Trojano anno dom 120. formulam catechizandi catechimenos addisceret nam inducit Christianam siccine Ethnicos catechizantem licet animo blasphemo Deum alte regnantem magnum aetherium atque aeternum fiilium patris spiritum sanctum ex patre procedentem unum ex tribus ex uno tria Patres Concilii Constantinopolitani anno dom 383. mittunt libellum Synodicam Romam at Damasum aliosque Episcopos ibidem convicatos in quo exhibent fidei suae Confessionem Fidei Nicenae consentaneam 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 consentaneam baptismati 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Nazianzenus his contemporaâ—â—us orat 32. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Socinus anno dom 1604. scribit epistolam Smaltio itidem Sociniano de baptismo ut non necessario remittendo atque ad synaxin excipiendis hominibus vitae honestae ac probatae religionem christianam professis quamvis nunquam baptizatis adeo abhorrent acfloccipendunt baptismum Satan ut fidem nostram ab ipsis radicibus convelleret partim de divina filii Spiritus Sancti essentia partim de personali distinctione ingentes pugnas semper movebat Calvin Institut lib. 1. cap. 13. §. 21. Servabat tamen Dominus in Papatu renascituri suo tempore populi semen manebat salvus baptismus in Patris Filii Spiritus Sancti nomen quamvis perigrinae linguae usu multis aliis conspurcatus superstitionibus manebat frustra toties oppugnatum unitatis essentiae trinitatis personarum fundamentum manebat doctrina de duabus Christi naturis Beza epist 81. Mysteries of Christian Religion which it hath pleased God in His infinite Wisdom Mercy Goodness to reveal to His Church on Earth on which they are to build their Faith and Salvation the Mystery of the Sacred Trinity one God in three Persons is the first in order and of great concernment even the three that bear record in Heaven the Father the Word and the Holy Ghost and these three are one 1 Joh. 5. 7. These three bear witness to the truth of all the Scriptures then assuredly to this truth also that they are three Persons in one Godhead and among the twelve Articles of the Apostolick Creed this Mystery of the Trinity takes up three This sacred Mystery is most clearly manifested in our Saviour's Baptism Mat. 3. 16 17. Luk 3. 21 22. John 1. 32 33. The Father speaks from Heaven this is my well beloved Son while at the same time the Son is baptized in Jordan and the Holy Ghost came down from Heaven in the likeness of a Dove and lighted upon God the Son and abode upon Him Moreover The Sacrament of Baptism being ordained of God Father Son and Holy Ghost the first Sacrament of the Covenant of Grace in it all the Promises of Mercy and Salvation are sealed to Believers and by it Christians are solemnly entered into the Church and House of God so that the Contemner of this Sacrament debarreth himself from Salvation Therefore God Himself hath appointed this Program to be prefixed upon the Porch of His Church that this Almighty God in whose Name we are baptized and in whom we Believe is Father Son and Holy Ghost and It cannot be supponed but that these Men and Women who were Proselyted and being Pagans before admitted to the benefite of Christian Baptism behoved to take a time to learn the Grounds of their Religion therefore the the Doctors of the Church not only wrote Catechisms for these young Christians who therefore betwixt their first offering of themselves to the Christian Church until the time they were baptized were called Catechumeni These Doctors also wrote certain short Sums of Christian Faith commonly called Creeds that before these Pagan Catechume in received Baptism they were to give a confession of their Faith contained in their Creed in all which Creeds written by the Church whether longer or shorter and in their Catechisms the Doctrine of the Trinity was a special part and accordingly that Synod of Divines at Westminster in their lesser Catechism have not omitted the Trinity So the reformed French Church in Geneva have a little Catechism containing only twenty one short Questions on which they examine these who are at first to be admitted to the Lords Table which little Catechism begins with the Trinity and is bound in with their French Version of the Bible printed at Geneva 1567. The Sacred Trinity being the Program of Christian Baptism proved the strong and invincible Fort of the Christian Faith in the Trinity of Persons in the Godhead against the Arrians and other Antitrinitarian Hereticks wherefore Socinus who hath drunk much deeper in the poysonable Cup of Blasphemy against the blessed Trinity then the old Arrians hath very slightingly written of the Sacrament of Baptism The second great Mystery of Christian Religion is that the Word was made Flesh Joh. 1. 14. and this the Holy Ghost calls the great Mystery of Godliness God manifested in the Flesh 1 Timoth. chap. 3. vers 16. which Mystery viz. that the Word the second Person God the Son was incarnate and not the Father or the Holy Ghost this cannot be known and believed aright until first we know believe that there are three distinct Persons in the Godhead therefore our Saviour Joh. 17. 3. joyns these two together This is life everlasting to know thee the only true God and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent and the Apostle Paul Coloss 2. 2. to the acknowledgement of the mystery of God and of the Father and of Christ. If it be objected that it seems to be a hard saying That the Knowledge and Faith in God and three Persons Father Son and Holy Ghost and in Christ God and Man in one Person is necessary to Salvation Seing both these are profound Mysteries so far above Humane Reason and Capacity I answer first Not only these two are great Mysteries but also the whole Gospel is a Divine Revelation of a continued tract of Mysteries Mark 4. 11. Rom. 16. 25. 26. Eph. 3. 9 16 19. Coloss 1. 26 27. called the great Mystery of Godliness 1 Tim. 3. 16. for there is no other Name under Heaven given among Men whereby we must be saved but the Name of Jesus Acts 4. 12. who is the Captain of our Salvation Heb. 2. 10. the Author of Eternal Salvation Heb. 5. 9. and the Gospel is called the Knowledge of Salvation Luk. 1. 77. the Word of Salvation Acts 13. 26. the Way of Salvation Acts 16. 17. the Salvation of God Acts 28. 28. the Power of God to Salvation Rom. 1. 16. the great Salvation Heb. 2. 3. so that whosoever will not believe these Gospel Mysteries is damned I answer secondly that to Divine and Saving Faith as such demonstrative knowledge in the Logical Sense far less comprehensive knowledge is required but the Lord condescending to Mans Humane weak Capacity accepts of Faith albeit apprehensive Knowledge go before it not alwayes requiring that they know how such a thing is true
were now Christians of understanding as they were Baptized presently in the name of Father Son and Holy Ghost and gave a Confession of their Faith in Father Son and Holy Ghost that they also in their publick worship did sing Glory to that Father Son and Holy Ghost in whose name they were newly Baptized Some asks the question upon what Text of Scripture the Doxology is chiefly founded for answer It hath two parts to wit The three Persons of the Trinity which are the object of that worship Secondly the Glory given to them which is the Act of worship in the Doxology accordingly the giving of Glory to God is founded on many Scriptures but there is one full and express Rom. 11. the last verse Of him and through him and to him are all things to whom be glory for ever Amen But seing the object of the worship in three distinct Persons of the Trinity is most clear in the Words of the Baptismal institution Matth. last Baptizing them in the Name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Ghost therefore with Athanasius Bazil and the rest of the Greek Fathers we think that the Doxology is chiefly grounded upon that Text in Matthew It is true some of the Learned would build it on that Text Rom. 11. And that because they alleadge the three Persons of the Trinity insinuate here which though it Lombardus lib. 1. senten distinct 36. capitulo 3. putat cum Augustino in lib. 1. de trinitate cap. 6 in loco praedicto 11. capitis ad Romanos indigitari distinctionem trium personarum astibi certum est to loco non satis perspicuum datur fundamentum fidei trium personarum trinitatis pro argumento invincibili quod Eunomius Arianus istam textam citat ut patet Basilei lib. 1. contra Eunominium dum dat confessionem suae fidei pag. 7. Credimus inquit in unum Deum ex quo sunt omnia in unum unigenitum dei filium eundem verbum dominum nostrum Jesum Christum per quam sunt omnia in unum Spiritum Sanctum paracletum Haec Arij confessio fidei in trinitatem subolet hunc locum ad Romanos ipse Arianus prius rumperet quam consiteretur se credere in Patrem Filium Spiritum Sanctum aut ita proferret Doxologiam ut scribit Basilius were granted that the three Persons are there insinuat yet the other Text being full and express and the strongest Bulwark against the Arian therefore that Text in Matthew is the chief ground for the Doxology for to glorify God according to that Text in the Romans is so general that the Arian could easily subscribe to such a Doxology CHAP. VII The lawfulness of singing the Doxology proven by the Induction of all it's Parts 12. from the three Holies Isa 6. 3. IN this Chapter we prove by Induction that all the Parts of the Doxology are in the Holy Scriptures from whence we deduce this Reason that Divine Glory which in the Holy Scripture is given to Father Son and Holy Ghost that same Divine Glory is lawfull to sing to Father Son and Holy Ghost we prove the assumption that Glory is given to Father Son and Holy Ghost Rom. 11. v. last To God be glory for ever 1 Tim. 1. 17. To God be honour and glory forfor ever and ever Amen 2 Tim. 4. 18. To God be glory for ever and ever 1 Tim. 6. v. 16. To God be honour and power everlasting for ever Jude v. last To God be glory now and for ever Amen Galat. 14. 5. To God and our Father be glory for ever and ever Amen and the same Words Philip. 4. 20. Secondly Glory to God through Christ these words you shall find Rom. 16. v. last Eph. 3. 21. Heb. 13. 20 21. Thirdly To Christ be glory now and for ever Amen 2 Peter 3. v. last Revel 16. Revel 5. 12. He is the Lord of glory 1 Corinth 2. 8. James 2. 1. He is crowned with glory Heb. 2. 9. The Lords glorious branch Isaiah 11. 10. The Holy Ghost Pet. 14. 14. The Spirit of glory is glorified Thus we have proven from Scripture these parts of the Doxology Glory to the Father to the Son and Holy Ghost for now and ever There remains one word to be cleared in the Doxology to wit As it was in the beginning for clearing of which we wrot in the end of the fourth Chapter that these words were added to the Doxology because of Arian Hereticks and that in the fourth Century when Arius denyed that the Son was with the Father from all eternity but affirmed that there was a time when the Son was not and these Ancient Doctors of the Church knowing that the first Words in St. Johns Gospel in these three Verses were indited by the Holy Ghost and written by the Apostle John his Pen-man to assert the Co-eternity of the Son with the Father and that against Ancient Hereticks who lived in the Apostle St. John's time and were Blasphemers of Christ the Church therefore hath made choise of that same Text as fittest against the Arians a Alexander Alexandriae Episcopus Concilij Niceni Membrum Arij Blasphemijs infensissimus in sua Epistola ad omnes ubique gentium fratres scribit Arium asserere tempus aliquando fuisse cum filius Dei non esset quod sic refutat in initio Evangilij Joannis In principio erat verbum itaque non erat tempus cum non esset Socrates lib. 1. cap. 3. Syrmiense concilium in symbolo damnat eos qui dicunt erat tempus aut seculum quando 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 non erat ibidem anathemate 25. Si quis dicat Christum ex quo ex Maria natus est initium accepisse ut Deus esset anathema sit ut Samosatenus Ebion Cerinthus Thus have we cleared that all the Words in the Doxology are express Scripture and according thereunto and if any object that it follows not to be lawfully sung in the Church except it were in Scripture all contiguous together as one of the Psalms of David to these in this place I only give this Answer That the reformed Church of France in their publick worship sing the Apostolick Creed turned in Meeter and is therefore printed and bound in with their Psalm Books and yet that Creed is far lesse continued Scripture then the Doxology And the Learned know that the Church of France is famous not only of old time for many glorious Martyres before the Council of Nice but also in the beginning of Reformation from Popery b Origines in hunc locum Is 66. 3. ait hic trinitatem insinuari Athanasius tom 1. operim pag. 154. 255. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 proferunt glorificationem dicentes sanctus sanctus sanctus tres personas perfectas ostendunt sub una voce Dominus unam substantiam declarant idque 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in confuse indivise subinnuens nec Angelos
benedictio videtur absque cantu Deo oblata 3. Davidis Doxologia solemnior Jehovah Elohim videtur prorsus ultima jam moribundi inquit Tremellius sanctam ipsius animam Deo reddentis Psal 72. 18 19. benedictus sit Jehovah Elohim v. 19. benedictum nomen gloriae ejus in seculum impleaturque gloriâ ejus tota terra Amen Amen huic Davidis Doxologiae seraphim Isai cap. 6. vers 3. stantes clamabant Trinitati Doxologiam ut supra probatum est hujus tractatus pagin◠47. plena est omnes terra gloria ejus quod quam belle respondet quasi implet verba Davidis nempe impleaturque gloria ejus tota terra Gods most proper Name most often used in the Old Testament it comes from an Hebrew word that signifies To Be and so Jehovah signies Gods Essence and Being of Himself and the giving of Being to all His Creatures therefore Exod. 6. 3. the Lord prefers His Name Jehovah to His other Name God Almighty for this Name implyes Gods Almighty Power to wit Elshaddai but Jehovah importeth Gods infinite Perfections therefore Psal 83. 18. God alone His Name is Jehovah and Isa 42. 8. I am Jehovah that is my Name and Exod. 15. 3. Jehovah is His Name therefore Num. 6. 24 25 26. when God endites the words of the Blessing to Moses how the Priest should pray over his People it is all in the Name of Jehovah and so the Lord puts His Name Jehovah upon His People The second Name of God most frequent in the Old Testament is Elohim it is the Plural Number and is sometimes indeed used in the Old Testament in the Singular Number but not so often by far as it 's in the Plural Number It is dispute among Divines what can be the reasons why the Lord should take to Himself so often a Name signifying Moe to wit a Plurality and to joyn that to another of His Names to wit Jehovah which is of the Singular Number for albeit often in the Old Testament God design Himself by other moe Names as God Almighty Lord of Hosts God of Israel c. yet most often He designs Himself Jehovah Elohim which is ordinarily rendered in the Bible Lord God For answer to the question proponed generally it is this That albeit from these two words there cannot be demonstrate the Unity of the Godhead and Trinity of the Persons by a convincing Argument against obstinate Jews and Antitrinitarian Hereticks yet from it may be brought a probable Argument to moderate and sober spirited Christians to prove that Moses and other Pen men of the Old Testament who themselves undoubtedly did know the Mystery of the Trinity as Moses David Isaiah c. and therefore when they did so often write these two Names of God together Jehovah Elohim the first being the Singular Number the second the Plural did thereby intimate the Unity of the Essence in the Godhead with the Trinity of Persons therefore Pareus on Genesis pag. 23. having dispute the question at length concludes No godly Man will deny the probability of this reason drawen from Elohim joined with another word of the Singular Number as it is here with Jehovah and so think the Westminster Synod Notes on the first two words of Genesis Elohim Bara the first Elohim being in the Plural Number jovned with Bara in the Singular Number He did creat and that Moses and the rest of the Pen-men of the Holy Scriptures in the Old Testament did know this Mystery is out of question to the Doctors both of the Reformed and Roman Church all which with the Fathers and Councils bring many strong and clear Arguments from the Old Testament to prove the Mystery of the Sacred Trinity Therefore Tremellius a Jew born in his Notes upon Gen. 1. 26. Let us make Man after our own image saith God Note this here God Father Son and Holy Ghost one God in three distinct Persons so appoint Let us here saith Tremellius is a Testimony of the Sacred Trinity and that not an obscure one And therefore the Westminster Notes prove from the Scriptures that Moses was not ignorant of the Doctrine of the Trinity and it is observable that in the first three Chapters of Genesis Moses nineteen times calls God Jehovah Elohim and who will deny that Abraham saw Christs day John 8. 56. and did not David call Him Lord when in the Spirit of Prophecy he spake of Him Mat. 22. 44. and Isaiah saw His Glory John 12. 41. And if some object If there be so many clear Testimonies in the Old Testament of the Doctrine of the Trinity how came it to pass that now the Jews who have and read the Old Testament deny the Sacred Trinity The Scriptures will answer you our Saviour in the Gospel pronounces them blind Mat. 15. 14. the blind lead the blind and often elsewhere and so the Apostle calls them Rom. 11. 7. were they not broken off for their Unbelief Rom. 11. 20. till the fulness of the Gentiles come in and since their rejection and breaking off the Vail is on their Eyes until this day while they read the Old Testament 2 Cor. 3. 13. yet it will not follow but that the Mystery of the Trinity was known to the Saints and saved in the Old Testament who believed the Covenant of Grace made with Adam in Paradice the seed of the Woman should tread down the head of the Serpent which our blessed Saviour was to the Saints in the Old Testament as well as to us the Way the Truth and the Life Joh. 14. 6. and the same to day yesterday and for ever Heb. 13. 8. So that as the believing Jews and Church of God in the Old Testament did believe the Doctrine of the Trinity albeit we grant that that Mystery of the Trinity was not so clearly revealed to these Saints in the Old Testament as it is now to us Christians under the New Testament asserted to them in many Testimonies of Scripture so they reading and hearing the Hebrew Text which was their Mother Language and therein two Names of God so often joyned together Jehovah Elohim the one in the Singular the other in the Plural Number the Holy Ghost and His Pen-men did thereby insinuate to them the Doctrine of the Sacred Trinity and according to this in many of the Hebrew Psalms and some Spiritual Songs there is a Doxology to Jehovah Elohim closing the Psalm to wit these Psalms following 76 80 84 90 92 99 144 146 and 1 Chron. 16. 36. and Chap. 29. vers 20. and Psal 72. vers 18 and 19. If then the Jew closed many Psalms with the Doxology to the blessed Trinity shall not the Christian to whom the Mystery is more clearly revealed and in which he is baptized and without which he cannot be saved for no Salvation without Christ Acts 4. 12. and he who denieth the Son hath not the Father 1 John 2. 23. and as the Holy Ghost proceeds from the Father and the
THE DOXOLOGY Approven OR The singing Glory to the Father Son and Holy Ghost in the Worship of GOD Its lawfulness and expediency proven from the Holy Scriptures Councils and Fathers and the Scruples of the Weak thereanent cleared BY Mr. ROBERT EDWARD Minister of the Gospel of Christ at Murrois 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 St. Basil in Liturgia 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 St. Chrysostomus in Lyturgia 1 Cor. 11. 16. Quod si quis videtur contentiosus esse nos ejusmodi consuetudinem non habemus neque Ecclesiae Dei Doxologiam respuere Rom. 15. 5 6. Now the God of patience and consolation grant you to be like-minded one towards another according to Christ Jesus That ye may with one mind and one mouth glorifie God even the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ EDINBVRGH Printed by the Heir of Andrew Anderson Printer to the King 's most Sacred Majesty Anno DOMINI M. DC LXXXIII A To the Right Honourable GEORGE Earl of Aberdence Viscount of Farmertin Lord HADDO METHLICK TARVES and KELLE Sheriff principal of Edinburgh and Aberdene Lord High-Chancellor OF SCOTLAND My Lord WHatsoever Maxim relating to Religion albeit it be neither Fundamental nor Orthodox yet these Persons who are entangled in Errour and Slaves to their Corruption if they fancy that Maxim to be both Fundamental and Orthodox close with it in their Judgment embrace it in their Will and dandle it upon the knees of their Affections yea they idolize it as fondly and furiously as these Pagan Ephesians did their Image of Diana Acts 19. 34 35. which they strongly believed fell down from Jupiter yea often they lay all the stress of their Religion upon that their Opinion and will concenter with none in Love but with these that will concenter with them in their Judgment and cry up their great Diana with them nay they are so transported with their Fancy that their Idol-Maxim is esteemed by them one of the noble Parts and lies so near to the Heart of Religion that there is no Salvation but in that way of theirs albeit it were a Path never beaten before and far from the true old Way wherefore they think they are obliged in Conscience to seperate and keep no Church-fellowship with these that are not of their Judgment hence a Schism and Separation in Worship flowing from Separation in Affection and that from Separation in Judgment and when once Altar is reared up against Altar follows Sword against Sword and Camp against Camp Division and Schism in the Church begetting Sedition in the State Therefore St. Paul among the wicked works of the Flesh Gal. 5. 19. hath coupled Seditions and Heresies together This sad truth is known to the Learned by many Histories in many Kingdoms and of the strong affinity betwixt Schism and Sedition St. Basil writes most pithily Hippocrates 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Basil Tom. 2. lib. de Spiritu Sancto contra eunomium Arianum cap. 30. Sufficiens est inimicitiae causa opinionibus dissentire erroris similitudo res est quavis conjuratione fidelior ad seditionis societatem Twins were so near of Nature that always when the one was sick the other also but Church and State are of a nearer union for these same Persons both for Souls and Bodies are Subjects and Servants to God in Christ united by the same Faith and Worship in relation to Eternal Happiness and Subjects also to one and the same King on Earth united by the same Laws in relation to their civil and external Well-being and as the Spiritual Concernment and Eternal Salvation of that Body will more affect it then its short and external Well-being on Earth so any Member in that Body disjoynted in regard of Spiritual-union will cause such a stir and trouble as during the time of its dislocation the whole Body will be so tormented that no civil Bonds will prevail to compose them They will brag to sacrifise their Temporal Life for their Eternal Salvation hence ariseth debates envyings wraths strifes backbitings whisperings swellings tumults 2 Cor. 12. 20. then confusion and every evil work James 3. 16. Wherefore as a compassionate Member of the Mystical Body of Jesus the least of the sons of Levi whom the Holy Ghost hath made Overseer of a part of the Flock of God I have written this little Treatise for information of the Judgment of the weak Lambs of the chief Shepherd who being unskilful in the word of Righteousness refuse to sing the Doxology because of their Doubts and Scruples which by this Treatise through the help of God I have endeavoured to remove that there be no longer division in Judgment Affection and Worship upon that account My Lord All the Miseries and Confusions in this Land more than fourty Years continuance began at Schism in the Church which is well known by sad experience and its Tragical History is written with red Capital Letters of Blood that he who runs may read it with the blood of his Royal Majesty now a glorified Martyr with the blood of many Nobles and Worthies and thousands of other Subjects therefore the King of kings in His gracious Providence with his Vicegerent over these Kingdoms hath placed your Lordship in the civil Watch-Tower of this Kingdom to espy and prevent Sedition in the State and consequently to have a watchful Eye against Schism in the Church especially seing the great fundamental Maxim of some in this Kingdom was not only dangerous to the State consequentially and by its tendency but substantially such And seing the purpose of this little Treatise is for healing and preventing of further Schism and Error in Judgment tending to Sedition I have presumed to intreat your Lordships Patrociny for albeit it be little in quantity yet its Subject-matter is so glorious to wit Singing glory to our infinitely glorious God and the duty so unquestionable that the Universal Church will joyn in the Practice with your Lordship and say Amen not only the reformed Churches but also all these of the Greek and Latine Communion yea all Christians to the ends of the Earth My second Attractive Are the many and rich Talents of Grace and Gifts with which the Father of Lights hath eminently endued your Lordship of knowledge and prudence of Piety and Justice of Zeal to the true Christian Religion and Loyalty to his Majesty by which your Lordships knowledge and deep Judgment ye are able exactly to ponder the weight and validity of the Reasons brought to prove the lawfulness of singing the Doxology and the levity and weakness of the pretended Reasons brought against it Therefore trusting your Lordship will follow his steps on whom the Spirit of the Lord did rest the spirit of wisdom and understanding the spirit of council and might the spirit of knowledge and of the fear of the Lord Isa 11. 2. And that you will piously observe the holy ways and stately steps of the Lord's Providence towards you and so understand the loving kindness
where Satan had his Throne and Antichrist kept the Chair They wrote nine several Creeds not all confirming or explaining the former Creed but some of them containing Contradictions of which themselves were ashamed d Socrat. lib. 2. cap. 25. for a Liar should have a good Memory yea in the last of these Councils they ratifie their Council at Seleucia and its Creed and cursed the Creed at Ariminum because it was not Heterodox enough e Socrat. lib. 4. cap. 4. As we have seen the Activity Perfidity and Falshood of the Arian in spreading their Heresie so in the fourth place we shall take a view of their Hellish Cruelty practised against the Orthodox and true Church of God For they poysoned with their Arianism the Emperour Constantius who began his Reign Anno Dom. 336. and Valence who began his Reign Anno Dom. 366. thâ—se two Emperours they instigate to raise cruel and bloody Persecution against the Orthodox during the time of their Empire of which we shall only mention a few notable Instances First The Arians at Constantinople raised a great Tumult of Sedition that many Christians were troden under Foot to Death a Socrat. lib. 2. cap. 9. Secondly The Arian Emperour Constantius having banished the Orthodox Bishop of Constantinople the Arians strangled him in his Exile and the Orthodox Bishop of Adrianople died in Prison with Torments b Socrat. lib. 2. cap. 21. Thirdly Great Persecution was raised by the Arians in the Cities of the East against the Orthodox Christians by Banishment spoiling of their Goods and sundry kinds of Torments c Socrat. lib. 2. cap. 22. Fourthly The Arians at Alexandria upon the Lords Day invaded with Arms the Orthodox and having kindled a great Fire apprehended Orthodox Virgins who as they thought would soonest yield to them these they threatned with Burning unless they turned Arian but percelving these holy Virgins invincible Courage resolute to die Martyrs for the Glory of the Sacred Trinity they violently in the open Streets pulled off all their Clothes to put them to shame and mocked them in their nakedness but these Virgins being of undaunted Courage to suffer for the Name of Christ them the Arians so wounded on the Face that their nearest Relations did hardly know them and fourty Men they scourged with Rods that some of them died yet they refused to give their dead bodies to their Friends to bury and these who outlived their Scourging part of them they Banished of others not banished the Chirurgians had great difficulty to pull out the Thorn Pricks out of their Flesh At that same time the Arians killed moe then thirty Orthodox Bishops in Egypt and Lybia and banished sixteen moe whereof some died in their cruel usage by the way others died in the place of their Banishment of which Martyrs the World was not worthy d Socrat lib. 2. cap. 23. Fifthly In Constantinople and the Country about many Orthodox Bishops were banished by the Arians and other of the Orthodox that refused to communicate with the Arians they cruelly tormented their Bodies and then scobbing their Mouths violently thrust in the sacramental Elements of the Lords Supper and that not only of Men and Women but also of Children and these who were most reluctant they detained in Prison and Torments that so the Arian intended by this his work to get the honour that the Orthodox did communicate with them but prophane forcing proved the Arian Communion to be the Table of Devils yea they thrust the Papes of some holy Women into a Chest and closing its lid cut off their Papes with a Saw and others they burnt off their Papes with a red hot Iron a Socrat. lib. 2. cap. 30. Theodoret. lib. 2. cap. 14. Sixthly The Arians in Alexandria conspired with the Jews and Pagans and all three raised great Persecution against the true Christians there they apprehended the holy Virgins stripped them naked as they were born and led them through the Streets obscenely mocking them and if any Beholder in Christian compassion did speak but one word in their favours they were driven away with Wounds thereafter many of the Virgins they ravished some they killed and refused to give their Bodies to their Parents to be buried yea in this Tumult the Arian and Pagan committed so great abomination that I am ashamed to render them in English b Theodoret. lib. 4. cap. 20. a most profane Pagan being a chief Acter of these Abominations acted both in the Pulpit and on the Altar of the chief Church of Alexandria it was too like a Stage-Play of Satans divising against God's Word and Worship the most profane the Devil could devise and all this acted in the presence of the Arian Bishop whom the Pagan Spokesman thus saluted O Bishop who denies the Son of God thy coming is welcome to us c Theodoret. lib. 5. cap. 22. our god Serapis embraceth thee and brought thee hither observe how well the Devil and the Arian does aggree like Heart and Joy This Pagan god Serapis had a Church in Alexandria where he was worshipped and in it a monstruous great Image at that time much worshipped by the Pagans there What true Christian can read the Perjury Falshood and hellish Cruelty of the Arian and their atheistical profaning of the Lord's Supper and not look upon them as incarnate devils against these antichristian and profane bloody Arians who blasphemed both the Son and Holy Ghost The Orthodox Church were most zealous to defend the Truth and for that cause to sing the Doxology in their publick Worship exactly according to the words of the Holy Scriptures For then the Arian also keeped the singing of their own Doxology but it was different from the Orthodox and Holy Scriptures Now considering the true Churches hard condition when the Arians persecute them and yet these holy Christians were most willing to suffer Martyrdom for the Name of Jesus and also to sing the Doxology therein professing their Faith in one God in three Persons Father Son and Holy Ghost equal in Power and Glory Now I would ask the Christian now a days If the Lord in His Providence did put them now in such a condition to be persecuted to the death by the prevailing Arian whether or not they would be content to suffer Martyrdom in defence of the honour of Christ and also with the Orthodox Christian to sing the Doxology would they both sing and suffer as these did who are now singing triumphant Songs to Father Son and Holy Ghost having trode Satan and Arians under-foot I willingly judge in Charity to these weak Lambs they would then with the Orthodox Christians both joyn in singing the Doxology and also in suffering with them for the Name of Jesus Then I ask them again if they would have sung the Doxology if they had been going to the Stake to die in desence of the honour of Christ against the cursed Arian then have they not as good
nec Homines debere nec audere colere essentiam divinam non una colere tres personas ut supra probatum hoc idem Athanasius ait detestandos ac procul abigendosesse Arianos dicentes ac si ipsi interfuissent angelos illos in primis vocibus exclamandi sanctus maxima voce usos esse in secundis autem non tam magna voce in tertia adhuc submissiori ac primam sanctificationem propriam legittimamque esse secundam autem inferioris notae tertiam adhuc gradatim deterioris conditionis esse In eandem sententiam scribit Caesarius Gregorij Nazianxeni frater dialogo primo responsione ad interrogationem 13. Epiphanius in ancorato § 10. 26. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 hic hymnus Isaiah 6. 3. quem Gre. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 vocant canitur in liturgijs Basil Chrisostom Gregorij ut Damascenus lib. 3. Orthodoxae fidei cap. 10. interpretatur quod ter sanctus sit tribus personis trinitatis 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in ordine baptismi secundū Aethiopes habetur Sanctus Sanctus Sanctus Pater Filius Spiritus Sanctus nunc semper in secula seculorum Amen Anno Dom. 451. Hic hymnus trisagius in Concil oecumen Chaledon 630. Episcoporum fuit cantatus inter actu hujus Concilij refertur postea Ecclesia universalis to hymno est usa ut colligitur ex Constantinopolitana Sinodo 5. Praesidente Menua ejus sedis Patriarcha ubi Petrus Gnapheus Antiochiae Episcopus damnatus quod in suae Ecclesiae Lyturgia Heretice trisagio Sanctus Sanctus Sanctus addidisset qui pro nobis crucifixus est ubi per ter sanctus interpretantur tres Personas Trinitatis ut videre est in Epistola monitoria ad eundem Gnapheum prioribus consentiunt Theodoretus sermone 2do de curandis Grec affecto Cyrillus in tum textum Augistinus sermone 38 de tempore Et haec eadem est sententia theologorum modernorum Calvini institut lib. 1. cap. 13. Is 6. cap. § 11. 15. 28. Zanchij tomo 1. lib. 1. cap. 2. Isa 6. cap. Seraphim occinunt Patri Filio Spiritui Sancto quod etiamsi Antitrinitarij Transilvanij negent hunc textum nunquam mihi eripient Polani syntagmate lib. 9. cap. 15. Professores Leidenses disp 7. thesi 16. Bucan loco 3. § 7. Ames meduli lib. 1. cap. 5 § 17. The second Part of the Chapter containing the twelfth Reason it is taken from Isaiah cap. 6. v. 1 2. 3. The Prophet Isaiah in a vision saw the Lord sitting on a Throne and the heavenly seraphims crying one to another holy holy holy is the Lord of hosts the whole earth is full of his glory Here the learned prove that this song is sung to the Sacred Trinity as if these Seraphims had said Holy Father Holy Son Holy Ghost for that same Lord of Hosts in the 8. v. speaks in the plural number who will go for us just so Gen. 1. 26. And God said let us make man after our likeness which speech the learned agree to be spoken by the Sacred Trinity Secondly We shall prove that glory to the three distinct Persons of the Trinity is meant here First That glory to the Father is meant none will deny no not the Arian nor Socinian Secondly we prove that glory to the Son is also meant here for God the Son was also here for the Prophet Isaiah saw His glory here which is proven John 12. 41. The Prophet Isaiah saw Christs glory and spake of Him even then when the Lord blinded their eyes and hardened their hearts Verse 40. which commission Isaiah received Isaiah 6. 10. after he had seen Christs glory then if God the Son was here the 2d holy is to him Thirdly the Holy Ghost was here which I prove it was the Holy Ghost here which spake to the Prophet Isai 6. 9. The Lord said go tell this people but Acts 28. 25. That same Lord is the Holy Ghost well spake the Holy Ghost by Isaiah the Prophet unto our Fathers saying Go unto this people and say hearing ye shall hear and shal not understand c. Then seing the Scriptures prove the three Persons expresly were here it cannot be denyed but the three holies were to the three Persons therefore the Doctors of the Ancient Church and universal Councills and approven Orthodox Divines unanimously teach that here the Seraphims in their Chore are singing a Doxology to the blessed Trinity and consequently this Doxology is a Scripture Song therefore the Divines of Westminster Synod in their Notes upon Revel 4. at the 8. Verse singing the like three Holies with them in the 6. of Isaiah 3. Verse which they also quoat and coment thus They contiually praise God and set out the Trinity of the Persons in the Godhead Did not the Angels in this 6. of Isaiah sing the Doxology to the Glorious Trinity The universall Church in their General Councill have taught so and also practised accordingly The Fathers both before and after that Councill with Calvine and the rest of the reformed Church teached so and the Synod of Divines in their Notes on the Revelation teached so will ye not then go along with the Universall and Reformed Church or will ye go along with the Synod of Divines on the Revelation to that Synod you gave the Credit to draw up your Creed or Confession of Faith and Catechisms and will ye not give them credit in the matter of the Doxology that the Heavenly Seraphims sang Glory to Father Son and Holy Ghost shall the Angels come from Heaven to Earth to give you a good example to sing the Doxology will neither the Universal Church on Earth nor Angels in Heaven move you to follow their holy example I answer it will move all these on whom that Judgement hath not fallen pronounced Isaiah 6. 9 10. Hear indeed but understand not make the heart of this people fat As ye love your Souls bewar of that Judgement which is my prayer for you at the Throne of Grace CHAP VIII 13. Reason from that Song Revel 5. 9. 14. From Gods Command 1 Chr. 16. 20. Illustrat by Councils and Fathers THe thirteenth reason is taken from the 5. Chap. of the Book of Revelation thus collected John the Divine saw a vision in Heaven and heard them sing a new Song vers 9. continuing to the end of the Chapter and vers 13. Every creature which is in heaven and on the earth and under the earth and such as are in the sea and all that are in them heard I saying blessing honour glory and power be unto him that sitteth upon the Throne and unto the Lamb for ever and ever Here the university of singing is so great that it comprehends the universal Church of all Christians yea of all the Angels in Heaven and all Saints in Heaven and Earth both the Church Militant and Triumphant 2. What are they singing Blessing honour glory and power 3. To whom do
hanc questionem posse agitari num sit possibile aut saltem probabile Christianum posse esse certum de sua salute eundem non esse certum de hac veritate bonum est expedit Christianum psallere Doxologiam Patri filio spiritui sancto ratio dubitationis est haec probavimus nullum Christianum habere certitudinem propriae salutis nisi in cognitione religiosa scripturarum in fide sanctificatione fortem at vix est verisimile hunc fortem christianum acquisivisse certitudinem propriae salutis quae veritas est dissicillima acquisitu quia multum excedit lumen naturae solum fundatur in lumine gratiae at haec veritas Deus est licite hymno glorificandus Pater Filius Spiritus Sanctus haec propositio non solum fundatur in himine scripturarum gratiae sed etiam in lumine naturae ut probatum est Alia ratio probans certitudinem salutis esse veritatem acquisitu difficiliorem quam eam praedictam de Doxologia haec est plurimi quibus nunquam contingit certitude vera salutis quia impossibilis at ex eisdem non pauci qui callent sensum Scripturarum Literalem Historicum dogmaticum praecipâ—e si in Philosophia sunt bene versati quamvis vel Hypocritae vel flagitiosi tamen haec veritas licet glorificare Deum Patrem Filium Spiritum Sanctum hymno facillime potest ab ijs comprehendi quia Christiani millies milleni nec ad salutem credentes in Christum nec pij tamen has duas veritates certo credunt scilicet licet Deum hymno glorificare hanc assumptionem Deus est Pater Filius Spiritus Sanctus Simodo sint Philosophi nullatenus de conclusiâ—ne dubitabunt itaque possit mirum videri homines cognitionis fidei pietatis certitudinis propriae salutis multum jactantes attamen eosdem quasi sit mysterium incomprehensibile an sit licitum vel expediens saltem Deum Patâ—â—m Filium Spiritum Sanctum hymno glorificare dubitantes nec mirum videatur objectum fidei justificantis de sua salute Christiani certissimi hypocritae dogmatice solum credentis de sua salute incerti idem esse nempe Deum Patrem Filium Spiritum Sanctum nam justificatus credit in Deum toto corde Patrem Filium Spiritum Sanctum in Christum 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 sibi salvatorem at hypocrita credit esse Deum eumque esse Patrem Fiâ—ium Spiritum Sanctum Scripturas Dei Verbum esse veras at neutiquam credit in Deum Patrem Filium Spiritum Sanctum in Christum salutorem fidei justificante coâ— purificante renovante ipsum Deo in Christo vinculo Spiritus Sancti in Aeternum uniente hypocritae fides est more speculativa in cerebro fluctuans at credentis ad salutem in corde radicata pieque fiducialis practica that the Doxologie is of this nature which reason of the strong is thus framed whatsoever is clearly lawful from the light of Nature and the Word of God that to the religious Christian is lawful to do but to sing glory to God is clear from the light of Nature and from the holy Scriptures therefore it is lawful for the religious Christian to do it First It is clear from the light ol Nature because many learned Pagans who had no more but the light of Nature did sing holy Hymns of praise to their gods this is abundantly clear in Humane History and undenyable Secondly The Holy Scriptures are full of it especially the Book of the Psalms commanding us to sing praises to God now this proves infallibly the general that it is lawful to sing glory to God Which Conclusion being proven I make up a second Reason and takes the proven Conclusion for the Major and I reason thus It is unquestionably lawful to sing glory to God I assume God is Father Son and Holy Ghost then it is unquestionably lawful to sing Glory to Father Son and Holy Ghost and if any think themselves strong and being under prejudice are not satisfied with this reason I would ask them if their Infant-Baptism was not an act of lawful Worship and done in faith of the Minister that Baptized and of their Parent that required and received that Sacrament for their use in both which I judge the Minister consecrat and administrat the Sacrament lawfully and their Parents lawfully received them from the Laver of Regeneration and yet I would gladly know from these that are not content with singing the Doxologie because it is not express in Scripture that the Christian sing glory to Father Son and Holy Ghost why then do they not reject their Infant-baptism because it is not express in Scripture Baptize Infants but well proven to be lawful by necessary consequence from Scripture which with the universal Church we think a sufficient ground for Infant-baptism And what is the cause that Antipedobaptists have fallen in that error and separat from the true Church Even because they were too deep in that opinion that necessary consequence from Scripture is not sufficient warrand for an act of religious Worship of which error ye would be aware lest it draw you into other greater errors then you are aware of 2. What express Scripture had Rahab to receive the Spies conceal them and send them away safely Joshua 2. 9. c. Heb. 11. 31. Jam. 2. 25. All which that she did in Faith is proven clearly from these quoted Scriptures then her faith was good and acceptable to God albeit only built on good consequences from Scripture 3. I ask of you John who comes to Church and Communicats taking the Lords Supper whether your worship be in faith which I in charity suppon it is but where is your express warrand in your Bible you John such a man come and worship and take the Lords Supper as the pledge of your salvation These words are not to be found in the whole Scripture why then dare ye come to worship and take the holy Sacraments I think ye will or should answer because in the express Word of God there is a general invitation Come to me all ye that labour and are heavy laden and I will give you rest Mat. 11. 28. From which gracious general invitation I suppon ye assume in sincere and good Conscience I John am heavy loaden and labours to be freed of my burden by all the good means appointed by God preparatory to that holy Sacrament which if you can truly affirm in the sight of God then I dare assure you in the Name of Jesus that your worshipping and communicating is in faith albeit you have not express warrand in your Bible for you such an one by name to communicate 4ly You John believes to be saved but no expresse warrand have you in your Bible that you John such a one shall be saved yet I suppon with you in charity your Act
of Faith to be allowed and accepted of God and to be comfortable to your Soul for I suppone it well grounded on the Word of God His Promise and Command whosoever believes in Christ shall be saved John 3. 16. and John 6. 40. But I John such a one believe in Jesus Christ therefore I John such a one shall be saved the General Promise is express in the Word but not your two following Acts of Faith builded thereon and yet you will assume they are Acts of true Faith and for the first of the two it 's truth is best known to your selves who are alone privy to that heart secret of yours 1 Cor. Chap. 2. 11. For all within the visible Church say I believe in Christ â—ccording to the Apostles Creed received by the universal Church for an Act of true Faith and yet a great part speak not truly This is a sad but sure Truth but as truely as thou believes in Christ it is assuredly as true thou shall be saved then if I grant that your Act whereby you believe to be saved is True Faith and rightly believed by you albeit it is not express in in your Bible then why shall not this be an Act of Faith when a Christian believes it is lawfull to sing Glory to the Father Son and Holy Ghost albeit these words be not express in the Bible altogether but deduced from the Scripture by infallible consequence I could proceed further in this point but because the Babes are not able to bear it and the Learned are fully clear in this Truth I shall not insist and these who will not assent to the Truth the defect is in themselves and not in the Truth for Children so long as they are such will think speak and understand as Children for which the strong Christian should not despise the Babes but consider they were once Babes themselves and on the other hand the Children should not presume nor overwean themselves nor judge uncharitably of the strong but that they sing the Doxology in Faith grounded on a strong Scriptural Consequence as when the weak Christian takes his Sacrament and I request the weak Christian to think soberly of himself when David a Man according to Gods own heart said in sincerity Psalm 131. 2. I have quieted my self as a child that is weaned of his mother and if ye will ask wherein he so behaved he tells you himself he did not aspired things too high for him If every Christian would do so there would be more peace in the Church CHAP. XI The Reasons why the General Assembly was not in power to lay aside the Doxology proving their great reluctancy to their own deed with several other circumstances alleviating the same IN this Chapter we are to answer the Grand Objection to wit That the singing of the Doxology in the publick worship of God was laid aside by the Generall Assembly of this Church Anno Dom. 1649. To this my first answer is that Assembly hath fourty two Sessions mentioned in the Index of the imprinted Acts thereof but the laying aside of the Doxology is not mentioned in the Printed Acts of that Assembly nor yet in the index of the imprinted Acts therefore seing there is no mention in the Register of the Church to prove to Posterity that the Doxology was laid aside it may put some to demurr in that affair seing there is no legal proof of it extant 2 dly I answer though the laying aside of the Doxology was res gesta yet seing there is not a word of it in the Register of the Church the laying of it aside will come under the Notion of an unwritten Tradition to Posterity 3 dly I answer That it is to be considered whether or not the Generall Assembly was in potestate and had lawfull power to lay aside the Doxology for in their National Covenant they grant their Religion as reformed at the first expelling of Idolatry and was Ratified in Parliament in Anno Dom. 1560. And it 's Confession of Faith to be Christs true and perfect Religion that they shal adhere to it all their dayes to which they bind themselves with Solemn and fearfull Curses but so it is That at the said Reformation in the Lyturgy then appointed and Printed at the beginning of the Psalm Book Glory to the Father and to the Son and to the Holy Ghost as it was in the beginning is now and aye shall last is extant in Print yea in that Psalm Book of the Church of Scotland of the old Edition there is great variety of the Meeter Poesies and lest any of them having their diverse Tune should want the Doxology sung at the close of it each of these diverse Poesies have a diverse Doxology one in substance with the ordinar Doxology but differing in some words being framed to be sung according to the particular musical Tunes all which Doxologies were in use in the Church of Scotland after the Reformation which Book is yet extant Printed at Aberdeen cum privilegio in Anno Dom. 1638. So that the National Covenant compared with our first Reformation engadgeth us in all Scotland not to quite the Doxology under the pain of perjury as for that foresaid Lyturgy of Scotland which was Printed and bound in with the Psalm Book it was drawn up by the General Assembly Anno Dom. 1560. and 1555 and 1567. The Fourth Answer The General Assembly 1639. August 30. Which day that Assembly hath enacted thus The General Assembly considering that the intended Reformation being recovered may be established Ordains that no Innovation which may disturbe the peace of the Church and make division be suddenly proponed or enacted but so as the motion be first communicat to the severall Synods Presbytries and Churches that the matter may be approven by all at home and Commissioners may come well prepared unanimously to conclude with settled deliberation upon these points in the general Assembly Which Act of Assembly as it was prudently made so accordingly practised thereafter for in the General Assembly Anno Dom. 1642. August 6. There are four Overtures Printed with the Acts of that Assembly to be advised by Presbyters against the next Assembly So that his laudable Act was carefully obeyed in other things but not so in laying aside the Doxology For it was done abruptly without the knowledge or advertisement of particular Churches Presbytries or Synods who should have been acquainted before and canvassed the matter before any thing had been determined in the General Assembly anent the Doxology and the laying of it aside which was an innovation suddenly proponed and instantly passed to the discomforming division of themselves from all transmarin Protestants yea and from the universal Church Fifthly In the Solemn League and Covenant of Scotland and England approven by the General Assembly of Scotland Anno. Dom. 1643. August 17. In the said League and Covenant with hands lifted up to the most high God they swear sincerely and constantly to
meek and lowly Matth. 11. 29. So in all due humilitie as one of the least of the Sons of my Mother Church what I have written on this Subject in submission I lay it down at her Feet fully resolving to obey the Law of my Father in Heaven which is not to despise or forsake the Law of my Spiritual Mother on Earth Prov. 1. 8. and Prov 6. 20. That our Father in Heaven may have all the Glory His Church Edification and the Lambs of Christ their Milk which shall be my desire and Prayer at the Throne of Grace THE CONTENTS of the Several Chapters Chap. I. PRoveth the great Fundamentality of the Doctrine of the most blessed Trinity from the Sacred Scriptures and illustrateth it by Fathers and Councils and modern Divines and answers the common Objection Chap. II. Containeth a Catalogue of the chief Blasphemers of the Blessed Trinity the first 400. Years with the many evils of Sin and misery that followed thereupon and how the Lord from Heaven and His Church on Earth gave effectuall and prevalent Testimony against them Chap III. Containeth the rise of the Arian Heresy in the Fourth Century their Persecution and Activity their Fashood Injustice and Cruelty and the Testimonie both of God and His Church against them Chap. IV. The unanimous Practice and Appointment of the universall Church for Singing the Doxologie be Occasion of Satan and his Supposts great Opposition to the Doctrine of the Trinity and in that their War against God Chap. V. The cause of the continuance of the Doxologie in after Ages viz. The continuance of the Churches Persecution and Temptation from Arians and other Blasphemers of the Trinity as Eutichians within and Mahumitans without the Church and the Rise and Growth of the Socinian Heresie notwithstanding Gods witness against them and the Church and Magistrats endeavours in many Kingdoms these Blasphemous Antitrinitarian Hereticks remained and nested with Anabaptists and Quakers all three Blasphemous Antitrinitarian Hereticks which gives sufficient cause for the continuance of the Doxologie Chap VI. The lawfulness of Singing the Doxologie proven by these Arguments 1 Because all Christians are Baptized in the Name of Father Son and Holy Ghost 2. They believe or profess their Faith in Father Son and Holy Ghost 3. They believe Father Son and Holy Ghost to be their Creator Redeemer and Sanctifier 4. Their Faith and Hope of Eternal Glory is from Father Son and Holy Ghost 5 God Father Son and Holy Ghost made all things and especially for His Glory 6. This Lord of Glory often calls mans tongue His Glory 7. From the practise of the Saints and Angels 8. From Gods Command 9. The Appointment and Practice of the universal Church 10. The indivisibility of the Worship we give to God one in Essence and three Persons Illustrat by Fathers and Councils Chap. VII The lawfulness of singing the Doxologie proven by the induction of all it's Parts 12. from the three Holies Isa 6. 3. Chap. VIII 13 Reason from that Song Revel 5. 9. 14. From Gods Command 1 Cor. 16. 20. Illustrat by Councils and Fathers Chap. IX 15. Reason from the necessar Difference of the Christians worship as in reading of the Word Prayer and Sacraments they exceedingly-diffet from Christians shal not then also be a difference betwixt the Christian singing of Psalms and the Jewes by singing the Doxologie 16. As the Jewes in their Psalms of David close many of them with a Doxologie answering to the measure of their Light dispensed to them in the Old Testament So it becomes the Christian to have a Doxologie answerable to their greater measure of light of the Trinity in the New Testament 17. Reason founded upon the signification of Jehovah Elohim which is often in the Doxologie of the Old Testament Chap. X. A Reason given for singing the Doxologie satisfactory to every strong Christian and that born in also upon the weak Christian by Scripture Reason Chap. XI The Reasons why the General Assembly was not in power to lay aside the Doxologie proving their great reluctancy to their own deed with several other circumstances alleviating the same Chap. XII That invalid Scruple answered because the Doxologie is not to be found altogether in one place of Scripture and the conveniency of singing is proven Chap. XIII The many evils that flow from the refusing to sing the Doxologie Chap. XIV An exhortatory conclusion to the strong and orderly Christian to receive and imbrace with all Christian Love and tenderness every weak Christian who shall return from their wandring in Error to live in Order and Unity in the Bosome of their Mother Church THE DOXOLOGY Approven CHAP. I. The great fundamentality of the Doctrine of the most blessed Trinity proven from the Sacred Scriptures and illustrated by Fathers Councils and Modern Divines and the great Objection answered AMongst all the Divine In symbolo Athanasil ab ecclesiae universali recepto utpote in principio fine fidem in trinitate personarum esse necessariam ad salutem 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 his asseritur Zanchius de Deo lib. 1. part 1. cap. 1. §. 2. quaestio de Trinitate ut est omnium in Theologia creditu maxime necessaria ita omnium cognitu dissicillima Meisnerus contra Socinianos scite probat plurimis argumentis primum magnum articulum fidei christinae esse unum Deum in Trinitate personarum quibus argumentis adstipulatur Hoorn Beek Socinianismi confutati 1. lib. 1. cap. 9. à pag. 226. ad pag. 243. Voetius select disp theol par 1. pag. 472. dogma de trinitate est fundamentale 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 imo fundamentum fundamenti quia fundat alia dogmata fundamentalia quod multis ibid probat Melanct. loc commun cap. 27. summa Evangelii erudite comprehensa est in verbis baptismi Eusebius Pamphilus in conc Niceno fatetur symbolum Nicenum paucis solum verbis differre à symbolo quod inquit nos ab episcopis antegressis accepimus cumque lavatro baptismatis abluti essemus audivimus Socrat. hist eccles l. 1. c. 5. Theodoret. lib. 1. cap. 12. Socrates Hist lib. 7. cap. 17. Judaeus requirens baptizari ante baptismi participationem multis diebus fidem christianam addiscere cum precibus jejuniis praecipitur idem cap. 30. lib. 7. gens Burgundorum à Paganismo conversa petit Baptismum quae post septem dies in eis catechisandis impensos cum praece jejunio votum obtinuere hinc canon 46. Conc. Laodicen anno dom 364. Baptizandos oportet fidei symbolum discere baptizanti reddere Symbolum Con. Nicen. anno dom 325. Constantinopolitani anno dom 381. Chalcedon anno dom 451. Symbolum Athanasii Symbolum quod habet Irenaeus lib. 1. adversus Haeresis cap. 2. primum concilium Toletan conc Lateranum in omnibus praedictis symbolis habetur articulus trinitatis tanta cura Paganos Catechimenos articulum trinitatis docuerunt ut Lucianus qui vixit sub
scruple or alteration c 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Gregory Nazianzen in his sixth Orration concerning the Holy Ghost we worship the Father Son and Holy Ghost one God-head and power to Him be all glory honour and power for ever and ever Amen In the Year of Christ 370. St. Jerome wrot to Damasus Bishop of Rome that in all the Churches of Rome Glory to the Father Son and Holy Ghost as it was in the a Rome 1. Council pag. 625. editionis Parisiensis beginning is now and for ever be sung alwayes at the end of the Psalm b Concilium Vasense provinciase sub Imperio Theodosij inmoris cap. 7. cujus titulus ac propter haereticorum incredulitatem post gloria Patri c. sicut erat in principio c. semper dicatur quia non solum in sede apostolica sed etiam per totam Orientem totam Africani vel Italiani propter Haereticorum astutiam qui dei filium non semper fuisse sed in tempore caepisse blasphemant in omnibus clausulis post Gloria Patri c. sicut erat in principio c. dicatur etiam nos universis Ecclesijs nostris ita dicendum esse decrevemus About the Year of our Lord 444. in the Council of Vason an Act is made because of the unbelief of Arian Hereticks Because not only in the Apostolick See but also throughout all the East and in all Africk and Italy to guard against the deceit of Hereticks Blaspheming that the Son of God was not ever with the Father but began to be in time therefore in all their closings of singings in the publick Worship after these Words Glory to the Father Son and Holy Ghost in all these other Churches is added as it was in the beginning so we appoint that the same Words as it was in the beginning be mentioned in the Doxology in all our Churches also c Symbolium Nicenium in sine 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Hence we may observe That this addition as it was in the beginning was not first appointed at Vason for their Act bears the contrare that it was used in Churches far and near before that time which Jeromes desire to Damasus proves But this Act at Vason gives the clear reason of the addition viz. To guard the flock of Christ the better against Arian Hereticks whereof some said there was a time when the Son of God was not Alexander Patriarch of Alexandria one of the chief Fathers in the Nicen Council to refute the Arian brings that Text d Socrat. lib. 3. cap. 3. among many others John 1. 1. In the beginning was the word and the word was with God and the word was God by him all things were made and if he made all things then he was before the world and also before that beginning and consequently Eternal as that Father reasoneth well and St. Basil after him for It were nonsense to say that there were priority of time in Eternity For Arius said there was a time when God was not a Father Therefore the infallible Theologue of St. John began his Evangell with these words intending in his Gospel to assert Christs God-head against two abominable Hereticks in his time Ebion and Cerinthus at whom Arius had learned his Blasphemies and from this same Text Calvin refutes both the old Arian and Servetus a vile Blasphemer his own contemporary who was burnt at Genevah for a most blasphemous Heretick In the Year of Christ 627. in the third Council of Toledo consisting of the Church-men of Spain and Galatia inact whosoever sayes not Glory to the Father and the Son and the Holy Ghost let him be accursed by saying they mean singing For then four hundred years before that the Doxology was sung in all the Templet of the universal Church And so in this Council all of them in the close of the same in the praises of God they cryed Glory to the Father and the Son and the Holy Ghost as the Learned may read in the Tomes of Councils by this cursing mentioned in this Councill It appears they judged that no Orthodox Christian would refuse to sing the Doxology they did not imagine any will refuse except a Heretick In the Year of Christ 633 in the Fourth Councill of Toledo there are some accused for rejecting the Sacred Hymnes composed by Hilary and Ambrose two famous Saints and being received and used in the Churches yet these Men refused to sing them because they were not in the Holy Scripture for which refusal they were Excommunicat yet these same very Men did not scruple nor refuse to sing the Doxology which was then constantly sung in the Church at the close of every Psalm Hence it is probable that these men who refused to sing the Churches Holy Hymnes and were willing to sing the Doxology did estimat it of a higher rank and counted it in with Divine and Spirituall Songs a 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. Quocirca at mea fert sententia major merces praemium potius apud justum indicem reponitur quam veteribus illic martyribus cum illi in confessa positum reportarent martyrij apud homines existimationem laurealas á Deo acceperint suas vobis autem desint in certamine pari á populo collati honores Basil tom 2. Epist 303. pag. 1074. The Learned have observed that the Arian persecution which was in this Fourth Century was more bitter to the Souls of the Saints and true Christians then the Suffering during the ten Persecutions in the first 300. Years from Pagan Emperours for then the Christian Martyrs received their Crown of Martyrdome from their Lord in Heaven with acclamations of praise from all their contemporary Christians without all malignant murmure or obloquie which was a sharp sput to hasten Christians to run that race for ingenuous spirits know what humane applause will do even to the godly to encourage them to a good action and rouse them up to their Duty even allowed by God Phil. 4. 8. Whatsoever things are of good report if there be any vertue and if there be any praise think on these things But in this fourth Century the Christian suffering Persecution and Death It wat not from Pagans but from these that called themselves Christians even the Arian who being prevalent and putting to Death the Orthodox Christians yet the Arian cryes out these are not true Christians but we they are justly suffering Death for Errors in Christianity Therefore writs the Learned that the Martyrs in the fourth Persecution their reward will be greatest in Heaven And because this Persecution was so much the sadder to the Orthodox Christian and in this Century the King of Saints who promised His presence to His Church on Earth seemed to be asleep like that Matth. 8. 24. while the Ship is filled with waves yet in the mean time though thus he had decreed to let His brittle Vessel and His Disciples suffer a
presume not to claim to this word for it is none of yours but the Childrens Bread 5thly Why do ye pretend your disguist of the Bishops to be the cause of your refusing to sing the Doxology did you not refuse to sing it before they were Re-established and that because the General Assembly laid it aside whom ye obeyed then ye refused to sing it before they returned and if they had not returned would you have resumed it I think you will not say it Then if the Bishops had not returned stil to this day you would have refused to sing it 6thly I will give you better Information ye with the rest of all this Kirk are desired to reassume the Doxology by Authority of the King's Majesty for ye know it is the will of God in His Word to invest the King with a power to restore the decayes of Religion when they happen and so did the good Kings of Judah Asah Jehosaphat and Josiah and accordingly our Kings Majesty being by the King of kings wonderfully and mercifully restored to his Crowns and Scepters according to his duty of thankfulnesse and Authority from the Lord given to Him He perceiving that the Doxology was laid aside in a time of confusion when there was no King in Israel even that part of the Kirk's publick Worship wherein we not only agree with the universall but more especially with the Reformed Kirks Therefore seing all the Reformed Churches with the Universall retained the Doxology and the General Assembly of Scotland laid it aside when they were not in power to do it therefore the Kings Majesty by His Authority wisely and piously recommended the reassuming of the Doxology therefore in refusing to sing the Doxology ye disobey the King in that which is lawfull and right therefore my request is to you to fear God and Honour the King by singing the Doxology and thereby you shall first honour God Father Son and Holy Ghost and then your King for albeit at the casting off the Yoke of the Popes usurped Power some of the Reformed Kirks did quite the Government of the Kirk by Episcopacy yet none of these Kirks did ever affirm that Monarchy or Kingly Government was unlawfull no nor yet Episcopacy for albeit some of them quite Episcopal Government because they had not Rents to sustain them yet they granted the Government to be lawfull I have more to writ upon this Point but it is not for the Babes who have need of Milk and not of strong Meat There remains one doubt to be answered because the Apostle Paul 1 Cor. 6. 12. a 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Beza reddit conducens Pastor spiritualiter utile hoc verbum invenitur John 16. 7. 1 Cor. 10. 33. 1 Cor. 12. 7. Heb. 12. 10. Anis medul Theolog. lib. 2. 6. 16. res media dicitur expedire cum omnibus circumstantiis consideratis ad gloriam Dei aedificationem proximi facit Hath a distinction All things are lawfull for me but all things are not expedient therefore some may say according to this distinction albeit the singing of the Doxology be lawfull for a Christian yet it will not follow that it is expedient to sing it for answer as we have proven by many Arguments the lawfulnesse to sing it so we shall clear the expediency which can be best cleared from the Holy Scriptures therefore 1 Cor. 10. 28. The Apostle sayes All things are lawfull for me but all things edifie not The Greek word which is rendered expedient may be rendered profitable or conducing that is for the Christians spiritual good and edification but so it is that the singing of the Doxology to the blessed Trinity is most conducing First To the glory of God 2dly To the edification of the Christian in the most fundamentall point of all Divinity and this was the true cause why the universall Church hath agreed so unanimously these many hundred years to retain the Doxology in the publick worship and for guarding of the Lords Flock against Aâ—itrinitarian Blasphemous Hereticks so that it cannot be objected it might be expedient then but not now for to the old Arians are now added Socinians Anabaptists and Quakers which Errors are come to our doors 2dly If any will yet be contentious to deny the expediency of it we Answer that the most competent Judge on earth to prove it's expediency is not this or that privat Man nor yet this or that privat Church but the universal Church which to this day retain it and use it and therefore by their practice they declare to all particular Christians that they judge it not only lawful but also expedient which is a satisfactory answer to all rational Christians CHAP. XIII The many evils that flow from the refusing to sing the Doxology HAving proven the Lawfulnesse and Expediency of singing the Doxology and answered the Doubts and Scruples to the contrare we shall hasten to a close having mentioned the evils that flow from the refusing to sing the Doxology the Apostle Paul 2 Cor. 12. 20. Mentions the evils that flowed from their divisions at the Kirk of Corinth to wit debates envyings wraths strifs back-bitings whisperings swellings tumults and all these are the sad effects of their divisions 1 Cor. 3. 3. That same Apostle writting to the Galatians hath yet sadder evils Galat. 5. 15. If you bit and devour one another take heed that ye be not consumeed one of another which judgement I pray God in his mercy to avert from this Land what bodily evils of Bloodshed Spoiling of Goods Desolation of Families many Widows and Fatherless Children these are the sad and sore evils that they are very dull and sensles who takes not this to heart but the spiritual evils of Sin and Scandal is far more provocking in the eyes of the Lord and First The sin of Sedition against the lawfull Magistrat which not only brings down the wrath of God upon a Land but if not repented of ends in damnation to Soul and body as appears Rom. 13. From the beginning another evil the great Scandal given to the grieving of the Strong and stumbling of the Weak when they see the Commands of the lawfull Magistrat commanding a thing so lawfull as to sing the Doxology yet to be contemned and slighted The Apostle Paul in that same place Rom. 13. Says we should obey the Magistrat not only for fear of Gods Wrath and the Magistrats Wrath but also for conscience sake is it not then strange Religion when the Lord bids oney the Magistrat in all things lawfull and that for Conscience sake that in the mean time they who call themselves Christians and conscientious will answer for Conscience sake we will refuse to obey the Magistrat can it here be supponed that their Conscience that will not obey is a good Conscience when the Conscience in the Word named Rom. 13. Is certainly meaned good conscience except ye will make it such Divinity as this It is good Conscience sayes