Selected quad for the lemma: scripture_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
scripture_n	rule_n	tradition_n	unwritten_a	2,845	5	12.5918	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A09434	A godlie and learned exposition upon the whole epistle of Iude, containing threescore and sixe sermons preached in Cambridge by that reverend and faithfull man of God, Master William Perkins, and now at the request of his executors, published by Thomas Taylor, preacher of Gods word ; whereunto is prefixed a large analysis, containing the summe and order of the whole booke, according to the authors owne method, to which are further added, foure briefe tables to direct the reader ...	Perkins, William, 1558-1602.; Taylor, Thomas.	1606 (1606)	STC 19724.3; ESTC S100865	274,393	200

is corrupted so as wee may not build vpon it that thereby they might bring their Latin Bible into credit as most authentical and yet that they might make the sentence of their Church the rule of faith the most learned of al that Church hold that the Latin Bible is also corrupt so indeede they couertly renounce all scripture that the sentence of the Church may obtaine the chiefe stroke Secondly in teaching that the authoritie of the Church in regarde of vs is aboue the Scriptures because wee knowe not the sense thereof but by the Church Thus putting downe the true and principall ground of Scripture that they might more easily set vp their own dotages The second ground concerneth the sufficiencie of scripture and is this The Scripture of the Prophets and Apostles is a perfect rule of faith and manners It is of all things to be beleeued or done to saluation 2. Tim. 3.16 The Scripture is profitable to teach improue correct instruct in righteousnes to make the man of God absolute yea perfect in euery good worke If it make him perfect in al kind of teaching it is also able much more to make euery man perfect to all the duties of his calling Gal. 1.8 If an Angell should teach otherwise that is diuerse or besides though not contrary to that which is taught hee shall bee accursed many doctrines indeed of Artes and other things are diuers and besides it but the meaning is that no doctrine of saluation must be brought no not besides it therfore the bookes of the Prophets and Apostles containe a perfect rule Many things which cannot bee found in scripture may be supplied by tradition Ans. Traditions can neuer settle the conscience for though diuerse of them are found in the writings of the fathers yet they were subiect to error and so might and did erre in them Aduersaries of this ground to bee contended with First all men by nature Iob. 22.14 Who say to the Almightie Departe from vs for wee desire not the knowledge of thy waies yea our common Protestants who in iudgement acknowledge this rule yet in their life they leaue it and take the leaden rule of naturall reason sense sight and feeling and few there be that liue by faith Secondly the Romish Church for first they make the written word a thing ruled by setting vp another Rule saying that there are two kindes of Scripture The first is inward written in the heart of all Catholikes which is the vniuersall consent of the Church The second is outward written by the Prophets and Apostles an inken scripture say they and a dead letter without the former Whereas the cleane contrarie is true the true rule being the scripture of the Prophets and Apostles and the other in the heart in this life but an imperfect patterne drawne according to the former Secondly they ouerturne the ground in ioyning to the written word vnwrittē tra●●tions so making it but half a rule and indeed as good no rule but where are these traditions In the writings of Fathers they say But how shall we know them to be scripture Because the Fathers say so But how shall wee know they say true Here must they flie to man whereof yet no man can assure vs. Thirdly in teaching that the true sense of scripture cannot be found without the Churches determination and so indeede make it no rule because a right rule both ruleth it selfe and is plaine to rule other things also The third ground is There is one true God By one I meane one in number not two 1. Cor. 8.6 To vs there is but one God that is to the Church to vs that looke to bee saued which is plaine by this reason for there can be but one infinite and if there were two or moe Gods there should be two or moe infinites which is impossible Aduersaries to this ground First the common Protestant who in iudgment holdeth one God yet in heart and life he setteth vp two or moe some riches some pleasure some one sinne or other for where a mans heart is there is his God Paul saith some make their bellie their God and that the Diuell is the God of the world Secondly the maine Enemie is the Popish Church which in word holdeth one God but diuers waies set vp diuers gods As first the Pope himselfe who by their reformed Canon law is to iudge all and to be iudged of none Who maketh himselfe a forgiuer of sinnes and that properly yea a maker of lawes to binde conscience aswell as Gods lawes which is horrible blasphemie Secondly the Virgin Mary whom they make a Goddesse as Christ a God as Christ a King so her a Queene as he a Lord so her a Ladie yea they set Christ below her whom they desire to commaund her sonne by the right of a mother yea and in some of their reformed Seruice bookes they trust in her for saluation Thirdly the Saints whom they pray vnto wherein they attribute vnto them the knowledge of the secrets of mens hearts and omnipresence for they must also be in all places which are things proper vnto God alone The fourth ground is that God is all sufficient in himselfe Gen. 17.1 I am all sufficient that is he hath in himselfe all perfection for first he taketh being from none but giueth being to all Secondly for substance he is a Spirit of perfect nature Thirdly euery way infinite in regard of time place attributes This may well be called a ground for whosoeuer placeth any want or imperfection in God denieth God and maketh him no God Aduersaries hereof First the common people who conceiue a God made all of mercie without his iustice Secondly the Papist who robbeth God of his perfection two waies first they attribute an imperfect iustice vnto him namely such a one as may be satisfied by mans satisfaction Secondly an imperfect mercie whereof our own merits must make a supplie teaching that indeed Christ must make vs iust but we must make our selues more iust and merit saluation The fifth ground is There be three in heauen the Father Sonne and holy Ghost and th●se three are one God 1. Ioh. 5.7 How can it be that three are one God Ans. It is a mysterie which the ancient Church answered thus They be three in person and one in substance so wee also say they be three in manner of subsisting but one in nature and Godhead Three they be distinguished in person the Father not being the Sonne nor the holy Ghost and so in the other persons 3. subsistences in one nature Ioh. 17.2 This is life euerlasting c. This is a groūd because wee must worship one God in three persons neither can wee aright thinke of God out of the Trinitie Aduersaries of this ground First Heretikes innumerable whose memorie is accursed as Arians of former and later times denying the Godhead of Christ. Secondly the Turke and Iew

that euer Christ appointed a Crucifixe to bee a signe of his presence or that God willeth their Images to bee signes of his presence Thirdly the Chaire of Estate is a signe only in the Kings absence for himselfe being present the ciuill worship is performed to himselfe but Christ is neuer absent from his Church and yet in his presence they set vp an Image to remember him by Thus that Church being an open Idolater must not bee ioyned with for she is not ioyned to Christ any longer but is a professed harlot neither i● it so indifferēt as some think to finde saluation there as well as by our Religion The fifth ground is Matth. 4.10 Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God and him only shalt thou serue That this is a chiefe ground needes no proofe and therefore wee will consider first the meaning secondly the aduersaries against whom wee must contend To know the meaning the words going before will affoord vs some direction wherein Satan hauing moued Christ to fall downe and worship him with bodily worship only and requiring not the maine worship due to God but a little bowing of the bodie betokening that he was the disposer of the kingdomes of the world this Christ denieth him with this reason ratified by Scripture that it is a worship and seruice proper to God and to bee tendred to him onely Secondly the words themselues are to bee weighed By worship is properly signified bodily worship in a bodily gesture the meaning then is thou shalt with thy bodie adore the Lord for so it is sutable to Satans demaund The word serue signifieth all worship due to God both inward and outward Only This word appertaineth to both the members and so to the whole sentence for else there should bee no direct deniall of Satans temptation requiring onely the former and not the latter But some will say we may serue men lawfully how then is seruice proper to God only There be two kindes of worship religious and ciuill Religious is an action or actions of reuerence and subiection whereby a man doth acknowledge the Godhead it self or the properties thereof either in God himselfe truly or in the creature falsely These properties of God are first to bee an absolute Lord. Secondly to bee Almightie Thirdly to be present in al places at all times Fourthly to heare all men in all places at all times Fiftly to know all things past present and to come yea and the hearts of men Sixtly to be giuer of all good things and the preuenter of all euill Now any action of reuerence in signification of any of these properties is a religious worship the very intent of the minde in religious worship being to ascribe either Godhead or diuine properties to the thing worshipped Ciuill or politique worship is when men performe actions of reuerence and subiection to others as acknowledging them to bee preferred aboue themselues in gifts or authoritie Thus bowing of the bodie is sometime religious when it is done to God in acknowledging his properties and sometime ciuil performed to a man in respect of his eminency in gifts or gouernment But these words of Christ are meant only of the former and not of the latter which belongs vnto man This ground thus truly conceiued affoordeth vs these two maine points of Religion first that God is to be worshipped with religious worship Secondly that all religious worship is proper to God and due to him alone Now religious worship is two-fold first inward standing in two things faith and inward obedience Secondly outward when this inward worship is outwardly testified consisting of three principall parts first in preaching hearing and reading the word secondly in receiuing the two Sacraments thirdly in prayer and thanksgiuing publike and priuate The Aduersaries hereof are the Papists who pretend the Catholike Religion but indeed ouerthrow it in deprauing the outward worshippe of God wherein the inward is testified The first part whereof standing in the preaching hearing and reading of the word they depraue first by mingling the pure word of God with mans word and writings and authorising bookes Apocryphall as Canonicall Scripture Secondly by making vnwritten Traditions Apostolicall and Ecclesiasticall as they say of equall authoritie with the Scripture Thirdly in that they teach in their Catechismes that the worship of God doth stand in obeying the Commandements of the Church as wel as the Commandements of God themselues and are necessarily to be practised vnto saluation so they worship God in vain Mat. 15.9 Fourthly in that they allow no Bible to be ●uthenticall but onely the Latin translation of Iere●ie renouncing both the Hebrew and Greeke fountaines and ye● learned Papists confesse that their Latin text i● corrupted and that therefore the true sense is to bee fetched from the Popes determination and from Councels and no other sense to be admitted Fiftly in that they make Images Lay mens bookes and teachers and debarre the people of the Scriptures publikely and priuately in the vulgar tongue and suffer it only to be read by them and vnto them in the Latin tongue vnknowne vnto them The second part of outward worship standing in administration of Sacraments they likewise corrupt and abolish for howsoeuer Baptisme is preserued for the substance of it in the Romish Church which as a lanterne carrieth the light it retaineth not for it owne but for the hidden Churches sake within it yet haue they abolished the Lords Supper for the substance of it first of a Sacrament they haue made it● reall sacrifice Secondly they haue turned the Communion into a priuate Masse where the Priest alone receiueth all and the people nothing Thirdly although in a Sacrament the●e must bee a distinction between the signe and the thing signified yet they make none but ouerthrow all such signification of the signes by their transubstantiation Fourthly they haue turned the bodie of Christ into a breaden God which they carrie about in boxes and worship which is as vilde an idolatrie as euer was among the Heathen not inferiour to the worshipping of Cats and Buls as gods among the Egyptians Fiftly they haue added to Christs Institution fiue Sacraments viz. Penance Confirmation Orders Matrimonie and annoynting But indeede Baptisme is a Sacrament of Penance the Lords Supper of Confirmation and further are they deceiued in the other The third part of outward worship concerneth Prayer and thankesgiuing this they ouerthrow likewise first they mocke God in praying in an vnknowne tongue not knowing what they aske much lesse seriously addressing themselues vnto the dutie which euen earthly Kings would disdaine Secondly in prayer must bee brought sense of want and contrition of heart this they cannot bring who are taught that they merit by prayer Thirdly prayer must be made in particular faith but this they make presumption Fourthly they allow praying to creatures the mediation of Saints and so denie the very substance of prayer which is to make

reformed resisteth plainly saying I will not haue this man to rue ouer me I desire none of his waies This loue then comes from grace 1. Ioh. 4.7 Loue commeth from God 1. Tim. 1.5 it hath his beginning from a pure heart true faith and good conscience Which must bee maintained against the Papists who say that nature affoordeth the inclination but grace the practise whereas indeed grace giueth both Thirdly consider the vse of loue It is the instrument and companion of true faith which worketh by loue Galath 5.6 The proper worke of faith is to lay hold on Christ this faith as a hand can of it selfe doe but when it commeth to the practise of morall duties it can no more worke without the grace of loue then a hand which can lay hold alone and of it selfe receiue and retaine can cut any thing without an instrument Whence it appeareth that faith in iustification is alone but in the life of man it worketh by loue and whereas it hath bin taught for many hundred yeeres that loue is the life of faith that is vn●rue for it only testifieth that faith hath life It is alleaged that as the bodie without the spirit is dead euen so faith without workes is dead therfore workes are the soule and giue life to faith But this consequence from this comparison is not good because the soule is not properly the soule of the bodie but of the man and so it proueth not that loue is the soule of faith Again the word Spirit there betokeneth the breath without which the body is dead and thus is the comparison to be returned that as breath maketh not a man liuing but sheweth him to be aliue so loue maketh not faith liuing but testifieth it so to be yea indeed is the fruite and effect of faith as breath is of life More particularly this grace of loue is two-fold first that whereby man loueth God secondly that whereby man loueth man In the former note two points first what it is namely a motion of the heart whereby it is affected to God causing it to be well pleased in God and his workes for himselfe as also to seeke fellowship with God so much as it can Secondly note the measure of this loue which in Scripture is double first that which the law requireth and that is the full measure of loue loue in the highest degree when man loueth God with all his soule with all his strength and all the powers of the whole man so as in man no loue can be aboue it vnto this all men are bound yet no man since the fall can attaine Secondly that which the Gospell describeth standing in an vnfained will and true endeuour to loue God with all the heart all the strength and all the powers which is a smaller measure than the former yea and a qualification and moderation of it yet to none but those that are in Christ. Wherby we come to the right vnderstanding of diuers places of scripture as 2. King 23.25 of Iosiah 2. Chron. 15.15 all Iudah sought the Lord with their whole hart These and such other places must be vnderstood as they are qualified by the Gospell in that they willed and endeuoured by all good meanes to seeke God yea this text also must be vnderstood of this second measure seeing the former being in the highest degree cannot be multiplied no not if men were glorified The second kinde of this loue is that whereby man loueth his neighbour which is a certaine diuine and spirituall motion causing the heart as the former both to be wel pleased in man for God that is because he is Gods image and his owne flesh as also to powre out it selfe and communicate goodnes to his neighbour in wishing speaking and hoping the best of him Wherein by the way obserue a plaine difference betweene faith and loue faith is a hand but to pull Christ to our selues loue is a hand also but opening it selfe and giuing foorth vnto others In this loue of the neighbour consider these three things first the order of it The order that hath been taught for many hundred yeeres is that first wee must loue our selues and then others from this ground Thou shalt loue thy neighbour as thy selfe for the rule say they must goe before the thing ruled But this is not found seeing worthie then haue been commended in Scriptures for louing others as well yea and better than their owne selues so Dauid loued Ionathan 1. Sam. 20.17 Christ loued his enemies better than himselfe these began not with themselues yea indeed the right beginning of loue is in God and then as a man is a more principall instrument of Gods glorie hee must be for God preferred in our loue aboue our selues Thus euery man is bound to loue and preferre the life of his Prince aboue his owne see the perfect rule of direction herein Ioh. 13.34 Secondly note the manner of it set downe in that precept Thou shalt loue thy neighbour as thy selfe that is as wee are cheerfull and free to practise the dutie of loue to our selues so must we doe it to others for this precept aimeth at the manner rather than the rule of our loue to man for that is as Christ hath loued vs. Thirdly the kindes of it it is two-fold first single when men loue others but are not repaid with loue againe yea when a man loues his enemie but is not loued again The second is mutuall loue that is when loue is requited with loue called in Scripture brotherly loue see Philip. 2.2 1. Cor. 1.10 when men are of one iudgement like minded speak● one thing and one soule is as it were in many bodies The second point is the multiplication of loue which the Apostle prayeth for vpon good ground because it ioyneth man to God and man to man and so becommeth as it is called the bond of perfection the bond of the Church Common-wealth of al societies 1. Cor. 13. Loue ed●fieth that is it helpeth to build the kingdome of God yea it constraineth men to all good duties in their particular callings Qu. But how shall this loue be multiplied Ans. By certaine meditations and practises The meditations are many first on Gods cōmandement Be seruants one to another in loue Gal. 5.13 Secondly of Gods image which al men should beare in loue 1. Ioh. 3.16 Thirdly of the fellowship of the faithfull hauing all one father one brother one saluation all linked by one spirit Ephes. 4.4 Fourthly of the loue of God Ioh. 13.35 which hereby we shall be assured of 1. Ioh. 3.14 The practises also are diuers first wee must labour to be assured of Gods loue to vs and encreased vpon vs Ephes. 5.2 Secondly the law of nature must teach vs to doe as we would be done vnto Thirdly our care must be more to loue than be loued for to loue is a vertue in our selues to be loued i● the vertue of another Fourthly pray daily for

him such princely gifts as it is said God gaue him another heart his heart was changed in regard of other gifts than formerly he had so when Dauid was annoynted King and when Samuel had powred the horne of oyle vpon his head it is said 1. Sam. 16.13 that the spirit of the Lord came vpon him which furnished him with gifts and graces both of regeneration and regiment also In like manner the Lord tooke of the spirit of Moses and put it on the seuenty Elders Numb 11.17 whereby they were furnished with gifts of gouernment and enabled to beare rule and iudge iustly as Moses was such titles therefore as these are not ascribed vnto them without iust cause Yea how can they be fitlier called than Glories seeing there is no greater glorie in earth than to supplie Gods roome and to bee enabled with gifts for the sufficient discharge of it Hence learne that it is lawfull for Princes to beare an outward pompe in diet buildings costly apparell and troopes of men for they are dignities and their dignitie being outward in regard of men they may maintaine it by outward pompe to procure more reuerence and awe of men thereunto So Agrippa and Bernice came with great pompe and entred into the common hall which pompe is not there discommended but rather approued as by the circumstances of the text appeareth Secondly Magistrates ought especially to honour God because he especially honoureth them this must they doe by discountenancing and punishing vice and by setting vp and maintaining true religion and vertue Thirdly being in Gods place they are to execute iustice without corruption or partialitie in the face and feare of God 2. Chro. 9.7 Seeing the iudgement is the Lords let the feare of God bee vpon you take heede and doe it Deut. 1.17 Ye shall haue no respect of persons in iudgement but shall heare the small as well as the great ye shall not feare the face of man for the iudgement is Gods and herein stands a great part of their glorie Fourthly we are in all lawfull things to yeeld free subiection and obedience vnto our Magistrates and gouernours euen as vnto God himselfe whose roome they are in which duty the child oweth also to his father the seruant to his Master because they also are set ouer them in Gods stead Fifthly hence also is it lawfull for vs to giue to Princes the titles of Maiestie and Grace because it hath pleased the holy Ghost to ascribe them vnto them and by their titles to commend their persons and places vnto vs yea and to furnish them with such gifts of Magistracie as that they become not onely naked titles but iust significations of the true honour which God hath graced them withall Vers. 9. Yet Michael the Archangell when he stroue against the Diuell and disputed about the bodie of Moses durst not blame him with cursed speaking but said The Lord rebuke thee IN this verse is laid downe another reason amplifying their sin of these seducers by a comparison from the greater to the lesse and thus it standeth Michael the Archangell durst not so much as raile on the Diuell himselfe much lesse may these vpon Magistrates who are Gods and consequently their sinne is hainous who dare open their mouthes to reuile Princes and Magistrates Here one question is mooued namely whence the Apostle had this historie of the disputation betweene Michael and the Diuell concerning the bodie of Moses seeing it is not to bee found in the Scriptures I answere the substance of it is in the Scripture although though not the circumstances For in Deut. 34.6 is said that the Lord buried Moses but no man knoweth of his sepulchre till this day There is the ground of the historie the other particular concerning the contention of the Archangell and the Diuell wi●h this manner of rebuking is not found in the old Testament Quest. Where then had he this Ans. Either from some booke then extant among the Iewes which is not now to bee found or else from some tradition which passed amōg the Iewes from hand to hand as many things did as that 2. Timot. 3.8 where the Apostle saith that Iannes and Iambres withstood Moses the historie of which is not found in the old Testament Hence the Papists conclude that the word written is not sufficient and perfect in and of it selfe vnlesse the vnwritten word be added vnto it that is that word which is giuen by tradition both which say they make a perfect word but neither is perfect or sufficient alone grounding their opinion hence that Iude alleageth an example out of a tradition which is not found in Scripture But that is an hereticall doctrine and vntrue seeing the perfection of a thing is not to bee measured by euery thing that is wanting vnto it but by the perfect end of it for perfection is taken from the end Whence I reason thus If the written word be perfect and sufficient to the end to which it is ordained it is euery way perfect But it is perfect and sufficient to that end namely to the glorie of God in working out perfectly the faith saluation of man and is in nothing wanting for the atchieuing of this end but sufficiently teacheth all things to be beleeued and done and giueth perfect direction concerning faith and manners Ioh. 20.31 These things are written that they might beleeue and beleeuing might haue life thorough his name Rom. 15.4 Whatsoeuer things are written are written for our learning that wee through patience and comfort of the Scriptures might haue hope and therefore the word written is euery way most sufficient and absolutely perfect and neede no addition or tradition to helpe forward this end Ob. This place is a tradition and not written and many other true traditions were neuer written besides that the Church may make traditions Ans. We grant many true traditions are not in Scripture but such they are as a man may be ignorant of and not preiudice his saluation Againe the Church hath a power and hath had priuiledge to make constitutions and lawes which were to be knowne and receiued but these are such as only concerne the orderly gouernment of the Church and are not necessarie to saluation Ob. But some traditions are necessarie to saluation which are not contained in the written word and they alleage two first in Rom. 12.6 that Gods word must be tried by the rule of faith and so also by the same rule expounded This rule of faith is nothing else by their exposition but a general consent in the hearts of all true Catholikes together with the Pope assenting with them which of necessitie wee must beleeue and yet say they it is not in the Scripture and therefore some things must of necessitie bee beleeued which are not in the Scripture Ans. The rule of faith is not such a crooked rule as they would thrust vpon the world by their wicked exposition but the right rule of faith

is the plaine word of God euery way absolutely directing in all points of faith and loue 2. Tim. ● 5 Paul wisheth Timothy to keepe the true patterne of wholesome words in faith and loue which is nothing else but the testimonie of Scripture in points of faith and loue comprised in the Decalogue and Apostles Creede The rule of faith therefore in expounding Scripture is Scripture it selfe The second thing necessarie by their doctrine to be beleeued not contained in Scripture is that the Canonical Scripture is Gods word which truth is absolutely necessarie to saluation to be beleeued but cannot otherwise bee knowne or beleeued but onely by the tradition of the Church Ans. As euery other Arte and Science hath certaine principles of truth to proue all other precepts by but themselues are to bee prooued by none so also hath Diuinity the chiefe of al other Sciences of which kinde this is one principle that Canonicall Scripture is Gods word which not granted inferreth a destruction of all other diuine rules this is a truth therefore confirmed not a thing testified from some other but as a ground of it selfe Secondly in diuine matters saith goeth before knowledge which in humane things is cleane contrarie for if a man would know whether fire bee hot let him put his hand vnto it he shall haue experience of it and then he shall beleeue it but in diuine things first a man giueth credit and yeeldeth consent to the word and then hath experimentall knowledge for although faith hath his knowledge yet experimentall knowledge followeth faith Abraham beleeued aboue hope here faith went before knowledge Ioh. 7.27 If ye do the will of my Father yee shall know whether the doctrine bee of God nor no. Thus then we may conceiue it the tenour of the word of God is this Thus saith the Lord. If the question now be whether the Lord said thus or no I answere to beleeue the Church herein before God is sacriledge but herein we are first to yeeld assent vnto God and then after this experimentall knowledge will follow that Canonicall Scripture is the word of God Thirdly wee know that Scripture is Gods word by Scripture and not by the Church out of which being in humilitie taught and acquainted with the excellent matter of it and manner of writing the end the glorie of God and our owne saluation wee cannot but haue sufficient perswasion of the author of it and that it can proceede from none other but God himselfe Thus notwithstanding the allegations of the aduersaries the written word retaineth that perfection which needeth no tradition to strengthen or further it in that end to which it is appointed Now to the reason it selfe amplifying this sinne in this verse which containeth three points to be considered First the person that durst not raile Secondly the goodnes of his cause which was very iust and yet he durst not raile vpon the Diuell himselfe Thirdly the manner of his speech The Lord rebuke thee The person that durst not raile was Michael the Archangell whom some affirme to bee Christ himselfe others that he is some chiefe arch and principall Angel which opinion is more probable For first the Apostle speaketh of him as one in subiection and standing in awe not daring to breake the law of God for he durst not reuile the Diuell Secondly in 1. Thess. 4.16 The Lord Christ shall come to iudgement with the sound of a Trumpet and the voyce of an Archangell where is a plaine distinction betweene Christ who should come in the clowdes and the Archangell Thirdly Peter explaineth it speaking the same thing and saith The Angels giue not railing iudgement against them 2. Pet. 2.11 It is more probable then that by Michael was meant a principall Angell rather than Christ. Doctr. First from the person wee learne that there be distinctions and degrees of Angels there bee Angels and an Archangell Quest. Is there but one Archangell Ans. The Scripture speaking of Archangels vseth alwaies the singular number neuer mentioning more than one and where the Scripture resolueth not we are not to determine yet I condemne not those who haue probably held that there are more than one Secondly wee haue here an example of Angelicall meeknes and modestie Tit. 3.1 Put them in remembrance that they bee subiect to principalitie and speake euill of no man but shew all meeknes vnto all 〈◊〉 the contrarie practise of railing slandering and obtrecting is a propertie of the Diuell whence he hath his name Reu. 12.10 the Accuser of the brethren and the Aduersarie 2. Pet. 5 8. who is euer readie with one accusation or other to stand vp against euery man the malitious man whose malice caused him to stand vp against Iob and falsely accuse him of hypocrisie vnto Gods own face Let slanderers and backbiters of their brethren see hence whom they imitate and most liuely resemble Secondly consider the goodnesse of Michaels cause which was this It was the wil of God that Moses body should be buried in a secret place vnknown to any man to preuent and auoid al occasion of superstition and Idolatrie amōg the Iewes The Diuell on the contrarie would discouer it that so the Israelites might fall to Idolatrie before it herein the Archangell resisted him and stroue with him for the performance of the will of God and the maintenance of his true worship and yet in this good cause Michael durst not reuile the Diuel himselfe In this cause consider two things First the fight and contention betweene Michael and the Diuell Secondly the cause and occasion of it about Moses bodie In the former wee may obserue that there is a sharp and serious contention betweene good and bad Angels in which the good Angels labour to defend all that are in Christ against the rage and furie of the Diuell and his angels As Psal. 34.8 The Angels of the Lord pitch their tents round about those that feare him And on the contrarie the Diuell and wicked spirits cast about how to destroy the bodies and soules of men 1. Pet. 5. Our aduersarie the Diuell goeth about continually seeking whom he can deuoure This combat concerneth and is conuersant about either first the persons or secondly the societies of men The fight about the persons concerneth either infants or men of yeres First for infants the Diuell seeketh how to spoyle and destroy them especially those of elect and faithfull parents in regard of their weaknes and tendernes both of minde and bodie but the Angels of the Lord haue charge giuen thē to defend them against this malice of Satan As Psal. 91.12 They shall beare thee vp in their armes that is they shall bee as nurces to beare them in their armes preseruing them from danger Mat. 18.10 Despise not one of these little ones for their Angels alwaies behold the face of my father which is in heauen Secondly concerning men of yeeres the diuell and his angels striue to driue them out