well as themselves Quest 3 Whether under this title father is onely the first person of the blessed Trinitie supplicated Answ 1 First although Christ here teacheth us to pray our father yet we are not hereby prohibited to supplicate either God the Sonne or Holy Ghost for we may pray unto any of them this word father being taken in Scripture two manner of wayes Namely Personally as it is distinguished from Sonne and Holy Ghost but not so here Mat. 20.19 Essentially as it doth distinguish God from man and so it is here taken to teach us that wee must pray unto none but unto God as followes by and by Answ 2 Secondly Christ is also called a Father Vnto us a sonne is given who shall be called the everlasting Father Esa 9.6 And therefore the Lord Christ is here included Answ 3 Thirdly the Holy Ghost is called by the Apostle the Father of lights Jam 1.17 and therefore this title Father doth not exclude the other persons of the blessed Trinity Fourthly it is our duty to supplicate and invocate Answ 4 all the three persons I. We petition God the Father for what wee stand in need of because he is the Author of every good thing which we enjoy Iam. 1.17 II. Wee supplicate God the Father in the Name and mediation of God the Sonne who is the alone Mediator betweene God and man hee onely laying flat the partition wall k Iohn 16. Act. 4.12 III. We implore the Throne of Majesty in the Name and Mediation of Christ to be pleased to impart spirituall graces and gifts unto us by the administration of the blessed Spirit and therefore this title Father includes not excludes the rest Why call we God Father Quest 4 First that we may acknowledge our selves Answ 1 to be his children and that in a foure-fold regard I. By Creation because he made and framed us Luk. 3.38 II. By Protection because it is he that takes care to defend us from all those dangers we are incident to fall into III. By Redemption because hee hath ransomed us by Christ from the captivitie of Satan IV. By Sanctification because it is the Lord that by his Spirit doth regenerate and sanctifie us l 1 Cor. 6.10 11. And therefore deservedly we call him Father in these regards although in no regard we have deserved to be called or made his children Secondly we are taught to call God Father Answ 2 that thus the prayers of the faithfull may be distinguished from the prayers of unbeleevers For First the godly regard no other father in regard of this Father Secondly the wicked they have God to be their Lord but not their Father he is Lord over them and rules over them but they deny unto him that love reverence and obedience which a childe ought to give unto his Father Thirdly we are taught to call God father to Answ 3 excite and stirre up in us a filiall reverence of him Psal 2.9 10. Fourthly we call God father to corroborate Answ 4 and strengthen our assurance of being heard Because We are present before And We make our wants knowne unto a Father who loves his children more dearely then any naturall parent doth his childe for his love unto them is infinite sempiternall yea eternall m Luk. 12.30 31. This Verse is a strong argument against the popish invocation of Saints our Saviour not sending us unto any creatures but unto God himselfe Pray thus Our father Why must we pray unto the Lord in all our Quest 5 necessities and not at all to the blessed Saints who love truly all that are good or belong unto God First because prayers to Saints are no where Answ 1 commanded and therefore it will be but will-worship to pray unto them Answ 2 Secondly because the Scriptures doe directly prohibit and condemne it Iudg. 13.16 Acts 10 26. Apoc. 19.10 and 22.10 Answ 3 Thirdly because we are punctually commanded to call upon God onely and alwayes Psal 50.15 Call upon me in the time of thy trouble so Ioel 2.13 and Act. 2.21 Answ 4 Fourthly because God afflicts us and brings us into straights for this end that he might draw us unto himselfe and not drive us from him unto others as wee see Exod. 3. and Psal 107. They cry and pray in their distresse not unto the Patriarches but unto their God Answ 5 Fifthly because invocation is a part of the worship and service of God and therefore it belongs onely unto him Ioel 2.13 14. and Matth. 4.10 Answ 6 Sixthly because prayer ought to be in faith Rom. 10.14 Now we must not beleeve in the Saints but onely in God In our Creed we doe not say Credo in ecclesiam sed Credo in Deum I beleeve in the Church but I beleeve in God Seventhly because we cannot say to the Saints Answ 7 Our father and therefore this prayer cannot bee said unto them neither any prayer according to this forme because as was said before wee are obliged negatively unto this see before Question 7. and Booke of Martyrs pag. 1274. Eighthly the last but not the least answer is taken from the nature of him unto whom wee ought to pray Here then observe he that wee Answ 8 ought to pray unto should be 1. Lubens willing to helpe us 2. Sciens one that knowes our necessities 3. Potens able to save First he whom we must pray unto ought to be lubens willing to helpe but there is none like unto the Lord in mercy hee being the Father of mercies And therefore he onely is to be invocated Secondly hee ought to be scienâ— one that knowes more then we our selves For I. He should know Genus morbi the kinde of the disease what our malady is the Physician and Lawyer can better understand our estates then we our selves and those that cannot are unfit and unable to helpe us II. He should know apta remedia what the best meanes are for the curing of our griefes lest otherwise they should give a stone instead of bread and hurt rather than helpe Sometimes we aske that which is hurtfull for us and therefore he unto whom wee should pray ought to know both what we are and what may be truly good for us for the time to come And these things the Lord knows better then all the Saints and Angels together Thirdly he should bee Potens able both To heare and that 4. manner of wayes namely First from Heaven unto earth this the Papists say the Saints can doe in a glasse that is the face of God but this is false as shall bee elsewhere proved Secondly to understand all languages and tongues wherein men pray this the Papists thinke the Saints doe and it may be so therefore I question it no further Thirdly to heare the sighes and see the hearts of all and this is necessary in a double respect to wit I. That they may be able to understand those who pray in the Spirit without a voyce or words Rom.
Peter or Paul themselves The Prince of Anhault tearmed the Scriptures the swathling bands wherein Christ was wrapped that is the containers and includers of truth it selfe Therefore we must never forsake them Fourthly there is nothing more profitable Answ 4 either for the unregenerate or for the regenerate and therefore to bee adhered unto by all because under those two all are included First it is profitable for those that are not regenerated and as yet borne anew unto God and that in these regards First the word of God breakes the hard heart Is not my word saith the Lord like a hammer that breaketh the Rocke in pieces i Ier. 23.29 Secondly the word of God gives sight to the blind eyes k Psa 19.8 Behold saith God unto Paul I have sent thee to open their eyes and to turne them from darknesse unto light l Acts 26.28 Thirdly it is profitable for such to bring them from the power of Satan unto God m Act. 26.18 Fourthly it is profitable unto them for the pardon of their sinnes and spiritual adoption into the fellowship of sonnes n Act. 26.18 Fiftly it is profitable to convince them of their sinnes o 1 Cor. 14.24 Secondly it is profitable for those that are regenerated in these respects First the Scriptures protect and defend them against the temptations of Satan they are a shield unto them that put their trust in God p Pro. 30.5 yea they are the spirituall sword which serves both for offence and defence q Ephes 6.17 Secondly by the Scripture the understanding of Gods children is more and more enlightned r Psal 19.8 9. Thirdly their affections are thereby more and more enflamed Did not our hearts burne within us said the two Disciples while he opened unto us the Scriptures ſ Luk. 24.52 Fourthly the word of God doth purge us from our guylt Now ye are cleane through the word that I have spoken unto you t Ioh. 15.3 Fiftly the Scriptures are profitable unto the righteous to arm them against afflictions to comfort them in sorrow u Rom. 15 4. Sixtly they strengthen them unto patience in all crosses whatsoever x Rom. 15 4. Answ 5 Fiftly the word of God is the guid convoy and directer of the soule and therefore cannot be forsaken without inevitable danger of erring the word of the Lod is right y Psa 19.8 that is regula recti the rule of truth and uprightnesse yea thereby the servants of God are forewarned that is advised preadmonished and forearmed against the assaults of Satan z Psal 19.11 The word of God is a light unto our feete and a lampe unto our pathes a Psa 119 105. And therefore we must not seeke unto them that have familiar spirits but seeke the Lord in the law and in his testimonies b Isa 8.19 20. And therefore seeing the word of God is the conducter of the soule wee must take heed that we never forsake or let goe out of our hands this weapon of the Scriptures Quest 5 It is here demanded what word of God it is that is the directer of the soule for it is controverted both by the Papists and Anabaptists who like Sampsons Foxes c Iudg. 15 4. meet in the tailes both of them opposing us and the truth but their heads are diametrally opposite one to the other as appeares by a double quaere Quest 6 First what word of God is the rule to walke by Answ 1 To this first they both answer not the Scripture alone Answ 2 Secondly the Papists say besides the Scriptures there are 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 traditions which are the rule of the life also Answ 3 Thirdly the Anabaptists cry downe their traditions and advance 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 their enthusiasmes and revelations which we are rather to be regulated by then by the written word of God Answ 4 Fourthly we say that it is the written word onely that is the rule of the life and directer of the soule and neither unwritten traditions nor unwarranted revelations If wee believe not Moses and the Prophets wee will believe nothing saith our Saviour d Luk. 16 29. because the Scriptures were written that we might believe and believing bee saved e 1 Ioh. 20.31 and therefore saving faith is built upon the Scriptures only and neither upon traditions nor enthusiames yea it is onely the Scriptures that are truely profitable for all sorts of men as was shewed in the former question answer 4. yea they are able to make us wise unto salvation and perfect men in Christ Jesus f 2 Tim. 3 15 and therefore are the onely loadstone of our Quest 7 life Secondly who shall expound the word of God which is the soules conduct First here they both answer that the Scriptures Answ 1 must not expound themselves they must not be both a Judge and a Partie Answ 2 Secondly the Papists say the Church must interpret the Scriptures that is that Church which is built in the Popes brest infallibility lying and residing onely in him Answ 3 Thirdly the Anabaptists say the Holy Spirit in them is the interpreter of the word that is their revelations are all divine truthes and to be obeyed and admitted as oracles from heaven Answ 4 Fourthly we say the holy Scriptures interpret themselves quod in uno difficile aliàs aptius that which is more difficult in one place is easier in another a Austen And therefore I conclude that the holy Scripture is that Lucifer or day starre that directs the soule unto Christ for the Father sends us unto the Sonne commanding us to heare him the Sonne sends us unto the word bidding us search that diligently b Ioh. 5.39 the scripture is able to make us perfect the Apostles taught the whole Counsell of God c Acts 20.20.27 and yet they teach nothing besides Moses and the Scriptures And therfore how injurious unto the soules of Men are Papists that robbe the people of this light and debarre them from the Scriptures These are builders 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of Babell indeede they speake a tongue which the people cannot understand for they must not enjoy it or bee suffered to reade it in the vulgar tongue These make the Scriptures like the Shew bread which none were to touch but the Priests alone These are like the spyes Obiect 2 sent to Canaan they bring evill reports of the word of God telling the people the beauty of it but withall the difficulty to bee such as they can never overcome and therefore it boots them not reade them To this I answer First Chrysostome opposes Answ 1 the Apostles to the Philosophers and Rhetoritians because these were very obscure and hard to be understood but the Scriptures are plaine and may be conceived at least the precepts and instructions thereof by the diligent reading of them Chrysost hom 3. de Lazaro Secondly if the divine
Ceremoniall in shadowing forth first Christs rest in the grave and our spirituall rest in him so now also it is Mysticall in shewing our spirituall rest and cessation from the works of sin as the Prophet applieth it Esa 58.14 teaching us how to keep the Sabbath in not doing our own works nor seeking our own will Besides it is Symbolicall in being a pledge unto us of our everlasting rest in the Kingdom of God according to that of the Apostle There remaineth therefore a rest to the people of God Heb. 4.9 Quest 3 What works were permitted to be done upon the Sabbath under the Law and are allowed unto us under the Gospel Answ 1 First there was a great difference among the Jews in the observation of their festivall daies for the Sabbath was more strictly kept than the rest they being therein forbidden to prepare or dresse that they should eat Exod. 16.23 or to kindle a fire Exod. 35.3 But in the other solemn daies as in the first day of the Pasch those works are excepted which were about their meat Exo. 12.16 and they onely are restrained from all servile works Lev. 23.7 And the reason hereof was because the Sabbath was a speciall figure and type of our spirituall rest in Christ and figures are most exactly to be kept for the more lively shadowing forth of that which was figured And therefore we have now more liberty in keeping of the Lords day wherein it is lawfull to provide for our food and to do other necessary things because the figure and shadow is past and the body is come Å¿ Tostat s Exod. qu. 13. Answ 2 Secondly notwithstanding the strict injunction of bodily rest certain works were lawfull to be done by the Jews even under the Law and much more by us under the Gospel As I. Opera necessitatis works of necessity which could neither be conveniently be deferred nor yet prevented Of this kinde is the necessary defence against the invasion of enemies as 1 Mac. 2.40 So Ioshua with his company compassed the wals of Iericho seven daies together of the which number the Sabbath must needs be one It was also lawfull for them to leade their Oxe or Asse to the water Luke 13.15 and if their Beasts were faln into the pit to help them out Luke 14.5 and in this place And it was lawfull to save their Cattell or their other substance if any sudden casualty did indanger them as if an house were set on fire to quench it if their Corn were like to be lost in the field to preserve it yea they might also in case of necessity seek for their food upon the Sabbath as the Apostles plucked and rubbed the ears of Corn on the Sabbath when they were hungry and in so doing are excused by our Saviour verse 1 2 3 c. of this Chapter II. Opera charitatis the works of mercie and charity might and still may be exercised upon the Sabbath day as to visit the sick to cure and heal the diseased or for the Physician to resort to his Patient Thus we see our Saviour cures on this day verse 13. of this Chapter and Luke 13.11 and Iohn 5.8 III. Opera pietatis religious works or works tending to piety were not inhibited but allowed to be performed upon this day as the Priests did slay the sacrifices and offer them did other bodily works which belonged thereunto and therefore they are said to break the Sabbath and not to be guilty verse 5. Not that indeed the Sabbath was broken by them but this our Saviour spake in respect of the vulgar opinion that thought the Sabbath violated if any necessary worke were done therein Tostat s Exod. 20. qu. 14. Thus the Sexton may ring the bels to call the people to Church and the people may walke to their Parish Church though somewhat farre off and the Pastor and Minister may goe forth to preach yea study and meditate of his Sermon although this bee laborious unto the body because all these being helpes for the exercises of Religion are warrantable and lawfull IV. Opera voluntaria workes of pleasure and recreation Now as for these we have Permission to use them as they shall be no lets or impediments unto spirituall exercises as publike prayers the hearing of the word the meditating therein and such like otherwise they are not to be used Willet Synops fol. 498. Initio VERS 18. Vers 18 Behold my servant whom I have chosen my beloved in whom my soule is well pleased I will put my Spirit upon him and he shall shew judgement to the Gentiles Wee have all the three Persons of the blessed Trinity lively expressed in this verse but I will speake but only of the third How is the Holy Ghost distinguished from Quest 1 the Father and the Sonne First hee is distinguished from them by his Answ 1 name For this Person onely is called the Holy Spirit and neither the Father nor the Sonne Secondly hee is distinguished from them by Answ 2 office for he is sent by them God the Father sends him as in this verse and Iohn 14. God the Sonne sends him Iohn 15. and 20. Thirdly the true propriety which distinguisheth Answ 3 this third Person from the first and second is this that he equally proceeds from the Father and the Sonne How this is wrought is not revealed except only that Christ once blowing or breathing upon his Apostles gave the Spirit unto them Iohn 20. What names are given to the Holy Spirit in Quest 2 the Scriptures First sometimes hee is called only Spiritus a Answ 1 Spirit as Mat. 4. Hee was led into the wildernesse of the Spirit and Iohn 3. That which is borne of the Spirit and Iohn 7. The Spirit was not yet given Secondly sometimes some Epithets are added Answ 2 thereunto as Spiritus Dei Mat. 9. Hee saw the Spirit of God descending And verse 28. of this Chapter If I by the Spirit of God cast out devils c. Answ 3 Thirdly sometimes hee is called Spiritus Patris the Spirit of the Father Matth. 10.20 and that I. To distinguish him from all created spirits And II. To shew that he proceeds and is sent from the Father or is of the same substance with the Father Answ 4 Fourthly sometimes he is called Spiritus sanctus the Holy Spirit as Matth. 1. That which is borne is of the holy Spirit and so verse 3.32 Whosoever speaketh against the Holy Ghost Now hee hath this name given unto him in a double regard viz. I. In regard of his substance because that is most holy And I. In regard of his substance because that is most holy And II. In regard of his office becasue hee is the Fountaine of holinesse bringing remission of sinnes and working holy motions in the hearts of the faithfull Answ 5 Fifthly sometimes hee is called the Spirit of truth as Iohn 14. and 16. And this name he hath also from his office because hee keepes
sincerity of Doctrine as appeares thus Jf sometimes they taught those which was true and sometimes yea more often that which was false then they did often depart from the truth and sincerity of Doctrine But the former is true therefore the latter The Assumption is proved from Matthew 15.3 4 5 6. and 16.6 From whence it appeares plainly That the Scribes and Pharisees not onely offended in this that they did not order their lives and conversations according to the prescript rule of the Law which they propounded to others but also in the expounding of that Law they did heape together many Traditions not lawfull yea and weaken the Law it selfe Whence it followes that those who sate in Moses chaire were neither the rule of the Law or truth neither the rule and absolute Iudges of Interpretations J conclude therefore this gâ—eat Objection thus Seeing the Scribes and Pharisees sometimes taught amisse and sometimes were to be avoided it is therefore necessary that when Christ saith here Because they sit in Moses Chaire therefore obey them that by the Chaire of Moses is to be understood not any authority of theirs but rather some Rule by which it might appeare when they taught well when ill I hold this an insoluble and plaine solution If the Pastors sitting in the Chaire are then to be obeyed when they teach according to the chaire and if teaching contrary to the chaire they are not to be obeyed which thinke none will deny then the chaire is the Rule of obedience due unto the Pastors but this chaire is the Law of Moses as was amply proved before therefore the Law of Moses 1 the Rule of obedience which Law is the Scripture and consequently the Scripture is that Rule of obedience Sect. 2 § 2. They make broad their Phylacteries Having spoken before of these Phylacteries J here passe them by but if the studious Reader would know further what these Phylacteries were what was written in them whence they were so called and what is meant by the enlarging of their Phylacteries Let him read Senens biblioth sanct Lib. 2. Page 9â— et Sylloge vocum exotic Page 153. c. ad 160. et Godwyn in his Jewish antiquities Lib. 1. Cap. 10. Page 51 52 53 54. Vers 6 VERS 6. And they love the chiefe seates in Synagogues Quest What were the chiefe seats which were so much affected Answ For answer hereunto observe That the manner of their meetings when Disputations were had in their Synagogues or other Schooles was thus according to Philo Iudaeus quod omnis probus page 679. The chiefe Rabbies sate in reserved chaires these are those chiefe Seats in the Synagogues which the Scribes and Pharisees so much affected Their compaâ—ions sate upon benches or lower formes and their Schollers on the ground at the feet of their Teachers Vers 9 VERS 9. And call no man your Father upon the Earth for one is your Father which is in heaven Quest 1 Why doth our Saviour forbid his Disciples and the multitude to call no man Father Answ As the Grecians were wont to call the Students in Physicke 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Erasm epist dedic Hilario praefix The children of the Physitians so the Jewes termed the Schollers of the Prophets Filis Prophetarum The children of the Pr phets 2. King 6.1 by reason whereof the Prophets sometimes were called Fathers as appeares by Elisha's cry My Father my Father 2. King 2.12 whence the Rabbies grew very ambitious of the name Father which was the reason of this our Saviours speech Call no man Father upon earth How can this command Call no man Father upon Quest 2 earth stand with the Law of God which commands honour to parents and the precept of Christ which else-where enjoynes children to honour their parents and the practise of the Apostle Paul who calleth himselfe the Corinthians Father First this place must not be understood simply Answ 1 as though it were not lawfull to give the name and appellation of Father to any For then indeed I. St. Paul should have been contrary to his Master who maketh himselfe a spirituall Father to the Corinthians 1. Corinth 4.15 Yea II. Christ then should have beene contrary to his Father who hath himselfe termed Superiours Fathers in the fifth Commandement and commanded Inferiours to honour them a part of which honour is to call them Father Yea III. Christ then should have beene contrary to himselfe who repâ—oveth the Scribes and Pharisees because they perverted the children and suffered them not to doe any thing for their Fathers and Mothers Marke 7.11 And therefore Christ doth not forbid a bare and simple appellation of Father Secondly Christ reproveth here onely the ambitious Answ 2 affectation of the Pharisees who delighted much to be called Fathers Thirdly our Saviours meaning here is that they Answ 3 should not call any their Father in earth as we call God our Father that is to put our trust in him and to make him the author and preserver of our life for the Lord would have us to trust onely in him and depend as his children heirs only upoÌ„ him Fourthly a Christian hath in him a double man Answ 4 to wit I. An old man in which respect he hath a carnall Father whom he must honour so long as he enjoyes his life And II. A new man in which respect he hath God to be his Father who in CHRIST hath regenerated him by his holy Spirit and hath given him power to be made his Sonne Fifthly although there be some who in Scripture Answ 5 are called spirituall Fathers yet they are not such by nature but onely by denomination and participation Thus St. Paul cals Timothy Sonne â— Timoth. 1.2 18. in regard of the Gospell which he had made knowne unto him Sixthly St. Paul cals himselfe 1. Corinth 4.15 Answ 6 the Father of the Corinthians in respect of their conversion but not primarily but secondarily because he was onely the instrument which God first used for their vocation and regeneration by the Gospell and not the author or efficient cause thereof VERS 13 14 15. Vers 13.14 15 But wee unto you Scribes and Pharisees Hypocrites for ye shut up the Kingdome of Heaven against men for yee neither goe in your selves neither suffer yee them that are entring to goe in Woe unto you Scribes and Pharisees Hypocrites for ye devoure Widowes houses and for a pretence make long prayer therefore ye shall receive the greater damnation Woe unto you Scribes and Pharisees Hypocrites for ye compasse Sea and Land to make one Proselyte and when he is made ye make him twofold more the child of Hell then your selves Sect. 1 § 1. Woe unto you Scribes and Pharisees Hypocrites These Scribes and Pharises were of high esteeme and reckoning both in their owne conceits and also in the opinion of others none being thought better then they and yet we see here that Christ slights them cals them Hypocrites and denounceth many Woes against
〈◊〉 QVESTIONS Dogâ—â—â—icall OBSERVATIONS Aâ—â— Evangelicall ESSAYS VPON THE GOSPEL OF JESUS CHRIST ACCORDING TO St. MATTHEW WHEREIN About two thousand six hundred and fifty necessary and profitable Questions are discussed and five hundred and eighty speciall points of Doctrine noted and five hundred and fifty Errours confuted or Objections answered together with divers Arguments whereby divers Truths and true Tenents are confirmed By RICHARD WARD Sometimes STUDENT in the famous VNIVERSITIES Of CAMBRIDGE In ENGLAND St. ANDREWS In SCOTLAND And Master of Arts of both the Kingdoms And now a Preacher in the famous City of LONDON Si in Scriptura sacra tantûm essent quae facillimè intelligerentur nec studiosè quareretur nec suavitèr inveniretur veritas Augustâ— de verà religione â—on potentus in verbis Scripturarum esse Evangelium sed in sensu Non in superficie sed in medullà non in serâ—â—num foliis sed in radice rationis Hier. in Epist ad Ephes So they read in the Book in the Law of God distinctly and gave the sense and caused them to understand the reading Nehem. 8.8 LONDON Printed for PETER COLE and are to be sold at his shop in Cornhill at the sign of the Glove and Lyon neer the Royall Exchange M.DC.XL THE DEMONSTRATION OF THE SCRIPTVRES BEing about by the grace of God to cleare some difficulties and to collect a few observations from some verses of this Gospel written by St Matthew it will not bee amisse first of all to resolve a generall question or two Our first question then shall be this Quest 1 How this Booke or any other may bee knowne to be the divine word of God dictated by the Holy Spirit of God and not the humour or fancy of a private erring spirit Answ I answer Scripture is knowne to be Scripture and canonicall bookes are knowne to bee such by these proofes properties infallible markes First by the evidence of the Spirit imprinted in the Scriptures and shewing it selfe in every line of them or the testimonies of the Scripture it self that is the testimony of God speaking unto us in the Scriptures as Rom. 10.8 This is the word of Faith which we preach Rom. 10.8 Secondly the purity and perfection of Scriptures sheweth it to bee Canonicall For they teach nothing but truth and teach all truths necessary unto salvation They are both pure and perfect Psal 19.8 9. Psal 19.8.9 First pure they being a doctrine according to holines a rule to direct our waies in righteousnesse all the exhortations and examples therein tending thereto Secondly they are perfectly holy in themselves and by themselves whereas all other writings are profane farther then they draw holinesse from these which yet is never such but that their holinesse is imperfect and defective Prov. 8.8 and 30.5 Psal 12.7 But the Scriptures are perfectly profitable in themselves to instruct unto salvation a Iames 1.21 All other writings are utterly unprofitable thereunto any further then they draw from them yea they containe full and perfect Doctrine for the pacifying setling and directing of the conscience in all things Many Histories shew us the heavy wrath of God upon man for sinne but the Scriptures onely shew us Morbuâ—â— medicinâ—â— medicâ—â—â— That is both the sickenesse the physicke and the Physitian to cure it Thirdly the consent of one part with anotheâ—â—â—ere being a perfect concord and harmony in all the Bookes both of the Old and New Testament notwithstanding the diversity of persons by whom the places where the times when and matters whereof they have beene written b Acts 26.22 There may seeme some contradiction amongst the writers of holy Scripture but indeed there is none but a perfect harmonie And therefore when we see the heathen history or Apocryphall bookes contradicting the holy history we should stand for the holy Scripture against them but when we see any appearance of contradiction in holy writ we should labour to reconcile it When Moses saw an Aegyptian and an Israelite striving together hee killed the Aegyptian and saved the Israelite c Exod. 2.12 but when he saw two Israelites striving together he laboured to reconcile them saying Yee are brethren why doe ye strive So when we see heathen History to contradict the Scriptures we should kill the Aegyptian and save the Israelite as for example Iacob cursed Simeon and Levi for murthering of the Sichemites d Gen. 49.7 But Iudith blessed Simeon for killing of them Iudith 9. So Ieremiah saith They shall returne in the third generation e Ierem. 27 7. But Baruch saith They shall returne in the seaventh generation Baruch 6. Here let us kill the Aegyptian but save the Israelite but when we see any appearance of contradiction in the holy Scriptures we should labour to reconcile them because they are brethren Weemse Fourthly the antiquitie of it the Scripture being the most ancient of all Histories from the creation of the world to the flood was to the heathen Tempus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a hid unknowne time there being no humane Historyes of any thing before the flood but the Scriptures beginne at the beginning of the world and continue the History of the world unto the flood Againe from the flood to the Olimpiâ—ds of the Grecians which began but in the dayes of Vzziah was unto the heathen tempus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a fabulous time and all their Histories of Hercules Promâ—thine and the rest being but lying and forged tales but the Scriptures goe on setting downe unto us the History of the Church from the stood even unto the comming of Christ Thus we see how farre Gods word exceedeth humane writings in antiquitie it beginneth with the world f Luke â— As he spaâ—â— by the mouth of his holy Prophets which haâ—e beene since the world beganne and endeth with it g 1 Pet. 1.25 For the world of the Lord endureth for ever Fiftly the Majesty of it in plainnesse of speech the Scriptures seeme at the first view to bee very plaine but at a full sight are full of Majesty above all other writings h â— Cor. 1.17 18.21.24 and 2.15 1 Tim. 5.21 Thus their plaine and cleere manner of setting downe things sheweth them to be Divine i Esa 8.1 Take a great roule and writ in it with a mans pen Behhoret Enosh that is clearely that the simplest among man may understand it so k Deu. 30.11 This Commandement which I command thee this day is nor hidden from thee neither is it far off In the Hebrew it is Lo niphleeth non separatum a te i. e. It is not separated from thy knowledge that thou canst not understand it neither is it farre from thee those things which are obscure which wee cannot take up are said to be farre from us and those things which we understand are said to be neare us l Rom. 10.8 Sixtly the power and force it hath over the conscience it makes often
the stoutest hearer with Faelix tremble and the most stubborne with the souldiers cry out Men and brethren what shall wee doe to be saved Although it bee contrarie to mans corrupt nature yet hath it in all ages won some unto it wheresoever it came and by an admirable force inclining their hearts from vice to vertue The Spirit in us lusteth after envie but the Scriptures gives more grace a 〈◊〉 19.7 Hebr. 4.12 that is the Scriptures offer grace and abilitie to doe more then nature can doe Nature cannot heale a spirit that lusteth after envy or after money or after uncleannesse b Iames 4.5 6. but the Scripture offer more grace to overcome any of these sinnes bee they never so strong Seventhly the certaine prophecies of things to come which none but God could foretell Eightly the admirable preservation of it against time tyrants many other books have beene written which now are lost or falsifyed or grosly corrupted but the Lord by a speciall providence hath still preserved the fountain of the Scripture pure and entire Thus God by his especial care of them shews them to be no other then his divine Oracles Ninthly the Divells rage against those that desire and endeavour to regulate and moderate their conversations according unto the Scriptures those that walke contrarie unto them he keepes in peace c Luke 11.22 and persecutes with war hatred and rage onely The woman and her seed d Apoc. 12.13.15.17 who conforme themselves according to the will of God manifested unto them in his word Tenthly the judgement of God upon those that have opposed it and the professors of it as might bee proved by innumerable examples taken from all ages to instance but only upon the ten bloody persecutors none of them escaping hence out of this life without a stroke of vengeance and some remarkeable iudgement Eleventhly the constant couragious and cheerefull sufferings of many millions of Martyrs who have shed their bloud for the Gospel of Christ and truth of God Twelftly a gracious simplicitie in the writers of these bookes of the Old and New Testament neither fearing their friendes nor themselves but most freely and impartially setting downe their owne faults and infirmities as well as others testifying thereby that in writing they were guyded by the Spirit of God and of truth Thirteenthly the eviâ—ence of Gods Spirit working in the hearts of his Children assuring them that the Scriptures are the word of God whereunto they may safely leane without the least feare or suspicion of error e 2 Pet. 1.9.1 We have a more sure word of Prophesie whereunto you doe well that yee take heed c. Againe The bookes of Scripture containe many mysteries above the reach of humane reason although not against reason because wee may discerne a truth in them and that by groundes and principles of reason Againe the speeches of Scripture aime not at by respects but simply and absolutely give and ascribe all glory unto God alone and above all things perswade us to seeke the glory of God making that the end and aime and primary scope of all our actions Againe a reconciliation of Iustice and Mercy propounded in the Gospell both which meete sweetly in Christ Iustice as it were in a sort giving place unto Mercy Againe the heavenly order set downe and observed in Scripture shew them to be divine there is in the Scripture a fourefold order 1. Ordo naturae 2. ordo coniugalis thori 3. ordo historia 4 ordo dignitatis An order of nature of marriage of history and of dignity all which orders the Scripture marks and for sundry reasons setteth one before another first in setting down the Patriarkes it observeth the order of nature as they were borne As first Reuben then Simeon then Levi then Iudah c. Secondly there is Ordo coniugalis thori according to their birthes and so the children of free women were set first Thirdly there is Ordo dignitatis so Sem is placed before Iaphet for dignitie although hee were yonger So in this Gospell Saint Matthew observes this order Mat. 13. Hee bringeth forth new and old New is first in dignitie although old first in time so Ephes 2. Apostles and Prophets Fourthly there is an order of History observed also by Scripture as in the first verse of the Gospell The booke of the Generation of Iesus Christ the sonne of David the sonne of Abraham Why is Abraham put last after David because the historie is to begin at him So 1 Chron. 3.5 Salomon is placed last amongst his brethren because the Historie was to begin at him yea if we shall marke the heavenly order that is amongst the Evangelists they will shew us that the Scriptures are divine Saint Marke beginneth at the workes of Christ Saint Matthew ascendeth higher to the Birth of Christ Saint Luke goeth higher to the conception of Christ and Iohn goeth highest of all to the Divinitie of Christ and his eternall Generation Lastly a constant and perpetuall testimonie of the Catholique Church which wee call Ecclesiasticall Tradition the Church in all ages allowing of these Bookes as truly Canonicall or as sure certaine and infallible rules of direction for our lives and conversations yea although the Papists themselves dispute of the authoritie and perfection of the Scriptures whether they be perfect and of themselves sufficient unto salvation without Tradition or whether they have authoritie from themselves and witnesse in themselves or from the Church and how we without the consent and testimonie of the Church know them to be Scriptures yet to my knowledge there is no learned Papist doth question the question in hand viz. whether these Bookes of the Old and New Testament be the divine word of God or no neither is there any controversie betwixt us and them in this particular they with us agreeing that the Old and New Testament and every booke in either were written by holy men of God as they were inspired by the Spirit of God a 2 Pet. 1. And thus much for this first generall question The second followes Quest 2 How are the Scriptures divided I answer Foure manner of wayes Answ viz. first in bookes Canonicall and Apocryphall Secondly the Canonicall Bookes are divided into the Old and New Testament Thirdly the Canonicall bookes of the Old Testament into three parts 1. Into the Law i. e. the five Bookes of Moses 2. Into the lesser and latter Prophets 3. Into the Bookes which the Grecians call 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 holy Writings The Canonicall Bookes of the New Testament are also divided 1. Into Bookes Historicall 2. Epistles 3. Propheticall as the Apocalypse Fourthly the last division of all the Canonicall Bookes both of the Old and New Testament is taken from the summe of the whole Scriptures and that is into the Law and Gospell b Zanch de sacra script f. 22 Having to handle this question elsewhere more largely I passe here thus briefly
by it Thus much for this second generall question Wee now come to consider of this Gospell and first of the Title The Gospel according Quest 3 to Saint Matthew Here first it may bee demanded Answ what is meant by this word Gospell Answer For the true and full understanding of this question wee have two things to consider of viz. the Name and the Nature of the Gospell of which not apart or severally but together For the Name shewes the Nature Conveniunt rebus nomina sape suis The Name is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is a good and joyfull message c Bullinger s Luke 2.10 and is attributed and ascribed unto many things 1. Sometimes to a peculiar message Ecce Luke 2.10 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. Behold I bring you glad tidings 2. Sometimes to the preaching of the Gospell as 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 according to my Gospel d Rom. 2.16 1 Cor. 4.15 2 Cor. 8.18 that is my preaching of the Gospell 3. Sometimes to holy doctrine or the preaching of Christ e Mat. 24.14 Esa 61.1 This Gospell of the Kingdome shall be preached unto all Nations c. 4. Sometimes this word Gospell is taken for the Evangelicall Bookes Matth. 26 1◠Wheresoever this Gospell shall bee preached there shall also this which this woman hath done bee told Now the Euangelicall Bookes are of two sorts to wit Either Forged and false as the Gospel of S. Peter S. Iames S. Clement and divers others which the Papists cosen the world withall Or True which are the foure of S. Matthew Marke Luke and Iohn and are called Gospell 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 after a more singular manner because they bring unto us both true newes and the best newes that ever we heard f Luke 2.10.13 14. Behold sayth the Angel I bring you glad tidings tidings of great ioy which shall bee unto you and to all people c. Now the truth of this appeares thus First The Gospell is the power of God unto salvation g Rom. 1.16 1 Cor. 1.18 Secondly it is a glasse wherein as with open face the vaile being taken away wee may see the glorie of the Lord and bee transformed into the same image from glory to glory h 2 Cor. 3.18 Thirdly it shewes unto us i Luke 2.14 Gods good will unto mankinde and mans reconciliation unto the Lord of glory Fourthly it shewes unto us the will and pleasure of the Lord more clearly and plainly than was made knowne unto the Fathers in and under the Law k Ephes 3.4 5. Fiftly the Gospell is such a blessed message that woe bee unto him that either Neglects to preach it being called thereunto Wee unto me if I preach not the Gospell l 1 Cor. 9.16 Or Brings any other Gospell than this let him be accursed that bringeth any other Gospell m Gal. 1.8 9. Or Rejects this It shall bee more tollerable for Sodom and Gomorrah at the day of iudgement than for those that despise this Gospell n Mat. 10.14 15. And thus much for this question Another question here will arise Why the Quest 4 Gospell or any Scripture was written To this I Answ 1 Answer first for the helps of our knowledge least that in processe of time there should either have beene no remembrance or a false remembrance of our salvation and redemption by Christ to prevent which God in much mercy and love hath committed the life death resurrection and ascension of Christ unto writting that the truth might remaine and bee knowne for and unto all ages The Lord would have us remember what Christ did for us and what hee undertooke and underwent for our Redemption and therefore hee commandes that those things which are to bee remembred should bee written least otherwise the memory of them should perish The Lord would have our memories to retaine Truth not lyes and therefore commands the Gospell to bee written that the truth may not be corrupted o Luke 1.4 5. I answer againe the Gospell was written for Answ 2 the helpe of our faith least it should have beene uncertaine If the History of Christs conception birth life temptation sufferings obedience and the like had only beene by tradition delivered from Father to Sonne in processe of time we should have questioned the truth of it and so our faith would have beene the more shaken and lesse sure to redresse which the Lord commends all these things to writing that so our faith might be firme and working not fraile and wavering If the Gospel had beene related unto us by others not by the Apostles wee should have been prone to have called the truth and certainty of it in question as the Sadduces who will neither receive nor imbrace any other Scripture but onely the Pentatench or five bookes of Moses because none were written by him but them and therefore the Lord will have the Gospel written and the Canon and Rule of faith taught confirmed and sealed by his Apostles who were eye and eare witnesses of what they wrote a 1 John 1.3 that wee might the more undoubtedly beleeve the infallible truth of it Quest 5 It may here further be questioned what the Gospel and Scriptures doe containe Answer I answer First holy Histories to bee knowne Secondly Rules and doctrines of faith to be practised and beleeved For the better understanding of this question and answer observe First what is to expected Secondly what is to bee learned from the holy Scriptures I. What is to be expected from the Scriptures First the truth of Historie not of every historie and passage but onely those that are necessary b Joh. 20.21 Secondly the summe also of all those things which are to bee beleeved as necessary unto salvation c 2 Tim. 3.16 And therfore 1. they are to blame that say the Scriptures are corrupted and falsifyed by Heretiques 2. the Patrons and setters up of those 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Vnwritten traditions II. What is to be learned from the Scriptures First the doctrine of faith d Collo 3.16 and therefore 1. Papists are much to blame who hold some things as articles of their faith for which they have no warrant from the word of God as is proved by Sir Humfrey Linde in his via tuta 2 Ignorant persons also are here very faulty who will not studie the Scriptures that thereby they may bee inabled to give an account of their faith to every one that shall demand a reason of it e 1 Pet. 3.15 3. They also are blame worthy that refuse to bee Catechised and instructed in the principles of Religion grounded upon and taken from the holy Scriptures Secondly the truth of History is to be learned from the Scripture because that is the foundation of faith and therefore it is necessary to heare reade conferre and accustome our selves unto the study of holy writ because for this end God commanded them
to bee written that wee by the frequent and daily meditating thereof might understand what is necessary to bee knowne what to be beleeved unto salvation And thus much for the first word of the Title viz. Gospel Quest 6 It may yet bee demanded further concerning the Title of this Book what this Matthew was Answ 1 To which I answer for his person hee was the sonne of Alphens by name also called Levi and it is probable that hee was the brother of Iames the lesse f Mat. 10.9 I answer againe for his function hee was a Publican or a Tole-gatherer a calling very odious Answ 2 unto the Jewes First in regard of the office because they conceived these taxes to bee imposed upon them unjustly by the Roman government under which they were now subject Secondly in regard of the office because for the most part they were unjust exacters and oppressors extorting more from them then their due as Zacheus himselfe doth intimate when he saith g Luke 19 8. If I have taken any thing from any man unjustly c. And hence Christ exhorts Publicans h Luke 3.13 to exact no more then that which is appointed unto them Lastly I answer for Saint Matthewes paines Answ 3 labour or imployment this wee finde First Gualt â— that he preached the Gospel as farre as Aetheopia Secondly that hee sealed with his blood Quest 7 the Gospel he had preached being martyred for it From Saint Matthewes calling it will bee questioned why doth God use sinners for the publishing of the Gospel as here Matthew who was a Publicane and afterwards Paul who was a persecutor i Acts. â— 1 Tim. 1.12.13 and Onesimâ—s who was disobedient k Phil. 1â— I answer it is very profitable and behovefull for the patient or sicke person to have a Physitian who hath had experience of his Answ 1 sicknes for he that hath felt the griefe knowes best how to cure and redresse it and therefore the Lord will have quoâ—dam or sometimes sinners to preach unto those that yet are wicked because they know best the nature of sinne and how to apply fit corrosives and salves to every sinfull soule Againe I answer this the Lord Answ 2 doth to shew unto us that when he doth forgive he doth also forget when once wee turne unto God by repentance never to bee repented of hee doth as wholly put our sinnes out of his remembrance as though we never had offended him at all k Ezek. 18 22. Act. 17.30 Again God doth this to encourage sinners to turne unto him that having such presidents they may bee certainely assured that hee who is Answ 3 no respecter of persons will thinke nothing too deare for them whatsoever their former lives have beene if they will but truely returne unto the Lord. Lastly God doth this to demonstrate his Answ 4 power unto us that of great Sinners he can make great Saints of oppressing Publicans faithfull Apostles and of cruell Persecuters constant Professors and Preachers Concerning the time of this Gospel Answ it will be Quest 8 demanded when was this Gospel written by Saint Matthew I answer before any of the other three within 8 or 9 yeares from the Ascension l Athanasius Concerning the Author it will be demanded Quest 9 By whose authority was this Gospel written Answer I answer Saint Matthew was not the Author but the Hand for the holy Spirit was the Author and therefore Castalion erres who thus entitles this booke The Gospel by the Authour Matthew for it is more rightly called by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 According to Saint Matthew a Sic Tertul Cyprian or the Gospell of our Lord Iesus Christ according to Matthew b Vet. Interp as it is plainly expressed Mark 1.1 The Gospell of Iesus Christ the Sonne of God Quest 10 Concerning the Idiome it will hee enquired in what language this Gospell was written Answ 1 To this some answer in Hebrew and the reason they give for this is because it was written first and principally for the Iewes This was the constant opinion of these Fathers Irenaeus Tertullian Origen Athanasius and Epiphanius all of them giving the fore-named reason that Saint Matthew being an Hebrew writ in Hebrew unto the Hebrewes and Ierome to confirme this tells us that hee found an Hebrew Copy in the Caesarian Librarie and Syrus the Interpreter is so confident herein that hee prefixeth this Title to this Book The Gospell which Saint Matthew preached in Hebrew in the Region Palestina Answ 2 I answer with reverence to so learned Fathers that the exposition of the name Emmanuel Matth. 1.23 doth shew that either first Matthew did not write in Hebrew for then he would not have expounded Emmanuel which is an Hebrew word or secondly that hee wrot both in Hebrew and Greeke or thirdly that he wrot this Gospell in Hebrew and that this addition unto Emmanuel that is if it be interpreted God with us was added by some Greeke Interpreter Now which of these is the certaine truth in truth is uncertaine Indeed the Fathers were not so confident that it was written in Hebrew but Erasmus and other learned Interpreters do as much question it and their reasons for the contrarie opinions are these First because if this Gospel were written first in Hebrew then who translated it into Greeke for none certainly can be produced to have done it the maintainers of this opinion not agreeing herein among themselves Theophilact thinkes that Iohn the Evangelist translated it but Athanasius ascribes it to Iames the Apostle The second reason is because all the other Pen-men of the holy Scriptures both Apostles and Evangelists writ in Greeke which was the most vulgar and knowne tongue then in those parts where they lived and therefore it is not likely that onely Matthew would use a divers idiome or language The third reason is because the proofe alledged by the Fathers proves not their opinion their proofe is Matthew wrot in Hebrew because hee was an Hebrew and wrot to Hebrewes This followes not because the rest of the Apostles were Hebrewes and yet they wrot and preached in Greeke They are Hebrewes sayth Saint Paul b 2. Cor. 11.22 and so am I. The fourth reason is because if we should grant that this Booke was written by Saint Matthew in Hebrew we must grant also that wee have not the Fountaine of this Gospell but a streame onely flowing from the Fountaine and derived unto us as Maldonate sayth by some uncertaine Authour Now it is not to be admitted or granted that this Translation which comes wee know not from whom should bee coupled with the rest of the Evangelists and Epistles whose fountaine it is granted wee have that is as they were written by them and not translated by others The fift reason is because the Hebrew words which Saint Matthew for some causes doth retaine in this Gospell he doth interpret not into other Hebrew words
Redemption But I rather thinke the reason to bee this in short Saint Matthewes chiefest regard in the reckoning up of this genealogie was to move the Jewes to embrace the Gospel and therefore hee beginnes with David in this verse because then it was most common in the mouthes of all men that the Messias should be the sonne of Dauid but Saint L ke as testifies Eusebius * Eccles Hist lib. 3. cap. 4. by birth a Gentile borne in Antiochia learned in Physicke and now a Proselite truely converted doth write his Gospel to convert others and therefore shewes to the comfort of all beleeving Gentiles that Christ is a Saviour also unto them even which are of the posterity of Adam The promise of the Messias was tyed to the families of David and Abraham k Gen. 22.18 2 Sam. 7.12 and therefore Matthew proving Christ to bee the sonne of David and Abraham according to the flesh needs goe no further But Luke writes unto the Gentiles for he was Pauls companion who was the Apostle of the Gentiles and therefore hee proceeds unto Adam the Father of all Nations Quest 7 Againe hence it will bee demanded why is onely David and Abraham here named Answer I answer because under these two were all the promises made and given viz. First to Abraham Gen. 12.3 and 22.18 Secondly to David 2 Sam. 7.12 1 Chron. 17. Psal 89.37 Esa 37.35 and 53.3 Ier. 13.13 22.4 30.23.5 Quest 8 Lastly one other question may hence be propounded which is this why is David set or placed before Abraham in this verse Abraham being Answ 1 the eldest I answer First because the promises made to David were more cleare and illustrious and later and therefore better knowne unto the people as appeares by the blinde man who cries unto Christ thou sonne of David have mercie upon me and so the common people call the Messias the sonne of David Secondly I answer Answ 2 It is ordinarie with Historians to proceed from later things to more ancient first to relate those things that are freshest in our memories and then goe one to those that are more remote from us Lastly I answer The matter Answ 3 in hand or the historie of the Genealogie of Christ doth require that David should bee placed before Abraham for the Catalogue of the persons is to bee drawne from the first to the last or to begin with the eldest first and so proceed downewards and therefore being to begin with Abraham as he doth vers 2. hee first names David then subjoynes Abraham vers 1. that so the second verse may depend immediatly upon the first Thus much for the questions One objection we have further to resolve Object Saint Matthew making no mention at all in this his Genealogie of the linage of the blessed virgin Mary gives Salmeron the Jesuite occasion to alledge this place to prove that the virgin Mary was without sinne at all and that we should not consider her to have sprung from sinners lest she should thereby have incurred the guilt of originall sinne from them but wee must conceive of her as the elect and gracious mother of Christ and consequently exempted from all sinne and for this cause onely sayth he she is described as Saint Paul describes Melchizedech without Father or Mother or genealogie and as wee understand an other person i. e. Christ figured in Melchizedech so the blessed Mother of Christ must bee imagined to be without Father or Mother that so wee may understand her to bee without the least staine of sinne The Jesuites argument being something confused we will draw it to this forme Major Whosoever is described without father or mother or genealogie is altogether voyd of sinne Minor But the blessed virgin Mary is such a one described without father or mother or genealogie Therefore she is altogether voyd of sinne First of all we deny the Major or first proposition Answ 1 for Melchizadech is described in Scripture to be without father or mother or generation and yet neither Papists nor any other goe about to prove that hee was free from all sinne Secondly wee answer that the confirmation Answ 2 and proofe of the Major is very ridiculous Mary is described like Melchizedech 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 without any genealogie or generation therefore as Melchizedech signifies Christ so Mary was free from all staine of sinne this is a Sequitur à baculo ad angulum as wee say in the Schooles Thirdly the Minor or second proposition Answ 3 is false Mary is not described like Melchizedech 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for his parents none at any time or any where hath named in Scripture yea he is so obscurely brought in that wee have no argument to prove that hee was borne but onely that generall argument which is taken from the nature of man But Mary was not onely borne after the nature of other men and women but also her Genealogie is named in Scripture For I. First she is called the Cosen of Elizabeth from whence necessarily one genealogie must bee common to them both II. Secondly shee is shewed to bee the daughter of David and Abraham because Christ was borne of her vers 20. and hee is sayd to bee the sonne of David and Abraham vers 1. And therefore the Genealogie of the Sonne must needs appertaine unto the Mother III. Thirdly this same Genealogie which is described both by Matthew and Luke is both the Genealogie of Mary and described for Maries sake and not for Iosephs because it is described to shew the descent and linage of Christ who came not of Ioseph but of Mary onely and therefore if this Genealogie belong not unto her it belongs not unto Christ l Chamierus Tom. 3. f. 115. Sect. 18.19.20.21 Vers 2. Observa VERRS 2. Abraham begat Isaac Isaac was a type of Christ in 3 things First in his nativitie which was in a manner and in nature almost impossible m Rom. 4.19 Abrahams body being dead so Christ was wonderfull in his birth Secondly in his obedience unto the death making no resistance against his Father Abraham Gen. 22. So Christ was also obedient to the stroake of death n Phil. 2.8 Thirdly he was the sonne of promise and the promised seed Gen. 21.12 and so was Christ Gal. 3.16 Vers 5 Quest § 1. VERS 5. Boaz of Rahab It may here bee demanded why in the Genealogie of our Sect. 1 blessed Saviour none of the holy women are reckoned up but those onely whom the Scriptures Answ 1 doe taxe and reprehend as sinners I answer this was done first of all because Christ came into this world to save sinners and to take away their sinnes Sinners are reckoned up in his Genealogie and he is sayd to be descended of them because he descended frō heaven for them o Hier. s Christ for the comfort of poore penitent sinners assumed that nature which once was sinfull that he might separate it from sinne Secondly another
common nature of men neither free from originall sinne thus Argum. Those unto whom Christ by his death hath brought salvation were guiltie of sinne but unto the blessed Virgine Christ by his death hath brought salvation and for her purchased salvation Therefore the blessed Virgine was guiltie of sinne The Major proposition is proved from this verse and these places Mark 2.17 Rom. 5.6.7.8.9.10 and 4.25 and 1. Cor. 15.3 Galath 3.13 1. Pet. 3.18 The Minor proposition is confirmed from Luk. 1.46.47.48.49 and Act. 4.12 Yea Bellarmine himselfe can say h Li 4. de amiss gra cap. 16. Inter Catholicos convenit beatam virginem per Christi sanguinem verè fuisse redemptam c. The Papists doe generally among themselves agree upon this and assent unto it that the blessed Virgine was truly redeemed by the blood of Christ and that which the Apostle sayth 2. Cor. 5. Christ dyed for all men is universally to be understood without excepting of any But here they give us a testimony of their subtile Sophistry Reply acutely distinguishing of a double salvation in this manner Christ is a Saviour in a double respect either for saving men already fallen into sin and condemnation or else for sustaining and preserving them from falling and in this sense onely he was a Saviour to the Virgine Mary who was preserved only from sinne by Christ not saved from her sins which she had not i Franciscani Fox pag. 801. To this we answer Christ is called JESUS a Saviour in this sense onely because hee should Answ 1 save his people from their sinnes in this verse he was then either a Saviour unto Mary or not at all but her Saviour he was as shee her selfe confesseth k Luke 1.47 therefore hee saved her from her sinnes Answ 2 Againe we answer one cannot be said to bee a Saviour if he save none but Christ in their sense never yet saved or preserved any that they should not sinne at all contra naturam pene est ut aliquis fine peccato sit l Deâ—ret part 1. dist 25. ca. 3. Gloss It is a thing against nature for a man to be without sinne No man or woman then was ever yet so preserved from sinne wherefore in that sense Christ is not a Saviour but that he saveth that is delivereth us from sinne m D. Willet Synops f. 1321. Vers 22 VERS 22. Now all this was done that it might be fulfilled which was spoken of the Lord by the Prophet Quest 1 Why doth the Angel adde this prophecie to his message Answ That thereby hee may confirme his message unto Ioseph for in the message he brings are two things observable 1. the matter or substance of it and that is the maine and chiefest doctrine of religion to wit our salvation by Christ and therefore it was necessary that it should bee confirmed from the Prophets the principles of religion being to bee grounded n 2 Tim. 3.16 upon Scriptures 2. The manner of it and that was miraculous in a double respect both in regard of the appearing of the Angel and also in regard of that divine conceptioÌ„ which he preadmonished Ioseph of and therfore to avoid all deceit which Joseph might imagine to be in this vision the Angel cites the Prophecie that so Ioseph might the more certainely give credit unto it Observ teaching us hereby that Miracles are to be confirmed by Scripture thus the Angel doth here confirme his message from Esay 7.14 and againe hee confirmes his message unto Zachary Luke 1.17 from Malach. 4.6 both which were miraculous Quest 2 But hence it may be demanded why are miracles to be proved by Scripture Answ 1 I answer first because delusions and false miracles may be wrought by Sathan Reade these places Iannes and Iambres wrought miracles Exod. 7.11.22 and 8.7 so 2 Tim. 3.8 Deut. 13.1 c. Antichrist shall come with signes and lying wonders Mat. 24.20 and 2 Thes 2.9 and Revel 13.14 and 16.14 Answ 2 Secondly because omnis confirmatio à fortioribus every confirmation must necessarily bee drawne from the greater stronger and more undeniable principles but unto the faithfull there is nothing more strong then the word of God and the holy Scriptures whom they will rather beleeve then one that should rise from the grave unto them True it is that the Apostels confirmed the Scriptures by Miracles unto unbeleevers o Cor. 14 2â— but the Angel here unto faithfull and holy Ioseph confirmeth his miraculous message by the Scripture for unto beleevers Religion is not to bee proved by Miracles but Miracles by Religion VERS 23. Behold a Virgin shall be with child Vers 23 and shall bring forth a sonne and they shall call his name Emmanuel which is by interpretation God with us This verse is a recitation of a prophesie Exposit from Esay 7.14 the scope of which prophecie is this Achaz feares Esai comforts him and for the further strengthning of him offers a signe which Achaz refuseth the Prophet disdaining this his obstinacie doth repeate a generall signe verse 14. adding a particular signe verse 14.16 Observ The malice of the Jewes against Christ and the truth of the Gospel doth evidently appeare by this place for First they will not grant that it is to bee understood Obiect 1 of Christ the Messias but either first of Hezekiah or secondly of Shearjashub the sonne of Achaz Isa 7.3 of thirdly of some other of Achazes sonnes whiâ—h was not as yet borne But to this I answer Answ the first and second were already borne and how can the third be called Emmanuel 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 God and Man without blasphemie Secondly they object further It is not likely Object 2 that the Prophet would give a remote signe of an approaching deliverance or thus the conception and birth of the Virgin Mary could not be a signe unto Achaz to whom it was promised and made seeing it fell out 800. yeares at the least after Achazes death It is answered first the Prophet doth not Answ 1 give a remote signe of an approaching deliverance for here are two prophecies as followes by and by Secondly although the Prophet Answ 2 should doe thus yet were it no new thing there being divers instances of the like in Scripture p Vide Iunii Parall fol. 8. Thirdly This signe was not promised unto Answ 3 Achaz that wicked King that would not aske of God a signe Esay 7. but unto the house of David which continued unto the time that Christ was borne of the Virgin Mary as appeares by the genealogie of Christs drawne from David and Abraham by Saint Matthew unto Ioseph and consequently unto Mary as hath beene aforesaid q Pareus s The Jewes object againe The following Obiect 3 scope doth shew that this is spoken of a child either borne already or to bee borne hereafter unto Achaz verse 15.16 I answer those two verses doe not belong to this child for the proofe
Herodians h Epiphan Danaeus The Scribes they were interpreters of the law and hence in this verse Herod called both the Governours of the Sanhedrin the Chiefe-Priests and also those that were skilfull in the law the Scribes that so it might bee a lawfull Councell and yet the end of this Convocation or convocated Councell was for the ruine and overthrowe of Christ teaching us that a true Councell may erre Observ that this was a true Councell appeares thus First it was lawfully called by Herod the King Secondly those that were gathered together in Councell were the lawfull Rectors and Doctors of the people of God the Iewes Thirdly the consultation was about a maine question of Religion the true Messias and yet notwithstanding all this was done for a wrong and a wicked end Hence it may be doubted If a lawfull Councell may erre concerning religion who then Quest 2 must interpret the Scriptures Answer there are three interpreters of the Scriptures First I and thou or every particular man now this is to bee exploded that is when one private mans opinion or exposition shall crosse all that hath beene before it is lightly to bee waved or not much to be weighed and yet there have beene such who have spoken truth as for example Saint Hierome expounding those words The God of this World hath blinded their eyes a 2 Cor. 4.4 by the God of this world he understands the devill which exposition was called inventum Hicronymi Hieronymies phansy or inventiō because they that were before him expounded it of God the Lord and yet we see that his interpretatiō is true and all the other mistooke the place by an unanimous consent of all our now Interpreters I might give instance likewise of Augustines invention as they called it concerning the creation of the Angels but I passe it by concluding that a private and particular mans exposition which thwarts all that hath gone before it as it is not rashly to be beleeved and admitted of so it is not to bee adjudged to the fire nor wholy rejected till it have beene examined by other Scriptures and the analogie of faith Secondly the second interpreter of the Scriptures are the Fathers and Councells of the Church these are venerable highly to bee prized and much esteemed but yet not wholy and absolutely to be adhered unto or admitted without examining of them by Scriptures Thirdly the last and best interpreter of Scriptures is the word of God it selfe and this interpretation is to be admitted accepted and received nil difficile quod non alibi planum b August In fundamentall points absolutely necessary unto salvation that which is obscure in one place is more plaine and easie unto the understanding in another And thus every exposition of holy writ is to be examined whether it doe crosse or contradict any other plaine place of Scripture or no for the whole Scripture is as one truth and therefore that cannot bee the true sense of one place that belies another § 3. Herod demanded of them where Christ Sect. 3 should be borne Quest 1 It may heere bee doubted whether Herod did well in asking counsell of the Chiefe Priests concerning Christ or no First I answer to take counsell of them and Answ 1 advise with them was both according to the custome of the Iewish Church and also was well done because to them were committed the Oracles of God and therefore the Gentiles in these cases were to repaire unto them and all the Proselites were instructed by them Answ 2 Secondly I answer that this was not well done of Herod to advise with them upon an hypocriticall pretexte Teaching us Observ that truth is to be sought in the word and of the Ministers of the word they being appointed by God for this service and worke c Malach. 2.7 that is First to teach men what things are to be beleeved and known Secondly to leade and draw men unto those things that are to bee obeyed and done the Scriptures being given for this end to make a man perfect in knowledge faith and obedience unto salvation d 2 Tim. 3.16 Thirdly to admonish advise perswade and exhort e 1 Tim. 4.13 2. Tim. 2.25 whence wee are called dispensers f Cor. 4.1 that give unto all that are hungry good and wholesome meate and that in due time and therefore although it be blame-worthy to doe as some doe to question with the Ministers of God and desire to bee resolved by them of some scruples for this end that they may entrappe them in their talke or ensnare them as the Iewes did with Christ yet it is according to the ordinance appointment of God that those that are in doubt should have recourse unto his messengers for comfort consolation directiō Hence it may be demāded quomodo quatenus Quest 2 how and how farre we must beleeve the Church and the Ministers thereof First if the holy Citie become an harlot and Answ 1 the watchmen of the citie seeke onely their owne pompe and glory and covetousnesse c. then they are not to be beleeved Answ 2 Secondly if the voyce of the Church and Church-men be not vox Dei the voyce of the Lord we must not then heare nor beleeve them Answ 3 Thirdly wee must heare the Church and chiefe Priests and Scribes as Herod in this verse but then examine by the Scriptures what they teach unto us for this Christ commands g Ioh. 5.39 Search the Scriptures and Paul commends in those noble Bereans h Act. 17.11 that searched the Scriptures daily whether those things were so that were preached unto them And this we see is the present practise of this present Councell holden at Jerusalem the Magi they repaire unto the Church at Jerusalem Herod he repaires to the Priests and they to the Scriptures Vers 11 VERS 5. And they sayd unto him in Bethlehem of Iudea for thus it is written by the Prophet Quest 1 Why doth the Lord suffer Herod to know where Christ was borne seeing he sought his life to prevent which Ioseph was constrained to flye Could not the Lord first have admonished the wisemen not to have come to Jerusalem at all or have blinded the understanding of the Pharisees that they should not know where Christ was born seeing Herod desired not the knowledge of it for good but formischiefe Answ 1 I answer First God would not take away such a cleare testimonie of Christ from Herod the Lord will have him know of the birth of Christ that by his owne experience he may perceive and acknowledge that there is no forcerie against Iacob nor inchantment against Israel yea that all his Fox-like craft and subtiltie cannot availe him but that maugre his malice God will preserve this infant the newes whereof doth so trouble him from his rage tyranny and crueltie Answ 2 Secondly God would not take from his children the participation of the crosse For
certainely there is a double sense of this Answ 4 prophecie and that in a threefold regard I. In regarde of the Persons mentioned which are Israel Christ Therefore there must necessarily bee a double sense which may be applyed to both the persons II. In regard of the things spoken of and mentioned which are The Jewes deliverance out of Aegypt Christs calling from Aegypt III. In regard of the scope of the prophecie It speakes of Israels deliverance out of Aegypt which is past by way of reproach It is a prophetical prediction of Christ heereafter to bee accomplished And therefore it necessarily requires a double sense Answ 5 Some prophesies are mentioned in the Holy Scriptures in expresse words some in figurative words First Some prophecies are mentioned in expresse words and are fulfilled one of these two waies either first semel once as it was foretold unto Abraham that after 400 yeares his posterity should enjoy deliverance and freedome from Aegypt which prophecie was only once fulfilled so it was foretold Eli that upon one day his two sonnes Hophni and Phinehas should both be slaine a 1 Sam. 2 34. which was once accomplished b 1 Sam. 4 17. so it was foretold unto Ieroboam that Iosiah should be borne which should raigne over Israel c 2 King 13.1 2. which was once fulfilled d 2 King 23.17 Secondly these prophecies which are mentioned in expresse words are sometimes fulfilled saepius oftentimes as it was prophecied of the Iewes that for their obstinacie they should see but not perceive they should heare but not understand e Esa 6.8.9 this prophecie was truely accomplished in the time of the Prophet although it be often repeated else where f Matth. 13 14. Acts 28.26 Rom. 11.8 so it was foretold that the Iewes would draw neere unto God with their lips while their hearts were farre from him g Esa 29.13 which was truely fulfilled in the Prophets time although it be repeated in the New Testament h Matth. 15.8 Mark 7.6 yea accomplished also in our dayes and in all times of the Gospel because there will be hypocrites and formall professors alwaies in the Church Some Prophecies are mentioned in the holy Scriptures in figurative words which According to the literall sense Cannot bee understood and that in a double regard sometimes For the impossibility and falshood in the thing it selfe as it is said that there shall be no end of the kingdome of David but it shall continue for ever i Esa 9.7 which cannot literally be understood Let the reader but diligently consider of all these places where hee may plainely see prophecies propounded which are impossible literally to bee accomplished Esa 11.6 and 14.28 Ier. 30.9 Ezech. 34.23.24 and 37.24.25 Hosea 3.5 Mal. 4.5 Matt. 11.14 Luke 1.17 For some circumstance in the Prophecie let but the reader though of a meane understanding marke well the prophecies expressed in the places following and he shall see some circumstances which hinder them from a literall interpretation Esa 9.6 Psal 2.8 and 16.10 which place Saint Peter expoundes of Christ Acts 2.27 and so also Saint Paul Acts 13.35 May be understood but yet so that some further thing may be drawne from those tipes which hath some analogy either in The things themselves the one being a type of the other as the Paschall Lambe was a type of Christ and therefore that which was said literally of the Lambe aboue of it shall not be broken k Exod. 12 46. was applyed and said to bee accomplished in the Lambe of God l Ioh. 19.36 so David was a type of Christ and therefore that which hee said literally of himselfe expressing his affliction they gave me gall to eate and vinegar to drinke m Psa 69.21 it is said to bee fulfilled in Christ n Ioh. 19.29 so also David saith it was my friend that lay in my bosome and they divided my garments o Psal 22.18 which are applyed unto Christ Or at least in the words David praying against his enemies saith Let another take his office p Psa 119.8 which is said to bee fulfilled in Iudas Acts 1.20 there being some resemblance in the words And thus Hoseahs prophecie is fulfilled in this place there being some analogie betweene the Israelites deliverance out of Aegypt and Christs calling from thence Observ In these Prophecies which admit of a literall sense we must be very warie and cautelous how we convert them into Allegories and therefore observe heerein these short rules First consider the scope of the place and marke well what the marke is that the Holy Ghost aymes at Secondly consider the circumstances of paralleld places or Scriptures like unto that which thou desirest to understand Thirdly observe the analogie and proportion of faith allegorize not one place to overthrow another Fourthly let us have the testimonie and the warrant of the holy Scriptures those places that may literally be understood but are allegorized by the Holy Ghost wee may by the warrant of Scripture also allegorize as Gal. 4.22 c. Agar and Sina are allegorized but without this guide the journey is dangerous and without the president of the Scripture we must be very fearefull to draw it from his true naturall and germane sense Vers 16 §. 1. VERS 16. Then Herod when he saw that hee was mocked of the Wise-men was exceeding Sect. 1 wroth and sent forth and slew all the children that were in Bethlehem and in all the costs thereof from two yeares old and under according to the time which hee had diligently enquired of the Wisemen When hee saw that hee was mocked Quest It may bee asked heere Why doth God elude and frustrate the cruelty of the wicked I answer First because it is intended against Answ 1 his children Psal 2.2.4 Secondly the Lord doth this because thereby Answ 2 he would shew us two things viz. I. That he is faithfull in all his promises now he hath said that hee will infatuate all the counsels of the wicked therefore he will doe it and hence it comes to passe that the wicked ever err or fail or are over-seen in something as Herod here might have wrought wiselier then hee did for he might have injoyned some of his servants to have accompanied the wise men in this quest of Christ or he might have sent some of his actendance to have brought the infant to the court but the Lord be-fooles him so Pharaoh when he might by himselfe have destroyed the Israelitish children makes use of the women who deceive him II. The Lord hereby would teach us that he is carefull over his children neither sleeping nor slumbring but vigilantly watching over all his to preserve them from all their enemies Obiect It will here be objected somtimes the plots of the wicked take place against the righteous how then can it be said that God infatuates their devices I answer first if the wicked do
unto us how doth Quest 5 he give counsell or advice unto us for no such thing appeares at all I answer Hee doth not come unto us Answ or perswade us visibly but by Instruments by his enticements which are either externall or internall First the Divell hath externall allurements to entice us by as for example one hath lost a Gold Ring or a Silver Spoone another hath his sonne sicke or his horse or hogge sick here the Divell perswades to goe unto a Witch who can helpe the sicke and restore the thing lost but let us remember that there is a God in Israel and therefore let us give our selves unto him and seeke ayd and succour of him and not from the Divell Secondly the Divell hath internall enticements to allure us viz. First our owne evill concupiscence so long as sinne is pleasing unto us and therefore let us fight against this lust which warres against our soule e 1 Pet. 2 1â— Secondly our owne wisedome for reason dictates and teaches many things unto us contrary unto Gods word yea often times those things which are not false principles but false consequences from true antecedents as for example the Sabbath was made for man therefore man may lawfully breake the Sabbath By lying we may helpe our brethren or save our selves from danger therefore it is lawfull to lye in such a case Usury is profitable for a Common-wealth therefore it is by no meanes to bee abolished Thus as Christ can bring light out of darknesse and good out of evill so the Divell can sucke evill from good and with the Spider change wholsome juice into mortall poyson Secondly Christ would not turne Stones into Bread because the counsell given was inconvenient and therefore though the thing in it selfe might have been done yet in regard of the circumstances it might become unlawfull Teaching us that that thing which is lawfull in generall may in the circumstances be unlawful It was lawfull for the Israelites to offer sacrifice unto God and yet some circumstances made their sacrifices execrable and abominable unto him f Esa 66.3 It was allowed also unto them by God Observ 2 to celebrate some feast dayes and yet some circumstances there were in the celebration of their feasts which made the Lord openly protest against them g Esa 1.13.14 Amos 5.21 It is lawfull for Christians to eate flesh but if it doe offend a weake brother it becomes unlawfull unto us to doe it if it be in our power or choyce to doe it or not to doe it Quest 6 How or by what meanes can lawfull things become unlawfull Answ Because even lawfull things are to bee moderated according to a three-fold rule and therefore when they erre from any of them they become unlawfull The first rule is faith wherein two things are required I. That the thing which is done bee good not a thing which is forbidden by the Law And II. that it be done well sincerely discreetly with a good intent c. The second rule is Charitie wee must not offend a brother for whom Christ died by that which we doe The third rule is decencie or comelinesse which is described by the holy Scriptures in three words The first is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Comely h 1 Cor. 11 13. Judge you sayth the Apostle if it be comely for a woman to pray uncovered Wherein hee teacheth us to doe those things which becometh us and our profession we being called unto a holy calling i Eph. 5.3 and women must doe theâ— workes which become women professing the Gospell k 1 Tim. 2.10 And Titus must speake those things which become sound Doctrine l Tit. 2.1 which places teach us that wee must not onely doe those things which are good but also which are comely and beseeming us The second word is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 honestly or deâ—â—â—ly Let us walke decently as in the day a Rom. 13 23. and honestly towards them that are without b 1 Thess 4.12 The third word is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 let all things be done 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 decently in order c 1 Cor. 14.40 for it is a cause of rejoycing unto the righteous to see this as Saint Paul said I reioyce beholding your order d Col. 2.5 And thus things lawfull in themselves may become unlawfull unto us if either first wee doe them not well for the manner of them but for some base or by end or if secondly we offend our brethren when we need not by any impulsive command or thirdly when we doe those things which are undecent uncomely disorderly or not beseeming our places or persons or professions And therefore it is not sufficient to say as some doe this is not a sinne for although it be not in the substance yet it may be so unto thee in regard of the circumstances thereof wherefore we must examine our actions by these three rules Faith Charity Decency First examine what thou dost by the rule of Faith and herein observe these two things An Bonum sit An Benè fiat First examine whether that which thou dost be good or not that out of thine own knowledge for nothing must be done with a doubting faith e Rom. 14.22.24 for that pollutes and defiles the conscience f 1 Cor. 8.7 And therefore remember if it be not certaine that thou maist lawfully do that which thou desirest it is most certain thou maist lawfully abstain from doing it as for example if thou be not certainly assured of the lawfulnes of Usury or of recreations upon the Sabbath day or of going to law with thy brother thou maist be assured that it is lawfull to abstain from these and therefore rather forbeare that which is certainely lawfull then doe that which is disputable controverted and consequently uncertainely lawfull Secondly examine whether that which thou dost bee well done or not And herein search into these two things I. In generall if thou dost it Sincerè with a sincere heart Deus remunerat adverbia g Bern. God doth not alwayes reward Bonum a thing which is good for the substance of it or good materially but alwayes bene that which is formally good done well and with a sincere heart If a Justice of Peace or a Judge upon the Bench execute Justice with anger or hatred or revenge it is bonum a good thing to execute just judgment but not bene thus to execute it If an hypocrite pray that hee may the better devour widowes houses this prayer shall not be rewarded because although to pray bee bonum yet thus to pray is not bene II. In particular examine if thou dost that which thou dost Securè safely to wit if thou dost not tempt God in the doing thereof by approching too neare the gates of sinne There are certaine cords of vanity which draw on iniquity as with cart-ropes h Esa 5.18 from which all ought to abstain
undergoe what he layes upon thee and in his due time removing the evill from thee g 1 Cor. 10.13 Quest 8 Is it never necessary to use unlawfull meanes Answ I answer No for the clearing whereof observe that there is a threefold necessity First Necessitas rerum a necessitie of riches or an estate or of the things of this world thus tradesmen say they cannot live and gaine except they deceive and lye thus poore men say they must steale and pilfer otherwise they and their little ones must starve but these must know that there is no necessity of sinning better gaine little then loose the soule better starve then steale Secondly there is Necessitas vitae a necessitie of life Thus some if their children be sicke repaire to the wisards and witches thus subjects rebell against tyrants persecuting both their persons and profession but those must remember that their children had better dye then live by the devils helpe and these must know that they owe obedience unto superiours either active or passive and to rebell is contrary to the practise of the primitive Church a Lege Apolog Iustin A Tertul. Certainely it is lawfull to rise up against and withstand invaders as the Machabees did but not against lawfull Kings though they forgetting the office of Kings should tyrannize over their subjects Thirdly there is Necessitas animae a necessitie of the soule to preserve it from sinne or to free it from concupiscence Thus Lucretia murthered her selfe because Tarquin had ravished her and some kill themselves rather then they will be defloured But these must remember that they pollute the soule by one sinne while they shunne the pollution of another yea it is themselves that contaminate their soules which were not defiled by an others fault it was no sinne in Lucretia to bee forced violently against her will for that was Tarquius fault that ravished her and in him a hainous sinne but it was in her a notorious sinne to kill her selfe To conclude Vincit qui patitur affliction is to bee borne temptations are to be withstood I. by prayer II. by watchfulnesse in them and against them III. by hope and expectation of the divine helpe and assistance of God but IV. never by the use of wicked or indirect meanes VERS 4. But hee answered and said it is written Vers 4 Man shall not live by bread alone but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God § 1. It is written Christ fights against Sathan Sect. 1 onely with the sword of the Spirit the word of God and all the dartes hee throwes at him are fetched out from the quiver of the Scriptures Why did Christ this Quest 1 I answer First because this is the best and most Answ 1 powerfull weapon as God is stronger in himself then Sathan so his word is most operative against Sathan it is the sword of the Spirit b Ephes 6.17 able both to defend us offend our enemy c Heb. 1.3 it being the sword of Gods mouth 2 Thes 2. able to confound the adversary thereof and make the obedient thereunto wise unto salvation Secondly Christ did this to teach us that nothing Answ 2 doth captivate an evill conscience or subdue evill concupiscence sooner then the word of God it being a sharpe two edged sword d Heb. 4.12 Adam had figleaves to cover his shame and never was truely awakened untill the word of the Lord comes unto him saying Adam where art thou e Gen. 3.7 Who in such like cases use any other weapons Quest 2 I answer Answ there are divers that use other meanes then the word of God against Sathans assaults viz. First some fight against him with the wisedome of the flesh they dare not assent either for losse of goods or reputation amongst men or the like this weapon is a traytor and will at length consent unto Sathan and fight against him that useth it yea the devill is wiser and more crafty then men and therefore humane wisedome will never conquer him Secondly some perswade themselves that they can drive away the devill by their exorcismes conjurations or the like Thus the Papalins use these remedies against the devill I. their sacramentall consecrated wafer cakes II. holy water III. the sound of consecrated belles IV. the signe of the crosse V. the Gospel of Saint Iohn hung about their neckes VI. the name of God or of Christ VII verses per crucis hoc signū c. and divers other ridiculous things which are too foolish or frivolous to overcome or expell Sathan the divell seemes to feare these but hee doth but faine that he may deceive the users of them for it is onely the word of God that hee feares the weapons wherewithall our Saviour foiles him But the Papists may here object it is the word Obiect 1 of God which they use Saint Iohns Gospel and the name of God c. are the word of God and therefore a warrantable remedy against the devill The word of God profits us if we use it aright that is First it profits not Answ being barely pronounced with the lipps or carried about us as we may see by the sonnes of Scheva g Act 19. they adjure the devill by Jesus whom the Apostle preached but hee obeyes them not but woundes them to their hurt Secondly it profits when it is applyed by faith for thus this strong man is overcome h 1 Pet. 5.9 Who are enemyes unto this weapon of the word of God Answ 1 First those that forbid the translation of the Scripture into the vulgar tongue which may be understood Answ 2 Secondly those that prohibit the reading of the word of God because ignorance thereof will not condemne them Answ 3 Thirdly those that applaud ignorance of the Scriptures as the mother of devotion and to be preferred before the knowledge thereof These are refractory unto the Lords injunction who commands them to bee read and taught even in private families i Deut 6.7 8. and to bee diligently studyed night and day k Psal 1.2 and to be read to all the people as Iosias did l 2 Chron. 34.30 and Nehemias also Chapter 8. These are contrary to Christs practise here and to his precept else-where commanding to search the Scriptures m Iohn 5.39 These are not like those noble Bereans whom Saint Paul commends that turned over their bookes to see whether the Apostle taught them according to the Scriptures or not n Act. 17.11 But here the Papists object the Scriptures Obiect 2 are perillous and full of danger to him that reads them because they are difficult to be understood and being misunderstood they leade unto errour Answ 1 First if holy writ be dangerous to be read so are also humane writings they being indeed full of errours as we may see in the writings of Origen Answ 2 Secondly the whole Scripture is not difficult to be understood and consequently
one mouth which cannot faile Truth is one immutable and constant and can never become a lye or false but the word is truth sanctifie them Father with thy truth what is that thy word is not true onely but Truth f Ioh. 17.17 It is written againe Sathan abuseth Scripture and as it were prophanes it yet Christ nothstanding this gives it not over but keepes him close to his guard with this Sword of the Spirit in his mouth and hand Scriptum est it is Obser 3 written Teaching us that we must never depart from the use of the Scriptures we must never forsake this weapon Here divers questions will be made What is the Scripture the use whereof wee Quest 2 must never forbeare It is the word of God written by the Prophets and Apostles Answ being dictated unto them by the divine inspiration of the Spirit of God a 2 Pet. 1.19.20 The words of the Prophets and Apostles were the words of God hence ever and anone they say Thus sayth the Lord because the Lord spake in and by them The Papists believe the Scriptures to bee the word of God and prove it too but by an argument which the Philosopher will not approve of viz. Probatione circulari treading out this truth like a horse in a mill in this manner The Scripture is the word of God because the Church teacheth us so the testimonie of the Church they thinke infallible because it is guided by the Spirit of God they are sure it is guided by the Spirit of God because the Scripture sayth so b Ioh. 16.13 and thus they run at the ring ending where they began If the Scripture bee not knowne to bee the Quest 3 word of God but by the testimony of the Church then how is it knowne to be such For answer hereunto Answ I referre the Reader to the first question of this booke Pag. 1. onely adding one answer more to those many It appeares that the Scriptures are the word of God by comparing of them with all other bookes writings and writers for the amplifying whereof take notice of three sorts of Bookes under one of which rankes all sorts of bookes and writings may bee included viz. First Humane Secondly Ecclesiasticall Thirdly Divine First Humane bookes are bookes written by men either in the Church of God or out of it of humane things as Philosophicall Bookes or Rhetoricall bookes or Politicall bookes or bookes of any other humane Art or Science These are not divine bookes but humane not the bookes of God but the writings of men having both the matter manner method and stile from men And therefore these are not authenticall bookes in all things to be beleeved which they affirme Secondly Ecclesiastical bookes are those which are written by holy or at least learned men in the Church containing divine things Now these writings are to be admitted and are called the word of God as farre as they sympathize consent and agree with the word of God but they are not authenticall of themselves but as they depend upon the Scripture and speake her true language These writings I say are 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 worthy to be beleeved but not of themselves to bee beleeved nor any further than they accord with the word of God Thirdly Divine bookes are the bookes of God written by the Prophets and Apostles which bookes are the word of God the Prophets and Apostles being onely instruments Pen-men thereof and the holy Ghost the Dictator who endites unto them both the matter and manner and the very words and therefore is called aright the word of God and are 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of themselves to be beleeved because the writers were 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 inspired taught and directed by the Lord of glory and Spirit of truth in the writing of them And thus comparing the word of God with all other writings we finde that there are none to bee equalled for excellency truth purity and infallibility thereunto and therefore great necessity there is to adhere unto them Obiect 1 The Anabaptists object that the Scriptures are not now necessary because God made many promises that under the Gospell all should be taught of God and that he would write his law in their inward man and they should heare a voice behind them saying this is the way walke in it c Ter. 31.34 Ioh. 6.35 Heb. 8.11 Answ These words are not to be understood simply but comparatively that there shall bee greater knowledge under the New Testament then was under the Old according to the saying of the Prophet the earth shall be full of the knowledge of the Lord that is in the times and places of the Gospell as the waters cover the Sea d Isai 11.9 Quest 4 Why must wee never depart from the use of the Scriptures but with our Saviour here alwayes shield our selves with this buckler Scriptum est it is written Answ 1 First because there is a sweete consent harmony and concord in the whole Scripture Divinae enim lectiones ita sibi connectuntur tanquam una sit lectio quia omnes ex uno ore procedunt e August All the Divine precepts of the word of God are so linked together as though they were but one onely heavenly lecture because all of them proceeded from one blessed and celestiall mouth Secondly because the Scriptures are more excellent Answ 2 then all other writings whatsoever and more abounding with Grace Vertue and Piety Quicquid in Scriptura docetur veritas quicquid praecipitur bonitas quicquid promittitur faelicitas f Hugo Card. That is the Scripture teacheth nothing but truth commandeth nothing but goodnesse promiseth unto us all happinesse Aliae scripturae si quam veritatem docent non sine contagione erroris est si quam bonitatem commendare videantur Gregor vel malitiae mixta est ut non sit pura vel sine cognitione vel dilectione Dei ut non sit perfecta That is if other writings teach any truth yet it is not without the contagion and taint of error if they seeme to commend any good thing it is either mixed with malice and so not pure or without the knowledge or love of God and so not perfect g Ambros Tota Scriptura est convivium sapientiae singuli libri singula sunt fercula the whole Scripture is a banquet of wisedome and every severall booke a dainty dish and therefore great reason there is that we should cleave close unto them Thirdly of all writings the Scriptures are Answ 3 most true and therefore we must never give over the use of them Pope Pius himselfe said Resistendum est quibuscunque in faciem sive Paulus sive Petrus sit qui ad veritatem Evangelii non ambulant h Abba◠Urspergensis He is to be resisted to his face that walkes not both in practise and opinion according to the truth of the Gospell though it were
Scriptures be obscure Answ 2 humane writings are no lesse yea where shall we meet with certainty and infallibility but onely in the word Can we have it in the Fathers they have their navi and blemishes yea Augustine and Hierom confesse that they may erre and therefore would have none to subscribe to their opinions further then they go according to the word of God Can we find infallibility in the Councels they have erred as may bee shewed largely both out of Bishop Iewell Doctor Whitakers Doctor Willet Chamierus and divers others Can we finde certainty amongst the Popish writers least of all they jarring like an instrument wholy out of tune Thomas against Scotus Catherinus against Cajetane Whatson against Parsons Bellarmine in somethings almost contrary to them all and therefore if obscurity and difficulty bee a sufficient rampire to keepe us from reading the Scriptures by the same reason we are debarred from reading Philosophers Rhetoritians Fathers Schoolemen Popish writers yea all writings and bookes in any sort materiall or necessary to bee studied because they all in many things are difficult and obscure to the understanding and the Scripture is no more Answ 3 Thirdly those things that are obscure in the word of God may bee explained by more easy and cleare places as was said before Answ 4 Fourthly the Father saith e August li 1. de doct Christ Christum Dominum obscurasse Scripturas quo his major habeatur reverentia autoritas qua communia sunt vilesscunt rara verò difficilia cum pretio admirantur that is Christ our Lord in his infinite wisedome hath made the Scriptures something difficult not that men might forbeare to reade or study them but that they might hold them in greater authority price and reverence for naturally we contemne those things that are plaine and facile unto the understanding but those things which are rare and difficult we most admire and more highly value Obiect 3 They object againe The tree is knowne by his fruit and the cause conjectured by the effect and therefore it is neither requisite nor good for people to reade the Scriptures in the vulgar tongue They proove the consequence thus the Scripture read by those that are ignorant is the cause of all errours and heresies usus Scripturarum est causa omnium haereseon f Alphons de Castro the vulgar use of the Scriptures is the ground of all errours Audenter dicimus nullam haeresin ess◠quae non occasionem in Scriptura g Cens Colon. I dare boldly say a bold speech indeede that there hath no heresie sprung up in the Church but it was occasioned by the word of God An Italian Bishop dehorted the people from reading the scriptures ne fiant haeretici h Clem. Espens s Tit. 1. least it should make them damned Heretiques To this we answer First the Scriptures may occasion errours either Answ 1 By containing that which is false and erroneous but this the Papists say not Or By a misunderstanding or wrong interpretation thereof but this is not the fault of the Scriptures but the malice perversenesse or ignorance of men Answ 2 Secondly if a wolfe should cloth himselfe in a sheepes skin the sheepe must not therefore cast off his skinne as Saint Augustine saith the Bees must not forsake the sweet flowers because the spider extracts poyson from them Christ doth not here forbeare the use of Scriptures because the devill abuses them some men wickedly abuse Wine unto drunkennesse Meat unto gluttony Marriage unto coveteousnesse and adultery Magistracy unto Tyranny Must therefore Wine Meat Wedlocke Magistracy be prohibited and cryed downe as unlawfull I hope they will not and therefore let them consider how little reason they have upon the like grounds or insequent or ilsequent consequences to forbid the reading of the Scriptures unto the laity in the vulgar tongue 3. They permit worse and more pernitious Answ 3 things unto the common people and therefore why not the Scriptures though they were dangerous as they say First the Popish Clergy allow the Laity to reade other bookes which may occasion errours as well as the Scripture yea containing errours which the word of God doth not as Iustinus Irenaeus Origen who were Chiliastes Tertullian and Cyprian who were Montanists these they permit only the Scriptures they prohibit why because there is a greater enmity betwixt the Scriptures and the Papists then there is betweene these Fathers and the Papists the Fathers in somethings have erred greatly the Papists in many things doe erre grossely but the Scripture in nothing at all it being the touchstone of truth and the hammer of errours to breake them and dissolve them in peeces and therefore as great opposition and enmity there is betweene the Papists and Scriptures as is betweene truth and errour life and death Secondly the Priests allow the people to reade lascivious and wanton bookes which may and doe infect them why then not the Scriptures which is immaculate it is an inhumane thing yea an argument of small love to permit them to wallow in stincking puddles or to drink unwholsome yea venomous waters and onely prohibite pure streames yea the water of life unto them Si manifestū infidelitatis signum sit aliquid scriptorū rejecere vel non scripterum inducere quid dicemus de lasciva praeferentibus a Basil tract de vera fide that is if it be a manifest signe of infidelity either to reject refuse any part of holy writ or to induce into the Canon of faith that which is not divine scripture what shall we say then of those who preferre lascivious and wanton bookes or toyes before the word of God Fourthly and lastly the objection is apparantly false for first it is not the Scripture but the Answ 4 ignorance of the Scripture that is the cause of errours and heresies b Chysost s col 3.16 which truthes we learne even from Truths lips ye erre saith Christ not knowing the Scriptures c Mat. 22.29 where wee see plainely the cause and the effect the effect is error yee erre the cause of their errour is ignorance of the word of God ye know not the Scriptures therefore ye erre It is not then without great cause that the Holy Ghost cals the Pope 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the adversary that thus dares in his Tenets oppose Christ himselfe to the face Secondly the Scriptures reproove heresies and errours and therfore there is no likelyhood that they in themselves should bee the cause of them d 2 Tim. 3.16 Thirdly there is nothing else worthy of credit besides the Scriptures other writings being as chaffe this as wheate e Ierem. 23.28 whence the Fathers f Hier. s Matth. 23. Greg. hom k. sup Ezech. said quod de scripturis sacris authoritatem non habet eadem facilitate contemnitur quà probatur those writing or opinions which are not confirmed by the holy Scripture are easilyer contemned
then confirmed better rejected then received Inter mille talenta secularium sermonum vix centum denarios imo nec decem obolos spiritualium reperies g Cass s Matth. 1. Amongst a thousand talents of secular sentences a man shall scarce finde a hundred pence yea not ten halfe pence of spirituall coyne Now if there be this immense disproportion betweene holy Writ and all other writings there is then a great impudencie in those that shall cast this aspersion upon them to be the causes of heresies and consequently forbid the reading and studying of them Fourthly the Scriptures are given us by God to be our spirituall armour and weapons h Ephes 6.12 Num in bellum sine iis quomodo servaremur i Chrysost s Col. 3.16 and therefore if wee should enter into the Lists against our spirituall enemies without these how could wee possibly escape their hands or retire with safetie and freedome they therefore that prohibite the common people the use benefite and knowledge of the written Word of God doe certainly not desire that they should bee the free men of Jesus Christ enabled manfully and victoriously to fight the battles of the Lord against Sinne and Sathan but rather desire and endeavour that they may bee overcome by Sathan and retained in his captivitie and slaverie forever to the eternall destruction both of body and soule Sect. 2 § Thou shalt not tempt the Lord thy God This place is taken either from Deut. 6.16 or from Exod. 17.7 or from Numb 21.5 which place is repeated Psal 106.14 Quest 1 What is meant by tempting Answ I answer Tentare to tempt is to enquire after some thing by some signe or an endeavour to try or to make triall of something And thus first man is tempted and that either I. by God when he proves tis as he did the Israelites Iob and Abraham Genes 22. Or II. by Sathan when he tries if he can deceive and delude man by causing him to fall Secondly thus God is tempted by man when we make triall of his power or of his truth either in his threatnings or promises and this is the temptation here spoken of Quest 2 How doe wee tempt God Answ 1 I answer First wee tempt him pie piously and warrantably and that foure manner of wayes viz. First when wee tempt him by repentance that is having by our sins provoked God unto anger we repent and turne from them to try whether the Lord will avert his judgements or not This is a warrantable tempting of God for we have a command for it from him Prove me now herewith sayth the Lord and try if I doe not blesse you a Malach. 3.10 Secondly when wee tempt him by prayer and fasting Thus the King of Niniveh by a publick edict sanctified a fast upon this ground Who can tell whether God will repent and turne from his fierce anger that wee perish not b Iona 3.9 as if hee should say we will try God if hee will by this meanes be appeased towards us As the former tryall was commanded by God so this is commended by him and therefore must needs bee both warrantable and religious Thirdly when wee tempt God by patience and dependance thus the three children say unto the King We know our God is able to deliver us but if not wee are ready to suffer for him c Dan. 3.17 that is we know God is able if hee please to free us from thy hands but wee know not whether hee will doe it or not yet by patience and confidence we will try what hee will be pleased to doe with us Fourthly when wee tempt or try God by some especiall command from him that is when the Lord shall bid us try him by any signe wee will whether hee will doe what hee hath promised unto us or not it is warrantable then to tempt him yea not to do it is blame-worthy Thus God commands Ahaz to try him by asking what signe he will and reproves him because he sayth I will not tempt the Lord d Isa 7.11 12. This verse speakes not of this pious tempting and proving of God Secondly wee tempt God impiè impiously Answ 2 and unwarrantably Mala tentatio est signa petere non ad salutem sed experientiam e Aug. confess 35. the wicked tempting of God is to desire a signe from him not for our good but onely out of an incredulous curiositie to make tryall what he can doe Mala tentatio est de Dei potentia sapientia voluntate non necessariò periculum facere f P. Mart. 1.7 Sect. 5 the prohibibited tempting of God is to make tryall of his power wisedome and will when by no necessitie we are compelled or urged thereunto Nulla causa Christo se precipitandi nisi experientia ergo fuisset tentare Deum g Aug. de vera relig 1.38 There was no cause at all why Christ should cast himselfe headlong from the pinnacle except it were to make an experiment of Gods power which was to tempt God unwarrantably and therefore hee will not doe it but answers It is written againe Thou shalt not tempt the Lord thy God How doe wee tempt God wickedly and unwarrantably Quest 3 First some h Amesius med Theol f. 3 28. Sect. 10. say We tempt God two manner Answ 1 of wayes to wit First when we desire and expect something to bee done for us and unto us but in the meane time neglect the necessary and lawfull meanes for the obtaining thereof in naturall things as when a man expects life but refuses meat or health but refuses medicines and Physicke or in supernaturall things when a man desires grace on earth and glory in heaven but in the meane time neglects the Word Prayer Sacraments and the other meanes appoynted by God for the procuring thereof Secondly when any doe expose themselves unto danger without any urgent necessitie from which there is no probabilitie scarce possibilitie that they can be delivered except God miraculously do it Thus in naturall things men sometimes through a desire of vain-glory contemne death and cast themselves in nature into inevitable dangers Thus in spirituall things men often runne into the occasions and provocations of sinne as though they would dare the Divell to overcome them if he can Now of this more by and by Answ 2 Secondly some say a P. Mart. 2.4 Sect. 54. GOD is tempted 3 manner of wayes viz. First when we have meanes for the obtaining of our desires but use them not because we desire more gallant meanes that is either to be helped without mâ—anes or by meanes extraordinary thus the Divell here tempts Christ to doe not to goe downe but to cast himselfe headlong Secondly when wee want means wherein is a double fault viz. First because wee will not patiently expect and awayt the Lords leasure Secondly because wee prescribe unto God either the Time as Ozias perswaded his brethren
5.14 as if hee would say this long and heavie disease hath been inflicted upon thee for thy former sinnes and therefore take heed of sinning hereafter Thus the Apostle tells the Corinthians that for their unreverent and unworthy receiving of the holy communion many were sicke and weake among them and many slept that is many were sicke and many dead e 1 Cor. 11.31 Secondly sometimes sicknesse is inflicted upon us to curbe and keepe us backe from sinne thus David was afflicted f Psa 119 67.71 Thirdly sometimes to stop the mouthes of others thus Davids childe was stricken with sicknesse and death g 2 Sam. 12.14 Fourthly sometimes to teach others by their example that are thus afflicted thus the Lord daily layes sicknesse upon some for the instruction of others and thus the Galileans were wounded h Luk. 13.3.5 Fiftly sometimes to glorifie God and that either By the miracle which is wrought thus God was glorified by the blind man i Ioh. 9.3 By our patience and thus Iob was afflicted with boyles and sores And hence they are called Trials wherefore we must apply all our sicknesses and griefes of body to the comfort and advantage of the soule learning therein I. to encrease in patience II. to repent us of our sinnes and III. to grow up in faith and confidence in God in and through the onely Physitian of the Soule Jesus Christ Fourthly Lunaticos those that were lunaticke Answ 4 some question there is about the meaning of this word First some a Aretius sup say that Lunatici signifie Epilepticâ—s either those that were sick of the falling sicknesse or the Epilepsie a disease which deprives one of the use of minde and sense together for a time it is called by the Physitians Morbus sacer and Comitialis and Herculeus Secondly I rather thinke that Lunatici here signifies Maniacos those that are madde brain-sicke and deprived of common sense and are called lunaticke for divers causes according to the opinion of divers First some think because this disease is caused by the influence of the Moone b A retius sup Secondly others thinke because those only which are born directly at the change of the Moone are afflicted with this disease Thirdly others thinke they are so called because this disease is bred in the braine by the Aspect of the Moone with other Planets Fourthly because this evill doth encrease and decrease according to the encrease and decrease of the Moone and in this sense it is a symbol of sinne for our hearts are dunghils or noysome channels and the more they are stirred the more they smell the more our affections are excited and provoked unto sinne the more madde wee grow therein And therefore none must thinke that they are free from this lunacie of sinne because they are not excited but if they be prone unto sinne when they are provoked or occasion is offered certainly they are not in their right wits or mindes or not rightly disposed in their soules and therefore had need labour by Christ to be healed of this phrenzie Fiftly Damoniacos those that are possessed of Answ 5 Divels 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 comes from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a Spirit which first Plato and the Philosophers used for God Secondly or for the good and evill Genius Or thirdly for an evill Spirit and thus the holy Scripture alwayes useth it Hence 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifies a damone teneor I am captivated or taken by the Divell and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 obsessus besieged or beset round about with the Divell Thus by nature wee are assaulted daily by one Divell or other which is in us there is a Divell of pride of anger and of envie and of luxurie and of drunkennesse and of calumnie and of covetousnesse and of treachery and of blasphemy and of prophanenesse by which we are daily tempted and therefore we must repaire to the Physitian of our soules for preservation from this internall foe Answ 6 Sixtly Paralyticos the Palsie this is an ordinarie disease in the Soule when the Nerves are bound and there is no power of moving and therefore power and abilitie is to bee begged at Gods hands Thus much for the second generall answer why our Saviour is sayd here to cure onely great maladies Answ 3 Thirdly others say this was done Propter Medicum for the Physitians sake these sicknesses that were more incurable unto others hee cures but those that ordinary Physitians could helpe he omits Answ 4 Fourthly Christ cured all sorts of sicknesses but these great diseases are onely named to shew us that nothing is incurable unto God or that Christ cures and heales all our evils and infirmities both corporall and spirituall This is the difference betweene Christ and the best of Christians they by the power of Christ can doe some things but not others as for example the Apostles can restore the lame to their legges c Acts 3.16 but they cannot cast out Divels alwayes d Mat. 17.16 Paul could recover some sicke persons by sending his handkerchiefe unto them e Act. 19.12 but hee cannot restore unto health Epaphroditus that was so deare unto him f Phil. 2.27 Peters shadow could heale some and his word destroy Ananias and his wife but hee could not deliver or free himselfe from prison Acts 12 nor from the hands of Nero g Eusebius But Christ can doe all things whatsoever he will whensoever he will and therefore in all our sicknesse and distresse and danger let us have recourse onely to Christ unto whom no cure is hard Quest 5 Is there any at least amongst Christians that seeke helpe in their sicknesse at the hands of any other Answ Some seeke helpe from Hell Some from Earth Some from Heaven First some forsake seeking unto Christ and travell unto Hell to be cured by the Divell Thus Ahazia sendeth to Baalzebub the god rather the Idoll or Divell of Ekron 2 King 1.2.3 that by him he might bee cured of his hurt and thus many repaire to witches and wizards in their sicknesse as we shewed before Secondly some neglecting Christ seeke helpe from the Earth these are they who repaire unto the Physitians and trust in their skill True it is hee is to be honoured and used and sought unto as a lawfull remedie as we may see in these places Ecclesiasticus 10.11 and 18.10 and 38.1 and Genes 50.2 and Ezech. 47.12 and Apoc 22.2 But we must neither trust in the Physitians helpe nor despaire of health though wee should bee deprived of it for this is blamed in these Scriptures 2 Chron. 16.12 and Ierem. 46.11 and Mark 5.26 Thirdly some neglecting the helpe of this heavenly Physitian Christ make choice of others in Heaven to wit the Saints These are the Papists who in their distresse flye unto the glorified spirits for health helpe and succour and they approve and prove the efficacy of this practise by many miracles as true
Antiquity is not alwayes true it may bee said of Old and yet bee false Tertullian saith Quod antiquissimum verissimum Quest 2 that which is most ancient is most true And the Prophet directed by the Spirit of God commands us To seeke and aske for the old pathes where is the good way and walke therin m Ier. 6 16. How then doe we say that Antiquitie is not true We must distinguish betweene a double Antiquity namely Prima the first or Antiquissimum and this we grant according to Tertullian to be verissimum Answ for what is most ancient is most true Secunda the second and this is oftentimes false for thus wee may prove murder from Caine Drunkennesse from Noah ancient religions of the Heathens which were full of superstition yea sacrifices of humane flesh all which are of great antiquity And therefore our Saviour urgeth the Jewes to looke ad primam to the first Antiquity from the beginning it was not thus Matth. 19.8 Quest 3 Why may wee not assent unto Antiquitie although it be not most ancient Answ 1 First because at the best they are but humane authorities and therefore being subject to error we must be very wary how wee subscribe unto them this the Lord admonisheth his people of in these words What is the chaffe to the wheate where the Word of God is compared to wheate and the words or writings of men to chaffe Answ 2 Secondly because truth hath beene revealed unto the world by little and little and not all truths of old time and therefore neither every ancient opinion is true nor every recent tenet false as wee may see by an example or two The Apostle saith The God of this world hath blinded their eyes n 2 Cor. 4.4 Irenaeus Tertullian Augustine yea all before Hierome understood this of the Lord who is blessed for ever but Hierome expounds it of the Divell who is accursed for ever Now the first interpretation is more ancient but the second is more true as all expositors doe now acknowledge Moses saith o Gen. 6.2 The sonnes of God saw the daughters of men that they were faire c. Iustine Origen Tertullian Philo Iosephus and divers others understood this of the sinne and fall of the Angels but now all agree that by the sonnes of God are meant not the Angels but the posterity of Seth who married with daughters of the posterity of Cain Here also the first opinion is more ancient but the second more true It was a common errour maintained by all before Augustines time that the Angels were created long before the world and he holding that they were created within the six dayes it was called inventum Augustini And yet hee which was later spake more true than those who were long before him Answ 3 Thirdly many of the ancient Fathers were Heretickes and therefore Antiquitie is not alwayes to be assented unto Tertullian and Cyprian were Montanists wherefore Hierome calls them Haeresiarcha Arch-heretickes Irenaeus Iustinus Papias Tertullian Lactantius were Ghiliasts Origen in many things so faulty that although he often doth hit the marke yet where he misseth none roves so far or erres so grossely as he doth In libris doctorum inveniuntur prava Anselmus In the writings of the Ancients are many slips Dum errorem destruunt in alterum incidunt Senensis While the Fathers laboured to avoid one errour they often fell into another Fourthly the ancient Fathers would not Answ 4 have us embrace their opinions except we finde them consonant unto the holy Scriptures And therefore without this tryall Antiquity is not to be our rule Nolo authoritatem meam sequaris Angust epist 112. ad Paulin. I would not have thee to follow my directions or to build thy faith upon my opinions Solis Scripturis canonicis hanc authoritatem timorem c. August epist. 19. but onely respect the authority of the Canonicall Scriptures and regulate both thy opinions and practise thereby May we not build our faith upon the ancient Quest 4 Fathers First the Papists sometimes say absolutely Answ 1 yes thus one of them Greg. a Valent. tom 3. pag. 291. d saith The Protestants in the questions of faith should enquire on what side the Fathers stand that it being knowne immediately without any other examination they might embrace that Doctrine which the Fathers of old judged to be true So another Brist Mot. 14. cries out what the Fathers beleeved I beleeve what they held I hold what they taught I teach what they preached I preach Secondly some of the Papists are not so lavish Answ 2 as these but limit their answer thus that which all the Fathers deliver with one consent is infallibly true and a sure Rocke for us to build our faith upon This seemes reasonable if it were not a stale to deceive us and a meere jugling tricke to bleare our eyes for wee must know what they meane when they say All the Doctors or the Fathers consenting in one are to be assented unto The meaning whereof is not that they know the judgement of all at any time unlesse it be very rare but this is it p Greg. 4 Valent. tom 3. f. 290. They are to be counted All the Doctors whose authority is such that the circumstances of their learning piety and multitude considered they alone may justly be regarded and the rest neglected as no body if they be compared with these And thus one or more Doctors erring may be pressed with the authority of the rest Here wee see one brave device that although they brag of all the Fathers and say they will refuse nothing wherein they all consent yet when it commeth to scanning they have no hope so much as to finde this consent of all but referre it to their owne discretion wisely to judge by circumstances who are all and what the consent is Another brave device of theirs is to give soveraigne authority to the Pope over the Fathers to explain their meaning to allow them dis-allow them purge them and fit them to their purpose If the Reader desire to see this clearly confirmed let him repaire to White his way to the true Church fol. 328. § 11. Thirdly some Papists of as good credit as the former answer this question negatively that they care not what the Fathers say neither doth their authoritie move them at all and therefore they will be sure not to build their faith upon them here first they speake of the workes and writings of the Fathers in generall thus Marsilius q Def. p. 413. saith He will receive whatsoever they bring consonant to the Scripture but what they bring dissonant from it he will reject upon the authority of the Scripture whereto he will leane Turrecremata saith r In c. Sancta Romana d. 15. n. 12. The writings of the Fathers binde us not to beleeve them in all their opinions but we may lawfully contradict them where they speak against the Scripture or
are made e Staplet Ibid. And therefore it followes not that because Christ is a Law-giver therefore he must make new lawes disanulling or opposing the old Secondly Christ saith Ego dicâ— I say not as Arg. 2 the Prophets were wont to doe Haec dicit Dominus Thus sayth the Lord and therefore Christ here opposeth himself to the law of God The reason why Christ sayth I say Answ is not because hee speakes contrary to that which his Father had spoken formerly by his Prophets but because whatsoever he speaks from the Father he speakes from himselfe which the Prophets did not Propheta ad conservos Christus ad serâ—os f Chrysost sup Christ as a Lord speakes unto his servants and therefore saith I say unto you the Prophets as the servants of the Lord speake unto their fellow servants in the Lord and therefore say thus saith the Lord. Thirdly Stapleton proves this from examples Christ saith he addes new Lawes and therefore Arg. 3 he opposeth the Law of God he proves the proposition thus First Christ saith thou shalt not sweare at all vers 34. I answer it was never lawfull or allowable by Answ 1 the Law of God to sweare by those things which Christ reproves wherefore this was no new Law Secondly Christ teacheth that Divorce is never lawfull but for adultery or fornication vers 32. I answer this was an old Law and no new one Our Saviour himselfe saying that from Answ 2 the beginning it was not allowed for a man upon every occasion to put away his wife g Matth. 19.8 Thirdly Christ teacheth us under the Gospel to love our enemies vers 44. Answ 3 This was an ancient law If saith the Lord thou meet not thy friends but thy enemies Oxe or his Asse going astray thou shalt surely bring it backe to him againe h Exod. 23.4 Now none can deny but this instance doth plainely imply and injoyne love to our enemies But if any be so blind that they cannot see it or so obstinate that they will not acknowledge that it may hence bee deduced or proved that wee ought to love our enemies let him listen then to the wise man If thine enemy be hungry give him bread to eate and if bee bee thirsty give him water to drinke c i Pro. 25.21 And therefore that addition which our Saviour speakes of vers 44. Thou shalt hate thine enemy is a falsification of the Pharisees as shall bee shewed afterwards and was never injoyned by the Law of God Fourthly Christ teacheth us to love our brethren and calleth it his Commandement John 14.15.21 and 15.10.12.17 and John 13.34 and Saint Paul cals it the Law of Christ Galat. 6.2 Answ 4 This was no new commandement but an old given in the Old Testament David expresly commends and implicitly commands this brotherly love Oh how good and joyfull a thing it is for brethren to dwell together in amity and unity Psal 133. c. Yea our Saviour saith the one halfe of the Law is to love our neighbour as our selfe Mat. 22.49 which words are taken from Lev. 19.18 And therefore I may safely those rubbes removed out of the way conclude this question that certainely Christ doth not here oppose himselfe to the Law of God but to the expositions of the Pharisees Quest 2 Why did not Christ who was the true Messias ordaine new Lawes for those to walke by who were under the Gospell Answ 1 First because the Law of God was perfect Psal 19.7 and wonderfull 119.129 and spirituall Rom. 7. extending it selfe to the inward man as well as the outward for it forbids coveteousnesse and condemnes the internall concupiscence of the heart in the tenth Commandement God is to be worshipped in spirit and with spirituall worship Joh. 4.24 this also the Law commands Salomon perswades us to give God our hearts Prov. 23.26 and Moses to love and serve God with all our hearts and with all our souls Deut. 6.5 And therefore there was no need of a new Law the old being such as hath beene said Secondly whatsoever Christ taught or desired Answ 2 to teach to his Apostles and Disciples and to all his dispersed through the whole world was included prescribed and laid down in the Law and therefore there was no necessity of framing new Commandements We read of three principal Lawes which Christ commends unto all that are under the Gospell the first is to keepe the Commandements Mat. 19.17 Now this is injoyned in the Old Testament The second is to love the brethren or our brethren this also was commanded in the Law The third is to believe in Christ but this is the Commandement of the Father k 1 Ioh. 3.23 § 2. But I say unto you The scope of Christ Sect. 2 in this place is to oppose his true opinion to the opinion of antiquity and he doth not endeavour to prove this from the best most learned or most ancient Rabbines but onely from his word that he might teach us Observ that the onely fountaine of truth is in his word Christ doth not say It was said of old thou shalt not kill c. but Rabbi Salomon or Ben-Ezra doth not say so But I say unto you that hence wee might learne that the true tryall of antiquity is in the Holy Scriptures and therefore wee are commanded to search them Ioh. 5.39 to repaire to them Esa 8.20 because by them we are regenerated 1 Pet. 1.23 from them we have faith Rom. 10.17 yea they are able to make us perfect l 2 Tim. 3 16. The Church is our Mother therefore shee must be subject to God our Father for the wife ought to be so unto the husband and hence Saint Paul would have us to wave the opinion of an Angell rather then of the word of God m Gal. 1.8 much more then of a Father who is subject to errour as was shewed in the former verse Is there no use at all to be made of Antiquity Quest or of the opinions workes and writings of the Fathers and Ancients First in generall the true use of the Ancients Answ 1 is not to establish a new way unto heaven but to facilitate the old not to teach new opinions but to expound and explaine the ancient truths which are couched in holy writ Secondly more particularly the true use of Answ 2 the Fathers and ancient writers consists In these 4. things to wit First in the exposition of the Scriptures which is twofold namely either Positive as for example this exposition of Scripture is true because the Fathers so interpreted it This followes not Privative this exposition is false because none of the Fathers so give it here observe two things namely First this is no certaine or generall rule because often all the Fathers of some one time or for a long time have been mistaken as was shewed in the former verse in the exposition of Gen. 6.2 and 2 Cor. 4.4 Secondly this is
diversitie of sinnes but another kinde of punishment beside eternall it sheweth not For Iudgement a Counsell and Hell fire doe but signifie three degrees of the same punishment Hell fire being due to the rest but added onely for distinction to shew both the difference of the sinne and punishment Answ 2 Secondly Iudgement 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is taken in Scripture for everlasting punishment or condemnation as Roman 2.3 How shalt thou escape the Iudgement of God And therefore Bellarmines consequence is nought He that is angry shall be guiltie of judgement therefore not of hell fire for Iudgement signifies the punishment of ever-burning Tophet Thirdly Saint Paul sayth No rayler shall inherit Answ 3 the kingdome of God 1 Cor. 6.10 But he that sayth Racha to his brother is a â—ayler wherefore hee that sayth Racha shall not inherit the kingdome of heavens The Minor proposition is thus proved Racha is an Hebrew Interjection and is derived from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Raiak evacnare and is read by the Thalmud 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Inavis vacuus that is a light head or cock-braine wide and emptie of wisedome or understanding Now hee that thus reviles his brother railes upon him and therefore if Saint Paul may bee beleeved hee that calles his brother Racha shall not inherit the kingdome of heaven § 8. Whosoever shall say thou Foole. Is it Sect. 8 not lawfull then at all to call any Foole Quest 1 First it is lawfull for God to call wicked men Answ 1 fooles Prov. 12.6 and for Christ to call the two Disciples foolish Luk. 24.25 yea for Saint Paul to brand the Galatians with folly Gal. 3.1 and plainly to call the Cretians Liers and Slow-bellies Titus 1.12 Secondly this place is to be understood of Answ 2 them which charge men with folly with a mind to reproach them by way of revenge we must not call any foole in anger hatred or contempt because as was formerly sayd Christians must looke upon all men as their brethren and our Saviour sayth here plainly thou must not in anger call thy brother foole Doth the abuse of the tongue deserve hel fire Quest 2 or destroy the soule First Pomerius saith Convitia reprochfull Answ 1 words are veniall sinnes when they are thus qualified I. When they are given by superiours by way of correction or reproofe II. When they proceed not from hatred but from the levity of the mind III. When they proceed from a light or small anger and from unbridled or immoderate rage IV. When they procced from no desire of disgrace that is although a man use some reprochfull and disgracefull words unto his brother in his anger yet doth it not with a purpose or intent to disgrace him V. When by the reprochfull words which are given our brother is not much disgraced Secondly Pomerius saith Maledicta evill Answ 2 speeches and maledictions are but veniall sins when thus occasioned or uttered viz. I. When they proceed from a good cause or from some calling from God II. When they are pronounced against or reflect upon him onely who hath deserved to be evill spoken of III. When they are occasioned for a trifle a matter of no great moment IV. When they are from a sudden undeliberated heat of passion These respects thinkes Pomerius doe so allay and qualifie the poyson of the tongue that it wil not prove mortall unto us Thirdly we have a more sure word of prophecy Answ 3 to resolve and establish us in this particular then the opinion of an erring Papist and that is the word of God which teacheth us what to thinke or judge of rayling reproachfull and cursed speeches by these particulars First the Scripture commands us if wee desire to approve our selves to have put on Christ to put on the vertue contrary unto these Put on therefore as the elect of God bowels of mercies kindnesse humblenesse of mind meekenesse long suffering forbearing one another and forgiving one another p Coloss 3.12.13 All these are contrary or opposite to reproaches and evill speakings and therefore if the one bee commanded then is the other forbidden if one bee an argument of an elect vessell the other is of a reprobate at least for the present And therefore whether simply taken or according to Pomerius his qualifications and restrictions they are no veniall sinnes Secondly the Scripture prohibites these ex consequenti by a necessary consequent Let no corrupt communication proceed out of your mouth but that which is good c. That you grieve not the Holy Spirit of God q Ephes 4 21. Now none will deny but that reviling and wicked speeches are corrupt communication at least tend not to edification but rather offend God The Apostle seemes plainely thus to argue those speeches which are corrupt and edifie not the hearers are displeasing to the pure Spirit of God and become not Christians but rayling reviling and reproachfull speeches are corrupt and tend not to edification and therefore they are unbeseeming Christians and displeasing to the Holy Ghost and consequently in their owne nature lethall and not veniall Thirdly the Scripture dislikes all speeches of this kind because they argue that there is neither grace in us for the present nor hope of glory for the time to come I. That man who gives way to these abusive speeches doth thereby testifie that his heart is not seasoned or sanctified with true grace If any man seeme religious and bridleth not his tongue he deceiveth his owne heart and his religion is in vaine r Iam 1. â—6 II. That man is as yet no heire of glory Be not deceived for raylers and revilers shall never enter into the kingdome of God Å¿ 1 Cor. 6 10. I conclude this particular with this plaine syllogisme That which excludes us both from grace and glory is mortall and not veniall but rayling reviling and reprochfull words not being repented of exclude us both from the possession of grace and true hope of glory therefore they are no veniall sinnes Fourthly these are directly and positively forbidden by God in his word and therefore are no veniall sinnes in their owne nature Lay aside all malice envy and evill speakings saith Saint Iames t 1 Pet. 2.1 and Saint Paul most plainely Let all bitternesse and wrath and anger and clamour and evill speaking be put away from you u Ephes 4.31 Having shewed that rayling and reprochfull words are Quest. 3 mortall sinnes it may hence be further demanded why the abuses of the tongue doe destroy the soule and must bee punished with Hell Fire Answ 1 First because the tongue was given unto us for other ends speech is onely given unto men and that for this end that thereby they might performe those dueties which God requires of them viz. to wit First wee must blesse and praise God with our tongues Jam. 3.9 Secondly wee must confesse Christ with our tongues Rom. 10. Thirdly wee must invocate and supplicate the
be our Mother obeying her in those injunctions which are not contrary to the Mandates of God our Father for otherwise wee are not the true children of God Children must bee obedient unto Parents therefore when the Mother injoynes that which the Father doth not forbid the child must subscribe to the practise of it Here observe that there are three Churches I. The Primitive Church II. The Moderne Churches where our religion is professed And these two we reverence and submit unto where they doe not oppose the law of God III. The Popish Church Now this we doe not so hate that we will refuse to embrace things worthy to bee received because they used them They have the Word Sacraments Ministers and a Ministerie yea and use all these shall we therefore refuse them Secondly for the peace of the Church let us be of the same mind with Saint Paul to become all things to all men in lawfull and indifferent things that thereby wee might winne some Wee should not rend Christs seamelesse coate in twaine or breake a gap in the hedge of the Church for Adiophorall things lest in avoyding the use of them we fall into a direct breach of the fifth commandement Sect. 2 § 2. That it hath beene said The Pharisees here alleadge and urge the words of the precept for the confirming of an errour namely that no man sinneth against the seventh Commandement but hee that actually committeth the sinne of uncleannesse Quest 1 Can errour be founded upon Scriptures Answ 1 First it may by wresting and wrong expounding of them Many saith Saint Peter pervert the Scriptures to their owne damnation 2 Pet. 3.16 Answ 2 Secondly although the Scriptures speake alwaies the truth yet they doe not utter this truth alwaies one and the same way For I. sometimes they speake Allegorically sometimes literally II. Sometimes they barely and historically recite a thing sometimes they command and injoyne a thing sometimes they counsell and advise unto a thing III. Sometimes they speake indefinitely and generally to all men sometimes particularly to some certaine time people and persons And therefore if these should not rightly bee applyed according to the sense and meaning of the Blessed Spirit wee should quickly runne into an errour Quest 2 If the Scripture speake so many waies unto us doe not the Papists Pighius and Perresius then say truely that they are like a nose of wax which a man may turne which way hee list or like a shipmans drawers which will fit any person yea the causes of heresies because they may bee expounded according to every mans judgement opinion and affection Answ 1 First it is maliciously and wickedly spoken of Pighius for the Scriptures in themselves are not such but onely are perverted by wicked men unto their destruction Answ 2 Secondly Perresius from a true proposition collects a false conclusion Heresies saith hee are founded upon the Scriptures men stil alleadging Scripture for the proofe of their opinions whether true or false this is true Therefore he concludes the Scripture is not to be reade by the laicks this is false as was shewed before verse 7. Chap. 4. Wee must not refuse to sucke hony out of the sweet flowers because the spider from thence extracts poison wee must not forbeare the use of Scriptures because wicked men abuse them but reade them study them and learne to understand them How may we bee enabled to understand the Quest 3 Scriptures and to learne their true sense and meaning Interpret them according to these few plaine rules to wit Answ First hold fast the Analogie of faith this is a Rule 1 great and principall rule for that exposition of the word which doth overthrow any Article of our faith is not sound solide or orthodoxe Which is the Analogie of faith are the principles Quest 1 of Catechisme or the three Creedes namely the Apostles Nicene and Athanasius or any of them First wee must wade warily through this Answ 1 ford because otherwise wee may fall into a gulfe Secondly the grounds and principâ—les of Answ 2 Catechisme are certaine truthes and â—â—e rudiments because they are agreeable unto the holy Scriptures Thirdly but yet the grounds and principles Answ 3 of Catechisme are not fit foundations of our faith because then the holy Scriptures should be judged by them Cujus contrarium est verum that is the principles and grounds of Catechisme are to bee judged by the Scriptures not the word by them Fourthly wee say therefore that there is no Answ 4 undoubted analogie 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is of it selfe to bee beleeved but onely the harmony of the sacred Scriptures in themselves Fiftly two things are here therefore to be observed Answ 5 viz. First the true expositor of Scripture is Scripture onely for the understanding hereof take notice of foure Interpreters namely I. The opinion of some one private man this is not much to be regarded II. The judgement of the Moderne Church this is venerable but is to be assented unto no further then the Scripture will allow for the Church was once an Artian yea the East Churches and Popish Church are in many things false and erroneous III. There is the consent of Antiquitie this is much to bee reverenced but yet with some reservations and cautions because all things were not revealed at once IV. The exposition and consent of other places in Scripture Secondly we must not so ground any opinion Rule 2 upon one place of Scripture that wee overthrow another for that is no true sense of Sripture which doth make any sentence in Scripture false Secondly attend diligently to the scope of the Holy Ghost that thou extend and stretch the place no further then was meant by him In this rule many things are carefully to bee attended unto namely First whether is the place Allegoricall or literall For I. to wring Allegories out of plaine and cleare truthes is both ridiculous and impious and instead of that sincere milke which is therein truely contained for our nourishment is presented unto us the unwholsome blood of mans perverting braine This is the fault of the Origenistes and Anabaptists II. If the place bee literall then let the exposition thereof accord with the analogie of faith and seeke not for Allegories III. To exact a literall exposition or interpretation of every place is full of danger yea more perillous then the former For if the place bee Literall then he who expounds it Allegorically doth onely loose the true sense and overthrow the germane and genuine meaning of the words but not establish untruthes As for example we reade in Genesis that when Abraham was old and it ceased to bee with Sarah after the manner of women that unto them was borne Isaac Origen expounds this thus By Abraham is meant a Wiseman and by Sarah Vertue to whom is borne Isacke that is pleasure when it ceased to be with her after the manner of women that is when all carnall affections
and desires were mortified in her And hence he concludes Vera voluptas ex virtute nascitur The fruits of true joy spring from the roote of vertue which conclusion is true although the true sense of the place be lost Allegoricall then hee who expounds it literally doth not onely pervert the true sense and meaning of the place but doth also establish a falsehood and untruth for thus a man might prove Christ to be bread yea to be a stone which none are so stony or blockish to beleeve Secondly observe whether is it a rule or an historicall narration we reade of Iephtah who offered his daughter of the Midwives who lied unto Pharaoh of the adulterie and subornation to drunkennesse and murder in David of Noahs drunkennesse and Lots incest Now if these historicall narrations should bee by some understood to bee rules of directions how diabolicall would their lives and conversations become And therefore we must not drawe a rule A facto ad jus from a deede done to the equitie thereof for by that rule all things were lawfull Thirdly observe if it be a Rule then whether is it given as a Command and Precept or as a counsell and advice Paul would have all to live unmarried t 1 Cor. 7.7.8 but this he speakes by permission onely that is by way of counsell and advice not by a positive command from God Verse 6. For concerning Virginity he had no commandement from the Lord but onely supposed it to be good for the present distresse to remaine unmarried Verse 25 26. Fourthly consider if it bee a precept and a command then whether is it generall or particular That is I. Whether was it given to one man onely or to all Thus God commands Abraham to slay Isaac and this precept is not to bee extended further then to him II. Whether doth the precept respect some one particular action which is onely once to be performed or a worke which is frequently to be practised Thus the Israelites were commanded to spoile the Egyptians which precept was neither to bee stretched unto any other nor unto them at another time that is by this command no other persons were allowed to robbe the Egyptians neither were the Israelits warranted to do it at any other time III. Whether were the Precepts given onely unto some one particular people or unto all nations Thus the judiciall Law was given unto the Iewes onely and not unto the Gentiles IV. Whether did the Command concerne some certaine time onely or was it to be extended also unto all times Thus Circumcision Sacrifices and the Ceremoniall law are not now to be urged because they were to continue but unto the death of Christ Thus we must carefully observe the scope of the Holy Spirit and urge nothing beyond that Thirdly in the reading and expounding of the Rule 3 Scripture take heede of all grosse consequences which are very frequent with the erroneous I. some thus expound positiva privativè positive things privatively Thou maist hate thy enemie because thou must love thy brother Mat. 5.43 Secondly some expound Confutativa confirmativè those things which are spoken by way of Confutation as though they were spoken by way of confirmation as for example Saint Paul saith The doers of the Law shall be justified u Rom. 2.13 From whence The Apostle concludes that none shall be justified The Papists conclude that we may bee justified by the workes of the law Thirdly some expound Scriptures so as that there is no consequence at all but a palpable non sequitur Thus Hooker observes the Separatists and Brownists to doe daily And thus the Papists doe hourely I have prayed for thee Peter saith Christ therefore the Pope cannot erre Master saith Peter here are two swords therefore the Pope hath both Ecclesiasticall and Civill jurisdiction both over King and People and many the like But wee must take heede of these sophismes and of this begging the question Fourthly be never obstinate in thy owne opinion Rule 4 but let the spirits of the Prophets bee subject to the Prophets v 1 Cor. 14.32 Great is the errour here of the Papists who will change nothing retract nothing lest they should seeme formerly to have erred Great are the blemishes hereof of the Lutherans with the Zwinglians concerning the corporeall Concomitancie who rather then they will â—â—cant or confesse their errour will which is too grosse confesse the Ubiquitie of Christâ— humanity Certainely this obstinacie in opinion in generall doth hinder the progresse of faith and of religion and therefore all Christians should be carefull to observe this rule not to bee too stiffe in their owne tenets or obstinate in their owne opinions Rule 5 Fiftly adde to the reading a frequent meditation of the word thou readest reade studie and contemplate the Scripture night and day be not a stranger in Israel he that frequenteth a path daily will not lightly goe wrong or erre therein David became wiser then his teachers because hee had respect unto the Testimonies of the Lord w Psal 119.99 And therefore if any thâ—ng be difficult suspend thy judgement reade it over againe turne unto other places like unto it and compare them together and haply God will reveale it unto thee at the last x Phil. 3.15 Rule 6 Sixtly to reading and meditation adjoyne prayer this was the Prophet Davids frequent practise Shew me thy waies oh Lord teach mee thy pathes leade me in thy truth and teaâ—h mee Psal 25.4 5. Againe Teach me O Lord the way of thy statutes yea give thou me understanding and I shall keepe thy law Psal 119.33.34 And againe Make thou me to understand the way of thy precepts verse 27. yea Make thy face to shine upon thy servant and teach me thy statutes verse 135. for my lips shall utter praise when thou hast taught me thy precepts verse 171. Thus pray fervently unto the Lord to enlighten thy understanding to anoint thy blind eyes with the true eye-salve of the blessed Spirit and to leade thee in his truth and then rest certainely assured that faithfull is hee who hath promised who will at length reveale himselfe and his truth to him who doth his endeavour to know the Lord and the way and truth whereby he may be brought unto him by reading hearing meditating and a willing subjecting of his opinion and judgement to the word of God Sect. 3 § 3. Of old time The Papists say the consent of the Fathers is the true rule of interpreting the Scriptures Argum. or the word is to bee expounded according to the minde and judgement of the Ancients Against this Chamierus y Tom. 1. de interp script lib. 16 Cap. 11 Sect 1. f. 601. urgeth this place thus If the consent of the Fathers were a certaine rule of interpreting the Scriptures then it should never be reprooved and blamed this is manifest by it selfe But the consent of the Ancients in the expounding and opening of Scripture
of hostes e Esay 19.18 Fourthly that Christ doth not quite take away all swearing appeares by these reasons I. Because he saith himselfe he came not to destroy the law now if he had condemned and forbidden all oathes hee had dissolved the law and the Commandement of God which saith Thou shalt sweare by my name f Deut. 6.13 and 10.20 And therefore Christ here saying Thou shalt not sweare at all doth not destroy the law but fulfill it because hee taught them the way and meanes how to fulfill it namely to take heede of all perjurie and rash oathes as we shall see amply by and by II. This will appeare by the consideration of the nature of an oath because an oath is nothing else but an invocating of God whereby we desire that he who is the onely 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 searcher and knower of the heart would giue testimony of the truth and punish him who sweares if willingly or wittingly he affirmeth any thing which is false Now none without blasphemie can say that Christ forbids and condemnes invocation of God III. The truth hereof appeares by the end and use of an oath both in regard of God and man First an oath ascribes unto God 1. the laude and praise of infinite wisedome because he only knowes the most secret corners and passages of the heart and understandeth all truth and therefore we implore his presence to testifie the truth of that which is delivered 2. an oath doth ascribe unto God the praise of infinite goodnesse and justice because hee is the onely defender of truth and avenger of falsehood and therefore we desire in swearing that if wee utter any falsehood God would judge us and make us examples unto others Secondly in regard of man swearing is the very bond of all humane societie and civill government which cannot subsist without truth therefore the Apostle saith that among men swearing is the end of all strife as if hee would say there is no greater better nor surer way to be beleeved then by taking a lawfull oath because he who makes no conscience of an oath makes conscience of nothing And therefore to condemne and forbid all swearing were to detract from Gods glory and to destroy and dissolve the bond of humane societie g Pareus s IV. That Christ doth not quite take away all oathes appeares because there was nothing commanded in the law of Moses which was sin in it selfe and therefore Christ would not forbid that which was good V. Because swearing is commended as a speciall part of Gods worship and an excellent signe of an upright man yea hath a promise of blessednesse whence I argue thus That which God the holy Ghost commends in Scripture as a part of Gods worship and a signe of an upright and holy man and which God the Father promiseth to reward with eternall happinesse that God the Sonne will never quite take away condemne or prohibite But swearing truely and lawfully by God is commended by God the Holy Ghost as a part of Gods worship and a signe of an upright and holy man and hath a promise from God the Father of eternall glory Therefore God the Sonne will never quite take it away The first proposition I take as granted because I hope none will deny it The second may be thus confirmed Every one that sweareth by God shall glory but the mouth of them that speake lies shall bee stopped here is both an Antithesis betweene the wicked and those who sweare by God as also a promise made unto such h Psal 63.11 Thou shalt sweare saith Ieremiah the Lord liveth c. and thou shalt turne from thy abominations and then thou shalt not remove Ierem. 4 1 2. But most plainely the Prophet David Psal 15. propounds a double quere First Oh Lord who shall dwell in thy Tabernacle Quest 1 who shall abide in thy holy hill that is who shall be made partakers of eternall happinesse Answer He that walketh uprightly Answ and worketh righteousnesse and speaketh the truth from his heart Secondly who walketh uprightly and worketh Quest 2 righteousnesse and speaketh the truth Answer Hee that sweareth and changeth not Answ though it bee to his owne hurt VI. It further appeares that Christ condemns not all swearing because hee saith here Thou shalt not sweare by Heaven or by Earth or by Ierusalem or by thy Head but he doth not say Thou shalt not sweare by God and we allow of no other oathes And thus much for the first generall answer to the second objection that our Saviour doth not prohibit all swearing in saying Thou shalt not sweare at all Answ 2 Secondly the meaning of our Saviours words is Thou shalt not sweare at all ordinarily in thy common talke And thus Saint Iames is to be understood when he saith Sweare not neither by heaven nor by earth nor by any other oath i James 5.12 Quest 3 Why is all swearing forbidden in ordinary communication and discourse Answ 1 First because it comes from Satan vers 37. Whatsoever in our common talke is more than yea or nay comes of evill that is from that evill one the devill Answ 2 Secondly because swearing ariseth from no internall concupiscence and therefore is more inexcusable It proceedeth not from any desire of honour or pleasure or gaine or ease and idlenesse for there is none of these to be acquired by common swearing it onely proceedes from a perverse nature And therefore as he is the best Christian who loves serves and desires God for himselfe and not for any reward so he is the worst Christian who blasphemes disobeyes displeases and dishonours God for himselfe and not for any thing whereby hee may have either pleasure or profit or honour or ease for the swearer is both more wicked and more foolish then either the drunkard thiefe or adulterer because there is pleasure and profit in these but in that nothing but a corrupt and perverse disposition Answ 3 Thirdly this pollutes and profanes the Name of God the mercy of God the justice of God yea all the Attributes of the Lord to attest his presence and testimony upon every trifle brabble and sleight occasion Answ 4 Fourthly this profanes the worship of God a religious oath is a part of Gods worship as was said before therefore this customary and usuall swearing profanes this worship So prayer is a part of Gods worship but hee who at Dice shall pray God to send him a good cast profanes that worship Answ 5 Fifthly because by this usuall swearing wee defile and pollute our tongues which are given us for the glory of God David saith Hee will praise God with the best member he hath that is his tongue because it was given us by God that thereby we might laud praise magnifie and honour his holy Name now by swearing we dishonour both God and our tongues Answ 6 Sixthly because God will never hold him guiltlesse that thus prophanes his Name
of another mans labour Answ 2 Secondly thou incurrest no danger at all being sure both of usury and principall but hee stands liable to all dangers Answ 3 Thirdly thou extendest this word gaine too farre saying thy brother gaineth when hee but onely saveth as for example thou saiest if I had not lent him money his lands or lease had beene forfeited but now hee hath redeemed them this is no gaine but onely hereby hee is preserved from a losse Is it not lawfull for widowes guardians of Quest 5 orphans and those who are through weaknesse and sickenesse unable to follow any calling to put out their money unto usury Answ Truly I conceive that they may lend their money for a participation of gaine with an equall condition of hazard and losse that is if the party employing their money loose they will beare a proportionable share of his losse according to that proportion of gaine which they should have if he gaine by it This point of usury being so much controverted Quest 6 among divines some holding one thing some another where may we find a place to rest our foote upon what may we certainely thinke or know concerning it by which we may be informed All cleare and orthodoxe divines agree and accord in these things concerning usury I. Answ That wee must not take usury of any poore man II. Thou must not deny to lend to poore men what thou canst well spare neither in lending preferre the rich before the poore III. Thou must take no usury or increase of him who gaineth nothing by thy mony IV. Thou must not of any take more then the law allowes to wit eight in the hundred V. Thou must avoid all biting usury which impoverisheth and consumeth thy neighbour VI. All agree that usury is no lawfull function or calling VII That those who are rich and can live sufficiently without putting forth their money should not use it VIII That if there be an equall condition of losse as well as gaine a man may take a part of the profit IX That with tradesmen it is lawfull in regard of the forbearance of their money that is they may sell dearer if they sell for a longer time because they loose by the forbearance of their money and so if a man desire his money in bargaines before the day he who payes may justly demand an abatement according to the time These are agreed on by all and therefore those who desire to bee resolved in that which they doe let them not goe further herein VERS 43. Yee have heard that it hath beene said Vers 43 thou shalt love thy neighbour and hate thine enemie § 1. Yee have heard that it hath beene said c. Sect. 1 How do the Jewes infer this that enemies are Quest 1 to be hated The text alleadged doth directly forbid hatred Thou shalt not hate thy brother Answ but love him as thy selfe Levit. 19.17 18. And yet they from hence by the rule of contraries doe collect that because friends are to be loved therefore enemies are to be hated Wherein were they faulty by this collection Quest 2 or inference They were guilty of a double crime namely Answ First boldnesse or audaciousnesse that durst thus adde to the sacred Canon of Scripture Secondly foolishnesse and ignorance that collect 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 soloccismes for they loose the sense and meaning of the place by pressing too much the words The Law doth not say said the Scribes and Pharisees Thou shalt love all men but thou shalt love thy Brother and thy Neighbour therefore strangers and enemies we are not commanded to love And thus by their additions and corrupt expositions they would found error upon the sacred Scriptures for which our Saviour blames them in this place Quest 3 How may wee so give the sense of Scripture that we doe not deduce or collect things from thence contrary to the mind and meaning of the Holy Ghost Answ The Rules observable hereunto are either probable or certaine First if we desire so to expound the Word of God that we may not mistake the drift of the Holy Ghost wee must then observe diligently these probable Rules Rule 1 First let not the exposition be thine that is some new invention of thy owne never heard of before but an interpretation confirmed by many Rule 2 Secondly let thy exposition have the assent of the first and most ancient Church for the Church is our Mother and that exposition is much to be suspected which doth crosse the minde of the whole Primitive Church Rule 3 Thirdly if thy interpretation be assented unto by all Protestants and Professors wee may then walke the more safely and rely the better upon it Rule 4 Fourthly if our Protestant Divines differ in any point or exposition of any place then hold with that opinion which is most holy Indeed sometimes a shew of sanctitie may deceive as wee see in the Monkes and Anabaptists who would perswade men to assent unto them because their lives are so pure when for the most part both of them are like to painted sepulchers And thâ—â—efore we must not looke to the outside of holinesse in the opinionists but to the true sanctitie and puritie of the opinion and hold that which without question is most holy as for example It is questioned and disputed amongst our selves pro contra whether usury be lawfull or no here it is granted by all that it is certainly lawfull to lend gratis but it is disputable and undecided what Usury is lawfull by the Word of God for herein Divines differ and therefore the most sure and pure course will be to lend freely Secondly if we desire to open the Scriptures that the mind and meaning of the Holy Ghost may evidently appeare unto us then wee must carefully and diligently walke according to these few certaine and true Rules Rule 1 First study and reade the Scriptures without any prejudice for if once the braine bee bound it will easily pervert the sense as wee see in the Jewes who will beleeve nothing of Christ bee the place never so plaine as also in the Papists who will beleeve nothing against images or the Popes supremacie or infallibilitie or the merit of workes or invocation of Saints and the like although they be directly contrary to Scripture And therefore take heed of this resolution this I hold and this I will hold whatsoever I reade or heare to the contrary Secondly pray daily for a right and informed Rule 2 judgement lay downe thy owne opinion and sense praying heartily unto God to give thee an understanding heart Thirdly let the exposition agree with the circumstances Rule 3 of the place not adhering too much to the Letter of the Text as the Euchets did who thought men should doe nothing but pray because the Apostle saith Pray continually 1 Thess 5.17 Fourthly doe not too generally extend any Rule 4 passage of Scripture thus some expound these words our brother must
that hate you pray for them which persecute you Quest 1 Why doth our Saviour expresse or adde these particulars doth not this generall exhortation Love your enemies imply and include all these Frustrà fit per plura quod fieri potest per pauciora is not this unnecessarily to multiply words Answ This our Saviour doth for the hardnesse and senselesnesse and dulnesse of our hearts because spirituall things are difficultly aright understood except they be very plainely and clearly laid downe wee can sometimes understand generalls but are not able to inferre those particulars which are therein included Quest 2 Why are spirituall things so hard to bee understood by us Answ 1 First because they cannot be perceived without the helpe of the Holy Spirit 1 Corinthians 2.14 Answ 2 Secondly because we can easily find a knot in a rush we can find something to cavill at or to object against being in the reading and study of Scripture prompted hereunto by Satan and carnall reason who will invent some arguments against the truth of Gods sacred volume Answ 3 Thirdly because spirituall things are contrary to our natures and naturall affections wee can easi y understand those things which suite with our dispositions and are deare unto our affections but those things which are opposite unto them we cannot understand Vers 45 VERS 45. That yee may be the children of your Father which is in Heaven for he maketh his Sunne to rise on the evill and on the good and sendeth raine on the just and on the unjust Sect. 1 § 1. That ye may be the children of your Father Object Stapleton urgeth and objecteth this place to prove the merit of charitie because our Saviour commandeth us to love both our Neighbours and enemies in the former verses Vt fiamus filii patris that so we may be made the children of our heavenly Father Answ 1 First we deny that any merits of counsell or command or supererogatory workes can make us the sonnes of God Answ 2 Secondly we say that merits follow our filiation and doe not goe before it Answ 3 Thirdly the sense therefore of this place is one or both of these I. Shew thy self to be the son of God by thy love unto all Approba filiationem Calvin Beza Muscul Marlor approve thy filiation to be true by thy love unto thy enemies and by doing good unto those who doe evill unto thee II. Walke worthy of thy adoption and sonne-ship as if our blessed Saviour would say walke in your Fathers steps who doth good unto all There are here two things considerable namely First the Argument Secondly the Consequence First the Argument which our Saviour here useth is this Because ye are sons therefore c. as if hee would say The chiefest care of man is or should be that hee may bee made the sonne of God Obser Why should we principally endeavour to be Quest 1 made the children of our heavenly Father First in generall because all the promises of the Answ 1 Gospel depend upon this we cannot bee made partakers of any promise of God untill wee are his children for all the promises are made to such Secondly because adoption and filiation are Answ 2 seales of salvation we never can be assured that we shall be saved untill we are assured of our filiation Thirdly because it is the greatest dignitie in Answ 3 the world to be made the sonne of God David thought it a great honour to be an earthly Kings sonne in Law how much greater is it then to be the adopted sonne our heavenly Father which is the King of Kings and a Lord of Lords The blessed Virgin Mary was more blessed in being Gods daughter then Christs mother Fourthly because Christ onely loves those Answ 4 who are the children of God Fifthly because Christ died for this end that Answ 5 he might gather together in one the children of God that were scattered abroad Iohn 11.52 Sixthly because if we be not the children of Answ 6 God we are the children of the Divell Ioh. 8.44 Seventhly because if we be the sonnes of God Answ 7 wee shall be directed by his holy Spirit in our lives and conversations for as many as are led by the Spirit are the Sonnes of God Rom. 8.14 and contrarily Eighthly because if we be the sonnes of God Answ 8 by adoption wee shall then have communion with God and fellowship with his naturall and eternall Sonne Jesus Christ 1 Cor. 1.9 and 1 Iohn 3.2 Ninthly if we be sonnes wee are heires yea Answ 9 heires of glory if we be here adopted into the fellowship of sonnes we shall hereafter be crowned with a wreath of glory and raigne with Christ for ever and ever Reade Rom. 5.2 and 8.17 21. and Gal. 4.7 And therefore to conclude this Question If we desire 1. To bee assured that all the gracious and comfortable promises of the Gospel belong particularly unto us If 2. wee desire to be assured that we are of the number of those who shall be saved If 3. We desire to be promoted unto the greatest honour in the world If 4. Wee desire to be assured of Christs love unto us If 5. we long to be gathered by Christ into his fold If 6. We would not be the sonnes of Satan If 7. We desire the direction and conduct of the blessed Spirit If 8. We desire union and communion with God and Christ we must then labour and endevour to be made the sonnes of God We hope we are the sonnes of God and not of Quest 2 Satan but how may we be not only well perswaded but also certainely assured hereof Answ Wee may undoubtedly know whether we be the children of the most High by these signes Signe 1 First faith is a note of the sonne of God and therefore we must try whether we have faith or not Wee are the children of God by faith in Christ Iesus Gal. 3.28 And therefore if we have no faith we are strangers from God and the Covenant of grace Ephes 2.12 and 4.18 Signe 2 The next Signe is the Spirit and the testimony of the same he who is adopted into the fellowship of Sonnes is endued with the Spirit which unto his spirit testifieth the truth of his filiation Reade Rom. 8.16 and Gal. 4.6 And therefore we must examine what manner of certainty we have of our adoption I. If we have no assurance hereof we are very miserable II. If our perswasion be a lying presumption and our hope without any solid ground then our condition is much more miserable III. If our assurance be weake like a smoaking flax or bruised reede then we must labour that it may be more strengthned IV. If our assurance be strong and built upon that never-failing Rocke then wee are happy and blessed Rom. 8.38 and 2 Tim. 4.8 Signe 3 The third Signe is this if wee be the children of God we are led by the Spirit Gal. 5.25 and Rom. 8 14. wherefore we should examine
who say at once so many Pater nosters and the curiositie of the Anabaptists who will not endure that it shall be said at all are both here condemned Answ 4 Fourthly as this is a platforme or exemplarie prayer so it is also commanded Omnibus semper to all alwaies because all men in all ages must strive in their supplications to imitate this forme as we shall see further in the next question In the third answer we affirmed that the Anabaptists deny this to be a prayer which is also the opinion of the Brownists who held that the words laid downe here by our blessed Saviour in the 9 10 11 12 and 13 verses are positions or rules of direction for praying and not petitions Against this assertion we argue thus Argu. 1 An expresse Commandement neither contrarie to nature nor against reason or the analogie of faith agreeable also to the scope and tenor of the place ought to bee obeyed and literally understood But these words when thou prayest say thus Mat 6.9 and Luke 11.2 say our Father c. is such an expresse Commandement as is neither against reason nor contrary to nature or the analogie of faith but agreeable to the scope and tenor of the place Therefore it ought to be obeyed and literally understood and used as a prayer Argu. 2 Whatsoever Scripture hath in every respect the forme of a prayer is not onely matter of doctrine but hath beene used also as a prayer But this Scripture Mat. 6.9 hath in every respect the forme of a prayer Therefore it hath beene used as a prayer and is not onely matter of doctrine The Major proposition is thus proved how can we tell which are prayers and which are not but onely by their forme of petition whereby they are distinguished from Doctrines and rules proposed in another forme as Whatsoever you aske it shall be given you and the like h Mat. 7.7 and 21.22 and 1 Iohn 5.14 The Minor proposition is as evident as the Sunne as is thus shewed That Scripture which hath expresly the Petitioned and the Petitioner and the Petition hath in every respect the forme of prayer But this Scripture Mat. 6 9. hath lively laid downe in it I. the Petitioned Our Father II. the Petitioner every one of the faithfull shrowded and soulded up in those words Our and Us. III the Petition which is either deprecative against sinne sathan and temptation or supplicative both for spirituall graces and temporall blessings Therefore these words here used by our Saviour have in every respect the forme of prayer In a dutie prescribed unto all and to be used by Argu. 3 all the Holy Ghost is plaine and the Scripture so shallow that a Lambe may wade But if these very words be not to be used as a prayer but onely given us as a Rule of prayer then no Christian for 1500. yeare or there abouts did understand our Lords meaning Therefore it is very probable that it is a prayer The Brownists object Object The Apostles never used those very words in prayer Therefore these words are but positions and rules of doctrine First an expresse Commandement is warrant Answ 1 enough without any example Secondly There is no example of Baptising Answ 2 in the name of the Father Sonne and Holy Ghost yet is the Commandement of Christ sufficient warrant so to doe Compare Mat. 28.19 with Acts 10.28.19.5 Whether are we obliged and inioyned to use Quest 7 this prayer alwaies when we pray First No. Secondly it binds First Negatively alwaies for we must never use another forme that is we must pray for no other things nor otherwise then according to this forme Secondly affirmatively onely in part secundum exigentiâ—m Mus s according to our present necessities and occasions as appeares by these three particulars I. Christ himselfe did not alwaies pray this same prayer for First sometimes he gives thankes Mat. 11.25 I thanke thee O father Lord of Heaven c. Secondly sometimes hee prayes in other tearmes Mat. 26.30 Father take this cup from me II. The Apostles of Christ often pray otherwise Reade Acts 1.24 and 4.24 III. Sometimes we are in a manner constrained in our prayers to expresse our spirituall necessities which verbatim are not contained in this forme And therefore we are not affirmatively obliged alwaies to these words Thirdly I adde another answer to this question Answ 3 given by Paraeus i Pareus s Mat. That although publickly in the congregation privately at home we often in regard of our present necessities pray in other words then these in the Lords prayer yet it is very fit and convenient that we should seale up and conclude all our prayers with this forme of prayer and that for these causes I. Because thus we obey the Commandement of the Sonne of God who in this verse saith Sic orate pray thus and Luke 11.2 When thou prayest sic dicite say thus And therefore it is fit that sometimes this forme should bee used II. Because we must not doubt or question but these words prescribed by God the Sonne are very acceptable unto God the Father when they are poured forth by a pious and intelligent supplicatour For the Father doth alwayes heare the Sonne and therefore hee will be ready to heare the words of his Sonne III. Because it doth most briefly contain a perfect summe of all those things which are necessary to be prayed for and therefore whatsoever is over-slipt by us in our Petitions is supplyed by this forme wherefore it is not amisse to conclude alwaies with it And thus I conclude the generall questions concerning this prayer proceeding unto the expâ—ication of the severall petitions If any desire to know whether this Prayer may or ought to be said to the Saints let him consult with M. Fox in his Acts and Monuments where the matter is discussed pag. 1274. Sect. 3 § 3. Our Father which art in Heaven I will not consider of these words according to the order of nature but of place taking them as they lye Quest 1 Why doe wee appropriate God unto our selves calling him ours Answ That wee may pray the more confidently because if he be our father he will helpe us Quest 2 Why doe we pray in the plurall number our father not my father Answ 1 First because it is our duty to pray one for another there being no faith without this true brotherly love Gal. 6.4 Answ 2 Secondly wee pray our father for the greater increase of our confidence and assurance that we shall be heard knowing that all the faithfull pray with us and for us Vis unita fortior many hands quickly dispatch a great worke many faithfull prayers quickly pierce the clouds and ascend the heavens and come into Gods eares and never returne without a blessing And therefore great is our confidence and assurance to be heard when we know that all Gods children with us pray our father thereby praying with us and for us as
the Law is Love thy neigbour as thy selfe but he who kills himselfe loves not himselfe yea if it were lawfull for a man to kill himselfe he might argue thus I must love my neighbour as I love my selfe but I care not to kill my selfe And therefore I may murder him Secondly the Law is Thou shalt not kill It is worth observing that the Lord in the ninth Commandement saith Thou shalt not beare false witnesse against thy neighbour but here the Lord speaketh indefinitely Thou shalt not kill that is neither thy selfe nor thy neigbour Indeed it is lawfull for men to kill beasts and therefore the Law is Non hominem occides Thou shalt kill no man but hee who kills himselfe kills no other then a man therefore it is a direct breach of this Commandement 4. When thou killest thy selfe either Reason 4 First thou murdrest an innocent man and so becomes guilty of innocent blood Or Secondly thou murdrest a guilty man now this is unlawfull Suppose a man have privatly to bâ— bad or murdred his brother it is not lawfull therefore for him to goe hang himselfe because hee must neither bee his owne judge nor executioner nor deprive himselfe of the space of repentance Reason 5 5. It is a practise which cannot bee patronized by any president in Scripture that is none of the Saints or holy men who are recorded in Scripture for such have done it although they have beene subject to extraordinary great evills and miseries both in body and good name Looke upon Ioseph David Job and wee shall set them to have beene sometimes a very Map of miserie but yet they never went about that wee read of to lay violent hands upon themselves but patiently underwent and endured the crosse Saint Paul being extreamely grieved and perplexed by reason of those strong remainders of corruption which were in him cryeth out Me miserum quis liberabit Oh wretch that I am who shall deliver mee he doth not answer himselfe Ingâ—â—â—m a halter shall deliver me Indeed this practise hath presidents in Scripture and may bee patronized by the example of wicked men for wicked Soul fals upon his owne sword (q) Sam. 31.4 treacherous Achitophel hangs himselfe (r) 2 Sam. 17.20 and traiterous Iudas together with unjust Pilate murther themselves but no righteous men have done so in all the word Objection 2 If any object here the example of Sampson who pulled the house upon his owne head I answer Answer 1 First hee was a Type of Christ who was to dye for his people Answer 2 Secondly hee intended directly to kill the Philistines not himselfe although hee did foresee that his owne death must necessarily follow M. Thirdly wee have to consider the punishments allotted unto this unnaturall sinne Punishment of selfe-murther namely 1. The Athenians punished him who did attempt to murther himselfe but was by some meanes prevented with the losse of the right hand cutting it off Rhoding 2. The Ancients held that death of all others most infamous and did forbid buriall unto such by this law Qui sibi manum admoverit insepuleus jaceat Rhoding Let not him bee buried but cast into the high way like a dead dog who layeth hands upon himselfe 3. God is angry with such as a Master with his slaves who kill themselves If a man buy slaves that they may worke his worke and enrich him thereby he cannot but be exceedingly incensed if they should kill themselves and by that meanes frustrate his expectation So the Lord hath both created and redeemed us for his service and therefore hee is sore offended with him who by the shortning wilfully of his dayes defraudes him of his expectation and declines his worke 4. This sinne is greater then disobedience and therefore shall bee more severely punished He who kills himselfe in the battell is more exceedingly to be blamed then hee who denieth to fight for hee may disobey and repent as the younger sonne in the Parable who said I will not and yet afterwards went But hee that cuts the thread of his owne life can never doe service any more 5. God will reject such a soule so sent unto him Josephus being hid in a cave with fiftie â—â—re who would have killed themselves disswaded them from it by this argument If we send our soules unto God before hee call for them hee will not receive them when they come Shewing most truely that we must expect Gods time for the dissolution of our lives as good old Simeon â—â—d Lord now litheâ—â— thiâ— thy servant depart in peace Luke 2.29 the word here used is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which the Siryach renders Ianuam câ—ncurà aperis Lord now thou openest the prison dores So. S. Paul saith I desire to be dissolved Phil. 1.23 to wit of the Lord. And therefore wee should patiently endure all afflictions and temptations and trials whatsoever and avoide this monstrous selfe cruelty as we would the torments of hell § 7. And few there be that finde it Sect. 7 How are there few that walke in the strait way Question 1 when there are many in heaven Answer 1 First absolutely there are many in heaven Isa 60.4.16 * Matth. 8.11 Revel 7.9 Secondly but comparatively there are but few and thus our Saviour meanes in this place teaching us that there are but few truly pious or religious in comparison of the wicked Or Observat That there are but few who walke in the narrow and strait path of pietie in comparison of those who walke in the broad and wide way of sinne and iniquitie Read Matth. 20.16 and 22.14 and Psalm 14.3 and Isa 53.1 Rom. 9.27 How doth it appeare that there are but few who Quest 2 walke in this strait way First from divine examples wee reade of eight Answer 1 onely preserved from the deluge 1. Pet. 3.20 of two onely who came into the Land of Canaan of all those who came out of Aegypt Numb 14.30 of Lots faâ—â—ly onely in wicked Sodome Genes 19. of Elius onely in the sight of the world 1. King 19.10 Secondly this may be proved from experience Answer 2 who teacheth that there are many rebellious many ignorant many hypocriticall many halfe converted but very few truely religious vel duo vel nemo Good Christians are to bee esteemed among us as good Publicanes were in Rome where a faithfull Publicane was so rare that Sabinus for his honest managing of that office in an honourable remembrance thereof had certaine Images erected with this superscription 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to the faithfull Publican I dare not say as an Athenian said who being commanded by the Roman Embassadors vvho came to Athens to goe cal the honest men of Athens to come to the Embassadors vvent to the Tombes and bid the dead men come and being demanded the reason thereof ansvvered that the honest men of Athens vvere dead and that there vvas not one novv to be found alive This I most not say but I
King 16.3 and Ahab 21.21 and Achan Iosh 7. and Hananiah Ierem. 28.16 Secondly sometimes he cuts them off by some sudden casualtie as the Prince who was troden under foot â— King 7.17 Thus many have been taken away by some accident in their drunkennesse and duels and when they have been blaspheming and the like Thirdly sometimes God shortneth their dayes by letting them fall into some sicknesse or disease and thus often drunkards take surfeits uncleane persons impure and loathsome diseases which bring them to their end Prov. 23.29 Fourthly sometimes the Lord suffers them to be their owne executioners and to cut the thread of their owne lives And thus hee did with Iudas and Achitophel Question 6 What sinnes doth God or hath God punished with sudden or untimely death Answer These which follow to wit First Idolatrie thus hee cut off Nadab and Abihu Levitic 10.2 and Oza or Vzza 2 Sam. 6.7 Secondly Blasphemy thus two and forty children were suddeÌ„ly destroyed for blaspheming of the Lords Prophet 2 King 2.24 And a girle of twelve yeares old here in England mentioned by M. Fox For hee is a swift witnesse against such Malach. 3.5 Thirdly Treason thus Achitophel came to an untimely end 2 Samuel 17.23 and Iudas Matth. 27.5 Fourthly Persecution of the godly thus Pharaoh and Haman were taken quickly away for their malice and rage against the people of God Fiftly Perfidiousnesse unfaithfulnesse or false dealing thus Senacherib came to an untimely end And often God lâ—ts men fall into the net that themselves have laid Sixthly Lust this brought Sampson into the Philistines hands and brings many daily into filthy loathsome and incurable diseases and sudden death Seventhly Drunkennesse many have come to their end by some sudden mischance in their drunkennesse Eighthly Desperation the conscience oppressed with the burthen of sinne doth often finde out this lamentable remedie of murther as a meanes to put an end to that torture which indeed doth put but a beginning to it as wee see in Iudas Matth. 27.3.5 And thus wee have seene how this phrase of hewing downe may signify a shortning of this temporall life which wee live on earth Secondly this phrase may signifie a cutting off from Christ heavâ—n and all hope of mercy or felicity Certainly it may meane 1. A câ—â—â—ing off from all hope of heaven and salvation And 2. A câ—â—tting off from Christ as hee is offered in the word But. 3. Not a cutting off from Christ himselfe because they were never grafted into him 1 Iohn 2.19 But this coming to bee considered of in the next section I here omit it § 4. And cast into the fire Section 4 What is the meaning of these words Quest 1 By this phrase is signified eternall punishment Answer Observat and the phrase it selfe doth show the terrour of that punishment as if our Saviour would say The wicked man which beares nothing but corrupt fruit shall bee cast at length into the fire of hell which of all other tormentâ— is the greatest How doth it appeare that the Punishment prepared Quest 2 for the wicked in hell doth exceede all other tortures First it appeares by the language of the holy Answer 1 Scriptures who sometimes calleth it The fire of hell Matth. 5.22 sometimes a fire that cannot bee quenched or extinguished Matth. 3.12 sometimes an eternall fire Matth. 18.8 and 25.41 sometimes a worme that never dyes and a fire that never goes out Marke 9.43.44 Sometimâ—s the Scripture telleth us what is there that wee might the better conceive of the insufferablenesse of the torment In hell there is weeping and wayling and gnashing of teeth Matth. 13.42.50 In hell there is fire and brimstone Apoc. 19.20 In hell there is negatively no rest Revelat. 14.10 but affirmatively torments day and night Revel 20.10 Secondly it appeares by the place Hell is a place Answer 2 ordained unto torment in so much as there is no prison no dungeon like it Prisons deprive men of liberty and Dungeons of light but men may bee free from torments in them yea may â—njoy some comforts in them but hell is a place which deprives us of liberty and light which debarres us from all joy and comfort and which afflicts with torments never patiently to be endured Thirdly it is cleare from the persons that are Answer 3 there tormented who are men forsaken and rejected of GOD for ever Depart hence I know you not Oh how miserable is the condition of those poore soules whom God will not owne whom God doth not pitty but rather rejoyce and laugh at their destruction Prov. 1.24 Answer 4 Fourthly it will appeare by the executioner or hang-man the Divell who is 1. Our eternall enemy and a foe never to be reconciled 2. An enemy that excels and exceeds in envie and malice 3. A foe powerfull and able to inflict unspeakable torments 4. An enemie who hath no other comfort then this that he hath copartners in his misery And therfore he will make them as miserable as may be Answer 5 Fiftly this appeares by the absence of good In hell there is no good thing neither any thing that can affoord the least comfort For there will be neither 1. Light to comfort the eye Nor 2. A droppe of water to coole the tip of the tongue Nor 3. Any confidence or courage to support the heart Answer 6 Sixtly it appeares that the torments of hell are of all other torments the greatest by the extension thereof unto every kinde of evill For 1. There shall bee most sharpe and unsupportable tortures exercised upon the body 2. The heart shall bee wholy dejected through sorrow wholy devoted unto sorrow and wholy devoured and consumed by and with sorrow 3. The conscience shall for ever presage terrible things And therfore the torments of hell must needs be exquisite that thus are extended both to body soule and conscience Answer 7 Seventhly it evidently appeares by the conâ—â—â—â—ltie perpetuitiâ— and eternitie of hels torments which shall never have either end or ease they shall bee continuall and perpetuall sine intervallo without any intermission or interruption The Papists faine some Lady dayes to bee observed in hell when the soules play or make holy day but this is but an idle dreame for as was showed before from the Scripture there is there no rest nor ease nor cessation of torments Yea these torments shall bee eternall Semper and endured for ever and ever for neither the torments nor the tormentor nor the tormented shall ever bee consumed or ended but shall endure last for ever Semper moribundus nunquam mortuus robore vacuus sensu plenus ut quod ferre non possis semper feras in aeternum In hell men shall be ever a dying but never bee dead ever weake and voide of strength but full of sense of smart and that which they can never suffer with any patience they must ever suffer with insufferable paine Answer 8 Eightly the exquisite torments of hell appeare
thus Mercy and anger are called the two armes of God Ergo similes ex se dignoscuntur mutuò Stapleton And therefore the knowledge of the one will helpe us to the understanding of the other Now eye hath not seene nor care heard nor ever entred it into the heart of man once to imagine the joyes that God in mercy hath prepared in heaven for the righteous man 1 Corinth 2.9 And on the contrary eye hath not seene nor eare heard nor ever entred it into the heart of man once to conceive the torments that God hath in his just anger and indignation prepared in hell for the wicked and ungodly man Ninthly this appeares from the names given unto Answer 9 both sorts the Righteous are called vessels of mercy and therefore they shall bee filled full of all joy and felicity the wicked are called vessels of anger Rom. 9.22.23 and therefore they shall bee filled to the brimme with anguish and sorrow To the righteous in heaven shall bee given good measure pressed downe shaken together and running over (f) Luke 6.38 of joy and happinesse And To the wicked shall bee given in hell great measure pressed downe shaken together and running over of paine and torments And therefore of all griefes this is the greatest Tenthly the torment of hell is the consummation Answer 10 very complement of all punishments in regard whereof all other paines and sorrowes are light and easie Lastly a mortall body is not capable of such torments Answer 11 neither could possibly endure them the insufferablenesse of such paines would cause the heart of a mortall man to die within him and his very spirits to faint and faile him And therefore of all other torments this must needes bee acknowledged to bee the most extreame and excessive Wherefore let us daily so meditate thereof that wee may learne to escape and avoid them Where is hell Quest 3 Certainly Answer the Fathers did conceive that it was in the bowels of the earth yea Christ and the holy Scriptures speake of a Descent unto hell in opposition unto heaven And therefore wee may as well doubt whether heaven be above us as doubt of hels being beneath us Whether is this fire of hell a materiall fire or not Quest 4 Certainely as the joyes of heaven Answer so the paines of hell are above our apprehension and imagination but yet without doubt there is materiall fire in hell because the body which here on earth sinned is there in hell to bee tormented and punished What are these insufferable torments which Quest 5 wretched and wicked soules shall endure in hell for ever First the Monks dispute and affirme much of Answer 1 these torments which I here omit Secondly the holy Scriptures shew forth unto us Answer 2 two sorts of punishments Namely First of sense to wit sorrowes either in Body which are signified or expressed by fire V. Soule which are signified or expressed by gnashing of teeth W. Secondly of losse to wit an excluding and extruding out of heaven never to have any place or portion or inheritance therein X. V. First there is Poena sensus the punishment of sense which is first Dolor corporis the paine and anguish of the body I cannot better expresse nor more fully illustrate this torment then thus 1. Let us meditate remember the most grievous paines and tortures sicknesses the mortal body of man is subject unto whether head-ach or tooth-ach or collicke or stone or gout or whatsoever Then 2. Let us suppose all these to bee in one man at once and that in extreame manner Then 3. Remember that the least paine and torment which thou shalt suffer in thy body in hell will be greater then the greatest yea then all these And 4. Meditate upon the eternitie of these torments and remember that thy body must not bee subjâ—ct unto them onely for ten or twenty or thirtie or forty or fiftie yeares but for ever and ever world without end Secondly the next thing which here begges our most serious consideration is Dolor animae the internall paine and anguish of the soule which farre exceeds the former torments which are inflicted upon the body Here three things are to bee ruminated upon namely 1. In the beginning there is a horrible expectation of some unsupportable misery At the day of judgement the heart will presage such terrible thiâ—gs that it will crie to the mountaines and to the hills to cover it from the dreadfull face of the irefull Judge Reade Psalme 50.2 Isa 13.9 Ioel. 2.2 Abac. 3.9.10.16 For to the wicked First the face of God is terrible the poore soule sees that it is a fearefull thing to fall into his hands (g) Hebr. 10.31 because hee is a consuming fire (h) Hebr. 12 29. Secondly hence the frighted soule will crie Oh where shall J hide mee from the face of this angry God If Balthazar 's knees smote one against another when hee saw but a hand writing against him Daniel 5.6 c. How will that poore wretch tremble that sees the angry face of God frowning upon him Yea Thirdly hence hee will wring his hands and with bitter tears crie out oh how wretched and miserable am I now become that cannot appease the Lords anger nor pacifie his wrath Thus wee see the beginning is miserable let us now therefore proceed and consider whether the feare bee greater then the danger or the evill every way answerable to the feare and fearefull expectation 2. After this dreadfull presage of mourning followes nothing else but perpetuall lamentation For then continually these things will come to their remembrance to wit First all the sinnes that ever they committed in all their lives Secondly the time of grace which they neglected and lost and trifled away and the ofers of mercy which they contemned and despised Thirdly the eternitie of the misery which they have acquired for every moment the miserable soule will call this to minde Thus am I tormented and thus shall I bee tormented for ever and ever And hence comes those double clamours ve vae woe is me woe is me that ever I was borne If ever thou hast I speake here to the wicked been drowned or drenched in desperate teares wishing for nothing so much as the medicine of death to ridde thee out of thy horrid feares yea in thy desperation hast gone about to shorten thy dayes either by poyson or knife or halter or the like thinke but how great the horrour of thy conscience then was and yet how little it is in comparison of that horrour of soule and conscience which thou shalt feele in hell For First the eye of the understanding is more quicke fighted there then it is here and can more fully conceive of and apprehend the misery which is measured out and allotted unto it to suffer then now it is able And Secondly the sight thereof causeth all hope of mercy to fade and fall to the ground And therefore
Tim. 1.20 And II. Absolves sorrowfull and penitent sinners 2 Cor. 2.7 8. Thirdly by Indulgences and pardons And this comes from the Church of Rome and it came in by steps and degrees For I. These Indulgences were onely for the remitting of the penance and punishment enjoyned II. Afterwards they were given or rather sold for the remitting both of the sin and punishment in this life And III. At length these pardons were not given to some who seemed penitent but to all that would buy them yea not only as profitable for this life but as helpfull for those who are in Purgatory VERS 9. And as Iesus passed forth from thence Vers 9 he saw a man named Matthew fitting at the receit of Custome and he saith unto him Follow me And he arose and followed him § 1. And Iesus passed forth from thence Sect. 1 As Iacobs hand holds Esaus heel Observ so doth our Saviours cares and labours for as soon as the miracle is wrought and ended another work begins without any intermission and that for our example and instruction that from thence we might learn That a Christians life is a constant labour Gal. 6.10 and 2 Thess 3.13 Gal. 5.7 How doth it appear that our life is thus laborious Quest 1 First because we have Enemies alwaies so long Answ 1 as we live the Devill will tempt us the world allure us and our own hearts suggest wicked things unto us And therefore we must perpetually labour to be free from these Ephes 6.11 12. Gal. 5. â—7 Rom. 13.12 and 1 Pet. 2.11 and 5.8 Secondly it appears that our life is full of labour Answ 2 because that is the end of our vocation or thereunto are we called as is evident from these phrases following namely I. Our life is called a warfare Iob 7.1 and 1 Tim 6.12 and 2 Tim. 2.3 c. Yea II. Our life is called a Watch and we are commanded to watch so long as we live d Iob 14.14 and 1 Pet. 5.8 And III. It is called a Race or course the end whereof is death and therefore we must not stand still or sit down but run swif ly and cheerfully untill we come to our journeys end e Psal 119 32. and Cant. 1.4 1 Cor. 9.24 Quest 2 Why doth the Lord allot so much and so great labour for us in this life Answ 1 First because great is the reward and notable is the price which is prepared for all true Christians The Crown which they fight strive and run for is immortall heavenly and glorious and therefore the Lord will have some proportion though far from adequate to be betwixt the labour and the reward Reade Gal. 6.10 and Rev. 2.10 and 3.13 and 14.13 Answ 2 Secondly because the Lord girds and indues his servants with a great measure of strength and affords unto them strong help and assistance therefore he appoints unto them a great and long labour God arms his children with grace which is stronger than sin and aids them by his Spirit which is stronger than Sathan wherefore they are able to undergo a great labour and fight of temptations Gen. 32.24 and 2 Cor. 12.9 Heb. 6.10 Quest 3 May we not cast all our labour and care upon God Answ 1 First certainly this is a most dangerous perswasion that we need neither care nor endeavour nor sweat nor fight but refer and leave the care and labour of all things wholly unto God Answ 2 Secondly why hath God given us power to walk run fight and strive but onely that we might reduce this our power into act the lame man was not cured to sit still but that being healed he might arise walk work and praise God Answ 3 Thirdly if we might let the Lord alone with all the care and labour and our selves do nothing then why are those many exhortations in the holy Scriptures Certainly they are not I. That we might merit our salvation as the Papists would have it Nor II. That they might be as idle appearances or skar-crows as some unjustly calumniate us to hold But III. That they might excite us unto labour giving us hope of help and assistance from God we are commanded to labour to work out our salvation with fear and trembling Philip. 2.12 and then we shall be aided by God who works in us both the will and the deed verse 13. Answ 4 Fourthly I briefly distinguish thus viz. The event is To be expected from God if we labour and endeavour for Conanti aderit Deus Not to be cast upon or left unto God if we neglect our duty and sleep That is Let us do our endeavour and as God hath commanded and then we may leave the successe and event unto him But to leave the issue to him and to be negligent in the use of the means is to tempt his providence and as a thing altogether unwarrantable is without all hope of good successe Wherein must we labour Quest 4 Labour is two-fold viz. First internall of the heart Answ whereby we endeavour to subdue those corruptions which war against our souls And Secondly externall of the life wherby we labour both to abstain from all evil to be rich in good works and to be industrious in the outward duties of Religion § 2. He saw a man named Matthew Sect. 2 Faustus from this verse objects Object that this Gospel was not written by Saint Matthew but by some other because of Matthew it is written in the third person he seeth a man named Matthew sitting at the receit of Custome To this Augustine answers Answ that by the same Argument Faustus may aswell conclude that Saint Iohn writ not his Gospel for he thus speaketh of himself Peter turning about seeth the Disciple whom Iesus loved that is Iohn himself following and he said unto Iesus Master what shall this man do e Ioh. 21.20 21. August contr Faust lib. 19. cap. 7. Here iâ— Matthew observe two things namely First that he had two names for here he is called Matthew and Mark 2.14 and Luke 5.27 he is called Levi. Musoulus thinks that he was a Jew and from the first was named Levi and afterwards took unto himself the name of Matthew which was a heathenish name and now was better known by Matthew than by Levi. Secondly Matthew writes these things and yet neither omits nor mitigates his own blots and blemishes Whence we might learn two things namely First that the failings and errours of the Saints Observ 1 do not a whit obscure the fidelity of the sacred Scriptures that is neither Noahs drunkennesse nor Davids adultery nor Abrahams dissimulation nor Lots incest nor Peters deniall nor Pauls contention with Barnabas nor Matthews being a Publican can detract or derogate any thing from the truth of the word of God Secondly from S. Matthews humility we may Observ 2 observe That those who are truly humbled will not be ashamed to reveal and acknowledge their sins and offences 2 Cor. 11.30 Why do
practise thereof we must examine whether we have taken Christs Physicke and digested it well in our hearts or not whether we have received some new internall strength from the holy Spirit which workes a change in our lives and by which we are enabled in some measure to obey and serve God Answ 5 Fiftly examine whether thy health returne by little and little or not A sick man knows that he begins to amend by these tokens namely I. If his pains abate and are weakned II. If his strength or body increase and that he can now stand or go III. If he have a better stomacke and appetite to his meat then formerly IV. If his meat digest well with him And V. If he can be more jocund and cheerefull than formerly By these then let us examine our selves viz. First are the assaults of sin and sathan fewer and weaker than formerly they were doth not sin raign in thy mortall body this is a good sign of saving health Secondly doth thy strength of Grace encrease art thou able to walk in the waies of God yea to run the race of his Commandments and to work out the work of thy salvation with fear and trembling this is a second good sign of health Thirdly hast thou a greater desire and more hungring affection after spirituall duties than formerly doth thy heart long after Christ and thy soul delight in hearing reading meditating praying and the like certainly this is another good sign of spirituall recovery Fourthly dost thou suck some good juyce and nourishment out of all the food thou takest is thy faith still more increased by the receiving of the blessed Sacrament of the Lords Supper is thy joy increased by thy prayers unto God is thy soul daily bettered and more instructed by all thy hearing and reading undoubtedly this is an undoubted sign of health Fifthly dost thou daily increase in spirituall peace of conscience and in internall joy of the holy Ghost Rom. 14.17 then thou maist be certainly assured that Christ hath cured and healed thee for flesh and blood cannot work these things in thee Vers 13 VERS 13. But go ye and learn what that meaneth J will have mercy and not sacrifice for I am not come to call the righteous but sinners to repentance Sect. 1 § 1. Go and learn quid sit what this is The words alleaged here by our Saviour are the words of the Prophet whereby our Saviour would teach us That all doubts are to be solved by Observ and from the holy Scriptures Ioh 5.39 Esa 8.20 Mic. 6.8 Ier. 23.28 Why must all the knots of Religion be solved Quest 1 by holy writ First because of all other writings onely these Answ 1 are not subject to corruption as the Papists themselves with us confesse Secondly because these are given unto us for Answ 2 this end that we might be taught by them 2 Tim. 3.16 It is usually questioned whether the breaches of Quest 2 the first Table or of the second be greatest To this we answer Answ that if there be an equall comparison that is if the greatest breach of the first be compared with the greatest breach of the second Table then the breaches of the first will be greater than the breaches of the second but if we make not an equall comparison then the breaches of some of the second Table are greater than some of the first as in this verse the Lord saith I will have mercie and not sacrifice where the Lord doth not prefer the duties of the second Table to the Morall worship of the first Table simply for spirituâ—ll duties are more excellent than corporall duties as the spirit is more excellent than the body if a man be like to starve for hunger then it is better to feed him than to teach him but simply it is better to teach him than to feed him § 2. I came not Sect. 2 Christ by saying here Veni I came doth intimate that he was not sent for by men but came freely of his own accord as Iohn 3.19 and 10.18 Wherefore did Christ come into the world Quest First he came to be a Physician and to cure Answ 1 our souls as in the former verse Secondly he came to give spirituall and living Answ 2 bread unto us that thereby our souls might be nourished Iohn 6.51 Thirdly he came to redeem us from sin and sathan Answ 3 Luke 1.74 Fourthly he came to bring us out of darknesse Answ 5 and to give the spirituall light of saving knowledge unto us that thereby we might see the way wherein we ought to walk Mat. 4.16 Ioh. 9.39 and 12.46 Fifthly he came to be a Mediatour unto us Answ 5 and to reconcile us unto his Father whom we had offended 1 Iohn 2.1 Sixthly he came to give life unto us Iohn 10.10 Answ 6 And all these of his own free grace love and mercie without any merit yea seeking of ours § 3. To call Sect. 3 Christ in saying here that he came not to call Observ c. would have us to learn That none can be saved without his call Rom. 8.29 How doth it appear that except Christ call Quest 1 us we cannot be saved It appears thus viz. Answ First all men naturally are under sin and therfore they must be freed before they can be saved Secondly and faith is to be given before we can be saved for I. There can bee no salvation without faith And II. There can be no faith except it be given from above for it is not to be acquired by any power or strength of nature but is the gift of God Thirdly we are called unto faith Act. 15.9 And therefore exâ—ept Christ vouchsafe to call us wee cannot be saved Quest 2 Whereunto doth Christ call us Answ 1 First we are called by Christ unto his society and fellowship 1 Cor. 1.9 Answ 2 Secondly Christ cals us unto glory 1 Pet. 5.10 whence elsewhere it is called a glorious calling Answ 3 Thirdly we are called unto security safety and peace Ier. 13.11 and 1 Cor. 1.8 And hence wee are commanded to make our calling sure because if that be certain then have we cause of exceeding joy Quest 3 How may we know whether wee be called or not Answ 1 First only those are effectually called who are taught of God Esay 5.4 Iohn 6.45 Answ 2 Secondly those who are called have their hearts opened sanctified Act. 15.9 16.16 Answ 3 Thirdly those who are called are humbled with a true sight and sense of their sins Act. 2.38 Answ 4 Fourthly they who are effectually called are also changed both in heart and life 1 Tim. 1.13 And therfore we must examine our selves whether I. We be enlightned and taught by God those things that concern his glory our good And II. Whether God have opened our hearts and sanctified our affections And III. Whether we be truely contrite and broken hearted for our sins And IV. Whether we be truely and totally changed both in
the true Doctrine of the Lord and leads the sincere Ministers of the Church and the faithfull people unto all truth yea because hee dwels in those places and brests where heavenly truth raignes and beares sway but absents himselfe from all that love lyes and errours Answ 6 Sixthly sometimes hee is called Paracletus the Comforter because he sustaines the heart of the faithfull in affliction by comfort faith patience perseverance and hope of eternall glory Iohn 14. and 15. and 16. Quest 3 What are the offices operations and workes of the holy Spirit Answ They are many and respect either the Prophets or Christ or the Apostles or Ministers or the faithfull and Elect people of God First the workes of the Spirit respect the holy Prophets whom he governed inspired and taught enflaming them with the knowledge and light of the true Messiah and of things to come Thus David in Spirit called Christ Lord Mat. 22. And Zachary and Elizabeth and Simeon are taught many things by the Spirit which they foretell of Christ Luke 1. and 2. Secondly the operations of the Spirit respect Christ for he helped the conception and nativity of the Messiah The Holy Ghost shall come upon thee c. Luke 1. and Matth. 1. Before they came together Mary was found to be with child of the Holy Ghost yea the Spirit was given unto Christ by God out of measure Iohn 1. and Luke 4. Iesus being full of the Holy Ghost c. and Luke 10 He rejoyced in spirit although this may be understood of the internall motions Thirdly the operations of the Spirit respect the Apostles and Evangelists hee inspired them when they were to write the Scriptures 2 Pet. 1.19 Hee led them in the truth of their preaching and brought those things into their minds which before Christ had taught them He made them able Ministers enduing them with the gift of tongues and the power of Miracles and with all graces befitting such a calling Fourthly the works of the Spirit respect the Ministers and Ministery of the word of God for he makes them able Ministers he cals them to the work of the Ministery yea he is the Governour of the Ministery who doth conserve deliver and propagate the true Doctrine and that by means viz. the sincere Doctors of the Church whom he hath promised to direct Fifthly the operations of the Spirit respect the faithfull elect children of God for I. He regenerates them Iohn 3. Except a man be born of water and of the holy Ghost c. II. He quickens the hearts of men and doth excite and inspire spirituall motions therein III. He comforts and cheers sorrowfull souls and raiseth up those who are dejected in spirit from whence he is called the Comforter IV. He leads them the right way They shall hear a voice behinde them saying This is the way walk in it V. He excites and provokes the minde unto an ardent invocation of God teaching the faithfull to pray in the Spirit VI. He gives to the faithfull an assurance of their Adoption and Glorification Rom. 8.15 16 And therefore if we desire to be made partakers of these graces and blessings let us labour for the Spirit by faithfull fervent and frequent prayers unto God VERS 20. A bruised Reed shall he not break Vers 20 and smoaking Flax shall he not quench What is meant here by Flax Quest 1 The word in the Originall is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Answ and hath divers significations namely First sometimes it is taken generally for any threed Secondly sometimes more strictly for a linnen threed Thirdly sometimes for the string of a Harp Fourthly sometimes for a Fishers line which is made of threed Fiftly sometimes for sails Sixtly Syrus reads lucernam crepitantem non extinguet he will not quench the crackling lamp because when a lamp is ready to dye or go out it makes a creeking or crakling noise And Tremellius for linum flax puts lucernam a lamp whose match or wick is made of flax and who smokes and makes a noise as if it were ready to dye and yet this Christ will not quench Hence then observe That there is a weak Faith which yet is true Observ and although it be weak yet because it is true it shall not be rejected of Christ Psalm 103.2 How doth the truth of this appear Quest 2 It is evident from hence Answ because Faith is not created simul semel perfect at the first as Adam was but is like a man in the ordinary course of Nature who is first an imperfect birth and then an infant then a childe then a youth then a man or like a grain of Mustard-seed Mat. 13.31 33. and 1 Pet. 2.2 for Faith groweth and encreaseth unto perfection as is cleer from these places Prov. 4.18 Ephes 4.13 and 2 Pet. 3.18 and 1 Corin. 1.7 and 2 Corin. 1.7 and 10.15 and 2 Thes 1.3 Quest 3 Who are here to be reproved Answ Those who tax condemn and contemn the weak children of God Mark 9.24 Quest 4 Must we sow cushions under mens Elbows must we cry peace peace unto them 1 Thes 5.3 must we not reprove them for their weaknesse of Faith must we be blinde leaders of the blinde and not tell them of their faults Answ Extreams are here most carefully to be avoided for as we must not lull them asleep so we must not be snares unto them some sing a secure man asleep and others choke a half dead man we must neither be beds of Down unto them nor sharp Knives we must neither be soft Cushions for them to rest themselves securely on nor yet to choke them withall And therefore three degrees are to be observed namely First some utterly reject all weak ones and tax all weaknesse in Faith of hypocrisie Certainly these are either proud or cruell men Secondly some comfort and establish those who are weak saying Be quiet thou hast Faith and Grace enough and thou art good enough thou needest no more neither must thou be too righteous Eccles 7. These are soft but not safe Cushions these are fawning flatterers and not faithfull friends Thirdly some comfort and exhort saying Be of good cheer he who hath begun a good work will also finish it in you Philip. 1.6 and therefore pray that his Grace may abound in you verse 9. yea do not sit still but go forward and march on in the way of the Lord Heb. 6.1 Now this is the safest and best course for three things are to be acknowledged namely I. That the maturity of Faith doth consist in the perfection thereof Rom. 8.38 and 2 Cor. 5.6 and 2 Tim. 1.12 and Heb. 10.22 II. That doubting is not blamelesse for a wavering staggering and doubting Faith is every where taxed as Ephes 4.14 Iames 1.6 Heb. 10.23 III. That it is every mans duty perpetually to encrease and to labour to abound in Knowledge Love Faith Spirit and in all graces and vertuous qualities 2 Pet. 3.18 Rom. 15.13
his height untill he returned thither again The Romans Egyptians and the Occidentals reckoned their day from midnight to midnight The Athenians and the Hebrews accounted their day from sun-set to sun-set from whence it came to passe that the night was the beginning of the following day Secondly it was very ordinary with the Hebrews to put a part for the whole and therefore a part either of the day or night was called in their manner or form of speaking a Day to wit a naturall day consisting of four and twenty hours Thirdly when they did denote one day although that which they called a day were but the least part of a day yet they did usually pronounce or declare it by parts thus The day and the night from whence by their propriety of speech a day and a night was ordinarily called a Day and a Day by a Synechdoche was used for a part yea sometimes the least part of a day And hence the answer to the question is manifest namely When Christ was buried it was between the ninth and twelfth hour of Friday which hours were part of the first day and by the forenamed Synechdoche were called the first day and night Then from sun-set upon Friday unto sun-set upon the Sabbath or Saturday was the second day and night which were both entire Then from sun-set upon the Saturday to the next dawning of the day was part of the third day which part was called a day and a night according to the vulgar wont of the Jews whose use and custome onely is the rule of expounding many things of this nature in holy Scripture And thus Christ is said to lye three daies and three nights in the heart of the earth because he was crucified between Evenings at that time when the Paschall Lamb was killed where the Evening is reckoned for the first day and the next four and twenty hours are reckoned for the second day and he arose upon the third morning and that was the third day the morning being taken Syneedochicè for the whole day and the night following § 5. In the heart of the earth Sect. 5 The meaning of the Text is as Ionas was buried in the belly of the Fish and reputed dead for three daies and three nights so Christ remained in the state of the dead three daies and three nights VERS 41.42 Vers 41.42 The men of Niniveh shall rise in the judgement with this generation and shall condemne it because they repented at the preaching of Ionas and behold a greater then Ionas is here The Queene of the South shall rise up in the Iudgement with this generation and shall condemne it for shee came from the uttermost parts of the earth to heare the wisedome of Solomon and behold a greater then Solomon is here § 1. The men of Niniveh Sect. 1 What dissemblance 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or disparity Quest 1 was betweene the Ninivites and the Iewes First the Ninivites were strangers from the Answ 1 Common-wealth of Israel and people of God neither had received his word before this But the Iewes had received the Law from the Lord and did boast therein and yet would not heare Christ who interpreted and explained the Law unto them Secondly the Ninivites had but one Preacher of the word namely Ionas and yet they obeyed him but although God had spoken unto the Iewes by many Prophets and by Iohn Baptist yea by his owne and only Sonne Hebr. 1.2 yet they shamefully and reproachfully rejected them all Answ 3 Thirdly the Ninivites having heard but only one Sermon from Ionah the servant of the Lord repented beleeved and changed their lives But the Iewes had heard many Sermons from the Prophets in all ages and at last heard those Sermons repeated and confirmed by Christ the Lord and Master of the Prophets And this is that which our Saviour means in these words but a greater then Ionas is here And yet they would not repent and amend their lives Answ 4 Fourthly the Ninivites heard a stranger and beleeved him although he came from a Nation which they hated and envied But the Iewes despised Christ who came of the Fathers according to the flesh was no stranger but a child and free-borne amongst them Answ 5 Fiftly the Ninivites beleeved Ionas without any signe content with this that hee had come unto them for their disobedience towards God But the Iewes daily saw many signes that is Miracles wrought by Christ and yet persevered in their obstinacie as though hee had done nothing worthy of faith or for which they had reason to beleeve in him Answ 6 Sixthly none had ever fore-told the Ninivites any thing concerning Ionas and yet when hee came they beleeved and obeyed him But all the Prophets had fore-told the Iewes of Christs comming and they saw his workes sute and agree with their predictions and yet they would not beleeve him nor amend their lives Answ 7 Seventhly the Ninivites patiently suffered Ionas although he threatned the miserable destruction both of their Citie and Kingdome But the Iewes would not endure or heare or obey Christ although he preached grace and salvation unto them yea did not prescribe any hard or harsh rules of living unto them but declared remission of sinnes to every one who would repent beleeve and obey Answ 8 Eighthly Ionas was not derided and mocked by the Ninivites although hee fled when God sent him unto them But the Iewes scoffed and taunted Christ who refused not to undergoe reproach hatred persecution and death for them and their salvation Sect. 2 § 2. Shall rise up in the Iudgement Quest What is meant by these words Answ The phrase is an Hebraisme signifying thus much that the Ninivites and the Queene of the South shall stand in judgement and not fall compared with the Iewes Or shall bee justified before this generation Sect. 3 § 3. The Queene of the South c. Quest What 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or comparison is there betweene the Queene of the South and the Iewes Answ 1 First shee was a woman the weaker vessell 1 Pet. 3.7 yea a person unaccustomed to travell and yet she came to Solomon But the Iewes were men and the more worthy sexe and yet they are more slow and fluggish to heare then she was Secondly she being a Gentile came to heare Answ 2 an Hebrew But the Iewes who were Hebrewes and nourished in the Law disdained to heare Christ who was one of themselves and came of their Father Abraham according to the flesh Thirdly she came along a tedious journey unto Answ 3 King Solomon although shee her selfe were a Queene But the King of Kings himselfe comes unto the Iewes his subjects and yet they wil not entertaine or receive him Fourthly fame and report only moved her to Answ 4 come unto Solomon although oftentimes nothing is more false then fame according to the old saying Tam ficti pravique tenax quam nuntia veri Not only truth but
that it had been some Specter and therfore were frighted with the sight whence it may be demanded Why men naturally so much abhorre and fear such sights and apparitions of Spirits Quest First the reason herof is because of that diversity Answ 1 of nature which is in corporall and spiritual bodies or because of that strangenesse which is betwixt them For spirituall creatures whether good or bad are alienated from all commerce and society with men and hence from the unwontednesse or strangenesse of the sight Specterâ— trouble men which would trouble them lesse if they were more acquainted with them or accustomed to such fights Secondly spirituall creatures are more agile Answ 2 quicke strong and powerfull then are corporall and therefore men are troubled with the sight of them and affrighted with them as naturally the weaker things are afraid of the stronger VERS 31. Verse 31 And immediately Iesus stretched forth his hand and caught him and said unto him O thou of little faith wherefore didst thou doubt Concerning a small true faith divers things have bâ—en spoken heretofore I will therefore here onely propound a Question or two of faith in generall Quest 1 Wherein doth the faith of beleevers now differ from that faith which was in Adam in his innocency Answ For answer hereunto observe that the Object of that faith which is in beleevers is twofold viz. First the whole will of God revealed unto us in his word containing all Histories Commands Doctrines Threatnings Promises of what kind soever And this is called Legall faith Secondly the particular promise of remission of Sins and everlasting life by the death of Christ and this is called Evangelicall faith Now in this distinction between Legall and Evangelicall faith we must not conceive of two distinct habits of faith for it is but one gracious quality of the soule disposing it to the belief of all divine truth which for the substance of it was the same in innocent Adam with that which is in regenerate men The difference standing onely in these three things to wit First in the degrees Adams faith was perfect because his understanding was fully enlightned and his affections absolutely conformable to all holinesse We know but little and by reason of our internal weakenesse wee beleeve but weakly what we do know Secondly in the Originall in Adam faith was naturall by Creation in us it is supernaturall by the Holy Ghosts infusion Thirdly in the particular Object Adam beleeved God without reference to Christ the Mediatour we beleeve chiefly the promise of grace in Christ and all other things with some Relation to him And thus we see wherein our faith differs from Adams Quest 2 Whether is fiducia trust and assurance of the essence of justifying faith because our Saviour here blames Peters doubting Answ It is and I make it good by these three grounds namely First from the Phrase of Scripture used in this businesse Those phrases 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Iohn 1.12 and Rom. 10 14 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Romans 4.5 Acts. 16.31 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Ephes 1.12 To beleeve in or upon or into God Christ the Holy Ghost are not used as the learned know by prophane writers but onely by Ecclesiastical implying that in divine matters 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifies besides the naked acknowledgement of the Head the confidence and affiance of the heart Secondly it is cleare from that opposition which is made between faith and distrust or doubting as in this verse and Iames 1.6 and Rom. 4.20 Thirdly from that excellent place 2 Timoth. 1.12 where it is apparent that to beleeve is as much as to commit our selves to Christs trust and keeping I know saith the Apostle in whom I have beleeved or whom I have trusted and I am perswaded that he is able to keep that thing wherwith I have entrusted him or delivered up to his keeping What was that his soule unto everlasting salvation Wherefore to beleeve the Promise is with confidence and Trust to rely upon it resting our selves upon the performance of it Verse 33. Then they that were in the Ship Verse 33 came and worshipped him saying of a truth thou art the Sonne of God How many waies are men Quest or any other creatures called the Sonnes of God and how is Christ his Sonne Thomas 1 p. q. 33. ar 3 saith that The Sonne of God is five wayes used in Scripture viz. Answ First some are called the Sonnes of God Propter similitudinem vestigij tantum and thus the unreasonable creatures are called the Sonnes of God and God is called their Father Iob. 38.28 Secondly some are called the Sons of God Propter similitudinem Imaginis and thus the reasonable creatures are called the Sonnes of God as Deuter. 32. Js not he thy Father who hath created and made thee Thirdly some are called the Sonnes of God Secundum similitudinem gratiae and these are called Adopted Sonnes Fourthly some are called the Sonnes of God Secundum similitudinem gloriae according to that of the Apostle Rom. 5. We rejoyce in the hope of the glory of the Sonnes of God Fifthly some are called the Sonnes of God Secundum perfectam rationem nativitatis and thus onely Christ is the Sonne of God CHAPTER XV. Verse 1. 2 VERS 1. 2. Then came to Iesus the Scribes and Pharisees which were of Hierusalem saying Why doe thy Disciples transgresse the Tradition of the Elders for they wash not their hands when they Eate Bread Quest WHat is meant by this word Tradition This voice Tradition is equivocall Answ and hath divers significations namely First sometimes it is taken for all Doctrine whether written or not written 2 Thessal 2.15 Hold fast the Traditions which ye have been taught whether by word or our Epistle Secondly sometimes it is taken for that Doctrine which is delivered only Vivâ Voce by word of mouth as in this verse Why doe thy Disciples transgresse the Tradition of the Elders which Traditions were never written but delivered with a living voice from one to another Thirdly sometimes it is taken for the written word of God As Acts 6.14 and 1 Corinth 15.3 Fourthly by the Papists this word Tradition is taken for that Doctrine which is written but not in the holy Scriptures Fiftly the Fathers by this voyce did understand sometimes those Doctrines which were contained in the Apostolicall writings and unwritten Traditions they called that which was not Totidem verbis expresly commanded or laid down in the Scripture but yet the thing it self was extant in the Scripture and might be proved from thence And sometimes by Tradition they did understand not Doctrines but Ecclesiasticall order and Rites Scharp de sacra Script pag. 125. Verse 3. Vers 3. But he answered and said unto them Why do you also transgresse the Commandement of God by your Tradition Argu ∣ ment Against the Popish Traditions we produce this Argument from this place All Traditions among the Jews besides
By Corban thou shalt receive no profit by me This exposition is as agreeable to the scope of the place as it is to their form of swearing and plainly sheweth how the Pharisees by their Traditions transgressed the Commandment of God For God commanded saying Honour thy father and thy mother But the Scribes and Pharisees said Whosoever shall say to father or mother seeking relief By Corban thou shalt receive no profit from me he was discharged Vide Drusium de tribus sect lib. 2. cap. 17. Cui bono To what end did the Scribes and Quest 2 Pharisees teach this unjust and wicked Doctrine For the understanding hereof we must know Answ that the Priests Scribes and Pharisees being given to covetousnesse that their oblations might be the greater and better they covered over their impiety with a curtain and vail of Religion saying That it was better to offer unto God those things which were to be given to parents than to confer them upon their parents and they gave this double reason for it viz. First because God is the chief and principall Father according to that of Esaias O Lord thou art our Father But we must here remember that this is to be understood when parents do enjoyn that which is contrary to God that is if our earthly Father bid us do any thing which our heavenly Father forbids us to do then we must obey the Lord because he is our chief and principall Father but in those things which God commands we must say or think we hear the Lord say That Obedience is better than Sacrifice And therefore when the Lord commands us to releeve our parents we must do so because therein we obey our God and not say O but it is a better deed to spend that which I should expend upon my Father in sacrifice and oblations unto God for in so doing we disobey him yea we honour and please the Lord better in honouring and releeving our indigent and aged parents than in offering up any outward sacrifices Secondly the Priests confirmed this their Tenet by this reason because it would more profit and benefit their parents to offer that unto God which they should give unto them than if they should really receive it The Pharisees held that if children should say to their poor parents The gift which I have promised and will offer up unto God will benefit you more than if I should give it unto you that then they were not bound to feed them or supply their necessities l Carthus s p. 130. b. medio But we must not neglect an ordinary duty in hope of a miraculous or extraordinary successe we must not offer that up that in sacrifice which should feed our parents in expectation that they shall be fed from heaven or miraculously be sustained without meat for they stand in need of relief but not the Lord of oblations And therefore those things which ought to be administred to the necessity of poor parents should not be offered up unto God who in this case would say I require not your Sacrifices that is I never commanded that a man should take necessary food and provision from his parents to give it unto me Concerning the adorning and beautifying of Churches a question betwixt us and the Papists we affirm That the Churches of Christians and places of Prayer ought decently to be kept yea and with convenient cost and seemly beauty to be built and repaired and Church vessels with other necessary furniture to be of the best not of the worst but yet it followeth not that such immoderate and excessive cost should be bestowed upon Idols to garnish and beautifie Idolatry and poor people in the mean time to want And this we prove by this Argument from this place Argum. Our Saviour Christ here reproveth the Scribes and Pharisees because they drew the people to be good unto the Altar and to bestow largely upon them and so leave their parents helplesse And he often doth inculcate that golden saying I will have mercie and not sacrifice it being better to succour the living Temples of God which are the bodies of his poor children than to bestow superfluous cost upon dead Temples of stone Willet Symps s 485. Sect. 3 § 3. Thus have ye made the Commandment of God of none effect by your Traditions Quest 1 What did our Saviour here tax in the Scribes and Pharisees Answ Two things namely I. That they honoured and observed their Traditions more than the Commandements of God And II. That many of their Traditions were directly contrary to the Commandements of God Quest 2 Who are in both these particulars like unto the Pharisees Answ The Church of Rome For First the Commandements of that Church are much more honoured and observed than the Commandments of God for it is there taught that the Romane Church authoriseth the Holy Scriptures that is to say that the ordinances of men authorise the Commandements of God Secondly in the Romane Church they teach things absolutely contrary to the word of God For I. God saith Exod 20. Thou shalt not make the likenesse of things which are in the heavens or in the earth thou shalt not bow downe before them c. But in the Church of Rome they paint the Trinity and kneele before the Images of Saints II. God saith by his Apostle 1 Tim. 3 2.4 That a Bishop should be a husband of one wife only and that his children should be subject to him in all reverence But the Romane Church willeth that a Bishop have neither wife nor children III. God saith by his Apostle 1 Cor. 14. That it is better to speake five words in the Church in a tongue understood of the people then ten thousand in an unknowne tongue But the Papists are commanded to serve God in an unknowne tongue and to pray in latine VERS 9. But in vaine doe they worship mee Verse 9 teaching for doctrines the commandements of men Wee produce this place against the Monasticall life now used in Popery and hence prove it to be but a humane invention There is neither Precept nor President either in Old or New Testament of the Monasticall life of the recent Monkes But it is only proper unto the Lord to institute and ordaine all religions and religious kind of lives by his word Therefore that religion or religious kind of life which hath neither Precept nor President in the word is but hypocriticall and humane In vaine saith our Saviour doe they worship me teaching for doctrines the commandements of men Whence I frame this plaine and direct Argument Those who worship God by a kind of life religion and worship which was never commanded by God worship him in vaine that is worship him not at all or worship him hypocritically But the Monkes worship God by a kind of life and religious worship which was never commanded by God Therefore therein they worship him in vaine and not at all truely but altogether hypocritically
Aristotle is the instrument of sciences for Petrus differs from Petra as Dialecticus from Dialectica namely because both are 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 This reason is drawne from Augustine Tract 124. in Iohn and Basil serm de poenit and Ambrose serm 84. IV. This may further bee confirmed from Scripture as First from this very Text where wee see the Evangelist doth thus expresse the mind meaning of Christ Thou art Peter and upon this Rocke will I build my Church in which words wee see Peter clearely distinguished from the Rocke both in gender and person which were absurd if both the members were to be understood of one Peter for if so then the words should have bin thus Thou art Peter and upon thee Peter will I build my Church Now wee not being able to teach the Holy Ghost to speake must take the Scripture as spoken and meant by him Secondly that Christ founded not his Church upon Peter but upon the Rocke of his confession doth further appeare by the Text what was his confession That Iesus Christ was the Sonne of God Then this faith of Peters is the foundation of the Church which foundation Paul affirmeth to bee Christ 1 Cor. 3.11 Thirdly this may further be confirmed from these words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 my Church thou art Peter and upon this Rocke will I build my Church which words signifie the whole edifice which consists of divers parts and is called the Church whereof there are principally these two parts namely the Militant Church and the Triumphant Now there is nothing in all Christs words which may be restrained unto one part onely namely to the Militant excluding the Triumphant Now it is granted on all hands as most certaine that these two parts have but one foundation And therefore if Peter be understood by that Rocke upon which Christ promiseth to build his Church then it will follow that Peter is the foundation and head of the Triumphant Church as well as Militant and consequently the Pope which is so false that I perswade my selfe every ingenuous Papist would blush to affirme it t Cham. de Pontif. lib. 11. cap. 2. fol. 377 Fourthly this may yet further bee confirmed from this verse because Christ said not to Simon Thou shalt be Peter but thou art Peter and there fore if both these enunciations be one in signification Thou art Peter and Thou art a Rocke then it is necessary that now when Christ spake this Peter should have beene a Rocke immoveable but this is false because presently after he fell foully and dâ—nied his Master shamefully whereby he shewed that hee was not as yet so confirmed and rooted in Christ that hee could adhere unto him without any staggering which yet notwithstanding he did afterwards when he had received the Holy Spirit And therefore the Rocke did not betoken Peter because now hee was no Rocke Fifthly the Apostle Paul saith positively 1 Cor. 3. Another foundation can no man lay besides that which is laid which is Iesus Christ wee may adde hereunto the testimony of Gregory u Greg lib. 28. mor. cap. 6. Cum in sacro eloquio non fundamenta sâ—d singulari numero fundamentum dicitur nullus alius nisi ipse Dominus designatur Whensoever in the holy Scriptures wee reade of a foundation in the singular number we must understand it of Christ For if as the Apostle affirmes besides Christ there can be no other foundation of the Church then without doubt it cannot be proved by any argument that Peter is the Rocke upon which the Church is built For that upon which the Church is built Eccles 2.20 is the Churches foundation which is Christ and not Peter For Peter himselfe was built upon Christ and so also were the rest of the Apostles yea the whole Church of God Indeed Peter may be called a foundation Revelat. 21.14 because by preaching the Gospel he founded the Church in this sense the other Apostles are called foundations But grant that Peter is that Rocke which doth so sustaine the whole Church that the gates of hell cannot prevaile against it which none dare affirme that are in their right wits yet what is this to that Monarchy of Popish and Romish Bishops which all their adherents labour so much for It is one thing to sustaine a house and another to governe it by a Monarchicall command and rule Neither can the Popes by this their externall Monarchicall governement either defend any one member of the Church against the gates of hell or themselves who are swallowed up of death And therefore wee may pitty the Church of Rome whose Rocke even according to their own confession may sinke downe into hell and be overcome by it For themselves acknowledge that the Pope who is the head and foundation of the Church may be damned eternally Sixthly and lastly it appears evidently that the Rocke in this place doth signifie Christ and not Peter by the testimonie of the Popish Writers themselves First venerable Bede saith Metaphoricè Petre dictum est super hanc Petram id est salvatorem quem confessus est aedificatur Ecclesia c. Bede in Matth. 16. Christ saith Metaphorically to Peter upon this Rocke that is upon the Saviour of the world whom thou hast confessed wil I build my Church Secondly to summe them up together as our Reverend Prelate doth v Bishop Mort. pag. 276. Their learned Expositor Lyra their honest Preacher Ferus and Cardinall Hugo by Rocke expound Christ yea their common Glosse upon the Papall Decrees fixeth a Credo that is a beliefe upon it and their Cardinall Cusamus is confident in the matter and ventureth against their Notwithstanding to affirme that by the Rocke is meant Christ Thirdly some of the Iesuits themselves have neither feared nor blushed to affirme it Pererius Comment in Dan. 2. in ea verba lapis abscissus saith that Christ is that Rocke noting the place of Matth. 16. upon the which the Church is built And Salmeron Comment in Ephes disp 16. sheweth that Christ is the foundation And thus much may suffice I hope unto any indifferent Reader in answer to their first objection The Papists produce these words Thou art Peter Object 2 and upon this Rocke c. to prove that the Pope cannot erre they reason thus In this place Peter is called the Rocke and foundation of the Church and withall every one of his successors is the Rocke and foundation thereof Now the name of a Rocke doth denote constancie and solidity and an immoveable stability And therefore if the Pope erre in faith as hee is Pope hee cannot bee called the Rocke of the Church Further seeing the building that is the Church it selfe cannot fall then neither can the Pope the foundation thereof for a house and building hath its stability and firmenesse from the foundation upon which it is built First this whole Argument is taken from a Answ 1 false exposition of the place for
eternall good things and not to conferre upon Peter and his successors wordly power and pomp Secondly our Saviour in this his commission Answ 2 given to the Apostles and Ministers of the Church speaks not of externall good things but of internall namely of the righteousnesse of the heart of the expiation of the mind and of the remission and pardon of sins which things are not subject to externall power as other corporal things are And therefore it is evident that no political authority or jurisdiction is here promised to Peter or the Pope Thirdly the power of the Keyes doth consist Answ 3 in the remitting and retaining of sins as Iohn 20.22.23 Whose sins ye remit they are remitted c. And therefore no Primacy or externall power is here meant Answ 4 Fourthly the Keyes ought not to be separated from the word and therefore seeing the Preaching of the word is common to all Ministers the Keyes cannot signifie an externall power or Primacie which belongs only unto one particular person Answ 5 Fifthly the Holy Spirit is the Rector and governour of the Keyes for Christ Iohn 20. being about to give them the charge of Preaching and the power of binding loosing doth first breath upon them saying therewith Receive ye the Holy Ghost and therefore no externall and personall Primacie can be here meant Answ 6 Sixthly the use of the Keyes ought not to crosse or contradict the Holy Scriptures but ought to be agreeable and in all things according to the Holy Scrâ—ptures but these ascribe full and absolute power of all things only unto Christ Matth. 28. All power is given to me c. Therefore by the Keyes Christ did not promise any such power to Peter or his Successours Answ 7 Seventhly the power of the Keyes is not absolute or boundlesse but limited and determined and therefore the use of them depends upon the will of him who delivered them and consequently except they be administred according to the will of Christ they are not effectuall but a heady presumption That is Christ neither gave to the Pope nor Peter nor unto any Apostle or Minister absolute power to excommunicate and bind over to Sathan or to remit and pardon whomsoever they will but they must onely bind impenitent and obstinate persons and loose only penitent and obedient or otherwise they shall be punished for abusing their office and power and transgressing their charge If the studious Reader would see this enlarged by many more Arguments let him reade Aret. probl de Clavibus fol. 25. b. 26. a. Quest 2 How or when do those to whom Christ hath committed the keys abuse their judiciary power which with the Keyes is given unto them Answ 1 First the Prelates and Clergie abuse this judiciary power when they usurpe this judiciary power over persons which are not subject to their jurisdiction as if the Church should endeavour to subject resisting and withstanding Heathens to their power and discipline contrary to the practise of S. Paul 1 Corinth 5.12 Or if one particular Church to wit the Church of Rome or France should excommunicate or assume power to cast another Church as of England out of the Communion of the Catholike Church for some errour as they conceive which it holds Indeed one Church may counsel and advise another but not exercise this judiciary power over any Church though in some things faulty which is not under her jurisdiction Answ 2 Secondly this judiciary power is abused by the Prelates when they judge those unjustly which belong unto their jurisdiction that is when they do not judge them according to equity and the Law of God but out of malice or ignorance pronounce those who are Orthodox to be Heterodox and punish them for Heretikes For it often happens that they which have lawfull power to judge use that power of judging unlawfully Thus the Scribes and Pharisees excommunicate all those who confesse Christ Iohn 9 22. So the Papists punish those who are amongst themselves for Heretikes and bring them into their bloody Inquisition if they be found to read and study the Scriptures and begin to acknowledge the truth of the Gospel Thirdly this judicary power is abused by the Answ 3 Clergy when they judge men truly and that for some errours in Religion but over and above impose those punishments upon those who are so condemned for Heretikes which doe not belong unto an Ecclesiastical Court to inflict as if a man being convicted of heresie and condemned for it they should presently endeavour to spoil him both of his life and goods Now this belongs to the Civil Magistrate to inflict these punishments and not unto the Sacerdotall power and therefore it is an abuse of their authoritie to goe any farther then judgement for the execution of the Lawes is to be left to the Civill Magistrate Bishop Davenant de Iudice controv pag. 90. Some Papists Object this place to prove that Object 1 the Pope may by his dispensation dissolve the Oath of Alleagiance Christ saith whatsoever thou loosest in Earth shall be loosed in Heaven Therfore the Pope hath power to dispense with all kind of vowes and Oathes First this text is not understood of every kind Answ 1 of loosing and binding as of Oathes and vowes but of the binding of sins to the impenitent and of loosing and releasing of sins as their own interlineary Glosse expoundeth and the Scripture warranteth Iohn 20.23 Secondly absolute power is not given of binding or loosing but according to Gods will as Answ 2 Lyra expounds it Supposito debito usu clavis c. The right use of the Key being supposed God approveth it in Heaven Now it is not Gods will that lawfull Oaths should be violated but faithfully kept Psalm 15.4 He that sweareth and changeth not shall dwell in Gods house Thirdly this power of binding and loosing is Answ 3 given to all Apostles and their successors Mat. 18.18 And so Hierome confesseth as hee is cited by the ordinary glosse And therefore if this exposition were true then every Priest might dissolve reverse and dispense with Oathes Fourthly whatsoever is said to St. Peter is not Answ 4 said to the Pope unlesse he would shew himselfe to be the true successor of St. Peter both in doctrine and place in the probation of both which he failes The Papists further produce this place to warrant Object 2 the Popes practise of dispensing of pardons and selling of Indulgences affirming that the power of granting Indulgences doth rest only in the Pope as the successor of Peter to whom Christ said whatsoever you loose in earth shall be loosed in Heaven They argue thus That which was given to Peter was given also to the Pope But from this place it appeares that unto Peter was given a full power of loosing sinners both from the fault and punishment Therefore this power is also given to the Pope Cajetan opuse tract 8. Answ 1 First for a full answer of this
from the testimonie and mouth of God the Father that Christ was God as well as man yea no other then the Son of the living God verse 5. Object The Rhemists object this place for the proofe of Transubstantiation Christ say they transfigured his body marvellously in the Mount as wee reade Matth. 17.2 Therefore he is able to exhibite his body under the formes of bread and wine Answ 1 First the Argument followeth not Christ could give a glorious forme to his passible body therefore hee can take away the essentiall properties of his naturall body and yet keepe a true body still Or thus Christ could glorifie his body not yet glorified Therefore he can or will dishonour his glorious impassible body by inclosing it under the formes of bread and wine which may bee devoured of dogs and mice which is honoured and worshipped of the Angels and Saints in heaven Answ 2 Secondly the question is not so much of Christs power as of his will and therefore the Argument followes not Christ is able to doe it therefore he will Verse 3 VERS 3. And behold there appeared unto them Moses and Elias talking with him Object Many Papists yea some Popish Writers hold That soules after they are departed may returne on earth againe and appeare unto men And for the proofe of this produce this place Moses and Elias appeare unto Christ and his Apostles and talke with them Therefore soules after they are departed may returne on earth againe and appeare unto men Argu. 1 First wee grant that God is able to send soules againe into the earth but that it is his will so to doe or that it is necessary so to doe especially in the dayes and places of Christianity is neither proved by Papists nor approved by us Argu. 2 Secondly Moses and Elias appeared not to all the Apostles but onely to three neither that wee reade of did they speake to those three or perswade them to doe any thing for their honour as to build Churches in their name or teach any new Doctrine unto them which is the common practise of the Popish spirits that appeare Thirdly Moses Answ and Elias were not sent to the Apostles as popish spirits are sent to men but unto Christ himselfe onely Object Against this it is objected If it be thus then it was needlesse for the three Apostles to have beene there Christ might have gone up to Mount Tabor alone but Christ doth nothing in vaine there was some use therefore certainly of their presence It was very necessary Answ that they who should be Christs witnesses should rightly understand that both the Law and the Prophets doe beare record unto Christ that hee should die for the world and come againe in the end to raise up the bodies of the faithfull and lead them with him into heaven And for this cause God would have these two excellent Prophets seene of the Apostles Why doe these two above all the rest appeare unto Christ Quest First that by Moses who was truely dead and Answ 1 by Elias who was not dead it might be shewed that Christ is Lord and Judge both of the dead and living Secondly Moses and Elias appeare unto Christ Answ 2 for that speciall conformity which was betwixt them for Moses was the giver of the old Law and Christ of the new and Elias was a Type of Iohn Baptist the fore-runner of Christ Thirdly these two appeare for the signifying Answ 3 of the nature and perfection of Christ for as Moses was of a meeke and gentle spirit and Elias of a fiery when God was dishonoured so Christ is meeke and gentle and infinite in mercy to all penitent and beleeving sinners and soules but infinite in justice and fiery indignation against all those who are impenitent and disobedient Fourthly for the eminencie of the dignity Answ 4 and sanctity and miracles of Moses and Elias Fifthly these two appeare to shew that Answ 5 Christ came not to destroy the Law or the Prophets but to fulfill the Law and verifie the Prophets VERS 4. Then answered Peter and said unto Iesus Vers 4 Lord it is good for us to be here if thou wilt let us make here three Tabernacles one for thee and one for Moses and one for Elias § 1. Lord it is good for us to be here Sect. 1 St. Bernard applies this briefly to Religion or the true spiritual Spouse and Church of Christ It is good to be here that is in Religion and the true Church it is good yea very good to be a member of this little house and to be truly religious and that in many regards viz. First because those who live in the Church and are of the Church live more pure and holy lives then those do which are without Secondly because those who are of the Church and are truly religious sin much seldomer then doe they who are either without the pale of the Church or are irreligious in their lives for these sell themselves to worke wickednesse and that frequently but those onely sometimes through infirmity and frailty Now there are three reasons why the religious sinne seldomer then the other namely I. Because hee carefully avoids all evill occasions or occasions of evill but those who are not of the Church run into them II. Because hee carefully avoids all evill customes and labours to resist them but the other makes custome a law and is led thereby III. Because he carefully shuns the company society and conversation of wicked men but the other rusheth thereinto Thirdly it is good for a man to bee religious and a member of Christs Church because such rise from sinne more quickly they sometimes fall as was said before but they lye not long but speedily renew themselves by repentance but those who are not of Christs fold and flock lye and continue in sinne yea wallow in the puddle of iniquity not hastning at all to come out of the jaws of Sathan Fourthly it is good for a man to be in and of Christs Church because then hee wil walke more warily and circumspectly Religion is a Schoole of wisedome wherein he learnes the wisedome of God and how to direct his steps in the wayes of God Ephes 5.15 Now this wisedome whereby wee may be enabled to walk warily is acquired by these meanes and wayes namely I. It comes from God and is procured by faithfull and fervent prayer Iames 1.5 If any man lack wisedome let him aske it of God c. II. It is learnt by the reading hearing meditating and studying of the holy Scriptures Psal 119 9.105 And III. By the godly exhortation admonition advice and counsell of good men And IV. By experience which is the Mistris of things Paul would have us not to be ignorant of Sathans devices but learne his craft and policie and marke what occasions of evill he doth offer unto us what impediments hee casts in the way to hinder us from that which is good and how he watcheth his
a Councell in determining of a case after that the Pope had delivered his sentence Card. Cusan Concord Cathol lib. 2. Cap. 17. pag. 737. If the Reader would see this Pillar of Popery That the Pope is not subject to a Nationall or Generall Councell razed and pulled down and that by their own side let him reade Bishop Mort appeale lib. 4. Cap. 2. § 8. p. 451. 452. Wee affirmed before in the conclusion of the fourth Generall Question that these verses speak of private and personall suits and quarrels between man and man Now how this is clearly confirmed and the contrary Objections made by the Separatists fully confuted If the Reader would know and see let him reaâ—e Mr. Bernard against the Separatists pag. 220. 221. § 2. Take with thee one or two Sect. 2 Why must witnesses here be called First Quest that they may convince the offender of his sin if so be he be either ignorant of it or Answ 1 deny it And Secondly that hee may be left without excuse if hee offend again And Answ 2 Thirdly that they may see and know that he which hath suffered the wrong hath done what Argum. 3 became him or belonged unto him to doe Carthus s § 3. Tell the Church Sect. 3 The Separatists object here against us and what wee have said That in these words Tell the Church the word Church cannot be taken for the Iewish Synedrion or the Assembly of Authoritie among the Iewes which was then as well civill as Ecclesiasticall First the word Church in holy Scripture is not alway so strictly taken as men do now use it but is used for the assembly of good or bad Christians or Infidels met together to consult and determine of causes whether civill or Ecclesiasticall Psalme 26.5 Where the Septuagint do translate the word Assembly by the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Church So Prov. 5.4 and Acts 19.32.39.40 in which three verses the word translated Assembly is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the same which is here translated Church Secondly Beza himselfe by the word Church understandeth it as spoken here of the Iews that is the Elders assembled who exercised juâ—gement in those dayes which assembly of Iudges as here they be called the Church so in the old Testament they were called the Congregation which is all one Num. 35.12 24 25. Iosh 20.6 9. And therefore our Exposition is warrantable by the word and this objection is also of no moment against it Sect. 4 § 4. If hee refuse to heare the Church Object 1 The Papists say that Generall Councels may absolutely determine without Scripture and bind all men necessarily to the obedience of their Canons because such a Councell is a representative Church and for the proof hereof they thus urge this place Our Saviour Christ saith If hee refuse to heare the Church let him be unto thee as an Heathen-man and Publican Therefore the Church is absolutely to be obeyed in all things Bell. lib. 1. de Concil cap. 18. Answ 1 First our Saviour in this place speaketh not of the Canons and Decrees of the Church concerning faith but only prescribeth the form of Church discipline for reformation of manners and correction of sin If thy brother trespasse against thee c. verse 15. where Christ saith no more then this That Christians ought to obey the sentence of the Church in censuring of sin and not that they ought to receive new Articles of faith if imposed by the Church though contrary to Scripture Answ 2 Secondly our Saviour speaketh not of every Church absolutely but of a Church guided and ruled by his word and assembled in his name verse 20. For otherwise by the Iesuits collection Christ and his Apostles should have been as Publicans because they obeyed not the Scribes and Pharisees amongst whom the Church was at that time Object 2 The Papists further produce this place to prove that the Church cannot erre but is infallible in her judgement Christ saith If hee will not heare the Church let him be unto thee as an Heathen man and Publican but unlesse her judgement were infallible it were hard yea unequall to hold them for heathen men and Publicans which would not obey her Decrees And therefore the Church that is the Pastors of the Church Bellarm. de verbo Dei lib. 3. Cap. 5. cannot erre but is to bee heard in all things Answ 1 First it followeth not that the Church cannot erre because we are bidden to heare it for so we are commanded to obey Magistrates Rom. 13.1 and yet they may command things unlawfull and in such a case they must not be obeyed Act. 4.19 It was a Law to the Jews that in matters of weight they should repair to the Priests and doe according to that which hee should judge without declining from it Deut. 17.8 and yet the Papists will not say that Vriah and Annas and Caiphas were of infallible judgement Secondly the meaning of this place is That Answ 2 wee must obediently hear the Church and yeeld unto it not simply in all things but conditionally as long as it speaketh things agreeable to the word of God Thirdly the things properly which Christ Answ 3 here mentioneth and wherein hee biddeth us hear the Church are not determinations of faith but Church censures and admonitions wherein it is clear the true Church of Christ may sometimes decline from the right and be admonished by her children notwithstanding this threatning of Christs Thus the Jewes excommunicated him that was borne blind Iohn 9.34 and the East and West Churches censured one another about the keeping of Easter Niceph. lib. 12. Cap 33. If the Reader would see this further cleared and fully proved from some of their own side let him reade Mr. White his way to the true Church pag. 78. Epise Daven de Judice p. 100. Fourthly if the Church may erre in her censures Answ 4 as is proved in the fore-cited Authors notwithstanding these words of Christ then we leave it to the Iesuit to yeeld some sound reason or other why not as well in points of faith Fifthly the judgement of the Church whether Answ 5 in inflicting of censures or defining of opinions concerning faith or determining of differences about Religion is so farre to be regarded as it is warranted by the word For the Scripture neither here nor no where else doth say That the Prelates of the Church can never erre in judging Sixthly this place speaks of a particular Answ 6 Church for not for every offence of one brother against another is a Generall Councell to be called And therefore if there be any weight or truth in the Objection at all it proves that every particular Church hath an infallibility of judgement and cannot erre But this is more then the Papâ—sts affirm But of this more in the next objection Tarmerus in colloquio Ratisbonensi sess 13. produced this Argument to prove That the deciding determining and judging of all controversies of
them because they should hold their peace but they cryed so much the more saying Have mercy on us Oh Lord thou Sonne of David § 1. And behold two blind men sitting by the Sect. 1 way side Whether is this an Historicall or an Allegoricall Quest 1 narration Although undoubtedly it be a reall trueth Answ and was verily performed according to the words of the Evangelists yet the Fathers and some Expositors have Allegorized it What is observable in the Allegory Quest 2 First the state of man after the fall For by Answ 1 nature I. We are like these men blind in our understandings Caeti and blockishly ignorant in Spirituall things II. We like these are beggers in grace Iuxta vias being herein miserably poore deprived of all grace vertue and goodnesse and strangers from the favour of God III. We like these sit doing nothing Sedetes being dead in workes for so long as we are naturall we are dead in sinne and so long as we are dead in sinne we are as unable to worke spirituall workes well as a man corporally dead is to work corporall or naturall workes Answ 2 Secondly in the Allegoricall sense of this history we may observe the degrees of our Reparation and Renovation For I. CHRIST passeth by II. We heare the noyse III. We aske what the matter is Marke 10. IV. We then crye and begge and sue for mercy V. We have many impediments which hinder us from being heard for a time VI. Yet if we continue crying Christ will First call us And then Secondly take pitty of us And Thirdly helpe us But I passe by these Quest 3 How doth it appeare that we are blind by nature Answ It is most evident by these foure following particulars to wit First if a man should walke in a way and before him should be a deepe pit and on one side of him a rich treasure and he see neither but neglects the treasure and fals into the pit who would say but this man were certainly blind Thus we walke in the way of the world seeing neither the heavenly treasure that is reserved for the righteous nor the infernall torment which is prepared for the wicked but neglect the one and engulfe our selves into the other and therefore it is evident that we are blind Secondly who will say that he sees who is not able to discerne betweene light and darkenesse betweene gold and burning coales Thus the naturall man cannot understand spirituall things 1. Corinth 2.4 but chooseth the burning coales of this world yea even of hell neglecting the celestiall gold of life eternall Naturall men preferre the darkenesse of fables and humane traditions before the light of the word yea death before life and hell before heaven and therefore who will deny but that they are blind Thirdly the blind man knowes not whether he goes ignorant which way to turne yea often running against a wall Thus by nature being ignorant of the word and will of God we know not whether we goe we know not how to serve God aright â—or when we doe well And therefore who will deny but that great is our blindnesse Fourthly the blind often stumble and easily fall so as long as we remaine in our naturall blindnesse and ignorance we frequently fall into one sinne or other not being able to cease from sinne 2. Peter 2.14 And therefore our deeds of darkenesse and workes of the flesh doe shew that we are as blind in soules as these men in the text were in their bodies Quest 4 What must we doe to be freed from this spirituall blindnesse Answ Doe as these blind men did namely First let us acknowledge and confesse unto our God our spirituall blindnesse and how ignorant we are in divine and celestiall things Secondly let us seeke for and enquire after the Physitian of our soules who is able to open our blind eyes If it be demanded Who this is Moses the Patriarks Prophets Evangelists Apostles Confessours and Martyrs answer with one mouth that it is JESVS the Sonne of David who is the light of the world and which enlightneth every one that commeth into the world Iohn 1.9 Isa 35.5 and .61.1 Thirdly we must ingenuously confesse this Physitian as these did Iesus thou Sonne of David we must not be ashamed to confesse and acknowledge him before men who is able to deliver us both from the wrath of God and the rage of men and this our extraordinary naturall blindnesse Acts 26.18 Fourthly with blind Bartimeus we must cast away our cloakes and reject and shake off whatsoever may hinder us from comming unto Christ Hebr. 12.1 we must take up our crosses and deny our selves and follow CHRIST and wee must lay downe our pleasures and profits if they keepe us from Christ But of this something hath beene said before Chapt 5. and 7. and therefore J enlarge it no further When or about what time did this History Quest 5 fall out Jt was after Christs departure from Iericho Answ verse 29. and Marke 10.46 St. Luke 18.35 saith it was when he came Quest 6 nigh unto Iericho and therefore how may the Evangelists be reconciled First the omitting of some circumstances overthrowes Answ 1 not the substance of the History for although circumstances should varie or some should be omitted yet the summe and matter of the narration may be true Secondly it is very likely that these blind Answ 2 men cryed unto CHRIST before his going unto Iericho and although he heard them yet hee would not answer them for the tryall of their perseverance untill his returne from thence and thus thinkes Calvin And thus before Chap. 9.28 Two blind men crye after him in the way but he answers them not untill he come into the house St. Matthew saith here there were two blind Quest 7 men but according to Marke and Luke there was but one and therefore how can they be reconciled in this particular First it may be at the first there was but one Answ 1 and that another came running after him afterwards and so two were healed Or Secondly it may be there were two yea certainly Answ 2 there was and yet onely Bartimens is named either because he was better knowne or more famous or more clamorous running faster and crying louder after CHRIST then the other did Thirdly Omne majus continet in se minus Answ 3 every greater containes a lesse and therefore there is no contradiction at all amongst the Evangelists St Matthew saith there was two St. Marke and St. Luke say there was one not that there was but one onely now where there are two there is one Fourthly the holy Scriptures are not strict in Answ 4 the observing of numbers but are wont to neglect them and thus our Evangelist Chapt. 8.28 saith There were two possessed with Devils and St. Marke 5.1 and. St. Luke 8.26 say There was one Quest 8 Why did these blind men sit by the way side Answ St. Marke and St.
part after another as the words were spoken one after another But this is also contrary to the opinion of the Papists for they would have it done altogether Ninthly we may not credit this Tenet of Transsubstantiation Answ 9 because the holy Scriptures call the element bread still after the consecration 1 Cor. 10.17 and 11.26 27 28. Tenthly the judgement of the ancient Church Answ 10 doth oppose this Novelty of Transsubstantiation If the Reader would see how the Ancients expounded this phrase and how it appeares they held not this doctrine Let him reade Perkins reformed Catholike of the reall presence Pag. 196 197 198 And thus we have seene the reasons why we must not beleeve this fancie of Transsubstanâ—iation Doe any absurdities follow this doctrine Quest 22 This Tenet of Transsubstantiation doth bring along with it foure absurdities Answ namely First if the bread and wine should be turned into the body and blood of JESUS CHRIST there should be no signe in the supper and so there should be no Sacrament which cannot be without a visible signe Secondly if the bread and wine should be turned into the body and blood of Christ then the blood must needs be separated from the body which is absurd and impossible Thirdly if this doctrine of Transsubstantiation were true then it would follow that Christ should have a body infinite and by consequent he should not be true man nor truely ascended into heaven which would overthrow the principall Articles of our faith Fourthly if this opinion be true then it will follow that infidels and hypocrites comming to the Lords supper should truely participate the body and blood of Christ and so it must needs follow that God and the devill should be lodged together Many are the absurdities which follow Transsubstantiation which our adversaries wâ—pe easily off with telling us that they are not incongruities but Miracles For the proofe hereof observe That Iohan. de Combis comp Theolog. lib. 6. Cap. 14. makes nine wonders in this Sacrament viz. First that Christs body is in the Eucharist in as large a quantity as he was upon the crosse and is now in heaven and yet exceeds not the quantity of the bread Secondly that in this sacrament there be accidents without a subject Thirdly that the bread is turned into the body of Christ and yet is not the matter of the body nor resolved to nothing Fourthly that the body increaseth not by consecration of many hosts neither is diminished by often receiving Fifthly that the body of Christ is under many consecrated hosts Sixthly that when the host is divided the body of Christ is not divided but under every part thereof is whole Christ Seventhly that when the Priest holds the host in his hand the body of Christ is not felt by him nor seene but onely the formes of the bread and wine Eighthly that when the formes of bread and wine cease the body and blood of Christ ceaseth also to be there Ninthly that the accidents of bread and wine have the same effects with the bread and wine it selfe which are to nourish and to fill Antoninus part 3. Tit. 13. Cap. 6. § 16 reckons up twelve Miracles and strange ones that are in this Sacrament and he hath them from Iohan. de sancto Geminiano in sâ—rmone quodam I conclude this question thus That on this manner it shall be easie for any man to defend the most absurd opinion that is or can be if he may have liberty to answer the arguments alleadged to the contrary by wonders and miracles Object 6 But they object here that God is Almighty and therefore nothing is unpossible unto him he can doe all these things which are above rehearsed and change bread and wine into the body and blood of CHRIST Answ 1 First true it is that God is Almightie but in this and like matters we must not dispute what God can doe but what he will Answ 2 Secondly because God is Omnipotent therefore there be some things which he cannot or rather will not doe as for him to deny himselfe to lye and to make the parts of a contradiction to be both true at the same time Thirdly if God should make the very body of Answ 3 CHRIST to be in many places at once he should make it to be no body while it remaines a body and to be circumscribed in some one place and not circumscribed because it is in many places at the same time yea he should make the very body of Christ to be visible in heaven and invisible in the Sacrament And thus should he make contradictions to be true which to doe is against his nature and argues rather impotencie then power vide August de symb ad Catech. lib. 1. Cap. 1. Object 7 They object againe CHRIST hath a glorified body and therefore he may be visible in heaven and invisible in many places at once upon earth Answ 1 First this argument is vaine because CHRIST had no such body when he instituted the Supper and said these words This is my bodie Answ 2 Secondly Christs glorification doth not any way diminish the nature of a true body And therefore it is said Acts. 3.21 That the heavens should containe him untill the day of judgement when he shall visibly descend as he was seene to ascend Quest 23 Is the Eucharist of necessity to be received of all men of discretion Answ Yea it is the Sacrament of Christs flesh whereby all men must be saved Reade verse 27. of this Chapter and Iohn 6.53 and 1 Cor. 10.17 As Baptisme is sometimes compared or resembled unto a begetting so the Lords Supper is to food and therefore as food is necessary for the body so is this Sacrament of the Lords body necessary for the soule Wherefore three sorts of people are much to blame namely First those who care not at all for comming to the Lords Supper Secondly those who will never come but at Easter Thirdly those wâ—o omit and forbeare comming either I. Because they are so taken up with worldly imployments that they have no leisure to fit and prepare themselves Or II. Because they are at Law with some or have beene injured by some whom they will not forgive but rather forbeare comming to the Lords Table How oft must we receive this Sacrament Quest 24 With an ordinary continuance Answ as oft as we can conveniently Act. 2.42 and 20.7 and 1 Cor. 11.25 This Sacrament must not be once celebrated as Baptisme is but often First because we are once borne but often fed and nourished SecoÌ„dly because as often as we worthily celebrate this Supper so often we honour our Christ And hence it was that the Ancients did celebrate this Sacrament every Lords day What is inwardly signified by these Elements Quest 25 of bread and wine Our communicating in the body and blood of Christ by faith Answ For First bread signifies the body of CHRIST Iohn 6.35 55. And in this verse he tooke the bread and
this must be understood figuratively not properly that is wheresoever Christ is there is joy and comfort and happinesse but this doth not overthrow a locall heaven the Seate of glory and the Throne of CHRIST where hee dwels in regard of his Humanity and where is the greatest manifestation of the Majesty and glory of GOD. But this pleaseth not the Objecters neither who strive to evert this locall heaven Thirdly CHRIST in these words Vntill I drinke Answ 3 it new with you doth promise a communion and participation of glory and eternally felicity unto his Apostles with himselfe For although meate and drinke doe not properly suite and agree with the Kingdome of God where wee shall neither be subject to hunger nor thirst yet it is usuall with the holy Ghost in Scripture in a figurative phrase of speech to expresse the participation and communion of Spirituall graces and Celestiall glory and felicity by corporall things And hence our Saviour speakes here of a new kinde of drinking untill I drinke it new to shew that the life which they shall have in heaven with him shall not need to bee sustained and conserved by eating or drinking but shall be an immortall and incorruptible life Fourthly it is false that these words of our Saviour Answ 4 Vntill I drinke it new with you in my Fathers Kingdome were fulfilled when hee ate and dranke with his Disciples after his Resurrection and before his visible ascension For when hee was in a middle state betweene a mortall and celestiall life then the Kingdome of God was not made manifest and therefore hee saith unto MARY Touch me not because I am not as yet ascended unto my Father the meaning of which words is this that the state of his Resurrection was not perfect and in every degree compleate and absolute untill he were seated at his Fathers right hand in the Kingdome of heaven Fifthly the Apostles were not as yet entred into Answ 5 the Kingdome of God when they ate with CHRIST after his Resurrection they being still in a mortall state And therefore this speech untill I drinke it new with you was not fulfilled when CHRIST ate and dranke with them after his Resurrection Sixthly Christ before his visible Ascension was Answ 6 not in regard of his humanity in heaven but on earth as shall elsewhere be shewed And therefore noâ—withstanding this Objection this truth stands firme That the name of Heaven doth declare a certaine region not seene or perceived by this visible world but concealed from it into which Christ entring with his body doth now sit at the right hand of his Father And consequently that neither heaven nor the humanity of Christ is every where Seventhly our Saviour in these words Answ 7 I will not henceforth drinke of the fruite of the vine untill I drinke it new with you in my Fathers Kingdome doth import these two things viz. I. That henceforth he will not drinke of the fruit of the earthly vine and hereby doth intimate that this shall be his last draught For as to men ready to dye is given drinke instead of a farewell so CHRIST being now about by the death of this corporall and earthly life to be changed into an heavenly condition by this draught would as it were bid his Disciples farewell II. He implies here that he will drinke new wine with them in his Fathers Kingdome Now this particular is two manner of wayes interpreted by Expositors to wit First it may be understood of his Resurrection which was the beginning of the New Testament and the Kingdome of the father And thus Chrysostome by the Kingdome of his Father understands his Resurrection and by the new wine which therein he will drinke with his Disciples understands that corporall eating and drinking of our Saviour with his Apostles after his Resurrection mentioned Luke 24.43 For thence it is evident that he ate corporally though not for any corporall necessity but onely to confirme the certainty of his Resurrection Indeed St. Luke in the place before cited mentioneth Christs eating but not his drinking but St. Peter Acts 10.40 41. saith Him God raised up the third day and shewed him openly Not to all the people but unto witnesses chosen before of God even to us who did eate and drinke with him after he rose from the dead Now by St. Peter it appeares that Christ both ate and dranke with his Disciples after his Resurrection but whether he dranke water or wine or some other drinke that is not mentioned and therefore it were a hard taske to prove that he dranke wine But grant that this which he dranke was wine and that this was the wine which in this verse he foretold that he would drinke with his Apostles then we must understand it to be called New because he dranke it after a singular new and unwonted manner that is not in shew or appearence onely but truly and really not with a phantasticall but with a true body he both ate and dranke although he were now changed into a celestiall immortall and incorruptible estate and was free from all corruptible conditions of body And thus we see if our Saviour speakes of his corporall drinking here what is meant by Kingdome what by wine and what by new wine Secondly these words of our Saviours mentioned in this verse may be and I conceive is rather to be understood of life eternall where many comming from the East and West shall sit downe and banquet with Christ Luke 13.29 For by the Kingdome of his Father is meant that Kingdome which the Elect shall enjoy after this life in Heaven and by his drinking of new wine with them is not meant any earthly drinke for there shall be no such in heaven but some celestiall liquor that is no other thing then that joy delight mirth and eternall consolation which â—fter the period of this miserable life the faithfull shall injoy â—n the celestiall Kingdome of their heavenly Father with their Lord Christ And thus which way soever we interpret these words they make nothing for the Vbiquity of the Body of Christ This verse serveth us as another Argument to confute the Popish Transsubstantiation Argum. There remained wine still after the consecration and distribution amongst the Apostles for Christ saith here That he will drinke no more of this fruit of the vine c. Therefore there remaineth wine still in the Sacrament and consequently no body or blood of Christ For Wine and Blood cannot be both there corporally and substantially as the Papstts teach VERS 30 And When they had sung an Hymne Vers 30 they went out into the mount of Olives For the understanding of this verse observe that the Booke of the Psalmes was divided according to the time when they were sung For Some were sung every morning as Psal 22. at the morning Sacrifice And One was sung upon the Sabbath day as Psal 92. And At the Passeover they sung from Psalm 112. to verse
operations motions and gifts of the holy spirit are called Spirit c. Thirdly sometimes the regenerate part of man and the spirituall life of the regenerate and internall motions and revelations are called Spirit Answ 2 Secondly here this word Spirit is taken literally for an essence incorporeall incomprehensible and uncreated and this essence is called a Spirit for these causes to wit I. Because he is incorporeall A sight saith Christ hath not flesh and bones And thus Angels and humane soules are incorporeall also but they differ from this holy Spirit thus they are not infinite and incomprehensible essences as he is And II. Because he inspires and breathes into us the breath of spirituall life and thus the Father and the Sonne also doth give spirituall life of grace But it is by the Spirit And III. Because Spiratur he proceeds from the Father and from the Sonne Quest 3 How is this Spirit which is an incorporeall incomprehensible and uncreated essence called Sanctus holy The blessed Spirit of God is not onely called Sanctus Answ holy essentially because he is holy but in his nature and essence also Causally because he makes holy being the immediate temper of this impression of holinesse in the Creatures From this name of holy Spirit we may conclude that this blessed person is true God Object 1 Some against this affirme That the holy Spirit signifieth no other thing then that spirit of regeneration which is infused in man by God and so is as it were a creature This they would confirme from these two reasons namely Reason 1 First because this Spirit is said to pray for us Rom. 8.26 Now it is the spirit in us which prayeth for us and consequently this holy Spirit is not God To this J answer Answ 1 I. The Spirit is said to pray because he makes us to pray and so the worke it selfe seemes to come wholly and altogether from the blessed Spirit And. Answ 2 II. The Spirit also is said to cry Abba Father Gal. 4.6 not that he cryes but that we cry by him Rom. 8.15 Secondly they say the holy Spirit knowes not Reason 2 the Sonne because no man knowes the Sonne but the Father Matth. 11.27 To this we answer I. That our Saviour there excludes not the Answ 1 persons of the blessed Trinity but the creatures And II. That indeed none knowes the Sonne of Answ 2 themselves which are different from the Father in nature and essence but the holy Spirit is the same God by nature and essence though distinct in person And thus CHRIST saith That it was not his to give to sit on his Fathers right hand and on his left and else-where denies that hee knowes the time when the last day will be but both these were spoken onely in regard of his humanity And III. Jt is evidently false that the Spirit knowes Answ 3 not the Sonne For First the Spirit discernes all things 1 Cor. 2.15 And Secondly the Spirit teacheth us the knowledge of the Sonne yea all things Iohn 14. And Thirdly he is called the Spirit of the Sonne Object 2 Some againe grant that the Spirit is God but not that he is a â—istinct person from God but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Patris the vertue and power and operation of the Father and they would ground this upon those words The power of the most high That is the holy Spirit shall overshadow thee Luke 1.35 First it is not necessary that the place should be Answ 1 so interpreted and indeed the scope of the Angell in that place seemes to me to be double to wit I. That the blessed Virgin might understand the immediate worker of this great worke namely God the holy Ghost and hence he saith The holy Ghost shall come upon thee And II. That she might understand the primary Authour of this great worke and the true Parent of the child to be borne to wit God the Father and hence he saith The power of the most high shall overshadow thee Secondly although it were thus understood Answ 2 and that by the power of the Almighty were meant the holy Spirit yet it would not follow that therefore he is not a distinct person from God the Father For as although the Sonne by the word of the Father Iohn 1.1 And yet that takes not away the distinction of the person so the Spirit may be the power of the Father he proceeding partly from the Father and yet a distinct person from him as followes by and by How doth it appeare that the holy Spirit is God Quest 4 or how may it be proved First he created the world and therefore he is Answ 1 God Gen. 1 2. Iob. 33.4 And Secondly we are baptized in his name in this Answ 2 verse and therefore he is God for we are baptized onely unto God And Thirdly the Apostles were taught of God but Answ 3 it was the Spirit which taught them Luke 12 12. yea which teacheth all things Iohn 14.26 Fourthly we must pray onely unto God but in Answ 4 the Scriptures the holy Ghost is invocated therefore hee is God 2 Corinth 13 13. Answ 5 Fifthly but because Harding and Bellar. say That it cannot be proved out of Scripture that the holy Ghost is God we will produce some cleare testimonies where he is called God As I. That which the holy Spirit speakes Acts 28.25 Iehovah himselfe speakes Esa 6.8 Therefore the holy Spirit is Iehovah II. Our bodies are called the Temples of the holy Ghost 1 Cor. 6.19 and the Spirit dwelleth in us 1 Cor. 3.16 But our hearts are the Temples of God 1 Cor. 3 16. and 2 Cor. 6.16 and God dwels in us 2 Cor. 6.18 III. Ananias lyed against the holy Ghost Acts. 5.3 but he lyed not against men but God verse 4. And therefore the holy Spirit is God thus Augustine disputed contr Petil. 3.48 IV. The Father the world and the holy Spirit are one Iohn 5.7 Quest 5 How doth it appeare that this holy Spirit is a distinct person from the Father and the Sonne Answ 1 First He descended upon CHRIST in the likenesse of a dove when a voyce came from heaven from the Father This is my welbeloved Sonne c. Luke 3.22 Where there was the Father speaking from heaven the Sonne baptized upon earth and the holy Ghost descending from heaven to earth Therefore the holy Spirit is a person subsisting by himselfe and distinct from the rest Answ 2 Secondly He is called the Comforter Ioh. 14.16 and he was sent from the Father in the same place and from the Sonne Ioh. 16.7 and therefore hee differs from them both Iohn 14.26 Answ 3 Thirdly he is called the Spirit of the Father Ioh. 15.26 and the Spirit of the Sonne Gal. 4.6 Therefore he is neither the Person of the Father nor of the Sonne Answ 4 Fourthly three Persons are named Matth. 28.19 and 2 Cor. 13.13 and 1 Iohn 5.7 Object 3 But he is said to be the same with the