the inward Essence and the other according to the outward manner of Existence Yet this must be taken further into Consideration seeing from this distribution of the Church Mr. Baxter hath got up an Argument to prove visible Churches to be no Churches which is his nineteenth Argument of his 26. and is thus framed If the distribution of the Church into visible and invisible be but of the subject into divers adjuncts and not of a Genus into its Species then that part or those Members which are meerly visible are indeed no part of the Members of the Church so distributed but are onely Equivocally called a Church Church-Members c. The Antecedent must be yielded him the Consequence he saith is undeniable in that adjuncts are no part of the Essence much lesse the form or the whole Essence and therefore cannot denominate but aequivocally instead of the essence To this I answer the consequence might as fairly have been that these members which are invisible are no parts or members of the Church so distributed seeing invisibility or invisible as is confest is an adjunct as well as visibility or visible There may be a distribution of man by hundreds of adjuncts either corpulent or leane high or low black or fair old or young rich or poor learned or unlearned c. If one of these so denominated be a true man shall the other then be onely aequivocally a man If a corpulent man be a true man is a leane man no man If a tall black or old man be a true man shall then a low fair or young man be no man This must needs follow as well as the other The reason given that adjuncts are no part of the Essence is not at all to the purpose seeing the subject that is denominated by such adjuncts hath its Essence though blacknesse be not of the essence of a man yet the man that is black hath his essence and though visibility be not of the essence of the Church yet the Church which is denominated visible hath its essence And whereas we are warned to note that visibile is not the same with visum so I can give warning that invisibile is not the same with non visum though I know not to what purpose Secondly I answer the Church being an integrum and that per aggregationem and onely one in exact propriety of speech it cannot be capable of any such distribution so there must be one Church of one denomination and another of another but it is a distribution of Church-members which serve as parts to make up the whole some of which are onely visible that is all their honour to make a visible profession and to enjoy the glory of Ordinances and the Divine protection of God over his vineyard upon which account they are nigh when others are a far off The other are invisible members As they have all the visible honour before mentioned so they have an addition of a far greater glory of invisible graces The former I take to be the Church most properly though I know others are of another opinion for two reasons 1. When the Church is an integrum as Mr. Hudson hath largely proved it the visible Church containes the whole for the invisible part is also visible invisible respective to graces but visible respective to profession and outward priviledges The invisible is onely one part and so not the Church in its most proper signification 2. The Scripture almost wheresoever it speakes of a Church takes it in this acception and that which is the ordinary and common language of the holy Ghost which he uses most often almost alwayes is that which is most proper Some have said that the word Church is not more then once taken for the Church invisible which is Heb. 12.23 The Church of the first born If it should be granted that there is two or three places more which will bear that acceptation of it which is as much as can be pretended yet I dare say there is not one for twenty where the Church is taken for the Church visible And is the language of Scripture still all over aequivocal When Christ sayes The Kingdome of heaven is like to a man that sowed good seed in his field is like to a draw-net shall we say the Kingdome of heaven aequivocally taken Stephen sayes This was he that was in the Church in the wildernesse must we understand it of the Church aequivocal And when Paul gave Timothy a directory how to behave himself in the house of God which he sayes is the Church of the living God must we understand it of a Church aequivocal Such a one would be but a weak ground or pillar of the truth we may say the same of abundant other places If all these aequivocals be granted it will shortly be questioned whether there be any reality in Scripture language The Author vindicated from Arminianisme As the authority of our Divines is produced against the Papists so also their authority against the Arminians is brought forth Our Divines against the Arminians saith he do suppose the first act of believing to be the first time that God is as it were engaged to man in the Covenant of grace and that it is dangerous to make God to be in actual Covenant with men in the state of nature though the conditional Covenant may be made to them and though he hath revealed his decree for the sanctifying his elect That God is then first engaged for the graces of the Covenant I easily yeeld for then the grand condition by the help of grace is put in by the soul But let us here take up that which he is pleased to yield and compare it with that which he hath put into the Index of his Treatise of Infant-Baptisme where he notes this as Mr. T. his Error That the Covenant whereof Baptisme is the seal is onely the absolute Covenant made onely to the Elect which pag. 223. he confutes And if men in the state of nature be in that Covenant that Baptisme seales viz the conditional Covenant then men in the state of nature and short of justifying faith have right to Baptisme It follows In my opinion the transition is very easie from Mr. Blakes opinion to Arminianisme if not unavoidable save by retreat or by not seeing the connexion of the consequence to the antecedent When this was charged upon me by another hand I was acquitted by Mr. Br. and he testified for me that I had acquitted Mr. M. from any such charge I marvel therefore that now it should be fastened upon me But let us hear his reason For grant once that common faith doth coram Deo give right to Baptisme and it is very easie to prove that it gives right to the end of Baptisme God having not instituted it to be an empty sign to those that have true right to it What is it that we hear will it give immediate right to the end of Baptisme
thus driven on they could not but see that Christs presence with or in the Elements can be no more then Sacramental in which the sign is still put for the thing signified The bead is the body and the cup the blood of Christ no otherwise then the rock in the wildernesse was Christ In the explication of Sacramental signs there can be expected no other then Sacramentall speeches And therefore that great Lutheran Logician was much mistaken in charging the transgression of his maxim upon Calvinists that the proper sense of Scripture is ever to be held unlesse the contrary can be evidently proved in their leaving of the letter in the words of the Supper sive 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as he speaks Taking it for granted that no such necessity can be shewen When it is enough to evince the necessity of a trope that the words are an explanation of a Sacramental sign We must not put this Sacrament at such a distance from all others as to make the whole here rigidly proper and all others Sacramental Words must be fitted to the nature of the subject But to help himself out he wisely borrowes from Bellarmine an assertion that Reasons are not to be demanded of any that hold the proper sense why they keep to it Both of them it seems despairing of giving any reason that is satisfying But methinks he might blush in the use of the Simile that he hath also borrowed to make his assertion good This were say they as if any should ask of those that are in a journey why they hold the old beaten way and why they go in at the door and not at the window When they or either of them can make it appear that the old way of interpretation of Sacramental speeches is to understand them properly without any Metonymie then I shall say that the letter here is not to be left but in the strictest rigour to be followed But till then I shall believe them to be both out of the way And all Sacraments being appendants to promises it will likewise follow that Christs presence with him that in faith takes these Elements is no other then a presence in Spirit Where these things are happily accorded and all scruple laid aside a new quarrel is raised about the subject of Sacraments That they are institutions of Christ and gifts vouchsafed by him to his Church is acknowledged But to whom they belong and who of right can make his claim to them is not determined when yet the visibility of the Ordinances and trust reposed in man for dispensation of them whose sight is more weak then to discern that which is invisible necessarily concludes that they belong to visible Church-members not in a select way pickt out of other Churches which is a way that no Scripture-Saint ever trod but in as great a latitude as the profession of the Christian faith In this Scripture is so plain that it is wonder that ever it was made a controversie Either the Jew outwardly was mis-nam'd when the title of Circumcision was given him and a foul misprision run upon when a proselyte was circumcised or a new convert in Scripture-way baptized or else this must necessarily be granted So that as to title and right of claim if Scriptures may judge the Covenant-grant is clear Yet as there are many that have their just right in Legacies and inheritances who are not judged meet for present fruition It would be many a man's losse even to ruine to have that presently put into his hands which justly might be claimed as his own So it fares in this great Ordinance of the Lords Supper which all that partake of are to look upon and improve as a memorial of Christs death for which all are not in any possible capacity as they are not for some other duties And here in all reason they that are to dispense this Ordinance are most concerned to distinguish And if Regeneration be the mark by which they are to be steered it is not like a Sea-boy appointed for the Pilot's guide floting on the top of the water but rather as one hid in the bottome which necessarily involves both dispenser and receiver in inextricable difficulties and perplexities And when most confesse that men free from ignorance errour and scandal though unregenerate must have admission and all acknowledge that such will we nill we will enter If it be concluded that unregeneration is an undeniable and invincible barre to all possible benefit and blank paper is alwayes sealed whensoever such take it it is not yet made known how it may be dispensed by those in whose hands it is entrusted with any possible comfort A great part of this work is to render the way here more comfortably passable in giving the doubting soul hopes that yet sees not concluding evidence in his own thoughts of a new birth many of which upon principles that they have taken in sadly reason against themselves in participation of this Ordinance and withal to put courage into the hands of the Ministers of Christ to presse the power of this soul-humbling Ordinance of God on the hearts of intelligent hearers competently instructed in Gospel principles whom yet they may justly have in jealousie not yet to have come up to this great and blessed work of a thorough change wrought in the mean space differing little or nothing from the common received opinion as to the qualifications of those that are to be or are not to be denyed admittance Yet I thought not meet that they should go alone but to send out upon this occasion into publick view a just Tractate of Sacraments which occasionally is grown into a bigger bulk then I ever intended That which appeares clear to my sight I doubt not but will seem otherwise in the eyes of some others And therefore I put it upon my account to meet not onely with dislike as every one does that deals in works of this nature but also with opposition I heare indeed that as of old it hath been said that unregenerate men have no true right in the sight of God to any of his creatures and that all such possessors are usurpers so also it is now maintained that all such notwithstanding their visible Church-interest are without all right to any Church-priviledges Though they make use of them as unregenerate men do of the creatures and by command from God must make use of them so that their neglect of them is justly charged as their sin yet they are still without any true right to them or title in them This I confesse with me is a strange assertion I should thinke that those immunities which Jesus Christ to whom all power is given in heaven and in earth of his good pleasure doth vouchsafe to men of meer visible Church-interest in order to bring them to an invisible right and title and which unregenerate men enjoy in order to work them to a Regenerate state are their true ana proper right
blood p. 570 l. 12 member l. 22 before me p. 573 l. 22 Tome page 576 marg directly page 579 l. 6 ascribes p. 584 up to Ibid. nor p 588 l. 7 older p. 589 l. 4 lesse l. 5 more p. 590 l. 19 which page 606 line 10 a fine Travellers page 611 l. 11 takes off the force of the Law condemning p. 614 l. 4 a fine Then p. 648 l. 20 wait THE Covenant sealed OR A TREATISE of the Sacraments of both COVENANTS Polemical and Practical CHAP. I. Of the word Sacrament THe mutual relation between the Covenant of God entred with man and the Sacraments by him instituted and appointed is generally acknowledged Sacraments are in that way bottomed on the institution that both Sacrament and institution have respect to the Covenant Though some to keep back such from all interest in any Sacrament that they know not how to deny to be in Covenant have made it their businesse had it been feasable to have made a divorce between them Having therefore by Gods assistance published a Treatise of the Covenant I would willingly adde somewhat the subject being of so near affinity of the nature and use of the Sacraments of which I know much is already said by men of all parties and interests Though few have written industriously of the Covenant and several books that carry that title have very little of the thing yet they are almost above number that have treated of the Sacraments He that would have a List of names may consult Chamierde Sacramentis pointing the authours out as they have dealt in the several heads of this Controversie as also Vorstius Enchirid. Controversiarum and to compleat the Catalogue especially in the addition of English Writers Dr. Wilkins his Ecclesiastes yet notwithstanding this plenty in which abundance of more light by Gods mercy hath been brought forth I suppose I may say That much is left to be further spoken especially in the particulars in our times most in agitation where I think there is least need I shall be more brief and if in any thing I shall have hopes to adde any strength to the truth or light where it is not so clear I would be more large And before I come to speak of the thing it self it may be expected that I should premise somewhat of the name by which these Ordinances are ordinarily known The word Sacrament vindicated In which Papists saith Chamier have disputed much Catholiques little giving the reason Because the mysteries of Divinity are not contained in words Some have manifested their dislike of the word seeing it is not a name given of God nor to be found in Scripture with application to these Ordinances Bellarmine will have it to be the same with Mystery 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in Greek saith he is to be translated Sacramentum in Latine but confesses That though the word Mystery be frequent in Scripture yet it is only once used in Scripture in reference to any of the Sacraments and that is Ephes 5.32 in reference to Matrimony But neither is Matrimony a Sacrament as hereafter may be shewen nor yet hath the word Mystery in that place reference to it in which according to Durand there is no Mystery but to the Conjunction of Christ with his Church And upon this account that Scripture useth it not in this sense as is confest by Protestants some lay aside all use of it as we find in the practice of our Dissenting brethren As they differ from us in the subject of the Sacraments so they differ from us in the name One with them is dipping the other is breaking of bread but neither of them with them is a Sacrament to both of which terms I have spoken somewhat Bellarmine lib. 1. De Sacrament Cap. 7. layes the dislike of this name to the charge of many of our Divines as Luther Melancthon Zuinglius Calvin But falsely saith Whitaker Praelect De Sacramentis pag. 4. And Chamier dealing with him about it entitles the first Chapter of his first Book de Sacramentis in genere a De Sacramenti nomine Calumnia The Calumny about the name of Sacrament in which he acquits these Authours and with Whitaker admits the use of the word as it is commonly received So also Vossius Thes 13.14 De Sacrament Efficacia and Vorstius speaking in the name of Protestants in general in the entrance of this Controversie taking notice of Bellarmine's defence of the use of the word saith b Nostri hic facile assentiuntur licet id quod de Graecae vocis aequipollentia dicitur non omnino admittant uti nec ca omnia quae de etymologia Hebraea Latina dicuntur Here our Divines willingly assent onely he saith they make some animadversions on some passages of his making Mystery and Sacrament to be equipollent as also his Etymologie of the Hebrew word Razi and the Chaldee word Raza c Fallit ergo fallitur Bellarminus cum Luthero Zuinglio litem movet quasi absoluté à vocibus illis abhorruissent Bellarmine is deceived and doth deceive say the Leyden Professors Disput 43. when he contends with Luther Zuinglius as though they had absolutely condemned those words And their unanimous practise speaks their opinion In Treatises Catechismes Sermons constantly making use of the word without the least scruple about it Religion not consisting in words but things when there is consent in the thing there is not contention to be raised about the word In case we had a word in Scripture from the Pen of the Holy Ghost fitted to the thing it self and comprizing these ordinances in that generality as the word Sacrament doth in the common use of it I should then quit this name and take to that But seeing there is no such word And Tertullian the most ancient of all the Latine Fathers whose works are extant using it as Vossius observes Thes 6. De Sacrament and since his time in the successive ages of the Church it is continued and now generally received it were too much affectation of singularity to recede from it yet I would put this caution upon the use of it That it must serve onely to denote the thing that we treat about and that no argument from the word be drawn to hold out the nature of these Mysteries The reason of the word enquired after But those that upon this and the like grounds do freely admit the use of the word cannot so easily agree of the reason of it how it comes to passe that these Ordinances came to have this term or name put upon them why Baptisme and the Lords Supper should be called by the name of Sacraments There are onely three opinions that I meet withall that are worthy to be taken notice of and these drawn from three several acceptations of the word Sacrament in prophane Authours First The depositing of money by men striving for Masteries in Consecrated places upon those terms that he
that conquered should take away his part and he that was conquered should leave his with the Priest according to Varro was called a Sacrament They collected therefore that the Sacrament signifies our depositing of our selves as I may say with God or our yielding up of our selves to him As they that strive for mastery did leave for a pledge a summe of money so we leave our selves as a pledge with God But this use of the word Sacrament I suppose is more obscure and the analogy not so clear and therefore Divines in ancient times would scarce borrow this word from thence so few understanding the allusion or the application of it Secondly The oath which anciently Souldiers took when they listed themselves to the Emperour for faith and obedience was called by the name of Sacrament Therefore others judge it very probable that these Ordinances are called Sacraments in that in them every Christian Souldier doth tye himself to his Captain Christ Jesus This is far more probable for three Reasons 1. The use of the word in this sense was more common and received and therefore more apt to give occasion to the like use of it in these Sacred Ordinances 2. The application is more clear seeing our Sacraments as God willing shall be shewn are engagements 3. Heathen Writers make such allusion d Deo oportebat nos jurare milites Caesar It behoves us saith one of them to swear to God and Souldiers to Caesar And the Fathers used the word Sacrament with this allusion as Vossius out of Tertullian quotes two passages e Vocati sumus ad militiam Dei vivi jam tunc cum in Sacramenti verba respondimus We are at that instant called to the warfare of the true God when we answer in the words of the Sacrament and elsewhere f Ut Sacramento benedictionis exauctoretur nunquam in castra Ecclesiae reversuâ—us That he may be disbanded and shut out from the blessings of the Sacraments never more to return into the tents of the Church To which may be added a third quoted by Bellarmine The Devil imitates the very things of Divine Sacraments in idol-Mysteries he washes some and signes other of his Souldiers in their foreheads And Austine in his Preface to the 181 Sermon De tempore saith g Notum est dilectissimi quod beneficia temporalia a temporalibus Dominis accepturi prius Sacramentis militaribus obligantur Dominis suis fidem se servaturos profitentur Quanto magis ergo aeterno Regi militaturi aeterna praemia percepturi debent Sacramentis coelestibus oligari fidem per quam ei placituri sunt publicè profiteri It is known Beloved that the Souldiers being to receive temporal rewards from their temporal Masters do first tye themselves with military Sacraments and professe faithful service to their Lords How much more should those that war under an Eternal King and are to receive rewards from him bind themselves with heavenly Sacraments and publickly professe that faith whereby they may please him In this Rivet rests satisfied as appears in his Cathol Orthodox Tract 3. Quaest 2. h Vox Latina Sacramentum deducta est à verbo Sacrare à Scriptoribus Ecclesiasticis Latinis à militia desumpta fuit in qua juramentum quo milites duci obstringebantur vocabatur Sacramentum Refert Claris Ed. Leigh Crit. Sac. pag. 270. The Latine word Sacrament saith he is borrowed from the verb Sacrare and by Ecclesiastical Latine Writers is taken from proceedings in war in which the Oath wherewith Souldiers were tyed to their Captain was called a Sacrament Thirdly There being so great affinity between Mystery among the Greeks and Sacrament among the Latines Mystery signifying that which is secret of any kind whether sacred or prophane of which there are many instances given and Sacrament signifying that which is made sacred or consecrate words seldome long holding their signification Mystery began to be taken more strictly for holy secrets and so Sacraments for Sacred secrets afterwards the word Mystery and with it Sacrament began to be used for sacred things held forth in outward signes The vision of the seven Candlesticks setting out seven Churches are called Mysteries Revel 1.20 The conjunction in marriage of man and wife setting forth the union between Christ and his Church is called a Mystery Ephes 5.32 And when Divines found no word in Scripture to set out these Ordinances of the Old and New Testament Circumcision Passeover Baptisme the Lords Supper they gave them the name of Sacraments further restraining their signification to holy secrets held forth in outward signes and sealing spiritual grace to us This Vossius takes to be most satisfactory Though I professe my self scarce satisfied with the reason that he gives Thes 16. and comparing it with what he hath said in his 6th Thesis it may seem to speak as much in favour of the second opinion which he rejects as this third which he followes The reason that he assignes as taking with him is i Latinos in variis Sacramenti notionibus secutos esse Graecos qui ipsi 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 nunc rem arcanam appellant nunc rem arcanam sacram nunc rem arcanam symbolicam nunc denique rem arcanam sacram symbolicam gratiae spiritualis significativam That the Latine Fathers in the use of the word Sacrament had much respect to the use of the Greek word Mystery And so in several places by him produced they had respect unto the military use of it in like manner Here it is not for me to interpose I suppose none is able to speak any more then conjecture In which I leave the Reader to use his own liberty assenting to Vossius that those are weak arguments that are drawn from the use of the word either in the first or second acceptation and concluding that they are as weak that are drawn from the use of it according to the third opinion There must be a better bottom for an argument then the bare denotation of the word especially when it is of humane not of Divine imposition And the use of the word being thus taken up by man the acceptation or use of it upon that account hath been very various and ambiguous insomuch that when Writers speak of Sacraments the Reader is often at a stand what they mean by them The various acceptation of the word Sometimes every thing that is secret is called by the name of Sacrament therefore the vulgar Latine which appears to be more ancient than their number of seven Sacraments doth not onely render the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Sacramentum in Eph. 5.32 upon which they take advantage to bring in marriage into the number but frequently elsewhere when nothing towards a Sacrament by their own confession is intended Having made known to us the Sacrament of his will Eph. 1.9 By revelation he made known to me the Sacrament Eph. 3.3
Levit. 25.42 they are born unto God Ezek. 16.20 they are the children of God Ezek. 16.21 they are holy Rom. 11.16 1 Cor. 7.14 Either then we must carry it out to all the infants of the visible Church or else we cannot assure it to the infants of invisible members And therefore the Schoolemen afore mentioned justly ascribe as much to a faith informed as to that which is formed respective to the good of the issue of such believers 5. All that is spoken in Scripture of the blessedness of the seed of the righteous may as fairly be extended to them through the whole course of their lives as to the times of their infancy promises being not put with any such restraint as to have an end when their infancy is expired The most ample of promises which we find is in Esay 59.21 There it is promised that the Spirit shall not depart out of the mouth of thy seed or thy seeds seed but this rather belongs to them of years then of an infant-condition If it be said that many infants of the righteous persevere not but cast off the seed of grace received I answer the grace of perseverance is necessarily required to make blessed and blessedness is promised we know temporal blessings are made over by promise to the seed of such His seed shall be mighty upon earth wealth and riches shall be in his house Psal 112.2 3. Psal 37.25 26. I have been young and now am old yet have I not seen the righteous forsaken nor his seed begging bread He is ever merciful and lendeth and his seed is blessed The opposition that is found between the letter of promises of this nature and the event which the experience of every age observes hath wrought a great conflict in mens spirits how to reconcile them And this hath been the result of all that they are not to be understood without their due limits and several have been put I shall not stand to enter into the dispute onely I say experience doth as much oppose the literal meaning of true blessedness to all the seed of the righteous as of temporal prosperity one must therefore have its due limits as well as the other To wind up this whole discourse concerning Sacraments in that juncture of time God then had his Church in which there was salvation Henoch walked with God and yet without faith it was impossible to please God Heb. 11.6 Noah was an heir of the righteousness of faith Heb. 11.7 a righteousness in which the Apostle desired to be found for salvation Phil. 3.8 yet in all that juncture of time there was no written Word in which the succeeding ages have everlasting life Joh. 5.39 God had other wayes of discovery of himself to his people for life So the Church might answerably be without Sacraments howsoever we judge salvation to be thereby either conveyed or sealed God that tyes us to Ordinances is himself free and in what way he pleases may communicate blisse and give assurance of it The likest conjecture that we can make of Gods ordering by providence that in this juncture of time from the fall to the time of Abrahams call there should be no Sacrament nor any such supposed remedy known to acquit infants from Orinal sin is â—o declare the freedom of God that as he pleases to ordaine Sacramental signes so he is not tyed to them or his hands bound up by them but as he saved without Sacraments before the floud and after to the time of Abraham and infants under the Law dying before the eighth day so he still saves in the want though not in the sinful neglect much lesse in the contempt of these Ordinances CHAP. IV. Of the definition of a Sacrament THe next consideration of Sacraments in mans fallen condition is from Abraham unto Christ in the time of the dispensation of the Old Covenant In which those known Sacraments Circumcision and the Passeover were of force and given in charge of God to his people and together with those Sacraments extraordinary or such as come near up to the nature of Sacraments The Cloud the Red-Sea Manna and the Rock Sacraments under the old new Covenant of one and the same nature 1 Cor. 10.1 2 3 4. But intending to speak of Sacraments in general and there being no essential difference between the Sacraments under the Old and New Covenant One and the same definition containing whatsoever is essential to a Sacrament in any of them as many wayes might be made manifest Their names are promiscuously used the cloud that Israel was under and the sea that they passed through is called by the name of Baptisme 1 Cor. 10.2 and so also is Circumcision Collos 2.11 12. The thing signified and benefit received is in every one the same The Apostle comparing those that did eat of Manna and drank of the Rock in the Wilderness with believers in Gospel-times that partake of the Lords Supper saith They all ate the same spiritual meat and did all drink the same spiritual drink for they drank of that spiritual Rock that followed them and that Rock was Christ 1 Corrinthians 10.3 4. And we may say the same of those that did eat of the Passeover As Christ was that bread that Manna did typifie Joh. 6.49.50 so it was he that was held out and his death shewed forth in the Passeover 1 Cor. 5.7 I shall therefore wave this different consideration of them and make it my businesse to enquire what a Sacramen is and to make discovery of the generall nature of it which in case out of Scripture I can reach that will serve for a bottome on which all that I intend to speak may be grounded Bellarmine spends a whole Chap. in enquiry whether a Sacrament can properly be defined quoting severall Schoolmen for the negative That it cannot be defined because a Sacrament is not one of it self but an aggregatum one by accident or at least not ens reale no real being and those things that are but one accidentally or not really are below a definition He quotes others in the affirmative Some that it may be defined imperfectly others that it admits of a perfect definition After a distinction laid down very little to the purpose one member of the distinction being by his own confession not considerable by Divines he concludes that a Sacrament morally considered as it ought to be considered by Divines may be defined having a reall being and according to its own way of being it is one Morall Philosophers define saith he a Kingdome a City a Family though they be not one physically but by aggregation so do Divines define a Church a Councell or Sacrament which are one in being no other way Suarez agrees with him Disput 1a. de Sacramentis Sect. 4 ta which Whitaker praelect de Sacr. pag. 4. acknowledges to be true A Sacrament may be defined So that he observes it is agreed that they may be defined and I
that God himself and not John was the Author of it Let John himself speak whether he went on his owne head on this work He that sent me to baptize with water the same said unto me Vpon whom thou shalt see the Spirit descending and remaining on him the same is he which baptizeth with the holy Ghost Joh. 1.33 The people of the Jewes certainly had another opinion of his Baptisme as appears by their reasoning when Christ demanded The Baptisme of John whence was it from heaven or of men and they reasoned with themselves saying If we shall say from heaven he will say unto us Why did ye not then beleeve him But if we shall say of men we fear the people for all hold John as a Prophet Matth. 21.25.26 When the opinion among the people was so generall that the Chief Priests and Elders were afraid to oppose it had it been an errour doubtlesse Christ would not in that way have nourished them in it And to say with Bellarmine that Deus solum in genere inspiravit inspiratione illa mandavit ut baptizaret sed ritum in particulari quo baptizandum esset ipse Johannes instituit non a Deo prae scriptum accepit God did command him to baptize but the particular rite was left unto John himself is nothing When Christ demanded of the Baptisme of John whether it were from heaven or of men the Priests and Elders to whom he spake understood the whole work and to conceit that the work was commanded and the way of doing concealed is an ungrounded fancy All that are confest to be Sacraments are we see yeelded to be of Divine institution which is further plain in reason First Sacraments are parts of worship a piece of the homage that is due from man to God And it is God and not man that is to prescribe in his own worship here God hath declared himself to be jealous Exod. 20.5 that not any thing of the invention of man come within that worship that is Divine And if Nadab and Abihu fell for adulterating the worship of God bringing in strange fire when fire from heaven was provided to their hands How shall they stand that coin a worship it self as do our adversaries or put a new stamp upon it when it is set up of God which is their way likewise Marriage which is an Ordinance without the Church they make a Sacrament in the Church Of duties they make ordination and repentance Sacraments and in case Pharisees made the Commandements of God void by their tradition when they imposed a necessity of washing of hands before meat when yet they did not raise it to the honour of a Sacrament How much more had John offended if out of his own fancy he had set up such an Ordinance as Baptisme David hath been charged that he appointed singers and other officers in the house of God without any command or direction from heaven but the contrary to this appeares 2 Chron. 29.25 where in the life of Hezekiah it is said He set the Levites in the house of the Lord with Cymbals with Psalteries and with harpes according to the commandement of David and of Gad the Kings Seer and Nathan the Prophet for so was the Commandement of the Lord by his Prophets Secondly Sacraments are notes of distinction between the people of God and others that beare not that relation to him as we have heard Circumcision and uncircumcision divided the world The Circumcised were a people of God when all others were children of a strange god so we may say of all Sacraments And as men of place alone have power to give liveries to their own servants to distinguish them from those that have their dependance on others so God hath alone power to give differencing Cognizances to his servants likewise Thirdly God onely can give strength and efficacy to the Sacraments what that is rests to be enquired and is not a little controverted but whatsoever it is that it is wholly of God was never doubted and he onely that can give efficacy to them is to ordaine them This is Thomas Aquinas his reason in the place mentioned Fourthly Sacraments are teaching signes visible words whereby man is instructed in Divine mysteries but God alone is the author of the Word It is given by inspiration of God 1 Timothy 3.15 God alone therefore is the author of Sacraments Fifthly Sacraments are seales put to promise annext for confirmation of Covenants as shall be further shewen But he onely that makes the promise and appoints the Covenant can give the seal The Schoolman then quoted by Bullinger de Sacr. Decad. 5. Ser. 6. hath well minded the Church that she is no Lady over the Sacraments but barely a servant and can no more appoint a Sacrament then abrogate a Divine Commandement And Bellarmine puts this for the first reason that Ministers are Stewards of the Mysteries of God therefore they are not to institute them but being instituted of God are onely to administer them This holds true not onely of Sacraments in their essence that none may adde any to the number of those that God hath instituted But of all that is of the integrality of Sacraments likewise there is not the least Sacramental rite that is to be of humane but all of Divine institution There is the same reason of the whole and of every part He that may not appoint a Sacrament may appoint no piece of a Sacrament A worship made up of Divine and humane Commandements stands in the Church like Nebuchadnezzars image the head of Gold but the feet of earth The Poets device of a mans neck joyned to a horses head is not so great a soloecisme Thomas Aquinas saw that this might be objected against much in the Sacraments in the Church of Rome and therefore when he had put the question Whether Sacraments have their institution from God in the first place objecteth c Ea quae sunt divinitus instituta t aduntur nobis in sacra Scriptura sed quaedam aguntur in Sacramentis de quibus nulla fit mentio in sacra Scriptura puta de Chrismate quo homines confirmantur oleo quo Sacerdotes inunguntur de multis aliis tam verbis quam factis quibus utimur in Sacramentis Illa quae aguntur in Sacramentis per homines instituta non sunt de necessitate Sacramenti sed ad quandam solennitatem quae adhibetur Sacramentis ad excitandam devotionem reverentiam in his qui Sacramenta suscipiunt Ea vero quae sunt de necessitate Sacramenti ab ipso Christo instituta sunt qui est Deus homo that there are some things done in the Church of which there is no mention in Scripture as Chrisme wherewith men are confirmed and oyl wherewith Priests are ordained and much else as well words as actions saith he which we use in Sacraments and answeres that those things which are done in Sacraments instituted by
unbeliefe to the working of it for regeneration so we that hold that infants are confederate with their Parents do conclude likewise that they put no obstacle or barre to their admission to the sign or seal As there was no further qualification required in an infant for title to Circumcision then to be the son of an Israelite or one by Circumcision joyned to Israel so there was no barre by reason of uncleannesse or want of previous purification mentioned either in the command given to Abraham Gen. 17. or in the Law given by Moses Levit. 12. There is mention made of the uncleannesse of the Mother that hath born a man child Levit. 12.1 2 3. she was to continue in the blood of her purifying thirty three dayes and to touch no hallowed thing nor come into the Sactuary untill the dayes of her purifying be fulfilled but nothing said of the uncleanness of the child but on the eighth day the flesh of his foreskin was to be circumcised without mention either of uncleanness or purification Those that can find no barre in the child tendred to Baptisme but seek for one in the Parent to withhold it from this initiating Ordinance may here see that when the Parent was personally polluted the child was clean when the Parent might touch no hollowed thing the child was yet to be circumcised And moral uncleannesse in the Parent can have no more influence on the child to indispose for this priviledge then legal when according to themselves Original sin though transfused by the Parent into the child is no barre In vain do they make the Parents actual sins an obstacle which is terminated in the Parent as defiling the person but transmitting no blot to posterity It is a most un-Scriptural way in those that in their judgement are for Paedo baptisme to inhibite the tender of infants upon pretence of either their Parents sin or their want of Congregational membership And here that supposed great argument to debarre the infants of ignorant and scandalous persons from Baptisme may have an easie answer Such Parents if they were now to be Baptized ought not to be Baptized Ergo they cannot challenge it for their children Baptisme belongs primarily to the Parent The consequence is here manifestly false seeing such Parents have unquestionably a fundamental first right both to Baptisme and the Lords Supper in their respective order by virtue of their profession of the worship of God in Christ as their God in opposition to all false gods and their profession of the wayes of Christianity in opposition to all other wayes though their ignorance and scandal do prove a barre to their present admission to either and having this right and being to be Baptized their children with them are enrighted and children putting in no barre may be actually admitted Priviledges in Church and Common-Wealth are ex traduce and so are not crimes In this I have delivered my self Treatise of the Covenant chap. 46. as also in my Birth-priviledge making good this position by several arguments That the children of all that by profession are Christian are by virtue f Covenant-interest to be received into the Church by Baptisme Enlarging my self in several particular instances in such whose seed some would debarre which yet according to Scripture rules we ought to receive Examining Mr. Firmins grounds to the contrary in his serious question stated Mr. Firmins appendix as to the latitude of infant-Baptisme examined And answering his arguments he hath been pleased in one day to read and undertake to refute what I have spoke He must therefore give his Reader leave from his own mouth to believe that it is a very hasty birth and what need there is that he should yet lick it over the work it self will speak I little expected I confesse so unfair dealing from a man of his candour he might easily have seen that all that I speak to him in this thing there is by way of Corollarie or inference drawn from that which by Scripture-testimony and arguments in several foregoing Chapters I had made good Which as it appears from his own hand when his refutation came out he had never read and therefore by his own acknowledgement hath taken my conclusion into consideration having never seen the premises and so must judge according to his own reason onely having never had any sight of mine Before I come to give answer to his exceptions against that which this Position affirmes I must clear my selfe from some imputations of his touching my dealing with him The Author cleared from some imputations I observe sometimes saith he you dresse my argument in such a fashion that I cannot know it to be mine but disclaime it then you find fault To give the Reader here an account Mr. Firmin had framed this argument against the power of mediate Parents to conferre Baptisme on posterity If that promise doth give this power to predecessours then though there were none to educate this child for the ignorant and prophane Parents will not but teach them how to breaks Covenant predecssours cannot they are dead and are not yet we must seal to the child Having explained my self to avoid mistake I first answer that Mr. Firmin himself here concludes such a childs interest In case he can be brought to break Covenant he is interessed in the priviledges of the Covenant to which he sayes nothing at all but either in haste or prudence passeth it by and dealing with Mr. Caudrey speaks fully to confirm the strength of it Interest in the Covenant of the Gospel he saith Pag. 4. gives first right to Baptisme This child hath this interest otherwise he can be in no capacity to break Covenant he hath therefore this first right and let Mr. F. see how he can deny an infant the second I add in the second place let him make it up into a formal argument and then it runs thus That child whose immediate Parents will not bring it up to the power of Godliness hath no right to Baptisme Here his exception lyes and therefore he demands Where have I mentioned the power of Godlinesse as a requisite in him who claimes Baptisme but to bring up a child in it is harder matter To which I reply 1. That here is a strange question seeing we were not speaking to any prerequisite for Baptisme but after education which was his exception 2. Though he mentions not education in the power of godlinesse in words yet in case his meaning be not so his argument answers it self For the child of such a parent that he mentions shall infallibly so farre as man can judge have education in a away of Christianity so farre as to be of the Society of professed Christians under the dispensation of those Ordinances that are able to save the soul and are called by the Apostle the power of God to salvation Rom. 1.16 He further addes Sometimes your answer is a bare laying down your own judgement with a
in ignorance being so far knowing Christians SECT IX The seventh Proposition enlarged AS for those that are of years Admission of men of years examined though we are not much concerned scarce one unbaptized Person in an age being tendred to us yet it is not meet wholly to omit it when any in the Primitive times upon the Preaching of the Apostles was ready to professe and willing to engage in a way of Christianity he was streight according to the order of Christ to be admitted by Baptisme the Commission it self speaks thus much Disciple all Nations baptizing them is the charge being discipled there needs no further enquiry and accordingly was the practice the Eunuch upon profession of faith and water at hand was presently baptized by Philip Act. 8. and the Jaylour the self same hour that he was converted was baptized by Paul and Silas Act. 16. Those that limit Baptisme to years of discretion appear to be wholly of this mind Mr. Tombes Examen Pag. 159. is clear that profession of faith and holinesse is sufficient warrant to baptize And for their practice let their Proselytes wheresoever they prevail speak when such as we see are admitted we may well conclude that in their judgement none are to be refused There are others that set up a new Church-door having discipled any in their way they do not as Christ enjoyned concerning unbaptized Heathens or as others concerning baptized Christians baptize them but they tender a Covenant of Church-fellowship unto them and that is their way of Church entrance when yet their infants keep the old rode of Baptisme These at least some of them are exceeding strict and will have none admitted but those that the quickest sighthed Admission unto a Church-Covenant and membership looked into Eagle-eyed Christians judge so farre as they are able to apprehend to have both name and thing of Christianity And to add honour to this way the world must be born in hand and that with attestation of no mean ones that the conversion of the Gentiles and Jewes in that infinite number as we read in the Acts of the Apostles was all in reality and that the whole Church of Hierusalem consisting at least of eight thousand members was an homogeneal body under the same light conscience and tendernesse Of a more noble homogeneity and more pure constitution sure then ever came into Christs thoughts to see his Kingdom attain unto upon earth He compares it to a field made up of a mixture of Tares and Wheat Matth. 13.24 to a Draw-net cast into the Sea which taketh fishes of all kinds both good and bad Matth. 13.47 And in the close o◠two other Parables inferres that many are called but few are chosen Matth. 20.16 Matth. 22.14 This he spake in the ears of his Disciples and we may wonder if they should live to see it contradicted He tells his hearers Luk. 9.27 Matth. 16.18 There be some standing here which shall not taste of death till they see the Kingdom of God And can we think that he understood a Kingdom in that resplendent glory which he had ever denyed when he made it his business to decipher and hold it forth unto them When they heare of it they hear of a field with tares and wheat of a draw-net with fish of all sorts They live to see flourishing fields of pure wheat full nets of fishes that are onely good being told that many are called but few chosen they yet see myriads of thousands called and all chosen Yea Paul after he had seen the contrary and gained fellowship according to these men in such an homogeneal pure body still symbolizes in like Parables of a great house that had vessels some to honour and some to dishonour 2 Tim. 2.20 applying it to the Elect and Reprobate in the Church of God We are told that the complexion of a visible Church under the Gospel is conversion the constituted matter converted ones and that this soul-complexion is the same in the whole body members having received the same Spirit of Adoption owning and experiencing the same grace of God But it is plain that Christ did neither see nor foresee any such purity of complexion nor can they that look upon Primitive Churches in the glasse of Scriptures see any more then Christ did discover Those words of Luke Act. 15.3 And being brought on their way by the Church they passed through Phenice and Samaria declaring the conversion of the Gentiles and they caused great joy unto all the brethren is made a fundamental ground-work of this building of such glory as though all conversion by the Word were attended by the changing work of the Spirit which happy glosse in case it would hold would turne all the grounds in the parable into good ground and a cōnvert or proselyte in an historical narrative would ever be the same with elect or regenerate But the words going before and following these if they may be but taken in will serve to spoil all this supposed glory and purity A sect riseth up and teacheth the Brethren that except they be circumcised after the manner of Moses they cannot be saved and what manner of men they were and how their Doctrine took we may read in Pauls Epistles to the Philippians Colossians and especially in that to the Churches of Galatia it almost wrought to the apostatizing of those Churches from the faith of Christ to another Gospel If ever these were one homogeneal body respective to soul complexion an abundant proof is given in against the Saints perseverance and for their falling from grace Paul was not so enamoured with their beauty when he tells them that he is afraid of them and travells again in birth of them And whether he had such high thoughts of the Corinthians let sundry passages in his Epistles to them witnesse Great complexion spots may be seen 1 Cor. Chap. 3.3 Chap. 6.8 Chap. 11.18 19 21. Chap. 15.12 34. 2 Cor. 12.20 21. So that it is plain that in primitive times Jewes and Pagans being wrought upon by the Word heard and miracles seen to make profession of and engage to a Christian faith and life were upon that account received of which as some had hearts sincere towards Christ so many were otherwise Through the whole Scripture there is no demurre put to the Baptisme of any who made profession of the Name of Christ save Saul concerning whom Ananias being warned of God to go to him and conferre sight upon him being struck blind objects the evil that he had done to the Saints at Hierusalem and that he had at present authority from the Chief Priests to bind all that called on the Name of Christ Acts 9.13 14. And when he afterwards assayed to joyn himself to the disciples that were at Hierusalem they were all upon that account afraid of him Neither Ananias at Damascus nor the Church at Hierusalem did put his sincerity in grace to the question upon that account they might
have challenged thousands of others But they feared that he onely pretended conversion upon a design to advance his way of persecution Let Mr. Cobbet from New England in this particular be heard who laies down this conclusion That the Church in dispensing an enjoyned initiatory seal of the Covenant of grace looketh into visibility of interest in the Covenant to guide her in the application thereof nor is the saving interest of the persons her rule by which she is to proceed There we find in the affirmative what that is that must lead viz. visibility of interest in the Covenant and in the negative what must not lead and that is saving interest in the Covenant And visibility of interest is certainly theirs who professe Christ engage for Christ and avouch themselves to be for him unlesse we will utterly confound Covenant entring and Covenant keeping which Scripture so carefully distinguishes I know Mr. Firmin in his reply to Mr. Caudry speaking of Scandalous persons Mr. F. appendix as to the admission of men of years examined pag. 4. saith According to our Congregational principles that which gives a man the first right to a Sacrament viz. his interest in the Covenant of the Gospel this man hath not for he doth visibly declare to the Churches that he hath no interest in the Covenant That interest in the Covenant of the Gospell gives a man the first right to a Sacrament we willingly imbrace but that censure of scandalous persons that they visibly declare to the Churches that they have no interest in the Covenant we must reject as evidently contrary to Scripture principles Israel of whom Moses gave that testimony that the Lord had not given them an heart to perceive and eyes to see or eares to hear speaking of the generality of them had some that might have been judged scandalous yet they all of them even then entred Covenant with God Captaines of their tribes Elders Officers even all the men of Israel from the hewer of wood to the drawer of water Deut. 29.10 11. Those that God owns as his people in Covenant and calls by the name of his people I shall take to have interest in the Covenant though thousands say the contrary But God ownes these as his people respective to Covenant interest they that did steal murder commit adultery sweare falsely burne incense to other gods and walk after other gods all men would judge to be scandalous yet such come and stand before the Lord in his house and professe themselves to be his people in Covenant and whether or no God doth not so esteem them let his own mouth speak Jer. 7.12 Chap. 6.26 Chap. 8.11 The Vineyard of the Lord consists of a people in visible Covenant yet with these we find not a few scandals and scandalous ones as Isay 5. is manifest see Hos 4.6 12. My people are destroyed for lack of knowledg my people aske counsel at their stockes and their staffe declareth unto them for the spirit of whoredome hath caused them to erre and they have gone a whoring from under their God Shall we say they were not Gods people or shall we say that these were no scandals to put all out of question the Apostle tells us Rom. 9.2 3. that interest in the Covenant pertaines to all Israel after the flesh neither is it any otherwise in Gospel times 1 Cor. 5.11 If any man that is called a brother be a fornicator or Covetous or an Idolater or a rayler or a drunkard or an extortioner c. he that is called a brother is visibly in Covenant but such a one we see may be scandalous The seven Golden Candlesticks are the seven Churches amidst which Christ walkes and whether there were not scandals among these read the Epistles to them If visible interest in Covenant give a first right then these undoubtedly may claime it their first right according to the forementioned principle is undoubted and for actuall admission as well as the first right to the Sacrament of initiation let the same Mr. Cobbet speak John Baptist did and lawfully might baptize those multitudes albeit in the general he knew that many yea most of them would prove false and frothy quoting Matth. 3.5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12. and afterward Albeit we may think in the general that to be sure in all visible Churches there will be some vessels of dishonour sometimes yet Ministers which are the Churches as well as Christs servants are not therefore to refuse to dispense Church ordinances since they are in the face of the Church such utensills as the Lord may have and hath need of Hence the Apostles which are extraordinary persons knew the guile of persons secret from the Church witnesse that act against Ananias and Sapphira Acts 5.1 c. yet in administring the Church seal of Baptisme they refused not Ananias and Sapphira no nor Simon Magnus Acts 8. Nor thousands of other of the Jewes amongst whom how many proved false Acts 2.41 and 4.1 2 3 4. compared 21.20 21 22 23 24 28 30 31 36. and 22.20 22 and 23.12 13. witnesse So that we see Scripture gives precedents if we judge them safe to follow of a very facile admission of those that professe and manifest their willingnesse to engage in Christian waies Mr. Firmin saies If a bare profession of faith in Christ be sufficicient to make a member of a Church then no person can be justly excommunicated out of a Church for the vilest sinnes or heresies provided he doth but hold this profession of his faith The consequence is cleere the person is the same now which he was when you took him into the Church To this I have answered pag. 449. The consequence is cleerly erroneous for he made a profession of his faith and not of his sin To this Mr. Firmin replyes Then it seemes the man must professe his sin with his own mouth as his faith though Mr. Blake knowes he is a ranter c. The members of the Church witnesse it yet because the mans own mouth doth not professe it you admit him I desire to know where witnesses were called in for this purpose to speake what they had to say against such and such a mans admission to Baptisme as now by an instrument affixt on the door of the publique place of meeting men are called to except in case they have any thing to speak against Ministers ordination Had Paul and Silas nothing against the Jaylour at Philippi who was so serviceable to those in power that he thrust them into the inward prison and made their feet fast in the stockes Acts 16.24 And wheras our author saies elsewhere that there was a legal work on his conscience so there is many a time on mariners in a sea storm which a calme will suddenly quiet Can he imagine that the lives of all the people even the Publicanes and harlots that John baptized Matth. 21.31 Luke 7.29 compared were so inoffensive that none could say
he calls the great question between him and me is no question at all It were madnesse to affirm that which with these limits he thus denyes Yet still I say that the Covenant which Baptisme seales is made with the unregenerate as well as regenerate persons which as we have heard he makes Mr. Tombe's error to deny And because the Covenant belongs to them Baptisme in like sort belongs to them and as upon that account we must baptize them so in foro Dei according to the mind of Jesus Christ they have right to Baptisme Which in case Mr. Baxter shall deny I shall desire him to reflect upon the afore-cited passages of his own together with that which pag. 65 of this Treatise he delivers If it be the whole matter of Christianity that is professed but dissembledly then as he is equivocally or analogically a believer or Christian so I yield he is a member of the Church visible And Church-membership is one of his own mediums to prove a right to Church-entrance by Baptisme and here is a Faith not above dogmatical At least short of that which is justifying and yet such a faith as is real having reall fruits and effects and sometimes reall miracles If the argument hold when it is thus enfeebled how much more when it is put in its full strength Such an one is univocally in Covenant whose dissimulation is no other then necessarily attends an unregenerate estate in case there be any thing in Scripture above equivocation They remembred that God is their Rock the high God their Redeemer Psal 78.34 And whereas I stand charg'd in this discourse by Mr. Baxter with several uncouth if not wild opinions and assertions about the Covenant and Mr. Baxter despairs as we have heard of understanding of my meaning I shall here endeavour as to vindicate so to explain my self in like manner that the Reader if not Mr. Baxter may be brought to a right understanding avoiding as much as may be both nicety and multiplicity 1. It is said that I suppose certain Promises to go before the great Law of Grace Those that suppose such saith he are of two sorts 1. The Arminians and Jesuites 2. Such as Mr. Bl. about Church-Ordinances And having spent many lines upon the Arminians to shew his dissent and assent so that the Reader may well have forgotten both me and my charge he saith 2. The Author vindicated from a fiction imposed The second part of promises before the great Covenant of Grace is feigned by Mr. Bl. and if there be any other that go that way as some do and that with some difference amongst themselves and that is a promise of Church-priviledges upon condition of a faith not justifying nor saving One that Mr. Baxter will not deny to be eminently learned and I think as well vers'd in his Writings and mine as any man alive Far better I believe then he in mine or I in his upon observation of this passage replyed as by addresse to him You rather feign this of Mr. Bl. then find it in him And I professe I know no man whose brain ever either hatch'd or vented such a crotchet Neither do I know how this mistake was ever entertained for I believe it was a mistake unlesse it be that taking for granted that there is no Covenant of grace entred with any out of the state of grace and finding that I assert that Church-Ordinances appertain to unregenerate Christians and those that are short of faith that is justifying he here fancies a promise of these made to a faith of this kind Whereas that which I say is That every acceptation of a Gospel-tender which tenders a man a Christian outwardly actually vests him in right to these Ordinances as it did the Jew outwardly Rom. 3.1 And that these Ordinances are necessarily requisite to bring men up to the fruition of those happy priviledges of Pardon Justification Adoption Glorification So that I conceit no promise of these Ordinances made to such a faith but an actual investiture of every such believer in them Neither do I know any promises preceding the Covenant of Grace Such must be made to meer Heathens or those that are in a parallel estate aliens from the Common-wealth of Israel Unlesse perhaps some such promise to some such upon some particular account may be found Yet if he can work me to be of his mind that Election Regeneration and the Covenant of Grace are commensurate so that no non-elect man is in Covenant then shall I say that there are Promises made before the Covenant The Apostle speaking of the Jews that for the generality of them were neither elect nor regenerate saith To them appertained the Covenants I may therefore charge it upon him with better reason then he upon me Those stand vested in promises that he sayes are out of Covenant The Promise is said to belong to those Jews Rom. 9.4 on whom yet the Word took no saving effect verse 6. Hence by opposition to the Gentiles they were those that were not strangers to the Church but of it They were not strangers to the Covenant of Promise but in the same Eph. 2.11 12. Hence God saith he maketh his Covenant with them all Deut. 29.10 12 13 14 15. speaking there of that solemn renewal of the Covenant of Grace as Deut. 30.6 10 12 13 14. compared with Rom. 10.6 7 8. evinceth So Ezek. 16.8 he made a Covenant with that Church and people many whereof proved very base as that Chapter sheweth Cobbet just vindicat pag. 46. Where much more to this purpose from many Texts of Scripture may be seen The Authour further vindicated I am farther charged that my common phrase is That they namely unregenerate men are in the outward Covenant with this note upon it what that is I cannot tell Who would not now think but that here were a phrase peculiarly mine Upon which the same learned hand as before expresseth himself in these words I do not see that that phrase is common with Mr. Bl. He rather useth it as from others which any may evidently see if they consult pag. 189 190. of my Treatise of the Covenant But of this I have spoke before and therefore his guesses upon it that he believes that it is called outward by reason of outward blessings annexed to it might have been spared They that use it expresse their own meaning The Covenant they say is but one and the same but all are not in the Covenant after one and the same manner Some are onely in it by outward profession to the present participation of outward priviledges but some by cordial acceptance to the enjoyment of saving benefits by means of these priviledges He sayes in the place quoted I should have thought it but reasonable for Mr. Bl. 1. To have told us what those outward blessings are that this Covenant promiseth But what need I to tell him when pag. 61. he hath told me that it is a
promise of Church-priviledges and I now tell him that these stand actually possest of these priviledges and have all the Promises together with these priviledges that the Gospel contains And that these priviledges are appointed of God to bring them in Gods way to the possession of them 2. Saith he That he would have it proved out of Scripture that God hath such a Covenant distinct from the Covenant of grace which promiseth Justification and Salvation and having other conditions on our part To this I know not what to say but that when Mr. Baxter hath proved that there are not onely mountains of earth in his West side of England viz. Wreakin Mawbourn Clee but also mountnins of Gold I will endeavour the proof of this if I can tell how for he hath had as many thoughts of such golden Chimaera's as I have had of any such Covenant distinct from the Covenant of Grace which in my name he here imagineth Having vindicated my self from these imposed fancies that never entred into my thoughts I shall now endeavour if it may be further to clear my own meaning in these following Propositions Propositions tending to cleer the Authors meaning 1. Those that take upon themselves a Christian profession being separate for God calling him by the name of Lord that have Ordinances of God as their inheritance that acknowledge a Deity and no other but the true Deity a necessity of worship and none but the Christian worship these with me are in Covenant with God as was Propos 1 the whole state of the Church of the Jewes and the whole face of the visible Church of the Gentiles that were engraffed in their stead This to me is plain in that they are the Church or Churches of God Acts 7.8 Gal. 1.2 The called of God Mat. 22.14 The people of God Isa 1.2 Psal 90.7 They that sacrific'd to the true God Psal 50.7 Are the sons of God Gen. 6.1 Deut. 14.1 Rom. 9.4 Are a people nigh unto the Lord Deut. 4.7 Psal 148. ult God professing himself to be their God Psal 90.7 Are Children of the Covenant Acts 3.35 Saints Psal 90.5 Act. 26.10 1 Cor. 14.33 Believers Act. 8.12 13. Act. 21.20 Luke 8.13 Disciples Matth. 10.1 4. Acts 9.1 15.10 Christians Act. 11.26 That all of these imply a Covenant-state and that unregenerate men have in Scripture all this honour is clear These therefore with me are in Covenant I know that as to all of these elogies it is answered in a word that they are equivocal An answer that I can scarce take into my thoughts without horrour As though Gods oracles were all over from one end of the Bible to the other like those of Apollo and there were no reality either in their separation for God or gifts that they receive from God which as to illumination conviction faith as well ordinary as extraordinary oftentimes are many or priviledges that they enjoy But this we shall have further occasion to consider and when there can be no plain denial that all of this here mentioned argues Covenant-state a quarrel seems to be pickt rather then any direct answer given For as I say pag. 189 of my Treatise That in Old-Testament-times the Covenant was made with Israel in the uttermost latitude of it with all those that bore the name of Israel making proof at large from Deut. 29. as the Reader may see Mr. Baxter quoting the place takes notice of no more then that it was made with all Israel and infers pag. 65. So that it seems he takes all to be in Covenant that bear the name Christian And then questions What Though they know not what Christ or Christianity is Is taking a name entring into Covenant The poor Indians that by thousands are forced by the Spaniard to be baptized are said to know so little what they do that some of them forget the name of a Christian which they assumed And do's not he think that a man may take as plausible exceptions against his word where he saith The rule is That a serious professour of the faith is to be taken for a true Believer If he would travel as far as India for it as he doth here against Gods Word Do not we know that force may make these poor Indians to appear serious in their profession And it is wonder that it should be so strange with him that taking a name should be entring Covenant or at least that it should imply a Covenant-state Let him consult Isa 4.1 and those manifold Scripture-Texts which expresse the relation of Gods Covenant-people to him in these words A people called by his Name or on whom the Name of God is called And distinction should be put between children of the Covenant by descent from parents in Covenant whether Jewes or Christians who continue their Covenant relation till they professedly cast it off notwithstanding their ignorance and such that of meer aliens are to be received having no other title then their own present qualification This ought to be voluntary as well in renouncing their old false way as embracing the present as we see it was in those converts through the Acts of the Apostles And it is not to be without some competency of knowledge discerning the evill of their former course and the happinesse attainable in the present And I am easily induced to believe that more knowledg by the industry of teachers is now required then was in the primitive times seeing there is not so much of God by miracle to perswade and as it were to overrule So that it is not a naked taking of a name that is intended but that which still attends upon it As a wife is called by her husbands name and withall makes her abode in his house so it is with a Covenant-people and was with Israel They bore the name of God and they made abode in the Church of God enjoying his Ordinannances as their inheritance Mr. Baxter saies For the Word of God God oft bestowes it on infidels and in England there aremen that deride the truth of Scripture and esteem it afliction and yet for credit of men come ordinarily to the Congregation These have the Word given and so have other unregenerate men but not by Covenant that I know of That God doth bestow his Word on infidells to me is strange it is true that he often tenders it to them but in case they remain infidells they put it away from them and bestowing implies not onely a tender but an acceptance It is the great advantage of Israel above other Nations that to them was committed the oracles of God when others had not that honour And to speak of Gods giving his Word by Covenant is a most improper speech seeing it is the very Covenant droughts as though we should say he gives his Word by his Word And these sure are no open deriders that for the credit of men make such a publique profession this would work restraint on
conditions of Gods Covenant or promise rather than of ours for our own promise is the first part of them and our performance of that promise but a secondary part Is not here a convincing reason Our own promise is the first part our performance the second part Ergo they are more properly the conditions of Gods Covenant then of ours I deny not the thing but wonder at the reason but speed it as it will I thence collect that promises and performances are distinct things and that is enough for me Our promising to God I am sure is our covenanting this then differs from Covenant-keeping or performance and is not to be confounded with it There followes For 2. Gods Covenant is a free gift of Christ and life to the World on condition of their acceptance This our Divines against the Papists and the doctrine of merit have fully proved That God doth freely give Christ to those that accept him I freely yield and that our Divines have fully proved it against Papists I confesse and that it must be asserted against Antinomians but what Divines have proved that Gods Covenant is his free gift of Christ and life to the world on condition that they will accept I know not It is the first time I think that ever I heard it This then is a full definition of a Covenant which I yet think comes short of it and if it be a truth it well serves my purpose many a Covenant is made and conditions never performed After his expression of himself about the modification of our acceptance of Christ by faith he addes Our acceptance or consent is our Covenanting and our Faith So that our Covenanting with Christ and our Faith is the same thing that is our accepting an offered Saviour on his terms or a consent that he be ours and we his on his termes And who knowes not that this Faith or Covenanting or consent is the condition by us to be performed that we may have right to Christ and life offered I do know the latter and therefore upon that account as upon divers others I deny the former I know that justifying faith is the condition by us to be performed and I as well know that it is not our covenanting but our making good our Covenant That Faith by which the Romans stood in Covenant with God was such a faith that the whole visible Church of the Gentiles had and the Jewes both Rom. 11. But this was not a justifying faith but short of it To make justifying faith and Covenanting Synonyma is an error I am confident of what size I leave to others to determine If they were both one Scripture would promiscuously speak of them but we find that it still distinguisheth them and gives us clearly to understand that the greatest part of Covenanters are short of Faith that is saving and justifying Ordinances in which the Covenant of grace is dispensed and which speak all those that entertain them to be in Covenant are granted of God to men short of justifying faith as their proper inheritance Rom. 3.1 Deut. 33.4 Titles implying a Covenant-state as I have abundantly shewed are given of God to them that are short of this faith viz. Christian Disciple Saint Believer Called Brethren God imposes Covenant-conditions makes promise of Covenant-blessings upon these imposed conditions to those that are short of Faith that justifieth These therefore are in Covenant Though I hear neither of Scripture nor argument nor any thing else but bare words in two or three Paradoxes for my conviction yet by a similitude I shall understand that our own Covenant-act is the primary condition of Gods Covenant In his Aphorismes he sayes It may seem strange but now a similitude shall render it familiar If a King saith he will offer his Son in marriage to a condemned woman and a beggar on condition that she will but have him that is consent and so covenant and marry him here her covenanting consenting or marrying of him is the performance of the condition on her part for obtaining her first right in him and his but for the continuance of her right is further requisite If we had had either Scripture or argument to have given us a first light then a Simile might have served for somewhat and come in as a garnish but being served in alone it may speak the Authors thoughts but never settle any in the truth And I shall leave it to the Reader to judge whether the edge of it may not easily be turned against himself and whether when it is brought home it will not prove destructive to his own opinion I must therefore tell the Reader that our relation to Christ whilest on earth is more frequently expressed in Scriptures by espousals then marriages as we may see through the book of Canticles and Hos 2.14 2 Cor. 11.2 and that there is ordinarily a relation of men to God preceding faith that justifies Now Mr. Baxter is not so ill read in the Civill Law but that he knowes that there are sponsalia de futuro and sponsalia de praesenti Those God is pleased to take for his people that are his onely in the first relation and to honour them with priviledges to bring them on to the second Whereas he sayes Our Covenant principally is to receive nor is it onely de futuro but de praesenti I may answer first If our Covenant be to receive then it doth precede this receiving and secondly if he mean that it is our duty to receive Christ in present and not to delay the least moment of time I shall readily yield but in case he say that present profession and engagement to receive gives a people no title to any Covenant-relation before Christ be actually and savingly received I may well ask what we are to say to the whole body of Old Testament-Scriptures were not all Israel in Covenant were they not all visibly the people of the Lord are they not owned of God for such when they were at the worst and lowest How many thousands of Scripture-Texts may be brought to evince it Had they called themselves so and valued themselves as such on this account to be a people nigh unto the Lord and no people so nigh it might have been said to be their own vapour but when God gives them that testimony of honour and hath never done with it sure he would have us to believe it There is a first right therefore before that right in the similitude contended for and that is no other but a right of Covenant to be without God and without hope is the case of a meer heathen uncircumcised in the flesh Eph. 2.11 The state of visible relation is one step nearer than aliens from the Common-wealth of Israel do enjoy and yet too short of a state of salvation Mr. Baxter concludes By this time I leave it to the Reader to judge who it is that introduceth confusion about the Covenant and whether it be
to baptize no Infant as being unable to know the Parents faith to justification and further with Walaes concluding that the Parents faith doth not justifie the child but as Calvin resolves lib. 4. instit cap. 16. Sect. 20. they are baptized into future faith and repentance which Walaeus also sayes is the opinion of most others Neither shall I baptize any man of years till I have as high assurance if not more of his justification than Mr. Baxter seems to think any man can have of his own If this must stand then Paedobaptists and Anabaptists must all leave their Principles and both men and women when they have learn'd to read that new name in the white stone that is have concluded their assurance must turn Sebaptists and then let us look for as many counterfeits as there were Jews in Christs time with broad Phylacteries Those that bottom Baptisme on the Covenant holinesse of Covenant distinct from that of sanctification stand ensnared in none of these difficulties or inextricable perplexities All the following Arguments to the 9th may be easily granted and that is thus formed Titles given by Apostles do not argue that in their thoughts they were alwaies answered with inherent grace If the Apostles use to communicate the proper titles of the justified to all that are baptized till they see them prove apostates or hypocrites then they did take all the baptized to be probably justified though they might know that there were hypocrites among them yet either they knew them not or might not denominate the body from a few that they did know But the antecedent is true Therefore For the truth of the antecedent here laid down That the Apostles use to communicate the proper titles of the justified to all that are baptized I expect better proof then a naked affirmation And all that is brought for proof is I need not cite Scripture to prove that the baptized ar called by the Apostles Believers Saints Disciples Christians Mr. Bl. hath done it already pag. 28. And he very well knowes that I there make it good That those titles are not proper to the justified but ordinarily given to those that are not justified nor in any saving condition But if my words in the place quoted or elsewhere may not be heard Mr. Baxters sure will take who in his Saints rest Part 4. Sect. 3. p. 105. saith There are many Saints or sanctifyed men that yet shall never come to heaven who are onely Saints by their separation from Paganisme into fellowship with the visible Church but not Saints in the strictest sense by separation from the ungodly into the fellowship of the mysticall body of Christ quoting these following Scriptures Heb. 10.29 Deut. 7.6 and 14.2 21. and 26.19 and 28.9 Exod. 19.6 1 Cor. 7.13 14. Rom. 11.16 Heb. 3.1 compared with vers 12. 1 Cor. 3.17 and 14.33 1 Cor. 1.2 compared with 11.20 21. c. Gal. 3.26 compared with Gal. 3.3 4. and 4.11 and 5.2 3 4. John 15.2 His demand therefore to me is strange Now who knows not that salvation is made the portion of Believers Saints Disciples when he himself affirms that there are Saints that never shall be saved He afterwards puts a further question Is it another sort of them or doth the Scripture use to divide Saints as a genus into two species Not that I know of It is but an aequivocum in sua aequivocata The name belongs to them but as the name of a Man to a Corps c. Then it seems that there is nothing of Reality in such Separations Camero tells us otherwise that there is a reality in this Saintship by separation In the relation of his dispute with Courcellius he affirmed that the Text of the Apostle 1 Cor. 7.14 was without doubt to be understood of reall holinesse To which Courcellius replying He that is really holy hath no need of regeneration and baptisme But Infants of Believers after they are borne have need of baptisme and regeneration Ergo. Which Camero answered as the relation sayes by distinguishing of real holinesse which is twofold One consisting in the bare relation of the person to the people of God or the Church and depends wholly upon birth within the pale of the Church and of parents embracing the Covenant The other is c. And it seems that the Scripture is still under the change of equivocal speeches all over As Camero hath somewhere observed that the word Saints in Scripture is far more frequently taken for Saints on Earth then for Saints in heaven so I doubt not but it may be maintained that it speaks far more frequently of Saints by dedication and separation and so of Believers and Disciples by profession then by inherent qualification and doth it in all these places speak equivocally had it been affirmed to be Genus Analogum in opposition to uni vocum Scripture Language real and not aequivocal as is said of Ens in respect of Substantia Accidens it had been lesse but to make nothing of this noble priviledge of which Scripture speaks so honourably is too plainly to side against the truth it self I would know for my learning what advantage or profit a dead Corps is in Capacity to enjoy I think one at all but these as the Apostle tells us have much every way even they that have no more then sanctity of this nature If such equivocation be found in the word Saint their the like is to be affirmed of the word Believer and believers having their denomination from their faith that is equivocal in like manner and so our Common division of faith into dogmatical or historical temporary miraculous and justifying is but a division of an aequivocum in sua aequivocata which I should think no man would affirm much lesse Mr. Baxter who makes common and special graces to differ onely gradually and then as cold in a remisse degree may grow to that which is intense so one aequivocatum may rise to the nature of another animal terrestre may become Sidus coeleste one of our dogs that we use on Earth may become a star in heaven then miraculous faith it self hath onely the name and nothing of the power and nature of faith in it Judas had power given him to cast out unclean spirits Maetth 10.1 4. and he never had faith that justifieth if his faith was onely aequivocal then the unclean Spirits were equivocall likewise I shall never believe that an aequivocal faith can cast out a real devil The Apostle tells us of faith to the remooval of Mountains void of charity 1 Cor. 13.2 If this were equivocall faith those must be equivocal Mountains Mr. Baxter addes To put the matter beyond doubt I wish Mr. Bl. to consider that it 's not onely these forementioned titles but even the rest which he will acknowledge proper to the regenerate which are given by the Apostles generally to the baptized Instances given in Adoption Gal. 3.26 27. union with
Christ and several others If I will acknowledge this I shall be soon brought to yield up all Is all Adoption proper to the regenerate what shall we say then to that of the Apostle Rom. 9.4 To them pertained the Adoption Had the Apostle that heavinesse and continual sorrow of heart for Israel after the flesh and doth he yet give them that testimony that they are regenerate Gomarus on the place hath these words Lest any in this place should mistake Adoption and acceptation for sons in Scripture is twofold general and special General adoption is an outward destination or call into the visible Church and Company of the Sons of God upon which account many are said to be the Sonnes of God as opposite to the Sonnes of men that is aliens from the Church Gen. 6.2 And Israel this general way are called the sons of God not onely those that were elect to life eternall and regenerate but also those that were reprobate and meerly carnal and therefore the Jewes Sons of the kingdome or the Church of God are said to be cast into utter darknesse Matth. 8.12 And whether all union with Christ imply regeneration let John 15.2 be consulted where an union with Christ is cleerly held out yet Mr. Baxter brings that text among others to prove that there are some Saints that shall never be saved Mr. Hudson and Mr. Cobbet tell us at large that Christ is the head of the Church visible and hath many unfruitful members Other phrases are there brought or titles as proper to the regenerate which are well known in Scripture to be applyed to such as have Apostatized and are brought by Arminians to prove falling away and are answered by their adversaries Mr. Hudsons words are here worthy of consideration Onely the invisible company have internal spiritual communion and are elect many of those that have external communion and are visible members shall perish and yet by reason of their profession are said 2. Thes 1. 1. to be in God the Father and the Lord Jesus Christ as Ames also confesseth Med. lib. 1. Cap. 32. art 9. Such was the Church off Corinth and Ephesus c. wherein all were not in Communion for life and of such Christ speaketh John 15.2 Every branch in me that beareth not fruit he takes away and verse 6. If a man abides not in me he is cast forth as a branch and is withered and men gather them and cast them into the fire and they are burned These are said to be redeemed 2 Pet. 2.1 denying the Lord that bought them and sanctified Heb. 10.29 yet hath accounted the blood of the Covenant wherewith he was sanctified an unholy thing and much more to this purpose Vindi. pag. 5. And if the Apostle give Testimonies to whole Churches holding out what they ingage to be ought to be and professedly were this comes short of his purpose I find little or nothing in all the other Arguments but that which either looks not at all towards any thing that I hold Humane authorities vouched or else is already spoken to His last onely from humane authority is observable Our Divines against the Papists saith he do generally plead that Hypocrites are not true members of the universal Church but as a wooden leg is to the body I must tell him that if they be Members of a particular Church then they are true members of the Church universal Taking universal and particular in a Similar homogeneal way for the visible Church state as we must take them if we speak any thing to purpose That which is pars partis is pars totius if my finger be a part of my hand it is a part of my body and if Mr. Baxter be an Inhabitant of Kederminster then he is an Inhabitant of Worcestershire and if of Worcestershire then an Inhabitant of England and let us see what they say of the Church visible indefinitely Lord Duplesse in his Treatise of the Church pag. 3. saith The invisible Church conteineth none but the good the visible containeth both the good and the bad that onely the Elect this all those indifferently that are brought into her by the preaching of the truth e Visibilis Ecclesia est coetus communiter vocatotum tum electorum tum reproborum Wollebius saith pag. 194. the visible Church is a company joyntly called as well of Elect as Reprobate f Ecclesia visibilis constat non solum ex electis vere piis sed etiam ex reprobis Hypocritis Ravanellus in verb. Eccles The visible Church consists not onely of the Elect and truely Godly but also of reprobates and Hypocrites g Nostri Ecclesiam universalem non invisibilem quae solos electos vere fideles complectâ—tur de quae Christus loquitur Matth. 16. sed visibilem quae electis hypocritis constant intelligunt Gomarus Analysis in 2 Thes 2. Our Divines understand the Church universal not invisible which onely contains the elect and truely faithful of which Christ speaks Matth. 16. but the visible which consists of Elect and Reprobate Mr. Hudson Vindication pag. 7. In the same sense that a visible Church may be called a Mystical body of Christ Christ may be also called a Mysticall head thereof as Christ terms himself a Master so he hath evil slothfull servants and stewards as a King he hath rebells that will not have him to rule over them even in his Church Matth. 25.6 giving like instance as a shepherd as an householder as a bridegroom a husbandman a fisherman a vine adding Christ saith My people are foolish they have not known me sottish children c. h Alia est Ecclesia vocatorum promiscue bonis malis fidelibus hypocritis constans Alia est Ecclesia electorum vere fid lilium qui quidem in coetu vocatorum sunt Pareus Revelation 3.1 The Church of the called is one consisting promiscuously of good and bad faithful and hypocrites the Church of the elect is another consisting of Elect and truely faithful which indeed are of the same company of those that are called Ames Anti Bel. T. 2. lib. 2. Cap. 1. not 5. when Bellarmine had stated the controversy between his party and his adversaries Others he saies require inward virtues to make any a Church member i Nosautem ut aliquis aliquo modo dici possit pars verae Ecclesiae de qua Scripturae loquuntur non putamus requiri ullam inteman virtutem But we faith he do not think that any inward virtue is required to make a man in some sort a part of that true Church of which the Scripture speaks After discovery of his sophistry in the word after a sort positively answers k Falsum est internas virtutes requirui à nobis ut aliquis sit in Ecclesia quod visibilem ejus statum It is false that inward vertues are required of us to put a man into the Church according to
visible profession he will not deny them admittance there because they intend to go no further but will let them come as neer as they will And what he sayes of Christs readinesse for admittance I may say of Ministers endeavours they must bring them thus far in order to a greater work Ministers are to be instrumental by the work of regeneration to make men babes in Christ and by remisse heat resembling smoaking flax to bring them up to greater fervour Shall we thence infer that they are to make men luke-warm which is a temper that Christ will not bear We therefore distinguish of luke-warmnesse 1. As a medium to further heat so Ministers must bring men up to it 2. As a terminus or end in which men rest So considered a Ministers work is to bring men beyond it the same we may say of a visible profession as a medium not as a terminus it must be all Ministers endeavours Mr. Baxter cannot be ignorant that Mr. Marshall and others that are for Infant-Baptisme have proved and Mr. Tâ—mb's hath yielded That this inlarged Commission given here to the Apostles is put in opposition to their limited Commission Matth. 10.5 6. They were first sent unto a Nation discipled to their hands entring as Christ tells them into other mens labours what that Nation was they must by their endeavors work all to be That was a Nation of professed disciples and hither they are by their Commission to bring all Nations Mr. Baxter addes For your Argument I grant the Conclusion and what would ye have more I wish no more so that you will stand to your word and then visible disciples of which whole Nations consist according to Christs Commission have right to Baptisme and I think that is the thing in Question He yet saith I grant the Minor taking the word disciples equivocally as a Corps is called a man and I confesse it usual so to take the word but otherwise I deny the Minor But I abhor that acceptation Honest-meaning men do not use to say so much lesse the Holy Ghost as though I should say that I had kept twenty men in my house these twenty years and then come off with a tale of twenty pictures I assert a reality in that discipleship which you call aequivocal As for that which followes To be Christs Disciple as to the Aged is to be one that hath unfeignedly taken Christ for his Master to teach him and rule him renouncing the contrary guidance of the flesh the devill and the world c. This is true as to the Inheritance of heaven but not as to Inheritance of Ordinances in order to the further work of sincerity that qualifies for heaven The Jew outwardly was not thus qualified and yet he had upon that account just title to Church-priviledges and in particular to Circumcision There followes to your Confirmation I deny the Minor and I say that it is so new a doctrine to affirm that whole Nations are not capable of being sound believers that it deserved one word of proof Much lesse should you have hid your Minor and turned it into a Negatio Existentiae when it should have been but a Negatio Capacitatis Doth it follow that a Nation is not capable of sound faith because they have it not or will not have it and afterwards you say If there be any Nation uncapable of faith then God cannot make them believers And so in conclusion you will have stones to be in this capacity for God can make them disciples as well as he can of them raise up Children to Abraham But you might easily know that I intended a Capacity to be brought into this state in Gods ordinary regular way by the Apostles Ministry And Chap. 27. pag. 194. I had before thus explained my self That which a whole Nation in Gods ordinary way of administration is in a Capacity to attain and enter into is onely a Covenant professed visibly entred upon and doth not require any inward change or work upon the soul to the being of it This is plain it cannot be expected in Gods ordinary way that a Nation should be brought forth at once all inwardly holy and sanctified such a field without tares hath not been seen such a floor without chaffe such a draw-Net without any fish that 's bad such a feast and none without a wedding Garment So that this is a doctrine so clear that proof needs not where there never shall be any futuriety we may well and fairly speak of an incapacity Capacity is vain when it is known and confest Existence shall never follow But there must never be any such existence as appears in Christs and the Apostles Parables of mixtures in visible Churches and hitherto all ages have had experience Whereas you say Do you think Preachers yet be not bound to indeavour the saving conversion of whole Nations If you say No you take them off the work their Master hath set them on If you say Yea Then you think they must indeavour to perswade men to that which they have not a Capacity of I think they are to bring them if heathens to a visible profession and as many as may be to thorow conversion That is somewhat remarkable which followes Vocation uneffectual is common to Pagans Vocation throughly Effectual is of the same extent with justification and I think Election A Pagan called according to Scripture is a Contradiction in adjecto Calling in Scripture-phrase is not a bare tender but accompanied with a professed answer That speech of Christ Many are called but few chosen is the close of two Parables Matth. 20.16 22.14 the one of Labourers called into the vineyard the other of Guests called to the wedding And in both applyed to them that answered to the Call that came and laboured in the vineyard that came with other bidden ones to the Feast and not to those that refused According to this doctrine there is no Medium between a Pagan and a justified man all Pagans and unjustified men are upon the same terms the Jew outwardly whatsoever St. Paul saith to the contrary hath no profit or advantage above the heathen When the Psalmist gives that Elogy to the children of Israel a people near unto the Lord Psal 148.14 the same may be said of every Pagan that is an alien from the Common-Wealth of Israel if once he hath manifested so much stubbornnesse as to refuse a Gospel-tender Scripture makes visible Church-Members nigh when others are afar off Ephes 2.13 and in visible Churches some according to Scriptures are more nigh then others Mark 12.34 when yet both are in an unjustified Condition Argument 2. reviewed Mar. 16.16 vindicated Mr. Baxters second Argument to prove that onely justifying Faith gives title to Baptisme is thus laid down When he saith He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved here Faith goes before Baptisme and that not a common but a saving faith for here is but one faith
down a ladder at the same instant he is climbing up it When I bring this similitude for illustration of the point in hand that a promised service and fidelity in war is enough to get listed and to do service is of necessity to be rewarded I am told that this runs upon the great mistake which I have been so often told of and am further informed that the formal reason and denomination of a condition is from the donors constitution or imposition giving this benefit onely on the terms by him assigned and not upon our promise to perform them If I have been told of it often it is well if I can be convinced of it now I utterly deny that the denomination of conditions of a Covenant in actual being is from the one and not from the other that is exclusively to the other I well know the donour is to prescribe and the receiver is to accept without putting in Exceptions But if there be no acceptance of terms there is no Covenant and there being no Covenant there can be no Covenant conditions as is plain by the usual definition of Covenants where the Gospel is preached and no entertainment at all given there is no Covenant people of God they stand bound by Law precepts but are under no obligations to Covenant conditions Argument 4. reviewed The next Argument in which I am concerned and the last which in this thing is produced is That the Eunuch must first believe and then be baptized upon his desire of Baptisme Philip saith If thou believest with all thy heart thou maiest This I have confest carries more colour then all the former and indeed I never met with any thing either in Scripture or reason produced that carries with me so much as any colour for it this excepted Yet this is not unanswerable One difficult text does not use to take us off our hold of many plain ones I answer 1. Philip may call for that de bene esse when the Eunuch was to be admitted which was not yet essential to his admittance Those that preach preparatory Sermons for the Lords Supper call for allthat may give the highest comforts and not barely for that which is the Minimum quod sic to give admission 2. As I have said so I say still that dogmatical faith is a true faith and to prevent needlesse Criticisms it is truly a divine faith so that none can say that Jesus is the Christ can believingly subscribe that Article but by the holy Ghost 1 Cor. 12.3 And whosoever sayes with assent of judgment and understanding that Jesus the Son of Mary is Christ the Son of the living God speaks more then flesh and blood can suggest and is not attainable but by Divine revelation And whereas it is objected that it is a false faith when it pretends to be that which Scripture calls faith in Christ and denominateth believors I answer 1. I have shewed before that our prosession qualifying for Baptisme is not a profession that we have such faith which cannot be done without an eminence of faith to assurance but a profession of the necessity of it to salvation and an engagement to it 2. It denominates believers in the ordinary and common language of Scriptures and wheresoever believer is put in opposition to unbeliever or infidel faith of this nature is still understood In that famous text 1 Cor. 7.14 every man and woman is a believer that was removed from heathenish Idolatry to the profession of Christianity or as Paulinus whom Jerom so much magnifies speaks was a baptized person Otherwise the case there put about the validity of marriage and lawfulness of marriage society were not between an infidel and a professour of Christianity but between a regenerate man whom this language onely makes a believer and one unregenerate which in this language are infidels which were a case never yet put to question When mention is made through the History of the Acts of so many thousands that upon the Apostles preaching believed it can denote no more then the embracing of the way of Christianity in opposition to Judaisme or Heathenisme If it imply a through Regeneration of the soul there could be no unregenerate ones among them which is wholly against the nature of visible Churches and all experience as hath been abundantly manifested As for that distinction which seems to be hinted between believing Christ and believing in Christ Mr. Ball in his Treatise of Faith pag. 5. hath sufficiently shewed the groundlesnesse of it pointing out Scriptures where a preposition is added to the word believe when nothing but assent of mind is signified And where it is put without a preposition when trust and confidence is implyed Abraham believed God Rom. 4.3 where no preposition is added and it was counted to him for righteousnesse And on the contrary the Rulers believed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in or on Christ and loved the praise of men more then the praise of God Joh. 12.42 43. It followes I think if a man say This is the Son the Heir Come let us kill him and the inheritance shall be ours we will not have this man reign over us that these are not true believers nor have right to Baptisme though their belief that he was the heir be a dogmaticall faith true in its kind I am sorry that such things should be mentioned where inquiry after truth is contended and contention not studied It is well known that I speak to a faith of profession which is theirs that take to that party which is for Christ and not with those that professedly go in a full opposition against him and are in a high rode any such conviction of spirit supposed of sin against the Holy Ghost I know not why Dr. Ames should be brought in telling us that in those places where saving faith is spoke to trust in the Messiah is ever included seeing we are speaking of a faith that is short of saving nor yet that I should be told that words of knowledge and assent do in Scripture oft imply affection and consent unlesse that it be to let me know that it doth not generally hold which in case I were in a strait and at want for a present answer would well help me out And whereas I am demanded whether I do not know how ordinarily saving faith it self is denominated from the Intellectual act alone I answer that I do know it and if I were ignorant of it before Mr. Burgesse hath taught me the same thing with the same reason of it in his Spiritual Refining page 170 171. Pos 8. And I know also that it hath its denomination often from the act of the will alone But will it follow that the understanding is never fully perswaded for assent but the will is also not alone somewhat moved but throughly inclined for consent and acceptance If the understanding at any time be brought to a reall assent whilest the will is swayed by lusts
any man that desired to be a member of the Church though but onely professing to repent and believe so neither did I ever there find that any but convicted Hereticks or scandalous ones and that for the most part after due admonition were to be avoided or debarred our fellowship And whereas it is urged that they are to prove their interest to the priviledges that they lay claim to and not we to desprove it I answer If that were granted yet their meer sober professing to Repent and believe in Christ is a sufficient evidence of their interest to Church-membership and admittance thereto by Baptisme supposing them not admitted before and their being baptized persons if at age or members of the universal visible Church into which it is that they are baptized is sufficient evidence of their interest to the Supper till they do by heresie or scandall blot that evidence which evidence if they do produce yea though they are yet weak in the faith of Christ who is he that dare refuse to receive them And this after much doubting dispute and study of the Scriptures I speak as confidently as almost any truth of equall moment so plain is the Scripture in this point to a man that brings his understanding to the model of Scripture and doth not bring a model in his brain and reduce all he reads to that model What have I spoke more then here is said and did I ever speak with more and higher confidence I say that a faith which is short of justifying gives title to Baptisme and he sayes Such give sufficient evidence of their interest to Church-membership and consequently admittance to Baptisme so that if my doctrine herein be loose as he chargeth it the Reader will hardly find his to be fast and it heares not well to play fast and loose The evasion of equivocal will not here serve that will utterly spoyl the whole strength of his Caution and put men amain on this separation as it will contradict his assertion of their grace as real and true They will say They will have no fellowship with a dead Corps instead of a reall man for that is his expression of the difference between what is real and what is equivocal Neither can he here come off by the help of his distinction of forum Dei and forum Ecclesiae These gifts and graces from God these priviledges vouchsafed of God and purchased by Christ plainly enough speak a right in the sight of God Neither is there as we have heard in this Controversie any such distinction to be admitted I am therefore in this no further to blame then he hath been and if he see cause to recede from yet I see all reason to persist in my opinion SECT X. Proposition 8. FOr the Sacrament of the Lords Supper No such vast difference between baptisme and the Lords Supper that the one should be a priviledge of the Church visible and the other peculiar to the Church invisible there cannot be that vast difference and disproportion between it and baptisme that the one should be a priviledge of the Church visible and the other peculiar and proper to the Church invisible that all in the outward administration of the Covenant as some speak should be interessed in the one and onely those that come up to the termes of the Covenant should have any interest in the other Christ gave order that Disciples should be baptized Matth. 28.19 and he delivered his Supper to Disciples Matth. 26.26 27. and it is more then strange that disciples should be taken in that aequivocall way as to hold out all in outward profession confoederation and visible Church communion in the one as is almost generally agreed upon between Paedobaptists and their adversaries and to be restrayned to those that answer to their profession in the other so that in the administration of the one the dispensers have a firme rule to lead them viz. visibility of interest as Mr. Cobbet hath largely shewn in his Vindication pag. 52. Cou. 4. and in the other can have nothing for their guide but an invisible work left to their charity to conjecture Disciple therefore respective to either of the Sacraments which are outward visible ordinances and visible Church priviledges can be no more then a man of visible interest When Christ sate down to the Passeover it is said he sate down with the twelve onely they had right to eat of it in his company Exod. 12.3 being of his family And as he was eating he gave the Supper but then the phrase is changed he gave it to his Disciples onely the twelve were occasionally there but it was instituted in behalf of all Disciples of which the number could not be small considering how many John had made and baptized and Christ had made and baptized more then he though not in person but by his Disciples Joh. 4.1 2. A reverend brother makes this practice of Christ at the first institution and administration of the Supper to be a directory for future to receive such onely to it as are the Disciples of Christ To which I willingly condescend provided that the word be aright understood I know the word is sometimes taken in a restrayned sense for those that indeed do the duty of disciples Joh. 8.31 If ye continue in my word then are ye my Disciples indeed and Luke 14.33 Whosoever he be of you that forsaketh not all that he hath he cannot be my Disciple As the word Israelite is sometimes taken for those that do the duty of Israelites and are such as Israelites ought to be Joh. 1.47 Behold an Israelite indeed in whom there is no guile when respective to fruition of Church ordinances of what nature soever all that were of Israel according to the flesh or visible Church-Members in Israel are expressed by it Disciple or Israelite is a man of outward Covenant interest The latitude of it according to Scripture expressions I have shewen Treatise of the Covenant pag. 208. All that were Christs family Disciples did eat of the Passeover with him Matth. 26.18 even Judas as is acknowledged and scarce to be doubted of but he did eat of the Supper It is more then strange that as a Disciple he should be taken into the Passeover and a few houres after as no Disciple should be put from the Supper The Lords Supper is for the building of those that Baptisme takes in But Baptisme takes into the Church visible Visible Church members have then interest in the Supper When Sacraments are in their use distinguished one for admittance into the Church and the other for growth one as the Sacrament of our birth and the other our nourishment most understand the first of admission into the Church visible well knowing that regeneration is not tyed to baptisme but the growth many will have to be in the Church invisible which inharmonious discord between Ordinances of the same kind cannnot be suffered To give notes of
the Disciples of Christ for discovery of a Disciple in the former sense by their affections to him and suffering of affliction for him are of singular use Christ himself hath gone before us in it But upon the notation of the word because Christ gave the Bread and Cup to Disciples to make the subject of that Sacrament to be onely those that reach these markes is besides the holy Ghosts intention All outward Ordinances are for the Church in fieri and not onely in facto for the bringing of it on to Christ I should desire to know where any outward sensible Ordinance is made or how in reason and according to Scripture it can be made the proper peculiar right of invisible members SECT XI Proposition 9 THe Sacrament of the Supper no more then other Ordinances is not limited to those that have received a new life in Christ by the Spirit that are actually regenerate and in grace The Lords Supper is not limited to those that have received a new life by the Spirit others as they may be admitted without sin so they are in a capacity and possbility to receive benefit from it This I am not ignorant that some will question But let these consider before they censure First That it is an external Ordinance as hath been said Arguments a priviledge of the Church as visible put into the hands of those for edification that are not able to discern men of spiritual life and invisible interest And though there be characteristicall differnces whereby a man in grace and he that is short of it may be distinguished whereby all bad ground at the best may be differenced from that which is good yet they are such whereby a man is to make trial of himself onely they are Spirit-works and none knowes them in any man save the Spirit that is in him and therefore no marks for any others cognizance For a Minister of Christ to dispence by command the Sacrament to many when he knowes that it is of possible use and benefit to some few unto these it is food and nourishment unto life unto the others as Rats-bane Poyson and onely for death is such a snare that may hold him in his administration in all horror and amazement A fad dilemma either to lay aside an Ordinance of Christ and so never come up in his place to the whole of his duty or else to deliver to them that which will inevitably be the ruine and destruction of so many of them I know no possible way that can be supposed or so much as pretended for avoidance but in the Name of Christ to give warning to all in whom this new life by the Spirit is not to abstain every man and woman not actually regenerate on their peril to keep off Let them say some know their danger in the highest terms that can be uttered and then if they come their blood is on their own heads and the Minister of Christ hath by this means delivered his soul But to this I have three things to say 1. That it is as I suppose without all Scripture-precedent to warn men upon account of want of a new life by the Spirit wholly to keep off from this or any other Ordinance of Christ I know we must warn men of their sin and the judgement hanging over their heads for sin in which let it be our prayer that we may be more faithful but that we should warn men upon this account upon this very ground to hold off from all addresse to Ordinances I have not learnt 2. I say this doth presuppose that which is wont to be denyed unregenerate men to be in a capacity to examine themselves respective to this Ordinance How can we warn them upon want of justifying faith and the saving work of repentance to hold back when they are in an incapacity upon trial to find themselves thus wanting 3. Shall we not hereby pluck the thorne out of our own sides and as much as in us lyes thrust it into the sides of many of our hungry thirsty and poor in spirit people How many may we suppose are in grace through a work happily begun on their souls yet for several reasons are not able to see this grace or reach to any discovery of it Sometimes by reason of the infancy of the work upon their hearts being yet babes or rather embryo's in grace The first that appears upon light received is an army of lusts and potent corruptions as we know Paul sets it out This cloudes for present any other weak work that as yet in present is wrought In this time Satan is not wanting he did not shew so much artifice before to lessen their sin but he now makes use of as much to aggravate it and as he was industrious before to seduce now he is as busie to accuse He led the incestuous man to incontinency 1 Cor. 7.4 And we know Paul feares least upon continuance of the Church-censure he would gain advantage to swallow him up in overmuch sorrow 2 Cor. 2.8 11. These perhaps as yet are not able to give an account of the nature of faith and repentance or their genuine fruits much lesse are they able by a reflex act to conclude the truth of them in their souls Sometimes by reason of some sharpe conflict of temptation being under the shock and assault of it and therefore whatsoever they have seen of grace heretofore or the favour of God now it is under a cloud which I believe was Pauls case when a messenger of Satan was sent to buffet him and a thorne in the flesh given him seeing it is put in opposition to the abundance of revelations that he had being taken up into the third heavens 2 Cor. 12. and therefore had need of Ordinances for support Sometimes on a soyle received by temptation of which his own heart and not the Church is witnesse and therefore is at a losse of the joy of his salvation and stands in need of strength for recovery Sometimes by over-much sloath and rust contracted on his graces through negligence which is supposed to be the case of the spouse indulging her self too much in carnal ease Cant. 5.2 I have put off my coat how shall I put it on I have washed my feet how shall I defile them Sometimes God out of prerogative withdrawing the rayes of his Spirit and refusing to testifie with our spirits in which case the soul that is most upright with God and sincere in his feare walks in darknesse and sees no light in which there is need of all communications from God and attendance upon him in Ordinances When these shall hear all in whom the work of grace is not in truth thus warned to keep back and told of the high danger of approaching to this Table in such away aggravated will not they put in their name and say their souls are now spoke to They must therefore absent themselves and so the smoaking flax is quenched
and the bruised reed broke There have not been a few hungry sad souls that I have known that have born the terror of the Lord separate themselves for this reason But it will be replyed by those that give this warning that they mean not these they are not at all intended in their speech these they would tender and with all endeared affection of love encourage as those that have most need and are most fit to receive food for their strength But all of this helps not when this Proposition is laid down That no man in whom justifying faith and a new life by the Spirit is not wrought may dare otherwise then on the peril of his soul to draw nigh hither will not such a soul necessarily assume A new life through the Spirit is not wrought in my soul I am conscious to my self that I am carnal whatsoever endeavours I have used to believe yet how far am I from faith in strength and truth I find my self all over doubts and fears and plunged in unbelief And though I have made it my businesse to keep off from sin yet how far am I from a true change by repentance I find my heart hard obdurate even as an adamant yea the poor deserted soul will take to it self the state of Cain the condition of Judas If there be any other high in wickednesse they have matched yea they have exceeded them They are to put it to the question whether they are in grace or no whether they have a new life wrought or as yet are short of it This they must either determine in the affirmative that they are in grace at least there are those hopeful signs in present that they cannot but conclude it and then they safely may come upon sight of this they may with cheerfulnesse make their addresse or else they must carrie it in the negative all that is yet wrought is not life is not grace is not faith in its power is not repentance in truth as they can do no other that walk in darknesse and see no light that say God hath forgotten to be gracious and so they must keep off from the Ordinance and debar themselves from those cordials those apples those flagons that are there tendered and sick of love yet dare not intermeddle with the Lords tokens that are tendered to them or in the third place suspend and so sit down in doubtful fears whether they have grace or no and then that of the Apostle Rom. 14.23 He that doubteth is damned if he eat because he eateth not of faith for whatsoever is not of faith is sin will soon come into their thoughts and so all that are short of fulnesse of assurance must in dreadful horror separate themselves Secondly This Sacrament in that it is a Sacrament hath the name and nature of a seal as we see in the text and God willing shall be shewn a visible seal intrusted in the hands of man and therefore must needs be of a more different latitude and large extent then that seal which God reserves in his own keeping the seal of the Spirit The Lord knowes them that are his 2 Tim. 2.19 But man is to seek who are the Lords God knowes how to put to his seal to his own man who hath not this knowledg must needs be here allowed a greater latitude either men entrusted with it must have the knowledge of God as to this particular who they are in whom a new life is and grace wrought or else they must be allowed a greater latitude to take in men that make profession of God and as members in Church-Communion may be edified by it I know this argument is carried another way and that we conclude the contrary upon a double account 1. These seales of God outward and inward should answer each to other Those that have the outward seal they are to have the inward those that take into their hand the seal of the Sacrament should have the impresse of the Spirit on their soules To which I answer That the writing of the Word with Inke and Paper in the Bible and the writing in the heart by the Spirit should answer each the other that is every Christian should make it his businesse to hide that Word in his heart that by the Ministery sounds in his ears and yet Christians are not warned not to take a Bible into their hands till the impresse of that which is there is put on their hearts The Word is delivered in a greater latitude and so also must the Sacrament 2. Some say this Sacrament seales Gospel-promises onely they therefore that can claime the promise and have their interest in it can claime the seal otherwise the seal is put to a blank there is a seal where there is no Covenant-promise 1. I answer this argument thus carried speaks sadly to the hearts of all dispensers of the Sacraments they must see there is a Covenant-promise or else they must not dare to put to a seal To put any mans seal to a blank paper where nothing is written is a vain use of that seal It stands there as a cypher Now to put Gods seal to a blank where nothing is written doubtlesse is as vain and an high taking of Gods Name in vain according to these the Covenant is written in non-legible and invisible characters This inward work is that white stone with a new name written which no man knoweth save he that receives it Revel 2.17 and so the dispensers too often against convictions of conscience allwayes at hap-hazard must deliver them any thing written or not written whether a blank or filled up they cannot tells but are all at uncertainties 2. I answer as is the seal so is the Covenant both of them external and one must answer to the other Now these in question as hath been demonstrated at large are in Covenant An outward Covenant is by few questioned and so the seal is put to no blank but given to one interested in Covenant It seals the grace of the Covenant and mercy tendred in the promise on Gods termes and propositions So that the different latitude of the seal of the Spirit and of the seal of the Sacrament do conclude that men of no more then visible Church-interest may partake of it 3. The Church de facto hath injoyed it in this latitude not to instance in some ages following the times of the Apostles in which the Pastors called all their people to daily Sacraments and the use of it in Austins time when wicked ones in the Church were so numerous that they durst not deal with Church-censures but look into the Scripture though we are kept much in the dark concerning their practice little mention being made of the administration after the institution yet we know that this Sacrament was the priviledge of visible members then in being and it is clear enough how far many even then were short of sincerity If that of 1 Cor. 11. be
put into the Proposition and it not delivered in that generality and whensoever that distinction shall be put I shall not doubt but an answer in the distinction will be suggested Secondly Inabilities to perform duties upon the bare account of natural corruption in a right way and in that acceptable manner as to receive the comforts of them do not discharge a man from obligation to the duty In case indeed it could be proved that God never gave the Sacrament in charge to an unsanctified man but left this visible Ordinance as a Legacy or charge to an invisible Society whom none but themselves can distinguish and few of them able to distinguish themselves then the argument were of some force but from the inability to reason against obligation to the duty to take men off from it upon that account of weaknesse through natural corruption will take all men off that are unregenerate from all duties Thirdly Those that in this way disable all men in nature from these duties which are given in charge to a Communicant upon that ground to keep them from the Sacraments yet confesse they may do this work in order at least to their own exclusion they cannot examine themselves in order to receive but they may and must examine themselves in order to hold themselves off from it When the Apostle speaks to the whole visible Church of Corinth expressely Let a man examine himself and so let him eat of this bread and drink of this cup. This few say they can reach but to examine and not to eat is in the power of all the other Fourthly Though these reach not the highest duties and so come not up to the ultimate end of the Sacrament yet they perform in their measure several duties and reach the intermediate and subordinate end of it They see Christ there evidently set forth and crucified before them There they see the highest aggravation of sin Christ wounded for sin bruised for transgression under the Fathers wrath for mans guilt suffering for sin the just for the unjust They see him bearing the sins of many and they cannot nor may not exclude themselves from the number They see there a ransome paid for sin a discharge made to the Fathers Justice They see Christ tendered and offered They may further oblige themselves to all duties required as well to the interesting grace which is faith as to the qualifications of obedience They do believe Acts 2.12 13. Luke 8.13 Joh. 12.42 43. 1 Tim. 1.19 This faith is true in its kind they do not onely yeeld assent but reach to some measure of joy and delight Luke 8.13 They are in Christ their way of inhesion or implantation I shall not determine But in the latitude as he is an head he hath members that are inherent in him he is an head of a Church visible and hath many members suitable as the Reader may see in Cobbet of Infant-Baptisme Conclus 5. pag. 56. Whilest those hearers mentioned Luke 8.13 believed I cannot think it was the seeds-mans office who had sounded the Word in their ears to have withheld the visible Word from their eyes or advised them to have withdrawn themselves And as they do duties incumbent on Communicants so also they receive mercies many intermediate mercies though in that state they receive not the highest and choicest mercies They partake of the fatnesse of the Olive Rom. 11. even all that come into that state that the blinded Jewes and the worst part among them did relinquish SECT XII Proposition 10. THe Lords Supper as all other Ordinances of Christ must be so administred The Lords Supper must be so administred that Communicants may be edified that the Kingdom of Christ may be most advanced and the Church in her members most edified Let all be done to edification is the Apostles rule 1 Cor. 14.26 Not as an Apostolical Canon as Mr. Hooker in his Ecclesiastical Policy hath observed for then if the Apostle had been silent that injunction had not been obliging but as a necessary result from all that they had in charge from Jesus Christ Prophecie exceeds unknown tongues because it edifies 1 Cor. 14.4 And unknown tongues are without profit and of no use without interpretation to edifie ver 5. Therefore we have the Apostles resolution for publique prayers ver 14 15 16 17. For if I pray in an unknown tongue my spirit prayeth but my understanding is unfruitfull what is it then I will pray with the Spirit and with understanding also I will sing with the Spirit and I will sing with the understanding also Else when thou shalt blesse with the Spirit how shall he that occupieth the room of the unlearned say Amen at thy giving of thanks seeing he understandeth not what thou sayest for thou verily givest thankes well but the other is not edified And for the preaching of the Word ver 18 19. I thank my God I speak with tongues more then you all yet in the Church I had rather speak five words with my understanding that by my voice I might teach others also then ten thousand words in an unknown tongue Matters circumstantiall and of themselves indifferent if they be not reduced to this end prove inexpedient and to the doer evil All things are lawful for me but all thinges edifie not 1 Cor. 10.23 The whole of the Ministerial work and every appendant to it must be reduced hither what have builders to do but to edifie And if they edifie not what do they do In what other metaphor soever their work is set out this is still their businesse the perfecting of the Saints the edifying of the body of Christ Ephes 4.12 When they have done this and made it their whole businesse they may with confidence speak to God in the words of Christ I have glorified thee I have finished the work that thou gavest me to do Joh. 17.5 This thread which runs through the whole of the Ministeriall work is not to be excluded here Those of whom there is hopes that they are willing to learn Christ are to be taken into Christs School by Baptisme and those are to be admitted to the Lords Supper that knowingly will engage for continuance and comming on in the waies of Christ Baptisme is the entry door into the Church visible no man must be refused of whom there is reason of expectation that they will be professedly Christs And the Lords Supper is the means of the growth of those that are thus visibly and in the face of the Church received where this may conduce to their building up it is not to be denyed so that the dispensers great enquiry must be whom the Lords Supper may benefit where it may edifie which according to Scripture rules may be discerned and determined otherwise the Apostle had not given this charge Let all things be done to edification and where it may edifie to give it and where it serves not for edification to forbear it not whether
whatsoever interest they may claim or on their behalf be claimed are justly debarred from it and in present denyed admission to it And on the contrary All that are in a present aptitude and capacity to improve it for spiritual advantages are regularly to be received and by no means to be denyed This is plain it must be administred to the Churches advantage and edification unto every members possible advantage They that are in an utter incapacity to receive benefit are in all reason to be denyed it and those of capacity to be received to it Some would have those debarred or at least to debar themselves that hopefully may profit and we may not plead for their admission that are in the judgment of all reason in an incapacity of profiting Those that stand in this present incapacity are of two sorts 1. Such that through inabilities cannot make any improvement of it 2. Such that resolvedly and obstinately will not Those that through inability cannot are of four sorts First Those that by reason of minority and non-age are not yet ripe for the use of reason as Infants and younglings Secondly Those that by providence are denyed it as natural idiots Thirdly Those that are berest of it as distracted persons aged persons grown children Fourthly Those that by their grosse neglect in spiritual things never made improvement of it First Infants These the Church as well Popish as reformed by an universall received custome denies to admit As the Disciples sometimes rebuked those that brought infants to Christ to receive a blessing so the Church now provides that none shall bring them to partake of this Sacrament And though the Disciples suffered a check from our Saviours mouth in the one Infants having title to and being in a capacity to receive benefit by that Church-priviledg as being Church-member yet we believe the Church is free from reproof in the other upon the ground laid down before viz. their incapacity to improve it to their spiritual benefit It is true that the practice in the Church for at least some Churches anciently was otherwise as those know that are verst in antiquity several quotations out of Dionysius Areo pagita Cyprian Austin the Councell of Tolet may be seen in Suarez disput 62. quaest 79. Art 8. sect 4. Though according to Thomas Aquinas Dionysius his words make not for it as may be seen part 3. quaest 80. Art 9. This custome Maldonate in Joh. 6.53 saith continued in the Church 600. years but he onely saith it and Suarez in the place before quoted saies it was never received of the whole Church and perhaps saith he the practice was not Common seeing there is no more mention of it among the Ancient and quotes the opinion of some that day The Fathers never observed this custome but onely tolerated it because they could not resist the multitude And one that speaks enough in favour of it findes the practice of it in Africk and Europe but can bring no testimony out of Asia for it onely he saies that he does not read that the custome was contrary in any part of Asia The Schooles have disputed infants capacity of it Thomas Aquinas in the place quoted is against it together with many others whose names Suarez mentions Suarez himself is for the affirmative that infants are in capacity of it as that which he saith is farre the more probable and hath most reason and authority for it And in the conclusion hath much ado to excuse the Church of Rome for the neglect of it as Jansenius hath for their Communion onely in one kind Harmon Evang. cap. 131. when the practice of all antiquity he confesses was otherwise and Bellarmine for their eating on fast daies before the evenning against all Scripture precedent Bellar de bon oper lib. 2. cap. 2. But the Church of Rome her self hath reformed this and hath not put our Reformers to the trouble of it though a man might wonder what moved them to it giving so much to this Sacrament as they do to conferre grace by the work done and to fortifie the foul against Satan But it is plain that the high reverence they gave to their transubstantiated elements moved them to it lest any thing unworthy of them should befal them upon the same account that they deny their cup to their laity they deny the bread to those that are in minority see Jansenius ut supra an eminent Writer of the Protestants appears much in favour of this practice not upon the reasons that moved those Fathers which was a supposed necessity of it grounded on those words of Christ Joh. 6.53 Except ye eat the flesh of the Sonne of man and drink his blood ye have no life in you understanding it of Sacramentall eating at the Lords Table but on other grounds 1. Those that are partakers of the thing signified are not to be denied the sign 2. Infants are of the Church they serve to make up that body and Christ the Saviour of the body 3. Christ himself saith Suffer little children to come unto me and forbid them not for of such is the Kingdome of heaven And from each of these he drawes up formal Arguments for infants admittance And he supposeth that that text which is brought as a barre to hold them back 1 Cor. 11.28 Let a man examine himself and so let him eat of that bread and drink of that cup may be easily answered that it is to be understood of those onely that are in danger to eat and drink unworthily and so to be guilty of the body and blood of Christ of which saith he there is no fear of infants These Arguments undoubtedly are of strength to conclude their fundamental right and title as to baptisme so to the Lords Supper but they are two weak to give them actual admission They conclude their jus ad rem but not their jus in re They have upon these grounds a first right but they must wait a further growth till they have a second Baptisme gives right in the face of the Church to all Christian priviledges and this is a Christian priviledg so also the hearing of the Mysteries of Faith the highest of Mysteries to be taken into debate of doubts of the highest nature are Christian-priviledges yet as every baptized person hath not forthwith these high Mysteries communicated to him nor yet is admitted to such high debates as Christ was at the age of 12. years which is recorded as a miracle so neither are they therefore to be actually admitted to the Lords Table And if that text of preexamination may be avoided yet sufficient may be said for a barre to their admission They cannot do that which is outwardly to be done at this Table they cannot take and eat see Whitaker pag. 373. And in case the bread be put into their mouthes it is more like to be cast out then eaten They cannot answer the end of the Sacrament to do it in remembrance of
it be left to a Ministers prudence according to Scripture-rule to manage it It is further said that this is to assume a power without any Object 6 warrant or power from Jesus Christ No text can be produced in which any such power is given To this I answer None that would take this power from the Minister can own this objection It is of equal force against any other hand Let them shew where any other is set up for it and we will presently yeeld it Those onely that are for promiscuous administration can with any pretended colour in this way object it and to these I suppose enough hath been spoken that it is a necessary result from that power that is given for administration of this Ordinance All Ordinances must be so dispensed that they may profit where profit cannot follow there is to be no dispensation Allegations for the power of the people taken into consideration As to the claime of those of the Congregational way before mentioned the former failing this falls with it They both agree that it is an act of jurisdiction in which one party will have all to vote the other onely the Eldership But when it appears that it is an act of prudence and not of juridick censure either of both are at losse for their interest If these have power by their vote to let in and keep from the Sacraments it is either as dispensers of these Mysteries or by vertue of a juridick power of rule and government vested in them That it is not as dispensers themselves will acknowledge for they cannot in a joynt way thus administer neither can it be by virtue of any juridick power of rule and government In case it were granted if all are in place of rule where then are those that are ruled and under government If every member be an eye where is the foot The Apostle salutes the Saints and those that rule over them Heb. 13.24 Here are no Saints but what are Rulers Obey them that are over you in the Lord saith the Apostle these must obey one another If these thus govern and this be an act of their government then no man must be admitted to the Supper but together with it he must be vested in Church-power and rule None must be a member unlesse he be a Commander Christ's Army must have all leaders no followers all Commanders no common Souldiers by this means either worthy Communicants must be shut out or men unfit for rule promoted seeing every godly man that hath the spirit of sanctity hath not presently a spirit of rule Hence will follow that confusion by the experience of many found and complained of by Mr. Blackwood Mr. Firmin and others not to be suspected of partiality And when they argue from their power in excommunication to their power in barring from this Ordinance as the antecedent is to be denyed so the consequent is false All the faithfull are not to decree excommunication The meeting together mentioned 1 Cor. 5.4 was not of members but officers there being more Congregations then one in Corinth as is justly presumed and in some Churches is undenyably proved and therefore their members could not meet about any act of government but officers onely So also the consequence is false and though excommunication were in their power yet the power of administration of Sacraments and mens admission may be in an other hand as a prudential act And so every part of the argument is found faultie It is true that excommunication being a juridical suspension from all Church-Communion and Participation in Church-priviledges comprizes in it suspension from the Lords Table as he that is cast out of the house is no more ordered for his diet in the house but kept from it Yet there may be a non-administration by the Minister where there is not any such Church-censure A Christian in his minority suppose of the age of ten or twelve years is not upon the account of his minority to be excommunicated yet he is not of that age as to be admitted to the Lords Supper And whereas it is said that it is their dutie to avoid such in their converse that are thus denyed I answer that were it granted to be a Church-censure formally executed Mr. Rutherford hath sufficiently answered that their duty to avoid them under censure is no argument that they are to have an hand in the censure But being denyed to be any formal censure of the Church there needs no further answer and they are to avoid them no further then the manifestation of their condition according to Scripture-grounds gives them occasion So they must avoid children youth and all others that are not competently instructed in Gospel-wayes and according to the principles of many of them all those that are not highly vers'd in Christian Mysteries And as for crimes that carry the name of scandal the Minister is in a publick way to debar none but upon known manifest evidences openly seen of which any may be competent witnesses And in case they suffer wrong by the Ministers imprudence or otherwise they are not to suffer farther by other mens avoiding their society and communion The community of the faithful therefore having no power of juridick censure they have no colour of claime to it under any such a notion And being no formal censure Elderships that have that power are not formally qua rulers vested in it It therefore remains that it is an act of prudence in the dispenser and no act of jurisdiction in them that have right of censure or inflicting of penalty Some cautions are here needful for a right understanding and to avoid mistakes in that which hath been delivered Cautions to be observed in these proceedings 1. This which hath been spoken must not any way be understood Cauti 1 to be prejudicial to Church government or the power of Church censure For though Governours are not to be consulted before these seals be dispens'd yet government still stands in due power notwithstanding of this we have all cause to be tender seeing whilest some dispute in what hand to place it others take their advantage quite to abolish it But that Scripture speaks of a Government distinct from that which is in the hands of civil powers is a truth that carries such evidence that it can with no colour of truth be opposed As the Romans divided that state into Senatum populumque Romanum implying that some were in power of Governing and others were to yield subjection the Spirit of God himself makes like division of the state of Israel into Elders and people Ruth 4.9 So the Apostle to the Hebr. in like sort distinguisheth Christians Salute the Saints and those that rule over you Hebr. 13.24 Some were without any power for rule and these are styled Saints without any further addition others are in power for Government and these have their just title given them The same title that is given to
Cyrenius in Syria to Pilate in Judea Luke 2.2 Luke 3.1 is given by the Apostle to these here mentioned A military or politicall word saith one which is spoken of a publick person who is possest of power either in Common Wealth or Army And if those other texts of the Apostle be consulted Hebr. 13.17 1 Tim. 5.17 1 Tim. 5.19 2 Cor. 2.6 and 5.12 13. 1 Thes 5.12 to mention no more so much will easily be found in them that speaks a government within the Church it self not going out of its own limits Whether some texts ordinarily produced hold out so large an enumeration as is by some bottom'd upon them may happily be disputed but that there should not so much as any government at all be spoken to cannot be imagined which thing in reason is also plain 1. The Church is a society a visible Kingdom an incorporation a body and when all of these have their lawes governours censures punishments it cannot be thought that this society should herein so farre differ and be so farre inferiour to all other societies as to be wholly destitute when all others enjoy government governours for their strength defence and more compleat being the Church alone shall be like that City which the Wise man speaks of broken down and without walls Prov. 25.28 2. The Church consists of men as do other societies subject to failings yea to enormities and exorbitances in judgement and practice There hath no age past in which the Church hath not had her schisms errors and scandals No society or body politick is so like to run upon miscarriages seeing the lawes to which Christ ties are so averse to our natures when we can bear others we are apt to say we will break these bonds and cast them away from us Satan envies no other society or bond of men as he doth the society or bond of Christians His kingdome will consist together with all other states and kingdomes they may rule and he rule likewise onely this of Christs Kingdome is wholly averse to Satans and militates against it for the ruine of it 3. The Church from the beginning hath exercised this power within it self when all other powers were adverse and contrary to it How long was it before the Church had a Christian Magistrate and lay under the persecution of heathen states in all which time a discipline vvas yet kept up If the Church had no such povver hovv could it then exercise it 4. The Churches that have been remisse in their improvement of this povver have had their check from Christ himself in glory He manifests his displeasure from heaven against the Church of Pergamos that they had those that held the doctrine of Balaam and the doctrine of the Nicolaitans and against the Church of Thyatira because they suffered Jesabel to teach and seduce his servants Rev. 2.14 15 20. The censure that lyes upon the Kings of Judah upon neglect of reformation in their time argues that they vvere in povver for it So the censure of these Churches upon like account argues their povver in like manner Even those that plead most for freedome of conscience and liberty in religion vvith all impunity from the civil povver yet confesse from these and like texts a povver vvithin the Church it self for censure of delinquencies To all this some are ready to subscribe as being not able to gainsay the clear Scripture evidence of a povver Ecclesiastical and confesse that it vvas so in those times but novv they contend that the case is othervvise Providence hath ordered a change of things and all is swallowed up in the hand of him that is chief in power since the time that the Church hath enjoyed Kings for her nursing fathers and Queens for her nursing mothers not barely accusing them of error that dissent in opinion but charging them to resemble those sons of Belial that upon the Israelites institution of Kingship were ungratefully asking this question How shall this man save us 1 Sam. 10.27 Making good their assertion of a change of this nature by this similitude As in the first Church among the Jewes whilest they were in a wandring condition as their need was greater so Gods personal providence and guidance of them was more expresse and apparent and therefore whilest they were in this Theocraty their government was not to be managed by any setled universal authority besides that of God himself or any one who took not in all weighty things immediate direction from him until such time as being throughly settled in peace and security from their enemies he might make his recesse and permit and appoint to them a King of their own Nation So in the first founding of the Christian Church during the time of their persecution as their weaknesse required were in a Theocraty too guided by the expresse direction of our Saviour himself given to the Apostles during the time of those fourty daies that he was conversant with them upon earth but now after the time that God hath perfected the time of the Churches deliverance and free establishment in peace and rest from all about her and the Prophecy is fulfilled by appointing Kings her nursing fathers and Queens her nursing mothers and having sons to be set as Princes in all Lands so that now under Constantine the uproomes and wandring Tabernacles as formerly under Solomon are converted into stately temples for men now to think of their running into their Wildernesse and persecuted condition by entertaining those temporary forms which unto that condition were most fit doth import both ingratitude and murmur against God and imprudence towards themselves Thus farre this similitude But those of this opinion I doubt would take ill that free dealing toward themselves which they use toward others and that upon their casting off all Ecclesiastical government under the notion of temporary forms we should apply that speech of the Lord himself to Samuel concerning the people of Israel upon their resolution to make a change in government 1 Sam. 8.7 They have not rejected thee but they have rejected me that I should not reign over them And to make the dissimilitude in this simile further apparent it should I suppose be taken into consideration that when God was pleased first to permit and then appoint a King over Israel that the former fabrick of Government written in the Law was not taken down but the whole Levitical order still stood as to all purposes prescribed of God the change was no more nor further but in him that rul'd in chief Instead of one raised by an immediate hand of God as their exigence required they now had one after the manner of other Nations of constant standing And God forbid that we should murmur that the Church hath her sons for Princes and that those that rule over us serve the Lord Jesus with us But we think that these servants of Christ thus raised in honour should see that what Christ hath set up should
be aright managed and that they should have that inspection as the Kings of Judah had to rectifie what they find out of order but not to pull down any thing that Jesus Christ had raised up no more then the praise-worthy Kings of Judah did that which Moses had prescribed especially seeing the Lord Christ even in the space of those forty daies before mentioned asserting his pleni-potentiary power that he had received from his Father and giving power to his Church declares it to be of that lasting tenure to continue to the end of the world Matth. 28.18 19 20. And because these words which import this continuance are variously interpreted and some will understand them with limit to the end of the Apostles age seeing the age of a man is often set out by the word seculum the sports at Rome which were seen once in mans age were called ludi seculares and so we have this text against us But against this interpretation let the Reader observe 1. The frequent use of the phrase 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to the end of the world by this Evangelist chap. 13.39 The harvest is the end of the world ver 40. So shall it be in the end of this world ver 49. So shall it be in the end of the world and Matt. 24.3 Tell as when shall these things be what shall be the sign of thy coming and of the end of the world none of all which can be understood of the end of one but of all ages 2. Let the context there be considered Christ there promises his presence in the work of discipling all Nations but that was not the work of one age onely many ages are past over and yet many Nations are not discipled His presence is promised in the Word and Sacraments which must have their continuance till Christs second coming 1 Cor. 11.26 The Apostles words Heb. 9.26 may well serve for a comment on these words of our Saviour the alone place as Gomarus notes where this phrase is used excepting the texts out of Matthew mentioned But now once in the end of the world he hath appeared to put away sin by the Sacrifice of himself There are two ages of the world one determining upon Christs suffering resurrection and ascension the other commencing at that time and concluding at the end of all time and therefore the space betwixt Christs first and second comming is ordinarily called the last daies Christ dyed at the consummation of the first and the promise of his presence is made till the consummation of the second and the power given and received is no otherwise temporary Cauti 2 2. Neither is this to make for the prejudice of the office of ruling Elders Ruling Elders not hereby prejudiced Various opinions concerning them concerning whom there is in the Church so hot dispute Some own no such power but make it to be a new device not heard of before this last age Others plead a divine right for it and produce Scriptures that appear to speak very fair that way though they meet with very shrewd objections A third not insisting upon any such formal institution being jealous that the texts held forth will scarce bear it out yet concluding that the whole body of the faithful have their interest in government Church Government being neither Monarchical nor purely Aristocratical but mixt with a Democraty they bring in ruling Elders not as officers set up by any immediate institution but as representers of the people So that as Knights appear in Parliament not in their own names as the Peers of the realm heretofore have done but in the name of the respective Counties and Burgesses in the name of their respective Corporations so ruling Elders chosen by the vote of the people have no other power but what they exercise in the name and right of those that set them up Pastors have their power primitively vested in their own persons by immediate appointment of Christ Jesus These have power by way of delegation from them that authorize and appoint them others yet are not at all displeased with this power but upon neither of the former grounds but as a prudential course for the more easy and orderly regulating of the affairs of the Church in case either the chief Magistrate shall set them up or the Church it self by his appointment allowance or connivance Asserting a liberty in the chief Magistrate or Church for this purpose That as in the Jewish Sanedrim there were of the people appointed to assist the Priests both in civil and sacred affaires so when nothing to the contrary appears in New Testament-times it may be still so provided As the Church might set up some to determine Controversies and prevent law-suits 1 Cor. 6.4 and might appoint a brother to be joyned with Apostles to receive and disburse the Churches Alms 2 Cor. 8.9 10. And the Church of Antioch might delegate some to be present at the debate and determination of the Apostles and Elders of Jerusalem in a case then controverted Act. 15.2 so it is not unlawful with prudent limits to appoint some that may be assistant to carry on Church Government I shall not determine on what bottome it is safest to fix them I onely say that I do not see how the Church can well want them And though Mr. Mede whom some adore as their oracle for antiquity Apparet ex his quae diximus in munere adsessorum qui nonnullis in locis in usu sunt quos distinctionis causa temporarios aut laicos praesbyteros appellare possumus nihil esse quod possit reprehendi Non deesse in pia antiquitate exempla quae si non plane conveniant certe ad hunc morem accedunt Quae urbs si non prima 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 certe praecipuos ejus defensores edidâ—t and all deservedly magnifie calls it a new device yet Grotius of no lesse esteem speaks with more favour Imper. Summar potestat circa Sacra Cap. 11. After a large discourse about them He saith that it appears by that which we have said that in the office of Assessors which are in use in some places whom for distinction sake we may call temporary or lay Elders there is nothing that may be blamed Affirming further that there is not wanting in Sacred Antiquity examples which come very near to this custome though not wholly up to it Neither does he make Geneva with some others the first Authors but onely the chief defenders of this order instancing in the benefit that may hence arise both respective to the civil Magistrate and Church Pastors The second of these with me is very rational and being fixt upon that bottome though those exceptions hold that are usually taken against those texts on which their Divine autority is usually built yet the order may still stand and those negative arguments which are brought against them from the Apostles inscription of his Epistle to the Philippians directed to
eat of this bread or drink of this cup he must upon that account take care that they be so farre knowing as to do it If he must administer it for edification he should see so farre as he is able to discern whether they be in a capacity to be edified by it If this knowledg be wanting then by their own confession they are unmeet in case they be of knowledg it is easily signified and made known especially fundamental necessary principles being alone demanded Secondly Among other graces wilt not thou in this self-examination look for that grace of humility that of hungring after Christ Jesus evidenced in the love of his Ordinances If thou art wholly wanting in the grace of humility thou standest unfit for this Table God resists the proud The soul that is lift up is not right If once this be obtained then thou wilt as to thy guidance in heaven-way not be too high to obey those that are over thee in the Lord. Those speeches that we have heard of scorn and comparisons entred never came from an humble heart If thou wantest an hungring fervent affection after Christ Jesus thou then art not meet for this Table as being without a spiritual appetite If thou hast attained to it no such barres will be pleaded or spoken of to hold thee from it Hunger will break stone-walls iron-bars This is a hard weapon that will break through all obstacles For the manner some say The association of Elders in the work no warranty for absence If this were done by the Minister alone they could easily bear but others associated they do not like Ruling Lay-Elders they suppose are not of Gods institution To this I say First What do they say to all the Reformed Churches almost in the World that have that way of Discipline if thou wert a member of the Church there wouldest thou upon this account separate and leave Church-Communion Secondly What sayest thou of our Government in this Church when Bishops were in power who acted then in Government but Chancellors and Officials who were for the most part lay-persons If such could rule over a whole County perhaps three or four Counties three or four may then with the Minister have inspection into one Parish The 26 Canon required Ministers to keep back notorious offenders from the Sacrament and Canon 27. provided that he should give his reason upon complaint to the Ordinary and obey his direction This Ordinary was for the most part a Lay-person and he was set over both the Ministers and Communicants of many Congregations Thirdly In case any judge that according to Gospel-order no others should joyn with the Minister but that he should act alone in admission what prejudice is this to the Sacrament when he that is confessedly called to the work acts alone in the administration of it And in case a Minister see it expedient to crave assistance in so weighty a businesse especially where he is cast upon a large Congregation for his further information and advice where then is the evill When Ministers this way go alone then it is auricular confession shrift and whatsoever prophanenesse can devise then partiality is objected that out of spleen they put men from this Ordinance when to avoid these even by consent help is chosen that on the other hand it is such a grievance The mixture of such that are supposed unworthy no warrantly for absence that it is thought a sufficient reason of mens absence These that we have hitherto seen are extreams on the one hand There are those of an opposite party that have their Objections likewise and would come as they say to this Table in case they could meet with suitable guests there and those onely that become such a Feast such that are holy and no other but looking for others there whom God never called they resolve upon that account to keep absent I answer 1. Let these take heed lest they take too much upon them in passing sentence upon all that come to joyn in this duty and think better upon it whether that or somewhat else ought not to be there their businesse 2. Whether they go not higher then the Word of God will bear them out in the principles that they lay for the qualification of such a one that is admittible to this Supper and take heed that their great ambition be not to find out a Church in that purity and glory that Christ hath altogether denyed to be enjoyed on earth 3. Where it is that they can have hopes to go to joyn where all give evidences of regeneration and no other are received These betake themselves all their dayes to the Society of Seekers As those under the famine of the Word threatened by the Prophet shall wander from Sea to Sea and from the North even to the East and shall run to and fro seeking the Word of the Lord So may these seeking a Church of their own fancying but shall find none But for more full satisfaction let these take these following Arguments into consideration Arguments evincing the lawfulnesse of communicating in mixt Congregations First There is never an approved example in all the Scripture of any one man that did separate or withdraw himself from an Ordinance which God hath enjoyned upon the account of the impurity or defilement either of him that did administer or of those that were to joyn in it It is true that it is said 1 Sam. 2.17 as the aggravation of the sin of Hophni and Phinehas the sons of Eli that men then and as appears for their sakes abhorred the offering of the Lord and therefore in all probability absented themselves from it but Elkanah and Hannah did not so as appears Chap. 1.3 7. and Mr. Hildersam Lect. 29 on John pag. 129. observes from Chap. 2.24 that it was their sin that made any such separation Secondly There are many approved Examples of the people of God to the contrary how much do we read in the Prophets of the peoples wickednesse and corruptions in the State Civill and Ecclesiastical yet which of them for that cause did make separation We see what company did resort to the house of God in Jeremy's time Jer. 7.9 10. and yet we see Jeremy ready when he had liberty to resort to it Jer. 36.5 Much was out of frame and little in due order in Christs time yet as he acknowledged that even then salvation was of the Jewes Joh. 4.22 they had then saving Ordinances among them so he held Communion with them as he religiously observed other Feasts so some have observed as we have heard that he kept four Passeovers after he appeared in publick for the work of mans Redemption Thirdly One mans sin must not keep another from a necessary enjoyned duty if one man will make himself by his prophane addresses guilty of Christs death another must not therefore forbear to shew forth his death This is such a duty and the sin of
farre as I could learn that it did succeed and spread as little as almost any error that ever I knew spring up in the Church Plain Scripture proof of Infants c. pag. 294. so inconsiderable was the party that stood for it And Vorstius speaking in the name of Protestant Divines in general saith b Id potissimum quaeritur an Sacramenta sint signa tantum sigilla foederis gratiae sive externa symbola signacula foederi gratiae appensa divinitus ad hoc institura ut gratiam Dei salutarem in foedere promissam nobis significent atque ita fidem nostram suo modo confirment simul publice testaram reddant quae quidem communis est Evangelicorum sententia an vero preaterea sint causae efficientes hujus salutaris justificantis gratiae sive an sint effectiva gratiae ejusdem organa nempe ad hoc divinitus institura ut gratiam istam realiter instar vasorum in se contineant omnibus illa percipientibus candem vi sua imprimant reipsa conferant quae Bellarmini Pontificiorum omnium opinio est It is disputed whether Sacraments are onely signes and seales of the Covenant of grace or outward signes annext the Covenant and appointed for this of God that they should signify saving grace of God promised in the Covenant and signifying seal and after their manner confirm our faith and give publick testimony of it which saith he is the common opinion of Protestants or whether they be further efficient causes of this saving and justifying grace or whether they be effective instruments of this grace appointed of God for this thing that they should indeed containe it in them and convey it which is the opinion of all Papists Vorstius Anti. Bellar. ad Contro 1 Gen. And our men further judge that opinion of the opus operatum or of the outward Sacramental action as though without the faith and pious motion of those that use it it could justifie any to be evidently false and pernicious And they teach that all Sacraments by the ordination of God himself have onely a power to signifie and seal and not to conferre the grace of the Gospel it self And whereas several passages in the Liturgy of this Church did seem to favour the opposite opinion affixing adoption membership of Christ and inheritance of the Kingdom of heaven and regeneration to Baptisme we know how great offence it gave to many eminently Learned and pious putting them upon omission of those passages And also what Interpretation as with a grain of salt others put upon them that they were onely Sacramentally such And doubtlesse these either hit upon the meaning of the Church which was held to these phrases in imitation of many hyperbolical speeches in the Fathers or else the Church had mist the meaning of Scriptures so loth were the sons of the Church to be quarrelling with their mother and yet more loth with her to run into errors The Observation it self if heeded hath a caution or limit in it Affirming that Sacraments work no otherwise then as signs and seals and that they conferre no inward graces or priviledges further then they work upon the understanding and faith of those that receive them it implyes that they do conferre what an outward symbole or sign is apt to and of powder to convey and that outward priviledges in Sacraments are either conferred of infallibly evidenced This is clear the Apostle having so far undervalued Circumcision in the flesh as to make it Parallell with uncircumcision so that a circumcised Jew and an uncircumcised Gentile differed nothing as to their Spiritual state and condition inferres by way of objection What advantage then hath the Jew and what profit is there of circumcision And answers not that outward circumcision is altogether unprofitable but that it hath much profit and instances in one eminent one To them are committed the Oracles of God This is the inheritance of the Congregation of Jacob Deut. 33.4 as Moses speaks and carrying with it this great priviledge it conveyes with it all other inferiour Church-priviledges right to the Passeover upon this account was theirs Exod. 12.48 and not otherwise So it is with Baptisme men are taken into the Church at this door according to the Commission given to the Apostles Disciple all Nations baptizing them in the Name of the Father c. Whatsoever they were and whomsoever they professedly served before they are this way taken in as the consecrate servants of the whole Trinity and added to the Church Act 2.47 When they had by the Covenant a precedent title in Baptisme they have a solemn inauguration By one Spirit we are all Baptized into one body 1 Cor. 12.13 It is the Spirits work to shape the heart of unbelieving Corinthians to enter into one visible Church-body as that work of Gods power whereby he did perswade Japhet to dwell in the tents of Shem Gen. 9.27 And therefore when c Durandus docet characterem esse ens rationis id est respectum advenientem ex deputatione ad certum officium qualis est relatio in Doctoribus Praetoribus c. Quae sententia vix distinguitur ab haeresi hujus temporis Durand denyed that the Character which the Church of Rome speaks of was any quality in the soul but meerly a relation comming as by way of deputation to an office or duty exemplifying it by the relation that is seen in Doctors Praetors c Bellar. lib. 2. de Sacramen effectu cap. 14. saith That this opinion can scarcely be distinguished from the Heresie of this time d Haeretici non negant neque negare possunt quin sit aliqua relatio rationis in Ministris quae non est in aliis qui non sunt deputati ad ministrandum And further saith That Heretiques do not deny nor can deny but that there is some relation in Ministers which is not in others who are not deputed to the Ministery We do confesse indeed that there is that relation in Christians to Christ by the work done in the Sacrament of Baptisme which is not in Heathens And though we deny Orders to be any Sacrament yet we confesse there is that relation in Ministers to Christ by vertue of their Ordination that is not in those that are not called to the work of the Ministery There are those indeed that do deny it But those that Bellarmine had to deal with and that he charges for Heretiques as Luther Melancthon Calvin Beza Peter Martyr Chemnitius willingly yeeld it And in case this were all the character that they talke of to be imprinted in Baptisme yea in Ordination we should never contend about it And as these priviledges are conferred as to actual interest in the initiatory Sacacraments both of Baptisme and Circumcision so the same priviledges in the following Sacraments are infallibly evidenced as appears in that text 1 Cor. 10.17 The Apostle there making it
of faith in the baptized to obtain it and baptisme to them as Circumcision to Abraham is onely a sign and seal of it and doth not otherwise effect it The like I may say of impenitence that according to them it is a barre to the working of Sacraments Sacraments onely work in penitent persons repentance then is a qualification in them that obtain a pardon and Sacraments by way of seal assure penitent oneâ— of it Eighthly 8. The most eminent of the adverse opinion produce Scriptures clearly opposite to their assertions The most eminent that ever have appeared for this power in Sacraments to confer grace on the receivers either utterly deny or at least very doubtfully affirm that Baptisme works in Infants any real change but onely that which is relative that it conferres any habits or any thing more then priviledges on Infants baptized when yet the Scriptures that they bring for proof of this baptismal work almost all speak to such a change that is reall not relative of habits and not of priviledges When this is made good it will appear to any impartial eye that the Scripture-Texts alledged come far short of proof of any such baptismal power to confer grace on all baptized Infants This as it seems Reverend Dr. Ward suspected asserting the certainty of salvation of all baptized Infants dying in infancy he saith That o Quae est nostrae Ecclesiae totius antiquitatis indubitata sententia ut ego reor ipsius Scripturae it is the undoubted opinion of all antiquity of our Church and as he thinks of the Scripture it self For the former part of this assertion that the most eminent that have appeared on this party have held as before let Reverend B. Davenant in his Epistle speak Asserting by Arguments that which he sayes he had often affirmed that the argument borrowed from Infants which Arminians Papists and some of our own use to maintain the apostasie of Saints or believers is not onely invalid but altogether impertinent as to that controversie His third Proposition to make good this assertion is p Pontificii non agnoscunt pro fidei dogmate habitus fidei aut charitatis infundi parvulis in baptismo neque tanquam de fide docent effici uâ—los justos formaliter inhaesione habitualis justitiae aut Sanctitatis That Papists do not receive it for a point of faith that the habits of faith or charity are infused into Infants in Baptisme neither do they deliver it as of faith that are thereby made formally just by any inherent habituall righteousnesse or holinesse To make this good Bonaventure Aquinas Gerson among the more ancient Schoolmen are brought in and of the more modern Writers Soto affirming that habits infused into Infants are not so known as is the Catholique faith and that Estius doth ingenuously acknowledge that this infusion of inherent righteousnesse is problematically disputed the Master of the sentences inclining to the negative And whereas some later Papists affirm that this opinion of infused habits in Infants is now otherwise ratified then heretofore by the authority of the Trent Councel he first answers that that Councel hath no such authority as to make that an article of faith which for so many hundred years hath not been such and afterwards peremptorily denyes that that Councel did ever so determine concluding that it is resolved upon by Papists that all baptized Infants are some way rendred acceptable to God but that this is done by any such infused habits or by any inherent quality created of God is as he sayes as yet doubted among them His fourth Proposition is that q Protestantes non concedunt fidem justificantem aut charitatem Deo unientem aut gratiam regeneratricem quae reparat omnes animae faâ—â—tates in ipso Baptismi momento infundi insantibus Protestants do not yield that justifying faith or charity that unites us to God or regenerating grace that repaires all the faculties of the soul is infused into Infants in the very moment of Baptisme quoting Calvin Beza and Peter Martyr speaking fully to it r Nec quenquam scio nostris Theologis qui regenerationem illam quae sita est in spiritualium qualitatum creatione quam nos sanctificationem Pontificii formalem justificationem in digitant in ipso momento Baptismi productam definiant Cumigitur nec Arminiani nec Pontificii nec Protestantes agnoscant parvulos in ipsa Baptismi susceptione fieri participes illorum habitualium donorum aut Spiritualium qualitatum quae propriè dicuntur constituere hominem justum et inhaerenter sanctum nemo eorum potest amissionem fidei aut justitiae aut sanctorum Apostasiam argumento ab infantibus sumpto demonstrare Adding that he does not know that any of our Divines determine that that regeneration which consists in the creation of spirituall qualities which we call Sanctification and Papists formal Justification is infused in the instant of Baptisme And he brings in also Mountague in his appeal vouching it out of these Belgick and French Confessions and then concludes when neither Arminians Papists nor Protestants acknowledge that Infants in their participation of Baptisme are made partakers of those habitual gifts and spiritual qualities which properly make a man just and inherently holy none of them can demonstrate the losse of Faith or righteousnesse or Apostasie of the Saints by an argument drawn from Infants His fifth Proposition is That Å¿ Patres nec actualem nec habitualem fidem aut charitatem parvulis in baptismo donatam agnoscunt conversionem etiam sive novi cordis creationem quae propriè regeneratio dicenda est non nisi cum ad aetatem rationis capacem pervenerint in iis produci docent the Fathers do not acknowledge that either actual or habituall Faith or charity is given to Infants in Baptisme and that they teach that conversion or creation of a new heart which is properly regeneration is not wrought in them but onely when they come to yeares and are capable of reason For this Austin is quoted and frequent places out of him are produced and with him Hierome Nazianzen Justin Martyr and Bernard making all up with the testimony of Whitaker t Patres ne somniasse quidem de habituali Papistarum fide quam illi volunt in Baptismo ex opere operato infusam esse parvulis that the Fathers did not so much as dream of the habitual faith which Papists say is infused by the work done in Baptisme inferring this as the result of all that in five several propositions he had delivered that u Hinc quivis perspiciat quam invalida sit haec concludeni ratio Multi ex infantibus baptizatis postea pereunt in infidelitate et impoenitentia Ergo fides charitas reli quaeque Spirituales qualitates in renatis Spiritus virtute productae aliquando amittuntur from thence any man may see how invalid this argument is Many baptized Infants
them making them to think that this is all that can be said for them Mr. Fuller in his history of holy warre lib 3. cap. 20. quoting out of Reinerius a charge against the Albigenses that they gave no reverence to holy places answers It is true And then gives in this for a reason because most in that age ran riot in adoring of Churches as if some inherent holinesse was ceiled to their roof or plaistered to their walls yea such as might more ingratiate with God the persons and prayers of people there assembled Let men take heed that they raise not Sacraments above the honour that Scripture gives them with like successe as these did places of publick holy assemblies a good cause hath not a greater adversary then a weak argument taken up in the defence of it This argument I confesse had it ground to stand upon might be of force for the battery of Anabaptisme but having no Scripture-bottome it presently falls before any adversary and Anabaptisme gathers strength by the fall of it 3. As to the argument it self tending to evince the uselessenesse of infant-Baptisme it may very fitly be parallelled with that Objection made against Pauls doctrine Rom. 3.1 when he had made it his great businesse to set circumcision on its right bottom and declared that it was not efficacious in the way that they expected and that it was without use for salvation unlesse it were answered with the Circumcision of the heart an objection presently is raised What profit is there then of Circumcision so these likewise when Sacraments are not raised to that height as the Schoolmen have advanced them to be instruments of conveyance of grace by the work done and as they expect from them they presently demand what profit And affirm as to infants at least that they are uselesse 4. That answer which Paul gives to his Questionists that demanded what profit is there of Circumcision I give to those that demand what profit is there of infant-Baptisme Having asserted in general Much every way he answers more punctually instancing in one eminent priviledge that virtually comprized all the external priviledges enjoyned by Israel as Church-members chiefly that to them were committed the Oracles of God It was said before that these priviledges in all Sacraments are either actually conferred or infallibly evidenced In Baptisme a true title is legally conferred Upon account of our baptisme we have an orderly and legall right and title to all succeeding Church-priviledges as the Jewes had done upon account of their Circumcision though there be not alwayes an aptitude for actual admission to them or improvement of them Upon this ground infants have 1. Their share and interest in all the prayers made for the Church collectively even in all that are preferred to God by his people for Zion and Jerusalem This was the duty of every son of Zion Psal 122.6 This was the faithfulls practice Psal 51.18 and in these infants as Church-members had their interest on this account infants were brought to Christ Priviledges following upon infant-baptisme That he might put his hands upon them and pray Matth. 19.13 2. They have their share in the blessings of the Church we see with what solemnity it was to be done Num. 6.22 c. The Lord spake unto Moses saying Speak unto Aaron and unto his sons saying On this wise ye shall blesse the children of Israel saying unto them The Lord blesse thee and keep thee c. and they shall put my Name upon the children of Israel and I will blesse them Infants had their share here and upon this account infants were blessed of Christ Mar. 10.16 3. Their relation to God by virtue of Covenant-interest is hereby evidenced and ratified How transcendent a priviledge this is to have the Lord for our God we see Psal 144.15 having reckoned up several mercies the Psalmist concludes Happy is the people that is in such a case yea happy is that people whose God is the Lord This is the priviledge of every infant that upon Covenant title is baptized God will not suffer their enemies to passe without vengeance As it was an acceptable work to dash the infants of Babylon against the stones Psal 137.9 being a seed growing up against God so it is as displeasing and provoking to harme these that are a seed dedicated unto and growing up for God 4. Baptisme teaches them to know as soon as they are of capacity to learn to whom they belong what Master they are to serve and in what School they are to be trained 5. A necessity is seen to get the knowledge of Christ and timely to walk in his wayes 6. A delight is wrought in them towards those in whose communion they are bred and that own them as theirs whereas being debarred in childhood from this society and denyed this badge it is the way to bring them to maligne them each one is apt to love those of his owne fraternity and on the contrary to study the opposition of others 7. The aggravation of their sin presently rings in their ears by reason of the favour they receive from God the society into which they are incorporated when their conversation doth not in some measure answer their profession 8. Parents here see a strong engagement to bring them up for Christ whom they have thus dedicated to him and put into the fellowship of those who are his Saints and members When they have brought forth children unto God they see their sin heightned in giving them to Moloch or any other besides God and there is no example of any believing parent in all the Scripture bringing up a child for Covenant but in Covenant with the Lord. These alone though more might be added might stop the mouthes of all that insultingly move this question 5. That which in present does not but hereafter may work upon the understanding is not vain and uselesse when it is done That was not vain which Christ did to Peter Joh. 13.17 when he said unto him What I do thou knowest not now but thou shalt know hereafter 6. Seals of purchases taken in infants names are of use to infants though during infancy they know not how to make actual improvement themselves of them If Baptisme hath its actual use in behalf of infants whilest infants as hath been shewed and remains with them to be improved by their understanding and faith when they come to maturity it cannot be thought to be vain and uselesse SECT IV. A Corollary from the former doctrine THen it followes by way of necessary Corollary from that which hath been said Answer to Sacramental engagementsâ— ncessary to salvation that unlesse the soul answer to Sacramental engagements Sacraments are not efficacious for salvation to the receivers This is a clear result from that which hath been said and is fully delivered by the Apostle 1 Pet. 3.21 speaking of the Arke of Noah wherein few that is eight souls were saved by water he
of Christ but also the supererogation of the Saints which as they perswade themselves is satisfactory not onely for the Saints themselves but for others The Church of Rome makes it her care to take in the whole of all these branches of righteousnesse and in all of them they place their justification Here we had need of the clew of Scriptures to lead us That righteousnesse which according to the precept of the Law is to be wrought by our selves as to sanctification or qualification of the soul in the way of salvation we must vigorously pursue and not disclaim As Christ when he was accused by the Pharisees to destroy the law and to be an enemy to righteousnesse to take off this calumny he tells his Disciples Matth. 5.20 I say unto you that except your righteousnesse shall exceed the righteousnesse of the Scribes and Pharisees ye shall in no case enter into the Kingdome of Heaven So we may say to these adversaries that charge us to be enemies of good works except your righteousnesse exceed the righteousnesse of these superstitious ones ye can by no means enter into the Kingdome of heaven The righteousnesse of a Papist being of the self same stamp with that of the Pharisees for tradition the Trent Councel makes known their zeal Concil Triden Sess quart p. 11. With the same degree of reverence and esteem we receive the Traditions of our Fathers as we do the bookes of the Old and New Testament and how defective both of them were touching the righteousnesse of the law their agreement in the glosse which they put upon the law is a sufficient witnesse The Pharisees glosse on the law we may read in Christs refutation Matth. 5. and the several precepts which Christ there delivers transcending the Pharisees dictates Papists will have to be no branches of the law but Evangelical Counsels added to it So that B. Hall quotes a speech of Serrarius the Jesuite that the Pharisees may not unfitly be compared to Catholiques adding as his own that one egge is not liker to an other then the Tridentine Fathers to these Jesuites Supererogating righteousnesse and that which is bottom'd on tradition we must wholly shun It is enough that we can bring it up to the rule in the parts of it it must not exceed It is hard to determine whether a man that casts off all regard of righteousnesse or a man of such righteousnesse be more hatefull in Gods presence one utterly sleights the soveraignty of God and the other corrects his wisdome one refuses to serve at all the other serves onely according to his own pleasure As to the other branch of righteousnesse wrought by others The supposed satisfaction of the Saints must be left and the Lord Christs alone chosen That speech of Christ in the Prophet Isai 63.3 spoken of the conquest of his enemies I have trod the Wine-presse alone and of the people there were none with me holds true when it is applied as by many it hath been though not according to the letter of the text to his satisfaction By one offering he hath perfected for ever those that are sanctified Heb. 10.14 yea the righteousnesse of Christ in the matter of justification must stand alone in opposition to all righteousnesse in the world whether of others imaginarily to be applyed out of any publique treasury by way of indulgence or wrought by our selves either by the strength of natural abilities without grace which the Papists confesse to be too weak or in grace and these works how great an honour soever of late is put upon them come short of perfection to justification likewise as plainly appears by the Apostles argumentation Rom. 3.20 By the deeds of the Law there shall no flesh be justified in his sight giving this in for his reason for by the Law is the knowledg of sin The argument runs thus Where the Law discovers sin the works commanded by it cannot justifie This proposition is the Apostles But the law discovers sinne even in those in whom grace here hath its most perfect work This needs not to be proved Therefore works commanded in the law and done by assistance of grace in the regenerate cannot justifie And that the Apostle disclaims all righteousnesse any other way his own then by free imputation from God in the work of justification is clear 1 Cor. 4.4 I know nothing by my self yet am I not hereby justified Though he had the witnesse of a good conscience as his rejoycing 2 Cor. 1.12 Yet this is not his justification when the Rhemists on the place and Bellarmine de justificat urge this text against assurance of salvation Mr. Ball Treat of Faith pag. 107. saith This text makes strongly against justification by works but against certainty of salvation it makes nothing And Pareus upon the words saith Hence it is most firmly concluded that by the works of the law no man is justified If so great an Apostle cannot be justified by works then much lesse others His works were certainly done by the power of grace and upon new-Covenant-engagements That of Mr. Baxter Aphor. of justif pag. 307. must stand as an eternal truth who after that he had laid down the Socinians tenent that they acknowledg not that Christ hath satisfied the Law for us and consequently is none of our legal righteousnesse but onely hath set us a coppy to write after and is become our pattern and that we are justified by following him as a captain and guide to heaven and so all our proper righteousnesse is in this obedience And having mark'd it with this just brand Most cursed doctrine he addes So far am I from this that I say The righteousnesse which we must plead against the lawes accusations is not one grain of it in our faith or works but all out of us in Christs satisfaction As this righteousnesse which is no otherwise ours but by imputation being neither inherent in us Faith the alone grace that interests us in this righteousnesse nor wrought by us must stand entire and sole in our justification so faith must be acknowledged to be the alone grace which interests us in it and attains to our reconciliation to God in Christ otherwise why is it that not onely the denomination is still from faith onely as we see in the text and alwaies when it is named it is called the righteousnesse of faith and not of hope love obedience or repentance But that justification is evermore in Scripture ascribed to this grace The Apostle speaking of Christ who is confessed to be our righteousnesse saith Whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation through faith in his blood In him God who otherwise through wrath stands at the greatest distance is propitious and this through Faith on which Diodate hath these words All this hath been done by vertue of Gods appointment who of his meer will and full power hath from everlasting appointed Christ to be the onely means of expiation and
such as we have heard 2. Sacraments are engaging signs with restipulation these are absolute nothing at all being called for from man much lesse from other creatures 3. The Covenant people of God are the adequate subject of Sacraments but here the whole world of mankind and all flesh is entitled 4. This is onely to be seen as it is set of God in the Cloud but Sacraments are to be received upon tender from God and not onely beheld 5. Sacraments are seales of the righteousnesse of faith appointed for ratification of spirituall and saving mercies but this is onely a ratification of a temporal deliverance As to this last dissimilitude perhaps some exceptions might be taken As the Rainbowe was immediately a signe and seal of a temporal mercy so it was with the Passeover in like manner The freedome of Israel in Egypt when the first born were destroyed seems to have no more spirituality in it then our security from a deluge And in case we make that of Egypt a type of a further deliverance in Christ so we may make this deliverance a figure of like mercy and so Zanchy indeed makes it And the last Annotations hint such a thing Though this Rainbowe say they be a sign of a temporal Covenant in the general extent of it to all creatures yet the Godly may look upon it with reference to Christ in whom all promises of what sort soever are Yea and Amen and who is represented sitting in his throne compassed with a Rainbowe in light like unto an Emerald Rev. 4.3 And in case this sign had been peculiar to the Church as was that deliverance in Egypt and given of God onely to his people in Covenant and in New testament-Testament-Scriptures so applyed as that of the Passeover is it had been unquestionable but being common to the world all creatures in the world having like interest in it and there being no touch of it in New Testament-Scriptures it cannot be so conceived Onely we may safely yield thus much that as the godly may see a son-like title to every common mercy in Christ and not barely as they are to others a commmon providence and largesse so they may see the Rainbowe shadowing out a like mercy but in case this would conclude it to be a Sacrament every creature enjoyed by a Child of God would have the nature of a Sacrament likewise SECT III. Sacrifices not Sacraments THe next Old Testament-ordinances that offer themselves as of the nature of Sacraments are sacrifices These being of several kinds are usually ranked under four heads The Burnt-offering The Sin-offering The Trespasse-offering and the peace-offering Some of which also admit of several subdivisions Other distributions of them are also made by some under other notions which would be besides my purpose particularly to mention There is much agreeable to the nature of Sacraments in them 1. They had their institution from God as we may see in the Levitical Law and so had all sacrifices that from the beginning the people of God did offer By Faith Abel offered a more excellent sacrifice then Cain Heb. 11.4 And nothing can be done in faith without warranty of a Divine prescript 2. These were given in command of God to his people in Covenant Psal 50.5 Gather my Saints which have made a Covenant with me by Sacrifice 3. Christ was held out in these Sacrifices and consequently the righteousnesse of faith signified as the whole body of the Epistle to the Hebrewes shewes Some therefore will have them to be Sacraments properly so called and are angry at that Divinity as they call it magisterially imposed by some that the Jews had but two Sacraments Circumcision and the Passeover and oppose against it the Cloud the Sea which Israel passed through and Manna and the Rock which were to them in stead of the Lords Supper and also the Sacrifices under and before the Law appointed to the people of God And doubtlesse they had much of Sacramentality in them being external rites appointed of God for his people in Covenant Leading them unto Christ and remission of sinnes by his blood and the Church as it appears for a long time had no other yet doubtlesse there are differences to be assigned between them 1. Sacrifices were received of God from the hands of his people being given to God by man they were accepted of him If the Lord were pleased to kill us he would not have received a burnt-offering and a meat-offering at our hands Judg. 13.23 But Sacraments as we have heard are given of God to be received of his people Abraham offered Sacrifice to God but he received Circumcision from God And the Passeover was to be eaten by those of the family Exod. 12.4 10. And though perhaps it may be proved that the people had liberty to eat of some of their Sacrifices yet that was not the proper end and reason of them as it was of the Passeover The people brought them to offer rather then to eat of them 2. These Sacrifices led men unto Christ for attonement by him to attain it Sacraments are to seal up an attonement made and already actually perfected upon Gods terms to be applyed to us in particular And so their difference from Sacraments properly so called is evident SECT IV. The Cloud the Sea Manna and the Rock were Sacraments extraordinary THe next that offer themselves to our consideration are those providences of God over his people as they passed out of Egypt and whilest they were in the Wildernesse and these are four The Cloud the Sea Manna and the Rock For the cloud we have the history of it Exod. 13.21 22. And the Lord went before them by day in a pillar of a Cloud to lead them the way Exod. 13 21 22. opened and by night in a pillar of fire to give them light to go by day and night He took not away the pillar of the cloud by day nor the pillar of fire by night from before the people As also Exod. 14.19 20. And the Angel from God which went before the camp of Israel removed and went behind them and the pillar of the Cloud went from before their face and stood behind them And it came between the Camp of the Egyptians and the Camp of Israel and it was a Cloud and darknesse to them but it gave light by night to these So that the one came not near the other all the night Which is further enlarged in other texts of Scripture Numb 9.15 c. Numb 14.14 Deut. 1.33 with observations upon it Neh. 9.19 Psal 98.14 concerning which many questions are multiplyed of which some are not so needful to be answered 1. For the number Whether there were two clouds or onely one whether there was one onely Cloud or two The text quoted Exod. 13.21 seems to imply that there were two Clouds one dark and the other bright but the other text Exod. 14.20 as also Numb 9.21 rather makes it to be
Lastly as Durand Reas 4 doth observe The whole that is done in it speaks its own use and signification and the use and signification of Sacraments wholly depends upon divine institution They have nothing that beares any colour to say for the Sacramentality of it save that Text of the Apostle Ephes 5.32 where the Apostle having illustrated that love which is due from the husband to the wife by that similitude of the love of Christ to the Church concludes This is a great Mystery and having spoke both of the union betwixt Christ and the Church and between man and his wife to prevent all mistakes he addes but I speak of Christ and his Church so that first we have not the word Sacrament there but the word Mystery which by Bellarmines own confession is not elsewhere in Scripture to be understood of any Sacrament and Cajetan on the words as Amesius observes warnes the prudent Reader to observe that we have not from Paul in this place that Marriage is any Sacrament So that neither word nor thing is found in Scripture that Marriage is a Sacrament Every one of these might have born a large discourse as is well known to all that are verst in these controversies But so many having spoken so fully to them though I was unwilling intending a Treatise of the Sacraments wholly to omit them yet was resolved that the Reader might not be overburthened to be as brief as possible in them FINIS A POSTSCRIPT TO REVEREND and LEARNED Master BAXTER IN WHICH These following QVESTIONS are friendly debated Whether faith in Christ quà Lord be the justifying act Whether mans Evangelicall personall righteousness be here perfect Whether the Morall Law is a perfect rule of righteousness Whether Vnbelief and Impenitence in professed Christians are violations of the Covenant of Grace Whether Faith and Repentance be Gods conditions or mans in the proper conditionall Covenant Whether the Covenant of Grace require perfection and accept sincerity With an enquiry into the judgement of Antiquity about severall things in reference to Justification Sicut meritum Christi non potest apprehendi ad justitiam salutem nisi per organon fidei divinitùs ad hoc ordinatum ita si fides alibi quà m in suo proprio principali objecto quaerat Justificationem non invenit nec accipitillam Chemnit exam concil Trident de fid Justif pag. 159. LONDON Printed by S. G. for Abel Roper at the Sign of the Sun against Dunstans Church in Fleet-street 1655. THE INTRODVCTION REverend Beloved and much Honoured I have received your Apologie according to your appointment from your Stationer for which I return you hearty thanks as for the gift it self so for the pains that you have taken to rectifie me where in your judgement I have publickly stept aside An error in Divine things if it stand alone without addition of further aggravations is not light Truth being of such divine excellency that no pensil can draw out all deviation from it into opposite error must needs answer in black deformity and darkness But when it is not simple error but joyned with endeavour to engage others it is far above it self in fowlness To reduce a brother therefore not onely erring but thus erring must needs be an high acceptable office of love But in this I need to do no more than to say over to you what you have said to me in your first and second page which you stile your Prologue In this if we both speak our hearts thoughts we are one And I wish that in all other things there were a like unity in judgement and the time I hope with some confidence is near at hand that all mists and clouds will be so dispelled that we shall arrive at perfect union And as for infinite other reasons so for this glory is infinitely desireable In order to a right understanding between us I must acquaint you that your first words after your Christian salute have their mistake though not much material whether upon mistake of my words when I last saw you in Shrewsbury or fayling in memory I cannot determine I told you not that I had then sent to the Press a treatise of the Covenant◠but wished you indeed not to be offended in case I should in such a treatise publish somewhat in the way that you mention In which I do not barely oppose my memory to yours but also the witness of the Reverend Brother whom you know was then present together with the computation of time which speaks it to me to be above contradiction It was May 3. that we spake together as I well know by the errand that I had at that time into those parts and my book saw not the light till towards the end of November following and yet made speedy haste after it went out of my hands I was glad of the opportunity as of a brief discourse of some things as the little scantling of time would bear so also to understand your mind in the thing already mentioned before any further proceeding that there might be no unbrotherly difference which at that time you express'd with all possible candor for my encouragement in that way Yet you now complain that I have given the first onset and so put you upon a necessity of this way of dealing against me which you mention in your Preface Apologetical and in this Prologue and more at large in the Preface of your Confession preferring in your judgement a more private Collation and enquiry into things before this publique way of appearing in the Press And indeed I had it in my thoughts to have written to you before I had any setled resolution at all any more to have appear'd in publique had done some little that way as soon as your Aphorisms came to light which was more than three years and an half before my treatise of the Covenant was published as may be seen comparing the dates of either but after-thoughts took me off And indeed I see no cause of Repentance considering the issue of things between you and others After so much pains of writing on both sides I do not hear that any of those eminently learned men which you say from most parts of the land have taken this way to impart their animadversions have at all prevail'd to change your mind Neither do I hear that any of your replies have wrought any change in them for satisfaction And in the mean space those elaborate writings on both sides are buried in your Study and theirs and no other but your selves have any benefit at all Only we have their complaints such is humane frailty that their names suffer in your publick writings As to the Charge against me for making the first onset I had not appear'd at all had I not upon other occasions which may be seen in my Preface been put upon it to come out in open view And how far I stand guilty of that in which I
you thus challenge never had any such thing in their thoughts Making the Scripture their study and Protestants writers their Comment they find Justification by the blood of Christ Rom. 5.9 and interest in this blood alone by faith Rom. 3.25 28. and works they find again and again excluded I wish you to consult the Homilies of the Church of England especially the Homilies of the Salvation of Man-kind by Christ our Saviour pag. 14. Having touched upon divers passages of Saint Paul This is added In the aforesaid places the Apostle toucheth especially three things which must go together in our Justifycation upon Gods part his great mercy and grace upon Christs part Justice that is the satisfaction of Gods Justice or the price of our Redemtion by the offering of his body shedding of his blood with the fulfilling of the Law perfectly and throughly and upon our part true and lively faith in the merits of Jesus Christ And therefore Saint Paul declareth here nothing upon the behalf of man concerning his Justification but only a true and lively faith And yet that faith doth not shut out repentance hope love dread and the fear of God to be joyned with saith in every man that is Justified but it shutteth them out from the office of Justifying With much more to the same purpose Your Readers that are not so much seen in the Language of Bellarmine and Suarez as they are in the Scriptures or at least that do not so much heed them deny all that you take for granted In which also you have phrases more uncouth to your Readers then any that I have uttered can be to you to be righteous signifieth say you quoad legem novam non obligatus ad poenam cui debetur praemium This signification according to this new law I think was never found in any of our old and new Dictionaries Those that are righteous shall be thus acquit and rewarded we believe but not upon account of any righteousnesse inherent in them but the righteousnesse of Christ made theirs by faith and so their faith is accounted to them for righteousnesse You then adde So that you see that your first righteousnesse non reatus poenae vel jus ad impunitatem ad praemium as it requires Christs perfect satisfaction as a medium to it by which all the charge of the Law works must be answered So it requires our performance of the condition of the Law of grace as an other medium by which Christ and his benefits are made ours I had thought that our righteousnesse had not been non reatus poenae that is not the thing at best were it as perfect as Adams was but reather non reatus culpae If a man be charged with Murther his righteousnesse as to this charge is his not-killing and not his non-obligation to the Gibbet That follows upon it non reatus is not of the essence of righteousnesse nor is reatus of the essence of sin otherwise then consecutive And that Christs righteousnesse should be thus called a medium I do not see I think it is the thing it self and not a medium to it And that our righteousnesse is any medium to Justification as it is inherent I deny and that our inherent righteousnesse required by the Law of Grace stands in any such subordination to the righteousnesse of Christ as a necessary means to make it ours I see your word for it but I think and the reformed Churches are of the same mind that I have the whole current of Scripture against it You close up this discourse thus And thus I have done what at present I thought my duty that it might be not my fault that you are in ignorance all over But I have said the lesse because I have lately more exactly opened the nature of our righteousnesse in answer to the Animadversions of an other learned brother But it is worth inquiry whether this learned Brother have received satisfaction from that more exact paines of yours Perhaps his learning may serve to give as exact an answer And if his greater learning be not satisfyed with that which is more exact and elaborate my less learning may well remain as much unsatisfied with lesse exactnesse And your Reader will think you were not so well advised to publish your self and conceal your most exact opening of this poynt of so great concernement Though you might think that any thing might serve me yet all your exactnesse will I believe be litte enough in this poynt to give satisfaction to many Readers Whereas you had said in your Aphorismes pag. 122. Imperfect righteousnesse is not righteousnesse but unrighteousnesse Imperfect righteousnesse is no contradiction It is a contradiction in adjecto yet there admitting an imperfection in holinesse I answer'd I never took imperfect righteousnesse to imply any such contradiction more then imperfect holinesse To this you reply 1. By a way of concession that holinesse is taken first for the relation of a person or thing dedicated to God So it admits not of magìs and minùs more then righteousnesse 2. That the common use of the word Holinesse is for the qualities or actions of a spiritually-renewed man this is confessed to have its transcendent perfection as wel as righteousness Hitherto we are agreed but here say you is the difference Holinesse thus taken is a quality which though it have the truth of being yet it is intendend and remitted or doth recipere magìs minùs righteousnes is a relation which in suo formali is not intended or remitted And is not Righteousnesse a quality in like manner which is intended and remitted when Zachary saies Righteousness as well as holiness is intended and remitted We are delivered out of the hands of all our enemies to serve in righteousnesse and true holinesse Is not the one a qualification by a new work of the Spirit as well as the other When the Angel said Rev. 22. He that is unjust let him be unjust still and he that is filthy let him be filthy still and he that is righteous let him be righteous still and he that is holy let him be holy still As unjust and filthy hold out vicious qualities from the flesh so Holy and righteous both signifie renewed qualities by the Spirit It follows Nay if you will exactly open it it will appear that the righteousnesse in question is a relation founded in a relation Yea more that the very subjectum proximum hujus relationis nec intenditur nec remittitur this is that I mean by perfection besides the aforesaid transcendentall perfection And how shall we know what the righteousnes in question is either it must be gathered out of your own words or out of their words that you censure as guilty of such ignorance as before Let us look upon your own words Thess 2.2 which you there comment upon In this fore-explained sense it is that men in Scripture say you are said to be
teachers or contradict others when they have got two or three words of Scripture Nor such as have not wit for an ordinary businesse and yet think thy can master the deepest controversies He that thinks to do this without a peircing wit as well as grace ordinarily thinks to see without eyes 2. That he be one that hath longer and more diligently and seriously exercised himself in these studies then I have done 3. That he be one more free from prejudice and partiality then I am 4. That he have more of the illumination of Gods Spirit which is the chief 5. That he have a more sanctified heart that he may not be led away by wrong ends or blinded by his vices It is not for me here to enter comparison There being but one piece of one of them in which I can speak any such priority I have been longer I think exercised in these studies which is all that I have to plead and I wish it had been with more serious diligence It is my way then to keep silence Though many may think that you are scarce serious in judging all of these to be necessary requisites in any that shall take upon them such boldness seeing you seem not to tye your self up to this Rule in your dealings with others You are pleased sometimes to say that you should have little modesty or humility if you should not think more highly of the understanding of many Reverend and Learned Brethren who dissent from you in severall points debated between you and me then of your own Yet who is it of all these that you do not charge with error Yea where is there the man almost in the world that hears not that charge from your pen More then once you charge error on Reverend Dr. Twisse Prolocutor while he lived of the late Assembly in speaking for justification of of Infidels as you call it and making it an immanent act in God warning younger Students to be wary in their Reading of him In whose behalf Mr. Jessop hath stood up as an advocate not pleading justification in his name but not guilty In which I shall not interpose My judgement in the thing is sufficiently known You charge the Assembly that set him up in that honour in like sort entring your dissent from their larger Catechism in four passages from their confession in six desiring onely indeed a liberty of expounding but in several of them you well know that your exposition was none of their meaning which you do not obscurely signifie in the different expression of your self in your dissent from them and from the Synod of Dort You charge the pious Ministry of this Nation in general out of whom that Assembly was gathered in the Preface of your Confession with error in their thoughts about Church Discipline and if information do not deceive me as full an Assembly of Learned and pious Ministers as Conveniently live for such a meeting together in any part of the Nation after a full debate of that which you charge as an error determined it against you Lastly you charge the whole reforming party of Divines with four great errors as we have seen in your Apology pag. 16. Now for a man to think that you judge your self above all these in this gradation mentioned in every one of those enumerated qualifications were indeed to challenge both your humility and modesty Your Readers then must conclude that either you were not serious in your List given in or else you take liberty to transgress your own Rules and set upon that work your self which you will not allow in others After quotation of severall passages of the Fathers with which all must vote you seem to prefer one of Austin above all contra rationem nemo sobrius contra Scripturas nemo Christianus contra ecclesiam nemo pacificus Making that application of this as you have done of none of the other That in the point of faiths instrumentality and the nature of the justifying act taking in afterwards the interest of mans obedience in justication as it is consummate in judgement you are constrained upon all these three grounds to give in your dissent I can perswade none to abjure Christianity renounce reason and make a schisme in the Church as it seems you think you must do to come over to me and yeelding as cleerly enough you do that I have this little corner of the world wheresoever Protestants dwell for an hundred and fifty yeers past on my side sure you stand amazed that none of all these men in so long a space of time can either be brought to the sight of reason or to a right understanding of Scriptures or yet to returne to that unity from which they have in so foul a Schism departed These points on the two first grounds have been brought already as well as I can do it to the test In which you see my reason against yours and my sense of Scriptures against that which you have given The third onely doth remain to be enquired into and I cannot yet believe that the Church is my adversary And here you seem to put me fairly to it If you will bring say you one sound reason one word of Scripture or one approved writer of the Church yea or one Heretick or any man whatsoever for many hundred years after Christ I think I may say 1300. at least to prove that Christ as Lord or King is not the object of the justifying act of faith or that faith justifieth properly as instrument I am contented so far to lose the reputation of my reason understanding reading and memory You speak this you say because I tell you there was scarce a dissenting voyce among our Divines against me about the instrumentality of faith and if say you there cannot be brought one man that consenteth with them for 1200. or 1400. years after Christ I pray you tell me whom an humble and modest peaceable man should follow Answ For reason or Scripture I shall bring no more then I have done I think you may see both in that which I have already written The Churches testimony onely now remains to be looked after whether you or I can lay the fairer claime and here you distinguish of it 1. As it was for the first 1200 1300 1400 yeers after Christ for you name all of these Periods 2. As it hath been for 150. yeers now past The Church for one full hundred yeers at least it seems by you stood Newter viz. from 1400. to 1500. The Church for this little scantling of time viz. for 150. yeers is not denyed by you to vote with me if the Protestant party to which you joyn in communion may deserve that name But for all that space as before it was as you pretend unanimously yours at well the Orthodox as the Hereticall party in it Here for further discovering of truth two things should be enquired into 1. Whether he more worthily deserves the name of
Page 111 Over much rigour in admission to Baptisme hinders the progress of the Gospell Page 112 The admission of some to Baptisme in prudence may be delayed Page 113 Papists expect not grace for but a convenient disposition to grace in the person to be Baptized Page 111 The restraint of right to Baptisme a breach in the Church of Christ Page 181 Baptisme a leading Church-privilege Page 161 In what sense Baptisme works what it figures Page 383 Babtisme engages to the first work of regeneration Page 369 The Bloud and Spirit of Christ are not alwayes applyed in it Page 381 Dangers attending the restraint of Baptisme to the regenerate Page 551 Baptized A man unbaptized is bound to believe in Jesus Christ for justification Page 144 The Author vindicated from a supposed assertion of the contrary ibid. Titles given by the Apostle to Baptized persons do not argue they were alwayes answered with inherent grace Page 149 Vpon what grounds Simon Magus was Baptized Page 160 c. Believers A title in Scripture not proper to the justifyed Believing What ordinarily meant by believing in the History of the Acts. Page 177 The distinction of believing Christ and believing in Christ groundless ibid. Bloud Faith in the bloud of Christ onely justifies Page 766 This assertion quit from danger Page 582 Bloud and Spirit may be distinguished but must not be divided Page 367 C. Call AN outward call asserted Page 169 Calvin Vindicated Page 118. 550 Catholick And universall in Authors use of them distinguished Page 155 Chemnitins His testimony for the instrumentality of the word and faith in justification Page 490 See Antiquity Christ The Covenant of works was without reference to Christ as Mediator Page 10 Whether the Covenant of works be made null or repealed by Christ Page 19 Faith in his bloud onely justifies Page 566 Faith hath respect to whole Christ to every part and piece of his Mediatorship Page 562 Interest in him interests us in all other privileges Page 458 Scripture speaks of receiving Christ and not of the Species of Christ onely Page 459 The healing of our nature and the removall of our guilt is his work Page 366 Faiths instrumentality in receiviug Christ being granted it 's instrumentality in justification cannot be denyed Page 441 Communication of titles between Christ and his Church Page 448. 449 Christians Vnregenerates are reall and not equivocall members of visible Churches Page 153 Humane authority vouched for it ibid. c. Christian a title in Scripture not proper to the justified Page 149 Church-Membership What gives right to it Page 201 102 Circumcision How Infants were saved before Circumcision Page 26 27 28 Severall propositions for clearing of the truth Page 24 Circumcision and Baptisme engaged to the first work of regeneration Page 369 The right of Circumcision implyed the propagation of corruption Page 368 Circumcision was no earnall badge Page 425 Cloud Whether two or onely one Cloud with Israel in the wilderness Page 521 No ordinary one but supernaturall Page 522 The motion of it guided by an Angell ibid. The form of it in appearance as a pillar ib. The use of it twofold As Israels guide Page 522 As Israels guard ibid. It was of the nature of a Sacrament Page 525 No standing Sacrament Page 526 Communicants The Lords Supper must be administred for their edification Page 199 Communication Of titles between Christ and his Church Page 448 Conclusions Desperate conclusions often inferred from right principles Page 579 Condition The great condition to which Baptisme engages is not a prerequisite to the essence and being of Baptisme Page 143 44 The Authors meaning cleered Page 145 In what sense faith is the condition of the promise of remission of sin Page 171 Actuall existence not necessary to the being of conditions in a Covenant Page 462 One and the same thing is not the condition of both parties in a Covenant Page 632 Confirmation Preferred by the Church of Rome before Baptisme Page 528 Perfects what Baptisme begins ibid. The matter of it Page 529 The form Page 529 The fruit Minister Ceremonies at consecration at administration Page 529 Arguments evincing it to be no Sacrament Page 530 The Apostles imposition of hands no proof of it Page 530 The ancient use of it degenerated Page 531 Consecration Respects not elements but participants Page 58 Whether the word which gives being to Sacraments be Consecratorium or Concionatorium ibid. Contradiction The Author acquit from any Page 447 Conversion The Lords Supper with the word as an Appendant to it may be serviceable towards Conversion Page 200 Arguments evincing it Page 200 201 c. Whether the Lords Supper may be stiled a Converting Ordinance Page 211 Explicatory propositions ibid. c. The Lords Supper doth not necessarily suppose a through conversion Page 217 Covenant Law and Covenant are not to be confounded Page 598 Keeping Covenant failing in Covenant and forfeiture of it to be distinguished Page 392 The Covenant falling Sacraments annexed fall with it Page 18 c. Where God denies his Covenant there the seal must not be granted Page 20 The Covenant people of God the adaequate subject of Sacraments Page 74 All relation to God in tendency to salvation is founded in the Covenant ibid. Interest in Sacraments is upon the account of the Covenant Page 75 c. God enters a Covenant with his people exactly and properly so called Page 79 The word Covenant asserted ibid. The thing it self asserted Page 80 in the essentials of it Page 80 81 in the solemnities Page 81 Arguments evincing a Covenant between God and man in its proper nature Page 82 Covenant and seal are commensurate Page 120 Covenant outward and inward This distinction examined Page 83 The Author vindicated in it Page 124 The outward Covenant is most properly a Covenant Page 83 c. To it belongs the definition of a Covenant ibid. It usually bears the name in Scripture Page 84 Men enjoy privileges of Ordinances and interest in Sacraments upon account of the outward Covenant Page 86 Scripture characters of men in Covenant Page 115 Covenant God Gods Covenant with his people not equivocall Page 80 Men of a visible profession timely and really not equivocally in Covenant with God Page 128 Covenant of works Passe between God and man in an immediate way without any reference to Christ as Mediatour Page 10 11 Whether this Covenant be made null or repealed by Christ Page 19 Covenant of Grace Righteousness of faith the great promise of it Page 414 Duty and condition in it are one and the same Page 641 643 It requires and accepts sincerity Page 637 Arguments evincing it vindicated Page 639 Mr. Cramdons Arguments against Mr. Br. herein answered Page 645 Covenant absolute Conditionall Arguments offered against an absolute Covenant Page 626 Faith and Repentance are mans conditions not Gods in the proper conditionall Covenant Page 626 Covenant Old and New Sacraments under the old and new Covenant one and the