the Amalekits contrary to GOD's command pretending that he did so For the good purpose of Sacrificeing 1 Sam. 15.21.22 Neither should Books be approven in which Errours are mixed with Verities since evil is through any defect but good from the intire cause So I distinguish this Rule if a Writter having a good design mistake in a few things of no great moment and upon sound Advice will revoke his Errours I grant this should be favourably interpreted but if the Errours be gross and many and the Author boasting of being Divinely inspired in writting them and to have had more Light and Piety then all men in that case I deny that such mistakes should pass uncensured Lastly as to the first of the four Pre-concessions for disputing that we should be well acquainted with what we censure that is a very good Rule and by it the Ap. seems to insult his Opponents that either they did not well know the French Language in which A. B. wrote or had not read all her Twenty two Books So not only the Ap. but likewise all that own A. B. whensoever her Errours are mentioned they answer warmly that whatsoever seemeth hard in some of her Writtings is explained in others which the censurers either have not read or will not be at the pains to compare places together Now to ward of this thrust the Reader shall be judge if I censure any thing of A. Bs. Writtings but what I understand well enough having had sufficient means for it by reading sundry of her writtings and particularly The Light of the World which is held for the chiefest of them all and the standard of all both be herself and Poiret see the admonition prefaced thereto by P. P. p. 36. And now I have read the Ap. which is aequivalent to the reading of all her Books since the Author hath read them all and defends all and if I quarrel nothing but what he mantains it were a frivolous shift to bid me go and search any of A. Bs. Books for any explication of her Opinions And if there be reall Errours and Contradictions found in her writtings what explications can remove them To conclude this Section I shall to the foresaid four add other three rules of arguing and especially anent Points of Divinity 1. To explain the Termes and state the Question aright 2. To reason and answer candidly without Sophistry or Deceit 3. To seek Verity rather than victory and therefore though we may justly commend some good things in any Person or his writtings not to mantain their Errours and Evtravagancies which if through fondness we have failed in upon second thoughts to do so no more SECTION III. If A. B. was Divinely inspired A. THis Question cannot be well resolved untill the Terms thereof be cleared in the first place and the Question be rightly stated according to my first Rule for unless this be done all abrupt disputs turn to a meer Logomachie or a proud and ignorant doting about Questions and strife of words which God expresly forbids 1 Tim. 6.4 Divine Inspiration is taken in very different Senses for First in a large sense every man may be said to be Divinely Inspired because of his Rational Soul which was made after the Image of God Gen. 2.7 God breathed into Mans Nosethirls the Breath of Life and Gods breathing into Man is a Divine Inspiration 2ly One is said to be Divinely Inspired to whom God giveth a capacity Genius or fitness for an Office or Imployment as it is written Judg. 3.10 The Spirit of the Lord came upon Othniel and he judged Israel and went out to Warre so it is a necessary Qualification of a Bishop that he be Apt to teach 1. Tim. 3 2. and the Holy Ghost maketh Bishops Acts 20.28 Yea this is ascribed to men of Manuary Callings as to Bezalcel and with him Aholiab Exod. 31.3 I have filled him with the Spirit of God in Wisdom and in all manner of workmanship for the tabernacle 3ly A Spiritual man judgeth not of Divine things by carnal reason Church Authority only Tradition or Custom but according to the Truth and Minde of God revealed in the Scriptures 1 Cor. 2.14.15 But the Spiritual man judgeth all things c. Job 32.8 The Inspiration of the Almighty giveth man Knowledge Which Apothegme may also be referred to the former sense that God qualifies and fitteth every person whom he commissioneth for any Imployment as to teach others Yea persons unregenerated may have something like to this Orthodoxie as that understanding Scribe who in Conference with the Lord did give the true and Spiritual sense of the Law upon whom it was accordingly pronounced That he was not far from the Kingdom of God Mark 12.34 Yet being at a distance from true Conversion all the knowledge he had was only by the common illumination of the Spirit which and other common gifts of the unconverted whether they differ specifically or gradually only from the saving knowledge and graces of the Godly I shall not here abide to determine 4ly Every Pious Person is led by the Spirit of God both in his Conversion when Gods Spirit enlightneth the Understanding and reneweth their Will and likewise afterwards directing and quickning to all Duty which Light and Grace he bestows in such measures as fitteth the work wherein He in his Infinite Wisdom imployes them as reading the Scriptures Praying Preaching Writting doing of good Works and suffering when called thereto Of this the Holy Spirit is the efficient cause he bids us do well Yet it is God who worketh in us both to will and to do of his good pleasure Phil. 2.12.13 so 1 John 2.20 Ye have an unction from the Holy One and ye know all things And this Illumination is by Divines called Subjective Revelation because of the agreement betwixt our Souls and the Divine assistance and to distinguish it from the pretended Enthusiasm of deluded Persons who boast of new Revelations as the chief Rule of their Faith and Manners And in this sense Luther Zuinglius and other Divines who are cited in Quakerism no Popery from pag. 19. are to be understood when they write that the inward word of God and the dictats of the Holy Spirit are the true word of God which profit unto Salvation which is also the Sense and meaning of the ancient Holy Fathers when they speak of the leading of the Spirit of God as S. Chrys upon John 6.63 Christs words are to be heard according to the Spirit And whoso heareth them after a carnal manner profiteth nothing And S. Cypr. de S. sancto p. 485. edit Par. cum Annot. Ja. Pamel Suspiration Inspiration and Aspiration in the Godly they have from the Holy Spirit the cause and effect Matter and Increase 5ly The Prophets and Penmen of the Holy Scriptures were in a strict sense Divinely inspired 2 Pet. 1.21 They spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost 2. Tim. 16.17 All Scriptures is given by the Inspiration
good things I have noted on Discursus Academicus his errours in this matter neither have I read in any Book of A. B. where she retracteth the foresaid errours and if the Ap. hath done it he should have told us of it Now to put a period to the first Subsection anent the essentials of Religion it is manifest I hope by what I have written to the impartial Reader that A. B. had no good skill of Religion were it but for one reason that she preferred Heathenism to Christianity by assirming that Heathens Turks and Jewes had more reason and Religion than Christians Pref. L W. p. 9.10 And that not one Christian is so much resigned to GOD or did understand true vertue so well as the Heathens did pt 3. p. 129. And since her Sentiments are against the Holy Scriptures and the essentials of Religion she hath not represented the same aright nor revived the Spirit of Christianity neither was she Divinely Inspired to publish the Gospel to the World which was the thing thus to be demostrated SECTION IV. SUBSECTION II. NUMBER I. Of Accessories in the General THe Ap. pt 1. p. 3 4 5 6 7 8. and 9. comprehends all the Doctrine of A. B. in the two general heads of the Essentials of Religion and her accessories which distinction I promised to examine in this place Sect. 4. Subs 1. Initio The word Accessory which is taken from the Latine word Accedo signifyeth ordinarily to come to to follow or add to any thing but in the English for the most part it soundeth ill to be accessory importing the abetting or partaking of a Crime In the civil Law it signifies an Adminicle or Addition to a statute of which it is required that it be not alien from or contrary but that it follow the nature of the principall to which it is an Appendix De regulis juris in sexto reg 42. But in Divinity few or none sound writters use the term Accessory in comparing points of Religion among themselves the ordinary distinctions are of Essentials and Integrals of things necessary and expedient Essential or fundamental points are the Doctrines clearly revealed in Scripture and upon which the Holy Ghost the Revealer hath put the caracter of necessity to be believed for Salvation as the sum of the Creed is The Integrals are other Doctrines taught by GOD to make up the whole as the several parts of Mans Body make the composition of Man intire so the uniform obeying all the Commandments of GOD make up the whole of Religion Again the Articles of Religion are either the necessary and indispensable means of obtaining the chief ends thereof to wit GODS Glory and Mans Salvation such as Faith Hope Love and Repentance or they are necessary by Reason of the Precept because commanded by GOD such as the Sacraments and the publick and ordinary Worship of GOD. And further all things commanded by GOD are called necessary and things injoined by the Church for Edification Order and Decency are said to be of positive right and expedience And some things not fundamental which are but darkly revealed in Scripture Christians may keep Peace and have communion together albeit they have different Opinions thereanent as in points of Discipline concerning which whoso would be fully informed he may read Isaak Causabon on the Epistle of King James the 6th to Cardinal Perron anent the Peace of the Church But A. Bs. Accessories can no wayes be reduced to any of the foresaid branches of the points of Religion as being either necessary true lawful or expedient which shall be manifested in the next number Neither is it obvious viewing all Christian Churches to find out a parallel to A. Bs. notion of Accessories but that which it mostly resembles is the decretals wherewith the modern Romanists have stuffed the Canon Law of which it is truely said that the Old Decrees had been good if they had wanted the Alae Wings and new additions forced upon them So her representing the Essentials of Religion and pressing of Piety had been good if she had understood them well and done it without diminution of any or adding extravagant flights and fancies to wing them throughout the whole World in her own conceit There remains yet to be discussed another sense of the word Accessories and that is in military terms Auxiliaries or additional forces are called Accessories but there can be no reasonable translation of this to A. Bs. purpose for the Truths of Religion contained in the Holy Scriptures are perfect and sufficiently able to serve their turn to defend themselves and to make the man of GOD perfect unto Salvation without such additions or auxiliariâ—es as she proposeth For they are but meer intruders coming uncalled over which a vigilant eye should be had lest if intertained or let alone they prove such auxiliaries as the Mammaluks did in Egypt and the Saxons in England who betrayed and subverted the Natives whom they came to aid because both their Principles and Interests were contrary to each other Obj. O but says the Ap. pt 1. p. 45. There is no such evil to be feared from A. Bs Accessories for they tend to advance the main ends of Religion and tho they be not warranded in the Scriptures yet they are neither hurtful nor damnable A. To answer which Objection shall be the subject of the following Number of this second Subsection anent her Doctrines NUMBER II. Of A. Bs. Accessories in particular IN this inquest all the Doctrines of A. B. relating to and depending upon the Essentials of Religion might be reviewed since the Ap. comprehends the whole of her Doctrine in these two Essentials and Accessories without noticing the third branch of the division namely Doctrines which tho not Fundamental or Essential yet may either further or prejudge the Essentials of Religion as they are either true or false proper to Religion or improperly mustered therewith but that being in a good part done already Subs 1. n. 6. wherein it is proven in seven Points that many of A. Bs. Doctrines which are nearly related to the Essentials of Religion are very erronious and disproven of the Holy Scriptures I proceed now to examine other Doctrines which she reckoneth not among the Essentials of Religion and so they must be indeed her Accessories 1. That Man before he sinned did feed upon the quintescence of things being altogether Spiritual he could flee in the Air and go to the Centre of the Earth and so it shall be with Man afterwards when Christ reigneth upon Earth with the Saints This Doctrine is disseminated throughout all A. Bs. writtings and approven be the Ap. pt 1. p. 46. 47. which is not so innocent as he represents it but is both hurtful and damnable For it contradicteth the truth of the History of the Creation of the World written by Moses in the Book of Genesis be the dictating of the Holy Ghost which accomodating to Vulgar Capacities mentioneth not as other Scriptures doe
Image of GOD Knowledge and Holiness and be cemented one with another in love but from this no Scripture language nor any Christian Commentator neither any wise man did ever infer that men should be called GOD Unless he would vouch the Manichees for his Authors who were vile Hereticks and held that there were two Gods one good and another evil they indeed taught That the Soul of man was of the substance of GOD As did other blasphemous Hereticks to wit Cerdonians Marcionites and Priscillianists which we have faithfully accounted by a most trustie and diligent antiquary Forbes of Corse in his Instr hist Theol. Li. 4. C. 5. N. 12. Citing also the Orthodox who refuted them Namely St. Ambrose Aug. Theodoret c. And how can the unlearned Readers of A. Bs. writtings distinguish her Opinion from theirs in this prime and essential part of Religion Likewise A. B. denyes GOD'S Attribute of Omniscience tho to deny any of his Attributes be to deny GOD himself when she taught that GOD doth not foresee all future Actions of a free agent which is defended by the Ap. pt 2. p. 127. 128. 129. This is contrary to the Scriptures John 21.17 LORD thou knowest all things Psalm 139.2 Thou knowest my down sitting and mine uprising thou understandest my thought a far off Are not these the Actions of a free Agent Moreover A. B. denyes the Justice of GOD which she learned from the pestiferous Socinus L. de Serv. p. 1. C. 1. c. Where he Sophistically argues because GOD is Love 1. John 4 8 Therefore there is no vindicative Justice in him which is defended by the Ap. pt 1. p. 22 where he affirms that the Scriptures which speak of GOD'S Justice and displeasure in threatning and punishing of sin are to be understood as these which attribute humane parts and passions to him All this contradicts the Scriptures which teach that hatred of sin and vindicative Justice are of the nature of GOD as he is Simple Pure Holy and Righteous even as Love and Mercy are of his Nature and Essence as He is good Habb 1.13 HE is of purer Eyes than to behold Evil and cannot look upon Iniquity GOD hath no parts at all nor passions and when they are ascribed to Him in the Scriptures such as Love Anger Hatred c. It is spoken by Us not for the infirmity of affections but for some likeness of His works and ours as St. Aug. wordeth it De Civ D. L. 9. C. 5. And the effect hath produced the word Revenge which truth of the vindicative Justice of GOD is clearly vindicated from all the Objections of Socinus by John Owen Diatr de Just Div. where he proveth that the application or exercise of GOD's essential Justice is to be understood when he punisheth sin as our soveraign LORD and Judge and likewise he removeth the mistakes of Rutherford and Twisse thereanent and the satisfaction of CHRIST wherein yet they were not of the mind of A. B. and the Socinians Then for the Blessed Trinity in the GOD-Head Head her Doctrine is plainly Heretical writting that it is a Romish Errour to say there are three Persons in the GOD-HEAD that there are in Him only three Powers Attributes or Properties of Truth Righteousness and Goodness and that her self had these three Properties L. W. pt 2 p. 109 and pt 3. p. 166 Lavie continue p. 553 554 L. W. pt 3 p. 80 Ap. pt 2 p. 84 85. These Sentiments so called by the Ap. are contrary to the Essentials of Religion to the Creed and to the constant Doctrine of the Catholick Church See some of many Scriptures 1 John 5.7 There are three that bear record in Heaven the FATHER the WORD and the HOLY GHOST and these three are One. Heb. 1 3. CHRIST is the express Image of His FATHERS Person see also how the Trinity was manifested at Christs Baptism Mat 3 16 17. The Father speaking from Heaven the Son present in Person and the Holy Ghost by a Dove So Preaching and Baptising are enjoined in the express naming of the Trinity or three Persons Mat 28 19. And thus the blessing is still pronounced 2 Cor 13 14. The Primitive Church still condemned all Antitrinitarians for Hereticks and particularly Sabellius and Samosatenus were accursed by the great Council of Nice Anno 325 Theodoret Eccl. hist L. 5. c. 9. Epiph. haer 6. For the very Doctrine now revived by A. B. That there were not three Persons but three Names and three Powers in the GOD-HEAD Whereas to exclude all Hereticks and to mantain the Unity of Faith in the Catholick Church it was expressed in all the approven Creeds which are Exegetick or Explicatory of the Apostles Creed To wit the Creeds of the Councills of Antioch Nice and Constantinople and of St. Athanasius That there are in the GOD-HEAD three Persons or Subsistencies having Incommunicable Personal Properties the Father begetting the Son the Son begotten and the Holy Ghost proceeding from them both three in One and One in three undivided in Essence or Substance with much more which is to be seen in them to this purpose So that it is evident A. Bs. Doctrine is inconsistent with the Scriptures and many Articles of the Creed NUMBER II. Of CHRIST and His Satisfaction for Us. IT is worthy the noticeing in the first place anent this foundation of Religion that A. B. in all her Books never once giveth CHRIST his due Tittles as it is in the Creed His only SON Our LORD or the LORD 1 Cor. 11 23. The Ap is guilty of the same omission till p 406. Some approver of A. B. in a Letter to the Ap. doth it And no marvel that they shift to speak of Christs Divinity since they write that He had a sinful Nature corrupt and rebellious to the Superiour part of His Soul produceing inclinations and temptations to sin though He consented not thereto S. V. pt 1 p 198. Ap pt 2 from p 198 to 143. This contradicteth the Holy Scriptures which shew clearly that he took to Himself our Nature but without sin which could not have been if any sin had been in His Nature for the very first motions or inclinations in Us to sin which School-Men call Primo-primi they are sins because of our sinful Nature even before we deliberatly consent thereto Jam 1 15. Lust when it is conceived bringeth forth sin Gen 6.5 Every Imagination of the thoughts of Mans Heart is only evil continually Whereas it was impossible that the Lord Jesus Christ could have had a sinful Nature otherwise the Divinity which is Holiness and Purity it self could not have been Hypostatically united to his Humane Nature neither could the Holy One Immanuel GOD with us have any inclination or temptation to sin in his Nature or proceeding from any thing in Himself as the Scriptures teach us 2 Cor. 5.21 He was made sin for us who knew no sin Heb. 4.15 He was in all Points tempted like as we are yet
without sin The foresaid Errour of A. B. is a great one but behold a greater Against the Satisfaction which Christ the Redeemer made to Divine Justice for us That there was no need for Christ to become Man to suffer or die for our Redemption that He had been Incarnat tho Man had never sinned to converse with us visibly upon Earth that GOD was not honoured by His sufferings and that he suffered only by accident for the instruction of Men and their relief and to give them a good example L. W. pt 1. p. 139. 140. 141. 142. and pt 3. p. 53. This Heretical Doctrine is catcht from Photinus and from Socinus L. de Serv. c. 3.4 per tot That Arch-Heretick and Heir of Arrius who denyed the Divinity of Christ and is the Father of the Atheists that now infest many places in Europe whether they call themselves Deists Theists Unitarians or under whatsoever Denomination they pass at the Time The foresaid Doctrine is no less Absurd and Heretical when it proceeds from A. B. and her adherents than as it is disseminated be the Socinians who pretend to be Christians as well as they for they all strick at the root of Christianity teaching that Christ suffered for our behoof but not in our stead that it is enough to say He set Captives free whereas Redemption imports paying of the Ransom also for us both of them deny the Vindicative Justice of GOD pretending to cry up his Love and though they pretend to the highest Reason yet how unreasonable is it to say that the SON of GOD suffered as He did without a necessity of satisfying the Justice of GOD thereby and suffering of the greatest of Punishments due to Us for Sin And without which all Mankind had perished eternally as well as the Devils It was the admirable free Love of GOD which made the Difference and it is the great Foundation of Saving Faith That when we were sinners outlaws and rebells Christ dyed for Us Rom. 5.8 Now I shall cite the Scriptures for the Satisfaction of Christ whereby I am perswaded that the Impartial Reader will easily perceive that the foresaid Doctrine of the Socinians and A. B. is inconsistent therewith and so inconsistent with the Creed and the Essentials of Religion notwithstanding of her Profession and her Ap. to the contrary John 10.25 I lay down my Life for my Sheep Mat 20 28. The Son of Man came to give his Life a Ransome for many Acts 4 12. There is none other name under Heaven given whereby we must be saved Gal 3 13. Christ hath Rdeemed us from the Curse of the Law being made a Curse for us Eph 5 2. Christ hath given himself for us an Offering and a Sacrifice to GOD 1 John 2 2. He is the Propitiation for our sins Rev. 5 9. Thou hast Redeemed us to GOD by thy Blood These Texts pondered It may probably seem strange to some who rashly were taken with A. Bs. Books how any Christian could have written so perversely of Christ as is forementioned but they may marvel the less when they finde her writting very often liker to an Infidel than a Christian as when she asserts that Mahometans and Gentiles may be saved by resigning their wills to GOD without mentioning Faith in Christ that the Jews are yet the People of GOD that they love GOD more than any other People that their being despised may perhaps satisfie for putting Him GOD to Death and that their hopes of the Messiah yet to come is well founded on the Word of GOD. L. W. pt 2. p. 127 131 and pt 3 p. 3. 168. How can the Jews be the People of GOD who were cast off for their Infidelity in S. Pauls days Rom. 11.15 If the Love of GOD which A. B. boasts of so much be of that kinde with the Jews love to GOD then it is but a lifeless Fancie instead of the true Love of GOD since the Jews have not Faith in Christ and True Faith worketh by Love Gal. 5.6 of which in a number a part afterwards neither Jewes Gentiles Mahometans or any Infidels can resign their will to GOD remaining Infidels so it is nonsense and repugnancie in the adject to write that they doe for none can be Accepted of GOD but by Faith in his beloved Son the only Mediatour Eph. 1.6 What a rare piece of confidence is it for A. B. and the Ap. to aver that they own the Creed and the essentials of Religion and to mantain the direct contradiction thereof for if the Jewes expectation of the Messiah yet to come be well founded on the Word of GOD as she sayes in the fore cited place then the Christian Belief is not well founded thereupon that in the fulness of time as Gal 4.4.5 he was conceived by the Holy Ghost and born of the Virgin Mary and the rest of the Articles of the Creed concerning Him are false if A. B. speak Truth For the Messiah to have already come according to the Prophecies in the Scripture and performed the work of our Redemption in the exercise of His three fold Office and to be yet to come as the Jewes vainly expect is a flat contradiction nor can I conjecture what the wit or cunning of any Ap. can answer for A. B. in these things unless it be said that A. B. is generally misunderstood for her Christ is not our Christ mentioned in the Belief who was Prophecied of in the Old Testament and of whom the New Testament is an History But her Christ is an imaginary Christ which proceeded from Adam before the Woman was made and came not of the Seed of the Woman L. Etoile dumatin p. 32.33 and Ap. pt 1. p. 47. And to evite a very strong Argument against her fantastical Christianity taken from Gen 3 15. which is the first promise of Christ importing the very tenor of the Covenant of Grace she brings forth a rare sort of new coined blasphemy like John of Leyden or Nailour the Quaker who called themselves the Messiah so she affirms that she is That Womans Seed which should bruise the Head of the Serpent L W. pt 3. p. 47. This is that A. B. of whom De Cort. her admirer says Pref. to the L. W. p. 41. That no Body since the Creation of the World Explaines the Scriptures so well as she doth but behold what it comes to The Ap. pt 2. from p. 90. to the 100 useth much Art to smooth the Doctrine of A. B. against the Satisfaction of Christ He distinguisheth a mans being substituted to suffer for another and declares that A. B. held such a substitution to be false and diabolical as procures a discharge to the Party offending but granted a substitution of love whereby Christ merited that we should by our penitence merit Salvation adding our own merits to Christs Sacrifice to satisfie the Justice of GOD and mockes at a man who declares he is but a frail creature and hopes to be saved
of God c. The Prophets and Apostles were without any previous Ratiocination of themselves powerfully moved by God both to Teach and Write the Rule of Faith and Manners and that infallibly both as to Matter and Words which they proved to be immediat Objective Revelation or rather Gods word than their own 1 Thess 2.13 by the gift of Tongues Miracles Oracles Visions discovering of Secrets foretelling things to come and the conversion of men to God beyond and above the ordinary Humane Means The phrase thus explained I come to state and answer the Question to wit if A. B. was Divinely inspired The Ap. spends the third part of his Treatise being 38 leaves aiming to prove that A. B. was led by the Spirit of God or what is the same on the matter divinely inspired but never shewing in what sense or meaning he would have the World believe that she was so and therefore all discoursing to that purpose looks too like a continued Sophism commonly called Ignorantio Elenchi or a Fallacious way of arguing seeming to prove the thing intended by an hudle of pretended Arguments which yet conclude nothing as to the main point under Debate Viz. In what sense or respect he alleadgeth his A. B. to have been Divinely inspired 1. Which now to examine particularly I grant that she was Divinely Inspired in the first of the five respects forementioned i. e. She had a Rational Soul if ever there was such a person as A. B. which some doubt of who lived in Flanders about the time she is said to have been at Lisle and yet heard nothing of her but this is not all which the party means by her being Divinely inspired since she pretends to more than an ordinary Spirit 2. It is more to be doubted if she was divinely inspired in the second sense to wit if she was fitted and well qualified for the condition and imployment that she set out for in the World which was three fold the Mistris of a Familie a School-Mistris and a Prophetess or a Teacher to reform all Mankind There is but little evidence given in her own writtings of he Discretion and far less of Divine inspiration in guiding either her School or Family tho she pretended to the knowledge of discerning Spirits and the very thoughts of peoples hearts Pref. to L. W. p. 41 for she testifieth of her self S. V pt 1. p. 196. how all her 32 Scholars at Lisle were in Actual compact with the Devil and yet did very well what she taught them Also the Ap. writes of her pt 4. p. 323. that all her Servants were Witches and for a long time designed to murder her for her Riches yet mentioneth nothing that ever she dismissed them before her Death And if she had a Prophetical Spirit that shall be tryed anon 3. The third and fourth Respects may be considered together whereanent I charitably think that A. B. was a pious person and so was led by the Spirit of God as any other godly person is Rom. 8.1 But this concession will not satisfie the Ap. who holds her to have been incomparably holy and to have exceeded in knowledge the greatest Divines pt 3. p. 240.241 And therefor her pretension must be tryed in another sense Obj. How can she be called pious who wrote many Errours and was very proud and Uncharitable A. 1. She spake aright of Religion in sundry things which might have been by Divine Conduct but in her Mistakes and Errours she was led by her own spirit Ap. p. 216.217 As she confesseth in another Case when she was deluded by St. Saulien p. 239. And it is probable that she intended not to have written Lies or Fopperies which happened either through her want of the means of true Knowledge or the neglecting thereof as the Reading of the Holy Spriptures and Systems of Divinity and medling with things too high for her Ps 131.1 She might have been Pious tho not pefect and persons ought to be charactered from their better pairt and not from the worst from the set of their Spirit and tract of their Life rather than from particular Actions or Escapes and especially if they endeavour to discover and mortifie all Sins in themselves 2. This Obj. might be easily answered in the opinion of A. B. that Saints may apostatise totally and finally even they who have attained to perfection and could keep all the Commandments of God Which is defended be the Ap. pt 2. p 136. which yet is a gross Errour as shall afterward be shown for according to her Hypothesis it might follow that she wrote only Truth she was Humble and Charitable so long as she continued in the state of Grace but wrote her Errours became Proud and Uncharitable how soon she lost the Grace of God and fell into the estate of Damnation 4. As to the fifth Sense or Consideration of the Conduct of the Spirit of God which is the publick and ordinary acceptation of it namely a Prophetick infallible Spirit This I positively affirm A. B. had not in her writtings and so the Question is answered Negativly in Oposition to the affirmation of A. B. and her Ap. and it is thus proved 1. The Holy Scriptures which were written by the Holy Prophets and Apostles have a self Evidence in them shewing themselves to be the Word of God or the Dictats of the Holy Spirit to wit the matchless Sublimity of the matter the Holiness Purity and Harmony of the whole the Efficacie or effectual working for converting Souls to God besids their confirmation from the Pen-mens speaking of all Languages which they had never heard nor learned and other Miracles accompanying them extraordinary Visions sure Prophecies the Antiquity and preservation of the samen and the Confession of Adversaries But A. Bs. writtings have nothing the like Confirmation and therefore she had no Divine Inspiration in writting them The Major is granted by all Christians and the Minor is also clear since neither A. B. nor her Ap. pretend to such Testimonys tho their pretence be very high 2. The Scriptures written be men Divinely inspired are a perfect Rule in Religion teaching us how to glorifie God and be saved our selves 2 Tim. 3 16.17 That the man of God may be prrfect And we are to hold them accursed who would add to this Canon Gal. 1.8 Rev. 22 18. Therefore A. B. dare not pretend to such inspiration under pain of the curse Obj. You have wronged A. B. by mistateing the Question for she did not pretend to Prophecie or to write by an Infallible Spirit as the Prophets and Apostles did but only to interpret the Scriptures to live well and to teach others to do so L W. pt 1. p. 133. There she promiseth to write a Commentary upon the whole Scriptures tho she never performed it A. First denying the Charge for she is not wronged by me nor the Question mistated since it is the ordinary and received Sense of the Phrase to be
Divinely Inspired or to be led by the Spirit of God in writting to write by an Infallible Spirit as the Prophets and Apostles did who were the Amanuenses of the Holy Ghost 2. Though she durst not speak it out in plain Terms that she acclaimed no less than such a Spirit as the Prophets and Apostles had lest the Readers at the first sight had cryed fy upon her for Blasphemie but goes on in Clouds and Darkness never declaring in what Sense she was Divinely inspired yet I say on the matter she acclaimed no less for these Reasons 1. First because when it was objected to her by Divines that she had not such Knowledge as the Prophets had and wrought no Miracles she shifted to give any direct answer but slily strived to diminish their Credit and of the Holy Scriptures also alleadging that the Prophets knew not all things which they wrote that all of them wrought not Miracles that the Devil had opened the eyes of the blind and raised the Dead and that the Lord himself was mistaken I tremble relating it anent the Fig Tree Mat. 11.19 L. W. pt 1. p. 136. Ap. p. 168.203.204.205.206 and 222.223 All which Calumnies might be easily refuted but I leave that Task to those who are writting against them more Copiously 2. The very Title of her Book is Blasphemous to wit The Light of the World which is the Epithite given to CHRIST and his Apostles and in assuming that Title she equaliseth her self to them tho injuriously 3. It is evident that she pretended to such a Spirit as the Apostles had when she affirmed that she could write such a Book as the New Testament L. W. pt 1 p 133. Now if she could have so written then she could have done it either by a fallible or infallible Spirit if only by a fallible Spirit then it could not have been such a Book but if by an infallible Spirit then she acclaimed such a Spirit as the Apostles had which the Objector denyes Many more Instances might be adduced to this purpose but these may suffice 3. Thirdly I answer to the grand Objection that she pretended not to write a New Canon or Rule of Faith but only to expound the Scriptures giving but not granting that her pretensions did run no higher that same is too high The Quakers acknowledge that their Spirit is somewhat inferiour to the Prophets Quakerism no Popery p. 32.33 Mr. G. K. The learned Author whereof is no Quaker now Yea the Roman Church it self would be offended if any man should say that they coine new Tenets in Religion or that they did more by their Dogmatising then to expound the Scriptures and dispense the Churches Traditions but by a Prophetical Light and Divine influence as their doctrine in this point is well collected by Amyrald in Thes Salmur de aut Script n. 15.16 So for A. B. to pretend Divine Conduct to expound the Scriptures better than all others is too great Arrogancie Q. Will you not allow A. B. to have had more of Divine Conduct than you have done alreadie that possibly she had it only in some things which she did and taught as ordinarily every Godly Person hath in what he does aright A. I have granted enough in the said Terms and more I cannot because it is sufficiently proved that she was not Divinely inspired as the Pen-men of the Holy Scriptures were either to add to the Canonical Books or to interpret Scripture infallibly as they did neither was she led by the Divine Spirit as an ordinary Officer in the Church to interpret and apply the Scriptures which is Preaching since she was not fitted for that end by the means of Gods appointment nor yet observed the Rules thereof Neh. 8.8 Ezra the Scribe with the Priests and Levits read in the Book of the Law distinctly and gave the sense and made the People to understand the reading Timothy the Evangelist was enjoined Reading 1 Tim. 4.13 and since his Days all Holy and Wise Men who interpret the Scriptures pray to God for the Direction of his Spirit which indyted them that they may Prophecie according to the Proportion of Faith Rom. 12.6 They compare Scripture with Scripture and look to the Scope of the place they study the Languages in which the Scriptures were first written Histories likewise and Customs of several Countries Proverbial Speeches and famous Writters of them which are often cited and frequent Allusions made thereto in the Holy Scriptures they read the Creeds Confessions of Faith Catechisms and Systems of Divinity of the Orthodox Churches both Ancient and Modern they search for Truth by the Literal Sense of the whole Scriptures pondering well whether or no the speech be in Terms proper to the things treated of or borrowed from other things which is called a figurative Speech By these and the like means the settled and ordinary Teachers and Expositors of the Scriptures doe begging the blessing of God Humbly and Assiduously endeavour to be fitted for the great and Sacred function of labouring in the Word and Doctrine But A. B. does not so much as pretend to use these means nor yet to expound the Scriptures by the true Rules but on the Contrary she laid by the Scriptures and contemned all Systems of Divinity and other helps of Learning Therefore she was not fit or qualified to expound the Scriptures even as an ordinary Teacher So since A. B. was not led by the Spirit of God to write her Books and expound the Scriptures either in an Ordinary or Extraordinary way It remains then that she performed these things by no other Faculty but by Guessing and vain Divination nor can I add a Fourth Member to this Tripartite Division tho possibly the fertile Brain of a new Ap. will gender one shewing how one can be led by the Spirit of God to write not by an Infallible Spirit nor as an Ordinary Teacher nor yet to be a Meer Guesser or pretender to it which as the Roman Proverb was Let the credulous Jew believe not I. To put a Period to this long Section I shall produce all the pretended Reasons which the Ap pt 3. p. 240 and 241. Alleadgeth for proving A. B. to have been Divinely Inspired and shall answer them severally as if they had been Objected against my Conclusion on this Head Obj. 1. Her Doctrine was conform to the Scriptures therefore she was Divinely Inspired A. 1. Denying the Antecedent for her Doctrine was mostly contrary to the Scriptures as God willing shall be Manifested in the next Section 2. I deny likewise the Consequence because a persons Doctrine may be conform to the Scriptures who had no extraordinary Inspiration Obj. 2. She was Unlearned and yet exceeded the greatest Divines A. 1. She exceeded them only in Vanity 2. George Fox was unlearned so he gave it out that all his Divinity was revealed to him among the Hils of Lancaster And Jacob Bhemen the pretended illuminated Sutor wrote seventeen Books
like A. Bs. yet none of them was Divinely Inspired Q. Instance How could an unlearned Person write as she did without Divine Inspiration A. 1. It is much doubted if Poiret or some other man wrote not these Books that are said to be hers 2. It is very conceavable how one Unlearned but of a Melancholly Temper and Luxuriant Fancie might write such Books getting Terms of Art by Converse with Learned Men and a Schem and Copy of their Fancies and high flown Notions by reading some of these called Mystiches such as Theular and Joannes à Cruce yet without Divine Inspiration Obj 3. She wrote without premeditation and did neither correct nor read over what she once wrote A. That is not like to be true yet if it was indeed so then her writtings are somuch the worse Obj 4. She had no Worldly aim therefore c. A. Many pretended Enthusiasts seemed to have as little who yet were not Divinely Inspired Obj. 5. She reached the Consciences of Others therefore c. A. All Sectaries and Shismaticks have the like pretension accounting the People of their perswasion the only Inlightned and Godly Party having the Old Gnosticks for their Patrons in Monopolising Godliness to themselves Iren. L. 1. G. 1. see Corse instr L. 1. C. 37. and L. 14.2.1 whereas the truly Orthodox rather make one Christian than an hundred of their Opinion Obj. 6. Her Writtings had no contradiction in them therefore c. A. It shall be shown she had in the next Section as for Example on this present Subject She affirmed that one might know by his Natural Spirit her self to be Divinely Inspired Ap. pt 3. p. 197 But against that p. 200. None can discern her to be Divinely Inspired who is not so himself now to know a certain thing by the Natural Spirit and not to know it thereby is a Contradiction but to know by the Natural and not to know but by the Divine Spirit is to know and not to know by the Natural Spirit which is a clear Contradiction of her self whereas GOD's Spirit cannot contradict Himself He being Truth it self Obj. 7. She had a Pious Life and taught rare Penitence therefore c. A. St. Aug. Epis 106. accounts that Pelagius the Arch Heretick deceived many by the strictness of his Life and Doctrine so he taught the Doctrine revived now by A. B. That riches should be abandoned and that we can by a strict penitence merit remission of sins c. Obj. 8. A. B. affirmed that she was Divinely Inspired therefore c. A. But I have proven the contrary therefore she was not Divinely Inspired SECTION IV. Q. If the Doctrine of A. B. be conform to the Holy Scriptures A. THis is the second Material Head in this Tractate for if it be true which is often written be A. B. and her Ap. That her Doctrine is agreeable to the Holy Scriptures which are the only Publick Standard of Truth then it would be most injurious for any man to offer to give Chek unto it Therefore I hope it will be no less profitable than pleasant to the Readers that this be fairly put to the Test and if it appear upon an impartial inquirie that not a little but very much of A. Bs. Doctrine be alien from and contrary to the Scriptures it may happily prove an Antidote for ingenuous People that they swallow not down her Poisonous Errours together with her Varnisht Pretensions to Devotion and Piety for to write Errours pretending to be Divinely Inspired makes the sin the more hainous to father Untruths upon the Spirit of Truth SUBSECTION I. Anent the Essentials of Religion THe essence of any thing is that which we conceive in the first place as the definitive Idea or formal Notion of it and without which it could not be such a being as the Soul and Body are the Essential Parts of Man so the Essentials of Religion are these most necessary and fundamentall Truths which if any Person disown he is accounted an Atheist or Heretick and none of the True Religion In the beginning of the next Subsection I purpose 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to consider the Aps. distinction of Essential and Accessory Verities and at the present for dispatching's sake shall admit of his Definition of the Essentials of Religion p. 1. p. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. that they are such Truths without the Express Knowledge and Belief of which none can be eternally saved A. B. and the Ap profess that they own the Apostles Creed and that they are content that her Doctrine be entirely tryed by the Holy Scriptures L. W. Pref. to the English Reader now their Knowledge and Ingenuity in that main Point whether or no their Doctrine be agreeable to the Scripture and the Creed which is collected therefrom shall be brought to the tryal distinctly in the subsequent part of this Section SECTION IV. SUBS. I. N. I. Concerning GOD and the Blessed Trinity THe word Religion is taken from a Latine word Religando Binding for it is an Holy Law or Doctrine binding or obliedging Man to worship and serve GOD and binding us to Him for our own Salvation It is the Chief thing in Religion to have true Knowledge of GOD in order to the glorifying of Him and next to that how we shall be happy by Him John 17.3 This is Life Eternal that they may know Thee the only true GOD and JESUS CHRIST whom thou hast sent Heb. 11.6 For he that cometh to GOD must believe that He is and that He is a rewarder of them that diligently seek Him But A. B. had not a right notion of GOD Almighty when she wrote that man is made as a little God in his Divine nature inclosed in his humanity Our Souls are little Divinities The Soul is GOD and GOD is the Soul We are not to seek GOD without us GOD made us Deities depending upon Him The Church is an invisible Spirit and the Church is GOD himself S. V. pt 1. p. 54.75 L. W. pt 1. p. 42.53 110.111.113 and pt 3 p. 92. Such Doctrine cannot abide the Test of the Holy Scriptures which teach us that GOD is the most perfect Being most Simple Infinite Immense Immutable Independent and Eternal whereof the contrary properties are in the Creatures Deut. 6.4 The LORD our GOD is one LORD But if the Church or the Soul of man be GOD then there must be more Gods then One which to affirm were blasphemous and hereticall The Ap. p. 52. attempts to answer this citing John 17.21 and thence infering that seeing man may have some sort of union with GOD A. Bs. words may be favourably Interpreted That is but a weak subterfuge for the Learned Author doubtless knows that the Text John 17.21 and its Parallels do not excuse A. Bs. foresaid language for CHRISTS praying That Believers might be one in Him and one among themselves imports only their being Members of His Mystical Body that thereby they might recover the
like that a Preacher wrote the Ap. for else he had not accused all others of dryness 3. As the pretended inspired A. B. is most vain glorious that she only had discovered the Love of GOD to be the great end of Religion so is she no less proud of the means that she had attained to obtain it namely such a penitence and self denyall as merited remission of sins and which should be added to the Sacrifice of Christ Lae. Temoing de verite pt 1.59.61.64 and Ap. pt 2. p. 91.99 But we have not so learned Christ Rom. 6.23 Pardon of sin and eternal Life are none of our merit but GOD 'S free Gifts procured by Christs merits Eph. 2.8 whereof possibly more afterwards 4. You have hitherto narrated such instances as convince my self of her ignorance in the main point of Religion whereto a fourth shall be added which probably will abait the fondness of her admirers if it doth not altogether break her party if they consider it aright who noticed not before what doctrine she taught and that is that every good Christian must abandon Riches and Honour and take no more of them but what is simply needful for the sustenance of Nature and that of the least and meanest sort for the strain of the Doctrine which her Party cryeth up runeth thus A good Christian seeks to attain to the Love of GOD in perfection which to do we must renounce self love and love of the Creatures and none can doe that but they who renounce Riches and take meat and cloathing only to sustain Nature S. V. pt 1. p. 58. 59. L. W. pt 1. p. 121. Ap pt 1. p. 66. 67. Now let all that have doted upon Borignianism prove themselves to be her true Proselites by this plat form of her levelling which ere they doe I am of Opinion she will have but a very small Train of either Sex As Henry Martin said in the Rump Parliament in England when it was proposed to purge it quite of Immoral Men purge it also said Martin of all Knaves and Fools and then we shall have but a thin House NUMBER V. Of the Holy Scriptures IT is doubtless of the Essence of Religion to have right Sentiments of the Holy Scriptures which are the word of GOD and the Rule of Religion But many of A. Bs. and the Aps. Sentiments are wrong in this matter for First she perverts most of the Texts which are cited in her Books whereof one pregnant instance is already shown anent Gen. 3.15 N. 2. another is of Mat 5.45 He maketh his Sun to shine on the Evil and on the Good from which A. B. inferreth that the Wicked have the true Grace of GOD L. W. pt 1. p. 43. whereas the words import only that Worldly things such as the Suns light are common both to good and evil People 2ly They derogate from the Authority of the Holy Scriptures which is altogether Divine and Infallible the Ap. pt 2. p. 179 Approves Teresa a Spainard a pretended inspired Teacher who when she was urged with that Text 1 Tim. 2.12 I suffer not a Woman to Teach did answer that GOD bid her not to be directed by one passage of Scripture for there was a twofold falsehood if not rather a lie in the answer of Terese for there is a parallel Text to the foresaid purpose 1 Cor. 14.34 And GOD bids us be directed by his Word as well as when it is found in one passage of Scripture as if it were in twenty so it was the Devil and not GOD that suggested such an answer to her As Tertul long since wrote that all Hereticks Strive to derogate from the Scriptures and whosoever doth deprave any part of the Scriptures he rejects all because they are all from the same Authority Adversus Heres de prescrip c. 49. 3ly They disregard and contemn the Holy Scriptures Diod. Sic. L. 14. reports that Theopompus a Pagan Historian when he had inserted some part of the Holy Scriptures into his prophane writtings did run mad I shall not say that A. B. was mad but probably she was Hypocondriack for writting as she did anent the Scriptures exhorting people to imitat herself in not reading the New Testament for twenty Years and affirming that she could write such a Book as it that it was not hitherto understood by any and only slightly allowing people to read the BIBLE that are not otherwayes taught S. V. pt 1. p. 120. Ap. p. 347. L. W. pt 1. p. 120. Whereas the Holy Spirit teacheth us to search the Scriptures daily Acts 17.11 The truely Divinely Inspired take their warrand from the Scriptures 2 Pet. 1.19 Though they were immediatly taught of God And it was a thing more impossible for A. B. for to write such a Book as the New Testament than to have joined the land of Flanders to England for she could have written such a Book either by a fallible or an infallible Spirit if by a fallible Spirit only then it could not have been such a Book which was written by men infallibly inspired and not by an infallible Spirit because she had it not as is proven Sect. 3. Hence may be espyed a piece of very goodly confidence in the Ap. pt 2. p. 179. affirming that none could vilifie A. Bs. way of handling Scriptures but they who have a secret disgust at it whereas on the contrary out of love to the Scripture I openly disgust her abusing it NUMBER VI. Miscellanies relating to the Essentials of Religion THere are many other heads of Doctrine nearly relating to the Essentials of Religion ill treated of in the writings of the Authors whom I deal with and abruptly brought in by them without any Logical order some of which shall be noticed in this last Number together as they have occurred to my observation in seven distinct points that this Subsection concerning A. Bs. Essentials may terminate in a certain method POINT I. Of GOD'S Decrees and the Doctrines depending thereupon AS A. B. hath not written right things of GOD about the Essentials of Religion so nor of the integrals thereof though there be sundry of the samen which have so near a relation to and connection with the Essentials that by sound Divines they are truely called Circa Fundamentals For her Tenets anent the high and mysterious Decrees of GOD and many Doctrines depending thereupon such as the Operation of Divine Grace upon the Will of Man and the Perseverance of the Saints they are in my Judgement both contrary to the express Letter of the Holy Scriptures and the interpretation thereof by the Orthodox Church For she frequently affirms in the general that GOD had no Eternal Decrees nor praescience of the Actions of free Agents and in special that He had no Eternal Decree of Predestination L. W. pt 3. p. 154. which is contrary to Psal 33.11 The Counsel of the Lord standeth for ever the thoughts of His Heart to all Generations Acts 15.18 Known unto GOD