Father or the Son c. Now were it not that Hereticks cannot away with this doctrine they would easily admit of the phrases of speech But they therefore abandon the terms because they abhor the things and doctrine intimated and signified by them Hence we easily answer this their objection Obj. Words not extant in Scripture are not to be used in the Church But these names namely Essence Person and Trinity occurre not in Scripture therefore they may not be used in the Church Ans We expound the Major thus That which is not in Scripture neither concerning the bare words nor concerning the sense is be omitted But the names themselves of Essence Person and Trinity as concerning the things lively insinuated by them are extant in Scripture as hath been proved Again Terms not extant in Scripture are to be omitted if by sparing them the substance of the things themselves be not endangered But the drift and purpose of hereticks is no other but with the terms to abolish or at least deprave the doctrine of the Church Therefore they are to be retained to prevent their attempts Repl. But they breed contentions Answ This happeneth by accident by reason of contentious hereticks 6. How many persons there be of the Divinity or God-head Three persons are one God and one God is three persons IN one divine Essence are subsisting three Persons and those truly distinct one from another by their properties namely the Father the Son and the holy Ghost each of which three persons notwithstanding are one and the same God eternall infinite and most perfect in himselfe And these persons are consubstantiall co-eternall without any confounding of their properties and respects as also without any disparagement or inequality between them And That there are three persons each of which are that one true God Creatour of all things is proved 1. By testimonies of Scripture which are taken partly out of the old Testament and partly out of the new The old Testament yeeldeth us many testimonies Gen. 1.2 3. Exod. 3.2 The Spirit of the Lord moved upon the waters Then God said Let there be light The Lord is said to have appeared unto Moses in a flame of fire out of the midst of a bush Acts 7.30 Steven calleth him The Angel of the Lord which is Christ the Son of God even that Angel of the great counsell The Spirit of the Lord God is upon me Isa 61.1 therefore hath he anointed me he hath sent mee to preach good tidings unto the poor to binde up the broken hearted Here the Spirit is discerned both from him that anointeth and from him that is anointed Hee is discerned also by his gifts because hee saith Upon mee that is dwelling in me sanctifying mee Therefore these be three diverse persons subsisting But yet there are both moe and more cleer testimonies in the new Testament Mat. 28.19 Teach all nations baptising them in the Name of the Father and the Son and the holy Ghost The Comforter which is the holy Ghost John 14.26 John 15.27 whom the Father will send in my name When the Comforter shall come whom I will send unto you from the Father even the Spirit of truth which proceedeth of the Father The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ 2 Cor. 13.13 and the love of God and the communion of the holy Ghost be with you all In this saying of the Apostle invocation is joyned with an application and distinction of the three persons By grace he meaneth the benefits of Christ by love the acceptation whereby God for his Sons sake doth receive us into favour by the communion of the holy Ghost his gifts which are common unto the godly There are three in heaven which beare record God saved us by the washing of the new birth 1 John 5.7 Tât 3.5 6. and by the renewing of the holy Ghost which he shed on us abundantly through Jesus Christ our Saviour Here he maketh three authours of our salvation Ephes 2.18 Gal. 4.6 Through him wee have an entrance unto the Father by one Spirit God hath sent forth the Spirit of his Son into our hearts Therefore it is one Spirit which the Father and the Son sendeth 2. The same is proved by those places of Scripture which give unto these three the Father the Son and the holy Ghost the name of Jehovah and the true God In like manner those places wherein those things which are spoken of Jehovah in the old Testament are in the new referred expresly and most plainly to the Son and the holy Ghost 3. Those places which attribute the same whole divine essence to the three and shew that the Son is the proper Son of the Father most truly begotten of him and the holy Ghost is the Spirit of the Father and the Son and that so proper and peculiar as that he is and proceedeth of God which is the Father and the Son The Son therefore and holy Ghost have the same and that whole essence of the Deity which the Father hath the Son hath it communicated of the Father by being born of him and the holy Ghost of the Father and the Son by proceeding from them 4. Those places which give unto the three the same attributes or properties and perfections of the divine nature namely eternity immensity omnipotency c. 5. Those places which attribute to the three the same effects or works proper unto the Deity namely creation preservation and government of the world as also miracles and the salvation of the Church 6. Those places which yeeld to the three equall honour and worship and such as agreeth to the true God alone By this consent therefore of the old and new Testament it is confirmed that one God is three persons truly distinct and those three persons are one God By this also we understand that it is truely said that the Father is other from the Son and the holy Ghost and the holy Ghost other from both but not truly that the Father is another thing from the Son and the Son another thing and the holy Ghost another thing for to be another thing betokeneth a diversity of essence to be other a diverse manner of existing or a distinction of persons Now the three distinct persons have not a diverse Deity but one and the same in number It followeth that we should demonstrate of each severall person of the Deity that they are true Subsistents against Samosatenus and Servetus that they are distinct against Arrius Eunomius and Macedonius lastly that they are of the same and not of only like essence against the same hereticks But of the person of the Father there is no controversie and these scruples and doubts touching the persons of the Son and holy Ghost shall more conveniently hereafter in their proper place be cleared 7. How the three persons of the God-head are distinguished HEre we are first to observe and consider Attributes common to
in office only and in the manifestation of his God-head For they which are in nature equall may be unequall in degree of office 10. This is saith Christ life eternall John 17.3 that they know thee to be the only very God Therefore the Son and the holy Ghost are not very God Ans In this place are opposed not the Father and the Son or the holy Ghost but God and Idols and Creatures Therefore these are excluded not the Son or the holy Ghost 2. There is a fallacy of severing and dividing clauses of mutuall co-herence and necessary connexion For it followeth in the Text And whom thou hast sent Jesus Christ Therefore herein also consisteth life eternall that Jesus Christ sent of the Father be likewise knowne to be very God as it is said The same is very God and life everlasting 1 John 5.20 3. There is a fallacy in transferring the particle Onely unto the subject Thee unto which it doth not belong but unto the predicate God which the Greek Article in the originall doth shew For the sense is ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã that they know thee the Father to be that God who only is very God Repl. But this argument followeth Maximilian is Emperour Therefore Rodulph is not Why then doth not this follow The Father is God Therefore the Son is not God Ans These persons are finite and their essence cannot belong to moe but the Father and the Son are persons infinite and their essence may be of moe namely of three persons 11. Jehovah or the true God is the Trinity The Father is Jehovah Therefore the Father is the Trinity that is all three persons Ans Meere particular propositions conclude nothing And if the Major be expounded generally after this manner Whatsoever is Jehovah is the Trinity it is false for that which is Jehovah may be some one person of the Trinity The Syllogisme therefore is faulty because Jehovah is not taken in the same signification in both the premisses For the name Jehovah in the Major is taken absolutely and essentially for the three persons for one and the same Jehovah or true God is the Father and Son and holy Ghost joyntly but in the Minor it is taken personally for one person of the God-head that is the Father who is Jehovah of himself Repl. Jehovah is one in number Therefore it is alwaies taken in Scripture after the same manner Ans Jehovah is one in number of essence not of persons 12. Where are three and one there are foure But in God are three and one to wit three persons and one essence Therefore there are foure in God Ans The Major is to be distinguished Where are three and one really distinct there are foure But these three in God are not another thing distinct in the thing it selfe from the essence but each is that one essence the same and whole as they differ from their essence only in their maner of subsisting or of being The maner of existing is not a diverse substance from the existence being or essence 13. Christ according to that nature according to which in Scripture hee is called Son is the Son of God But according to his humane nature only hee is called Son Therefore according to that only and not according to his divine also hee is the Son of God and so by a consequent the Son is not very God Ans The Minor is false John 3.16 5.18 Rom 8.32 John 5.17 19. John 1.18 Heb. 2.16 John 3.13 17. John 1.14 For Christ is called the only begotten and proper Son of the Father and equall with the Father The Father hath created all things by the Son The Son from the very beginning worketh all things likewise which the Father doth The Son revealed the Fathers will of receiving mankinde into favour unto the Church before his flesh was borne The Son was sent into the world descended from heaven and took flesh But the Word which is God is the only begotten and proper Son of God and took flesh And not the humane but the divine nature of Christ is Creatresse and worketh with equall authority and power with the Father and descended from heaven Therefore God or the God-head or divine nature of Christ is both called in the Scripture and is the Son and by a consequent the Son is that one true and very God These Objections we may compare with those that are before set downe in the Common place concerning the Trinity of the persons For with whatsoever Sophismes the Trinity it selfe and divinc essence is impugned with the selfe-same also is each Person assaulted and contrariwise with whatsoever Sophismes one person is impugned with the same the whole essence of the Deity is assailed Besides some objections were there only proposed which are here more fully assoiled You may reade more of this point Vol. 1. Ursin from page 115. to page 125. Quest 34. Wherefore callest thou him Our Lord Ans Because he redeeming and ransoming both our body and soule from sins not with gold nor silver but with his precious bloud and delivering us from all the power of the Divell hath set us free to serve him a 1 Pet. 1.18 19. 2.9 1. Cor. 6.20 1. Tim. 2.6 John 10.28 The Explication Here we are to observe these two things 1. In what sense Christ is called Lord. 2. For what causes hee is our Lord. 1. In what sense Christ is called Lord. TO be a Lord is to have right and power granted by Law either divine or humane over some thing or person as to use and enjoy it and to dispose thereof at thy owne will and pleasure Christ therefore is our Lord 1. Because hee hath dominion over all things and over us also and hath care of all things and of us especially that is ruleth preserveth and keepeth us as his own to eternall life and glory as being bought with his precious bloud None of them is lost John 17.12 John 10 28. whom thou gavest mee None shall pluck them out of my hand 2. Because all things are subject unto him and we are bound to serve him both in body and soule that he may be glorified by us Ye are bought with a price therefore glorifie God in your body and in your spirit Cor. 6.20 for they are Gods Quest To which nature then is the name of the Lord to be referred Ans To both like as also the names of Priest Christ is out Lord according to both his natures King and Prophet For the names of the office benefits dignity and bountifulnesse of Christ towards us are affirmed of his whole person not by communication of properties as the names of his natures and properties are but properly in regard of both natures For both natures of Christ will and work our redemption For the humane nature of Christ is made the price of our redemption by dying for us his divine nature doth give and offer that price
Our sacrifices differ from Christs three waies 236. How sacrifices and sacraments differ 400. A propitiatory sacrifice cannot be without bloud 461. Save Saviour Vide Jesus How the whole three persons may be said to save 221. 222. Christ is our most perfect Saviour 223. Why all men are not saved by Christ and why onely the faithfull 132. Scriptures Their authority depend not on the Church 5. 6. Objections against this answered 6. 7. Arguments shewing the certainty of Scriptures 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Why no doctrine but the Scripture is to be received into the Church 12. It is the rule of faith ibid. The difference of it and other mens opinions 13. The Scriptures sufficiency proved by the Ancients 14. Objections against it answered ibid. c. The Papists objection of the Scriptures obscurity answered 18. 19. Some places of Scripture more darke then other some confessed and instanced 19. Three points observable in the interpretation of Scriptures 20. 438. Not the Church but the holy Ghost is Judge of the Scriptures 21. Six waies of deciding doubts in Scriptures 21. 22. Servant Whence the word is derived and what it signifies 269. Shamefastnesse What it is 603. Silence What 612. Simplicity What. 612. Sinne Vid. Wickednesse What sinne and what manner of sin the first sin of man was pag. 45. It consists in six things pag. 45. 46. What were the causes of its first sinne ibid. c. and effects 47. The cause of its permission by God with excellent uses of it 47. 48. How we know that sin is in us 48. What sin is 49. A two fold nature of it ibid. Two proofes that corrupt inclinations are sinnes 50. What originall sin is ib. 51. proofes of its being derived to posterity ibid. Foure causes why Adams posterity abideth the punishment of his sinne 53. Whether Infants sinne seeing they want will 54. Actuall sin what ibid. Of reigning sinne and why so called ibid. of mortall and veniall sin that Popish distinction 55. The Elect may sin against conscience yet not unto death 55. All sinne mortall in its owne nature 56. Of sin against and not against conscience 59. Of the sin against the holy Ghost what and why unpardonable 59. 60. Sin what it is of it selfe 62. The vertues of the unregenerate are sins by accident ibid. What the causes of sinne are 64. An order in the causes of sinne ibidem Foure pretended causes of sin 65. God no cause of it ibid. It ariseth from man himselfe 66. It s beginning is from the Devill 67. GOD is the causer of sinne not as sinne but as punishments ibid. The proper ends of sinne ibid. Sinne is a naturall property of man corrupted 71. The fearfull effects of sinne 72. 73. All sinnes not equall 73. God in sinne though he be the mover of the wicked will yet he is not the mover of the wickednesse in the will 80. Three causes why God is said to permit sinne 201. The Question of Gods being thought to be the cause of sinne decided 209. 210. 211. c. Sin is not of the nature of mans flâsh but by accident only 275. The Article of remission of sins 361. Sit. Sitting Why it is said Christ sitteth at the right hand of God 321. 322. Vide Hand of God Slandering What. 611. Sonne Vide Christ How Christ can be called the onely begotten Sonne of God when wee also are called his sonnes 238. 246. Divers sorts of sonnes ibidem How Christ is the onely and first begotten Sonne of GOD. 239. How the naturall Sonne of God 239. 244. and co-eternall 244. 245. Christ so named before he tooke our flesh 245. The onely begotten Sonne of God 246. The Sonne hath all things from the Father not by grace but by nature 260. Hee doth all things with the Father as the Father doth ibidem Arguments against the Sonnes Divinity answered 264. 265. Why the Sonne is called Lord and why Our Lord. 268. How the Sonne was conceived by the holy Ghost 270. Soule Whether immortall 365. sundry places of Scripture alledged against the immortality of the soule 366. The Elects soules estate separated from the body 369. Spirit Vide holy Ghost The divers names which are given in the Scripture to the Spirit 341. Suffering Vide passion pag. 290. 291. 292. c. Whether Christ suffered according to both natures 293. why hee suffered under Pontius Pilate 294. why on the Crosse 295. Ancient types of that death ibidem Superstition Who are superstitious 540. Supper Vide Sacraments What the Lords Supper is 426. 427. It s manifold names 427. Its ends 428. How Baptisme and the Lords Supper differ 429. What it is to eate the flesh of Christ in the Lords Supper 430. who ought to approach to the Lords Supper and who not 462. what the wicked receive in the Lords Supper 463. Three causes for which the wicked are said to eate unto themselves condemnation 464. The right and lawfull use of it 465. Who are to be admitted to it 466. Vide Passeover page 467. c. Reasons against the reall presence 477. Suspicion What it is 611. Foure roots of good and evill suspicion 612. Swearing Of right and lawfull swearing 568. Whether lawfull to sweare by the creatures 569. By whom wee must sweare 570. Five causes why we must sweare by GOD alone 570. 571. Two principall causes of swearing 573. Vide Oathes T. TEmperance What it is 603. Temptation What it is with its kinds 650. What it is to leade into temptation 651. Testament The Old and New Testament in what they agree and how they differ 126. Thanks Thankfulnesse Why the knowledge of our thankefulnesse is necessary 35. 36. What mans thankefulnesse is and what Christian Thankefulnesse is 498. 560. the danger of omitting of it or being cold in it 560. 561. Transubstantiation Of it very largely and learnedly 448. 449. c. And Consubstantiation 450. Trinity What it is 172. Heretikes Objections answered that say that they are not named in the Scripture 173. The number of persons in Trinity ibidem Six strong proofes of the three persons in Trinity 174. How distinguished 175. Their order ibidem Their Attributes Effects and Operations what 175. 176. The doctrine of the Trinity necessary to bee held and maintained in the Church 177. Heretikes opposing that doctrine 178. Truth Six waies whereby we are taught the truth of GOD in Scripture 162. Truth what 610. V. UBiquitaries Their opinion refuted by many strong Arguments 477. 478. c. Three pestilent weeds that grow in their Garden 318. Vertue Two causes why the vertues of Ethnickes please not God pag. 44. The vertues of the Vnregenerate are sinnes by accident 62. The difference betweene the vertues of the Regenerate and of the Vnregenerate 63. Unchangeablenesse Gods unchangeablenesse proved 157. 158. Union The similitude of mans body to declare our union with Christ 234. Of the union of Christs two Natures and what it is in Nature what in Person 278. 279. W WIckednesse Whence the
and 21.6 and 22.13 The holy Ghost likewise is uncreated because in the beginning of the creation as the Creatour he moved upon the superficies of the waters Gen. 1.2 He adorned or made the heavens Job 36.13 He made and he put life in Job Job 33.4 c. He is also immense because he dwells in us Rom. 8.9 1 Corinth 3.16 2 Tim. 1.14 Hence Didymus saith well Didym lib. 1. de Spiritu sancto If the holy Ghost were one of the creatures he should have a substance circumscribed as all things that are made although they are not circumscribed For seeing the holy Ghost is in many he hath not a circumscribed substance Likewise eternall because he was in the beginning of things Gen. 1.2 and because God was never without his Spirit 9. And yet not three As the divine Essence is not multiplied with the persons because there is one common to three so the right faith forbids us to multiply Gods essentiall attributes with the persons because they are one and the same common to three As the Catholick faith then forbids us to beleeve with the Tritheits three Gods but worshippeth one God in Trinity so it forbids us to say three uncreated three immense three eternall but one uncreated one immense and one eternall it professeth to be in the Trinity ARTICLE V. 10. Likewise the Father is almighty the Son almighty and the holy Ghost almighty 11. And yet there are not three Almighties but one Almighty even so the Father is God the Son is God and the holy Ghost is God and yet not three Gods but one God So the Father is Lord the Son Lord and the holy Ghost Lord and yet not three Lords but one Lord. The Declaration 10 LIkewise almighty Here is further declared the coequality and consubstantiality of the divine persons out of the unity of the divine attributes and of the divinity it selfe because as the Father so the Son and so the holy Ghost is Almighty and God and Lord. Of the Father no man doubts The Son is also omnipotent because whatsoever the Father hath the Son hath also and therefore omnipotency Joh. 16.15 And he is called expresly God almighty Rev. 1.8 and 4.8 He is also God and the true God 1 John 5.20 God blessed for ever Rom. 9.5 Where the Name of God doth surely signifie the Divine subsistence and not the attribute onely of that subsistence against two most impudent sayings of Socinus That the simple Name of God when it is given to Christ doth no where signifie his subsistence and that it is no where found in the Scripture where the Name of God being the subject is necessarily referred to Christ The first of these is refelled by divers places of Scripture especially these Rom. 9.5 Of whom Christ is after the flesh who is above all God blessed for ever 1 John 5.20 We are in that true one in his Son Jesus Christ He is the true God and life eternall The latter is false both by these and other places Acts 20.28 God hath purchased the Church by his owne blood 1 Tim. 3.16 God was made manifest in the flesh He is also Lord. Luke 2.11 To you is borne this day a Saviour which is Christ the Lord. The holy Ghost is also omnipotent Because all graces and divine operations one and the same Spirit doth worke distributing them apart to every one as he will 1 Cor. 12.11 Likewise he is that God and Lord who spake of old by the Prophet Isaiah Acts 28.25 And by the mouth of David Acts 1.25 In whose Name we are baptised Mat. 28.19 And who is a witnesse in heaven with the Father and Sonne 1 John 5.7 The Hereticks cavill that they finde it not literally written that the holy Ghost is God which is too frivolous a subterfuge Where is it literally written the Father is God the Son is God What faithfull man will require so many letters written when the thing it selfe is written Is it not plainely written 1 John 5.7 The holy Spirit beares record in heaven And presently after The witnesse of God is greater Acts 5.3 Thou hast lyed to the holy Ghost Then by and by Thou hast lyed to God 1 Cor. 3.36 You are the temple of God and the holy Spirit dwels in you And shortly after c. 6.19 You are the temple of the holy Ghost He is also Lord because we are as well baptised in the Name of the holy Ghost that is into his worship service and obedience as in the Name of the Father and of the Son Mat. 28.19 and the Apostles call upon God who spake by the mouth of David Why did the Gentiles rage that is they call upon the holy Ghost thus Lord thou art that God who made the heaven and earth seas and all things in them Acts 4.24 11. And yet not three See Numb 8. 12. And yet not three But one Lord to wit Jesus Christ 1 Cor. 8.6 Is not then the Father Lord nor the holy Ghost Lord The Catholick faith doth thus reconcile this that onely the Father is Lord the Son and holy Ghost by the dominion of the deity common to the three Persons which consisteth in the creation and government of all things and from which dominion the Apostle 1 Cor. 8.6 excludes not the Father and holy Ghost but false gods and all creatures But Jesus Christ is the one and onely Lord by the dominion of mediation which is not common to the three Persons but proper to Christ which consisteth in the Propheticall Priestly and Kingly office of the Mediatour and from which the Apostle 1 Cor. 8.6 excludes not so much the Father and holy Ghost as the fictitious mediatours of Pagans Jews and Antichristians ARTICLE VI. 13. For as we are compelled by the Christian verity to confesse severally each person to be God and Lord so we are forbid by the Catholick faith to say there be three Gods or three Lords The Declaration 13. FOr as This Article gives a reason of the Antithesis of the fourth and fifth Article which reason was declared before out of Scripture in which alone the Christian truth and Catholick religion is grounded both in respect of the equalitie of each person as also in regard of the consubstantialitie of the same in the Trinitie therefore the Christian veritie compells us to confesse each person to be God and Lord because the Scriptures which affirme the same cannot faile as it was Number 9. And the Catholick faith forbids us to say there are three Gods or Lords because the Scriptures which affirme one God and one Lord cannot faile as is said Numb 3. and 11. ARTICLE VII 14. The Father 15. is made of none 16. nor created 17. nor begotten 18. the Sonne is from the Father alone 19. not made 20. nor created 21. but begotten the holy Ghost 22. is from the Father and the Son 23. neither made nor created 24. nor begotten 25. but proceeding There is then one Father not three
required therefore that our Mediatour should pay a sufficient punishment for us and in regard hereof be armed with the power of the God-head for the divels themselves are not able to sustain the weight of Gods wrath against sin much lesse should man be able to do it Repl. But all the divels and wicked men bear and sustain and are constrained to bear and sustain the everlasting wrath of God Ans They indeed bear the immeasurable wrath of God Wicked men and divels satisfie in never satisfying but so that they never satisfie Gods justice neither recover out of punishment for their punishment is extended to all eternity But it beseemed the Mediatour so to bear the burthen of Gods wrath that after he had satisfied for our sins he might shake off that burthen and take it away both from himself and from us Because of revealing Gods will unto us Our Mediatour must be God That he might reveal and make known unto us the secret will of God concerning the redemption of mankind whereof except he were God he could have no knowledge For no creature could at any time have searched out the bottomlesse depth thereof and conceived so intricate a mystery had not the Son of God displayed and laid it open unto us No man hath seen God at any time John 1.18 the onely begotten Son which is in the bosome of the Father he hath declared him Because of giving the Spirit Our Mediatour must be God That he may give the holy Ghost by whom he may gather in one his Church be present with it in the world and bestow on us maintain and perfect in us the benefits purchased by his death remission of sins righteousnesse new obedience and life everlasting For it is not sufficient for our Mediatour to be made a sacrifice for us to break the bonds of death and make intercession with God for us but it is necessary also that he promise on our behalf that we shall imbrace the decree concerning our redemption by our Mediatour and cease at length to offend God through our sins which is the other part of the Covenant made between God and us and is performed by us that the Covenant may remain firme and ratified But this by reason of our corruption could be promised of no man in our behalfe except he have the power also of giving the holy Ghost by whom he might work in us to assent and to be more and more conformed to the image of God Now to give the holy Ghost and by him to regenerate our hearts and work forcibly in us faith conversion and salvation belongeth to God alone whose also is the Spirit Whom I will send you from the Father John 15.26 For only the Lord of nature is able to reforme nature Jerem. 23.6 Lastly it behooved the Messias to be the Lord our righteousnesse Object The party offended cannot be Mediatour Christ is the Mediatour Therefore he cannot be the party offended that is God Ans The Major proposition is true if the party offended be such a one as in whom there are not more persons But a most cleer testimony whereby are taught in few words those three former to wit that the mediatour is both true man Acts 20.28 and perfectly just and true God is extant when it is said God hath purchased the Church with his bloud for he is true man who sheddeth his own bloud Hee is perfectly just who sheddeth it for the redemption of others Hee is true God to whom both the name and properties of true God are given which is to be a Redeemer both by his merit and also by his efficacy and power and that of the Church that is the elect and chosen Quest 18. And who is that Mediatour which is together both very God a 1 Joh. 5.20 Rom. 9.5 Gal. 4.4 Isa 9.6 Jer. 23.6 Mal. 3.1 and a very b Luke 1.24 2.6 7. Rom. 1.3 9.5 Phil. 2.7 Heb. 2.14 16 17. 4.15 perfectly just man c Isa 53.9 11. Jer. 23.5 Luke 1.35 Joh. 8.46 Heb. 4.15 7.26 1 Pet. 1.19 2.22 3.18 Ans Even our Lord Jesus Christ d 1 Tim. 2.5 3.16 Maâth 1.23 Heb. 2.9 Luke 2.11 who is made to us of God wisdome righteousnesse sanctification and redemption e 1 Cor. 1.30 The Explication WHat kind of Mediatour is necessary for us hath already been declared The Mediatour was to be God yet not the Father nor the H. Ghost but the Son only Eight reasons hereof Now the question is of the person who is such a Mediatour This Mediatour therefore is Jesus Christ alone the Sonne of God manifested in the flesh which position is proved by these reasons 1. Our Mediatour must be true God as heretofore hath been evidently shewed But God the Father could not be Mediatour because he worketh not by himsefe and immediatly but mediatly by the Son and the holy Ghost Neither is he the messenger because he is sent of none but he sendeth the Mediatour Neither yet could God the holy Ghost be Mediatour because he was to be sent of the Mediatour into the hearts of the elect therefore necessarily the Son and he only was to be our Mediator 2. That which our Mediatour should impart unto us he must needs first have it himself But it belonged unto him to confer and bestow on us the right and title of the sons of God whence we were fallen that is to work that through him we might be adopted of God to be his sons because this was in his power alone sith he alone had the sole claim and interest herein For the holy Ghost had it not because he is not the Son neither had God the Father it because he also is not the Son and was to adopt us by his Son to be his sons The Word therefore only which is that naturall Son of God is our Mediatour in whom as in the first begotten of God we are adopted to be the sons of God John S. 36. John 1.12 as it is said If the Son shall make you free ye shall be free indeed As many as received him to them he gave power to become the sons of God Who hath predestinate to be adopted through Jesus Christ unto himselfe Ephes 1.5 6. With his grace he hath made us accepted in his beloved 3. The Son alone is the Word his Fathers embassador and delegate and that person which is sent unto mankind by whom the Father openeth his will by whom he worketh and giveth his holy Spirit by whom also is made the second creation for by the Son we are made new creatures Therefore the Scripture joyneth every where the first creation with the second John 1.3.2 Cor. 5.17 Gal. 6.15 Ephes 2.10 Col. 1.16 Heb. 1.10 because the second creation was to be made by the same party by whom the first was wrought By the Son were made all things But this was
Trinity and yet all three persons have their joynt-working in them neither did the Father and the holy Ghost redeem mankind neither do the Father and the Son sanctifie the faithfull Ans It is a fallacie grounding upon that which is affirmed but in respect as if it were simply affirmed For the Creation is given to the Father Redemption to the Son Sanctification to the holy Ghost not as they are simply an operation or work for so should the other two persons be excluded from it but in respect of the order and manner of working which is peculiar and proper to every of them in producing and bringing forth the same externall work A more open declaration hereof may be this The works of our creation redemption and sanctification are the operations of the Godhead outwardly that is externall operations which God worketh on his creatures and they are undivided that is common to the three persons which they by common will and power work in the creatures by reason of that one and the same essence and nature of the Godhead which they have For the Scripture attributeth the Creation not onely to the Father but to the Sonne also and the holy Ghost All things were made by it John 1.3 Genes 1.2 Matth. 1.20 Psal 33.6 The Spirit of the Lord moved upon the waters That which is conceived in her is of the holy Ghost By the Word of the Lord were the heavens made and all the hosts of them by the breath of his mouth Likewise our Redemption is attributed to the Father and the holy Ghost John 3.17 Titus 3.5 6. God sent his Sonne into the world that the world might be saved by him Hee saved us by the renewing of the holy Ghost which hee shed on us abundantly And Sanctification both to the Father and to the Son God hath sent the Spirit of his Sonne into our hearts crying Gal. 4.6 1 Thess 5.23 1 Cor. 1.30 Ephes 5.26 Abba Father The very God of peace sanctifie you throughout Christ is made sanctification unto us Christ sanctifieth the Church All the persons therefore create redeem and sanctifie Why distinct operations or workings are attributed to the three persons Neverthelesse yet in respect of that order of working which is between them Creation is ascribed unto the Father not excluding the other persons but because hee is the fountain as of the Divinity of the Son and the holy Ghost so also of those divine operations which hee worketh and performeth by the Sonne and the holy Ghost Redemption is ascribed unto the Sonne not excluding the other two persons but because he is that person which executeth the Fathers will concerning the redeeming of mankind and doth immediatly perform the work of our redemption for the Son only was sent into the flesh and hath paid the ransome or price for our sins not the Father nor the Spirit To the holy Ghost is ascribed Sanctification not excluding the other two persons from this action but because it doth immediatly sanctifie us Object 2. The externall workes of the Godhead that is such as the whole three persons exercise not mutually one towards another but execute in the creatures are indivisible or cannot be divided that is they are not appropriated unto any one of the three persons without respect unto the other But Creation Redemption and Sanctification are externall workes of the Godhead Therefore they are indivisible and by force of good consequent there needeth no such distinction of them as is proposed Answer to the Major The works of the Trinitie are indivisible but with retaining to each person his proper and peculiar manner of working All three persons therefore work on the creatures but yet that order still is inviolably kept as that the Father still is the fountaine of the operations of the Sonne and the holy Ghost and doth all things not of any other but of himselfe by the Sonne and the holy Ghost the Sonne doth all things of the Father by the holy Ghost the holy Ghost doth all things of the Father and the Sonne by himselfe For The Father createth but mediately by the Sonne and the holy Ghost the Sonne from the Father and the holy Ghost from the Father and the Sonne The Father and the holy Ghost redeeme us but mediately by the Sonne but the Sonne immediately from the Father by the holy Ghost The Father and the Sonne sanctifie us but mediately by the holy Ghost but the holy Ghost immediately from the Father and the Sonne But as concerning the works of the Trinitie which are called outward and inward works it shall be more fully enlarged when wee come to handle the last Question save one of the doctrine touching GOD. a Deut. 6.4 Isa 44.6 45.5 1 Cor. 8.4 6. Ephes 4.6 Quest 25. Seeing there is but one only substance of God why namest thou these three the Father the Son and the holy Ghost Answ Because God hath so manifested himself in his word b Gen. 1.2 3. Psalm 33.6 Isa 6.1 3. 48.16 61.1 Mat. 3.16 17. 28.19 John 12.40 14.26 15.26 2 Cor. 13.13 Gal. 4.6 Ephes 2.18 Tit. 3.5 6. 1 John 5.7 that these three distinct persons are that one true and everlasting God The Explication IN this Question is contained the doctrine of the Church concerning one God Questions concerning God and the three persons of the Godhead The principall questions therein are 1. Whence it may appeare that there is a God 2. What hee is or what manner of God the God of the Church is whom wee worship and in what hee differeth from idols 3. Whether he be One only and in what sense there are said to be many gods 4. What the name of Essence Person and Trinity signifie and how they differ 5. Whether these names are to be used in the Church and whether they are had in the Scripture 6. How many persons there be of the God-head 7. How they differ and are to be distinguished one from another 8. For what cause it is necessary that the Doctrine of the Trinity bee held in the Church 1. Whether there be a God and whence it appeareth THe great misery of mans nature cannot be sufficiently thought upon that whereas it was created to the bright knowledge and even the very image of God it is fallen so far as not only it is ignorant who and what God is but also maketh disputation Three causes which have made men to doubt whether there be a God whether there be any God in heaven or no. The causes of this evill the Church alone doth understand the first whereof is The blindnesse and corruption of mans nature after his fall the next The instigation of the divell who would have the whole opinion of God razed out of the minds of men unto which cometh the horrible confusion of mans life and humane affairs in that oftentimes the wicked flourish and the godly either are oppressed by them
Person no separate thing from the essence That the persons are not any thing separated from the essence which is common unto them nor the essence is any fourth thing separate from the three persons but each of them are the very selfe same whole essence of the Divinity But the difference is this that the persons are each distinct from the other but the essence is common to them three And that the person is no other thing subsisting or other substance then the essence may be understood in some sort by the example of a man One and the same man or one and the same substance is a father and a man or a son and a man and yet the manhood or to be a man is one thing the fatherhood or to be a father another but there is not one subsistent which is the father and another subsistent which is a man but one and the same subsistent is both because both manhood and fatherhood is in him manhood absolutely fatherhood respectively as in regard of his son What reference essence hath unto person Of the word Essence also it is further to be noted that God or the Deity or divine essence is not in respect of the persons the same which the matter in respect of the effect because God is unchangeable neither is compounded of matter and form Therefore we cannot say well Three persons are or consist of one essence Neither is it as the whole in respect of the parts because God is indivisible Wherefore it is not well said that the person is a part of the essence or the essence consisteth of three persons for every person is the whole divine essence one and the same Neither is it as the generall to the speciall because essence is not the generall to the three persons nor person a speciall to essence But God is a more common name because the essence of the Deity is common to the three persons and therefore may be affirmed of each of them But these names Father Son and holy Ghost are more strict because the persons are indeed distinct and cannot be affirmed the one of the other Therefore it is well said God or the divine Essence is the Father is the Son is the holy Ghost Likewise The three persons are one God or in one God Again They are one and the same essence nature divinity wisdome c. They are of one and the same essence nature divinity c. Yet it cannot be well said They are of one God because there is no one of these persons but is whole and perfect God Wherefore the divine essence is in respect of the persons as a thing after a rare and singular manner communicated in respect of those things unto which it is common For neither is there the like example of community in any created things For a generall is a certain thing common to many specials and a generall and speciall to many individuals but yet so that they are affirmed of those many plurally not singularly as that the father and the son or this father and son are two living creatures two men But we may not speak after this sort of God and the divine persons as to say The Father and the Son are two Gods two Spirits two Omnipotents c. Because there is but one God one Spirit one Omnipotent c. Wherefore that affirmation The Father is God the Son is God the holy Ghost is God is a true affirmation affirming that which is more common of a thing which is more restrict that is affirming the essence of the individuall which hath in some sort an analogy and proportion only with the speciall affirmed of his individuall but it is not at all the same nor of the same kind What the Trinity is By the name of Trinity are understood the three Persons distinct in one essence of the Deity by three manners of being or subsisting Now Trinity and Triplicity as also Trinall and Triple differ That is said to be Triple which is comprehended of three essences or is distinct by three essences Trinall is that which in essence is but one and most simple but hath three manners of being of subsisting God therefore is not triple because there are not more essences but Trinall because he being one according to his essence is three according to his persons 5. Whether these names are to be used in the Church HEreticks of ancient carped at these termes because they occurre not in Scripture But wee imitate aright the manner of speech which was usuall in the ancient and purer Church and by their authority and example retain these names 1. Because though they are not found extant in so many syllables yet phrases and speeches of neer affinity and likelihood yea and sometimes words and terms of the same signification which these are are read in Scripture For instance that of the Lords own mouth I am that I am Again I am hath sent mee unto you Again Exod. 3. ââ it cannot be denied but that the word Jehovah answereth to that wee call essence So the word Hypostasis is used to signifie a Person in the Epistle to the Hebrewes Who being the engraved form of his person Heb. 1.2 Neither doth the Church in any other sense call the persons the Trinity then as John saith that There are three which bear record in heaven the Father the Word and the holy Ghost 2. Because the course of interpretation requireth that the words of Scripture be expounded to the learned by such words as being more usuall in other languages or matters and doctrines are more easie for them to understand and paveth and maketh plain a way unto them for the understanding of the speech and phrase of Scripture Otherwise if no words were to be used but such as are extant in the Scriptures all interpretation should be taken away It is lawfull therefore that the Church invent and use words and phrases of speech whereby they may significantly expresse the sense of Scripture and their owne meaning 3. Because the sleights and sophisms of Hereticks which for the most part they go about to cloak and cover with the words of the holy Scripture are more easily espyed and taken heed of if the same things be expounded in divers words and those especially short perspicuous and significant For it cometh to passe that by reason of the pithinesse and plainnesse of these terms Hereticks are dismantled and can no longer shroud their sinister constructions and apparent corruptions Neverthelesse if there were a consent and agreement on the things wee should easily come to an agreement about the words for we detest contention brawling about words Neither is the Church at controversie with other Gentiles and Hereticks about bare terms but of this main substantiall doctrine That the eternall Father and the Son and the holy Ghost are one God and yet neither is the Father the Son or the holy Ghost nor the holy Ghost the
the whole three persons What the Scripture attributeth as common to the whole three persons Father Son and holy Ghost which three are one God and yet distinct in persons Effects in the creature common to the three persons What it ascribeth to each particular as peculiar unto him and how it distinguisheth and discerneth the persons Common to the three persons are 1. All the essentiall properties of God all which we comprehend in the name of Deity as eternity infinity omnipotency wisdome goodnesse to have essence from himself or to be God of himself 2. All externall actions and operations of the Divinity that is those effects which God exerciseth on his creatures and in them or by them such as are creation preservation the government of the world the gathering together and tuition of his Church c. The three persons distinguished two wayes 1. By inward works 2. By outward Of the inward operations of the three persons These persons are distinguished two wayes First by their inward works Secondly by their outward works or form of working without themselves The inward works or actions of the Divinity are those which the persons have and exercise one towards another The persons therefore are first distinguished between themselves by these inward operations or properties For The Father is and existeth of himselfe not from another Hee begot the Son and inspired the holy Ghost after an unspeakable manner The Son hath his being from the Father begotten of him from everlasting that is he hath the divine essence communicated unto him from the Father in such sort as no tongue can expresse The holy Ghost proceedeth from everlasting from the Father and the Son that is hath the same essence but communicated unto him from the Father and the Son in a manner which cannot be uttered Testimonies hereof are frequent In the beginning was the Word Joh. 1.1 14 18. and the Word was with God and God was the Word We have seen his glory as the glory of the only begotten Son of God The onely begotten Son which is in the bosome of his Father hee hath declared him When the Comforter shall come John 15.26 whom I will send unto you from the Father The order of the persons in subsisting The order therefore of the persons in subsisting is on this wise The Father is the first person and as it were the fountain of the Divinity of the Son and holy Ghost because the Deity is communicated unto him of none but he communicateth the Deity to the Son and holy Ghost The Son the second Person because the Deity is communicated unto him from the Father by an eternall generation The holy Ghost the third person because the Deity is communicated unto him from the Father and the Son by an everlasting inspiration in which order they are reckoned up unto us in these Scriptures Baptise all nations in the name of the Father Mat. 28.19 and the Son and the holy Ghost There are three which bear record in heaven the Father the Word and the holy Ghost and these three are one Yet is not the Father precedent in time before the Son and holy Ghost nor the Son before the holy Ghost but onely in the order of existing or working For no person of the Deity is former or later then another in time dignity or degree but only in that order whereby they issue and proceed one of the other For never was the Father without the Son nor the Son without the holy Ghost sith the Divinity is unchangeable So God from everlasting was subsistent in himself and so hee hath revealed himselfe in his word Here hereticks demand of us What that eternall generation of the Son Ambâ de side ad Grat. lib. 1. cap. 5. Aug. cont Max. Arian l. 3. cap. 14. Damasc orth fid lib. 1. cap. 10. How everlasting generation and proceeding differ and proceeding of the holy Ghost meaneth and how they differ between themselves Which although we confesse as in former times also the catholick and right beleeving fathers confessed of themselves that it is not in mans ability to expresse perfectly the manner of this everlasting generation and proceeding and of the naturall distinction between them yet we gather the very thing it self from out of Scripture that Generation is a communicating of the divine essence whereby onely the second person of the Deity deriveth and taketh from the first person alone as a Son from his Father the same essence whole and entire which the Father hath and retaineth the same And Proceeding also is a communicating of the divine essence whereby the third person only of the God-head receiveth from the Father and the Son as the Spirit from him whose spirit it is the same whole essence which the Father and the Son have and retain Now both of them differ from Creation How generation proceeding differ from creation because To be created of God is when something is made of nothing at the commandement and will of God but To be conceived or begotten and To proceed or issue out is when some other person is begotten of the substance of him which begetteth and is in unexplicable wise produced from all eternity out of his substance from whom the proceeding springeth yet with this distinction that the Son hath his subsistence from being born the holy Ghost from proceeding Thus wee conceive the thing it selfe That thus it is as farre forth as God for his glory and our salvation hath thought meet to impart unto us so deep and hidden a mystery although wee cannot attaine to the cause Why thus it is Further of that Question so long controversed between the Greek and Latine Churches Whether the holy Ghost were truly said to proceed from the Father and the Son and not from the Father alone hereafter fit opportunity of handling the same will be offered us in the doctrine concerning the holy Ghost Orthodoxal phrases to be observed with their opposites to be avoyded in this mystery Here wee are to note the usuall proper phrases of Scripture and the ancient Church in this difference of the persons between themselves It is truely said God begate God but not truely God begate another God or begate himselfe True it is The Father begate another It is not true that hee begate another thing or another God True it is The Son is that which the Father is Untrue The Son is hee or the same person which the Father is True it is The Son is begotten The holy Ghost proceedeth from the Father And The Son is of or from out of the Father The holy Ghost is of or from out of the Father and the Son And Whatsoever the Son hath hee hath it from the Father and by eternall nativity or birth hath received it from the Father Whatsoever the holy Ghost hath hee hath it from the Father and the Son and receiveth it by proceeding And the Son and holy Ghost
temporall and miraculous generation of the Virgin and not in respect of any eternall generation of his Father according to his Divinity Ans The Major is true of such a son as hath a generation unlike in the whole kinde that is both in nature and in the manner of the generation But Christ according to his humanity hath a generation divers from us Why Christ according to his man-hood cannot properly be called the onely begotten not as concerning his nature but onely in respect of the manner For according to his humanity he is consubstantiall with us that is hee is true man having a humane nature the same altogether with ours in kinde the difference is onely in the singular and miraculous manner of his conception and nativity of the Virgin Wherefore although in respect of this generation also of his Man-hood hee is onely begotten yet in Scripture and in the Creed hee is properly called the onely begotten Sonne of God according to his divine nature not according to his humanity For ac-according to his humane nature hee hath brethren of the same generation and nature but according to his divine nature hee hath no brethren but alone was from everlasting borne of the essence of the Father Of no other is it said that The Father hath given unto him to have life in himselfe and that John 5.26 Col. 2.9 John 1.14 ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã In him dwelleth the fulnesse of the God-head bodily Therefore he is expresly called the onely begotten of the Father not of his Mother And the very word only begotten properly respecteth the nature and essence it selfe not the peculiar manner of his miraculous conception and it signifieth one that is begotten alone and not one begotten after a singular manner alone Object 3. Every son is either naturall or adopted Christ according to his humanity is not the naturall Son of God He is therefore the Son of God by adoption Ans The Major of this reason albeit it may be granted according to civil constitutions yet it is false in divinity because it compriseth not a sufficient enumeration of the sons of God For there are sons of God by grace as the Angels Job 1.6 which yet are not adopted sons Thus is Christ according to his humanity the Son of God even by grace without adoption as appeareth out of that distinction of sons before delivered The meaning of the Article I beleeve in Jesus the only begotten Son Now what is meant when we say I beleeve in Jesus the onely begotten Son of God Ans The meaning is 1. I beleeve that Jesus is the only begotten Son of God that is the naturall and proper Son not having any brethren begotten of the substance of the Father from everlasting very God of very God But this sufficeth not For the Divels also beleeve this and tremble Therefore hereunto is to be added 2. I beleeve that for me that is for my salvation he is the only begotten Son of God or I beleeve that he is therefore the naturall Son that hee may make me a son by adoption and may communicate to me and to all the elect the dignity and right of the sons of God as it is said We have seen his glory as the glory of the only begotten Son of the Father John 1.14 12. Mat. 1.17 Ephes 1.6 As many as received him to them he gave power to be the sons of God This is my beloved Son in whom I am well pleased God with the glory of his grace hath made us accepted in his beloved Of the Deity or God-head of Christ WHereas this doctrine concerning the only begotten Son of God is a foundation of our salvation and we cannot beleeve that Christ is the only begotten Son of God and much lesse can beleeve in this only begotten Son of God unlesse withall we beleeve that Christ is true God even the everlasting Word of the same substance dignity power and nature with the Father it remaineth therefore that herein briefly we deale against the Heretickes who impugne it Foure things are principally controversed touching the God-head of the Son 1. Whether the Sonne of God or the Word be a Subsistent or Hypostasis or person in the flesh and before the taking of flesh That is whether in Christ man there be besides his soule and body a spirituall nature or substance which was also existing before Christ borne of the Virgin and wrought and accomplished the works of God and is the Son of God and is so called in Scripture 2. Whether hee be a person truely distinct from the Father and the holy Ghost 3. Whether he be equall unto the Father 4. Whether hee be consubstantiall that is of one and the same substance and essence with the Father We have therefore foure principall conclusions to be proved in their order against severall Heretickes 1. That Christ borne of the Virgin besides his soule body is a subsistent or person 2. That he is a distinct person from the Father and the holy Ghost 3. That he is equall to both 4. That he is of the same essence with both A double way of gathering testimonies of Scripture MOreover there is a double manner of gathering arguments out of the Scriptures whereby the divinity of the Son and the holy Ghost as also other things questioned in divinity are confirmed 1. When the testimonies of Scripture are gathered according to the order of the bookes of the Bible 2. When as certain orders or sorts of arguments or proofes are set unto which the testimonies of Scripture thereto belonging are referred Both waies are good and both very often necessary for a Divine when he privately considereth and examineth or discusseth controversies and disputes of Divinity and searcheth what is true in them The first way is more laborious and repeating of the same things the later is more short and compendious and more fit and appliable both for teaching and also that the grounds of the points and opinions of Christian Religion may the more easily be conceived of the minde and more firmly stick and abide in the memory for whatsoever need or use thereof to come THE FIRST CONCLUSION The Son of God is subsistent in the flesh both of the Virgin and before the flesh THis Conclusion is to be proved and maintained against both ancient and moderne or late up-start Heretickes ancient as Ebion Cerinthus Samosatenus Photinus modern as Servetus and others The orders or sorts of arguments which confirme this Conclusion may be either eight or nine in number To the first Classe belong those testimonies of Scripture 2 Classe which expresly teach and distinguish two natares in Christ and in which the Word is discribed that he was made man that he was manifested in the flesh John 1.14 Heb. 2.16 1 Tim. 3.16 1 John 4.3 John 3.13 18.37 Heb. 2.14 John 5.58 and assumed or took flesh c. The Word was made flesh He tooke the
could not be called the proper and only begotten Son Wherefore he is and is called the proper Sonne of God in that he alone was begotten of the substance of God the Father Repl. 2. The word saith Servetus was indeed alwaies in God but it was not the Sonne but in respect of the filiation or son hood which was to come in the wombe of the Virgin or in respect of man to be borne of the Virgin that is the Word in it selfe was not any invisible hypostasis and substance which being begotten of the substance of the Father and distinct from him was truly subsisting before the flesh borne of the Virgin but was a certaine relucency or reflexed shining in God that is that visible image or shape which appeared unto the Fathers in the Old Testament and afterwards passed into the flesh or into that visible man Jesus who alone is the Sonne in respect of whom also the Word or that visible shape which alone he will have to be the person is called the Sonne Answ 1. By this is denyed that Christ is the proper Sonne of God because his humanity issued not from the substance of God 2. The Word is such a Son as unto whom the Father gave to have life in himselfe as he himselfe hath it in himselfe who when things were created was even then God by whom all things were made who was the life and the light of men c. The Word therefore was and that before Jesus born of the Virgin a living intelligent working hypostasis or substance 3. There should have been no hypostaticall or personall difference between the Father and the Son because the Word according to Servetus doctrine had not his proper hypostasis whereby he should differ from the Father So that the Father should either have bin without the Son or the Father should have bin the same person with the Son which is the heresie first broached by Sabellius Object 2. He who is not named in the Scripture before the taking of flesh the Sonne of God was not the Sonne of God before his nativity of the Virgin Wherefore he was not the Sonne of God before Answ 1. We deny the Major for we know that Gods revelation and manifesting in the New Testament is clearer than in the Old And therefore albeit it were true which these would that the Son of God is not called the Son but after the assumption of the flesh yet notwithstanding seeing in many places it is shewed most cleerly that the Sonne who tooke flesh was before he tooke flesh as The Word who is the onely begotten Sonne of the Father Joh. 1.13 5.17 was in the beginning By the Sonne all things were made My Father worketh hitherto and I work it may not be said that therefore the Son was not before he tooke flesh because he was not called before by his name Ans 2. The Minor is not true Christ named in the Scripture the Son of God before he took flesh For however the Old Testament be more obscure and darke than the New yet is he called by Salomon the co-eternall wisedome of God begotten of God Likewise it was foretold that the Messias should be God and the Sonne of God and after another manner than other sons His name shall be called Immanuel Esay 7.14 9.6 He shall call his name wonderfull Counsellour The mighty God The everlasting Father This is the name whereby they shall call him The Lord our righteousnesse The Lord hath said unto me Jerem. 23.6 Thou art my Sonne this day have I begotten thee Againe Kisse the Sonne I will be his Father Psal 2.7 12. 2. Sam. 7.14 and he shall be my Sonne Wherefore long before was he signified to be the Son of God who afterwards was to be man Object 3. If the divine nature of Christ was without his humane nature the Sonne of God there shall be made three sonnes namely his Divinity his Humanity and whole Christ consisting of both natures Christ but one Son though consisting of two natures Wherefore there was not any Sonne before Jesus was borne Ans The Antecedent is most false For seeing the Word did take joyne and unite personally unto himself not another person or Son of God but another nature this assumption or taking maketh not moe persons or sons but it is one and the same person or one Son having in him two natures Object 4. If the God head of old without the flesh was the Son and now two natures are one Son there shall be neverthelesse two sons one incorporeall the other corporeall Wherefore there was not any Son before the flesh Ans Neither is this Antecedent true For one and the selfe same Son is of old incorporeall of one only nature and only God but now corporeall of two natures and existing both God and man Object 5. The humanity by it selfe is not the Sonne Therefore neither the Divinity by it selfe is the Sonne Answ This reason doth not follow because there is great dissimilitude of the natures which are compared The Word existed and was a person and the Sonne before the flesh was taken and assumed But the humanity was neither before the assumption neither being assumed did it make the person by it selfe And therefore the humanity severally is not the Sonne but is in the Sonne or is the other nature of the Sonne but the Word both separate and knit to the flesh is the same Son as touching it selfe it is the Son of God by nature but as touching the assumed nature or humanity the naturall son of man and the Son of God by grace or personall Vnion To the third Classe of arguments also belong those sayings which teach the man Christ to be the only begotten Sonne of God 3. Classe Christ the only begotten Son of God John 3.16 1.14 So God loved the world that he gave his onely begotten Son Wee saw the glory thereof that is of the Word incarnate as the glory of the onely begotten Sonne of the Father For the only begotten is hee who hath not any brethren of the same generation and nature But Christ as touching his humane nature Heb. 2.14 vers 16.17 hath brethren Forasmuch as the children were partakers of flesh and bloud he also himselfe likewise took part with them And a little after Hee in no sort took the Angels but hee took the seed of Abraham Wherefore in all things it became him to be made like unto his brethren And a little before He that sanctifieth and they which are sanctified are all of one that is of the same nature humane Wherefore hee is not ashamed to call them brethren Wherefore there is in Christ another nature according to which he is the only begotten Son of the Father besides his humanity according to which both he hath many brethren and is sprung not of God but of the seed of David Christ is called the only begotten by nature
not in respect of the maner of his generation Obj. The man Jesus is called the only begotten because he only was begotten of the Virgin by the holy Ghost It is a misconstruing and corrupt interpretation of the word For 1. He is so the only begotten that he is also the proper or naturall Son Now such a one is said to be the only begotten not for the speciall manner only of begetting but because he only was begotten of his substance whose Son he is called or because hee only hath his essence issuing from the substance of the Father 2. Because hee is the very same by whom all things were made and are preserved who is in the bosome of the Father even from the beginning of the world revealing God unto the chosen who being sent from heaven into the world took flesh c. He is called the only begotten Son of the Father John 1.14.18 1 John 4.9 Wee saw the glory thereof that is of the Word but not of the man Jesus as Heretikes would have it For there is no other Antecedent in that place but the Word For these words goe before The Word was made flesh and dwelt among us then followeth and we saw the glory thereof If then the Word it selfe be called and is the only begotten then Christ is called the only begotten in this place not in respect of the maner of his generation of the Virgin but in respect of his generation from everlasting of the Father 3. The Words generation of the Father is often in Scripture discerned and distinguished from Christs generation of the Virgin The Evangelist as we see calleth the Word the only begotten of the Father Of wisedome it is said Prov. 8.25 That before the mountaines that is from the beginning it was formed or as the Chaldee Paraphrast interpreteth it begotten but wee read in Matthew Mat. 1.18 25. that Jesus who is called Christ was borne of Mary 4. The only begotten is opposed to Angels and Men. But Angels and Men are the sons of God either by creation or by adoption or by sanctification after what sort soever this be wrought by the holy Ghost Therefore Christ must needs be called the only begotten for this cause even for that he is his Son by nature For after this manner he is the Son of God onely and truly and simply severed from other sons Wherefore to this third ranke or Classe those places also should be referred which shew that we are the sons of God by adoption by and for that onely begotten Son For seeing grace is opposed to nature and we are sons by grace it must needs be that Christ is the Son by nature 4. Classe Christ the Son of God To the fourth Classe belong those testimonies of Scripture which attribute the name of Son of God manifestly to the other nature also in Christ which subsisted by it selfe before and besides the flesh assumed and did worke all things And seeing Servetus and others are here in an uproare as it were and fight for this that only the man Jesus born of the Virgin but not God or the God-head is called the Son in Scriptures and that therefore before Jesus was born there was not any Son of God subsisting we are diligently to gather and collect those testimonies wherein the name of Son is not attributed to the humane nature onely but also to the divine The argument therefore is this That which subsisting before the flesh born of Mary created the world and from the first beginning hitherto worketh the same things with the Father the same is a person and that without the flesh and before it But the Son of God is called that which subsisting before the flesh created the world and from the first beginning hitherto worketh the same things with the Father Therefore the Son is a person and subsisting even without the flesh and before it that is Christ Jesus born of Mary hath another nature besides his humane nature in respect whereof Christ even before his humane nature was truly existed and is called the Son of God The Major of this reason is manifest For that which worketh all workes and that with the same authority liberty and power wherewith the Father doth must needs be a living and understanding substance that is a person Now the Minor is proved by testimonies of Scripture For the very same who is before all things for whom and by whom all things were created and do consist who doth all things likewise himself which the Father doth is called the beloved Son of God the first begotten of all creatures Col. 1.16 Heb. 1.1 2. 2.10 by whom God spake unto us in the last dayes c. But the flesh or humanity of Christ is not before all things is not Creatresse but created in the last times John 5.19 doth not uphold or sustain all things with its word becke and effectuall will but is it selfe sustained and upheld by the Word who did assume and take it Therefore in Christ besides his flesh is another nature which also before the flesh was miraculously conceived in the Virgins wombe was subsisting did worke and is the Son of God Againe God sent not his Son into the world to condemne it John 3.17 The Father sent the Sonne into the world but the humanity of the Sonne was borne in the world Therefore he was his Sonne before hee was sent into the world John 5.21 The Sonne quickneth whom he will No man knoweth the Father but the Sonne Mat. 11.27 and hee to whom the Sonne will reveale him But in the old testament before Jesus was borne of the Virgin some were raised from the dead and quickned for there were some from the beginning of the world who knew God aright Therefore in Jesus the Son of Mary is another nature besides his flesh which is the Son of God and subsisted from the beginning of the world revealing God unto men not onely to those of the godly who lived since hee took flesh but to those also who lived before it Again He is called the Son who came from heaven who being in earth is in heaven who came into the world not as other men from the earth but from above Joh 3.13 17 19 31. 16.28 out of heaven from the Father So that then he was before he came into the world But the flesh of Christ is not of heaven neither came it from heaven therefore there must needs be another nature in him in respect whereof he is the only begotten Son of God even before he took flesh of the Virgin Again He that was manifested in the flesh is God and therefore another nature from the flesh For God is one thing 1 Tim. 3.16 who is manifested and the flesh another thing wherein he is manifested The Son of God is he that was manifested in the flesh For this purpose appeared the Son of God that he might take away
from the Father against Noetus and Sabellius and their Sectaries who would have the same to be the person of the Father and the Sonne and the holy Ghost which in respect of diverse functions and actions is now called the Father now the Sonne now the holy Ghost And therefore were they called Patripassians Also against Servetus who confounded the Sonne and the holy Ghost That the Word or Sonne of God is diverse and distinct from the Father and the holy Ghost not in office onely but also in subsistence and person is proved by foure arguments No one person can be both Father Son in respect of himselfe None is the same person with him whose sonne he is nor with him who proceedeth or floweth from him otherwise the same thing in one respect should be relative and correlative But the Word is the Son of the Father and from the Word the holy Ghost proceedeth and is given Therefore the Word is neither the Father nor the holy Ghost Christ another from the Father John 5.32 37. 9.16 5.19 14.16 Christ expresly calleth himselfe another from the Father and the holy Ghost There is another that beareth witnesse of mee namely the Father in the same Chapter My doctrine is not mine but his that sent mee The Son can doe nothing of himselfe save that hee seeth the Father doe I will pray the Father and he shall give you another Comforter Three persons expressed in Scripture 1 John 5.7 Gen. 1.26 Joh. 10.30 14.26 15.26 The Scripture doth plainly affirme that the Father the Sonne and the holy Ghost are three There are three which beare witnesse in the heaven the Father the Word and the Spirit and these three are one Let us make man in our image he doth not say I will make but Let us make I and my Father are one he doth not say am but are The Comforter which is the holy Ghost whom the Father will send in my Name hee shall teach you all things When the Comforter shall come whom I will send unto you from the Father even the spirit of truth which proceedeth of the Father hee shall testifie of mee Teach all Nations baptizing them in the Name of the Father the Sonne and the holy Ghost The holy Ghost descended in the shape of a Dove the Son was baptised in Jordan and the Fathers voice was heard from heaven Mat. 28.19 Mat. 3.17 This is my beloved Sonne in whom I am well pleased The properties of the persons are diâtinct diverse The attributes of properties of the persons namely sending revealing and their offices are diverse The argument is this Whose properties are distinct they are in themselves distinct But the properties of the Father the Son and the holy Ghost are distinct Therefore the Sonne is neither the Father nor the holy Ghost The Minor is proved because the Son onely and not the Father or the holy Ghost was begotten of the Father conceived by the holy Ghost made flesh sent into flesh manifested in the flesh made Mediatour baptised did suffer and died The Father of himself worketh by the Son Mat. 11. â9 The Son not of himselfe but of the Father by the holy Ghost the holy Ghost of the Father and of the Sonne No man knoweth the Sonne but the Father neither knoweth any man the Father but the Sonne These wordes cannot be expounded after this sort No man knoweth me but I and no man knoweth me but I As the Father knoweth me ãâã 14.13 so know I the Father The sense of these wordes cannot be this As I know me so I know me The Son of God therefore Christ is another from the Father and the holy Ghost THE THIRD CONCLUSION The Word is equall with the Father THat the Word or the Son of God Christ is no made God or inferiour to the Father or created of the Father before other things as Arius Eunomius Samosatenus Servetus and others the like Heretickes imagined but is by nature true and eternall God and equall unto the Father in God-head and in all essentiall perfections of the God-head is confirmed ãâ¦ã 16. ââ Cââ 2.9 By testimonies of Scripture We are in him that is true that is in his Son Jesus Christ. The same is very God and eternall life All things that the Father hath are mine In him dwelleth all the fulnesse of the God-head bodily As the Father hath life in himself so hath he given unto the Son also to have life in himselfe Joââ3 â Phââ ââ Who being in the forme of God thought it no robbery to be equall with God whatsoever things the Father doth the same things doth the Son also that all men should honour the Son ãâ¦ã as they honour the Father But the Father is to be honoured as God Therefore Christ is God equall in honour with the Father Christ ãâ¦ã God ãâ¦ã He that hath the whole essence of the God-head is necessarily equall with the Father But the Son of God hath the whole essence of the God-head communicated unto him for this because it is infinite is indivisible therefore the whole must needs be communicated unto whomsoever it is communicated Therefore the Word or Son of God is equall in all things with the eternall Father in the God-head The Minor is proved Generation or begetting is a communicating of the essence the Word was generated or begotten of the essence of the eternall Fatherâ because he is his Son proper naturall and only begotten Therefore the whole Deity was communicated unto the Word He hath the same properties of the God-head The Scripture giveth the same properties and perfections of divine nature unto the Son which it doth unto the Father as namely eternity omnipotency immensity omniscience the searching of the heart and reines He is eternall Prov. 8.25 John 1.1 John 3.13 Eph 3.17 For Before the mountaines were settled and before the hils was I begotten In the beginning was the Word He is immense or unmeasurable No man ascendeth up to heaven but he that hath descended from heaven the Son of man which is in heaven That Christ may dwell in your hearts by faith He is omnipotent Whatsoever things the Father doth John 5.19 Phil. 3.21 Heb. 1.3 the same things doth the Son also According to the working whereby he is able to subdue all things unto himselfe Bearing up all things by his mighty word He is omniscient or of infinite wisedome knowing all things His name shall be called Counsellor Esay 9.6 Mat. 11.27 No man knoweth the Son but the Father neither knoweth any man the Father but the Son c. He is the searcher of hearts But Jesus did not commit himself unto them John 2.24 25. because he knew them all And had no need that any should testifie of man for he knew what was in man Now we know that thou knowest all things He is the sanctifier of his Church
very God and eternall life Christ which is God over all blessed for ever Therefore the Son is that one and the same God or that selfe-same divine essence which is God 3. Whose essence is distinct their spirit is not one in essence which proceedeth of both and is proper unto both but is either of a diverse essence or compound whether he be of a part or of the whole essence of them of whom he proceedeth But one and the same is the Spirit of the Father and the Son proceeding of both proper unto both and by him both work effectually Gal. 46. God hath sent the Spirit of his Son into our hearts Therefore the Father and the Son are one essence and the same God Otherwise each essence should have his proper spirit and diverse 4. Vnto whom the eternall Father communicateth the same essence which himselfe hath and that whole hee is of the same essence with him Vnto the eternall Son the eternall Father communicateth his essence the same and whole Therefore the Sonne is of the same essence with the Father The Minor is proved because Christ is the onely begotten and proper Sonne of the Father begotten therefore of the essence of the Father But the divine Essence or God-head by reason of the immensity and great simplenesse thereof can neither be multiplied nor divided Therefore the Father communicateth the same and that whole unto the Son Wherefore as in respect that it is the whole essence of the God-head which is commmunicated unto him of the Father hee is co-equall with the Father so in respect that it is the same which the Father hath and retaineth hee is co-essentiall and consubstantiall with the Father Certaine generall heads of those reasons wherewith Heretickes both old and new oppugne this Doctrine That there is both an equall and one and the same God-head of the Father and the Son and also of the holy Ghost with Rules whereby answer may be easily and soundly made unto their objections 1. THe Heretickes build on most false principles and grounds such as this is If the Father begot one of his substance he could also have begotten moe and the Son also might beget another 1. Rule or moe sons For answer this Rule is to be held Wee are to judge of God according to his owne word not according to Hereticall braines and he is to be acknowledged such as he revealeth himselfe in his word as being the eternall Father with the only begotten Son and the holy Ghost For God hath so revealed himselfe that he begot the Son and that one Son only Therefore wee ought to rest here and not to imagine false conceits of our owne 2. They reason out of naturall principles or grounds which are such as are true in things created and finite but false in God who is an essence infinite as Three cannot be one Three persons really distinct cannot be one essence An infinite person cannot beget an infinite person That which begetteth and that which is begotten are not one and the same essence Likewise He that communicateth his whole essence to another doth not himselfe remaine the same which he was To this we answer by another Rule 2. Rule Those principles which are true of a finite nature are foolishly and impiously translated to the infinite essence of God And arguments of this sort are refuted not by a simple deniall of them but by distinguishing between natures capable and uncapable of those principles whereon they ground 3. Of the properties of the humane nature in Christ they inferre the inequality and diversity of his God-head As Christ suffered died c. Therefore he is not God The Rule whereby we answer to this 3. Râel is Those things which are proper to the humane nature are not to be drawn to the divine nature For Christ died not as God but as man 4. They confound the office of the Mediatour with the nature or person that is they goe from the office to the nature As Christ is sent of the Father Therefore he is inferiour to the Father 4. Rule The Rule to answer this is The inequality of office doth not inferre inequality of nature or persons Or as Cyril saith The sending and obedience take not away the equality of power or essence So the Father is said to be greater than the Son not in nature or God-head but in manifestation For not the Father but the Son was made base and miserable in the humane nature assumed Where then Christ saith that his Father is greater than he it is meant in respect of his humane nature and in respect of his office of the Mediatourship 5. They exclude and shut out the Son and the holy Ghost from those things which are attributed unto the Father as the fountain of all divine operations As The Son saith that his workes are the workes of the Father Therefore hee is not authour of them neither doth hee those works of his own power but only is the instrument whereby God the Father doth them The Rule and Answer hereto is 5. Rule Those things which are ascribed unto the Father as fountain are not removed from the Son or the holy Ghost to whom they are communicated that they may have them their owne and proper For the Son worketh likewise and in like manner Vnto whom the Father likewise did give to have life in himselfe 6. They detract those things from the Son and the holy Ghost ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã John 5.26 whereby the Divinity in the person of the Father is discerned from creatures or false gods To which this Rule answereth 6 Rule As often as in Scripture one person of the God-head is opposed to creatures or false gods and is discerned from them the other persons are not excluded from the God-head but onely those things are excluded against which the comparison is made Or The divine properties operations and honour are so attributed to one of the persons as that notwithstanding they are not taken away from the other persons of the God-head but onely from creatures Againe A superlative or exclusive speech used of one person doth not exclude the other persons of the God-head but creatures and feigned gods unto whom the true God either in one or in moe persons is opposed John 10.25 The Father is greater then all that is then all creatures not then the Son or the holy Ghost I give eternall life unto them that is no creature doth give it For both the Father also and the holy Ghost doe quicken and give life The Father onely knoweth the day of judgment that is no creature That they may know thee to be the onely very God Mat. 24.26 John 17.3 here the Son is not excluded from true Deity but Idols and false gods to which God the Father is opposed 7. They wrest the phrase of Scripture to another sense as 1 Cor. 15.24 7. Rule The Son shall deliver up
the Kingdome to the Father The Rule for answer to this is Of the phrase of Scripture wee must iudge according to the whole Scripture that is by marking circumstances of the Text alledged and by conference of other places with it The Son shall deliver up the Kingdom unto the Father not by laying it downe but by manifesting it or changing the forme thereof For the Father also reigneth now neither shall the Son ever cease to reigne Likewise he shall deliver it by subjecting all things under him So the Father also delivereth the Kingdom unto the Son neither yet doth he forgoe it The Son doth nothing to wit nothing of himselfe or without the precedent will of his Father yet he doth something by himself from his Father Other Rules whereby the objections of the Arrians are dissolved 1. NOthing hindereth why they who are equall in nature may not be in degree of office unequall 2. That which the Father hath given unto the Sonne that hee should ever have it hee will never demand of him againe but that which was but for a certaine time given and committed unto him the same hee must meeds depart from and resigne 3. That consequence doth not hold in reason which is brought from a thing that is respective to a thing that is absolute 4. That is said of the person in the concrete which is proper only to one nature but not otherwise than in respect of that nature unto which it is proper 5. There is a double wisedome one existing in the creatures which is the order of things in nature wisely disposed and the doctrine or knowledge as well of nature and the law as also of the Gospel Another wisdome is subsisting in God which when it is opposed unto the creatures is the very divine minde or eternal decree as touching the order of things in the Father the Son and the holy Ghost that is it signifieth the three persons but when it is distinguished from God then it is taken for the Son of God the second person only The former wisdome existing in the creatures is created the other subsisting in God is uncreate 6. God absolutely named in the Scripture is never meant but of very God himselfe 7. Whereas the Son and the holy Ghost are of the Father and the Father worketh by the Son and the holy Ghost neither was humbled as the Son the Scripture doth oftentimes especially in Christs speeches understand by the name of the Father the Son also and the holy Ghost 8. When God is considered absolutely or by himselfe or is opposed to the creatures the three persons are comprehended but when hee is opposed to the Son the first person of the God-head is understood which is the Father 9. The name of God being put simply or absolutely is essentially taken that is for the God-head it selfe and compriseth all three persons but when the property of any person is joyned therewith it is taken personally 10. The Scripture distinguisheth the persons when it opposeth or compareth them among themselves or expresseth their personall properties whereby it restraineth the name of God common to them all to one certain person and it meaneth them altogether when it opposeth the true God to creatures or false gods or considereth them absolutely according to his own nature 11. That which began at some certain time to be manifested may not thence be concluded never to have been before 12. The Son is wont to referre that to the Father which yet hee hath common with the Father not making any mention of himselfe when hee speaketh in the Mediatours person 13. The Son is said to see learne heare and worke as from the Father in respect of both natures yet not without a difference still remaining For unto his humane understanding the will of God is made known by revelation But his God-head doth by it selfe and of his owne nature know and behold from everlasting most perfectly the Fathers will 14. The externall operations of the three persons if they were distinct they should make verily distinct essences because one working and another ceasing there should be diverse essences but the internall operations because they are the communicating of one and the same whole essence make not a diversity but an unity of essence 15. When God is called the Father of Christ and the faithfull it doth not hereof follow that he is after the same manner their Father and his 16. The Father was never without the Son nor the Father and the Son without the Spirit inasmuch as the God-head can neither be augmented nor lessened not changed 17. It followeth not that whosoevers person is from another his essence also is from another 18. As often as in Scripture one person of the Deity is opposed to creatures or feigned gods and is distinguished from them the other persons are not excluded from the Deity but the creatures only between whom and the true God comparison is made This we must also observe in all exclusive and superlative speeches The principall arguments against the Divinity of the Son and the holy Ghost together with the answers unto them 1. ONe essence is not three persons for one to be three doth imply a contradiction God is one essence Therefore there cannot be three persons of the God head Ans The Major is true of an essence created and finite that cannot being one be the same and whole substance of three or be three but it is false of the infinite most simple and individuall essence of the God-head For this as it existeth one and whole together in many nay in infinite places and things so may it be remaining one the same and whole essence of moe yea and moreover it is necessary so to be seeing the generation of the Son and the proceeding of the holy Ghost is the communicating of the essence of the Father 2. Whose operations are distinct their essences also must needs be distinct The eternall operations of the Father the Sonne and the holy Ghost are distinct Therefore they have also distinct essences Answ The Major of this reason is true of persons having a fiâite essence but being understood of the divine person it is false if it be meant of those internall operations whereof the Minor speaketh Wherefore inverting the Major wee returne it backe upon the adversaries themselves Whereas the internall operations namely the generation of the Son and the proceeding of the holy Ghost are the communicating of the Fathers essence whole and the same in number it must needs be that there is not a diverse or distinct but one divine essence of all three persons 3. That which hath a beginning is not eternall but the Sonne and the holy Ghost have their beginning or originall from the Father Therefore they are not eternall Answ That is not eternall which hath a beginning of essence or nature and time But the Sonne and the holy Ghost have a beginning or originall of person or order or
of the manner of existing but not of essence For this they have one and the same in number with the Father from everlasting and that is void of all beginning and originall and existeth necessarily from no other but of it selfe His goings forth have bin from the beginning and from everlasting Now glorifie mee thou Father Micah 5.2 John 17.5 with thine owne selfe with the glory which I had with thee before the world was Repl. But hee who hath his originall of person from another is not Jehovah But the Sonne and the holy Ghost have their originall of person from the Father Therefore they are not Jehovah Answ The Major is a false ground For the Scripture doth plainly teach both of them namely both the Son and holy Ghost to be Jehovah As the Father hath life in himselfe so hath hee given likewise to the Son to have life in himselfe John 5.26 and yet the Scripture wu hall affirmeth that both have their originall of person from the Father For the Father begot not the essence but the person by communicating unto him his owne essence the same and whole 4. The faithfull are one with God not in essence but in consent of wils But the Father and the Sonne are in such sort one as the faithfull are one with God Father keepe them that they may be one as wee are one Therefore John 17.11 21. the Sonne is one with the Father in conjunction of wils onely and not in unity of essence Answ There is more in the conclusion than in the premisses For the particle onely which is stitched to the conclusion is not in the Minor proposition Wherefore of a Minor which is but particular an universall conclusion is ill inferred after this manner There is a certaine unity between the Father and the Sonne such as is between God and the faithfull Therefore all unity which is betwixt them is such Wherefore wee say that the faithfull are one with God and among themselves in will onely or conformity or conjunction of mindes The Father and the Sonne are one both in will and furthermore in unity of essence I and the Father are one John 10.30 14.10 Heb. 1.3 I am in the Father and the Father is in mee Who is the ingraved forme of his Fathers substance Wherfore if a wider and more ample conjunction be put a straiter conjunction is not thereby excluded 5. Hee that is the whole God-head is not any one person of the God-head or there is not any one besides him in whom likewise the whole God-head is But the Father is the whole God-head Therfore the Father is not any one but even all the person that is of the God-head neither are there moe persons wherein that God-head is Ans Wee deny the Major because the same God-head which is in the Father is whole also in the Son and the holy Ghost For by reason of the immensity and undividablenesse thereof that is communicated of the Father even the same entire and whole both to the Son and to the holy Ghost so that there is neither more nor lesse of the God-head in every person than either in two or in all three 6. The divine essence is neither begotten nor proceeding of another But the Sonne is begotten and the holy Ghost proceedeth Therefore they are not the same divine essence which the Father is Answ Of meere particulars nothing can follow or be concluded The Major cannot be expounded generally For it is false That whatsoever is the divine essence he is not begotten or proceeding 7. The divine essence is incarnate The three persons are the divine essence Therefore the three persons are incarnate Answ Of meere particulars there followeth nothing The Major speaketh only of the Son For it is false being taken generally as Whatsoever is the divine essence is incarnate this generall proposition is false For the divine essence is incarnate only in one of the persons which is the Son not in all three 8. The Mediatour between God and man is not God himselfe But the Son is the Mediatour between God and man Therefore hee is not God Answ The Major is apparently false because by the same reason it might be argued that the Mediatour between God and men is not man Repl. The Major is thus proved God cannot be lesse than himselfe or inferiour to himselfe But the Mediatour with God is lesse and inferiour unto God Therefore hee is not God Ans The Minor is true onely in respect of Christs office in which sense Christ is inferiour unto God not in respect of his essence and nature according to the fourth Rule The inequality of office doth not inferre inequality of nature or persons Repl. 2. The Son is Mediatour with Jehovah But the Son is Jehovah Therefore Jehovah is Mediatour with himself Ans Nothing followeth of meere particulars For the Son is not Mediatour with all that is Jehovah but with the Father Rep. 3. Therefore the Father only is pacified towards us and by a consequent hee alone is the true God not the Son or the holy Ghost For hee is the true God who is pacified by the Mediatour Answ Wee deny this sequele For there is but one will of the three persons and that agreeing in all things Wherefore the Father being pleased and pacified for the Sonnes satisfaction in our behalfe the Sonne also and the holy Ghost are pacified and receive us into favour for the same satisfaction Rep. 4. Whom the Son pacifieth with him hee is Mediatour But the Sonne pacifieth not only the Father but himselfe also Therefore hee is Mediatour with himselfe which to grant were absurd Answ First wee answer to the Major that the Sonne is properly said to be Mediatour with him whom hee so pacifieth with his satisfaction that the decree and purpose of atonement may seeme to have originally issued from him Now this is the Father alone Therefore in this sense the Sonne is not Mediatour with himselfe but with the Father alone Secondly wee answer to the Minor That it is not absurd to say that the Sonne is Mediatour to or with himselfe For it is no inconvenience that he should manage both functions namely of God admitting the reconciliation and of the Mediatour making the reconciliation each in a diverse respect The former of these by vertue of his divine nature the later by reason of his office of the Mediatourship 9. Christ doth every-where discern and sever himself from the Father hee hath a Head he hath a God he is lesse than the Father Therefore he is not the same God with the Father or he is not equall and consubstantiall with the Father Answ He discerneth and distinguiseth himself from the Father 1. In person 2. In office as he is Mediatour but not in God-head So Hee hath a Head and a God and is lesse than the Father 1. As touching his humanity in nature and office 2. As touching his God-head not in nature but
person Acts 28.25 Ephes 4.4 30. seeing God is a being but our goldinesse goodnesse godly motions and other divine affections cannot be called God Because hee is the authour of our baptisme Hee is a person because hee is the authour of our baptisme and wee are baptised in his name that is by his commandement and will But we are not baptised by the commandement and will of a dead thing or of a thing not existing neither are wee baptised in the name of the graces or gifts of God By his properties Because the properties of a person are attributed unto him as that hee teacheth that hee distributeth gifts even as hee will that he comforteth Luke 12.13 confirmeth ruleth reigneth likewise that he sendeth Apostles John 16.13 Luke 2.26 Acts 1.16 10.19 20.23 that he speaketh in the Apostles The holy Ghost shall teach you in the same houre what you ought to say So also he declareth the things to come The Spirit of truth will shew you the things to come Hee giveth prophecies of Simeons death of Judas the traitor of Peters journey to Cornelius of Pauls bands and afflictions which should betide him at Jerusalem of a falling away and of the deceivers in the last times of the meaning of the high priests entrance into the holiest of all 1 Tim. 4.1 Heb. 9.8 10.15 1 Pet. 1.11 Rom. 14.26 Acts 5.9 of the first tabernacle of the new covenant of Christs sufferings and his glory which should follow after them and such like he maketh request for us with sighs which cannot be uttered he crieth in our hearts Abba Father he is tempted by them who lie unto him he is a witnesse in heaven with the Father and the Son he commandeth and willeth that the Apostles be separated and lastly he appointeth teachers in the Church All these things are proper unto a person existing intelligent indued with a will working and living 1 Joh. 5.7 By his distinction from Gods gifts Because he is plainly dishinguished from the gifts and graces of God All these things worketh the self-same Spirit distributing to every man severally as he will There are diversities of gifts but the same Spirit Wherefore the gifts differ much from the Spirit it selfe Obj. The gift of God is not a person 1 Cor. 12.11 Ibid. ver 4. Acts 2.38 The holy Ghost is called the gift of God Therefore he is not a person Ans The Major is false if it be universally taken for the Son being given is the gift of God and yet is a person The holy Ghost is called the gift of God because he is sent from the Father and the Son John 15.26 I will send the comforter unto you from the Father Or we may answer He is called a gift in respect that he was sent and dwelleth in the hearts of the saints to whom he is given and is such a gift as worketh by his vertue and power the rest of his gifts and graces Now that to proceed signifieth to exist or to be from both I prove Because Paul calleth him the Spirit of God which is of God and in God Of God Because the Spirit floweth from the Father and the Son In God Therefore he is some-what of God himself Other spirits are not in God that is in the substance of God And what is in God that is the very essence of God II. That the holy Ghost is other that is distinct from the Father and the Son we prove against those who say He is the subsistent of the Father namely the Sabellians Four proofs that the holy Ghost is distinct from the Father and the Son Which we prove From his appellation or name From the very appellation in that he is called the Spirit of the Father and the Son For none is his own Spirit as none is his own Father and none is his own Son Therefore he is other from both Object That which is common to all the persons ought not to be distinguished and severed The name Spirit is common to all the three persons Therefore it ought not to be distinguished Ans This whole reason we grant if it be understood of the essence of the persons and not of their order of being and working for as he that breatheth and the breath it self differ so he that inspireth and the spirit are different he that proceedeth is one and he another from whom he proceedeth the third person of the God-head is one and the first or second another But the holy Ghost is said to be the third person of the God-head and this is not in that respect as if there were in God any first or last in time but in respect of the order or manner of being because the holy Ghost hath his essence from the Father and the Son from both which he proceeded from everlasting as also he is the spirit of both In like manner the Son is called the second person because he is of the Father the Father the first person because he is of none By expresse testimony of Scripture The holy Ghost is in expresse words called another I will pray the Father and hee shall give you another Comforter There are three which bear record in heaven the Father John 14.16 1 John 5.7 the Word and the holy Ghost and these three are one The holy Ghost therefore is a distinct person from the Father and the Son By his sending from the Father and the Son Hee is sent of the Father and the Son Therefore he is another from both for none is sent of himself One may come of his own will or of himself but none can be sent of himself John 15.26 14.26 I will send him unto you from the Father The Father sendeth him in my name By his distinct attributes from the Father and the Son The holy Ghost hath distinct attributes or properties personall from them The holy Ghost proceedeth only from the Father and the Son He alone appeared in the shape of a Dove in the likenesse of fire not the Father or the Son Christ is said to have been conceived not by the Father or the Son but by the holy Ghost that is by the immediate vertue and efficacy of the holy Ghost The holy Ghost shall come upon thee Luke 1 1â and the power of the most High shall over-shadow thee Wherefore he is another from the Father and the Son which is diligently to be observed for the adversaries hereof being convicted of the person of the holy Ghost grant that he is a subsistence but of the Father and thus they argue or reason Object The vertue and power of the Father is the Father himselfe The holy Ghost is called the vertue and power of the Father Therefore the holy Ghost is the Father himself Ans This reason is sophisticall because vertue is not taken for the same in the Major for which it is taken in
bodies or of our bodies blended and mingled with his The same is refuted by that often alledged comparison of the head and members For those are co-herent and grow together but are not in mixture or mingled one with another Whence also we may easily judge of that communion which is in the Sacraments for the Sacraments seale nothing else but that which the word promiseth But to let this passe The same former errour is also hereby refuted in that this communion must be continued for ever for to this end doth Christ communicate himself to us that hee may dwell in us wherefore such as is his abiding and dwelling such is his communion But Christs abiding and dwelling is perpetuall Therefore his communion also is perpetuall This argument is most strong and firm and therefore for the assoyling of it they have been fain to devise their Ubiquity For The originall of the Ubiquity For to obtain that other communion which they would have they must needs affirm that Christ dwelleth alwayes bodily in all his saints The faithfull are called saints in three respects 1. Imputatively that is Why the faithfull are called saints in respect of that Christs sanctity and holinesse is imputed unto them 2. Inchoatively that is in respect of that conformity and agreeablenesse with the law which is inchoated or begun in them 3. In respect of their separation because they are selected and separated from all other men and are called of God to this end ever to worship or serve him By this then which hath been spoken it appeareth what it is to beleeve the communion of saints namely The meaning of the words of the Article to beleeve that the saints of which number I certainly assure my selfe to be one are united by the Spirit unto Christ their head and that from the head gifts are powred down upon them both those which are the same in all necessary to salvation as also those which being diverse and diversly bestowed upon every one are requisite for the edification and building of the Church Quest 56. What beleevest thou concerning remission of sins Answ That God for the satisfaction made by Christ hath put out all remembrance of my sins a 1 Joh. 2.2 1 John 1.7 2 Cor. 5.19 and also of that corruption within me b Rom. 7.23.24 25. Jer. 31.34 Micah 7.19 Psal 103.3 10 12. wherewith I must fight all my life time and doth freely endow me with the righteousnesse of Christ that I come not at any time into judgement c John 3.18 John 5.24 The Explication The chief Questions here to be considered are 1. What remission of sin is 2. Who giveth it 3. For what 4. Whether it agreeth with Gods justice 5. Whether it be freely given 6. To whom it is given 7. How it is given 1. What remission of sins is REmission of sins is the purpose of God not to punish the sins of the faithfull and that for the satisfaction of Christ. Or it is the pardoning of deserved punishment and the giving or imputing of anothers righteousnesse to wit the righteousnesse of Christ. But more fully it is defined on this wise Remission of sins is the will of God which to the faithfull and elect imputeth not any sin but remitteth to them both the blame and punishment of their sin and therefore doth in like sort love them as if they had never sinned and delivereth them from all punishment of sin and giveth them eternall life freely for the intercession and merit of Jesus Christ the Son of God our Mediatour Now albeit God for the merit of his Son remitteth our sins to us yet hee afflicteth us as yet in this life not thereby to punish us but fatherly to chastise us Neither yet because God doth not punish us for our sins must wee therefore think that he is not displeased with them for hee is highly displeased and offended with the sins also of his saints and chosen although he punish them not in them because he punished them in his Son For God doth not so remit sins as if hee accounted them for no sins or were not offended at them but by not imputing them unto us and not punishing them in us and by reputing us just for anothers satisfaction which wee apprehend by faith It is all one therefore to have remission of sins and to be just Object The law doth not onely require us to avoid sin but to doe good also Therefore it is not enough that our sin be forgiven but also good works are needfull and necessary that wee may be just Ans The omission of good is all sin he that can do good James 4.17 and doth it not is a sinner and accursed But God doth not hate us neither hath he a will to punish us for those sins for which Christ hath sufficiently satisfied in whom also we have remission of these and all other our sins so that by his only merit we are reputed just before God 2. Who giveth remission of sins REmission of sins is given of God onely who as the Prophet Isaiah saith putteth away our iniquities Remission of sins is the work of all three persons Chap. 43.25 And this is done both of the Father and the Son and the holy Ghost for we are baptised in the name of all three Now baptism as also is said of Johns baptism Matth. 9.6 is wrought for remission of sins and of the Son the Scripture affirmeth plainly Acts 5.9 That the Son of man hath power to remit sins Likewise it is said of the holy Ghost Ephes 4.30 That he was tempted that he was offended and grieved Wherefore he also hath power to remit sins for none can remit sins but he against whom sin is committed and who is offended by sin And Christ also in plain words in the Evangelists speaketh of the sin against the holy Ghost Now the cause that God only that is Matth. 12.31 Mark 3.29 Luke 12.10 Why God onely can forgive sin the Father the Son and the holy Ghost only remit sins is this Because none but the party offended can remit sins But onely God the Father the Son and the holy Ghost is offended by our sins Therefore God only can remit them and consequently no creature is able to grant ought of this right of God Whereupon also David saith Against thee only have I sinned and done evill in thy sight Object But the Apostles also and the Church remit sins Matth. 18.18 because it is said Whatsoever ye bind on earth shall be bound in heaven and what whatsoever ye loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven Whosesoever sins ye remit they are remitted unto them John 20.23 and whosesoever sins ye retain they are retained Therefore not only God remitteth sins Answ How the ministers the Church are said to remât sins The Apostles remit sins in that they are the signifiers and declarers of Gods remission Likewise
157. Patience What. 539. Perfection In what sense the Scripture doth attribute perfection to the works of the Regenerate 94. How God is most perfect in himselfe 155. Whether our conversion hath perfection in this life 505. Whether our works be perfectly good and being not so how they can please God 510. 511. Whether those that are converted may perfectly keep the commandements of God 615. 616. Permit Permission Three causes why God is said to permit sinne 201. Gods permission of sin confirmed by Scripture 202. Gods permission is the withdrawing of his grace ibid. Person Of the three persons in the Trinity and why named three being but one in substance 146. What a person is 170. The difference betweene Essence and Person ibid. 171. The reason why this difference is to be held ibid. What reference Essence hath to Person 172. The properties of the Persons are distinct and divers 257. 258. Whether Christ be one person or more 275. 276. Objections against it answered ibid. c. Philosophy It s nature and lawfull and fruitfull use thereof 3. The differences betweene it and Church doctrine ibid. worlds creation unknowne to Philosophers 182. Their Arguments against it ibid. Prayer What 624. Foure sorts of it ibid. why prayer is necessary for Christians ibid. Eight conditions of true prayer 626. A difference of things to be prayed for 627. A difference betweene the prayer of the godly and of the wicked 628. The Lords Prayer expounded ibid. c. The causes why Christ taught us that forme ibid. c. Predestination Vide Election Nine circumstances thereof 352. c. what 355. the difference between it and Providence ibid. Its causes 355. 356. The effects of it 357. Whether unchangeable 357. 358. whether we can be certaine of our predestination 358. Presence A five-fold maner of Christs presence 317. Pride What. 538. Priest Priesthood What Christs Priesthood is 231. The high Priests prerogative under the law ibid. Three differences betweene the Priests and Prophets under the law 232. Christ the true prefigured high-priest ibid. Foure differences betweene Christ and other priests 232. 233. What a Christians priesthood is and its particulars 236. How Christ maketh us Priests ibidem Promises Gods promises not unprofitable to the unregenerate 91. Prophanenesse What. 541. Prophet Propheticall What Christs propheticall function is and the signification of the name Prophet 229. Two kinds of Prophets ibid. Foure testimonies of the truth of the Prophets doctrine of old ib. What a Prophet of the New Testament is 230. Christ a Prophet from the beginning ibidem Six differences betweene Christs being a Prophet and others before him ibid. c. Providence What Gods providence is 194. 197. The proofes of it 194. 195. 196. 202. Two parts of it 197. The degrees of Gods providence and testimonies of it 203. Proofes of his generall and particular providence 204. 205. c. Places of Scripture wrested against Gods providence 218. What the knowledge of Gods providence profiteth us ibid. Just causes why it may be knowne 219. The deniall of it shaketh all the grounds of Religion ibid. Punishment How God may be said to will punishment 68. The degrees of punishments of the ungodly 103. 104. The conditions of him that may be punished for another 113. The evill of punishment is a morall good and is done by God for three causes 199. Q. QUickning How the spirit quickneth pag. 23. Three parts of quickning 503. why the latter part of our conversion is called quickning 504. Quietnesse Two significations of the word in Philosophy 183. R REason How far we listen to Reason in divine matters 443. Reconcile It hath foure parts 120. No reconciliation without a Mediatour ibid. Regeneration It is but begun in this life pag. 55. The regenerate lose the grace of God in part but not whole in this life 56. The good workes of the regenerate not perfect in this like 93. 94. In what sense the Scripture attributes perfection to the works of the regenerate 94. Regeneration doth assure us of Justification 95. Christs Godhead proved by our regeneration 251. 252. Whether the regenerate can perfectly keep the law 616. A threefold difference betweene the regenerates and unregenerates sinning ibid. Repentance How God is said to repent 157. Reprobation How reprobates are said to be lightned and sanctified 61. Resurrection What Christs resurrection profiteth us 306. The manifold circumstances of his resurrection 306. 307. 308. The fruits of it 310. Five Reasons for our resurrection 311. more of it 364. 365. c. What it is and the errours concerning it 370. Proofes of its certainty ibid. c. The same body shall rise 372. How when and by what power the resurrection shall be 373. For what end and to what estate we shall rise 374. Reward No good worke of the creature meriteth reward pag. 217. 387. Three causes why God promiseth to reward our works 388. Riches Whether it be lawfull to desire them 644. Or to lay them up for hereafter 645. Righteousnesse The righteousnesse of God both generall and particular 160. How we are righteous before God 379. What righteousnesse is in generall and how manifold 380. Vide Justice Imputed righteousnesse is eternall 392. S SAbbath Three causes why the commandement of the Sabbath was so severely commanded 576. What the Sabbath is and how kept both by God and men ibid. What works are forbidden on the Sabbath 577. Two reasons why our children and families must keepe the Sabbath ibid. Objections about the Sabbath answered 577. 578. Why our cattell must rest on the Sabbath 578. How manifold the Sabbath is 578. 579. Many Sabbaths in the Old Testament 579. A Table of the distinction of the Sabbath 580. How the Sabbath belongeth to us Christians ibid. A double difference betweene the Christian and Jewish observation of the Sabbath 582. The causes why the Sabbath was instituted ibid. How the Sabbath is sanctified and how profaned 583. 584. 485. Saints What is meant by the Communion of Saints 360. Popish objections for invocation of Saints answered 562. 563. 564. c. Sacraments They are signes of the Covenant 124. 393. The originall word Sacrament what 394. It s definition with its difference from other signes 395. Their ends 396. 397. Sacrament and Sacrifice how different 397. How the old and new Sacraments differ 398. The difference of the signes and things signified in the Sacraments 399. What is the right and lawfull use of Sacraments 341. What the wicked receive in the Sacraments ibid. in what the Word and Sacraments agree and in what they differ 402. their number 403. Vide Baptisme and Supper of the Lord. Satisfaction Of Legall and Evangelicall satisfaction 108. We can make no satisfaction for two reasons 112. No other creature could satisfie for man but man 113. Meerely God could not satisfie for man 114. Christs satisfaction is made ours two waies 383. When we may be assured of Christs satisfaction imputed unto us 384. Why and how 384. 385. Sacrifice
dead after they are consumed by wormes by the power of God which notwithstanding they beleeve But what we beleeve and determine concerning God must not be measured by the shallow capacitie of humane reason from which the nature of God is most distant but rather according to his divine will revealed in his word Now these testifie that the true and eternall God is but one in number and essence 1 Cor. 8.4 Deut. 6.4 Heare O Israel the Lord our God is one Lord to wit in essence For the name Jehovah in Hebrew is from being and properly signifieth essence or being Hee is also three in persons Father Son and holy Ghost Hebr. 12.2 For Christ who is the author and finisher of our faith being willing that in the New Testament all the Gentiles should by a new sacrament be consecrated into one faith and worship of one true God commanded all to be baptised in the Name of the Father Son and holy Ghost as it were in the name and faith of one true God consisting of these three hypostases or persons For the Father is expresly called ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã or divine person Heb. 1.3 Now such as is the Father such is the Son and such is the holy Ghost Article 4. Neither are we baptised but in the Name of the divine hypostasis or person the Son then is a divine hypostasis also and so is the holy Ghost And these three divine hypostases are one and the eternall God S. John did more cleerly expresse this mysterie of the Trinitie in unitie saying There are three that beare record in heaven the Father the Word and the holy Ghost 1 John 5.7 and these three are one He calls the Son the Word usually Now by these three witnesses in Heaven he understands either three Gods or three divine persons But not three Gods for God is one therefore the three divine persons are understood And he sayes that these three are one either in essence or in personalitie but not in personalitie for so they could not be three therefore in essence And for this cause he teacheth that these three are one God in their will and consent of witnessing It may be easily proved that this mysterie of the faith was not altogether unknowne to the Fathers of the Old Testament but not so cleerly manifest to all of them as now And it is no wonder seeing the full revelation both of this and of other mysteries were reserved for the ministry of the Son of God manifested in the flesh John 1.18 as the finisher of our faith by Johns testimony No man hath seen God at any time the onely begotten Son which is in the bosome of the Father he hath declared him What the enemies of the blessed Trinitie out of humane reason or out of Scripture maliciously depraved use to dispute against this doctrine shall be explained in the progresse of our disputation 4. Neither confounding As the Noetian Sabellian Patrispassian Hereticks did who as they held but one God so they would acknowledge but one person sometime of the Father sometime of the Son sometime of the holy Ghost using this reason for a principle at this day common to Jewes Mahumetans and Hereticks That of one individuall nature there can be but one hypostasis or person which indeed is true of a finite and created individuall nature but of the divine infinite uncreated nature it is false as divine Oracles doe evince 5. Nor dividing the essence As the Tritheits doe and have done multiplying the essence of God with the divine persons against Scripture ARTICLE III. 6. For there is one person of the Father another of the Son another of the holy Ghost 7. But the divinitie of the Father Son and holy Ghost is one the glory equall the majesty co-eternall The Declaration 6. FOr there is one The distinction of the persons that one is not the other but the Father is one the Son another and the holy Ghost another is evidently taught in Scripture John 5.32 There is another who beareth witnesse of mee and who sent mee even the Father he it is that hath testified of mee John 14.26 But the Comforter which is the holy Ghost whom the Father will send in my Name John 14.16 I will pray the Father and he shall give you another Comforter But how the persons are distinguished it followes in the eighth Article 7. But of the Father and of the Son Here the consubstantialitie and co-equalitie of the divine persons is asserted against Arians and Photinians according to Scripture John 10.30 I and my Father are one to wit in the divine essence and therefore in strength and power but in respect of the humane nature the Father and Son are not one John 5.7 And these three are one to wit in respect of the divinitie and therefore in the unitie of will and testimonie So we are baptised not in the names of three but in the name as of one true God John 5.18 and Joh. 10.33 The Jewes understood that Christ made himselfe equall with God but he did not equall himselfe with God in his humane nature for so they might truly have said that he had blasphemed but in the glory of his divinitie and divine operations John 16.15 All things that the Father hath are mine therefore that one and co-eternall majesty of the divinitie which the Father hath is also the Sons and likewise the holy Ghosts For the Father and Son neither are nor were from eternitie without the holy Ghost therefore of the three there is one divinitie an equall glory and co-eternall majestie ARTICLE IV. 8. Such as the Father is such is the Son and such is the holy Ghost the Father uncreate the Son uncreate and the holy Ghost uncreate the Father immense the Son immense and the holy Ghost immense the Father eternall the Son eternall and the holy Ghost eternall 9. And yet not three eternalls but one eternall as there are not three uncreated nor three incomprehensible but one uncreated and one incomprehensible The Declaration 8. SUch as the Father Here is declared the co-equalitie and consubstantialitie of the divine persons by the identitie of Gods essentiall attributes because as the Father so the Son and holy Ghost is uncreated immense eternall Of the Father no man doubts The Son is also uncreated because hee was in the beginning of the creation and he was God and all things were made by him John 1.1 3. and nothing was made without him which was made He is also immense Hebr. 1.2 because he makes his aboad with the Father and dwells in the hearts of all the faithfull John 14.23 Ephes 3.17 And He is with us alwaies even to the end of the world Likewise eternall Mat. 28.20 because before the foundation of the mountaines were laid before the hills he was borne Prov. 8.25 John 1.1 And he is Alpha and Omega the beginning and ending the first and the last Revel 1.8
by faith to this end principally that God may be honoured it is manifest that to beleeve and doe those things which cannot be denied or omitted without offending of God is the worship of God and contrariwise that God cannot be worshipped but by the prescript of his will both the consciences of all men and God himselfe in his holy word doth testifie as In vain doe they worship me who teach the doctrines and commandements of men It is as wicked therefore to number those things which are not expressed in the word of God Isa 29. Matth. 15. amongst those which are necessary to be beleeved and done in matters of Religion as it is unlawfull for any creature to thrust upon God that worship which himselfe never required 4. The Scripture is sufficient Fourthly there cannot be any thing added of men unto this doctrine without great injury and contumely done unto the holy Scripture For if other things besides these that are written are necessary to the perfection of true Religion then doth not the Scripture shew the perfect manner of worshipping God and of attaining to salvation which fighteth with the plain words of Scripture which affirme that God hath opened unto us in his Word as much as he would have us know in this life concerning his will towards us John 15. as Christ saith All things which I have heard of my Father I have made knowne unto you And Paul I have kept nothing backe but have shewed you all the counsell of God Acts 20. And Knowing that thou hast knowne the holy Scriptures from a child 2 Tim. 3. which are able to make thee wise unto salvation through the faith which is in Christ Jesus For the whole Scripture is given by inspiration of God and is profitable to teach to improve to correct and to instruct in righteousnesse 5. Other Doctors may erre the Prophets and Apostles cannot therefore they are tied to these Fifthly we are to consider the degrees of them who teach in the Church For therefore is the authority of the Prophets and Apostles far higher then of other Ministers of the Church because God called them immediatly to declare his will unto other men and adorned them with testimonies of miracles and other things by which he witnessed that he did so lighten and guide their minds with his Spirit that hee suffered them to erre in no one point of doctrine our Ministers are called by men and may erre and doe erre when they depart from the doctrine of the Prophets and Apostles Wherefore the Apostle Paul saith Ephes 2. 1 Cor. 3. That the Church is builded upon the foundation of the Prophets and Apostles And That hee had laid the foundation and other then that could no man lay others build upon it gold silver precious stones wood hay stubble Now it is manifest that they who may erre ought to be tied unto their doctrine who are warranted by the testimonies of God that they cannot erre Wherefore all other teachers in the Church must not bring any new point of doctrine but onely propound and expound those things unto the Church which are delivered by the Prophets and Apostles The consent of Fathers in this point For these causes therefore doth the whole ancient Church with great consent submit it selfe unto the rule of the sacred Scriptures whose authority yet ought of right to be greater then these mens who both in words and deeds fight against this opinion Basil serm de confess fidei Basil saith That it is a falling from the faith and a fault of pride either not to admit those things which are written in the holy Scriptures or to adde any thing unto them Agust Epist 3. And Augustine For neither ought wee to account of every ones discourses though they be catholike and worthy men as of the Canonicall Scriptures that it may not be lawfull for us without impairing the reverence which we owe to those men to dislike and refuse any thing in their writings if peradventure wee shall find that they have thought otherwise then the Scripture hath as it is by Gods assistance understood either of others Epist 112. or of our selves And If ought be confirmed by the plain authority of the divine Scriptures of those which are called in the Church Canonicall wee must without any doubting beleeve it as for other testimonies by which any thing is moved to be beleeved thou mayest chuse whether thou wilt beleeve them or no. But against these testimonies of the Scriptures and the ancient Church the adversaries of the truth contend that besides the doctrine which is comprised in the holy Bible other decrees also made by the authority of the Church are no lesse unchangeable and necessary to salvation then the Oracles Propheticall and Apostolike And that they may not without some shew and pretence take upon them this authority of decreeing what they list Objections of the Papists 1 Object The Scripture doth not remaine perfect Numb 21. Joshua 10. 1 Kin. 14.19 Jude 9. 14. 1 Cor. 5. Ephes 3. John 21.25 besides and contrary unto the Scripture they alledge places of Scripture in which some writings of the Prophets and Apostles are mentioned which are not come to our hands as The booke of the wars of the Lord The book of the just The booke of the Chronicles of the Kings of Judah The prophecie of Enoch and the story of the body of Moses And lastly the Apostle Paul maketh mention of his Epistles which now the Church hath not Hence therefore these men will conclude That the doctrine of the sacred Scripture is maimed and that therefore the defect hereof must be supplied by the Church But first of all concerning the holy Scripture we are to know that so much thereof hath been preserved of God for us as was necessary and profitable for the doctrine and consolation of the Church Furthermore concerning points of Religion though some holy books are wanting as those Epistles of Paul yet it is manifest that all necessary doctrine is contained in those which are extant They alledge That many things were delivered by word of mouth 2 Object Some things delivered by word of mouth Answer both before there were any Scriptures and afterward also by Christ and the Apostles as John 16.12 1 Corinth 11.34 2 Thessal 2.15 and elsewhere But those things which they delivered by word of mouth are the selfe same which they put in writing except some matters of ceremonies as Act. 15.20 1 Cor. 11.34 which maketh not for the adversaries whose traditions most of them repugne the Scriptures They alledge farther the practice and examples of the Apostles 3 Object That the Apostles have decreed against and besides the Scripture Titus 1. 1 Timothy 1 Cor. 11. 1 Cor. 14. 1 Cor. 7. 1 Cor. 6. Answer as if they did make any ordinances or lawes either besides or against the Scripture as when Paul ordaineth many
things of chusing Bishops and Deacons of widowes of women to be covered and to containe themselves in silence of not divorcing the husband if he be an Infidell of controversies between Christians But these men remember not that their authority is not equall unto the Apostles authority neither consider they that there is nothing in all these things appointed of Paul which is not agreeable to the rest of the Word of God contained in writing and that many of those things which they alledge are comprehended in the commandements of the Decalogue More trifling is it that they say the forme of Baptisme appointed by Christ was changed by the Apostles because it is read Acts 28.19 that they baptised in the Name of Jesus Christ. For in those places not the forme of Baptisme but the use is declared that is that men were baptised for to testifie that they did belong to Christ Neither yet by the example of the Apostles who interdicted the Churches things offered to Idols bloud and that which was strangled is it lawfull for Councels and Bishops to make decrees and lawes to tie mens consciences For first here againe there must needs be retained a difference between the Apostles by whom God opened his will unto men whereupon they also say It seemeth good to the holy Ghost and to us and other Ministers of the Church who are tied unto the Apostles doctrine Further as concerning this decree of the Apostles they decreed nothing else then what the rule of charity commandeth which at all times would have that in things indifferent men should deale without offence Now if they urge that these ordinances are called necessary yet it doth not thereupon follow that the traditions of Bishops are necessary especially such as are the Bishops of Rome Then that necessity whereof the Apostles spake was neither to last continually neither did it bind consciences for feare of the wrath of God if these things were not observed but it dured but for a time for their infirmity who were converted from Judaisme to Christ or were to be converted 1 Cor. 10. as Paul doth at large teach To these they adde the examples of the Church 4 Object Present examples whom they say even from the Apostles to these very times to have beleeved and observed some things not onely not delivered in the Scripture but contrary to the Scripture They bring forth the selfe same decree of Jerusalem concerning things offered to Idols and bloud which being made of the Apostles and expresly set downe in the Scripture was yet abolished by the Church But it hath been already said that that constitution was made not that it should last for ever but for a time for a certaine cause even for the infirmity of the Church which was gathered from among the Jewes and after that cause ceased that ordinance taketh place no longer Neither yet did it at that time fetter mens consciences as if the worshipping or offending of God did lye in it wherefore the abrogating of it is not contrary but doth very well agree with it To these also they reckon the observing of the Lords day We truly as we doe beleeve this to be an Apostolike tradition and perceive it to be profitable and a farre other manner of one then for the most part they are which they would faine thrust upon us under the Apostles name so we doe not put any worship of God to consist in this thing but know it to be left arbitrary unto the Church Even as it is said Let no man condemne you in respect of a holy day But they affirme also that some things not written are beleeved which yet to call to question wee our selves confesse to be unlawfull as That Infants are to be baptised That Christ descended into Hell Coloss â That the Sonne of God is consubstantiall unto the eternall Father But they are too impudent if they take unto themselves a licence of hatching new opinions because the Church for to expound the meaning of the Scripture useth somewhere words which are not extant in the Scripture But impious are they and blasphemous if they say the doctrine it selfe which the Church professeth in these words is not extant in the Scripture 5 Object The holy Ghost to teach the Church therefore not the Scripture They say also that the holy Ghost is promised the Church that it may teach those things which are not delivered in the Scriptures as But the Comforter which is the holy Ghost whom the Father shall send in my name hee shall teach you all things And When the Spirit of truth shall come hee shall lead you into all truth But here they maliciously omit that which is added And shall bring all things to your remembrance which I have told you John 14.26 and 16.13 Againe Hee shall beare witnesse of mee Againe Hee will reprove the world of sinne of righteousnesse and of judgement Againe He shall glorifie mee for he shall receive of mine and shall shew it unto you For out of these it is manifest that the holy Ghost should speak nothing but that which was written in the Gospel and Christ himselfe had before time taught his Disciples so farre is it that he should bring any thing contrary to them For neither can he dissent from Christ nor from himself So also when they alledge that I will put my law in their inward parts Jerem. 31. 2 Cor. 3.3 and in their hearts I will write it And Yee are the Epistle of Christ written not with inke but with the Spirit of the living God not in tables of stone but in fleshly tables of the heart they do not mark that the Spirit cannot speak in mens hearts contrary unto these things which be revealed in the Scripture neither would God write any other law in mens hearts but that which is already revealed and written and that therefore the Apostle Paul opposeth not the matter written but the manner of writing in tables and hearts one against another because that the same was written in both but there with ink and here with the spirit of God It hath lesse colour which they go about to build out of that place If you be otherwise minded God shall reveale even the same unto you Phil. 3.15 If therefore say they the Church thinke any thing different from the written word that proceedeth from the holy Ghost For the Apostle comforteth and confirmeth the godly that albeit they did not understand somewhat of that which there hee had written or were of any other judgement in it yet that hereafter they should be taught it of God and should know those things to be true which he had written When as therefore it is denied that the holy Ghost reveales any thing diverse from that which is written the rule and mastership of the Spirit in the Church is not taken away but the same Spirit is matched with himselfe that is with the rule of the
day Likewise Galat. 5. â Stand fast in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free Now if againe they reply that the office of Bishops is above the civill power 2 Instance The higher power doth more binde 1 Answer and therefore hath greater force than that to binde men to obey first wee grant that more obedience is due unto the superiour power then to the inferiour as long as it commandeth nothing contrary to Gods word As long therefore as the Ministers propound the word of God unto the Church and for avoiding of offence command such things to be observed as appertain to decency and order they do not now offend against them but against God whosoever obey them not But if they require their lawes concerning things different to be observed with putting an opinion of necessity in them and of the worship of God and doe make them necessary when there is no danger of offence to ensue because this charge is contrary to the word of God no obedience is due unto it Further we confesse that greater obedience is due unto the superiour power in those things in which it is superiour that is in which God would have other powers to obey it But the Ministeriall power is superiour unto the Civill in those things in which it is superiour that is which are of God delivered commanded and committed unto the Ministers that by them they may be declared unto the Church But In matters indifferent concerning which nothing is either commanded or forbidden of God the civill power is superiour by reason of the authority which God in these matters hath given unto the civill Magistrate and not to the Ministers of the Church 8 Object Fathers and Councels are cited But against this they returne againe That wee also doe alledge the testimonies of Councels and Fathers in confirming the doctrine of the Church which were but in vaine for us to doe if their sentences had not the force and authority of Ecclesiasticall doctrine But we never bring nor receive the testimonies of the ancient Church with that mind Answer as if without the authority of the holy Scripture they were sufficient for confirmation of any points of doctrine Neither yet is there regard had of them in vaine 2. Uses of the testimonies of Fathers in points of doctrine For 1. They which are rightly minded after they are instructed by the voice of the Scriptures concerning the truth are yet more confirmed by the Church as by a testimony of lower degree 2. They which attribute more authority unto them then they should or abuse their sayings against the truth are very well refuted by the testimony of them whom they have made their Judges Also they say 9 Object Traditions are order 1 Cor. 14. That order and decency in the Church is necessary by the commandement of God according as it is said Let all things be done comely and in order For God is not the authour of confusion Now the order and discipline of the Church doth a great part consist in traditions Ecclesiasticall wherefore they conclude that by the violating of these mens consciences are wounded Answ Of meere particulars there is no concluding A double liberty of the Church in matters of order and God offended But as God commandeth some order to be appointed and kept in the Church so hath he given a double liberty in it unto his Church To appoint it That it be arbitrary for the Church to appoint as may be most commodious for it what order shall be in every place and at every time observed To keep or not to keep it being appointed so it be without offence That also after any thing is certainly ordained it may be kept or not kept without hurt of conscience both of the whole Church and of every one of the godly if there be no danger of offence For it is necessary that ever a difference be put betwixt the commandements of God by the observing whereof God is worshipped and offended by the breaking of them and those things which God hath left to men to appoint neither is worshipped or offended as himselfe pronounceth either by the altering or omitting of them so long as there is no cause or danger of offence 1 Cor. 14.40 Galat. 5.1 Col. 2.16 And the same Apostle who commandeth all things to be done comely and in order willeth us to stand fast in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free and that we should be condemned of no man in meat or drinke or in respect of a holy-day Wherefore not they who without contempt of divine things or wantonnesse or danger of offence doe something otherwise in these things then is appointed but they rather offend against the commandement of God concerning keeping order who either would have no order in the Church or trouble that which is well appointed These men find fault also with the obscurity of the holy Scripture 10 Object Obscure things do not suffice without interpretation 1 Pet. 3.16 which they prove both by examples of hard places of Scripture and also out of Peter where it is said That there are some things hard to be understood in the Epistles of Paul And therefore sith that things darkly spoken without they be expounded cannot suffice to perfect and wholesome doctrine they urge that the interpretation of the Church also is necessary to be received with the Scripture But here above all things they injure the holy Ghost ascribing darknesse and obscurity unto him Answer The Minor is false if they respect the ground who of purpose endeavoured to apply himself in simplicity of speech to the capacity of the common people and the rudest For those things which appertaine to the ground of doctrine which is necessary to be known of all as are the articles of our Beliefe and the ten Commandements they are so plainly recited so often repeated so plentifully expounded in the Scriptures that they are open and easie to any but to him who will not learne even as the 119. Psalme teacheth where the word of the Lord is called a lanterne to our feet and a light to our pathes Againe the entrance into thy word sheweth light and giveth understanding to the simple The word of the Prophet is called a light shining in a darke place To which ye doe well that yee take heed as unto a light that shineth in a darke place untill the day dawne and the day-starre arise in your heart 2 Pet. 1.19 And Solomon affirmeth that hee writeth to give the simple sharpnesse of wit and to the child Prov. 1.4 20. knowledge and discretion Againe that wisedome cryeth without and uttereth her voice in the streets Paul also saith that Christ sent him to preach the Gospel 1 Corinth 1.17 1 Instance The ground of doctrine is unknowne to many Answ Yea to the reprobate 2 Cor. 4.3 Isa 65.2 Rom. 10.21 Psal 36.3 Mat. 11.25 not
proper to the Mediatour to be a messenger and truce-man between God and us and to regenerate us by his Spirit Therefore only the Son must be this Mediatour 4. It belongeth unto the Mediatour immediatly to send the holy Ghost But the Son alone immediatly sendeth the holy Ghost The Father also indeed sendeth the holy Ghost but mediately by the Sonne the Sonne immediately from the Father as himselfe testifieth whom I will send unto you from the Father John 15.26 5. It belongeth to the Mediatour to suffer and die for us But the Sonne only is he who taking our flesh on him hath suffered in it and died God is manifested in the flesh c. 1 Tim. 3.16 1 Pet. 3.18 Christ was put to death concerning the flesh c. Therefore hee only is the Mediatour 6. That the Son is the Mediatour is proved by conference of revelations and prophesies in the old Testament and by the fulfilling of the same in the new 7. The same is proved by the works and miracles which Christ wrought John 5.36 John 7.31 John 10.38 Matth. 11.4 5. The works that I do bear witnesse of mee that the Father sent mee When Christ cometh will hee doe moe miracles then this man hath done Beleeve my works Goe and shew John what things yee have heard and seen the blind receive sight c. 8. By testimonies of Scripture There is one Mediatour between God and man which is the man Christ Jesus 1 Tim. 2.5 1 Cor. 1.30 Christ Jesus of God is made unto us wisdome and righteousnesse and sanctification and redemption that is to say he is made unto us a teacher of wisdome a Justifier and Sanctifier and Redeemer to wit a Mediatour and Saviour in full merit and efficacy For in this speech of the Apostle the Abstracts wisdome justification sanctification and redemption are put for the Concretes a teacher of wisdome a Justifier a Sanctifier a Redeemer In this sentence of the Apostle that is worthy observation whereas hee saith that the Mediatour was made unto us of God he meaneth was appointed and given The Mediatour was given us by God A Mediatour should have been given unto us and proceeded from us because we were the offenders But we were unable to supply any from amongst our selves because we were all the sons of wrath Wherefore it was necessary that a Mediatour should be given us of God Here we are to note farther that justice or righteousnesse and sanctity or holinesse in us before the fall were one and the same thing to wit an inherent conformity in us with God and the law as at this day in the holy Angels they are one and the same But now since the fall they continue no longer the same in us For now Christ is our righteousnesse How justification and sanctification and justice sanctity are now since the fall different and diverse in us and our justification is the imputation of Christs righteousnesse whereby we are accounted righteous before God Holinesse also is our inchoative or new begun conformity with God and sanctification is the working of a conformity with God in us which is here imperfect and shall be perfected in the life to come where holinesse and righteousnesse shall be again one and the same even in us Now followeth a brief recapitulation of the whole doctrine touching the Mediatour OF THE MEDIATOUR The causes why this doctrine of the Mediatour is to be in the Church THe doctrine touching the Mediatour whereas it so neerly concerneth Gods glory and our comfort is to be held and diligently considered for these causes 1. That we may acknowledge and magnifie the mercy and goodnesse of God towards us in that he hath given us his Son to be our Mediatour and to be made a sacrifice for our sins 2. That we may know that God is just and doth not of any lenity pardon sins but is so grievously offended therewith that he granteth no pardon to them except the satisfaction of his Son mediate and come between 3. That wee enjoying such a Mediatour may be assured of eternall life because this our Mediatour is both willing and able to grant it 4. Because it is the foundation and short summe of Christian doctrine 5. Because of Hereticks who at all times most grievously oppugne this doctrine that against them we may be able to defend it The doctrine concerning the Mediatour seemeth to belong to the place of Justification because there also the office of the Mediator is declared But it is one thing to teach What and what manner of benefit the benefit of justification is and how it is received which is performed in the common place touching Justification another thing to shew whose that benefit is and by whom it is bestowed which is proper to this present place here handled and these are different and diverse propositions Justification belongeth to the Mediatour or is wrought by the Mediatour and remission of sins is our justification In the former proposition Justication is the subject that is it is that whereof another thing is affirmed in the latter it is the Attribute or Predicate that is justification it self is affirmed of another thing even of remission of sins The principall Questions touching the Mediatour are these 1. What in generall a Mediatour is 2. Whether wee need any Mediatour with God for us 3. What his office is 4. What manner of one is necessary 5. Who or what person is or may be our Mediatour 6. Whether there may be moe Mediatours 1 What a Mediatour is What a mediator ãâã in generall A Mediatour in generall signifieth him who reconcileth two parties at variance by interposing himselfe and mitigating the offence or appeasing the offended by intreatie satisfaction and caution lest the like offence be again occasioned and committed To reconcile hath four parts For to reconcile is 1 To make intercession for him who offendeth unto him who is offended 2 To make satisfaction for the injury offered 3 To promise and to bring to passe that the party who hath offended offend no more For except this be brought to passe and effectuated the fruit and commodity of the intercession is lost 4 To bring them to an attonement and agreement who were before at enmity If one of these conditions be wanting A Mediatour in speciall there cannot be any true reconcilement But in speciall and as here it is used and meant of Christ A Mediatour is a person reconciling God who is offended and angry with sin and mankinde offending and subject to eternall death for the same and that by the satisfying of Gods justice by his death by praying and intreating for the guilty and by applying forcibly and effectually his merit through faith on them that beleeve and regenerating them by his holy Spirit effecting that they cease from sinning and lastly hearing their grones and petitions when they call on him Or A Mediatour is a
reconciled witnesse Peter who saith He was put to death concerning the flesh Repl. But Christ is the Intercessor and God the Testator Therefore the reconciliation is not of force Ans They differ in person and offices the person of Christ differeth from the person of the Father and the holy Ghost in office not in efficacy and power and in respect of him it is an intercession in respect of us a reconciliation or receiving into favour 2. How a Covenant may be made between God and men THat Covenant could not be made without a Mediatour for we could neither satisfie nor come again in favour with God no nor receive the benefit of reconciliation procured by another Furthermore God in his justice would not admit of us without sufficient satisfaction we were the enemies of God therefore the entrance and accesse to God lay not open to us before he was pacified by the merit of our Mediatour as it hath been shewed more at large before in that question Why a Mediatour is necessary for us The reconciliation could not be plenarily accomplished without the satisfaction and death of the Mediatour Again without the Mediatour regenerating us we should not have been able to stand to the conditions and so had the Covenant been made of no force 3. Whether there be one or moe Covenants There is but one Covenant in substance two in circumstance THe Covenant of God is but one in substance and matter but two in circumstances that is it is one in respect of the more generall conditions by which God combineth or compoundeth with us and we with God but it is two in respect of lesse principall conditions or as some speak it is two as touching the manner of the administration thereof There is but one in substance How one in substance 1. Because there is but one God one Mediatour between God and men Christ Jesus one mean of reconcilement one faith one way of the salvation of all who are saved and have been saved from the beginning It is a great question Whether the ancient Fathers were saved by any other means then we are which except it be well and circumspectly construed obscureth with palpable darknesse the light of the Gospel But these testimonies of Scripture doe lesson and schoole us the truth herein Hebr. 13.8 Eph. 1.22 4.1 Jesus Christ yesterday and to day and the same also for ever God hath appointed him over all things to be the head of the Church By whom all the body is coupled and knit together c. No man hath seen God at any time the only begotten Son which is in the bosome of the Father John 1.18 he hath declared him There is given no other name under heaven whereby we must be saved No man knoweth the Father but the Son and he to whom the Son will reveale him Acts 4.12 Matth. 11.27 John 14.6 I am the way the truth and the life no man cometh to the Father but by me Hee meaneth I alone am the way by which even Adam attained salvation Luke 20.24 John 8.56 Many kings have desired to see these things which ye see and have not seen them Abraham rejoyced to see my day and he saw it and was glad All therefore as well under the Law as under the Gospel who were to be saved had respect to the onely Mediatour Christ by whom alone they were reconciled unto God and saved Therefore there is but one Covenant 2. The Covenant is only one because the principall conditions which are termed the substance of the Covenant are the same both before and since Christs incarnation for in both Testaments before and after the exhibiting of Christ God promiseth remission of sins to beleevers and repentant sinners and men bind themselves to beliefe and repentance There are said to be two Covenants How two in circumstance the old and the new as concerning the circumstances and those conditions which are lesse principall which are the forme of administration serving for the principall conditions that the faithfull may attain unto them by the help of these Now what these principall conditions are shall appear out of that which followeth A rule here may be observed The diversity of Covenants is known by the diversity of their conditions In all Covenants their conditions are ever to be considered which if they be the same then are the Covenants also the same if diverse then the Covenants also diverse if partly the same and partly diverse then the Covenants are also in part the same and in part diverse as in this Covenant 4. In what the old and new Covenant agree and in what they differ The old and new Covenant agree in three things WHereas the Covenant is one and yet the Scripture speaketh thereof as of two we are to consider wherein the old and new Testament concurre and agree and wherein they differ They agree In their Author and Mediatour In their Authour which is God and in their Mediatour which is Christ Object But some man will say Moses was the Mediatour of the old Covenant Ans True as in a type adjoyned to the Mediatour which was signified who then also was Mediatour but now is sole Mediatour without that typicall Mediatour For he is manifested in the flesh and is no more covered with types In the promise of grace In the promise of grace touching remission of sins and life everlasting to be given freely by and for Christ the Mediatour to those only who beleeve which promise was common to the old Church as well as to us For God promised the same grace and mercy unto all who beleeve in the Mediatour In thy seed shall the nations of the earth be blessed Gen. 22.18 Gen. 3.15 Gen. 17.7 John 3.36 The seed of the woman shall break the head of the serpent I will be thy God and the God of thy seed He that beleeveth in the Son hath life everlasting We beleeve through the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ to be saved even as they doe Now here wee speak not in particular of the circumstances of grace but in generall of the promise of grace But Covenants have the same corporall promises also but that only in generall In their condition in respect of us Gen. 17.1 Mark 1.15 In their tenour and condition in respect of us for in both God requireth of men faith and obedience Walk before me and be thou upright And Repent and beleeve the Gospel The new and oâd Covenant therefore agree as concerning the principall conditions of the Covenant both in respect of God and in respect of man But the two Covenants differ The old and new Covenant differ In promises of corporall benefits In the promises of corporall benefits for the old Covenant had speciall promises of some certain definite corporall blessings as the promise of the land to be given to the Church of the form of ceremoniall
working and effecting any thing is so in God onely that there is not the least ability or efficacy of any creature but what he continually imparteth and preserveth at his pleasure and therefore the power of God is to be considered of us not as being idle but as creating sustaining moving and ruling all things The reasons are 1. God is the first cause of all things therfore he hath all things in his power and their ability is so much as he giveth unto them 2. He doth such things as can be done by no created and finite power as are the creation and governing of all things the preservation of common-weals the deluge the delivery out of Egypt and all his miracles 3 Hee is unchangeable therefore in him to be able to do and to do is the same which to will and so of the contrary But although all men affirme God to be omnipotent yet there is a double difference between the sacred doctrine of the Church Two differences between the doctrine of the Church and Philosophy in conceiving of Gods omnipotency and Philosophy concerning Gods omnipotency For 1. Without the doctrine of the Church men only know the universall and generall power of God whereby hee createth preserveth and governeth the whole world but they know not that power whereby he saveth men and restoreth the world by his Son gathering and preserving an everlasting Church and delivering it from sin and death and endowing it with life and glory everlasting by which works God especially sheweth forth his power as it is said Yet a little while and I shall shake the heavens and the earth and the sea Hagg. 2.7 and the drie land 2. Neither do they professe of the generall power of God so much as is sufficient for albeit they are enforced to confesse that God is the author and preserver of the world yet are they not able to say that all things were created of nothing by the word of God alone and forasmuch as they are ignorant of the cause of sin and confusion they cannot affirm all things so to be administred and governed by Gods omnipotency as that all which is good is done by the powerfull working of Gods will but they attribute many things to chance fortune and humane wisdome or vertue and so imagine the power of God to be idle in these and doing nothing Furthermore That God cannot either sin or will and allow of sin or be changed or diminished or suffer any thing or make things done undone or will things flat repugnant and contradictory or create another God or some nature equall to himselfe or be perceived by bodily senses or do other things proper to a created or finite nature or admit the same into himselfe this doth not diminish or weaken but rather augment and strengthen his power For that is the greatest and most perfect power which can neither be destroyed nor weakened nor diminished and that none sustaining it but only by it selfe But contrariwise to be able to be corrupted and impaired is a token of imbecility and imperfection Gods exceeding wisdom whereby both he knoweth all things perfectly and is the fountain of all knowledge and understanding Of exceeding and immense wisdome That wee may rightly and with profit and commodity know the power of God it is necessary not to consider it but as it is joyned with his immense wisdome and goodnesse which moderateth it Further of his divine wisdome we learn 1. That God doth of himself in one act or view under stand and behold perpetually and most perfectly in marvellous manner and that unknown to us himselfe and the whole order of his minde declared in the nature of things and in his word and what agreeth therewith and disagreeth and all his works and all the works of all creatures past present and to come and all the causes and circumstances of all things 2. That all Angels and men have no more knowledge of divine and humane matters then God doth work and maintain in their mindes for among other things the most beautifull and sightly order which is in the nature of things the ends and uses of all things the signification of future events arts and sciences the everting and overturning of those devices which the divell and wicked men have most craftily contrived against God and all the godly doe enforce all men to confesse that these things could not proceed but from a most wise artificer and author Wherefore also the Scripture it selfe willeth us to consider the wisdome of God shining in these his works Eccles 3.11 Isa 44.7 God hath made every thing beautifull in his time Who is like mee that shall call and shall declare it and set it in order before me since I appointed the ancient people He taketh the wise in their craftinesse Job 5.13 and of these it concludeth that the wisdome of God is immense and unconceivable Psalm 147.5 Rom. 11.33 as His wisdome is infinite O the deepnesse of the riches both of the wisdome and knowledge of God! But here again is to be observed a difference between Philosophy and the word of God 1. That even in the creation the known or legall wisdome was darkned and maimed in men through sin and therefore needeth a renewing by the word delivered to the Church 2. That men without this heavenly doctrine are altogether ignorant of the especiall wisdome of God revealed in the Gospel whereby hee saveth the Church gathered from amongst mankind by the Son as it is said I give thee thanks O Father because thou hast hid these things from the wise and men of understanding Matth. 21.25 and hast opened them unto babes Good Six significations of the goodnesse of God in Scripture Psalm 106.1 143.10.1 John 1.5 The goodnesse of God signifieth sometimes his bountifulnesse as Praise the Lord because he is good sometimes all the vertues and whatsoever is spoken of the nature of God as Let thy Spirit lead me through the right way That which also is meant by the name of holinesse or sanctity and light So in this place by the name of goodnesse are understood 1. All those things which are attributed to God in his word and are represented and resembled in his image as those things which are termed good in Angles and men as life power wisdom joy righteousnesse c. For such is the nature of God as it hath manifested it self in the Law and Gospel and the goodnesse of the reasonable creature is an image of the divine goodnesse and therefore here also differ Philosophy and the Scripture in that Philosophy attributeth onely to God that his goodnesse which was opened in the Law and yet neither that wholly but of his goodnesse revealed in the Gospel it is altogether ignorant 2. By reason of the great and huge difference between the Creator and the creature we understand those good things to be in God which are agreeing to his divine nature
have a beginning in respect of their persons and have their essence communicated unto them from some other Untrue They have a beginning in respect of their essence Sunt essentiati or They are essenced or have their essence produced from the Father or They have their essence produced from some other It is truely said The first person of the Deity begate the second of his owne essence The third person proceeded from the first and second But not truely The divine essence begate a divine essence or The person is begotten or proceedeth of the essence True it is to say The divine essence is communicated Untrue The divine essence is born or proceedeth The reason is because to be communicated is not the same as to be begotten but stretcheth farther For not whatsoever is communicated to the begotten is also begotten but that is begotten to which the substance of him that begetteth is communicated 2. Of the outward operations of the three persons Another difference of the persons ariseth out of the former consisting of the order of their externall operations which they exercise towards the creatures and in them and by them For these actions I grant are wrought be the common will power and efficacy of the Father Son and holy Ghost but yet that order still of the persons being kept which they have in their subsisting The Father is the fountain as of the persons so of the operations of the Son and of the holy Ghost and he doth all things not of any other that is no other working by him no others will preventing his no other imparting to him power or efficacy but of himselfe that is as hee subsisteth of himselfe so hee understandeth and worketh of himselfe But the Son and holy Ghost do not work of themselves but by themselves that is the Son worketh the Fathers will going before the holy Ghost worketh the will going before both of the Father and the Son The Father worketh by the Son and the holy Ghost and sendeth them but is not sent of them the Son worketh by the holy Ghost sendeth him from the Father into the hearts of the beleevers but is not sent of him but of the Father The holy Ghost worketh and is sent from both the Father and the Son not from himselfe All things were made (a) Joh. 1.3 Col. 1.16 Heb. 1.2 by him The Son can do nothing (b) Joh. 5.19 of himself save that he seeth the Father do For whatsoever things he doth the same things doth the Son also I proceeded forth and came (c) Joh. 8.42 John 14.26 John 5.26 from God neither came I of my self but he sent me Whom the Father will send in my name Whom I will send unto you from the Father What the sending of the Son holy Ghost meaneth Now when the Son and holy Ghost are said to be sent we may not understand this sending as if it were any locall motion or as if it were any change in God but we must understand it of his everlasting will and decree of accomplishing ought by the Son and holy Ghost and of the execution and manifestation of this his will by the working of the Son and holy Ghost So saith the Son that he was sent of the Father into the world that he came down from heaven and yet that he was in heaven whilest he remained on the earth So the holy Ghost though he were before in the Apostles and dwelt in them yet he is said to be sent unto them in the day of Pentecost Both these persons therfore were sent into the world not that therby they became present somewhere where before they were not but because the Son wrought in the world whatsoever was the will of the Father and shewed himself present and powerfull according to his Fathers good pleasure as it is said God sent forth his Son made of a woman And because ye are sons Gal. 4.46 God hath sent forth the Spirit of his Son into your hearts which cryeth Abba Father 8. Why it is necessary that this doctrine of the Trinity should be held and maintained in the Church The doctrine of the Trinity to be taught in the Church THis doctrine of the Trinity is to be learned and held in the Church In respect of Gods glory In respect of the glory of God that God may be discerned and distinguished from idols For God will not be matched with idols but will have himself to be worshipped and celebrated and therefore known and agnized for such a one as hee hath declared himself to be In regard of our salvation In regard of our owne salvation and comfort No man is saved who knoweth not the Father and the Father is not known without the Son For No man hath seen God at any time John 1.18 1 John 2.23 the onely begotten Son which is in the bosome of the Father hee hath declared him Whosoever denyeth the Son the same hath not the Father Again No man is freed and saved from sin and death without beleeving in the Mediatour Christ He is very God and eternall life 1 John 5.20 But no man reposeth trust and confidence in the Son when as yet he is not known unto him Rom. 10.14 How shall they call on him in whom they have not beleeved How shall they beleeve in him of whom they have not heard Therefore we must first know the Son and then for the Son wee must know the Father that we may beleeve in him Likewise no man is sanctified and saved by the holy Ghost who knoweth not the holy Ghost For he who receiveth not the holy Ghost is not saved according to that saying of Scripture Rom. 8.9 He that hath not the Spirit of Christ the same is not his But no man receiveth him whom hee knoweth not Therefore hee who knoweth him not is not saved That no man receiveth him whom hee knoweth not is proved by those words of Christ The Spirit of truth the world cannot receive because it seeth him not Joh. 14.17 neither knoweth him Except a man be born again of water and the Spirit hee cannot enter into the kingdome of heaven Hence it manifestly appeareth That they which will be saved must necessarily know the Father the Son and the holy Ghost And they must know that the Son and the holy Ghost are distinct from the Father but yet consubstantiall with the Father and equall in perfections honour worship and therefore the same true God which is the Father For except God be known of us to be such as he hath declared himselfe to be he doth not communicate himself unto us neither may we look or hope for everlasting life from him And what he hath shewed himself to be wee have heard namely That hee is the eternall Father co-eternall Son and co-eternall holy Ghost But among all points there is none more sharply oppugned by the adversaries of the truth then
in the holy Ghost as I beleeve in the Father The Father When the name of the Father is opposed to the Son it is taken personally and signifieth the first person of the God head as here in the Creed buâ when it is referred to the creatures it is understood essentially and signifieth the whole divine nature as in the Lords prayer Our Father which art in heaven In this sense the Son is expresly called of Isaiah The everlasting Father Now the first person is called the Father 1. In respect of Christ his only begotten and naturall Son 2. In respect of all the creatures as hee is Creatour and preserver of them all 3. In respect of the elect whom hee hath adopted to be his sons and hath made accepted in his beloved Wherefore God is our Father in respect both of our creation adoption and regeneration To beleeve therefore in God the Father is to beleeve in that God who is the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ and to beleeve that âe is my Father that is hath a fatherly affection towards me for Christs sake in whom hee hath adopted me to be his son Briefly and in a word it is to beleeve 1. That hee is the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ 2. That he is my Father for Christs sake Object I beleeve in God the Father Therefore the Son and the holy Ghost are not God bâââhe Father only is God Ans This kind of reasoning Logicians call a fallacie of composition and division that is either a mis-joyning or dis-joyning of words in any clause or sentence not to be joyned or dis-joyned for the word God is so to be joyned with the Father that it be not separated from the Son and holy Ghost for a comma point should be inferred after these words in God on this wise I beleeve in God the Father c. This is proved 1. Because the name of God here in the Creed is put essentially and compriseth all the three persons which by apposition or for farther explication are placed in order in the Creed as I beleeve in God the Father and in Jesus Christ his only begotten Son I beleeve in the holy Ghost For I beleeve in one true God who is the Father the Son and the holy Ghost yet so that neither the Father is the Son nor the holy Ghost is either the Father or the Son 2. We expresly professe that we beleeve in the Son and holy Ghost no lesse then in God the Father But wee may not beleeve but in one God Wherefore as we beleeve in the Father in that he is God so beleeve we also in the Son and the holy Ghost because they are God 3. Most of the Greek copies read I beleeve in one God to wit Father Son and holy Ghost 4. Furthermore if of these words of the first article it follow that the Father only is God then of the same words by the like reason it should follow that this Father only is omnipotent and Creatour of heaven and earth which the whole Scripture cryeth to be most false But of especiall consideration is this name of God but only once mentioned in the Creed thereby to signifie that the true God is but only one but in no case is it put as if thereby were intimated that the Father only is called God Almighty To beleeve in God almighty Almighty is to beleeve in such a one 1. Who is able to do whatsoever he will yea also those things which he will not if they be not contrary to his nature as he could have kept Christ from death but he would not 2. Who doth all things even with his beck and word only without any difficulty 3. Who alone hath power to work all things and is author of that power which is in all his creatures 4. Who is also unto me almighty and both can will direct all things to my safety Obj. God cannot lie die make that which is once done undone c. Therefore he is not omnipotent Ans God can do all things which to do argueth any power or ability But to lie to die c. is no signe or part of omnipoteny but of infirmity and want of power Now defects are in creatures not in God wherefore they are contrary to the nature of God By inverting the reason therefore I thus conclude God is not able to will or to do that which argueth impotency and is against his nature Therefore he is omnipotent Maker of heaven and earth Maker of heaven and earth To beleeve in the Creatour is to beleeve 1. That he is Creatour of all things 2. That he sustaineth and governeth by his providence those things which he hath created 3. That he hath created my self also to his own glory and to the obtaining at length of my salvation and that I may be a vessell of mercy he bringeth me to that salvation by his speciall providence wherewith hee imbraceth his chosen 4. That he hath created all other things for us to serve for the salvation of his Church to the praise of his glory More briefly thus I beleeve in God the Creatour that is I beleeve that God hath created me to celebrate and serve him and all other things to serve for my safety 1 Cor. 3.22 23. All things are yours and you are Christs and Christ is Gods as if he should say All things are created for us and we for God OF THE CREATION OF THE WORLD Two sorts of Gods workes 1. Generall 2. Speciall Gods generall works are the workes NExt unto the doctrine concerning God the doctrine of the works of God is most fitly placed as we see to be done also in the Creed The works of God are of two sorts generall and speciall The generall are divided into the works Of creation Of Creation the works whereof are read in Genesis to have been accomplished in six dayes and are by daily increase furthered and multiplied in the world Of preservation Of preservation whereby God still sustaineth the heavens and the earth and the things that in them are that they fall not to ruine and decay Of administration Of administration wherby through his immense and great wisdome he administreth and governeth all things These two latter are comprehended under the name of his providence And therefore next unto the creation is annexed the place concerning Gods Providence Gods speciall works are the works 1. Of reparation The speciall works of God are those which are wrought in the Church and company of his elect and chosen to justifie sanctifie and glorifie them and are either works of reparation or restoring whereby he repaireth all things which for the sin of man are subject to corruption or of perfection and accomplishment 2. Of perfection whereby he bringeth all things to their certain appointed end especially he perfectly delivereth and glorifieth his Church Here we are to treat of the work of Creation or the
Creation of the world and the principall Questions of Creation are these 1. Whether the world was created of God 2. How it was created 3. For what cause it was created 1. Whether the world was created of God Five significations of the word world FIrst the words and terms are to be understood The name of the world is diversly used in the Scripture 1. It signifieth the universall frame of all things namely heaven and earth and all things which are in them visible and invisible besides God himself The world was made by him John 1.10 2. Worldly concupiscence 3. All mankind 4. The wicked or those that are not regenerate in the world 5. The elect That the world might beleeve John 17.9 21. John 3.16 So God loved the world Here we consider it in the first sense To create signifieth three things To create signifieth 1. To ordain or constitute as the Latines used it Creare Consulem to create a Consull 2. To make something of nothing without any motion with a beck or word only so it is taken in this place 3. The continuating of creation or creation continued which is the providence of God The creation of the world proved That the world hath not been from everlasting but had when it seemed best to the Creatour according to his eternall counsell and will a beginning once and was created of that only true God who hath manifested himself in the Church that he is the eternall Father and Son and holy Ghost wee know By testimonies of Scripture By testimonies of holy Scripture as by the whole history of the creation set down by Moses Likewise Psal 33.6 9. Psal 104. 113. 124. 136. 146. Isa 44. Acts 4.17 out of other testimonies of Scripture very many By the word of the Lord were the heavens made and all the hoste of them by the breath of his mouth Hee spake and it was done hee commanded and it stood or was created There are other places also in the Psalmes where more largely and amply the wonderfull works of God and the principall parts of the world created by God are proposed to be considered of us that through the consideration thereof wee may learn to put our trust and confidence in God For this purpose did the Lord himself propose unto Job his marvellous and incomprehensible works conspicuous in heaven and earth Job 38. 39. and other things also created by him to declare his justice power and providence 2. By reasons Furthermore besides testimonies of Scripture almost innumerable it is confirmed also by firm and true reasons that the world was created of God such as these following 1. The originals and beginnings of nations and people shew it which could not be fained of Moses when as some remembrance and memoriall of them was then extant amongst many which yet in processe of time perished 2. The novelty and latenesse of all other histories compared with the antiquity and ancientnesse of the sacred story 3. The age of man decreasing which sheweth that there mas greater strength in nature at the first and that not without some first cause it hath decreased hitherto 4. The certain course and race of times even from the beginning of the world unto the exhibiting of the Messias 5. The constitution and founding of common-weals 6. The order of things instituted in nature which must needs have been produced and framed by some intelligent mind far superiour to all things 7. The excellency of the minde of men and Angels These intelligent mindes have a beginning Therefore they have it from some intelligent cause 8. The principles or generall rules and naturall notions ingenerated in our minds 9. The trembling of conscience in the wicked 10. The ends of all things profitably and wisely ordained therefore by some cause understanding and ordaining them 11. Lastly Those other arguments and reasons also which prove that there is a God prove in like manner that the world was created of God 3 Naturall reasons Thirdly besides these reasons it may be enforced by philosophicall arguments drawn out of the bosome of nature That the world was created and that it was created of God although by them we are not able to demonstrate the time when it was created For 1. There is no infinite processe in nature of causes and effects for if so nature should never attain unto her end even the producing of effects Therefore this world had a beginning 2. The noblest and excellentest of all effects is the world Therefore it proceedeth from the noblest and excellentest cause which is God How the creation is unknown to Philosophers Other questions as Whether the world was created from everlasting or in time that is Whether it be an effect of equall perpetuity with his cause and so co-eternall or Whether it once so began to be that before it had no being Again Whether if sometimes it were not yet it was necessary that it should be created And Whether it shall endure for ever And if it endure Whether it shall remain the same or it is to be changed These and such like questions cannot be decided by Philosophy The reason is because all these things depend upon the meer will of God the first mover of all things who doth nothing of necessity but with most absolute freedome Now this his will is not known to any creature but to whomsoever God himselfe revealeth it Therefore it is not manifested to heathenish Philosophers but declared to the Church alone for they cannot possibly collect any thing hereof by proceeding from a continuing effect unto his cause It followeth indeed that there is some cause of those effects but it followeth not that those effects were produced of that cause either at this or that time or from all eternity because a free agent may either act or suspend his action at his pleasure The whole demonstration hereof is thus brought in form No effect depending onely of such a cause as worketh freely or contingently can be demonstrated by that cause But the creation of the world is such an effect Therefore the creation of the world cannot be demonstrated by the will of God the first mover of all things that it either was made from everlasting or in some beginning of time Arguments of Philosophers against the creation of the world Now whatsoever arguments are brought of Philosophers against the creation of the world it is easie to perceive that these were not framed out of true Philosophy but by the imaginations of men if the order of the generation and mutation of things instituted in nature which was created of God be discerned from creation Object 1. It is absurd say the Philosophers to imagine that God is idle Ans Nay rather it is absurd to term him idle who administreth and ruleth the world Repl. This I grant but he could not govern the world when as yet the world was not
And thou preservest them all I forme the light and create darknes I make peace and create evill I the Lord doe all these things Wisedome reacheth from one end to another mightily and comely doth shee order all things Gods particular providence over creatures renewed with reason Ge. 45.8 50.20 Exod. 4.11 Jos 11.6 21.45 2 Sam. 16.10 1 Kings 22.20 Pro. 21.1 19.14 22.14 Esay 10.5 Lament 2.37 Dan. 4.32 Of the speciall providence of God over reasonable creatures the history of Joseph yeeldeth us notable testimonies Ye sent mee not hither but God When ye thought evill against mee God disposed it to good Likewise the indurating and hardening of Pharaoh Exod. 3.4 7 8 9 10 14. Who hath given the mouth to man or who hath made the dumbe or the deafe or him that seeth Have not I the Lord Therefore goe now and I will be with thy mouth The Lord said unto Josuah Be not affraid for them for to morrow about this time I will deliver them all slaine before Israel There failed nothing of all the good things which the Lord had said unto the house of Israel but all came to passe The Lord hath bidden him curse David Who shall entise Ahab that he may goe and fall at Ramoth Gilead and so forth Thou shalt entise and shalt also prevaile The Kings heart is in the hand of the Lord he turneth it whither-soever it pleaseth him A prudent wife cometh of the Lord. The mouth of strange women is as a deep pit He with whom the Lord is angry shall fall therein Likewise the Lord calleth the King of the Assyrians the rod of his fury Who is he then that saith and it commeth to passe and the Lord commandeth it not According to his will he worketh in the army of heaven and in the inhabitants of the earth and none can stay his hand nor say unto him What doest thou Herod and Pontius Pilate Acts 4.27 with the Gentiles and the people of Israel gathered themselves together to doe whatsoever thine hand and thy counsell had determined before to be done His providence over creatures voide of reason Psal 34.20 Job 37. Psa 104. 134.7 Gen. 8.1 Psal 147.8 9. Mat. 6.20 30. Of his providence in creatures which are without reason whether they bee living or not living testimonies are extant every where in the Sacred Scriptures The Lord keepeth all the just mans bones Likewise Hee bringeth up the clouds from the ends of the earth and maketh the lightnings with the raine hee draweth forth the winde out of his treasures God remembred Noah and made a winde to passe upon the earth Which giveth to beasts their food and to the young Ravens that cry Your heavenly Father feedeth the fowles of the aire If God so clothe the grasse of the field shall hee not doe much more unto you 4. Of the providence of God governing things contingent fortuâing and casuall these places of Scripture speake If a man hath not laid wait 2. His providence over things casuall fortuning Exod. 21.11 Mat. 10.21 30 Joâ 1.21 Prov. 16.33 Josua 7. but God hath offered him into his hand then I will appoint thee a place whither he shall flee Are not two Sparrowes sold for a farthing and one of them shall not fall to the ground without your Father Yea and all the haires of your head are numbred The Lord hath given and the Lord hath taken it blessed be the Lords Name The lot is cast into the lap but the whole disposition thereof is of the Lord. Thus God openeth the theft of Achan by lot Gods providence in necessary events John 19.36 Exod 12.46 Luke 24.46 Marke 18.7 Mat. 24 2â John 10 2â Two necessities depending on Gods decree Job 37.5 6 9 10. Job 38.27 28 32. Psal 104.13 14 15. Of Gods providence in necessary events if their necessity depend on the decree of God revealed in his word we have these evidences These things were done that the Scripture should be fulfilled Not a bone of him shall be broken Thus it is written and thus it behoved Christ to suffer and to rise again from the dead the third day It must needs be that offences shall come If it were possible they should deceive the very Elect. My sheep shal never perish neither shall any pluck them out of mine hand If their necessity depend on the order settled by God in nature that iâ on naturall causes working by a naturall necessity we have also these proofes thereof God thundreth marvellously with his voice he saith to the snow Be thou upon the earth likewise to the small raine and to the raine of his power The whirle wind cometh out of the South and the cold from the North-wind At the breath of God the frost is given He causeth the bud of the herbe to spring forth by raine he begetteth the deaw the frost the ice he bringeth forth Mazzaroth in their time he guideth Arcturus he guideth the motions of heaven and effectually worketh by them in these lower regions Hee watereth the mountaines from his chambers and the earth is filled with the fruit of thy workes He causeth the grasse to grow for the cattell and herbe for the use of man that he maâ bring forth bread out of the earth and wine that maketh glad the heart of man and oyle to make the face to shine and bread that strengtheneth mans heart He appointed the Moone for certaine seasons the Sun knoweth his going downe Thou makest darknesse and it is night To those testimonies of Scripture which ratifie Gods providence in such necessary events as depend on his decree revealed in his word those places also may be added which confirme the resurrection and raising again from the dead of those bodies which we carry about with us in this life as Who shall change our vile body that it may be fashioned like unto his glorious body Genes 3. Job 10. according to the working whereby he is able even to subdue all things unto himselfe This corruptible must put on incorruption and this morâall must put on immortality For seeing we see the substance of our bodies to be so many waies changed and scattered after death when as they are moldred into dust it followeth therefore necessarily that there is a providence of God which taketh a most strait and exact care even of the smallest dust whereby the substance of out bodies so often altered and dissipated into infinite formes and parts is againe in such wise to be recollected gathered together and reduced to their first masse and forme as that not other but the selfe same bodies which wee have in this life shall rise againe Against these places of Scripture alledged some make exception That the examples whereof these places speake are particular and propheticall events administred by the speciall counsell of God and that therefore there may not be framed a generall rule universally extending to all events But against
consequence or by supposition which is the immutability and unchangeablenesse of those effects which follow of causes which causes being supposed or put the effect must necessarily follow but the causes notwithstanding themselves might either not have been or might have been changed So are those things necessary which God hath decreed that they should be done in respect of the unchangeablenesse of his decree which decree yet God most freely made that is hee might from everlasting either not have decreed it at all or have decreed it otherwise according to those wordes Thinkest thou that I cannot now pray to my Father and hee will give mee moe than twelve legions of Angels Mat. 26.53 How then should the Scripture be fulfilled Likewise Those things are called necessary which are done indeed by such second causes as are so made of God that by their owne nature they cannot doe otherwise than they doe but yet may be by God himselfe either taken away or hindered or altered and changed As the Sun and the shadow going forward in consequence or order of nature with the Sun and yet consisting and standing still in that battell of Joshua and returning backwards in the daies of Ezechias the fire burning bodies within the reach thereof which are capable of burning and yet not burning the three Children in the furnace of Babylon or those things which are indeed in their own nature apt to produce a contrary or diverse thing or to forbeare producing of their effect and yet notwithstanding cannot doe otherwise because they are so moved by God or by other causes which although they be not changed yet might have been changed or when they worke so cannot withall not worke or worke otherwise because two contradictories cannot be both at one time true Fortune and Chance Fortune and Chance are sometimes taken for the events themselves or effects which follow causes that are causes but by an accident by reason of such causes as are causes by and in themselves but not knowne to us as when we say good or evill fortune happy or unhappy chance Sometimes they signifie the causes of such events either the manifest causes which are causes but by an accident as when any thing is said to be done by fortune or by chance or the hidden and unknown causes which are causes by and in themselves As it is said in the Poet Omnipotent fortune and fate inevitable And they are wont to call that fortune which is a cause by an accident in voluntary agents whose actions have some event that seldome happeneth besides their appointment As he that digging with purpose to build findeth treasure Chance they call an accidentall cause in naturall agents whose motions have effects neither proper to them neither alwaies happening and that without any manifest cause directing it as if a tyle falling from an house kill one that passeth by Fate or destiny The difference between the Stoickes the Churches doctrine concerning Gods providence By the name of Fate or Destiny sometimes is understood the decree and provideâce of God As that of the Poet Leave off to hope that the fates of the Gods are moved with entreaty But the Stoickes by this word understood the immutable connexion and knitting of all causes and effects depending of the nature of the causes themselves so that neither the second causes are able to work otherwise than they work neither the first causes can worke otherwise than doth the second and therefore all effects of all causes are absolutely necessary This opinion of the Stoickes because it spoyleth God of his liberty and omnipotency and abolisheth the order and manner of working in second causes disposed by Gods wisedome not only sounder Philosophy but the Church also rejecteth and condemneth and doth openly professe her dissenting from the Stoickes 1. Because the Stoickes tie God to second causes as if it should be necessary for him to work by them as their nature doth bear and suffer But the Church teacheth that God worketh not according to the rule or lore of second causes but second causes according to the prescript of God as being their chiefe and most free Governour and Lord and therefore are subject and tied to his will and pleasure 2. The Stoickes were of opinion that neither God nâr second causes can doe any thing of their own nature otherwise than they doe The Church affirmeth that not only second causes are made and ordained by God some to bring forth certain and definite effects some variable and contrary but God himself also could from everlasting either not have decreed or have decreed and wrought otherwise either by second causes or without them and by them either changeable in their own nature or unchangeable all things whose contrary are not repugnant to his nature and that he hath so decreed them and doth so work them not because he could not doe otherwise but because it so pleased him as it is said Our God is in heaven he doth whatsoever he will With God shall nothing be impossible that is which is not against his nature Psal 115.3 Luke 1.37 or whereby his nature is not overthrowne as it is said 2 Tim. 2. Out of this then which hath been spoken we answer unto the argument which was That which is done by the unchangeable decree of God is not done contingently but necessarily All things are done by the unchangeable decree of God nothing therefore is done contingently neither by fortune or chance but all necessarily First wee say there is more in the conclusion than in the premisses when the opinion of the Stoickes is objected to the Church For albeit the Church confesseth all events in respect of Gods providence to be necessary yet this necessity is not a Stoicall fate and destiny because the Church detendeth against the Stoickes both liberty in God governing things at his pleasure and a changeablenes in second causes and sheweth out of Gods word that God could both now doe and from everlasting have decreed many things which neither he doth nor hath decreed And therefore the Church also hath abstained from the name of fate lest any should suspect her to maintaine with the Stoickes an absolute necessity of all things Secondly necessity of consequence or supposition doth not take away contingency If removing Stoicisme yet notwithstanding the necessity of all things and the abolishing of contingency fortune and chance be objected wee make answer to the Major by distinguishing the words For those things which are done by the providence and decree of God are done indeed necessarily but by that necessity which is by supposition or of consequence not by simple necessity or absolute wherefore it followeth that all things come to passe not by simple and absolute necessity but by that of supposition or consequence And necessity of consequence doth not at all take away contingency The reason of this is Because the same effect may have causes whereof some may produce
equall with God he took on him the form of a servant Esay 5.14 9.6 25.6 7 8. c. Jer. 23.6 By him all things were made and do consist both visible and invisible he giveth the holy Ghost lightneth every man that cometh into the world he alone knoweth the Father and he to whom he revealeth him c. Lastly that there is a double nature or substance in Christ both a finite and an infinite is convinced and proved by the diversity and repugnancy of those properties which are attributed to the same Christ 2. By coâtrary properties but cannot possibly be together in one and the same nature Wherefore Christ man is God not created and made in time by reason of the fulnesse and excellency of his gifts but eternall subsisting before the flesh born of the Virgin and before all worlds by reason of the eternall God-head of the Word dwelling in his Majesty personally To the second Classe or order of Reasons are referred those restimonies 2 Classe Christ the proper Son of God which shew Christ to be the proper or naturall Sonne of God because he was begotten of the substance of his Father and not adopted The argument or proofe is this the naturall or proper Sonne of God is of necessity partaker of the divine nature of essence or sub stance But Christ man is the proper Son of God Therefore there is in Christ besides his humane nature which he tooke of our kinde a nature or substance divine in respect whereof he is and is called the Sonne of God that is Christ is by nature the Son of God and therefore subsisting and that before the flesh from everlasting because hee is the Sonne of the eternall Father having the essence of the Father in number the same and whole communicated unto him from the Father The Major is manifest by the definition of a proper or naturall sonne For a proper sonne is hee who is procreated out of his substance whose sonne hee is or he who is partaker of his fathers nature or substance John 5.17 18. The place is necessarily to âe undârstood and so was taken of the Jewes of a naturall son The Minor is proved by these testimonies of holy Scripture My Father worketh hitherto and I worke Therefore the Jewes sought the more to kill him not onely because he had broken the Sabbath but said also that God was his Father and made himselfe equall with God Because Christ called himselfe the Son of God not adopted or by grace only but naturall begotten of the substance of the Father and therefore equall with God the Jewes did therefore gather 1. That hee challenged unto himselfe the workes of God the Father And therefore because they deemed him to be a meere man they would have slain him as a blasphemer and robber of Gods glory both in this place and John 19.7 And if Christ had meant that he was the Son of God by grace only as are the Angels and men elected the Jewes verily would not have reprehended that as a blasphemy and treason against the Majesty of God for then they should have condemned themselves of the same crime John 8.41 because they say unto Christ Wee have one Father which is God 2. Christ also doth not reprehend this collection of the Jewes or repell it as a slander but defendeth it as being good and necessarily true in his answer presently following wherein hee avoucheth that whatsoever things the Father doth the same doth he also together with him as being his Sonne that by the same authority liberty power he raiseth the dead and quickneth them who beleeve in him by which the Father doth that as the Father hath life in himselfe so also hath he given unto him as being his Son to have life in himselfe c. Wherefore the man Jesus affirmeth that which of it selfe and demonstratively doth thereof follow and the Jewes called blasphemy namely that he is the Son of God not by grace only but proper and equall with God that is that there is in him besides humane nature a divine also which is the Son communicated unto him by an unspeakable generation or begetting from the Father and according to which hee is equall with the Father and the same God which the Father is For where the same power operations and works are there also is necessarily inferred the same nature or substance to be and that equall So Christ is called the proper Son of God Rom. 8.3 God sending his owne Son that is borne of his owne substance or we are otherwise also of God being renewed by his spirit 32. And. Who spared not his owne Son Object 1. It is not found any where in Scripture that Christ is the naturall and co-eternall Son of God Therefore it is but an invention of men imagining in him besides his flesh another substance Christ the naturall co-eternall Son of God which is expressed in Scripture according to which he should be the eternall Son of God Ans Although these very words are not in the very same Syllables extant in the Scripture yet there are found the like and equivalent or such as signifie the same which these do For The wisedome of God which is Christ and his Son is described to be such as was with God from everlasting before his works were made And further John saith that the Word whom he called the Son was even then in the beginning of the world and was God creating and preserving all things But God is eternall and before things were created together with which also time began eternity only existeth and may be imagined in mind Moreover he is expresly called the proper Son of God therefore he is the natural Son of God who hath the naturall essence of his Father and that the same with his Father because the Deity is but one in number Creatresse of all things also he had the same whole and entire because he is indivisible Wherefore the man Christ is the same eternall God with the Father by reason of the Deity Christ is the proper Son of God by nature not by grace which he hath simply alone and the same with the Father for there are two eternals he is also the naturall and co eternall Son of the Father because he is another from the Father as touching his person Rom. 8.32 Repl. 1. Christ is called the proper Sonne of God because he was made by God as also the Church is called the proper people of God Answ This is a corruption of the place before cited out of Paul For Paul opposeth the proper Son of God to us and also to the Angels For both the Angels and we are made the sons of God in respect either of our Creation Adoption and Regeneration by the holy Ghost or also in respect of both as the regenerate Therefore we being compared with Christ are not the proper sons of God For so he
the flesh which he tooke Repl. 4. But hee is no where said to be invisible John 1.5 10. Ans He is said to have been in the world unknowne and this John speaketh of him as he was before his incarnation And then he was in the world invisible Likewise John 14.21 Mat. 28.20 I and the Father will come unto him And in the same place I will not leave you comfortlesse I will come unto you I am with you alway unto the end of the world that is invisibly as in the Father And if they will deny him to be with us because he is not seen they shall also exclude the Father Repl. 5. He is with us in power and vertue not in essence Ans This objection were rather to be hissed out than to be refuted Jer. 10.17 because he hath not an infinite power and vertue who hath a finite essence The gods that have not made the heavens and the earth shall perish from the earth how much more then the makers of such gods And the Word was with God in the beginning Wee interpret this that the Sonne was co-eternall with the Father and so joyned with him that notwithstanding hee was distinct in person from him They say that this Doctor and Teacher the man Jesus was known of God alone and not men but he was the Messias Answ 1. To be or Not to be with one when it is spoken of a person is never read in this sense as to signifie to be known or not known of one It is therefore an impudent forgery 2. John himselfe expoundeth it The Sonne which is in the bosome of the Father This doth not onely signifie to be known but also to be indeed in the Father to be intirely loved of him and to be fellow and co-partner of the secret and hidden counsels of the Father 3. He saith of himselfe That he came downe from heaven That hee came from the Father and came into the world That he returneth to the Father with whom he was before This doth not signifie a knowing or a not knowing but an existence and being 4. By him all creatures were made of the Father therefore he was present with the Father 5. He was in the world before he being made man came unto his owne and yet not known Therefore to be in the world and to be known of the world are not all one and by consequent neither is it all one to be with God and to be known of God 6. Christ himselfe expoundeth it I in the Father and the Father in mee This signifieth not onely a knowledge but a co-existence and joynt being mutuall And that Word was God Wee interpret That the Word is true God eternall Creatour of heaven and earth the same God with the Father and therefore divers from him as the Word from him that speaketh by him and the Son from the Father but having the same nature and essence of the God-head in him which the Father hath as Christ himself saith I in the Father and the Father in me He is every where in the Father as the Father every where in him But they say that he is God in respect of his gifts worthinesse excellency and office but not by nature Which they prove because others also are in this sense and respect called gods which have not any divinity of themselves therefore Christ also after the same manner seeing hee also hath his divinity from the Father Further they adde that we make two gods and deale contumeliously with the Father Answ Wee make not two gods because the Sonne is one with the Father as God that is having the same essence in him which the Father hath but is diverse and distinct from him as the Sonne and having in him the same Deity which the Father hath communicated But they are blasphemous and contumelious against the Father and the Sonne Because they honour not the Son John 5.23 as they honour the Father Now that Saint John understandeth a Son not a made created and inferiour God to the Father and a diverse God from him is proved and confirmed by many reasons but some few shall now suffice 1. Simply and absolutely without restraint to any certaine circumstance none is called God in the Scripture besides the onely true God eternall creatour of the world 2. That the Word was God before things were created and is the Creatour of all things S. John doth teach 3. He sheweth that he is the authour and fountaine of life and knowledge in men even from the beginning For this signifieth the true light that is which is properly and by it selfe light it selfe and the originall of light in others 4. This Word giveth power to be the sonnes of God John 1.12 This none can doe but the true God alone 5. We are to beleeve in his Name But we must beleeve in none but God only as himself proveth that therefore they must beleeve in him because they beleeve in God 6. John Baptist saith that he baptiseth with the holy Ghost And Christ himselfe often saith that hee will send the holy Ghost from the Father John 1.33 But no man can send the Spirit of God and work by him in the hearts of men but only he whose proper Spirit this is namely God Esay 40.3 Joh. 1.23 3.28 Luke 3.4 8. John 5.13 7. John Baptist is called the fore-runner of Christ who should prepare his way But he prepareth the way of the Lord. 8. Christ himselfe saith That the Father will that all should honour the Son as they honour the Father But no creature albeit excellent can be equalled in honour with the Creatour 9. Every where he is called the true God 1 John 5.20 Rom. 9.5 Act. 20.28 He. 1.8 10. 3.3 and the Lord. This is the true God and eternall life Who is God over all blessed for ever Amen God hath purchased his Church with his owne bloud The scepter of thy kingdome is a scepter of righteousnesse Thou Lord in the beginning hast established the earth and the heavens are the workes of thine hands Christ is counted worthy of more glory than Moses inasmuch as he which hath builded the house hath more honour than the house and hee that hath built all things is God 10. Hee is said to have come downe from heaven yet so that he remaineth in heaven to come unto his together with his Father to be with them unto the end of the world Therefore hee is of an infinite essence every where present and working both in heaven and earth But his humane nature is finite The God-head is after another sort communicated unto Christ than unto creatures Therefore he is God in respect of another nature Now to that which hath been objected concerning the communicating of the Deity unto others whereby they are called gods we answer by distinguishing the diversity thereof For unto others it is communicated by a created similitude of the
servant for a witnesse of the things which should be spoken after But Christ is as the Sonne over his owne house John 17.2 As thou hast given him power over all flesh that he should give eternall life to all them that thou hast given him Therefore it is Christ who from the beginning of the world did reveale the will of God unto men appoint and ordain a ministery collect governe and save his Church wherefore he is the builder which seeing it is apparent that he hath done from the beginning of the Churches birth John 6.39 it is not to be doubted of that he hath alwaies been subsisting This is the Fathers will that of all which he hath given me I should lose nothing Wherefore hee saveth his Church and therefore hath alwayes been because the Church hath alwaies been saved and preserved To the eight Classe are those places referred 8. Classe The Angell spoken of in the Old Testament was Christ the Sonne of God Chap. 3.1 in which both the name and property of Jehovah are attributed unto the Angell who appeared in the Old Testament unto the Fathers and was the leader of the people whom to have been the Sonne of God Christ both the Church hath alwayes confessed and the Scripture doth witnesse it The Prophet Malachy hath a notable testimony Behold I will send my messenger and he shall prepare the way before me and the Lord whom yee seek shall speedily come to his temple even the messenger of the Covenant whom yee desire This speaketh Christ himselfe by the Prophet which is also confirmed by this argument Whose way is prepared he is Christ but he that promiseth is he whose way is prepared Therefore he that promiseth is Christ The Major is manifest for not the Father but Christ was looked for and he followed John Baptist The Minor is proved out of the text it selfe Behold I send my messenger and hee shall prepare the way before mee Wherefore Christ was before he tooke flesh because he sent his messenger and was also before he tooke flesh very God For he calleth flesh his temple to which hee saith he will come Flesh called the temple of God But none hath a temple builded in worship of him but God Therefore it is blasphemous to say that Christ was not before he tooke flesh Neither doth that hinder because he speaketh in the third person The Lord will come to his people For he sufficiently sheweth who that Lord is namely not the Father but the Son I the Lord who sent John before me and who am the messenger of the Covenant And further it may be that the Prophet doth not continue in makeing Christ speak but representeth the Father himselfe speaking of sending the Son Vnto the Son he saith O God thy throne is for ever and ever Christ Jesus is the Apostle and High Priest Psal 45.6 Heb. 1.8 3.3 13.8 Two reasons proâing that that Angell was Christ the builder heire and Lord of his Church Jesus Christ yesterday and to day and the same is also for ever The argument therefore is this The Messenger or the Angell sent of old unto the Church was a subsistent or person That Messenger is the Sonne of God Christ Therefore the Sonne of God was before Jesus was borne of the Virgin truely existing did worke and was ruler over his Church The Minor is proved 1. Because To be God and To be sent of God for to teach collect governe and save the Church that is to be the Mediatour are things proper unto the Son of God Christ not to the Father or the holy Ghost Exod. 3. 4. Gen. 32.28 30. 48.15 16. But these properties of the Son are attributed to this Messenger or Angel as authour and effecter 2. The Apostle Paul teacheth Christ to have been present with the people of Israel in the Desart and to have bin tempted and provoked by them 1 Cor. 10.1 Therefore the Messenger or Angel God and Christ are one and the same person 9. Classe The divine nature in Christ both was before the flesh and is the Son of God In the ninth Classe are contained those testimonies of Scripture which affirme Christ Jesus to be by nature God and the Son of God The argument is this Christs Divinity existed before Jesus borne of the Virgin Christs Divinity is the Sonne of God Therefore the Sonne of God existed before Jesus was borne The Major of this argument is confirmed by the reasons already alledged For 1. God is manifested in the flesh which he tooke 2. Christ is the proper or naturall Son of God and not man only 3. Christ is the Word 4. Christ is the Wisedome subsisting 5. Christ is the Mediatour 6. Christ is that Messenger or Angel sent of old unto his Church 7. In Christ is not any created God-head but that eternall Deity which alone is true God For unto Christ not only the name Rom. â 5 1 Tim. 3.16 2 John 5.2 Esay 9.6 Jerem. 23.6 but all the properties also and perfections of the true God are every where ascribed in Scripture as omnipotency infinite wisdome omniscience or all knowledge immensity the creation and governance of things the salvation of the Church the working of miracles And the attributing and giving unto him of the properties of the true God yeeldeth us a more firm proof of his Divinity than doth the attributing of the name of the true God or of the Lord For the names of God may after a sort be expounded metaphorically but the divine property attributed unto Christ cannot be wrested to any other meaning If therefore wee fence and guard our selves with such testimonies the adversaries of this doctrine cannot consist or stand but will they nill they they shall be forced to confesse that Christ was before he took flesh And if he were before he took flesh he was either the Creatour or Creature But he was no Creature both because hee created all things and because also he is called Creatour Wherefore seeing the true God hath been from everlasting his God-head also which is true God must needs be subsisting from everlasting The Minor is likewise confirmed by the former argument 1. The nature which took flesh is God and the Son of God for neither the Father nor the holy Ghost took flesh Therefore the Son otherwise the Son of God is not by nature God 2. The humane nature in Christ is not the naturall Son of God Therefore the Divine nature must be that Son 3. The Divine nature in Christ is the Word 4. It is Wisedome 5. According to it Christ is Mediatour 6. The Deity of Christ is the Angel and Messenger of the Lord sent of old unto the Church Therefore the Deity of Christ is the Son of God THE SECOND CONCLUSION Christ the Son of God is a person really distinct from the Father and the holy Ghost WEe are to hold that the Word is a person distinct
John 16.30 Eph. 5.25 26. Christ loved the Church and gave himselfe for it That he might sanctifie it and cleanse it by the washing of water through the word He is unchangeable Heaven and earth shall passe but my word shall not passe He is truth it selfe and the fountaine of truth Mat. 24.38 John 0781 0 8.14 John 14.6 Eph. 5.2 Though I beare record of my selfe yet my record is true I am the Way the Truth and the Life He is of unspeakable mercy Even as Christ hath loved us and hath given himself for us to be an offering and a sacrifice of a sweet smelling savour to God He is angry against sin John 3.16 Rev. 6.16 17. and taketh vengeance thereof yea of hidden sins He that beleeveth not the Son shall not see life but the wrath of God abideth on him Fall on us and hide us from the presence of him that sitteth on the Throne and from the wrath of the Lambe For the great day of his wrath is come and who can stand The Son therefore is God by nature and equall to the Father 4 The Scripture in like sort attributeth all Divine operations to the Son as it doth unto the Father And it communicateth unto him 1. All generall effects and works common to the whole three persons as that he is Creatour John 1.3 Heb. 1.3 By him were all things made Likewise that he is the preserver and governour of all things Bearing up all things by his mighty word 2. It appropriateth unto him certain speciall offices and functions appertaining to the safety of his Church as that he sendeth Prophets Apostles and other Ministers of the Church As the Father sent mee so send I you John 20 21. Ephes 4.11 He therefore gave some to be Apostles some Prophets some Evangelists and some Pastours and Teachers That he furnisheth his Ministers with necessary gifts and graces I will give you a mouth and wisdome where against all your adversaries shall not be able to speak John 1.18 nor resist That he revealeth unto us his spirituall doctrine The only begotten Sonne which is in the bosome of the Father he hath declared him unto us That he confirmeth this doctrine by miracles And they went forth and preached every where Marke 16.20 1 Cor. 11.23 Mat. 28.19 Rev. 22.16 John 16.14 John 10.14 16. And the Lord wrought with them and confirmed the word with signes that followed That he instituted Sacraments I have recived of the Lord that which I also have delivered unto you Baptise them in the name of the Father the Son and the holy Ghost That he revealeth things to come I Jesus have sent mine Angel to testifie unto you these things in the Church He shall receive of mine and shall shew it unto you That he gathereth the Church I am the good Shepheard and know mine and am known of mine Other sheep I have also which are not of this fold them also must I bring and they shall heare my voice and there shall be one sheep-fold and one Shepheard That he inlightneth the understanding and hearts of men No man knoweth the Father but the Son and he to whom the Son will reveale him Mat. 11.27 Luke 24.45 John 1.33 Titus 2.14 John 15.5 Gal. 2.20 Mat. 11.28 John 14.27 Then opened he their understanding that they might understand the Scriptures That he governeth the actions and lives of the godly Without me ye can doe nothing Thus I live yet not I now but Christ liveth in me That he ministreth comfort in temptations Come unto mee all ye that are weary and laden and I will ease you Peace I leave with you my peace I give unto you That he strengthneth and defendeth us against the temptations of Sathan and preserveth those that turne unto him by a true faith John 16.33 John 10.28 John 14.14 2 Cor. 12.8 even unto the end Be of good cheere I have overcome the world My sheep shall not perish for ever and no man shall take them out of mine hand That he heareth those that pray unto him If ye shall aske any thing in my name I will doe it I besought the Lord thrice and he answered mee My grace is sufficient for thee That he forgiveth sins justifieth and adopteth unto us to be the sons of God Esay 53.11 Mat. 9.6 By his knowledge my righteous servant shall justifie many That ye may know that the Son of man hath power to remit sins on the earth As many as received him John 1.12 John 10.28 1 John 5.20 Acts 10.42 Acts 17.31 to them he gave power to be the sons of God That he giveth life everlasting I give unto them eternall life This same is very God and eternall life That he judgeth the world It is hee that is ordained of God a Judge of quicke and dead Because he hath appointed a day in the which he will judge the world in righteousnesse by that man whom he hath appointed These divine works attributed unto the Son differ so from the divine properties which are attributed unto him as effects from their causes so that then his properties worke them 5. The equality of honour and worship dependeth of the equality of essence properties Esay 42.8 He hath equall honour given him and workes I will not give my glory to any other But the Scripture giveth equall honour and worship to the Father and the Son Therefore they are truely equall in God-head and in all the perfections thereof The Minor is confirmed 1. By testimonies Psal 97. Heb. 1.6 Rev 5.13 John 5.23 John 14.1 Psal 45.7 Heâ 1.8 Acts 30 28. 1 Tim. 16. proving that he is worshipped of Angels and the whole Church Let all the Angels of God worship him That all should honour the Son as they honour the Father Faith and hope are due unto him Yee beleeve in God beleeve also in mee 2. He is called God absolutely and simply as is the Father 3. The Epithetes or titles of divine honour which are every where in the Scriptures attributed unto the Son as God blessed for ever The great God and Saviour The Lord himself from heaven The Lord of glory The Lord of lords and King of kings power and eternall Kingdom Sitting at the right hand of the Father The Bridegroom Husband Head of the Church God of the Temple which are all the Elect Trust and beliefe in him Invocation for he is worshipped of the Church of God and Bridegroome of the Church at all times and in all places Thanksgiving for his divine benefits Furthermore albeit the name of God especially being put absolutely and without restraint doth evidently prove the Sons equality with the Father as it hath been said yet seeing that signifieth moe things and is also applyed to others who are not by nature God we are diligently to collect and to have in a readiness those testimonies in which things proper to the true God only are attributed to the
Son which agree to none else who are called gods and whereby God himself discerneth himself from other creatures and forged gods For unto whom the essentiall properties of any nature or essence doe truly and really agree unto him the essence it selfe must needs be given Object 1. Hee that hath all things of another is inferiour to him of whom hee hath them The Son hath all things of the Father Therefore he is inferiour unto the Father The Son hath all thing from the Father not by grace but by nature Ans The Major holdeth and is true of such an one as hath any thing by the grace and favour of the giver for he might not have it and therefore is by nature inferiour but it is false of him who hath all those things by his owne nature which he himselfe hath of whom he receiveth them For seeing he cannot but have them it cannot be that he should be inferiour or should have lesse than he of whom he receiveth them But the Son hath all things of the Father which the Father hath and that by nature and absolute necessity that is in such sort as that the Father cannot but communicate unto him all things which himselfe hath belonging to his divine Majesty John 5.26 John 17. â0 As the Father hath life in himself so likewise hath he given to the Son to have life in himself All mine are thine and thine are mine Therefore he is equall unto the Father in all things Obj. 2. Hee that doth whatsoever he doth by the will of another interposed and going before is inferiour unto him The Son willeth and doth all things by the will of his Father going before Therefore he is not equall unto the Father in vertue The Son doth all things with the content of the Father in like manner as the Father dignity and essence Ans The Son doth all things his Fathers will going before not in time and nature but in order of persons so that he willeth or doth nothing which the Father also willeth not and doth and whatsoever the Father willeth and doth the same also the Son willeth and doth likewise that is with equall authority and power Wherefore the society and order of the divine operations doth not take away but doth most of all settle and establish the equality of the Father and the Son as also of the holy Ghost THE FOURTH CONCLUSION The Word is consubstantiall with the Father THese three former Conclusions being declared and set down namely That the Son is subsisting or a person That hee is distinct from the Father That hee is equall with the Father the fourth is easily gotten and obtained against the New Arrians to wit That he is consubstantiall with the Father which is also in like maner to be understood concerning the holy Ghost For either this must be granted or of necessity there are made three Gods which they though in words they deny it yet in very deed affirme when they frame and feigne three essences and spirits They grant that the Son is like-substantiall that is of like essence and nature with the Father which ââââdeed true but this is not enough For the words Consubstantiall and Like-substantiall differ For like-substantiall signifieth moe persons and like essences as three men are like-substantiall For they are both three persons and three essences of like nature that is agree in humane nature But consubstantiall signifieth one essence and moe persons Thus in the God-head is not like-substantiall ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã because there are not three Gods but consubstantiall because there are three persons of one and the same divine essence For there is but one Jehovah that is one divine essence which is the same and is wholly in every of the three persons and therefore every of them are that one God besides which essence whatsoever is it is a creature not God The Father indeed is one person and the Son another person but the Father is not one God and the Son another John saith There are three which bear record in heaven but they are three persons not three Gods which bear this record We therefore hold against Arrius that Christ was not only like-substantiall but also consubstantiall with the Father that is hath the same individuall divine essence with the Father The Latine Church turneth the Greek word ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã consubstantiall taking substance for essence It is therfore the same that co-essentiall that is of one and the same essence The arguments which shew the Father and the Son to be of one the same essence are these 1 Jehovah * Deut. 6.4 The English translations retain not the word Iehovah but use The Lord instead thereof which is the signification of Jehovah and therefore in effect all one Jerem. 23.6 Esay 25.9 Hag. 2.9 Zach. 2.8 Malac. 3.1 is but one essence or one God But the eternall Father and the Son co-eternall with the Father are that Jehovah Therefore these two are one essence and one God The Minor is proved 1. By those places of Scripture which call the Son Jehovah This is the name whereby they shall call him Jehovah or the Lord our righteousness The expected God and Saviour is called Jehovah But the Messias is the expected God and Saviour who in the same sense is called The Desire of all Nations Therefore the Messias is that Jehovah whereof the Prophet speaketh The Deliverer of the Church sent from Jehovah which is the Messias only is called Jehovah He is called Jehovah whose fore-runner was John Baptist But John Baptist was the fore-runner of the Messias or the Son of God Christ He therefore is called Jehovah Hitherto belong all the places in which are given to the Angel or Messenger of Jehovah both the name of Jehovah and the divine properties and honours But that Angel was the Son of God not the Father Therefore the Son is Jehovah Again the Minor is also hereof manifest Joel 2.31 Psal 68.18 Eph. 4.8 Psal 95.9 1 Cor. 10.9 Psal 97.7 Heb. 1.6 Psal 102.6 Heb. 1.10 Esay 8.14 28.16 Luke 2.34 Rom. 9.33 Esay 41.4 Rev. 1.17 21.6 for that what things in the Old Testament are spoken of Jehovah those in the New are referred unto Christ as He that ascended on High and gave gifts is Jehovah and the same is Christ Jehovah was tempted in the desart and the same is Christ He that is to be worshipped and is Creator of all things is Jehovah and the same is Christ The stone of offence The first and the last is Jehovah and the same is Christ Lastly the same is proved by those testimonies which attribute things that are proper to Jehovah unto Christ also as authour and effecter or worker of them 2. The true God is but one The Son is the true God equall with the eternall Father in God-head properties works and honour as hath bin before declared This same is
reason of the latter is because all the elect and faithfull and they alone doe by faith apply unto themselves the merit of Christs death and by his application obtaine the efficacy thereof even their justification and salvation according to that saying of Scripture He which beleeveth in the Son hath life everlasting The rest are excluded from this efficacy of Christs death by their own infidelity according as it followeth in the same place He which beleeveth not shall not see life but the wrath of God abideth on him Wherefore John 3.36 whom the Scripture cancelleth from the participation of the efficacy of Christs death for them Christ cannot be said to have died with respect of the efficacy of his death but in respect only of the sufficiency of his sacrifice because the death of Christ is sufficient to save them if they beleeved but it saveth them not because they beleeve not If any demand what the will of Christ herein was whether he had a will to die for all hee is answered by the same distinction For as hee died so would hee die Whether Christ would die for all men As therefore he died for all in respect of the sufficiency of his ransome but for the faithfull alone in regard of the efficacy of the same so would hee also die for all in generall as concerning the sufficiency of his merit that is hee would in most sufficient maner demerit for all by his death grace righteousnesse and life everlasting seeing he would that nothing should be wanting on his part that there should be no defect in his merit that so all the wicked and reprobate might perish without excuse But for the elect alone hee would die as touching the efficacy of his merit that is hee would not only sufficiently merit grace and salvation but also effectually impart them on the elect alone namely hee would give unto them faith and the holy Ghost and accomplish or effect in them that they should apply unto themselves by faith the benefits of his death and so obtain the fruits thereof In this sense Christ is well said to have died in a different maner for the faithfull and unfaithfull Neither hath this interpretation any inconvenience consequent thereon but accordeth not only with Scripture but even with very experience also both which testifie unto us that the salve of sin and death is most sufficiently and plentifully offered in the Gospel unto all but it is applyed and it cureth the faithfull alone The whole current of Scripture restraineth the efficacy of redemption to some particulars only as to Christs sheep to the elect and to the beleeving whereas on the other side it apparently abandoneth and sequestreth from the grace of Christ the reprobate and unfaithfull as long as they remain such What concord hath Christ with Belial or what part hath the beleever with the infidell Again 2 Cor. 6.15 Christ prayed for the Elect only and beleeving and such as hereafter should beleeve on him I pray not for the world but for those whom thou hast given mee If Christ would not pray for the world to wit for the unfaithfull much lesse would he so die for them John 27.9 as by his death to effect their salvation For it is a lesse thing to pray for a man than to die for him and intercession and suffering of death are the two individuall or inseparable parts of Christs sacrifice of which if Christ deny the ungodly the one who is he that dareth reach out unto them the other Lastly the sounder Fathers and Schoole-men doe thus restraine these texts of Scriptures The opinion of Fathers herein Aug ad cap. ob cap. 1 in Ioh. tract 52. serm 137. de temp Cyr. in Ioh. lib. 11 cap. 19. Prospâr ad cap. Gallorum Lumb lib. 3. dist 22 Sum. de veâit Mat. 26. Quaft 7. and distinguish on them as we doe especially Augustine Cyril and Prosper Lombard thus writeth Christ offered up himself to God the Trinity for all men as touching the sufficiency of the price pay'd but for the elect alone as touching the efficacy because he wrought salvation only for the Predestinate Thomas saith The merit of Christ as concerning the sufficiency thereof equally belongeth unto all but not concerning the efficacy which hapneth partly by reason of free-will and partly by reason of Gods election whereby the effects and fruits of Christs merits are mercifully bestowed on some and by the just judgement of God are with-held from others This is the language of other School-men also Whence it is evident that Christ so died for all that notwithstanding the benefits of his death properly concern the faithfull alone to whom only they are availeable Object 1. The promise of the Gospel is universall as appeareth in that Christ saith Come unto mee all And againe That every man might be saved Also That hee might have mercy on all Therefore it concerneth not the faithfull alone Ans The promise indeed is universall but in regard of the faithfull and penitent For to extend it unto filthy dogs and hogs that is to the reprobate were open blasphemy There is saith Ambrose a certain speciall university of the elect and fore-knowne of God severed and discerned from the generality of all This manner of restraint is deduced out of the very letter of the promise John 3.16 Rom. 322. That every one which beleeveth should not perish but have everlasting life The righteousnesse of God by the faith of Christ Jesus unto all and upon all that beleeve Come unto mee all yee which labour and travell and I will refresh you Hee is rich unto all that call upon him Whosoever shall call on the name of the Lord shall be saved Mat. 11.28 Acts 2.21 Heb. 5.9 Mat. 7.6 Hee is made the authour of salvation unto all that obey him And out of the words of Christ Give not that which is holy unto dogs and cast not pearles before swine Obj. 2. Christ died for all Therefore his death appertaineth not to the faithfull only Answ Christ died for all as touching the merit and sufficiency of his ransom for the faithfull only as touching the application and efficacy thereof For inasmuch as the death of Christ is imparted unto them and profiteth them only it is rightly said to appertain properly unto them alone as before hath bin proved at large Quest 41. To what end was he buried also Ans That thereby he might make manifest that he was dead indeed a Act. 13.29 Mat. 27.59 60 Luk. 23.52 The Explication THE causes of Christs buriall are many For 1. He would be buried in testimony of his true death that we might know that hee was dead indeed For the living are not buried but the dead only As then after his resurrection hee offered himselfe to be seen handled c. for evident proof of the truth of his body raised from death so after his death he offered his body to be
the place and state of the blessed where both of us shall be free from these paines that is he speaketh of felicity and liberty which is not in hell for his meaning is both of us who now suffer shall this day be in Paradise a place of everlasting salvation or happinesse where being delivered from all torments we shall injoy most pleasant quiet and repose But Paradise is neither hell nor in hell which is the place of torment Whereupon also it is cleere that Christ spake this to the Thiefe not of his God-head but of that which suffered which was his soule For the God-head was not with the Thiefe neither did Christ suffer or was elivered as touching his God-head but as touching his soule 2. If Christ did locally descend into hell Because there was no cause why Christ should descend Joââ 39.30 he descended either to suffer or to deliver the Fathers thence as the Papists affirme But he descended not to suffer because now all things were finished on the Crosse as Christ himselfe also hanging on the Crosse said It is finished Hee descended not to deliver the Fathers 1 1. Not to suffer 1. Because hee did this before in suffering for them on the earth 2 2 Not to tree the Fathers out of the Limbo Wisd 3.1 Luke 16.26 2. He did the same by his power and efficacy of his God-head from the very beginning of the world not by the descension of his soule or body into hell The Fathers were not in Limbo Therefore they could not be delivered thence as it is said The soules of the just are in the hand of God Between you and us there is a great gulfe set so that they which would goe from hence to you cannot neither can they come from thence to us And in the same place Lazarus dying is said to be carried by the Angels into Abrahams bosome not into Limbus Patrum Some thinke that Christ indeed descended not into hell either to suffer 3 3. Not to triumph over Death and the Divell and affright them 1 Pet. 3.19 or to deliver the Fathers thence but to shew there the Divell and death his victory and to strike a terrour into them But that Christ descended for this cause is no where found extant in Scripture They object unto us first that place of Peter By the which he also went and preached unto the Spirits that are in prison which were in time passed disobedient Answ Peters meaning in this place is not as these men conjecture but is on this wise Hee saith Christ went that is being sent from the beginning of the Father unto the Church By his Spirit that is by his God-head To the Spirits that are now in prison that is in hell He preached in time passed When as yet they lived and were disobedient namely before the Floud For then hee preached to the disobedient when they were disobedient But they were disobedient in the time of Noah Therefore Christ preached by Noah and by the Fathers inviting the disobedient to repentance Farther if Peter here spake of the descension into hell yet this was not their opinion who pretend the broaching of it but the Papists who affirme and teach that Christ preached in hell unto the Fathers and delivered them 1 Pet. 4.6 They bring another place of Peter The Gospell was also preached unto the dead Answ That is unto those which are now dead or were then dead when Peter wrote this and who then lived when the Gospell was preached unto them They wrest and misconstrue also a place of Paul Ephes 4.9 Christ descended into the lowest parts of the earth Answ Into the lowest parts of the earth that is into the earth which is the lowest part of the world For one part of the earth is not opposed unto another but the earth is opposed unto heaven and the humiliation of Christ is thereby signified This interpretation is proved by the scope and drift of the Apostle who maketh in that place an opposition of Christs great glory and his great humiliation So on the other side Christ ascended into the highest paris of heaven that is into heaven into the highest part of the world These places therefore make nothing for the descension of Christ into hell and were it so that these places alledged to establish this opinion were to be understood of a locall descension of Christ into hell yet would they not make for them but rather for the Papists who teach that Christ preached unto the Fathers in hell and thence delivered them Now if these testimonies help not the Papists much lesse will they help them For it is certaine that it cannot be thence proved that Christ descended into hell to strike a terrour into death and the Divell This opinion indeed is not impious or ungodly and is approved by many of the Fathers so that we are not to contend maliciously with any therein yet I leave it because it is not grounded on any firme reasons neither can be gained by witnesse of Scripture and contrary reasons are at hand easie to be had For 1. After his death when he had said It is finished the soule of Christ rested in the hands of his Father into which he had commended it And 2. If hee descended to triumph this Article should be the beginning of his glorification but it is not likely that Christ took the beginning of his glorification in hell For it is apparent by the opposition of the Article following that Christs descension was the lowest degree of his humiliation And yet I confesse withall that Christ strook a greater terrour into the Divels but that was by his death whereby hee disarmed and vanquished the Divell Sin and death and without doubt the Divell perceived himselfe conquered by the death of Christ Hell signifieth in this place the terrours and torments of the soule What meaneth then this Christs descension into hell It signifieth 1. Those extreme torments straights and griefes which Christ suffered in his soule namely the wrath of God against sinners and that such as the damned feele partly in this life and partly in the life to come 2. The exceeding and extreme ignominy and reproach which Christ suffered That Christ suffered these things is proved by the testimony of David before alledged The griefes of hell caught mee Psal 116.3 which is said of Christ in the person of David There are other the like sayings whereby the same is proved The Lord would breake him and make him subject to infirmities Esay 53.10 Mat 26.31 My soule is very heavie even unto the death The same doe those his vexations also shew in the Garden when he sweat bloud because The Lord hath laid upon him the iniquities of us all Luke 22.44 Esay 53.6 Therefore he crieth out My God my God why hast thou forsaken mee The same is also proved by these reasons 1. Christ was to redeeme not only our bodies
severed by death Truely and hee did truely come forth even out of the grave also in despite of the Watch-men they being withall amazed and stricken therewith 2. He rose the same person which he died the same Jesus Christ God and Man according to the nature wherein he suffered namely In his true body according to his humane nature even the true humane nature and the same in essence and properties and that not deified but glorified all infirmities thereof being done away Behold my hands and my feet for it is I my selfe handle mee and see mee for a spirit hath not flesh and bones as yee see mee have And truely nothing else could rise againe Luke 24.39 but that which had fallen The same body therefore which fell did rise again which is the greatest comfort unto us For hee must have been one and the same Mediatour who should merit for us a communicating and participation of those benefits which we had lost by sin and who should restore the same unto us and apply them to every one Again except Christ flesh had risen neither should ours rise 3. He rose by his owne power that is he put death to flight and shook it from himselfe quickened his dead body re-united it to his soule By his own power John 2.29 John 10.18 John 5.21 Rom. 4.24 8.11 and restored un to himself a blessed heavenly and glorious life and that by the might and power of his God-head Destroy this Temple and in three dayes I will raise it up again I have power to lay downe my soule and have power to take it up againe As the Father raiseth up the dead and quickneth them so the Son quâckneth whom he will Obj. But the Father raised him For it is said If the Spirit of him that raised up Jesus from the dead dwell in you c. Therefore he raised not himself Ans The Father raised the Son by the Son himself not as by an instrument but as by another person of the same essence and power with the Father by which the person doth ordinarily work The Son is raised of the Father by himselfe himselfe hath raised up himselfe by his Spirit For John 5.19 Whatsoever things the Father doth the same things doth the Son also 4 Hee rose the third day by his Fathers and his owne power The third day 1. Because the Scriptures in which are understood all the prophecies and types under the Law doe shew that Christ ought to rise the third day as for example wee may instance in Jonas who fore-shewed Christ 2. Because his body was to rise not being tainted with any corruption and yet not forth-with the first day that his death might undoubtedly be knowne but the third day after his Passion on the Crosse The circumstance therefore of the third day is inserted in the Creed that the truth might be correspondent to the type and we ascertained that this Jesus is the Messias promised to the Fathers because he alone rose the third day 3. For what cause Christ rose CHrist rose The glory of the Father and the Son Rom. 1.4 John 17.1 For his Fathers and his owne glory Declared to be the Son of God by the resurrection from the dead Father glorifie thy Son that thy Son may also glorifie thee For the glory of the Son is the glory of the Father Because of the prophecies Psal 16.10 Acts 2.27 In respect of the prophecies which were uttered of his death and of his resurrection Thou shalt not leave my soule in the grave neither shalt thou suffer thine boly One to see corruption When hee shall make his soule an offering for sinne hee shall see his seed Esay 53.10 Mat. 12 39. and shall prolong his dayes Hee shall see of the travell of his soule and shall be satisfied No signe shall be given unto it save the signe of the Prophet Jonas For as Jonas was three dayes and three nights in the Whales belly so shall the Sonne of Man be three dayes and three nights in the heart of the earth As yet they knew not the Scripture Mat. 25.54 that hee must rise againe from the dead In regard of these and other such prophecies it was necessary that Christ should die and rise againe that the Scriptures might be fulfilled How then should the Scriptures be fulfilled which say that it must be so to wit because of Gods unchangeable decree revealed in the Scriptures of which decree the Apostles in the Acts speak Acts 4.27 28. saying Doubtlesse against thine only Son Jesus whom thou hast anointed both Herod and Pontius Pilate with the Gentiles and the people of Israel gathered themselves together to doe whatsoever thine hand and thy counsell had determined before to be done Hither also belong Christs own predictions hereof Mat. 17 23. John 2.19 They shall kill the Son of Man but the third day hee shall rise again I will raise up this Temple again The worthinesse of the person rising Acts 2.14 John 3.35 For the worthinesse and power of the person that rose For for this cause it was impossible that Christ should be held of death as Peter testifieth and that 1. Because Christ is the beloved and only begotten Son of God The Father loveth the Son and hath given all things into his hands So God loved the world that he gave his only begotten Son c. 2. Christ is true God and authout of life I am the resurrection and life John 5.26 â1 10.28 As the Father hath life in himselfe so likewise hath he given to the Son to have life in himselfe As the Father raiseth up the dead and quickneth them so the Son quickneth whom he will I give unto them eternall life It had been absurd then that he should not be raised but sleep in death who giveth life to others 3. Christ is righteous in himself and by dying satisfyed for our sins which were imputed to him Now where sin is not there doth not death reigne any more With one offering hath he consecrated for ever them that are sanctified Heb. 10.14 Rom. 5.10 In that he died he died once to sin but in that he liveth he liveth to God The office of the person In respect of the office of the person who rose which had he remained in death he could not have discharged For 1. The Mediatour who was true God and Man should reigne for ever Thy throne O God is for ever and ever the Scepter of thy Kingdome is a Scepter of righteousnesse Psal 45.7 2 Sam. 7.13 14. I will stablish the throne of his Kingdome for ever I will be his Father and he shall be my Son I have sworne once by my holinesse that I will not faile David Psal 83.34 35 36. Ez. 37.23 24. His seed shall endure for ever and his seate is like as the Sun before mee Hee shall stand fast for evermore as the
feigne and imagine in the Major proposition are altogether the same with the things which are affirmed that is the same in them is affirmed of the same and so these manners are that in which lyeth the contradiction For they say Christs body is every where according to the manner of majesty Being demanded what they meane by majesty they answer omnipotency and immensity To say then Christs body is every-where as touching the manner of majesty not as touching the mannor of a naturall body is nothing else even by their owne judgment than Christs body to be every-where according to the manner of immensity or infinity and not to be every-where according to the manner of finitenesse Now verily they trimly take away the contradiction by thus distinguishing For the manner of immensity is nothing else but immensity and immensity and to be immense are both affirmed of the same Wherefore as these are contradictory To be every-where and To change place or Not to be every-where so are these also contradictory The same body to be immense and To be finite Immensity and finitenesse to agree unto the same or the same body to be every-where or immense according to the manner of immensity or majesty and not to be every-where but to change place and to be finite according to the manner of finitenesse or a naturall body Wherefore it is manifest which was before also confirmed That Christ ascended locally and that therefore this Article is to be understood of Christs locall ascension Object 2. Contraries or opposites ought to be expounded after the same manner that the contrariety and opposition may be kept But these Articles Hee ascended into heaven Hee descended into hell are opposed one to the other Therefore as the Article of Christs descension is taken in a figurative meaning that is of his great humiliation so ought also the Article of his ascension to be taken of his great majesty not of any locall motion Answ We answer first to the Major Opposites are to be expounded after the same manner except such manner of explication be disagreeing from the Articles of faith and from other places of Scripture But this Article the Scripture it selfe understandeth of a locall ascension Acts 1.11 Hee shall so come as yee have seen him goe into heaven howsoever it understand that other of a spirituall as wee have heretofore proved And that thus we understand both these Articles the Analogy of faith requireth 2. We deny the Minor For these two Articles are not opposed For his ascension into heaven is not the furthest degree of his glory as his descension into hell is the furthest degree of his humiliation But the furthest and highest degree of his glory is his sitting at the right hand of the Father Therefore as touching this Article of his sitting at the right hand of his Father we grant the Major For unto this Article is the descension into hell opposed whereupon also the Scripture doth not interpret properly but figuratively these two Articles of Christs descension into hell and of his sitting at the right hand of his Father 3. If Christs ascension be construed of any equalling of his man-hood with his God-head all the other Articles concerning the true humanity of Christ shall be utterly overthrownâ a Mat. 23.20 Quest 47. Is not Christ with us then untill the end of the world as he hath promised Ans Christ is true God and true man and so according to his man-hood he is not now on earth b Hebr. 8.4 Matth. 26.11 John 16.28 John 17.11 Acts 3.21 but according to his God-head his majesty his grace and Spirit he is at no time from us c John 14.18 Matth. 28.20 The Explication THis Question is a prevention of an objection of the Ubiquitaries who argue thus Object But Christ promised that hee would be with us untill the end of the world Therefore hee did not so ascend into heaven but that hee is now also on earth and that every-where in his humane nature Answ They inferre more in their conclusion then the premisses inforce Christ is with us in that spirituall union whereby wee his members are joyned to him our head And further he speaketh of the presence of his whole person to which he attributeth that which is proper unto the God-head In like manner he saith before his passion when as yet he conversed on earth with his Disciples I and my Father will come unto him and will dwell with him this he speaketh John 14.23 as touching his God head which was and is in heaven and by which as the Father is with us so he is otherwise we might reason also thus I go away saith Christ Therefore he is not at all with us But it is attributed improperly to his other nature namely to his humanity What the personall union of two natures in Christ is that he abideth with us in respect of that personall union which is the secret and wonderfull indissoluble uniting and knitting of the two most diverse natures of Christ divine and humane into one person so that these two natures being in such wise linked and conjoyned absolve the essence of Christs person and one nature should be destroyed if it were sundered from the other both notwithstanding retaining their peculiar and severall properties whereby one is distinguished from another Saint Augustines Explication is on this manner That which Christ saith Loe Tract 50. in Johan I am with you alwayes unto the end of the world is fulfilled according to his Majesty Providence and unspeakable Goodnesse But as concerning that flesh which the Word tooke and after which he was borne of the Virgin taken by the Jewes crucified on the Crosse taken downe from the Crosse wrapped in linnen clothes laid in the Sepulchre manifested in the resurrection as concerning it yee shall not have him alwayes with you Why so Because as concerning the presence of his body he conversed forty dayes with his Disciples and they accompanying him to see him not to follow him he ascended into heaven and is no longer here For He is there sitting at the right hand of God and He is here for the presence of his Majesty hath not left us Againe according to the presence of Christs majesty we have Christ alwayes according to the presence of his flesh it was truly said unto the Disciples Yee shall not have me alwayes For the Church injoyed him a few dayes as concerning the presence of his flesh now it layeth hold on him by faith but seeth him not with corporall eyes Christ therefore is present with us 1. By his spirit and God-head Five manners of Christs presence 2. As touching our faith and confidence wherewith we behold him 3. In mutuall dilection and love because he loveth us and we him so that he doth not forget us 4. In respect of his union with humane nature that is in the conjunction of the soule with the body For
14.2 Our glorification or ascension For seeing Christ our head is ascended we are certaine that we also shall ascend into heaven as being his members I go to prepare a place for you And though I go to prepare a place for you I will come againe and receive you unto my selfe that where I am there may yee be also Object But Elias and Enoch ascended before Christ Therefore Christ is not by his ascension the cause of our ascension Answ They ascended in respect of Christs ascension which was to come Christs ascension and glorification is the cause and example of our ascension and glorification because except he were glorified we should not be glorified For the Father hath decreed to give us all things by the Messias and hath put all things in his hands And how should Christ have given us a Kingdome except himselfe first as being the first-borne had taken possession thereof but for this cause also he ascended into heaven that he might there reign Therefore he will translate his Citizens thither And seeing wee are his members and he our head is already ascended and glorified Therefore shall we also ascend and be glorified Where I am there shall also my servant be John 12.26 14.3 I will receive you unto my selfe that where I am there may yee be also The sending of the holy Ghost The sending of the holy Ghost by whom he gathereth comforteth and defendeth his Church to the worlds end Hee was given also to the godly which were under the Law before Christs ascension and coming But that was 1. In respect of this ascension and glorification of Christ which was then to come and whereof that sending and powring out of the holy Ghost is not a fruit only but also a part and so in respect also of this sending which was now after Christs ascension accomplished the holy Ghost was given unto the godly in the Old Testament 2. Now after Christs glorification it was given more abundantly as in the day of Pentecost that which also was fore-told And it shall be in the last dayes saith God I will powre out my spirit upon all flesh Now Jâel 2.28 Acts 2.17 that Christ did not powre out the holy Ghost in such plenty before his ascension that befell only as before was said in respect of the decree of God For God would that the holy Ghost should be given by the Messias as well man as God wherefore man also was to be glorified who should doe this It is expedient for you that I goe away for if I goe not away the Comforter will not come unto you but if I depart I will send him unto you John 16.7 By the efficacy and working of this his spirit we seek things above because there is our treasure there are our goods and that because Christ hath therefore ascended that he might make those good things ours which were there long before And this is the Apostles argument Col. 3.1 There are other fruits also of Christs ascension For Remission of sins John 16.10 it is a testimony That our sins are fully pardoned us who doe beleeve For except hee had suffered the punishment for sins he could not have entered into the throne of God For where sinne is there is death also Hee shall reprove the world of righteousnesse because I goe to my Father Conquest or victory over death It is a testimony That Christ is indeed Conquerour of death sinne and the Divell The comfort of the Church John 16 7. Eph. 4 8. It is a testimony That wee shall never be left destitute of comfort because he therefore ascended to send the holy Ghost If I goe not away the Comforter will not come When hee ascended up on high hee led captivity captive and gave gifts unto men The defence of the Church It is a testimony That Christ will for ever defend us because wee know that our head is a glorious head and placed above all principalities The meaning of the Article He asceâded into heaven Now what it is to beleeve in Jesus Christ which ascended into heaven Answ It is to beleeve 1. That he did truly and not in shew only ascend into heaven and now is there resident in his humanity and sitting at the right hand of his Father untill he thence returne unto judgment would be called on by us 2. That he hath ascended for our sakes and now appeareth in the prescence of God maketh intercession for us sendeth us his holy Spirit and will one day take us unto himselfe that wee may be where he is and reigne with him in glory Quest 50. Why is it further said He sitteth at the right hand of God a Ephes 1.20 21 22 23. Col. 1.18 by whom the Father governeth all things b Ans Because Christ therefore is ascended into heaven to shew thereby that he is Head of the ChurchMat 28.18 John 5.22 The Explication Christs sitting at Gods right hand differeth from his ascension TO sit at the right hand of God and to ascend into heaven are things different for one may be without the other Wherefore this Article differeth three waies from the former In order Because in this Article is declared the end of his ascension For Christ did therefore ascend into heaven that he might sit at the right hand of the Father In continuance Because Christ sitteth alwaies at the right hand of the Father but into heaven he ascended but once In end The Angels do ascend and we shall also ascend into heaven but yet neither they nor we shall sit at the right hand of God For To which of the Angels said God at any time Sit at my right hand Heb. 1.13 untill I have made thine enemies thy foot-stoole much lesse did God say thus unto any man Christ alone excepted The Questions of Christs sitting at the right hand of the Father are 1. What the right hand of God signifieth in the Scriptures 2. What it is to sit at GODS right hand 3. Whether Christ did alwaies sit at Gods right hand 4 What are the fruits of Christs sitting at the right hand of the Father 1. What the right hand of God signifieth THe right hand as also other members are attributed unto God by an Anthropopathy or resemblance after the maner of men and in Scripture the right hand of God signifieth 1. The omnipotency or exceeding vertue of God Him hath God lift up with his right hand Acts 5.31 Psal 118.16 Exod. 15.6 to be a Prince and a Saviour The right hand of the Lord hath done valiantly Thy right hand O Lord hath bruised the enemy 2. It signifieth perfect glory perfect dignity and full divine majesty and in this sense it is here taken 2. What it is to sit at Gods right hand TO sit at Gods right hand is to be a person equall to God in power and glory by whom the Father worketh immediately
and governeth all things They commonly define it to be to reigne in equall power and glory with the Father That is true indeed of Christ for he doth all things likewise as doth the Father and is endued with the same power with the Father which also he exerciseth But the Son hath alwaies so reigned and the same agreeth also to the holy Ghost who yet is not said in the Scripture to sit neither doth sit at the right hand of the Father because the Father doth not governe all things especially his Church immediately by the holy Ghost but by the Son Wherefore this definition which is commonly received is not sufficient and perfect Some confound his sitting with his ascension and say it is all one But we have already shewed and proved a difference and it is absurd that in so short a Confession should be an idle speaking of the same thing twice This phrase of speech is taken from the custome of Kings Whence the phrase of Christs sitting at Gods right hand ariseth who place those whom they honour at their right hand and have their assistant assessors to whom they commit the power of government So Christ is said to sit at the right hand of the Father because the Father will rule and governe by him immediately all things both in heaven and earth This Session therefore is the supreme dignity and glory given by the Father unto Christ after his ascension Or the peerlesse exaltation of the Mediatour in his Kingdome and Priest-hood Christ alone sitteth then at the right hand of God the Father that is he is that Mediatour and person omnipotent by which the Father governeth all things immediately but especially by which he defendeth the Church against her enemies And this glory and Session of Christ at the right hand of the Father Foure things wherein Christs sitting at Gods right hand consisteth is 1. The perfection of Christs divine nature that is the equality of the Word with the Father which he did not then receive but ever had Which his Divinity though for the whole time of his humiliation it lay hidden and undiscried yet it afterwards shewed forth it selfe with power and majesty 2. The perfection and exaltation of Christs humane nature This perfection compriseth 1. The personall union of the humane nature with the Word Col. 2.9 In him dwelleth all the fulnesse of the God-head bodily 2. The excellency of gifts wisdom power brightnesse glory majesty and other graces far greater and more in number than are bestowed on all men or Angels and therefore in which he far excelleth both men and Angels Joh. 1.16 3.34 Of his fulnesse have all we received God giveth him not the spirit by measure 3. The perfection or the excellency of the office of the Medâatour that is the Propheticall Priestly and Royall function which Christ now as the glorified head of his Church doth in his humane nature gloriously exercise in heaven For now he is our glorious intercessor he is the glorious giver of the holy Ghost and the mighty preserver and defender of his Church This excellency of Christs office is the very exalting of Christ in all his functions that is the laying down of the infirmity of Christs humane nature and the perfection of glory which was due unto Christ both in respect of his office as being a Prophet King and Priest and in respect of his person as being God Mat. 28.18 All power is given unto me both in heaven and earth 4. The perfection of Christs honour that is the adoration worship and reverence which equally as to the Father is yielded unto Christ both of Men and Angels because he is adored and magnified of all as the Lord and Prince of all Let all the Angels of God worship him Psal 97.7 Heb. 1.6 Phil. 2.9 Hee hath given him a name above every name By these and the like speeches are signified the parts of Christs sitting at Gods right hand But the name whereof is spoken in the words of the Apostle before alledged is the excellency of the person and office of Christ and a declaration of both by his visible majesty that all may be forced to confesse that this is the King by whom God ruleth all things So also did Stephen see him standing on Gods right hand adorned with visible majesty and glory and worshipped him Christ had some parts also before of his excellency both of his office and of his person but he then came to the full perfection of all when being taken up into heaven hee was placed at the right hand of the Father A more full description of Christs sitting at Gods right hand By these parts now of Christs sitting at the right hand of the Father the definition of his sitting may be made more full in this wise When Christ is said to sit at the right hand of the Father he is said to have the same and equall power with the Father To excell all Men and Angels in his humane nature both in gifts bestowed on him more and greater than on them as also in visible glory and majesty To shew himselfe Lord of Men and Angels and of all things that are created in the name of the Father To rule and administer immediately his Kingdom in heaven and the whole world and chiefly To govern by his power immediatly the Church Lastly To be acknowledged and magnified of all as chief Lord and Head But how and how many waies Christ is called our Head hath been heretofore fully handled in the 32. Question of the Catechisme Christ may be said to sit at Gods right hand in respect of both natures 1. How in respect of his humanity The Session therefore at the right hand of God is the honour not of the Father or the holy Ghost but proper to the Son alone and is indeed the last degree and consummation of honour which the Son obtained in both natures but diversly in each of them For in respect of his humane nature it is a reall communication of heavenly gifts or perfect glory which the humane nature or man-hood of Christ injoyed not before the ascension But as concerning his divinity his session at the right hand of God is no change thereof 2. How in respect of his divinity but a bare laying aside that humiliation whereunto it had subjected it selfe and a manifestation of that glory which he had alwaies with the Father and had concealed in the time of his humiliation and a title of full and free challenge whereof the God-head in the assumption of humane nature had as it were discharged it selfe For as the God-head humbled it selfe so also it was againe exalted and placed at the right hand of the Father namely John 17.5 it was gloriously manifested in the flesh Father glorifie me c. Many objections are by this definition refuted As 1. The holy Ghost also is equall with God the Father Therefore we may
all Nations or to the whole Church 5. Legall washings are taken away by Christ because ceremoniall uncleannesse and the ceremoniall Law ceased at the coming of Christ contrariwise our Baptisme is perpetuall for it is said Baptise all Nations Mat. 28.19 20. and lo I am with you alway untill the end of the world This argument therfore deceiveth by the ambiguity of the word washing For those washings have nothing but a bare name wherein they agree with our Baptisme 2. What are the ends of Baptisme 1. To confirme our faith THe chiefe and proper end of Baptisme is to be a confirmation of our faith that is a solemne testification when Christ testifieth that he washeth us with his bloud and spirit that is that he bestoweth on us remission of sinnes justification and regeneration Or the chiefe end of Baptisme is To be the sealing of God and also the sealing or obsignation of the promise of grace that is of our justification and regeneration and a testimony of Gods will that he giveth the baptized these gifts at this present and will give them ever henceforward For he baptizeth us by the hands of his Minister and by him signifieth unto us this his will That baptisme is a testimony and confirmation of this will of God concerning his bestowing salvation on us appeareth 1. By the forme of Baptisme namely because we are baptized in the name of the Father the Sonne and the holy Ghost that is we are assigned and deputed to God the Father the Sonne and the holy Ghost and are claimed to be his owne 2. By the promise annexed to the rite Because God hath promised salvation unto him Marke 16 16. who shall beleeve and shall be baptized 3. Testimonies of Scripture also confirme the same Why tarriest thou Arise and be baptized and wash away thy sinnes Acts 22.15 Marke 16.16 Rom. 6 3. Tit. 3.5 1 Pet. 3.21 in calling on the name of the Lord. He that shall beleeve and be baptized shall be saved Know yee not that all we which have beene baptized into Jesus Christ have beene baptized into his death We are buried then with him by Baptisme According to his mercy he saved us by the washing of the new birth and the renewing of the holy Ghost To the which also the figure that now saveth us even Baptisme agreeth By this end of Baptisme appeareth why Baptisme is not re-iterated or used againe namely Why Baptisme may not be re-iterated 1. Because Baptisme is a signe of our receiving into favour and the Covenant which is ever sure and ratified to them who repent Therefore when we have fallen we need no Baptisme but Repentance onely 2. Moreover Regeneration is wrought but once onely we are borne but once and we are regenerate but once For he who is once truly ingraffed into Christ is never cast out Him that cometh to me I cast not away John 6.37 and therefore it is sufficient that Baptisme which is the washing and signe of regeneration be received but once onely chiefly seeing regeneration or salvation hath not a necessary dependance on Baptisme Otherwise as often as we sinne we should be re-baptized 3. Againe our Baptisme succeeded Circumcision which Circumcision was but once received By this end also of Baptisme it appeareth How Johns Baptisme agreeth with our Baptism and differeth from the same Acts 19.4 Marke 1.4 that the Baptisme of John is the same in substance with our Baptisme For John preached the baptisme of repentance for remission of sinnes saying unto the people that they should beleeve in him which should come after him that is in Christ Jesus Such is our Baptisme also only herein it differeth that we are not baptized in the name of Christ to come but of Christ already come in the flesh Wherefore Johns Baptisme and ours are one and the same in nature and substance howsoever they differ in the circumstance of signifying whereas John baptized in the name of Christ which should suffer and be raised againe the Apostles baptized and we at this day are baptized in the name of Christ which hath suffered and hath risen againe For if it be not so we cannot but say our Baptisme is not the same with Christs Baptisme For Christ was baptized of John Object John saith I baptise you with water Therefore his baptisme was onely a washing with water Ans John in that his speech distinguisheth that his ministery from Christs efficacy in Baptisme for if he meant otherwise it would follow that Christ was only baptized with water and that we also are only baptized with water or have not that Baptisme which Christ had To bind us to be thankfull unto God and to be a testimony of this our duty Baptisme is instituted to be a testification of our duty towards God and a binding of us and the Church to thankefulnesse that is to faith and repentance To faith that we might acknowledge for very God this God alone who is the eternall Father of our Lord Jesus Christ the Sonne and the holy Ghost into whose name we are baptized that we worship him only and receive the promised benefits with faith To repentance that our whole life time we being admonished by this rite how we are washed with the bloud of the Son of God and regenerated by his Spirit should in witnesse of our gratefulnesse walk in newnesse of life according to those sayings of Scripture Mar. 1.4 1 Cor. 6.11 Rom. 6.2 3 4. John preached the baptisme of amendment of life And such were some of you but ye are washed How shall we that are dead to sinne live yet therein know ye not that all we which have been baptized into Jesus Christ have been baptized into his death We are buried then with him by baptisme into his death that like as Christ was raised up from the dead by the glory of the Father so also we should walke in newnesse of life To be baptized into the death of Christ is What it is to be baptized into Christs death 1. To be partakers of Christs death no otherwise then if our selves were dead 2. To die also our selves which is to mortifie the lusts of the flesh by the vertue and power of Christs death and to rise againe with Christ unto newnesse of life This mortification God promiseth us in baptisme and bindeth us unto it To be a token of our entrance into the Church Act. 8.38 10.48 16.15 33. Baptisme is instituted to be a token and Symbole of our receiving and entrance into the Church For these are opposed and contradictory To be and Not to be in the Church To enter and Not to enter into the Church For God will have all the Citizens of his Church thus enfranchised and those who are not baptized when they may he will not have reckoned in the number of his Church Hither appertaine all those places in which those who were become Christians as the Ethiopian
we are washed with the water of Baptisme Ans In the institution of Baptisme the words whereof are these Mat. 2â 29 Goe and teach all Nations baptising them in the name of the Father the Sonne and the holy Ghost He that shall beleeve and be baptized shall be saved but he that will not beleeve shall be damned a Mat. 16.16 This promise is repeated again whereas the Scripture calleth Baptism the washing of the new birth b Titus 3.5 and forgivenesse of sinnes c Acts 22.16 The Explication THe confirmation of the definition and chiefe ends of Baptism is contained in the words of the institution Mat. 28.19 Mark 16.16 which are read in S. Matthew and S. Marke Go and teach all nations baptizing them in the name of the Father and the Son and the holy Ghost He that shall beleeve and shall be baptized shall be saved but he that will not beleeve shall be damned These are briefly to be expounded and declared Teach all Teach all and not some Nations neither Abrahams posterity onely Here is the difference of the Sacraments of the old and new Testament For Christ did not institute this new Sacrament for the Jewes only to whom properly did belong the old Sacraments but to all others also succeeding Baptising them That is all who by your doctrine come unto me and are made my disciples And among them are numbred the Infants also of such as come unto Christ or are Christs disciples For their Infants also are disciples as being borne in the schoole of Christ For to be borne in the Church serveth to the Infants in stead of their profession The word is to go before the Sacrament The order here is to be noted and observed He willeth first that they be taught and after that they be baptized For he speaketh of men of yeeres which should be converted unto the faith and Gospel of Christ Wherefore he will not have the Sacraments to be dumb but signifieth that the Word ought to go before and then the Sacraments to follow Foure things signified in these words In the name of the Father Son and holy Ghost used in Baptisme In the name of the Father and the Son and the holy Ghost These words in the name signifie 1. That Baptisme was instituted by the common commandement and authority of these three and that these three persons doe command that they who will be members of the Church be baptized Wherâfore it is of like force when the Minister baptiseth as if God the Father the Son and the holy Ghost did baptize And hereof also it is manifest that these three persons are the three subsistents or persons of the God-head and are one true God into whom we are baptized 2. They signifie that these three persons confirme unto us by their owne testification that they receive us into favour and performe that unto us which is signified by baptisme which is salvation if we beleeve and be baptized where is noted the principall end of Baptisme 3. To be baptized in the name of the Father the Son and the holy Ghost is That he which is baptized be bound to the knowledge faith worship trust honour and invocation of this true God 1 Cor. 1.13 who is the Father and the Son and the holy Ghost This is the second end of Baptisme which Paul also in these words declareth were yee baptized into the name of Paul As if he should say Ye ought to be his to whom ye have given your name and bound your selves in Baptisme 4. Baptising them in the name of the Father the Son and the holy Ghost that is baptising them by invocation of the three persons invocating the name of the Father the Son and the holy Ghost upon them Which three persons receive us into favour And the Father verily receiveth us into favour for the Sonne by the holy Ghost whom the Sonne giveth us from the Father He that shall beleeve This condition is added unto the promise For they who are baptized cannot receive that which is promised and sealed in Baptism but by faith so that without faith neither is the promise ratified nor the Baptisme availeable And in these words is noted briefly the right use of Baptisme in which right use the Sacraments are ratified to them which receive them with a true faith What is the right and lawfull use of Baptisme But in whatsoever corrupt and unlawfull use and administration the Sacraments are no Sacraments but are Sacraments to them only who receive them with a true faith The right and lawfull use then of Baptisme is when the converted are baptized with observation of that rite and end which Christ appointed that is 1. When the ceremonies or rites instituted by Christ in Baptisme are not changed Whence it is manifest that the drosse and filth of Papists as oyle spettle and exorcisme or conjuration tapers salt The drosse which the Papists bloud with the simplicity of Christs institution in baptism is to be rejected and such like wherewith the defile Baptisme is to be thrown away Object But these appertaine and belong to order and comelinesse Ans The holy Ghost knew well enough what did appertaine to order and comelinesse in Baptisme Rep. But they appertaine to the signifying of some thing Ans It belongeth not to men to institute any signe of Gods will This also we are to judge and think of other ceremonies of the same hatching 2. The use of Baptisme is right When Baptisme is given to them for whom it was instituted which are all the converted or members of the Church and When of these it is received with a true faith according to that Acts 8.37 If thou beleevest with all thine heart thou maist be baptized 3. When Baptisme is used to that end whereunto it was instituted not to the healing of cattell and such like abuses 4. When Baptisme is administred by them to whom Christ hath given it in charge that is the Ministers of the Church whom Christ hath sent to teach and to baptize not by women or any other which are not sent of God And shall be baptized He would confirme us also by the outward signes and therefore this is added and shall be baptized that we may know that not only by faith but by the outward signe also we are assured that we are of the number of them who shall be saved Shall be saved That is let the baptized know that he hath those benefits which are signified by the ceremony or outward signe that is that he is justified and regenerated if he beleeve For without faith the promise is not ratified neither doth Baptisme profit at all Unto both both unto faith and unto Baptisme the promise is adjoyned but in a diverse manner unto faith as a necessary mean to apprehend salvation unto baptisme as a signe sealing the salvation we apprehend He that will not beleeve shall be condemned That is though he
Teach all nations that is make all nations my disciples and then he willeth them to be baptised Wherefore all they and they alone are to be baptised according to the commandement of Christ unto whom the covenant doth belong namely such as are and so ought to be accounted members of the visible Church whether they be of understanding professing faith and amendment of life or infants born in the womb of the Church for all the children of the faithfull are in the covenant and Church of God except they exclude themselves Or All that are the scholers oâ Chââââ are to be baptised All they are to be baptised who are to be accounted for the disciples and scholers of Christ but for the disciples of Christ are to be accounted all those of understanding who professe faith and repentance neither they only but their infants also which are born in the Church that is in the school of Christ which also teacheth and instructeth them by his holy Spirit according to their capacity or as the condition of their age will bear Out of this generall position thus concluded we may easily determine of this speciall Whether infants are to be baptised For if they be disciples of Christ and part of the Church they are to be baptised But such they are Therefore they ought to be baptised The Major is the flat prescript of Christ The Minor is most evident out of the form of the covenant and other places Baptism of infants confirmed by four arguments The reasons alledged in the Catechism for the baptism of infants are four 1. All that belong to the covenant and Church of God are to be baptised The infants of Christians as well as the aged belong to the covenant and Church of God Therefore the infants of Christians are to be baptised as well as the aged The Major is proved because the whole Church is to be baptised according to Christs commandement Go and teach all nations baptising them Mat. 28.19 and according to that of S. Paul By one Spirit are all baptised into one baptism 1 Cor. 12.13 The Minor is cleer out of the form of the covenant I will be thy God and the God of thy seed Gen. 17.7 and out of Christs commandement Suffer little children to come unto mee Matth. 19.14 for of such is the kingdome of God 2. Unto whom belongeth the benefit of remission of sins and regeneration they may not be forbidden baptisme But unto the infants of the Church belongeth the benefit of remission of sins and regeneration that is remission of sins by the bloud of Christ and the holy Ghost the worker of faith is promised to infants as well as to the aged Therefore the infants of Christians ought to be baptised The Major is confirmed out of those words of Peter Amend your lives Acts 2.38 39. and be baptised every one of you in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ For the promise is made unto you and to your children Again Can any man forbid water that these should not be baptised 10.47 who have received the holy Ghost as well as wee This is also proved by manifest reason For unto whom the things signified belong unto them also doth the signe belong except some condition in the manner of using it hinder or except there be some expresse circumstance of the institution hindering and letting the use of the rite and ceremonie as in ancient times the women were excluded and debarred circumcision in regard of their sex and at this day the shewing forth of the Lords death and the proving of themselves which infants cannot perform excludeth them from the Sacrament of the Supper The Minor is apparent out of the form of the covenant I will be thy God Gen. 17.7 Matth. 19.14 and the God of thy seed and out of the promise Suffer little children to come unto me for of such is the kingdome of God and out of these sayings To you Act. 2.39 3.25 1 Cor. 17.14 Rom. 11.16 and to your children is the promise made Yee are the children of the Prophets and of the covenant which God hath made unto our fathers Your children are holy If the root be holy the branches also are holy So also John Baptist was sanctified in the womb If a man diligently weigh these testimonies of Scripture he shall perceive doubtlesse not only that it is lawfull but also that this Sacrament of baptism must and ought to be given to infants because the infants are holy The promise is made unto them theirs is the kingdome of God And God saith also that he is their God who certainly is not the God of the wicked Moreover there is no condition or circumstance in the infants hindering the use of Baptism Can any man then forbid water that those should be baptised who are partakers of the same benefits with the whole Church 3. A Sacrament which is instituted of God to this end that it may be a solemn receiving into the Church and a severing or signe of distinguishing the whole Church from all other sects must be communicated to all ages whereunto the covenant and receiving into the Church and distinction from infidels agreeth But baptism is such a Sacrament Therefore it must needs be administred to all ages and by consequent hereof to infants also The consequence is good being drawn from the proper finall cause to the effect For to whomsoever the finall cause agreeth to them the effect is rightly and necessarily attributed 4. Circumcision in the old Testament belonged both to aged and to infants Baptisme in the new Testament succeedeth circumcision and indeed so succeedeth as it hath the same use which circumcision had in the old Testament Col. 2.11 Ye are circumcised in Christ with circumcision made without hands by putting off the sinfull body of the flesh through the circumcision of Christ in that ye are buried with him through Baptism in whom ye are also raised up together Therefore baptism is our circumcision that is a Sacrament whereby the same things are confirmed and conferred and that unto as many now in the new Testament which were confirmed and conferred and to as many as they were confirmed and conferred in the old Testament by circumcision Wherefore the Anabaptists denying baptism to infants born in the Church not only spoil them of their right but also obscure the grace of God who will that the seed of the faithfull should from their birth-day yea and from their mothers womb be reckoned for members of the Church yea further they derogate manifestly from the grace offered in the new covenant and scantle it lesse then the grace of the old covenant seeing they deny that baptism is now extended unto those infants to whom circumcision was extended they weaken the comfort of the Church and faithfull parents they cancell the solemn bond whereby God will have the seed of his people from their first infancy bound
in the place of bread The Minor That he is not to be adored in the Supper is easily proved because in the New Testament since Christs ascension it hath not been nor is lawfull to tie and binde invocation to any certaine place or thing without the expresse command and permission of God except we will commit open Idolatry For all adoration bound and restrained to any certaine place or thing on earth is abrogated and cancelled by Christ The houre cometh John 4 21 22 23 24. when ye shall neither in this mountaine nor in Jerusalem worship the Father Ye worship that which ye know not we worship that which we know for salvation is of the Jews But the houre commeth and now is when the true worshippers shall worship the Father in spirit and truth For the Father requireth even such to worship him God is a Spirit and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and truth Againe if Christ be so to be adored and worshipped in the Supper by our minds and motions of body converted unto the bread that whole oblation and sacrifice should consist in the hands of sacrificing Masse-Priests because they offer the Sonne unto the Father to obtaine remission of sinnes and so were his crucifying to be re-iterated Object Christ commanded not himselfe to be offered or adored but to be eaten Therefore we establish not the Papists offering up of Christ to his Father or their worshipping of him in the bread by that corporall presence which we uphold Ans This their reasoning is two waies faulty First they begge that which is in question whilest they say that Christ commanded us to eate him in the bread for this is no where found in Scripture 2. They shift and seeke to slide from the question in averring that Christ commanded not himselfe to be adored for we have a generall precept of adoring Christ in these words Psal 45.13 Psal 97.7 Heb. 1.6 He is the Lord thy God and thou shalt worship him And let all the Angels of God worship him This generall precept without any speciall exception or expectation of any particular injunction should no lesse binde us all unto obedience and to the adoring of Christ in the bread if we had any evident proofe of his invisible existence therein than if we beheld him present with our eyes Thus Thomas expecteth not some speciall expresse warrant but doth well in worshipping towards the place where he seeth Christ standing saying My Lord and my God Wherefore John 20.28 as long as the opinion of corporall presence standeth so long the Papists idolatrous adoration and oblation and their whole Masse must needs stand also For the Papists themselves will not have that we understand their offering of Christ in the Masse of any slaughtering or murthering him but only of a publique shewing him being there corporally present and of a craving and obtaining remission of sinnes for his sake whom the Priests beare in their hands and present unto God the Father 4. The fourth sort of Arguments drawne from like places of Scripture where namely the samething is delivered in words whereof there is no controversie 1. LIke phrases have a like sense and interpretation But all these phrases are accounted for like namely for sacramentall formes of speech wherein the names or proper effects of the things signified are attributed to the signe as Circumcision is the Govenant of God The Lamb is the Passeover of the Lord. Gen. 17.10 11. Exod. 12.11 31.16 Levit. 1.4 Exod. 24.18 Exod. 26.34 1 Cor. 10.3 Marke 2.26 Luke 22.20 Acts 22.16 Titus 3.5 1 Pet. 3.21 Gen. 17.11 Exod. 12.13 14. 13.9 31 17. The Sabbath is the Covenant of the Lord. The Leviticall sacrifices are an expiation or doing away of sinne The bloud of sacrifices is the bloud of the Covenant The covering of the Arke is the mercy seate The Rock was Christ The bread is the body of Christ The cup is the New Testament Baptisme washeth away sinne Baptisme is the washing of the new birth Baptisme saveth us c. Therefore their interpretation is alike Now God himselfe interpreteth some of them thus Circumcision is a signe of the Covenant The Lamb is a signe and memoriall of the Passeover The Sabbath is a signe of the Covenant Therefore we may justly interpret the rest on the same manner The Leviticall sacrifices signifie the attonement for sinnes made by the Messias The bloud of sacrifices is a Sacrament or signe confirming the Covenant or a signe of Christs bloud whereby the Covenant was established The covering of the Arke signifieth the Mercy-seate The Rock signifieth Christ The bread is a Sacrament of the body of Christ The cup is a Sacrament sealing the new Covenant Baptisme is a Sacrament of the washing away of sins and of our regeneration and salvation 2. As the cup is the New Testament so is the bloud of Christ the New Testament The cup is the New Testament Sacramentally that is it is a signe of the New Testament Therefore Christs bloud is a signe of the New Testament The Major is apparent because without doubt the words of Luke and Paul This cup is the New Testament in my bloud and the words of Matthew and Marke This is my bloud of the New Testament have all one meaning The Minor is proved before in the first argument and cannot be taken otherwise For the New Testament is no externall thing or ceremony but a free reconciliation with God promised in the Gospel through the bloud and death of Christ The cup then is either the thing promised or the seale of the promise but it is not the promise nor the thing promised Therefore it is the seale of the promise 3. The bread which we breake saith the Apostle is it not the communion of the body of Christ As bread is the communion of the body of Christ so also it is the body of Christ The reason is cleere because Pauls words and Christs have both one meaning seeing Paul interpreteth Christ But the bread is the communion of the body of Christ sacramentally that is it is a Sacrament or signe of our spirituall communion with Christs body For properly and literally bread cannot be termed a communion Therefore bread also is Christs body sacramentally that is it is a Sacrament or signe of Christs body Now that the communion or communication of Christs body is spirituall is thus proved 1. Paul speaketh of such a communion as whereby we being many are made one bread one body But we being many are one body spiritually Therefore the communion mentioned of Paul is spirituall 2. The communion of Christ whereof he speaketh cannot stand with the communion of Divels 1 Cor. 10.21 Ye cannot saith he drink the cup of the Lord and the cup of the Divels ye cannot be partakers of the Lords Table and of the table of the Divels The argument is not deduced from an inconvenience or an undecency as some
fondly tell us Mat. 6.24 but from an impossibility as that of Christ Ye cannot serve God and Mammon Where the words ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ye are not able or ye have no possibility are likewise used as well as in this place 2 Cor. 6.15 and as that of the same Apostle else-where What concord hath Christ with Belial or what part hath the Beleever with the Infidell 3. This communion of the Saints with Christ and Christ with the Saints is spiritually expounded in Scripture 1 John 1.6 7. Our fellowship is with the Father and with his Son Jesus Christ If we say that we have fellowship with him and walke in darkenesse we lye and do not truely But if we walke in the light as he is in the light we have fellowship one with another and the bloud of Jesus Christ cleanseth us from all sinne Neither doe we in the Creed beleeve any other communion of the Saints with Christ and Christ with the Saints but that which is spirituall Hom. 24. in 1 Cor. 10. 4. Lastly Chrysostome interpreteth Pauls words of a spirituall communion Why said he not participation That he might manifest unto thee somewhat more excellent then it to wit the strongest and mightiest union that can be And a little after Why call I it communion Yea we are the selfe-same body of Christ What is the bread even the body of Christ What are they made who receive the body of Christ not many bodies but one body For as the bread is kneaded of many graines so we also are joyned with Christ 4. Out of the words of Christ John 6.62 What then if ye should see the Sonne of man ascend up where he was before It is the Spirit that quickneth the flesh profiteth nothing the words that I speake unto you are spirit and life In these words Christ expresly rejecteth all eating of his flesh with our mouths and overthroweth by two arguments which wee have heretofore declared and on the other side he approveth and confirmeth our spirituall eating his flesh Wherefore we may not forge any corporall eating of Christs body in the Supper when such a kinde of eating is precisely reproved in the Gospel Object The sixth chapter of John treateth not of the Supper Therefore this testimony maketh nought against the eating of Christs body with our mouths instituted in the Supper Answ Here our Adversaries deceitfully argue from the deniall of a part to the deniall of the whole This Chapter we grant pertaineth not to the Ceremony of the Supper But hence it followeth not that simply it pertaineth not to the Supper For it concerneth the promise This is my body which is given for you because this promise is desumed out of this Christs Sermon registred in this sixth of John and is ratified and confirmed by the signes of bread and wine Wherefore it cannot be understood of any other eating of Christs body in the Supper then of that which is delivered in the sixth of John which is spirituall For bodily eating is in that Sermon condemned Repl. It is not simply the eating with the mouth that is there condemned but a Capernaiticall eating Answ All eating with the mouth is Capernaiticall For a Capernaiticall eating is not a bloudy renting onely and eating of Christs flesh and chewing it between the teeth but simply any eating with the mouth For the Capernaites say not among themselves How can this man give us his flesh to devoure to gnaw on with our teeth to rend asunder c. But they say How can this man give us his flesh to eate John 6.54 Neither doth Christ re-call them from a grosse eating with the mouth to a subtile kinde of eating with the mouth but to his ascension into Heaven which should shortly come to passe and thereby his body should be far removed from their mouthes and trained them to a spirituall eating which is with the heart by faith 5. Out of the same sixth Chapter of John To eate Christs flesh and To drinke his bloud signifieth To beleeve in Christ To dwell in Christ and Verse 54 56. To have Christ dwelling in us as appeareth because he attributeth the same effect of eternall life to both namely to the eating of his flesh and to faith in him But in the Supper this eating is authorised For no other purpose besides this can be shewed in the whole Gospel for sealing whereof the Supper was instituted Therefore To eate Christs body and To drink his blood is To beleeve in Christ To dwell in Christ and To have him dwelling in us 6. By one spirit are we all baptised into one body whether we be Jews or Grecians 1 Cor. 12 13. whether we be bond or free and have beene all made to drink into one spirit Hence we draw two arguments 1. Such as is the drinking of Christ such is the eating of him in the Supper The drinking of him is spirituall Therefore the eating of him is spirituall 2. The eating of Christs body and drinking his bloud is common to all the faithfull even to the Fathers of the Old Testament For we have all bin made to drink into one spirit But the eating with the mouth is not common to all the faithfull For the Fathers before Christs birth could not and at this day Infants and many of ripe yeeres having not liberty to partake of the Supper cannot eate his flesh with their mouthes Wherefore this mouthy eating of Christs flesh urged by our Adversaries is not that true eating which the Gospel promiseth and which the Supper sealeth The testimonies of Fathers in this point UNto these arguments drawne out of the sacred Scripture and the ground of our faith may be added testimonies of the Fathers and the purer Church who if we looke into their writings we shall finde that they plainly teach the same doctrine touching the Lords holy Supper which we do Among many we will produce onely some few notable and cleere in this point Irenaeus saith Lib. 4. cap. 34. The earthly bread taking his name from the word of God is no longer common bread but becometh the Eucharist or Sacrament which consisteth of two things an earthly and an heavenly thing Tertullian The bread which he tooke and distributed among his Disciples he made it his body saying This is my body that is The figure of my body Lib. 4. contra Marcion Praedag lib. 2. cap. 2. Lib. 2. Ephes 3. Serm. de Coena Clemens of Alexandria This is to drinke Christs bloud to be partaker of Christs immortality Cyprian Neither can his blood wherewith we are redeemed and justified seeme to be in the Chalice when the wine faileth in the Chalice wherein Christs bloud is shewed which is spoken of in every Sacrament and testimony of Scripture Againe the same Father saith As often as we doe this we sharpen not our teeth to bite withall but we breake and part the sanctified bread with a sincere
thy God a mighty and jealous God which visit the sinnes of the fathers upon the children c. consisteth of five properties of God which ought to stirre us up to obey God 1. He calleth himselfe Our God that is our Maker and Saviour and the author of all good things Hereby then he advertiseth us what execrable unthankfulnesse it is not to yield due obedience to so bountifull a Benefactor but to revolt from the true worship of him to Idolatry 2. He calleth himself a Mighty God that is who is mighty in power as well to punish the obstinate as to reward the obedient Therefore he is to be feared and loved above all things 3. He termeth himself a Jealous God that is a most sharp defender of his owne honour wonderfully displeased with such as revolt from him or violate or impaire his honour and worship Now seeing jealousie or indignation conceived from any injury or dishonesty ariseth from his love which is hurt God doth hereby withall signifie that he doth ardently and intirely love those who are his 4. He calleth himselfe a God which visiteth the sins of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate him Whereby he exaggerateth or increaseth the grievousnesse of his anger and their punishments when he threatneth also and denounceth unto the children and to the childrens children and to the childrens childrens children of his enemies even to the fourth degree and descent to take vengeance on the sins of their ancestors in them if namely they also partake with the sins of their ancestors But to this commination or denouncement the saying of Ezekiel seemeth to be repugnant Object Ezech. 18. The soule that sinneth it shall die The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son But in the same place it addeth a reconcilement of these two places of Scripture If a wicked man beget a son that seeth all his fathers sins which he hath done and feareth Answ Vers 14.19 neither doth the like hee shall not die in the iniquity of his father but shall surely live He threatneth them that he will punish the sins of their antecessors in their posterity that is such as persist in the sins of their antecessors whom it is meet and just to be partakers also of their punishments If any man reply Repl. 1. Answ That by this meanes the posterity rue only their own sins and not the sins also of their ancestors this reply is false and of no consequence For there may be and are oftentimes moe impellent and motive causes of one effect and the cause of one punishment are moe sins as well of diverse as of the same men If further it be urged Repl. 2. That vengeance is not taken on the ancestors sins in the posterity because the sense and feeling of those paines which the posterity suffer reacheth not to the ancestors we answer Answ that the posterity are a part of their ancestors of whom they came And therefore that is felt of them as it were in some part of them which their posterity suffer 5. He saith that he is a God which sheweth mercy unto thousands in them that love him and keep his Commandements by which promise he amplifieth his mercy the rather to invite us to obedience by the greatnesse of his bounty and by a desire of our owne good and safety and the good and safety of our posterity And whereas he here threatneth punishment only unto the fourth generation he extendeth his mercy unto thousands thereby to signifie that he had rather shew mercy then anger and so by this meanes to allure us the more to love him Object 1. But unto this promise are opposed many examples of the godly whose children and posterity have perished Whereunto God himselfe answereth That he will blesse the posterity of the godly Answ Ezek. 18. if they continue in the good conversation and godlinesse of their ancestors but will punish them if they depart from it If here it be demanded Why he doth not convert their posterity Repl Answ seeing without his mercy they are not able to follow the godlinesse of their Parents we answer 1. Because this promise is not universall but indefinite and therefore God doth not therein binde his mercy unto every particular one of the godlies posterity but reserveth his election free unto himselfe So that as of the posterity of the wicked he converteth and saveth some in like manner also he leaveth of the posterity of the godly some in their naturall corruption and in destruction which all by nature deserve and this he doth to shew that his mercy is free as well in chusing the posterity of the godly as of the wicked 2. Because he bindeth not himselfe to performe the same benefits or all the benefits to all the posterity of the godly Wherefore he satisfieth this promise when he doth even vouchsafe corporall benefits to the wicked and reprobate posterity of the godly 3. Because he promiseth this felicity of the posterity unto them that love him and keep his commandements that is to those which are indeed godly and of good conversation But because the love of God and obedience is even in the holiest Saints in this life imperfect therefore the reward also promised unto them is imperfect and joyned with the crosse and chastisements among which the wickednesse and unhappinesse of their posterity is not the least as may appeare in David Solomon and Josias Object 2. They who keep Gods Commandements obtaine mercie Therefore we merit somewhat of God by our obedience Answ The contrary rather followeth For God saith I will shew them mercie Therefore it is not of merit or desert for Whatsoever is done of mercie is not done of merit and contrariwise Whatsoever is done of merit is not done of mercie Therefore the objection is a fallacy putting that for a cause which is no cause For when God addeth this promise That he will shew mercie unto the thousandth generation of them that love him and keep his Commandements he sheweth that he had rather shew mercie then anger thereby to allure us to love him Object 3. This promise and commination belongeth to the whole Decalogue why then is it peculiarly annexed to this Commandement Answ This promise and commination is belonging verily to the obedience of the whole Decalogue but is therefore especially annexed unto this Commandement both that we might know the first and second Commandement to be the foundation of all the rest and also that God might shew that he is especially angry with the depravers and corrupters of his worship and punisheth this kind of sin both in them and in their posterity and contrarily doth blesse also the posterity of them which diligently regard and keep pure religion or the true service and worship of God ON THE 36. SABBATH Quest 99. What doth God
hearts and the hearing of prayers Answ The example is unlike For the humane understanding and minde of Christ understandeth and knoweth and his bodily eares and eyes also heare and see things whatsoever according to his humane nature he should or would behold either with his minde or with his outward senses by reason of his Godhead which sheweth them unto his humanity united thereunto or also giveth unto his senses a vertue and force of perceiving things which are farthest distant Neither yet is the force or wisedome of his humane nature infinite as is the power and wisdome of the Godhead neither doth he know by any transfused vertue into him the thoughts of minds and hearts For of the measure of knowledge convenient for his manhood Marke 13.32 it is said Of that day and houre knoweth no man no not the Angels which are in heaven neither the Sonne himselfe save the Father Of the revealing of the secrets of men unto him by his divinity Marke 2.8 it is said When Jesus perceived in his spirit that thus they thought with themselves c. But now that all things are revealed unto Angels and Saints which are revealed unto the understanding of Christ by his Godhead they will never be able to prove out of the Scripture For Christs humane nature doth excell and surpasse in wisdome all Angels and Men both in respect of the personall union thereof because it is united to his Godhead and also by reason of his Mediatourship which office his humanity beareth and executeth together with his divinity yet so that there is still kept in the administration thereof the difference of both natures Wherefore this example of Christ doth not prove that the Saints know all things either by beholding the things themselves or by divine revelation from God 9. In the divine essence shine all the Images and formes of things But the Angels and Saints departed behold the essence of God Mat. 18.10 Their Angels alwaies behold the face of my Father which is in heaven Therefore they behold in God all things which we doe suffer and thinke Answ 1. The Major proposition which they put is doubt full and uncertaine For it is manifest that God knoweth all things and doth in his wisdome comprehend the most perfect and perpetuall knowledge of all things but whether that understanding of things doth so shine in God that it may also be beheld of creatures this verily they have not as yet proved out of Scripture 2. Neither is the Minor true namely That the blessed behold the essence of God whereof it is said John 1.18 No man hath seene God at any time 3. Albeit there is no doubt but the holy Angels and Men in the heavenly life injoy a cleere knowledge and an immediate manifestation of God whatsoever it is yet we are not to imagine that they naturally know all things that are in God For then should their wisdome be infinite that is equall unto Gods wisdome which is absurd and flat against the testimonies of Scripture whereas Angels also are said not to know the day of Judgement Likewise Into which the Angels desire to looke To the intent 1 Pet. 1.12 Ephes 3.10 that now unto principalities and powers in heavenly places might be knowne by the Church the manifold wisdome of God They profit therefore and increase in the knowledge of wisdome and of the counsels of God by the very execution and contemplation of Gods works Now seeing that which they speake of is no naturall but a voluntary glasse or rather a divine manifestation or inlightning that is the Angels and blessed Men have not this in their owne nature to view and see in God his whole wisedome but God according to his good will and pleasure doth manifest and communicate unto every one such a part thereof as seemeth good unto him as it is said No man knoweth the Father but the Son and he to whom the Sonne will reveale him we affirme therefore the invocation of Saints so long to want a ground and foundation and so to be superstitious and idolatrous untill they shew out of the Scripture that God would reveale unto the Saints the knowledge of the thoughts and affections of them which call upon them For that invocation which is not grounded on the certaine and expresse word of God is Idolatry 10. The friendship and fellowship of the Saints with God and Christ is so great and so neere that he cannot deny them this manifestation Henceforth call I you not servants for the servant knoweth not what his Master doth but I have called you friends for all things that I have heard of my Father have I made knowne to you Much more doth Christ this in the heavenly life These follow the Lamb wither soever he goeth Ans Revel 14.4 This cause is insufficient For this friendship and fellowship continueth although God reveale not unto them all things or whatsoever they will but onely those things which for them to know is behoovefull for their owne salvation and happinesse and for his glory 11. Christ is the onely Mediatour of redemption or the Mediatour redeeming us by satisfaction as being God and Man but the Saints are also Mediatours of intercession praying for us Hence we thus reason Moe intercessors hinder not the being of one onely Mediatour But the Saints are onely intercessors or requesters Therefore their intercession hindereth not but that Christ may be the onely Mediatour Answ We deny the Major or distinction of mediation and intercession because the Scripture teacheth that Christ our Mediatour did not only by once dying redeem us and was in the time of his humiliation suppliant unto the Father for us but that also he continually appeareth and maketh intercession for us in the presence of his Father Heb. 5.7 9. John 17.9 Rom. 8.34 Heb. 7.24 25. Heb. 9.24 1 John 2.1 Who is also at the right hand of God and maketh request for us But this man because he indureth ever hath an everlasting Priesthood wherefore he is able also perfectly to save them that come unto God by him seeing he ever liveth to make intercession for them If any man sinne we have an Advocate with the Father Jesus Christ the just Wherefore both the merit or satisfaction and intercession is Christs alone and by our confidence in him alone we are to approach unto God that is we are to aske and expect his promised blessings For the satisfaction and intercession of Christ only is of that price and worthinesse with God that for his merit only God is gracious and favourable unto us 12. Against the former answer they reply with another distinction Christ is only Mediatour and Intercessour by the worthinesse and vertue of his own merit and intercession but the Saints are Intercessours by the worthinesse and vertue of Christs merit and intercession that is their intercession prevaileth with God for us through the merit and intercession of Christ Therefore that
his body into heaven not carrying away his majesty from the g world because though he be absent in his body presenting himselfe to the Father for us and sitting at his right hand he yet dwels in the Saints by his Spirit and suffers them not to be Orphans as religious Antiquity h speakes Testimonies of Scripture and of the Ancient Fathers a Heb. 9.12 Christ by his owne bloud hath entred once into the holy place having obtained eternall redemption b Acts 1.3 After Christ had suffered he shewed himselfe alive to his Disciples with many certaine signes being seene of them for 40. dayes c Acts 1.11 Then the Apostles returned to Jerusalem from the mount called Olivet which is neere to Jerusalem being distant a Sabbath dayes journey d Acts 1.9 And when he had spoken these things while they beheld he was taken up and a cloud received him out of their sight e Austine Tract in John 50. According to the flesh which the Word assumed according to that which was borne of the Virgin according to that which was apprehended by the Jews which was fastened to the tree which was taken downe from the Crosse which was wrapped in linnen which was laid in the Sepulchre which was manifested in the Resurrection you shall not have him alwaies with you Why because he conversed according to his bodily presence 40. dayes with the disciples and they accompanying him by seeing not by following he ascended into heaven and is not here Chrysost Serm. de Ascens Domini Tom. 2. p. 328. Because the space from earth to heaven is great and the sight of their eyes could not throughly perceive the body that was carried unto such an altitude but as our eye-sight failes us when we looke upon a bird mounting high so the higher that body was elevated the more was the sight of the beholders eyes weakened nature not being able to reach higher with the eye therefore the Angels stood shewing the celestiall journey lest any should suppose but that he was carried up into heaven after the manner of Elias who was elevated thither from you Ibid. See what space is betweene heaven and earth or betweene earth and hell or how far this heaven is distant from the higher heaven or how great the space is from the higher heaven to the Angels or from the higher powers to the seat of our Lord above all these is our Nature elevated that man who was here so low that he could descend no lower should be elevated unto such an high seat that he can ascend no higher therefore Paul saith He that ascended is he also that descended Ibid. He descended into the lower parts of the earth and ascended above all heavens f John 16.28 Againe I leave the world and go to the Father g August Tract in Joh. 102. He left the world by a corporall departure he went to the Father by a corporall ascension nor did he forsake the world by his presentiall government Idem Tract in Joh. 50. The Priests commanded that if any man knew where he were he should shew it that they might apprehend him We saith he will now shew to the Jews where Christ is I wish that all who are of their seed would heare and understand who gave command that it should be shewed them where Christ is Let them come to the Church and heare where Christ is and let them apprehend him They shall heare it of us they shall heare it of the Gospel He was slaine by their parents he was buried and rose againe he was knowne of his Disciples in their presence he ascended into heaven there he sits at the right hand of the Father who was judged shall come to judge let them heare and hold Thou wilt answer Whom shall I hold One that is absent Send up faith and thou hast held him Thy parents held him in the flesh hold thou him in thine heart because Christ being absent is present for if he were not present with us he could not be held by us But because that is true which he sayes I am with you to the end of the world he is both gone and yet is here he hath both returned and not deserted us He hath entred his body into heaven and hath not taken away his majesty from the earth h Cyril in Joh. l. 11. c. 3. For though he be absent in body presenting himselfe to the Father for us and sitting at his right hand yet he dwels in his Saints by his Spirit and suffers them not to be Orphans IV. By this only Orthodox faith we know where Jesus Christ our treasure is to be sought and called upon to wit above in heaven at the right hand a of God for where our treasure is there will our b heart be from whence wee must look for him namely from c heaven where lastly our mansion must be after this life to wit in heaven where our Lord hath prepared a place d for us Testimonies of Scripture a Col. 3.1 Seeke the things above where Christ is sitting at the right hand of God b Mat. 6.21 Where our treasure is there is our heart c Phil. 3.20 Our conversation is in heaven whence we looke for the Saviour c. d John 14.3 I go to prepare a place for you I will come againe and receive you unto my selfe that where I am there you may be also John 17.24 Father I will that where I am they may be with me that they may see my glory e 1 Thes 4.17 We shall be caught in the clouds to meet the Lord in the aire and so we shall be alwaies with the Lord. V. We reject those odious fictions of the Ubiquitaries ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã onera molesta as strangers from the Christian faith concerning heaven and Christs ascension the most of which fopperies to be seene in their books are scarce worthy of Lucian Surely pious posterity will have cause enough to groane and to wonder at the power of errour 1. They say That the heaven which is above this world which Brentius saith he laughs at is an old wifes dreame or a Thalmudicall or Mahumeticall phansie 2. That the heaven into which Christ ascended is not a place nor above but is God himselfe because forsooth the heaven was incarnate and died for us that it is every-where in which also hell it selfe is and in which not only the Saints but Sathan also and his Angels are found 3. That Christ ascended often into heaven invisibly in the womb of his Mother where the Word was made flesh on the Crosse where giving up the ghost he laid aside the forme of a servant in his resurrection from the dead Lastly visibly upon mount Olivet 4. That this last Ascension was not a true Ascension into heaven but a wonderfull lifting up of Christs body even to the clouds a sight dispensed with or a visible vanishing 5. That Christ in passing to his Father that is in his ascension to heaven did not a haires
exalted him and hath given him a name above all names that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow of things in heaven on earth and under the earth and that every tongue should confesse that Jesus Christ is Lord to the glory of God the Father VI. The glory of Christ the Mediatour doth first consist in that high perfection and dignity of the person of the Mediatour even according to that nature which was assumed being adorned with unspeakeable excellencies of endowents with happinesse and majesty and with that sublime exaltation above all principality power and dominion all things being put under his feet that he might be the Head of the a Church by which the Father governes all things in heaven and b earth the natures remaining whole and unconfused as also the properties of nature in this glory Which as Austine saith gave to the flesh to be immortall but tooke not away the c nature Testimonies of Scripture and of some Ancient Doctors a Ephes 1.20 21. God placed Christ at his right hand in heaven far above all power c. b John 5.22 For the Father judgeth no man but hath committed all judgement to the Sonne Acts 17.31 God will judge the world in righteousnesse by that man whom he hath appointed c August Epist 57. ad Dardanum Doubt not then but the man Christ Jesus is now there from whence he will returne call to minde and hold faithfully the Christian Confession because he is risen from the dead hath ascended into heaven sitteth at the right hand of the Father nor from any other place but from thence will he come to judge the quick and dead and so he will come as the Angell witnesseth after the same manner that he was seene to go into heaven that is in the same forme and substance to whom he gave immortality but tooke not his nature away VII Secondly it consists in the glorious administration of his Propheticall Sacerdotall and Regall offices by which as Mediatour he declares himselfe even in his assumed humane nature that he is appointed Lord and Judge of all a things and that he rules most powerfully in heaven and b earth gathering to himselfe out of the race of mankinde a perpetuall c Church by the holy Ghost and the Word making intercession for d her and defending her by his divine power on e earth untill having freed her from all molestations and from her enemies he glorifie her in f heaven Testimonies of Scripture a Acts 2.36 Therefore let all the house of Israel know assuredly that God hath made that same Jesus whom ye have crucified both Lord and Christ Acts 5.31 God having exalted him at his right hand hath made him Prince and Saviour that he might give to Israel repentance and remission of sinnes See Act. 17.31 John 5.22 b Psal 110.2 Beare thou rule in the midst of thine enemies 1 Cor. 15.25 He must reigne till he hath put all his enemies under his feet c Ephes 4.11 He gave some to be Apostles some Prophets some Evangelists some Pastors and Doctors Rom. 1.17 The Gospell is the power of God to salvation to every one that beleeves Marke 16.21 The Lord did cooperate and confirmed the word with signes following d Rom. 8.34 Christ is at the right hand of God and maketh intercession for us Heb. 9.24 Christ hath now entred into heaven that he might appeare before God for us 1 John 2.1 We have an Advocate with the Father Jesus Christ the righteous e Mat. 16.18 The gates of hell shall not prevaile against her John 10.28 I give unto them eternall life and they shall never perish neither shall any man pluck them out of mine hand f John 17.24 Father I will that they whom thou hast given to me may be where I am that they may behold my glory VIII Lastly in the perfection of that honour and worship due a to the Mediatour gloriously reigning even in our humane nature to wit that he is acknowledged by Angels men and all creatures and by them is adored and celebrated as their head and Lord as it is written And let all the Angels of God worship him Also Psal 1.6 Psal 97.7 Phil. 2.10 At the Name of Jesus every knee shall bow of things in heaven on earth and under the earth Testimonies of Scripture a Acts 9.14 In this place he hath power from the High-Priest to binde all that call on thy Name 1 Cor. 1.2 To all that call upon the Name of our Lord Jesus Christ in any place c. Rev. 5.9 Thou art worthy to receive the booke and to open the seales thereof because thou hast beene slaine and hast redeemed us by thy bloud out of every Tribe Langue People and Nation See also Rev. 4.11 and 8.13 and 19.5 6 7. IX Therefore these and such like doctrines of the Ubiquitaries are false and prodigious 1. That Christs humanity presently in his conception when the Word was made flesh did sit at the right hand of God 2. That to sit at Gods right hand is nothing else but to be united personally to the Son of God who is the Fathers right hand 3. That it is all one with his ascending to heaven 4. That it is to be made man and to become God 5. That it is all one with Christs humanity filling heaven and earth and being every-where ARTICLE V. Of Predestination I. TO deny in God an eternall predestination of mankinde is to deny God himselfe and to give the lye to the holy Scripture for as Luther (a) De servo arb cap. 143. saith truly God being spoiled of his power and wisdome in electing what will he be else but the Idoll of Fortune by whose power all things are done rashly or at randome And at length it will come to this that men are damned and saved with the knowledge of God as who hath not discriminated by a certaine election those that shall be saved and damned but a generall lenity tolerating and hardning being proffered to all then a correcting and punishing mercy he hath left it to mens choice whether they will be saved or damned he himselfe perhaps being gone to feast with the Ethiopians as Homer saith Austine in his booke De bono persever c. 18. averreth That no man can dispute except he will fall into error against this predestination which saith he we defend according to the holy Scripture and cap. 21. Therefore it savours too much of contention saith he to contradict predestination or to doubt of it II. Therefore of predestination we must speake and be silent with the Scripture for what God will have concealed must not be enquired after and what he hath revealed must not be neglected lest in those we be found unlawfully curious in these damnably ungratefull as (b) l. 1. ad Monimum p. 8. Ambrose excellently III. Neither that we may give this caution with Fulgentius is there any coactive necessity of mans will to be expressed by the name of
predestination but rather a mercifull just and eternall disposition of Gods future worke is hereby declared IV. For predestination that we may after the plainest way define it to wit from the effects of God knowne to us irrefragably out of Scripture and experience is Gods eternall a counsell by which out of the lost b masse of mankinde of his meere good will c he bestoweth justice and life eternall upon whom he pleaseth in his mercy by faith in Christ and freely by Christ d saveth them and to whom he pleaseth he denyeth to give that faith justice and e life but leaving them in their wickednesse blindnesse and destruction f for their sins he doth most justly addict and condemne them g to eternall paines that by saving of the beleevers he might declare his mercy h and grace by damning the wicked he might manifest his justice and power to i all eternity Testimonies of Scripture a Acts 15.18 The works of God are knowne to him from the beginning of the world Ephes 1.4 As he hath chosen us before the foundations of the world were laid Acts 4.28 That they might do whatsoever thine hand and thy counsell had fore appointed to be done Rom. 9.11 That the purpose of God which is according to election might remaine sure b Rom. 9.21 Hath not the Potter power over the clay that out of the same lump he may make one vessell to honour another to dishonour Jerem. 18.6 Cannot I as that Potter do unto you O house of Israel saith the Lord Behold as the clay is in the hand of the Potter so are you in mine hand O Israel c Mat. 11.26 Even so Father because it hath pleased thee Rom. 9.18 He will have mercy on whom he will and whom he will he hardneth Ephes 1.5 9. Having predestinated us unto the adoption of children by Jesus Christ to himselfe according to the good pleasure of his will Having made knowne unto us the mystery of his will according to his good pleasure which he had purposed in himselfe d Rom. 8.29 30. Whom he fore-knew he also predestinated to be made conformable to the Image of his Son that he might be the first-borne among many brethren Whom he predestinated them also he hath called and whom he hath called them he hath justified and whom he hath justified them he hath also glorified Ephes 1.4 5. As he hath elected us before the foundation of the world was laid that we might be holy and without blame before him in love Who hath predestinated us whom he hath adopted to be his sons through Jesus Christ to himselfe according to the good pleasure of his will e Rom. 9.18 He hath mercy on whom he will and whom he will he hardneth 2 Tim. 2.25 26. It behooveth the Jervant of God with all gentlenesse to trie if at any time God will give them repentance to the acknowledging of the truth that they may recover themselves out of the snare of the devill who are captivated by him at his will f Rom. 9.18 He hath mercy on whom he will have mercy and whom he will be hardneth Psal 81.13 I left them therefore to the strength of their own heart and they walked in their owne counsels Acts 14.16 And who in former ages suffered all Nations to walke in their owne wayes g Deut. 27.26 Cursed is he that doth not observe the words of this Law to do them Ezek. 18.4 That soule that sins shall die Colos 3.6 For which things the wrath of God cometh upon the disobedient h Rom. 9.23 That he might make knowne the riches of his glory towards the vessels of mercy which he hath prepared for glory Ephes 1.6 To the praise of the glory of his grace who hath freely made us acceptable in his Beloved i Rom. 9.22 But what if he willing to shew his wrath and to make his power knowne hath endured with much patience the vessels of wrath prepared for destruction Prov. 16.4 God hath made all things for himselfe and the wicked also for the evill day V. Now because all the works of God are knowne to himselfe from a eternity and with the Father of lights there is no change or shadow of b turning therefore it is not to be doubted but whatsoever God doth in time either in saving or condemning of men that he did decree from eternity unchangeably to doe and after that manner that he worketh now and as the Scripture witnesseth he doth c worke Testimonies of Scripture a Acts 15.18 All the works of God are knowne to him from the beginning of the world b James 1.17 With the Father of lights there is no changing or shadow of turning c Isai 14.27 The Lord of Hosts hath purposed and who shall disanull it VI. We may also otherwise define predestination out of Scripture à priori or from the causes That it is Gods a eternall b free c just d immutable and e holy f counsell and g purpose by which from eternity before the foundation of the h world out of mankinde being equally corrupted and i lost to wit which shortly after the holy creation by Satans instigation was to fall and to be lyable to eternall k death of his meere good pleasure and l mercy he fore-saw m some and elected n them and writ them downe in the Booke of o life and called them in p himselfe and ordained them for life q eternall to have salvation in r Christ Jesus whom from the beginning to the end of the world by his Word and Spirit he hath effectually s called to the knowledge of his Son Christ Jesus hath bestowed on them true faith and hearty t conversion hath u justified and at last will x glorifie them But others most justly and willingly he hath y pretermitted and hath not written them in the Booke of z life but hath decreed as impute vessels of his wrath for their sins to plague them with eternall aa death and in time he pitieth bb them not but hath reprobated cc them to be forsaken and left in their blindnesse and wickednesse that he might make manifest the riches of his bounty and grace upon the elect vessels of mercy and upon the reprobate vessels of wrath the power of his dd displeasure that so the mercifull and just Judge of the world might be to all eternity acknowledged and praised Testimonies of Scripture concerning Predestination and Election a Psal 33.11 The counsell of the Lord standeth for ever the thoughts of his heart from age to age b Rom. 9.18 God shews mercy on whom he will and whom he will he hardeneth Mat. 20.15 May not I do with mine owne as I list Esay 46.10 My counsell shall stand and I will fulfill all my pleasure c Dan. 9.14 The Lord our God is just in all the works that he hath made d Prov. 19.21 The counsell of the Lord abideth Isai 14.24 25. As I have thought so shall it come to passe as I have purposed it shall stand This is the purpose that
by true repentance stirre the same up againe which is done before death lest they perish Wherefore totally they never fall from the grace of God but God is so angry with them for sinne that notwithstanding he hates them not being his sons he so corrects them that yet he doth not totally reject b them Even as an earthly father will not presently thrust his son out of doores when he offends him much lesse will he shake off his fatherly affection although he may severely reprove and correct him Testimonies of Scripture a John 3.9 Whosoever is borne of God sinneth not because his seed is in him nor can he sin because he is borne of God b Psal 37.24 Though he fall he shall not be cast off for the Lord helpeth him with his hand 2 Sam. 7.14 15. I will be his father and he shall be my son whom when he offendeth I will visit with the rod of men and with the stripes of the sons of men but my mercy shall not depart from him VII With this comfort David erected himself when hee fell Cast mee not away from thy presence and take not thine holy spirit from me Psal 51.11 If the righteous man fall he shall not be cast off for the Lord puts his hand under him VIII This maine comfort the Saints have in their spirituall conflicts that they know they doe beleeve and by Gods grace will more and more beleeve and that their faith shall not totally faile them as to be damned because by the Gospel they are taught that it is sustained by Gods immutable a election and Christs most effectuall merit and b intercession and that it is preserved by the power of c God Testimonies of Scripture a Ephes 1.4 He hath elected us in Christ before the foundation of the world was laid Rom. 8.39 Whom he predestinated these he hath called and whom he hath called these he hath justified whom he justified these he hath glorified 2 Tim. 2.19 The foundation of God standeth sure having this seale The Lord knoweth who are his b Rom 8.33 Who shall lay any thing to the charge of Gods elect It is God that justifieth Who shall condemn It is Christ that is dead yea rather that is risen againe who is also at the right hand of God and maketh intercession for us John 17.15 I desire that thou shouldst keep them from the evill Luke 22.31 Simon Simon Sathan hath sought to winnow thee as wheat but I have prayed to my Father that thy faith may not faile c 1 Pet. 1.5 Who by the help of Gods power are preserved through faith to salvation IX To these may be added other express assurances out of Scripture of this * ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã fulnesse of faith That it is impossible for the elect to be a seduced for Christs sheep to be taken out of his b hands for the faithfull to be separated from the love of God in c Christ That vocation and the gifts of God are without d repentance * ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã That an inheritance incorruptible undefiled unfading is reserved for us in e heaven That by the power of God through faith we are preserved to f salvation That God is faithfull who will not suffer us to be tempted above our strength but with the tentation giveth an issue that we may g beare it Testimonies of Scripture a Matth. 24.24 It is impossible for the elect to be seduced b John 10.28 My sheep shall never perish nor shall any man take them out of mine hand c Rom. 8.39 Nothing can separate us from the love of God in Christ Jesus our Lord. d Rom. 11.29 These gifts and calling of God are such as are not to be repented of e 1 Pet. 1.4 5. Christ hath againe begotten us to an inheritance which cannot perish nor be defiled nor wither reserved for us in heaven f Ibid. Who by the help of Gods power are preserved through faith to salvation which is ready to be revealed in the last time g 1 Corinth 10.13 God is faithfull who will not suffer you to be tempted above your strength but will with the temptation also make a way to escape that you may be able to beare it X. But they who doubt of perseverance beleeve not life eternall yea they slight faith and all hope seeing that is an assured confidence of Gods mercie both present and to come this a certain expectation of life eternall which maketh not ashamed Rom. 5.5 Hope maketh not ashamed because the love of God is shed abroad in our hearts by the holy Ghost which is given to us Faith is the substance of things hoped for the evidence of things not seen Hebr. 11.1 But doubting confoundeth Jam. 1.6 XI Neither is this a doctrine of securitie except of a spirituall for with the certaintie of perseverance in the Saints there remaines alwaies a purpose to avoid sin or to repent for b sin God working all this immutably according to his eternall purpose in them nor withdrawing his mercie utterly from them lest they c perish Testimonies of Scripture a Rom. 8.38 For I am perswaded that neither life nor death nor angels nor principalities nor powers nor things present nor things to come nor any other creature can be able to separate us from the love of God in Christ Jesus our Lord. 1 John 5.10 He that beleeveth in the Son of God hath the witnesse in himselfe 2 Tim. 1.12 I know whom I have beleeved and I am perswaded that he is able to keep what I have committed to him against that day b Rom. 7.15 For what I would doe I doe not but what I hate that I doe if I doe that which I would not I consent to the law that it is good c Ephes 1.11 In whom we have obtained an inheritance when we were predestinated according to his purpose who doth all things according to the counsell of his will 2 Sam. 7.14 and Psal 89.30 I will keep my mercy for him for ever and my covenant shall stand fast to him XII We reject the opinions of Puccius Huberus and others who have been bred in the schoole of Pelagius as being contrary to this most comfortable doctrine 1. That faith now in the state of grace is naturall that it is Gods gift common to all as the Sun by Gods bountie shines on the good and bad 2. That faith hath its increase from God but not its beginning 3. That it is our work to beleeve that is to suffer God to help us 4. That we may doubt of our perseverance to the end 5. That the certaintie of Gods gifts which wee brag of out of the Apostle Rom. 11.29 is vaine So Huberus thes 777. 6. That the Saints as soon as they sin mortally utterly fall off from grace utterly cast off the holy Ghost and altogether lose their faith and so many of the elect are damned and perish ARTICLE VII Of the ministery of the Church I. COncerning the ministery of
13.8 Jesus Christ yesterday to day and the same for ever 1 Cor. 8.6 We have one God the Father of whom are all things and we in him and one Lord Jesus Christ by whom are all things and we by him d 1 Cor. 10.4 All did eate the same spirituall food and all did drinke the same spirituall drinke for they dranke of the spirituall Rock which followed them and that Rock was Christ 1 Cor. 12.13 By one Spirit we are all baptised into one body both Jews and Greeks and have beene all made to drink into one Spirit Ephes 1.4 5. He elected us in him before the foundation of the world was laid and hath predestinated us unto the adoption of children by Jesus Christ to himselfe according to the good pleasure of his will IV. The spirituall grace or the thing signified is with the signes received in the true use of the Sacrament which is when with true faith and conversion to God the Sacrament is a received for God so instituted the Sacraments that the signes ordained to confirme our faith should be received out of the hand of the Minister the promise annexed to the signes and spirituall grace it self promised should be received by faith from b God as the promise cannot be received but by faith Hence the Sacraments are not availeable to those that are without faith and conversion Testimonies of Scripture and of others a John 1.26 33. I baptise you with water but he standeth in the midst of you whom yee know not he it is who baptiseth with the holy Ghost 1 Cor. 3.6 I have planted Apollo hath watered but God gives the increase b Rom. 2.25 But if thou breakest the Law thy circumcision is become uncircumcision 1 Cor. 11.20 When ye come together therefore into one place this is not to eate the Lords Supper Apol. August Confes Tit. De usu Sacram. Therefore as the promise is ineffectuall if it be not received by faith so the Ceremonie is unprofitable if faith be not added which truly assureth us that here remission of sins is proffered V. Here is the true use of Sacraments when the Sacramentall signes are received with true faith and a repentance and are directed to that end for which they were ordained by God Testimonies of Scripture and of others a Mark 16.16 He that beleeveth and is baptised shall be saved Rom. 2.25 Circumcision indeed availeth if thou fulfill the Law Apol. August Confes De Sacram. c. Therefore we teach that in the use of the Sacraments faith is required which may beleeve these promises and may receive the things promised which are there offered in the Sacrament and it is a most plaine and firme reason that the promise is uselesse if it be not received by faith Idem De usu Sacram. And such an use of the Sacrament is the worship of the New Testament when faith quickneth the affrighted soule Idem But that faith acknowledgeth mercy and this is the principall use of the Sacrament VI. By reason of the Sacramentall signification obsignation and exhibition of things by signes it comes to passe that oftentimes the signes do retaine the names of the things signified which phrase is called Sacramentall Testimonies of Scripture and of others Gen. 17.18 This is my Covenant Verse 11. This shall be the signe of the Covenant betweene me and you Exod. 12.11 This is the Lords Passeover 1 Cor. 11.24 25. This is my Body This Cup is the New Testament in my blood August Ad Bonifac. Epist 23. If Sacraments had not a certaine similitude of these things of which they are Sacraments they could not be Sacraments at all and by reason of this similitude many times they receive the names of the things themselves Idem Tom. 4. in Levit. quaest 57. The thing which signifieth is wont to be called by the name of that thing which it signifieth as it is written The seven sheaves are seven yeares VII We therefore reject these truly Sacramentarian errors which are partly Papisticall and partly Ubiquitarian as 1. That there is no need of the generall doctrine of Sacraments 2. That Sacraments are not fully but onely in some sort defined by the efficient and small cause or by their effects as the Apology of Exfurt teacheth 3. That they are not the Seales of the promises of grace nor do they confirme our faith as the Jesuits and Anabaptists contend 4. That they containe justifying grace in them as it were the pitchers or vessels thereof that they are the instruments of justification by conferring it 5. That by their force they conferre justifying grace by the work wrought as they say 6. That there is not the same spirituall grace in the Word and in all the Sacraments nor the same communion of Christ 7. That the old Sacraments were bare signes without the true exhibition of the things themselves in their true use 8. That the spirituall things signified no lesse then the signes signifying are carried in and dispensed by the hands of the Minister 8. That spirituall things are received by the wicked even without faith 9. That there are no phrases figurative and Sacramentall but all proper in the Sacraments 10. That there are seven or more Sacraments then the two of Baptism and the Lords Supper instituted by God ARTICLE IX Of Baptisme I. WE beleeve that Baptisme is the laver of water in the Word by which Christ cleanseth his Church regenerating and renewing it by the holy a Ghost that is to say that it is a Sacrament instituted by Christ in which God witnesseth to those that are baptised with water in the Name of the Father Son and holy b Ghost that he receiveth them into the Covenant of grace through Christ and that he reneweth and cleanseth them from sin by the holy Spirit through his bloud Testimonies of Scripture a Ephes 5.26 Even as Christ loved the Church and gave himselfe for her that he might sanctifie her having cleansed her by the laver of water in the Word Tit. 3.5 By his mercy he hath saved us through the laver of regeneration and renewing of the holy Ghost b Mat. 28.19 Go and teach all Nations baptizing them in the Name of the Father Son and holy Ghost Mark 16.16 He that beleeveth and is baptised shall be saved 1 Cor. 6.11 You are washed you are sanctified you are justified in the Name of the Lord Jesus 1 Cor. 12.13 By one Spirit we are baptised into one body II. We say that it consisteth of the Element and the a Word according to that vulgar saying Adde to the Word the Element and it becomes a Sacrament as if it were a visible word and therefore it consisteth of a two-fold b washing the one external of water obvious to the sense the other internal of bloud and of the holy Ghost and of this the Word instructs us The externall signifying washing which is a signe is done by the Minister touching the body externally the internall which is the thing signified
sacred mysteries are written any Divinity which can tie us by any religion to beleeve the things contained in them but such force and amplitude there is in the Church which teacheth us that those bookes are sacred and recommends the faith and piety of the ancient Fathers that no man can oppugne them without grievous impiety Thus he Now he speaks not of the characters papers or parchment of the bookes the trust and authoritie whereof is among the Book-keepers or Stationers but of the Scriptures themselves of whose authoritie we dispute Concerning these hee affirmes both the heads of the Position 1. That there is no Divinitie in them for these words Nor any thing and Nothing are equivalent 2. Except so much as it receives from the Church for this is the meaning of the adversary but there is so much force in the Church We omit other Writers for brevities sake Let the Christian world judge of this Jesuites boldnesse and whether this Position alone be not sufficient to defend the assumption 12. Neither doth he account them authenticall but by the Churches authoritie 13. Yea he beleeves not God himselfe but for the Church The Assertion Here the Jesuite flings away both buckler and speare for he knowes too well that Poperie is held here Both these false and impious Positions have been blabbed abroad by their Triarian and Manipular that is their better and meaner sort of Writers The former by Eckius in his Enchiridion in these words The Scripture is not authenticall without the Churches authority This hee calls in the margine His Achilles for the Catholicks And shortly after Hence it appeares that the Church is more ancient then the Scripture and that the Scripture is not authenticall but by the Churches authority The other by Stapleton against Whitaker Cap. 10. §. 3. lib. De author Script We doe not beleeve God but for the Church Is not this I pray you blasphemously to subject God and his word to the Pope and his Church Neither can so great a blasphemy be eluded by the Jesuites cavills to wit That the Scripture in respect of it selfe hath its owne authentick authority from its owne worth ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã whereby it should be credited whose author is the first Truth not the Pope and that the Church as the ground and pillar of truth doth conferre somewhat to the credit of Scripture For this later point was never yet questioned for ought wee know Whether the Church conferres any thing towards the credit of the Scripture But that former assertion of the Sophisters Whether we doe not beleeve God and the Scripture but for the Church that former passage though it be truly said yet it is not truly beleeved in Popery For they detract from the Scripture that internall worth of credit as it was but now shewed out of Andradius denying any Divinitie to be in Scripture And their opinion is still firme That the Scripture is not worthy to be credited either in it selfe or by us but for the Church 14. It makes the Scriptures authoritie depend upon the Popes arbitrement because that authoritie resides in the Pope as in the head of the whole Church The Assertion Here that he might make shew of denying the former he hath cunningly muttered out the later which being added hee saw necessarily that the former would follow For if in the Pope as in the head of the whole Church the whole authority of the Church resides and if in the authoritie of the Church the Scriptures authority resides as the two former Positions have it must necessarily follow that in the Pope the whole authoritie of Scripture resides depends upon his beck Now that this authoritie of the Church resides in the Pope alone as in the head of the universall Church it is the common stile of the Canonists and Sophisters who advance the Pope above Councels Gregory de Valentia a Jesuite of an approved cut or coine tells us plainly that in the Pope as in the head of the whole Church this authoritie resides The Position then remaines and the proofe of the assumption 15. And because the Pope alone or with his Prelats is the Church therefore the Pope and his Prelats beleeve the Scriptures for themselves but they will have the lay-people to beleeve the Scriptures for the Pope and Prelats The Assertion The Jesuites were fools if they should openly speak so but as foolishly do they deny this affirming what they do affirme That we beleeve not either Scripture or God himselfe but for the Church and that the Pope with his Prelats are the Church For from hence it is as needfull to affirm both to wit that the Pope Prelats beleeve the Scriptures and God for themselves because they beleeve not but for the Church which themselves are the Laicks beleeve for the Pope and Prelats because they beleeve for the Church which is the Pope and Prelats This as necessarily followes as if we should prove there be foure Evangelists on this ground that there are twice two Evangelists Therefore not Parrie in affirming but the Jesuite in denying this Thesis lieth and the assumption remaines 16. Thus the faith of Popes Prelats Lay-men concerning the Scriptures stands upon the sandy foundation of humane testimony which indeed is no foundation The Assertion Every one may see that this is the consectary of the former For if the faith of Popes Prelats Mat. 7. Bellar. l. 3. de Justificat c. 2. who are men not gods nor angels stands upon themselves and if the faith of the Laitie stands upon the Pope and Prelats it must needs stand upon humane testimony Now for faith in divine things to stand upon this what else is it but to stand upon a sandy foundation that is upon an unstable movable each houre uncertain and indeed no foundation For in divine things an uncertain faith is no faith when by Bellarmine's own testimony it behoveth true faith to be most certain Neither will that painted shift of the Valentian Jesuite availe him saying That the authoritie of the Church that is of the Pope and Prelats is not purely humane nor purely divine but partly divine partly humane Such indeed was the authoritie of the Prophets and Apostles who wee know were immediatly called and illuminated by God Though they were men yet they spake wrote in the Church by divine inspiration We will give equall authoritie to the Pope and Prelats with the Apostles if they can shew us that they write and speak by the same inspiration If they can produce the word of those that were divinely inspired that is the holy Scriptures otherwise their Decrees are but humane testimonies and sand 17. They accuse the Scriptures of so great obscuritie in things that concerne faith worship and manners that without the Popes interpretation no man can understand them The Assertion The first part is the ordinarie stile of Papists and it is at large defended by Bellarmine That the
can receive a good or evill specification according to the naturall mans will 70. Or that it is a speciall influx but onely suasive the efficacy of which is in mans will against these Scriptures God giveth to will and to do And No man can come to me Phil. 2.13 John 6.44 except the Father draw him 71. Another impious falshood That they whom God predestinated to glory were by their fore-seene merits predestinated or after and for their fore-seene merits against these Scriptures Before the children had done good or evill Rom. 9.11 Ephes 1.4 5. He elected us before the foundation of the world that we might be holy and without blame He elected us according to the purpose of his will unto the praise of the glory of his grace 72. Which Pelagian dreame is not to be called predestination but post-destination 73. Another impious falshood that they can absolutely fulfill Gods Law against this Scripture In many things we offend all And Jam. 3.2 Rom. 8.3 What was impossible to the Law 74. Yea that they can do more then by the Law they should do against this Scripture When you have done all you can say We are unprofitable servants Luke 17.10 we have done what we ought to do 75. Yea that they can be free from all sin in this life if they will against this Scripture Surely there is none just upon earth Eccles 7.21 who doth good and sinneth not 76. Of this the Pelagians of old did brag Mat. 6.12 Luke 11.4 therefore were bid blot out of the Lords Prayer these words Forgive us our sins that is to make an officious lye or to mock God 77. And another impious falshood That by good works they merit life eternall of condignity Rom. 6.23 against this Scripture Life eternall is the gift of God 78. Another falshood That by reason of their good works they can be confident in the day of Gods judgements Psal 130.3 against this Scripture Lord if thou observe our sinnes who can indure it 79. Another blasphemy That by their merits they make God indebted to them that if he do not give them life eternall he must be unjust who forsooth may be sued for such an injurie against these Scriptures Rom. 2.13 11.35 9.20 We are debtors Who gave to him first and it shall be restored to him What art thou that answerest God 80. And it is no lesse blasphemous that Christ alone is not our Mediatour but the Saints Canonized by the Pope make Intercession for us 1 Tim. 2.5 as mediatours in heaven against this Scripture There is one Mediatour of God and man the man Christ Jesus 81. Such as this that They who depart in the faith go into Purgatory fire to suffer for their veniall sins against the Gospell Blessed are they from henceforth who die in the Lord. Rev. 14.13 John 2.24 He that beleeveth in me hath life eternal neither doth he come into judgement but passeth from death to life 82. Another hypocriticall falshood is That the Sacraments instituted by God are not signes of grace confirming faith but vessels containing and confirming grace by the work wrought against this Scripture Rom. 4.11 Abraham received the signe of Circumcision the seale of the righteousnesse of faith 83. And this also of the seven Sacraments of the New Testament unknowne in the Gospell and in the primitive Church 84. And this also of forbidden meats which in the New Testament the Apostle calleth the doctrine of Devils 85. And this doctrine which prohibits Bishops to marry against this Scripture 1 Tim. 3.2 Tit. 1.6 Let a Bishop be the husband of one wife 86. And this blasphemous falshood That the Priests by the five words of consecration do transubstantiate in the Masse the Host into the very body of Christ daily sanctifying it to God the Father and destroying it for the sins of them that live on the earth or that are dead in heaven and Purgatory Rom. 6.9 Heb. 10.13 against these Scriptures Christ dieth no more By one oblation he hath consummated all 87. And who is able to rehearse their other falshoods impieties and blasphemies concerning the Cup of which sacrilegiously they have robbed the people of Contritions Confessions Satisfactions Indulgences Jubilees Holy-dayes Fastings c 88. Therefore Popery by maintaining so many false impious blasphemous doctrines hath fallen from the faith and hath overthrowne salvation both to it selfe and friends 89. Which apostacy from the Faith the Spirit hath plainly fore-told 1 Tim. 4.2 3. That in the latter times some shall fall from the faith giving heed to deceiving spirits and doctrines of Devils speaking falshoods forbidding to marry and commanding to abstaine from meates which God hath made to be received with thanksgiving 1 Thes 2.3 90. The Apostle also foretold that this apostacy should be the signe of revealing the Man of sin and son of perdition that is Antichrist 91. This is that great earth-quake by which Christ the Son of righteousnesse was made black as a sack-cloth the Moone that is the Church was turned into blood the Stars that is the Bishops fell from heaven to earth the firmament of the Scripture being foulded up departed in the second vision of the Revelation 92. This pestilent fume whilst the fifth Trumpet blew openly flying out of the bottomlesse pit by Antichrists meanes that apostaticall Star the black inchantments of Papall decretals and of Schoole Divinity by which Christ the Son of righteousnesse and the heire of heavenly doctrine was obscured and the innumerable vermine of Clericall and Monasticall Locusts eating up the greene pasture of the Church and tormenting men were brought into the Christian world in the third vision of the Revelation 93. These are the great blasphemies but yet not all to which the Beast that came out of the sea opened his mouth And this is the Dragon-language of that earthly Beast making shew of the Lambs two hornes in the fourth vision of the Revelation 94. These are the darknesses with which his kingdome was obscured when the fifth Violl was powred out upon the Beasts throne c. in the fifth vision of the Revelation 95. We have the apostacy of Popery from the Faith fore-told long agoe by the Angel to John and the revolution of an age being accomplished it is revealed againe by the renewed light of the Gospell 96. Which was the most urgent cause why our Parents forsooke Popery and this is the cause why we do the same and so it is concluded 97. That a Church apostatising from faith it to be deserted and forsaken for 2 Cor. 6.14 15. What union is there betweene light and darkenesse 98. Popery is that Church that is fallen from the faith as is said 99. Therefore Popery is to be deserted and avoided II. The horrible Idolatry of Popery 100. God onely is to be religiously worshipped 101. For Religion by Lactantius his definition is the bond of piety by
by art also and that three waies by Simonie by Cunning and by Cursing 218. By Simonie he made all the Clergie throughout the world subject to him in selling the sacred wares of Patriarchats Bishopricks Dispensations Absolutions Indulgences Purgatory fire Humane soules lastly of Hell and Heaven he drew to Rome the treasures of Kings Churches and Nations And what could not the Popes monie doe 219. By deceit especially of three sorts as it were with so many spells he did so enslave the Christian world to him that not to obey his words deeds and beck by a blind obedience was counted an hainous crime 220. First by a forged Vicarship of Christ and Saint Peters seat and succession then by the pretence of the Roman Catholick Church to which all upon necessitie of salvation must be subject by which vizard as by Gorgons head they turned as it were into stones Kings and the inhabitants of the earth both great and small rich and poore free and bond and had them at his beck 221. To these he added prodigies and lying signs and sometimes poysoned hosts by which he proved himselfe a God in the very event according to the Apostles oracle 2 Thes 2.7 10. Whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signes and lying wonders and with all deceivablenesse of unrighteousnesse 222. Hee did easily suppresse by stirring up the people and absolving them from the oath of allegiance to those Princes whom he struck with the thunder of excommunication if they seemed to slight it 223. By this meanes Gregory the second drove out of the Exarchat of Italy Philip and Leo Emperours of the East because they forbade Image-worship which is condemned by Gods word 224. And a little after Pope Leo the Eastern Emperours upon the same pretence being quite driven out of Italy challenged to himselfe the Roman spoiles invaded the whole Exarchat neither did hee ever restore it againe to the succeeding Emperours though Image-worshippers 2 Thes 2.3 4. 225. This then is that man of sin sitting in the Temple of God as God and exalting himself above every thing that is called God 226. This is that double beast having a double rising out of the sea and earth like an Amphibion and of two formes of a double nature in emulation of Christ both as a secular Monarch and as an Ecclesiasticall seducer the Antichrist figured in the fourth vision of the Revelations Rev. 17.1 7. 227. This is that Whore clothed with purple and scarlet drunk with the bloud of the Saints and of the Martyrs curbing with a bit the beast which she sits upon in the fifth vision of the Apocalyps 228. This is that Babylon great proud tyrannicall Rev. 18.4 saying in her heart I sit as a Queen and am no widow nor shall I see mourning 229. Here we have the double tyrannie of Poperie of old fore-told by the Angel to S. John and now after the revolution of an age detected by the renewing light of the Gospel 230. Which third cause was most urgent for our fathers to forsake and for us to avoid Poperie And so we conclude 231. The tyrannicall Church Babylon is to be deserted and avoided according to the voice from heaven Rev. 18.7 saying Goe out of her my people lest you be partakers of her sins and receive of her plagues 232. The Pontificalitie with Roman Poperie is a tyrannicall Church and Babylon 233. Therefore the Pontificalitie with Poperie was to be deserted and is to be avoided 234. Whosoever then continues a Papist formally as they speak that is whosoever dies without repentance in this Apostasie and in this Idolatrie and under this tyrannie of the Pontificalitie and Poperie shall without doubt perish eternally 235. In saying of this we condemne not nor do we teach that their persons should be deserted or avoided God is our witnesse but onely their errours and excesses above named which are condemned by Gods word 236. But rather charitie so commanding us we heartily pray to God for all that live in Poperie for kings and subjects for great and small for the Pope himselfe and his whole Clergie that according to his great mercie he would open the eyes of their hearts and would convert such as are to be converted and save such as will be saved being sealed with the seale of God in their fore-heads for Christ Jesus sake our Lord. To whom be glory power and honour for ever Amen The CREED of blessed Athanasius concerning the most sacred Trinitie and the Incarnation of our Lord JESUS CHRIST the Son of God With the Notes of D. David Parrie Of the Catholick Faith concerning the Trinity ARTICLE I. I. Whosoever would be saved before all things it is needfull that he hold the Catholick Faith which except every man keep whole and inviolate he shall doubtlesse perish everlastingly The Declaration 1. WHosoever So the necessitie of the Catholick faith to salvation is every-where declared in Scripture Mar. 16.16 He that beleedeth and is baptised shall be saved but hee that beleeveth not shall be condemned Where it is manifest that the first thing required is the beliefe of the Trinitie out of Mat. 28.19 Heb. 11.6 Without faith it is impossible to please God Therefore it is impossible to be saved 2 Thes 1.8 The Lord Jesus shall be revealed from heaven in flaming fire taking vengeance on them that know not God and that obey not the Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ They then that know not God nor obey the Gospel they hold not in every point the Catholick faith therefore cannot be saved but shall doubtlesse perish everlastingly ARTICLE II. 2. And this is the Catholick faith 3. that we worship one God in Trinitie and the Trinitie in unitie 4. neither confounding the persons 5. nor dividing the essence The Declaration 2. THe Catholick faith That is called the Catholick or universall faith not which is beleeved by all but which is necessary to be beleeved to salvation by all For so Euphronius Presbyter in his exposition of this Symbole of Athanasius saith That is called the Catholick or universall faith that is the right faith which the universall Church should hold It is set down in two heads chiefly in this Symbole of Athanasius to wit the faith of the holy Trinitie and the faith of the Incarnation and Mediation of the Son of God 3. That one God This is the first and chiefe mysterie by which Christian faith is discerned from the sects of Pagans Jewes Mahumetans and Hereticks For to them it is thought an absurditie to worship one God in Trinitie and Trinitie in unitie that is to say to worship and beleeve one God in essence and three in persons Father Son and holy Ghost As though forsooth it were lesse absurd in humane reason by which they measure faith to beleeve the worlds creation of nothing and mans of the earth or as the Alchoran feignes of a bubble of water and the resurrection of the
Fathers one Son not three Sons one holy Ghost not three holy Ghosts The Declaration 14. FAther This Article declares the third concerning the distinction of the persons which consisteth in a distinct manner of existing proper for each person 15. Of none The Greek is ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã that is made of or from none having no off spring or originall from any other because he is from himselfe 16. Nor created The Greek is ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã neither made of any for neither created otherwise he should be the creature of another 17. Nor begotten So it is in the Greek hence the Greek Divines call the Father ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã unbegotten for if he were begotten he should be the Son not the Father And this is the manner of existing by which the Father is distinguished from the Son and holy Ghost because he is of none but of himselfe 18. The Son from the Father Not also from the holy Ghost for as the Father onely hath the Son so the Son is onely from the Father therefore he is not the Son of Abraham David and Mary but according to the flesh 19. Not made When the Apostle saith He was made of a woman Gal. 4.4 that is understood according to the flesh not according to the divinity 20. Nor created As Arius blasphemed that the Son was first created abusing a corrupted place in the Apochrypha Syrac 24.14 and depraving other Scriptures which call Christ the beginning of the creature of God to wit not a passive but an active beginning Col. 1.5.18 Rev. 3.4 21. But begotten In the Greek it is begotten of the Father and that alone therefore he is the onely begotten of the Father John 1.14 and that Wisdome that was begot before the mountaines were made Prov. 8.25 that is from eternity This eternall generation of the Son from the Father is the ineffable communication of the divine Essence by which alone the second person of the divinity from the first alone as a son from the father receives the same essence whole and intire which the father hath and this is the way of existing by which the Son is distinguished from the Father and the holy Ghost because he is onely begotten of the Father 22. From the Father So it is in the Greek from the Father as John 15.26 ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã c. Who proceedeth from the Father but Athanasius saith not from the Father alone as he spake of the Son ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã of the Father alone which exclusive particle when the later Grecians against the minde of the Apostles and of Athanasius at length added the Latine Church to fill up the Scriptures meaning said From the Father and the Son 23. Not made This is against the Macedonians who feigned the holy Ghost to be a creature created motions and created spirituall gifts 24. Nor begotten Because so he were the Son for to be begotten is to be the Son 25. But proceeding So it is in the Greek as it is said John 15.46 for this procession or emanation is the ineffable communication of the divine Essence by which alone the third person of the divinity from the Father and the Son as a Spirit from him whose Spirit he is receives the same entire essence which the Father and Son have Concerning the manner of this procession and generation to those that curiously enquire that of Damascen should be answered ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã c. Dam. l. 4. Orth. Fid. c. 10. That there is a difference betweene generation and procession we have learned but which is the manner or way of this difference we know not And that of Ambrose Licet scire c. We may know that the Son is begot and so that the holy Ghost proceeds but we may not know how he is begot and how he proceeds And this is the way of existing that he proceeds from the Father and the Son for he is the Spirit of the Son no lesse then of the Father Rom. 8.9 Gal. 4.6 and he is sent from both John 15.26 he proceeds then from both ARTICLE VIII And in this Trinity 26. none is before or after other 27. none lesser or greater then other 28. but all the three persons are co-eternall among themselves and co-equall so that in all things as is said the unity in trinity and trinity in unity is to be worshipped 29. He then that will be saved must thus think of the Trinity The Declaration 26. NOne before To wit in nature and time though in order of existence the Father be the first the Son the second and the holy Ghost the third person 27. None greater Because God admits no quantity but when Christ saith he is lesser then the Father John 14.28 he saith this not in respect of his divinity but onely in regard of his mediation and humanity otherwise that could not be true when he saith I and my Father are one All that the Father hath are mine 28. But all The co-eternity then and co-equality and the co-essentiality also of the Trinity is altogether to be worshipped 29. He then that will He therefore hates his owne salvation who beleeves not the holy Trinity for Whosoever denieth the Son hath not the Father 1 John 2.23 And Who hath not the Spirit of Christ he is none of his Rom. 8.9 For no man can say that Jesus is the Lord but by the holy Ghost 1 Cor. 12.3 The Catholick Faith concerning the Incarnation of the Son of GOD our Lord JESUS CHRIST According to the Creed of ATHANASIUS briefly declared and asserted ARTICLE I. Of the Creed the ninth But 1. it is necessary unto eternall salvation that whosoever will be saved 2. he beleeve rightly the 3. Incarnation of our Lord Jesus Christ The Declaration 1. BVt it is necessary This necessity is every where delivered in Scripture John 3.36 He that beleeveth in the Son hath everlasting life and he that beleeveth not the Son shall not see life but the wrath of God abideth on him Joh. 6.14 This is the will of him that sent me that all that see the Son and beleeve in him may have life eternall John 17.3 This is life eternall to know thee the onely true God and whom thou hast sent Jesus Christ 1 John 4.3 And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God Acts 4.12 Neither is there salvation in any other for there is none other name under heaven given among men whereby we must be saved Acts 10.43 To him give all the Prophets witnesse that whosoever beleeveth in his Name shall receive remission of sins by his Name By faith then in the Son of God made man it behooveth all to be saved and without this faith no man can be saved 2. Incarnation also In Greek ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã his inhumanation ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã his incorporation of the causes truth and manner of which Athanasius lest a famous
as the proper and onely begotten son of man is man which the Scripture in innumerable places confirmeth 10. Of the substance of his Father This also the Scripture confirmeth as often as it witnesseth the Son of God to be begotten and the onely begotten of the Father For when an intelligent nature is said to beget it is properly to bring forth an issue out of its owne substance that is the begetter to that which is begot the father to the son communicates his owne substance 11. Begotten before the world Wisdome which is the Son of God Prov. 8.22 23 25 30. three or foure times plainly restifieth that she was begot before time and before the world was made And this among sensible or rationall men not to speak of godly men ought not to be doubted For how could God be a Father before the world if he begot not his Son before the world The Church confesseth that the manner of this generation is ineffable Rufinus in his Exposition of the Creed which is commonly attributed to Cyprian saith thus ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã I will not have thee discusse how God the Father begot his Son neither search too curiously into the depth of this mysterie lest perhaps whilst thou art making too strict a scrutiny to find out the splendor of this inaccessible light thou forfeit that small and weak sight which by divine bounty is bestowed upon men Know that the mysterie of this divine generation is as far different and eminent above all things that are in us as the Creatour is more potent then the creature and the Artificer more excellent then his worke c. When thou hearest of this Son I would not have thee think of a carnall nativity but remember that these things are spoken of the simple nature of an incorporeall substance For if in that word which the heart or in that meaning which the mind or in that brightnesses which the light begets of it selfe if I say there is no weaknesse in that generation how much purer must our thoughts be of him who is the Creatour of all these By this manner then of subsisting proper to himselfe is the Son of God distinguished in the holy Trinitie from the Father and holy Ghost because he alone is begotten of the Father before the world and therefore hee onely assumed mans flesh and was borne of the Virgin in time 12. Of the substance of his mother As the Angel said to the Virgin Mary Luke 1.35 That holy thing which shall be borne of thee that is of thy substance and wombe shall be called the Son of God For the Son of God should have been the son of David according to the promise 1 Chron. 22.10 Hebr. 1.5 Math. 1.1 Of the seed of David according to the flesh Rom. 1.3 Hence hee is called the fruit of Maries womb Luke 1.42 But the fruit is begot of the substance of the tree which is flat against the madnesse of Valentinus affirming that Christ was sent by the Father and brought with him an heavenly bodie and that he assumed nothing of the Virgin Mary but that hee past through her as through a channell or pipe without taking any flesh of her August de haeres 10. 13. In the world That is in time or in the fulnesse of time to wit prefixed by God Galaâ 4.4 which was in the 42. yeare of Augustus his reigne and in the year of the world 3928. according to Beroaldus his best account 14. Perfect God In Greek perfect God is the same that 1 John 5.20 the true God for there is but that one and eternall God by nature ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã who calls himselfe Gen. 17.1 the God of sufficiency or perfection He is not then God equivocally in respect of the excellencie of his gifts and office as Angels Psal 97.7 Or as Princes Psal 82.6 as Samosatenus and Photinus of old blasphemed and of late the Servetians and Socinians affirming Christ to have taken his beginning from Mary and not to have had any being before her Neither a factitious or created God before all things of non-entities as Arius madly said For no creature can attaine to the perfection of the Creatour whereas every creature proceeds from non-entitie to entitie but not to be is absolutely repugnant to God and to his perfection 15. Perfect man A true and entire man consisting of a reasonable soule and a humane body which is contrary to the heresie of Marcion and Manichoeus affirming that Christ came in the later times to deliver soules not bodies and that he was not truly in the flesh but onely to delude humane senses hee made shew of humane flesh This is also against the errour of Apollinaris the Syrian affirming the Son of God to have assumed the flesh without the soule and that the Word was in stead of the soule in him August de haeres 46.55 Christ himselfe did pithily refute both these the former when rising from the dead he shewed himselfe to his disciples who being affrighted with his sight supposed they had seen a spirit to whom Christ faith Why are you troubled See my hands and feet for I am the same Touch me and see for a spirit hath not flesh and bones as you see mee have Luke 24.39 But the later he refells when in the garden in his feare and agonie he cried out My soule is heavie unto death Matth. 26.38 Now the Word could not either be troubled with passions of the mind or with the feare of death because the nature of man being assumed into the hypostasis doth not subsist by it selfe but in the person of the Word which is so far from diminishing mans perfection that it rather perfects it As for mans person to be or to subsist it is the perfection of a meere man which indeed should make Christ to be meerly man But to subsist in the person of the Word of God is the perfection of him that is both God and man or of man assumed into the Godhead as Athanasius speakes in the following Article 16. Equall to the Father That Christ was the Son of God and God the forenamed Hereticks of old did not and the moderne doe not deny but they did as they doe at this day trifle with an equivocation affirming a factitious god in respect of gifts and divine operations or a God created before all things but lesser and inferiour to the Father which is directly against the assertors of the Christian faith amongst whom Athanasius was not the meanest who by evident testimonies out of Scripture and arguments did demonstrate that the Son of God was God equall and consubstantiall with the Father Here let a few serve We are inaugurated by baptism equally in the name of the Father Son and holy Ghost as in the name of one true God The Jewes themselves did acknowledge Christ when he said John 5.17 My Father worketh hitherto and I worke that he called God his owne Father and
damnation and the judgment of the great day And elsewhere also they themselves complain that Christ came to torment them before their time The causes why God permitted them to fall Furthermore God permitteth them to fall into this wickednesse not onely thereby to shew his wrath against sin in their everlasting paines but also to punish by them in this life the wicked and also to chastise or try and exercise with temptations the elect Mat. 25.41 1 Sam. 16.14 23. Psal 78.9 For fire is said to be prepared for them from everlasting The evill spirit of God came upon Saul and vexed him He cast upon the Egyptians the fiercenesse of his anger indignation and wrath and vexation by the sending out of evill Angels But Job 1.12 Job is delivered to be afflicted of Sathan for the tryall of his constancie Sathan hath desired to winnow you as wheat Luke 22.31 1 Thess 2.17 2. Cor. 12.7 Wee would have come unto you but Sathan hindered us Lest I should be exalted above measure through the abundance of revelations there was given unto me a prick in the flesh the messenger of Sathan to buffet me because I should not be exalted out of measure 2 Thess 3.5 Lest the tempter had tempted you in any sort and that our labour had been in vain And Christ himself is tempted of Satan Mat. 4.3 6 9. and therefore verily he is called the tempter for that he solliciteth and inciteth men to sin and to revolt from God both by offering outward occasion of sins as also by stirring up the cogitations and inward motions of the will and heart ON THE 10. SABBATH Quest 27. What is the Providence of God Answ The almighty power of God every where present a Isa 29.15 16. Jer. 23.23 24. Ezek. 8.12 Act. 17.25 27. whereby he doth as it were with his hand uphold and govern heaven and earth with all the creatures therein b Heb. 1.3 So that those things which grow in the earth as likewise rain and drought fruitfulnesse and barrennesse c Jer. 5.24 Acts 14.17 meat and drink d Acts 14.17 health and sicknesse e John 9.3 riches and poverty f Pro 22.2 in a word all things come not rashly or by chance but by his fatherly counsell and will g Pro. 16.33 Matth. 10.29 The Explication The reason of the connexion of the two places of Creation and Providence Providence and creation one and the same thing but diverse in consideration THe doctrine which treateth of Gods providence is joyned with the place which treateth of the creation because the providence that is the preservation and government of things created doth not differ from the creation in the thing it self for that there is but one and the same will or power or action of God whereby things both begin to be and continue but they differ in consideration only For the omnipotent will of God is called creation in respect of the beginning when things by the force and power of his will took their being it is called providence as by the self-same power things are preserved Wherefore Providence is the continuance and accomplishment of creation or creation it selfe continuated and perpetuated For we may not imagine that the creation of the world is like to the building of a ship which the Ship-wright as soon as hee hath finished it committeth to the government of some Pilot but wee must hold this as a grounded truth that as nothing had ever been except God had created them so neither could they retaine and keep their being neither their force of working neither the very operation it selfe or motion no not the space of one moment or minute of time if God did not preserve and move them effectually And therefore the Scripture it selfe often joyneth the preservation and continuall administration of things with their creation and from hence reasoneth for Gods providence And God is called Jehovah God is called Jehovah 1. For giving 2. For maintaining the being of his creatures not only because hee once gave to every thing both small and great their being but also because hee maintaineth it in all and moveth them so as that he not only seeth what is done in all things but also causeth and inclineth them to do that which he from everlasting would every of them to doe And by this his providence hee governeth administreth ruleth and preserveth all things that they be not brought to confusion Wee cannot therefore have a full and perfect knowledge of the creation except we joyn with it the doctrine of providence Touching providence these three things are principally questioned 1. Whether there be any Providence 2. What Providence is 3. Why the knowledge thereof is necessary THe two former of these are discussed here under this twenty seventh Question of the Catechism the third is resolved in the twenty eighth Question immediatly following 1. Whether there be any providence of God Philosophers errours concerning Gods providence COncerning this point of doctrine three diverse erroneous opinions are found amongst Philosophers 1. The Epicures will have either no providence at all or onely of those things which are and are done in the lower parts of the world 2. The Stoicks have devised in stead of providence an absolute necessity and order of all things being in the very nature of things wherunto not only all other things but God himself also is subject which necessity they called destiny 3. The Peripateticks did imagine that God indeed doth behold and understand all things but yet doth not order and rule all things but moveth the celestiall motions and doth by them send down by way of influence some power and vertue unto the lower parts of nature but the operations themselves or motions depend of the matter and of the wils of men that is they will have the providence of God to be a prescience or fore-knowledge of God in all things but not a will decreeing causing and ruling all things The opinion of the Church touching providence Contrarily the Church teacheth out of the word of God That nothing is extant and cometh to passe in the whole world but by the certain and definite though yet most free and most good counsell and purpose of God There are two sorts of arguments and proofs whereby is confirmed Two proofes of providence that there is a providence of God Testimony of Scripure and force of argument Scripture Testimonies of Scripture are these Hee giveth to all life and breath and all things Acts 17.25 28. In him we live and move and have our being Are not two sparrows sold for a farthing Mat. 10.29 30. and one of them shall not fall to the ground without your Father Yea Ephes 1.11 and all the hairs of your head are numbred God worketh all things after the counsell of his own will Like to these are found infinite testimonies in
the Scripture by which both Gods universall and particular providence are established for there is almost no point of heavenly doctrine which is more diligently inculcated and urged in the old Testament then the doctrine of Gods providence So in Jeremy God reasoneth from the generall to the particular that is from the rule it self to the example The generall is Chap. 27.5 6. I have made the earth the man and the beast that are upon the ground and have given it unto whom it pleased mee And presently hee adjoyneth the particular Now have I given all these lands into the hands of Nebuchadnezzar the king of Babel my servant Reason The arguments whereby the Providence is avouched are of two sorts whereof one demonstrateth the thing that is in question à posteriori that is from the works or effects of God the other à priori that is from the attributes or properties or nature of God whereon as their proper cause those effects depend yet more known proofs and more common and obvious are those which are drawn from the works or effects of God For by these as being more known unto us we learn and know the cause it selfe even the nature and properties of God then after we know the cause we return back again from it to the effects and demonstrate them by this and have distinct and perfect knowledge thereof And both these proofes and reasons are demonstrative necessarily and irrefragably proving that which is in question and common to Philosophy with Divinity But the properties and works of God are better known of them which are in the Church then of them which are without And further the providence of God is proved almost by the same arguments whereby it is shewed that there is a God The reasons drawne from the works of God for proofe of his Providence 1. Order THe order which is in the nature of things that is the most apt disposing of all the parts and the succession of motions and actions continuing by certain and perpetuall lawes and courses and serving for the preservation of the whole and for those ends whereunto things were ordained for where there is order there is necessarily a cause ordaining and disposing the same Psal 89. 10. 135. 147. 148. Now this order proceedeth not from a meer sensible nature neither cometh it by chance or fortune but contrarily he must needs be most wise who appointed and setled this order in the nature of things and so he also who by his providence governeth and ruleth nature The minde The minde and understanding which is in Angles and men Man which as it were a little world is ruled by a mind and understanding much more then is the great world governed by divine providence as in the administring whereof more wisdome is required Whence it is said He that planted the ear shall he not hear Psal 94.9 Or hee that formed the eye shall he not see The naturall knowledge of the law The naturall notions or principles ingraffed in our minds or the law of nature or the difference between things honest and dishonest Hee that hath ingraved in the minds of men the rule of directing their life he will have men to live according to that rule and thereafter respecteth and governeth their life actions and events But God hath ingraved in the minds of men such a rule whereby to discern that which is honest from things dishonest Therefore hee is both the beholder and Judge of mans life As many as have sinned without the law shall perish also without the law Rom. 2.12 13 14 15. and as many as have sinned in the law shall be judged by the law For the hearers of the law are not righteous before God but the doers of the law shall be justified c. Plant. captiv Hom. in ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã And Plautus saith There is verily a God who both heareth and seeth what we doe And Homer God hath an upright eye The terrours of conscience The terrours and torments of conscience in the wicked which generally ensue upon sin committed by them These feares cannot be stricken into any without some intelligent and understanding nature which beholdeth and respecteth all humane affairs especially seeing the wicked cannot escape Therefore there is some revenger of sins and wickednesse who is God and who inflicteth those horrours Rom 1.18 2.15 and also who knoweth and regardeth all things even the secrets of men The wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodlinesse and unrighteousnesse of men And Juvenal writing unto a friend of his some way to comfort him for the losse which hee had suffered by trusting too much a cousening and perjured Merchant Why saith hee dost thou think such fellowes to have escaped whose mind being conscious and guilty of the deed possesseth them with astonishment c. Rewards and punishments Rewards and punishments He that at all times and in all places adorneth vertue with rewards and draweth the wicked to punishment he must needs rule all mankind with his providence But God yeeldeth more pleasant successes and events to the good which live with moderation and soberly even to those that are without the Church and punisheth hainous offences with grievous punishments in this life yea when men wink at them Therefore God ruleth and governeth the whole world by his providence The righteous shall rejoyce when hee seeth the vengeance Psal 58.9 10. 94 10. hee shall wash his feet in the bloud of the wicked And men shall say Verily there is fruit for the righteous doubtlesse there is a God that judgeth in the earth He that nurtureth the heathen shall not he punish Like unto this is the heathen Poets Axiome Such things as a man doth such an end and fruit thereof surpriseth him The maintenance and preservation of Common-weals The order and preservation of Common-weals He that ordereth and setleth the Empires and States of the whole world preserveth and maintaineth them against the power hatred sleights furies of divels tyrants and wicked men which are far moe in number then the good and wish rather the suppression then the maintenance of lawes and at his pleasure altereth and translateth them it must needs be that he taketh care of and guideth the affairs counsels and actions of men But it is God who alone is able to perform and doth perform these things for none besides him is mightier then the divell and the order of Common-weales and Kingdoms doth alwaies continue Therefore God governeth all things by his providence By me Kings reign and Princes decree justice Prov. 8.15 Dan. 4.14 That living men may know that the most High hath power over the kingdome of men and giveth it to whomsoever hee will and appointeth over it the most abject among men And Tully saith in a certain Oration Pro Rabir. Common-weals are governed far more by the
Booke entituled The inhumanation of the Word of God other Greeks commonly call this The Incarnation which word is made out of the sayings of Scripture in which the Incarnation of the Son of God is chiefly grounded John 1.14 The Word was made flesh and dwelt among us 1 Tim. 3.16 God was manifested in the flesh Heb. 2.14 Because children are partakers of flesh and blood the Son of God himselfe was made partaker of the same and ver 16. He tooke not on him the nature of Angels but he tooke on him the flesh is of God To this purpose are the Angels words to the Virgin Mary Luke 1.35 The holy Ghost shall come upon thee and the vertue of the most High shall over-shadow thee therefore that holy thing that shall be borne of thee shall be called the Son of God And that of the Apostle Gal. 4.4 God sent his Son made of a woman out of which is understood that this Incarnation is the miraculous assumption of humane flesh or nature by the operation of the holy Ghost in the Virgins womb being performed by the Son of God into the unity of his personality 3. Beleeve faithfully In the Greek it is firmely ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã in the last Article it is faithfully and firmely of which the first respects the sincerity of this faith purified from errour deniall and heresie whatsoever concerning this mystery the latter requires an assurance and confidence of salvation in the Son of God incarnate ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã being opposite to doubt and conjecturall opinion ARTICLE II. Of the Creed the X. This then 4. is the right Faith 5. that wee beleeve and confesse that 6. our Lord Jesus Christ 7. the Son of God is 8. God and man The Declaration 4. RIght faith The right faith concerning the Incarnation of the Son of God is briefly set out in two heads The first is of the very mysterie of the Incarnation or of the person of the Son of God incarnate The later is concerning his office or the mysterie of our redemption which was performed and to be performed by him in the flesh It is equally necessary to salvation to beleeve both and the first for the later The faith of which except it be held entire and untainted as the Gospel declares it to beleeve Christ to be God and man which the divels also beleeve and tremble will help nothing to salvation 5. That we may beleeve We must beleeve and confesse because with the heart we beleeve unto righteousnesse and with the mouth we confesse to salvation 6. Our Lord. So the Angell calls him the same day he was borne Luke 2.11 There is borne to us this day a Saviour which is Christ the Lord And the New Testament in very many places chiefly 1 Cor. 8.6 We haue one Lord Jesus Christ. And he will be so called of us John 13.13 You call mee Lord and you say well for so I am Hence in the Creed we beleeve in Jesus Christ our Lord. The Septuagint every-where expresse the word ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã Lord by Gods proper name ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã which is worth the observing because it affords an ample argument of the true Deitie of our Lord Jesus Christ For if ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã be the same that Jehovah surely ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã our Lord is God Jehovah The Son of God then is our Lord by a two-fold dominion one of his Deitie common to him with the Father and holy Ghost which is his absolute power over all things the other is of mediation proper to himselfe by which as he is the Mediatour between God and men he alone is at the right hand of God appointed head of the Church over all things Ephes 1.22 7. He is the Son of God Not a son by the grace of creation as the Angels are Gods Sons Job 1.6 nor a son by the grace of adoption as those that are predestinate are adopted to be sons by Jesus Christ Ephes 1.5 but the proper Son of God Rom. 8.32 The onely begotten of the Father John 1.14 Begotten before all created things from eternitie Prov. 8.23 25. Whose going forth from the beginning from the dayes of eternitie Mich. 5.4 By whom all things were made and without whom nothing was made that was made John 1.3 8. God and man Not God alone for so he were not truly Christ that is anointed for God alone is the anointer not the anointed Nor man alone for so he were not truly Jesus that is a Saviour for man alone is not the Saviour but the saved but God and man one and the same Son consisting of two natures the divine and the humane in the unitie of the hypostasis Furthermore why the Son of God the second person of the blessed Trinitie rather then any of the other persons to wit the Father or the holy Ghost united humane flesh to himselfe although that humane reason should stand amazed Christian faith should humbly adore and not search this mysterie some reasons notwithstanding are unfolded by Divines not improbable to wit that it was fit that he who was the Son of God begotten of the Father before the world should likewise be the Son of man borne in time of the substance of his mother First lest by the Incarnation the denomination of the divine persons should be changed or a confusion introduced which had hapned if either the Father or the holy Ghost or all together by the dispensation of the flesh had challenged to themselves the name of Son Secondly the benefit of the Incarnation was by God ordained and bestowed upon men for this end that wee might become the sons of God for it was meet that we should be made Gods adopted sons by him who is Gods naturall Son Thirdly it was most convenient that he who had obtained a middle place among the creatures should be repaired by the middle person of the Trinitie that there might be a decent correspondencie between the middle and middle Now man hath a middle place among the creatures having obtained to be under the spirituall and above the corporeall creatures it was then fit that man should be repaired by the middle person of the Trinitie Lastly there is nothing more decent than that decayed nature should be restored by him by whom it was created because all things were made by him John 1.3 therefore man was to be repaired and restored to his former dignitie by the Son of God ARTICLE III. Of the Creed the XI 9. He is God 10. of the substance of his Father 11. begotten before the world and man 12. of the substance of his mother 13. Borne in the world 14. Perfect God 15. Perfect man of a reasonable soule and humane flesh subsisting 16. Equall to the Father according to his Divinitie 17. inferiour to the Father according to his humanitie The Declaration 9. HEe is God It is as evident that the proper and onely begotten Son of God is God