epistle to a noble man hath this passage The bread is to be broken before the people after the example of Christ the Apostles and all the ancient Church and also to expresse the mystery of the passion and death of Christ which are lively represented by that action The breaking of the bread signifies 1. How we should be broken in humiliation for our sins and the pouring out of the wine how our bloud and life should be shed and poured out for our sins if we had that we deserve 2. They represent unto us how the body of Christ was broken and his bloud poured out for our sins M. Perkins Not the Palatine the French or English Churches have lately invented or brought in the breaking of the bread but the whole Apostolical ancient Church above 1500 years ago and since that time have used it according to Christs command Do this Paraeus de Ritu fractionis in S Eucharistia c. 5. See his 6th Chapter where he shews how frivolous that argument is Frangere Hebraica phrasi nihil aliud est quà m distribuere and gives this rule Where ever in Scripture the word Break concerning bread is put alone it is an Hebraism and signifies to distribute because the Hebrews above other nations used not to cut bread with a knife but to break it with their hands when they took it themselves or gave it to others to take but when the word â—ive is expresly added to it it signifieth the true breaking or dividing of the whole bread into parts as Matth. 14. 19. Mark 6. 41. Luke 9. 26. Matth. 15. 36. Mark 8. 6. and in the institution of the Supper Mat. 26. 26. Mark 14. 22. Luk. 22. 19. It is not necessarily required that the Lords Supper be administred in unleavened bread For bread is often times named and repeated but the word unleavened is never added Wherefore as it is in it self indifferent whether the wine be red or white and whatsoever the kinde or colour be if it be wine so it is not greatly material whether the bread be leavened or unleavened so it be bread Attersol of the Sac. l. 3. c. 5. The Papists pretend the institution of Christ who say they made the Sacrament of unleavened bread instituting it after he had eaten the Passeover which was to be eaten with unleavened bread according to the Law of Moses neither was there any leaven to be found in Israel seven dayes together We deny not saith Attersol but Christ mâ—ght use unleavened bread at his last Supper having immediately before eaten the Paschal Lamb yet no such thing is expressed in the Gospel The Evangelists teach He took bread but make no mention or distinction what bread b he took nor determine what bread we should take no more then limit what wine we shall use but leave it at liberty to take leavened bread or unleavened as occasion of time place persons and other circumstances serve so we take bread If Christ on this occasion used unleavened bread it was because it was usual common and ordinary bread at that time as we also should use that bread which is common It is therefore no breach of Christs Ordinance nor a transgression of the first original institution of the Lords Supper to eat either the one or the other The Papists give a mystical reason why the bread must be unleavened because hereby is signified our sincerity but this is ridiculous for if unleavened bread because it is unmixed must signifie my sincerity then the wine because it is mingled with water must signifie my duplicity and hypocrisie Whether it be leavened or unleavened bread we will not strive but take that which the Church shall according to the circumstance of the times and persons ordain Yet this we dare boldly say That in the use of leavened bread we come nearer to the imitation of Christs action then those which take unleavened For our Saviour took the bread that was usual and at hand there being only unleavened bread at the Feast of the Passeover and no other to be gotten We therefore taking the bread which is in ordinary use and causing no extraordinary bread to be made for the nonce are found to tread more nearly in the steps of our Saviour Christ. Therefore unlesse you will renew the Jewish Passeover of banishing all leaven at the time of the holy Communion your precise imitation of unleavened bread is but apish Although Azymes were used by Christ it being then the Paschal Feast yet was this occasioned also by reason of the same Feast which was prescribed to the Jews Protestants and Papists both grant it not to be of the essence of the Sacrament that it be unleavened but in its own nature indifferent When the Ebionites taught unleavened bread to be necessary the Church commanded consecration to be made in leavened bread The Grecians use leavened bread the Papists unleavened and that made up in such wafer-cakes that it cannot represent spiritual nourishment We hold either indifferent because in the institution we reade of bread without commanding leavened or unleavened De panis qualitate nos non contendimus si modo verus sit solidus panis quod de hostia Papistarum vix potest affirmari Ames Bell. Enerv. Tom. 3. Disp. 32. Cassander himself complaineth that the Papists bread is of such extream thinnesse and lightnesse that it may seem unworthy the name of bread Whereas Christ used solid and tough bread which was to be broken with the hands or cut with the knife The custome of the Christian Church by the space of above a thousand years was to put upon the sacred Table after Christs and the Apostles example a solid loaf which was broken into pieces among the Communicants for all the people did communicate Now this quantity of bread is reduced into round and light wafers in the form of a peny whereof they give this mystical reason because that Christ was sold for thirty pence and because that a peny is given for a hire unto those that have wrought in the Vineyard Matth. 20. 10. Upon these Hostes they have put the Image of a Crucifix Pet. du Moulin of the Masse lib. 1. cap. 7. lib. 3. cap. 3. The use of the Wafer-cake is defended by the Papists and some Lutherans as Gerh. loc commun Tom. 5. de Sacra Coena c. 7. but Christ used it not whose action is our instruction and also there is no Analogy or a very obscure one between the sign and thing signified Whether it be necessary to mingle water with the Eucharistical wine Aquinas saith Water ought to be mingled with wine but it is not de necessitate hujus Sacramenti Some Papists for mingling water with wine pretend the Antiquity of Councels and Fathers But we say 1. There is no such thing in
Regeneration ibid. How the Scripture is to be read l. 1. p. 23 24 Reason Reason the uses of it in matters of Religion l. 9. p. 87 Rebaptizing condemned l. 8. p. 676 Rebellion against God and man l. 4. p. 373 374 Recovery What mans Recovery is l. 5. p. 389. to 392 Redeemer Redeemer Christ how l. 5. p. 408 409 Redemption what l. 5. p. 414 Religion Three characters of the true Religion l. 7. p. 5 Remora able to stay the greatest Ship under sail l. 3. p. 262 Repent How God is said to Repent and how not l. 2. p. 151 Repentance what in us l. 8. p. 649 650 Reproach Christ reproached for our sakes l. 5. p. 427 428 Reprobation Reprobation what it signifies and what it is l. 2. p. 222 The word taken three wayes and five evil consequences of it ibid. Resurrection Christ Rose from the dead and why l. 5. p. 438 to 441 Our Resurrection l. 10. p. 857 858 Revelation The manner of Gods Revealing his will threefold l. 1. p. 5 The Book of Revelation why so called l. 1. p. 52 It is canonical l. 1. p. 51 52 Difficult ibid. The best Interpreters of it l. 1. p. 53 Revenge l. 4. p. 374 375 376 Reverence Reverenco l. 7. p. 577 578 In worship l. 9. p 779 780 Righteousnesse Whether original Righteousnesse was natural to Adam l. 3. p. 291 The Properties of original Righteousnes l. 2. p. 292 Christs Righteousnesse is ours l. 7. p. 522 523 Marks to try whether we have it and means to get it ibid. Rivers Rivers Their original use and motion l. 3. p. 251 252 The River Nilus l. 3. p. 246. 252 Romans Romans an excellent Epistle l. 1. p. 47 Who best expound it ib. Rule The properties of a Rule l. 1 p. 82 83 The Scripture is the Rule of faith and life ibid. 84 Ruth Ruth by whom written l. 1. p. 32 The best Expositors of it ibid. S Sacraments SAcraments their name and nature l. 8. p. 655 656 The Church hath ever had Sacraments l. 8. p. 656 The use of Sacraments and their parts l. 8. p. 656 657 The necessity and efficacy of the Sacraments l. 8. p. 657 658 How the Sacraments of the Jewish Church and ours agree and how they differ l. 8. p. 659 660 The Sacraments of the New Testament only two l. 8. p. 660 Sacraments are to be dispensed only by a Minister l. 8. p. 661 The use of the Sacraments of the New Testament ibid. Sadduceâ— confuted l. 3. p. 279. 289 Samuel The Authors of the two books of Samuel and the best Expositors of them l. 1. p. 33 Sanctification Sanctification what l. 7. p. 530 53â— Its parts and properties l. 7. p. 532 Why all godly men must be pure and holy l. 7. p. 532 The excellency of Sanctification l. 7. p. 533 It is imperfect here and why l. 7. p. 533 534 Evidences of Sanctification and means to get it l. 7. p. 534 The Sanctification of the whole man soul and body l. 7. p. 540 541 Of the minde l. 7. p. 541 Of the will l. 7. p. 542 543 Of the conscience l. 7. p. 544 545 Of the memory l. 7. p. 546 Of the affections l. 7. p. 546 to 579 Of the sensitive appetite l. 7 p. 579 580 Of mans body and all the external actions l. 7. p. 580 to 584 Satisfaction Christ satisfied for us l. 5. p. 416 417 It was convenient Christ should satisfie for us l. 5. p. 417 418 The difference between merit and Satisfaction ibid. Saviour Christ is our Saviour and how l. 5. p. 405 406 Scandal l. 4. p. 376 Schism l. 4. p. 376 377 Schoolmen taxed l. 1. p. 25 Scientia media an errour l. 3 p. 120. m Scripture It is the rule of Divinity l. 1. p. 5 Three general characters to know any word to be the word of God ibid. God revealed himself divers wayes to the Fathers ibid. The divers Epithetes of the Scripture l. 1. p. 5 6 Why called the word of God l. 1. p. 5. m Why the Scripture ib. The Divine Authority of the Scriptures proved by many reasons l. 1. p 6. to 16 A description of the Scripture l. 1. p. 7 The Scripture is not repugnant to humane reason and policy l. 1. p. 17 It is for it self worthy to be believed and known to be of God by it self ib. It hath its Authority from it self not the Church l. 1. p. 17 18 It is to be read by the common people l. 1. p. 20 21 How it is to be read l. 1. p. 22 23 24 Many contemn and unreverently handle the Scripture l. 1. p. 25 26 27 The Canonical Books of Scripture l. 1. p. 28 Of the Old and New Testament l. 1. p. 30. to 54 What parts of Scripture have been questioned l. 1. p. 43 The Authentical Edition of Scripture l. 1. p. 58. to 61 Whether any books of the Scripture be lost l. 1. p. 72 73 Whether the Scriptures of the Old Testament had points from the beginning l. 1. p. 73 74 The end of the Scripture l. 1. p. 80 The Properties of the Scripture its Divine Authority truth it is the rule of faith and life necessity purity perfection perspicuity l. 1. p. 81 to 105 The interpretation of the Scripture 1. It s divers senses 2. To whom belongs the chief authority to expound Scripture 3. The means which must be used in the Interpâ—eâ—ation of it l. 1. p. 105. to 121 Sea Sea a great work of God the making of it l. 3. p. 249 252 253 Why called mâ—re ib. m. Divers Questions about it answered l. 3. p. 249 250 251 Sedition l. 4. p. 377 378 379 Self love l. 4. p. 379 Self-denial l. 7. p. 600 Self seeking l. 4. p. 379 380 Septuagint Septuagint The Greek Translation of the Old Testament l. 1. p. 62 Is not authentical l. 1. p. 75 76 Serpents Serpents a three-fold profit redounds to us from them l. 3. p. 267 268 Why Satan is called the old Serpent l. 4. p. 304 Servants Two kindes of them three things commend a Servant l. 9. p. 843 844 Severity l. 7. p. 588 589 Ship the materials of it wonderful l. 3. p. 254 255 Signs several sorts of them l. 8. p. 655 656 Simple God is most Simple l. 2. p. 138 139 Sincerity l. 7. p. 602 Singing of Psalms a duty and how to be performed l. 8. p. 609 610 Sinne. Sin what it is l. 4. p. 307 Divided into original and actual ibid. l. 4. p. 315 That there is original sin its names and what it is l. 4. p. 308 309 310 The subject of it l. 4. p. 310 It is not the substance of a man l. 4. p. 310 311 Many hereticks extenuate it ib. All equally guilty of original sinne l. 4. p. 312 313 How it is propagated l. 4 p. 313 314 We are all guilty of Adams sin l. 4. p. 306 307 What actual sin is l. 4 p.
regula fidei Chamierus The Scripture is therefore called canonical because it prescribes a rule of our faith and life Phil. 3. 16. Gal. 6. 16. Tertullianus appellat Scripturam regulam veritatis Augustinus de doctrina Christiana l. 2. c. 8. ait in Scripturis inveniri omnia quae continenâ— fidem moresque vivendi Advers Helvid cap. 9. Sacra Scripturae regula credendi certissima tutissimaque est Bellarm. de verbo Dei l 1. c. 2. k Hoc primum credimus cum credimuâ— quod nihil ultra credere debemus See Mr. Anthony Burâ—â—â— on Mark 1. 2 3. Deut. 5. 29. Isa. 8. 20. l Verba Scripturae non sunâ— legenda sed vivenda Doctrinae saâ—itas servatur confirmando verum refellendo â—alsum vitae sanctimionia fugiendo malum saciendo bonum Satis habet Scriptura quo veritatem doceat errorent redarguat iniquitatem corrigat instituat ad justiciam Nec haecâ—â—tiliter praestat solummodo quae sophistarum cavillatio sed etiam sufficienter nempe ut perfectus â—it homo c. Rainoldus m Deut. 17. 18. Isa. 8. 20. Luke 16. 29. Acts 24. 14. Christians shall be judged by that hereafter Iohn 12. 48. 2 Thess. 1. 8. n Iudaei docenâ— exhoc loco teâ—eri regem sua maâ—â— sibi legem describere etiamsi alià s cum privatus esset descripâ—isset Chamierus Regula fidei est quasi causa exemplaris fidei quam videlicet fides in omnibus sequi cui se conformare debet Formale objectum â—idei est Causa objectiva fidei seu est principium propter quod fotmaliter principaliter credimus Baron contra Turnebul Nos discamus ex verbo non tantum sapere sed etiam loqui Be â—â—â—â— Epist. 7. David Psa. 119 desires that all his counsels thoughts manners actions might be directed according to Gods word The Scriptures contain 1. A necessary doctrine viz. Of the Law and Gospel Mat. 22 37. Iohn 13. 16. without which we cannot be saved Rom. 7. 7. It is 2. Necessary in respect of the efficient cause Of the Form Matth. 22. 29. 4. The end Iohn 20. 31. o Writing doth a larger good to a greater number and for a longer time then speaking Psal. 102 19. vox audita perit litera scripta manet To shew how much a more faithful keeper record is then report those few miracles of our Saviour which were written are preserved and believed those infinitely more that were not written are all lost and vanished out of the memory of men p Among the Turks Polygamy is lawful Theft was permitted among the Spartans q Literae sacrae dicuntur 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 scripturae ut non solùm à saecularihus proâ—anis litâ—ris sed etiam a quibuscunque quae de sacris rebus agunt discernaâ—tur r Mahomet said his doctrine came from God but the blasphemy and villany therein contained sheweth it came from Satan whereas the purity and perfection of the doctrine contained in the Scripture sheweth that it is from above Mahomet puts in some ingredients of the flesh gives them liberty to revenge themselves and to have as many wives as they would There is in the Precepts of Philosophers little condemning of fornication and of the desire of revenge Dr Featleys Preface to Newmans Concordance s The General view of the holy Scriptuâ—es Notatur verecunda casta scripturâ— loquutio ex genere per Synecdochen designantis specialem congressum sic 1 Cor. 7. 1. Non est bonum tangere Gen. 6. 2. ingredi ad filias hominum Quo major est spurcities eorum qui ex sacris scripturae loquendi formulis ansam arripiunt sermonis impuri Cartw. in Harm Evang. in Matth. 1. 18. Quidam Hebraeorum linguam Hebraeam linguam sanctam dici putant eò quod nulla propria vocabula in ea inveniantur quibus pudenda utriusque sexus Egestio aliaque obsâ—â—na significantur Paulus Fagius Annotat. in Deut. 25. 11. t Sancta sanctè Mr Gregory in his preface to observations upon some passages of Scriture u Luke 16. 29. Iohn 5. 39. Psal. 19. and 119. Augustinus affirmat omniaquae continâ—â—t fidem mores in illis inveniri quae apertè posita sunt in scriptura Chrysostomus manifesta itidem in divinis Scripturis esse perhibet quaecunque necessaria Tertullianus adorat Scripturae plenitudinem Et vae denunciat Hermogeni si quid iis quae scripta sunt vel detraâ—â—t vel adiiciat Rainoldus 1 Thesi. Deut. 4. 2. and 12. 32. De Scripturae plenitudine perfectione quâ—â— sentiat Maldonatus vide ad Joan. 7. 4. De Scripturae integritate vide Estium ad Galat. 3. 10. See Bishop Ushers Body of Divinity p. 18 19. 20 21. 2 Tim. 3. 16 17. John 15. 15. Acts 20. 27. Beâ—e habet ut iis quae sunt Scripta contentus siâ— Hilary In every age there was revealed that which was sufficient to salvation and yet now no more then is sufficient the Word it self is not now but the revelation only is more perfect The Old Testament was sufficient for the Jews but both the New and Old make but one compleat body for the Church now Singâ—li libri sâ—â—t sufficientes sufficientia pâ—rtium ad quam ordinatio sunt â—â—â—â—â—â—rò sâ—ripâ—urâ— est sufficiens essentiali sufficientia per â—i bros singulos suâ—â— Iun. Animad â—â— Bellarm Conâ—râ—â— Pâ—tmae câ—piâ—â— quarto The scriptures are a perfect rule for matters of Faith but not a perfect register for matters of fact Mr Geree Whitakerus de Script c. sexto quaest 6. Stapleton and Serrarius are more wary then some other Papists We are abused say they when we are said to hold that the Scriture is not perfect for say they a thing is said to be imperfect not when it wants any perfection but when it wants a perfection due as a man is not imperfect if he have not an Angels perfection because this is not due unto him they say it is not a perfection due to the Scriptures to teach us every thing necessary to salvation Perinde sunt ea quae ex scripturis coll guntur atque ea quae scribuntur G. eg Naziaâ—zen l. 5. Theol. Mat. 28. 29. Catholici in perfectione Scripturae Papistae in imperfectione totius causae id est omnium controversiarum de Religione proram puppim constituunt Chamierus Tom. 1. de Canonâ— lib. 8. cap. 1. 1 Cor. 10. 1 2 3 Mat. 8. 11. Luk. 19. 9. Gal. 3. 7 8 29. Rom. 4. 15 16. Some Papists say the Scripâ—uâ—es are not imperfect because they send us to the Church which is he perfect Rule and therefore they are perfect implicitè though not explicitè but so I might say every rustick were a perfect Rule of Faith because he can shew me the Pope who is the infallible Judge If the Scripture send to the Church to learn that which is not in the Scripture by this sending she confesseth her imperfection See Moulins Buckler of Faith pag. 45. Joh. 1. 18.
3. 22. Isa. 61. 1 2. Heb. 1. 1. 2. 3 Act. 1. 3. Mat. 11. 25 27. Mat. 22. 32. Joh. 5. 46. Luk. â—4 44 45 Montanus held that there was no sufficient instruction given by the Apostles unto the Church but that there were only certain principles of Religion given by them being unperfect and were afterward to be finished and polished by the Comforter which himself did forge Tertullian was a Montanist he often likeneth the Church of God in the Apostles time unto a Tree whose fruit was not bloomed and unto one which is in his base age Cartw. Reply to Whitgifts 2d answer 79. * Additio ad Scripturam fit tripliciter 1. In quo additum est contrarium est errorâ—s 2o. In quo additum est diversum est praesumptionis 3o. In quo additum est consonum est fidelis instructionis * That Doctrine of Religion to which God would have nothing added and from which he would have nothing taken away must needs be perfect Illud perfectum in suo genere cui nihil in eo genere aut addi aut diminui potest Psal. 19. 8. the Hebrew word signifieth that perfection cui nihil deest a Salus nostra Christus est salutis via fides viae dux Scripturae Raynoldus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 It is taken Collectivè not distributivè Si 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 non totam sed omnem significaret eo fortius futurum argumentuÌ„ nostrum nam si partes singulae sufficerent tum multo magis omnes Chamierus 2 King 5. 8. 2 Tim. 3. 15 16 17. b Nullus Papista aptè plenè huic argumento unquam respondit aut respondebit Whitak c Is not the Scripture said Hawks the Martyr sufficient for my salvation Yes saith one of Bonners Chaplains it is sufficient for our salvation but not for our instruction Hawks answered God send me the salvation and take you the instruction Fox Martyrol Episc. Daven de Iudicé Controvers cap. 5. d Notandum hoc loco verbum Dei Scripturis seu scripto verbo definiri quod enim prius Dei verbuÌ„ seu sermâ—nem nunc Scripturas appellat adversus Pontificios qui verbum Dei ad non Scriptas Traditiones Pontificum etiam decreta transferunt Sed verbum Dei Scripturis cingi terminari apparet Rom. 1. 2. deinde 2 Tim. 3. 17. Denique ex hoc loco cum vitam aeternam conferat eamque in se inclusam habeat Scriptura quid est quod ad cam accedere aut adjungi potest Hanc enim Iudaeorum de vita aeterna Scripturis comprehensa opinionem Christus ipse comprobat Cartw. in Harm Evangel in Joh. 5. 39. e Minima veritatis particula in Scripturis continetur Charronaeus f Bellarm. de verbo Dei lib. 4. cap. 3. Rhemists annotat in Joh. 21. sect 3. aunot in 2 Thess. 2. 16. annot in Act. 15. sect 3. in Apoc. 10. sect 1. g Asserimus in Scripturis non contineri expressè totam doctrinam necessarianâ— five de side five de moribus proinde praeter verbum Dei scriptum requiri etiam verbum Dei non s 〈…〉 id est Divinas Apostolicas traditiones Bellarm. lib. 4. de verbo Dei non scripto Omnes libros veteris Novi Testamenti neâ— non traditiones ipsas tum ad fidem tum ad mores pertinentes tanquam vel ore tenus à Christo vel à Spiritu Sancto dictatas continua successione in Ecclesia Catholica conservatas pari pietatis affectu ac reverentia suscipit ac veneratur Tridentina Synodus sess 4. sect 1. h Bellarminâ— haâ—h a whole Book De verbo Dei non scripto of the word of God unwritten Do we not allow of all the Apostolical Traditions which agree unto the Scriptures Nay more Do we not translate the word Traditions in the Scripture when the Text will bear it according to the Greek original Look upon Mat. 15. and in three several verses 2 3 6. we use the word Tradition Look upon the 7th of Mark and in four severall verses vers 3 8 9 13. we translate Traditions Look upon St Paul to the Colossians 2. 8. Gal. 1 14. and upon St Peter 1 Pet. 1. 18. and in all these in the Translation joyned with your Rhemish Testament you shall finde the word Traditions Dr Featley's Case for the Spectacles ch 8. i The word originally may import any thing which is delivered howsoever either by word or writing Thus whatsoever we have received in the Scriptures was first Tradition as delivered by word and still is tradition because it is delivered in writing But though the word in it self have this general and indifferent signification of anything that is delivered yet in our disputation it is restrained to one onely manner of delivering by word and relation only and not by Scripture We deny that either in the Law or Gospel there was any thing left unwritten which concerneth us to know for attaining of true Faith and Righteousnesse towards God Abbot against Bishop k In Mat. 15. l Vide Whitakerum de Scrip. c. 9. Quaest. 6. p. 405. 406. In his Book De verbo Dei standing for unwritten Traditions as a part of the word of God he will have Baptism of Infants to be one but when he disputes for Baptism of Infants against Anabaptists then he heaps up Texts of Scripture Mr Blakes Birth-Priviledge m Exstat nomen diei Dominicae Mat. 28 Mar. 16 Apoc. 1. Exstat exemplum Apostolicae Ecclesiae quae eum diem solennem habuit celebratione Coenae praedicatione verbi Dei Collectione Elâ—emosynae Act. 20. 1 Cor. 16. 1. Quod exemplum suum Ecclesiae praxin cum Apostoli nobis repraesentant in suis scriptis quis non videt eos praecipere imitationem sui Vedel 〈◊〉 Epist. Ignatii ad Magnesios c. 7. Vide plura ibid. n Symbolum Apostolicum ex traditione est secundum formulam rationemque verborum at secundum substantiam est Scriptura ipsissima Junius Animad in Bellarm. controv 1. l. 4. Negamus ullum esse in toto Symbolo vel minimum articulum qui non disertè constet ac totidem penè dixerim verbis in Scripture sancta adeò ut merito dici possit opus tesellatum uâ—pote constans ex variis loc is hinc inde excorptis atque in unum collatis artificioséque compositis Chamier 2 Thess. 2. 15. Hoc suit primum Pharisaeorum dog ma quòd negarunt omnia quae spectant ad Religionem scripta esse Joseph Antiq. l. 13. o Traditiones istae non Scriptae Pharisaeorum nunquam in N. Test. dicuntur simpliciter absolutè Traditiones sed notantur semper aliquo clogio ut quum dicuntur Traditiones seniorum Traditiones humanae siquando Traditionis vox ponâ—tur simpliciter sumâ—â—ur in bonam partem ipsum Dei verbum Traditio est Camer in Mat. 15. Ephes. 2. 20. Apoc. 21. 24. Christ taxeth the ignorance
praecipuam loco omnium humani ingenii commentorum ad cuâ—â—um spectantium Ames Medul Theol. l. 2. c. 13. a Non facias tibi intellige ex tuo capite sine meo expresso verbo ac jussu Ergò non praescribit sibi legem Deus quin possit jubere fieri imagines prout ipsi visum fuerit sicut postea jussit fieri Cberubinos alias imagines in Templo sed nobis praescribit legem generalem quam nunquam licet transgredi nisi peculiare accedat verbum Dei ex Levit. 26. interpretatio colligitur hujus proecepti ubi non simpliciter ait non sacies tibi sculptile sed addit ad adorandum ea Ergo non simpliciter damnantur sculpturae aut imagines quaevis sed tantum quae ad cultum solitae sunt proponi Zanch. de Decalogo c. 14. Non facies tibi id est ex tuo proprio cerebro vel judicio quamvis enim particula illa tibi alias nonnunquam vel redundat vel aliam vim habet hic tamen redundantiam excludit accuratissimam borum praeceptorum breviloquium vanitatem humanarum cogitationum excludi manifestum est ex aliis Scripturae locis eodem spectantibus ut Amos 5. 26. Num. 15. 39. Ames ubi supra Certè Deus leges suas promulgans nullius violatori tam gravem decrevit poenam atque secundae nullius observatori tam ampla proposuit praemia atque secundae siquidem praecepti de fugiendis Idolis transgressorum poenam in tertiam quartam generationem ejusdem verò observatorum praemium in multa posterorum millia derivavit Nulla etiam Lex est quam toties Deus repetiverit atque haec ipsa de Idolis de quibus cum Exod. 20. commate quinto mentem suam explicuisset mox versu 22 sensum praecepti iterans vos inquit vidistis quòd de coelo loquutus sum vobis Non facietis Deos argenteos nec Deos aureos facietis vobis Nec aliud praeceptum Moses moriturus tam altè populi animo impressit ac hoc de exeâ—randis Idolis Deut. 4. 15 16. 23. v. Sculcet Serm. de Idol Vide plura ibid. Vidâ— Picherel Dissert de Imag. babiâ—a ad fanum Germani coram Regina matre Neque coles victimis libamine incenso Grot. in Exod. 20. Iealous signifieth as much as zealous or to be moved with a very ardent affection and fervent desire proceeding either out of love to save the thing untouched which is loved Zech. 1. 14. 8. 2. or else of indignation against that thing which deserveth punishment Exod. 34. 14. Nahum 1. 2. Ezek. 38. 19. and here it is used in both those two senses or significations Ford on the Corenant See Estey on the Command b Verbum viâ—itandi alias est mediae significationis hic in malum ponitur pro eo effectu qui consequitur irati Iudicis visitationem id est pro punitione LXX 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 reddens iniquitatem hoc est pâ—nam iniquitatis Patrum in filios c. Rivet iâ— Exod. 20. See Estey Some urge that if it be righteous with God to leave the world liable to death for Adams sin then children may suffer temporal afflictions for their Parents sins Parents may convey an estate to them with a curse But Pet. du Moulin and Knewstub are of another judgement alledging Ezek. 28. 20. and so are divers others Deus pumt peccatum Patrum in filiis non semper sed tunc solùm cùm filii imit antur peccata patrum ut docent S. Patres Hieron Chrysost. August Thom. 1 2. Quaest. 87. Quos sequuntur ferè omnes recentiores hoc ipsum indicat Scriptura cùm ait His qui oderunt me Non euim simpliciter Deus dicit se punâ—turum peccata patrum in filiis sed in t is qui eum oderunt Bellarm. de Amiss grat statâ— peccat lib. 4. ca. 7. Ford of the Covenant Joh. 14. 15 21. 1 John 5. 3. M. Dod. It commands us to worship God by such means and after such a manner as he hath prescribed in his Word and is agreeable to his nature Deut. 12. 30 31 32. B. Down Abstract D. Wilkins of the gift of Prayer chap. 19. This people draw near to me saith Ieremy speaking of such exercises Cultum generaliter appellarâ— consuâ—tudo est omnem honorem ab inferiori persona debitum praestitumve superiori Chamierus Tomo secundo lib. 18 cap. 1. The grounds of worship are these 1. God will be honoured by all the creatures he expects honour from them sutable to their nature 2. The creature in all its worship must have a rule their service must be reasonable Rom. 12. 2. Gal. 6. 16. therefore the Lord hath manifested his will to them Dan. 9. 23. 3. The conscience of the creature must receive this rule and submit to it It is one of the hardest things in religion to conceive aright of God Every Nation suited the picture of their gods according to their own genius The Spartaus being a warlike people painted god in armour The Ethiopians painted him black The Heathens misrepresented God Rom. 1. 23. The Jews likewise and those in the Reformed Churches misfigure the Divine Essence Idolatry is not only in Images but in false imaginations of God menâ—al Idolatry unseemly conceits of God are as bad as Atheism Rom. 1. 25. Rom. 6. 17. Dum obtempeperant non obsequuntur Deo serviendum est non ex arbitrio sed ex imperio Teâ—â—ul Ezek. 20. 30. Deut. 12. 2. 2 King 12. 3. Helps and furtherances in Gods worship are 1. Necessary and in nature and use the same with the true worship of God instituted by himself particularly these are unlawful if devised by men because devised for the substantial things of Gods worship are to be determined and instituted by him 2. Meer circumstances and matters of order concerning the method phrase external celebration which are not determined by God therefore no particular is unlawfull which is according to the general rules in Scripture Balls Trial of grounds of Separat chap. 3. Isaac went out into the field to meditate These things meditate and be in them said Paul to Timothy Deut. 6. 7. Gal. 6 6. 1 Thess. 5. 17. Matth. 6. Col. 3. 16. The more one fetcheth duties from God immediately and the more he draws the motives from God immediately and the more he placeth his comforts in God immediately the more spiritual and happy he is I must not only perform service to God but for God Hos. 7. 14. 1. That which sets you awork is your end Finis movet efficientem ad agendum 2. The end sweetens the service finis dat amabilitatem mediâ—s 3. One rests satisfied when he hath attained his end in â—ine terminatur appetitus efficientis do you perform duties that you may honour God Iohn 17. 4. please him Col. 1. 5. injoy him Heb. 10. 22. and adde to your own everlasting account If God