is justified passive in regard of us who doe by faith receive Christ without which we cannot be justified Thus you see how destructive his Doctrine is to the maine fundamentall point of our Religion to wit justification by faith So much pressed upon us by Christ and his Apostles and by him denyed And justification without Faith in the sight of God is such a justification as I never read of in Scripture We come to his objection and his answer to it Pag. 36. at the latter end But it will be objected How then is faith said to justifie I answer sayes he if we take faith for the object of our faith That is Christ then faith is properly said to justifie us for by him wee are justifyed he being our Righteousnesse Marke here how he contradicts himselfe He sayes before he cannot conceive how faith should put on Christ and apply Christ and that Christs righteousnesse is made ours before God by Gods imputation before the Act of our Faith and therefore necessarily without it And now confesseth that Faith being taken for the object of our Faith Christ then it is properly said to justifie us and thus it is properly said to justifie Christ being apprehended by Faith Rom. 3.28 Therefore we conclude a man is justified by Faith without the workes of the Law So it is taken in the Treatise of Justification wheresoever Faith is written without expresse mention of Christ we are to understand the righteousnesse of Christ received by Faith Heb. 10.38 Now the just shall live by Faith And doth he not overthrow his Doctrine before delivered when he concludes That Faith taken for the object of our Faith doth properly justifie and how can that be without Faiths apprehension of the object Wee will make this more plaine if it may bee Rom. 3.22 Even the righteousnesse of God which is by Faith of Jesus Christ The (f) Ea est fides Jesu Christi non active quam ipse Christus habet sed passive qua ipse Christus habetur seu possideâ—ur Affert haec fides justitiam non effective quasi habitualiter aut formâ—li â—r justos efficiat nec materialiter quasi ipsa sit illud quo justi censâ—nâ—ur sed objective quatenuâ— fertur in Christum qui est justitia nostâ—aâ— et organice quatâ—nus instar manus donum â—â—â—â—itiae gratis propâ—er Christi meriâ—um credentib imputatae apprehendit Pare Com. in loc Faith of Christ is not here taken actively for the Faith which Christ had but passively for the Faith whereby Christ is had and possessed This Faith doth not justifie effectively as working an habituall justice or righteousnesse in us nor materially as though Faith it selfe were that whereby we are justified but it justifieth objectively as it apprehendeth Christ and instrumentally as it applyeth the righteousnesse of Christ Object How are we said to be justified freely seeing Faith is required which is an act in the beleever This Objection may bee urged further thus That is freely bestowed which is conferred without any helpe or worke in the receiver seeing then a man must bring Faith which is a worke of the will how is he said to be justified freely The Answer is that we are (g) Si fides qua ratione actus quidam est et ex se justitiam saceret gratis justitia non daretur at id non habet Ego pauperi scutum gratis porrigo quod ille extensa manua me accipit si quis mihi objiceret tu gratis non dedisti nam et pauper manum extendit nec acciperetnisi id faceret ridicula prosecto esset objectio extensio en im manus non habet ex se scutum adferre extendenti si enins id esset quoties manum extenderet scutum haberet A virtute potius et liberalitate dantis est scutum quamvis illi per manuum extensionem applicetur ita defide Tolet. ad Rom. cap. 3. Annot. 20 Deus imputans nobis justitiam Christi dat nobis fidem qua illam applicate valeamus Machowius quae de stat primi hominis Disput 7. justified freely although the condition of Faith be required because Faith doth not justifie as it is an act of ours but all the vertue thereof proceedeth from the object as the Israelites being healed by looking upon the Brasen Serpent obtained not their health by the very act of opening their eyes but by the object which they beheld which was the Serpent And like as when a rich man giveth his Almes unto the poore though he stretcheth out his hand to receive it yet it is said notwithstanding to be a free gift but adde here further that as when a blind man putteth forth his hand but he that giveth is faine to direct it to receive the almes or if a man have a weake and withered hand which he is not able to stretch out unlesse the other that giveth doth lift it up in this case every way the gift is free So our will is not of it selfe apt to beleeve or will any thing aright unlesse the Lord direct it Faith then being both the worke of God in inclining our will and Faith receiving all the vertue from the object which it apprehendeth namely Christ it remaineth that Faith notwithstanding wee are justified freely And the act of faith thus taken as we have set it downe doth according to Scripture stand in opposition to justification by workes And thus Christ in the Covenant of grace is set forth upon some condition to wit that we beleeve in him which condition God doth not onely require at our hand but doth by his Spirit freely give us and enable us to performe it And Christ freely given and all is done of Gods free grace and mercy It may be objected men may be justified before they doe beleeve and so without Faith for they are justified in Gods decree from all eternitie I answer God hath decreed before all time to justifie some men in time but not without Faith that being an effect of Gods decree and beleeving being that way by which God hath ordained to justifie and save men (g) Docet autem hic locus fidem ab election Dei dependere Calvin in loc Act. 13.48 And as many as were ordained to eternall life beleeved Gal. 3.24 that we might be justified by Faith and in the 26. Verse for yee are all the children of God by Faith in Christ Jesus it is plaine by these places of Scripture that God never made any such decree as to justifie any man before he doth beleeve and it is blasphemy to charge such an Act upon God For to justifie a man before he doth beleeve is to justifie him in his (h) Id est impietatem impiâ— Lapid Com. in loc sinfull wayes which God abhorreth and is contrary to his proclamation Exod. 34.7 that hee will by no meanes cleare the (i) Nempe impoenitentem in peccatis suis sibi placentem Riveâ— Com. in loc guiltie
remission no Article of the Jewish Creed explained and confuted p. 64. The people of the Jewes had actuall and eternall remission before Christs comming in the flesh p. 73. Angels now in heaven and Adam before the fall under the Law p. 77. Assize p. 84. B Bondage of conscience beleeving Jewes freed from 75 C Comfort for a distressed conscience 91 92 93. Chaine of salvation 93 Conversion of soules is not working of miracles 3.5 Crueltie as great as the souldiers used to Christ to apply the Law for satisfaction to a troubled conscience 14 Covenant of grace the same in all ages of the world 18. Moses and the Prophets preached it 10. Made knowne to beleevers in all ages 9 Conscience what it is 88. Testimony of it twofold 88 Christ ever the same to all beleevers 72. present in his Incarnation to the Fathers 84 not a hidden mystery to them 22 Christ the foundation upon which the Fathers built 27 D Desire of salvation a note of salvation 85. Desire after grace is grace 86. desire of Faith is Faith 87 Doctrine of Moses and the Apostle one and the same 19 20. The Gospel not a new Doctrine 23 24 E Eucharist A threefold eating 83 F Fathers did eate Christ present 83. They did eate the same spirituall meate that we eate in our Sacraments 82. Vnder the Law had the same hope of eternall life with us 54 Faith not without an inward change of the heart 32. How it justifieth 34. In saving Faith three things 65. Lying hid workes of piety and charitie assure us 88 G Gods people in severall ages make but one Church of God 80 H Heires under age how the Jewes were 70 Hell fourefold the Papists affirme 72,73 I John Baptist wrought no miracle at any time 1,2 Infants how said to beleeve not saved without Faith 47 Justification handled at large 35. to the 40. No man is justified before he beleeves 41 42. see more 43 44 45 K Knowledge what it is 65 Kingdome of God alwayes at hand to true penitents 81 L Law not a curse but a blessing to the Jewes 76.78 How it sanctifieth to the purifying of the conscience 51 52 53. Called the letter and why 7 A lewd slander against the Protestants 31. Contrary to Article 39. 32 33 Love to the brethren a sure marke of a child of God 88 M Moses called the Minister of death abusively 8. He spake truth as it was and is in Christ Jesus 20 21 25 Merit not in our prayers 12 Multitude 13 Ministers must cry out against sinne 48 Men reclaimed from sinne nearer the kingdome of heaven and not thereby made 7. times more the children of Hell 49 50 Manichaeus his errour from 2 Cor. 3.7 6 P Promise obtained by the Fathers as well as by us 78 Prophets did not preach the old covenant in opposition to the new 62 Papists and we differ about the foundation 28. They hold first justification to bee of free mercy 29 30 31 Preaching terrours makes not a man a legall Preacher 11. Preaching often makes not a man a painefull Preacher 15. Lucas Pollo his way of preaching 16 17 Paedagogicall discipline threefold 21 R Remission of sin what it is 65 Reall presence 83 Repentance the Prophets taught cannot justly be reprehended 55. How Johns repentance and the Prophets differ 55 56. Repentance the Prophets preacht not confined within the bounds of conversation 57. Repentance doth wash away sin and how 57 58. seven benefits by it 59.6 S Satisfaction for sin not made by lamenting and amending 61 Sacraments of the Fathers for substance the same with ours 82 Sermons like Davids Song 16 T Tradesmen ought not to take upon them the office of a Minister 15 Transubstantiation repugnant to the humane nature of Christ 28. W Word must be rightly divided 16 Z Zeale for the Sabbath a marke of a true Christian 85 Places of Scripture expounded  Psalme   Vers Pag. 68 11 9  Proverb  Chap. Vers Pag. 3 6 15  Isay  52 7 10  Amos  2 8 15  Zachar.  12 10 61  Matth.  5 6 85 11 15 50 11 2 3 4 2 25 40 91  Marke  12 34 49 10 19 50  Luke  18 14 59.60  John  1 12 37 1 17 19,20 1 18 65 66 67.69 5 46 25 Chap. Vers Pag. 6 29 36,37 8 56 68 10 41 1 14 6 21 14 12 3,4,5  Acts  3 24 9 10 43 66 15 11 10  Rom.  1 1,2,3 9 2 6,7 12 3 24 30 3 22 34 4 3 38 4 5 42 5 1 45 7 7 8 16 25 23  1 Corinth  2 11 90 10 3,4 82  2 Corinth  3 6 7 4 6 69  Galat.  2 16 33 Chap. Vers Pag. 3 10 76 3 24 20 3 17 62 4 1 70 4 9 52 4 25 74  Ephes  2 20 27 2 8 36 4 5 47  2 Tim.  2 15 15  Hebr.  2 25 75 3 5 18 7 19 54 10 1 52.54 11 39 78 11 1 84  James  4 8 58  1 Pet.  1 12 80 1 10 23 2 8 8  1 John  3 14 92 To the Assembly of Divines now sitting concerning matters of Religion by Order from the High Court of PARLIAMENT THOMAS-ATVVOOD ROTHERHAM wisheth increase of Gods graces in JESUS CHRIST Reverend Sirs I Have here presented to your view the Confutation of a Pamphlet intituled The Doctrine and conversation of John Baptist wherein you have Christ and Free Grace pretended and yet the power of grace in the Soules of Christians contemned and the Kingly Office of Christ rejected and under colour of Faith and beleeving the Law of God made void which the Apostle Rom. 3.31 cries downe with an Absit and God forbid such doctrins should be suffered standing so much in opposition to Scripture Those of this Sect pretend great knowledge great zeale great holinesse so did the Pharisees in Jerusalem the Donatists in Afrique the Electi amongst the Manichees but their knowledge is ignorance their zeale madnesse their holinesse hypocrisie Their writings speeches behaviour are cleare demonstrations of this It is high time to looke unto and to meet with such mischievous Doctrines as these Claudenda Cavea antequam aves Evolaverint the cage had need be shut before such uncleane birds as these be flowne God make you famous instruments for his glory the good of your King and Country To the beating downe of Superstition Heresies and Schisme and send you favour with God and man and thus I humbly take leave desiring your favourable acceptance of my poore endevours Et Postquam nos alma Ceres meliore beavit Fruge dabo vobis quam dedit illa Ceres A DEN OF THEEVES DISCOVERED IN the eleventh page of his Book He laies downe this conclusion That John did no Miracle is but an opinion of the people I say this is his false opinion for it is really true that John did
act of faith in (a) In nomen Christi credere est illum recipere tanquam filium dei salvatorem mundi ergo quinon credunt Christum non recipiunt Nam sine fide non recipitur Muscul com in loc justification which is to beleeve signifieth nothing but to receive Christ therefore the act of faith considered as I have here set it downe To say that Christs righteousnesse is made ours before God by Gods imputation before the Act of our faith and therefore necessarily without it This is blasphemy and false Doctrine The Scripture saith We are justified by Faith Here is a Doctrine quite contrary namely That we are justified without faith Bâ—t Pag. 36. You see evidently that he labours to prove that we are justified by Gods imputation of Christs righteousnesse without faith to which purpose he argues thus Even as our sins were made Christs so Christs righteousnesse is made ours now how our sinnes were made Christs let the Prophet Esay (b) Id nunc repetit quod nimuum paenam quam nos exol vere debeamus deus ipsi imposuent candem vero ipse in se receperit tanquam voluntarius Gualter in Isa Hom. 267. speake Cap. 53.6 And the Lord hath layed on him the iniquity of us all that is the guilt and punishment of our iniquities well then the Lord layd it upon Christ and he willingly received it 1 Pet. 2.24 Who his owne selfe bare our sinnes in his owne body God layd them on him Christ by his passive obedience received this burthen as Heb. 5.8 He learned obedience by the things which he suffered So then according to his conclusion God layes our sinnes upon Christ and Saint Ambrose upon this Scripture saith that he did willingly receive those things which hee suffered So God layes Christs righteousnesse upon us by imputation and we by the passive obedience of Faith receive it And by this it is plaine that God imputeth Christs righteousnesse to none but such as doe beleeve for Imputation is an action of God freely accounting the righteousnesse of Christ to be his righteousnesse who beleeves in Christ Rom. 4.3.4 and it was imputed or accounted to him for righteousnesse that is Faith was imputed Faith here must be considered two wayes first as a qualitie in it selfe and thus it is imperfect and consequently cannot bee imputed unto us for our justification Again faith must be considered as an instrument or hand receiving Christ and in this regard beleeving is put for the thing beleeved and faith is imputed for righte ousnesse because by it we doe (c) Paulus additâ—n â—rptetationem quod fide gratuita impu atio accipâ—atu Melancâ— par 3. fol. miâ—â— 958. receive imputed righteousnes Rom. 5.17 They which receive abundance of grace and of the gift of righteousnes to wit by faith shall reigne in life by one Jesus Christ These phrases of Speech Faith is imputed for righteousnes Faith justifieth of Faith or through Faith are Aequipollent of like force and signification When we say We are justified by faith or faith is imputed for righteousnesse it is to be understood correlatively the (d) Ostendimus sidem justificare non habitualiter ut est qualitas sed relate quia cortelatum fidei satisfactio meritum Christi fide apprehensum justificat Item organâ—câ— quia fides justitiam imputaâ—am accipit instar dextâ—ae Pareus in cap. 3. ad Rom. dub 8. correlate of faith is the imputed righteousnesse of Christ Faith then being the relate Christs righteousnes the correlate the one cannot be without the other for the Logician will tell you that relate and correlate considered as such that is according to relation they have their being together so that grant one you must needs grant the other to be take away the being of the one and he other cannot be For we cannot conceive so much as one individed instant of time wherein the one can have a being without the other but they have their being together at one and the same instant of time not one before or after the other As a father considered as a man so he hath the being of a man before his sonne but consider him as a father according to the relation added namely according to paternitie and filiation and so and in such manner the being of father and sonne is at one and the same instant To conclude Faith being the relate Christs righteousnesse made ours by Gods (e) Hoc loâ—o sc Rom. 4.34 fides non potest sumi eo sensu ut imputetur ad justitiam quatenus est opus aliquod justitiae et virtutis in nobis sed quod nos dicimus quatenus fides sumitur pro correlato suomempe re credita fide apprehen sa justitia Christi Rivit Orâ—hod Cathol Tom. 2. pag. 260. imputation the correlate it cannot bee but where there is righteousnesse imputed there must needs be Faith for imputed righteousnesse and Faith of necessity have their being together for where no Faith is there is no imputed righteousnesse And it is a contradiction of an high nature not onely in (f) Relatum correlatum qua ralia simul sunt natura cognitione ideoque se muâ—uo ponunt tollunt tam in essendo quam in cognoscendo Kekerman System log in praedicam Relati Can. 4. Logick but in the Scripture it selfe In this fourth Chap. to the Romans this word imputed is divers times repeated in the Doctrine of justification and is joyned unto Faith without which there is no imputation of Christs righteousnesse to us Imputation of righteousnesse and Faith have their being together grant one you must grant the other take away one you must take away the other Rom. 4.23.24 Now it was not written for his sake alone namely Abraham that it was imputed to him but for us also to whom it shall be imputed if we beleeve on him that raised up Jesus our Lord from the dead So that without beleeving Christs righteousnesse cannot be made ours before God There is no space of time betweene justification and justifying Faith for so soone as a man beleeves he is justified and so soone as he is justified hee beleeves Again the Apostle opposeth the Act of beleeving to justification by workes for the Act of beleeving is not our righteousnesse The proper action of Faith is apprehension and the Act of Faith in justification is beleeving or receiving Christs righteousnesse Now giving and receiving in regard of their relation stand or fall together Justification is (g) Justificatio solet distingui in Activam passivam Activailla dicitur quando deus justificat passiva quando justificatur peccator Distingui posse hic Justificationem patet ex ipsa â—erum natura si enim est quidam qui justificat quidam qui justificatur ergo est Activa Passiva justificatio Machowius Disput 17. active passive Active in regard of God that justifyeth Passive in regard of man who
of faith viz. that there is one degree of justifying faith which in order of nature goes before (e) Fides justificans praecedit justificationem ipsam ut causa suum effectum sed fides justificationem apprehendens prehenssatio praesupponit ac sequitur justificationem ut actus objectum suum circa quod versatur Ames Medul pag. 119. Quod objicitur vim justificandi non esse fidei ex seipsa sed quatenus Christum recipit libenter admitto nam si per se vel intrinseca virtute ut loquuntur justificatet fides ut est semper debilis ac imperfecta non efficeret hoc nisi ex parte sic manca esset justitia quae frustulum salutis nobis conserret Nos quidem nihil tale imaginamur sed proprie loquendo Deum unum justificare dicimus deinde hoc idem transferimus ad Chrislum quia datus est nobis in justitiam Fidem vero quasi visi conferimus quia nisi exinaniti ad expetendam Christi gratiam aperto animae ore accedimus non sumus Christi capaces unde colligitur non detrahere nos Christi vim justificandi dum prius cum recipi fide docemus quam illius justitiam Calvin Institut lib. 3. cap. 11. Sect. 7. remission of sins by which we obtaine forgivenesse of sinnes and by which we are justifyed before God Act. 26.18 That they may receive forgivenesse of sinnes and inheritance among them which are sanctified by faith that is in me Act. 13.38 39. Through this man is preached unto you the forgivenesse of sinnes and by him all that beleeve are justifyed and there is another degree of justifying Faith which followeth after justification and remission of sinnes whereby we being perswaded and in some measure assured of the remission of our sinnes we are justified in the Court of Conscience this being an effect of justifying faith And this may be proved by that Scripture he makes use of to prove his declarative justification by Faith Rom. 5.1 Therefore being justified by Faith we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ The Apostle (f) Ex hoc etiÌ„a leco certissimo aâ—gumento colligi potest justificationem ex sola fide Id autem constat ex effecto ad hunc modum Id per quod justificamur opoâ—ter ut nos pacatos reddat erga Dcum Pet. Mar. Com. in loc shewing that we are justifyed by Faith alone in the sight of God sets downe peace with God as an effect of justifying Faith which peace may be called the assurance of faith so that you see this declarative justification is no more but an effect of that faith without which we cannot be justifyed before God if he had proved by Scripture that faith is onely declarative in regard of justification it had beene something but it s altogether against the Word of God but to informe us the better I will set downe what justification is Justification is an action of God freely of his owne mercy and favour absolving a beleeving sinner from the whole curse due to his sins and accounting him perfectly just in his fight unto eternall life in heaven through the perfect obedience sufferings of Christ imputed to his Faith unto the everlasting praise and glory of Gods justice mercy and truth Rom. 3.24 25. chap. 4 5 chap. 5.19 2 Cor. 5.19 Rom. 4.4 Now judge by this whether a man can be justified by Gods imputation of Christs righteousnesse without Faith Faith and justification according to Scripture being inseparable Page 37. He sets downe the causes of justification First saith he it is God that justifyeth Rom. 8.33 efficienter as being the efficient cause of our justification Secondly it is the blood of Christ that justifieth Rom. 5.9 here is the materiall cause of our Justification Thirdly it is Faith that justifieth Declaratively I never read in Divinity amongst the causes (g) Est certus causarum ordo nec datur in iis processus in insinitum Kekerman Systemat Logic-lib 1. c. 14. of justification the declarative cause to be one never I thinke did any man heare a subject of so great concernment so lamely handled especially this Sermon as he confesseth in his Epistle being the quintessence of ten yeares Sermons let us see the causes of Justification The (h) Causa efficiens justificationis active intellectae est tota â—S Triniras causa ejus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 est mera gratta sive gratuiâ—â—s Dei favoricausa 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 est Christus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 efficient cause of Justification understood actively is the whole blessed Trinity 2 Cor. 5.19 1 Cor. 6.21 that which inwardly moves God is the meeregrace and free favour of God Rom. 3.14 Eph. 2.8 Tit. 3.4 5. the outward moving cause herein is Christ as God-man our Mediator because we obtaine this gift from his merit The (i) Causa eius instâ—umentalis est verbum evangeliiâ— justifica tonis passive sumprae respeclu hominiâ— qui justificatur nulla causa est nisi instrumentalâ— â—des instrumentall is the word of the Gospell Rom. 1.16 Justification taken passively in respect of man who is justified there is no cause but instrumentall and that is faith alone which as Logicians speake is a Passive instrument The (k) Materia justincationis active sumprae est Christi satisfactio qua peccatis nostris paenas debitas persolvit o bedientiam legi perfectam praestitir Materit ejus paslive acceptae est homo quidem in se miser Materiall cause of Justification taken actively is the satisfaction of Christ whereby he did undergoe the punishment due to our sinnes and did performe perfect obedience to the law for our Divines generally understand by Christs satisfaction his active and passive obedience The materiall cause taken passively is man in his naturall condition The (l) Forma ejus active intelle ctae est totius satisfaction is Christi imputatio qua tota quoque nostra est non secus ac si ipsi eam praestitisemus Forma justificationis passive acceptae est qua credences fide velat animae manu Christum cum roto merito suo apprehendunâ— sibique applicant formall understood actively is the imputation of the whole satisfaction of Christ whereby it is wholly made ours even as if we our selves in our owne persons had made this satisfaction Phil. 3.8.9 The formall being taken passively is when men beleeving doe by faith which is as the hand of the Soule apply unto themselves and apprehend Christ with all his merits The (m) Finis istius beneficii est dei gloria et salus nostra Welleb Christ Theol Compend lib. 1. cap. 30. finall is the glory of God and our Salvation or if you will take them more briefly thus First the efficient cause of Justification is the grace of God Secondly the materiall is Christ our redeemer Thirdly the formall is Imputation of our sinnes to him and his Justice to us Fourthly the Instrumentall
truth as it was in Christ Jesus who was ever to all beleevers as it is Joh. 14.6 The way the truth and the life No man cometh to the Father but by mee Moses could never come to the Father but by this way and this truth it is blasphemy therfore to say he did not speak according as the truth was in Christ Jesus who was ever that one truth in all ages of the world to all the people of God Againe had not Moses a Conscience sprinkled with the bloud of Christ and did he not in Christ apprehend Gods reconciled face to him in the full pardon and free remission of all his sinnes Why then if Moses spake truth according to conscience shadowing forth the bloud of Christ by the bloud of Bulls and Goats to bee that which did sprinkle the Conscience from dead workes to serve the living God it must needs bee that he spake the truth as it is in Christ Jesus Christ being ever the same in all Ages to the Consciences of all beleevers and certainely Moses spake nothing but what did accord with the truth as it was and is in Christ Jesus he being alwayes that same Truth But to prove this pag. 27. he saith this was the hidden mystery kept secret since the world began but now is made manifest Rom. 16.25 as though this was hidden all the time from Moses to John the Baptist It is strange a man should thus apply Scripture without unfolding the sense of it but it is his course throughout his Booke The scope (r) Quasi restimonii loco ne de praedicatione apostolica quisquam dubitare queat Scripturas propheticas commemotat ut admoneat Evangelii doctrinam nihil habere novi vel ficti sed id tradere quod prophetae olim futurum praedixerint Muscu in loc Hoc additur ne recens hujus Mysterii patefactio suspecta cuiquam fit infirma Testimonium inquit habet prophetarum Pet. Mar. in loc Adeo enim luculentum testimonium reddiderunt Evangelio prophetae omnes ut aliunde melius confirmaâ—â— nequeat Calvin in loc of this place if you consider the connexion with the 26. vers but now is made manifest and by the Scriptures of the Prophets according to the commandement of the everlasting God made knowne to all Nations for the obedience of faith is quite contrary to his application of it and makes against him And by the Scriptures of the Prophets The Apostle makes mention of this if any should make doubt of his Preaching as a sufficient evidence to prove that the Doctrine of the Gospell was no new or fained Doctrine And that he did deliver nothing but what of old the Prophets did foretell should come to passe And therefore it could not be a mystery hidden and kept secret from Moses and the Prophets as he affirmes falsely for then they should have foretold that which they knew not which no man well in his wits will speake or thinke They did foreknow and foresee all those things concerning Christ which afterwards were accomplished This you may see proved Luk. 18.31 Then he tooke unto him the twelve and said unto them Behold we goe up to Jerusalem and all things that are written by the Prophets concerning the Sonne of man shall be accomplished By (s) Secundum revelationem mysterii id est secreti scil de conversione gentium Si autem loquamur de mysterio incarnationis c. Aquin. Comâ—n Epist ad Rom. cap. 16. lect 2. mystery is understood First the calling of the Gentiles Secondly Christs incarnation This was the hidden mystery in regard of the Gentiles who before the comming of Christ did sit in darkenesse and in the shadow of death And now is made manifest and how could the (t) De gentibus nulla quaestio est quiante adventum Christi sedebant in umbra mortis nee vitam hanc aeternam quain Christus suis artulit aut intelligebant aut expetebant Qui poterant cum venturae Messiae praedictiones erant sacris Scripturis consignatae divina autem haec oracula crant Judaeis peculia suit igitur gentilibus simpliciter omni modo absconditum hoc mysteriâ—â— Daven in loc Gentiles know this seeing the predictions of the Messiah to come were set downe and contained in the holy Scriptures And these divine oracles were peculiar to the Jewes onely Psal 147.19.20 He sheweth his word unto Jacob his Statutes and his judgements unto Israel he hath not dealt so with any Nation The Gospell was hid from the Gentiles simply Not so from the Jewes but comparatively in comparison of the cleare light and manifestation of it since the incarnation of Christ as the Apostle himselfe expounds it Ephes 3.5 which in other ages was not made knowne to the sonnes of men as it is now revealed unto his holy Apostles and Prophets by the Spirit So by this it is plaine it was in other ages made knowne To use then this Scripture namely (*) Perpende totuÌ„ progressum mysterii suit quidem ab aeterno disposâ—uÌ„ in Deo absconditum suit postea perprophetas patefactuÌ„ in tempore hominibus ut crederent postremo agnitum revelatuÌ„ gentibus Cadinal Tol. com in loc Rom. 16.25 to prove that this mystery was kept secret and hidden from the people of the Jewes from Moses to John Baptists time is a false interpretation and misse-application of it if he lookes into the 26. verse he may see this mystery is made manifest by the Scriptures of the Prophets thus you see his exposition is a contradiction if made manifest by their writings then manifested to them Againe he useth 1 Pet. 1.10 11 12. The mystery the Prophets searched after as if he could prove by this place that this mystery was hid and kept secret from Moses and the Prophets but this Scripture makes altogether against his absurdity and plainely proves the contrary The Apostles (u) Scopus Apostoli est removere calumniam illam qua etiam tum temporis doctrina Christiana gravabatur esse eam doctrinam novam atque hactenus inauditam atque incognitam contrarium ergo hic asserit Petrus declarans etiam ab ipsis pro phetis eam esse testificatam ac praedicatam Jacobus Lauren. com in loc aime here is to take off an aspersion which some at that time cast upon the Doctrine of the Gospell saying as it is Act. 17.19 May we know what this new Doctrine whereof thou speakest is They did account it a new unknowne unheard of Doctrine the Apostle affirmes the contrary declaring that it is the same which was testified and Preached by the Prophets themselves who prophesied of the grace that should come unto you Searching what or what manner of time the Spirit of Christ which was in them did signifie when it testisied beforehand the sufferings of Christ and the glory that should follow So that from this place it is evident the Prophets did not onely declare the time but the
Againe it is plaine (k) Ratio quasi a priori est quod deus per essentiam sit ipsa justitia increata immensa fontalis ab â—a ergovelut a sonte manat omnis justitia creata angelorum hominum quam proinde ut suam amat ac vice versa odit abominatur omnem injustitiam quasi sibi essentialiter contrariam et a daemone prosectam Cornel. à Lap. Com. in loc Prov. 17.15 He that justifieth the wicked and he that condemneth the just even they both are abomination to the Lord will God who is the fountaine of justice doe that himselfe which he hateth in others if that place be alleadged Rom. 4.5 But to him that worketh not but beleeveth on him that justifieth the ungodly and therefore a man is justified before he beleeves the meaning is expounded in these words of the Verse his faith is counted for righteousnesse so that this must be understood in sensu diviso in a divided sense That God justifieth the wicked not him that remaineth wicked but was so before he was justified And the Schoole doth briefely resolve this God justifieth the ungodly Antecedenter antecedently that is him who before justification was ungodly not consequenter consequently that is him who after justification remaineth ungodly Pag. 36. towards the latter end saith he if we take Faith for the Act of our Faith apprehending this object then we are justified by it declaratively in our consciences and concludes that Faith doth onely justifie declaratively speaking to our consciences that wee are the children of God in Christ Jesus Thus you see hee doth exclude faith altogether from justifying a sinner in the sight of God And that it is onely said to justifie because by it we come to be certaine and to have assurance in our consciences that wee are justified in the sight of God and as it doth declare unto us our justification in the court of conscience Two grosse absurdities will follow upon Faiths declarative justification onely as he calls it The first is that Faith doth not at all justifie which is point blacke contrary to the Doctrine of Christ and his Apostles for it is one thing to be and another thing to appeare to be Faith having no hand at all in the being of Justification but in the making of it appeare to be So that I am first justified in the sight of God by Gods imputation without Faith and afterwards Faith comes and makes it appeare to me that I am justifyed And by it I come to have assurance in my conscience that it is so The second absurdity will be this That where there is not assurance there is no faith Faith being as he concludes onely an assurance that I am justifyed What will a distressed Conscience in case of spirituall desertion doe this doctrine makes him desperate for by this he argues the case thus Faith is nothing but an assurance to me in my conscience that I am justifyed in the sight of God but I want this assurance therefore I am without Faith and consequently in a damned condition as the case now stands with me Is this preaching Christ and free grace but I say a man may want in his owne apprehension this assurance and yet he may have Faith Gods people sometimes are in such a condition that they cannot see so much as a glimpse of Gods favour Nay the contrary They conclude themselves forsaken of God and cast-awayes what 's become now of assurance but for all this dare any man say that men in this condition have no Faith Nay they are upheld by the secret support of Faith otherwise in such a condition they would despaire as Judas did but it is plaine by Scripture that a childe of God may want assurance and yet by Faith stay himselfe upon God Isay 50.10 Who is among you that feareth the Lord that obeyeth the voyce of his servant that walketh in darknesse and hath no light let him trust in the name of the Lord and stay himselfe upon his God Take faith for the act of Faith apprehending the object and so we are justified by faith onely in the sight of God in regard whereof the salvation of all that truely beleeve is sure and certaine though they perhaps be not assured thereof for this is the promise of the Gospell that whosoever beleeveth on him should not perish but have life everlasting Take faith in reference to the Subject for that which doth declare our justification to our consciences and herein (a) Fides illa proprie dicitur justificans qua incumbimus in Christum ad remissionem pecca orum salutem Christus enim est adaequatuÌ„ objectuÌ„ fidei quatenus fides justificat fides enim non alia ratione justificat nisi quatenus aâ—prehendit illam justitiam propter quam justificamur illa autem justitia non est in veritate alicujus axiomatâ—s cui assensum pâ—aebemus sâ—â— in Christo solo qui factus est pro nobis peccatum ut nos essemus in ipso justitia 2 Cor. 5 21. fides ista justificans sâ—a natura producit atque adeo conjunctam secum habet speciaâ—em ac certam persuasionem de gratia ac misericordia Dei in Christo Ames Medul Theol. lib. 1 cap. 27. de Just faith cannot not be said properly to justify for this is an effect of justifying faith There are two degrees of justifying Faith the one being a lively assent to the promise of the Gospell the other a sound application thereof to our selves by the former as being the condition of the promise we are justified in the Court of Heaven by the latter in the Court of our owne conscience which is not properly called justification but the application of justification for a man must first be justified in the sight of God before he can be perswaded in his conscience of his justification otherwise his perswasion is a false perswasion and a meere delusion By the former we are justified before God by the latter we are perswaded in our conscience and in some measure assured of our justification For the further clearing of this distinction of Faith let us consider the differences betweene the two degrees by the former as I have said we are justified before God in the Court of heaven by the latter we are justified in the Court of our owne Conscience by the former we are justified properly by the latter we are assured of our justification I take this assurance to be an act of experience flowing from justifying Faith Of the justification which we have by the first degree which is properly so called there are no degrees (b) Justitia nobis imputata persecta aequalis est in omnibus credentibus Wolleb Compend Theol. lib. l.c. 30. but of that which we have by the second degree which is not justification but the assurance of it there are degrees according to the measure of Faith of necessity we must hold this distinction
words Peter went out and wept bitterly hath this passage Peter therefore wept bitterly he wept that he might with teares wash away his sinne If thou wilt obtaine pardon wash away thy offence with teares thus the Father (f) Tria sunt genera Baptismi quorum primum quo sordes peccatorum per regenerationis lavacrum abluuntur Secondum quo quis sanguine suo per Martyrium baptizatur Est autemtertium baptisina lachrymarum Isidor de offic eccle lib. cap. 22. sol mihi 411. Isidor Hispalensis who lived a thousand yeares agoe saith there are three kinds of baptisme or washing The first whereby the defilements of sinne are washed away by the laver of regeneration The second when one is baptized in his owne blood by Martyrdome with which baptisme Christ was like wise baptized The third is the baptisme or washing of teares To preach then that teares of repentance wash away sin is no new Doctrine and is not injurious to but doth magnifie the blood of Christ Teares being an effect flowing from the conscience sprinkled with the blood of Christ Musculus upon the first of Esay propounds this question How the Prophet exhorts men to wash and cleanse themselves seeing it is not in their power And 1 Joh. 1. The blood of Jesus Christ washeth us from all sinne He answers it thus That this (g) Hujusmodi resipiscentia causa est repurgationis non per quam sed sine qua non Muscul com in loc repentance here required is the cause of our washing or cleansing not the cause by which but the cause without which our sinnes cannot be washed away And they are said to wash away our sinnes not considered in (h) Non in reipsa intrinseca bonitate actus sed in divina acceptatione pactione ordinatione Cassand Ep. 19 pag. mihi 1110. themselves or in regard of intrinsecall goodnesse in the Act of shedding them but in regard of Gods acceptation who doth in and through Christ accept of them in regard of Gods covenant and promise in regard of his ordination who hath ordained that such as shall bee saved shall weepe for their sinnes There is a washing of Sanctification and Regeneration as well as to Justification By true repentance these benefits doe redound of beleevers First remission of sinnes Marke 1.4 John did preach the baptisme of repentance for the remission of sinnes Thus while hee intitles his booke Johns doctrine hee labours as much as in him lyeth to overthrow Johns Doctrine Act. 3.19 Repent therefore and bee converted that your sinnes may bee blotted out Secondly the favour of God Luke 4.18 The Spirit of the Lord is upon mee because hee hath annointed mee to preach the Gospel to the poore he hath sent mee to heale the broken hearted to preach deliverance to the Captives and recovering of sight to the blind to set at libertie those that are bruised to preach the acceptable yeare of the Lord Luke 15.7 Joy shall bee in heaven over one sinner that repenteth as you may see in the parable of the Prodigall The third benefit is righteousnesse before God Luk. 18.14 The Publican bewailing his condition in true repentance our Lord saith he went downe to his house justified rather than the other by (h) Uterque descendit domum sed impari fructu Publicanus vere justificatus Pharisaeus coram hominibus ranrum Areti in loc rather is meant the Publican was truely justifyed the Pharisee before men onely The Publican in the sight of God they had both their Righteousnesse the one hypocriticall the other reall who was justifyed of God So that rather must not be understood of one and the same Righteousnesse as though the difference consisted onely in this That the Publican was more justifyed the Pharisee lesse the Pharisee he justifyed himselfe before men hypocritically the other was justifyed of God which is much rather to be chosen Fourthly The gift and inhabitation of the Holy Ghost Act. 2.38 Repent and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sinnes and yee shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost Fifthly The hearing of our prayers 1 Joh. 3.21 22. If our heart condemne us not then we have confidence toward God And whatsoever we aske we receive of him The Sixth is Salvation and life eternall Act. 11.18 Then hath God also to the Gentiles granted repentance unto life The seventh is Freedome from temporall punishments or to be sure a mitigation of them Jonah 3.10 And God saw their workes that they turned from their evill wayes and God repented of the evill that he had said 2 Chron. 12.12 And when he humbled himselfe the wrath of the Lord turned from him that he would not destroy him altogether This is contrary to what he taught on a Fast day as I was credibly informed That we did not Fast and humble our selves for the turning away of Gods Judgements Looke well upon these particulars and consider the places of Scripture and you shall finde it no blasphemy to say repentance washes away sin Now let us see how all these benefits are attributed to repentance and how they may be said to be the fruites of it Not (i) Observandum est paenitentiae haec tribui non ratione contritionis quasi illa sit meritum quoddam ac causa remissionis peccatorum sed ratione hdei quae est essentialis pars paenitentiae Quod ergo partis quidem primatiae pro prium est illud usitata Scripturae phrasi toti tribuitur Gerhard locor Tom. 3. col mihi 428. in regard of contrition as if that were a certain merit and cause of remission of sinnes I meane the meritorious cause though as I said it is Causa sine qua non the cause without which we cannot receive them but in regard of Faith which is an essentiall part of repentance which doth apprehend Christ and in Christ doth freely receive the grace of God remission of sinnes righteousnesse the gift of the Holy Ghost and life eternall That therefore which is proper to a part it being the principall part That is by the usuall phrase of Scripture attributed to the whole Especially when as true and saving Faith and true contrition and the study of new obedience are inseparably joyned together I hope then we may use Scripture phrase without blasphemy Page 49. The latter end he sayes This doctrine workes hideous effects in the Church of God The simple people being asked how they thinke to make satisfaction to God for sin have answered by lamenting and amending Are not these simple people those that have lived the ten yeares under his Ministery they are simple indeed Aske a Childe that can say the Church Catechisme which in teaching repentance tells us Wee must have a lively Faith in Gods mercy through Christ with a thankefull remembrance of his death and he will tell you he hopes to make satisfaction by the merits of Jesus Christ We
unlesse they were done in faith and that by them the people did looke at the righteousnesse of faith aiming altogether at Jesus Christ in whom and by whom there was and ever is eternall remission who was (a) Quia ut primum caepit humani generis reparatio per justificationem hominum in Christo caepit Agni illius sanguis operari Estius in diffic Script loc Revel 13.8 The Lamb of God slaine from the foundation of the World But let us see what actuall remission which he calls a fleshly purifying is Why t is this when any of the people had outwardly defiled their bodies by touching any uncleane thing as for one the touching of a dead body they were to be excluded the congregation now by some legall service this uncleannesse was remitted namely by the act of sprinkling the water of separation and by this they had actuall remission of their uncleannesse which gave them admission into the Congregation againe The Prophets never had any Commission to preach the old Covenant separated and apart from the New neither is this actuall remission by legall services set downe but in reference to eternall remission by Christ neither did the Prophets ever preach it otherwayes for if they had they had Preached Justification by workes and the righteousnesse of the Law and so they and their hearers must needs come short of the righteousnesse of God which is by Faith and so perish everlastingly Oh damned Doctrine Page 51. About the middle To make these things more plaine saith he Take this proposition which I know will tingle in the eares of many happily it may tingle in his owne eares for t is pity but he should heare of it his proposition is this The knowledge of both actuall and eternall remission was no Article of the Jewish Creed but a part of that mystery which was kept secret from the giving of the Law untill the time of John Baptist his meaning is that all that time the Jewes had not knowledge of actuall and eternall remission as he layes it downe pag. 52. line 17. his reason is They differed nothing from servants so line the 20. he concludes they were in bondage and being so had not knowledge of actuall and eternall remission Marke and see if he doth not contradict his owne proposition pag. 51. line 6. he saith in the New Covenant the Prophet Preacht eternall remission why then he had knowledge of it and by Preaching made it knowne to others So then they had knowledge of that before the time of John Baptist as himselfe confesseth Againe he confesseth They Preached actuall remission by legall services Againe looke Pag. 53. line 3. he confesseth They had knowledge of actuall remission to come by the promised seed And herein he contradicts himselfe in saying It was a part of that mystery kept secret from the giving of the Law untill the time of John Baptist For then they could not have knowne it to come (b) Scientia est habitus demoÌ„strativus Aristot 6. Ethic. Knowledge is a Demonstrative habite and doth determin the Intellect to one side with certainty No question but the Jewes had so much knowledge whereby they did certainely and assuredly beleeve and were perswaded and did understand that their sins were really actually and eternally remitted in Christ By his actuall remission to come doth he understand Christs actuall comming in the flesh we must know that all true beleevers who lived before Christs comming in the flesh had actuall and eternall remission without which they could not be saved nor enter into Heaven He was up with (c) Patres sub lege non fuisse consortes aetornae vitae Osiand Epit. hist eccle Cent. 16. lib 2. cap. 21. Servetus in his Sermon but makes no mention of him in Print This Heretique held that the Fathers under the Law were not partakers of eternall life and according to his proposition this heretique speakes the truth To prove this proposition he brings in this place of Scripture Joh. 1.18 No man hath seene God at any time the onely begotten Sonne which is in the bosome of the Father he hath declared him Will he prove by this place that none of the Fathers and people of the Jewes did see God in regard of Actuall and eternall remission before Christs comming in the flesh Remission of sinnes is an Article of our Faith And did not they beleeve the same remission of sinnes which we doe To make things plaine I will here set downe what remission of sins is Remission of sins is forgivenesse of sin when both the guilt and punishment are freely pardoned for Christ alone to such as beleeve in him Now if the Fathers did beleeve eternall remission they must needs know it For in true saving Faith there are three things (d) Forma fidei docendi causa tribus partibus describi folet Notiria Assensu fiducia 1. Notiria est corum cognitio quae ad saâ—utem necessaria sunt 2. Assensus est quo firmiter credirut vera esse quae verbo Dei traduntur 3. hiducia est qua quisque fidelium fibi promissiones Evangelicas applicat Wolleb Theol. compend lib. 1. cap. 29. pag. 231. required Knowledge Assent and Application By Knowledge I mean the right conceiving of the necessary Doctrines of true Religion especially those which concerne Christ our Redeemer Assent is when a man knowing this Doctrine doth further approve of the same as whole some doctrine and the Truth of God directing us aright unto salvation Application is when we conceive in our hearts a true perswasion of Gods mercy towards us particularly in the free pardon of all our sins and for the salvation of our Soules The Jewes living in the time of the Law having true saving Faith must needs then have knowledge of Actuall and eternall remission having these three things which must needs be in all that did ever truely beleeve but it is proved by Scripture Act. 10.43 To him give all the Prophets witnesse that through his Name whosoever beleeveth in him shall receive remission of sins Three things observable in the Text. First That it is the proper Office of Christ by blotting out their sins to reconcile men to God Secondly That by Faith we obtaine remission of sinnes Thirdly That this (e) Quod haec doctrina non nova aut nuper fabricata sit sed jam olim ab ultimis seculis testes habuerit omnes Dei Prophetas Calvin in loc Doctrine of remission is no new Doctrine lately framed But of old from the beginnings of the world had all the Prophets of God witnesses to it and therefore they must of necessity know it But we will open the meaning of this place Joh. 1.18 No man hath seene God at any time c. God is said to be seene in Scripture diverse wayes First he is (f) Plures modi sunt videndi Deum 1. primus quo non in se sed in operibus suis videtur
pecâ—atorum per fidem venturi Christi conscientias a mortis peccati Tyrann de liberas habebant quantum saluti suae satisesset Parcus in loc did not derogate from their inheritance and adoption They were neverthelesse Sonnes Heires Lords of all under this outward servitude they had their consciences free serving God freely in the inner man with a filiall spirit for they were certaine of free remission of sinnes by Faith in Christ and had their consciences freed from the tyranny of death and sinne so farre forth as was sufficient for their Salvation So that this place of Scripture rightly understood makes altogether against him for from hence we may gather that the (b) Itaque hic verborum Apostoli sensus est nemo puter me quae hactenus dixi in Patrum ant gentis Judaicae contumeliam dixisse sueruÌ„t enim hi quo que filii Dei promissionum haeredes neque me latet quod olim pronuntiavit Deus Israel est filius meus primogenitus Item ex Aegypto vocavi filium meum Exod. 4. Hose 11. Gualter in Gal. hom 31 Fathers under the Old Testament had hope of the same inheritance which we have at this very day because they were partakers of the same adoption and they were chosen of God to this end that they should be the sons of God together with us as well as we Againe we gather from this place that in externall servitude which to them was no servitude but as it is compared with our condition since the comming of Christ they had freedome of conscience neither did the strict observation of the Law hinder Moses Daniel all the godly Kings Priests and Prophets and the whole company of beleevers but that they were free in spirit Therefore they did so beare the yoke of the Law upon their shoulders which I say againe was not to them a yoke but comparatively to the Christian liberty by the comming of Christ that they did serve God with a free spirit and were principally and especially (c) Praesertim vero de gratuita peccatorum remissione edocti ut conscientias haberent a peccati mortis Tyrannide solutas Inde constituendum est candem semper suisse doctrinam vera fidei unitate nobiscum fuisse conjunctos unius etiam Mediatoris fiducia nobisctan fretos Calvin in loc taught and instructed concerning free remission of sins and had their consciences loosed from the Tyranny and slavery of sinne and death From whence it is concluded that there was alwayes one and the same Doctrine and that they were joyned with us in the true unity of Faith and that they did injoy with us affiance and hope in one and the same Mediator in whom they had boldnesse and accesse with confidence by the Faith of him Ephes 3.12 and therefore it must necessarily follow that they had not an overly but an experimentall knowledge of actuall and eternall remission having assurance in their consciences that their sins were at that present time wherein they lived actually and eternally remitted in Christ Otherwise we must conclude that the sinnes of beleevers in the time of the Law were not remitted till Christs manifestation and comming in the flesh which is most absurd and contradictory to Scripture They had Christ in Spirit They beleeved in Christ and were saved by him as we are as it is Heb. 13.8 Jesus Christ the same yesterday and to day and for ever Yesterday to our Fathers to day to us for ever to ours all that ever were saved were saved by one and the same Christ who is the way being (d) Quia igitur haereditas caelestis non est nisi una 〈◊〉 una ejus parandae via ac ratio perspicuum est unam substantia esse veteris novi Testaments Ecclesiam salutis doctrinam contra quam â—anaâ—ici papistae contendunt Pareus com in Gal. cap. 4. 1. ever the same yesterday before the time of his comming in the flesh to day when he did come in the flesh at the time before appointed now and for ever the same Christ to all beleevers in all times all beleevers in all ages being for substance one and the same Church of God Christ was (e) Exhibitus Patribus in promissione ita ut eorum fider non minus praesen fue it sanguis Christi sun dendus quam sidei nostâ—ae praefens est jamolim effusus Tessan in Epist ad Hebr. praelect cap. 13.8 exhibited in the promise to the Fathers and the blood of Christ to be shed was no lesse present to their Faith then the blood of Christ long agoe shed is present to our Faith Heb. 9.22 Without shedding of blood is no remission and it was by the shedding of the same blood that all Gods people from the beginning of the world ever had remission Pareus (f) Unde commentum pontificium de limbo in quem Patres fideles crudeliter detruferunt ubi nulla salute fruerentur eminus tancum sururam intuerontur firmiter destruitur Pareus in loc that godly and learned man from his place Gal. 4.1 concludes that if the Fathers were Heires and Lords of the inheritance with us they were therefore saved by Faith no lesse than we whereby he condemneth the Papists concerning their (g) Altis debetur sola paenadamni solum temporalis absque ulla paena sensus isti dicebantur esse in limbo Patrum qui prohibebantur an eâ—passionem Christi a visione divina eo quod non crat satisfactum pro peccato totius naturae quanâ—vis hi non essent obnoxii alicur panae pro peccatis suis personalibus Durand lib. 3. dist 22 quae 4. limbus wherein they have cruelly shut up the Fathers where they injoy not salvation but behold it afar off onely to come and this is just according to his proposition as he defends it that they had knowledge of actuall and eternall remission to come not present but afarre off His proposition is farre more cruell and injurious to the Fathers than the opinion of the Papists is about the limbus They have devised and imagined in their wandering conceit foure infernall and subterrestriall places First Hell Secondly Purgatory Thirdly Limbus infantum where Children remaine dying without baptisime Fourthly Limbus Patrum where all the Fathers were before Christs comming in the flesh And their opinion is that they were kept in an infernall place or dungeon of darknesse yet without paine they did suffer the punishment of losse onely and that but for a time for this Limbus did indure but till the comming of Christ and (f) Constituunt Scholastici communi consensu intra terram quatuor sinus five unum in quatuor partes divisum unum pro damnatis alterum pro purgandis tertium pro Infantibus sine baptismo abeuntibus quartum pro justis qui moriebantur ante Christi passionem qui nunc vacuus remanet Bellarm. Tom 2. de Purgator lib. 2. cap. 6. pag. mihi 410. Bellarmin himselfe
not onely the separation of the soule from the body but the punishment which is inflicted upon us from an angry God so that it comprehends eternall destruction and thus every wicked man that is out of Christ is through the feare of death temporall as being the gate to eternall death all his life time subject to bondage The beleeving Jewes were not subject to this bondage they were the Sonnes of God and did receive the spirit of adoption and this slavish feare and bondage was taken away from them by Christ for they were the sonnes of God by adoption as well as wee Pa. 54. To prove that this was a bondage of conscience saith he What is it that makes death bitter but the sting of death and what is the sting of death but sin Wherefore they had conscience of sin This is a doctrine most injurious to the people of God in those times against the blood of Christ certainly the sting of death so of conscience was by Christ taken from them and they could say as well as beleevers now as it is (d) Nec quicquam obstabit quin olim corpora nostra resuscitentur fiat quod olim per propheras Apoâ—â—olos praedictum est Gual in loc hom 87. Verba Prophetae vel Apostoli laetantis Hos 13.14 Glo. Ordin 1 Cor. 15.55 56 57. O death where is thy sting O grave where is thy victory The sting of death is sin and the strength of sin is the Law but thankes be to God who hath given us victory through our Lord Jesus Christ Pag. 55. he argues thus If the Jewes betweene Moses time and John Baptist were under the Law then under the curse that they were under the Law is proved Gal. 3.23.24 But if under the Law then under the curse Gal. 3.10 Can he prove that because the Apostle saith Before faith came we were kept under the Law therefore the Jewes were under the curse and from Moses to John Baptists time lived and died under the curse which must of necessitie follow Never did any man mis-apply and mis-interpret-mis-interpret-Scripture more grossely for this place will prove clearely that their being kept under the Law was not a curse but a blessing upon them and that in a high degree 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 (e) Erat lex quoddam 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 munimentum quo circumse ptus populus ille conspicuus inexpugnabilis impermixtus usque ad Christum conservabatur ab aliis populis separatus permanebat Pareus in loc 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifieth to be fenced about with a garrison of men God did give unto this nation many particular priviledges they being a peculiar people unto himselfe as the morall Law written the Priesthood Rites Ceremonies and forme of government now the Law was quoddam 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is a wall of defence with which the people were hedged in round about and were conspicuous inexpugnable kept separated from other nations untill the comming of Christ thus to be kept under the Law was a peculiar favour of God to theÌ„ above al other nations in the world as God himself witnesseth Deut. 4.7 8. For what nation is there so great who hath God so nigh unto them as the Lord our God is in all things that we call upon him for And what nation is there so great that hath statutes and judgements so righteous as all this Law which I set before you this day This place doth confute him the (f) Dicturi erant pscudoapostoli Etiamsi coÌ„cedamus justitiam non manare ex lege sed ex gratuita in Christo promissione quum tamen Deus quem semper unum sui similem esse testatus est oeconomiam istam Mosaicam constituerit c. quo jure vis illam aboâ—ere Responder Apostolus temporariam fuisse istam oeconomiam Beza in loc scope and designe of the Apostle is to confute the false Apostles who were ready to say Although we grant righteousnesse not to come by the Law but from the free promise in Christ Notwithstanding God who is unchangeable did give the Mosaicall Law and oeconomie as you confesse to bring us to Christ how then can this stand with the unchangeablenesse of God that this Law should be abolished The Apostle makes answer that by Gods appointment this was but Temporarie and to endure but till faith came that is till Christs comming in the flesh for Faith is taken metonymically for the principall object of Faith and it were fearefully desperate to thinke that all the people from Moses to John Baptist lived so under the Law as that they were without faith in Jesus Christ Thus you see this place maketh against him and in stead of a curse pronounceth a blessing it being the blessing of God upon the Jewes to be kept under the Law till Faith came that is till Christs incarnation The beleeving Jewes before the comming of Christ were under the Law in respect of Ceremonies but not in respect of the malediction curse thereof To conclude this if by the Law of Moses we understand the Mosaicall Politie so the Law by the comming of Christ was abolished if by the Law wee understand the morall Law or ten Commandements the curse of the Law is and was ever taken away in regard of all true beleevers living in all ages of the world (a) Causa abrogationis manifesta haec est Deus singulari beneficio constituit politiam Mosaicam ut esser certa fedes certa gens quali Schola in qua servatetur doctrina de Filio Dei repeterentur promissiones adderentur illustrissima testimonia in qua certum esset Filium assumpta natura humana concionaturum esse fururum victimam resurrecturum esse editurum testimonia doctrinae quia Deus de his tantis rebus vult nos certos esse voluit autem postea finem esse hujus politiae Melancthon par 2. de leg pag mihi 251. And likewise consider it as a guard whereby the Jewes were fenced in and separated from all other nations so it is by Christs comming abolished Consider it as a rule of life Thus Angels are under the Law Adam before his fall the Saints now in heaven And none yeeld more subjection to it then they this subjection is their libertie and thus the Law considered as a rule of life is the will of God and is eternall as God himselfe Let us goe on and see how he can prove from Gal. 3.10 That the people being under the Law were under the curse The intent of the Apostle in this place is to prove justification by Faith in opposition to the workes of the Law as Vers 8 9. And the Scripture foreseeing that God would justifie the Heathen through Faith preached before the Gospel unto Abraham saying In thee shall all Nations be blessed So then they which be of Faith are blessed with faithfull Abraham for as