mystery of the Trinity is necessary to be known and believed of all that shal be saved it was not so plainly revealed to the Jewes of old as it is to us in the new Testament a perfect and full knowledge of this mystery is not attainable in this life Although Trinity in its native signification signifie the number of any three things yet by Ecclesiasticall custome it is limited to signifie the three Persons in the Trinity This is not meant as if the Essence did consist of three Persons as so many parts and therefore there is a great difference between Trinity and Triplicity Trinity is when the same Essence hath divers waies of subsisting and Triplicity is when one thing is compounded of three as parts they are three not in respect of Essence or Divine attributes three Eternals but three in respect of personall properties as the Father is of none the Sonne of the Father and the holy Ghost of both three Persons but one God as to be to be true to be good are all one because Transcendents Opera Trinitatis ad extra sunt indivisa the outward workes which concerne the creature belong to one person as wel as the other as to create govern but opera ad intra sunt divisa the personall properties or internall workes are distinguished as the Father begets the Sonne is begotten of the Father and the holy Ghost proceeds from the Father and the Sonne There is in the Trinity alius alius another and another but not aliud aliud another thing and another thing as there is in Christ the Father is another person from the Sonne but yet there is the same nature and Essence of them all They differ not in their natures as three men or three Angels differ for they differ so as one may be without the other but now the Father is not without the Sonne nor the Sonne without the Father so that there is the same numericall Essence The Father in some sence is said to be the onely God John 17. 3. that is besides the Divine nature which is common to the three persons there is not another God to be found the word alone is opposed to all faigned Gods to every thing which is not of this Divine nature so when it is said None knoweth the Father but the Sonne and the Sonne but the Father that excludes not the Holy Ghost which searcheth the hidden things of God but all which are not of that Essence Though there be no inequality in the persons yet there is an order not of dignity but of beginning The Father in the Sonne by the holy Ghost made the world not as if there were so many partiall causes much lesse as if God the Father were the Principall and these Instrumentall but onely meere order Persona divina est essentiae divinae subsistentia incommunicablis Wendelinus The Essence considered with the manner of subsisting is called a Person A Person is such a subsistence in the Divine nature as is distinguished from every other thing by some speciall or personall property or else it is the God-head restrained with his personall property Or it is a different manner of subsisting in the Godhead as the nature of man doth diversly subsist in Peter JAmes John but these are not all one It differs from the essence as the manner of the thing from the thing it selfe and not as one thing from another one person is distinguisht from another by its personall property and by its manner of working The personall property of the Father is to beget that is not to multiply his substance by production but to communicate his substance to the same The Sonne is said to be begotten that is to have the whole substance from the Father by communication The Holy ghost is said to proceed or to be breathed forth to receive his substance by proceeding from the Father and the Sonne joyntly in regard of which he is called the Spirit of the Father and the Spirit of the Sonne both Gal. 4. 6. The Father onely begetteth the Sonne onely is begotten and the holy Ghost onely proceedeth both procession and generation are ineffable In the manner of working they differ for the Father worketh of himselfe by the Sonne and through the holy Ghost the Sonne worketh from the Father by the Holy Ghost the holy Ghost worketh from the Father and the Sonne by himselfe There is so one God as that there are three persons or divers manners of being in that one Godhead the Father Sonne and the holy Ghost 1 Whatsoever absolutely agrees to the Divine nature that doth agree likewise to every person of the Trinity 2 Every person hath not a part but the whole Deity in it selfe A person is one entire distinct subsistence having life understanding will and power by which he is in continuall operation These things are required to a person 1 That it be a substance for accidents are not persons they inhere in another thing a person must subsist 2 A lively and intelligent substance endued with reason and will an house is not a person nor a stone or beast 3 Determinate and singular for mankind is not a person but John and Peter 4 Incommunicable it can not be given to another hence the nature of man is not a person because it is communicable to every particular man but every particular man is a person because that nature which he hath in particular can not be communirated to another 5 Not sustained by another therefore the humane nature of Christ is not a person because it is sustained by his Deity 6 It must not be the part of another therefore the reasonable soule which is a part of man is not a person That there are three persons in the Deity viz. Father Sonne and holy Ghost is manifest by expresse testimonies of Scripture Genes 1. 1. Gods created and v. 26. Psalm 33. 6. there three are named the Word the Lord and the Spirit Esay 6.3 Holy Holy Holy But this truth is most clearly taught in the new Testament Matth. 3. 16. Luke 3. 22. The first person in the Trinity utters his voice from Heaven This is my beloved Sonne the Sonne is baptized in Jordan the holy Ghost descends in the shape of a Dove upon Christ. Pater auditur in voce Filius manifestatur in homine Spiritus Sanctus dignoscitur in columba Aug. tract 6. in Joh. Adde to this the History of Christs transfiguration described Matth. 17. 5. Marke 9. 7. Luke 9. 35. In which likewise the voice of the Father was heard from Heaven This is my beloved Sonne the Sonne is transfigured the Holy Ghost manifests himselfe in a bright cloud Matth. 28. 19. The Apostles are commanded to baptize in the Name of Father Sonne and holy Ghost Cameron thinks that is the most evident place to prove the Trinity But that is as â—pposite a place as any for this purpose 1 John 5.
21 22 How the Attributes are divided l. 2. p. 22 23 Goodnesse what it is and what in God l. 2. 79 to 84 Graciousnesse what it is in God l. 2. p. 83 84 Grasse the usefulnesse of it l. 3 p. 67 68 Great God is exceeding great in nature works and authority l. 2. p. 48 to 51 Greeke the Greeke translation is not Authenticall l. 1. p. 119 120 121 H HAbakuk who interprets him best l. 1. p. 61 Haggai why so called and who best expounds him l. 1. p. 61 Haile what it is l. 3. p. 52 Hatred what it is and what in God l. 2. p. 73 74 Heavens the creation of the Heavens is a wonderfull worke of God l. 3. p 26 to 30 Its motion is exceeding swift l. 3. p. 41 Hebrew Text in the old Testament Authenticall l. 1. p. 104 105 VVhether the Hebrew Text had Vowels or Points from the beginning l. 1. p. 116 to 119 Hebrewes whether that Epistle be Canonicall written by Paul and in Greeke l. 1. p. 75 76 77 VVho best interprets it ibid. Herbes their usefulnesse l. 3. p. 65 66 67 High God is most High l. 2. p. 51 52 History is delightfull especially of the Scripture l. 1. p. 16 VVhy some Bookes of the new Testament are called Historicall l. 1. p. 66 Holy God is Holy l. 2. p. 102 to 105 The Scripture is Holy l. 1 p. 136 137 138 Hosea why so called and when he wrote it l. 1. p. 60 Who expounds him best ibid. The chiefest among the small Prophets l. 1. p. 59 I JAmes how it came to be doubted of by same l. 1. p. 78 79 Who best expounds it l. 1. p. 79 Ice what it is l. 3. p. 52 Jeremy when he prophesied and who best interprets him l. 1 p. 58 Jewes corrupted not the Hebrew Text of the old Testament l. 1 p. 103 to 111 Image fourfold l 3 p. 116 Immortall God is Immortall l 2. p. 31 32 The soule of man is Immortall l. 3. p. 119 120 Immutability what it is l. 3 p. 44 God is Immutable l. 3 p 44 to 48 Impossible l. 2. p. 108 Independent God is in Independent l. 2. p. 36 Infinite God is Infinite l. 2 p. 32 to 35 Inspiration what it is l. 1. p. 9 Interpretation of Scripture l. 1 p. 171 172 173 179 180 To whom it belongs l. 3. p. 173 174 Meanes to interpret Scripture l. 1. 180 to 184 Job who the Authour of it and who best expounds it l. 1. p. 54 Joel who best expounds him l. 1 p. 60 When he prophesied l. 1. p. 69 John what it signifieth and what Bookes of Scripture he wrote l. 1. p 69 Who best interprets him why he is called The Divine he hath something more then all the other Evangelists l. 1 p. 69 The second and third Epistles are doubted of by some l. 1 p. 80 Who best expounds them all three ibid. m. Joshua why so called and who best expounds him l. 1 p. 49 Jude doubted of by some l. 1. p. 80 who best interprets him l. 1 p. 81 Judges why so called and who have best expounded that book l. 1. p. 50 Just God is Just l. 2. p. 91 to 94 K KInd God is Kind l. 2 p. 105 Kings why so called and who best expounds both those Books l. 1. p. 51 Knowledge God knowes all things l. 2. p. 60 to 63 L LAmentations why so called and who best expounded them l. 1. p. 58 Latine translation of the Bible l. 1. p 99 100 Legends why so called l. 3. p. 36 Leviticus why so called l. 1. p. 48 49 Who best expounds it l. 1 p. 49 Lexicons which are the best Lexicons for expounding the words both Hebrew and Greek in Scripture l. 1. p. 182 Life Gods life differs from ours l. 2. p. 30 Light what it is and the benefits of it l. 3. p. 38 39 40 Lightning why we see that before we heare the Thunder l. 3 46 Living God is Living l. 3. p. 28 to 31 Long-suffering God is Long-suffering l. 2. 100 101 Love what it is in God l. 2. p. 70 71 72 Luke what he was and who best expound him l. 1. p. 69 M MAlachy why so called and who best expounds him l. 1. p. 62 Man created after Gods Image l. 3. p. 115 116 117 Marke when he wrote l. 1. p. 20 And whether originally in Latine or Greek l. 1. p. 64 68 who best interprets him p. 68. Martyrs divers suffered for the truth l. 1. 21 22 How they of the true Church differ from other Martyrs l. 1 p. 22 23 Matthew when he wrote l. 1 p. 68 Whether he wrote in Hebrew or Greeke l. 1. p. 63 68 Who best expounds him l. 1 p. 68 Meditation what it is l. 1. p. 38 And what in God l. 2. p. 86 to 91 Meteors what they are how divided and of what they consist l. 3. p. 44 45 Metals what they are l. 3. p. 54 Micah why so called and who best expounds him l. 1. p. 60 Miracle what it is l. 2. p. 12 Miracles twofold l. 1. p. 19 The true Miracles differ much from the false l. 1. p. 20 The Divels workes are called lying wonders and why l. 3. p. 109 110 Moone the nature and use of it l. 3. p. 73 Montaines a great worke of God l. 3. p. 56 N NAhum why so called and who best expounds him l. 1. p. 61 Navigation the benefit of it l. 2 p. 61 64 Necessary God is a Necessary Essence l. 2. p. 56 The Scripture is Necessary l. 1 p. 135 136 Nehemiah why so called and who best expounds it l. 1. p. 52 Night the benefit of it l. 3. p. 42 43 Numbers why so called and who best interprets it l. 1. p. 49 O OBadiah why so called and who best expounds it l. 1 p. 60 Omnipotent God is Omnipotent l. 2. p. 106 to 109 Omnipresent God is Omnipresent l. 2. p. 36 to 39 Christs body is not everywhere l. 2. p. 39 40 One God is wholly One l. 2. p. 56 to 60 P PAradise not allegorically to be understood l. 3. p. 121 122 What it signifieth and whether it was destroyed by the flood ibid. Patient God is Patient l. 2 p. 99 100 101 Pentateuch why so called l. 1 p. 47 Who have written well on it l. 1. p. 47 48 The Turks honour it l. 1. p. 48 It is often quoted in the new Testament ibid. Perfect the Scripture is perfect l. 1. 138 to 148 God is perfect l. 2. p. 48 49 50 Person what it is in the Trinity l. 2. p. 128 129 130 How the Persons in the Trinity differ l. 2. 136 137 138 Perspicuous the Scripture is plaine and perspicuous l. 1 p. 161 to 171 Peter why those Epistles are called Catholicall l. 1. p. 79 Who hath best expounded both the Epistles the second is Canonicall l. 1. p. 79 80 Philippi the Metropolis of Macedonia who best expounds the Philippians p.
both from all prophane and Sacred writings and Paul honours it with this Elogie a faithfull saying and worthy of all acceptation 1 Tim. 1. 15. a more sure word 2 Pet. 1. 19. the Comparative for the Superlative in which there is no doubting and uncertainty but all things firme As God is Iâ—hovah of himself so is his word autoritative of it selfe and is true and to be obeyed whether thou think it Scripture or no. There is no higher authority for thee to appeale to it is above opinions of men conscience and therefore it must determine all controversies 2. It is true and certaine verity is affirmed of the Scriptures primarily internally and by reason of it selfe which is called the truth of the object which is an abâ—olute and most perfect agreement of all things delivered in the Scripture with the first truth or divine will of which the Scripture is a symbole and lively Image so that all things are delivered in it as the Holy Ghost hath dictated whence those honourable titles are given to it the Scripture is called a sure word 2 Pet. 1. 19. Psal. 19. 7. the Scripture of truth Dan. 10. ult words of truth Eccles. 12. 10. Yea truth it self John 17. 17. having the God of truth for the Authour Christ Jesus the truth for the witnesse the Spirit of truth for the Composer of it and it worketh truth in the hearts of those which heare it 2 Pet. 2. 2. The Apostle preferres the Scripture before the Revelation made by Angâ—ls Gal. 1. 8. Christ commends the certainty of it above all other sorts of Revelation 1 Pet. 1. 19. above information from the dead Luke 16. 31. The word of God is not onely true but eminently true truth it selfe prima veritas and pura veritas The Scripture hath a twofold truth 1. Of assertion it containeth no errour 2. Of promise there is no unfaithfulnesse in it The first truth referres to the matter which is signified properly called truth or verity The second referres to the intention of the Speaker which is properly called veracite or fidelity the latter is implyed Psal. 19. thy Testimonies are sure and so the sure mercies of David the former is implyed in that the word is purer then Gold 7 times refined There are two signes of truth in the Scripture 1. The particularity of it it names particulars in genealogies dolosus versatur in generalibus 2. Impartiality toward friends and their adversaries the most holy men have their faults described they give due commendation to their adversaries The truth of Scripture is 1. More then any humane truth of sense or reason 2. Above all naturall reason as the doctrine of the Trinity the incarnation of Christ justification by faith in Christ. 3. A truth which evidenceth it self 4. The standard of all truth nothing is true in doctrin or worship which is not agreeable to this 3. The Scripture is the rule of faith and manners It is termed Canonicall generally by the Fathers of the word Canon which signifieth a rule because it containes a worthy rule of religion faith and godlinessâ— according whereunto the building of the house of God must be sitted These properties saith Suarez are required in a rule 1. That it be known and easie the Scripture is a light 2. That it be first in its kind and so the measure of all the rest 3. It must be inflexible 4. Universall 1. It is a perfect rule of faith and obedience and able to instruct us sufficiently in all points of faith or doctrinals which we are bound to beleeve and all good duties or practicals which we are bound to practise Whatsoever is needfull to beleeve or to doe to please God and save our soules is to be found here whatsoever is not here found is not needfull to beleeve and practise for felicity Christ proveth the resurrection of the dead being an article of our faith against the Sadduces Matth. 22. 32. and the use of the Sabbath being a rule of life against the Pharisees by an inference made from the Scripture Matth. 12. 7. The Heads of the Creed and Decalogue are plainely laid downe in Scripture therefore there we have a perfect rule of faith and manners It is a rule 1. For faith Jerome in his controversie with Helvidius saith Credimus quia legimus non credimus quia non legimus We beleeve because we read we doe not beleeve because we doe not read Christ often saith have ye not read is it not written what is written in the Law Luke 10. 26. faith and the word of God must run parallel This we first beleeve when we doe beleve saith Tertullian that we ought to beleeve nothing beyond Scripture When we say all matters of doctrine and faith are contained in the Scripture we understand as the Ancient Fathers did not that all things are literally and verbally contained in the Scripture but that all are either expressed therein or by necessary consequence may be drawne from thence All controversies about religion are to be decided by the Scripture Deut. 12. 32. and 4. 2. Josh. 1. 7. Franciscus de Sâ—lis a Popish Bishop saith the Gospell was honoured so much that it was brought into the Councell and set in the midst of them and to determine matters of faith as if Christ had been there 2. It is a perfect rule for our lives and practise Psal. 19. 11. and Psal. 119. 9. In the Scriptures there are delivered remedies against all vices and meanes are there laid down for the attaining of all vertues We must follow the Scriptures exactly and not swerve to the right hand or left a metaphore taken from a way or rule saith Chamier when Linacer a learned English man heard the beginning of the 5. of Matthew read Blessed are the poore in spirit c. he broke forth into these words either these sayings are not Christs or we are not Christians It is a perfect not a partiall and insufficient rule as the Papiâ—â—s make it as God is a perfect God so his word is a perfect word if it be but a partiall rule then it doth not perfectly direct and he that should perfectly doe the will of God revealed in Scripture should not yet be perfect Secondly if the Scripture be a partiall rule then men are bound to be wise above that which is written that is above the Law and Gospell Regula fidei debet esse adaequata fidei aut regula non erit Whitakerus 1. All addition and detraction are forbidden to be made by any man to the word Deut. 4. 2. and 12. 32. Deut. 5. 32. Gal. 1. 8. 2. The Scripture is said to be perfect to beget heavenly and saving wisdome Psal. 19. 8. 2 Tim. 3 15 16 17. 3. Men in the matter of faith and Religion are sent to the Scripture onely 2. The Scripture is an Infallible rule Luke 1. 4. of which thou hast had a full assent Regularectè definitur
faith knowledge assent and full assurance these cannot consist without the perspicuity of the Scripture the divine promises also of writing the Law in our heart and concerning the spreading abroad and cleare light of the Gospell should be to no purpose if the Scriptures should not â—e plaine in things necessary to salvation All difficulty in understanding the Scripture ariseth not from the obscurity of it but from the weaknesse of our understanding corrupted by naturall ignorance or blinded by divine punishment and câ—rse therefore it no more followes from thence that the Scripture cannot be an infallible and onely rule of faith and life because some obscure things are found in it not understood of all then that the Bookes of Euclide are not perfect elements of Geometry because there are some abstruse theoremes in them which every vulgar Geometrician can not demonstrate or that Aristotles Organon is not a perfect Systeme of Logicke because a fresh Sophister understands not all its subtilties More distinctly we say that the Scriptures are plaine and obscure in a threefold respect 1. They are plaine and easie to be understood by all men in Fundamentals and the Speciall points necessary to salvation as the Decalogue the Apostles Creed the Lords Prayer and the like unlesse by those whose minds the God of this world hath blinded if they be obscure in some lesse principall and circumstantiall matters there is need of interpretation that the meaning may be more clearely unfolded 2. A difference of persons is to be considered either more generally or more specially 1. More generally as they are elect and regenerate or reprobate and unregenerate to those the Scripture is plaine and pe picuous to whom alone it is destinated and whose minds the Holy Ghost will inlighten by the Scripture John 7. 17. Rom. 12. 2. 1 Cor. 12. 15. Psal. 19. 7. Matth. 11. 5. and 25. 25. Psal. 9. 10. 12. 13. 14. Yet the flesh and unregenerate part in them puts in impediments but that Ignorance is removed at last Luke 8. 10 The reprobates continue involved in perpetuall darknesse and blinded with Ignorance hypocrisie covetousnesse pride and contempt of divine learning even seeing they see not Psal. 36. 3. Esay 29 9. Jer. 5. 21. Esay 6. 9. 2 Cor. 3. 14. there is a vaile over their hearts 2 Cor. 4. 3. 4. which is the cause why is so many ages under the Papacy the Scriptures were not understood because they preferred a lye before the love of the truth 2 Thess. 10. whose Ignorance is a deserved punishment of that contempt which they shewed to the Scriptures and their authority 2. More specially the persons are distinguished according to the diversity 1. Of Conditions of life and vocations for so many places of Scripture are hard to this sort of men which are more easie to another neither is it required that all things be understood of all men the knowledge of more places is necessary in a Minister then in a Trades-man and Husband-man yet it is an 〈◊〉 Rule to every one in his Vocation 2. Of capacities and wits for every one hath his measure of gifts so among Ministers some understanâ— the Word more obscurely some more plainly yet it is to all a perfect rule according to the measure of Gifts 3 Of times all things are not equally obscure or perspicuous to all ages many things are better understood now then in times past as the prophesies and predictions of Christ and the times of the Gospell so in the Mysteries of the Revelation the exposition rather of moderne Interpreters then Fathers is to be received because in our times not theirs there is an accomplishment of those Prophesies and many things were more clearely knowne by them in those dayes the Ceremonies and Types of Moses his Law were better perceived by the Jewes then us God the Author of the Scripture could speak perspicuously for he is wisdom it selfe and He would speake so because he caused the Scripture to be written to instruct us to our eternall salvation Rom. 15. 4. and he commands us to seek in the Scripture eternall life We do not account the prophecy of Esay touching Christ which the Eunuch read to be a dark and obsure prediction but wee know it was cleare and plaine enough though the Eunuch a raw Proselyte understood not the meaning of it The Fathers proved their opinions out of the Scriptures therefore the Scriptures are more clear then the writings and commentaries of the Fathers To every one which readeth with humility and invocation of God the Booke of the Apooalypse the obscurest and hardest Booke to understand of all other blessednesse is promised which when it cannot beâ—all to any that understandeth nothing it is manifest that the promise of blessednesse includeth a warrant of understanding of it so much as is necessary to salvation We affirme that many places in the Scripture are very obscure and that either from the obscurity of the things as in the Prophesies of future things the event must interprete them as Daniels Prophecies of the foure Monarchies were in times past very darke but easier since when all things were fulfilled so the comming of Antichrist in the new Testament drew the Fathers into divers opinions so even yet there are many things obscure in the Revelation which are not accomplished So those things which are spoken of the Messiah in the old Testament are either not understood or not fully without the new Testament Sometimes the ambiguity of words breedes a difficulty as I and the Fathers are one the Arrians understood it of a union of will as when Christ prayed John 17. that the Disciples might be one Hitherto may be referred those places which are to be understood allegorically as the Canticles the first Chapter of Ezechiel 3. Some places are obscure from the ignorance of ancient Rites and Customes as that place 1 Cor. 15. 29. of Baptizing for the dead is diversly explained by interpreters both old and new There are six interpretations of it in Bellarmine l. 1. de purgatorio c. 8. Ambrose saith Paul had a respect to that custome of some who Baptized the living for the dead Piscator Bucane say the custome of the ancient Church is noted here who Baptized Christians at the Graves that so it might be a symbole of their beliefe and confession of the Resurrection of the Dead Tarnovius proves that that rite was not in use in the Apostles time Calvin interprets it of those who were Baptized when they were ready to die but Beza thinkes by Baptizing is understood the 〈◊〉 of washing the bodies before the Buriall Andreas Hyperius sheweth in a peculiar tract what various opinions there are about this place Voetius hath written a tract de insolubilibus Scripturae Estius and Dr. Hall on the hard places of Scripture Divers reaâ—ons may be rendred why God would have many things in the Scripture obscure and difficult 1. To
at the parts of any man if borne lame or deformed this is to despise the Workman to murmure at the Potter 3. It shewes that God hath first chiefe absolute and perpetuall soveraignty over all his creatures so that hee can use command and doe with them as in equity seems good to his heavenly wisedome 4. When we behold the Heavens the Earth Aire and Sea how they are filled what use and commodities they have we should contemplate God in these things we see with our eyes 2. We should learne what a one God is 1. Eternall Hee that made heaven and earth is ancienter than both 2. Almighty Great works cannot be brought to passe without great strength he must needs be Infinite in power which made heaven and earth and hangs the earth as a Ball without any pillar to support it 3. Most wise strength separated from wisedome is little worth God knowes all things the nature of the Heavens Earth Water perfectly because he put such a nature into them tell your selves that God is a wise understanding Essence can order all to the best 4. Exceeding good hee hath infused goodnesse into the Heavens Waters Earth they are helpfull and and serviceable to man how much more goodnes is there in God he is good and doth good 5. See his love in making man best of the Creatures here below we should honour God in our mindes account him the chiefest and onely good and his favour the chiefest felicity bring our wills to long after him to desire him above all other things chusing him as our happinesse loving him and desiring to enjoy himfully Learne to feare him above all not daring to offend him and obey and please him what more agreeable to reason then that the Maker of all should be Ruler of all we are more his than a childe his Parents a servant his Masters Wee should also acknowledge that he made us Psalme 100. and praise him Gods great workes call for great praise commend him with our tongues and speak good of his Name Psalme 19. 2. The heavens declare the glory of God i.e. give occasion to man of declaring it 5. This is a comfort to those who acknowledge God to be such a one as hee is is not he rich enough to maintaine them wise enough to direct them strong enough to protect them If thou want goodnesse he can create in thee a new heart it may comfort the godly in regard of the resurrectionâ— God can raise them up at the last day 6. It is a great terrour to the wicked which doe not feare but despise him God will hate despise and destroy them God can doe it he made heaven and earth and he will doe it because he is true he hath threatned it oh the misery of that man which hath him for his enemy 7. We may learne from all the Creatures in generall 1. to bewaile our Rebellion against God which all of them reprove for they all stand in their kinde and station in which God set them at first The Sun rejoyceth to runne his course the Sea keepeth her bounds the earth stands upon her foundation the heavens keep their motion and declare Gods glorie the very windes and seas obey him 2. All of them teach the invisible things of God Rom. 1. 20. as was before shewed 8. We should make a right use of the creatures use them first devoutly 1 Tim. 4. 5. in faith Rom. 14. 14. and ult with Prayer and Thanksgiving Matth. 15. 36. Acts 27. 35. Secondly soberly 1 Cor. 10. 31. 3. thankfully 1 Tim. 4. 4. Having handled the works of Creation in generall I now proceed according to Moses his Method to a more particular enarration of each dayes worke The whole first Chapter of Genesis may be thus divided 1. The Author of the worlds Creation God 2. The Worke. 3. The approbation of it 1. verse In the beginning of time or being therefore the World was not eternall John begins so and took it hence but beginning there may meane from Eternity or as here Christ did not begin then but was then Prov. 8. 22. Bara Elohim Gods Created That difference between the Noune Plurall and Verbe Singular saith Rivet signifieth not the mysterie of the Trinity but is an idâ—otisme of the Hebrew tongue in which such enallages are frequent as Numb 32. 25. How ever there is no difference in the thing it selfe for the name of Gods being taken here essentially not personally is common to the 3. Persons Gods created is as much as the Father the Son and Holy Ghost created for elsewhere it is manifest from Scripture that not onely the Father but the Sonne and Holy Ghost also created the world Created signifieth an act of infinite power and is not communicable to any creature 1. Ex nihilo fecit quidem potentissime ac magnificentissimè Junius Heaven and Earth In the first day were created Heaven and Earth as it were the foundation and roofe of the building Psalme 104. 5. Esay 40. 21 22. The worke of the first day was 1 Heaven under which name are comprehended partly the Empyrâ—an first and immoveable Heaven which is called in Scripture the third Heaven and Heaven of Heavens Ephes. 4 10. 2 Chron. 6. 18. Acts 1. 11. partly the Celestiall Spheres which it is probable were made the first day but without those lights of the Starres with which at length in the fourth day they were adorned the Hebrew word for Heaven being of the Duall number may imply both The heavenly Intelligences or Angels the Inhabitants of the Invisible Heaven were then made as is probable saith Chemnitius Coelum id est extimum illum hujus universitatis ambitum cum super Caelestibus incolis illius spiritualibus formis atque intelligentiis Gen 2. 1. Job 38. 7. Junius in loc 2. The foure first simple things or elements as some think Earth Water Aire Fire and the fitting of them for use by making day and night Though other hold that the aire and fire are comprehended under Firmament the worke of the second day For the earth there is he emphaticall this earth which we dwell in though then unpolished The earth is described in the second verse it was without forme and void informitie and vacuity in the originall without inhabitants and without ornament the earth and waters were joyned together among themselves the waters at first did encompasse and cover the earth round about as it were a cloathing and garment Psalme 104. 6. Darknesse was on the face of the deep that is the waters which inclosed the earth in themselves 3. v. There is an extraordinary light mentioned the ordinary fountaine of light is the Sunne which in what subject it did inhere is not certaine some say water in the thinner parts of the superficies some the Heavenly Spheres others say the Element of fire for that say they is either included under light or we know
argument of doing good to us His name is the more magnified by how much we are more vile We should ascribe unto his Name all the mercies we enjoy giving all the praise from our selves wholy to him God for his Names sake hath made and redeemed us * Hereby we may judge which is the true Religion what Doctrine is sound pure and of God and what corrupt and from men That Doctrine which setteth forth the praise of God commeth from Heaven but that which is from men advanceth the power pride and merit of man John 7. 18. Ephes. 1. 6. 2. 4. Rom. 3. 21. * Duobus modis referâ—i aliquid ad Dei gloriam dicitur Primum formaliter explicitè quando aliquis cogitat cum animo hoc sibi agendum esse quia nomini divino sit gloriâ—sum Deinde virtualiter implicitè cum quis divinae studens gloriae eoque nihil facere decernens nisi quod legi congruat ad hoc gratiam Dei quotidie exposcens boni quippiam facit de universali fine actu non cogitans sed solùm particularis finis bonum intendens Vossâ—us in Thesibus Though we can not actually intend Gods glory alwaies in every thing yet we should virtually To glorifie is to manifest ones excellency as appeares John 17. 4. compared with verse 6. See of glorifying God Church his miscelanies p. 11. to 18. * 1 Cor. 15. 42 43. There is say the Schooles beatitudo objectiva so whatever is the chiefest good of the soule is the soules blessednesse 2 Formalis when the soule and its beatifying object are united as the fruition of God The soule is here united to God remorely and imperfectly there immediately and perfectly 2 Sam 22. 47. 1 Kings 1. 48. Paul intitleth him God blessed for ever the onely blessed Potentate Vide Amesium Psalm 1. 1. * Beatitudo status est omnium bonorum aggregatione perfectus Boetius de consol Phil. 1 Tim. 6. 15. * He that is the cause of all welfare to other things and makes them in their severall kinds happy he must needs be therefore most happie himselfe God is the auâ—â—our of all blessednesse Psalm 132. 1 2. Aristotle Happinesse is taken two waies 1 Octjectively for the object wherein one is happy as Gods infinite essence is the object both of Gods Angels and mens happinesse 2 Formally for those acts whereby we possesse that object God is happy formally because he knoweth loveth and enjoyeth himselfe therefore it is said our goodnesse extendeth not to him so Angels and men are formally happy when they know and enjoy God We should praise God 1. Intensivè Psalm 36. 10. 103. 1. 3. Extensive with all praise Psalm 9. 14. and for all mercies Psalm 71. 7 8. Dicique beatus aâ—te obitum nemo supremaque funera possit Consectaries from Gods Blessednesse The happinesse of man consists in the enjoying of God All other things are no otherwise means of happinesse or helpes to it then as we see and taste God in them We must account our selves happy in this thing wholy and onely in that God is ours Happinesse is the enjoyment of good commensâ—â—ate to our desires * Bish. Lake a Man in the state of blessednesse can not see God absolutely as he is in himselfe for that which is Infinite can not be comprehended of that which is limited Visio beatifica est cognitio non comprehensiva sed quidditativa But God doth manifest himselfe so farre forth as a creatuâ—e is able to know him As a vessell may be filled with the water of the Sea but it can not containe all the water in the Sea The Apostle saith we shall know God even as he also is knowne But as is not a note of equality but of likenesse As God knoweth me after a manner agreeable to his infinite excellency so shall I know God according to my capacity * The Word â—ssence or Trinity are not found in Scripture but Essence is duely derived thence for seeing God saith that he is Essence is fitly ascribed to him Trinity hath a sufficient ground there are three that beare witnesse in Heaven 1 John 5. 7. The word person is extant Heb. 1. 3. therefore these words are rightly used in the Church Ephes. 1. 17 18. Par on Rom. 11. 23. Exod. 33. 20. 1 Cor. 13. 9. * Si rectè dicuntur tres Elohim etiam rectè dici possit tres Dii nam Elohim Latinè sonat Dii vel Deuâ— Drusius de quaefiâ—â—s per Epistolam Epist. 6â— Sic concidit gravis querela expostulatio viri Dâ—cti adversus libri cujusdam titulu De tribus Elohim Non n. voluit author libri illius voce Elohim propriè significare Personas ac proinde tot esse Elohim quot fides Christiana agnoscit esse personas in Divinis cum Scriptura aperiè contra flet que â—estatur Deum nostrum esse Deum unum Non â—ic erravit aut cecutiit doctus ille Theologus ut diceret doceres Tres esse propâ—ie loquendo Elohim Sed quoniam vocis illius terminatione plurali Scriptura innuere voluit S. S. Trinitatis mysterium ipse huc resciciem eò volâ—s in libri quem de S. S. Trinitate scribebat titulâ— alludere catachâ—esi non infrequenti sed â—â—ainaria Capel Davidis Lyra. * Matth. 28. 19. John 5. 26 27. The Father is the fountaine and originall of all the Deity and the cause of the Sonne which the very woâ—d Father signifieth therefore he is said to be unbegotten and hence the name God is often peculâ—arly and by an excellency given to the Father in Scripture Psalm 2. 17. proves that the Father begets and the Sonne is begotten of the Father Galat. 4. 6. See John 15. 26. 14. 26. Haec est differentia inter essentiam divinam personam divinam Essentia divina est communu pluribus divinitatis personis Persona autem una alteri non est communicabilis Vnde Pater non est Filius nec Filius Pater 2 Essentia divina est una Personae plures Wendelinus * Persona est individuum subsistens vivum intelligens in communicabile non sustentatum ab alio nec pars alterius Persona igitur non est â—ssentia quae pluribus est communicabilis Personae vox non hic sigâ—sicat ossicium aut relâ—tionem ut persona principis vel vultum visibilem speciem gestum vel formam alterius representamem ut Personae in drammate sed modum quo essentia divina subsistit Quinescis Triâ—â—tem ito ad Jordanem See John 15. 26. The Hereticks that are Antitrinitarians See John 8. 58. Psalm 2. 12. Paulus Samosetanus more fitly Semisathanas held Christ was but a meere man Matth. 6. 6. See Acts 4 24. 25 26 27. John 8. 54. God purchased his Church with his blood Acts 20. 28. John 1. 1 2. 1 Cor. 8. 6. By the Apostle Christ is expresly called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Divine
when he was pressed by Bishop Ridly and others to tolerate his Sister Masse in her owne Chapell he would not though importuned yeeld thereto saying He should dishonour God in it but being much pressed by them he burst into teares and they thence concluded that he had more divinity in his little finger then they in all their bodies O that you would study to premote Gods glory and be zealous for his truth since you have had such experience of his mercy and likewise could not but perceive the evill of those dangerous errours which were too much indulged by some of those whom you have cast out I shall now speake of the threefold Subject I handle in my Booke 1. The Scripture 2. God 3. The Workes of God It is reported of Charles the Great that he set his Crown on the Bible and Luther was so zealous to have the Scriptures read that he professed if he thought the reading of his Bookes would hinder the reading of the Scripture he would burne them all before he dyed Alphonsus King of Spaine and Naples read the Bible with Lira's glosse foureteen times over The Emperour Theodosius the second wrote the New Testament out with his owne hand many speake much of new light but the Prophet Esay saith To the Law and to the Testimony if they speake not according to this word it is because there is no light in them Take heed of too much of that new light which the world is now gazing upon so much new light is breaking forth that the old zeale is almost extinct by it saith a Minister of New England The Familists say they are above Ordinances when the body hath no need of nourishment then and not afore will the soule have no need of Ordinances we about Westminster have beene better instructed out of the 20. of Exodus 24. Some talke of Revelations and the Testimony of the Spirit But now the Scripture is compleated I must not expect any immediate Testimony of the Spirit Luther saith if any Spirit should come and speak any thing to him that he brought not Scripture for he would spit in his face The Scripture is the best Cynosure to follow it was Davids Counseller it is a perfect rule of a Perfect Reformation Secondly all Christian States and Persons should labour for an experimentall practicall knowledge of God and Christ Phil. 3. 8. 10. the vision of God in Heaven shall make us perfectly Happye Quid Deus sit ipse tantum novit what God is God himselfe doth onely perfectly know But he hath revealed himselfe to us in his word and workes That place in 34 of Exodus 6. 7. verses is as full a description of Gods Attributes as any in all the Scripture The Lord the Lord God mercifull and gracious long-suffering and abundant in goodnes truth keeping mercy for thousands forgiving iniquity transgression sin that will by no meanes clear the guilty visiting the iniquity of the Fathers upon the children and upon the childrens Children unto the third and fourth generation If God were more known he would be more loved honouâ—ed feared trusted The Heathens extolled the knowledge of a mans self but Christians must chiefely study to know God This is a Noble Subject for a Christian Parliament and a Christian Kingdome to exercise themselves in O that you would all labour to know Gods excellencies and to propagate the knowledge of him to the many darke Corners of the Land Thirdly the workes of God are to be diligently observed by a Christian State One observes that there is a five fold Declaration of the workes of God An Arthnieticall Declaration Psal. 40. 5. Secondly a Logicall Declaration of the workes of God when we shew the severall kinds of them as the workes of Creation the worke of Redemption the worke of Providence and distribute those into workes of mercy or works of Justice Thirdly an Historicall Declaration when we declare the persons acting the places the times the Counsels the mannaging of the severall actions the events and successes Fourthly a Rhetoricall Declaration Fifthly a Declaration purely Theologicall or a practicall Declaration of the works of God We should be lifted up by Gods manifold works to the Consideration of his unlimited greatnesse that is the first cause and author of them all we can turne our eyes no way but exceeding great multitudes of works wrought by God doe offer themselves to our view If we looke upward downeward on the right hand on the left into our selves and other things our minds shall be encountred with diversity of rare Workes of Almighty God These workes are all made with much wisdome Psal. 136. 5. and the serious considering of Gods workes is a great part of the sanctifying of his name Never had any Parliament more reason to magnifie Gods goodnesse for his singular mercies Oh that as many of your deliverances were got with supplication so they might be worne with thankefulnesse and as you have been a Parliament of many Prayers so may you be a Parliament of many prayses which is the earnest desire of Your Honours Devoted Servant EDW. LEIGH To the Christian Reader REader The number of bookes is without number the Presses are daily oppressed with them Yet though the world abound with unprofitable may pernicious Pamphlets there are many excellent subjects which are either not handled or not sufficiently There is a great variety in mens fancies as well as in their faces and bookes the fruit of mens brains are as various as men themselves Some books are to be tasted onely some chewed and some swallowed That saying of Stanchar the Hereticke doth exceedingly please the Papists Plus apud se valere unum Lombardum quam centum Lutheros ducentos Melancthones trecentos Bullingeros quadringentos Martyres quingentos Calvinos That one Lumbard was more esteemed by him then 100 Luthers 200 Melancthons 300 Bullingers 400 Martyrs 500 Calvins Focanus contrarily saith thus of the Schoolmen that one Austin among the Ancients and one Calvin in his Institutions of Christian Religion among the moderne Divines will afford thee more solid Divinity then all the School-Doctors of the Popish Church with all their vaine disputations jejune distinctions quodlibeticall questions and foolish speculations with which saith he Thomas Scotus Lombard Bonaventure Molina Vasquez Suarez à Soto Bellarmine and other Doctors of the Romane Church are full even ad nauseam But the Bible is indeed the Booke of Bookes it signifieth in the Greeke Tongue A Booke in generall and was sometimes taken so largely yet by an Antinomasie or excellency it is now taken for the Booke of the Holy Scripture and is all one with Gods Booke We told you before how much the Papists magnified Peter Lumbard the father of the Schoolmen calling him the Master of the sentences and preferring him before hundreds of ours The next Schoolman after him Alexander
soule and body shall be perfectly united with God 3. How Divinity is to be taught In the generall it is to be handled methodically There is a great necessity of methode in Divinity that being usefull both to enlighten the understanding with the clearnesse of truth and to confirme the memory that it may more faithfully retaine things therefore in Divinity there will be a speciall need of art and orderly disposall of precepts because the mind is nowhere more obâ—use in conceiving nor the memory more weake in retaining There is a different way of handling Divinity according to the severall kinds of it Divinity is threefold 1. Succinct and briefe when Divine truth is summarily explained and confirmed by reasons and this Divinity is called Catecheticall Systematicall 2. Prolix and large when Theologicall matters are handled particularly and fully by definitions divisions arguments and answers this is called handling of Common places Scholasticall and controversall Divinity 3. Textuall which consists in a diligent meditation of the holy Scriptures the right understanding of which is the end of other instructions This againe is twofold either more Succinct and applied to the understanding of the learned as commentaries of Divinity or more diffuse and popular applied to the capacity and affections of the vulgar as Preaching which is called Patheticall Divinity and is especially usefull to correct the manners of men and stir up their affections 4. How Divinity is to be learned There is neede of a fowrefold minde to the study of it 1. Of a godly and heavenly minde most ardent Prayers in our learning being frequently powred out to God the fountaine of light and wisdome that dispelling the darknesse of ignorance and error he would deigne to illuminate our minds with the cleare knowledge of himselfe we can not acquire Divine wisdome as we doe the knowledge of other arts by our owne labour and industry it is a praise to learne humane arts of our selves here we must be taught of God 2. Of a sober minde that we may not be too curious in searching out the profound mysâ—eries of Religion as about the Trinity predestination we must be wise to sobriety and not busie our selves about perplexed and unprofitable questions being content to know such things which are revealed to us for our salvation 3. Of a sâ—udious and diligent minde other arts are not wont to be gotten without labour this being the Queene of arts requires therefore much paines both for its difficulty and excellency 4 Of an honest and good minde Luke 8 40. We must learne 1. with a deniall of our wit and carnall reason not measuring the unsearchable wisdome of God by our shallow capacities 2 with deniall of our wicked affections 1 Pet. 1. 2 3. 3 with a firme purpose of obedience Joh. 7. 17. Psal. 50. 23. Prov. 28. 28. 5. The things contrary to Diviniy are 1. Heathenisme being altogether ignorant of and refusing the true and saving knowledge of God 2. Epicurâ—isme scoffing at Divinity 3. Heresie depraving and corrupting Divinity 6. The excellency of Divine knowledge or the study of Divinity appeareth in these particulars 1. In the subject matter of it which is Divine either in its own nature as God and Christ Ps. 70 7. 1 Joh. 5. 46. or in relation to him as the Scripture Sacraments It is called the wisdome of God Prov. 2. 10. 3. 13. 1 Cor. 2. 6 7. and that wisdome which is from above Jam. 3. 17. If to know the nature of an Herbe or the Sun and Stars be excellent how much more to know the nature of God Aristotle held it a great matter to know but a little concerning the first mover and Intelligences Paul desired to know nothing but Christ and him crucified 1 Cor. 2. 2. That is he professed no other knowledge Si Christum discis satis est si caetera nescis Si Christum nescis nihil est si caetera discis The Metaphysicks handle not things properly divinely revealed but that which the Philosophers by the light of nature judged to be Divine 2. In the end the principall and maine end of Divinity is the glory of God that is the celebration or setting forth of Gods infinite excellency the secondary end is mans blessednesse John 17. 3. 3. In the certainty of it Gods Word is said to be sure and like Gold seven times refined there is no drosse of falsehood in it The Academicks thought every thing so uncertaine that they doubted of all things 4. In the cause of it these truths are such as cannot be known but by Gods revealing them to us all Scripture was given by Divine inspiration flesh and blood hath not revealed this to thee a humane light is enough to know other things 5. In the holines of it Psal. 19. 5. by them thy servant is forewarned 1 Tim. 3. 15. the Word of God is able to make us wise to salvation and to furnish to every good worke Christ makes this a cause of the errour and wickednesse in mans life that they doe not reade and understand the Scriptures 6. In the delight and sweetnesse of it Job 23. chap. 12 verse preferred the Word of God before his foode David before thousands of Gold and Silver before the honey and the honey combe Psal. 19. 10. 119. 103. and when he ceaseth to compare he beginneth to admire wonderfull are thy Testimonies Archimedes tooke great delight in the Mathematicks Austin refused to take delight in Tullies Hortensius because the name of Jesus Christ was not there Nomen Jesu non erat ibi 7. In that the Devill and Hereticks oppose it the Papists would not have the Bible translated nor Divine service performed in the vulgar Tongue TWo things are to be considered in Divinity 1. The rule of it the Scripture or word of God 2. The matter or parts of it concerning God and man Principium essendi in Divinity is God the first essence principium cognoscendi the Scripture by which we know God and all things concerning him I shall handle both these principles but begin with the Scripture as many Systematicall Writers do Of the Scripture It is necessary that the true Religion have a rule whereby it may be squared else there could be no certainty in it but there would be as many Religions as men It appeares by the light of nature the Heathen had known rules for their Rites Ceremonies and services the Turkes have their Alcoran the Jewes their Talmud the Papists their Decrees neither can any thing be a duty which hath not a rule God revealed himselfe divers wayes to the Fathers Heb. 1. The manner of revealing Gods will is threefold according to our three instruments of conceiving viz. Understanding Phantasie and senses to the understanding God revealed his will by ingraving it in the heart with his owne finger Jer. 31. 33. by Divine inspiration 2 Pet. 1. 21. 2 Chron.
15. 1. Heb. 8. 11. Iâ—hn 14. 26. and by intellâ—ctuall visions Num. 12. 6. to the phantasie God revealed his will by imaginary visions to Prophets awake and by dreames to Prophets asleepe Gen. 40. 8. 41. 8 9. Acts 16. 10 10. 3. Num. 14. 4. to the senses God revealed his will and that either by vision to the eye or lively voyce to the Eare Gen. 3 9. 4. 6. 15. 4 5. Exod. 20. 1 2. 3. 1 2 3 33. 17. And Lastly by writing This Revelation was sometimes immediate by God himselfe after an unspeakable manner or by meanes viz. Angels Vrim Thummim Prophets Christ himselfe and his Apostles The written word forthematter contained in it is called the word of God Rom 9. 6. for the manner of Record the Scripture John 10. 35. 2 Tim. 3. 16. 1 Pet. 2. 6. or Scriptures Matthew 22. 29. John 5. 39. Romans 15. 4. 2. Pet. 3. 16. By an Antonomasie or an excellency of phrase as the most worthy writings that ever saw the light Sometimes with an Epithite the holy Scriptures Rom. 1. 2. 2 Tim. 3. 15. the Sâ—riptures of the Prophets Rom. 16. 26 Some thinke thâ—t Enoch the seventh from Alâ—m wrote but Jude 6. 14. speakâ—th onely of his prophesying which might rather be by word of mouth then writing because our Saviour citing Scripture ever gives the first place to Moses and undertaking by the Scriptures to prove himselfe to be the Messiah that he ought to suffer began at Moses Luke 24. 27. No doubt if there had beene any more ancient then Moses our Saviour would have alleadged it because all the Scripture that was before him was to give testimony of him Of the authority of the Scripture The Author of the Scriptures was God himselfe they came from him in a speciall and peculiar manner commonly called inspiration which is an act of Gods Spirit immediately imprinting or infusing those notions into their braines and those phrases and words by which the notions were uttered 2 Tim. 4. 16. All Scripture is given by Divine inspiration or by inspiration of God Prophesie came not of old time by the will of men but holy men of God spake as they were moved or carried by the Holy Ghost 2 Pet. 1. 21. They did not write these things of their own heads but the Spirit of God did move and worke them to it and in it 2 Sam. 23. 2. The Spirit of the Lord spake by me that is did immediately guide me and tell me what matter to utter and in what words Stephen saith they resisted the Holy Ghost when they did disobey the Scriptures The Holy Ghost by the mouth of David and the mouth of Esay spake Acts 1. 16. 28. 25. The Inscriptions of many Propheticall bookes and Epistles Apostolicall run thus The word of the Lord which â—ame to Hosea Amos Joel Paul Peter JAmes a servant of God and an Apostle of Christ. The proeme that is set before divers prophecies is this Thus saith the Lord and the Prophets inculcate that speech the mouth of the Lord hath spoken it because they would take off the thoughts of the people from their own persons and lift them up to consideration of God the chiefe author It is all one to say the Scripture saith Rom. 4. 3. 10. 11. 11. 2. Gal. 4. 30. 1 Tim. 5. 10. and God saith Rom 9. 25. Heb. 4. 3. 8. 5. 13. 5. and the word Scripture is put for God speaking in the Scripture the Scripture saith to Pharaoh Rom. 9. 7. and the Scripture hath shut up all men under sinne Galat. 3. 22. for which in another place God hath shut up Rom. 11. 32. All other disciplines were from God and every truth whosoever speaks it is from the holy Ghost but the Scripture in a singular manner is attributed to the Holy Ghost he immediately dictated it to the holy men of God The efficient principall cause then of the Scripture was God the ten Commandements of which most of the rest is an exposition were writen after a secret and unutterable manner by God himselfe therefore they are called the writings of God Exod. 32. 16. Secondly all the rest which was written though men were the instruments was done by his appoinment and assistance Exo. 17. 14. Esay 8. 1. Jer. 30. 2. The Scripture is often attributed to the holy Ghost as the Author and no mention is made of the Pen-men Heb. 10 15. The Prophets and Apostles were the Pen-men of the Scripture whose calling sending and inspiration was certainly divine for whatsoever they taught the Church of God or left in writing they learned not before in the Schooles 1 Cor. 2. 13. The Divine authority of thâ— word may be defined a certain dignity and excellency of the Scripture above all other sayings or writings whatsoever whereby it is perfectly true in word and sence it deserves credit in all sayings narrations of things past present and to come threatnings and promises and as superiour doth binde to obedience if it either forbid or command any thing 1 Tim. 1. 15. 2 Pet. 1. 19. John 5. 39. Heb. 6. 18. Rom. 1. 5. 2 Cor. 10. 5 6. 13. 3. 12. 12. Gal. 1. 1 12 13. though the things in mans judgement seem unlike or incredible or the Commandements hard and foolish to the carnall minde Hereticks have laboured to prove their corrupt and damnable opinions out of the Scripture and have received some bookes if not all as Divine The Turkes at this day so esteem the five books of Moses as they will kisse such patches of Paper as they finde having any part thereof written in the same Aristaeus an Heathen when he had determined to have disputed against Scripture confesseth that he was forbidden by God in a dreame Plato is termed Moses Atticus Moses speaking Greeke The holy Scripture in it selâ—e is Divine and Authenticall though no man in the world should so acknowledge it as the Sunne in it selfe were light though all the men in the world were blind and could not or would not see it but in respect of us it is Divine and Authenticall when it is acknowledged and esteemed so to be The Scripture is the word of God written by holy men as they were inspired by the holy Ghost divinely containing all Divine truth necessary to salvation for the edification and instruction of Gods Church thereunto and for the glory of God That the Scriptures were from God may appeare by reasons contained in or cleaving to the Scripture 1. From the excellency of their matter which is Heavenly the divine and supernaturall matter contained in it It telleth us of such things as doe farre exceed the reach of mans reason and which it was impossible for any man to counterfeit and faine and which being told are so correspondent to reason
things contingent which are to come many ages after and which depend upon no necessary cause in nature therefore in what writings we meet with such things foretold and doe finde them fully and plainly acomplisht these writings we must confesse to have their birth from Heaven and from God Now in the Scripture we have divers such predictions The two principall and clearest which are most obvious and evident are 1. the conversion of the Gentiles to the God of Israel by meanes of Christ. For that was foretold exceeding often and plainly in him shall the Gentiles trust and he shall be a light to the Gentiles Jacob lying on his death-bed said the obedience of the Gentiles shall be to him and David all the ends of the earth shall see the salvation of God and Esay in him shall the Gentiles trust and Malachy my name shall be great to the ends of the earth See Esay 49. 6. 60. 3 5. Scarce one of the Prophets but have spoken of the conversion of the Gentiles Now we see the Gentiles turned from their Idols a great number of them and embracing the God of the Jewes and the Scriptures of the Jewes by means of Christ whom they see and acknowledge to be the Messias foretold to the Jewes Againe it was foretold that Christ should be a stone of offence to the Jewes that they should reject him and so be rejected by God from being a people doe we not see that to be performed The accomplishment of these two maine prophesies so long before delivered to the world by the Pen-men of holy writ shewes manifestly that they were moved by the holy Ghost That promise Gen. 3. 15. was made 3948 yeeres before it was fulfilled as Sâ—aliger computes it It was foretold of Christ that they should cast lots about his Garments and that his bones should not be broken Looke upon this in the inferiour causes the souldiers that brake the other mens bones and it seemes to be a very hap and chance yet there was a speciall ordering of this in Gods providence The predictions of Satan were doubtfull and ambiguous but these are distinct and plaine Satans predictions are of things which might be gathered by conjecture for the most part false though Satan cover his lying by likelihoods but these are aboue the reach of Angels most true and certaine their end was confirmation in sin and Idolatry 7. The CoÌ„mandements are 1. most righteous and equall 2. impartiall they bind all men all in men the affections thoughts consciences and that perpetually Secondly the Threatnings are generall 1 in respect of persons 2. In respect of things Deut. 28. 59 60. 3. The Promises are comprehensive Levit. 26. and strange Exod. 34. 24. of eternall life Marke 10. 29 30. 8. Another reason may be taken from antiquity of the Scripture many wonder at the Pyramids of Egypt being the most ancient structure in the world The Bible containes a continued History from age to age for the space of 4000 yeeres before Christ even from the beginning No writer of any humane story can be proved to be more ancient then Ezra and Nehemiah who wrote about the yeere of the world 3500. Amongst the Grecians some say Homer is the most ancient author that is extant who lived long after Troy was taken for that was the subject of his Poem Now those times were not neere so ancient as those in which the Scripture was written Homer was after Moses 600 and odde yeeres saith Peter du Moulin That which the Egyptians brag of their antiquity is fabulous by their account they were 6000 yeares before the creation unlesse they account a month for a yeere and then it maketh nothing against this argument History is an usefull and delightfull kind of instruction Among Histories none are comparable to the Histories of sacred Scripture and that in their antiquity rarity variety brevity perspieuity harmony and verity Dr Gouge on Exod. 13. 13. that song of Moses Exod. 15. was the first song that ever was in the world Orpheus Musaeus and Linus the most ancient of the Poets were 500 yeeres after this time 9. The power and efficacy of the Scripture upon the soules of men sheweth it to be of God and the wonderfull alteration that it makes in a man for God when he doth entertaine and believe it in his heart it makes him more then a man in power to oppose resist and fight against his own corruptions it brings him into a wonderfull familiarity and acquaintance with God It puts such a life and strength into him and that for Gods sake and his truth he can suffer all the hardest things in the world without almost complaining yea with exceeding and wonderfull rejoycing The holy Ghost by meanes of this word workes powerfully so changing and reforming a man that he â—â—ndes himselfe transformed and renewed thereby 1. It overmasters the soule 2. It separates the heart from lusts and the world 3. Alters and changeth the customes of men 4. It keeps the heart up under the guilt of sinnes against all the power of the divell It quickneth the dull Psal. 119. 93 107. comforteth the feeble Rom. 15. 4. giveth light to the simple Psal. 119. 7. convinceth the obstinaâ—e 1 Cor. 12. 3. 14. 24. reproveth errors rebuketh vices 2 Tim 3. 16. is a discerner of the thoughts 1 Cor. 14. 24 25. and aweth the conscience JAmes 4. 12. 10. If there be a God he ought to be worshipped and he cannot be worshipped unlesse he manifest himselfe to us which he hath done in the Scripture 11. The candour and sincerity of the Pen-men or Amanuenses respecting Gods glory onely and not their owne and in setting down not onely the sinnes of others but their own slips and infirmities doth testifie that they were guided by the holy Ghost Moses shewes his disobedience Num. 11. 11. Jonah his murmuring Jon. 1. 4. Jeremy his fretting Jer. 20. 14. David shames himselfe in his preface to the 51 Psalme Saint Marke wrote the Gospell out of Peters mouth and yet the deniall of Peter is more expresly laid down by the Evangelist St. Marke then any other and Paul sets down with his owne Pen his owne faults in a sharper manner then any other Matthew the Evangelist tels us of Matthew the Publican The Pen-men of holy Scripture were holy men called sent inspired by the Spirit which had denied the world with the lusts and affections thereof and were wholly consumed with zeale for the glory of God and salvation of men 2 Pet. 3. 15. 2 Tim 3. 16. Matth. 16. 17. Gal. 2. 11 12. Ephes. 2. 3 5. They learned not of men what they wrote Moses David Amos were heardsmen Jeremy was almost a child Peter JAmes and John were in their ships other Apostles were unlearned before their calling Acts 4. 13. Moses learned of the Egyptians and Daniel of the Chaldeans humane
Arts and Sciences but they could not learne of them the knowledge of the true God they themselves being ignorant and grosse Idolaters Neither could they erre in that which they delivered for by them the Spirit of Christ and Christ himselfe did speake 1 Pet. 1. 11. 2 Pet. 1. 21. Acts 28. 25. 2 Cor. 13 3. In thâ—ir owne judgement the most holy did erre as 1 San 16. 1 and Nathan 2 Sam. 6. which errour is truly related in the Scripture but when they spake according to the guidance of the Spirit which did ever assist them in the penning of the Scripture they could not erre I have learned saith Austin to Jerome to give this honour onely to the Canonicall bookes firmely to believe that no authour of them erred in writing from all others he expected proofe from Scripture or reason 12. The wonderfull consent singular harmony and agreement of the Scriptures shewes that they came not from men but from God John 5. 46. each part sweetly agreeth with it selfe and with another and with the whole Acts 26. 22. 11. 17. Luke 24 27. John 5. 46. Matth. 4. 4. what was foretold in the old is fulfilled in the new Testament If there seem any contrariety either in numbring of yeeres circumstance of time and place or point of doctrine the fault is in our apprehension and ignorance not in the thing it selfe and by a right interpretation may easily be cleared See Dr. Willet on Gen. 24. 38. These considerations strengthen this argument 1. The length of time in which this writing continued from Moses untill John to whom was shewed the last authenticall revelation which prevents all conceits of forgery since they were not written in one nor yet in many ages 2. The multitude of books that were written and of writers that were imployed in the service 3. That difference of place in which they were written which hinders the writers conferring together Two other arguments may evince this truth that the Scriptures were from God 1. Miracles both of 1. Confirmation which the Lord shewed by Moses Exod. 19. 16. 24. 18. 34. 29. the Prophets 1 Kings 7. 24. Christ himselfe and the Apostles for the confirmation of their doctrine such as the devill was not able to resemble in shew The raising of the dead the standing still or going backe of the Sunne the dividing of the Sea and the Rivers the making of the barren fruitfull My works testifie of me saith Christ and believe the workes which I doe if you will not believe me 2. Preservation of the bookes of the Scripture 〈◊〉 the fury of many wicked Tyrants which sought to suppresse and extinguish them but could not As God caused it to be written for the good of his people so by divine providence he hath preserved the same whole and entire Here we have three arguments in one 1. The hatred of the Devill and his wicked instruments against the Scripture more then any other booke Antiochus burnt it and made a Law that whosoever had this booke should die the death yet secondly it was preserved maugre his fury and the rage of Dioclesian Julian and other evill Tyrants Thirdly the miserable end of Julian Antiochus Epiphanes Herod Nero Domitian and Dioclesian and other persecutors of this doctrine The bookes of Salomon which he wrote of naturall philosophy and other knowledge the profitablest bookes that ever were the Canon excepted are perished but those alone which pertaine to godlinesse have been safely kept to posterity which is the rather to be observed since many more in the world affect the knowledge of naturall things then godlinesse and yet though carefull of keeping them they have not been able to preserve them from perpetuall forgetfulnesse whereas on the other side these holy writings hated of the most part and carelesly regarded of a number have notwithstanding as full a remembrance as they had the first day the Lord gave them unto the Church The Roman Empire for 300 yeeres set it selfe to persecute and extirpate this new doctrine and in all these troubles the Church grew and increased mighily Acts 12. 1. Herod killed JAmes with the sword yet v. 24. the word grew and multiplied The miracles wrought in the confirmation of Scripture differ much from the wonders wrought by the false Prophets Antichrist and Satan himselfe Matth. 24. 24. 2 Thes. 2. 11. Apoc. 13. 13 14. they are neither in number nor greatnesse comparable to these 1. They differ in substance Divine miracles are above and against the force of nature as dividing of the red Sea the standing still of the Sunne the others seem wonderfull to those which are ignorant of the cause of them but are not true miracles simply above the ordinary course of nature but effected by the art and power of Satan or his instruments by naturall causes though unknown to men and many times they are but vaine delusions 2. They differ in the end those true miracles were wrought by the finger of God for the promoting of his glory and mans salvations these to seale up falshood and destroy men confirmed in idolatry and heathenisme 2 Thess. 2. 9. Those were not done in a corner or secretly but openly in the presence of great multitudes nay in the sight of the whole world by the evidence of which an unknown doctrine before contrary to the nature and affections of men was believed Bainham said in the midst of the fire Ye Papists behold ye looke for miracles and here now ye may see a miracle for in this fire I feele no more paine then if I were in a bed of down but it is to me as sweet as a bed of Roses The miracles done by our Saviour Christ and his Apostles receved testimony of their most venemous and bitterest enemies they had 2. The Testimony 1. Of the Church and Saints of God in all ages 2. Of those which were out of the Church 1. Of the Church Both ancient and Judaicall and the present Christian Church 2. Of the members of the Church 1. The Church of the Jewes professed the doctrine and received the bookes of the old Testament and testified of them that they were Divine which invincible constancy remaineth still in the Jewes of these daies who though they be bitter enemies to the Christian Religion doe stiffely maintaine and preserve the Canon of the old Testament pure and uncorrupt even in those places which do evidently confirme the truth of Christian Religion 2. The Christian Church hath also most faithfully preserved the old Canon received from the Jewes and now delivered by the Apostles as a depositum and holy pledge of the Divine will 2. Of the members of the Church the constant testimony which so many worthy Martyrs by their blood have given to the truth Rev. 6.
9. Foure thines are to be considered in this argument 1. The number which suffered for the same is numberlesse many millions that none can imagine it to arise from pride weaknesse or discontent More Christians were slaine as hath been observed under the ten bloody persecutions then Pasâ—hall Lambs were offered up under the State of the old Testament 2. The quality and condition of them which suffered noble and base learned and unlearned rich poore old yong men women children those which were tender and dainty all these could not suffer out of vain-glory that stubbornly they might defend the opinion which they had taken up 3. The torments used were usuall unusuall speedy slow some hewed in pieces burnt with slow fire cast in to Lyons given to be devoured by the teeth of wild beasts some beheaded some drowned some stoned with stones 4. All this they endured constantly patiently with great joy even a chearful heart merry countenance singing Psalms in the midst of the fire so that the madnesse of the enemy was overcome by the patience of them which did suffer Luther reports of the Martyr St. Agatha as she went to prisons and tortures she said she went to banquets and nuptials That martyr Hawkes lift up his hands above his head and clapt them together when he was in the fire as if he had been in a triumph So that their testimony was not onely humane God enabling them so stoutly to die for the truth Phil. 1. 29. Maytyrs of other sects differ from the martyrs of the true Church 1. They were fewer 2. They suffered not with joy of conscience which the godly martyrs did 3. They were punished for their errours discovered the martyrs were burned for having any part of the Bible and the Bible sometime with them where the Inquisition raignes it is death to have any part of the Bible in the vulgar tongue The Gentiles also which were out of the pale of the Church did give testimony to sundry stories and examples in the Bible Suetonius and Tacitus speakes of the miracles of Christ Pliny of the miracles of Moses and of the wise mens Star Macrobius of the slaughtering of the Infants Josepbus of the death of Herod the Poets of the flood Plutarke of the Dove which Noah sent out Josephus a Jew saith in his time there was a monument of the pillar of Salt into which Lots wife was turned Of Sodomes destruction speaketh Strabo Diodorus Siculus Galene in his booke of simples Pliny Solinus Polyst hist. Tacitus lib. ult Mela acknowledging that the remainders of Gods wrath are still to be seen there as the dead lake the fruite faire to the eye but falling to cinders and smoake in the hand The Oracles of the Sybillae were in greatest account among the Heathen and held as true of all men and if those be they which we have there is nothing which can more plainly set forth the birth of Christ his life and death Causabon makes it apparent that those prophesies of Sybil were counterfeited pieces and at first entertained by such as delighted in seeing the Christian Religion strengthned with forreine proofes Heretickes also prove the Scripture to be divine for they quote that and therefore Luther cals the Bible Librum Hereticorum Experience teacheth that all heresies either began or increased from the misunderstanding of Scripture Thirdly the Scripture it selfe doth give testimony to it selfe that it is divine it is called a light Psal. 119. 105. because it discovers it selfe the testimony and the testimony of the Lord because it beares witnesse to it selfe The Prophets give testimony of Moses Mal. 4. 4. the new Testament of the Old 2 Pet. 1. 19 20. Peter gives testimony of Pauls Epistles 2 Pet. 3. 15. and Paul witnesseth that all Scripture was given of God 2 Tim. 3. 16. which must be meant of all Scripture even of the new Testament that being the last Epistle which Paul wrote as appeares Chap. 4. v. 16. Fourthly none of all these arguments can undoubtedly perswade the heart certitudine fidei that the holy Scripture or any doctrine contained in it is the word of God till we be taught it of God till the holy Spirit of God have inwardly certified and assured us of it This is called the Sealing of the Spirit of God Ephes. 1. 13. by this the Scripture is imprinted in our hearts as the signe of the Seale in the Wax Other arguments may convince but this is absolutely necessary this is alsufficient to perswade certainly Matth. 11. 25. The Holy Ghost is the authour of light by which we understand the Scripture and the perswader of the heart by which we believe the things therein to be truly divine 1 John 5. 6. It is the Spirit that beareth witnesse because the Spirit i. metonymically the doctrine delivered by the Spirit is truth So to prove that there is a God reasons may be brought from nature and the testimony of the Church but no man can believe it savingly but by the Holy Ghost It is hard to carry the matter even between the Socinians reason and the Famalists spirit Socinians wil have nothing but reason no infused habits so they destroy the testimony of the spirit the Familists wil have nothing but Spirit they rest wholy in an immediate private spirit There are three that bear witnesse in earth blood that is justification by the blood of Christ water i. Sanctification by his grace and the Spirit say some witnesseth in these But ye have an unction from the holy one and ye know all things That is ye have received from Christ the Holy Ghost the Comforter and he hath taught and instructed you in all things which are necessary to the salvation of your soules for you to know and be instructed in see V. 27. The testimony is made up by arguing whosoever believeth and is sanctified shall be saved So the antiquity efficacy and Majesty of the Scripture the fidelity of the Penmen and its wonderfull preservation prove it to be the word of God The Spirit of God witnesseth that this word which hath these remarkable advantages above all other writings is the word of God The Spirit doth neither witnesse concerning my salvation nor that the Scripture is the word of God immediately but ultimately Because I am a believer and my faith is sound it assureth me that I am in the state of salvation and so he maketh use of the excellencies in the word to irradiate my understanding We are commanded to trie the Spirits true joy is first heard out of the word before it be fealt Psal. 51. 8. Spirituall joy is an affection proper to spirituall life that life is by faith and faith commeth by hearing Job 33. 22. See John 16. 14. Some question whether every part and parcell of the Scripture be divinely inspired as those places Touch him and he will curse thee
to thy face curse God and die and that Psal. 14. 1. Some answer thus these places are historically inspired not dogmatically Another question is whether preaching be not divinely inspired as well as the word written The Preaching of the Prophets and Apostles was divinely inspired but the preaching of our Ministers no further then it agrees with the word Some say the Scriptures are but a device of mans braine to give assistance to Magistrates in civill government Nothing is more repugnant to prudence and policy What policy was it in the Old Testament to appoint circumcision to cut a poore child as soon as he came into the world Two and twenty thousand Oxen were spent at the dedication of one Altar to sacrifice so many Oxen and Sheep such usefull creatures Christ chose silly illiterate men to propagate the Gospell This serves for information of our judgement and assures us of divers truths 1. That the Scriptures are for themselves worthy to be believed they have authority in and of themselves not borrowed from any persons in the world by which they binde the consciences of all men to receive them with faith and obedience for their Authors sake alone and the divine truth which shines in them though they should not be commended unto men by any authority of any creature Such as is the authority of the Authour of any writing such is the authority of the writing it selfe for all the strength of the testimony depends upon the excellency of the person which gives the testimony now God is the authour of these writings Thus saith the Lord therefore such authority as he hath such must they have a supreme highest authority which borroweth from none and is subject to none So this acknowledgement of their originall teacheth that we must not believe them for the authority sake of any man or men for Gods word can borrow no authority from men John 5. 34. I receive not testimony from man saith Christ that is need no mans testimony As the first goodnesse is to be loved for it selfe so is the first truth to be believed for it selfe saith Aquinas And as Christ by himselfe could demonstrate that he was the Messias so the Word by it selfe can prove that it is the Word of God We affirme that the Scriptures are known to be of God by themselves the Papists maintaine that we cannot be certaine of the Scriptures divinity by any other argument then the testimony of the Church which say they doth infallibly propound unto us what is to be believed what is not to be believed and Hermanus saith that the Scripture is no more worth then Aesops Fables without the testimony of the Church As in other Sciences there are alwaies some principles per se nota indemonstrabilia whence other things are proved so in Divinity all conclusions in point of beliefe and practice are proved by the Scripture The Scriptures prove themselves by their own naturall light manifesting their divine originall whence they are and their right meaning how they must be understood They are like light primum visibile which maketh all other things manifest and it selfe too by it own proper qualities 1. The Church rather depends on the Scripture which is an object not principle of Divinity the Church ought to be subject to Christ Ephes. 5. 24. the Scripture is the word of Christ Col. 3. 16. 2. All the words of the Scripture are words of truth Dan. 10. 21. some words of the Church are words of error Esay 1. 21 24. 3. 8 9. 5. 13. But the authority of him that speaks alwaies truth is greater then of him who sometimes lies ergo the authority of the Scripture is greater then that of the Church Goodnesse it selfe cannot deceive wisdome it selfe cannot be deceived God is both Titus 1. 2. The voice of the Scripture is the voice of God 2 Tim. 3. 16. but the voice of the Church is the voice of men Acts 14. 14. 15. 17. 17. 30. 3. Faith and a firme consolation in temptations ought to relie on a sure that is a divine foundation for every humane testimony is uncertaine 4. In vaine shall we dispute against the wicked concerning Religion and divine truth if we shall say it comes from God because we affirme so 5. This is proved by Scriptures John 5. 34 35. Christ in his humiliation did not receive the testimony of John much lesse will he receive the testimony of others now he is glorified John 5 34 35 36. 1 Cor. 2. 4 5. 1 John 5. 9. 6. The authority proving is greater more certaine and more knowne then the conclusion proved by the â—ame Autoritde probans is greater then probata The Papists to prove the authority of the Church flie to the Scriptures For I demand whence doe we understand that the Church erres not in delivering the Canon of the Scripture they answer it is governed by the Holy Ghost and therefore cannot erre in its decrees But how appeares it that it is so governed alwaies they answer God hath promised it and then they alleage those places to prove it Ob. The Church is ancienter then the Scripture because it was before Moses ergo it hath greater authority Sol. 1. The Prophets and John Baptist were ancienter then Christ yet not of greater authority 2. Consider the word 1. quoad formale externum as written and clothed with words so the Church was before the Scripture 2. quoad formale internum the matter and sence or meaning so the Scripture was more ancient than the Church because the Church is gathered and governed by it 1 Pet. 1. 23. John 17. 20. JAmes 1. 18. Semen semper sobole illa cujus est semen antiquius esse necesse est In the thing it selfe the being and substance of the word was before the Church although in this circumstance and manner of being it was after Ob. 2. Non erederem Evangelio nisi me commoveret Ecclesiae Catholicae authoritas saith Augustine Sol. These words saith Whitaker are so well known to the Papists that one can hardly exchange three words with them but they will produce them It is true indeed that we may at the first be much moved to receive and hearken to the Scriptures because the Church gives testimony of them as the woman of Samaria by her speeches of Christ was a meanes of moving the Samaritans to believe but when the men of Samaria had heard Christ himselfe speake they believed in him more for his own words then the womans John 4. 39 41. In which sence those words of Austin so frequently quoted by the Papists are to be interpreted Austin spake this of himselfe being a Manichee when he was a Manichee he was first moved by the authority of the Church to believe the Gospell His meaning is that he had never believed the Gospell if the authority of the Church had not
been an introduction unto him not that his faith rested upon it as a finall stay but that it caused him so farre to respect the word of the Gospell to listen unto it and with a kind of acquisite and humane faith to believe it that he was thereby fitted to a better illumination by force whereof he might more certainly believe it to be of God But that the testimony of one Father in one place in a matter of such consequence should be of that force it is strange We deny not the ministery of the Church as an externall meanes to move us to imbrace the word of God but we deny the authority of the Church to be the principall meanes When we call the Scriptures Canonicall we call them not so passively because they are received into the Canon by men and accepted of but actively because they prescribe a Canon and rule to us The office of the Church in respect of the Scripture stands in foure things 1. To distinguish Canonicall Scripture from that which is not Canonicall although the determination of the Church be not the onely or chiefest cause why the Apocrypha are rejected 2. To be a faithfull keeper of those books which are inspired by God like a notary which keepeth publique writings 3. To publish declare and teach the truth as a cryer with a loud voyce ought to pronounce the Kings edicts but to pretermit adde or alter nothing Matth. 28. 19 20. Acts 8. 35. 1 Tim. 3. 15. This Church here is not that Church which the Papists make to be the Judge of controversies neither the Church representative which is a generall Councell nor the Church virtuall which they imagine to be the Pope but the Church Essentiall the congregation of all faithfull believers the House of God as he calleth it The Apostle here speaks of a pillar not more Architectonico understanding by it some essentiall piece of the building but more forensi such a post or pillar on which Tables and Proclamations use to hang. In old time the Gentiles used to write their Lawes in Tables and so hang them upon pillars of stone that the people might read them as Proclamations are nailed to posts in market Towns The Apostle describing the Church likeneth it to one of these pillars whose use was to shew what hung thereon It is pillar not because it holds up but holds forth the truth 4. To interpret the Scripture by the Scripture Since many things in Scripture are doubtfull and hard to be understood without an Interpreter Acts 8. 31. it doth belong to the Church to expound the same to interpret and give the sence Nehem. 8. 8 9. Luke 24. 27. provided that this exposition be by the Scriptures Some of the Papists say that the Church may condere artioulos fidei facere canonicum quo ad nos and though they talke of Councels and Fathers yet all is as the Pope concludes The testimony and tradition of the Church especially the Primitive Church is necessary to know that the Gospell of Matthew is divine Scripture by an historicall and acquired faith to know this by a divine and infured faith besides the authority of the Church the matter character and contents of every booke and comparing of it with other Scriptures doe serve as an inward cause to produce the said infused faith Ob. We are sent to the Church to determine all controversies 1 Cor. 11. 16. Sol. Controversies are either dogmaticall concerning faith or rituall concerning true order the proposition is about these not the first Secondly from this fundamentall truth that the Scripture is immediately from God the basis indeed of all religion 1 Cor. 15. the wickednesse of the Church of Rome is farther to be condemned which will not suffer the Scriptures to be read in their Churches but in an unknowne tongue nor in private by the common people without speciall leave and certaine cautions from their superiours Of old they would not suffer them to be read at all of late they are forced to give licences to some and they teach them that they should not make the Scripture judge of the doctrine and practice of the Church but the doctrine and practise of the Church must be the interpreter and judge of the meaning of the Scripture that is they must take the Scripture to meane none otherwise whatsoever it seem to say then what is agreeable to that which the Pope doth teach and practice There cannot be a surer signe of a bad cause then that it feares to be tried by the writings which it selfe cannot deny to be written by God for correction for reproofe for instruction in righteousnesse Some Papists are more modest herein as Bellarmine l. 2. de verbo Dei c. 15. Catholica Ecclesia statuit ne passim omnibus concedatur Scripturae lectio some more rigid as Huntly and Hosiua The Papists object the obscursity of Scriptures as an argument to hinder lay-men from reading them and account it a matter of profanation to allow men women and children and all promiscuously the use of the vulgar translation and thinke they will rather be hurt then benefited by them taking occasion of erring from them Hosius urgeth that give not holy things to dogs cast not Pearles before Swine to prove the people must be barred from reading of the Scriptures It is Pope Innocents glosse a beast might not touch the mount a lay-man might not meddle with Scripture Lindan saith nihil noxae inferretur in Ecclesiam salvâ— traditionis fundamento if there were no Bible and another Scriptura citius faciet Haereticum Lutherarum quam Catholicum Because we will have all proved by Scripture and make that the compleat rule for what we believe or doe in all Theologicall matters they call us Scripturarios Scripturemen and atram entarios Theologos and so to carry or read a Bible is matter of scoffe we may stile them in Tertullians phrase Scripturarum Lucifugae Traditionaries Saint Gregory who is blessed in their Church exhorteth a lay-man to the serious study of the Scriptures that thereby he might learne the will of God alledging that the Scripture is the Epistle of God unto his creature Quid est autem Scriptura sacra nisi Epistola omnipotentis Dei ad Creaturam Greg. lib. 4. epist. 40. ad Theodorum medicum Proving further that obscurity of Scripture is so frothy an argument for perswading any devout Christian not to read them that it should rather incite them to greater diligence therein and therefore he elegantly compares the Scripture to a River wherein saith he there are as well shallow fords for Lambs to wade in as depths and gulphs wherein the Elephant may swim Chrysostome held it a thing necessary for all men daily to read the Scriptures Audite quaeso saeculares comparate vobis Biblia animae pharmaca Saint Jerome did exhort divers women thereto and commended
them for exercising themselves therein he writes to Laeta and Gaudentia and shewes them how they should bring up their daughters Scripturas sacras tenebat memoriter Hieron de Paula in Epitaphio The Apostle would not have commended this in Timothy 2 Tim. 3. 15. that from his childhood he knew the holy Scriptures nor noted it to the praise of his grand-mother and mother that they had trained him up so if he had not known that the holy Scriptures are so plaine that even a child may be able to understand them What may we judge of the other easier bookes when the holy Ghost would have the Revelation the obscurest booke of all the Scripture to be read Revel 1. 3. The people tooke occasion of erring and blaspheming from the humiliation of Christ many abuse preaching and the Sacraments 2. By this reason the Latine Bibles should not be suffered to be read publiquely because many understanding Latine from the reading of them may take occasion of erring There is a greater reason to be had of Gods elect which are edified by reading of the Scripture then of those who wrest them Peter by this reason stirred up the faithfull to read the Scriptures with greater devotion 2 Pet. 3 14 15 16 17. 3. This is common both to the Ecclesiasticall persons and Laity to take occasion of erring and blaspheming from the Scripture If we peruse the Histories of times past we shall finde that learned and Ecclesiasticall men did oftner fall into heresies and blasphenies from misunderstanding and wresting the Scriptures then any of the common sort of people who were often also by the learned drawn into heresie The Papists are not afraid the people should be corrupted by reading their legends and lying fables by their Images which doe naturally teach Idolatry Ob. The Papists further object that the Hebrews did not permit young men to reade part of Genesis Canticles Ezekiel Sol. First we must know the reading of those Scriptures non ablat am hominibus sed dilatam fuisse was not taken away from them but delayed onely Secondly this tradition concerning the age of men did drive away as well the Ecclesiasticke as the lay persons Notwithstanding all this that hath been objected by the Papists we hold that the Scriptures ought to be translated into the vulgar and mother tongues of each nation and that all men ought to read them and meditate diligently in them and that for these reasons 1. From the Commandement and will of God revealed in Scripture he hath commanded all that live in the Church to study the Scriptures and read them Deut. 11. 18 19. John 5. 3. He speaks not to the Scribes and Pharisees but to the people in generall they must try all things 2. From Gods intention which commanded it to be written for that end that it might be obvious to all John 20. 31. Rom. 15. 4. 3. Those are commended which did read the Scripture as the Eunuch 8 Acts 22. the Bereans Acts 17. Acts 11. and dispraised which neglected it as the Israelites Hos. 8. 12. they are pronounced blessed who diligently meditate in the Scriptures Psal. 1. 2. How unlike to Peter 2 Pet. 1. 19. are those which pretend to be his Successors 4. From the fact of the Apostles who as they publiquely preached the mysteries of salvation to the people so also in their Epistles they commended the whole doctrine of salvation to be read by them The Epistles of the Romanes Corinthians Galathians Ephesians were written to the people therefore to be read by them One Epistle of John was written to Gaius a layman another to the elect Lady Timothy from the Cradle was versed in the Scripture 5. From the profit and necessity of this study men are illightned and converted by reading of the Scriptures Psal. 19. 8 9 they are directed by them as most faithfull counsellers in in all their waies Psal. 1. 19. 24. they are armed by them against the fiery darts of Satan Ephes. 6. 16. One seeing a youth reade the Scriptures said it was never well since such were permitted to turne over the Bible but he answered him in the Psalmists words Psal. 119. 9. 6. From the unanimous consent of all the Fathers Chrysostome and Jerome especially who exhort the people to the private reading of the Scriptures and testifie that the Scriptures were publiquely read in their Ecclesiasticall Assemblies not in an unknown tongue but in a tongue understood by the people It was decreed by the Councell of Nice that no Christian should be without a Bible in his house And the Jewes at this day suffer no house amongst them to be without the Bible Christ and his Apostles teaching and disputing before the people appeale to the Law and the Prophets without the name of the Author Booke or Chapter because they knew the Bible text to be familiar to the Israelites In an unknowne tougue they cannot profit the people ergo they ought to be translated into a tongue known to the people 1 Cor. 14. the Apostle in divers verses treateth of this subject V. 6 7 19. He saith all things ought to be done in the Church for the edifying of the people that no man should speak in an unknown tongue without an interpreter and saith that he had rather speak five words be understood then 10000 words in an unknown tongue Those arguments before urged for the peoples reading of the Scripture prove this also for they cannot reade them in every Nation unlesse they be translated into a Tongue they understand Christ and his Apostles taught the people the Scripture in their mother Tongue In the next age after the Apostles saith Gratius l. 3. de veritate Relig. Christ. the new Testament was translated into divers vulgar Tongues the Syriacke Arabicke Aethiopicke and Latine which versionâ— are yet extant and differ not mainly from the Greek In the elder purer times the Scriptures were translated into innumerable yea into all Tongues usuall amongst men See Gregories preface to the notes on passages of Scripture The plain and usuall words the phrase and manner of speech most frequented the comparisons and similitudes in Scripture most familiar taken out of the shops and fields from husbandry and houswifery from the flock and the herd shew that the Scriptures were written for the capacity and understanding of the unlearned John 5. 39. a speciall place if it be indicative it shewes the custome of the Jewes if imperative it shewes what they ought to doe Many amongst us are to be blamed for not having the Scripture in their houses and for not reading it constantly in the same as they ought to doe or else they reade it as other bookes not with such respect to it as the greatnesse of its Authour deserveth I meane with a desire and purpose to believe and obey all that they finde there which must needs be the duty of those that confesse
these writings come from God We should receive it with reverence believe it with confidence exercise our selves in it with diligence and delight practice it with obedience Reading the Scripture is a rehearsing out of the booke such things as are there written barely without any interpretation It is to be done publikely as it was in the Synagogues of the Jewes who had the reading of the Law and Prophets amongst them the Prophets were read in their eares every day saith Paul and after the lecture of the Law and the Prophets in another place We honour God more by a publique then a private reading of it 2. Privately the godly Jewes of Berea did search the Scriptures and the King is commanded to read in the Law Some good Divines hold that the Scriptures barely read though preaching be not joyned with it may be the instrument of regeneration since the doctrine of the Gospell is called the ministration of the Spirit Psal. 19. the law of the Lord converteth the soule it is so when not preached but the word of God is made effectuall by the Spirit more often more ordinarily to beget a new life in the preaching that is the interpreting and applying of it then in the bare reading 1 Tim. 4. 13. Matth. 28. 29. Christs custome was as we may collect out of Luke 4. where one instance is recorded to make us conceive his ordinary practice when he had read to interpret the Scripture and often to apply it Let us all learn constantly to exercise our selves in the writings of God which if we strive to doe in a right manner we shall attaine true knowledge of the way to Heaven and also grace and help to walke in that way If the Lord should deny to any man the publique helps of preaching and conference yet if that man should constantly reade the word praying to God to teach him and guide him by it and strive to follow it in his life he should finde out the truth and attaine saving grace the word would illighten and convert but if God afford publique preaching and interpretation we must use that too as a principall ordinance Let us all reade the Scripture 1. With hearty prayers to God to direct us and open the sence of it to us Psal. 119. 18. JAmes 1. 5 17. and with a resolution to put in practice that which we learne Jam. 1. 25. Matth. 7. 24. and we shall finde the word read Gods power to our edification and salvation Onely a Spirituall understanding can discerne an excellency in the Scripture Nunquam Pauli mentem intelliges nisi prius Pauli spiritum imbiberis 2. Diligently attend unto reading 1 Tim. 4. 13 15. John 5. 39. Search the Scriptures whether the Greeke word be a metaphor from hunting dogges or from diggers in mines both import diligence It was a solemne speech used in holy actions hoc age The passions of the Martyrs may be read when their anniversarie daies are celebrated Whence the name of Legends Chamier 3. Orderly that we may be better acquained with the whole body of the Scriptures We should reade on in Chronicles and Ezra and other places wherein are nothing but names and Genealogies to shew our obedience to God in reading over all his sacred word and we shall after reape profit by that we understand not for the present though it will be convenient to begin with the new Testament as more plain before we reade the old 4. With faith Heb. 4. 2. The word of God consisteth of foure parts 1. History 2. Commandements 3. Promises 4. Threats All truths taught in the History of the Scripture ought to be believed As that the world was made of nothing onely by the word of God Heb. 11. 3. and that the bodies of men howsoever they died shall rise againe at the last day Job 19. 26. 2 All precepts Genes 22. 6. Abraham went doing that commandement though strange 3 All promises as that God could give Abraham when he was 100 yeeres old a seed and posterity which should be as innumerable as the Stars in the Firmament Genes 15. 5. and that by Sarah an old and barren woman Gen. 17. 16. Abraham and Sarah believed it Rom. 4. 20 21. Heb. 11. 11. 4. Threatnings as that Gen. 6. 13. 17. though unlikely Noab believed it 2 Pet. 2. 5. because God had said it Heb. 11. 7. and that Jonah 3. 4. the people of Nineveh believed v. 5. In narrando gravitas in imperando authoritas in promittendo liberalitas in minando severitas Spanhemius or at de officio Theologi 5. Constantly Cyprian was so much delighted with the reading of Tertullian that he read something in him every day and called him his Master Da Magistrum Let Gods command the examples of the godly and our owne benefit quicken us to a frequent reading of the holy Scriptures Mr Bifield hath a Kalender shewing what number of Chapters are to be read every day that so the whole Bible may be read over in the yeere The number of Chapters while you are reading the old Testament is for the most part three a day and when you come to the new Testament it is but two sometimes where the matter is Historicall or Typicall or the Chapters short he hath set down a greater number The Martyrs would sit up all night in reading and hearing After we have read and understood the Scripture we must 1. give thanks to God for the right understanding of it and pray him to imprint the true knowledge of it in our hearts that it may not fall out 2. We must meditate in the word of God now understood and so fix it in our minds One defines meditation thus It is an action of the soule calling things to mind or remembrance and discoursing of them that they might be the better understood retained affected and possessed It is as it were every mans preaching to himselfe and is a setting ones selfe seriously to consider in his mind and apply to his owne soule some necessary truth of Gods word till the mind be informed and the heart affected as the nature thereof requires and is the wholesomest and usefullest of all exercises of piety This is to ingrast the word into ones soule to give the seed much earth this is to bind it to the Tables of our heart and to hide it in the furrows of our soules this is to digest it and make it our owne 3. We must apply to our owne use whatsoever things we reade and understand the precepts and examples of the Law to instruct our life the promises and comforts of the Gospell to confirme our faith It serves for thankfulnesse 1. that now we have the Scripture the world was a long time without it it was the more wicked because they had no canon of Scripture We are not like to erre by tradition as former ages have done 2. That we have so great a
God shall destroy him with the Spirit of his mouth idest verbo suo Beza God hath consecrated the word to this purpose the end of it is not onely to save but destroy being the savor of death to some and it is a fit instrument for such a worke Antichrists strength is in mens consciences onely this will pierce thither Heb. 4. 12. God useth the word for the destruction of Antichrist these waies 1. It discovers him his doctrine his errours 2. It hardens him 3. It condemneth him and passeth sentence against him CHAP. III. 2. The Bookes of Scripture FRom the Divine flowes the Canonicall authority of the Scripture The bookes of Scripture are called Canonicall bookes say some from the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which word is used 2 Cor. 10. 13. Phil. 3. 16. Gal. 6. 16. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 marke the double emphasis this notable Canon because they were put into the Canon by the Universall Church acknowledged to be divinely inspired by it and also are made a perfect Canon or rule of all doctrine concerning religion credendorum agendorum of faith and manners of all things which are to be believed or done toward salvation But Cameron thinks it is not termed Canonicall because it is a rule for that booke saith he is called Canonicall which is put into the Catalogue which the ancients called a Canon of those writings which are esteemed Divine Becanus saith they are called Canonicall both because they containe a rule which we ought to follow in faith and manners and because they are put into the Catalogue of Divine bookes The conditions of a Canon are these 1. It must containe truth or be an expresse form and image of truth which is in the divine mind 2. It must be commanded sanctified and confirmed by Divine authority that it may be a Canon to us in the Church These bookes were sanctified either commonly all of both Testaments by the testimony of the Spirit and Church and Canon it selfe or the books of the old Testament were specially and singularly confirmed by word signes and event as the Pentateuch but the Propheticall books and Hagiographa before their carrying into Babylon by extraordinary signe the cloud and vaile in the Temple 1 Kings 8. 10. Levit. 16. 2. and Gods answer by Ephod Urim and Thummim Exod 28. 30. after their carrying away into Babylon by singular testimonies of events The books of the new Testament are confirmed by the Sonne of God revealed in flesh by his sayings and deeds Heb. 1. 2. and by the powerfull ministery of the Apostles by signes vertues and miracles Marke 16. 20. There is a threefold Canon in the Church Divine Ecclesiasticall and False The Divine Canon is that which properly and by itselfe is called the word of God immediately inspired of God into the Prophets and Apostles This according to the divers times of the Church is distinguished into the old and new Testament 2 Cor. 3. 6 14. this is a common division of the sacred Bible among Christians as in the version of Tremelius and Junius Testamenti veteris novi Biblia sacra and the Geneva gives that title to their Bible La Bible qui est toute la Saincte Escriture du viel novean Testament Austin thinkes they are better called Vetus novum Instrumentum Heinsius Grotius vetus novum Foedus vide Grotii Annotat. in libros Evangelii A Covenant is an agreement between two a Testament is the declaration of the will of one It is called in regard of the forme convention and agreement betweene God and man a Covenant in regard of the manner of confirming it a Testament For 1. in a Testament or last will the Testators mind is declared so is the will of God in his word therefore it is called a Testimony often Psal. 19. 119. l 2. Here is a Testator Christ a Legacy eternall life Heires the elect a writing the Scripture Seales the Sacraments 3. Because it is ratified by the death of Christ Heb. 9. 16 17. The Bookes of the old Testament are the holy Scriptures given by God to the Church of the Jewes shewing them what to believe and how God would be worshipped The new Testament containeth the bookes which treate of salvation already exhibited and Christ already come in the flesh All the bookes of the old Testament were written originally in Hebrew because they were committed unto the Hebrews Rom. 3. 2. except what Daniel and Ezra wrote in the Chaldee The Jewish Church receiving them from God kept them and delivered them to posterity Many grave Authours hold that the Hebrew was the first Tongue and mother of all the rest and it may probably be collected from the names of our first parents It was called Hebrew saith Erpenius not from Heber of the posterity of Sem as Josephus Jerome and others thinke when it is manifest that he rather spake Chaldee then Hebrew because Abraham the Patriarke which drew his originall from him was a Chaldean but it was so called saith Erpenius as all the Rabbines Origen and others testifie from the Hebrews which people arose from Canaan It is honoured with the title of the holy Tongue saith the same Erpenius because the most holy God spoke it to his Prophets delivered his holy will written in it to the Church and because it is very probable from the opinion of great men that holy men shall use it with God hereafter in Heaven vide Buxtorfium de Linguae Hebraeae origine Antiquitate Sanctitate There are many Hebraismes also in the new Testament many words and phrases rather used according to the manner of the Hebrews then the Greeks by which it is mauifest that the same Spirit was the Authour of the old and new Testament The knowledge of the Hebrew much conduceth to the learning of those famous Orientall Tongues the Chaldee Syriacke Arabicke and Aethiopicke by reason of the great affinity which they have with their mother The bookes of the old Testament may be divided severall waies in respect of the stile some were written in prose some in verse in respect of time some were written before their being taken captives into Babylon as Samuel Esay Hâ—sea and many others some in the Captivity and some after as Haggai Zachary Malachy The Hebrewes divide the Bible ex instituto Esdrae into three speciall parts 1. The Law the five Bookes of Moses 2. The Prophets 1. The former Joshua Judges two bookes of Samuel and two of the Kings 2. The latter 1. Greater three 2. Lesser twelve 3. The Hagiographa for want of a more speciall name by which title all the rest are understood and they are eleven Our Saviour himselfe mentions this most ancient distinction Luke 24. 44. calling all the rest of the bookes besides the Law and Prophets Psalmes All the Scriptures of the old Testament in other places are comprised in the Law
that time of the writing of the new Testament did speake Syriacke and not Hebrew which language is mixt consisting of Hebrew and Chaldee therefore saith Whitaker it is more probable that Matthew and he which wrote the Epistle to the Hebrewes wrote in Greek because the Greeke tongue was not unknowne to the Jewes which were Hellenists Act. 6. 1. and other Apostles wrote in Greeke which wrote peculiarly to the Jewes as JAmes and Peter Matthaeum Hebraicè scripsisse convenit inter antiquos Citat Irenaeum Origenem Athanasium Epiphanium Chrysostomum Hieronymum Vossius de genere Christi dissertat Scripsit Haebraea lingua quiae praecipuè Judoeorum quos viva voce hactenus docuisset haberet rationem Id. ibid. vide Grotium in libros Evangel It was needfull that the Gospell should be written by many First for the certainty Secondly for the perfection of it Amongst all the Evangelists there is a Generall agreement and a speciall difference they all agree in the maine scope and Subject Christ they differ in the speciall argument and order All describe the life of Christ some more largely some more briefely some more loftily some more plainely yet because all were inspired by the same Spirit they all have equall authority The difference of Evangelists in some smaller matters proveth their consent in the greater to be the voyce of truth for had they conspired all together to have deceived the world they would in all things have more fully agreed The doctrine of the Covenant of grace is more plainly expounded the will of God and way to salvation more plentifully set down in the new Testament then ever it was in the daies of Moses or the Prophets and in these bookes of the new Testament all things are so established as to continue to the end so that we must not looke for any new revelation All these Bookes we receive as Canonicall because they are divine for matter and forme divinely inspired by God sanctified and given to the Church for their direction written by the Apostles or Apostolicall men sweetly consenting with other parts of holy Scripture and with themselves received alwaies by the greatest part of the Church of God They were written after the death of Christ by the direction of the holy Ghost the Apostles by lively voyce first preached because it was needfull that the doctrine of the Gospell should by their preaching as also by signes and wonders be confirmed against the contradictions and cavils of the Jewes and Gentiles and allowed by the assent of believers generally before it was committed to writing that we might be assured of the certainty of those things which were written These bookes are acknowledged Canonicall both by us and the Papists so that touching this matter there is no controversie between us and them The Epistles doubted of by some for a while were first the Epistle to the Hebrews the Epistle of JAmes the second Epistle of Peter the second and third Epistles of John the Epistle of Jude and the Revelation of which I shall treate more when I come to handle the bookes of the new Testament particularly The story of the woman taken in adultery hath met with very much opposition See Gregories preface to his notes upon some passages of Scripture Crojus defends the truth of it Observat. in nov Testam c. 17. Vide Seldeni uxorem Ebraicam c. 11. The inscriptions and titles prefixed before the Epistles are no part of holy Scripture written by the Apostles but added to the Epistles by some others The Subscriptions and Postscrips also of divers bookes are false counterfeit and erroneous not written by the Apostles but added afterward by the Scribes which copied out the Epistles The subscriptions of the latter Epistle to Timothy and also to Titus are supposititious they are neither found in the Syriacke nor in all Greeke copies nor yet in the vulgar Latin translation these additions were made some 100 yeeres after the Apostles The Canonicall Bookes of the new Testament are either Historicall Doctrinall or Propheticall 1. Historicall containing matters of fact the history of 1. Christ exhibited in the foure Evangelists or Gospels as they are stiled by God himselfe Marke 1. 1. Matthew Marke Luke and John so called because they containe a message of joy and gladnesse They all treate of one subject Christ Jesus incarnate most true Historians Luke 1. 2. John 21. 24. 2. His Apostles in the Acts written by Luke thirty yeeres after Christs ascention so termed of the principall subject of the History though the acts of others not Apostles are there recorded Dogmaticall or Doctrinall such as were written by the Apostles for the instruction of the Church of God in faith and manners commonly called Epistles and that by warrant of the Scriptures 1 Thess. 5. 27. 2 Pet. 3. 1. 16. because they were sent to them who had already received and professed the Gospell of God These are 21. written 1. By Paul 1. To whole Churches To the Romans Corinthians Galathians Ephesians Philippians Colossians Thessalonians 1. Gentiles 2. Jewes To the Hebrews 2. To particular persons 1. Timothy 2. Titus 3. Philemon 2. JAmes one 3. Peter two 4. John three 5. Jude one 3. Propheticall wherein under certaine resemblances the state of the Church of Christ till the end of the wolrd from the time of John the Evangelist is most truely and wonderfully described and receiveth its name Apoealyps of the Argument Beza Piscator Calvin Erasmus have doâ—e well on all the new Testament Of the Papists Jansenius hath done well on the harmony of the Lutherans Chemnitus and Gerhard of the Protestants Calvin Maldonate de Dieu Cameron Scultetus and Grotius have done well likewise on the Evangelists Matthew and John were Apostle of the twelve Marke and Luke Evangelists Apostles is a name of office or dignity It notes one sent from another with command in speciall certain famous Ambassadours of Christ. The Evangelists accompanied the Apostles in preaching the Gospell Matthew There was never any in the Church which doubted of its authority Some say he wrote in Hebrew but that is uncertaine as hath been already declared He interprets the Hebrew name Emanuel Chap. 1. 23. and those words Chap. 27. v. 46. therefore it is likely he wrote not in Hebrew for why should one that writeth in Hebrew interpret Hebrew words to such as understand Hebrew and how came this authenticall Copy and Prototype to be lost for it is not now extant How ever the Greeke edition is Authenticall because it came forth when the Apostles were living and was approved by them which the Ancients confirme Of the time when Matthew wrote Authours agree not Eusebius saith that he wrote in the third yeere of Cajus Caesar others say he wrote after Claudius He wrote his Gospell in the fifteenth yeere after Christs ascention saith Nicephorus the 21 saith Irenaeus in the eighth yeere saith Theophylact.
name at least thrice saying I John Chap. 1. 9. 21. 1 2. 22. 8. whereas in the Gospell he never maketh mention of his name there he writes the history of Christ here he writes of himself and the Revelations declared to him Thirdly in the last Chapter are five testimonies heaped together v. 5 6 7 8. 1. Of the Angels 2. Of God himselfe the Lord of the holy Prophets 3. Of Jesus Christ behold I come shortly 4. Of John I John heard and saw all these things 5. The protestation of Jesus Christ vers 18. Fourthly the matter of the Booke doth convince the authority thereof seeing everywhere the Divinity of a Propheticall spirit doth appeare the words and sentences of other Prophets are there set downe part of the Prophesies there delivered are in the sight of the world accomplished by which the truth and authority of the whole is undoubtedly proved there are extant many excellent testimonies of Christ and his Divinity and our redemption by Christ. Fifthly The most ancient Fathers Greeke and Latine ascribe this Booke to John the Apostle Theophylact Origen Chysâ—stome Tertullian Hilary Austin Ambrose Irenaeus To deny then the truth of this booke is contra solem obloqui to gainsay the shining of the Sunne it selfe The Chyliasts abuse many testimonies out of this Booke but those places have been cleared long agoe by the learned as bearing another sence See Dr Raynolds conf with Hart Chap. 8. p. 406. Calvin being demanded his opinion what he thought of the Revelation answered ingenuously he knew not at all what so obscure a writer meant Se penitus ignorare quid velit tam obscurus scriptor Cajetan at the end of his Exposition of Jude confesseth that he understands not the literall sence of the Revelation and therefore exponat saith he cui Deus concesserit It consists of 22 Chapters the best Expositors on it are Ribera Brightman Pareus Cartwright Dent Forbes Mode Simonds 1. The Scriptures written by Moses and the Propheâ—s sufficiently prove that Christ is the Messiah that was to come the old Testament may convince the Jewes which deny the new Testament of this truth John 5. 39. They that is those parts of Scripture written by Moses and the Prophets there were no other Scriptures then written The 53 Chapter of Esay is a large history of his sufferings We have also another Booke or Testament more clearely witnessing of Christ the Gospel is the unsearchable riches of Christ Ephes. 3. 8. So much may suffice to have spoken concerning the Divine Canon the Ecclesiasticall and false Canon follow CHAP. V. SOme Hereticks utterly abolisht the Divine Canon as the Swingfeldians and Libertines who contemned all Scriptures the Manichees and Marcionites refused all the Bookes of the old Testament as the Jewes doe those of the new as if they had proceeded from the Divell Some diminish this Canon as the Sadduces who as Whitaker and others hold rejected all the other Prophets but Moses some inlarge it as the Papists who hold that divers other Bookes called by us Aprcrypha i. hidden doe belong to the old Testament and are of the same authority with the other before named and they adde also their traditions and unwritten word equalling it with the Scripture both these are accursed Rev. 22. 18. But against the first we thus argue whatsoever Scripture 1. is divinely inspired 2. Christ commandeth to search 3. To which Christ and his Apostles appeale and confirme their doctrine by it that is Canonicall and of equall authority with the new Testament But the holy Scripture of the old Testament is divinely inspired 2 Tim. 3. 16. where he speakes even of the Bookes of the old Testament as is gathered both from the universall all writing viz. holy in the 15 verse and from the circumstance of time because in the time of Timothies infancy little or nothing of the new Testament was published 2. Christ speakes not to the Scribes and Pharisees but to the people in generall to search it John 5. 39. this famous elogium being added that it gives testimony of him and that we may finde eternall life in it 3. Christ and his Apostles appeale to it and confirme their doctrine by it Luke 24. 27. Rom. 3. 21. Acts 10. 43. 17. 11. 20 43 26. 20. the new Testament gives testimony of the old and Peter 2 Pet. 1. 19. of Pauls Epistles The Ecclesiasticall Canon which is also called the second Canon followeth to which these Bookes belong Tobit Judith first and second of the Machabees Wisdome Ecclesiasticus Baruch Additions to Daniel and Hester for these neither containe truth perfectly in themselves nor are sanctified by God in the Church that they may be a Canon of faith and although abusively from custome they were called Canonicall yet properly in the Church they are distinguished from the Canonicall by the name of Apocryphall The false Canon is that which after the authority of the Apocrypha increased was constituted by humane opinion for the Papists as well as we reject for Apocryphall the third and fourth Booke of Esdras the prayer of Manasses the third and fourth of Machabees as Thomas Aquinas Sixtus Senensis Bellarmine and so the Councell of Trent confesse when they omit these and reckon up the whole Canon The state therefore of the controversie betwixt us and the Papists is whether those seven whole bookes with the Appendices be Sacred Divine Canonicall We doe not deny but many of these especially Wisdome and Ecclesiasticus are very good and profitable and to be preferred before all humane Tractates but that they are properly and by an excellency Canonicall and of infallible truth out of which firme arguments may be drawne that we deny Those Bookes which the Jewes of old and the reformed Churches now reckon for truely Canonicall in the old Testament are received all even by our adversaries for Canonicall without any exception 2. for the Canonicall Bookes of the new Testament there is no controversie between us and so far we agree but in the old Testament whole Bookes are reckoned by them for Canonicall which we hold Apocryphall The reason why these Bookes at first were added to holy writ was this the Jewes in their later times before and at the comming of Christ were of two sorts some properly and for distinction sake named Hebrews inhabiting Jerusalem and the holy Land others were Hellenists that is the Jewes of the dispersion mingled with the Graecians These had written sundry bookes in Greeke which they made use of together with other parts of the old Testament which they had in Greeke of the translation of the 70 when they now understood not the Hebrew but the Hebrewes received onely the 22 Bookes before mentioned Hence it came that the Jewes delivered a double Canon of Scripture to the Christian Church the one pure unquestioned and Divine which is the Hebrew Canon the other in Greeke
adulterate corrupted by the addition of certaine bookes written in those times when God raised up no more Prophets among his people Drus. praeterit l. 5. Annotat. ad Act. Apost c. 6. Jun. Animad in Bell. cont 1. l. 1. c. 4. l. 2. c. 15. sect 21. Tertul. in Apol. c. 19. They are called Apocryphall i. secret and hidden not because the names of the writers are unknowne by that reason Judges and Ruth should be Apocryphall but because they were not wont to be read openly in the Church of God as the Canonicall bookes but secretly and in private by private persons or because their authority was obscure and doubtfull with the Ancient These bookes our Church rejecteth as not written by Divine inspiration for these reasons All the Canonicall bookes of the old Testament were written by the Prophets but none of these bookes were written by any of the Prophets for 1. The last of the Prophets of the Jewes was Malachy Mal. 4. 4 5. between whom and John Baptist came no Prophet Marke begins with the same words almost with which Malachy ended a good argument to prove that the new Testament is next to the old But these Bookes were written by such who lived most of them after Malachy 2. All the Prophets wrote in Hebrew the language which the Jewes understood but the Fathers affirme and Papists acknowledge that most of these bookes were written in Greeke ergo being not written by the Prophets they are not Canonicall 2. All the bookes of the old Testament were committed to the Jewes and safely kept by them Rom. 3. 2. our Saviour Christ which reproved the Jewes for corrupting the sence of the Scripture did yet never reprove them for rejecting those bookes which were divinely inspired which sacriledge he would not have concealed yea our Saviour sendeth us unto the Scriptures as they received them John 5. 39. Eâ—ras after the captivity is reported to have gathered all the Bookes of holy Scripture and safely to lay them up If the Jewes should have rejected or not received any bookes being Canonicall they had grievously erred which the Papists themselves will not affirme Yea there should have been some Canonicall Bookes which no Church received for besides the Church of the Jewes at that time there was none in the world The Canonicall Bookes of the old Testament were divided into Moses the Prophets and Psalmes with which agreeth the old distribution of the Hebrews into the Law Prophets and Hagiographa 3 There are two waies to know a booke to be Canonicall one by the testimony of some Prophet or Apostle the other by the certaine testimony of them which did live when the booke was published who did witnesse that the booke was written by some Prophet or Apostle But these bookes are known to be Canonicall neither of these waies they were rejected by the Jewes who lived in the times when they were written our Saviour Christ nor his Apostles never commend these Bookes unto us as endited by the Spirit They are cited by Christ and his Apostles for the confirmation of their doctrine All the Canonicall Bookes in generall John 5. 39. 10. 35. Rom. 16. 26. Luke 16. 29 31. Ch. 24. v. 25 27 44. The most of all in speciall Genesis Matth. 19. 4 5 6. Exodus Matth. 5. 21 27 33 38. Leviticus Gal. 3. 12. Numbers John 3. 14. Deuteronomy Acts 3. 22. Joshâ—a Heb. 11. 30 31. Judges Heb. 11. 32. Ruth Matth. 1. 3. First of Samuel Matth. 12. 3. Second of Samuel Heb. 1. 5. First of Kings Matth. 12. 42. Second of Kings Luke 4. 27. First of Chronicles Matth. 1. 3 7 10 13. Second of Chronicles Acts 7. 48. Ezra Matth. 1. 12 13. Job 1 Corinth 3. 19. Psalmes Acts 4. 25. Proverbs Heb. 12. 5 6 7. Esay Matth. 1. 23. Jeremy Heb. 10. 16 17. Ezechiel Matth. 25. 35. Daniel Matth. 24. 25. All the lesser Prophets Acts 7. 42. 15. 15 16. Hosea Matth. 12. 7. Joâ—l Acts 2. 12. Amos Acts 15. 16. Jonah Matth. 12. 40 41. Micha Matth. 10. 35. Naâ—um Rom. 10. 15. Habacuc Rom. 1. 17. Haggai Heb. 12. 26. Zachary Matth. 21 5. Malachy Luke 1. 16 17. These bookes were not cited by Christ and his Apostles for confirmation of their doctrine Ob. If they be not Canonicall therefore because they are not cited then Naâ—um and Zephany are not Canonicall Aratus Menander and Epimenides prophane Poets are Canonicall because they are cited Acts 17. 28. 1 Cor. 15. 33. Titus 1. 12. Sol. They are not therefore not Canonicall onely because they are not cited but especially because they have not the characters of Divine Scripture 2 Nahuâ— and Zephany are implicitely quoted when the bookes of the Prophets are mentioned Acts 7. 41. 15. 15 16. The Poets are not cited as Canonicall but the Apostle applied himselfe to his hearers who did much esteeme their authority Some have well coucluded from Acts 10. 43. that the Apocrypha are not to be received as Canonicall Scripture because they testifie not of Christ. 4 Those bookes which containe manifest untruths coutrary to the Word of God and the books of holy Scripture were not inspired of God for as God is true so is his word John 17. 17 sweetly agreeeng with it selfe and every part with other these bookes commend false things as true and approve things evill as right Judith chap 9 v 2 commends killing the Sichemites against Gen. 49. 6 7. 2 Mac. 14. 42. Razis is commended for killing himselfe the fact is not onely related but commended also in these words nobly manfully and this commendation doth plainly shew that the Authour thereof was not inspired of God when the Donatists out of this booke urged that it was lawfull for them to kill themselves as Razis did Augustine then was forced to acknowledge that the authority of this booke was uncertaine and questionable and proves it by the judgement of the Jewish Church Christ and the Christians Manifest fables are told in some of them for true histories as that of Toby Judith Bell and the Dragon If any desire a particular conâ—utation of the severall Bookes of the Apocrypha I commend to his reading that learned Treatise of Dr Raynolds de libris Apocryphis who hath so exactly handled this subject that to write of it after him were to write Iliads after Homer or to draw a line after Apelles 5. The most ancient Fathers and Councels which lived the best and first 500 yeeres after Christ rejected the same bookes which we doe Jerome on Matth. 23. saith concerning a testimony cited out of the Apocrypha Hoc quoniam ex Scriptura nihil habet authoritatis eadem facilitate rejicitur qua profertur Because this hath no authority out of Scripture it may as easily be rejected as it is offered All that the Papists object for these Bookes in the generall is that the third Councell at Carthage the
Florentine councell and that of Trent doe approve the said Bookes to be Canonicall as also Augustine and Innocentius To which it may be answered 1. That the Councell of Carthage was but a Provinciall Councell and therefore it cannot binde the whole world Moreover in that Councell there are divers things which the Papists will not endure as in the 26 Canon there is a decree that no Bishop shall be called chiefe or universall Bishop no not the Bishop of Rome how should the Papists binde us with the authority of that Councell with which they will not binde themselves 2. The Latine Fathers judged these bookes fit to be read for example of life and instruction of manners but not for confirmation of faith or establishing any doctrine 3. These Bookes are not Proto Canonicall truely and properly Canonicall inspired by God containing the immediate and unchangeable truth of God sanctified by him and given to the Church to be a perfect rule of sound doctrine and good life but Deutero-canonicall or rather Ecclesiasticall as they are stiled In this sence Augustine and Innocentius are to be taken when they reckon these Bookes among the Canonicall 4. No Councell hath authority to define what Bookes are Canonicall what not seeing Bookes truely Divine receive authority from God himselfe and are to be esteemed of undoubted truth although all the world should barke against them These two Councels are of too late standing to oppose against the other ancient Councels which reject these Bookes The coâ—ncell of Trent was gathered and kept against all Civill and Ecclesiasticall right neither was there any forme of justice observed in it 1. It was not kept in a lawfull place for whereas it was intended against the Protestants and the Germans were the parties accused it ought to have been kept in Germany according to the request exhibited by the body of the States of Germany assembled at Noremberg this equity was not observed the parties accused being called into Italy 2. In that Councell matters were concluded and the sentence passed the adversary not being heard speake nor so much as present for the Protestants might not be admitted to hearing neither could they obtaine to propound their opinion in the Councell muchlesse to avouch it by lawfull reasoning Sleidan fol. 29. and yet were condemned against divine and humane law for they both forbid the condemning of any before he have lawfull liberty granted him to plead for himselfe 3. In that Councell the accuser and Judge were the same for the Pope did accuse the Protestants of heresie he did convocate the Coucell he by his Delegates was President and Moderator in it and so together was Accuser Judge and Witnesse whereas the reformation of the Pope was the thing in question Lastly all Councels ought to be free but in this Protestants might not propound their cause nor defend it neither might any thing be proposed but according to the mind of the Legates or otherwise then they approved no man had any voyce in the Councell but such as were sworne to the Pope nothing was there determined which was not first concluded of at Rome by the Pope in the Colledge of Cardinals and sent from Rome to Trent whereupon this Proverbe arose Spiritum Sanctum Roma pâ—r peram mitti Tridentum The Holy Ghost came to Trent packt up in a Cloke-bag We hope therefore since the Apocrypha are justly rejected out of the Canon that hereafter they will neither have the honour to be bound with our Bibles nor read in our Churches The Apocrypha was never received by the Church of the Israelites before Christ his comming nor of the Apostolicke and Primitive Church for more then 300 yeeres after as both Eusebius out of Origen and the Councell of Laodicea Can. 59. confirmed afterward by the sixth generall councell of Constantinople sheweth for the Greeke Church and St Jerome for the Latine CHAP. VI. Of the Authenticall edition of the Scripture NOw we must enquire which is the Authenticall edition of holy Scriptures it being necessary that this heavenly truth committed to writing should be delivered in some forme of words and in some language which may be understood Lawyers from whom the use of the word Authentique seemeth borrowed doe call those instruments and writings authentique which have a certaine and just authority in themselves A booke or writing is authentique either by divine or humane institution those are by Divine appointment and institution authenticall which have from God sufficient and absolute authority to command and approve themselves worthy credit and faith in as much as God himselfe doth approve thtm by humane institution such writings are held authenticall which by the opinion and sentence of learned men in their severall professions may be esteemed worthy credit and beliefe for themselves and for the truth in them There is a great diversity of editions of holy Scripture all cannot be simply and perpetually authenticall in of and for themselves without reference unto another no more then many draughts of the same Lease or Deed or copy of one pardon can be Some amongst many are authentique whence the others are transcribed yea it cannot be that there should be many but although there may be many counterpanes of the deed yet there is but one or two principall Deeds so amongst this great variety of editions one or more ought to be as principall and authenticall Thrre is a question betwixt the Church of Rome and the reformed Churches about the authentique edition of Scripture they say that the edition of the Bible in Hebrew and Greeke iâ— not authenticall but rather the vulgar Latine We hold that the vulgar Latine is very corrupt and false that the Hebrew for the old Testament and the Greeke for the new is the sincere and authenticall writing of God therefore that all things are to be determined by them and that the other versions are so far to be approved of as they agree with these fountaines The Tridentine Councell thus decreeth that in all sermons readings disputations controversies the vulgar Latine Translation should be taken for authentique before the Hebrew or Greeke and that no man should presume upon any occasion to reject it or to appeale from it When the Councell of Trent saith the vulgar Latine is authenticall it compares it with other Latine Translations not with the Hebrew Muis. Andradius the chiefest of the Divines at the Councell of Trent thinketh that the Councell of Trent did not meane either to condemne the Hebrew truth as he calleth it or to acquit the Latine Translation from all errour when they called it Authenticall but onely that the Latine hath no such errour by which any pestilent opinion in faith and manners may be gathered This saith Rainolds against Hart. ch 6. p. 202. Chamier tomo 1. l. 12. c. 2. The Rhemists in their preface to the new Testament translated by them prolixly
of the Interlineary version put forth by Arias Montanus for the finding out the sence and genuine signification of all the Hebrew and Greek words Amongst many and divers Latine translations there was one more common then the rest of the Old and New Teâ—â—ament usually called the vulgar because it was of vulgar use and received by many Who was the Author of this Edition it is not manifest Some say it was more Ancient then that of Jerome Jerome wrote pure Latine being skilfull in the Latine tongue but the vulgar transâ—ation is barbarous in many places Therefore Pagnine Maldonate Esâ—ius Sixtus Senensis Burgensis Valla Lindon deny it to be Jeromes that was translated from the Hebrew by the Greek and not by Jerome but by some uncertaine and unknown Authour saith Whitaker Bootius in the Index of his Sacred Animadversions ascribes it to Jerome Vide Whitakerum de Scripturis Quoest. secund controversiae Cap. Sexto Waltheri officinam Biblicam The Geneva translation for the French and our last translation for the English and Deodate for the Italian are the best which is now set out in English Diodatus noster in eximia Bibliorum Italicorum versione saith Spanbemius The question betwixt us and the Papists now cometh to be considered which of these Editions is authenticall that is which of it selfe hath credit and authority being sufficient of it selfe to prove and commend it selfe without the help of any other Edition because it is the first exemplar or Copy of divine truth delivered from God by the Prophets and Apostles This in respect of the old Testament is the Hebrew and in some Chapters of Daniel and Esra the Chaldee and in respect of the New Testament is the Greeke all other Editions are but of humane authority This proposition true in it selfe is yet divers wayes opposed by the Papists whose opinions may be set downe in three propositions 1. That the Hebrew and Greeke Text are corrupt and therefore not Authenticall for the fountaine is to be preferred before the streames if it come unto our hands uncorruptly The Book of Moses which by Gods Commandement was preserved in the Arke and that very Gospell written by Matthew those autographs saith Morinus are certainely the rule of all versions The second proposition is that the 70. Translaters were not so much Translaters as Prophets who wrote by divine inspiration so that their translation had been authentique if it had come to our hands purely and had not perished The third is that the vulgar Translation is of authentique authority and ought so to be received neither may any man presume to reject it upon any pretence they say it hangeth betweene the Hebrew and Greek as Christ did between the two Theeves To these 3. Propositions we oppose 3. which are most true and shall prevaile 1. The Hebrew of the old Testament and the Greeke of the new is the authentique Edition and the pure fountain of divine truth 2. The 70. were not Prophets but Translators 3. The vulgar translation neither is authenticall nor perfect neither ought it in any case so to be esteemed Reasons Proving that the Hebrew of the old Testament and the Greeke of the New are authenticall and pure To prove our first Proposition these arguments may be brought The Hebrew of the old and Greek of the New Testament are the very Scriptures which came immediately from God the very particular and individuall writings both for Character and stile of Speech yea the dialect as well as the matter of them is immediately by inspiration from from above and written by holy men as they were moved by the holy spirit what Edition therefore is worthy to be compared to this When we speake of the originall and authenticke Text of the Holy Scripture that is not to be so understood as if we meant it of the Autographs written by the hand of Moses or the other Prophets or Apostles but onely of the originall * or the primogeniall Text in that tongue out of which divers versions were derived according to the variety of tongues 2. For a long time before the Birth of Chirst the Hebrew was not only the alone authentique Copy but the only Edition which was extant in the world In the dayes of Moses the Kings of Israel and the Prophets before the Captivity what Edition of Scripture had the Church but the Hebrew what did the Jewes read in their Synagognes and in their solemne meetings but onely this Hebrew Edition After the time of Christ for the space of 600 yeeres the Hebrew Edition of the old Testament and the Greeke of the new were held Authentique and no other 3. If any thing be erroneous doubtfull lesse emphaticall or improper or if in the Articles of religion any doubt or difficulty arise which cannot be decided out of translations we must necessarily then have recourse to the Hebrew of the old and the Greeke of the new Testament as Augustine witnesseth and Jerome in lib. Contra Helvidium Beliarmine grants that sometimes we must have recourse to the Hebrew Greek fountaines 1. When in the Latine Edition there be any errours of the Scribe 2. When there are divers readings 3. When there is any thing doubtfull in the words of sentence 4. To understand the force and Energy of the word because all things are more emphaticall in the originall 4. If the authority of the authenticall Copies in Hebrew Chaldee and Greek fall then there is no pure Scripture in the Church of God there is no high court of appeale where controversies riâ—ing upon the diversity of translations or otherwise may be ended The exhortation of having recourse unto the Law and to the Prophets and of our Saviour Christ asking how it is written and how readest thou is now either of none effect or not sufficient The Papists differ among themselves in this controversie about the corruption of the originals some of them say that the Hebrew of the old and the Greeke of the New Testament is not generally corrupted and yet is not so very pure a fountain that whatsoever differs from it is necessarily to be corrected by it Others say that the Jewes in hatred of the Christian faith depraved and much corrupted the Hebrew Text of the Old Tesâ—ament Which opinion as absurd is rejected by Bellarmine and is easily refuted I shall first lay down some reasons against the grosser opinion and also that of Bellarmines before I come to answer the particular objections of the Papists 1. Jerome and Origen thus argue if the Jewes corrupted the Hebrew Text of the Old Testament then they did this before the coming of Christ or after it not before his coming for there was no cause why the Jewes should do it and our Saviour Christ would never have suffered so grosse a crime to have passed without due reproof when he was not silent for lesser faults On the contrary our Saviour sendeth
us to the Scripture to learn the doctrine of salvation Luke 16. 29. and proveth his doctrine out of Moses and the Prophets Not after Christs coming then the Testimonies cited 〈◊〉 Christ and his Apostles would have been expunged by them and the speciall prophesies concerning Christ But they are all extant The Jewes have and yet still doe keep the holy Text of Scripture most religiously carefully which may appeare since as Johannes Isaac contra Lind in l. 2. a Learned Jew writeth that there are above 200 arguments against the Jewes opinion more evident and expresse in the Hebrew Text of the old Testament then there be in the Latine translation From the dayes of our Saviour Christ untill this time the Jewes keep the Scripture with so great reverence saith the same Isaac ut jejunium indicunt si illa in terram ceciderit they publish a Fast if it fall upon the ground This Testimony of Isaac Levita is the more to be esteemed because he was Lindans own Master and professor of the Hebrew tongue in the university of Coolen and hath written 3. Bookes in the defence of the Hebrew truth against the cavils of his Scholler Arias Mâ—ntanus for his rare skill of tongues and arts was put in trust by King Philip to set forth the Bible in Hebrew Greek and Latine wherein he hath reproved that Treatise of Lindan and disclosed his folly Muis who hath written a Commentary on the Psalmes a great Hebrician and learned Papist hath written against Morinus about this Subject The most learned Papists Senensis Bannes Lorinus Pagnine Brixianus Valla Andradius and Bellarmine hold that the Jews did not maliciously corrupt the hebrew text Josephus l. 1. contra Appian who lived after our Saviour saith that the Jewes did keep the holy Scripture with so great fidelity that they would rather dye then change or alter any thing in it Euseb. Eccles. Hist. l. 3. cap. 10. teacheth the same thing The Stupendious diligence of the Massorites in numbring of the words and Letters with the variations of pointing and writing lâ—â—st any place or suspicion should be given of falsifying it seemes to be a good plea also against the Jewes wilfull depraving of Scripture Paulo post Hieronymum confecta est massora quam utilissimum thesaurum Arias appellaâ— Chamierus If Origen or Jerome the two chiefest Hebricians among the Fathers had had the least suspicion of this they would never have bestowed so much time in the learning of this tongue nor have taken such indefatigable paines in translating the Bibles out of Hebrew Yet Morinus would seeme to give answer to this viz. that we might convince the Jewes out of their own Books Jerome doth in a thousand places call it the Hebrew truth fontem limpidissimum and preferres it before the translation of the Septuagint and all other versions whatsoever He cals the Hebrew in the old and Greek in the New Testament fontes veritatis Farther if the Jewes would have corrupted the Scripture they could not for the Books were dispersed throughout the whole world how could the Jewes then being so farre dispersed themselves conferre together and corrupt them all with one consent The Books were not onely in the hands of the Jewes but of Christians also and in their Custody and they would never have suffered the Books of the old Testament which are the foundation of faith and life to be corrupted Adde if the Jewes would have corrupted the Scripture they would have corrupted those places which make most against them concerning Christs person and office as that prophesie 9. of Dan. of the Messiahs coming before the destruction of Jerusalem that Hag. 2. 9. which setteth out the glory of the second Temple to be greater then the glory of the first in regard of the presence of the Lord in it that Gen. 49. 10. who is such a stranger in the Jewish controversies as to be Ignorant how stoutly and pertinaciously many of the Jewes deny that by Shilo there is understood the Messias but the threefold Paraphrase there hath expressely added the word Messias and stops the mouths of the Jewes who must not deny their authority so that they feare nothing more then to contest with those Christians who read and understand the Chaldee Paraphrases and interpretations of the Rabbines See Master Mede on that Text. Psalme 2. 12. where the vulgar Latine hath apprehendite disciplinam quae lectio nihil magnificum de Christo praedicat the Hebrewes read osculamini filium which is more forcible to prove the mystery of Christs Kingdome and celebrate his ample dominion over all That place 53. of Esay containes both the prophesie and whole passion of Christ in it selfe Yet what is wanting there in the Hebrew Text is there a letter taken away or altered to violate the sense of the mysteries Isaac Levita saith that this Chapter converted him that he read it over more then a thousand times and compared it with many translations and that more of the mystery of Christ is contained in it than in any translation whatsoever He addeth further that disputing with five Rabbines at Frankford he urged this Chapter against them and thereby brought them into those straights and so stopped their mouths that they could not reply to his arguments We have the second Psalme the 21. the 110. and all others entire and complete in which there are most manifest prophesies concerning Christ. There are many besides the Papists who have stood for the uncorrupt truth of the fountaines and have defended the Jews faithfulnesse in preserving the Hebrew Copies as Whitaker Lubbertas Junius Ames Rivet and others But none hath performed more for the vindicating of particular places which are either suspected or openly charged of corruption by certain Papists then Salomon Glassius a most learned man who in his Philologia sacra hath vindicated 72 places of the Old Testament and 20. of the New All know that that place in the 7th of Esay a virgin shall conceive was constantly objected to the Jewes from the beginning and yet they have left it untouched Chamier de Canone l. 12. c. 4 Objections of the Papist against the purity of the Hebrew Text in the old Testament Bellarmine onely produceth 5. places of Scripture in which he indevours to prove not that the Hebrew text is corrupted by the labour or malice of the Jewes that opinion he evidently and solidly refutes yet that it is not altogether pure and perfect but hath its errours brought in from the negligence of the Scribes and Ignorance of the Rabbines Cotton saith the originals are miserably corrupted and that there is a multitude almost incredible of depravations and falsifications made by the Rabbines and Massorites But Bellarmine who was more learned than he and from whom he hath stollen a great part of his Book against the Genevah translations doth sufficiently confute him Ob. Ps. 22. 16. There is no Christian but
for holy men wrote as they were moved by Gods Spirit 4. Some thinke it the errour of heedlesse writers who might easily so erre but all the oldest Copies and the most Ancient Fathers have the name of Jeremy 5. Some say that Zachariah being Instructed and trained up with Jeremy did deliver it by tradition from Jeremy and so Jeremy spake it by Zachariah which might be true because it is said in the Text as was spoken by Jeremy not written But sixthly the most compendious and likely way of reconciling is this that Zachary and Jeremy was the same man having 2 names which was very usuall among the Jewes as Salomon was called Jedidiah Iehoiacim Jeconias and Coniah Simon Peter Cephas and Bariona Matthew Levi. So farre Junius and Doctor Taylor See Mr. Robert Baily on Zach. 3. 1. 2. p. 11. and last large Annotat. The best of the Popish writers cannot deny but that the name Jeremy the Prophet is put for Zachary either through the negligence of the Scribes or else it was inserted into the Text out of the Margent the Evangelist saying no more but that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the Prophet as both Iansâ—nius and Maldmate in loc doe confesse 1 Chamier distinguisheth of a twofold depravation one of Interpretation herein we excuse not nor defend the Jewes Second of the letter herein they are to be patroniz'd against the Papists who thorow their sides strike at the very Scriptures and labour to overthrow their authority The Hebrew Edition then notwithstanding these and such like frivolous objections is sincere and uncorrupt and if any errours crept in through negligence or Ignorance of the Pennien which Copyed out the Bookes yet Bellarimine himselfe granteth they arâ— of no great moment in matters pertaining to saith and manners saith he there is nothing wanting in the integrity of the Scriptures Haud negare ausim temporum injuria descriptorum iucuria errata quadam sphalmata in textum hebraum irrepsisse Amâ—ma Antibarb bibl What reasons can the Jesuites alledge why the Hebrew and the Greeke which kept their integrity 400 yeares together after Christ amidst as bitter Enemies as ever they had as troublesome and tempestuous times as ever were since should after in time of lesse danger and greater quiet loose not their beauty onely but their Chastity also And we marvell that the Jesuites are not afraid to suffer this blot to fall upon their Popish government which boasteth and saith it is the pillar of truth and yet hath had no better care to preserve the truth Objections of the Papists against the purity of the Greeke Text in the New Testament Ob. They instance in Rom. 12. 11. to be corrupt the Greek hath serving the time 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for serving the Lord 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Sol. Many of the ancient Greek Copies and Scholiasts have also 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as Salmerond the Jesuite confesseth serving the Lord and it appeareth in the Syriacke translation and who seeth not that it might rather be an oversight of the writer taking one word for another rather then a fault in the Text and the cause of the mistake saith Beza was the short writing of the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which was taken by some for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 whereas they should have taken it for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 If we should admit the other reading we must not understand the Apostle as if he commanded us to be temporizaers or to apply our selves to the corrupt customes and manners of the times but to keep time in all our actions and doe them in the fittest season as Col. 4. 5. Ephes. 5. 16. Ob. Erasmus the best translator of all the later by the judgement of Beza saith that the Greek sometimes hath superstuities corruptly added to the Text of holy Scripture as Matth. 6. The doxologie for thine is the Kingdome the power and the glory for ever and ever He calleth these words trifles rashly added to the Lords Prayer and reprehends Valla for blaming the old vulgar Latine because it hath them not Tertullian Cyprian Ambrose Jerome and Augustine doe expound the Lords Prayer and yet make no mention of these words Beza confesseth it to be magnificam illam quidem sanctificam a most high and holy forme of expression sed irrepsisse in contextum quae in vetustissimis aliquot codicibus Graecis desit it is not to be found in that vetustissimus codex by Beza to the university Library of Cambridge that Copy perhaps was corrupted by the Heretickes It is not presently trifles whatsoever Erasmus or any other man shall reject out of the Greek Copy under that name and yet they doe Erasmus wrong to say that he called that part of the Lords Prayer trifles absolutely for he stiles it so conditionally if it be not part of the Ancient Text. 2. If Erasmus had understood that that passage had beene taken out of the Book of Chronicles written by the penne of the holy Ghost he would no doubt have taken heed how he had called this conclusion of the Lords Prayer trifles for it appeareth manifestly that this sentence was borrowed from David 1 Chron. 29. 11. with some Abridgement of the Prophets words 3. That cannot be superstuous without the which we should not have had a perfect form of Prayer for since Prayer standeth as well in praising of God and thanksgiving as in petitions and requests to be made unto him it is evident that if this conclusion had beene wanting there had wanted a forme of that Prayer which standeth in praise and thanksgiving 4. If to give a substantiall reason of that which goeth before be superfluous then this conclusion may be so 5. For confirmation of this reading we may alleadge besides the consent of the Greek Copies the Syrian interpretation which is very Ancient Chrysostome Theophylact and Euthymius expound it The Lords Prayer in Luke is perfect in respect of the Petitions yet nothing hindereth but that in Matthew might be added the confirmation and conclusion Matthew hath many other things in his Gospell which Luke hath not Salmeron reproves Cajetan for calling this Multilâ—quium since there is a notable confession of 4 properties of God his Kingdome Power Glory and Eternity I should now shew that neither the translation of the Seventy nor of the vulgar Latine are authenticall but there are two questions of great moment first to be discussed The first is whether any Bookes of the Scripture be lost The second whether the Scripture of the Old Testament was punctata from the beginning To the first question that we may give a right answer we must distinguish of the Bookes of Scripture some were Historicall Ethicall or Physicall others Dogmaticall The former might perish and fall away but not the latter Therefore that common objection of divers Books mentioned in the Old Testament whereof we finde none so
intituled in the Canon thereof is easily answered Either they were Civill and common-wealth Stories whether the Reader is referred if it like him to read the stories more at large which the Prophets touched shortly or else they are contained in the Books of the Kings which are manifestly proved to be written by divers Prophets in their severall ages wherein they prophesied Salomons Books which he wrote of generall Philosophy fell away but all the other Books of the Scripture do still remain First they are all of God all whose works remain for ever therefore the holy Scriptures being not onely his handy-work but as it were the chief and Master-work of all other must have a continuall endurance Secondly they all are written generally for our instruction and more particularly for admonition and warning for comfort and consolation unlesse we will say that God may be deceived in his purpose and end wherefore he ordained them it must needs be that it must continue whatsoever hath been written in that respect Thirdly if the Lord have kept unto us the whole Book of Leviticus and in it the ceremonies which are abolished and whereof there is now no practice because they have a necessary and profitable use in the Church of God how much more is it to be esteemed that his providence hath watched over other Books of the Scripture which more properly belong unto our times Fourthly let us heare the Scripture it self witnessing of it own authority and durablenesse to all ages Moses thus writeth of it The secret and hidden things remain to the Lord our God but the things that are revealed to us and our Children for ever David also professeth that he knew long before that the Lord had founded his testimonies for ever-more But our Saviour Christs testimony is of all other most evident That heaven and earth shall passe but that his word cannot passe And yet more vehemently that not one jot or small letter prick or stop of his Law can passe untill all be fulfilled Rom 15. 4. therefore none of those which were written for that end are lost Origen in praefat in Cant. Canticorum Augustine l. 18. de civitate Dei c. 38. thought it could not neither stand with the Divine providence nor with the honour of the Church that any Canonicall Books and given for such to the Church should be lost Of this opinion are many worthy moderne Divines Junius Chamierus Tomo 1. L. 9. c. 5. Polanus Wendelinus Waltherus Spanhemius Cartwright Gerardus in exegesi loci primi de Scriptura sacra c. 6. Joh. Camero Tomo 3. in Praelectionibus de verbo Dei Cap. 15. Rivetus in Isagoge ad S. Script c. 6. in Summa Controversiarum Tom. 1. Tract 1. Quaest. 1. Altingi us But Chrysost. and Whitaker also Bellarmine l. 4. de verbo Dei c. 4. Grâ—ther and Becanus hold that some Canonicall Books are lost I rather subscribe to the judgement of the former Reverend Divines who held the contrary The second question is whether the Scripture of the old Testament was punctata from the beginning or whether the Hebrew Text had Vowels or points from the beginning as now it hath Controversiam de punctorum antiquitate vel novitate inter viros eruditos disceptatam non attingo Sententia utraque suos habet assertores magni quidem nominis Cevalerius Buxtorsius Marinus Junius and other very godly and learned men have defended the antiquity of the pricks which to the Hebrews are in stead of Vowels and say that the Bibles were punctata in our Saviour Christs time and that he approved of the same Matth. 5. 18. others hold that the invention of the pricks and the Massâ—reth is to be ascribed to the Tiberian Massorites who flourished about 500 yeares after Christs birth this opinion divers learned men have defended with most weighty reasons as Martinius in Technologia Luther Mercer Scaliger and Drusius Calvin upon the 11. of Zacharie Zuinglius in his Preface on Esay Raynolds in his censure of the Apocryphall Books But above all Capellus in his Book entitled Arcanum punctationis revelatum hath so strongly confirmed that opinion and hath so solidly confuted the reasons which are commonly brought to the contrary that he hath drawn some learned Divines to his opinion which before did stiffely adhere to the contrary opinion and left others very doubtfull He hath well answered that place Matth. 5. 18. l. 2. c. 14. But as Amana saith if any will not be moved from the other opinion that the puncta were invented by the Prophets which many godly Divines doe out of a good zeale stand for suum Cuique liberum sit judicium Vide Fulleri Miscell Sac. l. 4. c. 4. Mercerum ad Gen. 16. 13. Drusium ad difficuliora loca Genes Buxtor fij dissertationem de Ebraeorum literis Our Saviour saith Matth. 5. 18. that not one jot or prick of the Law shall perish whereby it should appeare that the Law and the Prophets for of both he speaketh immediately before had vowels pricks whereunto also belong all those places of Scripture which testifie of the clearnesse and certainty of the Scripture which could not at all be now if it lacked Vowels Yet this is not B. Vshers judgement as himselfe told me Non est improbabile argumentum ex Matth. 5. v. 18. Luc. 16. 17. ubi per 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 puncta accentus commodè intelligi posse docti opinantur inter quos Broughthonius in Daniel p. 45. Polanus Syntagm lib. 1. cap. 37. quamvis argumento illi nolimus insistere Voetius Tomo primo disputat de authoritate Scripturae Sine punctis legere saith Drusius paucis hodie Concessum Serarius de Rabbinis saith Elias Hutter a Lutherane writes thus è mille Praedicantibus ne unum quidem esse qui etiam punctatissina possit Hebraea legere nedum absque punctis CHAP. VII NOw I proceed to shew that neither the translation of the Seventy nor the vulgar Latine are anthenticall 1. The Greek translation of the Old Testament which is commonly ascribed to the Seventy Interpreters is not Divinely inspired The chiefe Pillars of the Primitive Church ranne into this errour whence sprung many other errours The Greek Fathers who were generally unskilfull both in Hebrew and Latine some few excepted were the lesse to be blamed here since they made use of no other Editions therefore they more confidently affirmed their own to be Authenticall Augustine Tertullian and many of the Latine Fathers whom divers Divines follow ascribed too much to the Seventy Interpreters Yet there was a controversie between Augustine and Jerome concerning their authority as is evident by both their Epistles Bellarmine is large in commending this version saying that it is most certain that those Interpreters did very well translate the Scripture and had the Holy Ghost peculiarly assisting them least they should erre
in any thing so that they may seeme rather to be Prophets then Interpreters Gretzer bestoweth a Prophetique spirit upon them because they did so agree and absolved their taske in so short a space of time viz. in 72. dayes They are said to have been put a part in 72. celles and to have all agreed in their translation and the ruines thereof were as is reported shewed a long time after at Alexandria But Hierome and many of the * Papists held this to be a Fable of the 72 celles since neither Aristaeus who was a chiefe man about King Ptolomie that set the 70 Interpreters on work nor Josâ—phus who was most desirous of the honour of his Nation maketh any mention thereof And as touching the Interpreters themselves Jerome saith Aliud est vatem agere aliud Interpretem It is one thing to be a Prophet another to be an Interpreter And as for the translation he saith Germana illa antiqua translatio corrupta violata est That Ancient and true translation of the Septuagint is corrupted and violated which as Hierome saith was agreeable to the Hebrew but so is not the Greek Copy now extant which is full of corruptions and seemeth to be a mixt and confused translation of many If the Seventy as well as the Hebrew had been authenticall the Lord would have been carefull to have kept it pure and uncorrupt unto our dayes as well as he hath done the Hebrew There is indeed a Greek Edition extant which goeth under the name of the 70. but Wâ—itaker saith that the true Seventy is lost and that this which we now have is mixt and miserably corrupted Danda 70 Interpretibus venia ut hominibus juxta Jacobi sententiam multa peceamus omnes Hieron ad Pamâ—ch The Apostles and Evangelists writing in Greek often followed the version of the Septuagint then common amongst the Graecians and cited it sometimes where there is a most manifest difference from the Hebrew Text but yet they did not alwayes use that translation which they would have done if they had esteemed it Divine and Authenticall Spanhemius Dub Evangel parte 1a Dub. 23. and Amama Antibarb Bibl. l. 2. both thinke that conjecture of Heinsius in his holy Aristarchus very probable viz. that the fable of the number and consent of the Interpreters took its originall from the 24. of Exâ—dus Hence saith Henisius there without doubt the History concerning Ptolomie hence those famous celles which Jerome scoffs at Hence that invention that none of all that number differed in their Interpreations Therefore since that version when pure was but a humane not Divine worke and proceeded from Interpreters not Prophets it couldbe neither Authenticall nor fide digna any farther then it agreed with the Hebrew Text. The Ancients themselves Commenting upon Scripture used not the Septuagint Edition as authenticke from which it would not have been then lawfull to depart but rather often correct it as Origen and Jerome from the Hebrew fountaines which every one knoweth that is versed in their workes They are most bold in changing numbers without any reason as Gen. 5. to Seth Enos Cainaan Malaleel they give each a 100 yeares beyond the Hebrew truth In the 46 Chapter of Genesis for Seventy soules they say 75. The Seventie read Prov. 8. 23 in the beginning God created me for in the beginning God possessed me whether because they mistook the Hebrew word Chava for Cava upon their likenesse in the Hebrew Characters or their translation was at the first 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 possedit possessed and the Copies slipping in one letter made it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 creavit created as Bellarmine after Zanchie thinketh 2. The vulgar Edition is not authenticall We are now come to shew that the vulgar Latine Edition is not authenticall a thing of it self manifest but yet to be proved by some arguments because our Adversaries stand upon it Our arguments are these 1. It was not Divinely inspired in respect of matter forme speech as the Hebrew of the Old Testament and the Greek of the new were but was translated by humane indeavour and therefore it is against both religion and reason to say it is authenticall a work of men cannot in perfection be equall with a work of God for as Jerome saith aliud est esse vatem aliud est esse Interpretem It is the office of an Interpreter to translate the authenticall Scripture not to make his translation authenticall for both Jerome and every other Interpreter might erre so did not the Prophets and Apostles the Councell of Trent first decreed that this translation should be authenticall before it many learned Papists themselves did disallow that translation as Paulus Brugensis Valla Engubinus Isidorus Clarius Jobannes Isaacus Cajetan Erasmus Jacobus Faber Ludovicus Vives and divers others 2. The vulgar translation doth oft change the sentence of the Holy Ghost yea it doth dangerously and heretically deprave the sense of holy Scripture and translate senselesly many times therefore it is not to be held authenticall Gen. 3. 15. ipsa for ipse viz. Christ or ipsum viz. semen which place it seemeth was corrupted Idolatrously to extoll the praises of the Virgin Mary and to prove her patronage and protection This reading drew Bernard into this opinion Maria abstulit opprobrium matris Evae patri pro matre satisfecit quod promittitur Gen. 3. 15. ipsa conteret cui servanda est victoria nisi Mariae Bern. See Bedels answer to Wadesworths Letters Ch. 6. Hoc conteret Tremel alij that is that same seed rather he viz. that one person Hieron Ipse câ—nteret caput tuunt so the Septuagint our translation Gen. 4. 13. Major est iniquitas mea quam ut veniam merear a corrupt translation serving to countenance the errour touching merit de congruo In the Hebrew there is nothing which hath the least signification of merit it should be translated ut feram vel sustineam vel remissionem consequar Translatio ista potest tolerari sumatur mereri pro consequi ut saepissimè olim apud veteres Chamierus Exod. 34. 29. v. The vulgar hath videbant faciem Mosis cornutam for radiantem which the Hebrew word signifieth the Seventie translate it the Apostle Paul approving of it 2 Cor. 3. 7. 10. was glorified This interpretation of the vulgar is reprehended by Valla Vatablus Arius Montanus Steuchus Cajetan Ferus Oleaster Thomas Aquinas and Bellarmine himself de ecclesia triumphante l. 2. c. 4. which is also confirmed by the Text it self for the Scripture witnesseth that the people could not behold the face of Moses for the brightnesse thereof Exod. 34. 30. and therefore his whole face not the highest part of his forehead or his head was covered with a vaile 33. v. of that Chapter 2 Cor. 3. 3. Job 5. 1. The vulgar Latine hath voca ergo si est qui tiâ—i respondeat et ad
he praised God Joseph was no King aud therefore had no Scepter to fall down before In the Hebrew Gen. 47. for top we read head which by a Metaphor signifies the top because the head is the end and highest part of man and consequently of any thing else And for staffe we now read in the Hebrew bed which fell out because the word mittah there extant pricked with other Vowels signifies a staffe for in the Hebrew matteh is a staffe and mitteh a bed The Septuagint whom the Apostle followes read it matteh and so translated it staffe otherwise thâ—n wâ— now read it in the Hebrew Text. If we follow the Hebrew Text as it is now extant the sence will be That Jacob because he could not raise his body out of his bed therefore he bowed his head forward upon his beds head and so worshipped God Bezâ— speaking of the divers Latine translations of the New Testament onely he saith of the vâ—lgar Latine that he followeth it for the most part and preferreth it before all the rest Maximâ— ex parte amplector claeeris omnibus antepono He speakes of the new Testament onely and of that Latine translation of the new Testament in comparison of all other Latine translations which were before him as Erasmus Castalion and such like These placâ—s may serve to shew that the vulgar Latine is corrupt no Book being entire or free fron errour Isidore Clarius Brixianus praefâ—â—t in Biblia a great learned man of their own affirmeth that it hath 8000 places in which the sense of the Holy Ghost is changed Since the Councell of Trent 2 Popes have set forth this vulgar Edition diversly which of these shall be received as authenticall How often doe the Papists leave the vulgar in all their controversies when it is for their advantage so to doe it is a matter ordinary with them and needlesse to be proved There is no Edition Ancienter then the Hebrew if the Latine have been used a 1000 yeares in the Church the Hebrew hath been used almost 3000 yeares the Chaldee Arbicke Syriacke and Greeke Editions also have beene used above a 1000 yeares and so should be authentique by the Papists argument Having spoken of the authority of the Scriptures the Canonicall Books and the Authenticall Editions I now goe on to treate of the end of the Scripture its adjuncts or properties fitted to that end and the Interpretation of Scripture The end of the Scripture comes next to be considered of this I have spoken somewhat afore but shall now inlarge my selfe The end of the Scripture is considered 1. In respect of God 2. In respect of us In respect of God the end of the Scripture is a glorifying of him by it we may learne to know love and feare him and so be blessed The glory of God is the chiefe end of all things Prov. 16. 4. In respect of us The end of the Scripture is 1. Intermediate temporall edification which is fitly referred to 5 principall uses the two first respect the mind the other three the heart will and affection It is profitable for Doctrine it serves to direct to all saving truth nothing is to be received as a truth necessary to salvation but what is proved out of Scripture Where that hath not a tongue to speake I must not have an eare to heare Hoc quia de scripâ—uris non habet autoritatem eadem facilitate contemuitur qua probatur Hieron 2. Reproofe or Confutation to refute all errours and heterodoxe opinions in Divinity By this sword of the Spirit Christ vanquished Satan Matth. 4. 4. 7. 10. by the Scripture he opposed the Jewes John 5. 45. 46. 47. and 10. 34. by this he refuted the Scribes and Pharisees Matth. 9. 13. and 12. 1. Luke 10. 25. 26. 27. Matth. 19. 34. and 21. 12. 13. the Sadducees Matth. 22 29. By this Austin refuted the Pelagians Irenaeus the Valentinians Tertullian the Mâ—rcionites Athanasius the Arrians In comitijs Vindelicorum cum episcopus Albertus aliquando legeret Biblia referente Luthero in Sermon Convival interrogasset quidam è consiliarijs quid libri hic â—sset nescio equidem respondet qualis sit liber sed omnia quae in eo lego nostrae religioni planè sunt contraria 3. Correction of iniquity setting streight that which is amisse in manners and life 4. Instruction to righteousnesse Instruunt Patriarchae etiam errantes Basil saith the Psalmes are a common Store house and Treasury of good Instruction The Title of the 32 and some other Psalmes is Maschil that is a Psalme of instruction 5. Comfort in all troubles Psal. 19. 8 and 119. 50. and 92. the Greek word for Gospell signifieth glad-tidings The Promises are the Christians best Cordials as Gods Promises are the rule of what we must pray for in faith so they are the ground of what we must expect in comfort 2. Ultimate and chiefest our Salvation and life Eternall John 5. 39. and 20. 31. 2 Tim. 3. 15. It will shew us the right way of escaping hell and attaining Heaven It will shew us what to beleeve and practise for our present and eternall happinesse This was Gods aime in causing the Scripture to be written and we shall find it fully availeable and effectuall for the ends for which it was ordained by God CHAP. VIII THe properties of the Scripture fitted to that end The properties which the Scripture must have for the former end are these It is 1. Of Divine Authority 2. True and Certaine 3. The rule of faith and manners 4. Necessary 5. Pure and Holy 6. Sufficient and Perfect 7. Perspicuous and Plaine 1. It is of Divine Authority and so greater then all exception It is Divine 1. In its efficient cause and Originall which is God the Father dictating in his Sonne declaring and publishing by his holy Spirit confirming and sealing it in the hearts of the faithfull He wrote the Decalogue immediately with his own finger and Commanded the whole Systeme and all the parts of Scripture to be written by his servants the Prophets and Apostles as the publike Actuaries and Pen-men thereof therefore the authority of the Scripture is as great as that of the holy Ghost who did dictate both the matter and words those speeches are frequent the Lord said and the mouth of the Lord hath spoken 2. In the subject matter which is truth according to godlinesse certaine powerfull of venerable antiquity joyned with a sensible demonstration of the Spirit and Divine presence and with many other things atteâ—â—ing its divine authority Whence it follows that the authority of the Holy Scriptures is 1. Infallible which expresseth the minde and will of God to whom truth is essentiall and necessary 2. Supreame and Independent into which at last all faith is resolved from whiâ—h it is not lawfull to appeale By which singular authority the Scripture is distinguished
mensura infallibilis quae nullam vel additionem vel detractionem patitur 3. It is a â—ust rule Lastly It is an universall and perpetuall rule both in regard of time and person ever since the Scripture hath beene it hath been the onely rule in the old Testament to the Law and the Testimony in the new they confirmed all things by the old it directs in every case 2 To all persons this is able to make a Minister yea a Councell a Church wise to salvation to reforme a young man whose lusts are unbridled 119. 9. to order a King 17 Deut. 29. 30. Ob. Faith was before the Scripture therefore the Scripture is not the rule of faith Sol. The word of God is twofold 1. Revealed that preceded faith 2. Written that did not Though it be a rule yet firâ—t it doth not exclude other Ministeriall helps as Prayer Preaching the knowledge of the tongues and the Ministry of the Church these are meanes to use the rule and subordinate to it we need no more rules Therefore it is a vaine and absurd question of the Papists let a man be lockt up in a Study with a Bible what good will he get by it if he cannot read 2. There must be reason and judgement to make use of it and apply it judge what I say saith Paul 1 Cor. 10. 15. The Scripture should rule our hearts thoughts and inward cogitations our words and actions we should pray heare receive the Sacrament according to the directions of it buy sell cloath our selves and carry our selves toward all as that bids us 2 Sam. 22. 23. the people of God wrote after this Copy followed this rule Psal. 119. 5. 59. 111. because they desired in all which they did to please God now God is pleased when his own will is done and to glorifie him in their lives and therefore they framed themselves according to his statutes We cannot better expresse an high esteeme of God and his excellencies then by following him in all things Every one esteems that person most excellent to whom he gives up himself most to be ruled and ordered 4. The Scripture is necessary In respect of the substance thereof it was alwayes necessary in respect of the manner of revealing it is necessary since the time that it pleased God after that manner to deliver his word and shall be to the worlds end It is not then absolutely and simply necessary that the word of God should be delivered to us in writing but onely conditionally and upon supposition God for a long time for the space of 2400 yeares unto the time of Moses did instruct his Church with an immediate living voyce and had he pleased still to goe on in that way there had beene no necessity of Scripture now more then in that age there was a continuall presence of God with them but now there is a perpetuall absence in that way and the word of God was written 1. For the brevity of mans life See the 5. the 11. Ch. of Gen. The Patriarks were long lived before and after the Floud to the times of Moses they lived some centuries of yeares therefore afterward the purity of the word could not fitly be preserved without writing By writing we have the comfort of the holy word of God which from writing receiveth his denomination in being called Scripture which is nothing else but writing 2. That the Church might have a certaine and true rule and Canon whereby it might judge of all questions doubts and controversies of Religion Luke 1. 4. Every mans opinion else would have been a Bible and every mans lust a Law 3. That the faith of men in Christ which was to come might the better be confirmed when they should see that written before their eyes which was done by the Messâ—as and see all things that were fore-told of him verified in the event 4. That the purity of Gods worship might be preserved from corruption and the truth propagated among all Nations 5. To take off excuses from men that they did not know Rom. 10. 18. civill Lawes are written and published that offenders may be excusable The Pen-men had a command from God 1. A publike and outward command as Jeremie 30. 2. and 36. 2 Moses Exod. 17. 14. and 34. 17. and John was commanded 12 times in the Revelation to write Rev. 1. 11. and 2. 1. 8. 12. 18. and 3. Ch. 1. 7. and 14. and 14. 13. and 19. v. 9. 21. 5. 2 an inward command by private inspiration and instinct 2 Pet. 1. 21. 5. The Scripture is Pure and Holy It commands all good and forbids reproves and condemnes all sinne and filthinesse it restraines not onely from evill words and actions but thoughts glances Those are frequent adjuncts of the word of God holy pure and cleane Psal. 12. 6. and 18. 31. and 119. 40 Prov. 30. 5. It is pure in its narrations it speakes purely of things evill and uncleane It is termed holy Rom. 1. 2. and 2 Tim. 3. 15. 1. From its efficient principall cause God who is the holy of holies holinesse it selfe Esay 6. 3. Dan. 9. 24. he is the author and inditer of it Luke 1. 67. 2 In regard of the instrumentall cause the Pen-men of it were holy men 2 Pet. 1. 21. Prophets and Apostles 3. From its matter the holy will of God Aâ—t 20. 27. the Scripture containes holy and Divine mysteries holy precepts of life holy promises Psal 105. 42. holy Histories 4. From its end or effect the holy Ghost by the reading and meditation of the Scripture sanctifieth us John 17. 17. it sanctifieth likewise all the creatures to our use so as we may use them with a good conscience 1 Tim. 4. 5. From the purity of it the Scripture is compared to a glasse Jam. 1. 23. to fire Jer. 23. 29. to light Psal. 119. 105. The reason of it is because God himselfe is pure most pure Psal. 92. ult Hab 1. 13. It is pure 1. Formally in it selfe there is no mixture of falshood or error no corruption or unsoundnesse at all in it Prov. 8. 6. 7. 8. 2. Virtually so as to make others pure John 15. 3. and 17. 17. Act. 20. 32. It begets grace Jam. 1. 18. 1 Pet. 1. 23. and preserves and increaseth it Act. 20. 32. Ephâ—s 4. 11. 12. The assertory part is pure what it affirmes to be is and what it dâ—nyes to be is not Psal 19. 7. and 93. 5. Jam. 1. 18. 2 What it promiseth shall be performed and what it threateneth shall be executed Numb 23. 19. 1 Sam. 2. 30. Zach. 1. 6. 3. What it commandeth is good and what it forbiddeth is evill Deut. 4. 8. Psal. 119. 108. and 19. 8. 9. Rom. 7. 12. In other Bookes some truth is taught some good commended some kinde or part of happinesse promised But in the Inspired Oracles of God all truth is taught all goodnesse commanded
all happinesse promised nay we may invert the words with Hugo de sancto victore and say Quicquid ibi docetur esâ— veritas quicquid praecipitur bonitas quicquid promittitur felicitas All that is there taught is truth all that is there commanded is goodnesse all that is there promised is happinesse It is a wonderfull thing that all the particulars which the Canticles containe being taken from marriage are handled so sincerely that no blemish or spot can be found therein Therefore the Scriptures should be preacht read and heard with holy affections and should be reverently mentioned The â—ewes in their Synagogues will not touch the Bible with unwashed hands they kisse it as often as they open and shut it they sit not on that seat where it is laid and iâ— it fall on the ground they fast for a whole day The Turke writâ—s upon the outside of his Alcoran Let no man touch this Book but he that is pure I would none might meddle with ours Alcorâ—â— signifieth but the Scripture you need not be afraid of the word but such as indeed are what other men doe but think themselvâ—s 6. The Scripture is Perfect The perfection of the Scripture is considered 2 wayes 1. In respect of the matter or the Bookes in which the holy doctrine was written all which as many as were usefull to our salvation have been kept inviolable in the Church so that out of them one most perfect and absolute Canon of faith and life was made and this may be called the Integrity of the Scripture 2. In respect of the forme viz. of the sence or meaning of these Canonicall Books or of Divine truth comprehended in them which Books containe most fully and perfectly the whole truth necessary and sufficient for the salvation of the elect and therefore the Scriptures are to be esteemed a sole adequate totall and perfect measure and rule both of faith and manners and this is the sufficiency of the Scriptures which is attributed to it in a twofold respect 1. Absolutely in it selfe and that in a threefold consideration 1. Of the Principle for every principle whether of a thing or of knowledge ought to be the perfect since demonstration and true conclusions are not deduced from that which it imperfect therefore it is necessary that the holy Scripture being the first only immediate principle of all true doctrine should be most perfect 2. Of the Subject for it hath all Essentiall parts matter and forme and integrall Law and Gospell and is wholy perfect both 1. Absolutely because for the substance it eitheir expressely or Analogically containes the doctrine concerning Faith and Manners which is communicable and profitable for us to know which may be proved also by induction that all necessary opinions of Faith or precepts of life are to be found in the holy Scripture 2. Relatively because as it hath a perfection of the whole so of the parts in the whole that perfection is called essentiall this quantitative For all the Books are Sufficient with an essentiall perfection although integrally they have not a sufficiency of the whole but only their own yet so that at distinct times every part sufficed for their times but all the parts in the whole are but sufficient for us 3. In its effect and operation it makes men perfect 2 Tim 3. 16. 17. Rom. 15. 4. John 2. ult 5. 39. 2. As opposed to unwritten Traditions all which it excludes by its sufficiency but we doe not understand by Traditions generally a Doctrine delivered in Word and Writing but specially a Doctrine not written by Prophets or Apostles whether Dogmaticall Historicall or Ceremoniall for a perfect reason of the primary opinions belonging to Faith and Manners is delivered in Scripture and those things which are out of beside or against the Scripture doe not binde the Conscience 2. Historicall the Sayings and Deedes of Christ and the Apostles are perfectly contained in the Scriptures as many as suâ—fice us for our salvation John 20. 30 31. Those things which are delivered out of Scripture are to be esteemed mans writings 3. Ceremoniall or secondary opinions concerning Ecclesiasticall Rites and Customes are for Essentialls Substantials and Fundamâ—ntals generally contained in the Word of God The accidentals accessaries and circumstantials are free and mutable If Traditions agree with the Scripture they are confirmed by it if they oppose it they are disproved by it The perfection of the Scriptures is not First Infinite and unlimited that is an incommunicable property of God every thing which is from another as the efficiente ause is thereby limited both for the nature and qualities thereof Secondly we doe not understand such a perfection as containeth all and singular such things as at any time have beene by Divine inspiration revealed to holy men and by them delivered to the Church of what sort soever they were for all the Sermons of the Prophets of Christ and his Apostles are not set downe in so many words as they used in the speaking of them for of twelve Apostles seven wrote nothing which yet preached and did many things neither are all the deeds of Christ and his Apostles written for that is contradicted John 20. 30. 31 21. 25. but we meane onely a Relative perfection which for some certaine ends sake agreeth to the Scripture as to an instrument according to which it perfectly comprehendeth all things which have beene are or shall be necessary for the salvation of the Church Thirdly the severall Bookes of Scripture are indeed perfect for their own particular ends purposes uses for which they were intended of the Lord but yet not any one Booke is sufficient to the common end the whole Scripture is compleate in all the parts thereof one speaking of that which another doth wholy passe over in silence one clearely delivering what was intricate in another Paul speakes much of Justification and Predestination in the Epistle to the Romans nothing of the Eucharist or Resurrection Fourthly since God did reveale his will in writing those writings which by Divine hand and providence were extant in the Church were so sufficient for the Church in that Age that it needed not Tradition neither was it lawfull for any humane wight to adde thereto or take therefrom but when God did reveale more unto it the former onely was not then sufficient without the latter Fifthly the holy Scripture doth sufficiently containe and deliver all Doctrines which are necessary for us to eternall salvation both in respect of Faith and good works and most of these it delivereth to us expressely and in so many words and the rest by good and necessary consequence The Baptisme of Infants and the consubstantiality of the Father and of the Sonne are not in those words expressed in Scripture yet is the truth of both cleerely taught in Scripture and by evident proofe may thence be deduced that Article of Christs
of Scripture John 14. 26. he that teacheth all things omitteth nothing Christ said all things to his Apostles as appeares John 15. 15. and 17. 8. John 16. 13. 2. By reasons drawne from thence 1. The plentifull pouring forth of the spirit was deferred till the glorifying of Christ he being glorified it was no longer to be delayed Christ being exalted on the right hand of God obtained the Spirit promised and that was not according to measure and poured the same in such abundance as it could be poured forth and received by men so that was fulfilled which was foretold by Joel 2. 28. Act. 2. 33. John 3. 34. 35. Act. 2. 16 17. 2. The Scripture and the prophesies of the old Testament doe teach and declare that all Divine truth should fully and at once be manifested by the Messias who is the onely Prophet High-Priest and King of his Church there is no other Revelation promised none other needfull besides that which was made by him Esay 11. 9. Act 3. 23. 24. Joel 2. 23. Vide Mercerum in loc therefore the last inspiration was made to the Apostles and none other to be expected The doctrine of the Law and the Prophets did suffice to salvation yet it did send the Fathers to expect somewhat more perfect 1 Pet. 1. 10 but to the preaching of the Gospell nothing is to be added we are not sent to waite for any clearer vision 3. So long as any truth needfull to be known was unrevealed or not plainly taught the Lord did stirre up some Prophet or other to teach the same unto the Church therefore the Lord surceaâ—ng to speake since the publishing of the Gospell of Jesus Christ and the delivery of the same in writing is unto us a manifest token that the whole will of God is now brought to light and that no new Revelation is to be expected Our 7th Proposition is Christ and his Apostles were able to propound and teach by lively voyce that doctrine which pertaines to perfection John 1. 18. and 11. 11. 32. John 8. 26. and the Apostles perfectly taught all things which are or shall be necessary for the Church Act. 20. 27. Gal. 1. 7. 8. 9. The doctrine of repentance and remission of sinnes in the name of Christ doth summarily containe all things necessarily to salvation Act. 5. 31. and 11. 11. but this doctrine the Apostles preached Act. 13. 38. 39. Luke 24. 47. The word of God is not onely Milke for Babes but strong Meat for men of ripe yeares 1 Cor. 3. 1. 2. Heb. 5. 14. and 6. 1. 2. therefore it containeth not onely matter of preparation but of perfection Or 8th Proposition is The sum and substance of that heavenly doctrine which was taught by the Prophets and Apostles was by them committed to writing the Holy Ghost giving them a commandement and guiding their hands therein that they could not erre so that the word preached and written by them is one in substance both in respect of matter which is the will and word of God and inward forme viz. the divine truth immediately inspired though different in the externall forme and manner of delivery Our 9th Proposition is that nothing is necessary to be known of Christians over and above that which is found in the old Testament which is not clearly and evidently contained in the Bookes of the Apostles and Evangelists Our last Proposition is that all things which have beene are or shall be necessary to the salvation of the Church to the end of the world are perfectly contained in the writings of the Prophets and Apostles long since divinely inspired written and published and now received by the Church of God so that now no new Revelation or Tradition beside those inspired published and comprehended in the Scripture are necessary for the salvation of the Church There are 3 opinions 1. Of the Papists who altogether deny it 2. Of the Socinians which would have all things expressely contained in Scripture and if it be not totidem verbis they reject it 3. Of the Orthodoxe who say it containes all things expressely or by consequence The expresse testimonies of Scripture forbidding even Angels to adde any thing to those things which are commanded by the Lord doe prove the perfection of the Scripture Deut. 4. 5. 12. and 12. 32. and 30. 10. and 5. 12 13 14. and 28. 58. Josh. 1. 7 8. Prov. 30. 5. wherefore the Apostle commands that no man presume above that which is written 1. Cor. 4. 6. 2 Tim. 3. 15 16. Divers reasons may be drawn from this famous place to prove the perfection of the Scripture 1. The Apostle teacheth that the Scriptures are able to make a man wise to salvation therefore there needeth no further counsell nor direction thereunto but out of the Scriptures 2 The Scriptures are able to make the man of God that is the Minister of the word perfect and compleat unto every worke of his Ministery whether it be by teaching true doctrine or confuting false by exhorting and setting forward to that which is good or dehorting from that which is evill Paul would not have us thinke that all and every writing viz. of Plato Aristotle is divinely inspired for in the 15. v. he not onely useth the plurall number calling them the holy * writings thereby to note the word of God and not one sentence or Booke but all the sentences and Bookes of the Scripture and also useth the Article which hath force of an universall note therefore the Greeke word the whole Scripture signifieth the whole altogether and not every part severally in this place 2. No one part of holy Scripture is able to make the Minister perfect therefore it must needs be understood of the whole body of holy Scripture wherein this sufficiency is to be found The Ancient Fathers and other Divines have from this place proved the perfection and sufficiency of the Scripture in all things necessary to salvation We doe not reason thus as the Papists charge us it is profitable therefore it is sufficient but because 1. The Scripture is profitable for all these ends viz. to teach sound doctrine to refute false opinions to instruct in holy life and correct ill manners therefore it is sufficient or it is profitable to all those functions of the Ministery that a Minister of the Church may be perfect therefore muchâ—more for the people Argumentum non nititur unica illa voce utilis sed toto sententiae camplexu Chamierus Hitherto of the perfection of the Scripture absolutely considered now followes the sufficiency thereof in opposition to unwritten traditions or verities as the Papists speake Doctor Davenant premiseth these things for the better understanding of the sufficiency of the Scripture 1. We speake of the State of the Church saith he in which God hath ceased to speake to men by the Prophets or Apostles divinely inspired and to lay open new Revelations to his
there contained and the benefit and good that foloweth of it we receive upon tradition though the thing it selfe we receive not for tradition Of this sort is the Baptisme of Infants which may be named a Tradition because it is not expressely delivered in Scripture that the Apostles did Baptize Infants nor any expresse precept there found that they should so doe yet is not this so received by bare and naked tradition but that we finde the Scripture to deliver unto us the ground of it Bellarmine and Maldonate both doe confesse that the Baptisme of Infants may be proved by the Scripture and therefore Maldonate concludes nobis verò traditio non est Bellarmine * as Whitaker shewes contradicts himselfe for first he saith that the Baptisme of Infants is an unwritten tradition and after that the Catholicks can prove Baptisme of Infants from the Scriptures To this head we may referre the observation of the Lords day the precept whereof is not found in Scripture though the practise be And if for that cause any shall name it a Tradition we will not contend about the word if he grant withall that the example Apostolicall hath the force of a Law as implying a common equity concerning us no lesse then it did them If any man shall call the summary comprehension of the chief heads of Christian doctrine contained in the Creed commonly called the Apostles Creed a tradition we will not contend about it For although every part thereof be contained in Scripture yet the orderly connexion distinct explication of those principall Articles gathered into an Epitome wherein are implyed and whence are inferred all conclusions Theologicall is an Act humane not divine and in that sense may be called a Tradition But let it be noted withall that we admit it not to have that credit as now it hath to be the rule of faith for this is the priviledge of holy Scripture The Creed it selfe was gathered out of Scripture and is to be expounded by the Scripture therefore it is not given to be a perfect Canon of faith and manners By Tradition is noted 1. Whatsoever is delivered by men divinely inspired and immediately called whether it be by lively voyce or by writing 2. In speciall it notes the word of God committed to writing 1 Cor. 15. 3. 3. It signifies rites expressely contained in writing Act. 6. 14. 4. It betokens that which is not committed to writing but onely delivered by lively voyce of the Apostles 5. It signifieth that which is invented and delivered by men not immediately called In Scripture Tradition is taken 1. in good part for any rite or doctrine of God delivered to his Church either by word or writing whether it concern faith and good works or the externall government of the Church 2 Thess. 2. 15. 1 Cor. 11. 15. 23. 2. In ill part it noteth the vaine idle and unwarrantable inventions of men whether Doctrine or Rites Matthew 15. 3. Marke 7. 8 9. When the Fathers speake reverently of Traditions by the word Tradition either they understand the holy Scripture which also is a Tradition it is a Doctrine left unto us Or by Traditions they understand observations touching Ecclesiastill policy D. Moulin Reasons confirming the sufficiency of Scripture against Popish traditions 1. The whole Church is founded upon the Doctrine of the Prophets and Apostles which were not true if any doctrin was necessary to salvation not revealed by the Prophets and Apostles 2. The Prophets and Christ and his Apostles condemne Traditions Esay 29. 13. Mathew 15. 3. 6. Col. 2. 8. Therefore they are not to be received Christ opposeth the Commandement and Scriptures to Traditions therefore he condemnes Traditions not written If the Jewes might not adde to the Bookes of Moses then much lesse may wee adde to the Canon of Scripture so much increased since 3. Those things which proceede from the will of God onely can be made knowne to us no other way but by the Revelation of the Scripture all Articles of Faith and Precepts of Manners concerning substance of Religion proceede from the Will of God onely Mathew 16. 17. 1 Cor. 2. 9 10 11. Gal. 1. 8. As in this place the Apostle would have nothing received besides that which he Preached so 1 Cor. 4. 6. He will have nothing admitted above or more then that which is written See Act. 26. 22. John 20. ult whence it is manifest that all necessary things may be found in Scripture since full and perfect Faith ariseth from thence which eternall salvation followeth Bellarmin saith John speakes onely of the miracles of Christ that hee wrote not all because those sufficed to perswade the World that Christ was the Sonne of God Those words indeede in the 30 Verse are to be understood of Christs Miracles but those in the 31. Verse rather are to be generally interpreted for the History onely of the Miracles sufficeth not to obtaine Faith or Life The question betwixt the Papists and us is de ipsa doctrina tradita non de tradendi modo touching the substance of the Doctrine delivered not of the manner of delivering it and of Doctrine delivered as the Word of God not of Rites and Ceremonies They maintaine that there bee doctrinall Traditions or Traditions containing Articles of Faith and substantiall matters of Divine worship and Religion not found in the holy Scriptures viz. Purgatory Invocation of Saints Adoration of Images Papall Monarchy Bellarmin and before him Peresius distinguisheth Traditions both from the authours and the matter From the Authours into Divine Apostolicall and Ecclesiasticall From the matter into those which are concerning Faith and concerning Manners into perpetuall and temporall universall and particular necessary and free Divine Traditions that is Doctrines of Faith and of the worship and service of God any of which we deny to be but what are comprised in the written Word of God Apostolike Traditions say they are such Ordinances as the Apostles prescribed for ceremony and usage in the Church as the observation of the memoriall of the Nativity Death and Resurrection of Christ the alteration of the seventh day from the Jewes Sabbath to the day of Christs Resurrection Ecclesiasticall ancient Customes which by degrees through the Peoples consent obtained the force of a Law Traditions concerning Faith as the perpetuall Virginity of Mary the Mother of Christ and that there are onely foure Gospels of Manners as the signe of the Crosse made in the forehead Fasts and Feastings to be observed on cetaine dayes Perpetuall which are to bee kept to the end of the World Temporall for a certaine time as the observation of certaine legall Ceremonies even to the â—ull publishing of the Gospell Universall Traditions which are delivered to the whole Church to be kept as the observation of Easter Whitsontide and other great Feasts Particular which is delivered to one or more Churches as in the
time of Austin fasting on the Sabbath day which was kept only at Rome Necessary Traditions which are delivered in the forme of a Precept that Easter is to bee celebrated on the Lords Day Free which are delivered in the forme of counsell as sprinkling of holy water Objection The Scripture it not perfect with a perfection of parts because many parts are either defective or excessive 1. Some labour wiâ—h a defect as Genesis 11. 12. a person is omitted in the Genealogy of Cainaan which was the Sonne of Aphâ—xad but it is reckoned in Luke in Christs Genealogy not in the old Testament therefore there is a defect Sol. Luke reckons it according to the vulgar opinion of the Jewes Junius in his paralels would have the fault to be in the Septuagint whom Luke followed not approving of their errour but yeelding to the time least the Gospell otherwise should have beene prejudicâ—d but Bezas opinion is rather to be approved of that this word is inserted from the Ignorance of those who undertooke to correct this Text according to the translation of the Seventy Interpreters For in an Ancient manuscript which Beza followed this word Cainaan was not to be found therefore he omitted it in his translation and so hath our great English Bible Ob. There is something found in the Scripture against the Commandement of God Deut. 4. 2. therefore there is excesse as well as defect for many Bookes which we beleeve to be Canonicall are added Sol. He doth not forbid adding by Gods Command but from the will of man for God himselfe added afterward The Papists arguments for Traditions answered Ob. Bellarmine saith Religion was preserved for 2000 yeares from Adam to Moses onely by Tradition therefore the Scripture is not simply necessary Sol. By the like reason I might argue that Religion was long preserved not onely without the Pope of Rome but also without Baptisme and the Lords Supper with the like institutions therefore they are not simply necessary yet none of ours hold the Scriptures simply necessary Secondly it is false that Religion was preserved all that while by ordinary Tradition onely for the living voyce of God sounded most perpetually in the Church and the doctrine of Religion was conveighed successivly from the Father to the Sonne which living voyce of God by little and little ceasing writing afterward succeeded and hath the same necessity now which Gods living voyce had before Ob. Whatsoever things are commended from Scripture are necessary but so are Traditions ergo they are necessary Joh 16. 12. I have yet many things to say unto you but ye cannot beare them now therefore say they the Lord spake many things which are not written Sol. 1. He saith not that he had many things to tell them which he had not taught them before but which they were not now so well capable of for it appeareth that he taught them that which they understood not and therefore they needed to be further taught of them by the holy Ghost which should not teach them any new thing that Christ had not taught but onely make them understand that which they had beene taught of our Saviour Christ. 2. If the holy Ghost did teach them any thing which our Saviour Christ had not before spoke unto them of yet that makes nothing for Traditions seeing that which the holy spirit taught them he taught them out of the Scriptures 3. If the holy Ghost should have taught the Apostles some things which neither Christ had told them of nor the Scriptures had taught them yet this is rather against the Papists For that which the holy Ghost taught them they undoubtedly left in record unto the Church as being faithfull Stewards and revealing the whole Counsell of God unto the people 4. It hath been the practise of Hereticks as Austine affirmeth at all times to cover their dreames and phantasies with this sentence of our Saviour Christ. Lastly if it be asked what were those grave and great mysteries which the Apostles could not for their rudenesse beare they are forsooth Oyle and Spittle in Baptisme Candles light at noone dayes which was not in the darker time of the Law Baptizing of Bels and such like gue-gaws as the grossest and carnallest men are fittest to receive Ob. 2 Thess. 2. 15. Therefore Brethren stand fast and hold the Traditions which ye have been taught whether by word or our Epistle From these words say our Adversaries it appeares that all things were not written nullum Papistae in Scripturis locum probabiliorem inveniunt saith Whitaker The Hereticks say the Rhemists on this place purposely guilefully and of ill conscience refraine in their translations from the Ecclesiasticall and most usuall word Tradition evermore when it is taken in good part though it expresse most exactly the signification of the Greeke word but when it â—oundeth in their fond fantasie againâ—â— the Traditions of the Church as indeed in true sense it never doth there they use it most gladly Here therefore and in the like plâ—ces that the reader may not so easily like of Traditions unwritten here commended by the Apostle they translate 〈◊〉 â—onstitutions Ordinances and what they can invent else to hide the truth from the Rimple or unwarry Reader whose translations have none other end but to be guile such by art and conveighance Thus farre the Rhemists Paul taught the Thessalonians some things by word of mouth which he taught them not in his two Epistles which he wrote unto them therefore he taught some doctrines which he wrote not as if that Paul wrote no more Epistles then these two whereby that which he taught not them in writing unto them he taught them by writing unto others Secondly how followeth this argument Paul wrote not all the doctrines of God unto the Thessalonians therefore they are not all written in the Propheticall and Evangelicall writings whereas it is plainly testified that the Old Testament containeth a perfect rule of the doctrine of salvation the new being written for a Declaration of the fulfilling and further clearing of that in the Old Testament Thirdly it appeareth manifestly in the Acts what was the summe of that which Paul taught the Thessalonians by word of mouth For there it is witnessed that Paul taught out of the Scriptures that it behoved Christ to suffer and rise againe from the dead and that Jesus was Christ this teaching then by word is there limited to the Scriptures of the Law and Prophets Neither ought it to seeme strange that this was the summe of all which the Apostle taught at Thessalonica where he tarried so small a while when amongst the Corinthians where he remained longest of any place and consequently taught most he sheweth that he taught nothing but Christ and him crucified Fourthly the Apostle himself in this very place calling verse 14. whatsoever he taught by word or wrote by the name of
the Gospell doth declare evidently that he taught nothing but that which is contained in Scripture seeing the Apostle defineth the Gospell which he preached to be that which is contained in the Scriptures Fifthly That the Thessalonians had some part of Christian doctrine delivered by word of mouth that is by the Apostles preaching at such time as he did write unto them and some part by his Epistles the Text enforceth us to grant But that the Church at this day or ever since the Testament was written had any Tradition by word of mouth necessary to salvation which was not contained in the Old and New Testament we will never grant The Papists doe commonly abuse the name of Tradition which signiâ—ieth properly a delivery or a thing delivered for such a matter as is delivered onely by word of mouth and so received from hand to hand that is never put in writing but hath his credit without the Holy Scripture of God as the Jewes had their Cabala and the Scribes and the Pharisees their Traditions besides the Law of God For the justifying of our translation it is true that we alter according to the circumstances of the place especially considering that the word Tradition which of it selfe is indifferent as well to that which is written as to that which is not written hath been of us and them appropriated to note forth onely unwritten constitutions therefore we must needs avoide in such places as this the word Traditions though our last translation useth it where the simple might be deceived to thinke that the Holy Ghost did over commend any such to the Church which he would not have committed to writing in the holy Scriptures and in stead of the word so commonly taken although it doe not necessarily signifie any such matter we doe use such words as doe truly expresse the Apostles meaning and the Greeke word doth also signifie therefore we use these words Ordinances or Instructions Institutions or the doctrine delivered all which being of one or neere sence the Greek word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 doth signifie and the same doth Tradition signifie if it be rightly understood Ob. 1 Tim. 6. 20. O Timothy keep that which is committed to thy trust By the name of pledge saith Bellarmine not the Scripture but the treasure of unwritten doctrine is understood Depositum say the Rhemisis is the whole doctrine of Christianity being taught by the Apostles and delivered their successors Sol. Though other learned men interprete this pledge or gage to be the gift of the holy Ghost yet we willingly acknowledge that it is to be understood of the doctrine of Christianity as that which hath best ground both by circumstance of this and conferrence of other places Whence we inferre that the doctrine of truth is not the Churches dâ—crees but the Lords given to the Church to keepe onely wherewith the title of a pledge cannot stand unlesse one may lay to pledge a thing in his own hands since in Popery the Church her selfe maketh the doctrine which her selfe taketh to pledge Herein they handle it like a pledge that they lock it up fast where the people of God for whose use it is given to be kept cannot come unto it What had become of the Law of God if others had not been more faithfull keepers of it then the Priests to whom the principall Copy thereof written with the singer of God himselfe was committed There are some points of faith not contained in Scripture neither in the Old nor New Testament therefore it is not perfect In the old Testament no doubt but the females had some remedy whereby they might be purged from originall sin as well as the males circumcision was instituted only for the males the Scripture mentions not what was instituted for the females In the new Testament the perpetuall virginity of Mary the mother of Christ. Two things are considered in circumcision 1. Signum 2. Res signata or the end and use of the signe Sol. The thing signified or efficacie of the outward signe of circumcision was common both to Males and Females the very institution of circumcision teacheth that for it was a signe of the Covenant the Covenant belonged to all which were of the seed of Abraham if they renounced it not Although there were no decision of the other point out of the Scripture yet would it not thence â—ollow which the Jesuits pretend that some necessary point of Christianity wanted the ground of holy Scripture it being sufficient for us to know that she was a Virgin when our Saviour Christ was borne of her as the Prophets did foretell Yet as Chamier saith well we beleeve that she continued a Virgin all her life time for in those things saith he which are not properly de fide we hold the authority of the Church is great if it contradict not Scripture or produce no other absurdity Vide Riveti Apologiam pro virgine Maria l. 1. c. 15. Helvidius would gather from those words 1 Matth. 25. untill and first borne that Mary after had Children by her husband The word till doth not import so much See Gen. 8. 7. and 28. 15. 1 Sam. 15. 35. 2 Sam. 6. 23. Matth. 28. 20. He is called the first borne in Scripture which first opens the wombe whether other follow or no. 7. The Scripture is plaine and Perspicuous The Perspicuity of the Scripture is a cleare and evident manifestation of the truth delivered in it It is Perspicuous both in respect of it selfe and us 1. In respect of it selfe as appeares 1. In the things delivered which although they seeme obscure for their Maâ—esty and dignity yet they carry the light of truth before them therefore the Scripture is frequently termed a light Psal. 19. 8. and 119. 105. Deut. 30. 11. Prov. 6. 2. 2 Pet. 1. 19. 2 Cor. 4. 3. 4. 6. the Scripture is a most bright light There are 2 things in Gods revealed will verbum rei the word and res verbi the mystery The Scriptures are hard if we looke to the mystery but not if wee looke to the word as for example the Scripture teacheth that there is one God in three persons the words are plaine and easie every man understands them but the mystery contained in those words passeth the reach of man we may well discerne these things to be so though we cannot fully conceive how these should be so 2. In the manner of delivering or kind of stile which is fitted to the things and persons shewing the greatest simplicity both in words either proper or figurative and in the cleare sence and mosâ— perspicuous propriety of signification viz. that one which is called literall and Grammaticall 2. In respect of us because the Scripture is to us the principle meanes and inâ—â—rument of faith every Principle ought to be by it selfe and in its own nature knowne and most Intelligible and there being 3 degrees of
the Evnuch and Luke 24. 45. also the divers expositions of old and New writers The first place is directly against them for teaching that it is the gift of Gods Holy Spirit obtained by Prayer to understand the Scripture the Spirit through Prayer being as well obtained by the simple as learned sort yea rather by them then the others it followeth that the reading of them belongeth to the simple as well as unto the learned The like answer serveth for the place of Luke 24. 45. for by that abuse of the place they may wring the reading of the Scriptures from all men even Ministers or the word commanded to attend the reading of them since they of whom they say that they understood not the Scriptures were Ministers of the word and that in the highest and most excellent degree of Ministery in the world which was the Aposâ—leship The cause oâ— want of understanding then was this the Spirit of God was not given because Christ was not glorified which can have now no place Besides that in saying they understood not the Scriptures concerning the suffering and glory of Christ it must needs be understood comparatively that they did not cleerly paricularly and sufficiently know them For that place in the 8th of the Acts it is to be understood comparatively viz. that a man faithfull and already gained to the truth as this Eunuch was cannot understand the Scriptures by the bare reading of them so well and throughly as when he hath one to expound them The Lord which helped the indeavor of the Eunuch searching the Scriptures by sending of Philip will never suffer those which seek him in carefull reading of his word to goe away ashamed without finding that which they seeke for in directing unto him some lawfull sufficient ministery to instruct him by The mystery of the Gospell then indeed fulfilled remained notwithstanding unpublished to the world by the Apostles which is now by their preaching and writings laid open and made more manifest The Eunuch which professed that he could not understand the Scripture without an Interpreter did notwithstanding busie himselfe in reading of it The multitude of Commentaries was not so necessary because the Scripture might have beene understood without them although they deserve singular respect amongst all those that are desirous to understand the Scripture who write learned and elaborate expositions on the Scripture That was a witty speech of Maldonates on Luke 2. 34. Nescio an facilior hic locus fuisset si nemo eum exposuisset Secondly These Commentaries are publisht that the Scriptures may better and more easiely be understood 3. The Papists confesse that the Articles of the Apostles Creed being necessary for all are easie Yet there are many commentaries of the Ancients upon the Creed as Ruffinus Augustine Cyrill Chrysostome Chrysologus and of Papists also Some Scriptures are hard for the matter which they handle as are the Books of Daniel Ezechiel Zachary or throng of much matter in few words as are in the Old Testament the Poeticall Books wherein no doubt the verse hath caused some cloud and amongst them the Proverbs from the tenth Chapter and the Prophesie of Hosea CHAP. IX Of the Interpretation of Scripture THis question divides it selfe into 3 parts First concerning the divers senses of the Scripture Secondly to whom the chiefe authority to expound Scripture is committed Thirdly what meanes must be used in the interpretation of Scripture 1. Of the divers senses of Scripture The Interpretation of Scripture is 2 fold One of the words which is called version or Translation this hath been handled already 2. Of things which is called explication the finding out of the meaning of any place which is more Theologicall the other being rather Grammaticall And this signification of the thing they commonly call the sence Nehem. 8. 9. Interpreting Scripture is 1. Ancient Nehem. 8. 8. 2. Honourable Marke 4. 34. The Scripture hath often two senses one of which the latter Divines call Literall Grammaticall or Historicall another mysticall or Spirituall The sense of the Scripture is that which God the Author of the Scripture in and by the Scriptures gives to men to know and understand The right expounding of Scripture consists in 2 things 1. In giving the right sense 2. In a right application of the same 1. Cor. 14. 3. The Literall sense is that which the letter it selfe or the words taken in their genuine signification carry And because the genuine signification of the words is that in which the Author useth them whether speaking properly or figuratively therefore the literall sense is subdivided into plaine and simple and figurative which ariseth from the words translated from their naturall signification into another as where Christ saith 10. John 16. I have other sheep which are not of this fold whereby he understandeth other people besides the Jewes The mysticall of spirituall sense is that in which the thing exprest in the literall sense signifieth another thing in a mystery for the shadowing out of which it was used by God The waters of the Floud with which the Arke was upheld signified Baptisme by which the Church is saved under the new Covenant as the Apostle teacheth 1 Pet. 3. 21. that History Exodus 12. it is a Passeover unto the Lord is spoken figuratively the other words properly The mysticall sense is the bones of Christ were no more broken then of the Paschall Lambe which did signifie Christ. The Papists say the literall sense is that which is gathered immediatly out of the words the spirituall which hath another reference then to that which the words doe properly signifie The last they subdivide into Allegoricall Tropologicall Anagogicall they say that the Scripture beside the literall sense may have these also The Allegoricall sense is when the words of the Scripture besides the plaine historicall and literall meaning signifie something in the new Testament which belongs to Christ or the Church as Gal. 4. besides the truth of the story of the bond and free-woman Saint Paul applyeth it unto the two Testaments Tropologicall when the words and deeds are referred to signifie something which belongs to manners as Paul 1 Cor. 9 teacheth from that place Deut. 25. thou shalt not muzle the mouth of the Oxe that treadeth out the Corne that things necessary are to be allowed to Pastors Anagogigall when words or deeds are referred to signifie eternall life as Psal. 94. I sware unto them they shauld not enter into my rest this is litterally understood of the rest in Canâ—an but applied by Paul 4 Heb to life eternall Becanus saith as there are 3 Theologicall vertues Faith Hope and Charity so there are 3 mysticall sences The allegoricall answers to faith the Anagogicall to hope the Morall to Charity Jerome saith he excelled in the literall sense Ambrose in the Allegoricall Augustine in the Anagogicall Gregory in the Morall The Papists erre three wayes in
this Subject 1. In that description which they make of the literall sense 2. In that they hold there are divers literall sences of one place 3. In their division of the mysticall sense into Allegoricall Tropologicall Anagogicall First that is false which Bellarmine saith Literalis sensus est quem verba immediatè prae se ferunt What then shall the literall sense of those words be Psal. 91. 13. Let them shew the Lion which Christ did tread oâ— and what shall be the literall sense of those places Esay 11. 6 7 8. and 65. ult And what literall sense shall those words of Christ have Matth 5. 29. Origen though otherwise he allegorized much interpreted that place according to the letter but foolishly That therefore is rather the literall senâ—e which ariseth from the words whether properly or figuratively taken as for example this is the literall sense of those words the Seed of the woman shall breake the Serpents head viz. Christ shall over come Satan and subdue all his force and power although the Devill neither be a Serpent nor hath a head 2. We hold that there is but one true proper and genuine sense of Scripture viz. the literall or Grammaticall whether it arise from the words properly taken or figuratively understood or both For that there should be divers literall sences of one and the same place is against the truth the Text and reason 1. The truth because of one and an Individuall thing there is one constant truth and not various verum unum convertuntur 2. The Text because it draweth away from its one true sense 3. And lastly reason because this is the chiefest reason in explaining the Text that the true literall sense of it may be found out The literall sense then can be but one in one place though a man may draw sundry consequences à contrarijs à similibus 3. We doe not altogether reject the third for we hold there are Allegories Anagogies and Tropologies in the Scriptures yet these are not many and divers senses of the Scripture but divers collections from one sense or divers applications and accommodations of one sense Besides the Tropologies and Anagogies are unfitly opposed to an Allegory since they are certaine kindes of it Haec nominum curiosa distinctio ex Scholarum potius morosiuscula diligentia quam ex ulla eorum vocabulorum necessitate Itaque Salmero agnoscit esse quid novum à pâ—sterioribus patribus trâ—ditum Chamierus tomo de Sensu Literali mystico l. 15. C. 1. Galat. 4. the Apostle saith not that there is a double sense but that it may be Allegorically applied which is Historically set downe There is then but one sense of the place part whereof consisteth in the Story part in the Allegory So that the whole sense is contained in them both So for the second example of the Tropologicall there is not a twofold sense of that place but one generall sense that as the mouth of the Oxe was not to be muzled so the Minister of the Gospell must be provided for Likewise of the Anagogicall kinde it is not one sense to understand the rest of Câ—naan another the Kindome of God but there is one whole sense that as they for their Idolatry were deprived of the Land of promise so we should take heed least by our disobedience we lose the hope of the Kingdome of heaven So we conclude that those are not divers sences but one sense diversly applyed The literall sense is the onely sense of the place because out of that sense only may an argument strongly be framed wherefore seeing Allegories and Tropes doe no conclude they are not the sences of the place and Allegories devised beside the sense prove not though they may illustrate It is manifest that is alwayes the sense of the holy Ghost which is drawne from the very words But we are not so certaine concerning any mysticall sense unlesse when the holy Ghost himselfe teacheth us as for example it is written 11. Hosea 1. Out of Egypt have I called my Sonne and Exod. 12. 46. Ye shall not breake a bone of him It is evident that the first place is understood of the people of Israel the latter of the Paschall Lamb. Who durst have applyed those things to Christ unlesse the Holy Ghost had first done it and declared his minde and meaning to us viz. that sonne in the first place doth not onely signifie the people of Israel but Christ also and by bone in the latter place not onely the bone of that Lambe but of Christ also is understood Secondly To whom the chiefe authority to expound Scripture is committed It was decreed in the Councell of Trent that Scripture should be expounded as the Church expoundeth it and according to the common and unanimous consent of the Fathers If the Fathers agree not the matter is referred to a generall Councell if there it be not determined we must have recourse to the Pope and his Cardinals We say also that the Church is the interpreter of Scripture and that this gift of interpreting resides onely in the Church but we deny that it belongs to certaine men or is tyed to a certaine place or succession of men The Ministry of judgement the Lord hath given to his Church 1 Cor. 2. 15. and 10. 15. 1 John 4. 1. Act. 15 16 2 Cor. 14. 29. 31. 32. but the Soveraignty of judgement he hath reserved to himselfe The Holy Ghost is the Judge and the Scripture is the sentence or definitive decree We acknowledge no publike Judge except the Scripture and the holy Ghost teaching us in the Scripture He that made the Law should interpret the same 1 Cor. 1. 12. 1 John 2. 27. Arguments brought by the Papists for their opinion Ob. 1. They object that place Exod. 18. 13. 26. Sol. Moses was a Prophet indued with singular wisdome adorned by God with extraordinary gifts sent immediately by him and commended by divine Testimonies to the people the Pope is not so He had chiefest authority from God over all the Israelites but the Pope hath not so over all Christians Moses his authority was extraordinary no man succeeded in his place Iâ—shua was a Captaine onely or Judge in Civill things Aaron onely a Priest to administer in things sacred But Moses exercised both functions Ob. 2. They urge that place Deut. 17. 9. Sol. Here the Civill Magistrate and the Judge are joyned together as v. 12. If it will follow hence that the Pope must be Supreme Judge in all Ecclesiasticall matters the Emperour ought to be as well in Civill 2. The Pope doth not hold the same place among Christians that the High-Priest did among the Jewes For he was the chiefest having all the rest of the Priests subject to him but the Pope is one amongst all having Collegues many Bishops as at first or a few Patriarkes as after Ob. 3. Eccles. 12. 11. If the chiefe
Pastor in the Old Testament had such authority much more the chiefe Priest in the New Sol. This one pastor signifieth neither the High Priest in the old Law nor the Pope in the New but Jesus Christ the High Shepheard for our soules Ob. Matth. 16. 19. Christ saith to Peter to theâ— will I give the Keyes of the Kingdome of Heaven therefore the Pope hath authority to expound Scripture Sol. First by the Keyes here is meant Commission to preach the Gospell not authority of interpreting the Scriptures When the Gospell is preached the Kingdome of heaven is opened to the beleevers and shut to the unbeleevers 2. That authority of the Keyes was not committed to Peter onely but to the other Apostles also Matth. 28. 18. 19. There is a twofold judgement 1. Of discretion 1 Cor. 10. 15. 2. Of authority as the Parllament judgeth Capitall crimes If the Papists understand the word Judge to â—ignifie Discerning as when we judge of meates by the taste every faithfull person ought to pray unto God for grace to judge to discerne and to know the true sense of the Scripture But if by judging they understand to pronounce decrees definitive and infallible judgements touching the sence of the Scriptures thereby to bind other mens consciences there is no man in the world that hath that power See Moulinâ— Buckler of Faith We have a more compendious way to come to the understanding of the Scripture It were too long when we doubt of any place to stay till we have the generall consent of the Pastors of the Church or to expect a generall counsell or to goe up to Rome But the word of God is amongst us the Scriptures themselves and the Spirit of God opening our hearts doe teach us how to understand them And yet we say not as the Papists falsely charge us that we allow every private mans interpretation of Scripture refusing the judgement of the Pastors of the Church Panoruitan saith the opinion of one godly man ought to be preferred before the Popes if it be grounded upon better authority of the Old and New Testament 2 Pet. 1. 20. No prophesie of the Scripture is of any private interpretation Stapleton saith interpretation is private either ratione personae when the man is private or ratione medij when it is not taken out of the context and circumstances or ratione finis when it is for a false end Now private interpretation in regard of the person if it be publike in regard of the meanes is not forbidden for it is lawfull for one man with Scripture toti resistere mundo saith the Glosse of the Canon-Law the meaning of this place is that the Prophets were no Interpreters or Messengers of their own minds but Gods The Catholickes hold saith Chamier meaning still by that Title the Protestants that the Scripture is to be interpreted by private labour and industry viz. of Augustine Jerome Chrysostome but not in a private sense that is in a sense arising from the braine of the Interpreter It is true saith Cartwright against the Rhemists that the Scriptures cannot be expounded of every private Spirit nor which is more of any private spirit nor yet of all private spirits together but onely of those which are inspired of God viz. the Prophets and Apostles which are here opposed unto private Interpretation And therefore it is evident that the exposition of the Scripture ought not to be fetched from Ecclesiasticall either Fathers or Councels which speake not by inspiration but from the Scriptures themselves what he meaneth he declareth in the next verse where he sheweth the reason of his saying namely that it must be interpreted as it was written and by as high authority Seeing therefore it was first spoken by holy men which spake as they were led by the holy Spirit and were inspired of God it followeth that it must be interpreted by the same authority The interpretation therefore that is brought but of the Apostles and Prophets is not private although it be avowed by one man onely On the other side that interpretation which is not brought from thence although it have the allowance of whole Generall Counsels is but private This is a principall meaning of our Saviour Christ when he willeth that we should call no man father or Master in the earth that is in matter of doctrine we should depend upon the authority of no man nor of all men in the earth but onely upon Christ and upon God Our reasons by which we prove that the chiefest judgement and authority of interpreting Scriptures is to be given not to the Church but to the Scriptures themselves and the Holy Ghost 1. That which onely hath power to beget faith that onely hath the chiefest authority of interpreting Scripture and of determining all controversies concerning faith and religion but the Scriptures onely and the Holy Ghost have this force Rom. 10. 17. the Holy Ghost onely can infuse saving faith into our hearts which is called by the Schoolemen infusa fides The faith which we have from the Church is acquired and sufficeth not to a certaine perswasion 2. The Scriptures cannot be interpreted but by the same Spirit wherewith they were written that spirit is found no where but in the Scripture whosoever have promises from God to understand the Scripture may interpret it but so have all the faithfull 3. Christ himselfe makes the Scripture a Judge John 12. 48. and still appealed to it 4. Although the Fathers were men indued of God with excellent gifts and brought no small light to understanding of the Scriptures yet learned men in our dayes may give a right sense of sundry places thereof which the Fathers saw not yea against the which perhaps they consent Hath any man living read all the Fathers nay have all the men living read them nay can they shew them can they get them I had almost said can they name them In the exposition of those words Tu es Petrus supra hanc petram almost every one of the Fathers at least the most part of them and the best expound it of Peters faith yet the Papists understand it non de fide sed de persona Petri. Here they dis-agree themselves from the Fathers John 10. 16. by the title of one Shepheard Augustine Chrysostome Jerome Cyrill Theodoret Theophylact Euthimius Rupertus Cyprian and other Fathers agree that Christ is there designed but Stapleton saith the Pope is there meant In the division of the Law they goe cleane contrary to the greatest part of the Fathers For they divide the Commandements as we doe but the Papists make the two first one and the tenth two 2. They have no Father to countenance them in this but Augustine There were no writings of the Fathers for a time many of them wrote 400 yeares after Christ but some 500 and 600 yeares after Christ what rule had they before that time of interpreting
holy Scripture in many places as well of the New Testament as the Old 2. The Fathers Doctores scil probati antiquae ecclesiae qui scriptis suis fidem illustrarunt as Voetius speakes For the Fathers Jerome among the Latines and Origen among the Greekes were learned in the Hebrew saith Chamier Jerome was the chiefest among them for skill in the Hebrew Chaldee Greeke Latine tongue and the most diligent searcher of the Jewish affaires he spared no labour cost nor time that he might attaine to skill in that tongue He made use of the Jewes for that purpose and the skilfullest amongst them Whose labour he purchased with a great deale of Money this he often witnesseth of himselfe 5 times saith Morinus he made use of them That one labour of his deserveth eternall praise that he translated the Scripture out of the Hebrew into Latine That was a most laborious worke of Origens in gathering together divers Editions of Scripture 1. The Greeke of Aquila Symmachus the Septuagint and Theodosion into one Volume distinguisht by 4 Columnes called Tetrapla to which he after added 2 more one in Hebrew the other in Greeke Characters and called it his Hexapla at last he joyned two other Editions and then called it Octapla by them one might have compared the severall Greeke Editions together and with the Hebrew Text. It was said of him Vbi benè nemo melius Vbi malè nemo pejus Quod attinet ad Originem mea certè nihil interest quid ille senserit quem scio Theologum fuisse audaciorem quam saniorem Chamierus Salmasius Whitaker Sixtus Senensis and others say Origen was skilfull in the Hebrew He wrote so many Books that Jerome saith Quis nostrum tanta potest legere quanta ille conscripsit Vir tantae fuit eruditionis in genij ut ei parem doctissima Graecia faelicissimâ—rum ingeniorum parens nunquam habuerit Sixtus Senensis Bibliothecae sanctae l. quarto He saith much more there in his commendation Tantum in scripturas divinas habuerit studium ut etiam Haebraeam linguam contra aetatis gentisque suae naturam edisceret Hieronymus de viris illustribus Austen for the Latine Church and Golden-mouth'd Chrysosostome for the Greek Church were most famous He is abridged by Theophylact. A Father so Ancient so learned so godly so skilfull in the Scriptures saith Rainolds of Chrysâ—stome Austen for disputations Jerome for the tongues Gregory for Morals Augustine Vir supra omnes qui ante eum post eum huc usque fuerunt mortales admirabili ingenij acumine praeditus omnibus liberalibus disciplinis instructus Divinis scripturis longè omnium eruditissimus in earum explanatione ultra quam dici queat incomparabili subtilitate sublimis omnes Latinae ecclesiae scriptores scribendi labore lucubrationum multitudine superavit Sixtus Senensis Biblioth Sanct. lib. quarto Subtilissimus Patâ—um Augustinus Dr. Prideaux lectione quarta Gregory Nazianzene for his excellencie in divine knowledge was sirnamed the Divine Irenaeus saith Capellus was almost the ancientest of all the Fathers whose genuine writings are extant He was Polycarpus his Disciple Tertullian was one of the Latine Fathers most Ancient and very neere the Apostles flourishing in the raigne of Severus the Emperour about 200 yeares after Christs Birth and not past one hundred after the death of John the Evangelist Jerome being urged with his authority said De Tertulliano nihil aliud respondâ—o quamecclesiae hominem illum non fuisse In Graecia celebres agnosco Patres Clementem Athanasium Cyrillum Damascenum Montacutius Analect Eccles. exercit 1. Sect. 6. Cyprian the Martyr was of great authority amongst all for his holinesse of life He was so diligent a reader of Tertullian that he intermitted no day but would call to have his Master meaning Tertullian given him Doctor Hall cals Lactantius the Christian Cicero Jerome cals him eloquentiae Tullianae Flievium Epist. ad Paul tom 1. and Mr. Selden de Dis Syris cals him Politissimum Patrum Sententious Tertullian grave Cyprian resolute Hierome * flowing Chrysostome divine Ambrose devout Bernard heavenly Augustine Bish. Hals 4th Decade of Epist. Epist. third One saith he that looks upon the Fathers works would think they did nothing but write he that looks on their devotions would thinke they did nothing but pray he that lookes on their learning would think they did nothing but read Bernard was a worthy man in the corrupt age in which he lived but Bernardus non vidit omnia say the Papists Bernardum non admitto ut pote recentiorem longè post confirmatam Romani Pontificis tyrannidem scribentem ex more errore sui temporis Chamierus de Canone l. 3. c. 3. c. 5. Dandâ— venia bonis illis sanctis patribus qui ignorantia linguarum multae saepe aliena à germana scriptura senserunt pia alioquin attulerunt 3. For Protestant Interpreters Calvin is not onely commended by our own writers but by the very Papists See Watson in his Quodlibets I would content my selfe among the new writers with Mr. Calvin who performeth best of all other that which he of himselfe professeth that a man in reading his expositions reapeth this benefit that for the shortnesse he useth he departeth not farre from the Text it selfe Cartw. letter to Mr. Hildersham Piscator hath done well in his Scholia on all the Bible He follows Junius for the Old Testament and Beza for the New and in his Aphorismes he follows Calvins Institutions Bucer also was an excellent Divine He hath written a twofold Exposition on all the Psalmes one more large and Paraphrasticall the other briefer and ad verbum Francis Junius the very Oracle of Textuall and Scholasticall Divinity as Dr. Hall cals him Epist. 7. Deead 1. Vatablus his Annotations upon the Old Testament and Bezas on the New are commended by Zanchie in his Miscellanies But Arnoldus Boot in his Jndex Autorum before his Animadversiones Sacrae saith Robert Stephens and not Vatablus was the Authour of those Scholia which are in Vatablus his Bible Quid hac phrasi denotetur optimè exposuit D. Beza suis in novum Testamentum nunquam satis laudatis notis Constantin L' Empereur in Dan. c. 2 v. 8. See more of him in Zanchies Epistles Amania Paulus Fagius Drusius Ludovicus Capellus Livelie Cameron Ludoviâ—us de Dieu have beene Great lights and by their skill in the tongues have excellently interpreted Scripture Peter Martyr Lavater Musculus Zanchie Pareus Rollock Rivet are sound Expositors Ex omnibus antiquis recentioribus medullam variarum interpretationum circa eos disceptationem collegit Willetus in hexaplis ad Genesin Exodum Leviticum Danielem Epistolam ad Romanos in libros Samuelis sibi dissimilis est compendio atque alia plane methodo commentatur optandum esset telam illam à Willeto tam faeliciter câ—â—ptam eadem methodo in
reliquos Scripturae libros pertâ—xi Voet. Biblioth Theol. l. 1. c. 14. 4. For Popish Expositors Aquinas is esteemed by the Papists as the Oracle of the Romish Schoole whom for his profound learning and search into the mysteries of all Divinity they sirnamed Angelicall He was the first thorow Papist of name that ever wrote and with his rare gifts of wit learning and industry did set out Popery * most Maximo altissimo ingenio vir cui ad plenam absolutamque totius tam divinae quam humanae eruditionis gloriam solus defuit linguarum eloquentiae usus quem aeruditi istius saeculi ut pote sublimioribus studijs intenti neglexere Sixtus Senensis vide plara ibid. Luther on 9 of Genesis chiefely commends Lyra for following the literall sense Nicolaus Lyranus vir tanta tamque pura vera germana sacrae Scripturae scientia praeditus ut in illa exponendâ— nullum habeat illius temporis parem Rainoldus de lib. Apoc tomâ— 1. praelect 21. Ex antiquioribus tanquam universales communes commentatores habiti fuerunt Lyrasnus Glossa Voetius in Biblioth Theol. Jansenius eruditus moderatus Interpres Cajetane went over all the Scripture saving the Canticles and Prophets which dying he left begun and the Revelation quam de industria attingere noluit He was both a learned moderate Papist as Chamier and Whitaker both shew He was chiefely intent on the literall sense and that according to the Hebrew truth of which tongue he had little knowledge but had by him those that were skil'd in the Hebrew who would interprete ad verbum not onely exactly but superstitiously and often absurdly which often drew the like expositions from the Cardinall There are now 5 Papiâ—s joyned together in severall Volumes on the whole Scripture Immanuell Sa Estius Gagneius Tirinus and Menochius the last of which Grotius commends in his Preface to his Annotations on the Old Testament Estius doth excellently on all the Epistles Maldonate doth well on the Evangelists but was a most supercilious writer and no marvell since he was for his Country a Spaniard and his profession a Jesuite Masius hath written learnedly on Joshua Quanta vir ille linguae Graecae sed preaesertim Hebraeâ—cae Rabbinicae Syriacae cognitione fuerit imbutus nemini docto opinor incognitum Morinus l. 1. exercitat 9. c. 6. and exercit 1. c. 4. Andreaeas Masius linguae Hebraicae Syriacae peritissimus atque in lectione Rabbinica egregiè exeroitatus The Popish Postils are the burden of many Camels as Lipsius speakes of the Bookes of the Law and are fitly sâ—iled by godly Divines pigrorum pulvinaria Vide Zepperi Artem Habendi Audiendi conciones sacras l. 1. c. 4 p. 38 39. c. Ministers to all the meanes formerly mentioned for the interpreting of Scripture must adde a conscionable practise of what they know and must in all humblenesse of minde seeke the peoples edification The meanes to be used by the people to understand the Scripture and find out the sence and meaning of it 1. If they be learned they may make use of most of the former meanes prescribed to Ministers 2. Such as are unskilfull and know not how to make use of those meanes are 1. Diligently to read the Scripture in which are to be considered 1. Antecedent preparation that they come to the reading and studie of the Scriptures with Prayers and greatest reverence relying on the Divine promises for the inlightening of their minds by the Holy Ghost The Scripture may well be called the Revelation of Christ. Rev. 1. 1. See Rev. 5. 5. 2. The adjuncts of reading which are 1. Chiefest attention in reading and a pious disposition and spirituall frame of the heart that they may not understand onely but cordially affect what they understand 2. Application of all things to the Examination Correction and amendment of their own lives 3. Diligent Meditation 4. Conferring of it with others and Catechizing 2 They ought to have recourse to those that are more skilfull then themselves and to consult with the best Commentaries and Expositions of the Scripture and read them judiciously We teach of our Meanes that they all together doe make a perfect way whereby we may finde the right sense of the Scripture Our Adversaries prescribe this method and course to be taken in expounding of Scripture which consists in 4 rules The generall practise of the Church the Consonant interpretation of the Fathers the decrees of generall Councels lastly the rule of faith consisting partly of the Scriptures partly of traditions unwritten In all these meanes the Pope is implicitely understood for the rule of faith is that which the Pope approves the practise of the Church is that which the Pope observes the interpretation of the Fathers is that which the Pope follows the determination of Councels what the Pope confirmes so that the Pope must interprete all Scripture But divers reasons may be alleaged to shew that the true interpretation of Scripture is not to be sought for from the Popes of Rome 1. Because the Popes of Rome have frequently and grossely erred in interpreting of Scripture as in the 8th of the Romanes 8. v. those that are in the flesh cannot please God that is those that are married said Siricius the Pope Innocent so expounded those words John 6. unlesse you eate the flesh of the Sonne of man and drinke his bloud you shall have no life in you that he thence concluded that there is no salvation without receiving the Eucharist and that it is to be given to Infants Pope Boniface interpreted Luke 22. 38. of the temporall and spirituall sword delivered to the Pope 2. Because the Popes of Rome doe differ among themselves in Interpreting of Scripture as Matth. 16. 18. Some Popâ—â— say rightly that by the Rock Christ or the confession of faith given by Peter concerning Christ is meant others interprete it of the person of Peter the Apostle others expound it to be the Romane Seat or Chaire 3. Because many of the Popes of Rome have not onely erred but been grosse wicked Hereticks Liberius the Pope about the yeare 350 was an Arrian and subscribed to the unjust condemnation of Athanasius and afterward as an obstinate Hereticke was deposed Honorius the first was a Monothelite he held that Christ had but one will and so but one nature and for this heresie was condemned in 3. Generall Councels Some Popes were Atheists as Leo the tenth who called the Gospell fabulam de Christo. One cals the Pope that great Heteroclite in religion another saith The Pope is the worst of Cardinals who are the worst of Priests who are the worst of Papists who are the worst of Christians For Councâ—ls Gregory the Pope did reverence the 4 first generall Councels as the 4 Evangelists But if these foure generall Councels be of equall authority with the
foure Evangelists the Popes authority as Papists say being above the authority of the Councels it followeth that his authority is greater then the Evangelists then which what can be more blasphemously spoken We say the true interpretation of Scripture is not to be sought from generall Councels 1. Because even universall Councels have erred the Chalcedonian Councell one of the 4 so much magnified by Pope Gregory in rashly preferring the Constantinopolitane Church before that of Alexandria and Antioch Those that condemned Christ were then the universall visible Church Matth 26. 65. John 11. 47. See Act. 4. 18. 2. Generall councels have beene opposite one to another that of Constance to the other of Basill whereof one setteth downe that Councels could erre and so also the Pope and that a Councell was above the Pope the other affirmeth the quite contrary 3. There were no Generall Councels after the Apostles for 300 yeares till the first Councell of Nice when yet the Church had the true sence of the Scriptures 4. The generall Councels interpreted Scripture by Scripture as Athanasius and Ambrose teach concerning the first Councell of Nice 5. Because they cannot be so easily celebrated to declare any doubtfull sense of Scripture They have expounded but few places of Scripture neither is it likely the Pope will assemble them to expound the rest The Papists say that the Scripture ought to be expounded by the rule of faith and therefore not by Scripture onely But the rule of faith and Scripture is all one As the Scriptures are not of man but of the Spirit so their interpretation is not by man but of the Spirit likewise Let Councels Fathers Churches give their sense of the Scripture it 's private if it be not the sense and interpretation of the Spirit Let a private man give the true sense of the Scripture it 's not private because it 's Divine the sense of the Holy Ghost and private in 2 Pet. 1. 20. is not opposed to publike but to Divine and the words are to be read no Scripture is of a mans own interpretation that is private contrary to Divine The word is interpreted aright by declaring 1. The order 2. The summne or scope 3. The sense of the words which is done by framing a Rhetoricall and Logicall Analysis of the Text. In giving the sense three Rules are of principall use and necessity to be observed 1. The literall and largest sense of any words in Scripture must not be imbraced farther when our cleaving thereunto would breed some dis-agreement and contrariety between the present Scripture and some other Text or place else shall we change the Scripture into a Nose of wax 2. In case of such appearing dis-agreement the Holy Ghost leads us by the hand to seek out some distinction restriction limitation or figure for the reconcilement thereof and one of these will always fit the purpose for Gods word must alwayes bring perfect truth it cannot fight against it selfe 3. Such figurative sense limitation restriction or distinction must be sought out as the word of God affordeth either in the present place or some other and chiefely those that seeme to differ with the present Text being duly compared together The end of the first Booke THE SECOND BOOKE CHAPTER 1. OF GOD. HAving handled the Scripture which is principium Cognoscendi in Divinity I now proceed to Treate of God who is principium essendi or thus the Scripture is the rule of Divinity God and his workes are the matter or parts of Divinity This Doctrine is 1. Necessary 1. Because man was made for that end that he might rightly acknowledge and worship God love and honour him 2. It is the end of all divine Revelation John 5. 39. 3. To be Ignorant of God is a great misery being alienated from the life of God through the Ignorance that is in them 2. Profitable Our welfare and happinesse consists in the knowledge of God Jer. 9. 23. John 17. 3. the knowledge of God in the life to come is called the Beatificall vision 3. Difficult God being infinite and our understanding finite betwixt which two there is no proportion who knowes the things of God save the spirit of God A created understanding can no more comprehend God then a Viall-glasse can containe the waters of the Sea His wisdome is unsearchable Rom. 11. Job 11. 7. and 26. 13. Euclide answered very fitly to one asking many things concerning the Gods Coetera quidem nescio illud scio quod odêre curiosos Simonides being injoyned by Hiero to tell him what was God required a dayes time to be given him before he answered and at the end of that two when they were expired foure still doubling his time for inquiry till at the last being by Hiero asked a reason of his delayes he told him plainely that by how much the more he thought of God by so much the more he apprehended the impossibility of declaring what he was We know God per viam eminentiae negationis causationis 1. All perfections which we apprehend must be ascribed unto God and that after a more excellent manner then can be apprehended as that he is in himselfe by himselfe and of himselfe that he is one true good and holy 2. We must remove from him all imperfections whatsoever he is Simple Eternall Infinite Unchangeable 3. He is the Supream cause of all There is a threefold knowledge of God 1. An implanted knowledge which is in every mans conscience a naturall ingraffed principle about God O anima naturaliter Christiana said Tertullian 2. An acquired knowledge by the Creatures Psal. 19. 1. That is the great Booke in evey page whereof we may behold the Diety Praesentemque refert quaelibet herba Deum 3. Revealed knowledge of faith spoken of Heb. 11. 6. and this is onely sufficient to Salvation The Heathens had the knowledge of God in a confused manner Rom. 1. 19. 21. and 2. 14. a practicall knowledge 15. v. which shew the worke of the Law written in their hearts not the gracious writing promised in the Covenant the light of nature is not sufficient to bring man to Salvation onely in Judah is God known 76. Psal. 1. 2. and 147. 19. See Iâ—hn 14. 6. and 11. 27. Ephes. 2. 11. 12. The Heathen might know Gods nature and attributes that he was the Creator of the world that by his providence he did preserve and rule all things but they could not by the most industrious use of all natures helpes attaine unto any the least knowledge of God as he is mans Redeemer in Christ they knew not the truth as it is Jesus Ephes. 4. 21. In God we will consider 1. His Nature 2. His workes In his nature two things are considerable 1. That he is 2. What he is That God is is the most manifest cleare evident ungainsayable truth in the world It is the first verity
or uttered which hath revealed the councels of God to men especially the elect that we may know the Father by the Sonne as it were by an Image John 1. 18. so also he is the externall wisdome instructing us us concerning the will and wisdome of the Father to salvation 1 Cor. 1. 21. and v. 30. 3 The Property of the Sonne in respect of the Holy Ghost is to send him out Iâ—hn 15 26. Hence arose the Schisme between the Westerne and the Easterne Churches they affirming the procession from the Father and the Sonne these from the Father alone To deny the procession of the holy Ghost from the Sonne is a grievous errour in Divinity and would have grated the foundation if the Greeke Church had so denied the procession of the Holy Ghost from the Sonne as that they they had made an inequality between the Persons But since their forme of speech is that the Holy Ghost proceedeth from the Father by the Sonne and is the Spirit of the Sonne without making any difference in the consubstantiality of the Persons it is a true though an erroneous Church in this particular divers learned men thinke that à Filio per Filium in the sense of the Greeke Church was but a question in modo loquendi in manner of speech and not fundamentall 3 The personall propriety of the holy Ghost is called procession or emanation John 15. 26. neither hath the word defined nor the Church known a formall difference between this procession and generation The third internall difference among the Persons is in the number for they are three subsisting truly distinctly and per se distinguished by their relations and properties for they are internall workes and different and incommunicably proper to every person There follows an externall distinction in respect of effects and operations which the persons exercise about externall objects namely the creatures for though the outward works are undivided in respect of the Essence yet in respect of the manner and determination all the persons in their manner and order concur to such workes As the manner is of existing so of working in the persons The Father is the originall and principle of action works from himselfe by the Sonne as by his Image and wisdome and by the holy Ghost But he is said to worke by his Sonne not as an instrumentall but as a principall cause distinguished in a certaine manner from himselfe as the Artificer workes by an Image of his worke framed in his mind which Image or Idea is not in the instrumentall cause of the worke but his hand To the Sonne is given the dispensation and administration of the action from the Father by the holy Ghost 1 Cor. 8. 6. John 1. 3. 5. 19. To the holy Ghost is given the consummation of the action which he effects from the Father and the Sonne Job 26. 13. 1 Cor. 12. 11. The effects or workes which are distinctly given to the Persons are Creation ascribed to the Father Redemption to the Sonne Sanctification to the holy Ghost all which things are done by the Persons equally and inseparably in respect of the effect it selfe but distinctly in respect of the manner of working The equality of the Persons may be proved 1. by the worke of Creation joyntly Psalm 33. 6. severally for the Father those places prove it 1 Cor. 8. 6. Heb. 1. 2. the Sonne John 1. 3 10. Col. 1. 16. the holy Ghost Job 33. 4. 2 By the worke of Redemption the Father sends and gives the Son the Son is sent and given by him the holy Ghost perfects the worke of conception and incarnation Luke 1. 35. 3 By the worke of Sanctification the Father sanctifieth John 17. 17. Jude v. 1. the Son Ephes. 5. 26. the holy Ghost 2 Thess. 2. 13. 1 Pet. 1. 2. 4 By the worship of religious adoration The Father is religiously adored often in the Scripture Ephes. 1. 17. the Sonne Acts 7. 59. Heb. 1. 6. the holy Ghost Acts 28. 25 26. Rom. 9. 1. This is a wonderfull mystery rather to be adored and admired then inquired into yet every one is bound to know it with an apprehensive knowledge though not with a comprehensive No man can be saved without the knowledge of the Father he hath not the Father who denieth the Sonne and he receives not the Holy Ghost who knowes him not John 14. 17. 2 We must worship the Unity in Trinity and Trinity in Unity as it is in Athanasius Creed We must worship God as one in substance and three in Persons as if Thomas John and Matthew had one singular soule and body common to them all and entirely possessed of every one we were baptized in the Name of Father Sonne and Holy Ghost 3 We should praise God for revealing this mystery to us in his word and be assured that what he promiseth or threatens shall be accomplished being confirmed by three witnesses The end of the Second Booke A Treatise of Divinitie The third Booke CHAP. I. Of Gods Workes HAving spoken of the Scripture and God the Workes of God in the next place are to bee handled which some make two the Decree and the Execution of the Decree others three Decree Creation Providence The Works of God whereby he moves himselfe to his Creatures are three Decree Creation Providence not three individually for so they are innumerable but in the species and kindes of things The Workes of God are 1. Before time or eternall his Decree 2. In time 1. Past Creation of all things 2. Present Gubernation and Susteâ—tation Government and Preservation Or thus Gods Workes are 1. Internall which are in the very will of God from eternity and they are called the Decrees of God by which God determined from eternitie what he would doe in time We follow the received Phrase of Divines when we call the Decrees the works of God and speake of God after our capacity Therefore we call Decrees of God his Works because the Decrees of man are Works or Actions from man and really distinct from his understanding and will by which we conceive the Decrees of God or rather God decreeing 2. Externall Creation and Providence 1. Of Gods Decree Decree is a speech taken from the affaires of men especially Princes in the determination of causes between parties at variance whose sentence is called a Decree or secondly it is a resolution of things consulted of either negatively or affirmatively according to the latter use of the Phrase it is applyed to God Esay 46. 10. Decretum in the Latine is indifferent to signifie either in the Abstract Gods Decree or in the Concrete a thing decreed Gods Absolute Decree is that whereby the Lord according to the Counsell of his owne Will hath determined with himselfe what he will doe command or forbid permit or hinder together with the circumstances of the same Acts 2. 23. and 4. 28. Luke 22. 22. John 7. 30. Or
our election sure by our calling Rom. 8. 29 30. and our effectuall calling by two things 1. by a new light 2. a new life 2 Cor. 4. 5. 1 Pet. 2. 9. John 12. 36. Ephes. 5. 8. We have a new knowledge wrought in us of our selves we see our miserie by sin and our inability to help our selves Rom. 2. 23. 2 of God God in Jesus Christ is discovered to us 2 Pet. 1. 3. We see our need of Christ and know him to be a mediatour who must reconcile God and us 2. a new life is wrought in us Ephes. 2. 1. We now die to sin and live to God 1. By faith Rev. 17. 14. These three are put together faithfull chosen and called 2. By new obedience CHAP. II. 2. The Execution of Gods Decree GOD executes his Decree by Actions Creation and Providence Gods workes are in time 1. Past Creation of all things 2. Present Governement and preservation Creation is taken 1. Strictly when God makes any Creature of nothing meerly of nothing not as if nothing were the matter but the terme so the souls of men and Angels are created of nothing 2. Largely when of some prejasent matter but very unfit and indisposed a creature is made as Adam of the earth Creation is the action of God whereby out of nothing he brought forth nature it selfe and all things in nature both substances and accidents in and with the substances and finished them in the space of sixe dayes both to his owne glory and the salvation of the Elect. Or it is an action whereby God the Father by his word and holy Spirit made all things exceeding good for the glory of his name Or thus Creation is a transient or externall action of God whereby in the beginning He made the world by a meere command out of his owne free will in sixe dayes space to the glory of his name 1. An action not a motion or change motion argueth some succession but in the things created the fieri factum esse is all one nor is it a change because that supposeth some alteration in the Agent 2. Transient it passeth from the Agent to the thing created whereas in immanent actions as Gods will decrees and personall actions they abide in himselfe 3. Of God The efficient cause of Creation is God the Father Son and Holy Ghost Creation is the proper worke of God alone so that He is God which created the world and he created the world who is God Jer. 10. 11. It is without controversie that the worke of creation agrees to God the Father the same is expressely given to the Sonne John 1 3. Col. 1. 16. and to the Holy Ghost also Psal. 33. 6. 4. In the beginning By the Scripture it is a matter of faith to hold that the world was not from all eternity in the beginning that notes not that there was time first and then God created the world for time is a creature and concreated but it denotes orde that is at first 5. The world that is the Heaven and Earth and all things contained in them Acts 4. 4. and 17. 24. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that well ordered decent beautifull and comely frame of heaven and earth 6. By his meere command as appeares Gen. 1. Let there be light let there be heavens wâ—ich argues his omnipotencie 7. Out of his owne free will for God did not need the world and therefore he created it no sooner 8. The finall cause to the glorie of his name Rom. 2. 20. Three Attrbiutes especially manifest themselves in this work of Creation Gods power wisedome goodnesse his power in that he made all thingâ— by a word and of nothing his wisedome is seene in the order and exceeding wonderfull and particular uses all creatures have his goodnesse in that he would communicate being to the creatures He needed not the world but was happie enough in himselfe without men or Angels The worke of Creation say some set out generally in a generall proposition In the beginning God created the Heavens and the Earth Which proposition He after explains by its parts That the world was not from eternity but was made by God these arguments may perswade First and principally Faith Heb. 11. 3. which is grounded upon divers places of Scripture as the first and second chapters of Genesis 38 and 39 chapters of Job and some Psalmes almost whole as 104. and 136. this also is the first Article of our Creede that the world was created in time by God The Apostle Paul Acts 14. 15. and 17. 24. doth point out God to the Heathen by this worke above others Secondly and probably the light of nature shining in these reasons 1. The originall of Nations laid downe by Moses Gen. 10. and else where which could not be fained by him since some memorie of them was then extant among many which yet in progresse of time was extinguished 2. The beginning of Arts the first inventers whereof are known and in what time they flourished for it is not probable that so many ages before mankind lived without arts and that in these last times they were all both invented perfected 3. The newnesse of all Heathenish histories the ancientest of which tell of nothing before Noah's flood or the beginning of the Assyrian Empire under Ninus The holy history it selfe is only of 4000. yeares or thereabout which neverthelesse iâ— the greatest monument of antiquity Now it would be a most unworthy reproach and contumelie cast upon all those men who had lived so many infinite ages agoe to say that they were so ignorant that they could not or so sloathfull that they would not deliver in writing what was done in their times 4. The decay of mans bodie and age which from a great strength quantity bignesse and time of life is now come down to a narrow scantling which if had decreased so alwais in infinite ages it would by this time have been brought almost to nothing The certaine series and order of causes and impossibility of their proceeding in infinitum for it must needs be that there should be one first which is the universall cause but first it is not unlesse it be one nor one except it be God 6. As a thing is so it workes but God doth not depend upon another in his being therefore neither in working doth he require a pre-existent matter 7. Art presupposeth nature and nature matter but God in working is a more excellent cause then art or nature therefore presupposeth nothing in working 8. The first cause viz. God is infinite therefore he can do whatsoever implyeth not a contradiction but the Creation of things in time implyeth it not 9. Whatsoever perisheth hath a beginning the world doth perish because all its parts decay and are subject to corruption therefore the whole The Angels and soules of men are changeable by nature as appears by the
tertic Vide Gerhardi loc-commun de magistratu Zanchius tomâ— secundâ— Miscellin Cap. de Magistratu Aâ—â—tius hath written the Hâ—story of Valmitius Gentilis put to death at Berne There was a Statute against Lollards in England and Hugonots in France Haeretitus egoâ—â—â—tion tu mihi See the Statute 10. ot Q Eliz. c. t. Propriè Heretici vocantur qui ea pertinaciter rejiciunt quae in Satris Scripturu docentur Dav. de judice controver Haeresis est error pugnans cum fundamento religionis Christianae isque pertinax Alâ—ingius Tomo secundo Problem Theol. parâ—e 2. Prob. 14. * Lib. 3. of the Church c. 3. See Dr Prideaux his sermon on â— Coâ— 11. 19. Errours are practicall or doctrinall onely fundamentall or circa-fundamentall or neither of the two * Arrius in Alexandria una scintilla suit Sed quoniam non statim oppressus est totum orbem ejus flamma populata est Aquinas a See M. Clarkes Sermons on Matth. 8. 13. and M. Cranfords Haereseomachia on 2 Tim. 2. 17. b Vbi supra Cum agitaretur de ista quaestione An morte mulctandi cogendi haeretici in Synodo quadam Londini perrogarentur singuloruÌ„ sententiae surrexit quidam senex Theologus atque hoc planum esse asserit ex ipso Apostolo Haereticum hominem post unam aut alteram admonitionem devita De vita inquit ergo manifestum est haereticos istos homines post unam aut alteram admonitionem è vita tollendos Eras. Annotat. in Tit. 3. Rom. 13. 4. * Magistrates in the Scripture in thâ— Hebrew are called Masters of restraint Qui non vetat peecare cum potest jubet Seneca * Mr. Hildersham on Psalm â—1 As all blasphemous Hereticks Levit. 24. 16. so seducing Hâ—reticks are to be put to deâ—th The whole 13 Chapter of Deutrâ—nomy is spent about the seducing of false Prophets Are not Moses morall Lawes of perpetuall equity and therefore to be observed in all ages Is blasphemy more tolerable in the new Testamenâ— Mr. Cotton on 16 of Rev. third Viall We are not obliged saith Beza to the Judiciall Laws as they were given by Moses to one people yet so far we are bound to observe them as they comprehend that generall equity which ought to prevaile every where 1. That there is Divinity Rom. 1. 18â—19 20. 2 14 15. * Omne bonum est sui diffusivuÌ„ ergo maximè bonum est maximâ— sui diffusivum Vt se habet simile ad simâ—le ita se habet magis ad magis Locus topicus 2. What Divinity is Theology if thou looke after the etymology of the word is a speech of God aâ—d he is commonly called a Theologer or Divine who knoweth or professeth the knowledge of Divine things Peter du Moulin Lâ—â—tanius de ira Dei 2. What Divinity is Titus 1. 1. 1 Tim. 6. 3. Col. 1. 5. 2 Tim. 2. 18. Theologia est doctrina de deo ac rebus divinis Divinity is the knowledge of God Theologia est scientia vâ—l sapientiâ— rerum divinarum divinitus râ—velata ad Dei gloriam rationalium Creaturarum salutem Walaeus in loc Commun De genere Theologiae est quaestio quod idem ab omnibus non assignatur Nam illis arridet scientia aliis sapientia aliis prudentia Litem hanc dirimere nostri non est instituti etsi verè scientem verè 〈◊〉 vere prudentem cum judicamus quâ— verus sincerus est Theologus Wendeliâ—â—s Christ. Theol. â— 1. c. 1. 3. How Divinity is to be taught 1 Discenda est Theolegia imprimis texâ—u alu 2. Systematica seu dâ—gmatica 3 elenâ—tica problematica Veâ—tiuâ— Biblioth Theol. l. 1. c. 6. How Divinity is to bee learned Job 28. 1. 2. Mat. 7. 7. John 20. 21. * Hoc scrutari temeritas credere pietas nosse vita Beru Deut. 29. 29. Rom. 12. 3. 6 7. 2 Tim. 2. 23 Mat. 11. 25. * 2 Prov. 2. 8. 4 5. 8. 17. 33. 5. The opposites of Divinity 6 The Excellency of divinity a Paul cals it the excellency of the knowledge of Christ Phil 3. 8. Ps. 40. 8. Christ is the principall subject of the whole Bible being the end of the Law and the substance of the Gospel M. Perkins Quicquid est in suo genere singulare et eximium id Divinum b Agreeable to which is the French proveâ—â— Ministre nè doit scavoir que sa Bible a Minister must know nothing but his Bible * Ps. 12. â— Mahomet would have had others believe that he learned the Doctrine of his Alcaron from the holy ghost because he caused a pigeon to come to his Eare. Origen saith of the Devills there is no greater tormeÌ„t to them then to see men addicted to the Scriptures â—um â—om 27. in hoc eorum omnis staâ—â—â—a est in hoc uruntur incendio Of the Scripture c The Scripture is called the word of God Eph. 6â— Pet. 1. 15. The counsell of God Acts 2â— 27. The Oracles of God Râ—m 3. 2. The Law of Gâ—d Psal. 1. 2. The minde of God Prov. 1. 23. d It is called word because by it Gods wil is manifested and made known even as a man maketh known his minde and wil by his words It is also said to be the word of God in regard 1. of the Author which is God himselfe 2 Tim. 3. 16. 2. Of the matter which is Gods will Eph. â— 93. Of the end whâ—â— is Gods glory Eph. 3. 10. 4. Of the efficacy which is Gods Power Rom. 1. 6. e So it is called the Bible or Booke by an excellency t is the onely Book As f August de civit dei l. 15. c. 23. * The principall Author of all Scriptures is God the Father in his Son by the holy Ghost Hos. 8. 12. 2 Pet. 1. God the Authour of the Sâ—riptures Inspiration whâ—t it is The Father hath revealed the Sonne confirmed and the holy Ghost sealed them up in the hearts of the faithfull * Acts 7. 50. 1 Cor. 11. 23. Exod. 4. 12. Deut. 18. 18. 2 Cor. 13. 3. John 1. 56. Heb. 1. 1. Ezech. 12. 25 28. Rom. 1. 2. Esay 58. 14â— Evangelium dicitur sermo Christi 3 Col. 16. utroque respectu Authoris materiae Davonanâ—ius * Rainoldus in Apologia Thâ—sium de sacrâ— Script Eccles. * Tria concurrunt ut hoc dogma recipiam Scripturam esse verbum Dei. Esse quosdam libros â—anonicos divinos atque â—os ipsissimos esse quos in manibus habemus Primum est Ecclesiae traditio quae id affirmat ipsos libros mihi in manum tradit secundum est ipsoruus librorum divina materia tertium est interna Spiritus efficacia Episc. Dav. de Judicâ— Controvers c. 6. What the Divine authority of the Scripture is * Formale objectum fidei generaliter absolutè conâ—iderawum est divina revelatio in tota sua amplitudine accepâ—a seu divina authorâ—tas cujuslibet
hundred thousand witnesses of the Seas rising up in walles Deut. 4. 3. See Matth. 27 45. * See D. Willet on Exod. 7. 9. what a miracle is and how true and false miracles differ and D. Prideaux on Psal. 9. 16. the distinction between miracles signes prodigies and Portenta out of Aquinas To which testimony these things give weight 1. To them were committed the Oracles of God Rom. 3. 1. 2. They have constantly professed the truth in great misery whereas by the onely deniing thereof they might have been partakers both of liberty and rule 3. Notwithstanding the higk Priests and others persecuted the Prophets while they lived they yet received their writings as Propheticall and Divine * Vide Crâ—ii observat in novum Testamentum cap. 15. In the two Dominions of France and the 17 Provinces within the space of little more then fiâ—eÌ„ yeeres under Charles the ninth of France and Philip the second of Spaine two hundred thousand suffered as Martyrs * See Foxes martyrologie Meteranus de rebus Belgicis and Fullers profane state of the Duke of Alvap 440. * A martyranswered Bishop Bonnâ—r My Lord I can not dispute but I can die for the truth John Jones said when he had a cap wherein were many painted devils with the title Haeresiâ—cha Shall I grudge to weare this paper cap for Christ who were a Crown of Thorns for me Videtis punctiones sed non unctiones You see their sufferings but not their rejoycings Omnis Christ anus mortis contemptor Photinus * In the primitive times they were wont to call martyrdome by the name of Corona martyrii the Crown of martyedome and Stephen the Protomaryr had his name in Greek from a Crown Erant 〈◊〉 â—â—rquentibus fortiores Cyprian a Non poena sed causâ— facit martyrem * Lib. 2. c. 25. Meminerunt Mosis Didetus Siculus Strabo Plinius Taâ—itus quâ—que posâ— eos Dioâ—ysius Longinus de forâ—â—is sublimitare Jamnia aatem mambris qui in Aegypto Mosi restiterunt praeter Talmunâ—ieos Plinim Apulrius Grâ—e de veris. relig Christ. * Credite me vobis folium recitare Sybillae Bish. Andrews in his large exposition on the 10 Commandements a Vide Spanhem Dub. porte secunda Dub. 34. Sâ—ct 6 7. b Exerciâ— 1. ad Aâ—nal Bar. Esay 8. 20. Psalm 19. The Authors often testifie that they speake not of themselves or by any humane instinct but from Gods command and the Spirit inspiring * Christ commends Moses the Prophets and Psalmes by which names are meant all the bookes belonging to the Canon of the Hebrews * The holy Ghost inwardly witnesseth in the hearts of the faithfull that the Scriptures are the Word of God 1 John 2. 20 27. 1 Cor. 2. 10 11 12. 12. 3. John 16. 23. 14. 26. Esay 51. 16. Esay 59. 21. Rom. 8. 10. 1 John 3. 8. 1 John 2. 20. Fides Christiana non acquiritur sed in sunditur * Leviculum est quod objiciunt qui contra sentiunt Si omnis Scriptura Divinitus sit inspirata sequiuurum inde etiam Graâ—corum Gemilium Scripturas esse divinitus inspiratasâ—nam ut buon respâ—â—det Theopâ—y lactus oportebat eos noviâ—â—e quod Paulus ante dixerat sacras literas nosti Riveâ— Isag. ad Script Sac. a Aliud sanè Prophetas hoc vel illud scripsisse aliud verò scripsâ—â—e ut Prophetas Spâ—nâ—emiâ—s * Nothing crosseth humane wisdom more then the Scripture Authoritas sine 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Scripturae Illud authenticum dicitur quod sibi sufficit quod se commendat sustines probat ex se fidem ac authoritatem habet Whitakerus * Every principle is known by it selfe The Scripture is the primum credendum the first thing to be believed we must believe it for it selfe and all other things for their conformity with it a Eccius reckons this among hereticall assertions major est Scripturae quam Ecclesiae authoritas b Nisi Deus hominibus placuerit non erit Deus said Tertul. in Apol. if God please not man he shall not be God as truly and certainly as God is God so truly is the Scripture the Scripture Spiritus sanctuâ— Spiritus veritatis loquitur semper in Scriptura in Ecclesia verò quandoque spiritu◠〈…〉 Thesâ— 3. l. 11. * See Chamiers sixth booke de Canone divers Chapâ—râ—â— and M. Pembles 〈◊〉 Vindicâ—agraâ—iâ— p. 207 to 22â— a Superstâ—us mihi â—ebâ—r videtur oprum quâ—â—adeâ— sollicite illud quoad nos inâ—uisiver 〈◊〉 quia â—e cogitari quidem protest 〈◊〉 corum librerum autorilos nisi quoad 〈◊〉 Cham. * Matth. 28. 20 18. 20. John 15. 26. 16. 13. b Scriptura est velipsa scriptio literarum per lineas certas victura vel ipse doctrina per 〈◊〉 Scripturas significata in iis literis conienta Scriptione fatemur Ecclesiam esse antiquiorem sed negamus esse antiquiorem ea doctrina quae significatur eascriptione Chamier Tom. 19. l. 1. c. 22. * Fuit Scriptura ante Mâ—â—sen materialiter non formaliter Quibus leâ—â—is verbis adeo exultanâ— quasi reperissent id quod pueri in fabase reperisse â—lamitant tamsue confidenter ae si ad plenum victâ—riac fructum sola â—riumpâ—i gloria deesset Chamierus * So Musculus Calvin Peter Martyr and Whitaker expound those words observe the composition of the word is signifieth to more with other things a Gâ—rson saith be taketh the Church for the Primitive Church and that Assembly which saw and heard Christ. * Ecclesia non habet magisterium supra scripturas sed ministerium circa Scripturas There are two causes why the Apocripha are cast out of the canon 1. Externall the authority of the Church decreeing and the quality of the Authours 2. Internall the stile the fabulous and wicked things Chamier a Ecclesiae idest Romano pontifici vel soli vel cum Conoilio magisterium tribuunt summum adeo ut solennis sit apud eas formula indicet magister fidei Amesius b D. Chalonero credo Ecclesiam Catholicam Ecclesia dicitur Fundamentum met aphoricè imptopriè fundamentum secundarium * Rivet and D. Preston De sensu horum verborum vide Caâ—â—ronis myroâ—â—ecium Collaâ—ionem Rainoldi cum â—artâ— c. 8. p. 557. c An allusion saith Bedell to the bases and pillars that held up the veile or curtains in the Tabernacle That distinction of authoritative inâ— se but not quoad nos is absut'd because the authority the Scripture hath is for and because of us * Dr. White of the Church The Spirit witnesseth the Scripture to witnesseth the Church sub-witnesseth b Vt olim Caligula occlusis omnibus horreis publicam populo inediam famem ita illi obturatis omnibus fontibus verbi Dei sitim populo miserabilem induxerant Illi homiminibus famem ut ait Amos Propheta sitimque attulerunt non famem panis non sitim aquaeâ— sed audiendi verbi Dei Iuellus
as many wives as they would Doctor 〈◊〉 Preface to New-mans Concordance * The Generall view of the Holy Scriptures * Sancta sanctè Mr. Gregory in his Preface to observations upon some passâ—ges of Scriptuâ—e * Luke 16. 29. John 5. 39. Psal. 19. and 119. Augustinus affirmat omniaquae continent fidem mores in illis inveniri quae apertè posita sum in Scriptura Chrysostomus Manifesta itidem in divinâ—â— Scripturis esse perhibet quaecunque necessaria Tertullianus adorat Scripturae pâ—enitudinem Et vae Heâ—mogeniâ—i â—i quid ijs quae scripta sunt vel de traâ—at vel adijciat Rainoldus 1â— Thesi Deut. 4. â— and 12. 32. De Scripturae plenitudine perfectione quid sentiat Maldonaâ—us vide ad Joan 7. 4. De Scripturae integritate vide Estium ad Galat. 3. 10. See Bp Vshers Body of Divinity p. 18. 19 20 21. 2 Tim. 3. 16. 17 John 15. 15. Acts 20. 27. Bene habet ut iis quae sunt Scripta contentus sis Hilary â— In every age there was revealed that which was sufficient to salvation and yet now no more then is sufficient the Word it selfe is not now but the revelation only is more perfect The old Testament was sufficient for the Jewes but both the new and old make but one compleate body for the Church now Singuli libri sunt sufficientes suffiâ—cientia parâ—â—um ad quam ordinatae sunt 〈◊〉 verò Scriptura est sufficiens essentiali sufficientia per Libros singu los fusa Jun. Animad in Bellarm. Controv Primae capite quarâ—â— The Scriptures are a perfect Rule for matters of Faith but not a perfect Register for matters of fact M. Geres Whitakerus de Script c. Sexto quaest Sexâ—ae Stapletons Sâ—rrariâ—â— are more wary then some other Papists we are abused say they when we are said to hold that the Scripture is not perfect for say they a thing is said to be imperfect not when it wants any perfection but when it wants a perfection due as a man is not imperfect if hee have not an Angels perfection because this is not due unto him they say it is not a perfection due to the Scriptures to teach us very thing necessary to salvation Perinde sunt ea quae ex Scripturis colliguntuâ— atque ea quae scribuntur Nazianzen Catholici in perfectione Scripturae Papistae â—n imperfectione totius causae id est omnium controversiarum de Religiâ—ne proram puppim constituâ—nt Câ—aniâ—rus â—â—m Primâ— de canone lib. Octavo c. primo 1 Cor. 10. â— 2 3. Math. 8. 11. Lu 19. 9. Gal. 3. 7. 8. 29. Rom. 4 15 16. Some Papists say the Scriptures are not imperfect because they send us to the Church which is the perfect Rule and therefore they are perfect implicitè though not explicitè but so I might say every rustick were a perfect Rule of Faith because he can shew me the Pope who is the infallible judge If the Scripture send to the Church to learne that which is not in the Scripture by this sending shee confesseth her imperfection See Moulins buckler of faith p. 45. John 1. 18. and 3. 12. Esay 61. 1. 2. Heb. 1. 1 and 2. 3. Act. 1. 3. Matth. 11. 25. 27. Matth. 22. 32. John 5. 46. Luke 24. 44. 45. * Additio ad Scripturam fit tripliciter 1. In quo additum est contrarium est erroris 20. In quo additum est diversum est praesumptionis 30. In quo additum est consonum est fidelis instructionis * That doctrine of religion to which God would have nothing added and from which he would have nothing taken away must needs be perfect Illud perfectum in â—uo genere cui nihil in eo genere aut addi aut diminui potest Psal. 19. 8. the Hebâ—ew word signifieth that perfection cui nihil deest 2 King 5. 8. 1 Tim. 6. 11. * Salus nostra Christus est salutis via fides viae â—ux Scriptuâ—a Raynoldâ—s 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 It is tâ—ken collectivè not distributivè Si 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 non totam sed omnem significaret eo fortâ—us futurum argumentum nostrum nâ—m si pâ—rtes singulae sufficerem tum multo magis omnes Chamierus * Nul'us Papista aptè plenè huic argumento unquam respondit aut respendâ—bit Whitakeâ—us * Is not the Scripture said Hawkes the Martyr sufficient for my salvation yes saith one of Bonners Chaplainâ—s it is sufficient for our salvation but not for our instruction Hawkes answered God send me the salvation and take you the instruction Fox Martyâ—ol Episc. Dav. de Judice Controvers c. 5. * Minima veritatis particula in Scripturis continetur Charronaeus * Bellarm. de verbo Dei l. 4. c. 3 Rhemists annotat â—n John 21. â—ect 3. and annotat in 2 Thessâ— 2. 16. and annotatâ— in Act. 15. sect 3. and in Apoc. 〈◊〉 sect 1. * Assâ—rimus in Scripturis non contineri expressè totam doctrinam necessariam sive de fide sive de moribâ—s proiâ—de praeter verbum Dei scriptum requiri etiam verbum Dei non scriptum idest divinas Apostolicas traditiones Bellarm. l quarto de verbo Dei non scripto Omnes libros veterâ—s novi Testamenti nec non traditiones ipsas tum ad fidem tum ad mâ—res pertinentes tanquam vel ore tenus à Christo vel à Spiritu Sancto dictatas continua successione in ecclesia catholica conservatas part pietaâ—is affectu ac reverentia suscipit ac veneratur Tridentiva synodus sess 4. Sect. 1. * Bellarmine hath a whole Book de verbo Dei nâ—â— spripto of the word of God unwritten * The word originally may import any thing which is delivered howsoever either by word or writing Thus whatsoever we have received in the Scriptures was first tradition as delivered by word and still is tradition because it is delivered in writing But though the word in it selfe have this generall and indifferent signification of any thing that is delivered yet in our disputation it is restrained to one onely manner of delivering by word and relation onely and not by Scripture We deny that either in the Law or Gospell there was any thing left unwritten which concerneth us to know for attaining of true faith and righeteousnesse towards God Abbot against Bishop Iâ— Matth. 15. * Vide Whitakerum de Script c. 9. quaest Sexta pag. 405. 406. In his Book de verbo Dei standing for unwritten traditions as a part of the word of God he will have Baptisme of Infants to be one but when he disputes for Baptisme of Infants against Anabaptists then he heaps up Texts of Scripture Mr. Blakes Birth priv * Symbolum Apostolicum ex traditione est secundum formulam rationemque verborum at secundum substantiam est scriptura ipsissima-lunius Animad in Bellarm controv 1. l. 4. Negamus ullum esse in toto Symbâ—lo
making Minerva the daughter of Jupiter and to have had her generation in his Divine braine As God the Son is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 so Grammer Logicke Rhetoricke carry upon them the same name There is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 verbam that is Grammer 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Ratio that is Logick 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 oratio and that is Rhetoricke All second causes depend on the first and we cannot proceed in InfinituÌ„ Quicquid movetur ab alio movetur Some derive Deus from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 feare because the feare of him is planted in the very natures and consciences of all reasonable Creatures others a dando in English God quasi Good his daily mercies and blessings shew that there is a God Act. 14 17 The Heathens lift up their eyes and hands to Heaven in any suddaine distresse Psal. 9. 16. The pure Atheist according to the propriety of that name is hee which generally and constantly denyeth all Deity and beleeveth as he saith The stouâ—est Atheist that ever lived can not resolutely and constantly believe there is no God a Diagorus made a very eloquent Oration that there was no God but the people comming to him applauded him saying that in his Oration he had almost perswaded them but he did so â—lâ—quently that they thought hee was the God b Mornâ—eus cap. 1. de verit Relig. p. 16. c When he wanted fire he tooke one of Hercules wooden Images and made a fire of it saying go to Hercules thou shalt now go through thy thirteenth labour Psal. 14. 1. 53. 15. So Genebrard and Muis expound that 14. Ps. of indirect Atheists who deny Gods Providence Heb. 11. 6. It is not only innatum sed etiam in animo insculptum esse Deos Cic l. 2. de natura Deorum No Atheists almost can be named neither in the holy Scriptures nor in Ecclesiâ—stical Historiâ—s nor in Heathen writings which came not unto some fearfull end See Atheomastix l. 1. chap. 15. d So Domitian Dominus Deus noster sic fieri jubet Suetonius edictam Domini Deique nostri Martiall More Caligula Dominum se Deumque vocarit coegit Aurelius Victor e Psal. 48. 14. f Esay 40. 5. 8. Quid su 〈◊〉 Job 11. 7 8. 26. 14. In the Epistle to my Hebrew Critica Sacra and in the Booke it selfe judaei in legendis et scribediâ— nâ—mi nibus Dei â—ppidò quam superstitiosi sunt interpretantur tertâ—â— praeceptum nomen lehovae non esse prenunciandum librum in quo integrè scriptum est nudis manibus non esse contrectandum Of those two Greeke names See my Greeke Critica Sacra As * Jehovab Jah Ehich Exod. 13. 19. * Vocantur Attributa quia ea sibi attribait Deus nostra causâ Zanchius de Attributis l. 2. c. 11. Attributum est Divinae simplicissimae essentiae pro diversa agendi ratione diversa vera habitudo conceptio nobis expressa M. Stock on Gods Attributes * Proprietates Divinae naturae seu essentiae sunt Attributa Dei essentialia quibus essentiae Divinae veritas ac Majestas nobis innotâ—scit abaliis distinguiturs Wendelinus These Attributes differ not among themselves nor from the Divine essence Esay 43. 25. For my selfe not for my Mercy to teach us that his Mercy is himselfe and not different from his Essence as it is with us God is so light that in him there is no darknesse at all 1 John 1. 5. John 8. 12. 1 John 1. 5. 4. 16. Psal. 105. 8. Jam. 1. 17. Psal. 136. 1. and 100. 5. Psal. 117. 2. Num. 23. 10. Proprietates Dei sunt primi vel secundi generis Primi generis proprietates sunt quae ita Deo competunt ut earum contrariae omni in sint creaturae Cujusâ—odi sunt independentia simplicitas immutabilitas immensitas aeternitas Secundi generis sunt quae ita Deo competunt ut earum expressae imagines in creaturis reperiantur Wendelinus Christian. Theol. l. 1. C. 1. God is called a Spirit 1. Negatively because he is not a body 2. Analogically or by a certaine likenesse because there are many perfections in Spirituâ—Il substâ—nces which doe more shadow forth the Divine nature then any bodily â—â—ng can Doctor Ammes Theol. God is of a pure and spirituall nature To be a spirit implies 1. Invisibility 2. Efficacie and activity Ezek. 1. 20. 3. Simplicitie God is invisible 14. Luke 39. Col. 1. 15 John 1. 18. Consectaries a lib. adver Prax. de anima Rom. 1. 23. Anthropomorphites a sort of Hereticks so called because they misconceived that God had a bodily shape like man Psal. 34. 16. Zach. 4. 10. Quod de Deo dicitur 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 intelligi debet 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Dextra Dei significat potentiam majestatem Dei oculi aures Omniscientiam The Scripture referring eyes to God by them intends 1. His knowledge and notice of things Prov. 15. 3. 2. His care Psal. 34. 15. 3. His direction Psal. 42. 8. L. 2. de Imag. Sanct. C. 8. Consectaries from Gods being a spirit and invisible Rom. 1. 9. Rom. 1. 20. a Matth. 5. 8 b Invisibile aliquid dicitur dupliciter inquit Cham. primò per se ipsa sui naturâ—â— ut Deus ut Spiritus sunt invisibiles Secundi per accidens â—um quid in se tale est quidem ut possitvideri sed al qua externa superveniente causa fit invisibile ijs à quibus vel alias potuit vel etiam debuit videri quo modo ijs qui sunt ad Septentrionem invisibiles sunt stellae ad Austrum quo modo stellae quaedam minutissimae sunt invisibiles The Divine essence is simple and altogether uncompounded Simplex proprie dicitur quod compositum ex diversis non est 2 Cor. 12. 3. The Gospell and the wayes of it are not Simple as Simplicity is opposed to the depth of wisedome for therein is made knowne the manifold wisedome of God Ephes. 3. 10. But as Simplicity is opposed to mixture Every thing the more simple in this sence the more excellent In Deo idem est esse essentia vivens vita quia Deus non vivit per aliud essentiae superadditum sed vitam habet inscipso est ipsa vita vivit à scipso per scipsum * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Consectaries of God simplenesse Simplex quasi sine plicis Sincerus sine cera See prov 11. 20. * A great French paire is called Le bon Chrâ—stien the good Christian because they say it never rots at the core 22. Matth. Christ opposeth a single eye and corrupt one an Israelite in whom is no guile is worth an eccâ— a rare man Mâ—s. Elizabeth Juxton said she had nothing to comfort her but poore syncerity 1 John 5. 20. 21. 115. Psal. 4. 5. Psal. 42. 2. Rom. 9. 26. Graeci Deum vocant 〈◊〉 â vivendo quoniam solus verè vivit