of Mans Wisdom but in demonstration of the Spirit and of Power that your Faith should not stand in the Wisdom of Men but in the Power of God. Luke 1. 35. The Holy Ghost shall come upon thee Blessed Mary and the Power of the Highest shall overshadow thee Luke 11. 20. I with the Finger of God that is by the Power of God Exod. 8. 19. cast out Devils Mat. 12. 28. I cast out Devils by the Spirit of God. Compare also Luke 24. 49. with Acts 1. 4 5 8. 2. A manifest Distinction is made as between God and Christ so also between God and the Holy Spirit or Power and Inspiration of God so that 't is impossible the Spirit should be God himself Rom. 5. 5. The Love of God is shed abroad in your Hearts by the Ho-Ghost which is given to us 1 Cor. 3. 16. The Grace or Favour of our Lord Jesus Christ the Love of God and the Communion of the Holy Ghost be with you Rom. 8. 27. He the Spirit v. 26. maketh Intercession for the Saints according to the Will of God. They note here that God's Spirit or Inspiration being designed to be a continual Director and Guide to the Faithful it is spoken of in these and some other Texts as a Person by the same Figure of Speech that Charity is described as a Person 1 Cor. 13. 4 5. and Wisdom Prov. 9. 11. and the Law or Commandments of God Psal 119. 24. They note also that in some Texts 't is called the Holy Ghost and Holy Spirit in the same sense that we commonly say the Holy Wisdom Holy Will of God. 3. The Spirit is obtained for us of God by our Prayers therefore it self is not God. Acts 15. 8. God which knoweth the Hearts bare them witness giving them the Holy Spirit as he did to us Luke 11. 13. How much more shall your Heavenly Father give the Holy Spirit to them that ask him If we say these Texts are to be understood not of the Person of the Holy Ghost but of his Gifts and Graces the Socinians readily confess it but they say also that if the Holy Spirit were at all a Person much more a God his Gifts and Graces would be bestowed by himself and asked of himself not bestówed by and asked of another Person as 't is manifest and by all confessed they are in these Texts They add there is neither Precept nor Example in all Holy Scripture of Prayer made to the Spirit on this or any other occasion which on the Trinitarian Supposition that the Holy Spirit is a Person and God no less than the Father is very surprizing nay utterly unaccountable 4. If the Holy Spirit and our Lord Christ are Gods or God no less than the Father then God is a Trinity of Persons or three Persons but this is contrary to the whole Scripture which speaks of God as but one Person and speaks of him and to him by singular Pronouns such as I Thou Me Him c. Job 13. 7. Will ye speak wickedly for God Will ye accept his Person Heb. 1. 1. God hath in these last times spoken to us by his Son who being the Brightness of his Glory and the express Image of his Person sat down at the right Hand of the Majesty on high Deut. 6. 4 5. Hear O Israel the Lord our God is one Lord and thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thine Heart In the Hebrew thus O Israel hearken to Jehovah our God Jehovah is one and thou shalt love Jehovah thy God with all thine Heart The Jews by a most ancient Tradition and Custom are obliged to repeat this Verse every Morning and Evening to keep it in perpetual Memory that Jehovah or God is one only not two or three Isa 45. 5. I am the Lord there is no God but Me. Psal 102. 25. O my God of old hast thou laid the Foundation of the Earth Matth. 4. 10. the Lord thy God him only shalt thou serve No Instance say the Socinians can be given in any Language of three Persons whoever spoke of themselves or were spoken to by the singular Pronouns I Thou Me Him Thee c. Such speaking is contrary to Custom Grammar and Sense which are the Laws of Speech therefore the Holy Scriptures always speaking thus of God either he is only one Person or the Scriptures are one continued ungrammatical Soloecism and Impropriety and that in the capital Article of Faith which no reasonable or good Man can or ever will allow For it no way helps the Trinitarians that God according to some Translations says at Gen. 1. 26. Let Vs make Man. Because nothing is so usual in common Speech as for single Persons to speak of themselves indifferently by singular or plural Pronouns thus 2 Cor. 10. 2. I think to be bold against some who think of Vs saith Paul of himself only as if We walked according to the Flesh Briefly they contend that when God speaks of himself in the plural Number or by plural Pronouns which yet some deny he ever does and if he doth 't is not above once or twice in the whole Scripture he speaks according to the Custom of single Persons especially Princes and great Persons in all Nations and Languages but were Almighty God three Persons they could never speak of themselves or be spoken to by the singular Pronouns I Thou Thee Him Me because 't is contrary not only to Grammar which is always to be observed when there is no Custom to the contrary but to the Custom of all Nations which understand to speak intelligibly and sensibly 5. Had the Son or Holy Ghost been God this would not have been omitted in the Apostles Creed This Creed say they which is of next if not equal Authority to any part of Holy Scripture after having declared that God is the Father Almighty and Maker of Heaven and Earth speaks not a Word of the Godhead of the Son or Holy Ghost It describes the Son by all the characters of a Man and by such only it says he was conceived or begotten by the Holy Ghost on Blessed Mary that accordingly he was born of her that he was crucified died and was buried that he rose on the third day and ascended into Heaven all these are the Descriptions of a Man for God cannot be conceived or be born or die no nor ascend into Heaven for he is always there Not content to take no notice that he is God this Creed distinguishes him very plainly from God that is denies him to be God by adding He sits at the right Hand of God. i. e. He is advanced to be next to God and is under the immediate and particular Protection of God. Concerning the Holy Ghost this Creed says no higher thing than it says of the Church I believe in the Holy Ghost and in the Holy Catholick Church For in the Greek the same Preposition in is before both alike and so also is this Creed
not for himself or People he cannot die and he deriveth his Power from none but himself But 't is certain that the Lord Christ could not himself without the previous Ordination of the Father confer the prime Dignities of Heaven or of the Church He placed his Safety in the Father's Presence and Help He prayed often and fervently to the Father both for himself and for his Disciples He died and was raised from the dead by the Father After his Resurrection he received of another that great Power which he now injoyeth Matth. 20. 23. To sit on my right Hand and on my left is not mine to give but it shall be given to them for whom it is prepared of my Father John 8. 29. He that sent me is with me and the Father hath not left me alone for I always do those things that please him Luke 22. 42. Father if thou be willing remove this Cup from me Heb. 5. 7. Who in the Days of his Flesh offered up Prayers and Supplications with strong Crying and Tears unto him that was able to save him John 17. 20. Neither pray I for these alone but for them also which shall believe in me through their Word Ephes 1. 19 20. According to the mighty working of his Power which he wrought in Christ when he raised him from the dead Matth. 28. 18. Jesus came and spake to them saying All Power is given to me 7. Jesus Christ is in holy Scripture always spoken of as a distinct and different Person from God and described to be the Son of God and the Image of God Rom. 16. 27. To God only wise be Glory through Jesus Christ. Luke 18. 19. Why callest thou me good there is none good save one that is God. 1 Tim. 2. 5. There is one God and one Mediator between God and Men the Man Jesus Christ. John 13. 18. He that believeth not is condemned already because he hath not believed on the Name of the only begotten Son of God. Luke 1. 35. The Holy Ghost shall come upon thee Blessed Mary and the Power of the Highest shall overshadow thee therefore also or and therefore the Holy thing that is born of thee shall be called the Son of God. Col. 1. 15. The Image of the invisible God. ' Tis. say the Socinians as impossible that the Son or Image of the one true God should himself be that one true God as that the Son should be the Father and the Image that very thing whose Image it is which they take to be simply impossible and contradictory to common sense which Religion came not to destroy but to improve Whereas to these arguings 't is objected that these things are in Holy Scripture spoken of Christ according to only his humane Nature or as he is a Man but that he is also God the Son though united to an humane Nature that is to an humane Soul and Body The Socinians reply that there is in Scripture no real Foundation for such a Conceit that 't is inconsistent with almost all the Texts already cited especially those in which the Lord Christ is spoken of as a distinct and different Person from God and that there are many other Considerations and Passages of holy Scripture which no less than demonstrate it to be false As 8. Because so many Texts expresly declare that only the Father is God John 17. 1 2 3. Father this is Life eternal that they know thee the only true God and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent or Jesus Christ thy Messenger 1 Cor. 8. 6. But to us there is but one God the Father of whom are all things and we in him and one Lord or Master i. e. Teacher by whom are all things In the Greek thus One Lord Jesus Christ for whom are all things and we for him See the Note on Heb. 1. 2. in the Fourth Letter Eph. 4. 4 5 6. One Spirit one Lord one God and Father of all who is above all 1 Cor. 15. 24. Then 〈◊〉 the End when he Christ ver 23. shall deliver up the Kingdom to God even the Father Jam. 3. 9. Therewith with the Tongue ver 8. bless we God even the Father Rom. 15. 6. With one Mind and with one Mouth glorify God even the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ 9. If Christ were indeed God as well as Man or as Trinitarians speak God the Son incarnate in an humane Nature it had been altogether superfluous to give the Holy Spirit to his said humane Nature as a Director and Guide For what other help could that Nature need which was one Person with as they speak God the Son and in which God the Son did personally dwell Luke 4. 1. Jesus being full of the Holy Ghost departed from Jordan Acts 1. 2. After that he through the Holy Ghost i. e. through direction and motion of the holy Spirit and Inspiration of God had given Commandments unto the Apostles Acts 10. 38. God anointed Jesus of Nazareth with the Holy Ghost 10. Had the Lord Christ been as Trinitarians speak God the Son joyned to an humane Nature he could not have ascribed his miraculous Works to the Holy Ghost or to the Father dwelling in him but to the Son dwelling in him and united to him Matth. 12. 28. I cast out Devils by the Spirit of God. John 14. 10. The Father that dwelleth in me he doeth the Works John 5. 30. I can do nothing of my self Acts 2. 22. Jesus of Nazareth a Man approved of God among you by Miracles and Wonders and Signs which God did by him in the midst of you 11. Had our Lord been more than a Man the Prophecies of the Old Testament in which he is promised would not describe him barely as the Seed of the Woman the Seed of Abraham a Prophet like unto Moses the Servant and Missionary of God on whom God's Spirit should rest Gen. 3. 5. I will put Enmity between thy Seed and her Seed Her Seed is by all Interpreters understood to be Christ Gen. 22. 18. In thy Seed shall all the Nations of the Earth be blessed This again is universally interpreted of Christ Deut. 18. 18. I will raise them up a Prophet from among their Brethren like unto thee and I will put my Words into his Mouth This is interpreted of our Lord Christ in many Texts of the New Testament as John 1. 45. and Acts 3. 22. and Acts 7. 37. Isai 41. 1. Behold my Servant whom I uphold mine Elect in whom my Soul delighteth I will put my Spirit upon him and he shall bring forth Judgment to the Gentiles This is interpreted of Christ Matth. 12. 17 18. Now that the Holy Ghost or Spirit is only the Power and Inspiration of God at least is not himself God they hold is ascertained by these Considerations 1. The Holy Ghost or Spirit and the Power of God are spoken of as one and the same thing 1 Cor. 2. 4 5. My preaching was not with enticing Words
for the Godhead of the Son or Spirit because as now Christians are baptized unto them so the Jews were baptized unto Moses and John's Disciples unto John. 9. Luke 1. 16 17 76. Many of the Children of Israel shall he John Baptist turn to the Lord their God and he shall go before him in the Spirit and Power of Elias Thou Child shalt be called the Prophet of the Highest for thou shalt go before the Face of the Lord to prepare his way Answ See on Isa 40. 3. 10. Luke 17. 5. The Apostles said unto the Lord Increase our Faith. Answ By thy Prayers to God which are always heard for us 11. Luke 24. 47. That Repentance and Remission of Sin should be preached in his Christ Name Answ The sense is Christ commanded the Disciples to require Men to repent and on their so doing to assure them in his Name or from him that God would forgive them 12. John 1. 1. c. In the Beginning was the Word c. Answ The Trinitarian Exposition of this Chapter is absurd and contradictory 't is this In the Beginning i. e. from all Eternity Answ From all Eternity is before the Beginning or without Beginning not in the Beginning In the Beginning must refer to some time and thing it must be in the Beginning of the World or of the Gospel or of the Word and in which ever of these senses it is taken the Word cannot be from all Eternity by Virtue or Force I mean of this Expression Was the Word i. e. was God the Son. Answ But where in Scripture is the Word called God the Son The Word was with God i. e. The Son was with the Father Answ It seems then that God in this clause is the Father But was not the Son also with the Holy Ghost and is not he too according to the Trinitarians God or a God If he is why doth St. John only say the Son was with the Father and how comes the Father to engross here the Title of God to the Exclusion of the Holy Ghost The Word was God. What shall we do here was the Word the Father for so they interpreted God in the foregoing clause No God in this clause hath a new meaning 't is God the Son. But in the whole Scripture there are not these words God the Son. The same was in the Beginning with God. How comes this to be again repeated for John had said once before that the Word was with God. They care not 't is said and that 's enough The Truth is according to their sense of this Context no account can be given of this Repetition and they must allow it to be a meer Tautology But let us say the Socinians hear Grotius interpreting this sublime Proem of St. John's Gospel Ver. 1. In the Beginning i. e. when God created the Heavens and the Earth For these Words are taken from Gen. 1. 1. was the Word The Hebrews call that Power and Wisdom of God by which he made the World and does all other his extraordinary Works his Word Psal 33. 6. By the Word of the Lord were the Heavens made Heb. 11. 2. The Worlds were made by the Word of God. 2 Pet. 3. 5. By the Word of God the Heavens were of old They borrowed this Expression from Moses who in describing the Creation saith that God said Let there be Light Gen. 1. 3. God said Let there be a Firmament Gen. 1. 6. and so through the whole Chapter Undoubtedly Moses is not to be understood of a Word orally spoken for God is a Spirit but his meaning is God put forth his Power and Wisdom and thereby created Light and the Firmament c. As easily as Men can speak these Words Let there be Light Let there be a Firmament Thus we see why the Divine Wisdom and Power was called the Word by David and so many Writers of the New Testament The Word was with God i. e. It was not yet in the World or not yet made Flesh ver 10. and 14. but with God. The Word was God i. e. The Word or Divine Wisdom and Power is not something different from God but being his Wisdom and Power is God. 'T is the common Maxim of Divines that the Attributes and Properties of God are God. Which is in some sense true We may also here note that those Persons whether Angels or Men to whom the Divine Word hath been in an extraordinary Degree communicated have also had the Names Jehovah and God given to them The Angel who destroyed Sodom by a miraculous Tempest from Heaven is called Jehovah so is he that promised Abraham to cause Sarah to conceive a Son Gen. 18. 13. On the same account God says to Moses Exod 7. 1. See I have made thee a God to Pharaoh Ver. 2. The same was in the Beginning with God. This is here again repeated by the Evangelist to teach us that the Word is so God that it is not all that God is there being other Properties and Attributes of God that are communicable as well as the Word Ver. 3. All things were made by him The English-Geneva Translation saith here All things were made by It. But it matters not for the Word begins here to be spoken of as a Person by the same Figure of Speech that Solomon saith Wisdom hath builded her House and hewn out her seven Pillars Prov. 9. 1. And that David calls God's Commandments Counsellours Psal 119. 24. Ver. 4. In him i. e. In him when he was in the World and was made Flesh Ver. 10. and 14. Was Life i. e. By the Word when made Flesh or Man the way and manner of obtaining Life eternal Life was discovered to the Gentiles The way is the Doctrine of the Gospel John 12. 50. And the Life was the Light of Men i. e. The Life-giving Doctrine by him taught was that Light to and by which Men may and ought to direct their Steps in order to eternal Blessedness John 12. 50. So here the Doctrine of Christ the Gospel is called Light as before it was called Life Ver. 8. He John was not that Light i. e. John neither was nor was the bringer of the Light of the Gospel though he bare Witness to both 'T is usual in familiar Speech to call the Bringer of a thing by the name of the thing he brings and for this reason our Saviour is called Life and Light John 14. 6. John 8. 12. Ver. 10. He was in the World. Here the Evangelist returns to speak of the Word The sense is in Process of time the Word became incarnate that is Abode on the Person of Jesus Christ and so conversed in the World among Men. God communicated his Word that is a vast Effusion of his Divine Power and Wisdom to his Son the Lord Christ Acts. 10. 38. The World was made by him i. e. The World and all Men were made by this Word which afterwards abode on Jesus Christ and which
that our High-Priest and Intercessor having been in our very Circumstances is touched with a true Feeling of our Infirmities and therefore doth with great Earnestnest intercede for us all in general 35. Heb. 7. 3. Without Father without Mother having neither Beginning of Days nor end of Life but made like unto the Son of God abideth a Priest for ever Answ All acknowledg that these Words are spoken of Melchizedec And that because neither his Father nor Mother nor the time of his Birth or Death are mentioned in Scripture he is therefore said to be withour Father or Mother and without Beginning of Days or end of Life But he is not herein like the Son of God the time of whose Birth and Death is recorded in Scripture and whose Mother was blessed Mary and his Father the everlasting God but he is like the Son of God in that he abideth a Priest for ever 36. Heb. 10. 5. A Body hast thou prepared for me Answ 'T is undoubted that God prepared a Body for the Soul of Christ 37. Heb. 11. 26. Esteeming i. e. Moses esteeming the Reproach of Christ greater Riches than the Treasures of Egypt Answ The sense is Moses preferred being reproached and ill used by Pharaoh and the Egyptians as Christ was reproached and abused when he came to deliver the true Israel of God from the Bondage of Sin and Satan before all the Treasures and Riches which he as an adopted Son of Pharaoh's Daughter might have expected and had in Egypt So Grotius and others the most esteemed Interpreters 38. Heb. 13. 8. Jesus the same yesterdy today and for ever Answ This is prefaced to what here follows be not carried away with diverse and strange Doctrines as an Argument to perswade Constancy in the true Faith. The sense is the Lord Christ and his Gospel is the same thing that it always was be not therefore carried about to every novel Doctrine Ye will by Experience find that 't is a good thing to be establish'd in the Grace of the Gospel and not in Doctrines about Meats which the Jews from the Mosaic Law and the Gentiles from the Dictates of their Philosophers so much urge 39. 1 Pet. 1. 11. Searching what and what manner of time the Spirit of Christ which was in them did signify when it testified before-hand the Sufferings of Christ. Answ 1. The Spirit of Christ that is the same Spirit of Prophecy that was in Christ Or 2. The Prophetick Spirit in them which spoke of Christ So Grotius interprets here Others confirm his Interpretation by observing that the Spirit of Truth and the Spirit of Error mentioned 1 John 4. 6. are those Spirits which speak the Truth and teach Error So we call Virgil the Poet of Eneas and Homer of Achilles and Vlisses because they have written and spoken of Eneas Achilles and Vlisses 40. 1 Pet. 3. 19 20. Quickned by the Spirit by which also he went and preached to the Spirits in Prison which sometimes were disobedient in the days of Noah Answ This Text seems to speak of Christ's descent into Hell. The sense is Christ being dead was shortly quickned or brought to Life again by the Spirit or Power of God by which also that is by assistance of which Spirit he preached and spoke to the Spirits imprisoned in Hell who would not harken to Noah who in his Life-time preached Righteousness to them 2 Pet. 2. 5. Cardinal Bellarmine has quoted above thirty of the Fathers who interpret this Text after this manner The Interpretation seems confirmed by 1 Pet. 4. 6. For this cause was the Gospel preached also to them that are dead For that he speaketh of the real dead appears by the foregoing verse 41. 1 John 1. 1 c. That which was from the Beginning which we have seen with our Eyes of the Word of Life declare we unto you Answ The Word of Life here is the Gospel The sense is we declare or preach to you that Gospel or Word of Life which from the Beginning was in the Mind and Decree of the Father So St. John explains himself in these Words at ver 3. That eternal Life which was with the Father and was manifested to us He calleth the Word of Life eternal Life as 't is the ordinary and appointed means and way to eternal Life He saith he had heard it and seen it with his Eyes and handled it with his Hands to signify by these Expressions that it was fully certainly and perfectly known to him For the Hebrews use to express full and certain Knowledg of things by Words and Phrases borrowed from the senses 42. 1 John 3. 16. Hereby perceive we the Love of God because he laid down his Life for us Answ Neither the Syriac nor almost any Greek Copy of the Bible hath the Word God in this Text. The true reading is hereby perceive we his Love because he Christ laid down his Life for us 2. Admitting the reading in the English Bible yet he in this Text is not God but Christ the Son of God who was mentioned ver 8. So Grotius And the Interpretation is certain for God cannot lay down his Life 43. 1 John 4. 3. Every Spirit that confesseth not that Christ is come in the Flesh is not of God. Answ This saying is come in the Flesh or in Flesh for so 't is in the Greek is opposed to those false Prophets and Teachers that affirmed Christ had not a real Body of Flesh and Blood but a spiritual and consequently was not a true Man nor the Off-spring of David On the contrary St. John here teaches that Christ is come in Flesh or in the Flesh that is was clothed with a real Body of real Flesh 44. 1 John 5. 7. There are three that bear Record in Heaven the Father the Word and the Holy Ghost and these three are one Answ 1. This verse was not originally in the Bible but has been added to it 'T is not found in the most ancient Copies of the Greek nor in the Syriac or Arabick or Ethiopic or Armenian Bibles nor in the most ancient Latin Bibles 'T is not acknowledged by the Fathers who treated professedly of this Question of the Trinity 't is wholly rejected by abundance of the most learned Criticks and Interpreters and by all acknowledged to be doubtful and uncertain 2. Admitting this verse to be genuine yet the most learned Trinitarians confess the sense is not these three are one God but these three are one in their Testimony or they agree in their Testimony for they are here considered and spoken of as Witnesses So Beza Vatablus Calvin Erasmus the English-Geneva Notes And accordingly most of the Greek Bibles which have this verse in them read here as they do in the next verse not these three are one but these three agree in one i. e. in one and the same Testimony 45. 1 John 5. 20. We know that the Son of God is come and hath given us an Vnderstanding
adv Prax. c. 3. 2. They say farther that none of the objected and above-cited Texts are by Trinitarians themselves thought to be true and demonstrative Proofs either of the Trinity or of the Divinity of the Son or Spirit Every one of these Texts but John 1. 1 c. is given up to the Socinians as an incompetent and unconcluding Proof by some or other of the most learned and allowed Criticks and Interpreters of the Protestant Party As to the Catholick Doctors so called Chr. Sandius hath made a great Collection of Testimonies out of them to this Effect that neither the Trinity nor the Divinity of the Lord Christ or of the Holy Spirit can be proved by the Scripture but by Tradition only Some of them confess that the Scriptures rather favour the Socinian Doctrine and that the Trinity is not only above but contrary to Reason finally that if the Authority of the Church did not oblige them to be Catholicks they should choose to be Socinians See for these things Sandius Hist Eccl. l. 1. c. de Ario and Cingallus in Script Trin. Revel An English Author of the Romish Persuasion has these Words in Fiat Lux. p. 379 380. I may truly say Christ is the Pope's God. For if the Pope had not been or had not been so vigilant and resolute a Pastor as he is he means such a Persecutor Christ whom the Pope both worships himself and propounds to the World to worship as the very true God that made all things Christ I say had not been taken for any such Person as this day we believe him to be Whereas besides the above-cited Texts the Orthodox object that if Christ were not God as well as Man he could not satisfy the Justice of God for our Sins or be a full and sufficient Atonement for them The Socinians answer 1. That the Lord Christ is a Propitiation and Atonement for Sin is a Demonstration that he is not God for God doth not give or make but receive the Satisfaction for our Sins 2. They wonder that the Son of God though he is a Man only should not be judged a sufficient Satisfaction and Propitiation for Sin through the gracious Acceptance of God when 't is so known and evident that the Oblation and Sacrifice of Beasts under the Mosaic Law and from Adam till those times was accepted as a full Atonement and Satisfaction in order to Forgiveness Lev. 6. 6. He shall bring his Trespass-Offering a Ram without Blemish and the Priest shall make Atonement for him before the Lord for any thing of all that he hath done in trespassing See the whole Context Finally whereas the Orthodox do decline many of the Socinian Arguments by the Distinction of two Natures a Divine and humane Nature in Christ For Example when the Socinians object John 14. 28. My Father is greater than I or John 5. 30. I can do nothing of my self We answer that these things are spoken of Christ only according to his humane Nature but that he hath also a Divine Nature by which he is equal to the Father and can do all things of himself To this they reply 1. That the Distinction of two Natures a Divine and Humane in Christ is clearly overthrown by the 8th 9th 10th and 11th Arguments mentioned in the the first Letter 2. If a thing otherways true of Christ may be denied of him because 't is only in one of these pretended Natures and not in the other if our Saviour saith he can do nothing of himself only because he can do nothing of himself according to his humane Nature and can do all things of himself according to his pretended Divine Nature then 't is lawful and allowable to say Christ is no Man was never born of the Virgin was not crucified dead or buried did not rise again from the dead ascended not into Heaven under pretence that according to his Divine Nature he never was born of the Virgin never was crucified dead or buried c. Now who does not see that to speak thus were to deny the whole New Testament and renounce Christianity Have not we say the Socinians reason to reject and abhor a Distinction that if it incommodes our Doctrine and the Allegations for it does as effectually fight against the most evident and acknowledg'd Points of the Christian Faith Nay the Distinction and Evasions founded on it do at least as much hurt to the Trinitarians as to the Socinians For if the Distinction of two Natures be true and the Answers founded on it allowable then no Fault can be found with a Socinian when he shall say Christ is not true God was not generated of the Essence of the Father was not from Eternity for all this may be said of him according to use their own Words his humane Nature for according to that he is not true God was not generated of the Fathers Essence was not from Eternity Do not Trinitarians absolutely disallow as false and Heretical these Forms of Speech though defended by the Distinction of the two Natures why then do they expect that their Adversaries in this Controversy should admit their Answers which are founded on the same and no other Defence This Sir is the Sum of what these Gentlemen say on this great Question a Brief of their Arguments and Answers by which they would support their Doctrine that God is but one Person and that as some of them add our Lord Christ nor the Holy Spirit neither are nor ever are called Gods or God in Holy Scripture as also that neither Creation whether New or Old nor any of the Attributes of God are ascribed to our Blessed Saviour For a Conclusion give me leave to advise you in the Words of St. Paul 1 Thess 5. 21. Prove all things hold fast that which is good SIR I am Your most Obliged The Publisher to whom the foregoing Letters were written having left them some time with a Gentleman a Person of excellent Learning and Worth they were returned to him with this following Letter SIR HAving had the Favour of perusing these Letters I cannot but greatly esteem the Learning and Judgment of the Author who has brought so large a Controversy and that has been debated with the utmost Industry Learning and Subtilty for many hundred Years even from soon after the time of the Apostles into so small a Compass that one may soon see the Allegations from Scripture on both sides with the most material Distinctions and Answers Wherein it seems obvious to me what is said in one of the Paragraphs of the first Letter that the Vnitarian Doctrine is an accountable and reasonable Faith grounded on clear and evident Scripture-Arguments so far as a negative Proposition can reasonably be expected to be Whereas the Trinitarian Doctrine is founded upon obscure or mistaken Texts and defended by such unreasonable Distinctions as cannot be admitted by any Man of a free Judgment being either contradictory in themselves or utterly unintelligible
Marseils who wrote about the Year of our Lord 460 saith thus concerning one sort of Vnitarians viz. Arians They are Hereticks but not knowingly They do so much judg themselves Catholicks that they defame us with the Name of Hereticks They err but with a good Mind not of Hatred but of the Love of God. How they shall be punish'd in the Day of Judgment for this Error of a false Opinion none can know but the Judg. De Gubern Dei. l. 5. where may be read more to the same purpose Though this Author according to the Vogue of Those times calleth the Arians Hereticks yet that which he says farther of them shows they were not so for the Character he gives of them shews them to be conscientious Christians and Lovers of God. St. Austin against the Manichees a sort of People that held there were two Gods one good the other evil saith thus Let them be fierce against you who know not how laborious a thing it is to find out the Truth and how difficultly we escape Errors Let them be fierce against you who know not how rare and hard a thing it is to overcome carnal Imaginations by the Serenity of a pious Mind c. Contr. Ep. Fausti Thirdly I added that the Trinitarians ought to own the Vnitarians for Christian Brethren and to behave themselves towards them as such For Protestants do agree that all necessary and fundamental matters of Faith are clear and plain in Scripture but other matters not so evident but that good Christians may err concerning them as we see they did even in the times of the Apostles now this Doctrine of the Trinitarians appearing to be no fundamental Doctrine it does by no means unchristian those that hold the contrary nor excuse the Trinitarians from those Offices which are due to them as Christians And the rather because they are not only willing to make Confession of Faith in all the forms of Words contained in the Holy Scripture but in the Words also of the Apostles Creed as also because they are not liable to any charge of Idolatry or Superstition in their Worship or of Uncharitableness in condemning those of contrary Minds as the Confederacy of Rome is Therefore I cannot but wonder at some learned Men that are so far carried away with an overweaning Opinion of their own Judgment that they will not allow those the name of Christians who do not believe besides the Bible and the Creed of the Apostles also the Nicene and Athanasian Creeds Nay some account the Trinitarian Doctrines to be so necessary to Christianity that though those who deny them be otherways very pious and useful Men yet going against the sense of the Catholick Church they err not for want of Instruction but from a certain Wantonness and Pride of Vnderstanding and are guilty of such unpardonable Immodesty as admits of no Excuse If what is hinted in these Letters concerning the Catholick Church of the Apostles times and first Ages be true then that Author builds his Condemnation upon a false and rotten Foundation and the Building falling impresses Rashness and Uncharitableness upon himself I mean as to this particular Case for otherways I readily acknowledg the Worth and Learning of the Author Neither can I sufficiently admire that another learned Man and a Sufferer for his Conscience should in a Pacifick Discourse treat the Socinians in the same contumelious manner not allowing them worthy of the Name of Christians because they go about saith he to overthrow the whole frame of the Christian Doctrine by arrogant Presumptions of false Reasonings and Sophistical Arguments Yea it is commonly objected against them that they exalt their Reasonings above plain and express Revelation in Scripture Which Crimination seems to me to be clearly taken away by the four Letters in which it appears by the many Unconcluding Texts false Translations unintelligible Reasonings and Distinctions cited and urged on the Behalf of the Trinitarian Doctrine and on the other hand by the numerous clear Texts allowed Translations Reasonings and Distinctions common to Mankind produced by the Vnitarians that these last may reasonably retort this great Objection on their Opposites the Trinitarians who in a thousand express Texts of Scripture do exalt their Reasonings to maintain another sense than the plain Words require For one Instance how many express Texts ascribe Parts and Members Affections and Passions Shape and Figure Place and Circumscription to God all which as the Author of these Letters notes are otherways expounded by learned Men because they judg these things in reason unsuitable to God. But what Principle more clear both in Reason and Scripture than this that there is but one God or that God is one All Christians and all Jews and all Mahometans who are said to be more in Number than Christians besides the wise Heathens do acknowledg it and all these understand by the term God a necessary existent Person Upon these clear Grounds the Vnitarians deny that there are three such as contrary to that Unity and introducing into the Godhead two unnecessary or superfluous Persons For if one be sufficient and he cannot be God if he be not sufficient then the two more are supernumerary and unnecessary and consequently not God. For my own part I was bred up in the Trinitarian Faith and took the Truth of it for granted but when these Scriptures and Reasons came into my View and I had got over the Fear of examining what some Men who name themselves the Church call Fundamentals I conld not avoid the Force of them though it grieves me that I cannot continue in consent with my old Friends as well in this as other parts of Christian Doctrine But certainly as in Philosophy Truth should be more dear to us than Plato or Socrates so in Theology the Testimony of plain Scripture agreeing with evident Reason should prevail with those who believe the Scriptures Divine more than obscure Texts dissonant to the clear Reason of Mankind And it may well allay any ones Fear of examining and judging concerning pretended Fundamentals when he shall consider that even the Church of England in another of her Articles says that as the Church of Jerusalem Alexandria and Antioch have errred so also the Church of Rome which contends that she is the Catholick Church hath erred not only in her living and manner of Ceremonies but also in matter of Faith. So also Chillingworth with his Approvers says I see plainly and with mine own Eyes that there are Popes against Popes Councils against Councils some Fathers against others the same Fathers against themselves a consent of Fathers of one Age against a consent of Fathers of another Age. There is no sufficient Certainty but in the Scripture only for any considering Man to build upon As to the boast of their Numbers 't is well known there was a time when the Christian World was Arian that is Vnitarian so that the Council of Ariminum and Seleucia in which 560 Bishops were present the greatest Convention of Bishops that ever was decreed for the Vnitarian Faith. Was number in those times an Argument of Truth If not how can it be so now The Author of these Letters has well observed besides that the Doctrine of the Trinitarians in these days is widely different from the Doctrine decreed in the first Council of Nice from whence I infer that their Boast of Antiquity is as vain as the other of Number I will only add to this Observation that though the more ancient and the modern Trinitarians may agree in terms yet those times and these have different senses of the same Words and Phrases SIR I pray accept of my hearty Thanks for this Publication and shew the Author how great an Honour I have for him I am Yours c. FINIS