mystery of the Trinity is necessary to be known and believed of all that shal be saved it was not so plainly revealed to the Jewes of old as it is to us in the new Testament a perfect and full knowledge of this mystery is not attainable in this life Although Trinity in its native signification signifie the number of any three things yet by Ecclesiasticall custome it is limited to signifie the three Persons in the Trinity This is not meant as if the Essence did consist of three Persons as so many parts and therefore there is a great difference between Trinity and Triplicity Trinity is when the same Essence hath divers waies of subsisting and Triplicity is when one thing is compounded of three as parts they are three not in respect of Essence or Divine attributes three Eternals but three in respect of personall properties as the Father is of none the Sonne of the Father and the holy Ghost of both three Persons but one God as to be to be true to be good are all one because Transcendents Opera Trinitatis ad extra sunt indivisa the outward workes which concerne the creature belong to one person as wel as the other as to create govern but opera ad intra sunt divisa the personall properties or internall workes are distinguished as the Father begets the Sonne is begotten of the Father and the holy Ghost proceeds from the Father and the Sonne There is in the Trinity alius alius another and another but not aliud aliud another thing and another thing as there is in Christ the Father is another person from the Sonne but yet there is the same nature and Essence of them all They differ not in their natures as three men or three Angels differ for they differ so as one may be without the other but now the Father is not without the Sonne nor the Sonne without the Father so that there is the same numericall Essence The Father in some sence is said to be the onely God John 17. 3. that is besides the Divine nature which is common to the three persons there is not another God to be found the word alone is opposed to all faigned Gods to every thing which is not of this Divine nature so when it is said None knoweth the Father but the Sonne and the Sonne but the Father that excludes not the Holy Ghost which searcheth the hidden things of God but all which are not of that Essence Though there be no inequality in the persons yet there is an order not of dignity but of beginning The Father in the Sonne by the holy Ghost made the world not as if there were so many partiall causes much lesse as if God the Father were the Principall and these Instrumentall but onely meere order Persona divina est essentiae divinae subsistentia incommunicablis Wendelinus The Essence considered with the manner of subsisting is called a Person A Person is such a subsistence in the Divine nature as is distinguished from every other thing by some speciall or personall property or else it is the God-head restrained with his personall property Or it is a different manner of subsisting in the Godhead as the nature of man doth diversly subsist in Peter JAmes John but these are not all one It differs from the essence as the manner of the thing from the thing it selfe and not as one thing from another one person is distinguisht from another by its personall property and by its manner of working The personall property of the Father is to beget that is not to multiply his substance by production but to communicate his substance to the same The Sonne is said to be begotten that is to have the whole substance from the Father by communication The Holy ghost is said to proceed or to be breathed forth to receive his substance by proceeding from the Father and the Sonne joyntly in regard of which he is called the Spirit of the Father and the Spirit of the Sonne both Gal. 4. 6. The Father onely begetteth the Sonne onely is begotten and the holy Ghost onely proceedeth both procession and generation are ineffable In the manner of working they differ for the Father worketh of himselfe by the Sonne and through the holy Ghost the Sonne worketh from the Father by the Holy Ghost the holy Ghost worketh from the Father and the Sonne by himselfe There is so one God as that there are three persons or divers manners of being in that one Godhead the Father Sonne and the holy Ghost 1 Whatsoever absolutely agrees to the Divine nature that doth agree likewise to every person of the Trinity 2 Every person hath not a part but the whole Deity in it selfe A person is one entire distinct subsistence having life understanding will and power by which he is in continuall operation These things are required to a person 1 That it be a substance for accidents are not persons they inhere in another thing a person must subsist 2 A lively and intelligent substance endued with reason and will an house is not a person nor a stone or beast 3 Determinate and singular for mankind is not a person but John and Peter 4 Incommunicable it can not be given to another hence the nature of man is not a person because it is communicable to every particular man but every particular man is a person because that nature which he hath in particular can not be communirated to another 5 Not sustained by another therefore the humane nature of Christ is not a person because it is sustained by his Deity 6 It must not be the part of another therefore the reasonable soule which is a part of man is not a person That there are three persons in the Deity viz. Father Sonne and holy Ghost is manifest by expresse testimonies of Scripture Genes 1. 1. Gods created and v. 26. Psalm 33. 6. there three are named the Word the Lord and the Spirit Esay 6.3 Holy Holy Holy But this truth is most clearly taught in the new Testament Matth. 3. 16. Luke 3. 22. The first person in the Trinity utters his voice from Heaven This is my beloved Sonne the Sonne is baptized in Jordan the holy Ghost descends in the shape of a Dove upon Christ. Pater auditur in voce Filius manifestatur in homine Spiritus Sanctus dignoscitur in columba Aug. tract 6. in Joh. Adde to this the History of Christs transfiguration described Matth. 17. 5. Marke 9. 7. Luke 9. 35. In which likewise the voice of the Father was heard from Heaven This is my beloved Sonne the Sonne is transfigured the Holy Ghost manifests himselfe in a bright cloud Matth. 28. 19. The Apostles are commanded to baptize in the Name of Father Sonne and holy Ghost Cameron thinks that is the most evident place to prove the Trinity But that is as â—pposite a place as any for this purpose 1 John 5.
argument of doing good to us His name is the more magnified by how much we are more vile We should ascribe unto his Name all the mercies we enjoy giving all the praise from our selves wholy to him God for his Names sake hath made and redeemed us * Hereby we may judge which is the true Religion what Doctrine is sound pure and of God and what corrupt and from men That Doctrine which setteth forth the praise of God commeth from Heaven but that which is from men advanceth the power pride and merit of man John 7. 18. Ephes. 1. 6. 2. 4. Rom. 3. 21. * Duobus modis referâ—i aliquid ad Dei gloriam dicitur Primum formaliter explicitè quando aliquis cogitat cum animo hoc sibi agendum esse quia nomini divino sit gloriâ—sum Deinde virtualiter implicitè cum quis divinae studens gloriae eoque nihil facere decernens nisi quod legi congruat ad hoc gratiam Dei quotidie exposcens boni quippiam facit de universali fine actu non cogitans sed solùm particularis finis bonum intendens Vossâ—us in Thesibus Though we can not actually intend Gods glory alwaies in every thing yet we should virtually To glorifie is to manifest ones excellency as appeares John 17. 4. compared with verse 6. See of glorifying God Church his miscelanies p. 11. to 18. * 1 Cor. 15. 42 43. There is say the Schooles beatitudo objectiva so whatever is the chiefest good of the soule is the soules blessednesse 2 Formalis when the soule and its beatifying object are united as the fruition of God The soule is here united to God remorely and imperfectly there immediately and perfectly 2 Sam 22. 47. 1 Kings 1. 48. Paul intitleth him God blessed for ever the onely blessed Potentate Vide Amesium Psalm 1. 1. * Beatitudo status est omnium bonorum aggregatione perfectus Boetius de consol Phil. 1 Tim. 6. 15. * He that is the cause of all welfare to other things and makes them in their severall kinds happy he must needs be therefore most happie himselfe God is the auâ—â—our of all blessednesse Psalm 132. 1 2. Aristotle Happinesse is taken two waies 1 Octjectively for the object wherein one is happy as Gods infinite essence is the object both of Gods Angels and mens happinesse 2 Formally for those acts whereby we possesse that object God is happy formally because he knoweth loveth and enjoyeth himselfe therefore it is said our goodnesse extendeth not to him so Angels and men are formally happy when they know and enjoy God We should praise God 1. Intensivè Psalm 36. 10. 103. 1. 3. Extensive with all praise Psalm 9. 14. and for all mercies Psalm 71. 7 8. Dicique beatus aâ—te obitum nemo supremaque funera possit Consectaries from Gods Blessednesse The happinesse of man consists in the enjoying of God All other things are no otherwise means of happinesse or helpes to it then as we see and taste God in them We must account our selves happy in this thing wholy and onely in that God is ours Happinesse is the enjoyment of good commensâ—â—ate to our desires * Bish. Lake a Man in the state of blessednesse can not see God absolutely as he is in himselfe for that which is Infinite can not be comprehended of that which is limited Visio beatifica est cognitio non comprehensiva sed quidditativa But God doth manifest himselfe so farre forth as a creatuâ—e is able to know him As a vessell may be filled with the water of the Sea but it can not containe all the water in the Sea The Apostle saith we shall know God even as he also is knowne But as is not a note of equality but of likenesse As God knoweth me after a manner agreeable to his infinite excellency so shall I know God according to my capacity * The Word â—ssence or Trinity are not found in Scripture but Essence is duely derived thence for seeing God saith that he is Essence is fitly ascribed to him Trinity hath a sufficient ground there are three that beare witnesse in Heaven 1 John 5. 7. The word person is extant Heb. 1. 3. therefore these words are rightly used in the Church Ephes. 1. 17 18. Par on Rom. 11. 23. Exod. 33. 20. 1 Cor. 13. 9. * Si rectè dicuntur tres Elohim etiam rectè dici possit tres Dii nam Elohim Latinè sonat Dii vel Deuâ— Drusius de quaefiâ—â—s per Epistolam Epist. 6â— Sic concidit gravis querela expostulatio viri Dâ—cti adversus libri cujusdam titulu De tribus Elohim Non n. voluit author libri illius voce Elohim propriè significare Personas ac proinde tot esse Elohim quot fides Christiana agnoscit esse personas in Divinis cum Scriptura aperiè contra flet que â—estatur Deum nostrum esse Deum unum Non â—ic erravit aut cecutiit doctus ille Theologus ut diceret doceres Tres esse propâ—ie loquendo Elohim Sed quoniam vocis illius terminatione plurali Scriptura innuere voluit S. S. Trinitatis mysterium ipse huc resciciem eò volâ—s in libri quem de S. S. Trinitate scribebat titulâ— alludere catachâ—esi non infrequenti sed â—â—ainaria Capel Davidis Lyra. * Matth. 28. 19. John 5. 26 27. The Father is the fountaine and originall of all the Deity and the cause of the Sonne which the very woâ—d Father signifieth therefore he is said to be unbegotten and hence the name God is often peculâ—arly and by an excellency given to the Father in Scripture Psalm 2. 17. proves that the Father begets and the Sonne is begotten of the Father Galat. 4. 6. See John 15. 26. 14. 26. Haec est differentia inter essentiam divinam personam divinam Essentia divina est communu pluribus divinitatis personis Persona autem una alteri non est communicabilis Vnde Pater non est Filius nec Filius Pater 2 Essentia divina est una Personae plures Wendelinus * Persona est individuum subsistens vivum intelligens in communicabile non sustentatum ab alio nec pars alterius Persona igitur non est â—ssentia quae pluribus est communicabilis Personae vox non hic sigâ—sicat ossicium aut relâ—tionem ut persona principis vel vultum visibilem speciem gestum vel formam alterius representamem ut Personae in drammate sed modum quo essentia divina subsistit Quinescis Triâ—â—tem ito ad Jordanem See John 15. 26. The Hereticks that are Antitrinitarians See John 8. 58. Psalm 2. 12. Paulus Samosetanus more fitly Semisathanas held Christ was but a meere man Matth. 6. 6. See Acts 4 24. 25 26 27. John 8. 54. God purchased his Church with his blood Acts 20. 28. John 1. 1 2. 1 Cor. 8. 6. By the Apostle Christ is expresly called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Divine
both from all prophane and Sacred writings and Paul honours it with this Elogie a faithfull saying and worthy of all acceptation 1 Tim. 1. 15. a more sure word 2 Pet. 1. 19. the Comparative for the Superlative in which there is no doubting and uncertainty but all things firme As God is Iâ—hovah of himself so is his word autoritative of it selfe and is true and to be obeyed whether thou think it Scripture or no. There is no higher authority for thee to appeale to it is above opinions of men conscience and therefore it must determine all controversies 2. It is true and certaine verity is affirmed of the Scriptures primarily internally and by reason of it selfe which is called the truth of the object which is an abâ—olute and most perfect agreement of all things delivered in the Scripture with the first truth or divine will of which the Scripture is a symbole and lively Image so that all things are delivered in it as the Holy Ghost hath dictated whence those honourable titles are given to it the Scripture is called a sure word 2 Pet. 1. 19. Psal. 19. 7. the Scripture of truth Dan. 10. ult words of truth Eccles. 12. 10. Yea truth it self John 17. 17. having the God of truth for the Authour Christ Jesus the truth for the witnesse the Spirit of truth for the Composer of it and it worketh truth in the hearts of those which heare it 2 Pet. 2. 2. The Apostle preferres the Scripture before the Revelation made by Angâ—ls Gal. 1. 8. Christ commends the certainty of it above all other sorts of Revelation 1 Pet. 1. 19. above information from the dead Luke 16. 31. The word of God is not onely true but eminently true truth it selfe prima veritas and pura veritas The Scripture hath a twofold truth 1. Of assertion it containeth no errour 2. Of promise there is no unfaithfulnesse in it The first truth referres to the matter which is signified properly called truth or verity The second referres to the intention of the Speaker which is properly called veracite or fidelity the latter is implyed Psal. 19. thy Testimonies are sure and so the sure mercies of David the former is implyed in that the word is purer then Gold 7 times refined There are two signes of truth in the Scripture 1. The particularity of it it names particulars in genealogies dolosus versatur in generalibus 2. Impartiality toward friends and their adversaries the most holy men have their faults described they give due commendation to their adversaries The truth of Scripture is 1. More then any humane truth of sense or reason 2. Above all naturall reason as the doctrine of the Trinity the incarnation of Christ justification by faith in Christ. 3. A truth which evidenceth it self 4. The standard of all truth nothing is true in doctrin or worship which is not agreeable to this 3. The Scripture is the rule of faith and manners It is termed Canonicall generally by the Fathers of the word Canon which signifieth a rule because it containes a worthy rule of religion faith and godlinessâ— according whereunto the building of the house of God must be sitted These properties saith Suarez are required in a rule 1. That it be known and easie the Scripture is a light 2. That it be first in its kind and so the measure of all the rest 3. It must be inflexible 4. Universall 1. It is a perfect rule of faith and obedience and able to instruct us sufficiently in all points of faith or doctrinals which we are bound to beleeve and all good duties or practicals which we are bound to practise Whatsoever is needfull to beleeve or to doe to please God and save our soules is to be found here whatsoever is not here found is not needfull to beleeve and practise for felicity Christ proveth the resurrection of the dead being an article of our faith against the Sadduces Matth. 22. 32. and the use of the Sabbath being a rule of life against the Pharisees by an inference made from the Scripture Matth. 12. 7. The Heads of the Creed and Decalogue are plainely laid downe in Scripture therefore there we have a perfect rule of faith and manners It is a rule 1. For faith Jerome in his controversie with Helvidius saith Credimus quia legimus non credimus quia non legimus We beleeve because we read we doe not beleeve because we doe not read Christ often saith have ye not read is it not written what is written in the Law Luke 10. 26. faith and the word of God must run parallel This we first beleeve when we doe beleve saith Tertullian that we ought to beleeve nothing beyond Scripture When we say all matters of doctrine and faith are contained in the Scripture we understand as the Ancient Fathers did not that all things are literally and verbally contained in the Scripture but that all are either expressed therein or by necessary consequence may be drawne from thence All controversies about religion are to be decided by the Scripture Deut. 12. 32. and 4. 2. Josh. 1. 7. Franciscus de Sâ—lis a Popish Bishop saith the Gospell was honoured so much that it was brought into the Councell and set in the midst of them and to determine matters of faith as if Christ had been there 2. It is a perfect rule for our lives and practise Psal. 19. 11. and Psal. 119. 9. In the Scriptures there are delivered remedies against all vices and meanes are there laid down for the attaining of all vertues We must follow the Scriptures exactly and not swerve to the right hand or left a metaphore taken from a way or rule saith Chamier when Linacer a learned English man heard the beginning of the 5. of Matthew read Blessed are the poore in spirit c. he broke forth into these words either these sayings are not Christs or we are not Christians It is a perfect not a partiall and insufficient rule as the Papiâ—â—s make it as God is a perfect God so his word is a perfect word if it be but a partiall rule then it doth not perfectly direct and he that should perfectly doe the will of God revealed in Scripture should not yet be perfect Secondly if the Scripture be a partiall rule then men are bound to be wise above that which is written that is above the Law and Gospell Regula fidei debet esse adaequata fidei aut regula non erit Whitakerus 1. All addition and detraction are forbidden to be made by any man to the word Deut. 4. 2. and 12. 32. Deut. 5. 32. Gal. 1. 8. 2. The Scripture is said to be perfect to beget heavenly and saving wisdome Psal. 19. 8. 2 Tim. 3 15 16 17. 3. Men in the matter of faith and Religion are sent to the Scripture onely 2. The Scripture is an Infallible rule Luke 1. 4. of which thou hast had a full assent Regularectè definitur
at the parts of any man if borne lame or deformed this is to despise the Workman to murmure at the Potter 3. It shewes that God hath first chiefe absolute and perpetuall soveraignty over all his creatures so that hee can use command and doe with them as in equity seems good to his heavenly wisedome 4. When we behold the Heavens the Earth Aire and Sea how they are filled what use and commodities they have we should contemplate God in these things we see with our eyes 2. We should learne what a one God is 1. Eternall Hee that made heaven and earth is ancienter than both 2. Almighty Great works cannot be brought to passe without great strength he must needs be Infinite in power which made heaven and earth and hangs the earth as a Ball without any pillar to support it 3. Most wise strength separated from wisedome is little worth God knowes all things the nature of the Heavens Earth Water perfectly because he put such a nature into them tell your selves that God is a wise understanding Essence can order all to the best 4. Exceeding good hee hath infused goodnesse into the Heavens Waters Earth they are helpfull and and serviceable to man how much more goodnes is there in God he is good and doth good 5. See his love in making man best of the Creatures here below we should honour God in our mindes account him the chiefest and onely good and his favour the chiefest felicity bring our wills to long after him to desire him above all other things chusing him as our happinesse loving him and desiring to enjoy himfully Learne to feare him above all not daring to offend him and obey and please him what more agreeable to reason then that the Maker of all should be Ruler of all we are more his than a childe his Parents a servant his Masters Wee should also acknowledge that he made us Psalme 100. and praise him Gods great workes call for great praise commend him with our tongues and speak good of his Name Psalme 19. 2. The heavens declare the glory of God i.e. give occasion to man of declaring it 5. This is a comfort to those who acknowledge God to be such a one as hee is is not he rich enough to maintaine them wise enough to direct them strong enough to protect them If thou want goodnesse he can create in thee a new heart it may comfort the godly in regard of the resurrectionâ— God can raise them up at the last day 6. It is a great terrour to the wicked which doe not feare but despise him God will hate despise and destroy them God can doe it he made heaven and earth and he will doe it because he is true he hath threatned it oh the misery of that man which hath him for his enemy 7. We may learne from all the Creatures in generall 1. to bewaile our Rebellion against God which all of them reprove for they all stand in their kinde and station in which God set them at first The Sun rejoyceth to runne his course the Sea keepeth her bounds the earth stands upon her foundation the heavens keep their motion and declare Gods glorie the very windes and seas obey him 2. All of them teach the invisible things of God Rom. 1. 20. as was before shewed 8. We should make a right use of the creatures use them first devoutly 1 Tim. 4. 5. in faith Rom. 14. 14. and ult with Prayer and Thanksgiving Matth. 15. 36. Acts 27. 35. Secondly soberly 1 Cor. 10. 31. 3. thankfully 1 Tim. 4. 4. Having handled the works of Creation in generall I now proceed according to Moses his Method to a more particular enarration of each dayes worke The whole first Chapter of Genesis may be thus divided 1. The Author of the worlds Creation God 2. The Worke. 3. The approbation of it 1. verse In the beginning of time or being therefore the World was not eternall John begins so and took it hence but beginning there may meane from Eternity or as here Christ did not begin then but was then Prov. 8. 22. Bara Elohim Gods Created That difference between the Noune Plurall and Verbe Singular saith Rivet signifieth not the mysterie of the Trinity but is an idâ—otisme of the Hebrew tongue in which such enallages are frequent as Numb 32. 25. How ever there is no difference in the thing it selfe for the name of Gods being taken here essentially not personally is common to the 3. Persons Gods created is as much as the Father the Son and Holy Ghost created for elsewhere it is manifest from Scripture that not onely the Father but the Sonne and Holy Ghost also created the world Created signifieth an act of infinite power and is not communicable to any creature 1. Ex nihilo fecit quidem potentissime ac magnificentissimè Junius Heaven and Earth In the first day were created Heaven and Earth as it were the foundation and roofe of the building Psalme 104. 5. Esay 40. 21 22. The worke of the first day was 1 Heaven under which name are comprehended partly the Empyrâ—an first and immoveable Heaven which is called in Scripture the third Heaven and Heaven of Heavens Ephes. 4 10. 2 Chron. 6. 18. Acts 1. 11. partly the Celestiall Spheres which it is probable were made the first day but without those lights of the Starres with which at length in the fourth day they were adorned the Hebrew word for Heaven being of the Duall number may imply both The heavenly Intelligences or Angels the Inhabitants of the Invisible Heaven were then made as is probable saith Chemnitius Coelum id est extimum illum hujus universitatis ambitum cum super Caelestibus incolis illius spiritualibus formis atque intelligentiis Gen 2. 1. Job 38. 7. Junius in loc 2. The foure first simple things or elements as some think Earth Water Aire Fire and the fitting of them for use by making day and night Though other hold that the aire and fire are comprehended under Firmament the worke of the second day For the earth there is he emphaticall this earth which we dwell in though then unpolished The earth is described in the second verse it was without forme and void informitie and vacuity in the originall without inhabitants and without ornament the earth and waters were joyned together among themselves the waters at first did encompasse and cover the earth round about as it were a cloathing and garment Psalme 104. 6. Darknesse was on the face of the deep that is the waters which inclosed the earth in themselves 3. v. There is an extraordinary light mentioned the ordinary fountaine of light is the Sunne which in what subject it did inhere is not certaine some say water in the thinner parts of the superficies some the Heavenly Spheres others say the Element of fire for that say they is either included under light or we know
21 22 How the Attributes are divided l. 2. p. 22 23 Goodnesse what it is and what in God l. 2. 79 to 84 Graciousnesse what it is in God l. 2. p. 83 84 Grasse the usefulnesse of it l. 3 p. 67 68 Great God is exceeding great in nature works and authority l. 2. p. 48 to 51 Greeke the Greeke translation is not Authenticall l. 1. p. 119 120 121 H HAbakuk who interprets him best l. 1. p. 61 Haggai why so called and who best expounds him l. 1. p. 61 Haile what it is l. 3. p. 52 Hatred what it is and what in God l. 2. p. 73 74 Heavens the creation of the Heavens is a wonderfull worke of God l. 3. p 26 to 30 Its motion is exceeding swift l. 3. p. 41 Hebrew Text in the old Testament Authenticall l. 1. p. 104 105 VVhether the Hebrew Text had Vowels or Points from the beginning l. 1. p. 116 to 119 Hebrewes whether that Epistle be Canonicall written by Paul and in Greeke l. 1. p. 75 76 77 VVho best interprets it ibid. Herbes their usefulnesse l. 3. p. 65 66 67 High God is most High l. 2. p. 51 52 History is delightfull especially of the Scripture l. 1. p. 16 VVhy some Bookes of the new Testament are called Historicall l. 1. p. 66 Holy God is Holy l. 2. p. 102 to 105 The Scripture is Holy l. 1 p. 136 137 138 Hosea why so called and when he wrote it l. 1. p. 60 Who expounds him best ibid. The chiefest among the small Prophets l. 1. p. 59 I JAmes how it came to be doubted of by same l. 1. p. 78 79 Who best expounds it l. 1. p. 79 Ice what it is l. 3. p. 52 Jeremy when he prophesied and who best interprets him l. 1 p. 58 Jewes corrupted not the Hebrew Text of the old Testament l. 1 p. 103 to 111 Image fourfold l 3 p. 116 Immortall God is Immortall l 2. p. 31 32 The soule of man is Immortall l. 3. p. 119 120 Immutability what it is l. 3 p. 44 God is Immutable l. 3 p 44 to 48 Impossible l. 2. p. 108 Independent God is in Independent l. 2. p. 36 Infinite God is Infinite l. 2 p. 32 to 35 Inspiration what it is l. 1. p. 9 Interpretation of Scripture l. 1 p. 171 172 173 179 180 To whom it belongs l. 3. p. 173 174 Meanes to interpret Scripture l. 1. 180 to 184 Job who the Authour of it and who best expounds it l. 1. p. 54 Joel who best expounds him l. 1 p. 60 When he prophesied l. 1. p. 69 John what it signifieth and what Bookes of Scripture he wrote l. 1. p 69 Who best interprets him why he is called The Divine he hath something more then all the other Evangelists l. 1 p. 69 The second and third Epistles are doubted of by some l. 1 p. 80 Who best expounds them all three ibid. m. Joshua why so called and who best expounds him l. 1 p. 49 Jude doubted of by some l. 1. p. 80 who best interprets him l. 1 p. 81 Judges why so called and who have best expounded that book l. 1. p. 50 Just God is Just l. 2. p. 91 to 94 K KInd God is Kind l. 2 p. 105 Kings why so called and who best expounds both those Books l. 1. p. 51 Knowledge God knowes all things l. 2. p. 60 to 63 L LAmentations why so called and who best expounded them l. 1. p. 58 Latine translation of the Bible l. 1. p 99 100 Legends why so called l. 3. p. 36 Leviticus why so called l. 1. p. 48 49 Who best expounds it l. 1 p. 49 Lexicons which are the best Lexicons for expounding the words both Hebrew and Greek in Scripture l. 1. p. 182 Life Gods life differs from ours l. 2. p. 30 Light what it is and the benefits of it l. 3. p. 38 39 40 Lightning why we see that before we heare the Thunder l. 3 46 Living God is Living l. 3. p. 28 to 31 Long-suffering God is Long-suffering l. 2. 100 101 Love what it is in God l. 2. p. 70 71 72 Luke what he was and who best expound him l. 1. p. 69 M MAlachy why so called and who best expounds him l. 1. p. 62 Man created after Gods Image l. 3. p. 115 116 117 Marke when he wrote l. 1. p. 20 And whether originally in Latine or Greek l. 1. p. 64 68 who best interprets him p. 68. Martyrs divers suffered for the truth l. 1. 21 22 How they of the true Church differ from other Martyrs l. 1 p. 22 23 Matthew when he wrote l. 1 p. 68 Whether he wrote in Hebrew or Greeke l. 1. p. 63 68 Who best expounds him l. 1 p. 68 Meditation what it is l. 1. p. 38 And what in God l. 2. p. 86 to 91 Meteors what they are how divided and of what they consist l. 3. p. 44 45 Metals what they are l. 3. p. 54 Micah why so called and who best expounds him l. 1. p. 60 Miracle what it is l. 2. p. 12 Miracles twofold l. 1. p. 19 The true Miracles differ much from the false l. 1. p. 20 The Divels workes are called lying wonders and why l. 3. p. 109 110 Moone the nature and use of it l. 3. p. 73 Montaines a great worke of God l. 3. p. 56 N NAhum why so called and who best expounds him l. 1. p. 61 Navigation the benefit of it l. 2 p. 61 64 Necessary God is a Necessary Essence l. 2. p. 56 The Scripture is Necessary l. 1 p. 135 136 Nehemiah why so called and who best expounds it l. 1. p. 52 Night the benefit of it l. 3. p. 42 43 Numbers why so called and who best interprets it l. 1. p. 49 O OBadiah why so called and who best expounds it l. 1 p. 60 Omnipotent God is Omnipotent l. 2. p. 106 to 109 Omnipresent God is Omnipresent l. 2. p. 36 to 39 Christs body is not everywhere l. 2. p. 39 40 One God is wholly One l. 2. p. 56 to 60 P PAradise not allegorically to be understood l. 3. p. 121 122 What it signifieth and whether it was destroyed by the flood ibid. Patient God is Patient l. 2 p. 99 100 101 Pentateuch why so called l. 1 p. 47 Who have written well on it l. 1. p. 47 48 The Turks honour it l. 1. p. 48 It is often quoted in the new Testament ibid. Perfect the Scripture is perfect l. 1. 138 to 148 God is perfect l. 2. p. 48 49 50 Person what it is in the Trinity l. 2. p. 128 129 130 How the Persons in the Trinity differ l. 2. 136 137 138 Perspicuous the Scripture is plaine and perspicuous l. 1 p. 161 to 171 Peter why those Epistles are called Catholicall l. 1. p. 79 Who hath best expounded both the Epistles the second is Canonicall l. 1. p. 79 80 Philippi the Metropolis of Macedonia who best expounds the Philippians p.
been an introduction unto him not that his faith rested upon it as a finall stay but that it caused him so farre to respect the word of the Gospell to listen unto it and with a kind of acquisite and humane faith to believe it that he was thereby fitted to a better illumination by force whereof he might more certainly believe it to be of God But that the testimony of one Father in one place in a matter of such consequence should be of that force it is strange We deny not the ministery of the Church as an externall meanes to move us to imbrace the word of God but we deny the authority of the Church to be the principall meanes When we call the Scriptures Canonicall we call them not so passively because they are received into the Canon by men and accepted of but actively because they prescribe a Canon and rule to us The office of the Church in respect of the Scripture stands in foure things 1. To distinguish Canonicall Scripture from that which is not Canonicall although the determination of the Church be not the onely or chiefest cause why the Apocrypha are rejected 2. To be a faithfull keeper of those books which are inspired by God like a notary which keepeth publique writings 3. To publish declare and teach the truth as a cryer with a loud voyce ought to pronounce the Kings edicts but to pretermit adde or alter nothing Matth. 28. 19 20. Acts 8. 35. 1 Tim. 3. 15. This Church here is not that Church which the Papists make to be the Judge of controversies neither the Church representative which is a generall Councell nor the Church virtuall which they imagine to be the Pope but the Church Essentiall the congregation of all faithfull believers the House of God as he calleth it The Apostle here speaks of a pillar not more Architectonico understanding by it some essentiall piece of the building but more forensi such a post or pillar on which Tables and Proclamations use to hang. In old time the Gentiles used to write their Lawes in Tables and so hang them upon pillars of stone that the people might read them as Proclamations are nailed to posts in market Towns The Apostle describing the Church likeneth it to one of these pillars whose use was to shew what hung thereon It is pillar not because it holds up but holds forth the truth 4. To interpret the Scripture by the Scripture Since many things in Scripture are doubtfull and hard to be understood without an Interpreter Acts 8. 31. it doth belong to the Church to expound the same to interpret and give the sence Nehem. 8. 8 9. Luke 24. 27. provided that this exposition be by the Scriptures Some of the Papists say that the Church may condere artioulos fidei facere canonicum quo ad nos and though they talke of Councels and Fathers yet all is as the Pope concludes The testimony and tradition of the Church especially the Primitive Church is necessary to know that the Gospell of Matthew is divine Scripture by an historicall and acquired faith to know this by a divine and infured faith besides the authority of the Church the matter character and contents of every booke and comparing of it with other Scriptures doe serve as an inward cause to produce the said infused faith Ob. We are sent to the Church to determine all controversies 1 Cor. 11. 16. Sol. Controversies are either dogmaticall concerning faith or rituall concerning true order the proposition is about these not the first Secondly from this fundamentall truth that the Scripture is immediately from God the basis indeed of all religion 1 Cor. 15. the wickednesse of the Church of Rome is farther to be condemned which will not suffer the Scriptures to be read in their Churches but in an unknowne tongue nor in private by the common people without speciall leave and certaine cautions from their superiours Of old they would not suffer them to be read at all of late they are forced to give licences to some and they teach them that they should not make the Scripture judge of the doctrine and practice of the Church but the doctrine and practise of the Church must be the interpreter and judge of the meaning of the Scripture that is they must take the Scripture to meane none otherwise whatsoever it seem to say then what is agreeable to that which the Pope doth teach and practice There cannot be a surer signe of a bad cause then that it feares to be tried by the writings which it selfe cannot deny to be written by God for correction for reproofe for instruction in righteousnesse Some Papists are more modest herein as Bellarmine l. 2. de verbo Dei c. 15. Catholica Ecclesia statuit ne passim omnibus concedatur Scripturae lectio some more rigid as Huntly and Hosiua The Papists object the obscursity of Scriptures as an argument to hinder lay-men from reading them and account it a matter of profanation to allow men women and children and all promiscuously the use of the vulgar translation and thinke they will rather be hurt then benefited by them taking occasion of erring from them Hosius urgeth that give not holy things to dogs cast not Pearles before Swine to prove the people must be barred from reading of the Scriptures It is Pope Innocents glosse a beast might not touch the mount a lay-man might not meddle with Scripture Lindan saith nihil noxae inferretur in Ecclesiam salvâ— traditionis fundamento if there were no Bible and another Scriptura citius faciet Haereticum Lutherarum quam Catholicum Because we will have all proved by Scripture and make that the compleat rule for what we believe or doe in all Theologicall matters they call us Scripturarios Scripturemen and atram entarios Theologos and so to carry or read a Bible is matter of scoffe we may stile them in Tertullians phrase Scripturarum Lucifugae Traditionaries Saint Gregory who is blessed in their Church exhorteth a lay-man to the serious study of the Scriptures that thereby he might learne the will of God alledging that the Scripture is the Epistle of God unto his creature Quid est autem Scriptura sacra nisi Epistola omnipotentis Dei ad Creaturam Greg. lib. 4. epist. 40. ad Theodorum medicum Proving further that obscurity of Scripture is so frothy an argument for perswading any devout Christian not to read them that it should rather incite them to greater diligence therein and therefore he elegantly compares the Scripture to a River wherein saith he there are as well shallow fords for Lambs to wade in as depths and gulphs wherein the Elephant may swim Chrysostome held it a thing necessary for all men daily to read the Scriptures Audite quaeso saeculares comparate vobis Biblia animae pharmaca Saint Jerome did exhort divers women thereto and commended
them for exercising themselves therein he writes to Laeta and Gaudentia and shewes them how they should bring up their daughters Scripturas sacras tenebat memoriter Hieron de Paula in Epitaphio The Apostle would not have commended this in Timothy 2 Tim. 3. 15. that from his childhood he knew the holy Scriptures nor noted it to the praise of his grand-mother and mother that they had trained him up so if he had not known that the holy Scriptures are so plaine that even a child may be able to understand them What may we judge of the other easier bookes when the holy Ghost would have the Revelation the obscurest booke of all the Scripture to be read Revel 1. 3. The people tooke occasion of erring and blaspheming from the humiliation of Christ many abuse preaching and the Sacraments 2. By this reason the Latine Bibles should not be suffered to be read publiquely because many understanding Latine from the reading of them may take occasion of erring There is a greater reason to be had of Gods elect which are edified by reading of the Scripture then of those who wrest them Peter by this reason stirred up the faithfull to read the Scriptures with greater devotion 2 Pet. 3 14 15 16 17. 3. This is common both to the Ecclesiasticall persons and Laity to take occasion of erring and blaspheming from the Scripture If we peruse the Histories of times past we shall finde that learned and Ecclesiasticall men did oftner fall into heresies and blasphenies from misunderstanding and wresting the Scriptures then any of the common sort of people who were often also by the learned drawn into heresie The Papists are not afraid the people should be corrupted by reading their legends and lying fables by their Images which doe naturally teach Idolatry Ob. The Papists further object that the Hebrews did not permit young men to reade part of Genesis Canticles Ezekiel Sol. First we must know the reading of those Scriptures non ablat am hominibus sed dilatam fuisse was not taken away from them but delayed onely Secondly this tradition concerning the age of men did drive away as well the Ecclesiasticke as the lay persons Notwithstanding all this that hath been objected by the Papists we hold that the Scriptures ought to be translated into the vulgar and mother tongues of each nation and that all men ought to read them and meditate diligently in them and that for these reasons 1. From the Commandement and will of God revealed in Scripture he hath commanded all that live in the Church to study the Scriptures and read them Deut. 11. 18 19. John 5. 3. He speaks not to the Scribes and Pharisees but to the people in generall they must try all things 2. From Gods intention which commanded it to be written for that end that it might be obvious to all John 20. 31. Rom. 15. 4. 3. Those are commended which did read the Scripture as the Eunuch 8 Acts 22. the Bereans Acts 17. Acts 11. and dispraised which neglected it as the Israelites Hos. 8. 12. they are pronounced blessed who diligently meditate in the Scriptures Psal. 1. 2. How unlike to Peter 2 Pet. 1. 19. are those which pretend to be his Successors 4. From the fact of the Apostles who as they publiquely preached the mysteries of salvation to the people so also in their Epistles they commended the whole doctrine of salvation to be read by them The Epistles of the Romanes Corinthians Galathians Ephesians were written to the people therefore to be read by them One Epistle of John was written to Gaius a layman another to the elect Lady Timothy from the Cradle was versed in the Scripture 5. From the profit and necessity of this study men are illightned and converted by reading of the Scriptures Psal. 19. 8 9 they are directed by them as most faithfull counsellers in in all their waies Psal. 1. 19. 24. they are armed by them against the fiery darts of Satan Ephes. 6. 16. One seeing a youth reade the Scriptures said it was never well since such were permitted to turne over the Bible but he answered him in the Psalmists words Psal. 119. 9. 6. From the unanimous consent of all the Fathers Chrysostome and Jerome especially who exhort the people to the private reading of the Scriptures and testifie that the Scriptures were publiquely read in their Ecclesiasticall Assemblies not in an unknown tongue but in a tongue understood by the people It was decreed by the Councell of Nice that no Christian should be without a Bible in his house And the Jewes at this day suffer no house amongst them to be without the Bible Christ and his Apostles teaching and disputing before the people appeale to the Law and the Prophets without the name of the Author Booke or Chapter because they knew the Bible text to be familiar to the Israelites In an unknowne tougue they cannot profit the people ergo they ought to be translated into a tongue known to the people 1 Cor. 14. the Apostle in divers verses treateth of this subject V. 6 7 19. He saith all things ought to be done in the Church for the edifying of the people that no man should speak in an unknown tongue without an interpreter and saith that he had rather speak five words be understood then 10000 words in an unknown tongue Those arguments before urged for the peoples reading of the Scripture prove this also for they cannot reade them in every Nation unlesse they be translated into a Tongue they understand Christ and his Apostles taught the people the Scripture in their mother Tongue In the next age after the Apostles saith Gratius l. 3. de veritate Relig. Christ. the new Testament was translated into divers vulgar Tongues the Syriacke Arabicke Aethiopicke and Latine which versionâ— are yet extant and differ not mainly from the Greek In the elder purer times the Scriptures were translated into innumerable yea into all Tongues usuall amongst men See Gregories preface to the notes on passages of Scripture The plain and usuall words the phrase and manner of speech most frequented the comparisons and similitudes in Scripture most familiar taken out of the shops and fields from husbandry and houswifery from the flock and the herd shew that the Scriptures were written for the capacity and understanding of the unlearned John 5. 39. a speciall place if it be indicative it shewes the custome of the Jewes if imperative it shewes what they ought to doe Many amongst us are to be blamed for not having the Scripture in their houses and for not reading it constantly in the same as they ought to doe or else they reade it as other bookes not with such respect to it as the greatnesse of its Authour deserveth I meane with a desire and purpose to believe and obey all that they finde there which must needs be the duty of those that confesse
part of Scripture and in our vulgar tongue the Martyrs would have given a load of Hay for a few Chapters of St JAmes or Paul in English 3. That we have so great helps for the opening of the Scripture so many excellent Expositors compare Mollerus on the Psalmes with Austin As the latter thoughts are usually the more advised so the latter Interpreters are generally the quicker sighted All those are to be reproved which contemne or unreverently handle the Scriptures 1. Atheists who impiously oppose the word of God and all prophane wretches who live loosely and wickedly their doom is written in this book Julian the Apostate said of Apollinarius his Booke wherein he defended the Divine truth against the Gentiles Vidi legi contempsi I have seen them I have read them I have contemned them To whom Basil replied Vidisti legisti non intellexisti si intellexisses non contempsisses Thou hast seen and read them but not understood them if thou hadst understood them thou wouldst not have contemned them 2. Papists who 1. Set up Images and Pictures instead of the Scripture the Scriptures they say may teach men errors but may not Pictures 2. Equall the Apocrypha and unwritten verities or rather vanities with the sacred Scriptures 3. Charge the Scriptures with insufficiency and obscurity allow it not to be a perfect rule 4. Make it of no force to binde our consciences unlesse the Pope ratifie it 5. Give the Pope power to dispense with things therein forbidden yea and with oathes and vowes which no Scripture dispenseth withall 6. Teach that the vulgar Latine is to be received as Authenticke 7. Wrest and turn it which way they please Esay 28. 16. Cardinall Bellarmine in praefat l. de Summo Pontifice Baronius say that by precious and corner stone in this place the Pope of Rome although lesse principally is meant who is a stumbling stone to Hereticks and a rocke of offence but to Catholicks a tried precious corner stone yet Peter 1. 2. 6. 8. expoundeth those words not of himselfe but of Christ. Bellarmine from Matth. 21. Feed my Lambs and Sheep would inferre the Popes universall dominion Baronius from the Acts kill and eate Psal. 8. 6. under his feet that is say they of the Pope of Rome Sheep i. Christians Oxen that is Jewes and Hereticks Beasts of the field i. Pagans Fowles of the ayre i. Angels Fishes of the Sea i. soules in Purgatory They have Tapers in their Churches in the day time because Christ saith I am the light of the world or because they had such at midnight Acts 20. 8. where Paul preached This is the great fault of the Schoole Divines that they handle Paul and Aristotle Suae curiositati litantes potius quam pietati so that he is counted most learned amongst them who dares to seeke and presumes to define most things out of the Scripture What distinctions orders degrees and offices doe they make of Angels what curious questions doe they raise what use would there have been of sexes if Adam had not sin'd whether Christ should have been incarnate if there had been no sinne and infinite such like The Schoole men perverting the Scriptures have prophaned Divinity with Philosophy or rather Sophistry and yet are called Schoole Divines when they are neither Schollers in in truth nor Divines Behold two Swords Luke 22. 83. therefore the Pope hath two Swords one Spirituall another Temporall 1 Cor. 2. 14. ergo The Pope judgeth of all things and is judged of none The Papils stile the Scripture Regulam Lesbiam nasum cereum Evangelium nigrum Theologiam atramentariam A Lesbian rule a nose of wax the black Gospell inky Divinity Bishop Bonners Chaplaine called the Bible his little pretty Gods book Giford and Raynolds said it contained somethings prophane and Apocryphall The Rebels in Ireland tooke the Bibles threw them into the chanels and cast them into the fire and called it Hell fire and wished they could serve all the rest so But I may say of the Gospell as the French Lady of the Crosse Never dog barkt at the Crosse but he ran mad Contrarationem nemo sabrius contra Ecclesiam nemo pacificus contra Scripturas nemo Christianus Thirdiy The Brownists vainly and idly quote the Scripture filling their margents with many Texts of Scripture but nothing to the purpose and misapply it they alledge those Texts of Esay 52. 51. and Rev. 18. 4. to draw men from all the assemblies of Gods people whither any wicked men doe resort Fourthly The Antinomians or Antinomists who cry down the Law of God and call those that preach the law Legall Preachers and stand for Evangelicall grace the Law is part of Canonicall Scripture and hath something peculiar in it being written with the finger of God and delivered with Thunder and Lightning See Mr Gatakers Treatise on 23 Numb 21. and Mr Burgesse his Lectures on 1 Tim. 1. 8 9. Fifthly Stage-players who jest with Scriptures Witches and others which use charmes writing a piece of St Johns Gospell to cure a disease or the like are to be condemned for abusing the Scripture Per vâ—â—es sacras puta Evang. Johannis orationem Dominicam frequenter cum Ave Maria recitatam Symbolum Apostolicum c. morbos curare magicum est Voetius Sixthly Printers who print the Bible in bad Paper a blind print and corruptly are likewise to be blamed Seventhly the Heathens and Jewes Tacitus cals the doctrine of the Gospell Superstitionem quandam exitiabilem The moderne Jewes call Evangelium aven gilion a volume of lies word for word the iniquity of the Volume The blasphemous Jewes meane I suppose the volume of iniquity Elias Levita in Thishi mentions this Etymologie or rather Pseudologie of the word but P. Fagius abhorred to translate it Scripture arguments are the chiefest to convince an unbeliever Christ by divers arguments John 5. labours to convince the Jewes that he was the Messiah promised 1. John bare witnesse of him vers 33. 2 His works bare witnesse of him vers 36. 3 The Father did beare witnesse of him vers 37. 4 He produceth the testimony of the Scriptures v. 39. They are they which testifie of me Will you not believe John my miracles my word from Heaven then believe the written word If we believe not the testimony of Scripture nothing will convince us though one rise from the dead nor Christ himselfe if hee were here in the flesh and should preach unto us John 5. ult The Lord in executing of his judgements commonly observes proportion and retaliation Antichrist is the greatest opposite to Gods Law and Word he is called therefore 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 2 Thess. 2. 8. the lawlesse one He is without Law above Law against Law he abuseth Scripture takes upon him to judge and interpret Scripture therefore it shall be his ruine 2 Thess. 2. 8.
he praised God Joseph was no King aud therefore had no Scepter to fall down before In the Hebrew Gen. 47. for top we read head which by a Metaphor signifies the top because the head is the end and highest part of man and consequently of any thing else And for staffe we now read in the Hebrew bed which fell out because the word mittah there extant pricked with other Vowels signifies a staffe for in the Hebrew matteh is a staffe and mitteh a bed The Septuagint whom the Apostle followes read it matteh and so translated it staffe otherwise thâ—n wâ— now read it in the Hebrew Text. If we follow the Hebrew Text as it is now extant the sence will be That Jacob because he could not raise his body out of his bed therefore he bowed his head forward upon his beds head and so worshipped God Bezâ— speaking of the divers Latine translations of the New Testament onely he saith of the vâ—lgar Latine that he followeth it for the most part and preferreth it before all the rest Maximâ— ex parte amplector claeeris omnibus antepono He speakes of the new Testament onely and of that Latine translation of the new Testament in comparison of all other Latine translations which were before him as Erasmus Castalion and such like These placâ—s may serve to shew that the vulgar Latine is corrupt no Book being entire or free fron errour Isidore Clarius Brixianus praefâ—â—t in Biblia a great learned man of their own affirmeth that it hath 8000 places in which the sense of the Holy Ghost is changed Since the Councell of Trent 2 Popes have set forth this vulgar Edition diversly which of these shall be received as authenticall How often doe the Papists leave the vulgar in all their controversies when it is for their advantage so to doe it is a matter ordinary with them and needlesse to be proved There is no Edition Ancienter then the Hebrew if the Latine have been used a 1000 yeares in the Church the Hebrew hath been used almost 3000 yeares the Chaldee Arbicke Syriacke and Greeke Editions also have beene used above a 1000 yeares and so should be authentique by the Papists argument Having spoken of the authority of the Scriptures the Canonicall Books and the Authenticall Editions I now goe on to treate of the end of the Scripture its adjuncts or properties fitted to that end and the Interpretation of Scripture The end of the Scripture comes next to be considered of this I have spoken somewhat afore but shall now inlarge my selfe The end of the Scripture is considered 1. In respect of God 2. In respect of us In respect of God the end of the Scripture is a glorifying of him by it we may learne to know love and feare him and so be blessed The glory of God is the chiefe end of all things Prov. 16. 4. In respect of us The end of the Scripture is 1. Intermediate temporall edification which is fitly referred to 5 principall uses the two first respect the mind the other three the heart will and affection It is profitable for Doctrine it serves to direct to all saving truth nothing is to be received as a truth necessary to salvation but what is proved out of Scripture Where that hath not a tongue to speake I must not have an eare to heare Hoc quia de scripâ—uris non habet autoritatem eadem facilitate contemuitur qua probatur Hieron 2. Reproofe or Confutation to refute all errours and heterodoxe opinions in Divinity By this sword of the Spirit Christ vanquished Satan Matth. 4. 4. 7. 10. by the Scripture he opposed the Jewes John 5. 45. 46. 47. and 10. 34. by this he refuted the Scribes and Pharisees Matth. 9. 13. and 12. 1. Luke 10. 25. 26. 27. Matth. 19. 34. and 21. 12. 13. the Sadducees Matth. 22 29. By this Austin refuted the Pelagians Irenaeus the Valentinians Tertullian the Mâ—rcionites Athanasius the Arrians In comitijs Vindelicorum cum episcopus Albertus aliquando legeret Biblia referente Luthero in Sermon Convival interrogasset quidam è consiliarijs quid libri hic â—sset nescio equidem respondet qualis sit liber sed omnia quae in eo lego nostrae religioni planè sunt contraria 3. Correction of iniquity setting streight that which is amisse in manners and life 4. Instruction to righteousnesse Instruunt Patriarchae etiam errantes Basil saith the Psalmes are a common Store house and Treasury of good Instruction The Title of the 32 and some other Psalmes is Maschil that is a Psalme of instruction 5. Comfort in all troubles Psal. 19. 8 and 119. 50. and 92. the Greek word for Gospell signifieth glad-tidings The Promises are the Christians best Cordials as Gods Promises are the rule of what we must pray for in faith so they are the ground of what we must expect in comfort 2. Ultimate and chiefest our Salvation and life Eternall John 5. 39. and 20. 31. 2 Tim. 3. 15. It will shew us the right way of escaping hell and attaining Heaven It will shew us what to beleeve and practise for our present and eternall happinesse This was Gods aime in causing the Scripture to be written and we shall find it fully availeable and effectuall for the ends for which it was ordained by God CHAP. VIII THe properties of the Scripture fitted to that end The properties which the Scripture must have for the former end are these It is 1. Of Divine Authority 2. True and Certaine 3. The rule of faith and manners 4. Necessary 5. Pure and Holy 6. Sufficient and Perfect 7. Perspicuous and Plaine 1. It is of Divine Authority and so greater then all exception It is Divine 1. In its efficient cause and Originall which is God the Father dictating in his Sonne declaring and publishing by his holy Spirit confirming and sealing it in the hearts of the faithfull He wrote the Decalogue immediately with his own finger and Commanded the whole Systeme and all the parts of Scripture to be written by his servants the Prophets and Apostles as the publike Actuaries and Pen-men thereof therefore the authority of the Scripture is as great as that of the holy Ghost who did dictate both the matter and words those speeches are frequent the Lord said and the mouth of the Lord hath spoken 2. In the subject matter which is truth according to godlinesse certaine powerfull of venerable antiquity joyned with a sensible demonstration of the Spirit and Divine presence and with many other things atteâ—â—ing its divine authority Whence it follows that the authority of the Holy Scriptures is 1. Infallible which expresseth the minde and will of God to whom truth is essentiall and necessary 2. Supreame and Independent into which at last all faith is resolved from whiâ—h it is not lawfull to appeale By which singular authority the Scripture is distinguished
all happinesse promised nay we may invert the words with Hugo de sancto victore and say Quicquid ibi docetur esâ— veritas quicquid praecipitur bonitas quicquid promittitur felicitas All that is there taught is truth all that is there commanded is goodnesse all that is there promised is happinesse It is a wonderfull thing that all the particulars which the Canticles containe being taken from marriage are handled so sincerely that no blemish or spot can be found therein Therefore the Scriptures should be preacht read and heard with holy affections and should be reverently mentioned The â—ewes in their Synagogues will not touch the Bible with unwashed hands they kisse it as often as they open and shut it they sit not on that seat where it is laid and iâ— it fall on the ground they fast for a whole day The Turke writâ—s upon the outside of his Alcoran Let no man touch this Book but he that is pure I would none might meddle with ours Alcorâ—â— signifieth but the Scripture you need not be afraid of the word but such as indeed are what other men doe but think themselvâ—s 6. The Scripture is Perfect The perfection of the Scripture is considered 2 wayes 1. In respect of the matter or the Bookes in which the holy doctrine was written all which as many as were usefull to our salvation have been kept inviolable in the Church so that out of them one most perfect and absolute Canon of faith and life was made and this may be called the Integrity of the Scripture 2. In respect of the forme viz. of the sence or meaning of these Canonicall Books or of Divine truth comprehended in them which Books containe most fully and perfectly the whole truth necessary and sufficient for the salvation of the elect and therefore the Scriptures are to be esteemed a sole adequate totall and perfect measure and rule both of faith and manners and this is the sufficiency of the Scriptures which is attributed to it in a twofold respect 1. Absolutely in it selfe and that in a threefold consideration 1. Of the Principle for every principle whether of a thing or of knowledge ought to be the perfect since demonstration and true conclusions are not deduced from that which it imperfect therefore it is necessary that the holy Scripture being the first only immediate principle of all true doctrine should be most perfect 2. Of the Subject for it hath all Essentiall parts matter and forme and integrall Law and Gospell and is wholy perfect both 1. Absolutely because for the substance it eitheir expressely or Analogically containes the doctrine concerning Faith and Manners which is communicable and profitable for us to know which may be proved also by induction that all necessary opinions of Faith or precepts of life are to be found in the holy Scripture 2. Relatively because as it hath a perfection of the whole so of the parts in the whole that perfection is called essentiall this quantitative For all the Books are Sufficient with an essentiall perfection although integrally they have not a sufficiency of the whole but only their own yet so that at distinct times every part sufficed for their times but all the parts in the whole are but sufficient for us 3. In its effect and operation it makes men perfect 2 Tim 3. 16. 17. Rom. 15. 4. John 2. ult 5. 39. 2. As opposed to unwritten Traditions all which it excludes by its sufficiency but we doe not understand by Traditions generally a Doctrine delivered in Word and Writing but specially a Doctrine not written by Prophets or Apostles whether Dogmaticall Historicall or Ceremoniall for a perfect reason of the primary opinions belonging to Faith and Manners is delivered in Scripture and those things which are out of beside or against the Scripture doe not binde the Conscience 2. Historicall the Sayings and Deedes of Christ and the Apostles are perfectly contained in the Scriptures as many as suâ—fice us for our salvation John 20. 30 31. Those things which are delivered out of Scripture are to be esteemed mans writings 3. Ceremoniall or secondary opinions concerning Ecclesiasticall Rites and Customes are for Essentialls Substantials and Fundamâ—ntals generally contained in the Word of God The accidentals accessaries and circumstantials are free and mutable If Traditions agree with the Scripture they are confirmed by it if they oppose it they are disproved by it The perfection of the Scriptures is not First Infinite and unlimited that is an incommunicable property of God every thing which is from another as the efficiente ause is thereby limited both for the nature and qualities thereof Secondly we doe not understand such a perfection as containeth all and singular such things as at any time have beene by Divine inspiration revealed to holy men and by them delivered to the Church of what sort soever they were for all the Sermons of the Prophets of Christ and his Apostles are not set downe in so many words as they used in the speaking of them for of twelve Apostles seven wrote nothing which yet preached and did many things neither are all the deeds of Christ and his Apostles written for that is contradicted John 20. 30. 31 21. 25. but we meane onely a Relative perfection which for some certaine ends sake agreeth to the Scripture as to an instrument according to which it perfectly comprehendeth all things which have beene are or shall be necessary for the salvation of the Church Thirdly the severall Bookes of Scripture are indeed perfect for their own particular ends purposes uses for which they were intended of the Lord but yet not any one Booke is sufficient to the common end the whole Scripture is compleate in all the parts thereof one speaking of that which another doth wholy passe over in silence one clearely delivering what was intricate in another Paul speakes much of Justification and Predestination in the Epistle to the Romans nothing of the Eucharist or Resurrection Fourthly since God did reveale his will in writing those writings which by Divine hand and providence were extant in the Church were so sufficient for the Church in that Age that it needed not Tradition neither was it lawfull for any humane wight to adde thereto or take therefrom but when God did reveale more unto it the former onely was not then sufficient without the latter Fifthly the holy Scripture doth sufficiently containe and deliver all Doctrines which are necessary for us to eternall salvation both in respect of Faith and good works and most of these it delivereth to us expressely and in so many words and the rest by good and necessary consequence The Baptisme of Infants and the consubstantiality of the Father and of the Sonne are not in those words expressed in Scripture yet is the truth of both cleerely taught in Scripture and by evident proofe may thence be deduced that Article of Christs
of Scripture John 14. 26. he that teacheth all things omitteth nothing Christ said all things to his Apostles as appeares John 15. 15. and 17. 8. John 16. 13. 2. By reasons drawne from thence 1. The plentifull pouring forth of the spirit was deferred till the glorifying of Christ he being glorified it was no longer to be delayed Christ being exalted on the right hand of God obtained the Spirit promised and that was not according to measure and poured the same in such abundance as it could be poured forth and received by men so that was fulfilled which was foretold by Joel 2. 28. Act. 2. 33. John 3. 34. 35. Act. 2. 16 17. 2. The Scripture and the prophesies of the old Testament doe teach and declare that all Divine truth should fully and at once be manifested by the Messias who is the onely Prophet High-Priest and King of his Church there is no other Revelation promised none other needfull besides that which was made by him Esay 11. 9. Act 3. 23. 24. Joel 2. 23. Vide Mercerum in loc therefore the last inspiration was made to the Apostles and none other to be expected The doctrine of the Law and the Prophets did suffice to salvation yet it did send the Fathers to expect somewhat more perfect 1 Pet. 1. 10 but to the preaching of the Gospell nothing is to be added we are not sent to waite for any clearer vision 3. So long as any truth needfull to be known was unrevealed or not plainly taught the Lord did stirre up some Prophet or other to teach the same unto the Church therefore the Lord surceaâ—ng to speake since the publishing of the Gospell of Jesus Christ and the delivery of the same in writing is unto us a manifest token that the whole will of God is now brought to light and that no new Revelation is to be expected Our 7th Proposition is Christ and his Apostles were able to propound and teach by lively voyce that doctrine which pertaines to perfection John 1. 18. and 11. 11. 32. John 8. 26. and the Apostles perfectly taught all things which are or shall be necessary for the Church Act. 20. 27. Gal. 1. 7. 8. 9. The doctrine of repentance and remission of sinnes in the name of Christ doth summarily containe all things necessarily to salvation Act. 5. 31. and 11. 11. but this doctrine the Apostles preached Act. 13. 38. 39. Luke 24. 47. The word of God is not onely Milke for Babes but strong Meat for men of ripe yeares 1 Cor. 3. 1. 2. Heb. 5. 14. and 6. 1. 2. therefore it containeth not onely matter of preparation but of perfection Or 8th Proposition is The sum and substance of that heavenly doctrine which was taught by the Prophets and Apostles was by them committed to writing the Holy Ghost giving them a commandement and guiding their hands therein that they could not erre so that the word preached and written by them is one in substance both in respect of matter which is the will and word of God and inward forme viz. the divine truth immediately inspired though different in the externall forme and manner of delivery Our 9th Proposition is that nothing is necessary to be known of Christians over and above that which is found in the old Testament which is not clearly and evidently contained in the Bookes of the Apostles and Evangelists Our last Proposition is that all things which have beene are or shall be necessary to the salvation of the Church to the end of the world are perfectly contained in the writings of the Prophets and Apostles long since divinely inspired written and published and now received by the Church of God so that now no new Revelation or Tradition beside those inspired published and comprehended in the Scripture are necessary for the salvation of the Church There are 3 opinions 1. Of the Papists who altogether deny it 2. Of the Socinians which would have all things expressely contained in Scripture and if it be not totidem verbis they reject it 3. Of the Orthodoxe who say it containes all things expressely or by consequence The expresse testimonies of Scripture forbidding even Angels to adde any thing to those things which are commanded by the Lord doe prove the perfection of the Scripture Deut. 4. 5. 12. and 12. 32. and 30. 10. and 5. 12 13 14. and 28. 58. Josh. 1. 7 8. Prov. 30. 5. wherefore the Apostle commands that no man presume above that which is written 1. Cor. 4. 6. 2 Tim. 3. 15 16. Divers reasons may be drawn from this famous place to prove the perfection of the Scripture 1. The Apostle teacheth that the Scriptures are able to make a man wise to salvation therefore there needeth no further counsell nor direction thereunto but out of the Scriptures 2 The Scriptures are able to make the man of God that is the Minister of the word perfect and compleat unto every worke of his Ministery whether it be by teaching true doctrine or confuting false by exhorting and setting forward to that which is good or dehorting from that which is evill Paul would not have us thinke that all and every writing viz. of Plato Aristotle is divinely inspired for in the 15. v. he not onely useth the plurall number calling them the holy * writings thereby to note the word of God and not one sentence or Booke but all the sentences and Bookes of the Scripture and also useth the Article which hath force of an universall note therefore the Greeke word the whole Scripture signifieth the whole altogether and not every part severally in this place 2. No one part of holy Scripture is able to make the Minister perfect therefore it must needs be understood of the whole body of holy Scripture wherein this sufficiency is to be found The Ancient Fathers and other Divines have from this place proved the perfection and sufficiency of the Scripture in all things necessary to salvation We doe not reason thus as the Papists charge us it is profitable therefore it is sufficient but because 1. The Scripture is profitable for all these ends viz. to teach sound doctrine to refute false opinions to instruct in holy life and correct ill manners therefore it is sufficient or it is profitable to all those functions of the Ministery that a Minister of the Church may be perfect therefore muchâ—more for the people Argumentum non nititur unica illa voce utilis sed toto sententiae camplexu Chamierus Hitherto of the perfection of the Scripture absolutely considered now followes the sufficiency thereof in opposition to unwritten traditions or verities as the Papists speake Doctor Davenant premiseth these things for the better understanding of the sufficiency of the Scripture 1. We speake of the State of the Church saith he in which God hath ceased to speake to men by the Prophets or Apostles divinely inspired and to lay open new Revelations to his
Church 2. We grant that the Apostâ—es living and preaching and the Canon of the New Testament being not yet sealed their Gospell delivered viva voce was no lesse a rule of faith and worship then the writings of Moses and the Prophets 3. We doe not reject all the traditions of the Church for we embrace certaine Historicall and Ceremoniall ones but we deny that opinions of faith or precepts of worship can be confirmed by unwritten traditions 4. We call that an opinion of faith to speake properly and strictly when a Proposition is revealed by God which exceeds the capacity of nature and is propounded to be beleeved as necessary to be knowne to salvation Fundamentall opinions are those which by a usuall and proper name are called Articles of faith 5. What is not in respect of the matter an Article of saith may be a Proposition to be beleeved with a Theologicall faith if you looke to the manner of revealing as that the Sunne is a great light the Moone a lesse Gen. 1. 16. that Rachel was beautifull Leah bleare-eyed The Papists doe not cease to accuse the Scripture of imperfection and insufficiency as not containing all things necessary to salvation The Councell of Trent sess 4. decret 1. Saith that the truth and discipline is contained in libris scriptis sine scripto traditionibus The Papists generally divide the word of God into the word written and traditions They affirme that there are many things belonging to Christian faith which are neither contained in the Scriptures openly nor secretly This opinion is maintained by the Papists but it was not first invented by them The Jewish Fathers did use the traditions of the Elders and it hath been said of old Marke 7. 5. Matth. 5. 21. for their errours and superstitions yea at length they affirmed firmed that God gave to Moses in mount Sinai the Scripture and the Cabala or a double Law the one written the other unwritten The Tridentine Fathers session 4th doe command Traditions to be received with the same reverend affection and piety with which we embrace the Scripture and because one Bishop in the Councell of Trent refused this he was excluded In the meane space they explaine not what those traditions are which must be so regarded none of them would ever give us a list and Catalogue of those Ordinances which are to be defended by the authority of unwritten traditions not of the word committed to writing onely they affirme in generall whatsoever they teach or doe which is not in the Scripture that it is to be put into the number of Traditions unwritten The cause of it selfe is manifest that at their pleasure they might thrust what they would upon the Church under the name of Traditions Vide Whitak de Script controviae quaest Sexta c. 5. See also Moulins Buckler of Faith p. 51. Lindan the Papist was not ashamed to say that it had been better for the Church if there had been no Scripture at all but onely Traditions For saith he we may doe well enough with Traditions though we had no Scripture but could not doe well enough with Scripture though we had no Traditions Baldwin saith a Testament may be either scriptum or nuncupativum set downe in writing or uttered by word of mouth But a nuncupative Testament or Will made by word of mouth without writing must be proved by solemne witnesses The solemne witnesses of Christs Testament are the Prophets and Apostles Let Papists if they can prove by them that part of the Testament of Christ is unwritten Because our Adversaries doe contend for Traditions not written hotly and zealously against the totall perfection of the Scripture that they might thrust upon us many points by their owne confession not contained in Scripture and usurpe to themselves irrefragable authority in the Church it shall not be amisse largely to consider of this matter And 1. to enquire of the signification of the words Greek and Latine which are translated Tradition and then to come to the matter which is controverted between us and the Papists The Greeke word signifying Tradition 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which in the new Testament is used only in these places Matth. 15. 2. 3. 6. Marke 7. 3. 5. 8. 9. 13. 1 Cor. 11. 2. Gal. 1. 14. Col. 2. 8. 2 Thess. 2. 15. and 3. 6. and in the vulgar Latine is rendred Traditio Matth. 15. 2. 3. 6. Marke 7. 3. 5. 8. 9. 13. Gal. 1. 14. Col. 2. 6. 2 Thess. 2. 15. and 3. 6. and praecepta 1 Cor. 11. 2. Whereto the Rhemists translation which seemeth to be but a bare translation of the vulgar Latine doth wholly agree using the word Tradition every where excepting 1 Cor. 11. 2. where they use the word precepts but set in the margent the word Tradition Arias Montanus in his Interlineall translation doth render it traditio Beza doth commonly expresse it by the word traditio In the English Geneva Bible we translate it by the word instruction tradition calling mens precepts traditions the Apostles doctrine Ordinances or instructions not that we feared the word tradition but because we would not have the simple deceived as though the unwritten verities of the papists were thereby commended or as though we had some honourable conceite of them and what we did herein the signification of the word doth give us free liberty to doe in our last English Translation we use the word tradition as often as the vulgar Latine or the Rhemists have done not that we were driven by feare or shame to alter what was done before but because we would cut off all occasion of carping at our translation though never so unjust First we contend not about the name tradition the word may lawfully be used if the sense affixed thereto be lawfull 2. All traditions unwritten are not simply condemned by us 3. The Apostles delivered by lively voyce many observations dispensable and alterable according to the circumstances of time and persons appertaining to order and comelinesse onely we say that they were not of the substance of Religion that they were not generall concerning all Churches 4. We receive the number and names of the authors of Books Divine and Canonicall as delivered by tradition but the Divine truth of those Books is in it self clear and evident unto us not depending on the Churches authority The Books of Scripture have not their authority quoad nos from the approbation of the Church but winne credit of themselves and yeeld sufficient satisfaction to all men of their divine truth whence we judge the Church that receiveth them to be led by the Spirit of God yet the number authors and integrity of the parts of those Books we receive as delivered by tradition 5. The continued practise of such things as are neither expressely contained in Scripture nor the example of such practise expressely there delivered though the grounds reasons and cause of the necessity of such practise be
there contained and the benefit and good that foloweth of it we receive upon tradition though the thing it selfe we receive not for tradition Of this sort is the Baptisme of Infants which may be named a Tradition because it is not expressely delivered in Scripture that the Apostles did Baptize Infants nor any expresse precept there found that they should so doe yet is not this so received by bare and naked tradition but that we finde the Scripture to deliver unto us the ground of it Bellarmine and Maldonate both doe confesse that the Baptisme of Infants may be proved by the Scripture and therefore Maldonate concludes nobis verò traditio non est Bellarmine * as Whitaker shewes contradicts himselfe for first he saith that the Baptisme of Infants is an unwritten tradition and after that the Catholicks can prove Baptisme of Infants from the Scriptures To this head we may referre the observation of the Lords day the precept whereof is not found in Scripture though the practise be And if for that cause any shall name it a Tradition we will not contend about the word if he grant withall that the example Apostolicall hath the force of a Law as implying a common equity concerning us no lesse then it did them If any man shall call the summary comprehension of the chief heads of Christian doctrine contained in the Creed commonly called the Apostles Creed a tradition we will not contend about it For although every part thereof be contained in Scripture yet the orderly connexion distinct explication of those principall Articles gathered into an Epitome wherein are implyed and whence are inferred all conclusions Theologicall is an Act humane not divine and in that sense may be called a Tradition But let it be noted withall that we admit it not to have that credit as now it hath to be the rule of faith for this is the priviledge of holy Scripture The Creed it selfe was gathered out of Scripture and is to be expounded by the Scripture therefore it is not given to be a perfect Canon of faith and manners By Tradition is noted 1. Whatsoever is delivered by men divinely inspired and immediately called whether it be by lively voyce or by writing 2. In speciall it notes the word of God committed to writing 1 Cor. 15. 3. 3. It signifies rites expressely contained in writing Act. 6. 14. 4. It betokens that which is not committed to writing but onely delivered by lively voyce of the Apostles 5. It signifieth that which is invented and delivered by men not immediately called In Scripture Tradition is taken 1. in good part for any rite or doctrine of God delivered to his Church either by word or writing whether it concern faith and good works or the externall government of the Church 2 Thess. 2. 15. 1 Cor. 11. 15. 23. 2. In ill part it noteth the vaine idle and unwarrantable inventions of men whether Doctrine or Rites Matthew 15. 3. Marke 7. 8 9. When the Fathers speake reverently of Traditions by the word Tradition either they understand the holy Scripture which also is a Tradition it is a Doctrine left unto us Or by Traditions they understand observations touching Ecclesiastill policy D. Moulin Reasons confirming the sufficiency of Scripture against Popish traditions 1. The whole Church is founded upon the Doctrine of the Prophets and Apostles which were not true if any doctrin was necessary to salvation not revealed by the Prophets and Apostles 2. The Prophets and Christ and his Apostles condemne Traditions Esay 29. 13. Mathew 15. 3. 6. Col. 2. 8. Therefore they are not to be received Christ opposeth the Commandement and Scriptures to Traditions therefore he condemnes Traditions not written If the Jewes might not adde to the Bookes of Moses then much lesse may wee adde to the Canon of Scripture so much increased since 3. Those things which proceede from the will of God onely can be made knowne to us no other way but by the Revelation of the Scripture all Articles of Faith and Precepts of Manners concerning substance of Religion proceede from the Will of God onely Mathew 16. 17. 1 Cor. 2. 9 10 11. Gal. 1. 8. As in this place the Apostle would have nothing received besides that which he Preached so 1 Cor. 4. 6. He will have nothing admitted above or more then that which is written See Act. 26. 22. John 20. ult whence it is manifest that all necessary things may be found in Scripture since full and perfect Faith ariseth from thence which eternall salvation followeth Bellarmin saith John speakes onely of the miracles of Christ that hee wrote not all because those sufficed to perswade the World that Christ was the Sonne of God Those words indeede in the 30 Verse are to be understood of Christs Miracles but those in the 31. Verse rather are to be generally interpreted for the History onely of the Miracles sufficeth not to obtaine Faith or Life The question betwixt the Papists and us is de ipsa doctrina tradita non de tradendi modo touching the substance of the Doctrine delivered not of the manner of delivering it and of Doctrine delivered as the Word of God not of Rites and Ceremonies They maintaine that there bee doctrinall Traditions or Traditions containing Articles of Faith and substantiall matters of Divine worship and Religion not found in the holy Scriptures viz. Purgatory Invocation of Saints Adoration of Images Papall Monarchy Bellarmin and before him Peresius distinguisheth Traditions both from the authours and the matter From the Authours into Divine Apostolicall and Ecclesiasticall From the matter into those which are concerning Faith and concerning Manners into perpetuall and temporall universall and particular necessary and free Divine Traditions that is Doctrines of Faith and of the worship and service of God any of which we deny to be but what are comprised in the written Word of God Apostolike Traditions say they are such Ordinances as the Apostles prescribed for ceremony and usage in the Church as the observation of the memoriall of the Nativity Death and Resurrection of Christ the alteration of the seventh day from the Jewes Sabbath to the day of Christs Resurrection Ecclesiasticall ancient Customes which by degrees through the Peoples consent obtained the force of a Law Traditions concerning Faith as the perpetuall Virginity of Mary the Mother of Christ and that there are onely foure Gospels of Manners as the signe of the Crosse made in the forehead Fasts and Feastings to be observed on cetaine dayes Perpetuall which are to bee kept to the end of the World Temporall for a certaine time as the observation of certaine legall Ceremonies even to the â—ull publishing of the Gospell Universall Traditions which are delivered to the whole Church to be kept as the observation of Easter Whitsontide and other great Feasts Particular which is delivered to one or more Churches as in the
time of Austin fasting on the Sabbath day which was kept only at Rome Necessary Traditions which are delivered in the forme of a Precept that Easter is to bee celebrated on the Lords Day Free which are delivered in the forme of counsell as sprinkling of holy water Objection The Scripture it not perfect with a perfection of parts because many parts are either defective or excessive 1. Some labour wiâ—h a defect as Genesis 11. 12. a person is omitted in the Genealogy of Cainaan which was the Sonne of Aphâ—xad but it is reckoned in Luke in Christs Genealogy not in the old Testament therefore there is a defect Sol. Luke reckons it according to the vulgar opinion of the Jewes Junius in his paralels would have the fault to be in the Septuagint whom Luke followed not approving of their errour but yeelding to the time least the Gospell otherwise should have beene prejudicâ—d but Bezas opinion is rather to be approved of that this word is inserted from the Ignorance of those who undertooke to correct this Text according to the translation of the Seventy Interpreters For in an Ancient manuscript which Beza followed this word Cainaan was not to be found therefore he omitted it in his translation and so hath our great English Bible Ob. There is something found in the Scripture against the Commandement of God Deut. 4. 2. therefore there is excesse as well as defect for many Bookes which we beleeve to be Canonicall are added Sol. He doth not forbid adding by Gods Command but from the will of man for God himselfe added afterward The Papists arguments for Traditions answered Ob. Bellarmine saith Religion was preserved for 2000 yeares from Adam to Moses onely by Tradition therefore the Scripture is not simply necessary Sol. By the like reason I might argue that Religion was long preserved not onely without the Pope of Rome but also without Baptisme and the Lords Supper with the like institutions therefore they are not simply necessary yet none of ours hold the Scriptures simply necessary Secondly it is false that Religion was preserved all that while by ordinary Tradition onely for the living voyce of God sounded most perpetually in the Church and the doctrine of Religion was conveighed successivly from the Father to the Sonne which living voyce of God by little and little ceasing writing afterward succeeded and hath the same necessity now which Gods living voyce had before Ob. Whatsoever things are commended from Scripture are necessary but so are Traditions ergo they are necessary Joh 16. 12. I have yet many things to say unto you but ye cannot beare them now therefore say they the Lord spake many things which are not written Sol. 1. He saith not that he had many things to tell them which he had not taught them before but which they were not now so well capable of for it appeareth that he taught them that which they understood not and therefore they needed to be further taught of them by the holy Ghost which should not teach them any new thing that Christ had not taught but onely make them understand that which they had beene taught of our Saviour Christ. 2. If the holy Ghost did teach them any thing which our Saviour Christ had not before spoke unto them of yet that makes nothing for Traditions seeing that which the holy spirit taught them he taught them out of the Scriptures 3. If the holy Ghost should have taught the Apostles some things which neither Christ had told them of nor the Scriptures had taught them yet this is rather against the Papists For that which the holy Ghost taught them they undoubtedly left in record unto the Church as being faithfull Stewards and revealing the whole Counsell of God unto the people 4. It hath been the practise of Hereticks as Austine affirmeth at all times to cover their dreames and phantasies with this sentence of our Saviour Christ. Lastly if it be asked what were those grave and great mysteries which the Apostles could not for their rudenesse beare they are forsooth Oyle and Spittle in Baptisme Candles light at noone dayes which was not in the darker time of the Law Baptizing of Bels and such like gue-gaws as the grossest and carnallest men are fittest to receive Ob. 2 Thess. 2. 15. Therefore Brethren stand fast and hold the Traditions which ye have been taught whether by word or our Epistle From these words say our Adversaries it appeares that all things were not written nullum Papistae in Scripturis locum probabiliorem inveniunt saith Whitaker The Hereticks say the Rhemists on this place purposely guilefully and of ill conscience refraine in their translations from the Ecclesiasticall and most usuall word Tradition evermore when it is taken in good part though it expresse most exactly the signification of the Greeke word but when it â—oundeth in their fond fantasie againâ—â— the Traditions of the Church as indeed in true sense it never doth there they use it most gladly Here therefore and in the like plâ—ces that the reader may not so easily like of Traditions unwritten here commended by the Apostle they translate 〈◊〉 â—onstitutions Ordinances and what they can invent else to hide the truth from the Rimple or unwarry Reader whose translations have none other end but to be guile such by art and conveighance Thus farre the Rhemists Paul taught the Thessalonians some things by word of mouth which he taught them not in his two Epistles which he wrote unto them therefore he taught some doctrines which he wrote not as if that Paul wrote no more Epistles then these two whereby that which he taught not them in writing unto them he taught them by writing unto others Secondly how followeth this argument Paul wrote not all the doctrines of God unto the Thessalonians therefore they are not all written in the Propheticall and Evangelicall writings whereas it is plainly testified that the Old Testament containeth a perfect rule of the doctrine of salvation the new being written for a Declaration of the fulfilling and further clearing of that in the Old Testament Thirdly it appeareth manifestly in the Acts what was the summe of that which Paul taught the Thessalonians by word of mouth For there it is witnessed that Paul taught out of the Scriptures that it behoved Christ to suffer and rise againe from the dead and that Jesus was Christ this teaching then by word is there limited to the Scriptures of the Law and Prophets Neither ought it to seeme strange that this was the summe of all which the Apostle taught at Thessalonica where he tarried so small a while when amongst the Corinthians where he remained longest of any place and consequently taught most he sheweth that he taught nothing but Christ and him crucified Fourthly the Apostle himself in this very place calling verse 14. whatsoever he taught by word or wrote by the name of
faith knowledge assent and full assurance these cannot consist without the perspicuity of the Scripture the divine promises also of writing the Law in our heart and concerning the spreading abroad and cleare light of the Gospell should be to no purpose if the Scriptures should not â—e plaine in things necessary to salvation All difficulty in understanding the Scripture ariseth not from the obscurity of it but from the weaknesse of our understanding corrupted by naturall ignorance or blinded by divine punishment and câ—rse therefore it no more followes from thence that the Scripture cannot be an infallible and onely rule of faith and life because some obscure things are found in it not understood of all then that the Bookes of Euclide are not perfect elements of Geometry because there are some abstruse theoremes in them which every vulgar Geometrician can not demonstrate or that Aristotles Organon is not a perfect Systeme of Logicke because a fresh Sophister understands not all its subtilties More distinctly we say that the Scriptures are plaine and obscure in a threefold respect 1. They are plaine and easie to be understood by all men in Fundamentals and the Speciall points necessary to salvation as the Decalogue the Apostles Creed the Lords Prayer and the like unlesse by those whose minds the God of this world hath blinded if they be obscure in some lesse principall and circumstantiall matters there is need of interpretation that the meaning may be more clearely unfolded 2. A difference of persons is to be considered either more generally or more specially 1. More generally as they are elect and regenerate or reprobate and unregenerate to those the Scripture is plaine and pe picuous to whom alone it is destinated and whose minds the Holy Ghost will inlighten by the Scripture John 7. 17. Rom. 12. 2. 1 Cor. 12. 15. Psal. 19. 7. Matth. 11. 5. and 25. 25. Psal. 9. 10. 12. 13. 14. Yet the flesh and unregenerate part in them puts in impediments but that Ignorance is removed at last Luke 8. 10 The reprobates continue involved in perpetuall darknesse and blinded with Ignorance hypocrisie covetousnesse pride and contempt of divine learning even seeing they see not Psal. 36. 3. Esay 29 9. Jer. 5. 21. Esay 6. 9. 2 Cor. 3. 14. there is a vaile over their hearts 2 Cor. 4. 3. 4. which is the cause why is so many ages under the Papacy the Scriptures were not understood because they preferred a lye before the love of the truth 2 Thess. 10. whose Ignorance is a deserved punishment of that contempt which they shewed to the Scriptures and their authority 2. More specially the persons are distinguished according to the diversity 1. Of Conditions of life and vocations for so many places of Scripture are hard to this sort of men which are more easie to another neither is it required that all things be understood of all men the knowledge of more places is necessary in a Minister then in a Trades-man and Husband-man yet it is an 〈◊〉 Rule to every one in his Vocation 2. Of capacities and wits for every one hath his measure of gifts so among Ministers some understanâ— the Word more obscurely some more plainly yet it is to all a perfect rule according to the measure of Gifts 3 Of times all things are not equally obscure or perspicuous to all ages many things are better understood now then in times past as the prophesies and predictions of Christ and the times of the Gospell so in the Mysteries of the Revelation the exposition rather of moderne Interpreters then Fathers is to be received because in our times not theirs there is an accomplishment of those Prophesies and many things were more clearely knowne by them in those dayes the Ceremonies and Types of Moses his Law were better perceived by the Jewes then us God the Author of the Scripture could speak perspicuously for he is wisdom it selfe and He would speake so because he caused the Scripture to be written to instruct us to our eternall salvation Rom. 15. 4. and he commands us to seek in the Scripture eternall life We do not account the prophecy of Esay touching Christ which the Eunuch read to be a dark and obsure prediction but wee know it was cleare and plaine enough though the Eunuch a raw Proselyte understood not the meaning of it The Fathers proved their opinions out of the Scriptures therefore the Scriptures are more clear then the writings and commentaries of the Fathers To every one which readeth with humility and invocation of God the Booke of the Apooalypse the obscurest and hardest Booke to understand of all other blessednesse is promised which when it cannot beâ—all to any that understandeth nothing it is manifest that the promise of blessednesse includeth a warrant of understanding of it so much as is necessary to salvation We affirme that many places in the Scripture are very obscure and that either from the obscurity of the things as in the Prophesies of future things the event must interprete them as Daniels Prophecies of the foure Monarchies were in times past very darke but easier since when all things were fulfilled so the comming of Antichrist in the new Testament drew the Fathers into divers opinions so even yet there are many things obscure in the Revelation which are not accomplished So those things which are spoken of the Messiah in the old Testament are either not understood or not fully without the new Testament Sometimes the ambiguity of words breedes a difficulty as I and the Fathers are one the Arrians understood it of a union of will as when Christ prayed John 17. that the Disciples might be one Hitherto may be referred those places which are to be understood allegorically as the Canticles the first Chapter of Ezechiel 3. Some places are obscure from the ignorance of ancient Rites and Customes as that place 1 Cor. 15. 29. of Baptizing for the dead is diversly explained by interpreters both old and new There are six interpretations of it in Bellarmine l. 1. de purgatorio c. 8. Ambrose saith Paul had a respect to that custome of some who Baptized the living for the dead Piscator Bucane say the custome of the ancient Church is noted here who Baptized Christians at the Graves that so it might be a symbole of their beliefe and confession of the Resurrection of the Dead Tarnovius proves that that rite was not in use in the Apostles time Calvin interprets it of those who were Baptized when they were ready to die but Beza thinkes by Baptizing is understood the 〈◊〉 of washing the bodies before the Buriall Andreas Hyperius sheweth in a peculiar tract what various opinions there are about this place Voetius hath written a tract de insolubilibus Scripturae Estius and Dr. Hall on the hard places of Scripture Divers reaâ—ons may be rendred why God would have many things in the Scripture obscure and difficult 1. To
this Subject 1. In that description which they make of the literall sense 2. In that they hold there are divers literall sences of one place 3. In their division of the mysticall sense into Allegoricall Tropologicall Anagogicall First that is false which Bellarmine saith Literalis sensus est quem verba immediatè prae se ferunt What then shall the literall sense of those words be Psal. 91. 13. Let them shew the Lion which Christ did tread oâ— and what shall be the literall sense of those places Esay 11. 6 7 8. and 65. ult And what literall sense shall those words of Christ have Matth 5. 29. Origen though otherwise he allegorized much interpreted that place according to the letter but foolishly That therefore is rather the literall senâ—e which ariseth from the words whether properly or figuratively taken as for example this is the literall sense of those words the Seed of the woman shall breake the Serpents head viz. Christ shall over come Satan and subdue all his force and power although the Devill neither be a Serpent nor hath a head 2. We hold that there is but one true proper and genuine sense of Scripture viz. the literall or Grammaticall whether it arise from the words properly taken or figuratively understood or both For that there should be divers literall sences of one and the same place is against the truth the Text and reason 1. The truth because of one and an Individuall thing there is one constant truth and not various verum unum convertuntur 2. The Text because it draweth away from its one true sense 3. And lastly reason because this is the chiefest reason in explaining the Text that the true literall sense of it may be found out The literall sense then can be but one in one place though a man may draw sundry consequences à contrarijs à similibus 3. We doe not altogether reject the third for we hold there are Allegories Anagogies and Tropologies in the Scriptures yet these are not many and divers senses of the Scripture but divers collections from one sense or divers applications and accommodations of one sense Besides the Tropologies and Anagogies are unfitly opposed to an Allegory since they are certaine kindes of it Haec nominum curiosa distinctio ex Scholarum potius morosiuscula diligentia quam ex ulla eorum vocabulorum necessitate Itaque Salmero agnoscit esse quid novum à pâ—sterioribus patribus trâ—ditum Chamierus tomo de Sensu Literali mystico l. 15. C. 1. Galat. 4. the Apostle saith not that there is a double sense but that it may be Allegorically applied which is Historically set downe There is then but one sense of the place part whereof consisteth in the Story part in the Allegory So that the whole sense is contained in them both So for the second example of the Tropologicall there is not a twofold sense of that place but one generall sense that as the mouth of the Oxe was not to be muzled so the Minister of the Gospell must be provided for Likewise of the Anagogicall kinde it is not one sense to understand the rest of Câ—naan another the Kindome of God but there is one whole sense that as they for their Idolatry were deprived of the Land of promise so we should take heed least by our disobedience we lose the hope of the Kingdome of heaven So we conclude that those are not divers sences but one sense diversly applyed The literall sense is the onely sense of the place because out of that sense only may an argument strongly be framed wherefore seeing Allegories and Tropes doe no conclude they are not the sences of the place and Allegories devised beside the sense prove not though they may illustrate It is manifest that is alwayes the sense of the holy Ghost which is drawne from the very words But we are not so certaine concerning any mysticall sense unlesse when the holy Ghost himselfe teacheth us as for example it is written 11. Hosea 1. Out of Egypt have I called my Sonne and Exod. 12. 46. Ye shall not breake a bone of him It is evident that the first place is understood of the people of Israel the latter of the Paschall Lamb. Who durst have applyed those things to Christ unlesse the Holy Ghost had first done it and declared his minde and meaning to us viz. that sonne in the first place doth not onely signifie the people of Israel but Christ also and by bone in the latter place not onely the bone of that Lambe but of Christ also is understood Secondly To whom the chiefe authority to expound Scripture is committed It was decreed in the Councell of Trent that Scripture should be expounded as the Church expoundeth it and according to the common and unanimous consent of the Fathers If the Fathers agree not the matter is referred to a generall Councell if there it be not determined we must have recourse to the Pope and his Cardinals We say also that the Church is the interpreter of Scripture and that this gift of interpreting resides onely in the Church but we deny that it belongs to certaine men or is tyed to a certaine place or succession of men The Ministry of judgement the Lord hath given to his Church 1 Cor. 2. 15. and 10. 15. 1 John 4. 1. Act. 15 16 2 Cor. 14. 29. 31. 32. but the Soveraignty of judgement he hath reserved to himselfe The Holy Ghost is the Judge and the Scripture is the sentence or definitive decree We acknowledge no publike Judge except the Scripture and the holy Ghost teaching us in the Scripture He that made the Law should interpret the same 1 Cor. 1. 12. 1 John 2. 27. Arguments brought by the Papists for their opinion Ob. 1. They object that place Exod. 18. 13. 26. Sol. Moses was a Prophet indued with singular wisdome adorned by God with extraordinary gifts sent immediately by him and commended by divine Testimonies to the people the Pope is not so He had chiefest authority from God over all the Israelites but the Pope hath not so over all Christians Moses his authority was extraordinary no man succeeded in his place Iâ—shua was a Captaine onely or Judge in Civill things Aaron onely a Priest to administer in things sacred But Moses exercised both functions Ob. 2. They urge that place Deut. 17. 9. Sol. Here the Civill Magistrate and the Judge are joyned together as v. 12. If it will follow hence that the Pope must be Supreme Judge in all Ecclesiasticall matters the Emperour ought to be as well in Civill 2. The Pope doth not hold the same place among Christians that the High-Priest did among the Jewes For he was the chiefest having all the rest of the Priests subject to him but the Pope is one amongst all having Collegues many Bishops as at first or a few Patriarkes as after Ob. 3. Eccles. 12. 11. If the chiefe
Pastor in the Old Testament had such authority much more the chiefe Priest in the New Sol. This one pastor signifieth neither the High Priest in the old Law nor the Pope in the New but Jesus Christ the High Shepheard for our soules Ob. Matth. 16. 19. Christ saith to Peter to theâ— will I give the Keyes of the Kingdome of Heaven therefore the Pope hath authority to expound Scripture Sol. First by the Keyes here is meant Commission to preach the Gospell not authority of interpreting the Scriptures When the Gospell is preached the Kingdome of heaven is opened to the beleevers and shut to the unbeleevers 2. That authority of the Keyes was not committed to Peter onely but to the other Apostles also Matth. 28. 18. 19. There is a twofold judgement 1. Of discretion 1 Cor. 10. 15. 2. Of authority as the Parllament judgeth Capitall crimes If the Papists understand the word Judge to â—ignifie Discerning as when we judge of meates by the taste every faithfull person ought to pray unto God for grace to judge to discerne and to know the true sense of the Scripture But if by judging they understand to pronounce decrees definitive and infallible judgements touching the sence of the Scriptures thereby to bind other mens consciences there is no man in the world that hath that power See Moulinâ— Buckler of Faith We have a more compendious way to come to the understanding of the Scripture It were too long when we doubt of any place to stay till we have the generall consent of the Pastors of the Church or to expect a generall counsell or to goe up to Rome But the word of God is amongst us the Scriptures themselves and the Spirit of God opening our hearts doe teach us how to understand them And yet we say not as the Papists falsely charge us that we allow every private mans interpretation of Scripture refusing the judgement of the Pastors of the Church Panoruitan saith the opinion of one godly man ought to be preferred before the Popes if it be grounded upon better authority of the Old and New Testament 2 Pet. 1. 20. No prophesie of the Scripture is of any private interpretation Stapleton saith interpretation is private either ratione personae when the man is private or ratione medij when it is not taken out of the context and circumstances or ratione finis when it is for a false end Now private interpretation in regard of the person if it be publike in regard of the meanes is not forbidden for it is lawfull for one man with Scripture toti resistere mundo saith the Glosse of the Canon-Law the meaning of this place is that the Prophets were no Interpreters or Messengers of their own minds but Gods The Catholickes hold saith Chamier meaning still by that Title the Protestants that the Scripture is to be interpreted by private labour and industry viz. of Augustine Jerome Chrysostome but not in a private sense that is in a sense arising from the braine of the Interpreter It is true saith Cartwright against the Rhemists that the Scriptures cannot be expounded of every private Spirit nor which is more of any private spirit nor yet of all private spirits together but onely of those which are inspired of God viz. the Prophets and Apostles which are here opposed unto private Interpretation And therefore it is evident that the exposition of the Scripture ought not to be fetched from Ecclesiasticall either Fathers or Councels which speake not by inspiration but from the Scriptures themselves what he meaneth he declareth in the next verse where he sheweth the reason of his saying namely that it must be interpreted as it was written and by as high authority Seeing therefore it was first spoken by holy men which spake as they were led by the holy Spirit and were inspired of God it followeth that it must be interpreted by the same authority The interpretation therefore that is brought but of the Apostles and Prophets is not private although it be avowed by one man onely On the other side that interpretation which is not brought from thence although it have the allowance of whole Generall Counsels is but private This is a principall meaning of our Saviour Christ when he willeth that we should call no man father or Master in the earth that is in matter of doctrine we should depend upon the authority of no man nor of all men in the earth but onely upon Christ and upon God Our reasons by which we prove that the chiefest judgement and authority of interpreting Scriptures is to be given not to the Church but to the Scriptures themselves and the Holy Ghost 1. That which onely hath power to beget faith that onely hath the chiefest authority of interpreting Scripture and of determining all controversies concerning faith and religion but the Scriptures onely and the Holy Ghost have this force Rom. 10. 17. the Holy Ghost onely can infuse saving faith into our hearts which is called by the Schoolemen infusa fides The faith which we have from the Church is acquired and sufficeth not to a certaine perswasion 2. The Scriptures cannot be interpreted but by the same Spirit wherewith they were written that spirit is found no where but in the Scripture whosoever have promises from God to understand the Scripture may interpret it but so have all the faithfull 3. Christ himselfe makes the Scripture a Judge John 12. 48. and still appealed to it 4. Although the Fathers were men indued of God with excellent gifts and brought no small light to understanding of the Scriptures yet learned men in our dayes may give a right sense of sundry places thereof which the Fathers saw not yea against the which perhaps they consent Hath any man living read all the Fathers nay have all the men living read them nay can they shew them can they get them I had almost said can they name them In the exposition of those words Tu es Petrus supra hanc petram almost every one of the Fathers at least the most part of them and the best expound it of Peters faith yet the Papists understand it non de fide sed de persona Petri. Here they dis-agree themselves from the Fathers John 10. 16. by the title of one Shepheard Augustine Chrysostome Jerome Cyrill Theodoret Theophylact Euthimius Rupertus Cyprian and other Fathers agree that Christ is there designed but Stapleton saith the Pope is there meant In the division of the Law they goe cleane contrary to the greatest part of the Fathers For they divide the Commandements as we doe but the Papists make the two first one and the tenth two 2. They have no Father to countenance them in this but Augustine There were no writings of the Fathers for a time many of them wrote 400 yeares after Christ but some 500 and 600 yeares after Christ what rule had they before that time of interpreting
Scriptures The Fathers were given too much to allegorizing Cajetane therefore in the Preface of his Commentaries upon the Books of Moses saith that the exposition of the Scripture is not tied by God to the sense of the Fathers therefore he admonisheth his readers not to take it ill if he somtime dissent from the stream of the Fathers 4. The doctrine of the Church must be examined by the Scriptures Act. 17. 11. If Pauls doctrine much more may the decrees of the Pope Church Councels be examined by the Scriptures 5. The interpretation of the Scripture is a gift freely given by God for the edification of the Church Rom. 12. 6. 1 Cor. 12. 10. therefore it is not tied to a certaine kinde of men but common to the faithfull 6. The faithfull are commanded diligently to try and examine every doctrine 1 Thess. 5. 21. 1 John 4. 1. which cannot be altogether done without interpretation 3. What meanes must be used in the interpretation of Scripture The end of the Scripture we heard was to direct the Church to all saving truth The meanes to be used for the attaining of that end by the Minister is diligent Study and humble Prayer by the people attentive reading hearing Prayer and meditating First the teachers must Pray earnestly to God for his spirit to inlighten them Matth. 7. 7. 8 9. Rom. 15. The Scriptures are understood by that spirit that dictated them Secondly The Pastors and teachers of the Church must diligently and painefully study the Scriptures giving themselves to read compare place with place John 5. 39. search the Scriptures it is a metaphore taken from such as search for Gold and Silver Oare in the earth who will search and sift and breake every clod to finde out the Gold Salomon useth the same metaphore Prov. 2. 4. and to this diligence in searching doth the Apostle exhort Timothy 1 Tim. 4. 13. This diligence is often exprest in Scripture in the old Testament by the phrase of meditating in the word Josh. 1. 8. Psal. 1. 2. Thirdly they must labour for a competent knowledge in the originall tongues the Hebrew and Greek in which the Scripture was written that so they may consult with the Hebrew Text in the old and the Greeke in the new Testament and see with their owne not anothers eyes 4. They should likewise be expert in all the liberall Arts especially in Grammer Logicke Rhetoricke generall Philosophy and History All the Treasures of wisedome and knowledge are hid in the Scriptures the treasures of naturall Philosophy in Genesis of Morall Philosophie in Exodus Deuteronomy and Ecclesiastes of the Politicks in the Judicials of Moses and the Proverbs of Solomon of Poetry in the Psalms of History in the Books of Chronicles Judges and Kings the Mathematickes in the dimensions of the Arke of the Temple of the Metaphysicks in the Books of the Prophets and Apocalyps 5. They must consider 1. The severall words 2. The Phrases In the severall words they must consider 1. Whether the word be taken properly or tropically and that they may the better understand the words an inspection 1. Of Lexicons is needfull some of which observed the order of the Alphabet but so as they distinguished betweene the roots and the Derivatives as Pagnine hath done for the Hebrew and Stephanus for the Greek The best Lexicons for understanding the Hebrew Text are Buxtorfe Avenarius Forster Schindler Mercer on Pagnine and Brixianus his arca Noae for the Greeke are Stephanus Budaeus Scapula my owne two I hope may be usefull for understanding both Testaments 2. Of Concordances some much extoll Buxtorfe for the Hebrew Kirchers is a very usefull one both for the Hebrew and the Septuagint Stephanus for the Greeke is the best Cottons Concordance as it is now inlarged by Newman is esteemed the best for the English See Dr. Featlies and Dr. Gouges Prefaces to it commending it and shewing the use of Concordances in generall They must 1. Consider the Text exactly in it selfe the Grammer of it must be sifted the nature of every word by it self and the alteration it admits in diversity of construction 2. The Rhetoricke whether any word leaving the proper signification receiveth a borrowed 3. Above all the Logicke as to know what he proveth and by what 2. Compare paralell places and obscurer with plainer To interprete that place this is my body make use of that other The Bread which we breake is the Communion of the body of Christ because both places are not onely concerning the Eucharist but also one and the same kind 3. Make use of Paraphrases and versions among which the Chaldee and the Septuagint for the Old Testament the Syriacke and the Arabicke for the new excell For the knowledge of the phrase they must proceed the same way and to understand the better both the words and phrases they must diligently consider of the scope and circumstances of the place as the coherence of that which went before with that which followes after and of the matter whereof it doth intreat All expositions ought to agree with the Analogie of faith Rom. 12. 6. Analogie is eitherof faith comprehended in the Doctrine of the Creed L. P. Command Sac. and gathered out of evident places of Scripture or of the Text by the coherence of antecedentia consequentia by the propriety of the phrase 6. The Jewish expositors the Ancient Fathers and other Interpreters Ancient and Moderne Popish and Protestant are usefull for the right understanding of the Scripture if they be read with judgement Not many but a few and those the best commentaries are to be consulted with of the Hebrew Interpretes and Rabbins two were most learned R. David Kimbi and Rabbi Aben Ezra saith Dr. Rainolds The pure Masters of the Hebrewes saith Mayerus in Philologia Sacra are specially Maymonides Rabbi David Kimchi wise Aben Ezra Rabbi Salomon Jarchi although the last two much favour Talmudicall dreames The Cabalists and many of the Rabbines are very fabulous and men in a burning fever cannot dreame of things more ridiculous then some of the Rabbines have seriously written and taught saith Muis against Morinus Vide Spanhem Dub. Evangel parte tertia Dub. 21. Dub 129. Glass Philol. Sac l. 2. partem primam Tract 1. Thalmud liber fabulosissimus Chamier Abarbanel hath done well of the greatest part of the Old Testament Scriptor famosissimus saith Buxtorfe of him in Decalogo Yet he was unknowne it seemes to Mercer and Drusius for neither of them mention him The Jewes say of Rabbi Moses Ben-Maymon that from Moses to Moses there arose not such a Moses He was the first of the Rabbines that ceased to doat Maimonides antiquus celeberrimus inter Judaeos Scriptor Capellus de Literis Ebr. Mr. Gregory stiles him the very learned Maimon The Church of God is much beholding to the Hebrew Rabbines being great helps unto us for understanding
holy Scripture in many places as well of the New Testament as the Old 2. The Fathers Doctores scil probati antiquae ecclesiae qui scriptis suis fidem illustrarunt as Voetius speakes For the Fathers Jerome among the Latines and Origen among the Greekes were learned in the Hebrew saith Chamier Jerome was the chiefest among them for skill in the Hebrew Chaldee Greeke Latine tongue and the most diligent searcher of the Jewish affaires he spared no labour cost nor time that he might attaine to skill in that tongue He made use of the Jewes for that purpose and the skilfullest amongst them Whose labour he purchased with a great deale of Money this he often witnesseth of himselfe 5 times saith Morinus he made use of them That one labour of his deserveth eternall praise that he translated the Scripture out of the Hebrew into Latine That was a most laborious worke of Origens in gathering together divers Editions of Scripture 1. The Greeke of Aquila Symmachus the Septuagint and Theodosion into one Volume distinguisht by 4 Columnes called Tetrapla to which he after added 2 more one in Hebrew the other in Greeke Characters and called it his Hexapla at last he joyned two other Editions and then called it Octapla by them one might have compared the severall Greeke Editions together and with the Hebrew Text. It was said of him Vbi benè nemo melius Vbi malè nemo pejus Quod attinet ad Originem mea certè nihil interest quid ille senserit quem scio Theologum fuisse audaciorem quam saniorem Chamierus Salmasius Whitaker Sixtus Senensis and others say Origen was skilfull in the Hebrew He wrote so many Books that Jerome saith Quis nostrum tanta potest legere quanta ille conscripsit Vir tantae fuit eruditionis in genij ut ei parem doctissima Graecia faelicissimâ—rum ingeniorum parens nunquam habuerit Sixtus Senensis Bibliothecae sanctae l. quarto He saith much more there in his commendation Tantum in scripturas divinas habuerit studium ut etiam Haebraeam linguam contra aetatis gentisque suae naturam edisceret Hieronymus de viris illustribus Austen for the Latine Church and Golden-mouth'd Chrysosostome for the Greek Church were most famous He is abridged by Theophylact. A Father so Ancient so learned so godly so skilfull in the Scriptures saith Rainolds of Chrysâ—stome Austen for disputations Jerome for the tongues Gregory for Morals Augustine Vir supra omnes qui ante eum post eum huc usque fuerunt mortales admirabili ingenij acumine praeditus omnibus liberalibus disciplinis instructus Divinis scripturis longè omnium eruditissimus in earum explanatione ultra quam dici queat incomparabili subtilitate sublimis omnes Latinae ecclesiae scriptores scribendi labore lucubrationum multitudine superavit Sixtus Senensis Biblioth Sanct. lib. quarto Subtilissimus Patâ—um Augustinus Dr. Prideaux lectione quarta Gregory Nazianzene for his excellencie in divine knowledge was sirnamed the Divine Irenaeus saith Capellus was almost the ancientest of all the Fathers whose genuine writings are extant He was Polycarpus his Disciple Tertullian was one of the Latine Fathers most Ancient and very neere the Apostles flourishing in the raigne of Severus the Emperour about 200 yeares after Christs Birth and not past one hundred after the death of John the Evangelist Jerome being urged with his authority said De Tertulliano nihil aliud respondâ—o quamecclesiae hominem illum non fuisse In Graecia celebres agnosco Patres Clementem Athanasium Cyrillum Damascenum Montacutius Analect Eccles. exercit 1. Sect. 6. Cyprian the Martyr was of great authority amongst all for his holinesse of life He was so diligent a reader of Tertullian that he intermitted no day but would call to have his Master meaning Tertullian given him Doctor Hall cals Lactantius the Christian Cicero Jerome cals him eloquentiae Tullianae Flievium Epist. ad Paul tom 1. and Mr. Selden de Dis Syris cals him Politissimum Patrum Sententious Tertullian grave Cyprian resolute Hierome * flowing Chrysostome divine Ambrose devout Bernard heavenly Augustine Bish. Hals 4th Decade of Epist. Epist. third One saith he that looks upon the Fathers works would think they did nothing but write he that looks on their devotions would thinke they did nothing but pray he that lookes on their learning would think they did nothing but read Bernard was a worthy man in the corrupt age in which he lived but Bernardus non vidit omnia say the Papists Bernardum non admitto ut pote recentiorem longè post confirmatam Romani Pontificis tyrannidem scribentem ex more errore sui temporis Chamierus de Canone l. 3. c. 3. c. 5. Dandâ— venia bonis illis sanctis patribus qui ignorantia linguarum multae saepe aliena à germana scriptura senserunt pia alioquin attulerunt 3. For Protestant Interpreters Calvin is not onely commended by our own writers but by the very Papists See Watson in his Quodlibets I would content my selfe among the new writers with Mr. Calvin who performeth best of all other that which he of himselfe professeth that a man in reading his expositions reapeth this benefit that for the shortnesse he useth he departeth not farre from the Text it selfe Cartw. letter to Mr. Hildersham Piscator hath done well in his Scholia on all the Bible He follows Junius for the Old Testament and Beza for the New and in his Aphorismes he follows Calvins Institutions Bucer also was an excellent Divine He hath written a twofold Exposition on all the Psalmes one more large and Paraphrasticall the other briefer and ad verbum Francis Junius the very Oracle of Textuall and Scholasticall Divinity as Dr. Hall cals him Epist. 7. Deead 1. Vatablus his Annotations upon the Old Testament and Bezas on the New are commended by Zanchie in his Miscellanies But Arnoldus Boot in his Jndex Autorum before his Animadversiones Sacrae saith Robert Stephens and not Vatablus was the Authour of those Scholia which are in Vatablus his Bible Quid hac phrasi denotetur optimè exposuit D. Beza suis in novum Testamentum nunquam satis laudatis notis Constantin L' Empereur in Dan. c. 2 v. 8. See more of him in Zanchies Epistles Amania Paulus Fagius Drusius Ludovicus Capellus Livelie Cameron Ludoviâ—us de Dieu have beene Great lights and by their skill in the tongues have excellently interpreted Scripture Peter Martyr Lavater Musculus Zanchie Pareus Rollock Rivet are sound Expositors Ex omnibus antiquis recentioribus medullam variarum interpretationum circa eos disceptationem collegit Willetus in hexaplis ad Genesin Exodum Leviticum Danielem Epistolam ad Romanos in libros Samuelis sibi dissimilis est compendio atque alia plane methodo commentatur optandum esset telam illam à Willeto tam faeliciter câ—â—ptam eadem methodo in
reliquos Scripturae libros pertâ—xi Voet. Biblioth Theol. l. 1. c. 14. 4. For Popish Expositors Aquinas is esteemed by the Papists as the Oracle of the Romish Schoole whom for his profound learning and search into the mysteries of all Divinity they sirnamed Angelicall He was the first thorow Papist of name that ever wrote and with his rare gifts of wit learning and industry did set out Popery * most Maximo altissimo ingenio vir cui ad plenam absolutamque totius tam divinae quam humanae eruditionis gloriam solus defuit linguarum eloquentiae usus quem aeruditi istius saeculi ut pote sublimioribus studijs intenti neglexere Sixtus Senensis vide plara ibid. Luther on 9 of Genesis chiefely commends Lyra for following the literall sense Nicolaus Lyranus vir tanta tamque pura vera germana sacrae Scripturae scientia praeditus ut in illa exponendâ— nullum habeat illius temporis parem Rainoldus de lib. Apoc tomâ— 1. praelect 21. Ex antiquioribus tanquam universales communes commentatores habiti fuerunt Lyrasnus Glossa Voetius in Biblioth Theol. Jansenius eruditus moderatus Interpres Cajetane went over all the Scripture saving the Canticles and Prophets which dying he left begun and the Revelation quam de industria attingere noluit He was both a learned moderate Papist as Chamier and Whitaker both shew He was chiefely intent on the literall sense and that according to the Hebrew truth of which tongue he had little knowledge but had by him those that were skil'd in the Hebrew who would interprete ad verbum not onely exactly but superstitiously and often absurdly which often drew the like expositions from the Cardinall There are now 5 Papiâ—s joyned together in severall Volumes on the whole Scripture Immanuell Sa Estius Gagneius Tirinus and Menochius the last of which Grotius commends in his Preface to his Annotations on the Old Testament Estius doth excellently on all the Epistles Maldonate doth well on the Evangelists but was a most supercilious writer and no marvell since he was for his Country a Spaniard and his profession a Jesuite Masius hath written learnedly on Joshua Quanta vir ille linguae Graecae sed preaesertim Hebraeâ—cae Rabbinicae Syriacae cognitione fuerit imbutus nemini docto opinor incognitum Morinus l. 1. exercitat 9. c. 6. and exercit 1. c. 4. Andreaeas Masius linguae Hebraicae Syriacae peritissimus atque in lectione Rabbinica egregiè exeroitatus The Popish Postils are the burden of many Camels as Lipsius speakes of the Bookes of the Law and are fitly sâ—iled by godly Divines pigrorum pulvinaria Vide Zepperi Artem Habendi Audiendi conciones sacras l. 1. c. 4 p. 38 39. c. Ministers to all the meanes formerly mentioned for the interpreting of Scripture must adde a conscionable practise of what they know and must in all humblenesse of minde seeke the peoples edification The meanes to be used by the people to understand the Scripture and find out the sence and meaning of it 1. If they be learned they may make use of most of the former meanes prescribed to Ministers 2. Such as are unskilfull and know not how to make use of those meanes are 1. Diligently to read the Scripture in which are to be considered 1. Antecedent preparation that they come to the reading and studie of the Scriptures with Prayers and greatest reverence relying on the Divine promises for the inlightening of their minds by the Holy Ghost The Scripture may well be called the Revelation of Christ. Rev. 1. 1. See Rev. 5. 5. 2. The adjuncts of reading which are 1. Chiefest attention in reading and a pious disposition and spirituall frame of the heart that they may not understand onely but cordially affect what they understand 2. Application of all things to the Examination Correction and amendment of their own lives 3. Diligent Meditation 4. Conferring of it with others and Catechizing 2 They ought to have recourse to those that are more skilfull then themselves and to consult with the best Commentaries and Expositions of the Scripture and read them judiciously We teach of our Meanes that they all together doe make a perfect way whereby we may finde the right sense of the Scripture Our Adversaries prescribe this method and course to be taken in expounding of Scripture which consists in 4 rules The generall practise of the Church the Consonant interpretation of the Fathers the decrees of generall Councels lastly the rule of faith consisting partly of the Scriptures partly of traditions unwritten In all these meanes the Pope is implicitely understood for the rule of faith is that which the Pope approves the practise of the Church is that which the Pope observes the interpretation of the Fathers is that which the Pope follows the determination of Councels what the Pope confirmes so that the Pope must interprete all Scripture But divers reasons may be alleaged to shew that the true interpretation of Scripture is not to be sought for from the Popes of Rome 1. Because the Popes of Rome have frequently and grossely erred in interpreting of Scripture as in the 8th of the Romanes 8. v. those that are in the flesh cannot please God that is those that are married said Siricius the Pope Innocent so expounded those words John 6. unlesse you eate the flesh of the Sonne of man and drinke his bloud you shall have no life in you that he thence concluded that there is no salvation without receiving the Eucharist and that it is to be given to Infants Pope Boniface interpreted Luke 22. 38. of the temporall and spirituall sword delivered to the Pope 2. Because the Popes of Rome doe differ among themselves in Interpreting of Scripture as Matth. 16. 18. Some Popâ—â— say rightly that by the Rock Christ or the confession of faith given by Peter concerning Christ is meant others interprete it of the person of Peter the Apostle others expound it to be the Romane Seat or Chaire 3. Because many of the Popes of Rome have not onely erred but been grosse wicked Hereticks Liberius the Pope about the yeare 350 was an Arrian and subscribed to the unjust condemnation of Athanasius and afterward as an obstinate Hereticke was deposed Honorius the first was a Monothelite he held that Christ had but one will and so but one nature and for this heresie was condemned in 3. Generall Councels Some Popes were Atheists as Leo the tenth who called the Gospell fabulam de Christo. One cals the Pope that great Heteroclite in religion another saith The Pope is the worst of Cardinals who are the worst of Priests who are the worst of Papists who are the worst of Christians For Councâ—ls Gregory the Pope did reverence the 4 first generall Councels as the 4 Evangelists But if these foure generall Councels be of equall authority with the
foure Evangelists the Popes authority as Papists say being above the authority of the Councels it followeth that his authority is greater then the Evangelists then which what can be more blasphemously spoken We say the true interpretation of Scripture is not to be sought from generall Councels 1. Because even universall Councels have erred the Chalcedonian Councell one of the 4 so much magnified by Pope Gregory in rashly preferring the Constantinopolitane Church before that of Alexandria and Antioch Those that condemned Christ were then the universall visible Church Matth 26. 65. John 11. 47. See Act. 4. 18. 2. Generall councels have beene opposite one to another that of Constance to the other of Basill whereof one setteth downe that Councels could erre and so also the Pope and that a Councell was above the Pope the other affirmeth the quite contrary 3. There were no Generall Councels after the Apostles for 300 yeares till the first Councell of Nice when yet the Church had the true sence of the Scriptures 4. The generall Councels interpreted Scripture by Scripture as Athanasius and Ambrose teach concerning the first Councell of Nice 5. Because they cannot be so easily celebrated to declare any doubtfull sense of Scripture They have expounded but few places of Scripture neither is it likely the Pope will assemble them to expound the rest The Papists say that the Scripture ought to be expounded by the rule of faith and therefore not by Scripture onely But the rule of faith and Scripture is all one As the Scriptures are not of man but of the Spirit so their interpretation is not by man but of the Spirit likewise Let Councels Fathers Churches give their sense of the Scripture it 's private if it be not the sense and interpretation of the Spirit Let a private man give the true sense of the Scripture it 's not private because it 's Divine the sense of the Holy Ghost and private in 2 Pet. 1. 20. is not opposed to publike but to Divine and the words are to be read no Scripture is of a mans own interpretation that is private contrary to Divine The word is interpreted aright by declaring 1. The order 2. The summne or scope 3. The sense of the words which is done by framing a Rhetoricall and Logicall Analysis of the Text. In giving the sense three Rules are of principall use and necessity to be observed 1. The literall and largest sense of any words in Scripture must not be imbraced farther when our cleaving thereunto would breed some dis-agreement and contrariety between the present Scripture and some other Text or place else shall we change the Scripture into a Nose of wax 2. In case of such appearing dis-agreement the Holy Ghost leads us by the hand to seek out some distinction restriction limitation or figure for the reconcilement thereof and one of these will always fit the purpose for Gods word must alwayes bring perfect truth it cannot fight against it selfe 3. Such figurative sense limitation restriction or distinction must be sought out as the word of God affordeth either in the present place or some other and chiefely those that seeme to differ with the present Text being duly compared together The end of the first Booke THE SECOND BOOKE CHAPTER 1. OF GOD. HAving handled the Scripture which is principium Cognoscendi in Divinity I now proceed to Treate of God who is principium essendi or thus the Scripture is the rule of Divinity God and his workes are the matter or parts of Divinity This Doctrine is 1. Necessary 1. Because man was made for that end that he might rightly acknowledge and worship God love and honour him 2. It is the end of all divine Revelation John 5. 39. 3. To be Ignorant of God is a great misery being alienated from the life of God through the Ignorance that is in them 2. Profitable Our welfare and happinesse consists in the knowledge of God Jer. 9. 23. John 17. 3. the knowledge of God in the life to come is called the Beatificall vision 3. Difficult God being infinite and our understanding finite betwixt which two there is no proportion who knowes the things of God save the spirit of God A created understanding can no more comprehend God then a Viall-glasse can containe the waters of the Sea His wisdome is unsearchable Rom. 11. Job 11. 7. and 26. 13. Euclide answered very fitly to one asking many things concerning the Gods Coetera quidem nescio illud scio quod odêre curiosos Simonides being injoyned by Hiero to tell him what was God required a dayes time to be given him before he answered and at the end of that two when they were expired foure still doubling his time for inquiry till at the last being by Hiero asked a reason of his delayes he told him plainely that by how much the more he thought of God by so much the more he apprehended the impossibility of declaring what he was We know God per viam eminentiae negationis causationis 1. All perfections which we apprehend must be ascribed unto God and that after a more excellent manner then can be apprehended as that he is in himselfe by himselfe and of himselfe that he is one true good and holy 2. We must remove from him all imperfections whatsoever he is Simple Eternall Infinite Unchangeable 3. He is the Supream cause of all There is a threefold knowledge of God 1. An implanted knowledge which is in every mans conscience a naturall ingraffed principle about God O anima naturaliter Christiana said Tertullian 2. An acquired knowledge by the Creatures Psal. 19. 1. That is the great Booke in evey page whereof we may behold the Diety Praesentemque refert quaelibet herba Deum 3. Revealed knowledge of faith spoken of Heb. 11. 6. and this is onely sufficient to Salvation The Heathens had the knowledge of God in a confused manner Rom. 1. 19. 21. and 2. 14. a practicall knowledge 15. v. which shew the worke of the Law written in their hearts not the gracious writing promised in the Covenant the light of nature is not sufficient to bring man to Salvation onely in Judah is God known 76. Psal. 1. 2. and 147. 19. See Iâ—hn 14. 6. and 11. 27. Ephes. 2. 11. 12. The Heathen might know Gods nature and attributes that he was the Creator of the world that by his providence he did preserve and rule all things but they could not by the most industrious use of all natures helpes attaine unto any the least knowledge of God as he is mans Redeemer in Christ they knew not the truth as it is Jesus Ephes. 4. 21. In God we will consider 1. His Nature 2. His workes In his nature two things are considerable 1. That he is 2. What he is That God is is the most manifest cleare evident ungainsayable truth in the world It is the first verity
7. For there are â—hree that beare record in Heaven the Father the Word and the Holy Ghost The Arrians wiped this place out of many bookes 2 Cor. 13. 14. The grace of the Lord Jesus Christ and the love of God and the communion of the holy Ghost be with you all The Arrians Samosatenians Sabellians Photinians and others deny the Trinity of persons in one essence of God Servetus a Spaniard was burnt at Geneva in Calvins time he denied that Christ was Gods Sonne till Mary bore him Servetus Trinitatem idolum item Cerberum Tricipitem vocabat See Mr Cbeynels rise of Socinianisme ch 1. p. 6. Socinus cals him Deum tripersonatum ridiculum humanae curiositatis inventum Infaustus Socinus omnium haereticorum audacissimus saith Rivet See Cheynels rise of Socinianisme Chap. 3. That the Father is God is confessed by all and it is manifest from Scripture we are directed to pray to him The Apostle saith Grace to you and peace from God our Father Philem. v. 3. That Christ is God is proved 1 By cleare Texts of Scripture affirming this truth in so many words The Prophet foretelling of him saith this in his name by which you shall call him Jehovah or the Lord our righteousnesse Jerem. 23. 6. and the mighty God Esay 9. 6. Paul saith Rom 9. 5. who is God over all blessed for ever and St John saith 1 John 5. 20. This is very God and St Paul saith 1 Tim. 3. 16. Great is the mystery of Godlinesse God manifested in the flesh and accordingly Thomas made his confession John 20. 28. My Lord and my God which title he accepteth and praiseth Thomas for believing and that he could not have done without extreame impiety had he not been God 2 By evident reasons drawn from the Scripture He hath the Name Titles Workes essentiall Attributes and worship of God ascribed unto him in Scripture 1 Divine Names and Titles are given to Christ He is the onely blessed Potentate 1 Tim. 6. 15. The King of Kings Revel 1. 5. and Lord of Lords Apoc. 17. 14. 19. 16. He is called the Image of the invisible God Col. 1. 25. the brightnesse of his glory Heb. 1. 3. the word and wisdome of the Father Prov. 8. 12. 9. 1. He is called the Word because he is so often spoken of and promised in the Scripture and is in a manner the whole subject of the Scripture he is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 cum articulo John 1. 1. Acts 20. 28. 1 Tim. 3. 16. the great God Titus 2. 13. the true God 1 John 5. 20. God over all or blessed above all Rom. 9. 5. the most high Luke 1. 76. and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by which name the Septuagint have expressed Jehovah the proper name of God alone John 20. 28. My Lord Jude 4. the onely Lord Acts 10. 36. the Lord of all 1 Cor. 15. 48. the Lord from Heaven 1 Cor. 2. 8. the Lord of glory 1 Cor. 2. 8. the Lord of Heaven and Earth Matth. 28. 18. These Titles are too high and excellent to be given unto any meere man whatsoever God therefore who wil not have his glory given to another would never have given these Titles to another if he were not God 2 The workes of God even the principall and most eminent of all which are proper to the Lord onely are ascribed to Christ. 1. The worke of Creation even of creating all things John 1. 3. and Col 1. 16. He for whom and by whom all things were created is very God for Christ and by him all things were created therefore he is very God 2 The worke of preservation and government is attributed to him also he is before all things and by him all things consist Heb. 1. 2. He who upholds all things by his powerfull word is God so doth Christ therefore he is God 3 The working of Divine miracles raising up the dead by his own power is given to him John 6. 54. and John 5. 21. He that can quicken and raise the dead is God so doth Christ therefore he is God 4 Redeeming of mankind Luke 1. 68. Matth. 20 28. Eph. 1. 7. Rev. 1. 5. 5 Sending of the Holy Ghost John 21. 22. 14. 16. and of Angels is ascribed to him Matth. 13. 41. Revel 1. 1. He forgives sinnes Marke 9. 2 5. He gives eternall life 3 The principall and incommunicable attributes of God are given to him 1 Omniscience John 2. 24 25. He knew all men and he knew what was in them John 21. 17. Lord thou knowest all things 2 Omnipotency Rev. 1. 8. Phil. 3. 21. 3 Eternity John 17. 5. Revel 1. 18. John 1. 1. Esay 9. 6. He is called the everlasting Father 4 Omnipresence Matth. 18. 20. 5 Unchangeablenesse Heb. 1. 11 13. 13. 8. He that is Omniscient Omnipotent Eternall Omnipresent Unchangeable equall to the Father in Majesty and glory Phil. 2. 16. is God so is Christ therefore he is God Laâ—â—ly worship due to God is ascribed to him Heb. 1. 6. Let all the Angels of God worship him Revel 5. 13. the Lambe that is Christ hath the same worship tendred to him that the Father hath We are commanded to call upon his name to believe and trust in him John 14. 1. 3. 16. 6. 39. to hope in him Esay 11. 10. we are baptized in his name Matth. 28. 19. Acts 8. 16. and sweare by him Rom. 9. 1. Ob. Christ is called God of God and light of light Sol. Christ as God is from himself but if the Deity of Christ be considered as in the person of the Sonne so it is from the Father The Sonne in respect of his essence is from none in respect of the manner of subsistence he is from the Father Ob. Matth. 19. 17. Christ denieth that he was good because he was not God Sol. Christ applieth himselfe to him to whom he spake now he called Christ good in no other sence then he would have done any other Prophet and in this sense Christ rebuked him for calling him good Ob. John 17. 3. God the Father is called the onely true God Sol. Some referre both these to God himselfe and Christ but others give a generall rule that the word alone is not opposed to the other persons but to the creatures and feigned Gods and so John 8. 9 the woman is not excluded but her accusers the added expressions shew him to be God because it is life eternall to know him as well as the Father Ob. Ephes. 4. 6. Sol. The word Father is not there used relatively or personally for the first person in the Trinity but essentially as Mal. 2. is there not one Father of us all and so he is God called Father in regard of his workes ad extrâ—i Ob. John 14. 28. My Father is greater then I. Sol. As he was man onely or mediator the Father was greater then
he but as he was God that is true John 10. 38. I and my Faher are one not in union of will as John 17. 21. but in unity of nature See Phil. 2. 6. Ob. Prov. 8. 22. Arrius objected this place Sol. This place much puzled the Fathers for want of skill in the originall Tongue it is in the Hebrew possessed me in the beginning not created me in the beginning See Verse 25. Ob. Col. 1. 15. Christ is called the first-borne of every creature therefore he is a creature Sol. It is a figurative speech Christ had the preheminence over the creatures was Lord over them as the first-borne An Arrian executed at Norwich for blasphemy against Christ in the daies of Q. Elizabeth being moved to repent that Christ might pardon him replied to this effect and is that God of yours so mercifull indeed as to pardon so readily those that blaspheme him then I renounce and defie him The Socinians deny Christ to be God and oppose his merits and satisfaction unto God for our sinnes they hold Christ is God salvo meliori judicio or prout mihi videtur till they can examine it better Many Heretickes denyed the Godhead of Christ as Ebion Cerintbus Arrius the Jewes also and Mahometans some denying him to be God others saying that he was not absolutely God but inferiour to him He is God not by office nor by favour nor by similitude nor in a figure as sometimes Angels and Magistrates are called Gods but by natuâ—e he is equall and coessentiall with his Father there is one Godhead common to all the three persons the Father the Sonne and the Spirit and therefore it is said Phil. 2. 6. that He was in the the forme of God and thought it no robbery to be equall with God Loâ—anequality to God the Father ascribed to him he is not God in any secondery or inferiour manner but is in the very forme of God equall to him the Godhead of all the three Persons being one and the same To beate down Arrius his hereâ—â—e the first Councell of Nice was called the Nicene Creed made The difference between the Councell of Nice and Arrius was but in a Letter whether Christ was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 1. like in essence or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 coessentiall to the Father The Arrian hereticke presseth Austin to shew where the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is read in Scripture Austin asketh what is Homoousion Consubstantiall but I and my Father are one See of Arrius his heresie and end Heilius Geog. p. 725. 3 That the holy Ghost is also God is proved by the same arguments 1 The names and titles of God are given to him 1 Cor. 3. 16. Acts 5 3 4. Compare Acts 1. 16. with Acts 4. 24. Numb 12. 6. with 2 Pet. 1. 21. He is called the Spirit of Glory 1 Pet. 4. 14. 2 Divine Attributes are given to the Holy Ghost 1 Omniscienâ—e he knoweth all things 1 Cor. 2. 10 11. John 14. 26. 2 Omnipresence Psalm 139. 7. Rom. 8. 9. John 14. 26. 3 Omnipotency Heb. 3. 7. 4 Eternity Heb. 9. 14. 3 The workes of the true God are given to the Holy Ghost 1 Creation Job 26. 13. Psalm 33. 6. 2 Preservation and sustentation of all things created is attributed to the holy Ghost Gen. 1. 2. Zach. 4. 6. 3 Redemption 1 Cor. 2. 10. 4 The power of working miracles is ascribed to the holy Ghost Matth. 12. 28. Acts 2. 4. Rom. 15. 19. the resurrection of the flesh is ascribed also to the Holy Ghost Rom. 8. 11. 5 Distributing of graces according to his pleasure 1 Cor. 12. 4. 11. instructing of the Prophets 2 Pet. 1. 21. governing of the Church and making Apostles Acts 13. 2. 20. 28. 4 Divine honour and worship is given to him Apoc. 2. 29. we are baptized in his Name as well as in the Name of the Father and Sonne Matth. 28. 19. we are commanded to believe in him and call upon him Blasphemy against the holy Ghost shall never be forgiven Matth. 12. 31. therefore he is no lesse religiously to be worshipped then the Father and the Sonne In the first Constantinopolitane Councell assembled against Macedonius who denied the Divinity of the holy Ghost there were 150 Bishops The communion and distinction of these three persons is to be considered 1 Their communion the same numericall essence is common to the three in one God or of one essence there are thre persons by reason of which community of Deity all the three persons remain together and are coeternall delight to themselves Prov. 8. 22. 30. John 14. 10. 2. The Persons differ 1. From the Essence not really as things and things but modally as manners from the things whereof they are manners as degrees of heat from heat and light from light 2 They differ amongst themselves as degrees from degrees as relations in a subject from other relations in the same as for example if three degrees should remaine distinctly in the same heate this is a distinction not of degree state or dignity since all the Persons are equall but in other respects and it is either Internall or Externall Internall is threefold 1 In order the Father is the first person from himselfe not from another both in respect of his Essence and person The Sonne is the second Person from his Father in respect of his Person and filiation existing by eternall generation after an ineffable manner and is so called God of God by reason of his Essence he is God himselfe The holy Ghost is the third Person proceeding or flowing coeternally from the Father and the Sonne in respect of his person by reason of his Essence God of himselfe with the Father and Sonne 2 In the personall property unchangeable and incommunicable which is called personality and it is 1 Of the Father paternity and to beget in respect of the Sonne to send out or breath in respect of the holy Ghost 2 Of the Sonne generation or to be begotten of the Father Psal. 2. 7. Heb. 1. 5. John 3. 16. 5. 18. 1 John 4. 9. Absque ulla essentiae temporis gloriae imparitate Chamier In this generation we must note 1 That the begetter and begotten are together in time 2 He that begets communicates to him that is begotten not a part of his Essence but the whole Essence that which is begotten is within not without the begetter In respect of this generation the Sonne is called the Word of the Father John 1. 1. not a vanishing but an essential word because he is begotten of the Father as the word from the mind He is called the Word of God both internall and conceived that is the Divine understanding reflected upon it selfe from eternity or Gods knowledge of himselfe so also he is the inward wisdome of God Prov. 8. because God knowes himselfe as the first and most worthy object of contemplation and externall
or uttered which hath revealed the councels of God to men especially the elect that we may know the Father by the Sonne as it were by an Image John 1. 18. so also he is the externall wisdome instructing us us concerning the will and wisdome of the Father to salvation 1 Cor. 1. 21. and v. 30. 3 The Property of the Sonne in respect of the Holy Ghost is to send him out Iâ—hn 15 26. Hence arose the Schisme between the Westerne and the Easterne Churches they affirming the procession from the Father and the Sonne these from the Father alone To deny the procession of the holy Ghost from the Sonne is a grievous errour in Divinity and would have grated the foundation if the Greeke Church had so denied the procession of the Holy Ghost from the Sonne as that they they had made an inequality between the Persons But since their forme of speech is that the Holy Ghost proceedeth from the Father by the Sonne and is the Spirit of the Sonne without making any difference in the consubstantiality of the Persons it is a true though an erroneous Church in this particular divers learned men thinke that à Filio per Filium in the sense of the Greeke Church was but a question in modo loquendi in manner of speech and not fundamentall 3 The personall propriety of the holy Ghost is called procession or emanation John 15. 26. neither hath the word defined nor the Church known a formall difference between this procession and generation The third internall difference among the Persons is in the number for they are three subsisting truly distinctly and per se distinguished by their relations and properties for they are internall workes and different and incommunicably proper to every person There follows an externall distinction in respect of effects and operations which the persons exercise about externall objects namely the creatures for though the outward works are undivided in respect of the Essence yet in respect of the manner and determination all the persons in their manner and order concur to such workes As the manner is of existing so of working in the persons The Father is the originall and principle of action works from himselfe by the Sonne as by his Image and wisdome and by the holy Ghost But he is said to worke by his Sonne not as an instrumentall but as a principall cause distinguished in a certaine manner from himselfe as the Artificer workes by an Image of his worke framed in his mind which Image or Idea is not in the instrumentall cause of the worke but his hand To the Sonne is given the dispensation and administration of the action from the Father by the holy Ghost 1 Cor. 8. 6. John 1. 3. 5. 19. To the holy Ghost is given the consummation of the action which he effects from the Father and the Sonne Job 26. 13. 1 Cor. 12. 11. The effects or workes which are distinctly given to the Persons are Creation ascribed to the Father Redemption to the Sonne Sanctification to the holy Ghost all which things are done by the Persons equally and inseparably in respect of the effect it selfe but distinctly in respect of the manner of working The equality of the Persons may be proved 1. by the worke of Creation joyntly Psalm 33. 6. severally for the Father those places prove it 1 Cor. 8. 6. Heb. 1. 2. the Sonne John 1. 3 10. Col. 1. 16. the holy Ghost Job 33. 4. 2 By the worke of Redemption the Father sends and gives the Son the Son is sent and given by him the holy Ghost perfects the worke of conception and incarnation Luke 1. 35. 3 By the worke of Sanctification the Father sanctifieth John 17. 17. Jude v. 1. the Son Ephes. 5. 26. the holy Ghost 2 Thess. 2. 13. 1 Pet. 1. 2. 4 By the worship of religious adoration The Father is religiously adored often in the Scripture Ephes. 1. 17. the Sonne Acts 7. 59. Heb. 1. 6. the holy Ghost Acts 28. 25 26. Rom. 9. 1. This is a wonderfull mystery rather to be adored and admired then inquired into yet every one is bound to know it with an apprehensive knowledge though not with a comprehensive No man can be saved without the knowledge of the Father he hath not the Father who denieth the Sonne and he receives not the Holy Ghost who knowes him not John 14. 17. 2 We must worship the Unity in Trinity and Trinity in Unity as it is in Athanasius Creed We must worship God as one in substance and three in Persons as if Thomas John and Matthew had one singular soule and body common to them all and entirely possessed of every one we were baptized in the Name of Father Sonne and Holy Ghost 3 We should praise God for revealing this mystery to us in his word and be assured that what he promiseth or threatens shall be accomplished being confirmed by three witnesses The end of the Second Booke A Treatise of Divinitie The third Booke CHAP. I. Of Gods Workes HAving spoken of the Scripture and God the Workes of God in the next place are to bee handled which some make two the Decree and the Execution of the Decree others three Decree Creation Providence The Works of God whereby he moves himselfe to his Creatures are three Decree Creation Providence not three individually for so they are innumerable but in the species and kindes of things The Workes of God are 1. Before time or eternall his Decree 2. In time 1. Past Creation of all things 2. Present Gubernation and Susteâ—tation Government and Preservation Or thus Gods Workes are 1. Internall which are in the very will of God from eternity and they are called the Decrees of God by which God determined from eternitie what he would doe in time We follow the received Phrase of Divines when we call the Decrees the works of God and speake of God after our capacity Therefore we call Decrees of God his Works because the Decrees of man are Works or Actions from man and really distinct from his understanding and will by which we conceive the Decrees of God or rather God decreeing 2. Externall Creation and Providence 1. Of Gods Decree Decree is a speech taken from the affaires of men especially Princes in the determination of causes between parties at variance whose sentence is called a Decree or secondly it is a resolution of things consulted of either negatively or affirmatively according to the latter use of the Phrase it is applyed to God Esay 46. 10. Decretum in the Latine is indifferent to signifie either in the Abstract Gods Decree or in the Concrete a thing decreed Gods Absolute Decree is that whereby the Lord according to the Counsell of his owne Will hath determined with himselfe what he will doe command or forbid permit or hinder together with the circumstances of the same Acts 2. 23. and 4. 28. Luke 22. 22. John 7. 30. Or
our election sure by our calling Rom. 8. 29 30. and our effectuall calling by two things 1. by a new light 2. a new life 2 Cor. 4. 5. 1 Pet. 2. 9. John 12. 36. Ephes. 5. 8. We have a new knowledge wrought in us of our selves we see our miserie by sin and our inability to help our selves Rom. 2. 23. 2 of God God in Jesus Christ is discovered to us 2 Pet. 1. 3. We see our need of Christ and know him to be a mediatour who must reconcile God and us 2. a new life is wrought in us Ephes. 2. 1. We now die to sin and live to God 1. By faith Rev. 17. 14. These three are put together faithfull chosen and called 2. By new obedience CHAP. II. 2. The Execution of Gods Decree GOD executes his Decree by Actions Creation and Providence Gods workes are in time 1. Past Creation of all things 2. Present Governement and preservation Creation is taken 1. Strictly when God makes any Creature of nothing meerly of nothing not as if nothing were the matter but the terme so the souls of men and Angels are created of nothing 2. Largely when of some prejasent matter but very unfit and indisposed a creature is made as Adam of the earth Creation is the action of God whereby out of nothing he brought forth nature it selfe and all things in nature both substances and accidents in and with the substances and finished them in the space of sixe dayes both to his owne glory and the salvation of the Elect. Or it is an action whereby God the Father by his word and holy Spirit made all things exceeding good for the glory of his name Or thus Creation is a transient or externall action of God whereby in the beginning He made the world by a meere command out of his owne free will in sixe dayes space to the glory of his name 1. An action not a motion or change motion argueth some succession but in the things created the fieri factum esse is all one nor is it a change because that supposeth some alteration in the Agent 2. Transient it passeth from the Agent to the thing created whereas in immanent actions as Gods will decrees and personall actions they abide in himselfe 3. Of God The efficient cause of Creation is God the Father Son and Holy Ghost Creation is the proper worke of God alone so that He is God which created the world and he created the world who is God Jer. 10. 11. It is without controversie that the worke of creation agrees to God the Father the same is expressely given to the Sonne John 1 3. Col. 1. 16. and to the Holy Ghost also Psal. 33. 6. 4. In the beginning By the Scripture it is a matter of faith to hold that the world was not from all eternity in the beginning that notes not that there was time first and then God created the world for time is a creature and concreated but it denotes orde that is at first 5. The world that is the Heaven and Earth and all things contained in them Acts 4. 4. and 17. 24. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that well ordered decent beautifull and comely frame of heaven and earth 6. By his meere command as appeares Gen. 1. Let there be light let there be heavens wâ—ich argues his omnipotencie 7. Out of his owne free will for God did not need the world and therefore he created it no sooner 8. The finall cause to the glorie of his name Rom. 2. 20. Three Attrbiutes especially manifest themselves in this work of Creation Gods power wisedome goodnesse his power in that he made all thingâ— by a word and of nothing his wisedome is seene in the order and exceeding wonderfull and particular uses all creatures have his goodnesse in that he would communicate being to the creatures He needed not the world but was happie enough in himselfe without men or Angels The worke of Creation say some set out generally in a generall proposition In the beginning God created the Heavens and the Earth Which proposition He after explains by its parts That the world was not from eternity but was made by God these arguments may perswade First and principally Faith Heb. 11. 3. which is grounded upon divers places of Scripture as the first and second chapters of Genesis 38 and 39 chapters of Job and some Psalmes almost whole as 104. and 136. this also is the first Article of our Creede that the world was created in time by God The Apostle Paul Acts 14. 15. and 17. 24. doth point out God to the Heathen by this worke above others Secondly and probably the light of nature shining in these reasons 1. The originall of Nations laid downe by Moses Gen. 10. and else where which could not be fained by him since some memorie of them was then extant among many which yet in progresse of time was extinguished 2. The beginning of Arts the first inventers whereof are known and in what time they flourished for it is not probable that so many ages before mankind lived without arts and that in these last times they were all both invented perfected 3. The newnesse of all Heathenish histories the ancientest of which tell of nothing before Noah's flood or the beginning of the Assyrian Empire under Ninus The holy history it selfe is only of 4000. yeares or thereabout which neverthelesse iâ— the greatest monument of antiquity Now it would be a most unworthy reproach and contumelie cast upon all those men who had lived so many infinite ages agoe to say that they were so ignorant that they could not or so sloathfull that they would not deliver in writing what was done in their times 4. The decay of mans bodie and age which from a great strength quantity bignesse and time of life is now come down to a narrow scantling which if had decreased so alwais in infinite ages it would by this time have been brought almost to nothing The certaine series and order of causes and impossibility of their proceeding in infinitum for it must needs be that there should be one first which is the universall cause but first it is not unlesse it be one nor one except it be God 6. As a thing is so it workes but God doth not depend upon another in his being therefore neither in working doth he require a pre-existent matter 7. Art presupposeth nature and nature matter but God in working is a more excellent cause then art or nature therefore presupposeth nothing in working 8. The first cause viz. God is infinite therefore he can do whatsoever implyeth not a contradiction but the Creation of things in time implyeth it not 9. Whatsoever perisheth hath a beginning the world doth perish because all its parts decay and are subject to corruption therefore the whole The Angels and soules of men are changeable by nature as appears by the
tertic Vide Gerhardi loc-commun de magistratu Zanchius tomâ— secundâ— Miscellin Cap. de Magistratu Aâ—â—tius hath written the Hâ—story of Valmitius Gentilis put to death at Berne There was a Statute against Lollards in England and Hugonots in France Haeretitus egoâ—â—â—tion tu mihi See the Statute 10. ot Q Eliz. c. t. Propriè Heretici vocantur qui ea pertinaciter rejiciunt quae in Satris Scripturu docentur Dav. de judice controver Haeresis est error pugnans cum fundamento religionis Christianae isque pertinax Alâ—ingius Tomo secundo Problem Theol. parâ—e 2. Prob. 14. * Lib. 3. of the Church c. 3. See Dr Prideaux his sermon on â— Coâ— 11. 19. Errours are practicall or doctrinall onely fundamentall or circa-fundamentall or neither of the two * Arrius in Alexandria una scintilla suit Sed quoniam non statim oppressus est totum orbem ejus flamma populata est Aquinas a See M. Clarkes Sermons on Matth. 8. 13. and M. Cranfords Haereseomachia on 2 Tim. 2. 17. b Vbi supra Cum agitaretur de ista quaestione An morte mulctandi cogendi haeretici in Synodo quadam Londini perrogarentur singuloruÌ„ sententiae surrexit quidam senex Theologus atque hoc planum esse asserit ex ipso Apostolo Haereticum hominem post unam aut alteram admonitionem devita De vita inquit ergo manifestum est haereticos istos homines post unam aut alteram admonitionem è vita tollendos Eras. Annotat. in Tit. 3. Rom. 13. 4. * Magistrates in the Scripture in thâ— Hebrew are called Masters of restraint Qui non vetat peecare cum potest jubet Seneca * Mr. Hildersham on Psalm â—1 As all blasphemous Hereticks Levit. 24. 16. so seducing Hâ—reticks are to be put to deâ—th The whole 13 Chapter of Deutrâ—nomy is spent about the seducing of false Prophets Are not Moses morall Lawes of perpetuall equity and therefore to be observed in all ages Is blasphemy more tolerable in the new Testamenâ— Mr. Cotton on 16 of Rev. third Viall We are not obliged saith Beza to the Judiciall Laws as they were given by Moses to one people yet so far we are bound to observe them as they comprehend that generall equity which ought to prevaile every where 1. That there is Divinity Rom. 1. 18â—19 20. 2 14 15. * Omne bonum est sui diffusivuÌ„ ergo maximè bonum est maximâ— sui diffusivum Vt se habet simile ad simâ—le ita se habet magis ad magis Locus topicus 2. What Divinity is Theology if thou looke after the etymology of the word is a speech of God aâ—d he is commonly called a Theologer or Divine who knoweth or professeth the knowledge of Divine things Peter du Moulin Lâ—â—tanius de ira Dei 2. What Divinity is Titus 1. 1. 1 Tim. 6. 3. Col. 1. 5. 2 Tim. 2. 18. Theologia est doctrina de deo ac rebus divinis Divinity is the knowledge of God Theologia est scientia vâ—l sapientiâ— rerum divinarum divinitus râ—velata ad Dei gloriam rationalium Creaturarum salutem Walaeus in loc Commun De genere Theologiae est quaestio quod idem ab omnibus non assignatur Nam illis arridet scientia aliis sapientia aliis prudentia Litem hanc dirimere nostri non est instituti etsi verè scientem verè 〈◊〉 vere prudentem cum judicamus quâ— verus sincerus est Theologus Wendeliâ—â—s Christ. Theol. â— 1. c. 1. 3. How Divinity is to be taught 1 Discenda est Theolegia imprimis texâ—u alu 2. Systematica seu dâ—gmatica 3 elenâ—tica problematica Veâ—tiuâ— Biblioth Theol. l. 1. c. 6. How Divinity is to bee learned Job 28. 1. 2. Mat. 7. 7. John 20. 21. * Hoc scrutari temeritas credere pietas nosse vita Beru Deut. 29. 29. Rom. 12. 3. 6 7. 2 Tim. 2. 23 Mat. 11. 25. * 2 Prov. 2. 8. 4 5. 8. 17. 33. 5. The opposites of Divinity 6 The Excellency of divinity a Paul cals it the excellency of the knowledge of Christ Phil 3. 8. Ps. 40. 8. Christ is the principall subject of the whole Bible being the end of the Law and the substance of the Gospel M. Perkins Quicquid est in suo genere singulare et eximium id Divinum b Agreeable to which is the French proveâ—â— Ministre nè doit scavoir que sa Bible a Minister must know nothing but his Bible * Ps. 12. â— Mahomet would have had others believe that he learned the Doctrine of his Alcaron from the holy ghost because he caused a pigeon to come to his Eare. Origen saith of the Devills there is no greater tormeÌ„t to them then to see men addicted to the Scriptures â—um â—om 27. in hoc eorum omnis staâ—â—â—a est in hoc uruntur incendio Of the Scripture c The Scripture is called the word of God Eph. 6â— Pet. 1. 15. The counsell of God Acts 2â— 27. The Oracles of God Râ—m 3. 2. The Law of Gâ—d Psal. 1. 2. The minde of God Prov. 1. 23. d It is called word because by it Gods wil is manifested and made known even as a man maketh known his minde and wil by his words It is also said to be the word of God in regard 1. of the Author which is God himselfe 2 Tim. 3. 16. 2. Of the matter which is Gods will Eph. â— 93. Of the end whâ—â— is Gods glory Eph. 3. 10. 4. Of the efficacy which is Gods Power Rom. 1. 6. e So it is called the Bible or Booke by an excellency t is the onely Book As f August de civit dei l. 15. c. 23. * The principall Author of all Scriptures is God the Father in his Son by the holy Ghost Hos. 8. 12. 2 Pet. 1. God the Authour of the Sâ—riptures Inspiration whâ—t it is The Father hath revealed the Sonne confirmed and the holy Ghost sealed them up in the hearts of the faithfull * Acts 7. 50. 1 Cor. 11. 23. Exod. 4. 12. Deut. 18. 18. 2 Cor. 13. 3. John 1. 56. Heb. 1. 1. Ezech. 12. 25 28. Rom. 1. 2. Esay 58. 14â— Evangelium dicitur sermo Christi 3 Col. 16. utroque respectu Authoris materiae Davonanâ—ius * Rainoldus in Apologia Thâ—sium de sacrâ— Script Eccles. * Tria concurrunt ut hoc dogma recipiam Scripturam esse verbum Dei. Esse quosdam libros â—anonicos divinos atque â—os ipsissimos esse quos in manibus habemus Primum est Ecclesiae traditio quae id affirmat ipsos libros mihi in manum tradit secundum est ipsoruus librorum divina materia tertium est interna Spiritus efficacia Episc. Dav. de Judicâ— Controvers c. 6. What the Divine authority of the Scripture is * Formale objectum fidei generaliter absolutè conâ—iderawum est divina revelatio in tota sua amplitudine accepâ—a seu divina authorâ—tas cujuslibet
vel minimum articulum qui non disertè constet ac totidem penè dixerim verbis in Scriptura sancta adeo ut merito dici possit opus tesellatum utpote constans ex varijs locis hinc inde excerptis atque in unum collatis artificioseque compositis Chamierus 2 Thess. 2. 15. Hoc fuit primum Pharisaeorum dogma quòd negarunt omnia quae spectant ad religionem scriptâ— esse Joseph Antiq. l. 13. * Tradìtiones istae non Scriptae â—harisaeorum nurquam in N. Test. dicuntur simpliciter absolutè Traditiones sed notantur semper aliquo elâ—gio ut quum dicuntur Traditiones seniorum Traditiones humanae siquando traditionis Vox ponitur simpliciter sumitur in bonam partem ipsum Dei verbum Traditio est Cameron in Mat. 15. Ephes. 2. 20. Apoc. 21. 24. Ephes. 41. 4. Christ taxeth the ignorance of Scripture commends the knowledge of it was carefull to fulfill the Scripture did interprete it gave ability to understand it * Deut. â— 2. 12. ult a Locus est egregiâ—s eoque nastri omnes utuntur qui contra Papisticas Traditiâ—nes aliquid scrâ—bunt Whitakerus longè illustrissimus locus est Chamierus b Nobis adversus Papistas non de quibusviâ— traditionibus controversia est sed duntaxat de traditionibus dogmatum quibus continentur fides mores â—oc est de ipsa Doctrina Chamierus l. 9. de Canone c. 1. * Vir ob ingenium laboremve ob Episcopatus dignitatem inter Papistas non postremi nominis Chamierus vide Malodanat ad Joan 16. 12. Estium ad Rom. 16. 17. Received from Christ himselfe teaching the Apostles Illud erat explicandum quâ— discrimine istae Traditiones tam multiplices graduque habendae sunt Nullum discrimen faciunt forsâ—n ergo volunt Ecclesiasticas etiam Traditiones parem cum divinis Scripturis Authoritatem habere Whitakerus de Scrip c. 3 quaest 6. Traditionum 〈◊〉 perniciosa est hac â—emul aperâ—a nihil est quâ—d non iâ—de â—â—umpat in Ecclesiam Chamierus 1 Chron. 1. 18. Luke 3. 36. Eorum mihi videtur sententia sanior qui negant vel è Lxx veâ—à Luca nomen Cainani fuisse insertum existimaâ—tes potius aliunde irrepsisse post â—vangelium à Lucà conscriptum cujus suae conjecturae rationes habent non lâ—ves in videre est apud Corneliam â Lapidein cap. 11. Geneseos Rivet Isag. ad Script Saâ— c. 10. vide pluâ—a ibid. l. 4 de verbo Dei c quarto Vix ullum vidâ—as de Traditionibus agentem qui non hic magnâ— fastu immoretur Chamierus Distingâ—â—nda sunt tempora personae non erant necessariae Scripturae ante legem ergo ne quidem post legem non erant necessariae Apostolis ergo ne nobis quidem negatur consequentia Ratio est quia aliter Israelitas doceri voluiâ— post legem Deus aliter aâ—te legem Aliter Christus Evangelium voluit Apostolis revelari aliter nobis praedicari Chamierus John â— 2â— Jansenius affirmat haec multa non fuisse diversa ab illis quae hactenus docuerat sed illustriorem illorum explicaâ—ionem hue adducit illud appositè quod habetur 1 Cor. 3. Christus testatur sè discipâ—lis suâ—s omnia tradidisse Joan. 15. 15 nihil ergo tacuit Hic locus omniâ—â—â— celebâ—â—rimus est Papistisque nostris inter primos in delicâ—js Chamierus 2 Tim. 3. 15 16. Luke 16. 29. 31. Act. 17. 3. What the trâ—dition was he preached is expressed 2 Thess. 3. 6. 1 Cor. 2. 2 Doctor â—ulke against Marâ—â—a in his Preface * Papistae maximi qui uâ—quam fueâ—irt Traditionarij Chamierus Syrus interpreâ— habet praecepta sive mandâ—ta Cartw. Annotat. on the Rhem. Test. Hic Achilles est Papistarum mag no fastu oftentatus ab omnibus singulâ—â— qui versantur in hac coâ—â—oversia Chamierus de Canone l. 9. c. 8. * Cicumcisio faeminarum continetur sub illa masculorum Signum in soliâ— masculis erat pro utrisque tamen faciebat si sinem usum ejus spectes Mariae perpetua virginitas non est fidei aâ—ticulâ—s ideò libenter amplectimur eam sententiam quae jam ab initio inter Christianos videtur invaluisse ut virgo fuâ—rit hoc est pura à coitu viri non tantum in toto Christi generationis mysterio quod sanè ut credamus necesse est sed etiam toto deinceps vitae tempore Châ—mierus de canone l. 9. c. 9. * Quam pertinacâ—â—r ludebat Helvidâ—us in primâ—genito Mariae fratribus Christi â— ut negaret perpetuam virginitatem Chamierus * Augustinus dicit nihil ad sidem necessarium obscurè in Scripturis doceri quin idem â—pertioribus locis aliâ—â— exâ—â—iceâ—ur * Verbum Dei coâ—latum cum lace analâ—gia multâ—plex Lucis est d spellere tenebras omnia manifestare aliâ—â— lucere noâ— sibi luce nihil puâ—ius illustrius gratius utilius faecundius caeâ—stis ejus oâ—igâ— odio habâ—tur saeped malis est bâ—num Commune plurium penetrat sordes sine inquinamento Spanhemius Dab Evangel parte tâ—rtia Dub. 94. Scriptura se 〈◊〉 profâ—etur tum formaliter tum effectivè lumiâ—â—sam illuminantem I. l. ibid. Esay 59. 21. Jer. 32 40. and 31 31. * Difficultas aut à rerum ipsarum natura est quae percipiuntur aut ab ipsis percipientibus aut ab ijs quae intercurrunt media Reâ— quae percipiâ—ntur natura sua intellectu difficiles sunt aut per obsâ—uritatem ut res futurae aut per majestatem ipsarum ut mysterium S. Trinitatis Sic quid Solâ— clarius quid difficilius aspectu nam hebâ—scit acies 〈◊〉 nostrorum vi râ—â—liorum â—llius A perciprientibus difficultatem esse quis sanus neget nam res quae sunt Spiritus homo naturalis non potâ—st capere Aâ—edijs quae Deus ipse ecclesiae obtulit id est à Scriptura negamus difficultatem esse lunius The fundamentals in Scripture are plaine to the Elect who are all taught of God so much as is necessary for their salvation John 6. 45. the least as well as the gâ—eatest In the first times of the Church there were no commentaries upon the Scriptures the Fathers read them without and yet then the Scriptuâ—es were nnderstood Origen who lived 200 years after Christ was the first that wrote any Commentary upon Scripture The pure Text of Scripture was ever read to the people and never any Commentaries and yet was understood by them Apoc. 1. 3. * Solet obscuritas lectores absterreve quo modo ajunt olim quendam dixisse Authorem obscurâ—m à se remâ—ventem Tu non vis intelligineque ego te intelligere a Especially in Genesis Job Canticles Ezeck Daniel and the Revelation In regard of the manner of writing there are many obstruse phrases in Scriptures as divers Hebraismes which peâ—haps weâ—e familiar to the Jewes but are obscure to us b The â—0 Chap.
especialy Camierus de Canone l. 15. c. 4. Plato Aristotle Euclid have their nodos and the Scriptures have their 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 2 Pet. 3. 16. in them are darke sayings Psalme 78. 2. Riddles Ezek 17. 2. Parables Mâ—t. 13. 35. Mysteriâ—s Mat. 4. 13. Mr. Greenhill That is a very difficult place 1. Cor. 3. 15. See Laurentius Augustin saith thisis one of the places of which Peter speaketh 2 Pet. 3. 16. and that Heb. 6. 4. 1 Pet. 3. 19. the last Luther saith is one of the obscurest places in the new Testament Vide Tarnovium in exercitat Bib. Cameronis Myroth Evang. * See Laurentius and D. Featly on the place in the last large Annotations on the Bible Augustinus de Doctrina Christina lib. 2. c. Sexto Ita Scriptuâ—as dicit a Deo temperatas ut locis apâ—â—tiâ—ribus faâ—â—i 〈…〉 fastiâ—ia deâ—er geâ—eâ—tur Idem Augustinus ait nos aperâ—s Scripturae locis pasâ—i obscuris exerâ—eri Apoâ— 5. 1. 4 65. M. Burroughs on â—6 of Isaiah v. 10. Bellarm. l. 3. de verbo Dei c. 1. Psal. 19. 9. 119. 115. 2 Pet. 1. 19. c Genebraâ—dus testatur aliquâ—s de tota Scriptura locum interpretari nec lâ—quitur de nostris sed aut suis aut antiquis Hieronymus quidem a partè est â—jus opinionis Lyranus alii â—ulti Whitakerus M. Durant Dr. Halls peace-maker sect 15. Ob. Sol. 8 Act. 31. * There was a time when the Scriptures were read without Commentaries and there was a time when they were hardly understood with Commentaries Dr. Ames Cartwrights Letter to Mr. Hildersham for the Study of Divinity * The interpretation of the Scripture is necessary in the Church of God 1 because it is commanded by Christ John 5. 39. 1 Cor. 4. 1. 39. 2. It is commended to the faithfull by the Holy Ghost 1 Thess. 5. 19. 20. 3. Iâ— conduceth much to the edification of the Church 1 Cor. 14. 3. 4 It was used by Christ and his Apostles Luke 4. 16. and 24. 27. Marke 4. 34. * Glassius Phil. Sac. l. a parte 1ª Tract 1 Literalis * sensus est is queâ— Sp. Sanctus autor Scripture intendit Chamierus Râ—inoldus de lib. Apoc. Est ille literalis sensus qui proximè per ipsa verba sive propria sive figurata sunt sign ficatur velut Glassius quem intendit proximè Spiritus Sanctus Amâ—ma * Sensus secundarius diversus à literâ—li similiâ— tamen Chamier Not the Letter but the right sense and meaning of the Scripture is Gods word John 19. Litera gesta docet quid creâ—as allegoria Moralis quid agas quo tendas anagogia * In Manuali Controvers c. 1. de Script quaest 3. * Origenes sio Paradiâ—â—â—n terâ—â—strem allego rizat ut historiae auâ—erat veritatem dum pro arboriâ—us Angelos prostâ— minibus viâ—â—utes Caelestes 〈◊〉 ruâ—â—icas pelliceas Adae Evae corpora humana interpretatur Bellarminus ex Hieronymo Concedit Bellarminus ex solo literall sensu peâ—i posse argumenta efficacia To prove any matter of faith or manner no sense must be taken but the literall sense Aquinas * Chamierus tomo 1â— de Scripturae sensu l. 15. c. 3. * Confundunt Pontificij sensum scripturae cum applicatione sâ—nsu accommodatione ejus ad usus Apostolicos 2 Tim. 3 16. dum vel cum literali mystico sensus alios iâ—troducunt vel mysticum subdividunt in allâ—goricum tropologicum anagogicum totidem diversos sensus in Scriptura dari contendunt confundendo heterogenâ— sensum applicationem sensus Spâ—nhem Dub. Evang parte tertia Dub. 66. Theologia Symbolica non est argumentativa This is good reasoning the Oxes mouth muh not be muxled ergo the Minister must be maintained because it is part of the sense The Fathers were too much addicted to Allegories Jerome sometimes went out of the way through a likeing of Allegories as a great reader and follower of Origen who handled the Scriptures too licentiously Rainolds against Hâ—rt Sess. 4. * Judicium est triplex 1 Directionâ—â— quale habet Minister 2 lurisdictionâ—â— quale habet ecclesia 3 Discretionis quale habet privatus ut Act. 17. 10. Dr. Prid. There is Judex Supremus and judex Ministerialâ—s visibilis but not supremus and judicium practicâ— discretionâ—â— which is left to every one B. Downam Primo Non sequitur à lege ad Evangelium Secundo non sequitur â— Mose ad Episcopum Romanum qui hic non eundem lorum tenet inter Christianos quem Moses inter Judaeos Chamierus * Hieronymus in locum aâ—t Etsi plures verbum Dei doceant unus tamen est illius doctrinae author nempe Deus ubi Manichaeos refellit qui unum statuerunt authorem veteris Testament alterum verò novi Alij Spiritum volunt esse hunc unum Pastorem ut Vatabâ—us Alij Christum ut Mercerus Papam nulli praeterquam â—nsulsi Papistae Whitakeâ—us Interpretes omnes de Deo expoâ—â—uerunt cum veteres tum recentes etiam Papistae Chamiâ—ruâ— * Cap significast de Elect. Review of the Councell of Trent l. c. 8. p. 45. * Deum atque homines testamur cum plurima nobis in Papisâ—o displiceant â—um hoc omnino intolerandum videri quod Scripturas quilibet apud eas doc â—or culas ita sibi in manum â—radiâ—as arbitretur ut eas sursum deâ—rsum versare queat quid libet inde conâ—ecturus suo arbitrio suo in quam arbitriâ— suo marte quidlibet excogitans commâ—ntans Ita enim evenâ—t ut qui maximè prae se ferant detestari privatum spiritum ij huâ—c ipsi indulgeant omnium maxima * Enimverò quis docuit prophetiam illam ex Psalmo 72. adorabunt â—um omnes reges terrae omnes gentes servient ei impletam essâ—â— Lâ—oâ—e â—eciâ—o Chamietus tomo 10 de Scâ—pturae interpretatione l. 16. c. 1o. vide Cameronem ad 2 Pet. 1. 20. Matth. 23. 8 9. 10. Matth. 17. 5. Soli scripturae vel spiritui in scriptura loquenti competunt requisita summi Iudicâ—â—que tria sunt 1º ut certo sciamus veram esse sententiam quam pronunciat 2. Vt ab illo ad alium judicem non liceat provâ—care 3. Vt nullo partium 〈◊〉 ducatur Wendelinus in Prolegom Christ. Theol. c. 3. * Cathedrâ—mâ—â—in câ—lo habet qui â— corda doceâ— Aug. Luke 10 21. 22 Jer. 31. 33 34. Convenit inter nos adversarios Scripturas intelligidebeâ—e â—o spiritu quo â—actae sunt id est Spiritu Sancto Bellarm. l. 3â— de verbo dei c. 3. 11. Dr. Rain against Hart. * The number of Ancient Fathers whose workes are yet extant who lived within Six and Seven hundred yeares after Christ are recorded to have beene about 200. Bishop Morâ—on of the Masse l. 7. c 6. The Fathers wrote some things 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to confute the adversaries with whom they had to deale and in these they erre sometimes