Selected quad for the lemma: scripture_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
scripture_n	ghost_n	holy_a	inspire_v	2,844	5	10.2489	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A09442	Lectures vpon the three first chapters of the Reuelation: preached in Cambridge anno Dom. 1595. by Master William Perkins, and now published for the benefite of this Church, by Robert Hill Bachelor in Diuinitie. To which is added an excellent sermon, penned at the request of that noble and wise councellor, Ambrose, Earle of Warwicke: in which is proued that Rome is Babylon, and that Babylon is fallen	Perkins, William, 1558-1602.; Hill, Robert, d. 1623.	1604 (1604)	STC 19731; ESTC S114472	318,460	389

in vision Now S. Iohn saw the holy Ghost in forme of seuen lights in a vision Reu. 4. 5. Which are before the throne This he speakes by comparison taken from earthly kings which fitting in their thrones do there shew their might and maiestie most So S. Iohn he saw God the Father sitting in a throne by vision and Christ at his right hand and before the throne the holy Ghost Hence it followes not that he is inferiour to the Father and to the Sonne but by this comparison and kind of speech S. Iohn sets out the office of the holy Ghost which is to be sent by the Father and Sonne to the Church to enlighten the members thereof and to sanctifie them Seeing that he ascribes grace and peace from God the father and also from the seuen spirits that is the holy Ghost hence we note the holy Ghost is very God for from whom grace and peace proceeds he is perfect and very God We learne that we may direct our prayers to the holy Ghost for to whom grace and peace is ascribed to him we may direct our prayers seeing he can giue grace c. but they be ascribed to him and he can giue them ergo we may pray to him for them There be some which doubt whether we may pray to the holy Ghost but they may aswell doubt whether he be God or not but they say we haue no example Ans. It is false for here we haue an example for though this grace and peace c. be a blessing yet in substance it is a prayer as though he had said O Father Sonne and holy Ghost let thy grace and peace be vpon the Church Which are before the throne of the Father Hence we note the holy Ghost is a substance and a person subsisting not a quality as some Heretikes hold confessing the Godhead of the Father of the Sonne and denying the Godhead of the holy Ghost But here we see for the holy Ghost he is a substance and person subsisting standing before the throne of the Father not a gift or grace proceeding from God but a person distinguished from the Father and the Sonne the Father he sits on the throne the Sonne is on his right hand the holy Ghost distinguished from them both stands before the throne And from Iesus Christ. That is grace and peace from Iesus Christ. Where Christ Iesus is ioyned to the Father and the holy Ghost in bestowing grace and peace on his Church Ob. Why is Christ the second person of the Trinitie placed after the holy Ghost the third Person Answ. For two causes First Christ is considered two wayes first as he is the Sonne of the Father secondly as he is the Mediator of the Church Now as he is the Sonne of the Father he is the second Person in Trinitie and so before the holy Ghost in order Secondly as he is Mediator and so he is after them both the Father and the holy Ghost Esa. 61. 1. The Spirit of the Lord is vpon me hath sent me to preach Where Christ is sent by the holy Ghost to preach as he is Mediator and so as he is sent in that respect he is after the holy Ghost Secondly he is placed after the holy Ghost because the maner of them which pen the Scriptures is to set them in the last place of whom they meane to speake last So Mat. 1. he setting downe the genealogie of Christ from Abraham though in all those there was none more excellent then Christ yet he is in the last place because of order the Euangelist meaning to speak and treat of him he sets him in the last place purposing still to continue his historie of the life and death of Christ. So here S. Iohn he placed Christ in the last place because he purposed to continue his historie in speaking of the death and passion of Christ and other things which concerne him Now what saith he of Christ From this fift till the ninth verse he describes Christ first by his offices secondly by the execution of his offices His offices are three first he is set out by his propheticall office in these words which is that faithfull witnesse secondly by his priestly office the first begotten of the dead thirdly by his kingly office and that Prince of the kings of the earth First his propheticall office First he is a witnesse Secondly a faithfull witnesse Thirdly that faithfull witnesse First he is a witnesse Esa. 55. 4. I gaue him to be a witnesse to the nations In that he is called a witnesse there are signified many duties of his propheticall office as first to reueale the will of his Father secondly to certifie the Church of the certaintie of the same and in these two stand his whole office propheticall First to reueale his Fathers will to the Church is his office for there is none which knowes his Fathers will but he which came from the bosome of the Father and he hath declared it Ioh. 1. 18. And he hath not onely declared his Fathers will since he came in the flesh but from the beginning he reuealed the will and word of God When the Lord rained fire on Sodome Gen. 19. 24. there Iehouah the Father rained downe by Iehouah the Sonne So when the couenant was made to our first parents it was made in Christ the promised seed It was renewed to Abraham and the Patriarkes from the Father by the Sonne as appeared in the bush where Iehouah appeared but 1. Cor. 10. there he is called Christ. The Prophets and the Apostles wrote as they were inspired by Christ they were but his instruments to speake and write that he put into them by the holy Ghost The matter and the stile and phrase of the Scripture all came from Christ. Nay when any particular man comes to vnderstand the Scriptures this is by the working of Christ he opens their eyes He gaue the disciples vnderstanding as they went to Emaus to vnderstand the Scriptures The second duty of Christ is to certifie men of his Fathers will and that in conscience of the certainty of his Fathers will This certification is generall or particular When he certifieth men that the word written or spoken by man out of the word is the word of God neither nature nor learning can do this but it is proper to Christs Propheticall office and for this he saith to his disciples he will send them the comforter which shall leade them into all truth Here we must know first by what meanes he assureth vs secondly the principall cause of this assurance The meanes is the word it selfe The principall cause is the operation of the holy Ghost By this three points are resolued First the Papists aske how a man can come to know that the Scriptures read and taught be the word of God Answ. We must here haue recourse to the word and to the faithfull witnesse and desire

seruants in the generall calling of a Christian but in our particular callings For S. Iohn was his seruant not onely in beleeuing in him and obeying him generally but in beleeuing and obeying him in the particular calling of an Apostle So Paule he was the seruant of Christ not only generally but in the speciall calling of the Gospell in preaching the same This example of his and the Apostles must be our direction we must not content our selues with the generall calling of Christians but serue Christ in our particular callings It is not inough to professe Christ in publike assemblies to heare the word receiue the Sacraments but in our particular callings we must serue him at home as the magistrate not onely in his generall calling of Christianitie but in his particular calling as he is a magistrate the Minister as he is a Minister the maister of a familie as he is a maister and so all men in their particular callings must obey Christ. And if the maister of a familie come to the assembly heare the word receiue the Sacraments yet in his familie faile and performe not the duties of a maister he is but an hypocrite he is no true Christian though men accept so of him because he must be obedient to Christ both in generall and particular calling Now followeth the second argument by which Iohn is described namely the effect that he bare record of the word of God Which Iohn bare this record partly by preaching partly by penning the Gospell of Christ. And because the word of God hath two parts the Law and the Gospell he shewes in the next words that he meanes especially the Gospell of Christ adding Of things done and sayd by Christ. And lest any man should call his testimonie into question he saith he testifies that whereof he was an eye witnesse he saw it and therefore could not be deceiued and therefore his testimonie was true The end why he alleageth these words is to shew that he is a faithfull pen-man of this booke that so it might haue more reuerence for he which was faithfull in penning the Gospell of Christ the same also is faithfull in penning this Prophecie of the Church By these words we may gather that to testifie the doctrine of the Prophets and Apostles to be the truth of God is a true note of a true Prophet And by these we may distinguish betweene a true Prophet and a false if they bring the doctrine of the Apostles and the Prophets it is true Deut. 13. If they worke wonders and their doctrine be to draw men from the true God they are false Prophets and must be put to death And our Sauiour Christ being asked of his authoritie he alledges Luk. 10. 1. Iohns testimonie and confirmeth Iohns testimonie to be true asking them this question The baptisme of Iohn was it from heauen or of men shewing that Iohn was a true Prophet seeing his Baptisme that is his doctrine was from heauen Hereby we see the difference of a true Prophet and false alledged by the Papists is no true difference for they say If one can worke miracles he is a true Prophet whereas Deut. 13. false Prophets may do that But the true marke of a true Prophet is the doctrine deliuered by the Prophets and Apostles and he which brings this though he can not worke a miracle is a true Prophet Now followeth the sixth argument by which this reuelation is described which is in the manner of propounding and deliuering of it to the Church And this maner and forme of deliuerie of it stands in foure degrees First God the Father giueth it to Christ the Mediator Secondly Christ the Mediatour and head of the Church giueth it to an Angell Thirdly the Angell conueyes it to Iohn the Apostle Fourthly Iohn directed and assisted by the holie Ghost deliuereth it to the Churches Now as this particular booke was so no doubt all the whole Scriptures were conueyed to the Church Now in that the Lord hath so conueyed his Scriptures to man we see his perpetuall care and loue of man and of the members of his Church Also we see the great excellencie and dignitie as also the perfection of these bookes seeing they were deliuered to man by God and by him he deliuers his will to his Church This shewes the blasphemie and sin of the Church of Rome who call the written word of God a dead letter a dumbe iudge they hold that generall Councels be equall to the word that the vniuersall consent of the Church is aboue the Scriptures it giues life and sense to them which otherwise they say of themselues be but an inkie and dumbe word But we see they be farre aboue all these for they be most absolute and perfect and also most excellent seeing they being giuen of God the Father to Christ the mediator and head of the Church and by him conueyed to an Angell who deliuers them to Iohn and he published them to the Church these degrees of the deliuerie of thē shew they be most excellent and perfect Blessed are they which heare c. Here is the seuenth and last argument of this description of the Reuelation which is by the fruite effect and the profite which comes of it being heard or read and ioyned with marking and attention it brings happinesse Blessed That is blessednesse which stands in the fellowship of God and life euerlasting belongs to them which heare and reade this booke and marke it keepe it in memorie remember the things contained in it being a prophecie of the estate of the Church partly present partly to come Blessed is he which reades Here the holy Ghost setteth downe the proper end of the Scriptures of this booke particularly For the ende of this booke and so of all other bookes of the Scriptures is to bring men to happinesse and felicitie and life euerlasting Ioh. 20. last the Scriptures be to make vs beleeue in Christ that so beleeuing we might haue eternall life 1. Ioh. 1. ● He declared to them the word of Christ that by it they might haue fellowship with God the Father Sonne and holy Ghost which fellowship is true happinesse it selfe Ioh. 5. 39. Search the scriptures for in them you thinke to haue eternall life And in this they differ from all other books and writings of men For mens writings being penned either by the light of nature and so be thence erronious and misse of the end of happinesse and euerlasting life or else they be penned by them which haue light by by the word and so as they agree with the word they be grounded on the word and haue all their truth from it Seeing the end of this booke as of the other bookes of scripture is to bring men to happinesse we see the opinion and practise of the Church of Rome is damnable who barre the people of God from reading and hearing the Scriptures in their vulgar tongue for in barring them of

all three and that the Father doth the Sonne doth and what the Sonne doth the holy Ghost and the Father do in outward actions Secondly Christ after his ascension teacheth not bodily but by his spirit for Christ being at his Fathers right hand sendeth his comforter to leade vs into all truth Now seeing the holy Ghost speaks in the Scripture he teacheth vs we see how the church of Rome sinneth in that they will haue a iudge which must speake for Christ he being in heauen and the Scriptures being not able to speake but are as a dumme iudge therefore the Church that is men in the Church they must be iudge of Scriptures But we see that the holy Ghost speaketh in the Scriptures and Christ he is iudge alone of them The Church is an instrument onely and cannot giue sentence of them but they be of themselues sufficient to take away any doubt whatsoeuer 2 Faith is no part of repentance but a cause of it for they be 2 distinct parts of Christianity the first a sermon beleeue and repent where repentance followeth faith as a fruite of it Thirdly obedience is no part of repentance but a cause thereof ergo repentance stands not in these three properties neither is all one with regeneratiō for this goeth before them for godly sorrow is the cause of repentance but regeneration is before godly sorow ergo before repentance too The second point is how we must practise repentance this stands in two things first true humiliation secondly true reformation of life Humiliation stands in confessing our sins miseries and wants and in condemning our selues for them and in harty praier to God for pardō Reformation is the changing of our bad actions to good and if need require to make satisfaction to men Dauid Psal. 32. first humbled himselfe secondly he prayed for pardon and withall promiseth reformation of life Manasses fel from God but he prayed to God humbled himselfe 2. Cron. 33. 12. So the prodigal son And Dauid in all these Psalmes of repentance humbles himself Psal. 32. 38. 51. 130. 143. 77. And so must we do if we truly repent Then we see the dānable doctrine of the Papists which make repentance stand in contrition and confession of sins to a Priest satisfaction for a man may do all these and yet be a reprobate So did Iudas he had contrition confessed his sinne made satisfaction and yet his repentance was not true repentance Another abuse is that they make contrition a part of repentance which is indeed no grace but may be a cause of grace Besides to confesse all sinnes to a priest is a gibbet to a mans conscience and more then God himselfe requireth Last of all to teach that a man must satisfie Gods iustice is to ouerthrow the satisfaction of Christ. The third point is Who commaunds this It is Christ. Now some out of these words gather that God giueth sufficient grace to euery man to repent if they will for say they if he command repentance and yet some cannot then he but mockes them and it is as if we should bid one bound hand and foot to rise and walke Ans. The Lord giueth not that commaundement to euery particular man but to the Church or to some people which shal become a Church and then he doth it to gather the elect Now in the Church there be elect and reprobate now this commandement to repent is giuen to the elect directly but to the reprobate by consequence as they be among the elect in the church And this commaundement is giuen to both for diuers ends first to the elect to shew them what they ought to do not their ability what they can do secondly that it may be an outward means to bring them to repētance for when he giueth them this commandement he is present by his spirit Phil. 2. 12. he bids them work out their saluation but addeth God giueth the will the deed shewing that God giuing that commandement is present by his spirit to worke in them abilitie to performe it Now the wicked being in the Church haue the same commaundement not directly neither to those ends but first to keepe them in outward ciuill order secondly to make them without excuse But whereas they reason thus If Christ command all to repent then all haue sufficiēt grace to repēt but the first is true ergo Ans. The first part is false vnles it be restrained thus if he command to this very end that they should repent and practise it for he giueth cōmandement to some not that they may do it but as to Pharaoh to harden their harts For the second part that he giueth commandement to all the meaning is he giueth it onely to the elect directly because he giueth them his spirit to obey it but to the wicked by consequence as they be mingled in the Church with his owne children The fourth point is who must repent namely the Angel and whole Church of Ephesus Ob. But they had repented before how then doth he bid thē repent againe Ans. There are two degrees of repentāce one is the beginning the other is the renewing of it In the practise of which two stands the whole life of a Christian first to begin to repent when he is truly called and secondly in continuing and renuing it dayly as he often falleth If we haue begun by Gods grace we must not stay there but go on and be renued euery day There is no man but he shall see in him selfe daily new sins slips and wants for which he must haue renewed repentance Then seeing we daily increase our sins we must take heed we lie not or continue in sin without this repentance for we are not so much condēned for sin as for lying in sin this if a man repent brings not condemation but lying in sin doth then aboue all things take heed of this let vs daily labor to know our sins to be acquainted with our wants to humble our selues pray for pardon 2. Cor. 5. 20. I beseech you saith Paul be reconciled to God they were reconciled before for they were iustified and sanctified but he would haue them to labour to be more assured of their iustification and to haue a more full and sensible feeling of it and that because their apprehension by reason of their weaknes is but sin all The like must be had of vs. The fift point is why or for what cause namely for their decay in loue especially and other wants Christ prescribeth to thē repentance not that they had none at all And so Christ preacheth to vs by his Ministers to repent of this decay in loue if we haue had loue and feele it now decayed we must repent if we haue not then we must labour to haue it And Christ we see giueth a large commaundement not for drunkennesse whooredome theft or such grosse sins but euen for their decay in loue want of knowledge faith feare

Peter is specially called Babylon Note that Ierome in this place accounted Rome to be Babylon the younger daughter of Babylon the elder And secondly that this was not his opinion onely but the consent of many other in his time and namely of such as vsed to interpret the Prophet Esay Thirdly and especially consider that he affirmeth Rome in the Apocalypse to be especially called Babylon So that Babylon in the Apocalypse by his iudgement can be vnderstood for nothing else but Rome because Rome is there specially figured by Babylon What meaneth Ierome so often to beate in this naile that Babylon is Rome If it had slipped out of his pen but once he might haue bene pardoned for his ouersight but when he hath neuer done writing that Rome is Babylon why should we account him any longer for a Catholike For in his Preface vnto the booke of Didimus De Spiritu sancto which he translated out of Greeke into Latine writing to Paulinianus he vttereth these words Cùm in Babylone versarer purpuratae Meretricis essem Colonus iure Quiritum viuerem c. Of late saith he when I was in Babylon and was an inhabitant of the purple Harlot and liued after the lawes of the Romaines I thought to intreat somwhat of the holy Ghost What needed Ierome in this place so odiously and contumeliously to call Rome by the name of Babylon but that he could neuer consider Rome otherwise but to be the See appointed for Antichrist For in other places where he interpreteth the Scriptures and Prophecies concerning Antichrist we may lesse maruell if he interpret Babylon for Rome because no reason could leade him to expound it otherwise But here talking pleasantly with his friend what necessitie compelled him to vse such descriptions of Rome but that this perswasion was so deepely grauen in his mind that Babylon is Rome that neither in earnest nor iest he could forget it but is alwaies harping vpon it as though he thought scorne to call Rome by any other name then that he had learned in the Scriptures to be Babylon and the purple harlot For in like maner writing to Marcella a vertuous Gentlewoman of Rome whome he allured to forsake Rome and to dwell neare vnto him in Bethelem one speciall reason that he vseth to perswade her is this That as Bethelem whither he wold haue her to repaire is situate in the holy Land and the place consecrated to the birth of CHRIST so Rome where she desired to remaine was the Babylonicall harlot according to the Reuelation of S. Iohn appointed for the birth of Antichrist which there should arise and exercise his tyrannie and from thence should deceiue the whole world with his wicked wiles But who so will reade the workes of Ierome may find yet more places in which he is bold to call Rome Babylon the very See of Antichrist Whereby it is apparant that it is no new or strange matter to seeke Antichrist at Rome when such old Doctors of the Church so commonly in Commentaries Epistles and other writings do teach vs that Rome is Babylon and the Scripture affirmeth that Babylon is the See of Antichrist But let vs leaue S. Ierome and see what other say of the same matter S. Ambrose writing a Commentarie vpon the Reuelation of S. Iohn is of the same iudgement Of the authoritie of the worke I wil moue no question at this time seeing it is commended to vs by Cuthbert Tonstall late bishop of Duresme who found it in an old Librarie and first set it in print vnder the name of that great S. Ambrose and is willing that men should so thinke of it It is good authoritie I say against the Papists being commended by so Catholike a Prelate and because they are wont to receiue whatsoeuer cometh vnder the name of an old Doctor though it be neuer so vnlike his writing and crie out vpon vs for reiecting at our pleasure the workes of auncient Doctors that make against our doctrine as though we reiected any without cause or they refused none for any cause whereas Pigius their great Patron blushed not to reiect the report of two generall Councels the fift and sixt of Constantinople which are commended to vs by publike faith of the Church of Constantinople because in the one Pope Honorius is condemned and accursed for an heretike and in neither of both the Popes Legates could haue the highest place according to the request of their ambitious Maister But as for this Ambrose if he were not Ambrose of Millaine yet is it apparant by the stile that he was some auncient Writer of the Latine Church and he throughout this Prophecie interpreteth Babylon to be Rome and Antichrist to be sought no where but at Rome Primasius also a very auncient Writer who likewise commenteth vpon the Apocalypse expoundeth these Prophecies of Antichrist to be fulfilled in the Romaine Empire and of the citie of Rome S. Augustine in his learned worke De Ciuitate Dei not once or twice but oftentimes is bold to call Rome Babylon and Babylon Rome as in his sixteenth booke and seuenth chapter he calleth Rome another Babylon in the West And in his eighth booke and second chapter he calleth Babylon of Caldea the first Rome and Rome of Italie the second Babylon willing men to consider that in the beginning of the citie of God which was the Church in Abrahams time the first Rome that was Easterne Babylon her enemie was builded in Caldea and about the same time that the first Babylon was destroyed lest the citie of God should lacke her enemie the second Babylon which is Rome in Italie was erected It is a strange matter that the same citie which is the professed enemie of the citie of God should be the mother of all religion and the very citie of God it selfe O Augustine thou wast not well aduised to make the Citie of Rome enemie to the Citie of GOD that Rome shold be the same to the Church of GOD that Babylon of old was to Ierusalem The same Augustine in the 22. Chapter of the 18. booke calleth Rome another Babylon and daughter of the first Babylon And in the 27. Chapter he calleth Rome westerne Babylon By these other testimonies of old Writers that might be brought but for tediousnesse I suppose it is sufficiently proued that Babylon in this my text spoken of is Rome and that we should not seek Antichrist to proceed from any other place then from Rome But what need I trouble my selfe to seeke further testimoniall for confirmation of this matter that Babylon is Rome then of the Papists themselues which affirme that S. Peter in his Epistle where he sendeth salutations frō the Church gathered in Babylon by Babylon vnderstandeth Rome And they learne it of Ieronime which in the life of S. Marke doth so expound it So greedie they are to find a place in Scripture where Peter should be said to haue bene at Rome that they are content to