ancient then the Scripture 1 Ans The Minor is false As for that which some men say that the Church is ancienter then the Scriptures and therefore of greater authority it is too trifling For the Word of God is the everlasting wisdome in God himselfe Neither was the knowledge of it then first manifested unto the Church when it was committed to writing but the manifesting of it began together with the creation of mankind and the first beginnings of the Church in Paradise yea the Word is that immortall seed of which the Church was borne The Church therefore could not be except the word were first delivered Now when we name the holy Scripture The Scripture is first in nature as the cause we mean not so much the characters of the letters and the volumes but rather the sentences which are contained in them which they shall never be able to prove to be of lesse antiquity then the Church For albeit they were repeated and declared often after the beginning of the gathering of the Church 2 Ans The Minor is false yet the summe of the Law and Gospel was the same for ever To conclude neither is that which they assume alwayes true That the authority of the ancienter witnesse is greater then of the younger A younger workman may be more skilfull then an elder for such may be the condition and quality of the younger witnesse that he may deserve greater credit then the ancienter Christ being man bare witnesse of himselfe Moses also and the Prophets had long time before borne witnesse of him yet neither his nor all other witnesses authority is therefore greater then Christs alone In like sort the Church witnesseth that the holy Scripture which wee have is the Word of God The Scripture it selfe also doth witnesse of it self the same but with that kind of witnesse that is more certaine and sure then all the others of Angels and men There is alledged also to this purpose a place 4 Object The pillar of truth 1 Tim 3. where the Church is called the pillar and ground of the truth But sith the Scripture doth teach other-where and that not once that the foundation of the Church is Christ and his word it is manifest enough that the Church is the pillar of the truth not a fundamentall or upholding pillar but a ministeriall that is a keeper and spreader of it abroad and as it were a mansion place or sure seat which might carry the truth left with her and committed unto her in the open face of all mankind Acts 9. Galat. 2. 1 Thes 2. 2 Thes 1. Titus 1. Galat. 2. even as the holy Apostle Paul was called an elect vessell to beare the Name of God before the Gentiles and Kings neither yet did Paul get credit unto the Gospel but the Gospel unto Paul So likewise are the Apostles termed pillars not that the Church rested on their persons but that they were the chiefe teachers of the Gospel and as it were the Chieftaines and Masters of doctrine for a man is not bound to beleeve those that teach on their bare word but for the proofes which they bring of their doctrine Furthermore they alledge a sentence of Austine out of his book entituled 5 Object Chap. 5. A place of Augustine 1 Ans An Example maketh no rule Against the Epistle of the foundation I saith Austine would not beleeve the Gospel except the authority of the Catholike Church did move mee thereunto But first if it were true that either Austine or some others did give credence unto the Gospel onely for the Churches authority yet might there not be fashioned a rule hence of that which all men either did or ought to doe But that this is not the meaning of Austine which these men would have they doe easily perceive who weigh both the whole course of this place and the phrase of speech which is usuall unto Austine For Austine going about to shew that the Manichees were destitute of all proofe of their doctrine first hee opposeth one who as yet beleeveth not the Gospel 2 Ans He speaketh of himselfe as yet not converted or not sufficiently confirmed and denieth that such a one is able any way to be convicted by the Manicheans for he were to be convicted either by arguments drawne out of the doctrine it selfe of which themselves were departed for example sake he proposeth himselfe who should not have beleeved the Gospel except the authority of the Catholike Church had moved him thereunto Austine therefore speaketh this not of himselfe as he was then when he writ these things against the Manicheans but of himselfe before he was yet converted or not sufficiently confirmed And that he speaketh not of the present but of the time past the words that follow doe manifestly declare Whom then I beleeved when they said Believe the Gospel why should I not beleeve them when they say Beleeve not a Manichean For hence it appeareth that when he saith he was moved especially by the authority of the Church hee meanes it of that time at which he obeyed the Churches voice that is departed from the Manicheans unto the true Church But after that once he was converted and had perceived the truth of doctrine that his faith was not now any more builded on the authority of the Church but on a farre other foundation himselfe is a most sufficient witnesse for us whereas in the selfe same booke hee saith on this wise Chap. 14. Therefore he did beleeve the Church especially before he was able to perceive it Thou hast proposed nothing else but to commend that thy selfe beleevest and to laugh at that which I beleeve And when as I of the other side shall commend that which my selfe beleeve and laugh at that which thou beleevest what dost thou thinke we must determine or doe but even to shake hands with them who bid us to know certaine things afterward will us to beleeve things that are uncertaine and Let us follow them who bid us first to beleeve that which as yet we are not able to perceive that being more enabled by faith it selfe we may discerne to understand that which wee beleeve not men now but God himselfe inwardly strengthening and enlightening our mind Wherefore they doe manifest injury unto Austine who draw that which himselfe confesseth of himselfe when he was not yet converted or was but weake unto that time when he affirmeth farre otherwise both of himselfe and all the godly For so reverent a regard ought wee to have of the word of God The application of the answer and such also is the force and efficacie of the holy Spirit in confirming the hearts of beleevers that we beleeve God yea without any creatures testimonie even as Elias forsooke not God no not when hee thought 1 Kings 19. That followeth not which they would 1 Because there is more in the consequent than in the antecedent 2 Because there is
Scripture lest those things should be thrust upon us under his name which are not his Further 6 The Church doth not erre Matth 18.19 they make their boast that the Church cannot erre and that therefore the decrees of the Church are of equall authority with the holy Scripture because the Church is ruled by the same spirit by which the Scripture is inspired even as it is promised If two of you shall agree in earth upon any thing whatsoever they shall desire it shall be given them of my Father which is in heaven For where two or three are gathered in my name there am I in the midst of them And I am with you alway unto the end of the world Matthew 28.20 1 John 2.20 27. So Yee have an ointment from him that is holy and ye know all things Likewise The annointing which ye received of him dwelleth in you and yee need not that any man teach you but as the same annointing teacheth you of all things and it is true and is not lying and as it taught you yee shall abide in him But first of all wee know 1 Answer The true Church Matth. 13. Marke 4. Luke 8. that it is the true Church onely which erreth not and is ruled by the holy Spirit which is gathered in the name of Christ that is which heareth and followeth the voice of the Sonne of God And therefore these things doe nothing appertaine to a wicked multitude which openly maintaineth doctrine contrary to the Gospel though it never so much vaunt of the Churches name yea and beareth sway and rule in the Church according to that which is said To him that hath shall be given but from him that hath not even that which hee seemeth to have shall be taken away So did the Pharisees and Sadducees among the Israelites erre not knowing the Scriptures neither were they the true Church though they seised upon the name and place of it 2. The true Church indeed erreth not universally For alwaies the light of the truth 2 Answer Universally especially concerning the foundation of doctrine is preserved in some mens mindes whereupon the Church is called the pillar and ground of truth But yet neverthelesse some of the godly oftentimes fall into errours through ignorance and infirmity yet so that they hold the foundation neither do they defend their erroneous opinions contrary to their conscience and at length they forsake them even as it is said 1 Corinth 3. If any man build upon this foundation gold silver c. And If ye be otherwise minded Ephes 4. God shal reveal even the same unto you Last of all There is given unto every man grace 1 Corinth 12. according to the measure of the gift of Christ And The Spirit distributeth to every man severally as hee will Philip. 3.15 The Apostles before they had received the holy Ghost at Whitsontide were the lively members of the Church yet erred they concerning the kingdome and office of the Messias There were of the Chiliasts opinion great men in the Church as Papyas Irenaeus Apollinarius Tertullian Victorinus Lactantius Methodius Martyr And therefore although the Church erre not universally yet oftentimes some of her members erre when as they swerve from the word which God suffereth not seldome to happen unto them for to keep us being warned of our weaknesse and blindnesse in modesty and his true feare and in daily invocating of him and withall to teach us that the truth of doctrine is not to be measured by the title of the Church but by the word delivered of him by the hands of the Prophets and Apostles as it is said Thy word O Lord Psamle 129. is a lanterne unto my feet and a light unto my paths Likewise 1 Tim. 6.20 Keep that which is committed unto thee and avoid profane and vain babblings This ground being once laid that so farre forth the Church erreth not 7 Object The Church ought to obey Bishops by the commandement of God Acts 20.28 Marthew 18.7 Luke 10.16 Heb. 13.17 as it doth not swerve from the written word of God it is easie to answer to that which they make shew of to the contrary That the Church is ruled by Bishops and therefore must obey them as it is said Take heed unto all the flocke whereof the holy Ghost hath made you over-seers to governe the Church of God And If hee refuse to heare the Church let him be unto thee as an Heathen man and a Publican Hee that heareth you heareth mee and hee that despiseth you despiseth me And Obey those who bear rule over you For both they must rule and the Church must obey them according unto the prescript of Gods word as it is said If any man preach any other doctrine let him be accursed Galatians 1.9 Answer Necessarily in those things which belong to the Ministry freely in traditions Mat. 23.2 Whatsoever therefore the Ministers propound of the word of God unto the Church we must of necessity obey it that which the Lord teacheth when hee saith The Scribes and Pharisees sit in Moses chaire All therefore whatsoever they bid you observe that observe and doe For they sit in Moses chaire who teach Moses doctrine in the Church If also they ordaine any things indifferent and of a middle sort which are profitable these also are observed for maintaining of order and avoiding of offence But if they require us to beleeve or observe things repugnant to the word of God or things that are in their owne nature indifferent with putting an opinion of necessity in them and of worshipping of God they sit no longer in Moses chaire but in the chaire of scorners and of them it is said John 10. â— 1 Tim. 4.1 The sheepe heard them not Likewise In the latter times some shall depart from the faith and shall give heed unto the spirits of errour And that the decrees of the Bishops also are not to be received among the precepts and decrees of the Church is confirmed by the example of the civill Magistrate whose just and good lawes binde the consciences of the subjects For the dissimilitude of the examples consisteth in that 1 Instance The Magistrate doth bind the conscience therefore Bishops that God himselfe by expresse word hath decreed a necessity of obedience to the Lawes and Commandements of the civill Magistrate which are not repugnant unto his Law but hath given a libertie of conscience in traditions of the Church so that hee pronounceth himselfe to be angry with him who obeyeth not civill Magistrates as long as they command nothing repugnant to his Lawes but not with them which without offence do contrary to the constitutions of Bishops For of the Magistrate is is said Rom. 13.5 Wee must obey him for conscience sake But of things indifferent in the Church Col. 2.26 Let no man condemne you in me at or drink or in respect of a holy
sacred mysteries are written any Divinity which can tie us by any religion to beleeve the things contained in them but such force and amplitude there is in the Church which teacheth us that those bookes are sacred and recommends the faith and piety of the ancient Fathers that no man can oppugne them without grievous impiety Thus he Now he speaks not of the characters papers or parchment of the bookes the trust and authoritie whereof is among the Book-keepers or Stationers but of the Scriptures themselves of whose authoritie we dispute Concerning these hee affirmes both the heads of the Position 1. That there is no Divinitie in them for these words Nor any thing and Nothing are equivalent 2. Except so much as it receives from the Church for this is the meaning of the adversary but there is so much force in the Church We omit other Writers for brevities sake Let the Christian world judge of this Jesuites boldnesse and whether this Position alone be not sufficient to defend the assumption 12. Neither doth he account them authenticall but by the Churches authoritie 13. Yea he beleeves not God himselfe but for the Church The Assertion Here the Jesuite flings away both buckler and speare for he knowes too well that Poperie is held here Both these false and impious Positions have been blabbed abroad by their Triarian and Manipular that is their better and meaner sort of Writers The former by Eckius in his Enchiridion in these words The Scripture is not authenticall without the Churches authority This hee calls in the margine His Achilles for the Catholicks And shortly after Hence it appeares that the Church is more ancient then the Scripture and that the Scripture is not authenticall but by the Churches authority The other by Stapleton against Whitaker Cap. 10. §. 3. lib. De author Script We doe not beleeve God but for the Church Is not this I pray you blasphemously to subject God and his word to the Pope and his Church Neither can so great a blasphemy be eluded by the Jesuites cavills to wit That the Scripture in respect of it selfe hath its owne authentick authority from its owne worth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 whereby it should be credited whose author is the first Truth not the Pope and that the Church as the ground and pillar of truth doth conferre somewhat to the credit of Scripture For this later point was never yet questioned for ought wee know Whether the Church conferres any thing towards the credit of the Scripture But that former assertion of the Sophisters Whether we doe not beleeve God and the Scripture but for the Church that former passage though it be truly said yet it is not truly beleeved in Popery For they detract from the Scripture that internall worth of credit as it was but now shewed out of Andradius denying any Divinitie to be in Scripture And their opinion is still firme That the Scripture is not worthy to be credited either in it selfe or by us but for the Church 14. It makes the Scriptures authoritie depend upon the Popes arbitrement because that authoritie resides in the Pope as in the head of the whole Church The Assertion Here that he might make shew of denying the former he hath cunningly muttered out the later which being added hee saw necessarily that the former would follow For if in the Pope as in the head of the whole Church the whole authority of the Church resides and if in the authoritie of the Church the Scriptures authority resides as the two former Positions have it must necessarily follow that in the Pope the whole authoritie of Scripture resides depends upon his beck Now that this authoritie of the Church resides in the Pope alone as in the head of the universall Church it is the common stile of the Canonists and Sophisters who advance the Pope above Councels Gregory de Valentia a Jesuite of an approved cut or coine tells us plainly that in the Pope as in the head of the whole Church this authoritie resides The Position then remaines and the proofe of the assumption 15. And because the Pope alone or with his Prelats is the Church therefore the Pope and his Prelats beleeve the Scriptures for themselves but they will have the lay-people to beleeve the Scriptures for the Pope and Prelats The Assertion The Jesuites were fools if they should openly speak so but as foolishly do they deny this affirming what they do affirme That we beleeve not either Scripture or God himselfe but for the Church and that the Pope with his Prelats are the Church For from hence it is as needfull to affirm both to wit that the Pope Prelats beleeve the Scriptures and God for themselves because they beleeve not but for the Church which themselves are the Laicks beleeve for the Pope and Prelats because they beleeve for the Church which is the Pope and Prelats This as necessarily followes as if we should prove there be foure Evangelists on this ground that there are twice two Evangelists Therefore not Parrie in affirming but the Jesuite in denying this Thesis lieth and the assumption remaines 16. Thus the faith of Popes Prelats Lay-men concerning the Scriptures stands upon the sandy foundation of humane testimony which indeed is no foundation The Assertion Every one may see that this is the consectary of the former For if the faith of Popes Prelats Mat. 7. Bellar. l. 3. de Justificat c. 2. who are men not gods nor angels stands upon themselves and if the faith of the Laitie stands upon the Pope and Prelats it must needs stand upon humane testimony Now for faith in divine things to stand upon this what else is it but to stand upon a sandy foundation that is upon an unstable movable each houre uncertain and indeed no foundation For in divine things an uncertain faith is no faith when by Bellarmine's own testimony it behoveth true faith to be most certain Neither will that painted shift of the Valentian Jesuite availe him saying That the authoritie of the Church that is of the Pope and Prelats is not purely humane nor purely divine but partly divine partly humane Such indeed was the authoritie of the Prophets and Apostles who wee know were immediatly called and illuminated by God Though they were men yet they spake wrote in the Church by divine inspiration We will give equall authoritie to the Pope and Prelats with the Apostles if they can shew us that they write and speak by the same inspiration If they can produce the word of those that were divinely inspired that is the holy Scriptures otherwise their Decrees are but humane testimonies and sand 17. They accuse the Scriptures of so great obscuritie in things that concerne faith worship and manners that without the Popes interpretation no man can understand them The Assertion The first part is the ordinarie stile of Papists and it is at large defended by Bellarmine That the
nothing though one should cut or wring it therefore 't is like a scabberd which admits of any sword not of steele only but of wood also or lead or brasse Doth then Parrie lye in this or hath the Jesuite lost his shame But yet they teare and defile the Scripture more miserably for thus Lindanus compares those that dispute out of Scripture to men drawing a woodden saw to whom being wearie there is no end of deluding Hosius in his book De expresso Dei verbo throughout it all handles these Positions That it is the propertie of Hereticks to dispute out of the Scriptures That they must not encounter with Hereticks out of the Scriptures That the Scriptures make Hereticks That the expresse word of God being alledged by Hereticks Protestants he meanes against the sense of all other that is of the Popish Church is the expresse word of the Divell We will not speak of other abominable passages which neither Jewes could attribute to Moses his Law nor Mahumetans to their Alchoran without punishment If heretofore such words had been spoken of Sibylla's leaves the Romans had punished them with death Yet for these or the like meritorious words by which they think they have cut off the Protestant sinews one receives a Bishops robe another a Cardinals Hat as a reward from the Pope O say they scoffingly what conferres your Scripture on you But boast not in thy wickednesse Psal 52.3 Pag. 24. the goodnesse of the Lord is powerfull every day But saith the Jesuite this is devised by Parrie Whitaker and such like deformed Reformers That in Popery the Scriptures are as much accounted as Aesops Fables without the Churches testimony That the Pope preferres the Church to the Scripture That in Popery they deny the word of God to be the rule of living and beleeving aright I answer that nothing of this is objected to us in the secular Theme why then doe you passe by things truly objected and accuse Poperie of these things Cover if you be wise the ulcers of your Babylon The first concerning Aesops Fables Brentius objected to Peter Asoto a black Friar anno 1556. Hee doth not obscurely saith hee intimate that hee hath plainly the same opinion of the Scriptures that any other Asoticus hath or hath written of to wit that the Scripture availeth as much as Aesops Fables without the Churches authority To whom Hosius answering anno 1557. saith thus This might be spoken in a pious meaning which any godly man endued with charity and that thinkes no evill might draw out of these words For truly if the Churches authority did not teach us that this Scripture is Canonicall it should have but little weight with us I pray you then how can you denie Poperie to be of this opinion which Hosius so great a pillar of the Romish Church confesseth may be spoken in a pious sense Tell me then what odds is there between these words To have a very little weight and between these To availe as much as Aesops Fables I wonder you touch the other sore Lib. de Concil col 12.13 which the chiefest of your side doe avoid willingly as a rock in the sea Bellarmine hath so touched it that hee equalls the Decrees of Councels in truth infallibilitie and Canonicall authoritie to the Gospels and holy Scriptures and extolls the Pope far above Decrees of Councels How then is the Pope according to Bellarmine not preferred to Scripture As for the third though we know not who objecteth it to you as you utter it yet it is doubtlesse true For according to the same Cardinall of yours the word of God written is but a partiall rule of right living and beleeving But a partiall rule is no rule if you will urge the nature of a rule for a rule in Greek 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is an infallible rule requiring or admitting of no addition or diminution to this that it may be a rule as the Jesuite knowes a rule to be defined by Basil and Varinus If then in Poperie the written word of God be but a partiall law of good life and faith not onely admitting but requiring also the addition of traditions it followes that this is plainly denied in Poperie which this fellow lies was devised by Parrie to wit that the written word of God is the rule of right living and beleeving 22. Lastly what Irenaeus wrote of ancient Hereticks when Roman Poperie is argued out of Scriptures it is turned to the accusation of the very Scriptures as if they were not right or had any authoritie and because they are diversly taken and because truth cannot be found out of them that want tradition 23. Roman Poperie then so many waies the originall of faith which is beleeved by tearing in pieces and blaspheming is deficient from the faith it overthrows faith both to it selfe and to its friends The Assertion If at this day Irenaeus that most ancient defender of the holy Scriptures against Hereticks did see our present controversies what else would he say think you against Poperie then what he wrote against the traditionarie Hereticks of his time that they cannot abide an encounter when they are convicted out of Scripture but fall upon accusing of the very words of God and that three waies First that they are not of authoritie Secondly that they are diversly spoken obscure doubtfull That finally they are imperfect not containing all truth At last they fix upon traditions which they think to be more perfect then the Scriptures they received from the Apostles All the Popish Masters now these hundred yeers past have after no other way handled this argument then what was the proper way of Hereticks of old For as often as they are convicted by our men out of Scripture do not they disswade any meeting or encounter That it is a vaine thing to draw a woodden saw with us Doe they not fall upon accusing the Scriptures themselves that they have no authoritie but what they have from the Church That they are most obscure and diversly spoken That by reason of their imperfection all truth cannot be found in them Doth not at length all their disputation end in tradition See the disputes and discourses of the Scriptures in Bellarmine Stapleton Lindanus Hosius Valentian and others Poperie then I hope understands whose successors the Scholastick Synagogues and Canonisticall in this part are and what principle of faith which is beleeved hath by unworthy tearing and blaspheming fallen from the faith and hath made the way of salvation unpassable both to it selfe and friends 24. Secondly to shake saving Faith by which we beleeve unto righteousnesse and to pull it out of mens hearts is to fail from the Faith and to overthrow faith both to themselves and others 25. Saving faith by which we beleeve unto righteousnesse is not onely an assent or knowledge of these things which concerning God and Christ are written in Gods Word but especially a confidence in the promises of the
to other men if indeed we neglect it we both make our Religion to be suspected shall undergo greater punishment for our negligence ignorance Neither would the Lord have the care keeping of the doctrine of Religion committed to us Scholars chiefly only for our own cause but others For the Learned themselves understanding the termes and method of the doctrine of Religion it is expected they should instruct and interpret unto others Seeing therefore Religion is to be taught in the Schooles as unto children to the end that it may be rightly taught Catechisme is necessary Neither indeed can this age learne unlesse brevity be used Nor can the parts of a discipline be dextrously and with due proportion of agreement between them be handled either by teachers or learners unlesse they first conceive in their mindes some short summ of the same For both these respects is it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that we read such oft repetitions in the holy Scriptures of brief summes of things As Repent and beleeve the Gospel He that shall beleeve and be baptized shall be saved War you a good warfare keeping faith and a good conscience And seeing that it is said Colos 3.16 Let the word of Christ dwell in you plenteously in all wisedome Explications must be added aggreeable to the speeches of the Prophets and the Apostles Neither is a Catechisme any thing else but a briefe explication of such speeches But because the little book called Melanchthons Examen is of that nature which I propound to you and the Authour hath comprised with great fidelity dexterity the heads of Christian Religion under an apt and perspicuous stile of words as also it is of no small consequence that a like form of Catechisme should be extant in sundry Churches stir up your selves to learn and conceive that these wretched papers of ours are swadling-bands wherein Christ will be found swadled up You see many are the things which doe commend these Swathels unto you and seriously exhort you to the imbracing of them by which I humbly beseech you to delight in them as the commandement of God your own salvation the duty we owe to posterity the example of the more reformed Church your condition of life your present age your desires and hope imminent dangers and the rewards and punishments to be expected from God But however our admonitions may be necessary yet of none effect we well know without the suggestions of the holy Spirit Therefore turning our selves unto God let us give thanks to him that his will was we should be born in this light of the Gospel and pray that wee may be taught and governed of him CERTAIN PREAMBLES on that Catechisme of Christian Religion which is delivered and taught in the Churches and Schooles throughout the Dominions of the County Palatine THe Preambles or preparatory Prefaces to this Catechisme are partly Generall concerning the whole Doctrine of the Church and partly Speciall concerning Catechisme alone The Generall Prefaces touching the Doctrine of the Church are seven 1 What and what manner of doctrine the doctrine of the Church is 2 What are the parts thereof and what the differences of each part 3 Wherein it differeth from the doctrine of other Sects and from Philosophie also and why these differences are to be retained 4 Whence it may appeare that it alone came from God 5 By what testimonies the certainty thereof is confirmed 6 For what cause no other doctrine besides is to be received in the Church 7 How manifold is the course of teaching and learning this doctrine 1 What and what manner of doctrine the doctrine of the Church is THE doctrine of the Church is the entire and uncorrupt doctrine of the Law and Gospel touching the true God The definition of the doctrine of the Church and his will workes and worship which doctrine is revealed by God himselfe comprised in the writings of the Prophets and Apostles and confirmed by sundry miracles and divine testimonies by which the Holy-Ghost worketh powerfully in the hearts of Gods chosen and collecteth unto himselfe out of mankinde an everlasting Church in which he may be glorified both in this life and in the life to come This doctrine is the chiefe and speciall note of the true Church which God will have eminent in the world and severed from the rest of mankinde according unto these sayings of Scripture Fly Idols Come out from amongst them and separate your selves If there come any unto you and bring not THIS DOCTRINE 1 John 5.21 2 Cor. 6.17 2 John 10. Esay 52.11 Rev. 18.4 bid him not God speed Be yee holy touch no uncleane thing yee that beare the vessels of the Lord. Goe out of her my people that yee receive not of her plagues Now God will have this separation made 1. His glory For his owne glory For as hee will not have himselfe coupled with Idols and Divels So hee will have his truth severed from falshood and lyes 2. Reasons why God will have his Church distinguished from other Sects and his houshold separated from the enemies of the Church that is from the children of Sathan It were contumelious so to thinke of God as that he will have such children as persecute him 2 Cor 6.15 It were blasphemy to make God the author of impious doctrine and patron of the blasphemous For What concord hath Christ with Belial 2. The salvation of his Elect. The consolation and salvation of his Elect. For it is necessary that the Church be visibly beheld in this world that the Elect dispersed throughout all mankind may know to what society they are to joine themselves and being gathered unto the Church may lay hold on this sound comfort That they are of that company which is acceptable and pleasing unto God and hath the promises of everlasting life For God will that all which are to be saved be gathered unto the Church in this life because without the Church there is no salvation 3. Notes whereby the Church is distinguished from other Sects How the Church is knowne and what are her badges and markes whereby shee is distinguished from other Sects is at large discoursed of in the tract of the Church The notes are three 1. Purity of doctrine 2. The right use of the Sacraments 3. Obedience towards God in every point of doctrine whether of faith or of manners Object Yea but oftentimes great vices abound in the Church also Answ I confesse indeed many times great vices over-grow the whole body of the Church but they are not patronised or maintained as falleth out in other Sects nay the true Church is the first her selfe that reprehendeth and condemneth them before any other In the Church faults are committed but with present reproofe and speedy reformation As long as this remaineth so long remaineth the Church 2 What are the parts of the doctrine of the Church and what the differences of each part
That the Law and Gospel are the two onely parts of Christian doctrine proved by 4. reasons THE parts of the doctrine of the Church are two the Law and the Gospel in both which the summe of the whole Scriptures is contained The Law is tearmed the Decalogue and the Gospel is the doctrine touching Christ our Mediatour and the free remission of sinnes through faith This division of Church doctrine is clearly demonstrated to be sufficient by these evident arguments 1. All doctrine comprised in sacred writ concerneth either the nature of God or his will or his workes or sinne which is the proper worke of men and divels But of all these we are taught either in the Law or in the Gospel or in both Wherefore the Law and the Gospel are the chiefe generall heads which comprehend all the doctrine of the Scripture 2. Christ himselfe maketh this division of that doctrine which he commandeth to be preached in his name saying So it is written and so it behooved Christ to suffer and to rise from the dead the third day and that in his name should be preached repentance and remission of sins Now the whole summe of all this is delivered in the Law and the Gospel 3. The writings of the Prophets and Apostles doe containe in them the old and new Testament or covenants between God and man Therefore it must needs be that in them is declared what God promiseth and what hee doth unto us to wit his favour remission of sinnes his holy Spirit righteousnesse and life everlasting as also what he requireth of us that is to say Faith and Obedience And these are the things which are taught in the Law and Gospel 4. Christ is the foundation and ground of the whole Scripture and the doctrine of the Law and Gospel is necessary to conduct us to the knowledge of Christ and of his benefits For the Law is our Schoolmaster unto Christ Gal. 3.24 constraining us to flee unto him and shewing us what that justice is which Christ hath recovered and restored unto us The Gospel of purpose amply treateth of the person of Christ his office and benefits Therefore all Scripture and heavenly doctrine is comprehended in the Law and the Gospel 3. Differences of the Law Gospel The maine differences of these two parts of Christian doctrine consist in three things In the matter it selfe In the subject or matter and kind of doctrine which they diliver because the Law is a doctrine prescribing unto men what is to be done and prohibiting whatsoever ought to be left undone whereas the Gospel is a preaching of free remission of sinnes by and through Christ In the manner of revealing In the manner of their revealing because the Law is knowne by nature the Gospel is revealed from above In their promises In their promises because the Law promiseth life with condition of perfect obedience the Gospel promiseth the same life on condition of our stedfast faith in Christ and the inchoation or beginning of new obedience unto God But hereof more shall be spoken hereafter in his due place 3 Wherein the doctrine of the Church differeth from the doctrine of other Sects and from Philosophy also and why these differences are to be retained THE differences betweene the doctrine of Gods Church and other Religions 4 Differences betweene Church-doctrine and other Religions are foure In their Authors GOD is the author of the doctrine of the Church from whom it was delivered by the ministry of the Prophets and Apostles other Sects are sprung from men and have been invented by men through the suggestion of Sathan In their testimonies of confirmation The doctrine of the Church alone hath divine testimonies firme and infallible such as quiet consciences and convince all other Sects of errour In teaching and not teaching aright the whole Law In the Church the entire and uncorrupt Law of GOD is perfectly retained and kept as for other Sects and Religions they maime and corrupt the Law of GOD. For they utterly reject the doctrine of the first Table concerning the true knowledge and worship of GOD either framing unto themselves another God besides that GOD who by his word and workes hath revealed himselfe unto his Church or seeking to know God but not by and in his Son or worshipping GOD otherwise than hee hath commanded in his word They are also altogether ignorant of the inward and spirituall obedience of the second Table That little good and truth which they have is a part of the commandements of the second Table concerning externall discipline and civill duties towards men In preaching not preaching aright the whole Gospel The Gospel of Christ is wholly taught and rightly understood in the Church onely other Sects are either cleane ignorant of it and despise it as the Ethnickes Philosophers Jewes and Turkes or they doe patch some little part of it out of the doctrine of the Apostles unto their owne errours of which part yet they neither know not perceive the use as the Arrians Papists Anabaptists and all other Heretickes of whom some maintaine errours concerning the person others concerning the office of our Mediatour These maine discords doe prove that the doctrine of the Church alone is zealously to be followed and kept and the Religion and doctrine of other Sects repugnant to the truth warily to be prevented and avoided according as it is said in Scripture BEWARE of false Prophets and FLY Idols The case holdeth not alike in Philosophy For true Philosophy howsoever it vary much from the doctrine of the Church yet it impugneth it not it is no lye as are the false doctrines of other Sects but it is absolute truth and as it were a certaine bright-shining ray of Gods divine wisdome fixed in mans understanding at the creation For it is a doctrine treating of God and his creatures The nature of Philosophy with the lawfull and fruitfull use thereof and other things good and profitable unto mankind compiled by wise and grave men through the light of Nature and grounded on principles in their own nature plaine and evident Whence it followeth that it is a thing not only lawfull but profitable also for Christans to imploy their labour and travell in the studies of Philosophy whereas contrariwise we may not busie our wits in the doctrine of other Sects but detest them all as untruths and lies coined by the Divel Notwithstanding between Philosophy the doctrine of the Church there is great difference especially consisting in these points 3 Differences between Philosophy and Church-doctrine In their grinciples They disagree in their principles For Philosophy in her principles is meerly naturall founded and built on things naturally knowne unto every man but the doctrine of the Church although it contain many things depending on nature yet the chiefest part thereof I meane the Gospel so far surpasseth the reach and capacity of nature
that had not the Sonne of God revealed it unto us out of his Fathers bosome no wit of men or Angels could have attained unto it In their subjects They vary in their subjects and matter which they handle For the doctrine of the Church comprehendeth the full perfect and entire sense both of the Law and Gospel but Philosophy is quite ignorant of the Gospel and omitteth the principall parts of the Law and rawly and obscurely propoundeth that small portion it retaineth concerning discipline and externall duties drawn but out of some few precepts of the Decalogue It teacherh us also other arts and sciences meete and serviceable for mans life as Logick Physick and the Mathematickes all which are not delivered in Church doctrine but have their proper necessary use in handling and learning the same In their effects They concurre not in their severall effects For the doctrine of the Church alone sheweth us the originall of all evils and mans misery to wit the fall disobedience or sin of our first parents Moreover it ministreth true and lively comfort unto our consciences pointing out the meanes by which wee may wade out of the danger of sin and death and assuring us of life eternall through Christ As for Philosophy it knoweth not the cause of our evils neither yeeldeth it us any sound comfort or consolation Philosophy hath certain comforts common unto her with Divinity Comforts common both to Philosophy and Divinity such are 1. The providence of God 2. The necessity of obeying of God 3. A good conscience 4. The worthinesse of vertue 5. The finall causes or the ends which vertue proposeth 6. The examples of others 7. Hope of reward 8. A comparing of events because a lesse evil compared unto a greater carrieth a shew and shadow of good but true comforts against sinne and death are proper to the Church Comforts proper to Gods Church such as are 1. Free remission of sins by and for Christ 2. The grace and presence of God in our very miseries 3. Our finall delivery and life everlasting Wherefore Philosophy though in respect of Divinity it be unperfect and faile in these premisses yet it never impugneth Divinity Whatsoever erroneous opinions contrary to the true doctrine of the Church occurre in the writings of Philosophers or are cited out of Philosophy to overthrow Scripture all these are either no way Philosophicall but the vaine sleights of mans wit and very biles and sores of true Philosophy such as was the opinion of Aristotle concerning the eternity of the world and of Epicurus touching the mortality of the soule and such like or else they are indeed Philosophicall opinions but unfitly applyed to Divinity The use of these differences in doctrine These maine differences between Christian doctrine and other Religions and Philosophy also are very worthy observation for these ends 1. That Gods glory be no way impaired of us but reserved wholly unto himselfe which cannot be unlesse wee acknowledge and confesse in the face and eye of the world whatsoever he hath precisely commanded us to beleeve either concerning himselfe or his will and that wee adde nothing of our owne braine unto that which hee hath revealed For God cannot be mingled with Idols nor his truth confounded with Satans forgeries without high dishonour to his name 2. That we hazzard not nor endanger our salvation which might happen if erroneously we should imbrace for true Religion any Schismaticall doctrine or heathenish Philosophy 3. That our faith and comfort in Christ Jesus might be strengthened and confirmed which falleth out when wee discerne the perfection of the doctrine of the Church before all other Religions how many important and weighty matters are found in our Religion which are wanting in others What are the causes why they alone are saved who professe this doctrine and other Religions with their Sectaries and adherents are damned and of God rejected Finally that we separate our selves from Epicures and Academicks who either make a mockery of pietie and godlinesse or so rack Religion that they thinke every man in every Religion shall be saved wresting in this sense that saying of the Apostle The just man shall live by HIS faith Now these Epicures are not worthy the answering Rom. 1.17 Hab. 2.4 as for those Academicks they manifestly falsifie the sentence and meaning of the Apostle and are easily refuted For the pronoune HIS in no sort signifieth whatsoever faith every man frameth unto himselfe but the true Catholike faith particularly appropriated unto every man and this word HIS standeth in opposition against any other mans faith though it be a true and good faith and thwarteth and crosseth also the opinion of Justification by works So that the naturall sense of that Text is The just man is justified not by the works of the Law but by faith alone in Christ and that by his owne private faith not by the faith of another man 4 Whence it may appeare that the doctrine of the Church alone was delivered of God 5 By what testimonies the certainty of Christian Religion or Church-doctrine is confirmed GOD in the very creation of the world put this bridle in the mouth of all reasonable creatures that no man without extreame and manifest impudeney such as was the Divell in Paradise durst say that any thing if it were once apparently known to have been spoken or commanded by God might be called into question or that any man might refuse to obey it Here-hence are those things so often inculcated in the Prophets Hearken O heavens and hearken O earth for the Lord hath spoken Thus saith the Lord. The word of the Lord came to Esaias Jeremias c. Sith therefore it appeareth that the bookes of the Old and New Testament are the words of God there is no place left of doubting whether that be the true Religion and Doctrine which is contained in them but whether these books were written by divine instinct and by what proofes and testimonies we are certaine of so great a matter this is a question not to be let passe of us Wherefore this question is necessary For except this above all other things remaine stedfast and immoveable that whatsoever we read in the bookes of the Prophets and Apostles doth as truly declare the will of God unto us as if we did heare God openly speaking tous from heaven it cannot chuse but that the very foundation and whole certainty of Christian Religion must be weakned Wherefore it is a consideration worthy those who are desirous of the glory of God and doe seek for sure comfort to enquire whence it may appeare unto us The first part The authority of the Scripture doth depend on the Church that the holy Scripture is the Word of God To this question now long since answer hath been made by the Papists that forsooth it is not otherwise certaine then because the Church doth confirme it by her testimony But we
as we neither reject nor contemne the testimony of the true Church so we doubt not but their opinion is pestilent and detestable who do often say that the holy Scriptures have not their authority else-where then from the word of the Church 1 Reason The reproach of God For first wicked is it and blasphemous to say that the authority of Gods Word dependeth of the testimony of man And if it be so that the chiefest cause why we beleeve that the Scriptures were delivered from heaven be the witnesse of the Church who seeth not that hereby the authority of a mans voice is made greater then the voice of God For he that yeeldeth his testimony unto another so that he is the only or the chiefe cause why credence is given unto the other out of all doubt greater credit is given unto him then unto the other who receiveth his testimony Wherefore it is a speech most unworthy the majesty of God that the voice of God speaking in his holy Book is not acknowledged except it be confirmed by the witnesse of men 2 Reason Our comfort Faith is grounded on approved witnesse therefore not on mans Secondarily whereas the doctrine of the Prophets and Apostles doth preach of so great matters as the certaine knowledge whereof is so greatly desired of all who are well disposed and the conflicts of doubtfulnesse in all mens minds are so great what full assurance of our faith can there be what sure consolation against assaults or temptations if that that voice on which our confidence relieth be no otherwise knowne unto us to be indeed the voice of God but because men say so in whom we see so much ignorance errour and vanity to be that no man scarcely especially in matters of some weight doth attribute much unto their word except other reason concurre with it 3 Reason The confutation of our enemies Thirdly the truth of God and Christian Religion is plainly exposed unto the mocks and scoffes of the wicked if we going about to stop their mouths doe therefore only desire that we should be credited that our Religion is from God because our selves say so For if they be by no other confutation repressed they will with no lesse shew of truth deny it then we affirme it 4 Reason Witnesses Last of all the Scripture it selfe in many places is against this opinion and doth challenge a far higher authority unto it selfe then which hangeth upon mens words For so saith Christ himselfe I receive not the record of man signifying thereby John 5. that his doctrine stood not no not on John Baptists testimony although yet he did alledge it but as of lesse account that he might omit nothing by which men might be moved to beleeve Therefore he addeth But I say these things that you may beleeve I have a greater witnesse then the witnesse of John And if Christ now being humbled said these things of himselfe then surely shall they be no lesse true of him being in glory and sitting in his Throne Paul saith 1 Cor. 2. My word and my preaching stood not in entising speech of mans wisdome but in plaine evidence of spirit and of power that your faith should not be in the wisdome of men but in the power of God If so be then our faith must not rest no not upon reasons wisely framed by men much lesse shall it depend on the bare word of men Ephes 2. The Church her selfe is said to be built upon the foundation of the Prophets and Apostles If then the confidence and confession of the Church stayeth on the doctrine of the Prophets and Apostles as on the foundation the certainty of Scripture cannot hang on the Churches witnesse for so should not the Church be upheld by the testimony of the Prophets and Apostles but by her owne And it is said 1 John 5. If we receive the witnesse of men the witnesse of God is greater If it be greater then the authority of it hangeth not on the record of man but we are to give more credence unto God witnessing the Prophets and Apostles writings to be indeed his voice then unto the Church affirming the same 1 Object That they are true the Church alone doth witnesse Ans The Minor is false Now that it is said of the contrary That by the Churches record alone it doth appeare unto us that the sacred bookes which wee have were written by the Prophets and Apostles whose names they beare in their fore-head and that even unto us they are come uncorrupt this we grant not For God far more certainly testifieth both in Scripture and in the hearts of his Saints that no feigned or forged thing is in these books then it can be by the Church and all the creatures of the world confirmed They therefore who stand upon the Churches testimony alone in this point shew that themselves have not as yet felt or understood the chiefest testimony 2 Object The discerning of books Ans The Minor is false 1 The working of the holy Ghost Furthermore they say That the bookes authenticke or as they terme them Canonicall of both Testaments are discerned from the Apocryphall by the Churches judgement and therefore that the authority of holy Canon doth depend on the Churches wisdome But that this difference of the bookes is not determined by the Churches judgement but being imprinted into the bookes themselves by the Spirit of God is onely acknowledged and approved by the Church this is easily to be understood if the causes of this difference be considered For either in these which are called Apocryphall the force and majesty of the heavenly Spirit doth lesse evidently appeare in the weight and vehemency of word and matter then in others of which it is cleere that they are the heavenly Oracles 2 The certainty of Authors set down in writing by the divine instinct that they might be the rule of our faith or it cannot be determined neither out of these bookes themselves nor out of others which are Canonicall that they were written either by the Prophets or Apostles because either they were not opened by those whom God by certain testimonies hath warranted unto us to be endued with a Propheticall spirit or themselves doe not shew any certain Authours of them or by their form of speech or other reasons it may be gathered that they were not left of them whose names they beare Now as touching either this evidence of spirit or certainty of the authours we build not our judgement on the testimony of the Church but of the bookes themselves And therefore not for the Churches judgement only do we judge some books to be Canonicall and the foundation and rule of our faith and do therefore accept of the doctrine of other some because they agree with the Canonicall but rather for the very cause of this difference which we find in the bookes themselves 3 Object The Church is more
a fallacy of the Accident A declaration of the like example that himselfe was onely left alive of the true worshippers of God If therefore either Austine or whosoever else being not as yet converted unto Religion not as yet having experience of the certainty of it in his heart was moved rather by humane than divine testimonies to embrace it it cannot thereof be gathered that the certainty of the holy Scripture dependeth on no other testimonies or that by no other we are assured of it because that some are moved especially by humane voyces to reverence it cometh not thereof to passe for that the Scripture is not maintained by any other authority but it chanceth through the fault and weaknesse of them who sticking upon humane records doe not feele as yet or understand divine An Image and example of these degrees of faith is the story of the Samaritane woman For many of the Samaritans are said to have beleeved in Christ 1 The Samaritans because of the speech of the woman who testified that hee had told her whatsoever she had done But after that they had Christ with them for two daies many more beleeved because of his owne speech and they said unto the woman Now wee beleeve not because of thy saying for wee have heard him our selves and know that this is indeed the Christ the Saviour of the world All men come not by the same occasions nor have not the same beginnings unto faith 2 The Emulation of the Jewes Rom. 11. Paul saith that salvation was come unto the Gentiles and that hee did magnifie his ministry that the Jewes might be provoked to follow the Gentiles In the first of Peter 3 The honesty of wives Chap. 3. wives are willed to be subject unto their husbands that even they which obey not the word may without the word be won by the conversation of the wives while they behold their pure conversation which is with feare Even then as the Samritans were moved first by the speech of the woman to beleeve in Christ but after they had seen Christ and heard him they were so confirmed that they said they would now beleeve though the woman held her peace so also may it be that they which are not as yet converted or but weaklings may be moved especially by the Churches testimony as which runneth more into their eies to give credence unto the Scripture who yet neverthelesse after they are once illuminated with a more plentifull light of faith do finde by experience that they are confirmed by a farre superiour and more certaine testimonie that the Scripture is the word of God and do know by the force and evidence of it that they must keep their faith were all the Angels and men perswaders to the contrary as it is said by the Apostle Though we or an Angel from heaven preach unto you otherwise then that which wee have preached unto you 〈…〉 let him be accursed By these things therefore it may be understood that the voice and consent of the catholike Church may and ought The conclusion of the first part amongst other testimonies to serve for our confirmation and yet the authority of the holy Scripture not to hang upon it but that out of the Scripture it selfe rather wee must learne by what arguments we may be brought to know that it was delivered from God because that God himselfe doth witnesse it and also such is the force and quality of that heavenly doctrine that although all men should gainsay it yet it should not be any otherwise more manifestly and certainly knowne to be the voice of God than by it self But left any man may thinke that by any arguments which even reason by a naturall light judgeth to be sound The second part Arguments shewing the certainty of the Scripture without the singular grace of the spirit this may be wrought in the mindes of the wicked as either to obey the truth or to leave off to reproach it first hee must remember that the arguments or testimonies are of two sorts which shew the certainty of Christian Religion and maintaine the authority of the Scripture For there is but one onely testimony which is appropriated unto them alone who are regenerated by the spirit of Christ and unto them alone is it knowne the force of which testimony is so great that it doth not onely abundantly testifie and seale in our mindes the truth of the doctrine of the Prophets and Apostles but it also inclineth and moveth our hearts to the embracing and following of it Other testimonies whatsoever may be brought they are understood indeed both of the godly and the wicked and doe compell their consciences to confesse that this Religion rather then others is pleasing unto God and that it came from him but unlesse that one other come also which is known of the godly alone these testimonies will never bring to passe that men shall imbrace the truth although it be knowne unto them The arguments therefore which shew the truth and certainty of the Scripture or Church-doctrine are these The purity of doctrine The purity and perfectnesse of the Law therein contained For impossible it is that that Religion should be true and derived from God which maketh Idols or approveth open out-rages flat against the expresse Law of God and sound judgement of reason Now all religions that only excepted which is delivered in Scripture and received of the Church are manifestly convicted of this crime For as before hath been sufficiently declared they either abrogate and cancell the first Table of Gods Law touching the true God and his worship or they shamefully defile and disgrace it with their feigned untruths and of the second Table they reserve onely a part touching outward decent demeanour and civill duties Only the Church according to the prescript of Scripture retaineth both Tables of the Law whole and sound Wherefore the doctrine of the Church alone is true and divine The Gospel shewing our deliverance The gospel which sheweth us the onely way to escape and find deliverance from out the power of sin and death For questionlesse that doctrine and religion is true and divine which directeth us unto the meanes of avoiding sin and death without violating Gods justice and which yeeldeth effectuall and lively consolation to mens consciences concerning life everlasting But it is the doctrine of the Church alone set downe in the Gospel which openeth and proclaimeth unto us this freedome from misery and sealeth unto mens consciences these solid comforts Therefore that doctrine alone is true and divine Antiquity The antiquity of this doctrine which is found to be most ancient For the doctrine of the Church alone delivered in Scripture deriveth her originall from God and is able to prove her continuall descent from the beginning of the world The conference of the histories of the whole world with divine history sheweth that all other religions rose long
fallacies and condemneth their Idols and other vices then any other Sect which rather either tolerate and winke at or patronize and defend them The world hateth me because I testifie of it that the workes thereof are evill John 5.17 John 15.19 If ye were of the world the world would love her owne Gods marvellous preservation thereof The marvellous protection and wonderfull preservation of this doctrine against the furies of Sathan and other enemies of the Church For whereas no Religion is more dangerously at all times without intermission assailed by Tyrants and Heretikes then this of the Church and God notwithstanding hath hitherto wonderfully protected it against the cankred rancour and malice of enemies and the very gates of Hell insomuch as it alone hath persisted invincible whereas other Religions either not at all or slenderly assailed have speedily perished and suddenly fallen to the ground hence we conclude that the doctrine of the Church is approved of God cared for and secured by him Punishments of the enemies of it The punishments of the enemies For without doubt that Religion is allowed and advanced by God whose adversaries God punisheth for oppugning and withstanding it But histories both old and new have registred and recorded the dreadfull and heavie punishments inflicted by God on them who resisted the doctrine of the Prophets and Apostles Therefore God countenanceth and authoriseth that doctrine Now although the wicked sometimes flourish in this world and the Church lieth trodden under foot yet the end and event testifieth yea and Scripture teacheth that this is a worke of Gods providence and no casualty or accident neither is God therefore more pleased with them or displeased with his Church For the Church is alwaies preserved even amidst her persecutions and is at length delivered whereas the short felicity of Tyrants and wicked Imps hath a most dolefull and eternall destruction following it Neither is thereby the force of this proofe weakned because that all the persecutors of the Church are not in tragicall manner punished in this life as were Antiochus Herod and the rest For whiles God doth take vengeance on most of them in this life he doth sufficiently shew what hee would have to be thought of the rest of their complices verily that they are his enemies whom without they repent he will plunge into eternall plagues the beginning and feeling of the which is desperation in which all the enemies of Christian Reâ—igion end their dayes 2 Object Not for this cause yea they who are not oppressed with any other calamities of this life To conclude that it may be manifest that they are not only for other transgressions punished of God God doth so often denounce in his word that such shall be the ends of his enemies Ans Yea for this cause and that for this very cause because they go about to extinguish the people and true worship of God Yea furthermore they are not a few from whom while they lie in torments their conscience wresteth out this confession that they have drawne these miseries upon themselves by persecuting the godly as from Antiochus Epiphanes and Julian the Apostata And since that all the adversaries of the Church in their calamities and death are destitute of comfort it is manifest that they suffer as the enemies of God and therefore are far from true Religion Now that which the wicked alone doe there is no doubt but that is in the number of their sins for which they suffer punishment Wherefore the overthrowes of the enemies of the Church are no obscure testimony of the wrath of God against them even as God himselfe saith of Pharaoh To the same purpose have I stirred thee up that I might shew my power in thee Exod. 9. Rom. 9. and that my Name might be declared throughout all the earth Confession and constancy of Martyrs The testimony and constancy of Martyrs who sealing this doctrine with their bloud do shew in the very midst of most exquisite torments that they do so think indeed as they taught and are firmly perswaded in their hearts of the truth of that doctrine which they have professed and that they draw that comfort out of it which they did preach unto others to wit that for Christs sake they are truly the sons of God and that God careth for them in the houre and point of death God therefore sustaining them by this lively comfort thereby witnesseth that he affecteth the doctrine of the Church for which they suffer The piety of the writers and professors therof The true prety and holinesse of those who wrote the holy Scriptures and made open profession of the doctrine comprised therein For that Religion is most sacred divine which maketh men holy and acceptable unto God But the Patriarchs Prophets Apostles and others who heretofore have and now doe earnestly imbrace this doctrine farre exceed men of other Religions in true vertue and integrity as by the conference and comparison will appeare Wherefore it accordeth with reason that the doctrine of the Church rather then of any other Religion whatsoever is true and divine Their plaine dealing in detecting vices Their ingenuity and plain dealing in opening faults committed either by them or theirs whom the holy Ghost hath used in committing this doctrine to writing The testimony of the holâ— Ghost The testimony of the holy Ghost by whose in spiration the Scriptures were written the testimony I say of the holy Ghost in the hearts of them which beleeve that is to say a full faith and firm perswasion that the holy Scripture is the word of God that God according unto the tenour of this Scripture will be mercifull and good unto us which faith there followeth joyfulnesse resting on God and calling on his name with assured hope of obtaining both other good things which according to the prescript of this word we beg of him and even eternall life it selfe For this assent and assurance this lively consolation of the godly testeth neither on the testimony of man nor any other creature but it is the proper effect of the holy Ghost which effect how it is enflamed and strengthened by the same spirit through the doctrine of the Prophets and Apostles read heard and meditated all the godly in a lively and certain feeling of their hearts have experience By this testimony of the holy Ghost all that are converted unto Christ have the certainty of heavenly doctrine mainly confirmed and surely sealed up in their hearts And this argument as it is proper unto the regenerate so it forceth their hearts alone not onely to credit the truth and authority of the holy Scripture but also perswadeth them to give an absolute assent thereunto and rest settled thereon All the other testimonies before alledged are common to those that are not converted unto Christ whom they also convict and stop the mouths of them that contradict this doctrine But of themselves they neither
perswade not move the mind to assent without the inward testimony of the holy Ghost But the Spirit of God when he once breedeth this most assured perswasion in our minds that the doctrine which is contained in the holy Bible is of a truth the will of God and worketh that comfort and change of our minds and hearts which is promised and taught in this book by our experience and feeling it is so confirmed that while this remaineth within us though all Angels and men should say contrary yet we would beleeve this to be the voice of God but if that remaine not or be not in us though all should say it yet we would not beleeve it Neither doth not the Spirit therefore establish the authority of the Scripture Object The Scripture beareth witnesse of the Spirit therefore the Spirit not of it Answer because we are to examine what the Spirit speaketh within us by the rule of the Scripture for before that this is done of us the Spirit himselfe declareth unto us that the Scripture is the word of God and inspired by him and that he will teach us nothing in our hearts which is not agreeable unto that testimony before set down of him in the Scripture And if this be not first most certainly perswaded us of the Spirit himselfe we will never re-call our opinions of God and his worship to the Scripture as the only rule to try them by Now then after it is declared unto us by divine inspiration that the Scripture is a sufficient witnesse of that divine revelation in our hearts then at length do we find our selves to be confirmed by the mutuall testimony of the same Spirit in the Scripture and in our hearts and we beleeve the Scripture affirming of it self 2 Tim. 3. 2 Pet. 1. That it was delivered by divine inspiration to the holy men of God 6 For what cause no doctrine besides the holy Scripture is to be received in the Church The Scripture is of God therefore the rule of faith Whereas it appeareth unto us that it is the word of God which the Prophets and Apostles have left in writing there is no man which doth not see that the Scripture must be the rule square by which all things which are taught done in the Church must be tried Now all things of which there useth to rise questions in the Christian Church do appertain either unto doctrine or unto discipline and ceremonies That the word of God ought to be the rule unto both sorts it is out of doubt But in this place we speak of the doctrine of the Church which consisteth in the sentences and decrees which we are bound by the commandement of god to beleeve or obey and therefore they cannot be changed by the authority of any creature and they are become obnoxious unto the wrath of God whosoever submit not themselves in faith and obedience unto them To these decrees and precepts the Papists adde many sentences which not only are no where delivered in Scripture but are repugnant unto it and they contend That the Church or the Bishops have authority of decreeing yea contrary and besides the Scripture what the Church must beleeve or doe and that mens consciences are bound by those decrees no lesse then by the words of the holy Scripture to beleeve or obey Contrariwise we beleeve and confesse That no doctrine is to be proposed unto the Church not only if it be repugnant unto the holy Scripture but if it be not contained in it And whatsoever either is not by the expresse testimony of the holy Scripture delivered or doth not consequently follow out of the words of the Scripture rightly understood that we hold may be without hurt of conscience beleeved or not beleeved changed abrogated and omitted The difference of the Scripture and of other mens opinions For we must ever hold a necessary difference between the bookes of the Prophets and Apostles and the writings and doctrine of others in the Church The Scripture only is of it selfe to be beleeved the rule of faith That the Scripture onely neither hath nor can have any errour in any matter other teachers both may erre and oftentimes also doe erre when they depart from the written word of God Againe that the Scriptures are beleeved on their own word because we know that God speaketh with us in them others have credit not because themselves say so but because the Scripture witnesseth so neither a whit more then they can prove by the Scripture Wherefore we do not reject others doctrine and labours in the Church but only setting them in their owne place we submit them unto the rule of Gods word This doctrine first is delivered of God himselfe and that not in one place only of the Scripture as You shall not adde unto the word which I spake unto you neither shall you take away from it And I protest unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecie of this booke Dent. 4. Revel 22. if any man shall adde unto thâ—se things God shall adde unto him the plagues that are written in this booke And if any man shall diminish of the words c. Neither only by these words is forbidden that no false things and openly repugnant to the written word be added to the doctrine of the Church but also that no uncertaine things or things not appertaining unto it be mingled therewith For it is not in the power of any creature to pronounce what we are to thinke of God and his will but this is onely to be learned out of that which is disclosed in his word And therefore the men of Beraea are commended Who searched the Scriptures daily Acts 17. whether these things were so 2 Faith is grounded only on the Word Secondly faith which is spoken of in the Church is a part of divine worship that is the sure assent by which we embrace every word of God delivered unto us because it is impossible for us to be deceived by it if we understand it aright Further also that it may breed in us a true worshipping of God and comfort of our soules it must stand sure and immoveable against temptations But there is no certain doctrine concerning God and Religion besides that which is knowne to be revealed in his word We may not therefore give the honour which is due unto God unto men neither may we go from certaine things to uncertaine but cleave only to the word of God in the doctrine concerning Religion and therefore humane decrees must not be accounted amongst those which we are to imbrace by faith Faith cometh by hearing hearing by the word of God c. 3 Things necessary to be beleeved or done are part of divine worship But things not prescribed are no part of divine worship Therefore they are not necessary Thirdly for so much as the worship of God is a worke commanded of God performed
by faith to this end principally that God may be honoured it is manifest that to beleeve and doe those things which cannot be denied or omitted without offending of God is the worship of God and contrariwise that God cannot be worshipped but by the prescript of his will both the consciences of all men and God himselfe in his holy word doth testifie as In vain doe they worship me who teach the doctrines and commandements of men It is as wicked therefore to number those things which are not expressed in the word of God Isa 29. Matth. 15. amongst those which are necessary to be beleeved and done in matters of Religion as it is unlawfull for any creature to thrust upon God that worship which himselfe never required 4. The Scripture is sufficient Fourthly there cannot be any thing added of men unto this doctrine without great injury and contumely done unto the holy Scripture For if other things besides these that are written are necessary to the perfection of true Religion then doth not the Scripture shew the perfect manner of worshipping God and of attaining to salvation which fighteth with the plain words of Scripture which affirme that God hath opened unto us in his Word as much as he would have us know in this life concerning his will towards us John 15. as Christ saith All things which I have heard of my Father I have made knowne unto you And Paul I have kept nothing backe but have shewed you all the counsell of God Acts 20. And Knowing that thou hast knowne the holy Scriptures from a child 2 Tim. 3. which are able to make thee wise unto salvation through the faith which is in Christ Jesus For the whole Scripture is given by inspiration of God and is profitable to teach to improve to correct and to instruct in righteousnesse 5. Other Doctors may erre the Prophets and Apostles cannot therefore they are tied to these Fifthly we are to consider the degrees of them who teach in the Church For therefore is the authority of the Prophets and Apostles far higher then of other Ministers of the Church because God called them immediatly to declare his will unto other men and adorned them with testimonies of miracles and other things by which he witnessed that he did so lighten and guide their minds with his Spirit that hee suffered them to erre in no one point of doctrine our Ministers are called by men and may erre and doe erre when they depart from the doctrine of the Prophets and Apostles Wherefore the Apostle Paul saith Ephes 2. 1 Cor. 3. That the Church is builded upon the foundation of the Prophets and Apostles And That hee had laid the foundation and other then that could no man lay others build upon it gold silver precious stones wood hay stubble Now it is manifest that they who may erre ought to be tied unto their doctrine who are warranted by the testimonies of God that they cannot erre Wherefore all other teachers in the Church must not bring any new point of doctrine but onely propound and expound those things unto the Church which are delivered by the Prophets and Apostles The consent of Fathers in this point For these causes therefore doth the whole ancient Church with great consent submit it selfe unto the rule of the sacred Scriptures whose authority yet ought of right to be greater then these mens who both in words and deeds fight against this opinion Basil serm de confess fidei Basil saith That it is a falling from the faith and a fault of pride either not to admit those things which are written in the holy Scriptures or to adde any thing unto them Agust Epist 3. And Augustine For neither ought wee to account of every ones discourses though they be catholike and worthy men as of the Canonicall Scriptures that it may not be lawfull for us without impairing the reverence which we owe to those men to dislike and refuse any thing in their writings if peradventure wee shall find that they have thought otherwise then the Scripture hath as it is by Gods assistance understood either of others Epist 112. or of our selves And If ought be confirmed by the plain authority of the divine Scriptures of those which are called in the Church Canonicall wee must without any doubting beleeve it as for other testimonies by which any thing is moved to be beleeved thou mayest chuse whether thou wilt beleeve them or no. But against these testimonies of the Scriptures and the ancient Church the adversaries of the truth contend that besides the doctrine which is comprised in the holy Bible other decrees also made by the authority of the Church are no lesse unchangeable and necessary to salvation then the Oracles Propheticall and Apostolike And that they may not without some shew and pretence take upon them this authority of decreeing what they list Objections of the Papists 1 Object The Scripture doth not remaine perfect Numb 21. Joshua 10. 1 Kin. 14.19 Jude 9. 14. 1 Cor. 5. Ephes 3. John 21.25 besides and contrary unto the Scripture they alledge places of Scripture in which some writings of the Prophets and Apostles are mentioned which are not come to our hands as The booke of the wars of the Lord The book of the just The booke of the Chronicles of the Kings of Judah The prophecie of Enoch and the story of the body of Moses And lastly the Apostle Paul maketh mention of his Epistles which now the Church hath not Hence therefore these men will conclude That the doctrine of the sacred Scripture is maimed and that therefore the defect hereof must be supplied by the Church But first of all concerning the holy Scripture we are to know that so much thereof hath been preserved of God for us as was necessary and profitable for the doctrine and consolation of the Church Furthermore concerning points of Religion though some holy books are wanting as those Epistles of Paul yet it is manifest that all necessary doctrine is contained in those which are extant They alledge That many things were delivered by word of mouth 2 Object Some things delivered by word of mouth Answer both before there were any Scriptures and afterward also by Christ and the Apostles as John 16.12 1 Corinth 11.34 2 Thessal 2.15 and elsewhere But those things which they delivered by word of mouth are the selfe same which they put in writing except some matters of ceremonies as Act. 15.20 1 Cor. 11.34 which maketh not for the adversaries whose traditions most of them repugne the Scriptures They alledge farther the practice and examples of the Apostles 3 Object That the Apostles have decreed against and besides the Scripture Titus 1. 1 Timothy 1 Cor. 11. 1 Cor. 14. 1 Cor. 7. 1 Cor. 6. Answer as if they did make any ordinances or lawes either besides or against the Scripture as when Paul ordaineth many
things of chusing Bishops and Deacons of widowes of women to be covered and to containe themselves in silence of not divorcing the husband if he be an Infidell of controversies between Christians But these men remember not that their authority is not equall unto the Apostles authority neither consider they that there is nothing in all these things appointed of Paul which is not agreeable to the rest of the Word of God contained in writing and that many of those things which they alledge are comprehended in the commandements of the Decalogue More trifling is it that they say the forme of Baptisme appointed by Christ was changed by the Apostles because it is read Acts 28.19 that they baptised in the Name of Jesus Christ. For in those places not the forme of Baptisme but the use is declared that is that men were baptised for to testifie that they did belong to Christ Neither yet by the example of the Apostles who interdicted the Churches things offered to Idols bloud and that which was strangled is it lawfull for Councels and Bishops to make decrees and lawes to tie mens consciences For first here againe there must needs be retained a difference between the Apostles by whom God opened his will unto men whereupon they also say It seemeth good to the holy Ghost and to us and other Ministers of the Church who are tied unto the Apostles doctrine Further as concerning this decree of the Apostles they decreed nothing else then what the rule of charity commandeth which at all times would have that in things indifferent men should deale without offence Now if they urge that these ordinances are called necessary yet it doth not thereupon follow that the traditions of Bishops are necessary especially such as are the Bishops of Rome Then that necessity whereof the Apostles spake was neither to last continually neither did it bind consciences for feare of the wrath of God if these things were not observed but it dured but for a time for their infirmity who were converted from Judaisme to Christ or were to be converted 1 Cor. 10. as Paul doth at large teach To these they adde the examples of the Church 4 Object Present examples whom they say even from the Apostles to these very times to have beleeved and observed some things not onely not delivered in the Scripture but contrary to the Scripture They bring forth the selfe same decree of Jerusalem concerning things offered to Idols and bloud which being made of the Apostles and expresly set downe in the Scripture was yet abolished by the Church But it hath been already said that that constitution was made not that it should last for ever but for a time for a certaine cause even for the infirmity of the Church which was gathered from among the Jewes and after that cause ceased that ordinance taketh place no longer Neither yet did it at that time fetter mens consciences as if the worshipping or offending of God did lye in it wherefore the abrogating of it is not contrary but doth very well agree with it To these also they reckon the observing of the Lords day We truly as we doe beleeve this to be an Apostolike tradition and perceive it to be profitable and a farre other manner of one then for the most part they are which they would faine thrust upon us under the Apostles name so we doe not put any worship of God to consist in this thing but know it to be left arbitrary unto the Church Even as it is said Let no man condemne you in respect of a holy day But they affirme also that some things not written are beleeved which yet to call to question wee our selves confesse to be unlawfull as That Infants are to be baptised That Christ descended into Hell Coloss â— That the Sonne of God is consubstantiall unto the eternall Father But they are too impudent if they take unto themselves a licence of hatching new opinions because the Church for to expound the meaning of the Scripture useth somewhere words which are not extant in the Scripture But impious are they and blasphemous if they say the doctrine it selfe which the Church professeth in these words is not extant in the Scripture 5 Object The holy Ghost to teach the Church therefore not the Scripture They say also that the holy Ghost is promised the Church that it may teach those things which are not delivered in the Scriptures as But the Comforter which is the holy Ghost whom the Father shall send in my name hee shall teach you all things And When the Spirit of truth shall come hee shall lead you into all truth But here they maliciously omit that which is added And shall bring all things to your remembrance which I have told you John 14.26 and 16.13 Againe Hee shall beare witnesse of mee Againe Hee will reprove the world of sinne of righteousnesse and of judgement Againe He shall glorifie mee for he shall receive of mine and shall shew it unto you For out of these it is manifest that the holy Ghost should speak nothing but that which was written in the Gospel and Christ himselfe had before time taught his Disciples so farre is it that he should bring any thing contrary to them For neither can he dissent from Christ nor from himself So also when they alledge that I will put my law in their inward parts Jerem. 31. 2 Cor. 3.3 and in their hearts I will write it And Yee are the Epistle of Christ written not with inke but with the Spirit of the living God not in tables of stone but in fleshly tables of the heart they do not mark that the Spirit cannot speak in mens hearts contrary unto these things which be revealed in the Scripture neither would God write any other law in mens hearts but that which is already revealed and written and that therefore the Apostle Paul opposeth not the matter written but the manner of writing in tables and hearts one against another because that the same was written in both but there with ink and here with the spirit of God It hath lesse colour which they go about to build out of that place If you be otherwise minded God shall reveale even the same unto you Phil. 3.15 If therefore say they the Church thinke any thing different from the written word that proceedeth from the holy Ghost For the Apostle comforteth and confirmeth the godly that albeit they did not understand somewhat of that which there hee had written or were of any other judgement in it yet that hereafter they should be taught it of God and should know those things to be true which he had written When as therefore it is denied that the holy Ghost reveales any thing diverse from that which is written the rule and mastership of the Spirit in the Church is not taken away but the same Spirit is matched with himselfe that is with the rule of the
day Likewise Galat. 5. â— Stand fast in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free Now if againe they reply that the office of Bishops is above the civill power 2 Instance The higher power doth more binde 1 Answer and therefore hath greater force than that to binde men to obey first wee grant that more obedience is due unto the superiour power then to the inferiour as long as it commandeth nothing contrary to Gods word As long therefore as the Ministers propound the word of God unto the Church and for avoiding of offence command such things to be observed as appertain to decency and order they do not now offend against them but against God whosoever obey them not But if they require their lawes concerning things different to be observed with putting an opinion of necessity in them and of the worship of God and doe make them necessary when there is no danger of offence to ensue because this charge is contrary to the word of God no obedience is due unto it Further we confesse that greater obedience is due unto the superiour power in those things in which it is superiour that is in which God would have other powers to obey it But the Ministeriall power is superiour unto the Civill in those things in which it is superiour that is which are of God delivered commanded and committed unto the Ministers that by them they may be declared unto the Church But In matters indifferent concerning which nothing is either commanded or forbidden of God the civill power is superiour by reason of the authority which God in these matters hath given unto the civill Magistrate and not to the Ministers of the Church 8 Object Fathers and Councels are cited But against this they returne againe That wee also doe alledge the testimonies of Councels and Fathers in confirming the doctrine of the Church which were but in vaine for us to doe if their sentences had not the force and authority of Ecclesiasticall doctrine But we never bring nor receive the testimonies of the ancient Church with that mind Answer as if without the authority of the holy Scripture they were sufficient for confirmation of any points of doctrine Neither yet is there regard had of them in vaine 2. Uses of the testimonies of Fathers in points of doctrine For 1. They which are rightly minded after they are instructed by the voice of the Scriptures concerning the truth are yet more confirmed by the Church as by a testimony of lower degree 2. They which attribute more authority unto them then they should or abuse their sayings against the truth are very well refuted by the testimony of them whom they have made their Judges Also they say 9 Object Traditions are order 1 Cor. 14. That order and decency in the Church is necessary by the commandement of God according as it is said Let all things be done comely and in order For God is not the authour of confusion Now the order and discipline of the Church doth a great part consist in traditions Ecclesiasticall wherefore they conclude that by the violating of these mens consciences are wounded Answ Of meere particulars there is no concluding A double liberty of the Church in matters of order and God offended But as God commandeth some order to be appointed and kept in the Church so hath he given a double liberty in it unto his Church To appoint it That it be arbitrary for the Church to appoint as may be most commodious for it what order shall be in every place and at every time observed To keep or not to keep it being appointed so it be without offence That also after any thing is certainly ordained it may be kept or not kept without hurt of conscience both of the whole Church and of every one of the godly if there be no danger of offence For it is necessary that ever a difference be put betwixt the commandements of God by the observing whereof God is worshipped and offended by the breaking of them and those things which God hath left to men to appoint neither is worshipped or offended as himselfe pronounceth either by the altering or omitting of them so long as there is no cause or danger of offence 1 Cor. 14.40 Galat. 5.1 Col. 2.16 And the same Apostle who commandeth all things to be done comely and in order willeth us to stand fast in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free and that we should be condemned of no man in meat or drinke or in respect of a holy-day Wherefore not they who without contempt of divine things or wantonnesse or danger of offence doe something otherwise in these things then is appointed but they rather offend against the commandement of God concerning keeping order who either would have no order in the Church or trouble that which is well appointed These men find fault also with the obscurity of the holy Scripture 10 Object Obscure things do not suffice without interpretation 1 Pet. 3.16 which they prove both by examples of hard places of Scripture and also out of Peter where it is said That there are some things hard to be understood in the Epistles of Paul And therefore sith that things darkly spoken without they be expounded cannot suffice to perfect and wholesome doctrine they urge that the interpretation of the Church also is necessary to be received with the Scripture But here above all things they injure the holy Ghost ascribing darknesse and obscurity unto him Answer The Minor is false if they respect the ground who of purpose endeavoured to apply himself in simplicity of speech to the capacity of the common people and the rudest For those things which appertaine to the ground of doctrine which is necessary to be known of all as are the articles of our Beliefe and the ten Commandements they are so plainly recited so often repeated so plentifully expounded in the Scriptures that they are open and easie to any but to him who will not learne even as the 119. Psalme teacheth where the word of the Lord is called a lanterne to our feet and a light to our pathes Againe the entrance into thy word sheweth light and giveth understanding to the simple The word of the Prophet is called a light shining in a darke place To which ye doe well that yee take heed as unto a light that shineth in a darke place untill the day dawne and the day-starre arise in your heart 2 Pet. 1.19 And Solomon affirmeth that hee writeth to give the simple sharpnesse of wit and to the child Prov. 1.4 20. knowledge and discretion Againe that wisedome cryeth without and uttereth her voice in the streets Paul also saith that Christ sent him to preach the Gospel 1 Corinth 1.17 1 Instance The ground of doctrine is unknowne to many Answ Yea to the reprobate 2 Cor. 4.3 Isa 65.2 Rom. 10.21 Psal 36.3 Mat. 11.25 not
with wisedome of words lest the crosse of Christ should be made of none effect The ground therefore and summe of doctrine is not obscure except it be unto the reprobates who contemne the truth or stubbornly reject it as the Apostle saith If our Gospel be hid it is hid to them that aâ—e lost in whom the god of this world hath blinded their mindes that is of the Infidels that the light of the glorious Gospel of Christ should not shine unto them All the day long have I stretched forth my hands to a disobedient and gain-saying people The words of his mouth are iniquity and deceit hee hath left off to understand and to doe good I give thee thankes O Father Lord of heaven and earth because thou hast hid these things from the wise men and men of understanding and hast opened them unto babes Now if they reply againe 2 Instance Divine matters are obscure unto all men 1 Cor. 2.14 Answ Not of themselves but through our naturall blindnesse which in the regenerate is cleared by Gods spirit Luke 8.10 2 Cor. 3.15 that divine matters are hard and obscure to all men as it is said The naturall man perceiveth not the things of the spirit of God for they are foolishnesse unto him neither can hee know them because they are spiritually discerned they should have called to mind 1. That this ignorance and hardnesse riseth not of the obscurity of the Scripture but of the blindnesse of mans minde 2. That the obscurity sith in very deed it is not in the Scripture but seemeth to be the fault of our nature doth not alwaies remain in those who are regenerate but is removed from them by the illumination of the holy Spirit according to those sayings It is given unto you to know the secrets of the kingdome of God but to others in parables that when they see they should not see and when they heare they should not understand Vntill this day when Moses is read the vaile is laid over their hearts Neverthelesse when their hearts shall be turned unto the Lord the vaile shall be taken away From this very place may wee easily refute that which they object That wee our selves 3 Instance The Scripture a long time not knowne Answer in that we say the Scripture hath not been understood for these many ages in the Popish Church doe confesse the obscurity of it For the ignorance which hath bin from the beginning of the world and shall be to the end in the adversaries of the truth is not to be imputed to the obscurity of the Scriptures but their owne perversenesse who have not a desire to know and imbrace the truth as Paul saith Because they received not the love of the truth that they might be saved 2 Thes 2.10 11. therefore God shall send them strong delusions that they shall beleeve lies Whereas therefore it appeareth that the ground and summe of doctrine is not obscure 4 Instance Many places obscure Answer yet wee confesse that some places of Scripture are more dark and difficult than others But 1. They are such that although they were not understood yet the ground may both stand and be understood 2. The interpretation of these places dependeth not on the authority of men but the exposition of them is to be sought by conference of other places of Scripture more clear 3. If we cannot finde it yet lest we should affirme any uncertaine thing concerning divine matters our conscience not satisfying us in it we must suspend our judgment untill God shall open unto us some certaine meaning and in the mean season we are to hold those with thankfull mindes in which God hath left no place of doubting for us But when we answer thus unto our adversaries they rise againe upon us out of those things which we grant them For because we confesse that some places of Scripture are harder to be understood then others 5 Instance because of the dulnesse and slownesse of mans minde in learning divine matters Of the necessity of interpretation Acts 8.13 neither those things which are most cleare are understood of the people as the Eunuch of Queen Candaces doth complain and that the Ministry it selfe was therefore ordained of God in the Church for that it seemed good unto the holy Ghost to add for our instruction an exposition of the Scripture which is done by the voice of the Church To be short because our selves in writing and teaching doe expound the Scripture and do exhort all men to the reading and hearing the exposition thereof out of these they conclude that besides the reading of the Scripture the interpretation of the Church is necessary and that therefore what the Church doth pronounce of the meaning of the Scripture that is without controversie to be received Answ 1. It is necessary as a helpe and instrument not as if it were impossible to know the truth without it But wee confesse 1. That the interpretation of Scripture is necessary in the Church not for that without this to come to the knowledge of heavenly doctrine is simply impossible whereas both God is able when it pleaseth him to instruct his even without the Scripture it self much more then without the exposition of his Ministers and the godly learn many things out of Scripture without interpreters and of the contrary side except the eies of our minds be opened by the grace of his holy Spirit heavenly doctrine seemeth alwaies alike obscure unto us whether it be expounded by the word of the Scripture or of the Church but for that it pleased God to appoint this ordinary way of instructing us and himself hath commanded the maintainance and use of his Ministry in the Church that it should be an instrument which the holy Ghost might most freely use for our salvation 2. Although interpretation of Scripture be necessary Answ 2. Though interpreting be necessary yet so that it must not be a depraving of Scripture yet this is so farre from granting any license to the Ministers to bring new ordinances into the Church that nothing doth more tie them to this doctrine alone comprehended in the Scripture then this very function of expounding the Scripture For to interpret another mans words is not to faigne at our pleasure a meaning either divers from them or repugnant unto them but to render the same meaning and sentence either in moe words or in more plaine words or at least in such as may be more fit for their capacity whom we teach and withall when there is need to shew that this is the minde of the author which we affirme to be Now such an interpretation of Scripture is made by this meanes 3 Points to be observed in interpreting Scripture 1. That the phrase be considered and the proper sense of the words found out 2. That the order and coherence of the parts of the doctrine contained in the text of the Scripture be declared
3. That the doctrine be applied to the use of the Church which it hath in confirming true opinions or refuting errours in knowing of God and our selves in exhorting in comforting and in directing of our life 2 Tim. 2.15 Titus 1.9 as Paul commandeth Study to divide the word of truth aright And A Bishop must hold fast the faithfull word according to doctrine that he also may be able to exhort with wholesome doctrine and improve them that say against it And wisely did Epiphanius advise Lib. 2. cont haeres Not all words of Scripture have need to be allegorized or construed according to a strange sense but they must be understood as they are and further they require meditation and sense for the understanding of the drift and purpose of every argument That is All places of Scripture are not to be transformed into allegories but we must seek out the proper sense of the words by meditation and sense that is using the rules of Art and having a regard of the propriety of tongues and our own experience by which we know the nature of those things which are signified by words commonly used in the Church 6 Instance Concerning the deciding of a controversie about the text and meaning thereof But here is cast in another difficulty for that in controversies concerning the text and the meaning thereof such a Judge is required whose authority and testimony may suffice for determining the meaning of the text For when both parties say they who strive about the meaning pleadeth each of them that his interpretation is true except judgement be given of such a Judge from whom it may not be lawfull to make any appeale the contention will never be decided and wee shall still remaine doubtfull of the sense of the Scripture Furthermore this judgment must needs belong to the Church for in the Church alone wee are to seek for an examining and determining of controversies concerning Religion What the Church therefore doth pronounce in these matters wee must of necessity rest upon that as the assured meaning of the Scripture And hereof they say it is manifest that the decrees of the Church are of no lesse authority then the expresse sentence of Scripture But we as we willingly grant that the eontroversies of the Church must be at length determined Answ Not the Church but holy Ghost is Judge of the Word and that according to the sentence of that Judge of whom wee may be certainly assured that wee cannot be deceived so we acknowledge this Judge to be not the Church but the holy Ghost himselfe speaking unto us in the Scripture and declaring his owne words For he is the supream Judge whose judgment the Church onely demandeth declareth and signifieth he cannot be deceived whereas all men are subject to the danger of errour in a word hee being the author of the Scripture is the best and surest interpreter of his own words And therefore the Scripture it self in all doubts recalleth us and bindeth us unto it self 2 Pet. 1.19 John 5.39 Isa 8.20 We have a most sure word of the Prophets to which ye do well that ye take heed as unto a light that shineth in a dark place Search the Scriptures To the Law and to the Testimony If they speak not according to this word it is because there is no light in them The Church doth not alwaies speak the words of the holy Ghost For although the holy Ghost speaketh also by the Church yet because shee doth not alwaies speake the words of the holy Ghost she cannot be the supreame and chiefe Judge of controversies in Religion For this Judge must be such a one whose sentence may by no meanes be called in question But we have none such besides the word of God registred in the Scriptures Neither do we at all take away the deciding of controversies Deciding of controversies is not taken away when wee make Scripture Judge of meaning of the Scripture For although contentious persons alwaies seek sophismes by which they may delude and shift off the testimonies of Scripture yet do they this against their conscience and the lovers of the truth require no other interpreter of the Scripture but the Scripture and do acknowledge and confesse themselves to be plentifully satisfied by it 6 Waies how to decide doubtfull places For whereas unto men also it is granted to be themselves the best interpreters of their owne words how much more ought this honour to be yeelded unto the holy Scripture wherefore if controversies be moved concerning the meaning of some place in the Scripture we ought much more to do that here which we would doe in other writings The analogy of faith To consider and respect the analogy of faith that is to receive no exposition which is against the ground of doctrine that is against any article of Faith or commandement of the Decalogue or against any plaine testimony of Scripture Even as Paul admonisheth forbidding to build wood hay 1 Cor. 3.12 stubble upon the foundation Examining of Antecedents and Consequents To weigh the things that go before and follow after that place which is in question that so not onely nothing contrary to these may be feigned on it but also that they may be set for the meaning of it which these require For these either not being observed or being dissembled the meaning of the Scripture is not seldome depraved So those words of the Psalme Psal 91.11 Hee shall give his Angels charge over thee that they shall beare thee in their hands that thou hurt not thy foot against a stone the Divell tempting Christ interpreteth them as if they served to maintaine over-rash and curious attempts when yet that which is added In all thy waies doth shew that they are to be understood of men doing those things that are proper unto their calling Resorting to places which teach the same more clearly To search every where in the Scripture whether there be extant any place where it stands for confessed or is manifest or may be shewed that the same doctrine in other words is delivered touching the same matter which is contained in that place which is in controversie For if the meaning of the clearer and undoubted place be manifested unto us we shall also be assured of the place which is doubted of because in both places the same is taught As when it is said Rom. 3.28 We conclude that a man is justified by faith without the works of the Law that in this place to be justified by faith is not to please God for the worthinesse of faith but for the merit of Christ apprehended by faith and that the workes of the Law signifie not the ceremonies onely but the whole obedience of the Law chiefly the morall other places do teach us which in moe and clearer words delivered the same doctrine concerning the justification of man before God as in the
same chapter By the works of the law shall no flesh be justified in his sight Vers 20 21 22 23. for by the law cometh the knowledge of sinne But now is the righteousnesse of God made manifest without the law having witnesse of the law and of the Prophets The righteousnesse of God by the faith of Jesus Christ unto all and upon all that beleeve for there is no difference For all have sinned and are deprived of the glory of God and are justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus Conferring like places together To conferre places of Scripture where though the same words be not spoken of the same thing yet the words and formes of speaking are used of the like things For if the interpretation of the like place be certaine and there be the same causes for the like interpretation to be given in the place in controversie which are in the other then of the like places we must give one and the same judgement Mat. 5.29 30. The Lord willeth to put out our eye to cut off our hand if they be a cause of offence unto us Now whereas the Law forbiddeth us to maime our body Thou shalt not kill that therefore by this figure of speech the Lord would have us that wee should rather forsake things most deare unto us than by the rust and motion of them wee should suffer our selves to be withdrawne from God the like forme of speech other-where used Jeremy 22.24 Deut. 32.10 to signifie things most deare and precious doth shew as If Jechoniah were the signet of my right hand yet would I plucke thee thence and Hee kept him as the apple of his eye Consent of the catholike Church with 3 rules of direction therein John 8.37 When once according to that rule the controversies concerning the text and meaning thereof are judged we may lawfully also descend to the consent of the Church yet putting great space betwixt and not without great advisement For lest by the name of the Church we be beguiled 1. No sentence or meaning is to be received which these rules of examining and judging which have been now declared do not suffer 2. Wee must consider what times and what writings are purest what points of doctrine have beene and in what ages either rightly expounded or depraved with errours 3. Whose interpretation either is of the authour or may be of 〈◊〉 confirmed by the testimonies of the Scripture And to this deciding of all controversies about the meaning of the Scripture drawne out of the Scripture it selfe doe all the godly and lovers of truth agree even as it is said Hee that is of God heareth the words of God Now the testimony of the ancient and catholike Church so farre as they see it to accord with the Scripture they doe with glad and thankful mindes embrace and are so much more assured of the knowne truth But if any quarrelling men doe not yeeld unto the testimonies of the Scriptures we must not seeke because of them a Judge higher then the word of God but must leave them unto the judgement of God as the Apostle counselleth us Reject him that is an hereticke after once or twice admonition Titus 3.20 knowing that he that is such is perverted and sinneth being damned of his owne selfe 1 Cor. 14.38 Rev. 22.11 And If any man be ignorant let him be ignorant Hee that is filthy let him be more filthy Neither verily doth he whom the word of God doth not satisfie rest on the authority of men as the truth it selfe doth shew but as these things are sufficient to shut the mouthes of them who gainesay the truth or at leastwise to manifest their impudency so is there further required for the fencing of the consciences of all the godly in debate of Religion besides a care of learning the doctrine of the word of God Prayers An ardent and daily invocating of God by which wee may desire that wee may be taught and guided by his holy Spirit This if wee shall doe hee will not suffer us to make stay in errour which may pull us from him but will open unto us the true and certaine meaning of his word concerning all things necessary to our salvation that our faith may depend not on humane but divine authority even as it is promised Mat. 7.7 Aske and it shall be given you seeke and ye shall finde knock and it shall be opened unto you Luke 11.13 James 1.5 For whosoever asketh receiveth and hee that seeketh findeth and to him that knocketh it shall be opened How much more shall your heavenly Father give the holy Ghost to them that desire him If any of you do lack wisedome let him ask it of God which giveth to all men liberally and reproacheth no man and it shall be given him but let him ask in faith and waver not Object 11. It is unmeet that the holy Ghost should be subject unto another Answ We make him not subject to any other but compare him with himselfe To their former arguments our adversaries adde That it is a shame that the holy Ghost speaking in the Church should be subject to the examination and judgment of another and therefore we must not examine him by the rule of the Scripture But seeing that the same Spirit speaketh in the Church and in the Scripture when wee doe examine the voice of the Church by Scripture we do not subject the holy Ghost to another but we compare him with himself And by this means 1. We give unto him the praise of truth and constancy while we do acknowledge and restifie that he is alwaies like himself and doth never square from himself 2. We confesse that the supreme authority of pronouncing the will of God belongeth unto him while we doe not seek whether those things be true and certaine which he hath spoken but whether those be his words which men ascribe unto him and this doe we even after the selfe same manner which he hath prescribed us and after we find out by the rule of the written word that any thing hath proceeded from him to that without making any controversie we submit our minds and wils Contrariwise it is easie to see 2 Contumelies against the holy Ghost issuing out of the Papists opinion of the Judge of the Scripture that our adversaries themselves are guilty of that contumely against the holy Ghost of which they accuse us For while they will have the authority of giving judgement concerning the meaning of the Scripture and deciding of controversies not to belong unto the Scripture but unto themselves by this very thing 1. They imagine that the holy Ghost may dissent from himselfe 2. They make themselves Judges higher then the holy Ghost and Word of God Lastly whereas Paul saith That he is the Minister of the New Testament Object 12. The Letter killeth the Spirit quickneth 2
Cor. 3.6 not of the Letter but of the Spirit for the Letter doth kill the Spirit doth quicken some men doe thence gather That we are to heare not what the written word of God soundeth but what the Spirit speaketh by the Church in our hearts Yea there hath growne an opinion heretofore That the Grammaticall and Literall meaning of the Scripture is pernicious except all be transformed into allegories But a manifold Paralogisme in this argument doth easily appeare Two significations of the word Letter if it be considered what the Letter and the Spirit signifieth in Paul for that all the doctrine and knowledge touching God as also the outward observation of the Law in those that are not regenerate is called the Letter by the Apostle and the Spirit signifieth 1. The holy Ghost himselfe Three significations of the word Spirit 2. The true doctrine concerning God when the holy Ghost is of force and efficacy by it 3. Faith and conversion and motions pleasing God being kindled of the holy Ghost through the Word as it appeares by the words going before For for that which here he saith The proofes of both significations Vers 2 3. That he was made of God a Minister not of the Letter but of the Spirit he said before That the Epistle of Christ was ministred by him and written not with inke but with the Spirit of the living God in tables of the heart that is that his preaching was not in vaine but of force and efficacy in the hearts of men the holy Ghost working by it And in like manner he calleth the ceremony without conversion Circumcision in the Letter Rom. 2.27 29. but conversion it selfe Circumcision of the heart in the Spirit Walk in newnesse of Spirit Rom. 7.9 and not in the oldnesse of the Letter that is in true holinesse such as is begun by the Spirit in the regenerate not in the sin and hypocrisie of them who know verily the will of God and make practice also of outward discipline and behaviour but remaine without faith and conversion Wherefore first as the doctrine by the fault of men and not of it selfe 1 Answ The Letter killeth not of it selfe but by an accident remaineth only the Letter so also not of it own nature but because of the corruption of men it killeth that is it terrifieth mens minds with the judgement of God and doth stirre up a murmuring and hatred against God as we are plainly taught by the Apostle Rom. 7.12 13 14. The Law is holy and the Commandement is holy and just and good Was that then which is good made death unto mee God forbid But sin that it might appeare sin wrought death in mee by that which is good that sin might be out of measure sinfull by the commandement For we know that the Law is spirituall but I am carnall sold under sin But the proper effect of the Scripture is to quicken men that is to lighten them with the true knowledge of God and to move them to the love of God 2 Cor. 2.15 As it is said We are unto God the sweet savour of Christ in them that are saved and in them which perish c. Answ It killeth as it is without the Spirit Albeit the Letter that is the doctrine without that spirituall motion killeth yet the operation of the holy Ghost accompanying it when now it is not the Letter but the Spirit and power of God to salvation unto every one that beleeveth it doth not kill but quicken as it is said Thy word quickneth me Wherefore Psal 119. that the Letter kill us not we must not cast away the Scripture but the stubbornnesse of our hearts and desire of God that he would let his doctrine be in us and others not the Letter but the Spirit that is that he would forcibly move our hearts by it and turne them to him Answ The Spirit quickneth agreeing with the Word That it is added that the Spirit quickneth that calleth us not away from the Scripture to other opinions or revelations For that Spirit quickneth which dissenteth not from the Scripture but teacheth and mindeth the same which he hath uttered in the Scripture But that Spirit which leadeth men away from the Scripture it quickneth not but may be said much more truly to kill then the Letter that is not by an accident or externall cause but of it owne nature For the spirit of Antichrist is a lyar and a murtherer and therefore be it accursed unto us Answ The Apostles mis-construed by them They who by the Letter understand either the characters of letters or the proper and literall sense whether it be of the whole Scripture or of those speeches which are allegorically and figuratively spoken and by the Spirit the interpretation of these speeches it is manifest that they swerve far from the mind of Paul both by those things which have been spoken concerning the meaning of Paul and also because not only every sentence of Scripture whether it be proper of figurative but also every interpretation of it is and remaineth the killing Letter except the quickning force of the holy Ghost come unto it Wherefore sith that neither for interpretation nor revelation nor authority nor any other pretence it is lawfull leaving the Scripture of the Prophets and Apostles to depart to whatsoever decrees of Religion which are not confirmed by the testimony of the Scripture let us hear it as an Oracle sounding from heaven bringing to the reading thereof not minds fore-stalled neither with opinions conceived either of our owne braines or else-where neither with affections neither with prejudices but the love of God and a desire of knowing the truth So shall it come to passe that both wee shall know the true meaning of the Scripture and by it godlinesse and sure and sound comfort shall be kindled in us and great increase 7. How manifold the course is of teaching and learning the doctrine of the Church THere is a threefold order or there are three parts of the study of Divinity The first is a Catecheticall institution 1 Catechising or a summary and briefe explication of Christian doctrine and the chiefe generall points thereof which is called Catechisme This part is necessary for all men because both the learned and unlearned ought to know the foundation of Religion 2 Handling of Common places The second is an handling of Common places or Common places which containe a larger explication of every point and of hard questions together with their definitions divisions reasons and arguments Poure especiall uses of Schoole Divinity This part properly appertaineth unto the Schooles of Divinity and is necessary The understanding of principall points of divinity That they who are trained up in Schooles and may one day be called to teach in the Church may more easily and fully understand the whole body of Divinity For as in other Arts and
Sciences so in the study of Divinity wee hardly and slowly conceive the grounds thereof nay all our knowledge is confuse and imperfect unlesse every part of the whole doctrine be delivered by the Professors and Readers and conceived by the Auditors and Hearers in some method and order Orderly delivery thereof in publick That the Students of Divinity may hereafter plainly and orderly deliver unto their auditory a briefe summe of this whole doctrine necessary it is that they themselves first carry in their understanding a complete frame as it were and perfect body thereof Invention and judgement of the interpretation of Scripture It is farther necessary to the finding out and judging of the true and naturall interpretation of Scripture which whereas it ought to square with faith that is to say to impeach no point of this heavenly doctrine of necessity the Interpreter must have an absolute knowledge of the main grounds and foundation thereof Examination of controversies in the Church It is needfull for the increase of judgement in Ecclesiasticall controversies which are divers difficult and dangerous lest perhaps otherwise we be carried head-long from truth into errour 3 Reading and meditation The third course of the study of Divinity is the reading and diligent meditation of the Scripture or holy Writ And this is the highest degree of the study of Divinity for which Catechisme and Common places are learned to wit that we may come furnished to the reading understanding and propounding of the holy Scripture For Catechisme and Common places as they are taken out of the Scripture and are directed by the Scripture as by their rule so againe they conduct and lead us as it were by the hand unto the Scripture Catechisme pertaineth unto the first part of the study of Divinity whereof it followeth that we presently discourse The Speciall Preambles touching CATECHISME THE Speciall Prefaces touching CATECHISME are these five which follow 1 What Catechising or Catechisme is 2 Whether it hath bin alwaies practised and of the originall thereof in the Church 3 What are the chiefe points thereof 4 The reasons why it is necessary 5 What is the scope and end thereof 1 What Catechisme is THE Greek word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 cometh from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as also 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is derived from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The significations of the word Catechisme both these words signifie in their common and largest sense to resound to instruct by word of mouth and to rehearse another mans sayings But properly to teach the rudiments and elements of any doctrine whatsoever and more properly in Church phrase to deliver the first principles of Christian Religion in which sense we read it used Luke 1.4 Acts 18.25 Gal. 6.6 c. So then this word Catechisme signifieth in a generall and common sense the first briefe and A B C Lecture in whatsoever doctrine delivered by word of mouth But as the Church useth it it signifieth an institution of the ruder sort in the elements of Christian doctrine Wherefore Catechisme is a briefe and plaine exposition and a rehearsall of Christian doctrine The definition of Catechisme framed for the capacity of the ruder sort select and gathered out of the writings of the Prophets and Apostles and drawne into certaine questions and answers Or Catechisme is a briefe summe of the doctrine of the Prophets and Apostles delivered by mouth unto the simple and ignorant and exacted or required againe at their hands What the Catechumeni in the Primitive Church were and how many sorts of them 1 Ancient Converts Catechumeni in the Primitive Church were those who learned the Catechisme that is to say such as were now of the Church and were instructed in the principles and beginnings of Christian Religion Of the Catechumeni there were two sorts Some of good yeares and ripe age who of Jewes and Gentiles became Christians but were not yet baptised These were first instructed in the Catechisme and afterwards baptised and admitted to the Lords supper Such a Catechumene was Augustine when of a Manichee hee became a Christian Austen and hee whiles hee was yet but a Catechumene wrote many bookes before hee was baptised of Ambrose Ambrose Such a Catechumene was Ambrose when hee was chosen Bishop of Millaine the urgent necessity of the state of that Church so requiring for suppressing the pestilent heresie wherewith the Arrians had infected it Otherwise Paul forbiddeth a Novice or Catechumene to be chosen Bishop For the Neophiti or Novices were those Catechumeni who as yet were not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 1 Tim. 3.6 or very lately were baptised so called from the words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in Enlish New-plants that is to say New-beginners and Punies of the Church Other Catechumeni there were little impes borne in the Church 2 Young children of Christian parents the children of Christians These eft soones after their birth as being members of the Church were baptised and after they were growne a little elder they were instructed in the Catechisme which when they had learned they were confirmed by laying on of hands and so dismissed out of the companie of the Catechumeni so that it was lawfull for them thence forward to draw neer with the elder sort unto the Lords Supper Of the Catechumeni you may see more in Eusebius tenth book of Ecclesiasticall history Euseb hist Ecclesiast lib. 10. cap. 4. Catechists and fourth chapter not far from the end They also were called Catechists who taught the Catechisme and were the instructers of the Catechumeni 2. Of the Originall of Catechisme and of the perpetuall use thereof in the Church AS of the whole ministery of the mysteries of Christianity so must we conceive of the originall of Catechisme The practice of catechising exereised in the time of both the Old and New Testament Gen. 17.7 that it was ordained of God and hath been of perpetuall continuance in the Church For whereas God since the beginning hath been the God not onely of the aged but of younglings also according to the forme of his Covenant made with Abraham I will be thy God and the God of thy seed he hath instituted and appointed that both of them after the exten◠and reach of their capacity be severally instructed in the doctrine of salvation First the elder by the publike voice of the Ministery then the younger by catechising at home and in schooles Concerning the instruction of the elder sort the case is cleere and out of doubt Touching the catechising of children in the Jewish Church In the time of the Old Testament there are expresse commands every where extant in holy Scripture In the 12. and 13. of Exodus God commandeth that children and the whole family should be taught the originall and use of the Passover In the fourth of Deuteronomie God chargeth Parents that they rehearse
worship and Mosaicall policie or government to be observed in that region and nation untill the coming of the Messias and lastly for the Messias to be born out of that people But the new Testament hath no such speciall promises of corporall benefits but only generall as that God will preserve his Church unto the end and give it some abiding and resting place In the circumstance of the promise of grace In the circumstance of the promise of grace for in the old Covenant the beleevers were reconciled unto God and saved for the Messias sake which should be exhibited and for his sacrifice to come in the new Covenant we are saved for the Messias being come and exhibited and for his sacrifice already offered In the signes of the promise of grace In the rights or signes added to the promise of grace In the old Covenant the Sacraments were divers and painfull as the Circumcision the Passeover the Sacrifices and Oblations But the Sacraments in the new are few and plain even Baptism and the Supper of the Lord. In cleernesse and evidence In cleernesse and evidence The old had types and shadows of good things to come all things were figurative as their Priests and Sacrifices and therefore the more obscure and dark In the new is an accomplishment of these types and so all things are more cleer as well in the Sacraments as the doctrine thereof In gifts In gifts In the old the effusion and powring out of the gifts of the holy Ghost was more narrow and sparing in the new it is more large and plentifull Jer. 31.31 1 Cor. 3.9 Joel 2.28 I will make a new covenant If the ministration of condemnation was glorious much more doth the ministration of righteousnesse exceed in glory I will powre out my spirit upon all flesh c. In continuance Jer. 32.40 In continuance The old was but for a time during untill the coming of the Messias the new is for ever I will make an everlasting Covenant with them In their manner of binding In their bond or manner of binding The old Covenant bound them to the obedience of the whole Mosaicall law morall ceremoniall and civil the new bindeth us only to the morall or spirituall law and to the use of the Sacraments In extent In extent In the old Covenant the Church was inclosed and limited within the Jewish nation whereunto it became all others that would be saved to repair In the new the Church is spread over all nations and there is an entrance into it open to all beleevers of whatsoever nation estate or language Why the old Covenant is taken for the Law and the new for the Gospel Here is to be observed that the old Testament or Covenant is in Scripture oftentimes taken by a figure of speech called Synecdoche which we use when we take the whole for a part or a part for the whole for the law in respect of that part which is especially handled there for in the old Testament the law was more urged and there were many parts thereof the Gospel was then more obscure Contrariwise the new Testament or Covenant is for the most part taken for the Gospel because in the new Testament a great part of Moses law is abrogated and the manifestation and knowledge of the Gospel is to us more cleer and ample Quest 19. Whence knowest thou this Ans Out of the Gospel which God first made known in Paradise a Gen. 3.15 and afterwards did spread it abroad by the Patriarks b Gen. 22.18 12.3 49.10 and Prophets c Isa 5.3 42.1 2 3 4. 43.25 45.5 6 22 23. Jer. 23.56 31.32 33 33.39 40 41. Mic. 7.18 19 20. Acts 10.34 3.22 23 24. Rom. 1.2 Heb. 1.1 shadowed it by sacrifices and other ceremonies of the law d Heb. 10.7 Col. 2.17 John 5.46 and lastly accomplished it by his only begotten Son e Rom. 10.4 Gal. 4.4 3.24 Col. 2.17 The Explication The order correspondence of this question in the second part of the Catechism which the third question in the first part thereof THis nineteenth Question of the Catechisme which is concerning the Gospel is like to the third For as there it is demanded Whence knowest thou thy misery and answer is made Out of the Law So here the Question is Whence knowest thou thy delivery the answer hereof is Out of the Gospel Seeing then it hath been already spoken of the Mediatour we are necessarily also to speak of the doctrine in which the Mediatour is declared described and offered unto us that doctrine is the Gospel Afterwards we are also to speak of the mean whereby wee are made partakers of the Mediatour and his benefits that mean is faith First therefore the common place concerning the Gospel cometh to be handled which is fitly annexed to the former doctrine concerning the Mediatour and Covenant between God and men 1. Because Christ the Mediatour is the subject or matter of the Gospel which teacheth who and what manner of Mediatour this is 2. Because he is the author and publisher of the same for it is part of the Mediatours office to publish the Gospel as it is said The only begotten John 1.8 which is in the bosome of the Father he hath declared him 3. Because the Gospel is a part of the Covenant and the new Covenant is often taken for the Gospel The principall Questions are 1. What the Gospel is 2. Whether it be any new doctrine 3. How it differeth from the Law 4. What are the proper effects of the Gospel 5. Whence the truth and certainty of the Gospel may appear 1. What the Gospel is Three significations of the word Gospel THe Greek word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for which wee use Gospel signifieth 1. A joyfull message or news 2. The sacrifice which is offered to God for this joyfull news 3. The reward which is given to him who bringeth glad tidings Here it is taken for the doctrine or joyfull newes of Christ exhibited in th flesh Luke 2.10 as Behold I bring you glad tidings of great joy because to you this day Christ is born There is a difference also to be observed between the words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is the promise of the Mediatour to be exhibited hereafter How the words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 sometimes differ in Scripture the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the tidings of the Messias already exhibited Neverthelesse this difference of these words is not perpetuall and it consisteth rather in the letter and words themselves then in the thing signified by the words for both of them declare the same benefits of the Messias but the difference is only in the circumstance of time and in the manner of his manifestation and exhibiting as
imparted by the Apostles and every one of them did bestow some part thereof but that cannot be proved This reason may be rendred thereof more probable that it was called a Symbole for that the Articles of faith are the square and rule whereunto the faith and doctrine of all orthodox or right beleeving Christians ought to agree and be conferred The Symbole is called Apostolick Two reasons why the Creed is called Apostolick Because it containeth the summe of the Apostolick doctrine which the Catechumenes were enforced to hold and professe Because the Apostles delivered that summe of doctrine to their Schollers and Disciples which the Church afterwards held as received from them This selfe same Symbole is called also Catholick because there is but one faith of all Christians Why it is called Catholick An answer to a question moved touching other Creeds Here some demand a reason Why after the Apostles Creed other Creeds as the Creed of the Councell of Nice Ephesus and Chalcedon with Athanasius his Creed were compiled and received in the Church Answ These Creeds properly are not others that is quite different in substance from the Apostolick Symbole but are onely a repetition and more ample declaration of this in all which certain words are added as an explication thereof by reason of Hereticks by whom because of the shortnesse thereof this was depraved there is no change either of the matter or of the doctrine but only of the form of declaring it as easily appeareth by comparing them together Other important and weighty causes there were which might compell the Bishops and Doctors of ancient Churches to compose and draw out these briefe compendious formes of confession especially the Church then increasing Four causes why other Creeds were made and received in the Church and heresies growing with and in the Church For instance in few That all both young and old might with more ease bear in minde the main and entire foundation of Christianity comprised in briefe That all might alwayes have in their sight and view the confession of their faith and consolation reaped thence knowing what that doctrine is for which persecution is to be sustained So God in times past made a short summary abstract of his law and promises that all might have it as a rule of life and ground of consolation obvious to their eyes That the faithfull might have a peculiar badge and cognisan whereby to be distinguished both then and in all future ages from infidels and hereticks which with wily glosing sophismes corrupt the writings of the Prophets and Apostles for which very cause also these Confessions were intituled Symboles 4. That there might be some perpetuall rule extant in publike plain briefe and easie to be known whereby to examine all manner of doctrine and interpretation of Scripture to approve and ratifie whatsoever accordeth therewith and refuse and disanull the contrary The Apostolick Creed preferred above other Creeds because 1. The phrase of it is most proper 2. The time most ancient 3. The copy most authenticall Notwithstanding the Apostles Creed far surpasseth the rest in authority 1. Because for the most part it literally consisteth of the proper words and phrases of Scripture 2. Because it is of greater antiquity then other Creeds and was delivered first unto the Church by the Apostles themselves or by their disciples and schollers and since them successively from hand to hand transferred unto us their posterity 3. Because it is the fountaine and originall draught even an authenticall rule of direction to other Creeds which for illustration of this to prevent the fraudulent sleights and forged corruption of hereticks have in universall and generall Synods or Councels been published and authorised by the whole joint-consent of the Church The certainty of this Creed dependeth not on the authority and arbitrement of men or definitive sentence of Councels but on the perpetuall concordance of holy Scripture with them and of the whole Church since the Apostles time retaining and holding fast the Apostles doctrine and testifying to all posterity that they received this doctrine at the Apostles mouthes and the mouthes of their hearers which consent is obvious to any man that daigneth to view it with both eyes and weigh it considerately For certain it is that no Congregation of Angels nor conventicle of men hath any power of instituting new lawes touching the worship of God or new Articles of faith binding the conscience for this is a work proper unto God Neither may we beleeve God for the testimony of the Church but the Church for the testimony of God This doctrine touching the causes and authority of divers Creeds is borrowed out of Ursinus Admonit Neustad de Concordia Burgens written Anno Dom. 1581. where young Divines may if they list reade a large discourse touching the truth and authority of Ecclesiasticall Writers learnedly discussed from 117. page unto the 142. page of the said Tract a briefe Type and Table whereof I have here decyphered THE TABLE The writings touching the doctrine of the Church are 1. Divine that is inspired immediately by God into the hearts of the Prophets and Apostles such as are the Canonicall books of the old and new Testament These alone are simply in their sentences and words full of divine inâ—piration and worthy credit and therefore are the sole rule of tryall unto all others 2. Ecclesiasticall that is written by the Doctors of the Church these are 1. Publick to wit written in the common name of the whole Church which again are subdivided into writings 1. Catholick I meane Creeds and Confessions written in the name and with the full consent of the whole orthodox right beleeving Church received and allowed by the authority thereof such as are The Apostles Creed The Creeds of the Councels of Nice ConstaÌ„tinople Chalcedon Athanasius his Creed 2. Particular namely the Confessions of certain Churches and Councels as divers Catechismes and the Augustanâ— Confession 2. Private that is written in the name and by the advice of some one private man or more as Common places Commentaries and such like ON THE 8. SABBATH Quest 24. Into how many parts is the Creed divided Answ Into three parts The first is of God the eternall Father and our Creation The second of God the Son and our Redemption The third of God the holy Ghost and our Sanctification The Explication THe principall parts of the Apostolick Creed are three 1. Of God the Father and our Creation 2. Of God the Son and our Redemption 3. Of God the holy Ghost and our Sanctification that is of the works of our Creation Redemption and Sanctification Ob. 1. Unto the Father is ascribed the Creation of heaven and earth unto the Son the Redemption of mankind unto the holy Ghost Sanctification Therefore the Son and the holy Ghost did not create heaven and earth How our Creation Redemption Sanctification are each appropriated to some one person of the
Trinity and yet all three persons have their joynt-working in them neither did the Father and the holy Ghost redeem mankind neither do the Father and the Son sanctifie the faithfull Ans It is a fallacie grounding upon that which is affirmed but in respect as if it were simply affirmed For the Creation is given to the Father Redemption to the Son Sanctification to the holy Ghost not as they are simply an operation or work for so should the other two persons be excluded from it but in respect of the order and manner of working which is peculiar and proper to every of them in producing and bringing forth the same externall work A more open declaration hereof may be this The works of our creation redemption and sanctification are the operations of the Godhead outwardly that is externall operations which God worketh on his creatures and they are undivided that is common to the three persons which they by common will and power work in the creatures by reason of that one and the same essence and nature of the Godhead which they have For the Scripture attributeth the Creation not onely to the Father but to the Sonne also and the holy Ghost All things were made by it John 1.3 Genes 1.2 Matth. 1.20 Psal 33.6 The Spirit of the Lord moved upon the waters That which is conceived in her is of the holy Ghost By the Word of the Lord were the heavens made and all the hosts of them by the breath of his mouth Likewise our Redemption is attributed to the Father and the holy Ghost John 3.17 Titus 3.5 6. God sent his Sonne into the world that the world might be saved by him Hee saved us by the renewing of the holy Ghost which hee shed on us abundantly And Sanctification both to the Father and to the Son God hath sent the Spirit of his Sonne into our hearts crying Gal. 4.6 1 Thess 5.23 1 Cor. 1.30 Ephes 5.26 Abba Father The very God of peace sanctifie you throughout Christ is made sanctification unto us Christ sanctifieth the Church All the persons therefore create redeem and sanctifie Why distinct operations or workings are attributed to the three persons Neverthelesse yet in respect of that order of working which is between them Creation is ascribed unto the Father not excluding the other persons but because hee is the fountain as of the Divinity of the Son and the holy Ghost so also of those divine operations which hee worketh and performeth by the Sonne and the holy Ghost Redemption is ascribed unto the Sonne not excluding the other two persons but because he is that person which executeth the Fathers will concerning the redeeming of mankind and doth immediatly perform the work of our redemption for the Son only was sent into the flesh and hath paid the ransome or price for our sins not the Father nor the Spirit To the holy Ghost is ascribed Sanctification not excluding the other two persons from this action but because it doth immediatly sanctifie us Object 2. The externall workes of the Godhead that is such as the whole three persons exercise not mutually one towards another but execute in the creatures are indivisible or cannot be divided that is they are not appropriated unto any one of the three persons without respect unto the other But Creation Redemption and Sanctification are externall workes of the Godhead Therefore they are indivisible and by force of good consequent there needeth no such distinction of them as is proposed Answer to the Major The works of the Trinitie are indivisible but with retaining to each person his proper and peculiar manner of working All three persons therefore work on the creatures but yet that order still is inviolably kept as that the Father still is the fountaine of the operations of the Sonne and the holy Ghost and doth all things not of any other but of himselfe by the Sonne and the holy Ghost the Sonne doth all things of the Father by the holy Ghost the holy Ghost doth all things of the Father and the Sonne by himselfe For The Father createth but mediately by the Sonne and the holy Ghost the Sonne from the Father and the holy Ghost from the Father and the Sonne The Father and the holy Ghost redeeme us but mediately by the Sonne but the Sonne immediately from the Father by the holy Ghost The Father and the Sonne sanctifie us but mediately by the holy Ghost but the holy Ghost immediately from the Father and the Sonne But as concerning the works of the Trinitie which are called outward and inward works it shall be more fully enlarged when wee come to handle the last Question save one of the doctrine touching GOD. a Deut. 6.4 Isa 44.6 45.5 1 Cor. 8.4 6. Ephes 4.6 Quest 25. Seeing there is but one only substance of God why namest thou these three the Father the Son and the holy Ghost Answ Because God hath so manifested himself in his word b Gen. 1.2 3. Psalm 33.6 Isa 6.1 3. 48.16 61.1 Mat. 3.16 17. 28.19 John 12.40 14.26 15.26 2 Cor. 13.13 Gal. 4.6 Ephes 2.18 Tit. 3.5 6. 1 John 5.7 that these three distinct persons are that one true and everlasting God The Explication IN this Question is contained the doctrine of the Church concerning one God Questions concerning God and the three persons of the Godhead The principall questions therein are 1. Whence it may appeare that there is a God 2. What hee is or what manner of God the God of the Church is whom wee worship and in what hee differeth from idols 3. Whether he be One only and in what sense there are said to be many gods 4. What the name of Essence Person and Trinity signifie and how they differ 5. Whether these names are to be used in the Church and whether they are had in the Scripture 6. How many persons there be of the God-head 7. How they differ and are to be distinguished one from another 8. For what cause it is necessary that the Doctrine of the Trinity bee held in the Church 1. Whether there be a God and whence it appeareth THe great misery of mans nature cannot be sufficiently thought upon that whereas it was created to the bright knowledge and even the very image of God it is fallen so far as not only it is ignorant who and what God is but also maketh disputation Three causes which have made men to doubt whether there be a God whether there be any God in heaven or no. The causes of this evill the Church alone doth understand the first whereof is The blindnesse and corruption of mans nature after his fall the next The instigation of the divell who would have the whole opinion of God razed out of the minds of men unto which cometh the horrible confusion of mans life and humane affairs in that oftentimes the wicked flourish and the godly either are oppressed by them
working and effecting any thing is so in God onely that there is not the least ability or efficacy of any creature but what he continually imparteth and preserveth at his pleasure and therefore the power of God is to be considered of us not as being idle but as creating sustaining moving and ruling all things The reasons are 1. God is the first cause of all things therfore he hath all things in his power and their ability is so much as he giveth unto them 2. He doth such things as can be done by no created and finite power as are the creation and governing of all things the preservation of common-weals the deluge the delivery out of Egypt and all his miracles 3 Hee is unchangeable therefore in him to be able to do and to do is the same which to will and so of the contrary But although all men affirme God to be omnipotent yet there is a double difference between the sacred doctrine of the Church Two differences between the doctrine of the Church and Philosophy in conceiving of Gods omnipotency and Philosophy concerning Gods omnipotency For 1. Without the doctrine of the Church men only know the universall and generall power of God whereby hee createth preserveth and governeth the whole world but they know not that power whereby he saveth men and restoreth the world by his Son gathering and preserving an everlasting Church and delivering it from sin and death and endowing it with life and glory everlasting by which works God especially sheweth forth his power as it is said Yet a little while and I shall shake the heavens and the earth and the sea Hagg. 2.7 and the drie land 2. Neither do they professe of the generall power of God so much as is sufficient for albeit they are enforced to confesse that God is the author and preserver of the world yet are they not able to say that all things were created of nothing by the word of God alone and forasmuch as they are ignorant of the cause of sin and confusion they cannot affirm all things so to be administred and governed by Gods omnipotency as that all which is good is done by the powerfull working of Gods will but they attribute many things to chance fortune and humane wisdome or vertue and so imagine the power of God to be idle in these and doing nothing Furthermore That God cannot either sin or will and allow of sin or be changed or diminished or suffer any thing or make things done undone or will things flat repugnant and contradictory or create another God or some nature equall to himselfe or be perceived by bodily senses or do other things proper to a created or finite nature or admit the same into himselfe this doth not diminish or weaken but rather augment and strengthen his power For that is the greatest and most perfect power which can neither be destroyed nor weakened nor diminished and that none sustaining it but only by it selfe But contrariwise to be able to be corrupted and impaired is a token of imbecility and imperfection Gods exceeding wisdom whereby both he knoweth all things perfectly and is the fountain of all knowledge and understanding Of exceeding and immense wisdome That wee may rightly and with profit and commodity know the power of God it is necessary not to consider it but as it is joyned with his immense wisdome and goodnesse which moderateth it Further of his divine wisdome we learn 1. That God doth of himself in one act or view under stand and behold perpetually and most perfectly in marvellous manner and that unknown to us himselfe and the whole order of his minde declared in the nature of things and in his word and what agreeth therewith and disagreeth and all his works and all the works of all creatures past present and to come and all the causes and circumstances of all things 2. That all Angels and men have no more knowledge of divine and humane matters then God doth work and maintain in their mindes for among other things the most beautifull and sightly order which is in the nature of things the ends and uses of all things the signification of future events arts and sciences the everting and overturning of those devices which the divell and wicked men have most craftily contrived against God and all the godly doe enforce all men to confesse that these things could not proceed but from a most wise artificer and author Wherefore also the Scripture it selfe willeth us to consider the wisdome of God shining in these his works Eccles 3.11 Isa 44.7 God hath made every thing beautifull in his time Who is like mee that shall call and shall declare it and set it in order before me since I appointed the ancient people He taketh the wise in their craftinesse Job 5.13 and of these it concludeth that the wisdome of God is immense and unconceivable Psalm 147.5 Rom. 11.33 as His wisdome is infinite O the deepnesse of the riches both of the wisdome and knowledge of God! But here again is to be observed a difference between Philosophy and the word of God 1. That even in the creation the known or legall wisdome was darkned and maimed in men through sin and therefore needeth a renewing by the word delivered to the Church 2. That men without this heavenly doctrine are altogether ignorant of the especiall wisdome of God revealed in the Gospel whereby hee saveth the Church gathered from amongst mankind by the Son as it is said I give thee thanks O Father because thou hast hid these things from the wise and men of understanding Matth. 21.25 and hast opened them unto babes Good Six significations of the goodnesse of God in Scripture Psalm 106.1 143.10.1 John 1.5 The goodnesse of God signifieth sometimes his bountifulnesse as Praise the Lord because he is good sometimes all the vertues and whatsoever is spoken of the nature of God as Let thy Spirit lead me through the right way That which also is meant by the name of holinesse or sanctity and light So in this place by the name of goodnesse are understood 1. All those things which are attributed to God in his word and are represented and resembled in his image as those things which are termed good in Angles and men as life power wisdom joy righteousnesse c. For such is the nature of God as it hath manifested it self in the Law and Gospel and the goodnesse of the reasonable creature is an image of the divine goodnesse and therefore here also differ Philosophy and the Scripture in that Philosophy attributeth onely to God that his goodnesse which was opened in the Law and yet neither that wholly but of his goodnesse revealed in the Gospel it is altogether ignorant 2. By reason of the great and huge difference between the Creator and the creature we understand those good things to be in God which are agreeing to his divine nature
Person no separate thing from the essence That the persons are not any thing separated from the essence which is common unto them nor the essence is any fourth thing separate from the three persons but each of them are the very selfe same whole essence of the Divinity But the difference is this that the persons are each distinct from the other but the essence is common to them three And that the person is no other thing subsisting or other substance then the essence may be understood in some sort by the example of a man One and the same man or one and the same substance is a father and a man or a son and a man and yet the manhood or to be a man is one thing the fatherhood or to be a father another but there is not one subsistent which is the father and another subsistent which is a man but one and the same subsistent is both because both manhood and fatherhood is in him manhood absolutely fatherhood respectively as in regard of his son What reference essence hath unto person Of the word Essence also it is further to be noted that God or the Deity or divine essence is not in respect of the persons the same which the matter in respect of the effect because God is unchangeable neither is compounded of matter and form Therefore we cannot say well Three persons are or consist of one essence Neither is it as the whole in respect of the parts because God is indivisible Wherefore it is not well said that the person is a part of the essence or the essence consisteth of three persons for every person is the whole divine essence one and the same Neither is it as the generall to the speciall because essence is not the generall to the three persons nor person a speciall to essence But God is a more common name because the essence of the Deity is common to the three persons and therefore may be affirmed of each of them But these names Father Son and holy Ghost are more strict because the persons are indeed distinct and cannot be affirmed the one of the other Therefore it is well said God or the divine Essence is the Father is the Son is the holy Ghost Likewise The three persons are one God or in one God Again They are one and the same essence nature divinity wisdome c. They are of one and the same essence nature divinity c. Yet it cannot be well said They are of one God because there is no one of these persons but is whole and perfect God Wherefore the divine essence is in respect of the persons as a thing after a rare and singular manner communicated in respect of those things unto which it is common For neither is there the like example of community in any created things For a generall is a certain thing common to many specials and a generall and speciall to many individuals but yet so that they are affirmed of those many plurally not singularly as that the father and the son or this father and son are two living creatures two men But we may not speak after this sort of God and the divine persons as to say The Father and the Son are two Gods two Spirits two Omnipotents c. Because there is but one God one Spirit one Omnipotent c. Wherefore that affirmation The Father is God the Son is God the holy Ghost is God is a true affirmation affirming that which is more common of a thing which is more restrict that is affirming the essence of the individuall which hath in some sort an analogy and proportion only with the speciall affirmed of his individuall but it is not at all the same nor of the same kind What the Trinity is By the name of Trinity are understood the three Persons distinct in one essence of the Deity by three manners of being or subsisting Now Trinity and Triplicity as also Trinall and Triple differ That is said to be Triple which is comprehended of three essences or is distinct by three essences Trinall is that which in essence is but one and most simple but hath three manners of being of subsisting God therefore is not triple because there are not more essences but Trinall because he being one according to his essence is three according to his persons 5. Whether these names are to be used in the Church HEreticks of ancient carped at these termes because they occurre not in Scripture But wee imitate aright the manner of speech which was usuall in the ancient and purer Church and by their authority and example retain these names 1. Because though they are not found extant in so many syllables yet phrases and speeches of neer affinity and likelihood yea and sometimes words and terms of the same signification which these are are read in Scripture For instance that of the Lords own mouth I am that I am Again I am hath sent mee unto you Again Exod. 3. â—â— it cannot be denied but that the word Jehovah answereth to that wee call essence So the word Hypostasis is used to signifie a Person in the Epistle to the Hebrewes Who being the engraved form of his person Heb. 1.2 Neither doth the Church in any other sense call the persons the Trinity then as John saith that There are three which bear record in heaven the Father the Word and the holy Ghost 2. Because the course of interpretation requireth that the words of Scripture be expounded to the learned by such words as being more usuall in other languages or matters and doctrines are more easie for them to understand and paveth and maketh plain a way unto them for the understanding of the speech and phrase of Scripture Otherwise if no words were to be used but such as are extant in the Scriptures all interpretation should be taken away It is lawfull therefore that the Church invent and use words and phrases of speech whereby they may significantly expresse the sense of Scripture and their owne meaning 3. Because the sleights and sophisms of Hereticks which for the most part they go about to cloak and cover with the words of the holy Scripture are more easily espyed and taken heed of if the same things be expounded in divers words and those especially short perspicuous and significant For it cometh to passe that by reason of the pithinesse and plainnesse of these terms Hereticks are dismantled and can no longer shroud their sinister constructions and apparent corruptions Neverthelesse if there were a consent and agreement on the things wee should easily come to an agreement about the words for we detest contention brawling about words Neither is the Church at controversie with other Gentiles and Hereticks about bare terms but of this main substantiall doctrine That the eternall Father and the Son and the holy Ghost are one God and yet neither is the Father the Son or the holy Ghost nor the holy Ghost the
Father or the Son c. Now were it not that Hereticks cannot away with this doctrine they would easily admit of the phrases of speech But they therefore abandon the terms because they abhor the things and doctrine intimated and signified by them Hence we easily answer this their objection Obj. Words not extant in Scripture are not to be used in the Church But these names namely Essence Person and Trinity occurre not in Scripture therefore they may not be used in the Church Ans We expound the Major thus That which is not in Scripture neither concerning the bare words nor concerning the sense is be omitted But the names themselves of Essence Person and Trinity as concerning the things lively insinuated by them are extant in Scripture as hath been proved Again Terms not extant in Scripture are to be omitted if by sparing them the substance of the things themselves be not endangered But the drift and purpose of hereticks is no other but with the terms to abolish or at least deprave the doctrine of the Church Therefore they are to be retained to prevent their attempts Repl. But they breed contentions Answ This happeneth by accident by reason of contentious hereticks 6. How many persons there be of the Divinity or God-head Three persons are one God and one God is three persons IN one divine Essence are subsisting three Persons and those truly distinct one from another by their properties namely the Father the Son and the holy Ghost each of which three persons notwithstanding are one and the same God eternall infinite and most perfect in himselfe And these persons are consubstantiall co-eternall without any confounding of their properties and respects as also without any disparagement or inequality between them And That there are three persons each of which are that one true God Creatour of all things is proved 1. By testimonies of Scripture which are taken partly out of the old Testament and partly out of the new The old Testament yeeldeth us many testimonies Gen. 1.2 3. Exod. 3.2 The Spirit of the Lord moved upon the waters Then God said Let there be light The Lord is said to have appeared unto Moses in a flame of fire out of the midst of a bush Acts 7.30 Steven calleth him The Angel of the Lord which is Christ the Son of God even that Angel of the great counsell The Spirit of the Lord God is upon me Isa 61.1 therefore hath he anointed me he hath sent mee to preach good tidings unto the poor to binde up the broken hearted Here the Spirit is discerned both from him that anointeth and from him that is anointed Hee is discerned also by his gifts because hee saith Upon mee that is dwelling in me sanctifying mee Therefore these be three diverse persons subsisting But yet there are both moe and more cleer testimonies in the new Testament Mat. 28.19 Teach all nations baptising them in the Name of the Father and the Son and the holy Ghost The Comforter which is the holy Ghost John 14.26 John 15.27 whom the Father will send in my name When the Comforter shall come whom I will send unto you from the Father even the Spirit of truth which proceedeth of the Father The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ 2 Cor. 13.13 and the love of God and the communion of the holy Ghost be with you all In this saying of the Apostle invocation is joyned with an application and distinction of the three persons By grace he meaneth the benefits of Christ by love the acceptation whereby God for his Sons sake doth receive us into favour by the communion of the holy Ghost his gifts which are common unto the godly There are three in heaven which beare record God saved us by the washing of the new birth 1 John 5.7 Tâ—t 3.5 6. and by the renewing of the holy Ghost which he shed on us abundantly through Jesus Christ our Saviour Here he maketh three authours of our salvation Ephes 2.18 Gal. 4.6 Through him wee have an entrance unto the Father by one Spirit God hath sent forth the Spirit of his Son into our hearts Therefore it is one Spirit which the Father and the Son sendeth 2. The same is proved by those places of Scripture which give unto these three the Father the Son and the holy Ghost the name of Jehovah and the true God In like manner those places wherein those things which are spoken of Jehovah in the old Testament are in the new referred expresly and most plainly to the Son and the holy Ghost 3. Those places which attribute the same whole divine essence to the three and shew that the Son is the proper Son of the Father most truly begotten of him and the holy Ghost is the Spirit of the Father and the Son and that so proper and peculiar as that he is and proceedeth of God which is the Father and the Son The Son therefore and holy Ghost have the same and that whole essence of the Deity which the Father hath the Son hath it communicated of the Father by being born of him and the holy Ghost of the Father and the Son by proceeding from them 4. Those places which give unto the three the same attributes or properties and perfections of the divine nature namely eternity immensity omnipotency c. 5. Those places which attribute to the three the same effects or works proper unto the Deity namely creation preservation and government of the world as also miracles and the salvation of the Church 6. Those places which yeeld to the three equall honour and worship and such as agreeth to the true God alone By this consent therefore of the old and new Testament it is confirmed that one God is three persons truly distinct and those three persons are one God By this also we understand that it is truely said that the Father is other from the Son and the holy Ghost and the holy Ghost other from both but not truly that the Father is another thing from the Son and the Son another thing and the holy Ghost another thing for to be another thing betokeneth a diversity of essence to be other a diverse manner of existing or a distinction of persons Now the three distinct persons have not a diverse Deity but one and the same in number It followeth that we should demonstrate of each severall person of the Deity that they are true Subsistents against Samosatenus and Servetus that they are distinct against Arrius Eunomius and Macedonius lastly that they are of the same and not of only like essence against the same hereticks But of the person of the Father there is no controversie and these scruples and doubts touching the persons of the Son and holy Ghost shall more conveniently hereafter in their proper place be cleared 7. How the three persons of the God-head are distinguished HEre we are first to observe and consider Attributes common to
Creation of the world and the principall Questions of Creation are these 1. Whether the world was created of God 2. How it was created 3. For what cause it was created 1. Whether the world was created of God Five significations of the word world FIrst the words and terms are to be understood The name of the world is diversly used in the Scripture 1. It signifieth the universall frame of all things namely heaven and earth and all things which are in them visible and invisible besides God himself The world was made by him John 1.10 2. Worldly concupiscence 3. All mankind 4. The wicked or those that are not regenerate in the world 5. The elect That the world might beleeve John 17.9 21. John 3.16 So God loved the world Here we consider it in the first sense To create signifieth three things To create signifieth 1. To ordain or constitute as the Latines used it Creare Consulem to create a Consull 2. To make something of nothing without any motion with a beck or word only so it is taken in this place 3. The continuating of creation or creation continued which is the providence of God The creation of the world proved That the world hath not been from everlasting but had when it seemed best to the Creatour according to his eternall counsell and will a beginning once and was created of that only true God who hath manifested himself in the Church that he is the eternall Father and Son and holy Ghost wee know By testimonies of Scripture By testimonies of holy Scripture as by the whole history of the creation set down by Moses Likewise Psal 33.6 9. Psal 104. 113. 124. 136. 146. Isa 44. Acts 4.17 out of other testimonies of Scripture very many By the word of the Lord were the heavens made and all the hoste of them by the breath of his mouth Hee spake and it was done hee commanded and it stood or was created There are other places also in the Psalmes where more largely and amply the wonderfull works of God and the principall parts of the world created by God are proposed to be considered of us that through the consideration thereof wee may learn to put our trust and confidence in God For this purpose did the Lord himself propose unto Job his marvellous and incomprehensible works conspicuous in heaven and earth Job 38. 39. and other things also created by him to declare his justice power and providence 2. By reasons Furthermore besides testimonies of Scripture almost innumerable it is confirmed also by firm and true reasons that the world was created of God such as these following 1. The originals and beginnings of nations and people shew it which could not be fained of Moses when as some remembrance and memoriall of them was then extant amongst many which yet in processe of time perished 2. The novelty and latenesse of all other histories compared with the antiquity and ancientnesse of the sacred story 3. The age of man decreasing which sheweth that there mas greater strength in nature at the first and that not without some first cause it hath decreased hitherto 4. The certain course and race of times even from the beginning of the world unto the exhibiting of the Messias 5. The constitution and founding of common-weals 6. The order of things instituted in nature which must needs have been produced and framed by some intelligent mind far superiour to all things 7. The excellency of the minde of men and Angels These intelligent mindes have a beginning Therefore they have it from some intelligent cause 8. The principles or generall rules and naturall notions ingenerated in our minds 9. The trembling of conscience in the wicked 10. The ends of all things profitably and wisely ordained therefore by some cause understanding and ordaining them 11. Lastly Those other arguments and reasons also which prove that there is a God prove in like manner that the world was created of God 3 Naturall reasons Thirdly besides these reasons it may be enforced by philosophicall arguments drawn out of the bosome of nature That the world was created and that it was created of God although by them we are not able to demonstrate the time when it was created For 1. There is no infinite processe in nature of causes and effects for if so nature should never attain unto her end even the producing of effects Therefore this world had a beginning 2. The noblest and excellentest of all effects is the world Therefore it proceedeth from the noblest and excellentest cause which is God How the creation is unknown to Philosophers Other questions as Whether the world was created from everlasting or in time that is Whether it be an effect of equall perpetuity with his cause and so co-eternall or Whether it once so began to be that before it had no being Again Whether if sometimes it were not yet it was necessary that it should be created And Whether it shall endure for ever And if it endure Whether it shall remain the same or it is to be changed These and such like questions cannot be decided by Philosophy The reason is because all these things depend upon the meer will of God the first mover of all things who doth nothing of necessity but with most absolute freedome Now this his will is not known to any creature but to whomsoever God himselfe revealeth it Therefore it is not manifested to heathenish Philosophers but declared to the Church alone for they cannot possibly collect any thing hereof by proceeding from a continuing effect unto his cause It followeth indeed that there is some cause of those effects but it followeth not that those effects were produced of that cause either at this or that time or from all eternity because a free agent may either act or suspend his action at his pleasure The whole demonstration hereof is thus brought in form No effect depending onely of such a cause as worketh freely or contingently can be demonstrated by that cause But the creation of the world is such an effect Therefore the creation of the world cannot be demonstrated by the will of God the first mover of all things that it either was made from everlasting or in some beginning of time Arguments of Philosophers against the creation of the world Now whatsoever arguments are brought of Philosophers against the creation of the world it is easie to perceive that these were not framed out of true Philosophy but by the imaginations of men if the order of the generation and mutation of things instituted in nature which was created of God be discerned from creation Object 1. It is absurd say the Philosophers to imagine that God is idle Ans Nay rather it is absurd to term him idle who administreth and ruleth the world Repl. This I grant but he could not govern the world when as yet the world was not
and is called Annointed hee is in respect of those three called Annointed But the Mediatour which was called Messias or Annointed was to be the chiefe Prophet Priest and King of the Church Therefore hee is in respect of those three called Annointed or Christ Againe the same is shewed by many places of Scripture Joh. 7.28 6.38 I came not of my selfe c. I came down from heaven not to doe mine own will Heb. 5.5 but his will which hath sent me Christ took not to himselfe this honour to be made the High Priest but hee that said unto him Thou art my Son this day begate I thee c. The Lord swore Psal 11.4 Heb. 13.8 Rev. 13.8 1 Cor. 1.30 thou art a Priest for ever after the order of Melchisedeck Jesus Christ yesterday and to day the same is also for ever The Lambe slain from the beginning of the world Christ is made of God unto us wisedome and righteousnes and sanctification and redemption So he is often called the Angel of the covenant sent of old unto the Church 2. He is called Annointed in respect of the gifts of the holy Ghost which were poured on him thick abundantly and most perfectly that is all the gifts and graces whatsoever are in all the blessed Angels and Men and those in the most excellent and high degree that he might be sufficient for the restoring ruling preserving of his Church and for administring of the government of the whole world and for the directing thereof to the safety and salvation of his Church God giveth him not the spirit by measure Wherefore God John 3.34 Heb. 2.9 Esay 61.1 thy God hath annointed thee with the oyle of gladnesse above thy fellowes The Spirit of the Lord is upon mee Therefore hath the Lord annointed mee The annointing therefore is of the whole person yet with this difference That it is so applied to both natures as it signifieth the ordaining of them to the Mediatourship For he is Mediatour according to both natures who was alwaies present with his Church Christ is annointed in respect of his humanity not of his Godhead in respect whereof he is annointer even before the flesh was born But as his annointing designeth the communicating of the gifts of the holy Ghost so his humane nature only is meant to be annointed For his Godhead because it is alwaies in it selfe goodnesse most perfect and passing measure is not annointed but annointeth and filleth with gifts and graces both his owne humanity which his Godhead doth personally inhabit as also the Elect and chosen Wherefore one and the same Christ in respect of his divers natures is both annointed and annointer as raiser and raised For the Father annointeth with the holy Ghost but by the Lord So that Irenaeus saith pretily Lib. 3. cap. 20. That by the name of annointing was comprised and understood the three persons of the Godhead The annointer the Father the annointed the Son and the annointing which is the holy Ghost Ob. But it is nowhere read Christ annointed spiritually that Christ was annointed Ans Christ was not annointed typically ceremonially or sacramentally but really and spiritually that is hee received the thing it self which was prefigured and signified by the ceremoniall annointing which was the holy Ghost as it is said Wherefore God thy God hath annointed thee with the oyle of gladnesse above thy fellowes Psal 45.8 Heb. 1.9 Esay 61.1 The spirit of the Lord is upon me Therefore hath the Lord annointed me As therefore it was meet that Christ should be a Prophet a priest and a King not typicall but the very signified and true that is the great and high Prophet Priest and King so it was necessary that he should be annointed not with typicall oyle but with the signified and true oyle which was the holy Ghost For such as the office was such should the annointing be But the office was not typicall but the very thing it selfe Therefore such also shold the annointing be Hence we learne and understand these two things 1. That Christ hath his name not from the ceremoniall annointing Christ hath his name not from the ceremoniall annointing but from the thing thereby signified but from the thing it selfe which was thereby signified because hee is that chiefe and high Prophet Priest and King whom as types the Prophets Priests and Kings of the Old Testament which were wont to be annointed with externall oyle did represent The name therefore of the signe or type that is annointed is transferred to the thing it selfe even to the High Priest Prophet and King Jesus 2. That there is a great difference betweene this Jesus Annnointed and the Annointed of the Old Testament Three differences between Christ annointed and the annointed of the Old Testament For 1. They were onely certaine types and shadowes of this only chiefe and true Christ that is of this King Prophet and Priest Wherefore necessary was it that they should yeeld and give place to him being once exhibited For the thing it selfe being come and exhibited the types cease 2. The annointing that is the communicating of the gifts of the holy Ghost in the typicall Annointed was imperfect and weake But in Jesus Christ it is perfect and exceeding great For in him dwelleth the fulnesse of the Godhead personally so that hee is both the Annointed Colos 2.9 and Annointer 3. Hee onely hath received all the gifts of the holy Ghost and those many waies more excellent than they are found in all the Angels and Men because he had them in the highest both number and degree Of his fulnesse have all we received John 1.16 1 Cor. 12.11 Ephes 4.7 But the Annointed of the Old Testament received neither all the gifts neither in the highest degree but divided and according to the measure of the gift of Christ some more some fewer and some greater gifts than some much lesse were they able by their own power and vertue to work the same in others Object God cannot be annointed Christ is God Therefore hee could not be annointed no not with the prefigured or signified oyle Answ In some respect wee grant this whole reason Why God cannot be said to be annointed For Christ as touching his Godhead cannot be annointed with the gifts of the holy Ghost 1. Because not one jot of the gifts of the holy Ghost can be added to the Godhead because of the exceeding perfection thereof 2. Because the holy Ghost by whom the annointing is immediately administred is the proper spirit of Christ no lesse proceeding from him than from the Father Wherefore he as he is God hath not any thing from the holy Ghost neither doth he receive him which is already his owne from any other but giveth him unto others whom it pleaseth him As also no man can give thee thy spirit which is in thee because that which thou already hast cannot be given unto thee Repl. According
workes of both creations Whatsoever things the Father doth the same things doth the Son also The Father sheweth him all things whatsoever hee himselfe doth Therefore not only the workes of the second creation but also of the first creation preservation and administration of the world In the same place it is said As the Father quickneth so the Son quickneth whom he will But the Father was from the very beginning the giver of corporall and spirituall life By him were all things created which are in heaven and which are on earth things visible and invisible whether they be thrones Coâ— 1.16 17. or dominions or principalities or powers all things were created by him and for him And he is before all things and in him all things consist Thus far of the first creation that which followeth speaketh of the second creation Repl. 1. All these speake of the instauration of the Church Ans No Because that comprehendeth also the Angels Repl. 2. The Angels also were restored by Christ and joyned to their head Ans But the new creation is called a restoring from sinnes and death to righteousnesse and life this agreeth not to the Angels Repl. 3. By whom also hee made the worlds Heb. 1.2 The worlds that is the new Church Ans 1. God made the old also by him because it is one Church having one head and foundation 2. The Greek word ' 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is used in that place signifieth in Scripture the world not the Church And further when it is there added Bearing up all things by his mighty word those words speake of the preservation not onely of the Church but of all things And moreover hee rendreth a cause why hee is the heire not onely of the Church but of all creatures namely because he is the Creator and Preserver of all things Thou Lord in the beginning hast established the earth and the heavens are the worke of thine hands Repl. In these wordes hee converteth his speech to the Father to prove that hee was able by his power to lift up the Sonne to divine majesty Answ This is an impudent shift and elusion 1. Because it is said before But unto the Son which appertaineth to both places of the Psalme cited by the Apostle 2. Because the Psalme doth intreat of Christs kingdom and therefore those words which there are spoken of the Lord are to be understood next and immediatly of his person secondarily and mediately of the Father Repl. 1. If hee made all things then the Father made them not by him John 5. â—9 Ans Both he made them and they were made by him Whatsoever things the Father doth the same doth the Sonne also And yet the Father doth them by him Repl. 2. The Creatour cannot be compared with the creatures But Christ is there compared with the Angels Therefore creation of things is not attributed unto Christ Answ Hee is not compared with the creatures in any proportion but without proportion This the place it selfe of the Psalme proveth The heavens shall perish but thou dost remanine Repl. 3. If hee were Creatour and equall with the Father hee could not sit at his right hand Ans Wee may invert this and say of the contrary rather if he were not equall he could not sit at his right hand Because none but the omnipotent and true God is able to administer the kingdome of heaven and earth Who being in the forme of God Phil. 2.6 Esay 45.23 Rom. 14.11 Esay 41.12 Rev. 1.18 22.23 thought it no robbery to be equall with God Thus saith the Lord that created heaven Every knee shall bow unto mee This is said of Christ Againe I am I am the first and I am the last My hand hath laid the foundation of the earth and my right hand hath spanned the heavens when I call them they stand up together These words Christ applyeth unto himselfe In it was life and the life was the light of men Wee interpret that the Sonne of God is by himselfe the life In the Word was life as is the Father and the fountaine giver and maintainer of all life as well corporall and temporall as spirituall and eternall in all from the very beginning of the world John 5.26 Hee hath given to the Sonne to have life in himselfe as the Father hath life in himselfe They construe it That the man Jesus is the quickner and giver of life because in him is the life of all that no man without him and all by him are saved These are their words Unto which we reply If hee give eternall life to all so that no man hath it without him Therefore either no man was quickned before he was born of Mary which were absurd or he was the quickner and giver of life from the beginning Even as John affirmeth this of him as being verified in him also before he was made flesh Neither can this be understood only of his merit whereby he deserveth this life for men For that life is in him signifieth that he is John 5.21 10.26 by his efficacy and effectuall working the quickner and reviver as himself expoundeth it and the adversaries themselves confesse So are we also to understand his illightning of men that is the knowledge of God the authour whereof he was in all even from the beginning as himselfe saith No man knoweth the Father but the Son and hee to whom the Son will reveale him And John Baptist saith Mat. 11.27 John 1.18 No man hath seen God at any time the Son hath declared him The light shineth in darknesse And the light shined in the darknesse and the darknesse comprehended it not Wee interpret it That this word even from the beginning hath both by naturall light and by the voice of heavenly doctrine shewed God unto men but those who were not regenerated by his Spirit have not knowne this light They say That he shined not before hee began to preach Ans 1. If so then should he not have been the true light that is the authour of light and the knowledge of God but only a minister thereof as was John Baptist but the Evangelist in this respect maketh John Baptist diverse from Christ 2. He should not have been the illuminaâ—or of all men which yet themselves are faine to confesse Christ himselfe saith of himselfe and Saint John here of him Hee lighteth every man that cometh into the world that is either with naturall light or spirituall Hee was in the world and the world was made by him and the world knew him not Wee as touching the time hereof say He was in the world it was from the beginning of the world unto his incarnation all which time the Son of God hath in the world which was created by him shewed God unto men but is not knowne of men They construe it of the time of his preaching when he was not heard but despised and persecuted Ans
servant for a witnesse of the things which should be spoken after But Christ is as the Sonne over his owne house John 17.2 As thou hast given him power over all flesh that he should give eternall life to all them that thou hast given him Therefore it is Christ who from the beginning of the world did reveale the will of God unto men appoint and ordain a ministery collect governe and save his Church wherefore he is the builder which seeing it is apparent that he hath done from the beginning of the Churches birth John 6.39 it is not to be doubted of that he hath alwaies been subsisting This is the Fathers will that of all which he hath given me I should lose nothing Wherefore hee saveth his Church and therefore hath alwayes been because the Church hath alwaies been saved and preserved To the eight Classe are those places referred 8. Classe The Angell spoken of in the Old Testament was Christ the Sonne of God Chap. 3.1 in which both the name and property of Jehovah are attributed unto the Angell who appeared in the Old Testament unto the Fathers and was the leader of the people whom to have been the Sonne of God Christ both the Church hath alwayes confessed and the Scripture doth witnesse it The Prophet Malachy hath a notable testimony Behold I will send my messenger and he shall prepare the way before me and the Lord whom yee seek shall speedily come to his temple even the messenger of the Covenant whom yee desire This speaketh Christ himselfe by the Prophet which is also confirmed by this argument Whose way is prepared he is Christ but he that promiseth is he whose way is prepared Therefore he that promiseth is Christ The Major is manifest for not the Father but Christ was looked for and he followed John Baptist The Minor is proved out of the text it selfe Behold I send my messenger and hee shall prepare the way before mee Wherefore Christ was before he tooke flesh because he sent his messenger and was also before he tooke flesh very God For he calleth flesh his temple to which hee saith he will come Flesh called the temple of God But none hath a temple builded in worship of him but God Therefore it is blasphemous to say that Christ was not before he tooke flesh Neither doth that hinder because he speaketh in the third person The Lord will come to his people For he sufficiently sheweth who that Lord is namely not the Father but the Son I the Lord who sent John before me and who am the messenger of the Covenant And further it may be that the Prophet doth not continue in makeing Christ speak but representeth the Father himselfe speaking of sending the Son Vnto the Son he saith O God thy throne is for ever and ever Christ Jesus is the Apostle and High Priest Psal 45.6 Heb. 1.8 3.3 13.8 Two reasons proâ—ing that that Angell was Christ the builder heire and Lord of his Church Jesus Christ yesterday and to day and the same is also for ever The argument therefore is this The Messenger or the Angell sent of old unto the Church was a subsistent or person That Messenger is the Sonne of God Christ Therefore the Sonne of God was before Jesus was borne of the Virgin truely existing did worke and was ruler over his Church The Minor is proved 1. Because To be God and To be sent of God for to teach collect governe and save the Church that is to be the Mediatour are things proper unto the Son of God Christ not to the Father or the holy Ghost Exod. 3. 4. Gen. 32.28 30. 48.15 16. But these properties of the Son are attributed to this Messenger or Angel as authour and effecter 2. The Apostle Paul teacheth Christ to have been present with the people of Israel in the Desart and to have bin tempted and provoked by them 1 Cor. 10.1 Therefore the Messenger or Angel God and Christ are one and the same person 9. Classe The divine nature in Christ both was before the flesh and is the Son of God In the ninth Classe are contained those testimonies of Scripture which affirme Christ Jesus to be by nature God and the Son of God The argument is this Christs Divinity existed before Jesus borne of the Virgin Christs Divinity is the Sonne of God Therefore the Sonne of God existed before Jesus was borne The Major of this argument is confirmed by the reasons already alledged For 1. God is manifested in the flesh which he tooke 2. Christ is the proper or naturall Son of God and not man only 3. Christ is the Word 4. Christ is the Wisedome subsisting 5. Christ is the Mediatour 6. Christ is that Messenger or Angel sent of old unto his Church 7. In Christ is not any created God-head but that eternall Deity which alone is true God For unto Christ not only the name Rom. â— 5 1 Tim. 3.16 2 John 5.2 Esay 9.6 Jerem. 23.6 but all the properties also and perfections of the true God are every where ascribed in Scripture as omnipotency infinite wisdome omniscience or all knowledge immensity the creation and governance of things the salvation of the Church the working of miracles And the attributing and giving unto him of the properties of the true God yeeldeth us a more firm proof of his Divinity than doth the attributing of the name of the true God or of the Lord For the names of God may after a sort be expounded metaphorically but the divine property attributed unto Christ cannot be wrested to any other meaning If therefore wee fence and guard our selves with such testimonies the adversaries of this doctrine cannot consist or stand but will they nill they they shall be forced to confesse that Christ was before he took flesh And if he were before he took flesh he was either the Creatour or Creature But he was no Creature both because hee created all things and because also he is called Creatour Wherefore seeing the true God hath been from everlasting his God-head also which is true God must needs be subsisting from everlasting The Minor is likewise confirmed by the former argument 1. The nature which took flesh is God and the Son of God for neither the Father nor the holy Ghost took flesh Therefore the Son otherwise the Son of God is not by nature God 2. The humane nature in Christ is not the naturall Son of God Therefore the Divine nature must be that Son 3. The Divine nature in Christ is the Word 4. It is Wisedome 5. According to it Christ is Mediatour 6. The Deity of Christ is the Angel and Messenger of the Lord sent of old unto the Church Therefore the Deity of Christ is the Son of God THE SECOND CONCLUSION Christ the Son of God is a person really distinct from the Father and the holy Ghost WEe are to hold that the Word is a person distinct
and made higher than the heavens What is the meaning then of this Article I beleeve in Jesus Christ Heb. 7.26 which was conceived by the holy Ghost borne of the Virgin Mary The meaning of the Article I beleeve in Jesus Christ conceived by the holy Ghost borne of the Virgin Mary The meaning thereof is 1. I beleeve that this naturall Son of God conceived and born after this manner was made true man after a marvellous order and the same to be one Christ having two natures united by personall union one to another which are his divinity and his humanity and to be sanctified from his mothers womb by the holy Ghost 2. I beleeve farther that he being true God and true man but one Christ was holy from his mothers womb to redeem and sanctifie me which he could not doe unlesse sanctification and union were in him and that I for his Sonnes sake so conceived and borne have the right of the adoption of the sons of God THE COMMON PLACE OF THE TWO NATURES IN CHRIST NExt after the Article of the Conception and Nativity of Christ for the better understanding thereof followeth not unfitly the Common place Of the Incarnation of the Son of God or Of the two natures in Christ and their personall union wherein these questions following are more copiously to be discussed 1. Whether there be two natures in the Mediatour 2. Whether they be one or two persons 3. If they be one person what manner of union that is of them and how made 4. Why this personall union was necessary to be made 1. Whether there be two natures in Christ our Mediatour Two natures in Christ THat there are two natures in Christ this one reason shewes by good demonstrance Essentiall properties which are opposite cannot be in the same nor be affirmed of the same thing in respect of the same nature or cause Vigil Vigil lib. 4. One nature doth not receive in it selfe a thing contrary and diverse But in one and the same Christ are and are affirmed of him properties diverse and contrary divine and humane finite infinite passible impassible and such like Therefore there must needs be divers natures in him humane and divine And that the very divine nature Creatresse of all things is in Christ hath been already proved It remaineth that we shew a true humane nature to be in him and that such as ours is and perfect consisting of a body and a reasonable soule of which Christ true man and of our kind and nature as of essentiall parts is made a third substance to wit this particular humanity which the Word having taken once into the unity of the person doth never lay away againe Which we are to hold against Hereticks both old and new Marcionites and Swenkfieldians whereof some deny Christs flesh to have been formed of the Virgins substance but will have it brought down from heaven into the Virgin or begotten in her of the substance of the holy Ghost Others fancie Christ to have instead of true flesh the likenesse semblance and apparency of a mans body Others acknowledge indeed that he hath a true body but not an humane soule the roome whereof is supplied by the Word united unto the body Against these and the like errors The truth of Christs humane nature is proved the sentence and doctrine of the Church is confirmed By plaine places of Scripture which testifie Christ Maries By Scripture Luke 1.31 Son to have been made like unto us in all things that is in essence in properties in infirmities sin only excepted Loe thou shalt conceive in thy womb and beare a Son Seeing then the Virgin conceived this her Son in her womb bare it untill the usuall time of delivery and was delivered of it as other women use to be of their children it followeth that his flesh was nor brought from heaven or else-where taken which should but passe onely through the womb of the Virgin but was formed in the Virgins womb of her seed and substance He that sanctifieth and they which are sanctified are all of one Hebr. 2.11 14 15 16. wherefore he is not ashamed to call them brethren And a little after For as much as the children were partakers of flesh and bloud he also himselfe likewise took part with them Againe In all things it became him to be like to his brethren Therefore he hath a humane nature of the same kinde wholly with ours Hereof he is called The fruit of Maries womb Luke 1.42 2 7. Gal. 4.4 3.16 Rom. 1.3 9.5 Luke 3. The first begotten Sonne of Mary Made of a woman The seed of Abraham Made of the seed of David Borne of the Jewes concerning the flesh The Sonne of Abraham of David and the Sonne of man And also his pedegree and stock concerning the flesh is deduced unto Adam Therefore he was begotten of the substance of his mother and issued from the same seed of Adam from which we did Christ proveth himselfe to be a true man and not a spirit by this that a spirit hath no flesh and bones as he hath and retaineth even after his resurrection Apollinaris the Heretick said Luke 24.39 The errour of Apollinaris refuted That Christs body indeed was a true body but instead of a soule he had the Word onely But this man is easily refuted because Christ should not then have been like unto his brethren in all things except sinne And Christ himselfe doth plainly confesse Mat. 26.38 Luke 2.52 John 10.18 My soule is very heavie even unto the death He is said to have increased in wisdome and stature and in favour with God and men and to lay downe his soule and take it againe But to increase in wisdome and To be heavie and sad doe neither agree unto a body which is a reasonlesse thing neither unto the Godhead which is not obnoxious to changes and passions Hitherto belongeth also that Father Luke 23.46 into thine hands I commend my spirit And when he had thus said he gave up the ghost This cannot be said of Christs God-head For that being immense and infinite is every where neither doth a removing from one place to another agree unto it it is not laid downe and taken up againe that is it never departed or was severed from the body but remaineth alwayes united unto it Wherefore there must needs be in Christ besides his body and his God-head a true humane soule which did truly suffer and abide in Christ these changes and the like By divine promises and prophecies Gen. 3.15 Esay 7.14 Matth. 1.1 Luke 1.42 Rom. 1.3 It is confirmed by divine promises and prophecies For the Messias in the Old Testament was promised to be such a one as should be the seed of the woman of Abraham Isaac Jacob c. But this Jesus the Son of the Virgin Mary is that promised Messias Therefore he must needs be the true man
delivered but shall sustain punishment eternall which is without end 4. Christ also himself hath fore-told that it was necessary that he should die Except I go away John 9.7 the Comforter will not come unto you John 13.8 If I wash thee not thou shalt have no part with me In this question therefore three memorable circumstances concurre 1. That it was necessary that Gods justice should be satisfied 2. That this satisfaction was to be made by death 3. That it was to be accomplished by the death of the Son of God alone Out of this which hath bin said we may draw these doctrines 1. That sin is most of all to be eschewed of us which could not be expiated but by the death of the Son of God 2. That we ought to be thankfull to the Son of God for this his so great a benefit of unspeakable grace and favour bestowed upon us 3. That all our sins how many how great and how grievous soever they be are expiated and done away by the death alone of Christ 3. For whom Christ died Or whether he died for all WE must answer this question by distinguishing the termes thereof that so we may reconcile such Scriptures as carry a shew of contrariety For in some places Christ is said to have died for all Testimonies of Scripture alledged on both sides and for the whole world as Who is a reconciliation for our sins and not for our sins only but for the sins of the whole world That by Gods grace he might taste of death for all men 1. That Christ died for all 1 John 2.2 Heb. 2.9 2 Cor. 5.1415 1 Tim. 2.6 We thus judge that if one be dead for all then were all dead And he died for all that they which live should not henceforth live unto themselves but unto him which died for them and rose again Who gave himself a ransom for all men Contrariwise in as many places Christ is said to have died prayed offered up himselfe 2 That Christ died not for all but for many John 17.9 Mat. 20.28 Mat. 15.24 Mat. 1.21 Mat. 26.28 Heb. 9.28 Esay 53.11 Ephes 5.25 c. only for many only for the elect for his peculiar people for his Church for his sheep c. Not for the world not for the unfaithfull I pray for them I pray not for the world but for them which thou hast given me for they are thine that is for the elect alone The Son of man came not to be served but to serve and to give his life for the ransome of many I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel He shall save his people from their sins This is my bloud of the New Testament that is shed for many for the remission of sins Christ was once offered to take away the sins of many By his knowledge shall my righteous servant justifie many for he shall beare their iniquities Christ loved the Church and gave himself for it A two-fold reconciliation of such Scriptures as plead for All 1. B restraining All to all that beleeve What shall we say then Is Scripture disagreeable with Scripture No verily Howbeit it seemeth so unlesse these generall and particular Aphorismes be reconciled by some pithy and plausible distinction The distinction and reconcilement of these places is two-fold either of which is true and sound 1. Some interpret these generall allegations of the whole number of the faithfull or of all the beleeving because the promises of the Gospel do properly appertain to all the faithfull and because the whole course of Scripture restraineth those promises to the beleeving Whosoever beleeveth in him John 3.16 Rom. 3.22 Acts 10.43 shall not perish The righteousnesse of God by the faith of Jesus Christ unto all and upon all that beleeve Through his name all that beleeve in him shall receive remission of sins S. Ambrose expoundeth the generall texts of Scripture on this wise Lib. 1. cap. 3. de vocat Gent. The people of God saith he have their fulnesse and although a great number of men neglect or cast from them the grace of their Saviour yet there is a certain speciall university of the elect and fore-knowne of God severed and discerned from the generality of all to this intent that a whole world might seem to be saved out of a whole world and all men might seem to be redeemed from out of all men Thus is there no repugnancy no contrariety between these Scriptures For all true beleevers are those many that peculiar people that Church those sheep those chosen which were given unto Christ and for whom Christ gave himself By the distinguishing between the sufficiency efficacy of Christs death Others reconcile these Scriptures by a distinction of the sufficiency and efficacy of Christs death For certain wrangling Sophists there are who admit not this restriction of these generall promises to the faithfull alone that is they deny that the letter of Scripture enforceth any such restriction and for proof of their conceit they quote and alledge certain places which seem to impart redemption and salvation not only to the faithfull but to Hypocrites also and Apostates as that of Peter Denying the Lord which hath bought them And Hath forgotten that hee was purged from his old sinnes 2 Pet. 2.12 2 Pet. 1.9 all which Scriptures it is manifest are to be understood and interpreted either of the vaine glorying of Hypocrites of their redemption and sanctification or of the extent and sufficiency of Christs satisfaction Wherefore that wee be not forced to maintaine frivolous contention with such crabbed perverse disputers touching the restriction of these generall promises before specified and for more sound and ample answer unto those places concerning the redemption of Hypocrites some chuse rather and not unfitly as I suppose to interpret those Scriptures in shew contrary one to the other partly of the sufficiency and partly of the application and efficacy of Christs death They answer therefore that Christ died for all And againe died not for all in a diverse respect How Christ is said to have died for all men and again not to have died for all men 1. Christ died for all men absolutely and without exception as touching the sufficiency of the price which hee pay'd 2. Christ died not for all men but for the elect alone and the faithfull as touching the application participation and efficacy of his merit and Passion The reason of the former is because Christs ransome is of such weight and worth that it may serve and be sufficient to purge and cleanse all the sins of all men if at least all men would apprehend by faith this salve of sin For it can no way be said that it is insufficient lest this blasphemous inconvenience which God forbid should follow That some cause of the destruction of the wicked resteth in the defect of the merit of the Mediatour The
the Father and the Sonne and the holy Ghost teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you And we are to hold and keep these notes and marks 1. In respect of Gods glory that enemies may be discerned from sons 2. In respect of our own salvation that we may joyn our selves to the true Church Object 1. There were in all ages great errours both publike and private in the Church Against the first marke Ans 1. But still the foundation was held on which some built gold some stubble 2. Errours are not defended by the Church and this mark standeth sure if the foundation be held though on it stubble be built so that such errours and such stubble be not maintained Against the third marke Object 2. In many Churches which professe true doctrine this third mark is not seene Therefore they are no Churches Ans 1. There are many in them who indeed yeeld and indeavour to yeeld obedience 2. All obey acknowledging by their profession that sins ought not to be maintained But it is necessary that this third mark should be added because they should mock God Against all the foresaid markes Not all that challenge these marks are the Church because all have them not though they challenge them The ordinary succession of Bishops no necessary mark of the Church who would say that they received this Doctrine of Christ and would not frame their lives according unto it Object 3. But those which all Schismaticks and Hereticks doe challenge unto them are not the marks of the true Church But all of them doe challenge these unto them Therefore they are not marks of the true Church Ans I deny the Major For we are not to see whether they challenge them but whether they have them So also would it follow that the heavenly blessings which are proper to the true Church are theirs also because they challenge them Object 4. Without which the Church cannot be that is a mark thereof But without the ordinary succession of Bishops the Church cannot be Therefore it is a mark thereof Ans By ordinary succession in the ministery is meant the succession of Ministers in the same doctrine and administration of Sacraments And if the proposition be so understood it is true for such a succession is nothing else then those notes which we have put But in the conclusion of this objection is understood that there should be an ordinary succession into the same place whether they teach the same doctrine or a diverse from it And so also it should be a tying of the Church to a certaine City Region and so forth But in this sense the Minor and Conclusion are false 4. Why the Church is called one holy and Catholike One for consent in faith and doctrine THe Church is called one not in regard of the cohabitation or the neere dwelling of the members thereof or for their agreement in rites and ceremonies of their Religion but in respect of their consent in faith and doctrine It is also called Holy because it is sanctified of God by the bloud and spirit of Christ that it may be like unto him not in perfection but Holy 1. for imputed righteousness By imputation of righteousnesse because Christs holinesse and obedience is imputed unto it For inchoative righteousnesse By inchoation of righteousnesse because the holy Ghost doth renue it by little and little and cleanse it from the filth of sin that all the members may begin all the parts of obedience For the use to which it is consecrated Catholike in respect of place time and the members thereof Because it is consecrated to an holy and divine use and therefore sequestred from the rout of wicked ones who are without the Church It is called Catholike 1. In respect of place because it is spread through the whole world For there is one universall Church of all places and degrees of life neither is it tied to a certaine place and kingdome or to a certaine succession 2. In respect of time because there is but one true Church of all times which also is at all times so Catholike as that it is dispersed through the whole world neither is it at any time tied to any certaine place 3. In respect of the men who are members of the same For the Church is gathered out of all sorts of men all states kindreds and nations It is not Catholike because it possesseth many kingdomes For Catholike is a title given unto the Church in the Apostles time for before time the Church was limited within narrow bounds Now that there is but one Church of all times and ages One Church of all times and ages from the beginning of the world unto the end it is out of doubt For 1. It is manifest that the Church hath ever beene Neither can Abrahams daies be objected as if before he was called there had been no worship of the true God in his family and himselfe had beene after his calling alone without any others For before his calling he held the foundation and grounds of doctrine of the true God though it were darkned with superstitions mingled therewith Againe Melchisedech lived at the same time who was the Priest of the most high God and therefore neither was Abraham after his calling alone but there were others besides him worshippers of the true God whose Priest was Melchisedech 2. That the Church as it hath beene ever so shall it also continue ever appeareth by these testimonies My words shall not depart out of thy mouth nor out of the mouth of thy seed If the night and day may be changed Esay 59.21 then shall my Covenant also be changed I am with you alwayes unto the end of the world Jer. 33.20 Mat. 28.20 Moreover Christ was ever and ever shall be King Head and Priest of the Church Wherefore the Church was ever and ever shall be And hence also it is manifest That the Church of both Testaments is one and the same that which is confirmed also by the article following For Christ is the sanctifier of his Church who is common to men of both Testaments Hitherto appertaineth the question of the authority of the Church The Papists maintaine that the authority of the Church is greater then the authority of the Scripture But this is false For the Church made not the Scripture but the Scripture made the Church They urge S. Augustine his testimony S. Augustine against Manichaeus his Epistle cap. 5. sheweth how he was brought to the faith of the Catholike Church For he saith That he obeyed the Catholikes when they said Beleeve the Gospel and there he bringeth forth that common saying I would not beleeve the Gospel except the authority of the Catholike Church moved me thereunto By the testimony therefore of the Church he was moved to read the Gospel and to beleeve that heavenly doctrine was contained therein But doth he after he
beleeved the Gospel promise that he would beleeve the Church more then the Gospel if the Church determine or propound any thing which is either contrary to the Gospel or can be proved by no testimony of Scripture This doubtlesse Augustine never meant Nay elswhere he denounceth Anathema and biddeth a curse to come to them who declare any thing besides that that we have received in the writings of the Law and Gospel And in the selfe-same place he witnesseth That he because he beleeveth the Gospel cannot beleeve Manichaeus for that he readeth nothing in the Gospel of Manichaeus Apostleship Therefore traditions or ordinances of the Church bring us unto the Scripture and tie us to that voice which soundeth in the Scripture The Papists wrangling about Traditions But here it must be observed how honestly and fairly the Papists deale For wheresoever they meet with the word Tradition that by and by they wrest to their traditions which cannot be proved out of the Word of God as when Paul saith I delivered unto you that which I received Straight-wayes they cry out Heare you traditions I hear but read on there in the words following Paul himself by writing declaring what those traditions are I delivered unto you how that Christ died for our sinnes according to the Scripture And that he was buried and that he arose the third day according to the Scripture Here you heare Pauls traditions to be double things written For first they were taken out of the Scripture of the Old Testament Secondly they were committed to writing by Saint Paul himselfe So Paul saith of the Lords Supper I have received of the Lord that which I have delivered unto you 1 Cor. 11.23 But this traditions after the Evangelists himself also hath set downe in writing 2 Thes 3.16 The Jesuites cite the saying of Paul Withdraw your selves from every brother that walketh inordinately and not after the traditions which yee received of us But a little after in the same Chapter he describeth what tradition he meaneth as it is manifest to him that looketh on the place And yet will they thence prove that many things are to be beleeved which cannot be proved by any testimony of Scripture The like impudency they shew in another testimony taken our of Luke Acts 16.4 They delivered them the decrees to keep ordained of the Apostles and Elders which were at Jerusalem Ibid. 15.23 When a little before he witnesseth that those decrees were set downe in letters written by the Apostles How the Church may be said not to erre That opinion or saying of the Papists The Church doth not erre is true after this sort 1. The whole doth not erre though some members thereof doe erre 2. It doth not erre universally although in some points of doctrine it may 3. It erreth not in the foundation 5. In what the Church differeth from the Common-weale Seven differences betweene the Church and Common-weale THe Church differeth from the Common-weale 1. Because Common-weales are distinct and Kingdomes of the world are in divers places and times The Church is alwayes one and the same at all times and with all men 2. The Kingdoms and States of the world have many heads or one chiefe Head and many other inferiour heads besides and that on earth The Church hath but one and that in heaven 3. The Common-wealth is governed by certaine Lawes made for the maintenance of outward peace and tranquillity The Church is ruled by the holy Ghost and the Word of God 4. The Common-wealth or civill State requireth outward obedience onely The Church requireth both as well inward obedience as outward 5. In civill States and Common-wealths there is power and liberty to make new Lawes positive by the authority of the Magistrate the violating of which Lawes bindeth mens consciences and deserveth corporal punishments The Church is tied to the Word of God to which it is not lawfull to adde ought or to detract ought from it 6. The civill State hath corporall power wherewith it is armed against the obstinate and disobedient for he may and ought by force to curb these and to punish them by the sword The Church punisheth by denouncing Gods wrath out of the Word of God 7. In the Church are alwayes some elect and holy but not alwayes in the Common-wealth 6. Whence ariseth the difference of the Church from the rest of mankinde Three sorts of men in the world THere are three sorts of men very much different one from another For 1. Some men are even in profession estranged and alients from the Church as who deny faith and repentance and therefore are open enemies of God and the Church 2. Others are called but not effectually which are Hypocrites who professe indeed the faith but without any true conversion unto God 3. Others are called effectually which are the elect who are but a little portion according to that of Christ Many are called Mat. 20.16 Election putteth the difference between the Church and others but few are chosen Now the difference being known let us in a word see what is the cause of this difference 1. The efficient cause of this difference is the Election of God willing to gather unto himselfe a Church in earth 2. The Sonne of God is the mediate executor of this his will and purpose the holy Ghost the immediate Acts 14.16 Rom. 9.18 John 6.37 Rom. 8.19 30. 3. The word of God is the instrumentall cause In times past God suffered all the Gentiles to walk in their owne wayes God hath mercy on whom he will and whom he will he hardneth All that the Father giveth me shall come to me Those which he knew before he also predestinate to be made like to the Image of his Sonne and whom he predestinate them also he called c. By these words we are taught that the promise of grace is generall in respect of the Elect or Beleevers God verily would have all to be saved and that 1. In respect that he loveth the salvation of all But the Elect onely have attained to that salvation 2. In respect that he inviteth all to salvation But the rest have beene hardened Rom. 11.7 7. Whether any one may be saved out of the Church NO man can be saved out of the Church None saved out of the Church John 13.5 Because without the Church there is no Saviour therefore no salvation also Without me you can doe nothing 2. Because whomsoever God hath chosen and elected to the end which is eternall life them he hath chosen to the meanes which is the inward and outward calling The elect therefore though they be not at all times members of the visible Church yet they are all made such before they die Object Therefore election is not free Answ It is free because God chose freely both to the end and to the meanes But after he hath once destined and ordained men to meanes he never
wheresoever he dwelleth is effectuall in working the Word and Sacraments are not so Quest 66. What are the Sacraments Ans They are sacred signes and seales set before our eyes and ordained of God for his cause that he may declare and seale by them the promise of his Gospel unto us to wit that he giveth freely remission of sinnes and life everlasting not onely to all in generall but to every one in particular that beleeveth for that onely sacrifice of Christ which he accomplished upon the Crosse a Gen. 17.11 Rom 4.11 Deut. 30.6 Levit. 6.25 Heb. 9.7 8 9 24. Ezek. 20.22 1 Sam 17.36 Esay 6.6 7. Esay 54.9 The Explication THe right and direct method of interpreting this doctrine of the Sacraments requireth that first we speak of the Sacraments in generall And this way may we not unfitly intreat in special of the Supper and Baptisme to wit if we take in declaring each Sacrament in speciall the same questions and that course and order of the same questions which we must observe and follow concerning the Sacraments in generall and lastly if we apply those testimonies which speak of the Sacraments in generall to the handling and declaring of the Sacraments in speciall The chiefe Questions concerning the Sacraments 1. What Sacraments are 2. What are the ends of Sacraments 3. In what Sacraments differ from Sacrifices 4. In what they agree with the word and in what they differ from it 5. How the Sacraments of the Old and New Testament agree 6. What are signes and what the things in the Sacraments and in what the things differ from their signes 7. What sacramentall union is 8. What formes of speaking of the Sacraments are usuall to the Church and Scripture 9. What is the lawfull use of the Sacraments 10. What the wicked receive in the use thereof 11. How many Sacraments there are of the New Testament 1. What Sacraments are The originall of the word Sacrament THat we may know what Sacraments properly are the name it selfe of Sacrament is first to be considered Among the ancient Romans this word Sacrament signifieth a peece of money which two parties putting one the other in suite laid down in some sacred place or left in custody of the High-Pontife or Priest with this condition that he who gained the suite should have his part entire againe and he who was cast in the cause should lose his part to the common Treasury in lieu of his wrongfull molesting the other party This signification nothing pertaineth to this place It also signified a solemne forme of an oath taken in warre which they called a military Sacrament so called of Sacrando that is of sacring or consecrating them because by that oath every one was consecrated or destined to his Captaine and not to any other to serve him Hereof it is that some will have these ceremonies instituted by God therefore to be so called for that as Souddiers did oblige and binde themselves by that military Sacrament unto their Captaine so we binde our selves unto our Captaine Christ by a solemne oath in the presence of God Angels and Men. This truly is no unapt or unmeet Metaphor but yet I think rather that the originall of this name came from the old Latine Translations in which wheresoever the word Mystery is used in the New Testament for the same they commonly in Latine put the word Sacramentum Now Mystery cometh from the Greek verb 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifieth to institute instruct or initiate one in the holy matters or matters of Religion But that Greek verb 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is derived from another which is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifieth to shut because as Eustathius saith they who are initiated or entered in holy rites were to shut their mouth and not to utter those things which were secret Now a mystery is said to be either a secret thing it selfe or the signe of a secret thing or that which hath a secret signification which none understand but they who are initiated in holy rites By a signe we understand an externall and corporeall thing and action or a ceremony instituted and ordained by God which betokeneth a certaine internall thing and spirituall Which the Grecians call a Mystery and is otherwise called of the Latine Divines a Sacrament And some such signes God alwayes would have to be extant in his Church whereby both the good will of God towards men might be recorded and made known and that men of the other side might declare and shew their faith towards God and other duties of piety and godlinesse Sacraments therefore are so called Mysteries because they have a secret signification which none understand but they who are initiated and instructed concerning the substance of sacred matters or the points of Christian Religion Neverthelesse the word Sacrament is used in divers significations in the writings of famous Divines of which these are chiefe 1. For a rite or externall ceremony which sense is proper and naturall to the word 2. For the signes themselves 3. For the thing signified by the signes 4. For the signes and thing signified both together Having seen now what the name of Sacrament signifieth it resteth that we consider the thing it selfe and define what Sacraments are The definition whereof is this Sacraments are rites or ceremonies instituted by God to this use The definition of Sacraments That they might be signes of the Covenant to wit of Gods good will towards us and of the bond of the Church whereby it covenanteth faith and repentance and that they may be marks and cognizances whereby to distinguish Gods Church from Gentiles and Sectaries The definition of Sacraments In the Catechisme they are thus defined Sacraments are sacred signes and feales object to our eyes ordained and instituted by God that by them he might the more declare and seale the promise of his Gospel unto us The parts of this definition are in number three The first part appertaineth to the kinde of Sacraments the latter two to their difference To the kinde whereof they are it appertaineth The Sacraments are sacred seales that they are sacred and ocular signes and seales that is divine and signifying or betokening sacred things such as belong to Gods worship and the salvation of men A signe and a seale differ one from the other as a generall thing from a thing more speciall For every seale is a signe but not every signe a seale A seale certifieth and confirmeth a thing What a signe is A signe onely sheweth it A signe is a thing signifying somewhat else then that which it sheweth to the senses and inducing something else into the cogitation as Augustine defineth it or a signe is that whereby the understanding understandeth some things else besides the signe it selfe apprehended by the sense So words are the signes of things Moreover signes are of two sorts some are onely signifying others are confirming also Two
union and Sacramentall union must be such as agreeth to all Sacraments else shall it be no Sacramentall union in generall but in speciall The union in the Supper and The union in Baptism Others are of opinion that there is a corporall copulation of the signe and the thing signified The Sacramentaries opinion confuted making one masse and co-existence of both in one place But this kinde of co-existence and containing of one the other is no Sacramentall union because it agreeth not unto all Sacraments Therefore Sacramentall union is not corporall neither consisteth it in a presence of the thing and signe both in one and the same place and much lesse in any transmutation or transubstantiation but it is relative or respective and consisteth in these two things In what Sacramentall union consisteth 1. In a similitude and proportion of the signes with the thing signified whereof Augustine thus speaketh If saith he Sacraments had not a certaine similitude of those things whereof they are Sacraments they should be no Sacraments 2. In the joynt-exhibiting or receiving of the things and in the lawfull and right use Epist 23. ad Bonifacium which cannot be without faith as hereafter shall be declared The faithfull only in the lawfull and right use receive the signes of the Ministers and the things signified of Christ and when we so receive both that is the signe and the thing signified the same is called Sacramentall union Proofes of Sacramentall union The proofe hereof is two-fold the first proofe is drawn from the nature of a Sacrament A Sacrament is a respective or relative word The foundation or matter in the Sacraments are the rites and ceremonies or externall visible actions instituted by God which are performed by men after a certain and solemne manner and are called by a relative or respective name Signes or Sacraments The terme respected or correlative is Christ and the communion of Christ and all his benefits or the internall spirituall working of God in us according to the promise of the Gospel this is called the thing signed or signified by the Sacrament because it is signified and confirmed by the outward rite The Relation it selfe is the ordination of the foundation to the terme that is of the rites to signifie the thing The correlatives are the things signified and the signes Hereby now appeareth that a Sacramentall union is nothing else but a relation of a sign to a thing signified Whence this infallible rule ariseth while the relation remaineth the thing and signes are coupled and when it ceaseth they are dis-joyned the meaning whereof is that as long as Gods order is retained in the signe and the things signified so long are the things exhibited and sealed with the signes but when Gods prescript ceaseth there can no longer be any exhibiting or sealing of the things by the signes The second proofe issueth out of the naturall proportion of Sacraments Sacramentall union is such as agreeth to all Sacraments therefore look what was the union of Christ with the old Sacraments such is it now with our Sacraments else either those Sacraments were no Sacraments or that union was no Sacramentall union namely such as agreeth to all Sacraments But that union could be no other but respective union Therefore Sacramentall union is now also respective 8. What phrases and formes of speaking of Sacraments are usuall unto the Church and Scripture Proper formes of speaking THe formes of speaking of Sacraments are partly proper and partly figurative The proper are 1. When the Sacraments are called tokens signes seales pledges and those sealing and confirming unto us that God will give those things which he hath promised Rom. 4.11 Gen. 17.11 So Circumcision is a seale of the righteousnesse of faith And it shall be a signe in thy flesh So bread is a signe of the body of Christ 2. When unto the signe are expresly signified adjoyned promises namely that receiving the signes we shall receive the things by them Mat. 16.16 Pigurative formes of speaking as when it is said He that shall beleeve and be baptized shall be saved A figurative or Sacramentall kinde of speaking is 1. When the names of the things are given to the signes as the Paschall Lamb is called the Passeover The rock was Christ 1 Cor. 5.7 1 Cor. 20.16 The bread is the body of Christ 2. Contrariwise when the names of the signes are attributed to the things as Christ is our Passeover 3. When the properties belonging to the things are attributed to the signe as The bread which we break is it not the communion of the body of Christ So Baptisme is said to wash away sinnes to save to regenerate 4. When contrariwise the properties of the signes are attributed to the things themselves Acts 22.16 Ephes 5.26 1 Pet. 3.21 Titus 3.5 1 John 1.7 John 1.33 John 16. as The rock was Christ We are washed by the bloud of Christ. All these phrases of speech signifie the same thing which is the promise of God adjoyned to the ceremony and this therefore 1. Because the signes represent and seale the things Baptisme is the washing of regeneration 2. Because the things and the signes are together received by the faithfull in the right use thereof Briefly A Sacramentall forme of speech is wherein the name or properties of the signe are given to the thing signified or of the contrary the name of the thing signified to the signe and the meaning is not that the one is changed into the other but that the signe representeth and sealeth the thing signified The cause of Sacramentall phrases and termes is the proportion between the signe and the thing signified Ad Bonifacium Epist 23. whereof Augustine thus discourseth If Sacraments had not a certaine similitude of those things whereof they are Sacraments they should be no Sacraments Now out of this similitude they beare for the most part the names of the things themselves As therefore the Sacrament of the body of Christ is after a certaine manner the body of Christ and the Sacrament of Christs bloud is Christs bloud so the Sacrament of faith is faith And in another place The things which signifie In Lev. quaest 57. are usually called by the name of the thing they signifie Hence it is said The Rock was Christ for he said not The Rock signifieth Christ but as if it had beene that which verily in substance it was not but onely by meere signification 9. What is the right and lawfull use of Sacraments In the right use of Sacraments is respected THe right use of Sacraments is when the rites appointed by God are used by the faithful and penitent as signes of grace and pledges of Gods good will towards them It consisteth therefore in these three things The institution of Christ which must be pure When the rites ordained of God are observed and not corrupted The institution of Christ is to be
tell it unto the Church Mat. 18.17 Luke 22.25 26. The Kings of the Gentiles reign over them but ye shall not be so Wherefore the consent and decree of the Church is to be expected 1. Because of Gods expresse commandement to this purpose 2. That no man be injured 3. That the processe may be better authorised 4. That the Ministery of the Church grow not unto an Oligarchy or a Papisticall soveraignity of some few persons 5. That the condemnation of the rebellious may be the more just The last abuse to be prevented by Excommunication is 5. That we kindle no schismes not give occasion of scandall and offence in the Church whilst good men see many at variance between themselves that grievous evils follow one another on the head and that the Church is divided These evils if the Ministers see or feare they may not proceed but warne and exhort both privately and publikely If they profit nothing hereby they are held excused Blessed are they which hunger and thirst after righteousnesse Mat. 5.6 for they shall be filled Others shall give an account of their obstinacy 5. How the power of the Keyes committed to the Church differeth from the Civill power THe differences are many and manifest 1. Ecclesiasticall discipline is executed by the Church the civill power by the Judge or Magistrate 2. In the civill state judgement is exercised according to civill and positive lawes in the Church judgement proceedeth according to Gods Lawes and Word 3. The power of the Keyes committed unto the Church dependeth on Gods Word and the Church exerciseth her authority by the Word when it denounceth the anger and wrath of God against Infidels and unrepentant persons and punisheth the obstinate with the Word only yet so as that this punishment pierceth even unto their consciences the civill power is armed with the Sword and punisheth the obstinate with corporall punishments only 4. The judgement of the Church hath degrees of admonition and if repentance interpose it selfe it proceedeth not to punishment the civill judgement and the Magistrate proceeds to punishment though the offender repent 5. The end and purpose of the Church is that hee which hath offended should repent and be saved for ever the end and purpose of the Magistrate is that the offender be punished and so peace and externall order and discipline be maintained in the Common-wealth 6. As the Church proceedeth against refractary and obstinate persons only so it is bound to reverse and retract her judgement and punishment if there come repentance but the Magistrate when he hath once punished is not bound to recall his judgment and punishment neither is hee able sometimes to revoke and repeale it The Thiefe repenteth on the Crosse and is received of Christ into Paradise neverthelesse the Magistrate goeth on to execute this penalty adjudged unto him and putteth him out of the Common-wealth So oftentimes the discipline of the Church hath place where there is no place for civill judgement as when the Church casteth out of her congregation the impenitent and accounteth them no more for her members whom notwithstanding the civill Magistrate tolerateth And contrariwise the civill government oft-times exileth those whom the Church receiveth as when the Magistrate punisheth Adulterers Robbers Theeves and doth no more reckon them for members of the Common-wealth whether they repent or continue obstinate whom yet the Church if they repent abandoneth not but receiveth Wherefore the difference of the Ecclesiasticall and civill power is apparent and manifest There remaine objections of the Adversaries of Ecclesiasticall Discipline whereunto wee will in few words make answer Object 1. The charge and office of the Keyes is no where commanded Therefore it is not to be ordained in the Church and by consequent no man ought to be excluded from the Sacrament Ans The Antecedenc is false because frequently in Scripture manifest testimonies of this charge and commission are extant Matth. 16.19 I will give unto thee the keyes of the kingdome of heaven and whatsoever thou shalt bind upon earth shall be bound in heaven Here in plain words is expressed the power of the keyes committed to all ministers of the word Moreover what this office or charge of the keyes committed to the Church is and how the Church must discharge this charge and function Christ likewise plainly advertiseth and declareth If he will not vouchsafe to hear them tell it to the Church Mat. 18.17 1â— and if he refuse to hear the Church also let him be unto thee as an heathen man and a publican Verily I say unto you Whatsoever ye bind on earth shall be bound in heaven and whatsoever ye loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven These things given thus in precept by Christ Paul also doth in the thing it selfe confirm 1 Cor. 5.1 5. 11.20 Let such a one be delivered unto Sathan for the destruction of the flesh that the spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord Jesus When yee come together into one place this is not to eat the Lords Supper 2 Thes 3.14 If any man obey not your savings note him by a letter and have no company with him that he may be ashamed Of whom is Hymeneus and Alexander whom I have delivered unto Sathan 1 Tim. 1.20 that they may learn not to blaspheme In the Prophets also are manifest testimonies in which this is apparent to have been commanded by God Isa 1.11 What have I to do with the multitude of your sacrifices saith the Lord I am full of the burnt offerings of rams and of the fat of fed beasts and I desire not the bloud of bullocks nor of lambs nor of goats Isa 66.3 Hee that killeth a bullocke is as if he slew a man he that sacrificeth a sheep as if he cut off a dogs neck he that offereth an oblation as if he offered swines blond he that remembreth incense as if he blessed an idol I spake not unto your fathers nor commanded them Jerem. 7.22 when I brought them out of the land of Egypt concerning burnt-offerings and sacrifices Psal 30.16 Unto the wicked said God What hast thou to doe to declare mine ordinances that thou shouldst take my covenant in thy mouth Wherefore Christ also saith Matth. 5.24 Leave there thine offering before the Altar and goe thy way first be reconciled to thy brother and then come and offer thy gift There are other places also of Scripture besides these where it is commanded that all professed wicked persons be excluded from the Church and the use of the sacraments as wheresoever is reprehended the unlawfull use of the sacraments Likewise wheresoever the Ministers are commanded to receive only such for members of the Church as professe faith and repentance Rep. God indeed forbiddeth the ungodly to come unto the Sacraments but he willeth not that the Church should forbid them Ans What God forbiddeth to have done in the Church
the Ministers with the Seniory should have and should exercise a power of convicting reproving excommunicating and executing any other point of Ecclesiasticall discipline on any offenders whatsoever even on Princes themselves 1. WHere the Word and Sacraments are rightly to be administred there must the authority of discipline be established But in the Primitive Church and at this day in well ordered Churches the authority of discipline is not established Therefore the Word and Sacraments are not rightly there administred But absurd were it so to say Therefore abjurd also to impose a necessity of discipline on the Church Ans These words To be rightly administred are doubtfull and have a diverse meaning 1. To administer rightly signifieth so to administer as that the administration wholly agree with the prescript of the Lord. 2. It signifieth To administer not according to the right perfect and exact observing of it but so that the administration be pleasing to God and profitable for the salvation of the Church In this whole world the Sacraments are not rightly administred according to the former signification but according to the later signification they are For albeit some blemishes by reason of the Churches weaknesse and imbecillity cannot be corrected and amended on a sudden yet the administration may please God and profit the Church albeit we are neverthelesse to acknowledge and bewail the defects for Mat. 5.6 Blessed are they that hunger and thirst after righteousnesse Except these things be granted there will be no pure Church in the world We may seem now to have sufficiently assoyled this objection but yet further also we deny the Minor For the authority of discipline was and continued in the Primitive Church and shall also continue in an ill ordered Church but with great abuse as amongst the Papists Repl. In our Churches and in the Helvetian Churches excommunication is not in force Therefore the Minor of the former objection is true Ans Although in some Churches it be not exercised yet is it not then ill exercised but the Minor is neverthelesse infringed because in those Churches the Word and the Sacraments are rightly administred according to the other signification whereof we spake before Here Ursine alledged a saying out of Chrysostome Chrysostome saith If any wicked person come unto the Lords Table give not unto him the Lords Sacrament the body and bloud of the Lord if he will not beleeve signifie it unto me I will rather lose my life then I will admit him Excommunication therefore was in force and was exercised in the Church many hundred yeers after Christ Object 2. That doctrine which hath neither Gods word nor approved examples Mat. 18.17 is not to be thrust upon the Church But this doctrine hath neither of these 1 Cor. 5.5 1 Tim. 1 20. Therefore it is not to be thrust upon the Church Ans It hath the word for it If he refuse to hear the Church let him be unto thee as an heathen man It hath approved examples Let such a one be delivered unto Sathan And Whom I have delivered unto Sathan Objections against the Word or Scriptures alledged for proofe of Seniory and Excommunication REpl No mention is made of the Seniory or of Excommunication in the place Mat. 18. Therefore this Scripture proveth nothing Ans I deny the Antecedent For although there be not the formall words yet the thing it self is contained in them For the Seniory is intimated in these words Tell it to the Church and Excommunication in these Let him be unto thee as an heathen or publican Rep. 2. The Church is not the Seniory That by the name of the Church is meant the Seniorie But Christ commandeth that signification be given to the Church and that admonition be given by the Church therefore not by the Seniory Ans I deny the Major albeit the whole reason notwithstanding may be granted namely that Christ understandeth not the Seniory but taketh properly the name of the Church both of the Jewish before Christ and of the Christian after Christ But there must be notwithstanding some order of the jurisdiction of the Church some must be appointed and ordained by the Church to oversee and direct mens actions else will there be a confusion of all things We cannot observe that which Christ saith without defining of circumstances Therefore by the Church is comprehended the Seniory and by consequent it is understood of a Councell or assembly of Governours Repl. 3. It is true indeed that signification cannot be given to the whole Church but to the Councell or assembly of Governours which yet is civill so that the meaning is Tell the Church that is the Senate of the City Ans Now then they confesse that it cannot be signified to the whole Church but to some Councell or assembly of Governours which yet must be civill not ecclesiasticall The question then is whether Christs words are to be understood of a civill Councell and assembly They prove therefore that this Councel is civill thus That Councell which punisheth with corporall punishment is civill The Councell which gave Paul power to put Christians to death punisheth with corporall punishment Therefore it was civill Ans That Councell which punisheth so according to right is civill but they who gave that power to Paul did it wrongfully because they had not that right and authority but usurped it Which also is to be thought of their putting Stephen to death because it was done tumultuously and further the Priests themselves were consenting to it but unjustly Rep. 4. S. Austin saith John 18.31 Tract 114. in Joh. that the Jewes did lie when they said It is not lawfull for us to put any man to death Ans The words of Austin are these Did they not put him to death whom they yeelded up to be put to death But we must understand that they meant they might not put any to death because of the solemnity of the day which they began now to celebrate Ye false Israelites are ye so hard hearted Have ye so lost all sense through your over-much malice that you think your selves undefiled from the bloud of the innocent because ye delivered him to another to be slain Therefore Austin saith not that they lied but only saith that they did that neverthelesse which they said was not lawfull for them to doe Rep. 5. S. Chrysostome also saith In Mat. Hom. 83. It is not lawfull for us that is because of the feast approaching Ans This is not true with the good leave of S. Chrysostome be it spoken because it is witnessed by their stories that their civill jurisdiction and lawes were taken from them by Herod the Great Lib. 4. Antiq. c. 8. and Josephus writeth that the whole Councell was put to death by him and Hyrcanus one Sameas only excepted Therefore the Jews in effect say this unto Pilate Thou hast the power of the sword it is not lawfull for us to put any man to
death which thing Pilate also himself confirmeth saying Joh. 19.10 Knowest thou not that I have power to crucifie thee and have power to loose thee Repl. 6. It is said in the Gospel Take ye him and judge him after your own law Ans He meaneth the law of Moses as if he should say If he be a blasphemer stone him to death you have my good leave and warrant Repl. 7. Josephus saith That their lawes were granted unto them by Claudius Ans Then before-time they had them not Moreover Claudius is said in this sense to have granted them their lawes because hee permitted them to observe their own lawes and rites in religion Joseph lib. 19. Antiq. cap. 5. I will saith Claudius the Emperour that their lawes be no longer infringed through my predecessour Caius his folly but by the publication of this my Edict that other of Caius be repealed and they have free liberty to persist in the ancient religion of their Fathers Repl. 8. Their Councell was taken away by Herod the Great Therefore before time they had civill jurisdiction and at that time when Christ commanded to signifie it unto the Councell they had none but the civill Wherefore by consequent it was to be signified to the civill Senate for that there was no councell but the Civill For in all there were three councels or assemblies 1. Of the whole kingdome as the high courts of Parliament in England 2. A lesse councell which was the Senate of the city of Jerusalem and that was civill and ecclesiasticall 3. The Triumviri All these were civill The Councell then was civill Christ sendeth to the councell Therefore to the civill Senate Ans 1. By retortion If the Jews lost their civill Jurisdiction under Herod the Great then they had it not in Christs time for it is cleere that Herod the Great died before Christ began to teach Ans 2. The councell was civill but not only civill for it had also Ecclesiasticall power because it handled and decided matters of religion It consisted of Pharisees and Scribes of Divines and Lawyers For they had morall and judiciall lawes The lesse Councell therefore whereof Christ speaketh was not meerely Civill but Ecclesiasticall also Now then the question is Whether Christ commanded to tell the Councell as it is Civill or as it is Ecclesiasticall That he will have it signified unto the Councell as it is Ecclesiasticall we prove out of the text 1. Because we are commanded to account the excommunicated person for an heathen and publican that is for an alien from Christs Kingdome Now to pronounce a man to be a Publican and an alien from Christs kingdome belongeth unto the Ecclesiasticall Magistrate not unto the Civill because a publican and an heathen may be a member of the City but not of the Church of Christ 2. Christ addeth Verily verily I say unto you whatsoever ye bind on earth shall be bound in heaven Here Christ meeteth with an objection For the excommunicated person may object what doth this touch me Although the Church account me for an Infidell for a Heathen man and publican I wil notwithstanding in the mean season ear and drink Christ answereth therefore that this judgement shall not be frustrate or of no effect for I my selfe will be the executor of it Before he said I will give thee the keyes of the Kingdome of heaven Chap. 16. but there he speaketh of the common and generall authority of the Ministery here he speaketh namely and particularly of the Ministers authority in this case To bind loose therefore is not belonging unto the Civill Magistrate but unto the Church Thus farre concerning the first member That in the name of the Church mention is made of the Seniory Now as touching the other member that there is mention of Excommunication in those words Let him be unto thee as an heathen or publican The excommunication is contained in the place of Scripture before alledged Repl. 1. To be accounted for an Heathen man and To be excommunicated are not all one Therefore the word Excommunication is not contained here in words of like force Now the Antecedent is proved thus Let him be unto thee as an heathen man and a publican There he speakes not of the publique judgement of the Church but of the private judgement of each man Therefore he is not presently excommunicated by the whole Church who is accounted for an heathen by private men Ans Whom each in severall account for an heathen man him the whole Church so accounteth of Therefore he speaketh of the judgement of the Church Rep. 2. But it is not said there in the text whom the whole Church accounteth for an heathen man but He that heareth not the Church account him for a heathen man Therefore thou accountest him not so according to the Churches judgement but according to thine owne judgement Answ Well I account him so because he heareth not the Church But Not to heare the Church and To be a publican and estranged from the Church are not these all one But I adde another thing which admitteth lesse questioning He saith not onely to every private man but the whole Church For To thee and To the Church are of like force For when Christ commandeth that I account a man for a publican and a Heathen doth he in the meane time will that the Church account him for a Christian No because then he would have contrary judgements to be at once given of the same man Wherefore to be accounted of one for a publican is so to be accounted of all even of the whole Church and if that denunciation should not be done in speciall and particular no man should be accounted for a Publican But To be accounted of the Church for a publican and an heathen is to be excommunicated and to be out of the communion of the Church wherefore this later member standeth still that in the Scripture alledged mention is made of Excommunication and that it is committed to the Church Repl. 3. The wicked may be accounted for heathens and publicans without any Excommunication Therefore a publican and an excommunicate are not all one Ans I deny the Antecedent because To account one out of the communion of the Church and To excommunicate are all one Rep. 4. But we may account one that is think one in mind to be such a person Ans If he hear not the Church thou art to know not what the Church thinketh of him in mind but what they publikly determine of him whether thou maiest account him for an heathen and publican And furthermore Paul else-where forbids us to eat and drink with a wicked person 1 Cor. 5.11 but conversing with a wicked man cannot be avoided on the secret cogitation but on the publick determination of the Church therefore it is not a knowledge only in the mind Thirdly in the same place he saith Put away from among your selves that wicked man that
is proclaim and declare him to be no member of the Church Therefore To account one for a publican is not only to think in mind but also to pronounce him an aliant from the Church and to excommunicate him Objections against the example of the Apostles excommunicating alledged 1 Cor. 5. 2 Cor. 8.5 2 Thess 3. 1 Tim. 1. c. THey who at this day disallow the Discipline of the Church elude the example of S. Paul two wayes Some simply deny that the Apostle speaketh of Excommunication when he saith He that hath thus done let him be delivered unto Sathan For say they to deliver unto Sathan is not to excommunicate but by some miraculous punishment through Sathans means to cut off or at least curse and banne him and deliver him to Sathan to be tortured yet so that hee continue a member of the Church notwithstanding Others grant that Paul speaketh of Excommunication but they deny that the example pertaineth to us because now there are Christian Magistrates maintainers of discipline of which Magistrates the Church was destitute in the Apostles time Ans But against the former of these make the Apostles words To deliver up to Sathan To put from the Church is to excommunicate 1 Cor. 5.2 Put away from your selves that wicked man and With such a one eat not These cannot be understood of a miraculous punishment by death such as Ananias and Sapphira suffered but they signifie the ordinary authority and judgement of the Church 1. Because he saith Put ye away and reprehendeth them because they have not yet abandoned him And Yee are puffed up and have not rather sorrowed that he which hath done this deed might be put from among you Now all these had not the gift which Peter had Therefore hee should wrongfully reprove them for not shewing some miracle 2. Because he requireth the consent of the Church When ye are gathered together 1 Cor. 5.4 and my spirit But there was no need of such a concourse or an assembly for manifestation of a miracle 3. Because hee will that the incestuous person be delivered unto Sathan for the destruction of the flesh 1 Cor. 5.5 that the spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord Jesus that is he will have him so dealt withall that notwithstanding he might live and repent that his flesh might be tamed with true contrition that the old man might be mortified and the new man quickned Wherefore the Apostle would not that he should be slain 4. He speaketh of the separating and exiling him from the Church when he saith Purge out the old leaven Company not together with fornicators With such a one eat not All these speeches intimate a separation not any mortall punishment 5. The conference of places of Scripture teacheth that they who either in word or in life deny the Christian faith are not to be reputed Christians Ambrose saith that this incestuous person when his offence was once known was to be banished from the company of the brotherhood that is from the Church Now they who are cast out of the Church are worthily said to be delivered up to Sathan because they are conversant and resident in his kingdome as long as they repent not Three causes why Paul commanded the incestuous person to be excommunicated They who maintaine the later opinion alledge a false cause when they say that Paul therefore would have the incestuous person excommunicated because then there was no Christian Magistrate For Paul rendreth farre different reasons hereof which continue in force unto this day 1. The Commandement of Christ When yee are gathered together and my spirit in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ that is by that authority and warrant of Christ Tell it unto the Church Let him be unto thee as an Heathen or a Publican 2. That the excommunicated person might repent and be saved Let him be delivered unto Sathan for the destruction of the flesh that the spirit may be saved in the day of our Lord Jesus 3. Lest others should be tainted and infected with the same fore Know ye not that a little leaven leaveneth the whole lumpe For Christ our Passeover is sacrificed for us that we should live with the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth and become a new sprinkling and cast out the old leaven of maliciousnesse and wickednesse or at least if we cannot cast it all out yet that we professe not the toleration thereof These are the causes why Paul commanded that the incestuous person should be excommunicated out of the Church but we no where reade that the Church did therefore excommunicate wicked persons because it wanted a Christian Magistrate For the duties of the Church and of the Magistrate alwayes were and yet remaine distinct It is certaine then that the Apostle speaketh of Excommunication when he saith Deliver him unto Sathan Put away the wicked man from among you and that he treateth of the ordinary power of the Church against malefactors whether any miracle then betide or no. Object 1. Nathan excommunicated not David an adulterer Therefore Paul excommunicated not the incestuous person Answ David repented after the first warning therefore he ought not to be excommunicated Paul also speaketh with condition of repentance Put him away to wit if he repent not or hath not already repented on which repentance he commandeth that he be received againe This condition we must necessarily understand because that Christ would that certaine degrees of admonition should first be practised and God at any time receiveth the penitent into favour The Theefe on the Crosse is not excommunicated but upon his repentance received of Christ Mat. 18.28 If thy brother shall sin against thee untill seventy times seven times thou shalt forgive him Wherefore not offenders but obstinate persons of which sort David was none are to be excommunicated Object 2. Christ excommunicated none Therefore Paul did it not neither ought the Church to excommunicate any Ans The consequence is not good to argue from the deniall of the fact to the deniall of the right and lawfulnesse of the fact The argument is no better than this Christ baptised none Therefore Paul might not and the Church may not baptise any For Christ indeed baptised none but he commanded his Apostles to baptise all Nations So likewise he excommunicated none but he commanded the Church to excommunicate the rebellious and obstinate Mat. 18.17 5.24 Acts 8.36 Let him be unto thee as an Heathen Leave thy gift at the Altar c. Philip said to the Eunuch Thou maist be baptised if thou beleevest with all thine heart Therefore he had not baptised him if he had not beleeved Object 3 Paul saith Ye have not * * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 sorrowed that he which hath done this deed 1 Cor. 5.25 might be put from among you Therefore they should have prayed that God would miraculously take him away by the Devill Answ Yee
have not sorrowed signifieth ye have not been earnest in taking away that scandall which should be removed from you from you I say because in the end Paul saith Put away from your selves that wicked man Therefore these words That he might be put from among you signifie that he was to be cut off not by Sathan but by the Church Repl. Paul useth the same word of himselfe 2 Cor. 12.21 I shall * * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 bewaile many of them which have sinned already and have not repented c. Here to bewaile signifieth not to be carefull of removing a scandall from the Church Therefore neither in the former place Answ We answer out of the text In that place he saith If I come againe I will not spare 2 Cor. 13.1 Where he noteth the cause of this his griefe in that he is constrained to punish severely the obstinate that is in the end to excommunicate them out of the Church Object 4. The Apostle expoundeth himselfe that he did not enjoyne the Corinthians to excommunicate the incestuous person when he saith 2 Cor. 2.6 It is sufficient unto the same man that he was rebuked of many Therefore those words Account him for a Heathen and a Publican and Put him away from among you signifie onely a rebuking Answ This reason deceiveth by a fallacy of consequent because a generall rule is not builded upon an example For because here was need of rebuking only seeing the party repented it doth not therefore follow that alwaies the same only is required Repl. What they did that Paul commanded But they did only reprehend and rebuke Therefore Paul commanded them onely to reprehend him when he commanded them to put him away from among them and to deliver him up to Sathan Ans Paul commanded that they should reprehend him but not that only because he commanded also that they should reject him if he repented not But if he repented it should be sufficient to reprehend and rebuke him Wherefore it doth not follow They only reprehended him Therefore Paul commanded them only to reprehend him This is a true answer unto the former reply but there is another also cleere and manifest For the Greek word which the Apostle here useth signifieth not only reprehension and rebuking 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but also that excommunication which is by words only And in this sense not onely it may but also must be taken because he saith So that now contrariwise yee ought rather to forgive him Therefore he was now excommunicated and not as yet received but to be received Neither was he only reprehended and rebuked but also cast out and rejected Matth. 18. And when also he saith Of many hereby is confirmed that by the name of the Church whereof Christ speaketh is not understood the common multitude but the chiefe Governours of the Church Againe For this cause did I write saith the Apostle that I might know the proofe of you whether you would be obedient in all things He praiseth them therefore because they obeyed Wherefore before repentance he forbiddeth That they company not together with the excommunicated person And further he also saith I pray you that you would confirme your love towards him The Greek word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which we interpret to confirme signifieth by publike sentence to speake a thing So it is taken Galat. 5.15 A mans covenant when it is confirmed that is ratified by publike authority The Apostles meaning therefore here is that they should declare their love towards that man by publike testimony Therefore to forgive is to receive the excommunicated person into favour and that doth he often repeat Now there was also some space betweene the writing of the former and the later Epistle to the Corinthians Therefore he stood in the meane time excommunicated In the former Epistle Paul saith That he heareth that some wicked persons were among the flocke Them he willeth to be excommunicated And it is likely that the Corinthians obeyed this his commandment in excommunicating them and so wrote to Paul that they had obeyed him therein because in his second Epistle Chap. 2. he commendeth them and willeth them to receive againe the incestuous person upon repentance Object 5. Excommunication needeth no excuse but Paul excuseth himselfe for that he had commanded him to be delivered up to Sathan Therefore he commanded not that he should be excommunicated but enjoyned some more grievous penance Answ The Major is false because excommunication from the Church and Kingdome of Christ whereas it is a most grievous punishment it requireth a farre greater excuse than any bodily punishment Object 6. The Ministers cannot shut men out of the Kingdome of God Therefore Paul commandeth them no such matter Ans To the Antecedent we answer that they indeed cannot by their owne authority but they can in Christs name according to the Apostles direction When ye are gathered together and my spirit in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ Againe they cannot cast men out of Gods Kingdome but they both can and ought to denounce rejection unto such as God professeth in his word that he doth reject For to excommunicate is nothing else but by denouncing to obstinate offenders their rejection from God to subscribe unto Gods divine censure Now this the Church not onely can but ought also to doe Therefore Paul reprehended the Corinthians because they excommunicated not the incestuous adulterer but expected untill they were admonished hereof Therefore he reprehendeth them because they had swerved from the common rule that is performed not the known and ordinary office of the Church that according to the commandement they should account of him as of an heathen or publican Obj. 7. Paul commandeth that he should be delivered to Sathan for the destruction of the flesh But the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 importing destruction signifieth every-where in Scripture violent death Therefore here in this place also is insinuated a miraculous slaying of the body by Sathan that the soule might be saved Ans It appeareth out of the circumstances that destruction here signifieth the mortifying of the old man for the opposition of the flesh and the spirit and the very phrase is most usuall with Paul in this sense The whole scope also of the matter ratifieth the same for he will that he should be delivered unto Sathan that the flesh may be mortified and the spirit saved that is that he may be converted in this life and saved in the life to come Therefore his meaning is not that he should be miraculously destroyed and deprived of life Rep. But no man can be delivered unto Sathan for his conversion or the mortification of the old man in him Ans It is true that this delivery and giving over to Sathan of it selfe worketh no such effect but by accident that is it is of Gods mercy that the elect are reformed by chastisements And in the same sense wherewith
observation of them necessary except the omitting of them breed offence So it is no worship of God but a thing indifferent and not binding mens consciences to use this or that forme of prayer to pray standing or kneeling to pray at this or that time at this or that houre in this or that place to reade or interpret this or that Text of Scripture to eat or not to eat flesh c. Neither hath the Church only this right and power to constitute or abrogate or alter by her own authority these ordinances as she judgeth it to be most expedient for her common edification but the consciences also of particular men retain this liberty so that they may either omit these or do otherwise without any offence against God if there arise no scandall or offence thereby amongst men that is if they do it neither of contempt or neglect of the Ministery nor of wantonnesse or ambition or of a desire of contention and novelty nor with the offending of weak ones The reason is because then lawes are rightly observed when they are observed according to the mind and purpose of the Law-giver But the Church ought to will that such ordinances and statutes as are made concerning things indifferent be observed not in respect of our owne authority or commandement but only for the maintenance of order and comelinesse and for the avoiding of scandals and offences Wherefore as long as comelinesse or order is not violated neither offence given it leaveth every mans conscience free to himself For not in respect of the Churches or Ministers commandement but in respect of the just causes of commanding things indifferent are necessary sometimes to be done or â—o be omitted and the conscience is hurt not by the neglect of any humane commandement as in Civill matters but by the neglect of the causes for which they are commanded Hither belongeth the precept of S. Paul If any of them which beleeve not call you unto a feast 1 Cor. 10.27 and ifâ—e will go whatsoever is set before you eat asking no question for conscience sake But if any man say unto you This is sacrificed unto Idols eate it not because of him that shewed it and for the conscience for the earth is the Lords and all that therein is and the conscience I say not thine but of that other for why should my liberty be condemned of another mans conscience For if I through Gods benefit be partaker why am I evill spoken of Acts 15. for that wherefore I give thanks Likewise the decree of the Councell of the Apostles 1 Cor. 11. of things sacrificed to Idols of bloud and that which was strangled Likewise the precept given concerning women to be covered Likewise the Lords day substituted by the Church in place of the Sabbath for the exercise of the Ministery c. Object If the Edicts of Magistrates binde mens consciences why then do not the traditions of the Church binde them also A difference between Civill and Ecclesiasticall Laws Answ There is a difference in these examples God gave this power and authority of making Civill Laws unto the Magistrate and hath strengthned it with this band in that he threatneth and denounceth his anger against them which breake these Laws but unto the Church and to his Ministers he hath not given any such authority but yet notwithstanding he would have these Laws and constitutions to be observed which the Ministers and the Church of their own authority command not for any necessity that there is of obeying these Laws commanded by the Church but according to the rule of charity that is for a desire of avoiding offence Mat. 20.25 This answer is delivered in these places of Scripture Ye know that the Lords of the Gentiles have dominion over them and they that are great exercise authority over them But it shall not be so among you but whosoever will be great among you let him be your servant Not as if yee were lords over Gods heritage but that yee may be ensamples to the slock 1 Pet. 5.3 Coâ—os 2.16 Gal. 5.1 Two causes of this difference Let no man condemne you in meate you in meate and drink or in respect of an Holy-day or of the new Moone or of the Sabbath dayes Stand fast in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free Neither are the causes obscure or hard to come by for which God made this difference namely 1. That there might be an evident difference between the Civill Magistrate unto whom it belongeth to beare rule over his subjects and to constraine by corporall force such as obey not and the Ministers of the Church unto whom no such rule and power is granted but unto them is committed the charge and office of teaching and instructing men concerning the will of God 2. Because of the breach of Ecclesiasticall Laws if it be done without giving offence the first Table of the Decalogue for which they are to serve is not broken but by the breach of Civil Laws albeit no offence be given thereby the second Table is broken inasmuch as either some thing is taken from the Common-wealth Repâ— or some occasion is given of injuring it Neither is this reply of force That unto the greater and worthier office greater obedience is due and therefore the constitutions of the Ministers of the Church are no lesse necessary to be kept then the Laws of the Civill Magistrates Answ For unto the worthier greater obedience is due in those things which are properly belonging unto his office Now the proper office of the Civill Magistrate is to make Laws which are for the commandement it selfe to be observed but the proper office of the Ministery of the Church is to sound forth Gods Commandements and the proper office of the Church is to ordaine ceremoniall decrees which must be kept not for the commandement of man but for avoiding of offences 4. Humane ordinances 4. Wicked ordinances of men Acts 5.29 Mat. 15.3 which are repugnant unto the ordinances of God These God forbiddeth us to obey whether the Civill Magistrate command them or the Church or the Ministers of the Church We ought rather to obey God then men Why transgresse you the Commandement of God by your tradition Object Answ Having now considered these foure kinds of ordinances delivered by men it is easie to make answer unto that first objection God commandeth us to obey the commandements of men He doth so 1. Such as be good that is not repugnant unto the word 2. Such as he himselfe hath commanded by men that worship may be given him 3. Civill ordinances which depend on the authority of men not obeying them for divine worship but for conscience sake 4. Ecclesiasticall or ceremoniall ordinances obeying them but not respecting therein any divine worship or conscience neither of which they import but only the avoiding of offence Object 2. What things the Church commandeth by the
is not translated unto them which is proper unto Christ Answ They cannot escape or avoide by this meanes but that they must needs be injurious unto Christ For the Antecedent proposition hath no sufficient enumeration of those waies whereby Christs honour is translated unto others For not onely they which by their own proper vertue and worthinesse but also they which by Christs vertue are said to merit of God those blessings that are proposed for the merit of Christ onely are put in the place and office of Christ For no man besides Christ is able to merit of God any thing not so much as for himselfe much lesse for others by his own obedience and intercession wherefore our Adversaries by this reply overturne their owne doctrine For if the prayers of the Saints are acceptable to God and are heard of him through the force and vertue of Christs merit and intercession they cannot be accepted nor obtaine any thing for us for their owne holinesse and merits as the Papists have hitherto taught us For he that standeth in need of a Mediatour and Intercessour himselfe cannot be the intercessour for other men albeit he may pray for others For he is here called an Intercessour who by the worthinesse and glory of his owne satisfaction and petition obtaineth grace and favour for others 13. Here they reply They which pray for us in heaven are to be prayed unto The Saints pray for us in heaven because in this life they pray one for another and in heaven their love is more fervent towards us then in this life and this may be done without any injury unto Christ our Mediatour and with assured perswasion of being heard either for their merits or for the merit of Christ Therefore we are to pray unto them Answ The consequence of this reason holdeth not Because the praying of one for another is no sufficient cause for which he should be called upon or prayed to who doth pray We gladly yeeld and grant that the Saints in heaven do most earnestly desire of God the defence and deliverance of their brethren namely of the Church militant on earth and that their prayers are heard according to the will and counsell of God whereunto they submit themselves And that this is the meaning and opinion of the ancient Doctors when they treate of the prayers of the blessed for the Church the considering and conference of the places themselves doth shew But that the Saints understand and pray against the evils and dangers of every one and heare out petitions and requests we deny Wherefore neither living in that heavenly fellowship and society neither conversing in this life are they to be called upon or prayed unto without manifest Idolatry 14. God saith though Moses and Samuel stood before me yet mine affection could not be towards this people Therefore the Saints departed pray for us Answ 1. Though we should grant this whole argument yet it followeth not hereon that they are to be prayed unto as hath been already proved 2. This is a figure of speech representative bringing in the dead praying as if they were yet living so that the meaning and sense is Though Moses and Samuel were now living and should pray for this wicked and reprobate people as whiles they lived they prayed for their people and were heard yet they should not obtaine grace or pardon The like place we reade in Ezekiel Though Noah Daniel and Job were in the midst of it As I live saith the Lord God Ezek. 14.20 they shall deliver but their owne soules Here Daniel which was yet living and Noah and Job which were long since departed are placed by the Prophet in the midst of the wicked praying for them 15. The Lord saith by Esaiah I will defend the City to save it for mine owne sake and for David my servants sake â— Kings 19.34 Therefore wee are heard also for the merit and intercession of the Saints Ans This protection and preserving of the City is not promised in respect of Davids merit but in respect of Gods promise of the Messias which should be born of Davids posterity Repl. The delivery of the City from the siege of the Assyrians is not promised and performed in respect of the promise of the Messias because that promise might have beene fulfilled without the benefit of delivery as also it was fulfilled after the taking and overthrow of the City Ans They erre that restraine Christs benefit to those things or promises onely without the performance whereof the promise made unto David concerning the Messias could not have been kept For all the benefits and blessings of God both corporall and spirituall both before and after the Messias was exhibited as well those without which the promise of the Messias could as those without which it could not be fulfilled are all performed unto the Church for the Messias sake For all the promises of God in him are Yea and are in him Amen 2 Cor. 1.20 And so doth the Scripture expound the like kinds of speaking as 1 Kings 13. Deut. 7. Lastly the benefits which God also performeth unto the wicked posterity of the godly are attributed to the godlinesse of their godly parents not of merit but of mercy and for the truth of Gods promises As Exod. 20. 32. Deut. 4.16 16. Jacob saith of Josephs sons Let my name be named upon them Gen. 48.16 and the name of my fathers Abraham and Isaac Here Jacob willeth himselfe and his fathers to be called upon after his death Therefore it is lawfull to call upon the Saints departed Ans It is an Hebrew phrase which signifieth not adoration but an adopting of sonnes so that the sense is Let them be called by my name or let them take their name from me that is let them be called my sons having the dignity and title of Patriarchs that two Tribes of Israel may come therein The like phrase is in Esay Esa 4.1 In that day shall seven women say to one man * According to the old Latines Let thy name be called upon us Job 5.1 Let us be called by thy name that is let us be called thy wives 17. Call now if any will answer thee and to which of the Saints wilt thou turne Here Eliphas exhorteth Job to crave the aid of some Saints Answ The words which goe before do shew that these words belong to a comparison of men with Angels whom he saith so far to excell men in purity that they doe not so much as make answer or appeare being called by men Wherefore this place doth more make against then plead for the invocation of Angels * This is translated according to the old Latine translation the words whereof the Papists urge 18. If there be an Angel one of a thousand to speake for him to declare mans righteousnesse He will have mercy upon him and will say Deliver him that he go not downe into the pit I
have found one in whom I am reconciled unto him Ans Here the old translation speaketh improperly For the words are thus If there be an Angel with him or Interpreter one of a thousand to declare unto man his righteousnesse Then will he have mercy upon him and will say Deliver him that he go not downe into the pit for I have found a reconciliation Now then albeit this were the sense that Angels pray for men distressed and in affliction yet this made nothing for their invocation But it is manifest that this is the sense If a man diseased or afflicted be in his calamity instructed of the will justice and goodnesse of God either by an Angel or by a Prophet or by some Teacher for these also are called Angels and repenteth him of his sins and assenteth unto the doctrine and comfort ministred unto him him will God deliver by their ministery by whom he doth instruct him 19. Inasmuch as saith Christ ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren Mat. 25.40 ye have done it unto me Therefore what honour of invocation we give unto the Saints the same is also given unto Christ himself Ans That honour of the creature may and ought to be referred unto God which God willeth to be done unto him but that honour of the creature which God forbiddeth to be given unto the creature is not honourable but reproachfull and contumelious unto God Now the reason is sottish whereas they will seeme to draw it from the words of Christ when Christ speaketh of the duties of charity which God willeth us to performe in this life towards those that stand in need of our aid help not of the invocation of Saints 20. If the Angels understanding our necessities pray for us and so are to be prayed unto it is lawfull also to pray unto Saints But that the Angels pray for us in speciall it is confirmed by Zachary The Angel of the Lord answered and said Chap. 1.12 O Lord of hosts how long wilt thou be unmercifull to Jerusalem and to the cities of Judah Ans The Major is not wholly to be granted namely that all the Angels understand all the wants and necessities of men For the calamities of Jewry were open not onely to the sight of Angels but also to the sight of Men. 2. We deny the consequence which they frame from the Angels unto the Saints departed For unto the Angels God committeth the care and protection of his Church in this life Therefore they being also here on earth see and know our miseries which the Saints see not unto whom this charge is not committed and they pray particularly for many which we cannot affirme of the Saints by any testimonies of Scripture 3. There is another fault in the consequence in concluding that we must pray to them because they pray for us because not every one who prayeth for us is straight-waies to be invocated as was before declared Object 21. Judas Maccabaeus saw in a dreame Onias the High-Priest and Jeremias the Prophet praying for the people 2 Maccab. 15.14 and holy city Jerusalem Therefore the Saints deceased pray for us and are to be prayed unto by us Ans First an Apocryphall book proveth nothing Againe we deny the consequence that because the Saints pray for us therefore we should pray to them seeing every one that prayeth for us is not forthwith to be prayed unto by us Object 22. Baruc saith Heare now the prayer of the dead Israelites Therefore the Saints pray for us and are to be prayed unto by us Ans Baruc is an Apocryphall Scripture also and besides in this argument the words dead Israelites are mis-construed For the Israelites are there said to be dead not which were deceased and departed this life but which were yet living and invocating on God in this life but by reason of their calamities like unto those that are dead Object 23. We cannot have accesse unto a Prince witâ—â—ut some ones intercession and mediation Therefore much lesse may we appeare before God without some Intercessour and Mediatour Ans We grant the whole For indeed without Christ the Mediatour there is no accesse to God for any man according as Christ himselfe saith No man commeth to the Father but by me John 14.6 And Ambrose notably answereth this their argument in his Exposition or Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans thus writing Some men are wont to use a miserable or cold excuse saying that we have accesse unto God by his righteous Saints as we have unto a King by his Nobles about him Well Is any man so desperately madde and carelesse of his life as to transferre the Majesty and title of the King to any of his attendants especially seeing that they who are found to have but once consulted of this practise are worthily condemned as guilty of treason Yet these men thinke them not guilty of treason against God who attribute Gods proper honour unto the creature and forsaking the Lord and Master adore and worship their fellow servants as if this made any whit the more for them that herein they serve God For therefore we approach unto a King by meanes of his Nobles and followers because the King himselfe is a man in like manner as we are and knoweth not to whom he may commit the charge of the Common-wealth But to put God in minde of us who is not ignorant of us for he knoweth the merits of all we need no solicitor save onely a devout minde For wheresoever such a one speaketh he will answer nothing c. And Chrysostome saith The Canaanitish woman prayeth not James nor beseecheth John nor goeth to Peter nor followeth after the whole company of the Apostles nor seeketh any Mediatour but in stead of all these she taketh repentance for her companion which repentance bare the place or person of her Advocate and so she went on to the spring head even Christ Thus much be spoken of the sixt vertue prescribed in this Commandement namely invocation and calling on God VII Vertue Right and lawfull swearing Right and lawfull swearing which is comprehended under invocation as a speciall under the generall wherein we desire that God would become a witnesse of the minde of the swearer that in the thing which he sweareth he will not deceive and that God would punish the swearer if he deceive This swearing is authorised by God to be a bond of truth between men and men and a testimony or record that God is the author and defender of truth Unto right and lawfull swearing is opposed The vices opposite Refusing of a lawfull oath The refusing of a lawfull oath when one avoydeth to take an oath which tendeth to Gods glory and to the safety of his neighbour An oath for confirmation is an end of all strife Perjury What it is to forsweare Forswearing Heb. 6.16 when wittingly and willingly a man deceiveth by
why the ceremoniall law belongeth not unto us are especially these 1. One part of this law of sanctifying the Sabbath is ceremoniall Col. 2.16 2. Paul saith Let no man condemne you in respect of an holy day 3. The Apostles themselves did change the Sabbath of the seventh day 4. From the end or purpose of the law It was a type of things that were to be fulfilled by Christ namely of sanctification and every type must give place to the thing thereby signified Likewise it was a severing or distinguishing the Jewes from other Nations but this severing and distinction was taken away by Christ Object 3. The Lord saith of the Sabbath day Exod. 31.27 It is a signe between me and the children of Israel for ever and an everlasting covenant Therefore the Sabbath of the seventh day is never to be abolished Ans 1. The ceremoniall Sabbath was perpetuall untill Christs coming who is the end of ceremonies 2. The Sabbath is eternall as concerning the thing signified which is a ceasing from sins and a rest in God for in this sense are all the types of the old Testament eternall even the kingdome of David also which yet was overthrown before the coming of the Messias Object 4. Wee grant the Mosaicall ceremonies to be changeable yet it followeth not thereof Look the question concerning the abrogating of the Law Ob. 1. Pag. 2. that the lawes which were made before Moses time are changeable in the number whereof also is the keeping of the Sabbath day Answ The ceremonies which were ordained of God before Moses are also changeable because they were types of the benefits of the Messias to come and therefore are by his coming abolished as circumcision which was given unto Abraham as also the sacrifices which were prescribed unto our first Parents Object 5. The lawes which were given of God before the fall are not types of the benefits of the Messias and binde all mankinde for ever for then was not given as yet the promise of the Messias and there was one and the same condition of all mankind But the Sabbath of the seventh day was ordained by God as soon as the creation of the world was finished before the fall of mankinde Therefore it is universall and perpetuall Ans The Major proposition is true concerning the morall law the notions whereof were imprinted in mans mind at the first creation but it is not true as touching the ceremony or observing of the seventh day as which after the fall was made a type of the benefits of the Messias in the Mosaicall law and therefore in like manner as other ceremonies which were either then or before instituted it became subject to mutation and change by the coming of the Messias For God would not have the shadowes of things to continue or remain the things themselves being once come and exhibited Wherefore albeit wee grant that the exercises of divine worship were to have been kept on the seventh day according to the commandement and prescript of the Decalogue as well if men had never sinned as now after they sinned yet notwithstanding seeing God hath enrolled this ceremony amongst the shadowes of the Messias to come he hath by this new law enacted by Moses made it changeable together with other ceremonies Object 6. The cause of the law being perpetuall doth make the law it selfe also perpetuall The memory and celebration of the creation and the meditation on the workes of God is a perpetuall cause of the Sabbath Therefore the Sabbath is perpetuall yea even after Christs coming Ans A law is made perpetuall or unchangeable by reason of an unchangeable cause that is if that cause it and doe necessarily or perpetually require this law as an effect or meane but not if at other times that end may be better come unto by other meanes or if the Law-giver may as well obtaine the same end by another law In like manner seeing also this law of sanctifying the Sabbath of the seventh day being repealed and abolished we may neverthelesse godlily and holily by other meanes meditate on Gods workes it followeth not that this law of the ceremoniall Sabbath is perpetuall although the memory and celebration of Gods creation and works ought to be perpetuall and therefore hath the Church by common consent according to Christian liberty well changed this ceremony of observing the seventh day being taken away by Christ and hath substituted in the place of the seventh day the first day of the week yet so that there is observed no difference of daies which is utterly forbidden in the Church seeing one day is not holier than another The Anabaptists also against the observation of the first day of the week Objecti against the observing of Sunday or the Lords day Col. 2.16 Galat. 4.10 Rom. 14.6 or the Lords day oppose those sayings of Scripture which forbid the putting of difference between daies and daies in the new Testament Let no man condemne you in respect of an holy day Yee observe daies and months and times and yeares Hee that observeth the day observeth it to the Lord and he that observeth not the day observeth it not to the Lord. Therefore say they the observation of the first day of the week or the Lords day is no lesse in these places reproved than the solemnizing of the Sabbath Ans We answer to the Antecedent that a putting difference between dayes and dayes is indeed forbidden amongst Christians but not simply or wholly but on this wise namely if it be done with an opinion of ceremonious worship or necessity Now the first day of the week or the Lords day is not so observed by the Church For there is a double difference between the Christian observing of the Lords day and the Jewish observing of the Sabbath or seventh day A double difference between the Christian observing of the Lords day and the Jewish observing of the Sabbath For 1. It was not lawfull for the Jewes to change the Sabbath or to omit it as being a part of ceremoniall worship and this they might not doe by reason of the expresse commandement of God to the contrary But the Christian Church retaining still her liberty allotteth the first day unto the Ministery without adjoyning any opinion of necessity or worship 2. The old ceremoniall Sabbath was in the old Testament a type of things to be fulfilled by Christ but in the new Testament that signification ceaseth and there is had regard only of order and comelinesse without which there could be either no Ministery or at least wise no well ordered Ministery in the Church 3. The causes for which the Sabbath day was instituted THe finall causes or ends for which the Sabbath day was instituted are these For publike service and worship of God in the Church The publike service and worship of God in the Church exercise of prayers confession and obedience in which consisteth the study of the knowledge of
thy glory Quest 129. What meaneth this particle Amen Ans That the thing is sure and out of doubt a 2 Cor. 1.20 2 Tim. 2.13 For my prayer is much more certainly heard of God then I feele in my heart that I unfeignedly desire the same The Explication THis particle is added not as a part of the prayer but it noteth and betokeneth 1. A true and sincere desire wherewith we wish that we may be heard that the thing we aske may be sure and certaine unto us and that God would condescend and answer unto our request 2. A certainty and profession of our confidence or confirmation of our faith whereby we trust that we shall be heard Wherefore the word Amen signifieth 1. So be it and sure and certaine be that which wee desire 2. So God being not unmindfull of his promise truely and certainely heare us FINIS Soli Deo Laus Gloria A large Alphabeticall Table containing all the chiefe and remarkable points contained in this BOOKE A ABsolution How the word of God doth absolve and condemne 485. Actions All actions are not sins in themselves but by accident 209. No action evill in it self in respect of God 210. Adultery The meaning of the word Adultery 601. Vide Chastity Affability What it is 613. Afflictions How many kinds of them 103. How they are punishments and how crosses ibidem Eight causes of them on the godly 104. The comforts which they have in them 105. 106. Three causes of the afflictions of the godly 161. All. Why all men are not saved by Christ but the faithfull onely 132. Whether Christ died for all 298. A reconciliation of those Scriptures which seeme to make for Christs dying for all 298. 299. Amen What it signifies 655. Angels What good Angels are 189. They are finite ibid. How they are called the children of God 190. They are the Ministers of the Elect. ib. Why called Powers 191. of evill Angels ibid. Christ called an Angel 256. Two reasons proving it ibid. c. Anger Gods anger against sin 165. Annointed Vid. Christ Why Christ is so called 226. What this annointing is ib. the Analogie betweene the signe and the thing signified 227. Christ is annointed spiritually 228. Why God cannot be said to be annointed ibidem and yet in what sort Christ may be said to be annointed according to his Godhead ibidem What the annointing of Christians is 234 What it is to be the partaker of Christs annointing 235. Arrians Their heresies confuted 263. 264. 265. c. Ascension What Christs ascension is 313. whither he ascended ibid. The manner how 314. The fruits of it 320. B BAptism What it is 409. Three things comprehended in it 410. The differences betweene baptisme and the washing of old ibidem Its ends and why it is not to be re-iterated 411. What it is to be baptised into Christs death 412. A two-fold washing in baptisme 413 What the right and lawfull use of baptisme is 414. The proper and improper formes of speaking of baptisme 415. Why baptisme is called the washing of the new birth 416. The baptisme of Infants confirmed by many arguments 417. The Anabaptists Arguments answered about the baptisme of Infants 418. 419. c. How baptisme and circumcision agree and how they differ 423. 424. Beget Begotten How Christ is said to be the only begotten Sonne of God 239. Why according to his manhood be cannot be properly so called 240. Beleeve What it is to beleeve God and IN God 179. what it is to beleeve IN Christ 237. Vid. Faith Blasphemy The difference betweene the blasphemy against God and against the holy Ghost 558. Blessings Wee may desire as well corporall as spirituall blessings 641. why corporall blessings are comprehended under the word Bread 643. Body How the parts of mans body are attributed to God 152. The Image of GOD in man doth not argue a bodily shape ibidem The similitude of mans body to declare our union with Christ 234. Of the bodies resurrection Vide Resurrection 372. 373. The ubiquity of Christs body confuted 459. Borne Five causes of Christs being borne of the Virgin Mary 272. The benefit of it 272. 273. Bounty In what the bounty of God is seen 164. Bread The breaking of Bread is one of the names which the Lords Supper yet retaines 427. Two things signified by it 434. Foure causes why this ceremony is yet retained ibid. whether Bread and Wine are the very body and bloud of Christ in the Sacrament 436. why the Bread is called the body 455. their Analogie 456. How corporall blessings are contained under the name of Bread 643. how we call Bread in the Lords Prayer Ours ibid. why Daily Bread and This Day 644. Brother Brotherhood Of our Brotherhood with Christ 240. Buriall To what end Christ was buried 300. C CAtechisme Catechising What. 25. who were the Catechumeni 25. 26. The originall and perpetuall use of Catechisme 26. The parts and points of it 27. Why necessary ibidem Its ends 29. Ceremonies What they are with their severall sorts 588. whether the Church may ordaine ceremonies 589. Chastity What it is 602. It s contrary vices 602. 603. c. Vide Adultery Christ Hee is perfectly just foure waies 115. why Christ is the Sonne and not Father nor holy Ghost 118. 119. why all are not saved by him and why the faithfull onely 132. why hee is called Jesus a Saviour 220. his office and benefits differ ibidem He is our most perfect Saviour 223. whom he saveth 224. why Jesus is called the Annointed 226. 227. he is annointed spiritually 228. Vide Annoint Christs Propheticall function what 229. Vide Prophet Why he is called the Word 230. why a Priest with the circumstances thereof See the word Priest Why Christ is a King and what his Kingdome is Vide King 233. Christ is our head in three respects 235. how Christ can be called the onely begotten Sonne of GOD when we also are called his sonnes 238. Of Christs God-head 241. his God-head proved by our Regeneration 251. Christ the Sonne of GOD a person really distinct from â—he Father and the holy Ghost 257. Christ hath the whole God-head entire 258. The properties thereof 259. he is equall in honour with the Father and the holy Ghost 260. Christians Why wee are so called 233. what our annointing is 234. Our Propheticall function and Priesthood 236. Church A definition of the doctrine of the Church 1. Reasons why GOD would have his Church distinguished from other Sects ibidem Notes of the Church 3. The parts of its doctrine with the differences from other Sects 3. 4. The difference betweene Church-doctrine and Philosophy 3. 4. How the Church-doctrine was delivered of God and how confirmed 4. 5. Reasons why the Scriptures depend not on the Church 5. Objections against this answered 6. 7. The Papists brag of their Churches not erring 16. Not the Church but the holy Ghost is Judge of the Word 21. Three Rules for having the
Our sacrifices differ from Christs three waies 236. How sacrifices and sacraments differ 400. A propitiatory sacrifice cannot be without bloud 461. Save Saviour Vide Jesus How the whole three persons may be said to save 221. 222. Christ is our most perfect Saviour 223. Why all men are not saved by Christ and why onely the faithfull 132. Scriptures Their authority depend not on the Church 5. 6. Objections against this answered 6. 7. Arguments shewing the certainty of Scriptures 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Why no doctrine but the Scripture is to be received into the Church 12. It is the rule of faith ibid. The difference of it and other mens opinions 13. The Scriptures sufficiency proved by the Ancients 14. Objections against it answered ibid. c. The Papists objection of the Scriptures obscurity answered 18. 19. Some places of Scripture more darke then other some confessed and instanced 19. Three points observable in the interpretation of Scriptures 20. 438. Not the Church but the holy Ghost is Judge of the Scriptures 21. Six waies of deciding doubts in Scriptures 21. 22. Servant Whence the word is derived and what it signifies 269. Shamefastnesse What it is 603. Silence What 612. Simplicity What. 612. Sinne Vid. Wickednesse What sinne and what manner of sin the first sin of man was pag. 45. It consists in six things pag. 45. 46. What were the causes of its first sinne ibid. c. and effects 47. The cause of its permission by God with excellent uses of it 47. 48. How we know that sin is in us 48. What sin is 49. A two fold nature of it ibid. Two proofes that corrupt inclinations are sinnes 50. What originall sin is ib. 51. proofes of its being derived to posterity ibid. Foure causes why Adams posterity abideth the punishment of his sinne 53. Whether Infants sinne seeing they want will 54. Actuall sin what ibid. Of reigning sinne and why so called ibid. of mortall and veniall sin that Popish distinction 55. The Elect may sin against conscience yet not unto death 55. All sinne mortall in its owne nature 56. Of sin against and not against conscience 59. Of the sin against the holy Ghost what and why unpardonable 59. 60. Sin what it is of it selfe 62. The vertues of the unregenerate are sins by accident ibid. What the causes of sinne are 64. An order in the causes of sinne ibidem Foure pretended causes of sin 65. God no cause of it ibid. It ariseth from man himselfe 66. It s beginning is from the Devill 67. GOD is the causer of sinne not as sinne but as punishments ibid. The proper ends of sinne ibid. Sinne is a naturall property of man corrupted 71. The fearfull effects of sinne 72. 73. All sinnes not equall 73. God in sinne though he be the mover of the wicked will yet he is not the mover of the wickednesse in the will 80. Three causes why God is said to permit sinne 201. The Question of Gods being thought to be the cause of sinne decided 209. 210. 211. c. Sin is not of the nature of mans flâ—sh but by accident only 275. The Article of remission of sins 361. Sit. Sitting Why it is said Christ sitteth at the right hand of God 321. 322. Vide Hand of God Slandering What. 611. Sonne Vide Christ How Christ can be called the onely begotten Sonne of God when wee also are called his sonnes 238. 246. Divers sorts of sonnes ibidem How Christ is the onely and first begotten Sonne of GOD. 239. How the naturall Sonne of God 239. 244. and co-eternall 244. 245. Christ so named before he tooke our flesh 245. The onely begotten Sonne of God 246. The Sonne hath all things from the Father not by grace but by nature 260. Hee doth all things with the Father as the Father doth ibidem Arguments against the Sonnes Divinity answered 264. 265. Why the Sonne is called Lord and why Our Lord. 268. How the Sonne was conceived by the holy Ghost 270. Soule Whether immortall 365. sundry places of Scripture alledged against the immortality of the soule 366. The Elects soules estate separated from the body 369. Spirit Vide holy Ghost The divers names which are given in the Scripture to the Spirit 341. Suffering Vide passion pag. 290. 291. 292. c. Whether Christ suffered according to both natures 293. why hee suffered under Pontius Pilate 294. why on the Crosse 295. Ancient types of that death ibidem Superstition Who are superstitious 540. Supper Vide Sacraments What the Lords Supper is 426. 427. It s manifold names 427. Its ends 428. How Baptisme and the Lords Supper differ 429. What it is to eate the flesh of Christ in the Lords Supper 430. who ought to approach to the Lords Supper and who not 462. what the wicked receive in the Lords Supper 463. Three causes for which the wicked are said to eate unto themselves condemnation 464. The right and lawfull use of it 465. Who are to be admitted to it 466. Vide Passeover page 467. c. Reasons against the reall presence 477. Suspicion What it is 611. Foure roots of good and evill suspicion 612. Swearing Of right and lawfull swearing 568. Whether lawfull to sweare by the creatures 569. By whom wee must sweare 570. Five causes why we must sweare by GOD alone 570. 571. Two principall causes of swearing 573. Vide Oathes T. TEmperance What it is 603. Temptation What it is with its kinds 650. What it is to leade into temptation 651. Testament The Old and New Testament in what they agree and how they differ 126. Thanks Thankfulnesse Why the knowledge of our thankefulnesse is necessary 35. 36. What mans thankefulnesse is and what Christian Thankefulnesse is 498. 560. the danger of omitting of it or being cold in it 560. 561. Transubstantiation Of it very largely and learnedly 448. 449. c. And Consubstantiation 450. Trinity What it is 172. Heretikes Objections answered that say that they are not named in the Scripture 173. The number of persons in Trinity ibidem Six strong proofes of the three persons in Trinity 174. How distinguished 175. Their order ibidem Their Attributes Effects and Operations what 175. 176. The doctrine of the Trinity necessary to bee held and maintained in the Church 177. Heretikes opposing that doctrine 178. Truth Six waies whereby we are taught the truth of GOD in Scripture 162. Truth what 610. V. UBiquitaries Their opinion refuted by many strong Arguments 477. 478. c. Three pestilent weeds that grow in their Garden 318. Vertue Two causes why the vertues of Ethnickes please not God pag. 44. The vertues of the Vnregenerate are sinnes by accident 62. The difference betweene the vertues of the Regenerate and of the Vnregenerate 63. Unchangeablenesse Gods unchangeablenesse proved 157. 158. Union The similitude of mans body to declare our union with Christ 234. Of the union of Christs two Natures and what it is in Nature what in Person 278. 279. W WIckednesse Whence the
exalted him and hath given him a name above all names that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow of things in heaven on earth and under the earth and that every tongue should confesse that Jesus Christ is Lord to the glory of God the Father VI. The glory of Christ the Mediatour doth first consist in that high perfection and dignity of the person of the Mediatour even according to that nature which was assumed being adorned with unspeakeable excellencies of endowents with happinesse and majesty and with that sublime exaltation above all principality power and dominion all things being put under his feet that he might be the Head of the a Church by which the Father governes all things in heaven and b earth the natures remaining whole and unconfused as also the properties of nature in this glory Which as Austine saith gave to the flesh to be immortall but tooke not away the c nature Testimonies of Scripture and of some Ancient Doctors a Ephes 1.20 21. God placed Christ at his right hand in heaven far above all power c. b John 5.22 For the Father judgeth no man but hath committed all judgement to the Sonne Acts 17.31 God will judge the world in righteousnesse by that man whom he hath appointed c August Epist 57. ad Dardanum Doubt not then but the man Christ Jesus is now there from whence he will returne call to minde and hold faithfully the Christian Confession because he is risen from the dead hath ascended into heaven sitteth at the right hand of the Father nor from any other place but from thence will he come to judge the quick and dead and so he will come as the Angell witnesseth after the same manner that he was seene to go into heaven that is in the same forme and substance to whom he gave immortality but tooke not his nature away VII Secondly it consists in the glorious administration of his Propheticall Sacerdotall and Regall offices by which as Mediatour he declares himselfe even in his assumed humane nature that he is appointed Lord and Judge of all a things and that he rules most powerfully in heaven and b earth gathering to himselfe out of the race of mankinde a perpetuall c Church by the holy Ghost and the Word making intercession for d her and defending her by his divine power on e earth untill having freed her from all molestations and from her enemies he glorifie her in f heaven Testimonies of Scripture a Acts 2.36 Therefore let all the house of Israel know assuredly that God hath made that same Jesus whom ye have crucified both Lord and Christ Acts 5.31 God having exalted him at his right hand hath made him Prince and Saviour that he might give to Israel repentance and remission of sinnes See Act. 17.31 John 5.22 b Psal 110.2 Beare thou rule in the midst of thine enemies 1 Cor. 15.25 He must reigne till he hath put all his enemies under his feet c Ephes 4.11 He gave some to be Apostles some Prophets some Evangelists some Pastors and Doctors Rom. 1.17 The Gospell is the power of God to salvation to every one that beleeves Marke 16.21 The Lord did cooperate and confirmed the word with signes following d Rom. 8.34 Christ is at the right hand of God and maketh intercession for us Heb. 9.24 Christ hath now entred into heaven that he might appeare before God for us 1 John 2.1 We have an Advocate with the Father Jesus Christ the righteous e Mat. 16.18 The gates of hell shall not prevaile against her John 10.28 I give unto them eternall life and they shall never perish neither shall any man pluck them out of mine hand f John 17.24 Father I will that they whom thou hast given to me may be where I am that they may behold my glory VIII Lastly in the perfection of that honour and worship due a to the Mediatour gloriously reigning even in our humane nature to wit that he is acknowledged by Angels men and all creatures and by them is adored and celebrated as their head and Lord as it is written And let all the Angels of God worship him Also Psal 1.6 Psal 97.7 Phil. 2.10 At the Name of Jesus every knee shall bow of things in heaven on earth and under the earth Testimonies of Scripture a Acts 9.14 In this place he hath power from the High-Priest to binde all that call on thy Name 1 Cor. 1.2 To all that call upon the Name of our Lord Jesus Christ in any place c. Rev. 5.9 Thou art worthy to receive the booke and to open the seales thereof because thou hast beene slaine and hast redeemed us by thy bloud out of every Tribe Langue People and Nation See also Rev. 4.11 and 8.13 and 19.5 6 7. IX Therefore these and such like doctrines of the Ubiquitaries are false and prodigious 1. That Christs humanity presently in his conception when the Word was made flesh did sit at the right hand of God 2. That to sit at Gods right hand is nothing else but to be united personally to the Son of God who is the Fathers right hand 3. That it is all one with his ascending to heaven 4. That it is to be made man and to become God 5. That it is all one with Christs humanity filling heaven and earth and being every-where ARTICLE V. Of Predestination I. TO deny in God an eternall predestination of mankinde is to deny God himselfe and to give the lye to the holy Scripture for as Luther (a) De servo arb cap. 143. saith truly God being spoiled of his power and wisdome in electing what will he be else but the Idoll of Fortune by whose power all things are done rashly or at randome And at length it will come to this that men are damned and saved with the knowledge of God as who hath not discriminated by a certaine election those that shall be saved and damned but a generall lenity tolerating and hardning being proffered to all then a correcting and punishing mercy he hath left it to mens choice whether they will be saved or damned he himselfe perhaps being gone to feast with the Ethiopians as Homer saith Austine in his booke De bono persever c. 18. averreth That no man can dispute except he will fall into error against this predestination which saith he we defend according to the holy Scripture and cap. 21. Therefore it savours too much of contention saith he to contradict predestination or to doubt of it II. Therefore of predestination we must speake and be silent with the Scripture for what God will have concealed must not be enquired after and what he hath revealed must not be neglected lest in those we be found unlawfully curious in these damnably ungratefull as (b) l. 1. ad Monimum p. 8. Ambrose excellently III. Neither that we may give this caution with Fulgentius is there any coactive necessity of mans will to be expressed by the name of
the Church in the New Testament we beleeve and teach that it is the office of publick teaching and governing the Church by the voice of the Prophets and Apostles instituted by Christ for finishing the salvation of the a elect Testimonies of Scripture a Matth. 28.19 Goe and teach all nations baptising them in the Name of the Father Son and holy Ghost Mark 16.16 Preach the Gospel to all creatures he that beleeveth and is baptised shall be saved but he that beleeveth not shall be condemned Ephes 2.20 You are built upon the foundation of the Prophets and Apostles Ephes 4.11 He gave some to be Apostles some Prophets some Evangelists and some to be pastors and doctors II. And that it is an effectuall meanes by which the holy Ghost stirs up confirmes and a operates faith and conversion in the hearts of the elect Testimonies of Scripture a Rom. 1.16 The Gospel is the power of God to salvation to every one that beleeveth Rom. 1.17 Faith is by hearing and hearing by the word of God Acts 10.44 While Peter yet spake these words the holy Ghost fell upon all them that heard this speech Acts 16.14 A certaine woman named Lydia who sold purple in the city of the Thyatirians fearing God did heare us whose heart the Lord opened that she should heare what was said by Paul 2 Tim. 3.16 17. The whole Scripture is inspired by God and profitable for doctrine for reproofe for correction for instruction in righteousnesse that the man of God may be perfect and perfectly furnished for every good worke III. Yet that internall power and efficacie by which we are sanctified is not the Ministers nor is it tied to or shut up with in their words actions but it is the holy a Ghosts The externall ministry is b mans which the Spirit of God makes use of for moving the minds and hearts of the elect when and how he c pleaseth Not as if he could not doe otherwise but because it pleased his divine wisdome by the foolish preaching of the Crosse to save such as d beleeve Testimonies of Scripture a Esay 43.25 I I am he that blotteth out thy transgressions John 3.8 The wind bloweth where it listeth and thou hearest the sound thereof but thou knowest not whence it cometh or wither it goeth so it is with every one that is born of the spirit 1 Cor. 12.11 All these things are done by one and the same spirit distributing to every one apart as he pleaseth b Matth. 3.11 I indeed baptise you with water to repentance but he who cometh after me is stronger then I he will baptise you with fire and with the holy Ghost John 1.23 33. I am the voice of him that crieth in the desart But he that sent mee to baptise with water he it is who baptiseth with the holy Ghost c 1 Cor. 3.5 6. Who then is Paul who is Apollo but ministers by whom you have beleeved and as God hath given to every man I plant Apollo waters but God giveth the increase Therefore neither is he that planteth any thing nor he that watereth but God who giveth the increase d John 3.8 The wind bloweth where it listeth and thou hearest the sound thereof but thou knowest not whence it cometh nor whither it goeth so is every one that is borne of the spirit 1 Cor. 12.11 But all these things are done by one and the same spirit distributing to every one apart as he pleaseth 1 Cor. 1.21 But after that in the wisdome of God the world by that wisdome knew not God it pleased God by the foolishnesse of preaching to save beleevers IV. But these Tenents are partly impious and partly too hyperbolicall 1. That God immediately doth infuse faith and conversion 2. That the ministerie is a dead letter but the exercise only of the outward man 3. That the faith which we have by hearing of the word is not justifying but historicall onely 4. That saving power is in the voice and under the voice of the ministerie and that Christs part is internall but ministers partly externall partly internall ARTICLE VIII Of the Sacraments in generall I. WE judge the generall doctrine of the Sacraments to be both profitable and needfull for without this we cannot know why Baptisme and the Lords Supper are Sacraments besides it gives a great light to the particular doctrine of each Sacrament by which we may avoid divers errours lest by giving them too little we esteeme them but bare Ceremonies and by giving them too much we transforme them into Idols which will necessarily be if we do not carefully observe what Sacraments are and why instituted by God and what is their use and end for Ecclesiasticall stories tell us that the Pope could not establish Transubstantiation untill he had overthrowne the nature efficacy and use of Sacraments II. Sacraments are signes of the Covenant or of the promise of a grace instituted by God for the confirmation of our b faith Testimonies of Scripture a Gen. 17.11 And you shall circumcise the flesh of your fore-skin and it shall be a signe of the Covenant betweene me and you b Rom. 4.11 And he received the signe of Circumcision the seale of righteousnesse by faith in his fore-skin Sacraments are not onely notes of profession betweene men as some imagine but they are rather signes and testimonies of Gods will towards us by which God moveth the heart to beleeve as it is in the Apology of the Augustan Confession Tit. De usu Sacramenti III. Sacraments consist of the Element and a Word or of externall signes and the promises of spirituall grace which grace in the Word and in all Sacraments is one to wit Christ with all his b benefits for there is one Christ yesterday to day and for c ever and there is one communion of Saints from the beginning of the world to the d end which is that spirituall union that is betweene Christ and the Saints and of the Saints among themselves to the same love by the holy Spirit in Christ as the Head and in us as his members in whom he dwels although this one communion according to the diversity of signes is diversly called and represented in diverse Sacraments Testimonies of Scripture and of others a Apologia August Confes Tit. De usu Sacramenti c. Sacraments are signes of Gods will towards us and not only signes of men among themselves And they define Sacraments rightly in the New Testament to be signes of grace And because two things are in Sacraments the Signe and the Word the Word in the New Testament is the promise of the remission of sins b Ibidem The same is the effect of the Word and Sacrament as it is excellently said by Austine The Sacrament is the visible Word because the ceremony is received by the eye and is as it were the picture of the Word signifying the same thing that the Word doth wherefore the effect of both is the same c Heb.
is the other Sacrament of the New Testament instituted by Christ by which he testifieth to us who receive the consecrated bread and wine with a faithfull remembrance of his death that he feeds us with his bodie which was given for us and with his bloud which was powred out for us and that hee quickneth d us that with him and amongst our selves we may grow up into one e bodie and that the covenant begun with God in Baptisme may remaine f ratified to us for ever Testimonies of Scripture a 1 Cor. 10.16 The cup of blessing which we blesse is it not the communion of the bloud of Christ the bread which we breake is it not the communion of the body of Christ b 1 Cor. 11.26 As often as you shall eat of this bread and drink of this cup you shall declare the Lords death untill he come c Matth. 26.26 Mark 14.22 Luke 22.17 1 Cor. 11.21 While they were eating he took bread and blessed and brake it then gave it to his disciples and said Take eat this is my body d John 6.54 He that eateth my flesh and drinketh my bloud hath life eternall and I will raise him up at the last day e John 6.56 Who eateth my flesh and drinketh my bloud he abideth in me and I in him 1 Cor. 10.17 Because there is one bread we being many are one bread and one body for we all partake of that one bread 1 Cor. 12.13 We have all drunk into one spirit f 1 Cor. 11.25 This cup is the New Testament in my bloud II. We say also that this Sacrament consisteth of externall signes and of the promises of grace in the word annexed to the a signes and consequently of a twofold food and a twofold eating or taking to wit an externall of bread and wine which is done by the mouth of the bodie out of the hand of the Minister as our sense witnesseth and an internall spirituall of Christs bodie and bloud which is by faith out of the hands of God himselfe and by the externall it is both signified exhibited and sealed in the lawfull use of the Sacrament as the promise annexed to the Symboles b witnesseth Testimonies of Scripture and of others a Apolog. August Confes tit De use Sacram. c. And because in the Sacraments there are two things to wit the signe and the word the word in the New Testament is the promise of grace added to the signe The promise of the New Testament is the promise of the remission of sins as this Text saith This is my body which is given for you This is the cup of the New Testament with my bloud which is shed for many to the remission of sins The word then offers remission of sins and the ceremony is as it were the pledge of the word or feale as Paul calls it shewing the promise b Matth. 26. c. III. For whereas all Sacraments are seales of grace promised in the a Gospel it is not to be doubted but these words of promise in the Supper This is my body which is given for you This is my bloud which is powred out for you c. are the very same Evangelicall promise in b John The bread which I will give you is my flesh which I will give you for the life of the world for my flesh is meat indeed and my bloud is drinke indeed being covered with the sacramentall ceremonie and confirmed with a symbolicall eating for the greater safetie or assurance but that it speaketh of the spirituall food of Christs bodie and bloud which is by faith is c manifest Testimonies of Scripture and of others a Rom. 4.11 And he received the signe of circumcision the seale of the justice of faith received in the fore-skin Apolog. August Confes tit De usu Sacram. c. The word in the New Testament is the promise of grace as above b John 6.5 I am that living bread that came downe from heaven if any man eat of this bread he shall live for ever But the bread which I will give is my flesh which I will give for the life of the world c John 6.35 I am that bread of life he that cometh to me shall not hunger and he that beleeveth in me shall never thirst IV. Christ never promised in the Gospel any orall manducation of his flesh but by expresse arguments rejected a it and therefore never established it by the Sacrament of his Supper And doubtlesse they sin grievously who at this day disturb the Church with their orall manducation which to acknowledge is no waies necessary to salvation to any but rather pernicious to many Testimonies of Scripture a John 6.61 62 63. When Jesus knew in himselfe that his disciples murmured at it he said unto them Doth this offend you What and if you shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before It is the Spirit that quickneth the flesh profiteth nothing the words that I speak unto you they are spirit and they are life V. The particle This as we teach and beleeve doth demonstrate the bread which Christ brake and that it is the true bodie of Christ not by conversion into the bodie nor by any reall co-existence with the bodie but by a sacramentall way because it is the Sacrament of Christs bodie or a sacred signe of it So the Apostle interprets Christs a meaning when he calls the cup The New Testament that is the Sacrament of the New Testament the bread The communion of Christs b body that is the Sacrament of that communion So c Austine The Lord saith he doubted not to say This is my bodie when he gave the signe of his bodie So d Prosper saith The bread is after a manner called the bodie of Christ and the sacramentall action is called the passion death and crucifying of Christ not in a reall veritie but in a signifying mysterie Testimonies of Scripture and of others a 1 Cor. 11.25 This cup is the New Testament in my bloud b 1 Cor. 10.16 The bread which we break c. c August cont Adimant cap. 12. d Prosper in Decret de Consecrat dist 2. cap. Hoc est VI. And whereas Christs bodie neither in the bread nor under the species of bread but rather in the word of promise is exhibited to us to be eaten by faith the wicked indeed eat the signes to their owne condemnation by abusing of which they sin against Christ himselfe but being destitute of faith they receive not his bodie Of which notwithstanding by the Apostles testimony they are guilty not that they receive it which by their infidelitie they tread upon but because they unworthily eat that bread which is the symbole or a signe of it Testimonies of Scripture a 1 Corinth 11.27 29. Whosoever shall eat this bread and drink this cup of the Lord unworthily shall be guilty of the body and bloud of the Lord. Also Who eateth and drinketh unworthily eateth and drinketh damnation to himselfe
Old He is minister of God to thee for good Rom. 13.4 IX In that saying of Luke 22.25 Christ doth not debarre such kings from the Church but he onely forbids the Apostles and Ministers of the Church to meddle with riotousnesse preheminence and civill dominion But Paul Gal. 6.15 doth not speak of the externall habit of Christians of whom some were circumcised as the faithfull Jewes and some were uncircumcised as the Christians who had been Gentiles To which saying answereth that Galat. 3.28 There is neither Jew nor Greeke there is neither bond nor free there is neither male nor female Which words if they understand literally surely they must also be separated from Christ seeing they are either servants or free either males or females The sense then of the Apostle is this That the outward differences of men doe nothing hinder or promote eternall salvation and that onely the new creature in Christ Jesus is necessary to salvation X. Lastly by that saying of Mat. 5.39 Christ doth not take away punishments due to the wicked but only private revenge for otherwise no Christian neither father nor mother nor school-masters nor any minister of the Church could be suffered the dutie of all which is to resist evill and wicked men and to maintain discipline every one in his place without which an horrible ataxie and confusion would ensue too much libertie would be brought in and at length would follow the subversion both of humane societie and of the Church it selfe Surely Christ and his Apostles did very often resist evill Neither doe wee reade any where in the Scripture that they who were appointed for politicall functions did after their conversion to Christianitie desert their province or calling or that ever they were commanded to forsake it So that Ruler in the fourth of John ver 33. beleeved himselfe and all his house Sergius Paulus the Deputie Act. 13.12 beleeved So the Keeper of the prison Act. 16.33 was baptised he and all his houshold XI Concerning the divers formes of Common-wealths which of them is best let Politicians dispute In the Scripture we reade of Cesars Kings Princes Governours Presidents Pretors Consuls Captaines Dukes and in a word both of inferiour and superiour Magistrates Of whom is this generall saying of Paul the Apostle There is no power but of God Rom. 13.1 1 Pet. 2.13 14 17. The powers that be are ordained of God And of S. Peter Submit your selves to every ordinance of man for the Lords sake whether it be to the King as supreme or unto Governours as being sent by him Also Feare God Honour the King Where we may note that when the Magistrates office by Peter is called an humane ordinance this is not repugnant to Paul who calls it a divine ordinance For God only ordained the Magistrate but as for the forms of Common-weathls and their distinct degrees to wit that in them should be Emperours Kings Princes superiours inferiours this depends from humane ordination and politicall sanction yet all are alike governed by God therefore wee must be subject to humane ordinance for the Lords sake saith S. Peter XII Of the right of Magistrates thus saith Paul For this cause pay you tribute also for they are Gods ministers Rom. 13.6 7. attending continually upon this very thing Render therefore to all their dues tribute to whom tribute is due custome to whom custome feare to whom feare honour to whom honour Againe Give to Cesar what is Cesars Whence we gather that the right of Magistrates consisteth of three things First that hee may be knowne as the minister of God to whom therefore honour and reverence is due because hee is in stead of God for this cause as it said Magistrates are called gods Secondly that for the authoritie of so great a function they should be reverenced honoured and feared by their subjects no lesse then parents are by their children for Magistrates should be to subjects in stead of parents Thirdly that customes and tributes due to Magistrates should be paid them that out of them they may be able to sustaine the heavie burthen of their function preserve their lives and dignitie and exercise their bountie towards others Yet the Magistrate must be as far from riotousnesse as the subjects themselves as it is in Jer. 22.14 15. and every-where else in Scripture XIII God hath furnished the Magistrate with chiefe power that hee may command some and may governe others and use the sword also if need require against the disobedient and maintaine and defend his owne authoritie For so it is written Dan. 4.22 The most High ruleth in the kingdome of men and giveth it to whomsoever hee will Againe The princes of the Gentiles exercise dominion over them Mat. 20.25 and they that are great exercise authority upon them Againe Rom. 13.4 He beareth not the sword in vaine XIV God also for this cause laid upon the magistrate this carefull and troublesome burthen that he might urge promote and preserve among men the obedience due to Gods Law chiefly among Christians For first hee ought entirely to maintaine the honour and worship of God according to the prescript of the first Table and to propagate pietie with the true worship of God amongst his subjects according to Gods will and word For so God commanded Josuah Jos 1.8 This book of the law shall not depart out of thy mouth but thou shalt meditate therein day and night that thou mayest observe to doe according to all that is written therein So Paul Rom. 13.4 He is the minister of God to thee for good Now the chiefe happinesse of subjects consisteth in true religion and the true worship of God XV. Againe the office of the Magistrate is to maintaine right and justice and to preserve honestie peace and concord to love the good to afright and punish the wicked to maintaine and defend their subjects and territories even with the sword against domestick and forraigne enemies As it is written Jer. 22.3 Psal 82.3 Thus saith the Lord Execute ye judgement and righteousnesse and deliver the spoiled out of the hand of the oppressour and doe no wrong doe no violence to the stranger the fatherlesse nor the widow neither shed innocent bloud in this place Againe Magistrates are not a terrour to good workes but to the evill Wilt thou then not be afraid of the power doe that which is good but if thou doe that which is evill be afraid for he beareth not the sword in vaine for he is the minister of God a revenger to execute wrath upon him that doth evill XVI Both offices of the Magistrate are usually impugned by Pontificians Anabaptists and other fanaticall persons XVII In Popery the Pontificians confesse Bellarm l. 4. de Laicis c. 17 18. that the Magistrate ought not only to have a care of the civill government and to promote the publick peace but also by all meanes to defend Gods worship as it
is administred by the Priests in Popery and to exterminate all other religions which they condemne but they will not permit the civill Magistrate to enquire into their religion and worship to wit whether it be true or false consonant to holy writ or not whether Priests and Clergie-men live godly or profanely whether Churches and Schooles be well provided for And lastly whether they can by right challenge to themselves ecclesiasticall jurisdiction and such like XVIII But this right of governing Churches and Schooles the holy Scripture in plaine termes attributes to the civill Magistrate for as he is bound with all diligence to procure that the civill good that is justice and equitie be lawfully administred according to the lawes of every province by men skilfull in the law and politicall prudence within the courts and places of Judicature even so his care should not be lesse but rather more that the divine law which is the good of souls that is true religion and piety be taught by Divines holy religious learned honest men in Schools and Churches to their subjects for their soules health according to the law and testimony as the Scripture commands Isa 8.20 Deut. 17.18 This was enjoyned by God to Moses Josuah This is confirmed by the example of many worthy Princes as David Solomon Jehosaphat Ezechia Josia and others who carefully promoted the worship of God reproved grievously wicked disordered Priests 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 So Paul speaks to the Christian Romans He is the minister of God for thy good Where he understands every kind of good as well civill and earthly as ecclesiasticall spirituall otherwise the Magistracie were no more advantageous to a Christian then to a Pagan And surely it is to be lamented that the Heathens heretofore in this point were of a better mind who by unanimous consent committed to their Kings the care of religion and of the worship of their gods being perswaded thereto both by the law of nature and of nations for they held this to be the proper office of the civill Magistrate to governe their subjects civilly that is to season them with all kind of vertue especially with militarie fortitude and such like XIX The Anabaptists also and Enthusiasts doe admit and grant that the Magistrates office is not onely to be conversant in the Courts of Judicature to administer justice but to punish evill both in time of peace and war with the sword but they will not have Christians to do this or to have any power to doe it because Christ said to his disciples Mat. 5.38 Mat. 26.15 Resist not evill Neither did he give the sword to them but inhibited it to them in these words He that taketh the sword shall perish with the sword The same also say That the New Testament doth not exhort us to shed bloud but to love one another Such phantomes they have out of the Schooles of the Manichees that they may remove from the Common-wealth of Christians all Magistracie XX. To them we oppose the Apostles doctrine Rom. 13.1 4. All power is from God and he is the minister of God What hath God ordained any thing which either lawfully may not or cannot be performed Shall a Heathen serve God better then a Christian Away then with these weak simple men 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and their fooleries Yet let them be tolerated so long as they trouble not the Church or deny not that obedience and honour which is due to the Magistrate of which matter in the Imperiall Constitutions there is a provident caveat made Of that saying Matth. 5.39 we have already said in the tenth Aphorisme In Matth. 26.52 Christ hath prohibited his disciples and other private men to meddle with the sword because it is not due to Apostles Bishops Ministers and other subjects but God hath taken the sword from Cesar to whom before he gave it but rather committed it to him for he said Give to Cesar what is Cesars And by the Apostle Hee is the minister of God nor doth he carry the sword in vaine It is also true that the New Testament perswades charitie not bloud-shedding in regard of ecclesiasticall and civill societie Sometimes notwithstanding he commands to draw the sword against domestick and forraigne enemies for preservation of the Common-wealth of the Church and of common tranquillitie and peace For God hath commanded expresly even in the New Testament such a revenge and therefore obedience is a part of divine worship Such a revenge also tends to the defence of the godly and therefore it is not contrarie but consentaneous to Charitie XXI But the same men reply That in the New Testament it cannot be proved neither by testimonies nor examples that Christians ought to make war Wee answer First the New Testament doth no waies take away the defence of subjects which sometimes cannot be procured by the Magistrate but by force of armes Secondly the Apostles have writ nothing concerning wars because they were not sent to set up a new forme of Common-wealth in the world but that in the ancient civill government of every place where they left to every one their owne priviledges and rights as it appeares by Paul Rom. 13. and else-where they should gather together a new Church to Christ Thirdly John Baptist Christs forerunner being asked by the souldiers what they should doe did not answer thus Leave off your warring Luke 3.14 but Doe violence to no man neither accuse any falsly and be content with your wages But these wages were paid to souldiers in the wars therefore John did not prohibite war 'T is false then that in the New Testament neither testimonies nor examples are found in which war is mentioned XXII Wee will not now dispute upon what causes or how lawfully war may be waged Let Christian Princes and Magistrates propose this to themselves and think that no lawfull war can be performed but for the recovering of peace and that this is the nature of war that it brings with it much mischiefe Neither can any war be so just but that there is much injustice mingled with it So that it is farre better to fling away Armes to avoid unnecessary warres and not to undertake a just warre untill first all meanes be tried to recover peace without it not onely because the Poet saith Sil. Ital. l. 11. sub fin Rom. 12.18 That peace is the best of all things that ever was bestowed upon man and that one peace is to be preferred to innumerable triumphs but much rather because the Word of God saith If it be possible as much as lyeth in you have peace with all men XXIII Secondly as for the Lawes to which the Christian Magistrate is tied in his government the Ancients said well that Laws were the soule of the Common-wealth and that the Magistrate is a living Law for as no State can subsist without Laws so Laws can have no force without the Magistrate
Scriptures are very obscure Lib. 1. de Verb. cap. 1. 2. both in the things that are set down and in the manner of setting them downe But what can be more false or more contumelious against God and his holy Prophets and Apostles seeing the word of God and of the Prophets but much more of the Apostles Psal 119.105 is called a lanterne to our feet and a light to our paths shining in a dark place 2 Pet. 1.19 This indeed the Jesuite whispered but afterward shamelesly denied it As though forsooth this were not the common stile of Poperie That no man can be the Interpreter of Scripture or Judge of the true meaning thereof but the Church that is the Pope either with or without a Councell And that in the Pope as in the head of the Catholick Church all power of interpreting resides Is not this to tell us that the Scriptures can be understood by none without the Popes interpretation See Bellarmine Lib. 3. de verb. cap. 3. where he strives to prove that the meaning of Scripture depends upon one Judge which is the Pope 18. It makes the Pope supreme Judge of all questions concerning faith in which it behoveth faith to stay at last even in those things that are in controversie between the Pope and Protestants The Assertion Whereas there be three members in this Position the first and third as being known to every one are by the Jesnite swallowed down in silence The Pope makes himself supreme Judge of all questions of faith but by what right It is a question of faith If there be a God if there be a Trinitie in unitie if hee made the world if Christ be God and man if he died for us if he rose againe if there be heaven and hell c. Shall then Christians Jewes Turkes and Atheists repaire to the Pope as the supreme Judge for resolution of these What greater madnesse can be The question is If the Pope be head of the Church if Christs Viceroy if the Monarch of Christendome if the Lord of Kings and Emperors if the supreme Interpreter Censor Judge of Scripture of all questions of faith Or if he be not rather that man of perdition sitting in the Temple of God as God the Beast the Whore sitting in the great Citie upon seven hills Finally Antichrist What shall the Protestants who are at controversie with the Jesuits about these questions repaire to the Pope as supreme Judge what 's more foolish what more unjust The middle member the Jesuite calls a lie to wit that our faith must at last stay upon the Pope Truly what he sayes is a lye but that Poperie teacheth this is no lye except it be a lye also that the Pope is supreme Judge of all questions of faith for it is only he on whom the faith of all questions doth at last stay Or that we may speak more cleerly from whom there is no appealing to a superiour But an appeale may be made from the Pope to the Scriptures or to God as to a Superiour and the Jesuite himselfe confessing Christian faith is resolved into this first veritie which is beleeved for it selfe therefore this Position stands firme in all its members and the proofe of the assumption Furthermore who ought to be supreme Judge of faith interpretations and controversies of faith whether the Pope or not and whether the Scripture alone be the rule of faith and controversies or traditions also Or whether the Scriptures alone can be both a Rule and a Judge which the Jesuite barks out with a dogs not with a mans mouth that we may pay him home in his own language whole books of Protestants are extant concerning these nor do they belong to the argument of our secular Theme 19. It accuseth the Scripture of imperfection as if it were neither sufficient to beget faith and pietie nor to attain to salvation except it be supplied by traditions 20. Hence it calls traditions The unwritten word of God as certaine in fallible canonicall and as necessarie to salvation as the written word of God and to be received with the like affection of pietie and reverence The Assertion Whereas our adversarie conceales both these Positions they need no defence It is the common stile of Poperie thus to speak of both and it is unspeakable how witty eloquent and earnest they are at this day all of them in aggravating the imperfection and defects of the Bibles or Scriptures which are among Christians And on the contrary in extolling the divinitie and necessitie of their traditions In stead of all see Bellarmine lib. 4. of the unwritten word throughout all the book But how contumelious it is against God to defile with the blemish of imperfection his written word which as it testifieth of it self is able to make the man of God perfect for every good work And to give life eternall to them that beleeve On the contrary what arrogance vanitie and how full of danger it is not only to equall to but to extoll above and more religiously to reverence humane traditions with which God whatsoever men lie to the contrarie is worshipped in vaine I say to extoll these above Gods sacred word is not now our purpose to speak many words seeing all good men doe easily understand this point and it hath been often demonstrated by our Writers 21. It blasphemously calls the Scripture a Nose of waxe a doubtfull and dead letter written with inke which needed the Churches confirmation Like a sheath receiving any blade whether it be of steele lead wood or brasse The Assertion The Jesuite silently acknowledgeth these blasphemies worthy of Anathema yet he is willing to wash them away with a lye as if injuriously they were imputed to Poperie but indeed here is no fiction yet too little hath been said for Lindanus doth openly professe In Panoplia that the holy Scripture in Poperie is commonly accounted a Nose of waxe an ambiguous word and such as may be turned which way you will and that it is rightly so esteemed For hee adviseth Papists not to dispute with Hereticks he meanes Protestants out of the holy Scriptures hereafter Because saith hee as commonly you may see it is easily bent to what opinion you will therefore it is compared and very fitly too to a Nose of waxe Thus he approves excuses defends that reproach which the Jesuite calls a lie Costerus one of their chiefe Jesuites deviseth a three-fold holy Scripture One spirituall inspired by the holy Ghost in the minds of the Church and Pope The other left by the Apostles to the Church written with inke in paper and parchment books The third grounded on the Pontificiall Decrees and generall Councels Of the paper Scriptures for so this paper-brawler disgracefully calls the Propheticall and Apostolicall books speaking These former saith hee needed the confirmation of that for these are a dead letter written with inke in parchment or paper which can feele
can receive a good or evill specification according to the naturall mans will 70. Or that it is a speciall influx but onely suasive the efficacy of which is in mans will against these Scriptures God giveth to will and to do And No man can come to me Phil. 2.13 John 6.44 except the Father draw him 71. Another impious falshood That they whom God predestinated to glory were by their fore-seene merits predestinated or after and for their fore-seene merits against these Scriptures Before the children had done good or evill Rom. 9.11 Ephes 1.4 5. He elected us before the foundation of the world that we might be holy and without blame He elected us according to the purpose of his will unto the praise of the glory of his grace 72. Which Pelagian dreame is not to be called predestination but post-destination 73. Another impious falshood that they can absolutely fulfill Gods Law against this Scripture In many things we offend all And Jam. 3.2 Rom. 8.3 What was impossible to the Law 74. Yea that they can do more then by the Law they should do against this Scripture When you have done all you can say We are unprofitable servants Luke 17.10 we have done what we ought to do 75. Yea that they can be free from all sin in this life if they will against this Scripture Surely there is none just upon earth Eccles 7.21 who doth good and sinneth not 76. Of this the Pelagians of old did brag Mat. 6.12 Luke 11.4 therefore were bid blot out of the Lords Prayer these words Forgive us our sins that is to make an officious lye or to mock God 77. And another impious falshood That by good works they merit life eternall of condignity Rom. 6.23 against this Scripture Life eternall is the gift of God 78. Another falshood That by reason of their good works they can be confident in the day of Gods judgements Psal 130.3 against this Scripture Lord if thou observe our sinnes who can indure it 79. Another blasphemy That by their merits they make God indebted to them that if he do not give them life eternall he must be unjust who forsooth may be sued for such an injurie against these Scriptures Rom. 2.13 11.35 9.20 We are debtors Who gave to him first and it shall be restored to him What art thou that answerest God 80. And it is no lesse blasphemous that Christ alone is not our Mediatour but the Saints Canonized by the Pope make Intercession for us 1 Tim. 2.5 as mediatours in heaven against this Scripture There is one Mediatour of God and man the man Christ Jesus 81. Such as this that They who depart in the faith go into Purgatory fire to suffer for their veniall sins against the Gospell Blessed are they from henceforth who die in the Lord. Rev. 14.13 John 2.24 He that beleeveth in me hath life eternal neither doth he come into judgement but passeth from death to life 82. Another hypocriticall falshood is That the Sacraments instituted by God are not signes of grace confirming faith but vessels containing and confirming grace by the work wrought against this Scripture Rom. 4.11 Abraham received the signe of Circumcision the seale of the righteousnesse of faith 83. And this also of the seven Sacraments of the New Testament unknowne in the Gospell and in the primitive Church 84. And this also of forbidden meats which in the New Testament the Apostle calleth the doctrine of Devils 85. And this doctrine which prohibits Bishops to marry against this Scripture 1 Tim. 3.2 Tit. 1.6 Let a Bishop be the husband of one wife 86. And this blasphemous falshood That the Priests by the five words of consecration do transubstantiate in the Masse the Host into the very body of Christ daily sanctifying it to God the Father and destroying it for the sins of them that live on the earth or that are dead in heaven and Purgatory Rom. 6.9 Heb. 10.13 against these Scriptures Christ dieth no more By one oblation he hath consummated all 87. And who is able to rehearse their other falshoods impieties and blasphemies concerning the Cup of which sacrilegiously they have robbed the people of Contritions Confessions Satisfactions Indulgences Jubilees Holy-dayes Fastings c 88. Therefore Popery by maintaining so many false impious blasphemous doctrines hath fallen from the faith and hath overthrowne salvation both to it selfe and friends 89. Which apostacy from the Faith the Spirit hath plainly fore-told 1 Tim. 4.2 3. That in the latter times some shall fall from the faith giving heed to deceiving spirits and doctrines of Devils speaking falshoods forbidding to marry and commanding to abstaine from meates which God hath made to be received with thanksgiving 1 Thes 2.3 90. The Apostle also foretold that this apostacy should be the signe of revealing the Man of sin and son of perdition that is Antichrist 91. This is that great earth-quake by which Christ the Son of righteousnesse was made black as a sack-cloth the Moone that is the Church was turned into blood the Stars that is the Bishops fell from heaven to earth the firmament of the Scripture being foulded up departed in the second vision of the Revelation 92. This pestilent fume whilst the fifth Trumpet blew openly flying out of the bottomlesse pit by Antichrists meanes that apostaticall Star the black inchantments of Papall decretals and of Schoole Divinity by which Christ the Son of righteousnesse and the heire of heavenly doctrine was obscured and the innumerable vermine of Clericall and Monasticall Locusts eating up the greene pasture of the Church and tormenting men were brought into the Christian world in the third vision of the Revelation 93. These are the great blasphemies but yet not all to which the Beast that came out of the sea opened his mouth And this is the Dragon-language of that earthly Beast making shew of the Lambs two hornes in the fourth vision of the Revelation 94. These are the darknesses with which his kingdome was obscured when the fifth Violl was powred out upon the Beasts throne c. in the fifth vision of the Revelation 95. We have the apostacy of Popery from the Faith fore-told long agoe by the Angel to John and the revolution of an age being accomplished it is revealed againe by the renewed light of the Gospell 96. Which was the most urgent cause why our Parents forsooke Popery and this is the cause why we do the same and so it is concluded 97. That a Church apostatising from faith it to be deserted and forsaken for 2 Cor. 6.14 15. What union is there betweene light and darkenesse 98. Popery is that Church that is fallen from the faith as is said 99. Therefore Popery is to be deserted and avoided II. The horrible Idolatry of Popery 100. God onely is to be religiously worshipped 101. For Religion by Lactantius his definition is the bond of piety by
Fathers one Son not three Sons one holy Ghost not three holy Ghosts The Declaration 14. FAther This Article declares the third concerning the distinction of the persons which consisteth in a distinct manner of existing proper for each person 15. Of none The Greek is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is made of or from none having no off spring or originall from any other because he is from himselfe 16. Nor created The Greek is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 neither made of any for neither created otherwise he should be the creature of another 17. Nor begotten So it is in the Greek hence the Greek Divines call the Father 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 unbegotten for if he were begotten he should be the Son not the Father And this is the manner of existing by which the Father is distinguished from the Son and holy Ghost because he is of none but of himselfe 18. The Son from the Father Not also from the holy Ghost for as the Father onely hath the Son so the Son is onely from the Father therefore he is not the Son of Abraham David and Mary but according to the flesh 19. Not made When the Apostle saith He was made of a woman Gal. 4.4 that is understood according to the flesh not according to the divinity 20. Nor created As Arius blasphemed that the Son was first created abusing a corrupted place in the Apochrypha Syrac 24.14 and depraving other Scriptures which call Christ the beginning of the creature of God to wit not a passive but an active beginning Col. 1.5.18 Rev. 3.4 21. But begotten In the Greek it is begotten of the Father and that alone therefore he is the onely begotten of the Father John 1.14 and that Wisdome that was begot before the mountaines were made Prov. 8.25 that is from eternity This eternall generation of the Son from the Father is the ineffable communication of the divine Essence by which alone the second person of the divinity from the first alone as a son from the father receives the same essence whole and intire which the father hath and this is the way of existing by which the Son is distinguished from the Father and the holy Ghost because he is onely begotten of the Father 22. From the Father So it is in the Greek from the Father as John 15.26 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. Who proceedeth from the Father but Athanasius saith not from the Father alone as he spake of the Son 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of the Father alone which exclusive particle when the later Grecians against the minde of the Apostles and of Athanasius at length added the Latine Church to fill up the Scriptures meaning said From the Father and the Son 23. Not made This is against the Macedonians who feigned the holy Ghost to be a creature created motions and created spirituall gifts 24. Nor begotten Because so he were the Son for to be begotten is to be the Son 25. But proceeding So it is in the Greek as it is said John 15.46 for this procession or emanation is the ineffable communication of the divine Essence by which alone the third person of the divinity from the Father and the Son as a Spirit from him whose Spirit he is receives the same entire essence which the Father and Son have Concerning the manner of this procession and generation to those that curiously enquire that of Damascen should be answered 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. Dam. l. 4. Orth. Fid. c. 10. That there is a difference betweene generation and procession we have learned but which is the manner or way of this difference we know not And that of Ambrose Licet scire c. We may know that the Son is begot and so that the holy Ghost proceeds but we may not know how he is begot and how he proceeds And this is the way of existing that he proceeds from the Father and the Son for he is the Spirit of the Son no lesse then of the Father Rom. 8.9 Gal. 4.6 and he is sent from both John 15.26 he proceeds then from both ARTICLE VIII And in this Trinity 26. none is before or after other 27. none lesser or greater then other 28. but all the three persons are co-eternall among themselves and co-equall so that in all things as is said the unity in trinity and trinity in unity is to be worshipped 29. He then that will be saved must thus think of the Trinity The Declaration 26. NOne before To wit in nature and time though in order of existence the Father be the first the Son the second and the holy Ghost the third person 27. None greater Because God admits no quantity but when Christ saith he is lesser then the Father John 14.28 he saith this not in respect of his divinity but onely in regard of his mediation and humanity otherwise that could not be true when he saith I and my Father are one All that the Father hath are mine 28. But all The co-eternity then and co-equality and the co-essentiality also of the Trinity is altogether to be worshipped 29. He then that will He therefore hates his owne salvation who beleeves not the holy Trinity for Whosoever denieth the Son hath not the Father 1 John 2.23 And Who hath not the Spirit of Christ he is none of his Rom. 8.9 For no man can say that Jesus is the Lord but by the holy Ghost 1 Cor. 12.3 The Catholick Faith concerning the Incarnation of the Son of GOD our Lord JESUS CHRIST According to the Creed of ATHANASIUS briefly declared and asserted ARTICLE I. Of the Creed the ninth But 1. it is necessary unto eternall salvation that whosoever will be saved 2. he beleeve rightly the 3. Incarnation of our Lord Jesus Christ The Declaration 1. BVt it is necessary This necessity is every where delivered in Scripture John 3.36 He that beleeveth in the Son hath everlasting life and he that beleeveth not the Son shall not see life but the wrath of God abideth on him Joh. 6.14 This is the will of him that sent me that all that see the Son and beleeve in him may have life eternall John 17.3 This is life eternall to know thee the onely true God and whom thou hast sent Jesus Christ 1 John 4.3 And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God Acts 4.12 Neither is there salvation in any other for there is none other name under heaven given among men whereby we must be saved Acts 10.43 To him give all the Prophets witnesse that whosoever beleeveth in his Name shall receive remission of sins by his Name By faith then in the Son of God made man it behooveth all to be saved and without this faith no man can be saved 2. Incarnation also In Greek 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 his inhumanation 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 his incorporation of the causes truth and manner of which Athanasius lest a famous
antiquitie will overthrow what he binds In the meane while he is warned if he cherisheth no monster that he speak with an upright mouth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 without prodigious phrases For a wise mans words are upright The Epistle of D. David Parie to the illustrious and noble Count Lord Ludovick Witgenstenius c. CONCERNING Christs active and passive justice Illustrious and noble Count IN that I answer your demand later then is fitting I humbly intreat that you will not impute this to any fault or neglect in mee For I acknowledge that you have deserved so well of the Church in generall as of my selfe in particular that your beck shall command both willing and deserved service from mee A concatenation of businesse hath hitherto withheld and pulled mee back now and then from that which I had heretofore begun to write but that I may speak plainly and ingenuously I desire not to interpose my judgement in matters of controversie because I am conscious of mine owne weaknesse that way as likewise in regard of that affection I have to peace which I have alwaies loved I am averse from medling with strange controversies and especially with this of Justice which makes me feare I know not how 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that it will prove both beneficiall and hurt full to our Churches We know that the reformation of doctrine in our times began from this head I wish it may not end in this The Scripture phrase is plain and simple That we are justified by the bloud and death of Christ and that our justification consisteth in remission of sins Now the dispute is Whether we are justified by the death of Christ whether by it alone whether it be temporarie whether the matter by imputation of which we are justified be one or multiplied simple or made up of parts two or three Whether the imputation be one or double or triple Whether remission of sins be whole or halfe of our justification and I know not what else In which my judgement is that there is more dangerous subtletie then solid veritie and that many worke more with their wit then with their faith And these digladiations are not onely in our neighbour countries exercised but are also every-where spread abroad and diversly agitated according to the acutenesse of mens wits In another corner not far from you 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 there is risen another strife more dangerous concerning Gods vindicative justice whether it is naturally or voluntarily in God That as God will raine or not raine to morrow his nature requiting none of these so whether he will punish or not punish the sins of Divels and wicked men his nature requiring neither of these which some seasoned with Socinian subtleties have begun lately to move By which craft Satan doubtlesse goeth about to undermine the necessitie of satisfaction and withall Christs satisfaction for us and consequently our whole faith and utterly to destroy these For it is not unknowne that Socinian nicities aime at this Good God! what meanes this itching humour of arguing and this lust of innovating and pulling up of every thing Whatsoever yesternight they dreamed of to day they utter it in their Pulpits as if they were Oracles and with great eagernesse defend to morrow they are of another opinion and they change their opinions as often as they doe their clothes as though there were not already too many strifes and monstrous opinions in the Church I feare lest these sparkes shortly burst out into a flame which will by degrees set our Churches in a combustion if we be not the more watchfull Therefore Noble Count your singular care and studie deserve high commendation in that out of your grave wisdome and excellent pietie you doe not slightly passe over these increasing evils but you perceive that you are concerned when your neighbours house is on fire and therefore you endeavour to find out fit remedies for these fresh wounds As for my selfe although I confesse that I am not willing to meddle with this controversie but by all meanes desire it may be buried both because I judge it unworthy of our Churches and Evangelicall Schooles especially in this cleere light of Scripture and Reformation as also because I perceive our Adversaries take occasion to oppresse the truth by our wranglings then lastly because whatsoever I say will presently be thought a casting of oile into the fire as the Proverb is by reason of the heat of some who are so violent in maintaining this cause that they can scarce abide their brethren if they be of another opinion Notwithstanding seeing what in this case is demanded from mee is not dissonant to mine office and profession I shall think it no burthen freely to deliver mine opinion of this question and that I may answer in order to all your Lordships interrogatories I will first of all briefly touch the chiefe opinions and reasons of moment in this controversie to wit 1. Whether Christs passive justice alone or his active also be imputed to us for righteousnesse 2. I will in few words unfold what I think of other mens opinions and of the best way to procure concord in this case 3. Whether it be fit to handle this Argument positively and refutatively in popular Sermons 4. I will briefly give mine opinion if it be needfull to leave out or to put out any passages in the Palatinate Catechisme and Directorie As for the first head That the state of the controversie may be better understood we must know in what these Disputers agree or disagree They all agree 1. That to justifie in that sense it is used in the Courts of Justice signifieth to absolve from guilt and to repute one just 2. That wee sinners are justified before God not legally but evangelically that is not by workes but by faith not by our owne but by anothers justice 3. That this justice of another is not infused but imputed by God to the faithfull and that freely 4. That the application of imputed justice is done by faith onely and that to be justified by faith is the same that is to be justified by the justice of another imputed and by faith applied 5. That this externall justice is the merit of Christ alone and his satisfaction for us or Christs righteousnesse imputed to us But they disagree in the explication of this merit or of Christs justice First as the justice of God in Scripture equivocally signifieth sometimes that by which God himselfe is just sometimes that by which he justifieth us So the justice of Christ equivocally is called that by which Christ God and man is just as also that which hee hath merited for us and which by faith hee bestoweth on us the neglect of this equivocation is the cause of all the controversie Againe when in Christ as God and man there is a foure-fold justice affirmed by some 1. His divine or essentiall 2. His humane or formall or originall 3.
His active filling of the Law 4. His passive obedience the question is Whether all these justices or some or the last onely be that thing by the imputation of which we are justified Some call this the matter others the forme of our justice I to be better understood will call it the matter This question hath drawne with it another concerning the forme of our justification whether remission of sins be the whole or onely the halfe of our justification And so far as I can remember this controversie began first to be in agitation amongst some Divines of Marchia about the yeare 64. then in the yeare 70. by the mediation of the University of Witteberg it was in some sort laid asleep or rather suppressed heretofore it was unknowne to the Reformed Churches neither is there any mention or dispute of it for ought I know in the writings of Luther Melancthon Zuinglius Calvin Martyr Musculus Hyperius or of the other Divines of this Age. But the simple doctrine of Scripture was received by consent of all to wit that we are justified by the death of Christ whereas by it we have remission of sins Now there are in a manner foure opinions which whilst I am writing I thinke of Lombard who rehearseth also foure opinions of his side Lib. 3. d. 19. concerning Justification he himselfe being ignorant what to thinke The first sort are they who will have all these foure justices of Christ at once to be imputed to us to them the matter of justification is the foure-fold righteousnesse of Christ the forme the quadripartite imputation yet this they reduce sometimes to two parts to wit the remission of sins by the death of Christ and the imputation of Christs righteousnesse divine humane active c. and the proper reason of these is that whole of Christ God and man is our Saviour King and Priest c. and that the dignity of Christs merit especially from the dignity of the person that is of the divinity hath its dependence Others will have the three latter justices of Christ to be the matter and the three-fold imputation of them to be the forme of justification And they teach that first is imputed to us the passive obedience to this end that we may not be unjust that is for remission of sins Secondly the active obedience for this end that we may be just that is to righteousnesse Thirdly the formall or as they call it the habituall sanctity for this end that we may be accounted holy that is to perfect holinesse The third sort make the two latter justices onely of Christ the matter of justification and the two-fold imputation of them the forme of justification All these three agree in this that they distinguish remission of sins and justification as the part and the whole sometime also as the integrall parts of the whole and the former they attribute to the death of Christ the latter to his active obedience they all likewise use the same arguments and words of Scripture of which I will briefly set downe the chiefest 1. As by the disobedience of one man many were made sinners so by the obedience of one many are made righteous Rom. 5. But Adams disobedience was active therefore we are justified by Christs active obedience 2. He was made obedient even to the death of the Crosse Phil. 2. Here is a two-fold obedience of Christ the one before death the other in death therefore both are imputed 3. God sent forth his Son made of a woman and made under the Law that he might redeeme those that were under the Law Gal. 4. Therefore the active fulfilling of the Law by Christ is imputed to us 4. He was made of God to us wisdome righteousnesse sanctification c. 1 Cor. 1. Therefore his justice and sanctity are imputed to us 5. The Law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus freed me from the law of sin and of death Rom. 8.2 Therefore the life of Christ or his active obedience is imputed to us 6. Whole Christ is our justice with which he justifieth us therefore whole Christ is imputed 7. Active justice cannot be excluded from Christs merit and from justification ergo it is imputed 8. The Law obligeth both to obedience and to punishment therefore it behooved Christ both to fulfill the obedience of the Law for us and also to suffer punishment 9. To whom the Law doth promise life such must we be by the grace of Christ that we may obtaine life the Law promiseth life not to them who transgresse not the Law but to them who fulfill it all but by the imputation of his passive obedience we are accounted indeed not unjust not sinners or not transgressors of the Law but we are not as yet accounted just or fulfillers of the Law for what is more vaine then to call him just who hath not fulfilled the Law Therefore not onely must his passive obedience be imputed to us for this that we may not be unjust or not transgressours of the Law but also his active for this that we may be just or fulfillers of the Law for he that in Christ is accounted for no sinner shall escape death but by what right shall he also sue for life unlesse he fulfill the whole righteousnesse of the Law in the same Christ 10. The sacrifice and death of Christ comfort us against the guilt and death eternall but his holinesse against our inherent impurity or the remainders of sin therefore the imputation of both is necessary for our consolation 11. Lastly the Catechisme of the Palatinate teacheth qq 60. and 61. that the perfect satisfaction justice and sanctity of Christ are imputed and given to us to be our justice and q. 36. that our Mediatour by his innocency and perfect sanctity covers our sins in which we were conceived lest they should appeare in the sight of God The same is found every-where in the Palatinate Directory I have faithfully set downe the arguments by which the former sort maintaine their opinions the fourth sort remaine who make Christs passive obedience onely our righteousnesse and define justification by remission of sins onely these make use chiefly of two arguments taken our of Scripture the one from the matter the other from the forme of justification The first is this The Scripture sheweth the whole matter of our righteousnesse to consist in the passion Crosse bloud and death of Christ therefore this onely is it for which we are justified They prove the Antecedent by testimonies of Scripture a Rom. 3.24 We are justified freely by redemption made in Christ Jesus whom God hath set as a propitiation by faith in his bloud b Rom. 5.9 We are justified by his bloud being reconciled by the death of his Son c 2 Cor. 5.21 Him who knew no sin be hath made sin that is a sacrifice for sin that we might become the righteousnesse of God in him d Gal. 3.13 He being
never knowne to him whom finally as accutsed workers of iniquity he will cast into hell fire But you will say Christ died for all therefore rose againe for all The Answer is double One is As often as the Gospell extends the fruits of the works and benefits of Christ to all this is to be understood of all those that beleeve in Christ for this is the perpetuall and constant voice of the Gospell He that beleeveth shall be saved he shall not come into judgement who beleeveth not is already condemned and the wrath of God remaineth upon him Therefore the Gospell debarres from the benefits of Christ all Infidels not onely by a plaine exclusion but also by that condition of faith and repentance under which either expresly or tacitly God promiseth to men the benefits of Christ and which is never to be found in those that persevere in sin So then Christ is said to die for all to wit all that do or shall beleeve in him for whom alone he prayed and in whom alone he findes the faith of his death but as for Infidels and Reprobates for whom Christ prayed not whom he never acknowledged for his owne upon whom the wrath of God abideth for ever John 17.9 Mat. 7.23 John 3.36 Mat. 7.6 to extend I say on these the benefits of Christ what is it else but agâ—â—nst his owne command To give that which is holy unto dogs and to cast pearles before swine These we could solidly defend by authority of Scripture and orthodox Fathers and they mainely concerne Christian consolation There is an other Answer usuall in the Schooles by which we may gratifie the contentious that Christ absolutely died for all if you consider the amplitude and sufficiency of his price and merit for it is out of controversie that the death of the Son of God is of that value that it sufficeth to expiate the sins not onely of one but of millions of worlds if so be they had faith to apply this Physick to their sins But the Question is properly of the efficacy and participation it selfe of these fruits when we demand if Christ died for all Because to die for another is properly to die in the stead and place of another so that he is freed from death and saved alive as when David weeping cryed out I wish I had died for thee O Absalom that is I wish I had died in thy stead that thou mightest have lived But we utterly deny that this participation of Christs merits is common to all unbeleevers as well as to those that beleeve or that this is promised or exhibited in the Gospell for in this regard we conclude that Christ did not die properly for all even for unbeleevers and reprobates But here some unluckie patrons of Infidels taking it ill that we do not divide the pearles equally amongst sheepe and swine cry out that we deny the bloud of Christ and that we produce a Saracenicall Mahumeticall and more then an Heathenish blasphemy which utterly overthroweth Christian Religion But Sirs it is not our purpose to encounter or contend with such rayling pratlers But first we protest against such bitter calumnies making our appeale to the unanimous consent of the orthodoxall Church and the perpetuall voice of the Gospell that we deny not but honour the bloud of Christ when we say it is poured out not for those that slight it and tread Christ under their feet but for those who by faith are justified through it as the Apostle saith Whom God hath given to be an atonement by faith in his bloud Heb. 10.29 Rom. 3.25 Rev. 1.5 1 John 1.7 to declare his righteousnesse by the remission of sins that went before for this is not the voice of Infidels Who hath washed us in his bloud from our sinnes and that The bloud of Jesus Christ cleanseth us from all sin Out of Gods word we know and beleeve that this is no Saracenicall Mahumeticall and more then Heathenish blasphemy as this calumny doth impudently blaspheme but that it is the genuine true and saving doctrine of the Gospell of Jesus Christ and this we are ready at all times â—o demonstrate before the whole Church Besides we hold it worth the while and necessary with as much brevity as may be to pull off from these Wolves the Sheeps-skins with which they are clothed and to paint out in its owne colours this their prodigious doctrine which cunningly lurks under the calumny 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which under this they goe about to bring into the Church They contend That Christ dyed for all Who denieth this for this is the Scripture phrase They adde That he dyed for all and singular Neither doe wee simply deny this to wit in that sense which we shewed a little before although we do not find the Scripture speak so They go on That he dyed for all and singular alike for the elect and reprobate for Cain and David for Judas and Peter for the damned as well as for those that are saved without any respect of faith or infidelity This is hard They proceed finally That he dyed for all and singular not onely in respect of sufficiencie but also in regard of the efficacie of the price But what is this to wit That Christ by his death hath truly delivered from death purged from sin sanctified and reconciled to God all absolutely even those who are not saved but have been damned ever since Cain and are damned and furthermore are to be damned all those they say he hath received into his favour This is that impious monster by which they conclude another no lesle impious and false to wit That wicked men whosoever have perished doe or shall perish that they have perished doe and shall perish not for their sins for they were expiated by the bloud of Christ but onely for their incredulity They who have read their Books and Disputations will confesse that this is no fiction of ours But how monstrous are these to Christian eares These brave patrons of wicked men teach that all wicked and impure dogs before and after the death of Christ are received into the bosome and favour of God But we say first That this is a false and impious doctrine because it plainly opposeth Scripture which continually cries out that wicked men so long as they remaine without faith and repentance are not in the favour of God but that they remaine the sons of wrath and of eternall malediction That they are not delivered from sin and death but are held captives by the snares of the Divell and are strongly deluded yea that they are already condemned and are under the wrath of God Againe we affirme that this is a most absurd monster which overthrowes many principles of Christian faith and it selfe also For now let us set downe and examine their Position All men without exception faithfull and unfaithfull before and since the death of Christ are truely and undoubtedly by the bloud
in God beleeve also in me for be you confident For there he comforts the Apostles Lord who is he that I may beleeve in him for that I may confide in him Saving faith with us is joyned with confidence of the promise of the Gospel or of the promised mercie of God concerning remission of sins through the bloud of Christ Rom 3.28 As when we are said to be justified by faith there faith signifieth confidence and to be justified by faith is in the confidence of Christs merits to be absolved from sin which sense the Apostle delivers when he saith Whom God set forth as an atonement by faith in his bloud to declare his justice by the remission of sins past Where faith in his bloud can signifie nothing else but confidence in Christs bloud But with them faith is assent onely and to beleeve is to give an assent this appeares because in the Article the words John 3.36 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 are rendred by them thus But who assenteth not to the Son for who beleeveth not the Son then their slippery disputes concerning faith teach the same In which for the most part they require not confidence in faith and they will have faith to justifie or to be imputed for justice not because it applies to it selfe Christs merits but because the very act of faith is reputed a fulfilling of the Law which was the opinion of Alberius Triuncurianus a pitifull man Therefore seeing this Article doth deprave the true doctrine of Predestination with so many equivocations and conceales the false it cannot be simply allowed Whether this Article be sufficient or may be tolerated setting Predestination aside But you 'l say What need we dispute so much about Predestination Is it not sufficient to salvation to hold the summe of the Gospel delivered in this Article Who beleeveth in the Son of God hath life eternall Who beleeveth not the wrath of God remaines on him And may not this Article hitherto be tolerated I know some judge so yea some men otherwise learned and pious have written that we ought not to dispute of Predestination now under the Gospel but onely preach upon the universall promises of grace But these good men observe not that by writing thus they contradict the holy Ghost who in the Gospel hath delivered the doctrine of Predestination as above cothurn 2. in the alledged places may be seen These unwise men seem under this pretext either to overthrow the foundations of our faith and comfort or else not to take notice that they are overthrowne by others therefore that religious speech whether of Ambrose or Prosper Lib. 1. de vocat Gent. c. 7. is to be held concerning Predestination These things are not to be searched into what God will have concealed and what are manifest are not to be denied lest in them we be found unlawfully curious and in these damnably ingratefull As it is then unlawfull curiositie to search into the mysteries of Predestination not revealed in the Gospel so it is damnable ingratitude to deny or suppresse what God hath revealed concerning Predestination in the Gospel But to the Quere thus we answer For Sufficiencie you may as well aske in the Church If the doctrine of the Catechisme be sufficient to salvation concerning mans miserie and deliverance by Christ and concerning gratitude Why then should we reade the Bible or higher points of divinitie In Logick is it not sufficient to hold that there are so many Figures of Syllogisms and so many Moods then what need is there of Aristotles Organum in the Schooles In the Politicks is not the popular knowledge of right and equitie sufficient to guide a State what need is there then of such a number of lawes and so great toile as the studie of the law requires In the Mathematicks is it not sufficient to know that a triangle hath three angles equall to two c. that the diameter to the circumference is in a subtriple proportion c what need is there then of Euclyd's hard and intricate demonstrations To these any man may answer with facilitie that to some the first rudiments of these sciences or the knowledge of the quid sit is sufficient but not to all To the Catechumeni or Novices in the Church the catecheticall Rudiments of salvation may suffice as milk is sufficient nutriment for infants but to those that are adult in faith who require more solid meat this is not sufficient Not to School-Doctors not to the Pastors of the Church whose office and conscience require of necessitie a fuller measure of Theologicall knowledge To young Logicians the knowledge of so many Moods Figures is enough for their syllogizing but Philosophers must have the science propter quid delivered in Aristotle's Organum to wit whence and why there are so many and why there can be no more To an inferiour or pedant Judge the elements of law and justice are sufficient but to a Doctor of the law to an Advocate or Chancellour the fountaines of the law must necessarily be knowne For a Mechanick the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of a triangle and circle is sufficient to work by but a Mathematick Doctor who is studious of demonstrations requires the science of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 After the same manner we may say that this Article putting now aside all equivocations is sufficient for salvation to the Catechumeni and private vulgar men which are not capable of sublimer mysteries and this 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is enough what they must be and what meanes they must use to attain salvation to wit that they must beleeve in Christ that they must persevere in faith and obedience of faith to the end by the ministerie of the Word and Sacraments and by grace co-operating with these But to those that are more adult in faith especially to the Doctors of Schooles Churches whoso will say that there is nothing besides this needfull his judgement will be accounted very weak and jejune yea rather it is necessarie that they should search the Scriptures and more exactly know the very 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of the foresaid doctrine that is the fountaine and prime cause revealed in the Scriptures whence these qualities and meanes of salvation with grace and salvation it selfe may originally descend on us from whence also may proceed that difference which wee see of people and particular persons which are to be saved from the multitude of those that perish lest perhaps which by ignorance or by forsaking the fountain must need◠come to passe we digge to our selves broken cisternes Jerem. 2.13 which will hold no water that is lest we ascribe vocation faith perseverance and our salvation either to the wit strength or merit of men or else to grace which is indifferent and to our owne free-will in part or in whole not without dishonour to God and destruction to our selves Now this fountaine this prime and supreme cause is Gods eternall predestination that
evill cause and a bad conscience neither doe they elude the conflict but tye the knot while they say That they question not the doctrinall point of perseverance Coll. p. 401. but desire onely to be further instructed But they dispute so through all their Conference of the perseverance of the Saints and they desire to be instructed that among their divers tergiversations they may prove the very same to be plainly false and impious which in the former members of the Article they did assever to be true and certaine Furthermore in the same Conference every-where whether it be to avoid this conflict or to draw envy upon orthodox men sophistically changing the subject of the Article they write that our orthodox Divines teach That they who once beleeved can never againe fall Coll. p. 403 404.353.354 355.372 nor shall fall but are perswaded that let them sin as often as they will they can never lose their faith nor fall from grace but inevitably shall persevere and shall be saved And it is but only this opinion of perseverance as they say or manner of it which they cal in question Coll. p. 353. or dislike For the refuting then and overthrowing of which the engines of seven Arguments are properly directed to overthrow the orthodox doctrine pag. 356. 1. Because of it self it is repugnant to true piety and good works pag. 359. or because the preaching of it is scandalous pag. 360. and the beliefe of it licentious 2. Because it takes away the meanes of exhortations pag. 361. promises pag. 362. and threatnings c. 3. Because it makes the warnings and caveats which the holy Ghost gives us against Satans trecheries ineffectuall pag. 363. 4. Because examples testifie that many who have beleeved have totally and finally fallen from the faith 5. Because many faithfull men are recorded to have fallen grievously and that they have committed the workes of the flesh and hainous wickednesse with which filthy deeds faith could not consist 6. Because this being granted all baptised Infants that are borne of faithfull Parents should be saved 7. Because many faithfull men do so defile themselves with wickednesse that they are to be excommunicated and are excommunicated by the Ministers of the Church But truly if this be all and onely this which they question and oppose they shew themselves to be vaine wranglers I will not say rash disturbers of the Church and State who make such stirre about an opinion which the orthodox no lesse then themselves would have not onely to be examined according to Scripture but also as a scandalous doctrine and manifestly false they oppose it reprove it and judge it fitting to be thrust out of the Church or surely they fasten a notable calumny upon orthodox men fathering an opinion upon them which they do no wayes acknowledge to be theirs And therefore these seven engines of Arguments beate upon that false opinion onely and no wayes hurt the orthodoxall Tenet as is shewed in the Conference Now the Calumnies appeare thus Coll. p. 368. to 398. The first is in the Subject who once beleeve For the Orthodox do not affirme that all such persevere whereas hypocrites also and temporary beleevers not perseverers are said equivocally to beleeve but of these onely they speake who by true faith are inserted into Christ Coll. p. 341. and are partakers of his quickning spirit The other Calumny is in the first Attribute That they can never nor ever shall fall for both Scripture and experience testifie and the Orthodox think and teach that the Saints or such as are ingraffed into Christ being they are men and subject to humane infirmities may not onely fall but have oftentimes fallen through the infirmities of their flesh into small and great sins The third is in the other Attribute Let faithfull men sin never so much yet they may and ought to be perswaded of their perseverance and this is that absurd doctrine of the Saints perseverance But this is as foolish and plaine a piece of Sophistry or fallacy of the accident as if they had said Because sound men may and ought to run and labour so sick men who are in a Fever or in a fit of the Gout may and should run and labour but as sickly dispositions accidentally hinder the vitall actions of the body so the infirmities of the flesh accidentally hinder the spirituall operations of faith and of the Spirit The fourth Calumnie is in the third Attribute The faithfull can never lose their faith nor fall from grace This sounds to them as an absolute impossibility but the Orthodox use a limitation thus The faithfull cannot fall if you looke upon Gods gracious promises for the holy Ghost is a faithfull keeper and the counsell of God concerning the salvation of such as are predestinated is unchangeable and that out of the mouth of our Saviour Mat. 24.24 John 10.28 But if we looke upon the treacheries and strength of Satan and the infirmities of the faithfull when they are left to themselves then they are too part and that every moment to be supplanted by Satan and their owne flesh Coll. p. 36. and they openly professe that in that respect they may fall away and perish The fifth is in the same Attribute To lose faith to fall from grace which these men understand absolutely but the Orthodox understand a limitation That they cannot lose faith nor fall from grace altogether or totally to wit so as to become of faithfull men Infidels and enemies to God as they that sin before regeneration which is false both by testimonie of Scripture and experience The sixth is in the fourth Attribute But shall persevere inevitably They think that we meane any sort of men even such as are carnally secure as if they should persevere nill they will they which is farre from the minde and candor of orthodox Divines And so having unfolded their buskins and removed the calumnies that the orthodoxall doctrine concerning the perseverance of the Saints in faith is true and sound is shewed by ten Arguments taken out of the Scripture in the Conference 1. Because God in his word hath promised to the faithfull in Christ Coll. p. 147. a totall and finall perseverance Jer. 32.40 Psal 125.1 John 10.28 c. Therefore he performes it because he cannot lye This is Austines first Argument for the good of perseverance De bono persev c. 2. Coll. p. 343. 2. Because the Apostles witnesse that God doth and will faithfully performe his promises concerning their preservation in the faith 1 Cor. 1.8 10.13 Phil. 1.6 1 Thes 5.23 c. 3. Because out of the Apostles doctrine Coll. p. 344. Lib. 3. De justif c. 12. Rom. 8.30 the perseverance of those that are called according to Gods Decree is the proper effect of predestination so that Bellarmine himself a great Patron of indifferent or resistible grace doth plainly confesse That perseverance
by true repentance stirre the same up againe which is done before death lest they perish Wherefore totally they never fall from the grace of God but God is so angry with them for sinne that notwithstanding he hates them not being his sons he so corrects them that yet he doth not totally reject b them Even as an earthly father will not presently thrust his son out of doores when he offends him much lesse will he shake off his fatherly affection although he may severely reprove and correct him Testimonies of Scripture a John 3.9 Whosoever is borne of God sinneth not because his seed is in him nor can he sin because he is borne of God b Psal 37.24 Though he fall he shall not be cast off for the Lord helpeth him with his hand 2 Sam. 7.14 15. I will be his father and he shall be my son whom when he offendeth I will visit with the rod of men and with the stripes of the sons of men but my mercy shall not depart from him VII With this comfort David erected himself when hee fell Cast mee not away from thy presence and take not thine holy spirit from me Psal 51.11 If the righteous man fall he shall not be cast off for the Lord puts his hand under him VIII This maine comfort the Saints have in their spirituall conflicts that they know they doe beleeve and by Gods grace will more and more beleeve and that their faith shall not totally faile them as to be damned because by the Gospel they are taught that it is sustained by Gods immutable a election and Christs most effectuall merit and b intercession and that it is preserved by the power of c God Testimonies of Scripture a Ephes 1.4 He hath elected us in Christ before the foundation of the world was laid Rom. 8.39 Whom he predestinated these he hath called and whom he hath called these he hath justified whom he justified these he hath glorified 2 Tim. 2.19 The foundation of God standeth sure having this seale The Lord knoweth who are his b Rom 8.33 Who shall lay any thing to the charge of Gods elect It is God that justifieth Who shall condemn It is Christ that is dead yea rather that is risen againe who is also at the right hand of God and maketh intercession for us John 17.15 I desire that thou shouldst keep them from the evill Luke 22.31 Simon Simon Sathan hath sought to winnow thee as wheat but I have prayed to my Father that thy faith may not faile c 1 Pet. 1.5 Who by the help of Gods power are preserved through faith to salvation IX To these may be added other express assurances out of Scripture of this * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 fulnesse of faith That it is impossible for the elect to be a seduced for Christs sheep to be taken out of his b hands for the faithfull to be separated from the love of God in c Christ That vocation and the gifts of God are without d repentance * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 That an inheritance incorruptible undefiled unfading is reserved for us in e heaven That by the power of God through faith we are preserved to f salvation That God is faithfull who will not suffer us to be tempted above our strength but with the tentation giveth an issue that we may g beare it Testimonies of Scripture a Matth. 24.24 It is impossible for the elect to be seduced b John 10.28 My sheep shall never perish nor shall any man take them out of mine hand c Rom. 8.39 Nothing can separate us from the love of God in Christ Jesus our Lord. d Rom. 11.29 These gifts and calling of God are such as are not to be repented of e 1 Pet. 1.4 5. Christ hath againe begotten us to an inheritance which cannot perish nor be defiled nor wither reserved for us in heaven f Ibid. Who by the help of Gods power are preserved through faith to salvation which is ready to be revealed in the last time g 1 Corinth 10.13 God is faithfull who will not suffer you to be tempted above your strength but will with the temptation also make a way to escape that you may be able to beare it X. But they who doubt of perseverance beleeve not life eternall yea they slight faith and all hope seeing that is an assured confidence of Gods mercie both present and to come this a certain expectation of life eternall which maketh not ashamed Rom. 5.5 Hope maketh not ashamed because the love of God is shed abroad in our hearts by the holy Ghost which is given to us Faith is the substance of things hoped for the evidence of things not seen Hebr. 11.1 But doubting confoundeth Jam. 1.6 XI Neither is this a doctrine of securitie except of a spirituall for with the certaintie of perseverance in the Saints there remaines alwaies a purpose to avoid sin or to repent for b sin God working all this immutably according to his eternall purpose in them nor withdrawing his mercie utterly from them lest they c perish Testimonies of Scripture a Rom. 8.38 For I am perswaded that neither life nor death nor angels nor principalities nor powers nor things present nor things to come nor any other creature can be able to separate us from the love of God in Christ Jesus our Lord. 1 John 5.10 He that beleeveth in the Son of God hath the witnesse in himselfe 2 Tim. 1.12 I know whom I have beleeved and I am perswaded that he is able to keep what I have committed to him against that day b Rom. 7.15 For what I would doe I doe not but what I hate that I doe if I doe that which I would not I consent to the law that it is good c Ephes 1.11 In whom we have obtained an inheritance when we were predestinated according to his purpose who doth all things according to the counsell of his will 2 Sam. 7.14 and Psal 89.30 I will keep my mercy for him for ever and my covenant shall stand fast to him XII We reject the opinions of Puccius Huberus and others who have been bred in the schoole of Pelagius as being contrary to this most comfortable doctrine 1. That faith now in the state of grace is naturall that it is Gods gift common to all as the Sun by Gods bountie shines on the good and bad 2. That faith hath its increase from God but not its beginning 3. That it is our work to beleeve that is to suffer God to help us 4. That we may doubt of our perseverance to the end 5. That the certaintie of Gods gifts which wee brag of out of the Apostle Rom. 11.29 is vaine So Huberus thes 777. 6. That the Saints as soon as they sin mortally utterly fall off from grace utterly cast off the holy Ghost and altogether lose their faith and so many of the elect are damned and perish ARTICLE VII Of the ministery of the Church I. COncerning the ministery of