which the other hath not and so one or both are imperfect and so there can be but one God Mathe. Whether do we Christians worship this one true God Phila. Yes we do For we worship him that made the world by his word and doth govern it by his wisedome and preserves it by his providence whose glorious presence is far above all heavens yet hath his influence upon all things here below by his Vicegerent Nature whose power he inlargeth and restraineth at his pleasure but a more rare influx upon mans soule by qualifying of it with rare gifts of Art and Science but most divinely upon souls refined from the drossie world by the operation of his holy spirit informing the mind with divine light inspiring with good desires incouraging in good actions preventing our doing evill furthering us in doing good convincing us of sin affrighting us for it Now this God we know to be a true God because he is the same who hath been worshipped from the beginning by the wisest holiest and best knowing men yea by the Jewish Nation who had the greatest evidences to shew of this true God by his miracles oracles prophecies and promises by which the very heathen have been convinced and became their proselytes 2. Because the heathen gods have been forced to confesse him the greatest As when King Thulis of Aegypt asked Shor-apis their Oracle Suidas who was the greatest it answered God Word and Spirit This is that Trinity whom all true Christians worship in unity 3. Because we find all other gods but counterfeits of this our true God and imperfect representations of his attributes or divine properties As their Baal a lord a counterfeit of this Lord of lords Baal-Zephon of our watching Lord that neither slumbers nor sleeps So their Baal-peor a counterfeit of him who gives the power of generation Baal-zebub a representation of him that is God of Hosts and Armies of all manner of flies which for sin he sendeth to infest the nations and at his word are driven away So Baal-berith a counterfeit of our God who keepeth Covenant with his people For the Devill is but Gods ape God had sacrifice and altar so had he God had a Temple at Jerusalem he had another at Delos God would have his Altar-fire alwaies burning and Satan would have alwaies his Vestall fire glowing God had his mercy Seat so the Devill his Tripodas So Apollo counterfeits Gods wisedome mans his power in battell Diana his purity Mercury his declarative word Jupiter his thundring voice Saturn his peaceable providence Venus his love Ceres and Bacchus his plentifull provision Proserpine the spirit of Nature in the earth Neptune Gods power in the Ocean Plato Gods power even in hell All which are but lame expressions of Gods properties by some seeming shew whereof the Devill hath drawn men from the true God so that the heathens worship they know not what but we know what we worship and that salvation is from our God who is infinite almighty invisible inscrutable the only wise and good God in whom from whom and by whom are all things to whom be glory for ever Amen Mathe. Some are content to acknowledge a God and one God but yet only as one person Therefore are we bound to beleeve persons in the Godhead or not Phila. You are bound to beleeve God as he revealeth himselfe Now he hath revealed himselfe to be a divine essence subsisting in three persons that is a Unity in Trinity Mathe. I pray first unfold the terms and then prove God to be a Vnity in Trinity Phila. First for the terms you must not look to find them in Scripture yet it disalloweth them not for they express the sense of them For 1. The essence of God is expressed Exod. 3.14 in that name I am that I am for essence or being is that which is 2. Subsistence signifieth only the manner of Being as humane nature is mans essence or substance of man and his person is his manner of subsisting in that nature So 3. Unity signifieth and shewes the divine nature cannot be divided diversified nor multiplied 4. The word Trinity sheweth the manner of the divine nature subsisting which the Scriptures deliver to us of God as in the 1 of John 5.7 There be three that bear record in heaven Vbi unus ibi unitas ubi tres ibi Trinitas the Father the Word and the Holy Ghost and these three are one Where by the WORD is meant the Son who is so called also John 1.1 to signifie his divine and spirituall generation like a word expressed by the mind So 5. The word Person signifieth to us that God is in his subsistence or manner of being an intellectuall substance neither divided nor communicated nor sustained in or by any other which is the property of a person This word is found Heb. 1.3 where Christ the Word or Son of God is called the ingraven image of Gods person Mathe. How came these words into use Phila. They were formed by the Doctors of the Church for the more easie confutation of heresie by a shorter way of disputation and demonstration of this mystery of the sacred Trinity which in many words could not have been so well moulded into a form of dispute without much trouble to the memory and the understanding As in all Arts there be proper terms which include in them the sum of the science in short words and therefore we are not to stumble at termes which serve to explain or maintain holy mysteries for whatsoever is not against the truth is for it Mathe. But how prove you that God is Vnity in Trinity Phila. That God is a unity in himselfe none can doubt who beleeves that God is one and that there is but one God as is already proved And that this Godhead hath a Trinity of persons in it selfe subsisting we are to beleeve it upon Scriptures which do first intimate to us more persons in the Godhead then one as Gen. 1.1 which saith Elohim bara that is Elohim plu Bara sing if translated word for word The Lords he created to which answereth John 1.1 In the beginning was the word and the word was with God and the word was God And ver 2. All things were made by him that is the Son and yet Gen. 1.2 The spirit of God moved upon the waters so that there were three in this work i. God the Father did it by the Son through the Spirit So Gen. 1.26 God said Let us make man which argued a consultation of persons So when God appeared to Abraham in the plains of Mamre Gen. 18.1 yet it was in three persons ver 2. though Abraham speaks to them as one saying my Lord The Poets shadowed out this by three prime gods Jupiter The Poets shadowed out this by three prime gods Neptune The Poets shadowed out this by three prime gods Pluto Mathe. But may they not be more then three persons Phila. No because the
a mutual emanency one in the other and an eternall emanency one from the other for they be each in each Aug. de Trin. Christ is in the Father and the Father in him and the holy Spirit in both so they be all in each For the Son is in the bosome of the Father and the Father in the Image of the Son the holy Spirit in the breath of each and they both in his operations 3. All in each for one is possessed of the other 4. All in all the whole essence being in every person And yet 5. But one in all because all three are but one God And take heed of thinking therefore 1. That there is no God 2. That there be no persons in the God but only relations Socin Patrisp offices or dispensations For so we may count the Father to suffer not the Son for our redemption 3. That they be only like one another in substance Arri. Eunom Tritheit but not of the same substance or of an unlike substance but of one and the same substance And take heed of thinking they be three gods for there is but one God in essence though three persons in subsistence one God in being though three persons in the manner of that being Nor may you like the Mahometans acknowledge one God without persons or like the Indians denie the Son of God Mahom. Indians because then they say God must have a wife These people only understand carnall generation not spirituall and in what they know naturally therein they abuse themselves Jude ver 10. and speak evill of what they know not For they perceive not how the soule begets children namely the thoughts and words without female conjunction This high knowledge of God should teach us to admire him whom we cannot comprehend and therefore to serve him in faith fear and reverence Psal 2.11 especially in his Temple and service Psal 138. and so say with Job O Lord what I know not do thou teach me so that in thy knowledge I may find felicity We must not think this knowledge to be superfluous since it is life eternall to have it John 17.3 Mat. 16.18 and that Christ so much approved St Peter for acknowledging it I know all men cannot apprehend this alike yet if we desire that Christ would shew us the Father John 14.8 and that we may have his Spirit he will not denie it to him that asketh him especially if we lament for the losse of the excellent knowledge no doubt he will reveal so much of it to us as shall acquire eternall life Mathe. What means hath God given us to know him by Phila. Two means his Works and his Words His Works Natura naturans naturata and the book of Nature naturated by the power of God His Word is the book of Nature naturating i. of God himselfe without which revelation man cannot apprehend God at all or very darkly The reason whereof is 1. Because Adam seeking curious knowledge beyond the light which God gave him in nature he lost that light of God which by nature he had and despoiled himselfe of that image and character of God which God had impressed upon him and so fell into false conceptions of God in his generations and by himselfe into a more obscure apprehension of him in his time 2. This dark knowledge of God in man ariseth from the depravation of his affections which desires to know God sensibly as men behold Princes which cannot be in this world 1 Cor. 15. no more then flesh and blood can inherit heaven till it be mortified by death and fermented in the grave and refined at the resurrection Moses desire was exuberant to see Gods glory in visible appearance For though God was pleased to be represented by Angels in shapes of men in the Old Testament yet he hath no shape For to what will ye liken me saith God 3. Men being not read in Scriptures are oftentimes driven by some accidents in the world and change of times and strange events above or beside reason to think that either there is no God or else that God is not just Psal 37.36 Psal 73.1 2 3. Wisd 1.1 2. 4. Because we find all things fall alike to all and a naturall succession of things to be as they were alwaies so they think we are all born at adventure and all things come by nature or fortune 5. It comes by the devils craft deluding men with vanity and making them not to think of God and so bold to perpetrate horrible sins through blindnesse and hardnesse of heart whereas if they did but consider Gods waies and footsteps in Scripture in making all things and in disposing them to their severall ends and orders the rare knowledge given to man above other creatures the peace of his mind when he doth well the terrors of his conscience in doing ill the impression and stamp of Elohim upon his Magistrates whom he calleth Gods the strange vengeance following wicked men to them whom temporall Judges either do not or cannot punish Besides prodigious signs in heaven of future calamities So to see monstrous births terrible earthquakes which though they have naturall and second causes yet why they are not alwaies or oftner or not at all or in this place more then that must needs be the rule of some superiour power But yet nothing of all these leads us to the knowledge of God like the Scripture Mathe. Why so Phila. Because the Scriptures are the word of the true God of whom nothing can testifie better then his own word and truth therefore Christ saith Search the Scriptures for they testifie of me Secondly because they clearly set forth God in his nature attributes and works Mathe. How prove you the Scripture to be the Word of the true God Phila. Because it alone doth treat primarily of that God who is Trinity in Unity three persons in one Godhead and of their relations one towards another and their operations in and towards man 2. Because it is the most ancient truth as the true God is the ancient of daies Now what is most ancient and first is true Moses writings are most ancient upon which the rest of the Bible is a comment and the New Testament is a perfect complement and is therefore called grace and truth which came by Jesus Christ John 1.17 because he brought to man by the Gospell the love and favour of God and brought the truth prophesied into fact and performance But this Moses is the ancientest writer Eupolem Masius whom some call Musaeus some Trismegistus as some have thought the Aegyptian Serapis to be a monument of Joseph Sure enough he was the oldest writer of divine Revelation if not of any other He lived in the time of Cecrops King of Athens Aug. The oldest writing the Greeks have is the wars of Troy which fell out in the time of Israels Judges which was three hundred
think themselves above Ordinances They may be in higher forms of knowledge and holy experience then some other Christians but so long as they are in Christs school no doubt but there will be something to be learned Ephes 4 13. whether they be schollers or masters till we come to the measure of the stature of Christ Mathe. How do the Scriptures set forth God to us Phila. By his attributes or qualifications which both the nature of the Godhead and naturall reason will acknowledge to be in him whereby it apprehends him for God being infinite cannot be fully apprehended nor defined by us but his nature is known by way of eminence as whatsoever good I find in the creature I attribute the same to God in the highest degree 2. By way of negation and so whatsoever deficiency I find in the Creature I deny any jot of it to be in God 3. By causation because when I see the creatures I cannot conceive they made themselves but were caused by some being far above themselves and thus even naturall men are led unto God But the Scriptures set him out more clearly to us in his essence and his attributes 1. That he is an essence most highly perfect therefore called Jehovah I am that I am signifying that he is Being in himselfe of himselfe Exod. 3.14 and by himselfe and so is the principle of all beings in whom all things live move and have being and so he is justly called Essence And that this essence subsisteth in three persons Father Son and Holy Spirit who in heaven bear record to the Scriptures truth 1 John 5.7 And in regard of this plurality of persons God is called Elohim Lords 2. The Scripture sets him forth to us by divers attributes by which we have a clearer apprehension of him to our capacity which cannot in any one word apprehend his nature Now some of these we find in the creatures others not for some of them cannot be communicated to any but himselfe Mathe. Which are his incommunicable attributes and what use can we make of them Phila. The first is simplicity of essence by which we know he is uncompounded without parts matter or form 1 Tim. 1.7 The second is his infinitenesse without measure quantity Psal 145.3 or determination of time and place or quantity vertue power 3. He is eternall without beginning of time past or end in respect of time to come 4. 1 Sam. 13.23 He is immutable without alteration or corruption change or shadow of change Jer. 23.28 5. He is unmeasurable without circumscription of place without increase or decrease within and without every place 1 Kin. 8.27 Mathe. Of what use are these to us Phila. 1. If God be purely simple then we know thereby that God is but one and full of all perfection that he is true and sincere in his promises nor can deceive any from which consideration ariseth the certainty of our salvation It teacheth us also to avoid hypocrifie and embrace sincerity onenesse and singlenesse of heart and soule and to strive to be like God only without mixture of sin in our affections 2. If he be infinite then to admire his greatnesse and his goodnesse his love and his mercy and to love him infinitely for it By his eternity I have assurance of an election before the world and everlasting life after it in him who hath neither beginning nor end His immutability cals to us for unchangeablenesse in our faith hope and charity by any crosses or afflictions which are all sent from God that is immutable in his love and promises So his immensity and ubiquity ought to confirm us in his providence because he is a God not only neer but a God also afarre off and to avoid sin because we are alwaies in his sight especially hypocrisie because he is within us as wel as without us and also to fly superstitious worshipping of Saints or Angels since he himselfe is neer to all that call upon him Mathe. Which are his incommunicable attributes Phila. Those whose shadowes we find in our selves as life wisedome will and power which are to be conceived in God absolutely abstractively and essentially as that he is life it selfe wisedome freedome and power it selfe not as they are in us finitely imperfectly and mutably but they are spoke of God for our capacity sake without which terms we can understand nothing of God Mathe. Why what do we know of God hereby Phila. 1. By life we understand Gods most simple and infinite activity by which he doth please to act himselfe and all things else And this argueth him to differ transcendently from all fained gods and creatures which have their life only by his communication of life to them yet not as the eternall Son who hath life from the Father by immanency in him and by emanation from him but by participation John 5.26 John 1.4 not of himselfe but of some vertue from himselfe Therefore as God the Father hath life in himselfe so hath he given the Sonne to have life in himselfe and this life is the light of men and through the energie of the spirit quickneth all things that hath life For as God made the Sun to be the center of light naturall so he hath ordained Christ to be the center of life naturall in the creation and also the center of spirituall life in regeneration by which we come to be partakers of the divine nature and so finally of life eternally 2. By his wisdome we understand and is signified unto us that God knoweth and understandeth all things infinitely and most simply plainly and distinctly at once not successively or discoursively and therefore praescience and foreknowledge and remembrance is improperly attributed to God saving for our understanding This attribute teacheth us that all wisedome in the creature comes from God Jam. not to feare any troubles in the world raised by Satan or wicked men but resolve to endure with patience because they are permitted by the wise God for ends best known to himselfe for he knowes of them sees and smiles at the madnesse of men who like foolish children desire of their fathers knives and daggers which having got they wound others and themselves worst 3. By Gods wil is signified Gods infinite free approbation or disallowance of what he wisely knoweth to be approved or disallowed so that he neither begins to will what once he would not nor can be hindred to do what he will Now this will hath divers terms in Scripture according to the divers objects of it As 1. Truth because he willeth constantly what he willeth Rom. 3.4 So goodnesse because he is willing and propense to do good to his creature So Love because he is willing to approve what is good and to be well pleased with it So hatred because he is not willing to allow evill but is most willing to punish it because he doth detest it So his justice because
both because it is meer matter and sin of a spirituall nature which cannot taint meer passive matter then can there be no ground for imputation and so it cannot passe but by propagation Mathe. But how prove you Christs soule not immediatly created Phila. Because he was to take mans nature body and soule that both by him might be redeemed Therefore he took whole humane nature of the blessed virgin as was promised The seed of the woman shal break the serpents head and Rom. 1.3 He was made of the seed of David according to the flesh Beside if soules and so his soule were immediately created of God then Adams sin must be imputed to him as he was man as well as to us and so he should be a sinner but sin was not imputed to him but only reputed his And then if it came not by immediate creation then it came by formation in the womans seed as ours by propagation And if we understand it not thus that it was immediately formed in the first conception i. when the holy Ghost separated that part of the blessed Virgins seed for his Manhood to the soule whereof the divinity was immediatly united to the body This dilemma will trouble us namely that either his divine nature was united to a bruit body or else the body subsisted by it selfe our of the Divine nature Mathe. But if Christs humane nature were thus formed or propagated I see not yet how he can ever the more escape the taint of originall sin Phila. I suppose you beleeve that he was conceived by the holy Ghost and so the matter of his humane nature was sanctified and purged from that stain Mathe. I beleeve he was conceived by the holy Ghost yet I know not how to beleeve that that conception was sanctifying or purging away of sin from his humane nature nor his humane nature from sin but only a separation and consecration of that part of the blessed Virgins substance to that holy work and endowment of it with all graces sit thereunto For there can be no sanctification without a Mediatour and there is but one Mediator 1 Tim. 2.5 by whose blood all are cleansed from sin yea the holy Ghost cleanseth none but by his blood so that if Christs nature did need sanctification then it also needed a Mediatour and then he must be a Mediatour for himselfe which he could not be for a Mediatour is not a Mediatour of one Phila. You say true and have almost wound your selfe out of this labyrinth For indeed the holy Ghost in this conception did not cleanse Christs nature from sin but did separate that substance which was not sinfull from a sinfull person for a person only is sinfull substance is not Now Christ did not take her person but substance only leaving the accident of sin which adhereth only to a person and so though Christs nature were in Adam and so in the Virgin who was of that sinfull line yet his person was in neither for he was the eternall son of God who in that instant that the humane nature was conceived or separated by the holy Ghost from the blessed Virgin Mary did assume it into himselfe to be one person and thus his nature could never be tainted with originall sin for his humane nature before that was never a person and when it was a person it was propagated not after the ordinary and naturall way and so without sin Nay more the substance of his humane nature though it were sinfull subsisting in the blessed Virgins person yet so it could not be Christs because personality cannot be imparted but it was made his by separation from her by the holy Ghost and his own immediate assumption and so great is the mystery of Godlinesse 1 Tim. 1.16 The not conceiving this rightly made the Marcionites and Manicheans say Christ had no true body and Apollinaris to say he had no humane soule Mathe. I thank you for these solutions but yet one thing stichs namely how the soule can be said to be immortall if it be propagated Phila. Consider that mortality proceeds not from generation so much as malediction of God for Adams sin who if he had not sinned his body might have been as immortall as the soule so that the propagation of the soule doth not make it meerly mortall but the act of Gods immediate power in the production of it makes it immortall because whatsoever is so produced cannot be dissolv'd but by the same power by which it first took life though the body may because it is bred only by the power of nature beside the soule is not made of any corporall matter and therefore is not corruptible though congenerate with the body Mathe. Now being somewhat satisfied about the soule I pray tell what principles are there to lead it to felicity Phila. Some principles there be which God hath given to nature and left in nature to seek felicity but as some know what happinesse is so others make no use of those principles Mathe. I pray what is felicity Phila. Mans soveraign and chiefest good consisteth in the enjoiment of God which confers to man concurrence of all good without any contrarieties which is opposed to that misery into which he is fallen by the first mans sin namely blindnesse of mind fondnesse of affection stubbornnesse of will inclineablenesse to all evill way wardnesse from all good for which cause we are subjected to vanity corruptibilitie all miseries of body and soul temporal and eternall death and damnation Now mans felicity is an estate contrary to all these After this many learned Philosophers searched but could not find it and why Because they knew not God from whom it proceeds and is the giver of it by redeeming man from all misery and from death to life by his free grace in Christ which is life eternall and true felicity to know aright John 17.3 Mathe. What principles lead thereunto Phila. Not the principles of nature only for they teach no further than there is a felicity but not what it is which made the Philosophers in such a labyrinth about it some placing it in pleasure some in poverty Vid. Varro some in knowledge some in riches some in honours as many people doe now For as some aim at no end or mark at all but like foolish children shoot their arrowes up in the aire some aim at a bad end in which can be no happinesse some at a seeming good which is not good in it selfe some at felicity in generall but go blindly and lamely about it wanting right leading principles The principles are such therefore as God hath revealed who is in himselfe the chiefest good and therefore can best ordaine the way whereby man may enjoy him This way is set down in the holy Scriptures for which Scriptures sake the world was made that so in time that might be revealed 〈◊〉 which in God was hidden at the beginning namely that Christ should come and redeem
mankind from the wrath of God the slavery of Satan and the dominion of sin and death which rightly to know and beleeve leads to life eternall Mathe. How may one attain this knowledge Phila. By right understanding the holy Scriptures in its propositions and consequences Now the Scripture tels us that the first man sinned and so incurred the wrath of God upon himselfe and all his posterity Rom. 5. yet he so graciously promised him that the seed of the woman should break the serpents head i. ruine the policies and works of the Devill wrought in and against man Now from whence commeth this doth God intend to put up this wrong and passe it over then how can his justice be satisfied or if infinite justice must be satisfied by some suffering for that sin then who must undergo it If we look upon God as absolutely one without distinction then the offended must mediate with himselfe and so put up this offence yea the Father God must be the sufferer without any mediator Gnosticks or Patrispassiani But this cannot be for a mediator is not of one but God is one Gal. 3.20 yet infinite justice must be satisfied by an infinite person The scriptures therefore declare that in the Godhead there be three persons Father Son and holy Ghost Now though we cannot so well apprehend how the essence divine can mediate to it selfe for man yet we may conceive how one person can mediate to another and so that the Son who lay hid in the bosome of the Father before all time did consult and mediate with the Father about it We must therefore understand first That God made man as perfect as a creature rationall could be made saving only that he gave him not immutability which is a portion beyond created nature For the very Angels that stood once were yet mutable in themselves and they that stand now are not immutable in themselves though they be in their estate and the reason is they that fell chose to stand by their own naturall power without dependency upon God they that stood chose to stand by dependency upon the Archangell the Son of God the first born of every creature Colos 1.15 and of whom the whole family of heaven and earth is named Eph. 3.15 these were the elect Angels Now as they stood by love so man must be recovered by faith in him Aug. Servans hos salvens illos that is the same Archangell and Son of God Jesus Christ who is the head of men and Angels Col. 1.18 creating both but preserving them and saving us from all the bitter effects of sin and leading us to eternall selicity by grace on earth to glory in heaven This is the way to felicity first To know God Then secondly my selfe and miserable condition and thirdly The remedy in Christ Mathe. How come men to wander so much in the seeking of it Phila. The reason of it is first The sin of Adam and Eve who sought to find the chief good in that which God the chiefe good prohibited Mans soule is troubled with a vertigo ever since and running round in a maze is not able to find the right object and if any time we come neer it yet like the Sun comming to his verticall point in the tropick we turn back to the old course Some men know nothing of felicity yet they aime at something they fansie to be good for them yea at a kind of immortality as in writing building or to practise Arts or Arms or purchasing and conquering all which are but shadowes of felicity and may keep our names alive while the soule may be damn'd as the body is dead Some are worse that place their felicity in carnall delights as in cating drinking Phil. 3.19 and wantonnesse which ends commonly in bitternesse shame and death Now though that felicity is thus divorsed by mans mistakings 〈…〉 ing round in a large circumference of mans vain apprehensions yet by serious consideration it may be reduced to one centrall point for when we have wearied our selves like Noah's Dove we must return to the Ark at last for rest and safety for only in God the soule takes rest Aratus for as we are the off-spring of God Acts 17.27 28. so he is not far from any of us and we may find him by nature if we would grope after him but especially by Scripture which teacheth us to know God in Christ for none can come to the father but by him otherwise we know not felicity at all or not rightly for as no man can divide a circle till he have found the center so neither the circumference of true felicity till we fix the foot of our affection in God like one foot of a compasse And as a man may find the center of a circle though he seeth it not so may one find God in the circumference of his works though he never saw him and felicity in Christ though he never yet knew it before Mathe. The knowledge of God being mans felicity it is not amisse to prove there is a God for he that commeth to God must beleeve that God is therefore I pray you prove to me there is a God Phila. I suppose you urge not this question because you doubt it but because you would have reason to satisfie others therein Therefore that there is a God fit to be known of all men I shall prove by reason for though Scriptures be enough to prove it to us that beleeve yet not to them who beleeve not therefore reason in this point is needfull for many will not beleeve unlesse their understanding be over-powred by miracle or revelation or by some extraordinary energeticall operation of God upon the soule they will not beleeve except their reason be convinced of the truth of Scriptures that they are of God and of divine revelation otherwise he thinks that his faith is but implicit or folded up in other mens beleefe or a weak yielding to antiquity or authority of Lawes and Customes without examination of their analogy and agreement with pure and primary reason and I beleeve if pure reason were not clouded by idlenesse ignorance or wilfulnesse it would prove a more impartiall judge of truth than the Pope himselfe who beleeves the Scripture by the ground of antiquity and forceth his conclusions drawn therefrom upon mens consciences by his own authority which men being made his vassals yield to any thing for quietnesse sake though themselves have no satisfaction therein From whence it is that most Christians profession of Religion is but either forced by fear of authority or voluntarily resigned up to another mans judgement or setled upon ones obstinate wilfulnesse neither which is saving faith For though we give some assent to Scriptures at first being moved by the authority of the Church to whom we owe respect and reverence as the people of Samaria first beleeved for the womans sake John 4.42 yet at last they beleeved
were called to their Images and took cognisance of their cases and then like patrons sollicited them before the gods or spirits of the stars above whose dwelling was not with mortals as said the Chaldean Astrologers to Nebuchadnezzar Dan. 2.11 â—esiod For the soules of these men they thought to be preserved to be Tutelaries and Patrons to defend their States Cities or Countries yea their houses which spirits or daemons they called Lares or Penates Cicero de Nat. Deor. of all which we find some footing in holy Scriptures but among heathen writers many thousands Mathe. I pray shew me some instances of them Phila. First I have shewed you those before the flood and some after it Now as their languages were divided so their Colonies were collected and then dispersed themselves about the world which division of languages and dispersion to remote places occasioned divers Religions The next you find are Penates the houshold gods of Laban the Syrian Gen. 31.30 whom some think that Rachel stole that her father might not enquire of them to follow Jacob. The next you find are those that were found in Israels travels towards Canaan Numb 25.3 Israel joined himselfe to Baal Peor Psal 106.28 and did eat the offerings of the dead i. of those sacrifices that were offered to the Idols of the dead men whom the Midianites worshipped for gods The next you read of is Michals Teraphim Images set in his house to worship in the shape of a man which by the help of a spirit gave them answers Zach. 10.2 Judg. 17. The next are such as the Jewes borrowed of the heathens in their apostacy from God as Moloch Vid. Aben Ezra in Gen. 31. Levit. 18.21 Amos 5.26 whose tabernacle they took up and carried about as their Priests did the Ark of God and Chiun and Rempham and Ashteroth which were types of the Sun and Moon as was Tamuz also taken for the Sun for whose departure to the winter Tropick they foolishly wept Procopius in Esa 18. Ezek. 8.14 and at his return as wantonly rejoiced You may take them all in a summe 2 Chro. 33.3 Manasses worshipped the whole hoste of heaven i. their superiour gods and set up altars to Baalim i. their inferiour lords or Idols representative And thus you see they had gods many and lords many 1 Cor. 8.5 as you may find them reckoned up by Rabshecheth 2 Kin. 18.34 upon severall nations Rab. Jarchi in 2 Kin. 17. and more particularly in 2 Kin. 17.30 where their Idols be named and signifie birds and beasts as the Jewish Doctors say So you read of Nisroch the god of Niniveh and of Rimmon the god of Syria 2 Kin. 5.18 and in the New Testament of Diana of the Ephesians 2 Kin. 18. Macrob. Satur. lib. 1. cap. 18. Origen contra Celsum lib. 6. fol. 76. col 3. Thus their sin robbed the true God of his titles Lord and God Gen. 1.2.3 chapters and gave it to the creatures as Jehovah to Jove turning the glory of the invisible God into vain similitudes Rom. 1. Which may teach man to bewaile his wofull estate as Henoch did three hundred years the fall of Adam by whose fin his progeny is ignorant of that God with whom he was familiar so it may teach Christians to beware of Idolatry lest we apostate as the Jewes did whom God forbad all such worship by commanding them to have a God and him for that God and none but him Exod. 20.3 So Christ in his Gospell saith as much that we must have a Mediatour and him for that Mediatour and none but him And therefore to abhor papistry which sets up the old heathen Religion by teaching that Saints are to be our mediatours and their Images may be worshipped which if they be not animated by the soules of Saints they do worse then the heathen to worship them If they be yet it is but heathenish to trust to their mediation as the heathens did who by this did but prove there was a God to be worshipped but knew not who nor how And therefore as the heathens set up the images of men departed to be the protecting patriots of such Cities and Country so have the Papists set up Saints for divers places as the Lady of Lauretta instead of their Minerva and St Dunstan for Vulcan and many others Mathe. What other reason is there to prove a God Phila. There needs no other nor can there be any more demonstrative than practise from natures principles among all men of all nations in all ages who beleeving there was one but could not find him did adore the creature for him and lest they should misse him they multiplied their gods as the stars of heaven and the species of things in the earth and yet doubting whether they had him or no they would make use of other mens gods as well as their own Gen. 31.53 The God of Abraham and the God of Nahor be witnesse So Jonah 1.5 The mariners cried to their God and Jonah was roused to call upon his God So the heathens were wont to close their praiers thus All ye gods and goddesses Ser. in Georg. Giraldus Syntag 17. Theophylact in act 17. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Lucian in Philop. Herodot lib. 8. help us And the Arabians built Altars to the unknown God and so did the Athenians Act. 17.23 From whence the Countries adjacent to it swore by him that was unknown at Athens Beside though God allowed no such worship yet he suffered avenging Angels to punish Atheists as they that neglected the oblation made to Geryon were struck with some disease as saith Diodor Siculus lib. 5. Lucian who barked against Christ was devoured by dogs So one Artabanus a Persian Generall contemming Neptune was drowned by an inundation with a great part of his army These things God suffers to shew that though he love no false gods yet he likes not that they who have no Religion should contemn any Religion But another reason that proveth there is a God is this because all things in nature are bounded in place and operation beyond which they cannot passe be their apperites never so large as the Sun though it soften wax it cannot soften clay because it is limited by the nature of the subjection which it worketh Indeed one thing is bounded to another Prosp lib. de provid p. 181. from the center to the highest heavens 2 Esdras 4.14 15. Therefore there must be some principle who set these bounds or else all nature by vastnesse of desire would be in an uprore and confusion one thing striving to exceed another Claudian in 4 Consul Honorii 186. Arist lib. 1. de anima c. 2. top 1. p. 786. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Arist lib. de mundo top 2. top 2. p. 1572. And therefore Anaxagoras said there was a thing called a Mind which infinite Spirit gives limits to all things in the world this name he gave to God
do nor at all contradict themselves but sometimes things are omitted for mystery sake as Moses a most accurate describer of Genealogies leaves out the Father and Mother of Melchisedeck that he might be a type of Christ to Abraham and all others For Christ considered simply as God had no mother and simply as man he had no father not that Melchisedeck had no generation though not in the Genealogy Heb. 7.3 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Vid Arab. caten c. 31. fol. 67 c. 30. fol. 66. at a. For we may find in some Eastern writings that he was the son of Heraclim the son of Phaleg the son of Eber. So sometime that is set before which is done afterward to stir up our diligence to search as 1 Sam. 16.21 Saul entertaineth David and loveth him and chap. 17.55 Saul enquireth whose son he is So there is great difference between Moses Genealogy from Shem to Abraham and of Lukes from Abraham to Shem in which we find two Nachors Gen. 11. and two Canaans Luke 2.34 c. So Heber to be the son of Nachor whom Moses sets down for the son of Selah which differences may be reconciled by comparing the Hebrewes account with the Grecists or Greek Jewes who very likely have made the mistake So by the Genealogy of Matthew Jacob is Josephs father and by St Luke Heli is his father but Iacob was his naturall father and Heli his father in law Mat. 1. Luke 2. by having Mary to his wife The doctrine of Scriptures also seems to vary but doth not and is reconciled by distinguishing as St Paul saith faith only justifieth and St Iames saith works justifie that is faith only justifieth by applying Christs merits to the soul but faith alone justifieth no mans christian profession but that is justified by works in the sight of men and faith it selfe is also approved by them These differences do vindicate the Scripture from any politike or crafty design that the authors had to impose upon men a sounder beleefe by continuing all circumstances most precisely without any appearing difference 3. R. Moses B. Maimon As for any diversities of readings in the Text and Margent of the Old Testament there be waies and books of directions enough to reconcile them the marginall notes being put down by the members of their great Synagogue Manasseh B. Israel his Conciliator vet Testam R. Isaac Jacob and Elias Levits a modern Jew who made the consignment of the Canonicall books such as was Daniel Ezra Haggai Zacharie and Malachi and that not because the Text was doubtfull but for some mystery Mathe. But we find divers books rejected by some Churches Phila. If they rejected them upon reason no doubt other Churches found as great reason to receive and hold them and I know not why one reason should not prevaile with you to hold them as well as the other to doubt of them I know Ecclesiastes is condemned by some as a book maintaining Epicurisme but it is rather Solomons recantations in the beginning crying down all for vanity and in the end concluding the summe of mans duty Others takes the Canticles for a love-ditty made to Pharaohs daughter but many of the expressions of it are not competible with womanhood nor beauty Cant. 7.4 It is rather a spirituall song full of Antiphona's and Responsories betwixt Christ and his and his Church Rab. Abr. Aben Ezra in cant cap. 1. The Jewes that best knew their own Canon say that it is abominable to think that this book treateth of venereall matters Indeed it is the rarest and most excellent not only of many which Solomon made to whit as some say 1005. but also the best of any other in sacred writ because it containeth in it doctrin of all sorts Porphyr So some say the Prophecy of Daniel is but an history written after the things there written were done namely in the time of Antiochus but indeed the book was delivered to King Alexander by Iaddus the high Priest 150. years before that time Others refuse the Epistle to the Hebrewes because it hath not the name of the author set to it They may as well reject the Book of Iudges and Ruth But this Epistle was alwaies received in the Greek Church as for the Latine Church it makes too bold with Scripture to put in or to dash out of it at her pleasure So some have questioned the Epistle of St Iames and Peters second Epistle and Iohns third Epistle yet upon debate they have been received and therefore now the lesse to be doubted Mathe. But some regard Scripture not to be the word of God the more for the Canon John 1.1 1 John 1.1 John 6.63 For they say the Word of God is God himselfe and that Christ the Son of God is the Word and that Gods word is Spirit and life not the letter for the letter killeth Phila. You may easily answer these thus Ask them from whence have they these arguments against the written Word but in the written Word If they allow not the written Word from whence they have these to be the word of God their arguments against the written Word are nothing If they do allow it so to be then they make God to fight against himselfe We know that a word of God there is that may be called himself As 1. The Word essentiall in the divine mind Genesis 1. as when God said i. the Trinity said or determined Let us make man This word cannot be any thing but God nor divided from God no more then thoughts can be from our minds 2. Hence is the Word personall and so Christ is the word begotten before all worlds by whom the world and all things were made and he is called God 3. Hence is the Word prophorical or enuntiative which God giveth by his spirit divers waies to men as by visions dreams inspiration and by an audible voice this is not called properly God though the fountain of it the holy Spirit be God The first of these words is immanent and consultative The second is emanent and generative The third is proceedent and communicative and therefore communicates Gods will declaratively to certaine men who spake and wrote as they were inspired by that divine spirit whose writing the Scripture is and is as improperly called God as God may be called the Bible The fourth is the word operative or efficacious Gods spirituall benediction of it to us But these men must pretend to some hidden way to make the world wonder a while and at last to smile at their simplicity who are not content to hear God speake in his word but must turn the word into God himselfe and so make him or it a kind of Idoll Mathe. But men doubt it because their translations are differing Phila. Either the Scriptures must be translated or else are never like to be known to the world abroad 2. They must be translated as every language will
election Psal 42.11 and for assurance leave it to God to give it thee as a comfort and crown of all thy labors as he did to Henoch before he was translated Heb. 11.5 So when thou hast endured the staggerings of David the sufferings of Job and the buffetings of Paul then God will tell thee his grace is sufficient for thee Let others boast they have it do thou use all diligence for it and let patience have its perfect work James that when you have done all you may find it at last 3. Do not dispute with God why he would not elect these but those but rest in St Pauls rule Prosp de vocal Rom. 9. that God was willing this way to reveal his goodnesse and justice If God hath ordained any to life it was graciously if any to punishment it was judicially and what you cannot comprehend do not reprehend lest God reprove thee as Job 38.2 But know God is just in all his waies and holy in all his workes 4. Labour to answer the temptations that arise from predestination and reprobation 1. From predestination as thus I am elected then I may live dissolutely and despise ordinances as being above them Not so for God did insure Ezekiah fifteen years of life will he therefore not eat or be carelesse of himselfe God forbid So neither must we for then election is not a decree absolute but dissolute 2. From the conceit of thy reprobation thou shalt be abetted in that conceit thus It is true thou art called but many are called which were never chosen thou canst not prove thy selfe to be one of the few yes if I come in at the call for I dare not think that God will deceive me by inviting me to bread and giving me a stone or giving me a stomack and means to starve me Beside I am bound upon my allegiance to God to beleeve that if he hath called me then he hath elected me till for my offending him or to try me he withdrawes the comfort thereof from me by making me to suspect my selfe by examining me how I came in not having on a wedding garment 2. Another temptation may arise in thy heart saying God by his revealed will would have all men to be saved but by his concealed will many are reprobated Now consider therefore God hath not two wils but in his word he expresseth his well wishing to all that they may be saved but foreseeing they will not all be saved he positively determines that all shall not be damned and therefore resolveth to give the Antidote of his saving grace to some without preventing any of sufficient means to be saved though he give them not the same efficacy to the means to draw them to faith and repentance as he doth to the elect 3. Another temptation to know thee desperate is this That though God offers the means of faith and repentance yet he intendeth that the major part of men shall not beleeve nor repent In this case bid Satan avoid for I have not to do with Gods secrets I am content to believe that he would have me do what he bids me do and therefore come of it what will I will trust God and exercise my selfe to keep a conscience void of offence toward God and man and so in well doing I will commit my selfe to him as to a faithfull Creator and hope to find my name at last in this book of Gods secret internall operation through Jesus Christ whom he hoth sent Mathe. What are those works of God called externall wherein the whole Trinity have also an equall hand Phila. These are the executions of his internall purposes or operations in his secret decrees For as God purposed before time so in his beginning to measure time he produced a world of visible and invisible creatures Polanus lib. 1. c. 37. all which were made for the Scriptures sake though written afterward that the will of God expressed in Scriptures might have an evident declaration by the works made before they were written Mat. 5. and before one jot of this word fail heaven and earth must vanish Now with the work of creation began time which God pleased to make the measure of his works and the beginning of his own revelation Psal 90 2. Aegyptians monas solitaria who was God from everlasting yet but like a solitary unite or a point which by creation was deduced into lines or like the top of a Pyramid which from one small point spreads in the basis to a great circumference Or as indeed the Jewish Cabalists say God was at first before creation a dark letter that could not be spelled nor read but by himselfe and so was a God that lay hid as in secret Isa 45.15 as saith the Prophet but by creation and the work of redemption became lucid and apparent by communicating himselfe in his wisdome and works And this time began 5605. years agoe reckoning backward from the present year 1656. by common account of Astronomers who differ somewhat among themselves The Scripture account is best which reckons the worlds age to be about 5721. But no Astronomers do so differ as to give occasion to men to think the world to be eternall or without beginning or that it was before Moses account as the Zabii who pretend that one Janbosher was Adams Tutor and our Praeadamites who dream of a world before the world and so would make us think to no end that the world will have no end as well as no beginning Mathe. Where were all these things before the Creation Phila. They were in God as notions in our mind by representation or as flowers in their roots in the winter invisibly or as Idea's in our minds before they be brought into act Mathe. But now God being an internall mind and pure act why not the world eternally produced God being neither sedent nor cessant Phila. Because if the world were coeternall with God it must be a Deity and then the visible creature might be worshipped as well as the invisible God nor then can the world have any end but must be a perpetuall motion of generation and corruption which were easie to beleeve if we had not an infallible revelation to the contrary for great learned men have thought so Osellus Lucianus Aristotle But the holy Scriptures tell us that the world was made Gen. 1. and that Wisedome was before the earth or heavens Prov. 8.23 And as they were made so they shall perish Psal 102.26 As it did in 1656. by a Dropsie so at last by a burning Feaver when Gods determined week is finished in whose account a thousand years is but as one day 2 Pet. 3.7 to the 12. when the elements shall melt with fervent heat Beside we never did find any authentick writer mention a world before Moses account Therefore let us not be wise above what is written but rest in Scripture which saith God in
holy Between which there being no receptacle for souls named you may conceive Limbus patrum and purgatory to be papisticall inventions The outward Court where all the people assembled might well signifie that part of the Church visible on earth which have not yet attained to that true measure of holinesse which others have yet are in the Churches pale by admission into it by circumcision and baptisme and so are in the Churches suburbs which is troden even by profane people Rev. 11.2 but none entreth into the holy state of the Church but the upright and worker of righteousnesse Psal 15. Mathe. What signification have the adjuncts and vessels of these rooms Phila. The utensils and vessels in generall may well signifie holy persons or holy gifts 1. Holy persons whether Ecclesiastick or Civill as 2 Tim. 2.20 21. In a great house are vessels of gold and silver Raban on Exod. wood and stone some for honour and some for dishonour If a man purge himselfe from them of dishonour he shall be a vessell of honor sanctified and meet for the masters use and prepared to every good work Which vessels may be sometime captived as those of the Temple by Babels King and Romes Antichrist yet they shall still remain Gods vessels and be returned to their right use by reformation in due time 2. As they be taken for gifts they set forth those divine graces by which God is served in his Church which graces may sometime be captived like Gods Ark by the Philistins 1 Sam. 4. but yet shall be received and returned to Gods service again by true zeale and repentance Mathe. I pray declare the signification of the particular utensils Phila. Those in the Sanctum or Holy place were The Altars the Laver the Table for Shew bread and the Candlestick 1. The Altars which were two of redemption which was that on which creatures were offered by fire and signified our redemption effected by the bloodshedding of Jesus Christ Gen. 4.4 Num. 28.3 John 2.29 1 Pet. 1.18 Exod. 40.6 Lev. 23.24 who was slain virtually from the beginning of the world and actually in the last age of the world he was slain for redemption of his people This Altar stood at the door of the sanctum without side to shew that none can have fellowship with the holy God or his people that makes not entrance into the Church by the sole sufficient sacrifice of Christ Next was the Altar of perfume for perfume was offered thereon every morning it stood neer the mercy seat but a vaile of the most holy place was between Exod. 30.6 7. signifying the praiers and intercessions of Christ for us as may be collected from Ephes 5.2 where Christ is called a sweet smelling savour for so he was in his death and in the devotion of his life Heb. 5.7 for he was heard for himselfe of him that is able to save And so he is for us by his mediation making our devotion acceptable by the sweetnesse of his intercession as Rev. 8.3 who is the one only Mediator betwixt God and man 1 Tim. 2.5 either for redemption signified by the bloody Altar covered with brasse or for intercession signified by the Altar of perfume which was covered with gold typing that in heaven Rev. 8.3 And therefore it is profane Idolatry to set up any other Chem. contra Trid. Co. as the Papists doe in their Rosary and also in their Manual of praiers chapt 1.11 and in many other of their tracts to that purpose Also these two Altars may well set forth a Christians offering up of himselfe to God by a reasonable sacrifice Rom. 12.1 as also our devotions in praier and thanksgiving related to by Malachie cap. 1.11 In every place incense shall be offered to my name Tertul. adv Marcion Hieron in Mal. 1. Rupert on Malac. Justin Martyr Cam. Triphon even a pure offering i. of praier and praise such as St Paul intimates 1 Tim. 2.8 willing the Gentiles to lift up pure hands in all places and to give alms which is a sacrifice of a sweet smell Phil. 4.18 and very acceptable to God as was that of Cornelius Acts 10.4 Mathe. What might be signified by the Laver Phila. It was made of brasse for endurance to hold water and of glasse Exod. 30.18 Exod. 38.8 that the Priests who were to wash therein before they went to the Altar might discern their cleannesse or foulnesse It was called a molten sea 2 Chron. 4.6 This might signifie the Laver of our new birth Eph. 5.23 and Tit. 3.5 namely Baptisme wherein we are purged by the blood of Christ through the eternall spirit and also our faith by whose operation hand and heart head and foot affection and action is to be cleansed Jam. 4.8 when we draw neer unto God and that we may lift up pure hands 1 Tim. 2.8 and look to our feet when we enter into the house of God Eccles 4.17 And to monish us hereof the Church thought fit in ancient times to set the font for baptisme at the entrance of the Church as this Laver stood at the entrance of the Holy place that as they so we might be cleansed before we offered our selves to God at the Altar of praier or praise and to examine our selves by the glasse of the word Jam. 1.23 as the Priests by the Lavers glasse placed in the foot thereof observe their spots or their purity And as our selves so our devotions are to be washed and cleansed also as the sacrifices were in the Temple in the ten Caldrons 1 Kin. 7.38 so our devotions to the equity of the ten Commandements though for the perfection of them we trust only upon the Lamb of God by whose merits we come boldly to the throne of grace This Laver and Solomons sea 1 Kin. 7.23 was answered by the sea of glass Rabanus in Rev. and Bale on that place Rev. 4.6 and the glasse of one and the chrystall of the other might well represent the clear word of God which God hath joined to the Sacraments by which through his spirit Aug in John tract 17. Bed in Rom. 10 the Sacraments are made efficacious And thus we are made clean by the word also which Christ hath spoken to us Mathe. What signified the Table of Shew-bread Phila. This table with the bread and frank insence set thereon prefigured divers things in the New Testament Orig in Lev. 24. The table might the holy Scripture and the bread of proposition the Ministers because the table was never to be removed but the bread was every seventh day Bed l. 1. c. 7. and new set on upon the Sabbath So the Ministers having finished their course are taken off by death and others come in their place But more properly the Table of the Lord named 1 Cor. 10.21 by St Paul and is never called an Altar by the ancient writers but only because there is a sacramentall seale of Christs body
of offence for though Isaiah had foretold them that he should be as a root out of a dry ground and they see no beauty in him to delight the sense yet they looked for him as one to come in outward glory and to be a worldly King and deliverer which God intended not 3. His birth was poor and private little taken notice of so that he escaping with his parent into Egypt by the warning of an Angell to avoid the massacre of Herod and returning afterward into Galilee and dwelling in Nazareth they had easily forgot that he was born at Bethelem and out of Nazareth they expected no good John 1.46 neither any Prophet 4. When he appeared among them because he was no sectary as Pharisee Sadducee they all envied him and slandered both his doctrine as if contrary to Moses and his miracles as if done by the power of the devill And so by their malice and the unjust judgement of Pilate brought him to the ignominious death of the crosse so unwittingly fulfilling the determinate counsell of God 5. Acts. Epiph. l. 1. tom 1. H. 15. They set the traditions of the Elders above Scripture 6. Some of them abolished Moses Law or his five books so did the Nasorites Some studied to add to the Scriptures as the Chasidim after the captivity Joseph antiq 1. â—â— c. 15. Luke 10.57 and would be holier then the Law required From these did spring the Pharisees some rejected all the Scriptures save the books of Moses as did the Sadducees and denied both Angels Spirits and the Resurrection and therefore confuted by Christ not out of the Prophets Jansen concor in Mat. 23. Eman. Sâ— in hunc locum Maldonat Ferus Aug. in tract 46. in Joh. but of those books they held for Canonicall Mat. 22.32 Thus heresie crept into Moses chaire as the Pope hath brought into Peters yet Christ saith because the Scribes and Pharisees sate in Moses chair he bids the people do as they say that is so far as they teach Moses for by Moses chair is meant his doctrine not his office and the people had a rule to try it by for the Jews kept the Old Testament entire Mathe. What punishment did God inflict upon them for this Phila. He took away from them Scepter and Myter Kingship and Priesthood and the very face of a Commonwealth about forty years after Christs death by Vespasian and Titus with their Roman army as was foretold by Daniel Dan 9.26 27. The occasion whereof was they having been conquered by the Romans and governed by their Deputies and they carrying an hard hand upon them they rebelled as Florus who succeeded after Faelix Festus and Albinus was so avaritious that he took out of the treasury of the Temple sixteen talents of silver and when the Jewes murmured at it he permitted the souldiers to slay and spoil the Citizens of Jerusalem at pleasure and scourged and crucified Jews of noble birth Here their refusing Christ and chusing Barabbas a murtherer began to be revenged and the scourging and crucifying Christ to be retaliated and his blood to fall upon their children This was the ground of that war that ruined Jerusalem at last But not only this was the cause but God gave them up to an obstinate mind for their malice against Christ and the prophecie began to take upon them Zac. 11.9 which Zachariah foretold I will not feed you that which dieth let it die and that that is to be cut off let it be cut off and let the rest eat the flesh of each other Zach. 11.15 The two staves of beauty and bands were broken and the instruments of a foolish shepherd were assumed The Ecclesiastick offices were disposed according to the pleasure of the Roman Deputies Valerius Gratus Pontius Pilate and Vitellius in the reign of Tiberius in whose eighteenth year Christ was crucified Againe to hasten their ruine Caius Caligula succeeding Tiberius would have his image set up in the Jewes Temple which though the Jewes zealous of their Religion would rather die then suffer yet it excited the Emperors malice the more which though it was unjust in him yet was it just with God to make him an instrument to punish them who were more afraid to defile their Temple of stone then to destroy the body of Christ in whom dwelt the fulnesse of the Godhead bodily After him succeeded Claudius in whose time 20000. of them were slain by crouding and treading one another in narrow places for fear of Cumanus souldiers who came but to keep the peace because they began to murmure much and the insolencie of a souldier which shewed his privities in the porch of the Temple After him succeeded Domitius Nero Joseph antiq l. 20. c. 6. in whose time a certain Egyptian feigning himselfe to be a Prophet drew four thousand men after him whom Faelix Hensen killed and scattered Acts 21.34 In this Emperors daies Florus aforesaid much pilled and oppressed them After this Domitius divers contended for the Empire as Galba Otto Vitellius Vid. Orati Reg. Agrip. contra Rebel in Joseph who were soon cut off and Vespasian chosen Emperour In whose time the Jewes refused to offer sacrifice for Caesars happinesse formerly and usually done Now began this calamity to grow apace for 50000. of them were slain at Alexandria 10000. at Damascus Joseph de bellâ— Jud. Prodigious signs appeared both in heaven and earth foreshewing desolation A comet like a sword hung over Jerusalem a years space A clear light about the Altar at midnight and the great brazen gate of the Temple opened of it selfe Chariots of fire were seen compassing Towns Voices were heard in the Temple admonishing people to be gone The Jewes notwithstanding were hardned Euseb l. 3. c. 3. but the Christians there departed as corn separated from the chaffe before the fire of destruction came Vespasian with his son Titus with an army of 60000. having first subdued many of the Jewes rebellious Towns at last gave order to besiege Jerusalem which he left to his son Titus to subdue and himselfe returned to Rome Titus besieged it at the time of the Passeover when the City was most full of people who being terrified by the sword of the Roman without and the seditious within the City was brought to great misery by famine and contagion of the dead wanting buriall women were forced to eat their children At last the City was taken and the Temple ruined the people some crucified others ript up in hope to find gold in their bellies others sold as slaves for thirty a penny as they valued Christ but at thirty pence others carried captive and devoured by wild beasts at the triumphs of Vespasian Thus God rewarded them that regarded not his Son so that destruction came on them to the uttermost for since that time they never had the face of a Church nor State but are scattered and hated of all nations And in token
next association was in the Temple at praier time and at breaking of bread in their houses Acts 2.46 that is in their private oratories or upper rooms set apart for holy occasions of which there was no use when Churches were built except for devotion of the private family Another meeting you find Acts 4.23 where God shook the place where they were assembled and they were all filled with the holy Ghost Another meeting you find Acts 6.2 about choosing the seven Deacons of whom Stephen was one who was the first Martyr that suffered death for Christ Acts 7.58 Then began persecution to wax hot by reason of Sauls being too zealous for the Law of Moses Acts 8.4 and so the Church was scattered but he was converted Acts 9. Then had the Church rest and multiplied exceedingly ver 31. and spread very farre and at Antioch they were first called Christians Acts 11.26 Then Herod Agrippa to curry favor with the Jewes Acts 12.2 killed James and imprisoned Peter but God smote him in the midst of his vain glory Acts 12.23 The next speciall meeting of the Apostles was Acts 15.16 the first Councill that ever was who determined the great Question of circumcision negatively that it should not be imposed on the Gentiles Other meetings there were in divers places according as the Church increased and was transplanted in divers regions as Acts 20.7 at Troas Mathe. But had they any publick meeting places called Churches in those times Phila. The first they had were those oratories which the Jewes had on tops of their houses 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 called the upper rooms which though the Romans called caenaculum or a banquetting room because it was like their feasting rooms on the tops of their houses yet neither the Jewes nor Christians used it but in religious devotions And therefore where Christ eat the Passeover and celebrated his last supper was held a place sacred though appertaining to some private house of some of the disciples In this place some say that Christ appeared to his disciples on the day of his Resurrection Nicepho Bed de locis Sanct. to 3. c. 3. and on the eighth day after to Thomas with the rest and that here James was made Bishop of Jerusalem by the Apostles and the seven Deacons elected and the first Councill held Cyr. Hieros cat 16. Acts 15. And Saint Cyril cals it the upper Church of the Apostles where the Holy Ghost descended also upon them Acts 2. And it may possibly be the place prophecied of as being neer to mount Sion Psalm 50.2 out of Sion God appeared in perfect beauty in which Psalm the spirit also seems to refuse carnall facrifices which was Gospel-like doctrine Also it is prophecied that out of Sion shall go forth the Law and the word of God out of Jerusalem to which many people shall flock and so they did Acts 2. And thus his foundations were laid in the holy mountains and he hath shewed that he loved the gates of Sion more then all the dwellings of Jacob Vide Hier in Epitap Paulae epi. 27. because he i. Christ was there produced by the Gospels promulgation which never came from the Temple though divulged from a place neer to Sion which place was enclosed afterward if we may beleeve antiquity with a faire Church called the Church of Sion In process of time as the Church Christian increased no doubt they built places of recess for the worship of God as well as the Jewes had Synagogues whose religion was estranged as much from the religion of the Roman Empire as the Christians was and in these places they did ordinarily assemble to perform divine duties unlesse they were hindred by necessity Mathe. I pray give me some instances of these Phila. We read that as at first they had their upper rooms for oratories so afterward they had places of worship built in fields Euseb eccles hist lib. 2. c. 16. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 where they heard the Scriptures interpreted and had severall classes for men and women and sung Psalms and had distinctions of Bishops and Deacons We see also in Pauls Epistles that he salutes some with their houshold only as Aristobulus and Narcissus Assyncritus Rom. 16. Oecume in in Rom. 16. and Col. 4. and Phlegon But others he saluteth with the Church at their house i. all those that there commonly assembled So he salutes Nymphas Col. 4.15 and Philemon and Aquila and Priscilla Rom. 16. which sheweth their houses or part of them dedicated to pious uses in common So Theophilus to whom St Luke dedicates his Gospel Hiero. in ep 2. ad Galat. Clem. in Recog lib. 10. and Acts of the Apostles did dedicate his house at Antioch to this purpose this was about thirty eight years after Christ And Eusebius reports that St Mark had divers Churches in Alexandria in his history lib. 2. cap. 16. So St Paul at Corinth as we may collect from 1 Cor. 11.22 saying have ye not houses to eat and drink in or do you despise the Church of God So Joseph of Arimathea and his Colony of Christians built the Church of Glassenbury in England Hist Angli which being burnt was built again by King Henry the second his Letters Patents So Crescens caused a Church to be built at Vienna So in 79. Eus l. 3. c. 4. there was a great Church built at Ephesus by St John saith Eusebius lib. 3. cap. 20. And many were built also in Rome by the Apostles means Euseb l. 2. c. 25 And surely the reason of this dedicating places to holy worship was because Christians being taught by Scriptures that the majesty of God is most sacred and incommunicable so those things by which they worshipped should not be made common And indeed therefore Christians were well admonished by an ancient holy Writer Clem. in epist ad Corinth that we ought to do all things as God had expressed them to be done in regard both of times when and persons whereby and places wherein that so we may be accepted of him all these we find in the first hundred years after Christ Mathe. I pray go on and give me a further light Phila. We find Ignatius reproving Trajan in a Church lib. 3. cap. 19. as Nicephorus reports And 117. the Emperor Adrian commands Christian Churches to be built Dion in Adri. and forbade to place the Images of the Romane Gods therein And Ignatius writing to the Magnesians Vid. Epist ad ad Philad chargeth them to meet in one place to use one common praier with one heart as coming to one Temple of God one Altar and one Christ So we find Polycarpus receiving the Communion in a Church at Rome in the year 169. And Theophylus Antiochenus Eus l. 5. c. 25. in his Epistle to Autolycum saith that as the sea hath Ilands that are fruitfull so the world hath Synagogues called
one Ardaeus a Syrian Then followed the Messalians called Euchitae because they thought the whole duty of man consisted in praiers not hearing by which St Paul tels us that faith is begotten by which praier must be offered up They were also called Enthusiasts because when they were transported they thought the spirit was infused into them Theo. l. 4. c. 7. so that they needed neither holy discipline for the body as fasting nor doctrine for the soule Apollinaris followed who denied Christ to have any humane soule but that his divinity supplied the place of it But then Christ was not perfect man Donatus Bishop of Numidia held that the Catholick was bounded among those of his society in Africa and that no baptisme was rightly administred but by them The wildest branch of this heresie was the Circumcilionists who would cast themselves down from clifts and rocks and into fire and water out of assurance that it was martyrdome and fruits of their faith Our Quakers are like them Aug. con Donat. Collyridiani worshipped the Virgin Mary and offered cakes to her Epiph. cont haeres as the Jewes did to the Queen of heaven and as the Papists do adore her as a mediatrix There were some also after these that said Joseph knew Mary after she had borne Christ because of the word in Mat. 1.25 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 till which word signifieth never oftentimes As 1 Sam. 15.25 So Mat. 28.20 Samuel saw Saul no more till the day his death i. never So 1 Sam. 6.23 Michal had no child till the day of her death and all the Fathers generally hold she was a perpetual virgin and so have taken those words of the Apostles Creed born of the Virgin Mary as if of one that ever was a virgin Yea some of them have argued it from Ezek. 44.2 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 viz. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by way of allegory that as the East gate of the Temple was to be shut up that no man might enter in nor go out there but the Prince So was the blessed Virgins body made the Temple of the Holy Ghost and her womb only for the ingresse and egresse of Messiah the Prince And though that some of the disciples were called Christs brethren as James and Joses Simon and Iude we know that those were so called in Scripture that were but Cozen germans and so these might be the sons of Iosephs brother or sisters or of Maries sister as Iames is said to be the son of Mary Cleophas Danaeus de heres fo 224. Epiph. de heres fol. 166. Or some might be the sons of Ioseph by a former wife if he were eighty yeers of age before he was contracted to Mary and so the more unlikely to know her after the flesh These hereticks were of the same mind with Nestorius and Helvidius who succeeded them But these were called from their opinion Antidicomarianitae After them sprang up the Seleucians that said that the Chaos of which God made the world was coeternall with God and that Angels created the souls of men Aug. and that Christ did not carry our nature up to heaven as it is said Acts 2.34 and cap. 3.23 Rom. 8.34 Ephes 1.20 but that he left his body in the body of the Sun These received not baptisme by water They denied the resurrection of the body and said only that was performed by succession of generation which it may be they borrowed partly from Plato and Pythagoras Himeneus and Philetus 2 Tim. 2.18 Pelagius affirmed that men by nature were able to fulfill the law of God contrary to Rom. 8.7 And denied originall sin contrary to Psal 51.5 and that it came not by propagation but imitation of Adams sin and that children need not be baptized for remission of sin Aug. con Pela and that the holy men that confessed sin did it rather for example of humility then for any necessity or guiltinesse Nestorius followed who denied the personall union of the divine and humane nature of which the blessed Virgin was the medium or mean and in that respect only called the * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 mother of God because she brought forth him that was by union both God and man inseparably and Nestorius would have her called only the * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 mother of Christ and therefore condemned by the first Councill of Ephesus and banished by Theodosius the Emperour and his tongue rotted in his mouth Eutyches confounded two natures in Christ humane and divine by saying that the divine swallowed up the humane and so Christ had only the divine nature He was condemned by the generall Councill of Chalcedon where sate 630. Fathers and the Emperour Martianus and it was decreed That the natures of Christ though united yet were not confounded Next followed those that worshipped the crosse and divers images which filth the Church of Rome hath licked up together with the worship of reliques One Godescalcus a Dutch man said that by predestination men were forced both to do good and evill About 1100. yeers after Christ a kind of monomachy arose between the Greek and Latine Churches about the bread in the Sacrament whether it should be leavened or unleavened The Greek Church was called Fermentarii the Latine Azymitae the first did leven it the other did not After this one Petrus Abolandus a French man said the Holy Ghost was the soul of the world and not of the substance of God the Father Almericus also of France said that God was the essence of all creatures and that they all should be converted into God again The Paleneni about Tholouze in France affirmed that a man might attain to such perfection in this world that he might be void of all sin and that such were not subject to any Civill or Ecclesiastick power that they had no need of praier and fasting or any exercise whereby grace may be increased These laid some grounds upon which the Anabaptists build now Others under a colour of Religion and charity made all things common and women also These surely began the Family of Love About 1600. years after Christ sprang up the Anabaprists but before I come to speak of them and others following from their time I must tell you according to your question how and when the Protestants came in and how persecuted by Papists and opposed by hereticks and schismaticks Mathe. I thank you for your remembrance and entreat you so to do Phila. You must take notice that the Protestant Religion hath been maintained in her doctrine from the beginning of the Primitive times First by the Bishops of Rome themselves for the first 300. years after Christ and many of them were Confessors and Martyrs though their pride began to appear 100. years before in Zepherinus and other Bishops following him as hath been declared before But after that they were grown rich and potent by the favour of Emperours and got
wrapt up in Laelius his notes This Faustus writ two books though no great scholar as he confesseth to Puccius if he had so little knowledge in the tongues and Arts. Socin Respons ad Defi. Puccii p. 49. One book handles the authority of Scripture the other handleth the cause for which the Gospell of Christ is to be beleeved The error of this Socinus was spread far in Sarmatia and Transylvania Silesia Lituania Mathe. What were their errors Phila. That there is no naturall knowledge leading a man to a beliefe of a Deity contrary to Paul who saith that the invisible things of God are seen by things created Rom. 1.20 and that the Gentiles do by nature the things written in Gods law Rom. 2.14 So they say Christ is not God and yet they give him divine worship and so make him an Idol and themselves Idolaters So they deny the Godhead of Jesus Christ which forfeits their own Christianity and overthroweth Christian Religion and all divine honour due to Christ from men This was the heresie of Samosatenus Bishop of Antiochia of whom you have heard already How can these men be called Christians who deny the office of Christ No marvell though they refuse to be baptized in the name of the Trinitie if they denie with Sabellius two persons in the Trinitie for they say Christ is not trulie God Iohn 8.58 yet Paul saith he was in the form of God Phil. 2.6 and the character of his glorie Heb. 1.2 and in him dwelt the fulnesse of the Godhead bodily Col. 2.9 So they say that the Holy Ghost is not God and so Macedonius held who was justlie condemned by the second generall Council of Constantinople in the year 386. But if the Holie Ghost be not God why doth St. Iohn rank him as equall to the Father and Son 1 Iohn 5.7 Again they say the Incarnation of Christ is repugnant to reason which I have formerlie disproved and that it is not fullie proved in Scripture yet St Iohn tels us that the Word became flesh Iohn 1.14 So they say that Christ did not by his death satisfie for our sins yet it is said that he is the propitiation for our sins and that is all one 1 Iohn 2.2 So they say it is against Scripture to beleeve three persons in the Godhead and yet Christ institutes baptisme to be given in the three names of Father Son and Holie Ghost So they say man was not created in originall righteousnesse yet Solomon saith God made man upright but he hath sought inventions So they say that the old Testament is not necessarie for a Christian man yet Christ saith Moses spake of him Iohn 5.46 and the men of Berea searched the old Testament to prove the truth of the new Acts 17.11 These are very dangerous errors because they overthrow the foundation of Christian faith namely Christs satisfaction for us and plainlie Antichristian in denying Christ to be God And also they denie the person of the Holie Ghost They confound faith and works together They say the Law is imperfect and yet that man is justified by the works of the Law not by the law of faith Rom. 3.27 Also that the soule of man hath no subsistence after death whereby it apprehendeth joy or sorrowes and so consequently they may denie heaven and hell as things only imaginarie They stand much upon reason and would subject not only Fathers and Councils but also the Scriptures to it and so every man doth like the Pope in being the judge of all by his own reason Beside they are tied in a knot with Arminians and Anabaptists concerning the power of magistrates and are one as lawlesse as the other And the Papists are well pleased with them because they perceive them to do their work for them in rooting out all Protestant Magistrates and Ministers Mathe. What Achans beside have troubled our Israel Phila. The Antitrinitarians Antitrinitarians who hold opinions against the Holie Trinitie and scraped up the old Heresie of Arrius denying Christ to be God and with the Socinians denie the Trinitie of persons and that the eternall generation of the Son is against truth contrary to Micah 5.2 whose goings out have been from everlasting And they say Christ is called God not in regard of his divine essence but his dominion yet Christ saith I and my Father are one Iohn 10.30 So they denie the Holie Ghost to be God yet St Peter told Ananias when he lied to the Holie Ghost that he lied not to man but to God Acts 5.3 These by some Writers though first sprung up in Polonia 1593 are called Legatinarians from one Legate who for obstinate holding these opinions was burned in Smithfield March 18. Anno 1611. and after him in April following another was burned at Leichfield for the same heresie Mathe. I hear also of men called Millenaries who pretend to antiquity and would prove their opinions from Scripture I pray what are their opinions Phila. They are a branch of the Anabaptists in some of their opinions Millenaries Their antiquitie is fetched from Cerinthus a Jew who lived about the 96 year after Christ in the time of Domitian who held with Ebion that Jesus was only begotten of Ioseph and Mary and that he was not Christ born but that Christ came upon him at his Baptisme in the form of a Dove and that Jesus suffered but that Christ fled away whom St Iohn confuteth in his Gospell John 1. This man pretended revelations from Angels and held that eternall life was here upon earth and that after the resurrection Christs Kingdome should be on the earth and that his subjects should eat and drink marry and keep holy daies and offer sacrifice and that this should last a thousand years Into which error also Papias fell Euseb l. 3. c. 36 the Bishop of Hierapolis for want of observing the Apostles writings So did Irenaeus Bishop of Lyons in France both men of great authority in their times Iren. l. 5. cont Valent. namely in the first hundred years after Christ So in the reign of Galienus Nepos and his followers called Nepotiani affirmed from Rev. 20. 5 6. that the godly should rise before the wicked and should live with Christ upon the earth in abundance of all earthly pleasures Eus l. 7. c. 22. But if that text be taken literally those godly must be beheaded and so dead first and then rise againe yea and Christ must be come first These were convinced by Coracion Eus l. 7. c. 23. But our latter Millenaries exceed all those before them in error for they will not stay till Christ come or those godly be raised Oh that men would study dark mysteries lesse and divine duty more the Kingdome of Christ lesus would be the better obtained but say that Christs Kingdome must be set up out of hand to promote which alll the ungodly must be slain that the meek may inherit the earth in
it was done by decree of St Paul upon the incestuous person 1 Cor 5. I have determined as if present to deliver him to Satan Amb. in 1 Tim. cap. 1. As for their assembling together at his command it was that the whole Church might see and fear that upon reading the sentence the spirit of Paul being present by the power of the Lord Jesus Satan should plainly smite him with some evill Chry. in 1 Cor. 5 hom 15. as once Peter did Ananias dead Acts 5. and Paul Elymas the sorcerer Acts 13. From this it is St Paul saith 2 Cor. 10. we have in a readinesse to revenge all disobedience and is called his rod 2 Cor. 13.2 1 Cor. 4. which he will not spare This I confesse was excommunication and somewhat more for many were excommunicated and yet not delivered to Satans power 2 Cor. 13.10 which was a sharp execution of that power the Lord had given him Thus we see the Apostles kept this power and by their command only it was executed Christ gave this power of the keies only to the Apostles John 20. and Paul being an Apostle used them without the authority of Presbyters Mathe. But whether doth the power still continue and in whom Phila. Some gifts were appointed to the Apostles persons As 1. Their calling by Christs own mouth 2. Their infallibility in truth 3. The visible assistance of Gods spirit 4. To speak extempore in divers tongues 5. To work miracles 6. To bestow the gifts of Holy Ghost upon others all which was given to them to beget and convert and confirm Christians at first But this milk is not necessary alwaies to be continued when the Church is grown to a ripe age for the Scriptures are afterward sufficient to make us perfect to every good work 1 Tim. and the miracles then done are a full confirmation of their truth But yet you must know that the authority of their calling liveth yet in their successors and to teach administer Sacraments to bind and loose sins to impose hands for the ordaining Pastours and Elders are not ceased nor can be wanting so long as there is a Church for these beget faith without which there is no Church Therefore their successors are stewards of the mysteries of Christ and are warned to take care of Christs flock Acts 20. and of this few doubt but the power of the keies troubles them to whom they are committed that is excommunication and absolution So others quarrell about ordination and these are the well-wishers to Lay-Eldership which they would have joined in this work with Apostles and Bishops but they find no warrant for it I know they bring commonly two or three places of Scripture for Presbyterie as the hands of the Presbyterie 1 Tim. 4.14 which I have shewed were the hands of Bishops and preaching Elders at least not of Lay Elders So they say Christ bids a man tell the Church Mat. 18. which if a man will not hear he is to be accounted as an heathen Now by this word Church they would bring in all the Lay Elders Chrys hom 61. in Mat. 18. Beza annot in Mat. 18. saith the chiefe implieth the whole But surely there is understood the spirituall Presidents and Governors so there we read of no Lay Presbyterie But they say that in the 1 Tim. 5. Paul tels us of ruling Elders and thereforre there were some Elders beside those that laboured in the word and doctrine as Rom. 12. he that ruleth let him do it with diligence but it is plain they are not distinct offices Beza annot in 1 Tim. 4. Chrys hom 15. in 1. Tim. 5. Hieron in 1 Tim. cap. 5. but sometime pertaining both to the Deacon or Preaching Elder who also ruled the Church and in regard of their good government deserved double honour of reverence and allowance but especially for laboring in preaching the Gospell because they cannot so well provide things needfull for themselves But for Lay Judges I never heard they were to be maintained by the Church stock of which maintenance the Apostle in 1 Tim. 5. speaketh and therefore here can be understood no Lay Presbyterie but rather such as did govern the Churches stocks as the Deacons did or ministers which either did both Beza annot in 1 Pet. cap. 5. or only laboured in the word for the name Elder compriseth sometimes all those that have any Ecclesiasticall function And St Chrysostome on 1 Cor. 1.17 on these words Chrys in 1 Cor. 1.17 Christ sent me not to baptize but to preach saith that few were able to preach but many to give baptisme therefore the inferiour sort of ministers baptized and the superiour in wisedome Evangelized They that performed the first well were counted worthy of double honour for their right ordering the Church but especially such as labored in the word and doctrine so that still we find no ruling for Lay Elders but rather the dutie and pains of their Pastors and Teachers 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the one by ruling the flock well in his Church and charge whereof he is president by doctrine administration and example 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the other for travelling with great pains of mind and body to dispense the Gospell and confirm Christians by travell and visiting in which sense Paul saith 1 Cor. 15. he laboured more then all the Apostles Yet I speak not this in derogation to Lay-men which are holy grave and wise but only that they had no place in ordination or excommunication yea I beleeve good use might be made of them for moderation of quarrels and strifes and examinations as 1 Cor. 6.4 and to end matters peaceably between Christians but not to censure Ecclesiastically for that belongs to the ministers nor to punish by the civill law for that belongs to the Magistrate The keies were given of Christ to his Apostles and of them to their successors which were spirituall pastors so that every godly minister hath power to put by an unworthy receiver from the Lords Table as well as to admit one that is worthy Amb. de poenit lib. 1. c. 2. without the assistance of Lay Eldership to whom neither power of preaching the Word nor administring the Sacraments Chrys de sacer lib. 3. was ever committed For when Christ said to Peter Aug. 5. Tract in Joh. I will give thee the keies of the Kingdome of heaven he meant and intended it to all the ministers of the Church as appeareth in giving the rest of the Apostles the same power after his resurrection Therefore saith Ambrose Amb. de dignita sacer c. 6. all we that are Priests received the keies in blessed Peter but he saith not Lay-men did also receive them Mathe. This may make Ministers take too much upon them Phila. Not if they be either wise and godly Cypr. l. 1. Ep. 2. for they are to use this power with moderation and great discretion for much
kingdome that he hath by dispensation is that free and voluntary kingdome which he received from God for the salvation of his Church and shall in the end of the world be given up to God the Father again 1 Cor. 15.25 28. in the mean time he is by dispensation the head and sole monarch of the Church But he hath neverthelesse a government ministeriall not only invisible by his spirit and Angels John 16.7 Heb. 1.14 but a visible ministration by the word and wholesome discipline to the exercise whereof some men are by his appointment delegated for the helping our infirmities and speaking to us in Christs absence 2 Cor. 6.1 And this hath alwaies been done by Bishops and Presbyters Acts 20.28 who by the Holy Ghost were made overseers of the flock not secular men though Princes had ever this externall government in the dispensation of spirituall things committed to them for then how was the Church ruled for 300 years after Christ till the daies of Constantine yet the secular power is to govern men as men but the ministers only governs them as Christians and therefore in this case Princes themselves have not refused subjection to this ministeriall government of Christ as the Emperour Theodosius to St Ambrose Bishop of Millane Theod. lib. 5. cap. 17. Nor have any dared to usurp their office without some exemplary punishment as Uzzah and Uzziah till these latter times 2 Sam. 6.7 wherein any tradesman dare take upon him the office of a minister and a seutor to be a soule member Beside if this ministeriall government were committed to secular powers then they might give the Sacrament and a woman if a Prince might preach too notwithstanding St Paul 1 Cor. 14.34 But we find Jehosaphat to distinguish the civill power 2 Chro. 19.5.8 from the ecclesiastick ministry in the Old Testament and surely the Church of the New Testament was not left to confusion in government 1 Cor. 14.40 Therefore the ancient Fathers have reproved even Emperors Amb. Ep 33. de Valentin Imper. Athâ—nâ—s Ep. ad agintes vitam solit when they took upon them to meddle with things divine which was no part of their administration for though God had committed to them the Empire yet to the minister the sacred things the mysteries whereof they are to teach not to be taught yet religious Magistrats are to rule over ministers by their civill power to which ministers are to subject themselves yea they may and ought to correct negligence in the practise of religion and vice which is a scandall to religion yea and heresies blasphemies and sacriledge proved to be so by Ecclesiasticall judgement but not to define points of faith nor to exercise ministeriall offices It is true that Moses Eli and Samuel and others did exercise both offices many times yet we cannot argue from an extraordinary action in a state not fully setled that it should be so in a setled Church and State for by the same reason a Priest may act the office of a Prince or a Judge at any time as did Moses Eli and Samuel But we find when the Priesthood was setled that Moses then medled not with Aarons businesse and Eli and Samuel were Judges by an extraordinary call in a corrupted State but ordinarily it was otherwise So in the New Testaments Church holy things were alwaies ordinarily and ordinately administred by Bishops and Presbyters Eph. 4.11 12. to whom those of the Church were to submit themselves Heb. 13.17 Nor was the Church governed by any one man but by them Acts 15.6 no not by Peter alone though he was in that Councill and the ancient Fathers decline that sole definitive judicature Cypr. lib. 31 Epi. 19. ad Cletum Amb. in 1 Tim. 1. Hier. in Epi. 1. ad Tur. which the Pope hath challenged to himselfe St Cyprian durst not do so and St Ambrose saith that first the Synagoue and afterward the Elders of the Church was to be consulted and without them nothing was to be done and St Jerom saith that till by the instinct of the devill contentions arose in the Church it was governed by the counsell of ministers Nor was the government of it democraticall or in the power of the people for then they must have this power from themselves or from God it cannot be from themselves for this power is not by right of nature or Nations but is supernaturall and of divine right nor have they it from God for no Scripture sets it forth but therein they are called the flock which are to be fed not to govern or chuse their Shepherds Yet it is true they were present at the ordination of Matthias Acts 1. and the seven Deacons Acts 6. but they only named or designed them but ordained them not however such a particular fact at first proveth not that it must be so alwaies no more then because the first Kings were chosen by the people therefore they must be so alwaies So that it seems to me that the Church militant is neither democraticall as governed by the people nor monarchicall by any one man but aristocraticall that is governed by some chiefe heads of the ministry Therefore the Pope can derive no such power from Peter as to be the head of the Church for Peter was never so constituted by Christ nor was ever so acknowledged by the rest of the Apostles for then they would never have contended who should be chiefe as they did Luke 22.24 Christ is only the head who is the head stone and the foundation of it Mat. 16.18 19 for though our Saviour said to Peter thou art Peter and upon this rock I will build my Church yet he called him only Peter Aug. retract lib. 1. cap. 22. Cypr. lib. de unit eccles not Petra the rock for that was Christ for all the Apostles were endued with the same power which Peter had John 20.22 when Christ said to them receive the Holy Ghost whosoever sins ye remit they are remitted Nor can the Pope challenge succession from Peter who was Bishop of Antioch not of Rome as some write But the Scripture saith that the Jewes were especially Peters charge Gal. 2.7 who were all banished from Rome by Claudius Acts 18.2 and so Peter had but little to do there or if he were Bishop there yet the Pope cannot be his successor properly Amb. de incarn cap. 5. if he succeed him not in faith and doctrine for faith is the Churches foundation much lesse can he pretend to be Christs Vicar any more then any other Bishop who may be said to be vice Christi in the stead of Christ to wooe men to be reconciled to God Conc. Nic. can 6. Cypr. Ep. ad Papas 41.58 when he was at the best he was allowed to be but one of the Patriarchs nor called by the ancient Fathers but only brother colleague or fellow Bishop But had they taken him for Christs Vicar or the head of the Church
they would have given him other titles than they did Pius 2. Ep. 301. as might become one of so high degree This swelling title of head of the Church and Christs Vicar and Universall Bishop was a forerunning signe of Antichrist as said Gregory the great who was Pope in his seventh Book Greg. M. lib. 4. Ep. 36. and Epist 39. to Mauritius the Emperor and therefore he much declined and waved such titles Mathe. I pray what think you of Antichrist what or who is he Phila. You know St John tels you there were many Antichrists in his time 1 John 2.18 that is some that were contrary to the Gospell of Christ in faith or manners or both Jerom. in Mat. 24. Some account all the heads of Heresies to be Antichrists Others say that they be such as overthrow all good manners and so one describes the state of the Church of Rome saying that the Princes and Judges are the beasts seale Papa Honorius in dial de libero arbit the Clergy his pavilion the Monasteries his Tabernacle the Nunneries his bedchamber and the people to bear his image This he spake of the second Beast Rev. 13.11 And Bernard the Abbot saith plainly Bern. ad Gaufrid Lorat Epi. 125. who writ about 546 years since that the Beast in the Revelation to whom a mouth is given speaking blasphemies is he that sits in Peters chair The other Beast is more subtle as this is cruell yet both joine against Christ So many other conclude the Pope and Papacy to be that man of sin and son of perdition that hath laied an opposite foundation to Christ 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 2 Thes 2.3 4. politickly pretending Christian profession and yet overturning his truth Indeed if one would be lead by Chronograms or the numerall letters in the word Lateinos Pet. Mart. in 2 Reg. 4. Iren. l. 5. c. 25. or Ecclesia Italica or in the Hebrew word Romiith or in Maometis one may find the number of the Beast Rev. 13.18 which is 666. about which time after Christ the Pope was made supreme and universall Bishop in the West and Mahomet chiefe Prophet in the East And though I will not build my faith on numbers in names nor do I think that all names be imposed inevitably by the influence of the stars yet this is not altogether to be despised since Nimrods name included his nature i. an apostate rebell and Cyrus his name in Hebrew was like himselfe wh was an head to the people and in the Persian language a glorious Sun This Antichristianity is called the mysterie of iniquity 2 Thes 2.7 for it is a secret wickednesse in the name and nature of it for Antichrist may signifie one that is a vicegerent for Christ As 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or a Deputy or a Lievetenant for him and thus the Pope would be thought Christs Vicar because he sitteth in the Temple of God or a part of the Church visible corrupted and exalts himselfe above all earthly power that hath given to it the title of God or Lord and shewing himselfe as God 2 Thes 2.4 both in placing and displacing Kings and forgiving sins So is the nature of his doctrine opposed to Christ very subtilly namely because faith must appear by works therefore to set up works to justifie our persons which works the popish writers call also the works of faith not of the law though they be but works of mens inventions and so they prefer works before the formall righteousnesse of Christ imputed to man for justification Mahomet speaks also very well of Christ but he enjoins externall works of his own collection by which men must be saved So the Pope and Mahomet join in one against Christ in this and also in holding that the holy Scriptures are not sufficient for salvation but their canons and rules of obedience have more attributed to them for performance then the obedience of faith which devices are like the locusts that came out of the bottomlesse pit of their inventions Rev. 9. having the face of a reasonable creature but a scorpions sting which gives no rest to the soule but poisons it yet if hue and cry were made after the Pope and Mahomet a man might justly stop the Pope upon suspicion of being the more proper Antichrist for these reasons First because the name of Antichrist agreeth most properly to him and his seat yea all the descriptions of Antichrist in Scripture doth so likewise But by the Pope we mean not every Bishop of Rome from the Primitive times for many of them were Confessors and Martyrs till the time of Sylvester neither was Antichrist discovered much till Boniface the third took from the Emperor Phocas the name of Universall Bishop and his See of Rome to be called the supreme head of all Churches After this we find in the Pope and Church of Rome all the marks of Antichrist for he sets in the Temple of God like an Hornet in a Bee hive driving out the labouring Bees and devouring their hony The popish writers make this an argument of their Church being the true Church and Temple of God because Antichrist sits there It is true that they have the name and shew of a Church Christian but have neither true Doctrine nor Sacraments in their simplicity as the Scripture sets them forth and hath delivered them to the Church so that they have only the name of a Church as Sardis had that she was living but indeed was dead Rev. 3.1 And in this Church Antichrist sitteth as a usurping Tyrant over Gods ordinances abusing them and changing them at his pleasure and over all authority Ecclesiasticall and Civill that beareth any similitude of Elohim even as St Paul foretold 2 Thes 2.3 4. And this may be proved from their own writers some of them saying that it is not lawfull for any man to reprove what the Pope approves for all men ought to be judged by him Zodericus Zamorra lib. 2. cap. 1. but he by none and that he hath all power in heaven and earth so assuming to himselfe the right of Christ as well as his title King of Kings and Lord of Lords which made him so bold as to let Emperors kisse his feet Alexand. pap 3 and to set his foot upon the neck of the Emperor Frederick abusing the 91 Psalm saying thou shalt tread upon the Lion and the Dragon as also Pius the fift did when he deposed Queen Elizabeth abused Jer. 1.10 Behold I have appointed thee this day over Nations and Kingdomes Beside is not he right Antichrist that arrogates to himselfe power over Gods word and his law and saith Gratia in gloss that he can dispense with the law of nature and contrary to the Apostles and therefore hath dispensed with Princes to marry their brothers wives which St John Baptist would not allow to Herod and make parricides saints and forgives sins to
the discession from pure doctrine is not generall So a Church may by ministers neglect want Sacraments and by the tyranny of Princes want discipline yet if the Church be purely visible it hath ordinarily these three notes which indeed freeth it from maintaining error heresie and schisme though all three may possibly be in it 1 Cor. 1.11 and cap. 3.3 1 Cor. 11.19 provided alwaies that the heresie thrust it not into infidelity or cause it not to deprave the doctrines of faith as the Church of Rome hath and so is become adulterous and hereticall So it may be in some things schismaticall so far as to hurt charity not verity by taking occasion unjustly as the Separatists to depart from the Church but not giving occasion to the Church to depart from them as the Papists have done to us like the old Pharisees who gave just occasion to Christ and his Apostles to separate themselves from their traditions Therefore true doctrine is the chiefe note of a true visible Church whereby people are taught as Christs sheep to hear his voice John 10.27 and to continue in his and his Apostles doctrine Acts 2.42 which is the foundation of the Church Eph. 2.20 And for the Sacraments they are commanded by Christ himselfe Mat. 28.19 and Luke 22.19 So also is the administration of discipline set down by our Saviour Mat. 18.17 and used by St Paul 1 Cor. 5.5 upon the incestuous person So that the right use of these must needs be a note of a true visible Church Let the Papists brag of their tearm Catholike I am sure it no way agreeth to them neither in respect of the extension of their Churches bounds which is not universall nor yet in regard of their doctrines which are not according to the Catholike truths confessed by the primitive or orthodox Churches of old and therefore their word Catholike is no note for a true visible Church is not to be judged by a name but by the thing it ought to hold otherwise the Pope like Simon Magus might be thought the great power of God Acts 8.10 Nor doth their boasted antiquity make their Church the more true for many things were said of old which were not intended at the first as they were afterward used Mat. 5. It is not antiquity but his truth that is the ancient of daies that is the note of the Church Aug. Q. 14. vet No. Testam The devill is older then the Church and Idolatry and Paganisme is very ancient and the Jews and the Samaritans pleaded antiquity and held the Gospell of Christ but a novelty yet their Church was not the true Beside if antiquity be a note then the Church Christian and Jerusalem and that of Antioch where Peter taught and sate as superintendent for seven years must be accounted the true Church and not Rome which was planted since but the authority of religion must not be measured by time Cypr. lib. 2. cont gent. Nor doth duration prove it the better for it is neither a proper or inseparable note as appeareth Psal 47.7 8. Rev. 12. And truly the Church of Rome hath not had a continued duration for Bellarmin saith that a Church cannot subsist without a Bishop and the seat of Rome hath been often vacant by wars and schisms among the Popes themselves as hath been formerly shewed you Nor doth their amplitude and multitudes make any thing in this case for them for Satans Kingdome is larger then Christs and his numbers more then Christs little flock who are often like Noahs family in the Ark they have a many of the vulgar Chrysost ad pop Antioch the Church hath a few faithfull one precious stone is worth many toies Nor will succession of Bishops help them to a note for who succeeded Melchisedeck but Christ many hundred of yeers falling between Vid. Athan. laudem in orat Nazian and the place changed also for the Church is not bound to place or persons of men Nor can ordination prove a note since hereticks hath it as well as the true Church neither can we find their ordination alwaies good if Pope Jone was ordained or she ordained any And Liberius the Pope being an Arrian ordained Arrians also Nor doth unity passe for a note except in the faith under one mysticall head Jesus Christ for satan is not divided against satan and very theeves are united together Nor can their miracles prove their Church true because they are false and Antichristian 2 Thes 2.9 and are invented to maintain false doctrines Beside if they were true they were not alwaies a note of a true Church for not only heathen gods have done strange things to perswade their divinity Bel. lib. de notis Eccl. cap. 14. Socrat. hist lib. 7. c. 17. but even heathen men as Vespasian made a blind man see and a lame man walk Mathe. What Church do you hold hath these three notes Phila. The true Christian Protestant Church especially as it was constituted by the first reforming Princes in England for the doctrine thereof is built upon the holy scripture They administer Sacraments in their primitive purity and hold only two generally necessary to salvation i. Baptisme and the Lords Supper rejecting all the spurious Sacraments of the Church of Rome As confirmation which the Church of England did use in a laudable manner and might do much good by using it as it was but not as a Sacrrment for it kept young people in a care to render an account of their faith and Ministers and Parents to teach them Catechisme So pennance was injoined notorious offenders for satisfaction of the Church and to reduce them better manners and to beget fear and shame in others but never held it a Sacrament no more then it did matrimony or ordination As for the fift spurious Sacrament of Rome extreme unction they never used it because not instituted of Christ as a Sacrament It is true Mark 6.13 the Disciples anointed many that were sick with oile and they were healed and St James in cap. 5.14 adviseth them to use oile with praier for the sick but it was no consecrated oile as the papists use Bellar. lib. 1. de extrem unct cap. 3. nor applied for remission of sins to seven parts of their body But you will say we in England at this time want right discipline I answer It is true yet the Church doth maintain it in her doctrines and constitutions but she cannot use it in those times when the shepherd is smitten and the sheep are scattered or else combined against him that they may live at their own liberty without correction by the rod of discipline yea libertinisme is grown to such a height that the disciplinarians themselves who envied the Bishops authority dare not exercise the Presbyterian virge lest they also follow the Bishops dejection Mathe. Might not a Nationall Councill set all right Phila. No doubt it might with Gods blessing so that it were called and
impowred by authority and consisted of men orthodoxall and of just minds and of moderate temper who would make Gods will their law and Gods word their rule otherwise whereas they might be the balm of the Church they prove her bane as many have done namely the second Nicen Synod and that of Constance and the Roman under Innocent the third and many others so that the outward communion of the Church hath been often dissolved though the inward hath and must hold among the faithfull Mathe. I desire to know what the Communion of Saints is Phila. The participation of those benefits to which the Saints only have a right in common and this communion they have with God and of his benefits among themselves That they have a communion with God you may see 1 John 1.3 7. by which we have a connexion and union with him by love of him towards us and our love to him and his word and service and so as it were cohabiting and dwelling one in and with another Iohn 14.23 as a father with his children by providence children with their father by a loving obedience And this communion is express in Scripture particularly with the blessed Trinity As first with the father by being made his sons 1 Iohn 3.1 through Christ by faith Iohn 1.12 and by the vertue of the Holy Ghost who leadeth us into all saving truth Iohn 16.13 and testifieth to us that we are the children of God Rom. 8.16 17. For as the Father by his love to us draweth us to Christ Iohn 6.44 so Christ dwels in our heart by faith Eph. 3.12 and the spirit acteth and perfecteth this union and communion by his operation through his spirituall graces Rom. 8.14 Therefore as God the Father hath given us his Son so his Son hath united our nature to himselfe by an union indissoluble as a body and members to the head 1 Cor. 12.12 So the Holy Ghost doth combine him and the Saints by a true and reall union and communion of his substance not by his body being in ours or ours in his but as the branches are in the vine which though differing in sight yet agree in connexion communication and assimulation By this spirit we have communion with Christs divine nature because it dwels in us and conforms us to it selfe 2 Pet. 1.4 and also with his human nature as children are partakers of the same flesh blood Heb. 2.14 yea of the same spirit 1. Cor. 6.17 and of his sufferings also Rom. 8.17 that we may be glorified with him For by the union we have with Christ is obtained all the benefits of his birth death resurrection and ascension spoken of before together with all the blessed effects thereof wronght in us as free justification regeneration adoption and freedome from sin satan and the sinfull world with all the consequents thereof which is remission of sin resurrection of our bodies and life eternall all which is sealed to us by the two Sacraments Baptisme and the Lords Supper by both which we have communion with Christ for all that are baptized into Christ have put on Christ Gal. 3.27 and the cup of blessing and the sacramentall bread is the blood and body of Christ to faith 1 Cor. 10.16 Mathe. What need was there of two Sacraments since both of them have relation to the death of Christ Phila. He that did first institute them knew best the reason of appointing two and the Scripture which is the expresse mind of Christ sets forth baptisme to us as the Sacrament of initiation or entrance or first grafting into Christ and his mysticall body the Church The other as the Sacrament of sustentation by which we are with the word nourished up to life eternall Therefore St Paul Rom. 6.5 cals baptisme a planting into the similitude of Christs death and Rom. 11.17 he saith the Gentiles were grafted into the true olive which no doubt was at first by the word of faith preached and baptisme received And the Sacrament of the communion is represented to us as food to which Christ had some respect John 6.55 saying my flesh is meat indeed though he explains it afterward in a spirituall sense ver 63. saying the spirit quickneth the flesh profiteth nothing It is true that there is no clear analogy between grafting and washing except we consider the subject of that Sacrament in divers respects 1. As a wild tree and so by baptisme one is said to be grafted because it is a means ordained for our admittance into the stock 2. If we consider man as a polluted infant in birth naturall so washing is proper Ezek. 16.4 5. and therefore baptisme is called the washing of regeneration or the new birth and differs as much from the other Sacrament in the thing signified as in the sign for the sign of one is water of the other wine So the thing signified in the one is the all-cleansing spirit of God John 3.5 which in effectuall baptisme operates with the water the thing signified by the other is the all-cleansing blood of Christ not but that both are in both the blood of Christ concurring with baptisme through the efficacy of it though not signified by it and the Holy Ghost in the communion by his powerfull operation conveying the efficacy of his body and blood to every beleever Mathe. Though Baptisme be but the Sacrament of entrance yet there be many tender minds who cannot comfortally bring children to it as there be many being fearfull of their own unworthiness and to partake with such as are not fit as they suppose to abstain from the Lords Table I pray therefore to help me therein that I being strengthened I may comfort others Phil. First I know no reason why any Christians should doubt of bringing their children to baptisme for the reasons I have already shewed But beside if Christ did admit children that were carried in peoples arms to his person for a blessing Luke 18.15 no doubt they may be admitted to baptisme where his blessing is to be expected especially there being no other ordinance appointed whereby we may bring children to him but this and that we find no prohibition in Scripture against it And whereas some say they may not because they have not faith they cannot prove they have none because Christ saith there be little ones that beleeve in him Greg. Decret lib. 3. cap. â— de baptis Nor can they prove that none may be baptized that beleeve not for Simon Magus was If they say that he made a confession of it I say they may make a better confession and profession by their parents and witnesses than he did by himselfe Or if there were a Text containing these words he that beleeveth not shall not be baptized would discreet men think it meant only of those that could hear and understand and not of Infants who cannot understand no more then that place of St Mark 16.16 includes infants damnation where Christ
saith he that beleeveth not shall be damned And what forbids us to beleeve that being God worketh without means upon some may not also into the children of Christians by his preventing grace convey so much seminall grace as may make them capable passively at least of this Sacrament of entrance Beside why may they not be admitted upon their parents faith as well as Christ cured some for the faith of others as the Palsey man and the woman of Canaans daughter and the centurions servant especially they having only sinned in their parents I see not but the imputation of their parents faith may possibly remove that which is imputed for the parents fact through that means which God in Christ hath ordained and so as they sin by another so in this case they may beleeve by another that as the malady is brought upon him without his will so without his will it may be healed Cypr Ep. 59. for no doubt the grace of God in Christ aboundeth above the guilt of Adams sin Rom. 5.15 16 17 18. and so the ordinance of Baptisme required and applied by the faith of the parents answereth to the ordinance of imputation of guilt for the parents fact and so Gods waies are equall that he may be justified in his doings and clear when he is judged By all which it may be collected beside from the ancient custome of the Church which is not to be despised that parents may without fear and in faith bring their children to baptisme Mathe. But how shall I resolve the fearfull in mind about their refraining to the Lords Supper Phila. Their fears may be good or bad If they be good as fear of their unworthinesse as Job feared all his works they be the fitter guests for this Table whose precious viands is able to remove that cold Systole of fear and bring forth the warm Diastole of faith both which those that have the spirit of God do breath at certaine times Psal 119.131 this may be a filiall fear of offending God by their unworthinesse But a despairing fear is bad as if Christ would cast thee away when thou commest to him and so is a panick fear when thou canst give no account of it so is an erroneous fear of taking the Communion in a mixt assembly because I have not a certain good character of all present or do certainly know that some of them are not so strict and conscientious livers as they ought to be For it is true that many are not to be admitted as the unbaptized and those that are ignorant of the grounds of religion and of the mystery of this holy Sacrament and some are to be sequestred from it as Adam from the tree of life lest he prophane it and as the leprous out of the camp lest they infect others so are obstinate and scandalous men and inordinate walkers Mat. 1â— 1â— 2 Thes 3. pertinacious hereticks wilfull schismaticks are to be suspended and they that neglect to do it if it be in their power do highly offend God But now let the fearfull consider whether they consent or allow of the one sin or the other if not he need not fear or whether it be in his power to separat those vile from the precious if not let it content him that God hath given him an heart to grieve for the disorder or if thou hast power to separate one from the other thou must be carefull that you mistake not the wicked for the just lest while you fear to beguilty of spilling the blood of Christ yet thou bringest the blood of some of his flock upon thee because thou takest from them the food allowed them by their Shepherd Consider therefore your fear to receive in a mixt assembly whether it proceed not from selfe conceit that you are more holy then others or that you may be defiled by them or that it is sinfull to accompany with such at the Communion and search if you can find any prohibition for it or reprehension in Scripture for so doing you may find prohibition of mixing with scandalous Christians company in common society and at meat not in sacred things 1 Cor. 5.11 So in 2 Thes 3.14 they are bidden to have no company with those that obeied not the Apostles words in that Epistle that was that Christians should walk orderly and laboriously in their callings So then they must forbear the company of such in common conversation not at the Lords Table for were it fit that the whole Church should forbear the Communion because of a wicked person there present surely nay but rather imitate Christs Disciples who did not avoid receiving the Lords Supper because Judas was there Luke 22.21 Neither did Christ forbid him because though inwardly bad enough yet be was not convicted of it and Christ not comming then as a judge would not censure him If we therefore look not narrowly into this feare it will make us neglect the duty we owe to God and the benefit God offers to us because another man doth not do his as he ought Aug. ex Cyp. lib de lapsis which is a thing disallowed by ancient Churches and Doctors namely that one is defiled with those mens sins that come unworthily to the Lords Table Mathe. How may one become a fit communicant of the Lords Supper Phila. The New Testament sets down two rules Christ bids us do it in remembrance of him St Paul bids us to examine our selves and shewes the danger of the neglect that it incurs judgement and the reason of that danger because for want of examination we discern not the Lords body By all which we may find what is the duty of a true communicant which no doubt consists in a right knowledge of the mystery of it and a true faith in the application of it both which to examine is our preparation Therefore we are to consider First the thing it selfe Secondly the relation that it hath to Christ Thirdly the end of it Fourthly the fitnesse of a receiver The thing it selfe is a visible earnest of an invisible good expected by faith in Christ to whom we have right through his word of which the Sacrament is a seale In this Christ hath shewed his abundant love that he would not only make himselfe visible to us by taking our nature but also humble himselfe to our sense of tasting and feeling that we may not only see but taste and handle the word of life so that though he be gone far from us and above us in the union hypostaticall having taken our manhood into God yet he is with us by an union sacramentall that we may take him into our selves and by vertue thereof be transformed to his likenesse in righteousnesse and holinesse The next thing to consider is the relation the Sacrament hath to Christ First in the elements Secondly the actions of the receiver The elements are mean and plain bread and wine the common food of the poorest man