volume of Controuersies betweene the Protestants and the Papists CHAP. 1. Of the holy Scriptures The holy Scripture alone is the Iudge of all controuersies which arise in the Church and the most certaine rule of truth REASONS THE Prophet Isaie sendes vs in deciding of coÌ„trouersies of Religion to the law and to the testimonie Isai 8. 20. that is to the holy Scripture Christ in the controuersie of his person â—nd doctrine saith to the Pharisies Search â—he Scriptures c. they are they which teâ—tifie of mee Ioh. 5 39. Saint Paul greatly commendeth the holy Scriptures vnto vs saying The whole Scripture is giuen by inspiration of God and is profitable to teach to improue to correct and instruct in righteousnes that the man of God may bee absolute being made perfect vnto euery good worke 2 Timoth 3 16 17. The Citizens of Beraea iudged of Pauls Sermons opinions out of the Scriptures whether Paul taught such things as were agreeable to the holy Scriptures and are for that cause commended Act 17 11. Christ answered out of the Scriptures to the questions of the Pharisies Matthew 19 4 c. of the Sadducees Matth 22 31 c. of the perfect fulfilling of the law Luke 10. 26 27. of his diuinitie out of Psalme 110 Matthew 22 43 44. Whereas hee might haue confuted and confounded them with his miracles alone The Apostles confirmed all their assertions out of the Scriptures as did also the Euangelists Matthew speaketh often of the fulfilling of the Prophets and so decides the greatest controuersie that euer was concerning the Messias out of the writings of the Prophets So Peter also prooueth out of the holy Scripture that Iesus is the promised Messias the Sauiour of the worlde Acts 2 25 c. And Chapter 3. verse 18 c. and Chapter 4 verse 11 25 c. and Chap. 10 verse 43 Stephen fighteth against his aduersaries the Priests Pharisies Scribes with the weapons of the Scripture Acts 7. Paul in the controuersie of Religion which he had with the Iewes prouokes to the law and the writings of the Prophets Acts 24 14 and 26 22 27. The same Paul gathered the doctrine of Iustification out of the Scripture Romanes 1 2 3 4 and 10 Chapters Galath 3 and 4 Chapter and cleareth the controuersie of the person of our Sauiour out of the Scriptures Ephesians 4. Peter draweth Baptisme 1 Peter 3. 21 And other controuersed points betwixt the Iewes and the Christians out of the Scripture of the old â—estament The Epistle to the Hebrewesis wholly heerein occupied to proue the greatest controuersie of his time concerning Christ the only true high Priest out of the Scripture of the old Testament The same did likewise the ancient Fathers in the Church of God who confuted the Heretikes out of the holy Scripture and the ancient godly Counsels ouerthrew the Heretikes not by the opinions of men but by testimonies of the holy Scripture dulie waighed The Position of our Aduersaries The holy Scripture alone cannot be the Iudge of controuersies Their reasons are Because it is insufficient and containeth not all things which pertaine to faith Because it is obscure Because it is vncertaine and may be drawne either to this or that side Hence arise these questions following The first question Whether the Scripture be insufficient They affirme we denie that it is insufficient and that for these testimonies following These things are written saith Iohn that you might beleeue that Iesus is the Christ the Sonne of God and that in belieuing you might haue life through his name Ioh. 20. 31. Therefore those which belieue may attaine euerlasting life by those thinges which are left writteÌ„ in the holy Scriptures and so the Scripture is sufficient for the saluation of men Thou hast knowne the holy Scriptures of a childe saith Paul to Timothie which are able to make thee wise to saluation 2. Timothie 3. 15. All things that I haue heard of my Father haue I made knowne to you Iohn 15 15. The holy Scripture doth mâ—ke â—he man of God absolute and perfect to euery good worke 2 Timo 3 17. I kept back nothing but shewed you all the counsell of God Act 20 27. There can be moued no controuersie of Religion for which the Scripture hath not afore hand prouided a deciding or determining sentence therefore Saint Paul in the controuersie of Iustification calleth the Scripture prouident or fore-seeing Galath 3 8. Contrariwise our Aduersaries reason thus 1 The Apostles taught many things which are not written Answer 1. This is a begging of the question for this same thing is it which is denied Now a doubtfull thing ought not to bee proued by an other as doubtfull 2 The contrarie heereto is contained in the places of Scriptures before alleadged 3 The Apostles should heereby be conuinced of vnfaithfulnes as hauing kept back things necessary to saluation 4 Moreouer there is extant not one onely writing of an Apostle or Euangelist but more that that which is not contained in one may plainely be seene in other of the Apostles writings 2 I haue yet many thinges to say vnto you but you cannot beare them now Ioh. 16 12 Answer 1. It is a fallacie from that which is saide in some particular respect to the same spoken absolutely and generally in all respects for Christ speaketh of his Apostles not yet illuminated by his holy Spirit but he speaks not of them as beeing endued with the holie Ghost in the day of Pentecost That which the worde Now dooth plainely declare 2. While our Aduersaries argue from the Apostles not enlightened to the Church instructed by the writings of the Apostles there arise in the Syllogisme foure termes 3 Besides it was one manner of knowledge which the Apostles had before the day of Pentecost and an other after the receiuing of the holy Ghost therefore these different thinges ought not to bee confounded 3 Other thinges saith Saint Paul will I set in order when I come 1 Corinthians 11 34 therefore Paul did not write all things Answer Paul speakes of indifferent Ceremonies in the Church not of articles of Religion necessarie to saluation Their Argument therefore as the saying is is from the staffe to the corner 4 Manie thinges are not contained in the holy Scripture which are necessarie to faith Ans 1. This we denie it is the very thing in question therefore it is a begging of the question 2. Our Aduersaries play with the word Faith for they meane not a true and sauing faith whereof our question is but in a large sence they take the word Faith vnfitlie wrapping in the word Faith euery friuolous toy long after the Apostles time as it were yesterday obtruded vpon the Church of Christ and so from the two-fold signification of the word Faith there arise foure termes which hinder that there can be no iust conclusion 5 The Scripture saith nothing of Christs descension into hell Answere That is most false for the
thing be required but faith alone why I say is it not once so much as in one word at the least insinuated by so great and worthie Authors in so many and so serious sayings of theirs therefore faith alone doth iustifie Contrariwise Infidelity alone is the cause that sinners doe not obtaine forgiuenes of sinnes and so are condemned whereas no sinne is vnpardonable where faith is 1 He that beleeveth not is condemned alreadie because hee beleeveth not in the name of the only begotten sonne of God Ioh 3 18 2 He that obeyeth not the sonne or that * The word in the latine translatioÌ„ is incredulus that beleeueth not the originall Hâ— Apâ—â—thoÌ„ signifieth hâ— that beleeueth not or he that obeieth not how soeuer it bee taken heere it is certaine it is opposed to faith and beleeuing as appeareth by the wordes next going before beleeveth not on the sonne shall not see life but the wrath of God abideth on him Ioh 3 36 3 Except yee beleeve that I am hee yee shall die in your sinnes Ioh 8 2. 4. The holy ghost shall reproue the world of sinne as if this were the sinne by an excellencie aboue other because they beleeue not in me Ioh 16. 8 9. 5 If any man heare my words and beleeue them not c. hee hath one that iudgeth him Ioh 12. 47 48. 6. Hee that will not beleeue shall be condemned Mark 16. 16. 7 The sinne of the Iewes for which they were reiected was their vnbeliefe Rom. 11. 20. 8. Christ is to them that beleeue not a stone to stumble at and a rock of offence 1 Pet. 2 8. 9 He that beleeueth not God hath made him a lyar 1 Ioh. 5 10 10 Hee that hath not the sonne now the sonne is had by faith hath not life 1 Ioh. 5 12. 11. Without faith it is vnpossible to please God Heb 11 6 Contrariwise our Aduersaries doe argue 1 As a gift is receaued not with one finger but with the whole hand so we doe not receaue iustification by faith alone but by hope charitie together with fairh Ans Similitudes haue no force to proue a thing And yet a gift may be receiued with one finger too as for example a gold chaine may This is therefore a most fonde argument although it were sometime alleadged in a famous place and companie by a Iesuite a man of no small authoritie and account 2 We are saued by hope Rom 8 24. Therfore we are not saued by faith alone Ans 1 Paul speakes not of iustification but of the future possession of euerlasting life which in this life wee possesse in hope only and this is all he saith that we are truly blessed through faith but we doe waite for the reuelation of that our blessednesse in hope And therefore because to bee saved is in this place taken of S. Paul in one sense and of our Aduersaries in an other sense in the conclusion there arise in the argument foure termes 3 Goe and teach all nations c. not only to belieue but to obserue all things whatsoeuer I haue commanded you Math. 28. 20. Therefore faith alone sufficeth not Ans Vnto Renouation whereof Christ speaketh in the obseruing of those things hâ— Our Aduersaries make no difference betweene SanctificatioÌ„ iustification commanded it sufficeth not onely to believe but to worke is required also But as concerning iustification in the very same instruction of the Apostles Christ sayth he that shall believe and be baptized shall be saued without making mention of charitie or any other workes Marke 16 16. 4 It was not enough for the blinde man that his eies were annoynted but it was needfull Eckius that he should goe to the poole Siloam Ioh. 9 6. 7. that is faith sufficeth not but workes are required also to iustification Ans Wee may not determine of controuersed points by such Allegories as haue no ground in scriptures 5 If I had all faith so that I could remoue mountaines and had not loue I were nothing c. 1. Cor 13 2. Ans 1 Paul speaketh of the necessitie of loue or charitie not as pertaining to iustification but to vnitie and the profite of the Church It is therefore a fallacie from that which is spoken in some respect to the same taken absolutely and this saying of the Apostle is wrongfully wrested to iustification 2 Neither doth he speake of iustifying faith but of the faith of miracles Heere be therefore fiue termes in this argument 6 To you it is giuen for Christ that not onely yee should belieue in him but also suffer for his sake Philippians 1 29. Heere Paul ioyneth faith and workes together Answ 1 Heere is not anie thing meant of iustification onely the Apostle sheweth that they that belieue should beare all things patiently for Christs sake and that it is the gift of God and not of the strength or abilitie of man that they doo patiently suffer aduersitie for Christs sake 2 He speaketh that of those that be iustified which our Aduersaries expound of them that are to be iustified There are therefore fowre termes 7 Faith is effectuall or worketh by loue Gal 5 6. therefore faith alone doth not iustfie but loue or charitie together with faith An 1. There is more in the conclusion Roffensis faith ful of good workes doth justifie before it bringes forth the good workes than in the premisses For there dooth no more follow but that faith which is voide of charity is a dead faith but that charity which follloweth faith doth iustifie here is not one sillable 2 The question is not what vertues are linked or ioyned with others but what is the peculiar propertie of euerie one of it selfe Heere is therefore a fallacie in workes making manie questions for one 8 Seest thou not that the faith wrought with his workes and through the works was the faith made perfect Iames 2 22. and yee see then that of workes a man is iustified and not of faith onely Verse 24. and faith without workes is dead Ver 26 Shew me thy faith by thy workes I will shew thee my faith by my workes Verse 18. Ans 1. Hee speaketh of a dead faith which we reiect in the article of iustification also 2 The meaning is that our iustification is to bee delared before men by our workes according to that which our Sauiour sayth Let your light so shine before men that they may see your good workes c. Mat 5 16 3 works are not good vnlesse they be done by them which are iustified 9 This word Onely by faith or by faith alone is found no where in the Scripture Therfore we are not iustified by it alone Answ Exclusiue particles equiualent to the word alone are found in the holy Scripture 1. The word Grace Ephes 2 8 Rom 11. 5 6. Tit 3 7. 2 Timo 1. 9. 2 The word freely with other of the same signification Roman 3 24 charisma a gifte freely
bestowed Roma 6. 23 doron a gifte Ephe. 2 8. kecharistai Ho Theos God gaue it freely Galathians 3 18. 19. 3. The word One by the grace of one Rom 5 15 with one offering c Heb 10 14. 4 Without the Law Rom 3 21 not by the lawe Galat 2 21 3 11. 5 The exclusion of workes without works Romans 4 6. not by workes Titus 3 5 not according to our workes 2 Timo 1 9. not of your selues Ephes 2 8. Not hauing mine owne righteousnesse Philip 3. 9. going about to stablisâ— their own righteousnesse haue not c. Rom 10 3. 6 The word Imputation which is opposed vnto merites Rom 4 3 4. 6 c. 7 The forgiuenesse of sinnes and the not recompensing for them by workes Psalm 32 1 Rom 4 7. 8 Not but by the faith of Iesus Christ Gala 3 16. The force of which exclusiue what it is is plaine by the like Phrase and manner of speech Ioh. 6 44. No man commeth vnto mee except the Father drawe him and No man commeth to the Father but by Mee Ambro in Epist ad Roma ca. 3 14. August in Ps â—8 et in Ioh. tract 42. et de â—empore Ser. 68. Basil homil de Humil. Chrys in Epist ad Gal. cap 3 c. Therfore exclusiue words which exclude all things in vs from iustification but faith are fully contained in Scripture Neither can it be denied but the Fathers have vsed the word onely by faith or by faith alone 10. If iustification be ascribed to faith alone there will be made too too easie a way to eternal life Ans 1. To belieue is not so easie a thing For faith is the gift of GOD and it is not in the power of man to belieue when he will 2 We require good workes to saluation as necessarie conditions but not as causes of iustification or saluation 3 Nay the Papists do make the way to HeaueÌ„ much more easie while first they place it in the free-will of man and then expounde it that Heauen is to bee purchased with money QVESTION 5. Our Aduersaries moue vs a fift question while they seeke for themselues a starting hole affirming that by the workes of the lawe in the places before cited Paul vnderstandeth the Ceremoniall law onelie and not the morall And secondlie that the workes of the Lawe are opposed to the workes of the Gospell as if the commandements of the Gospel were diuerse from those which are contained in the ten commandements The places of the Scripture following do most manifestlie contradict this opinion The righteousnesse of the Lawe is denied vnto Abraham Rom 4 where doubtles the Ceremoniall law cannot be vnderstood for that it had then no being but the morall law is meant Paul vseth the word Works absolutely without anie restraint as Ephes 2 9. Rom 4 6. and 11 6 c. in which places the nature of the thing will not suffer the word works to bee restrained to the Ceremoniall lawe onely So in like sorte he reiected the workes of Righteousnesse Tit. 3 5. Hee convinceth the Iewes to be sinnefull by the morall lawe as before hee conuicted the GENTILES by the morall lawe written by nature in the heart of man Paul decreede the morall lawe to be the rule of good workes euen in the regenerate also Therefore he doth vnderstand not the Ceremoniall onely Wee establish the lawe sayth Paul Romans 3 31. But the Ceremoniall lawe is not established for it is abrogated by the Gospell By the lawe commeth the knowledge of sin which seeing it is a general speech appertaining as well to vs as to the Iewes it cannot be vnderstood of the Ceremoniall but of the morall law Rom 3 20. 8 I knew not sinne but by the lawe but what law was that heare some particular commandement by way of instance out of that lawe I had not knowne lust except the law c. Rom. 7. 7 but the Ceremoniall law containeth nothing concerning lust It is evident therefore that Paul doth speake principally of the morall law although hee doe sometimes adioyne the Ceremoniall law too but hee bereaueth both morall and Ceremoniall of all power to iustifie Contrariwise our Aduersaries do reason 1 Paul maketh an opposition beetweene the law of workes and the law of faith Rom 3. 27. therefore we are to accept of this distinction Answere Paul doth in that place vse the worde law in a generall signification for a doctrine And whilest he denieth iustification to the law of workes hee doth certainly denie it to works therefore this is nothing to the purpose And our Aduersaries doe not or wil not vnderstand the phrase and manner of speach of the Hebrewes whereby the word law Thorah is taken for a doctrine 2 Paul speaketh of some things that are Ceremoniall as of the Sabbaoth of the new moones of Circumcision in the Epistle to the Galatians therfore he vnderstandeth not the morall lawe Ans 1 Paul passeth sometimes from the particular to the generall and sometime from the generall to the particular that hee may make it manifest that no workes of the whole law doe iustifie a man 2. Wee haue alreadie proued that he speaketh of all parts of the law and not only of the Ceremoniall 3 In the Acts of the Apostles Chap 15 the Ceremoniall lawes only are handled Ans 1 Be it neuer so true that the Ceremoniall law is there only haÌ„dled yet we may not argue thus Iustification is denied to the Ceremoniall law therefore it is not denied to the morall Now in that place the mention was of the Ceremoniall lawe because there was expressely moued a coÌ„trouersie coÌ„cerning the keeping of ceremonies 2 And yet that that place doth not only treate of the Ceremonial law is prooued by these words which wee were neither able to beare neither our fathers amongst whom the fathers that liued before Moses without the Ceremoniall lawe may be understood but we beleeue through the grace of the Lorde Iesus Christ to be saued euen as they Act 5 10 11. In which words Saint Peter had reference to the fathers which were not able to beare the burden of the morall law so that they might perfectly satisfie and fulfill the same And Peter doth expressely oppose the grace of Iesus christ and faith in Christ to the fulfilling of the lawe that which the whole course and order of the place doth manifestly declare to be true CHAP. 11. Of Faith Question 1. IT is no marvaile that our Aduersaries doe deny iustification by faith alone seeing they doe not acknowledge faith and those which bee the necessarie conditions thereof Wherefore now let vs treat of the conditions of faith what they be wherein our aduersaries doe dissent from vs. We consider faith not as our Aduersaries doe Condition 1 as a worke vertue habite or qualitie but we vnderstand it relatiuely according to the meaning of the Scriptures as it hath respect and relation vnto Christ and iâ— grounded vpon him * that
agree in euery particular point 18. The body and bloud of Christ bee propitiatorie for our sinnes In the holy Supper there is the body and bloud of Christ therefore the Masse is propitiatorie for our sinnes Ans 1. The body and bloud of Christ is not in the sacrament saue only sacramentally and spiritually and therfore cannot be there offered 2. By the same reason it would followe that in euery place where Christ was on earth there should be a propitiatorie sacrifice The vertue and efficacie of Christs sacrifice doth at all times flow from the flesh of Christ but it was made a propitiatorie sacrifice but once and that vpon the Crosse it is offered and given in the Supper and receaved of the beleevers by faith 3. There is a changing of the predication for in the minor it is said The body and bloud are in the Sacrament in the conclusion therefore the Masse is propitiatorie Were it granted that their Masse were nothing but the Sacrament duly administred that the body of Christ were carnally there yet there would no more follow but this that in the Masse there is that which is propitiatorie for sinnes And if it be propitiatorie in bare being why needeth it to be sacrificed that it may be propitiatorie 19. The Fathers of the Church called the Eucharist by the name of a sacrifice therefore the Masse is a sacrifice Answer 1. It is a fallacie heaping vp moe questions for one for it is one question whether the Fathers called the Supper a sacrifice which is not yet sufficient for the purpose and another in what sence they called it a sacrifice whether as the Papists meane it or otherwise 2 It is a fallacie from a thing spoken but in some respect to the same taken absolutely for the Fathers called it a sacrifice in some respect onely as namely 1. because all sacred rites may be called by the common word of the olde Testament sacrificia sacrifices quasi a faciendo sacra from doing holy sacred actions 2. Because in the Supper there is a commemoration of that one onely and true sacrifice of Christ they gaue that name to the action from the more chiefe and principall respect 3 Because of praiers which were poured out in the celebration of the Supper which are called sacrifices as was before declared 4 Because of praise thanksgiving which were vsed in the celebration of the Supper and are called sacrifices in the Epistle to the Hebrewes 5. Because of their offering of first fruites and food which they called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 loue-feasts 6 Because the spirituall sacrifices faith hope charitie c are exercised stirred vp by the vle of the Supper 3 The Papists should proue that the ancient Fathers ever taught that the Masse is a propitiatorie sacrifice for the sinnes of the living and the dead but this they will never doe 20. The Church hath alwaies acknowledged the Masse for a sacrifice therefore it is a noveltie to denie the Masse to be a sacrifice Answer The Antecedent is prooved false 1 because there is no Masse in the newe Testament 2 Neither can it be shewed in the Primitiue Church as was before alleadged out of the booke of Valentinus Vannius who hath plainely proved that the Popish sacrifice of the Masse was not in the Church of Christ for the space of 600 yeares or thereabout 3 Because the chiefe thinges in the Masse are newe of late invention and were heaped together at sundry times one after another some by one Pope and some by another And such novelties are iustly reiected by vs. 21. The Masse is an application whereby that which Christ merited for vs is applied to everie man in particular Answere 1 It cannot bee said to bee any application vnlesse it bee thereunto so ordained by God Now wee haue a two-fold application onely of the merites of Christ recorded in Scripture Whereof the one is by the word and faith without any externall element and the other by the elements and rites in the Sacraments ordained thereunto But the Masse is a thing altogether different from the Lords Supper therefore it maketh nothing for the applying of Christs merite Moreover the Masse hath no testimonie from the Scripture of either of these manners of applying Neither therefore doth it applie the merite of Christ 2 And because the Masse hath no coÌ„mandement of God it may not be lawfull for men to tye the grace of God to mans inventions 22. In the Masse there is remembrance of the passion and death of Christ therefore the Masse is to be reverenced Ans 1. The remembrance of the passion death of Christ ought to bee done by the celebration of the Lords Supper which Christ ordained and instituted but not by the theatricall celebration of the Masse which was not instituted by Christ 2 The Papists striue not onely for the remembrance of the Lords death in the Supper but for a propitiatorie sacrifice as the Canon of the counsell of Trent hath it There is therefore more in the consequent than in the Antecedent 23. There are many good things contained in the Masse therefore c. Ans And there be very many idolatrous things contained in the Masse And Magick is therby made good because Magitians vse good and holy wordes for good mingled with evill doth not make that which is evill to become good but that which was good of it selfe is corrupted by the evill as when a man mingleth poison with good wine 24 The Masse is a representation of the death and passion of Christ Now seeing a representation doth worke more strongly than a bare commemoration the Masse cannot displease God Answere 1. Because a representation seemeth stronger and more forcible to men it doth not therfore seeme stronger to God also for my thoughts are not as your thoughts Isai 55 8. 2 Seeing that representation is a kinde of commemoration they which contend for a representation alone are stricken by the Pope with a curse in the Canon before cited 3 Neither doth the first Supper of Christ beare a representation in which Supper our Aduersaries themselues doe not admit of a representation 25. Luke maketh mention of the * Liturgie of the Apostles Act. 13 2. therefore the Apostles celebrated Masse Ans 1. The word Liturgie is vnderstoode of any service of God and therefore their owne vulgar Authenticall translation rendreth it ministrantibus illis and our English 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 accordingly as they ministred to the Lord. 2 Seeing the most of the thinges in the Popish Masse are new how I pray you doth the Masse sute with this allegation of the Apostles who were dead sundrie hundreds of yeares before the Popish Masse was borne 26. We reade of many miracles that were done at the Masse of the Papists therefore it is not to be reiected Answer 1. The most of those miracles are such as If those mirâ—â—les bee tâ—ue how châ—nceth it thaâ— now theâ—e bee no
Scripture saith thou wilt not leaue my soule in hell Psalm 16 10. The sorrowes of hell compassed mee about Psalm 18. But that these Psalmes speake not of Dauid but of Christ our Aduersaries themselues cannot denie seeing the former is alleaged of Saint Peter expreslie in his Sermon of Christ Acts 2 27. 6 The Scripture sayth nothing of the perpetual Virginitie of Marie of a certainty Therefore it is insufficient Ans 1. Be it neuer so much that the scripture say nothing at all of the perpetuall Virginitie of Marie yet might it not therefore be said to be insufficient to our saluation for we are not hereby saved because we believe that Marie after the birth of Christ remained a Virgin but because we believe in Christ who according to the Scripture Isai 7. 14 was borne of a Virgin 2. The perpetuall Virginitie of Marie may bee shewed by the phrase of Scripture where it sayth And hee knew her not Vntill She had brought forth The word Vntill doth note also perpetuitie as the Raven returned not vntill the waters were dried vp vpon the Earth Genesis 8. 7. which Raven yet never returned at all 7 Manie things are rightly believed although they be not contained in the Scriptures as the words Trinitie Essence Person c. Ans 1. A thing is sayd to bee contained in the Scriptures two manner of waves according to the letter and according to the sâ—nse by a good consequence Or sometimes the things onely sometimes together with the things the wordes signifying the things are expressed also So the thing of Trinitie and Persons in the Deitie the Scripture expresseth Mat 3 16 17 28 19. Althogh the very words be not coÌ„tained there 2 We are not heerby saved for that wee vse and approve these words which were invented for a more easie and plaine waye of teaching but for that we steadfastly believe the thing it self which is found in the scriptures 8 There are many bookes lost as the Epistle to the Laodiceans c. Therefore the Scripture cannot be sufficient to saluation Ans 1 There are yet remaining other bookes which are sufficient 2 S. Iohn sayth of his Gospell alone that it containeth all things necessarie to saluation Ioh 20 31 9 The Canon of the holy Scripture which is a thing necessarie to saluation is not contained in the holy Scriptures Ans 1. The Canon is a thing necessary not of it selfe but by an accident to wit because heritickes had forged certaine counterfaite bookes which if they had not done there had been no need of a Canon 2 The true Canon is the perpetuall rule of truth which is comprised in the Scripture For therfore false counterfaite bookes are not received because they contradict the Scripture and the truth neither do agree with the authenticke Canonicall bookes 3 And the Church of Christ could for 300. yeares almost discerne the true Scriptures froÌ„ the counterfaite before the Fathers had composed the Canon and catalogue of holy writte The Canon therefore is not simply necessary and is contained after a sort in the Scripture 10 Hee shall bee called a Nazarite Mat 2 23. but this is not contained in the writings of the olde Testament Ans Yes this is typically spoken of Christ in the person of Sampson Iudg 13 5. And our Aduersaries if they be well in their witts will not reiect the types of Christ set out in the olde Testament Question 2. Whether the Scripture be obscure We deny they affirme We say it is plain for these reasons The Lawe of the LORD is perfect conuerting the soule the testimonic of the Lord is sure and giveth Wisedome to the simple Psalm 19 7 Nothing of all which the Scripture could effect especially to the simple if it were obscure The commandement of the Lord is pure and giveth light to the eyes verse 8 Thy Word is a Lanterne to my feete and a Light vnto my path Psal 119 105. Wee have a most sure worde of the Prophets to the which you doe well that you take heede as vnto a light that shineth in a darke place c. 2 Pet. 1. 19. Contrariwise our Aduersaries reason thus 1 Many sayings in the Scripture are very obscure Ans 1. We may not dispute from a part to the whole saving only particularly and of meere particulars no conclusion wil follow 2. Some things be obscure in the Scripture not of themselues but accidentally and the vaile that covers the eyes of the Iewes and other infidels is the cause thereof the word 2 Co 3 15 is not the cause 3. That which is spoken more obscurely in one place is explained more clearely in an other And so by conference of places the clearenes of the Scripture appeareth 2 Saint Peter sayth that in Pauls Epistles there be some things hard to bee vnderstood 2. Pet. 3. 16. Ans 1. Some things are hard to bee vnderstood therefore not all Heere the former answere fits this obiection that is that those things which are written of Paul more briefely and some what obscurely in one place are in other places most fully explained 2. Peter layes the fault of the obscurity vpon the vnlearned and vnstable which wrest and peruert the Word of God Now nothing was ever so plainly delivered which may not bee wrested by the frowarde to a wrong sence which is apparent in the outragious dealings of Heritikes Neither yet is the Scripture for that cause to be accused of obscuritie 3. Over and besides the greek text saith not that either the Epistles of Saint Paul or the maner of his teaching which he vseth in his Epistles is obscure but only thus much it sayth that Paul doth intreate of not onely such things as are plaine and easie for everie one to conceive but that he doth not let passe in handling of things necessarie to beknoweÌ„ such things as have in them some difficultie Which to bee so the nature of the Greeke Article En Hois which cannot answere or agree with the Antecedent En autais but with peri Toutoon accordingly also as Xantes Pagninus and Arias Montanus both of them Papists and Men very skilfull in the tongues have translated this place 3 In the Scripture are handled many things most obscure and such as cannot be found out by the wit of man to reason seeme very absurde Ans 1. They be obscure absurd to the reason of the naturall man but not to faith 2 It is not all one to say obscure things are haÌ„dled in the scriptures things are handled in the scriptures obscurely For theÌ„ by the same reason euery explication of an obscuritie should be it selfe nothing else but obscurity 4 The Greeke Hebrue Phrases breed obscurity Ans 1 To them that know not the tongues they be obscure Therefore that is but accidentally 2 This inconuenience is easily remedied by the knowledge of the tongues 3 Therefore the Primitive Church had the gifts of tongues And at this day by the singular
blessing of God there are many excellent men indued with the knowledge of the tongues who do fitly properly expound the Phrases of the Scriptures 5 There be some customes of the former ages vnknowen vnto vs as that which is said 1 Cor. 15 29. of them which are baptized for dead Ans 1. Some therefore not the whole Scripture The argument therefore goes from a part to the whole 2 Those things pertaine not to faith but to some speciall Ceremonies of the Ancients which faith is never a whit the worse if it know not 6 The Scripture handleth heavenly and high matters such as our reason cannot comprehend Ans 1. By faith wee believe the heavens were made Heb 11 3. 2. The Scripture as much as may be descendeth downe and applieth it selfe to vs and our capacitie 3. Many things are simply to be believed which in this life wee know but in parte but in that which is to come wee shall know fully 7 Some things are handled mistically as the Revelation Ans 1 Such are not Articles of faith therefore wee may be ignorant of them without losse of Saluation 8 Some cannot beare strong meate Therefore in the Scripture some things are plaine and some things are not plaine Ans 1. This is an Argument from a particular to a Generall on this fashion Some things are not vnderstood of all therefore all the Scripture is to be accused of obscuritie 2. Because the weaker sort cannot beare stroÌ„g meate the faulte is not in the meate but in their weakenesse Therefore heere is the fallacie whcih Logicians call fallacia accidentis And the stronger in tracte of time may expound the obscure things to the weaker Question 3. Whether the Scripture bee vncertaine and pliable to any sense Our Aduersaries affirme wee denie it Because If the Scripture bee plyable to any side then it will follow that either God coulde not or would not speake more distinctly that his minde might bee vnderstood Neither of which can bee sayde without great blasphemy Wee have a most sure word of the Prophets not flexible and vncertaine 2 Peter 1. The Word of our God shall stand for ever Isay 40 8. But we could not rely vpon the word of God as most true most certain if the Scripture were flexible Heauen and Earth shall passe away but my word shall not passe away Luke 21 33. If wee must belieue this word then doubtlesse it must not be flexible doubtfull and mutable Contrariwise our Aduersaries reason thus 1 In expounding of the sayings of Scripture the best Interpreters the fathers of the church doe not agree therefore the Scripture may bee drawne into diuers sences and meanings Answ The Scripture is not the cause thereof which remaines alwaies the same both for Simil. As if the motion of the stars should therfore be said to varie to change for that Alphonsus Pâ—olomie haue not hit vpoÌ„ the truest motion words meaning but the cause is the weaknes of mans iudgement Whence it coÌ„meth that one vnderstands more than an other that one hath more clearenes of iudgment than an other that one is more or lesse furnished with knowledge of tongues than an other or doth lesse diligently compare places of Scripture together and waigh the things themselues by their necessary circumstances antecedents coÌ„sequents what went before what comes after so then the Scripture is not flexible but mans iudgment is diuers therfore let vs chuse the better and refuse the worse 2 But all Heretiks do alleage for themselues the Scriptures Ans I answer 1 as to the former obiection 2 That happens not by the fault of the Scripture but the fault is in Heretikes as S. Peter saith for that they wrest and offer violence to the Scriptures haling their opinions into the Scriptures 3 Vnlesse the Scripture were certaine and free from flexibilitie it could not confute any heresie therfore it is not vncertaine 3 The Copies of the bookes of Scripture might be corrupted by the Scriueners and such as copied them out or by the Iewes Answer From what may be to what is is no good argument 2 By comparing of ancient Copies as also by the Analogie of faith if any be corrupted they may be amended 3 Againe heere is the fallacie which they call fallacia accidentis wheras the Scripture seemes to be flexible and vncertaine but of it selfe it is not but by an accident to wit through some mens negligence 4 But the Hebrue Copy in many places agrees not with the translation of the seuenty Interpreters therfore it is corrupted by the Iewes Ans That disagreeing hinders not the certainty of the Scriptures for the translation of the seuentie Interpreters is not of absolute authority in the Church of God neither is to bee compared or opposed to the Hebrew Bible whereto as to the fountaine in the diuersitie of translations we must euer haue recourse And who can assure vs that that which comonly goes now a-daies vnder their name is the right translation of the seuentie wheras it may euidently be shewed that a great part of the Latine translation of the Bible is not Hieroms which notwithstanding is thrust vpon the Church of God vnder the name of S. Hierome for this the barbarousnes of the Latine translation and ignorance of the Hebrew tongue as also the diuersitie of the stile in diuers places compared together doe apparently in many places conuince CHAP. 2. VVHether the Scriptures ought to bee read of the Lay-people Our Aduersaries denie and wee affirme it for these reasons Because the Scripture dooth make a man â—bsolute perfect to euery good work Lay men haue need of it for this purpose as well â—s the Clergie 2 Timoth 3 17. The Lord commanded that the King who is a ciuill person should read in the book of the law all the daies of his life Deut. 17. The Epistles of the Apostles were written not onely to Bishops and Clergie men but to Lay men too as appeareth by the Epistle of Paul to the Galatians wherein he warneth his Hearers that they discerne betweene false and true teachers So both the former and later Epistle to the Corinthians speaketh manie things to Lay men So likewise the Epistle of S. Iohn where the Apostle saith I write vnto you litle children c. I write vnto you fathers c. I write vnto you young men I write vnto you Babes c. 1 Iohn 2 12 13 14. Peter wrieth to the Elect strangers dispersed abroad If therfore Epistles bee written to Lay men why should they not also be read of Lay men The brethren of the rich glutton were Lay-men whoÌ„ notwithstanding Abraham sendeth to Moses and the Prophets Luke 6. 29. This was fore-told by Isay They shall be all so Lay men too taught of God Isai 54 13. We haue examples hereof in the Scriptures 1 of the Eunuch who reade Isai the Prophet Act 8 28. 2 Then of the Beraeans Act
certaine precepts to the Corinthians which they did well that they obserued them 1 Corin. 11 2. Answ The same answer which was giuen to the first obiection fits this too that is that there is no sound proofe of all particulars The Papists should prooue that those Traditions proceeded from the Apostles which they bragge so fast to bee Apostolicke 5 The Fathers testifie that certaine Traditions came from the Apostles to them Answ 1. The Fathers many times by the name of Traditions vnderstand such things as are contained in the Scripture according to the sence and meaning thereof though not according to the Letter And in this sence there bee in the reason foure termes the Fathers vnderstanding Traditions contained in the Scriptures the Papists Traditions not at all there contained 2 The Fathers by Traditions Apostolick vnderstand sometimes generall customes and rites of indifference which was in the liberty of the Church to alter as occasion should require 3. If any of the Fathers haue maintained other sort of Traditions as Apostolick then the question is whether they did well in accepting such Traditions for Apostolicke which were not Apostolick neither did coÌ„sent with the holy Scripture 6 That infants should be baptized that the Eucharist should bee deliuered to women c. wee haue receiued from vnwritten Tradition onely Answ 1. The Antecedent is not true for concerning the former wee haue Scripture that Baptisme is needfull for all and that it doth belong vnto Infants Iohn 3 5. Mark 10 14 15 16. 1 Corinthians 1 16 c. 2 The Trent Catechisme proueth the Baptisme of Infants by diuers places of Scripture Part 2. cap. 2 quaest 26. As for the latter that the Eucharist belongeth to the whole Church and so vnto women wee haue Christs commandement Math 26 26 27 28. Mark 14 22 c. Luk 22 19 20. 1 Cor 11 26 27 28. 7 The obseruation of the Lords day is not found in the Scripture Ans Seeing it is acknowledged by both sides by the Papists as well as by the Protestants that to set a certaine time a part for Gods seruice is a morall and immurable law and that the Apostles left to the Church the first day of the weeke which is the Lords day in Parte tertiâ— ca. 4 quaest 4. steede of the seuenth day which the Iewes obserued as the Trent Catechisme proueth out of 1 Corint 16 2 and Reuel 1 10 We ought to acknowledge it as a precept of God grounded on the Scriptures CHAP. 5. Of the Letter and the Spirit THE Papists seeke themselues an other starting hole when as they cannot proue See Fran. Coster in his Enchiridion of CoÌ„trouersies Cap 1 of thâ— holy Scripture out of the holy Scripture many their Idolatrous and superstitious opinions to say that the Scripture is a dead and killing letter but the Spirit that is the meaning of the Scripture is contained in the liuing tables of the heart of the Church that therefore all things ought to be iudged determined not out of the Scrip but by the consent of the Church So for examples sake whereas nothing is found in the letter of the Scripture concerning the worshipping of Images that say they is to bee sought for in the hearts of the faithfull that is of the Pope Cardinalls c Wherein the holy Spirit hath written it that Images are to be worshipped As for vs we acknowledge no other Scripture wherein God doth by writing reueale his will beside the sacred bookes of the Bible and this spirituall Scripture of the Papists we reiect Because the holy Scripture described and comprised in letters deserueth this praise that it can make a man perfect therefore vnto There is one manner of Spirit in the outward Scripture another in the inward which are coÌ„trary one to another concerning the authoritie of the Scripture Note heere the Spirit of Christ and Antichrist perfection there is no neede of any other new spirituall Scripture 2 Because that spirituall Scripture which the Papists forge doth disanull the authoritie of the holy Scripture penned in paper by the instinct of the holy Ghost But the holy Ghost cannot be so contrarie to it selfe as to commend highly the Scripture by the Apostles and Prophets and to diminish the authoritie of the same by an inward Scripture 3 Because this inward Scripture is manifestly proued to bee often ontrarie to the outward Therefore the holâ— Ghost if he be the Author of both should â—â— conuicted either of falshood or inconstanie By this meanes we should it open a wide gap to all errours whiles euey man would brag of the inward writing oâ— the holy Spirit and would compare it witâ— and preferre it before the holy Scripture Besides this sauours strongly of the error of the Enthusiasts and Schweneldians on this wise This inward Scripture or writing is either mediate or immediate if mediate then the Scripture keepes his old standing to be the meanes and Rule of this inward writing if immediate then they manifestly fall into the error of the Enthusiasts but our Aduersaries accept not of the former therfore of the later All the paines which the Euangelists and Apostles did take in penning the Scriptures were bootlesse if wee should take no more heede to their writings than to such a like inward Schwenfeldian writing Contrarily our Aduersaries doe argue 1 The Letter killeth but the Spirit giueth life 2 Corin 3â— Therefore we are not to heede the Scripture wâ—tten with inke but the inward Scripture of thâ— Spirit sealed in the heart of the Church Ans 1. Tâ—â—t Paul doth not speake of any inward or oâ—tward distinction of writing but of the diference of the law and the Gospell the wâ—rdes immediatly going before A view of a Doctour like exposition proceeding froÌ„ the inward writing of the heart doe shew â—od saith S Paul hath made vs able Ministâ—rs of the new Testament not of the â—etter bâ—t of the Spirit 2 So then there are fiue terâ—es taking the word Letter in the Antecedent or former proposition according to Paules meaning for the Lawe and in the consequent or later proposition for the whole body of the holy Scripture according to the Papists meaning and vnderstanding the word Spirit in the Antecedent for the Gospell and in the consequent for Enthusiasme or immediate inspiration from God the argument therefore hangeth together like sand Now S. Paul calleth the law a killing letter because that no man can bee iustified and saued by the law but the Lawe doth rather condemne and spiritually kill But he calls the Gospell Spirit because the Gospel receiued by faith doth giue the holy Spirit which doth quicken our harts create them a new stir them vp to good workes 2 I will put my Lawe in their inward parts and write it in their harts c. Ierem 31 33. therfore the will of GOD is to bee learned not out of the outward but inward Scripture or writing
Peter also erred Galat 2 11 14. Neither could be present in all places Christ only is the head of the Church Eph. 1 22 4 15. But the Church is not a two headed monster The Heavenly Father commended onely Christ vnto vs that wee should heare him Matt 17 5. Contrariwise our Aduersaries reason 1 From a similitude A Prince that goes into an other Countrey hath neede to leave some man behinde him furnished with full and absolute power so wee must beleeve that Christ did when he was to depart from vs. Ans Heere be manie falshoods and ridiculous toyes 1 Similes doe some times illustrate but never prove 2 If it were never so true that Christ had appointed a Vicar yet it would not follow that the Pope should be hee 3 Neither is there absolute authority such as is falsely ascribed to the Pope granted to anie vicar but authoritie onely which is bounded and limited by lawes 2 It is needefull that some one watch for the whole Church Ans 1. Christ watcheth for the whole and for the parts and speciall members let everie Bishop watch amongst his Clergie 2. It is a thing impossible that anie one man should watch over and for the whole this reason therefore supposeth an impossibility 3 In the olde Testament God appointed a Vicar in deciding controversies to wit the high Priest that hee might bee a visible head in the Church Deut 17. An 1 They argue from a type the signification whereof was accomplished ended in Christ to the Pope Which maketh foure termes in the Syllogisme for the high Priest was not the type of the Pope â—ut of Christ 2 The Priest was Iudge in civill affaires between bloud and bloud c therefore from civill affaires to Ecclesiasticall no good consequence can be drawen vnlesse perhaps from the type of Christ to the Pope 4 It is needefull that there should be some Vicar of Christ to interprete coÌ„troversies which arise or fall out in the holy Scriptures Ans If this were granted to bee never so true which yet may not be granted it wold not therefore follow that the Pope should be that interpreter 2. The Holy Ghost sendeth vs back to the Scriptures which is that our firme word of the Prophets 2 Pet 1 19. 3 Wee doo not reiect anie Interpreter which shall speake according to the law and the testimonie that is which shall interprete the Scriptures according to the Analogie of faith But the Pope will never suffeâ— himselfe to be tyed to this condition 5 It is certaine there should be one and a certaine visible heade for the preseruing of the vnitie of the Church Ans 1 Christ is that heade which governeth his Church by the Ministerie of the Word and Sacraments to whom whosoever joyneth himself is made one bodie with the Church vnder one head 2 The Pope draweth vs from this vnitie whilest he sends vs away from the Scripture to the closer of his breast which doth very often crosse the holy Scripture directly 6. A Monarchie is the best state of gouernment but we must thinke that the Church is to haue the best state of gouernment therefore a Monarchie Ans 1. As concerning a visible head there â—s great difference betweene Ciuill and Ecclesiasticall gouernment And Christ himâ—elfe sheweth a very great vnlikenes between â—hem when he saith The Kings of the Genâ—iles raigne ouer them but you shall not be so Luk 22 25 26. 2 But as concerning an inâ—isible head we haue Christ the only true Monarch of his Church 7 In the Church all things ought to bee done Corinth 1. 14 40. â—â— order but all Ecclesiasticall Order is contaiâ—ed vnder the Pope Ans In the Antecedent proposition Paul â—eats not of the order of inferiour or superiâ—ur persons but of the outward order of Ceremonies which is to be obserued in the â—ssembly of the Church for comlinesse sake Such an order euery Church ought to obserue as the circumstances of time person and place shall require though they submit not themselues to the yoke of the Bishop of Rome The alleadging therfore of that saying of Paul makes nothing at all for the establishing of the Monarchie of the Bishop of Rome and so heere be foure termes in this argument Question 2. Whether Peter receiued 1 power of Dominion ouer the rest of the Apostles and 2 the dominion of faith We denie both and first we denie that Peter receiued Dominion ouer the other Apostles for these reasons Because it is no where taught in the holy Scriptures Because Peter doth no where testifie that hee receiued such power but behaued himselfe as equall to the rest in power 1. I which am a fellow-elder Consenior and witnes of the sufferings of Christ 1 Pe. 5 1. 2. Not as Lords ouer gods heritage but that yee may be ensamples to the flocke 3. Therefore he suffered himselfe to be sent of the other Apostles into Samaria with Iohn as his fellow equall Act. 8. 14. 4. He suffers himselfe to be accused for that hee had gone in vnto the Gentiles as being their equall cleareth himselfe before them Act 11. 2 3 c. 5. Hee endured himselfe to be reproued of Paul Galat 2 11 14. 6 Who is Paul who is Apollo 1 Cor 3 5 which wordes doe shew that there was no authoritie no superioritie among the Apostles one ouer another 7. When Iames and Cephas Iohn knew Note 1. Paul placeth Iameâ— in the first place 2 Hee saith not pillar but pillars 3. Hâ— calleth theÌ„ fellows of the grace of God that was giuen vnto me which are counted to be pillars they gaue to mee and to Barnabas the right hands of fellowship c Galat 2 9. Christ saith the Kings of the Gentiles raigne ouer them but yee shall not bee so Luk 22 25 26. When the Apostles stroue for superioritie Christ neuer preferred Peter but exhorted all and so Peter also to equalitie humilitie Contrariwise our Aduersaries doe reason 1. Math 10 2. Where the Apostles are reckoned vp in order Peter is said to be the first Ans There bee foure termes in the Antecedent the word first is taken for the order of counting or reckoning and in the Consequent for the order of dignitie or authoritie 2 Thou art Peter and vpon this rocke I will build my Church therefore Peter is the foundation of the Church and thereupon hath power ouer the rest Ans It is a fallacie of Composition because in the Papists argument those thinges iointly are spoken of Peter which Christ spoke distinctly and seuerally of himselfe of Peter 2 Because Christ spoke to all the Apostles vnder the person of Peter it would follow arguing as the Papists doe that euerie one of the Apostles was the Prince of the Apostles Nowe what an absurditie were this 3 Christ saith to Peter feede my sheepe c. Ioh 21 17. Therefore hee made him head of the Apostles Ans 1. Heere is the changing of an
word yee are verily my Disciples and yee shall know the truth and the truth shall make you free Ioh. 8 31 32. If they were now at length to bee freed theÌ„ were they before not free men but captiues and slaues 3. Whosoeuer committeth sinne is the seruant of sinne Ioh. 8 34. 4. I am carnall sold vnder sinne Rom 7 14. Because the Scripture bereaues vs so to speake of all aptnes or abillity to good as of our selues 1. All the imaginations of the thoughts of mans heart are only evill continually Gen 6 5. 2. The imagination of mans heart is euill euen from his youth Gen 8 21. 3. The naturall man perceaveth not the things of the Spirit of God for they are foolishnesse vnto him neither can hee know them because they are spirituallie discerned 1 Cor. 2. 14. 4. We are not sufficient of our selues to think any thing as of our selues 2 Cor. 3. 5 5. Therfore God would signifie the hardnes of our hearts by the tables of the law made of stone Iere 31 32 c. 2 Corinth 3 3 7. 6. By grace yee are saved through faith that not of yourselues Ephes 2 8. Because the Scripture ascribes to God alone what good so euer wee haue either in our vnderstanding or will 1. Our sufficiencie is of God 2 Cor. 3 5. 2. God hath quickened vs in Christ Eph. 2 5. 3 It is God that worketh in vs both the will and the deede Phil 2 13. 4 No man can come vnto me vnlesse the Father which sent me draw him Iohn 6 44. 5 Without me can yee doe nothing Iohn 15. 5. 6 So God opened the heart of Lydia Act. 16 14. Because the doctrine of our Aduersaries savours of the heresie of the Pelagians Contrariwise our Aduersaries do reason thus 1. God giveth a choise to his people of obeying or disobeying Deut. 30 19. Iosuah 24 15. therefore GOD presupposeth freedome of will Ans 1. There is more in the Conclusion than in the Premisses for it followeth not GOD offereth them choise and exhorteth them to obedience therefore they can obey of themselues 2 Had the Israelites never so much had freedome of will to good yet they were regenerated and renued by the word of God and the Sacraments Now to argue from them to men vnregenerate is no good consequent for there arise foure termes 2 God reproveth men in the Writings of the Prophets and other where for that they would not convert heare and obey c. therefore they had freewill whereby they might have converâ—ed Math 23 37 Luke 19 23. Ezech. 18 31. Iere. â— 19 c. Ans 1. There is more in the Conclusion â—han in the Premisses for it followeth not â—hey would not convert therefore they might convert of themselues 2 It is a fallacie taking that for a cause which is none for the finall cause of these legall Sermons is not to free the will but to encrease wrath that the acknowledgement of finne may follow It followeth not then The Law requireth this or that at our hands therfore we can performe it of our selues but GOD would haue vs to learne to acknowledge our owne bondage and to pray that he would create a new heart within vs and take away our stonie heart and giue vs in place thereof a heart of flesh 3. Turne vnto me and I will turne vnto you Zacha. 1 3 Heere God would haue vs to prevent him in our conuersion Answer 1. The same answere serues for this argument Simil. The debter Mat 18 is reproued for that hee payed not his debt to his Maisters therefore he was able to paie which was giuen to the former for the legall wordes of commaundement vpbraiding reproving c doe not make vs able to amend that which is reproved in vs as being amisse 2 And the meaning of this place is turne vnto me and I will looke vpon you in mercie and doe you good And what makes this for avouching of free will 3 The conuersion of man is ascribed vnto God Conuert me and I shall be conuerted for thou art the Lord my God c. Ierem 31. 18. 4. If there were no freedome of will in spirituall thinges then it would followe that God mocked men commaunding them by the preaching of his word to doe that which were impossible namely to conuert Answer If God suffered his word to bee preached without giuing of the spirit then that might follow but because God ioyneth his Spirit together with his word whereby the hearts of the hearers are opened it no way followeth that GOD dooth mocke men 5. God gaue Dauid the choise of three plagues 2 Samuel 24 12 and the residue shall choose rather death than life Ieremie 8 3 and such others Ans The freedome of this choise was about outward matters of the World to witt temporall punishments and not about spirituall things There are therefore foure termes 2. There is no controuersie betwixt â—s about outward matters 6 God sayth vnto Cain If thou doo well â—halt thou not bee accepted and if thou doest not well sinne lyeth at the doore the desire thereof shall be subiect vnto thee and thou shalt rule over it Gen. 4 7 therefore a man hath free-will Ans i There is more in the conclusion than in the Premisses for thus much onely doth follow that Cain might haue refrained from killing of his brother neither is there any mention or determination whether hee might haue done it by power of his owne or derived from some other where 2 GOD speakes of an outward thing that is the eschewing of manslaughter therefore it is nothing to the purpose 3 The latter words of the place alleadged are ill translated for Moses meaneth not any dominion over sinne that Cain should haue but over his brother Therefore the place should bee translated thus his desire shall be subiect vnto thee and thou shalt rule over him that is over Abel thy brother 7 A man may nill therefore hee may will also An From nill to will is no good consequence seeing there is not the like reason of such contraries as haue not the like cause Now to will proceedes of God as from the first cause but to nill comes from Sathan the corrupt flesh heere is a fallacie of composition and division because those thinges are ioined together as having the like reason which nature will not suffer to be ioined together for the reason aboue named 8 Thou hast done evill et potuisti and thou mightest doe it Ierem 3 5 An. 1 The same answere serueth for this Simile This man can runne into debt therefore he can pay his debts argument which was given to the former for it followeth not a man may sinne therefore hee may worke his conversion 2 It is a fallacie from that which agrees to one of it selfe to that which happeneth accidentally or from an other which is not in his power For we can sinne of our selues but wee cannot doe well but by
voluntarie but originall sinne is not voluntarie therfore c. An 1. We may not leape from one science See Chap. 13 quest 2 obiect 6. to an other which is done in this argument whiles in defining what is sinne the Aduersarie goes from Divinitie to Philosophie to fetch the definition thereof from Aristotle 2 And so here is a confusion of distinct principles and seuerall artes and a fallacie of manie questions as but of one 3 Originall sinne though it be not voluntarie in vs now in respect of the present corruption which wee draw by nature from our Parents yet it was and is voluntarie in respect of the beginning principle and cause therof Adam and all his posteritie in his loynes coÌ„mitted the first sinne of disobedience against God willingly and thence issued Originall corruption And this is sufficient even in reaâ—on and philosophie to make an action sinâ—ull For a drunken man though hee knowe â—ot what hee dooth yet if hee kill a man in â—is drunkennesse is by the Ciuill Lawes of men guiltie of murder because himselfe was the cause of his drunkennesse See more in the place of Renouation Cap 13 quest 2. QVESTION 3. Of the workes of infidels The Question is whether the good workes or vertues of infidells be so devoide of all fault that the doers thereof do deserue grace The Papists affirme they bee wee denie it for these reasons Without Faith it is vnpossible note that hee sayth it is vnpossible to please God Hebr 11 6 but infidells want faith otherwise they should not bee called infidells therefore c. Without Christ there is no saluation noâ— eternall life no favour or acceptance with God Iohn 17 2 3. Acts 4 12. Matthew 3 17. But Infidells are ignorant of Christ therâ—fore c. The end of the workes which Infidellâ— doe is not for the glorie of God but most vsually for their owne glory or couetousnes or ambition or pleasure c. 4 If the person that doth the workes be not accepted of God then neither can the workes be how glorious soeuer they bee So God had no respect to the sacrifice of Cain not because for that the sacrifice was not of it selfe good but because God hated Cain for his impietie See more heereof in the 12 Cap quest 1â— Contrariwise our aduersaries do reason thus 1 Vertuous actions in infidels are not of themselues Simil Wine that is of it selfe very good if it bee kept in a corrupt vessell becommeth so distastful that it may breed loathing or cause vomiting in them that drinke of it euill therefore they may not bee reckoned amongst sinnes An. What vertues are of themselues wee are not heere to dispute but howe they are to bee esteemed by reason of the faultinesse of them in whome they are 2 It is therefore a fallacie making moe questions where there should be but one for these two are confusedly shuffled together what vertues are in theÌ„selues what in respect of the maÌ„ in whom they be It is also a fallacie from that which is spoken in some particular respect to the same taken absolutely and simply for these actions are in the former place taken absolutely and in the later as they are considered in respect of him that doth them 2 Vertues in infidels are the gifts of God therfore they are not to be accounted for sinnes Ans 1. As they are the gifts of God so they are no sinnes but heere they are considered not as they proceede from god but as the good and holy gifts of God are polluted in corrupt instrumeÌ„ts 2. Ther are some gifts of god which sanctifie the receiver and some which doe not of these later sort are all the gifts of God in infidells 3. A good thing by abusing of it may become to be not good 3. God hath sometimes rewarded the vertues of infidels therefore they haue pleased him and haue not beene counted for sinnes Ans God hath commanded outward honestie and civility and doth bestowe temporall rewards on it but our question is not of temporall but of spirituall rewards therefore this is nothing to the purpose The Iesuites in the Article of Iustification doe expound the word Grace for a gift or habite infused into the soule of man from heauen vvherby he is moved or stirred to worke righteously and by the which his workes are accepted with God and this Grace they deuide into the first and seconde Grace or into a preventing Grace whereby a man may prepare himselfe to the grace of Iustification and a subsequent grace whereby a man is actually and habitually made iust and so they goe about to shift of by this their explication al the sayings of the scripture concerning the free instification by faith But we in the Article of Iustification acknowledge no signification of the word Grace but such as excludeth all merits of men and that for these reasons Because the word Grace in the article of iustification is opposed to Merits workes and debt 1 To him that worketh the wages is not accounted by fauour but by debt Rom 4. 4. 2 If it be of grace it is no more of workes or else grace were no more grace Rom 11. 6 3 Hee hath saued vs not according to our workes but according to his owne purpose and grace which was giuen to vs through Christ Iesus before the world was 2 Tim 1 9 4 By grace ye are saued through faith that not of your selues it is the gift of God not of workes c. Ephes 2 8 9 Because it is opposed to the law which causeth wrath we are not vnder the law but vnder grace Rom 6 14 Because the Scripture declareth the same by equivalent termes or words of the same value and signification 1 They are iustified freely by his grace Rom 3 4. 2 When the bountifulnes and loue of god our sauiour toward man appeared not by the workes of righteousnes which wee had done but according to his mercy he saued vs Tit 3 4 5 3 Let vs goe boldly to the throne of grace that we may receiue mercy Heb 4 15. Contrariwise our Aduersaries doe dispute 1 The word grace is oftentimes in the Scripture taken for the gifts of the holy Ghost as 1 Corin â—â— 4 there are Diuisiones Gratiarum diuersities of graces Ans 1 The propositions of this reason are meere particulars and therefore no conclusion followes 2. Whereas Saint Paul in that place treateth of miraculous gifts not of iustification and our question is only of iustification the argument is frivolous and not to the present purpose 3. Though wee denie not but that the worde grace is sometimes in Scripture taken figuratiuely for the free gifts of God bestowed vpon men for only we deny it to bee vsed in that signification in the article of Iustification any where in the Scripture yet neither in this place alledged is the word Charis vsed which properly signifieth grace but Charisma which signifieth a gift freely bestowed
13. 13. Therefore Charitie doth iustifie An. 1 Paul compareth loue or charity with faith not in respect of iustification but of duration and continuance Therefore this is a fallacie from that which is spoken in some respect to the same taken absolutely and in all respectes 2 Faith dooth not iustifie as it is a vertue or habit for it own worth but as it is considered respectively in respect of Christ whose merits it applyeth vnto vs and so doth iustifie vs for his sake There are therefore in this argument more than three tearmes and it hangeth together like a rope of sande 16 If iustificatioÌ„ be takeÌ„ away froÌ„ good works no man will thence forward bee mooued to doo good workes Ans 1. It is a fallacie supposing that for the cause which is not the cause for the true doctrine of iustification is not the cause why some men doe not good workes 2 Neither may we doe evill that good may come of it that is we may not falsely ascribe iustification to works that men may thereby be stirred vp to good works 3 There are notwithstanding many most waighty causes besides why we should doe good works although iustification be not ascribed vnto them Question 4. Our Aduersaries denie that wee are justified by faith alone but to faith they joine hope and charity We on the contrary side ascribe justification to faith in Christ alone for these reasons Because in the former question all works are excluded from the acte of iustification and therefore faith onely is left Romanes 3 4. and 11 Chapter and a man is not iustified but by faith Galathians 2 and 3 Chapter 2 Timoth 1 Tit 3 Psalm 32 as the remooving of all other thinges hath sufficientlie beene proued by these places in the former question Because the holy Scripture wheresoeuer it speaketh of Iustification doth so describe it that it mentioneth none either work or affection but onely faith in Christ Let vs then briefly runne over the places of the new Testament 1 The Gospell of Iohn 1. As many as receaued him to them hâ—e gaue power to bee the sonnes of God even Let our Aduersaries shewe aniething but faith alone in all these sayings of Scripture to them that beleeue in his name Iohn 1 12. 2. As Moses lift vp the serpent in the wildernes c. That whosoeuer beleeueth in him should not perish but haue eternall life Iohn 3 14 15. 3 So God loued the world that hee hath giuen his onely begotten sonne that whosoeuer beleeveth in him should not perish but haue euerlasting life Ioh. 3 16. 4. Hee that beleeueth in him shall not bee condemned Ioh 3. 18. 5. Hee that beleeveth in the sonne hath euerlasting life Ioh 3 36. 6. The Iewes demaund what shall we do that wee might worke the works of GOD Christ answereth This is the worke of God that yee beleeue in him whom he hath sent Ioh. 6 28. 29. 7. This is the will of him which hath sent mee that euery one which seeth the sonne and beleeveth in him should haue euerlasting life Ioh 6. 40. 8. Verily verily I say vnto you he that beleeveth in me hath life euerlasting Ioh. 6. 47. 9. These things are written that yee might beleeue that Iesus is the Christ the sonne of God and that in beleeving yee might haue life through his name Ioh. 20. 31. 2 The Acts of the Apostles 1. To him gaue all the Prophets witnesse that through his name all that beleeue in him should receaue remission of sinnes Act. 10 43. 2. By him euery one that beleeueth is iustified Act. 13. 39. 3. By faith the heart is purified Act 15 9. 4. The Iaylor asketh Sirs what must I doe to bee saved and they saide beleeue in the Lord Iesus Christ and thou shalt be saved thine houshold Act. 16 31 32. 3 The Epistle to the Romanes 1 The righteousnes of God by the faith of Iesus Christ vnto all and vpon all that belieue Rom. 3 22. 2 Wee conclude that a man is iustified by faith without the works of the lawe Rom. 3 28. 3 Abraham beleeved GOD and it was counted to him for righteousnes Rom. 4 3. 4 To him that worketh not but believeth in him that iustifieth the vngodly his faith is counted for righteousnes Rom 4 5. 5 Therefore it is by faith that it might come by grace and the promise might bee sure to all the seede Rom 4 16. 6 This is written for vs also to whom it shall bee imputed for righteousnes which beleeue in him that raised vp Iesus our Lord from the dead Rom 4 24. 7 Being iustified by faith wee haue peace toward God Rom 5 1. 8 If thou shalt confesse with thy mouth the Lord Iesus and shalt belieue in thine heart that God raised him vp from the dead thou shalt be saued Rom 10 11 9 VVith the heart man belieueth vnto righteousnes Rom 10 10 4 The first Epistle to the Corinthians It pleased God by the foolishnes of preaching to saue them that beleeue 1 Corinth 1 21. 5 The Epistle to the Galatians 1 We know that a man is not iustified by the works of the law but note that he saith but or except by the faith of Iesus Christ and wee have beleeued in Iesus Christ that wee might be iustified by the faith of Christ and not by the works of the law Galathians 2. 16. 2 They which are of faith the same are the children of Abraham Galathians 3. 7. 3. God doth iustifie the Gentiles through faith Gal 3. 8. 4. They which bee of faith are blessed with faithfull Abraham Gal. 3 9. 5. The iust shall liue by faith Galathians 3 11. 6. The Scripture hath concluded all vnder sinne that the promise by the faith of Iesus Christ should be given to them that beleeue Gal 3 22. 7. The law was our school maister to bring vs vnto Christ that we might be made righteous by faith Gal 3. 24. 8. Yee are all the sonnes of God by faith in Christ Iesus Gal. 3 26. 6 The Epistle to the Ephesians By grace are yee saved through faith not of works least any man should boast Ephes 2 8 9. 7 The Epistle to the Philippians That I might be found in him not having mine own righteousnes which is of the law but that which is through the faith of Christ Philip 3 9. 8 The Epistle to the Hebrewes 1. By faith Abell obtained witnesse that he was righteous God testifying of his gifts by the which faith also hee being dead yet speaketh Heb 11. 4. 2. By faith was Enoch taken away that he should not see death Heb 11 5 3 He that commeth to God must beleeue that God is c. Heb 11 6 Finally that whole Chapter is spent in the commendation of faith alone Nowe whereas in these sayings of Scripture there is handled the way and meanes to attaine salvation iustification everlasting life forgiuenes of sinnes a testimonie of righteousnes c. Why if any other
is faith is not that righteousnes in it selfe whereby wee are iust before God but it is that instrument whereby we lay hold vpon Christ his righteousnes which being by faith made and accounted with God as ours we stand iust by the righteousnes of Christ before God and this we proue 1 Because the Scripture speaketh still of faith relatiuely as it respecteth and is referred vnto Christ as He that beleeueth in Christ in him on him the faith of Christ c. Ioh. 3 15 and 6 40 47 Act 10 43 and 15 11 Galat 2 16 Rom 3 22 26 and 4 24 and infinite moe such like Contrariwise our aduersaries doe reason 1 Faith is the gift of God but the gifts of God are qualities therefore faith is a qualitie Ans 1 We denie not but it is a qualitie but it doth not iustifie as a qualitie but because it layeth hold on Christ 2. Faith is called in the Scripture a gift not that it should be defined as a quality but that we might vnderstand that it is freely giuen vs. 2 Faith is oftentimes in the Scripture vsed absolutely without determination or reference to any other thing as Hee that shall beleeue and bee baptized c. Mark 16 16 if yee beleeue not surely yee shall not be established Isai 7. 9. Ans The obiect of faith is alwaies understood by the figure Synecdoche for without it faith doth neither beleeue neither is it faith 2 The Apostles taught their hearers to beleeue not absolutely without reference to Christ but to beleeue in Christ in whom they were bid to beleeue and to be baptized in his name Matt 28 19 3 Faith is a worke Iohn 6 29 therfore it iustifies as a worke Ans 1 The question is not whether faith may be called a worke but how it is considered in the verie act of IustificatioÌ„ This how it is to be considered Christ declareth in the words next following This is the worke of God that yee beleeue in him See there is the relatiue or respectiue acception whome he hath sent 2 Besides in this argument there is more in the conclusion than in the premisses for the collection they make is such like as this faith is in some sorte a worke therefore it iustifieth as a worke Our aduersaries doe acknowledge nothing in faith but a bare and general knowledge and assent Condition 2 making it only an historicall faith but wee as wee presuppose knowledge and assent so wee affirme that in faith there is required a trust or confidence whereby we relie and depende vpon God that for these reasons Because truste or confidence is the essential and proper difference whereby the faith of Christians is distinguished from the faith of Diuels for that Diuells though they certainely beleeâ—e that Christ died for the sinnes of mankinde yet they doe not put their trust in him seeing that benefite doth not belong vnto them Because the Scripture when it speaketh of faith doth expressely vse such wordes as be token trust or confidence 1 By Christ wee haue bouldnesse and entrance with confidence by faith in him Eph 3 12 2 Let vs goe bouldly vnto the throne of grace Heb 4 16 3 Seeing that by the bloud of Iesus we may be bould to enter into the holy place let vs drawe neare with a true heart in assurance of faith Hebrewes 10 19 22 4 Herein is loue perfect in vs that wee should haue boldnes in the day of iudgement c. There is no feare in loue but perfect loue casteth out feare for feare hath painefulnes and he that feareth is not perfect in loue 1 Ioh 4 17 18. In this saying the excluding of feare presupposeth a trust in Christ 5. Sonne be of good comfort thy sinnes are forgiuen thee Matth 9 2. 6 Daughter be of good comfort thy faith hath made thee whole Matt 9 22. 7 Bee of good comfort I haue ouercome the world Ioh. 16 33. Contrariwise our aduersaries reason Iames acknowledgeth no other faith but that which consisteth of a meere knowledge and assent Iam. 2. Ans 1 This holdes not Iames founde no other faith in the Diuels therefore neither did hee finde any other in true Christians 2. Neither doth this follow Iames intreateth only of one kind of faith to wit of historicall faith therefore the Scripture teacheth none other kind of faith Our Aduersaries affirme that faith may bee in Condition 3 impenitent and wicked men in Epicures and adulterers c. but we denie that faith can be in such men for these reasons Being iustified by faith we haue peace towards God Rom. 5 1 but euery one that committeth sinne is of the Deuill 1 Ioh 3 8 therefore hee hath not peace towards God consequently hee wanteth true faith All men haue not faith 2. Thessal 3 2 The hearts of the beleeuers are purified by faith Acts 15 9 therefore true iustifying faith is not in a wicked and impure heart which is polluted and laden with sinne Paule speakes of the wicked ones after an other manner than our Aduersaries doe 1 That as concerning faith they haue made shipwracke 1 Timoth 1 19 of those which haue bid all conscience farewell 2 That they haue erred from the faith 1 Tim 6 10 of couetous men 3 That they haue denied the faith 1 Tim 5 8 of such as are without naturall affection Contrariwise our aduersaries do reason thus 1 Wicked men haue wrought miracles in the name of Christ by faith Matt. 7. 22 23 therefore there is faith in the wicked ones Ans They haue the faith of miracles but not iustifying faith 2 Satan himselfe hath faith Iames 2 19. Ans Satan hath an historicall faith but our question is of a iustifying faith therefore seeing one kinde of faith is meant in the Antecedent and an other in the consequent there bee foure termes 3 Simon Magus beleeued whose heart notwithstanding was not right Act 8 13. 21 Answere He was conuicted in conscience that the miracles of the Apostles were not magicall but deuine as the forcerers of Egypt acknowledged the finger of God Exod 8 19 Simon therefore beleeued as Saint Luke saith but it was an historicall faith onely and not a true iustifying faith Our Aduersaries dreame that true faith may be without workes but wee maintaine that a true iustifying Condition 4 faith cannot want his fruites and that for these reasons A good tree cannot bring forth euill fruite Matt 7 18. Faith worketh by loue Galat. 5 6 Faith without workes is dead Iames 2 26 Because Christ shall proue our faith by our workes as by the in fallible effects therof Matt. 25. Contrariwise our aduersaries doe reason 1 Shew me thy faith without workes Iam. 2. 18 therefore faith may be without workes Ans That translation is faultie for according to the Greek it should be translated shew me thy faith by or out of thy works 2 vnlesse S. Iames thought true faith to be effectual working by loue he would not
The Apostles did annoint many sicke men with oile and healed them Mark 6. 13 therefore Extreame vnction is a Sacrament enâ—oined by Christ to the Apostles Ans 1. That annointing was a temporarie thing neither hath it any commaundemeÌ„t that we should do the like 2. By the same reason the handkerchiefs of Paul Act 19. 12. and the shadowe of Peter whereby manie sicke men were healed Acts. 15. 15. should be Sacraments 3. The text speaketh of miraculous gifts which because they endured but for a time doe not come within the coÌ„passe of Sacraments 3 Is any man sicke among you let him call for the elders of the Church and let them pray for him and annoint him with oile c. Iames 5. 14. Answer 1. It followeth not Iames speaketh of oile therefore of oile of Extreame vnction magicallie exorcized 2. That annointing was not extreame vnction but was for the recoverie of health whereas on the contrarie side extreame vnction is administred in Poperie to them which are readie foorth-with to die when there is no hope of any recoverie 3 The meaning of Saint Iames is that praier should be made for the sick that their sinnes may bee forgiven them whereby they haue drawne sicknes vpon them but thence ariseth no Sacrament 4. Caietan no meane Cardinall among the Papists saith this place cannot bee vnderstoode of extreame vnction but of the miraculous annointing spoken of Mark 6. Whereof hee giveth three reasons 1 Because Iames doth not say Is anie man sicke vnto death but simply is any man sicke 2 The end and effect heereof is the easing of the sicke but of remission of sins he speaketh not but only conditionally wheras Extreame vnction is not administred but at the point of death is directly intended for remission of sinnes 3 Iames bids call for many Ministers to one sicke man both to pray for him and to annoint him which is much different from the rite of Extreame vnction So one of their owne pillars hath wyped them of two places at once This of Iames and the sixth of Marke which are the onely shewes of authoritie the Papists haue for this forged Sacrament CHAP. 15. Of Transsubstantiation OVr Aduersaries doe expound the sacramentall vnion in the Eucharist to bee by manner of Transsubstantiation whereby they imagine that after the words of consecration the elements doe altogether vanish away and are changed into the substance of the body and bloud of Christ so that besides the bare accidents which are seene tasted and felt there remaineth no whit of the elements in the Sacrament but we denie that there needes any such fiction of Transsubstantiation for the making of the Sacrament of the Lords Supper and that for these reasons The nature of a Sacrament requireth that there be together an earthly and an heavenlie lie matter as Irenaeus saith or not that the substance be changed but that grace be adioined as Theodoret speaketh Because there be other meanes of Sacramentall vnion than by Transsubstantiation alone as is apparent in Baptisme Christ saith not This shall bee made my body or this is changed into my body but This is my body to wit by sacramentall relation and vnion as in other Sacraments Paul the heavenly Interpreter of Christs words doth not admit Transsubstantiation but doth so interprete the sacramentall vnion that stil the visible elements remaine or the bread of the Sacrament after the consecration hee calleth bread still to giue vs to vnderstand that the substance of the bread remaineth still 1 The bread saith he which we breake that is distribute after the consecration is it not the communion of the body of Christ 1 Cor. 10. 16. 2. All we are partakers of one bread 1. Corinth 10. 16. 3. As often as yee shall eate this bread 1 Cor 11. 26. 4. Whosoeuer shall eate this bread vers 27. 5. Let a man examine himselfe and so let him eate of this bread verse 28. So haue the Fathers explaned this mysterie that they declare that the elements remaine as Receaue that in the bread spiritually by faith which hanged vppon the Crosse Augustine These manner of speaches in the Scripture are almost alike God is man This is my beloved sonne In which phrases is noted the most neare and straite vnion of the two natures in Christ farre straiter and more neare than this of the Sacrament and yet is not concluded the transsubstantiation of one nature into another or the abolishing of either nature Vpon the opinion of Transsubstantiation many absurdities doe follow 1 So Christ should be said to haue a twofold body or two bodies whereof the one should bee taken from the virgine Marie and the other should be made of bread 2. We should not receaue the body crucified for vs but a certaine other thing which an houre before was not that bodie but bread nay which a little before had no being in nature which is absurd and impious contrarie to the wordes of Christ whereby he promiseth vs that bodie that was given for vs and that bloud which was shed for vs. 3. Accidents are heereby made to bee without a subiect as if when the snow is melted the whitenes of the snow should remaine alone with out a subiect 4. Mise that gnawe the consecrated bread cannot gnaw bare accidents alone Therefore either accidents are substances that they may be subiect to the grinding of teeth or the glorified body of Christ is subiect to elementarie passions and naturall sufferings both of which are most absurd The like question may bee made concerning the burning of the Eucharist what it is that burneth whether bare accidents or the body of Christ 5 Infinite such other grosse absurdities may bee seene in the Writings of that famous man Wilhel Holderus de mure exenterato wherein are recited many other such like things according to the opinion of the Schoole men Our Aduersaries themselues doe not beleeve that there is Transsubstantiation 1. And therefore they seeke out other and more goodly words as annihilation of the elements or a ceasing of them to be desinition they call it 2. Gerson amongst his reasons for the communion vnder one kinde bringeth this as a reason why the cup should bee denied to the people because the wine might bee corrupt and turned into Flies and vineger If the wine be truly transsubstantiated then can it not bee corrupted vnlesse wee will say that Flies and vineger may be generated of the glorified body oâ— Christ or that they are generated of accidents there being no corporeall matter or substance required thereunto 3 Transsubstantiation was not belieued in the whole Church before * I take is this is a fault in the print that the Autor meaÌ„t to say 1300 yeares as â— câ—tur â— writers also do CeÌ„â— 13 cap col 622 for in the 13th centurie after Christ was the Councell of Lateran vnder InnoceÌ„tius the 3d. whereof the Autor heere speaketh which was the 〈◊〉 generall CouÌ„cell wherein TranssubstaÌ„tiation was
Christ did not send the Thiefe vpon the Crosse to Purgatorie though hee had done many ill deedes but calleth him directly to heaven Luk 23 43 Paul would not haue Christians to be ignorant of the estate of theÌ„ which are dead in Christ there he doth not only say nothing of Purgatorie but hath arguments also against it 1 Thes 4 13. c. 1 He saith the faithfull departed do sleepe not they are tormented in purgatorie ver 13. 2 He speaketh it for our comfort But there would be no comfort if we should know that our friends religiously departed were in paine and torments and such as bee extreame ver 13. 3 Christ will bring with him at his coÌ„ming the faithfull departed hee will not then at length cal them to him out of Purgatorie ver 14. The Popish purgatorie whereby wee should bee purged from sinnes after death doth crosse and twhart the one only and true purgatorie of Christians which is the merit and bloud of Christ layed holde on by faith 1 Mens hearts are purged by faith not by the fire of purgatorie Act. 15 9. 2 The bloude of Iesus Christ the Sonne of God purgeth vs from all sinne 1 Ioh 1 7. 3 Be not deceiued neither fornicatours nor idolaters nor adulterers nor wantons c shal inherit the kingdoÌ„e of God And such were some of you now see their purgatorie what it was but ye are washed but ye are sanctified but ye are iustified in the name of the Lord Iesus and by the spirit of our God 1 Cor. 6 9 10 11. It twharteth also the perfect satisfaction and perfect merite of CHRIST if no we after all wee must make satisfaction in the paines of purgatorie 1 For so the passiue righteousnesse of Christ shall be thrust out of dores 2 Christ is the reconciliation for the sinnes of the whole World 1 Ioh. 2 2. 3 Surely hee hath borne our infirmities c. I say dooth in one place refute Purgatorie by many arguments Hee was wounded for our transgressions c. with his stripes we are healed c. the Lord hath layde vpon him the iniquity of vs all c. The chastisement of our peace the punishment of our sinnes was vpon him c. Hee hath caried our sorrowes Isay 53 4 5 6. It is contrarie to the article of the Christian faith 1 We belieue the remission not the compensation of sinnes 2 Wee belieue eternall life Heere is no mention of Purgatorie The opinion of our Aduersaries concerning Purgatorie hath no waight 1 For they confesse that there was no purgatorie in the time of the olde Testament 2 They cannot auoyde the absurditie concerning them which shall bee founde aliue at the latter day and haue deserued Purgatory what shall be done with them whether God will pardon them those punishments or whether they must bee tormented for a time after the finall sentence of the last â—â—dgment 3 The grounds of this opinion were taken from Plato and Virgil lib 6. Aened Contrariwise our Aduersaries do reason 1 Because all men haue not perfect and firme faith therefore all after this life cannot perfectly beâ—aued Ans 1 Christ when he saith that faith is the instrumentall cause of saluatiâ—n hee speaketh of faith generally and excludeth neither weake nor imperfect faith 2. Christ layed holde on by faith cannot be deuâ—ded that he should be said to be laied hold on but in part and they which lay holde on him to be saued but in part but whole Christ is apprehended as well by a weake as by a strong faith 3 It is a fallacie taking that for a cause which is no cause For the strongnesse or weakenesse of faith or an accident of faith is not the cause of apprehending saluation but of retaining it Now that which is spoken of retaining that ouâ— Aduersaries do wrongfully apply to the apprehending thereof 2 No vncleane thing shall enter into the kingdome of Heaâ—en Reuel 21 27. Therfore needs they must be purged by purgatorie Answ 1 There bee foure termes in the argument For the purging from the filth of sinne in the Antecedent is taken for the iustification of faith whereby all that belieue are washed are sanctified are purified 1 Cor 6 11 1 Ioh 1 7. Acts 15 9. in the consequent it is taken for a clensing in purgatorie neither knowen to God nor to the Scriptures 2 There is more in the Consequent than in the Antecedent For it followeth not the heires of eternall life are vncleane therefore they are purified onely by the fire of Purgatorie and not by any other means such as these which concurre together are faith the bloud the merite of Christ 3 In the name of Iesus shall euerie knee bow both of things in Heauâ—n and things in earth and things vnder the earth Philip. 2 10 Reuel 5 13. But the deuills hate Christ and doe not bow the knees vnto him Therefore there are soules in purgatorie and consequently there is a purgatorie Ans 1 The bowing of the knees in this place is the same that subiection in which sense euen the Deuils though they tremble doe in outward cariage confesse subiection to Christ 2 It is an error taking that which is spoken indefinitely of al sorts of creatuâ—es whether reasonable or vnreasonable as iâ— it were spoken definitely of a certaine sort of men of whom notwithstanding there is no certaintie in Scripture 3 As concerning the place Reuelat 5 3 13. where there is mention made of such as are vnder the earth I answeare 1 If there were a purgatory yet were it not certaine that it were vnder the earth 2 Vnder the earth are both the creatures vnder the earth also the dead which are buried which shall appeare before Christ at the resurrection and shall testifie their subiection 4 If anie mans worke burne hee shall suffer losse but he shall be safe himselfe neuerthelesse yet as it were by the fire 1 Câ—rin 3 15. Therefore there is a Purgatorie Ans 1 It followeth not the fire shall â—ye it Therefore purgatorie fire shall trie it 2 Paul saith the worke shall burne not the person but our Aduersaries imagine the persons and soules shall burne 3 If Paul speake of purgatorie then the Saints shall be thrust into purgatory which is proued by the vniuersall particle Eueriâ— mans worke c. 4 He speaketh of the fire of tribulation affliction and tentation against which stubble may not be opposed but faith which is more precious than golde 5. So then while they confound the worke that shall burne and the persons that shall burne and also the fire of tribulation and the fire of purgatorie there arise not foure but fiâ—e termes 5 Of the sinne against the Holy-ghost it is sayd it shall neither bee forgiuen in this World nor in the World to come Matth. 12 32. Therefore there remaineth a place after death wherein sinnes are forgiuen Answere 1 CHRIST speaketh of the World to come but our Aduersaries themselues
truth it did not belong vnto them 3 That after the canon of the Scripture was perfected yet neuerthelesse the inuocatioÌ„ of Saints was vnknowen and that yet notwithstanding Christians might beelâ—ued as Iohn witnesseth of his Gospel â—ap 20 ver 31. 4 Seeing the Apostles wrote all things necessary to saluation Act 20 27. Ioh 20 31 and the holy Scripture is such as maketh a man perfect to euery good work 2 Timoth 3 17. It followeth heereof that either these things are not true which are heere spoken of the scripture or that it is a lye that inuocation of saints is necessary to saluation 5 It followeth that inuocation of Saints hath none other grounds than lying miracles froÌ„ which God dehorteth vs De 13 2 3. 2 Thes 2 9. Isay 8 19. 6. It followeth also that all those papists doe impudently and against their conscience which being of Eckius his minde do go about to proue inuocation of saints by sayings of the Scripture 7 It followeth also that because inuocation of Saints is not contained in Scripture were it neuer so voidâ— of sinne yet no man were bound to accept of it The Scripture biddeth vs worship and pray vnto God alone 1 Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God him only shalt thou serue Mat 4 10 Deut 6. 13. and 10 20. 2. Call vpon Mee in the day of trouble Psa 50 15. 3. I will not giue My glory vnto an other Isa 48. 11. 4. Christ bid vs pray Our Father c. Matt. 6. 9. 5 Come vntoâ—e all ye that are weary c. Matth 11. 28. Hee is to be prayed vnto whom we may call vpon in faith But faith is by the Word of God Rom 10 17. Therefore because we haue no word to stir vp our faith with promise of being heard or to command vs so to do nay because it is an horrible sinne and religion forbiddeth vs to belieue on Saints doubtlesse it is vnlawfull also to pray vnto them But neither may wee pray vnto Saints as to mediatours because the holy Scripture doth ascribe the glory of mediation to none but to Christ alone 1. So he is called the Mediatour of the New Testament Heb. 9 15. 2. There is one GOD and one Mediatour betweene God and man which is the man Christ Iesus who gaue himselfe a ransome for all men 1 Timo 2 5 6. Now 1 This vnity is taken away if there be erected moe Mediatours 2 And the saintâ— gaue not themselues a ransome for vs therefore c. â— If any man sin we haue an Aduâ—cate with the Father Iesus Christ the iâ—st 1 Ioh 2 1. But Saints are noâ— Iesus Christ the Iâ—st â— Verily verily I say vnto you whatsoeuer ye shall aske the Father in My Name Hee will giue it you Ioh 14 13 16 23. â— No man commeth vnto the Father but by Me Ioh 14 6. By the doctrine of the inuocatioÌ„ of Saints Christians are bereaued of that confidence in the loue mercy of Christ the Sonne of God in trust whereof they ought to pray as if Christ were not truly a brother toward vs as if He were not mercifull and a louer of mankinde but such a one as would not be appeased and a fearefull Iudge euen to the repentant vnlesse hee were first pacified by some Intercessour or Saint The contrarie whereof is proued in Scripture 1 In all things it became him to bee made like vnto his brethren that he might bee As the Priest was a mediator betweene God and the peoplâ— so Christ in one and the same word is called a Priest a Mediator He. 2 17 18 mercifull a faithfull High Priest in things concerning God that he might make reconciliation for the sinnes of the people for in that He suffered and was tempted Hee iâ— able to suâ—â—ouâ— them that are tempted 2 Seeing then that wee haue a great high Priest which is entred into heauen euen It 〈◊〉 â—lâ—â— Sonne of God let vs holde â—aâ—â— our profession For we haue not an higâ— Prâ—est which cannot be touched with the feeling of our infirmities but was in alâ— things tempted in like sort yet without sinne Let vs therefore goe bouldly vnto the throne of grace that we may receiâ—â— merâ—y and finde grace to help in time oâ— neede Heb. 4 14. 1â— 16. 3. Wherfore he is able also perfectly to save them which come vnto God by him seeing he euer liueth to make intercession for them Heb 7. 25. 4 The Lord is gracious and mercifull slowe to anger and of great mercie Psal 145 8. Num 14 18. Yea and God the Father also is mercifull towards repentant sinners for the intercessioÌ„ of his Sonne so that there is no â—â—â—dâ— of the intercession of Saints 1. The Lord is ful of compassion mercie slow to anger of great goodnes He will not alway chide nor keepe his anger for euer He hath not dealt with vs after our sins nâ—râ—â—warded â—s according to our iniquities Heere the implacable popish god is not proposed vnto vs to whom wee should not daâ—e to come but by the medâ—ation of Saints For as high as the heauen is aboue the earth so great is his mercy toward theÌ„ that feâ—â—e him As far as the â—ast is fâ—oÌ„ the west so far hath he remoued our sins fâ—oÌ„ vs. As a father hath compassion on his children so hath the Lord compassion on them that feaâ—e him Psal 103. 8 9 c. 2 Hereto belong all the penitentiall fermoÌ„s of the prophets wherein God openeth his ready and willing minde Ezech 18 33 chap. and many other places 3 Paul in the 8 th to the Romans is wholy herein busied to shew vs with what confidence we should cometo God by his Son with the â—roâ—â—ings of the holy Spirit â—so that we should nothing doubt of the fauor of God toward vs. The â—iâ—â—â—cation of Saints is for this cause not to be â—oâ—n with be â—â—â—se the saints heare vs not yea they know not what is done on earth 1 Though Abraham be ignorant of vs Israel know vs not yet thou art our Father Isai â—3 â—6 â— Thus dooth the Prophet comfort Iosias Thou shalt bâ—â— put in thy graue in peace and thine eyes shall not see all the euill that I will bring vpon this placeâ— King 22 20. And because the most seruent prayers are often made without the voice or motion of the mouth and lippes but in the entralls of the heart and in the spirit if prayer bee directed to Saints hereby is deuine honour giuen vnto them as if they vnderstoode the thoughts of the heart which is proper to God alone 1 Thou alone knowest the hearts of all the Children of men 1 King 8 39. 2 I the Lord search the heart and trye the reines Ier 17 10. and â—0 12 Reu. 2 23. There are manie also in the popish catalogue of Saints of whom there is great doubt they be not glorified in Heauen And many of them
A MANVELL Or briefe volume of Controuersies of Religion betweene the Protestants and the Papists wherein the Arguments of both sides are briefely set downe and the Aduersaries Sophismes are plainely refuted Written in Latine in a briefe and perspicuous method by LVCAS OSIANDER and now Englished with some additions and corrections At London Printed by Humfrey Lownes 1606. TO THE READER AS their part is the chiefest in defeÌ„ding the truth vvho do sifte the full state of Controuersies explicating the question maintaining reasons for the truth and answearing the opposite arguments at large as the nature of euery one doth require for the full setling of mens iudgments vvho with singlenesse of heart desire to bee throughly satisfied so is their labour requisite also who do contract those larger disputations into a briefe and compendious summ For it helpeth the memory in calling to minde that vvhich hath beene reade in larger discourses before it furthereth the iudgment by giuing grounds of arguments answeares which may afterward by the learned Reader be further enlarged by his owne meditations as occasion shall require it may serue for some good taste in the knowledge of controuersies for such as haue not the leisure other opportunities means to read the larger disputations and lastly being coÌ„prised in a small volume it may easily be caried abroad if â—e desire to read such things vvhere wee cannot haue not the greater volumes VVhich reasons moued our Author to pen this briefe Manuell in a perspicuous methode and it vvere to be wished that some of our Countrey men whoÌ„ God hath furnished with iudgment and other necessaries for such a purpose would endeuour to do the like in our vulgar tongue in this briefe and plaine order In the meane time the translation of this present worke shall bee I trust neither vnprofitable nor vnwelcome Some things are altered vvhich I iudged might bee offensiue or othervvise hinder the Reader but they bee such aâ—d no moe than I hope who so shall compare the translation with the Originall vvith indifferencie will confesse there vvas reason to doe so Some things also vvhere neede seemed to require I haue added and vvhereas the Author in testimonies alleadged out of the Scripture quoted the chapter onely I haue generally throughout for the ease of the reader annexed the verses also as the case required The censure heereof I leaue to the indifferent reader and commend the successe to God vvhose Name be glorified for euer Amen A Table of the Chapters and Questions CHAP 1 Of the holy Scripture 1 VVhether it be vnsufficient 2 Whether it be obscure 3 Whether it be vncertaine or plyable to any sense CHAP 2 VVhether the Scripture be to be reade of the lay people CHAP. 3 Of the interpretation of the holy Scripture CHAP. 4 Of Traditions CHAP 5 Of the Letter and the Spirit CHAP. 6 Of councells CHAP 7 Of the Church 1 Whether our Church or the Church of Rome bee the true Church 2 Whether it be to be granted that there is an inuisible Church 3 Whether the church may erre CHAP 8 Of the Bishop of Rome 1 VVhether Christ haue neede vpon earth of any Vicar or visible head 2 Of the power and authority of Peter 1 Ouer the rest of the Apostles 2 In the rule and dominion of faith 3 VVhether Peter were at Rome and there instituted an ordinarie succession 4 VVhether the Bishops of Rome be Peters successors 1 In Doctrine 2 In Manners 5 That the pope is Antichrist CHA 9 Of free-will 1 VVhether vnregenerat men can of themselues by vertuâ— of their free-will bâ—gin their conuersion 2 Whether Originall sinne haue in it the nature of sinne 3 Of the workes of Infidels 4 Of Grace CHAP 10 Of Iustification 1 Of imputed righteousnesse or of the signification of the word Iustification 2 Whether the grace of Iustification bee aequally alike in all 3 Whether we be iustified by good workes 4 Whether we be iustified by Faâ—th alone 5 Whether Paul doe deny Iustification by the workes of the Ceremoniall lawe onely 1 CHAP. 11 Of the true conditions of faith 1 Whether Faith be taken respectiuely or habitually 2 Whether Faith bee onely a bare knowledge and assent 3 Whether Faith be also in wicked men 4 Whether true Faith may be voide of good workes 5 Whether Faith be informed by charitie CHAP 12 Of good workes 1 Whether good workes please God ex opere operato 2 Of Will-worship in generall 3 Of workes of supercrogation or Councells in particular 1 Of Pouerty 2 Of single life 3 Of Obedience 4 That good workes cannot be communicated to others CHAP 13 Of Renouation or imperfect Obedience 1 Whether our obedience begun in this life be perfect 2 Whether Concupisceace remaining in the regenerate be a sinne 1 CHAP 14 Of the Number of the Sacraments in generall 2 A particular examination of the fiue falsely supposed Sacraments 1 Of Confirmation 2 Of Penance 3 Of Orders 4 Of Matrimony 5 Of extreame vnction CHAP 15 Of Transsubstantiation in the Eucharist CHAP 16 Of inclosing carying about and adoring of the Sacrament 1 Whether the Eucharist out of the vse thereof bee a Sacrament 2 Whether the Eucharist be to be adored 3 Whether the Eucharist be to be inclosed caried about 1 CHAP 17 Of the Masse in generall whether it be a propitiatory Sacrifice 2 An appendix of the abuses in the masse 1 Priuate masse 2 The wresting of the masse to other affaires 3 Simonie in the Masse 4 The mingling of water with wine 5 A sinke of Ceremonies 6 The nouelty of their ceremonies 7 The errors and fooleries of the canon of the Masse 8 The masse sayd in Latine 9 Masse for the deade CHAP 18 Of Communion vnder both kindes CHAP 19 Of Purgatorie 1 Whether there be a purgatory 2 Whether the dead be relieued by the suffrages of the liuing GHAP. 20 Of Inuocation of Saints 1 Whether Latria be giuen to Saints in popery 2 Whether Saints be to be prayed vnto 3 Whether Papists commit idolatry in worshipping of images CHAP 21 Of the Vow of single life in ecclesiasticall persons 1 Whether mariage be a state that defileth a man 2 Whether single life haue any prerogatiue in Gods sight before mariage 3 Whether it be in a mans choise to vow single life CHAP 22 Of the errors of popish fastes 1 Of choise of meates 2 Of the tying of fastes to certaine and set times 3 VVhether fasting be meritorious 4 Of the fast of Lent 5 The keeping of fastes is more straightly vrged by the Papists than the keeping of Gods commandements 6 Mockeries in popish fastes 7 The iudgment of the holy ghost of the fastes of hypocrites CHAP. 23 Of Repentance and of the errours which the papists bring into this place of Repentance 1 Of the merite of contrition 2 Of the sufficiency of contrition 3 Of popish satisfaction 4 Of omission of faith 5 Of Auricular confession 2 Conclusion A Manuell or briefe