Selected quad for the lemma: scripture_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
scripture_n church_n ground_n pillar_n 2,625 5 10.3132 5 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A48286 The only vvay to rest of soule in religion here, in heaven hereafter: shewed plainly and succinctly by pure scripture, in three treatises: demonstrating, I. That the church was left by Christ, as the means to teach us his gospel. 2. Which is she that was left in that office. 3. What it is, she teacheth for gospel. By I.L. Bach of Div. Licensed by the university of Oxford, to preach throughout Engalnd, and late rector of L. in the county of S. now a Catholike. Lewgar, John, 1602-1665. 1657 (1657) Wing L1832A; ESTC R218105 64,778 221

There are 19 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

2 Cor. 5.20 Phil. 2.25 Tit. 1.7 The Pastors in common among whom it was by accident if any one were an Apostle are styled in simple sense the ministers of Christ his embassadors the stewards depositaries and dispensers of the mysteries of God whereof those of faith the first 7 Proofe Gal. 2.1 So supreame at that time was and consequently to worlds end was to be for els wherefore read we the Scriptures now the authority of the Church as God Almighty seeing how S Pauls teaching was with less fruit because opposed by other Teachers who called themselves Apostles of Christ 2 Cor. 11.13 yea pretended to teach the doctrine of the Church Act. 15.1 willed him by revelation to go up to the chief Pastors residing then by accident at Ierusalem to confer his doctrine with them and procure their approbation to it Nay S. Iohn himself though an Apostle in ordinary for the greater credit and fruit of his Gospel as to the people in regard of the great opposition was like to be made against it by the hereticks that denied Christs Divinitie and were verie malapert against him for asserting it 3 Ioh. 9. was moved by the H. Ghost to procure and insert in the close of it the testimonie of some Pastors we know that his testimony is true Ioh. 21.24 A singular instance to shew in what high esteem and authority the testimonie of the Church even to the truth of H. Scripture it self as to us and much more to the sense of it then was and was left by the Apostles at their death for ever to be amongst all good Christians 8. Proof Eph. 4.11 The Apostle delivers our tenet in almost express words plainly and fully in sense VVhen Christ ascended he gave some Apostles c. for the perfecting of the Saints c. that is as the ordinary means to that end until we all come in unity of faith which will not be till the second coming of Christ c. that we henceforth be no more as children tossed to and fro c. which end is not possibly attainable if those Pastors may be supposed liable to teach an errout in faith 9. Proof 1 Tim. 3.15 The Church is called in simple sense 1. The House of God meaning without doubt that School house for teaching Religion of which Esay foretold Esay 2.2 2. The pillar of truth not of the written truth only but of the truth absolutely that is of all truth revealed And not a pillar upon which Scripture is promulged or notified only to the people as Princes edicts upon some post but such a pillar as is also the foundation to the whole frame of truth Therefore he saith in the next word 3. The ground of the truth Which in simple sense absolutely is the incommunicable attribute of God Almighty the first truth in sense wherein it may be given to any created meanes that is as to us or our attaining to the knowledge or certainty of truth is here given to the Church And so it comprises our Tenet in the fullest highest sense possible and particularly the infallibility of the Church in her teaching For 1. If she the ground of all truth then of this there was a Iesus of Nazareth of this there is a Scripture of this there is a H. Ghost nay of this there is a God 2. If these and other revealed points be infallible truths she the ground of them must be infallible So as if possible for her ever once to totter in the truth of her testimony touching any one point by either affirming something to be Gospell which is not or denying something to be which is the whole frame of the truth and certainty of Christian Religion as to us must necessarily totter with it as any building must whose foundation does and as we could not believe the Scripture in any thing if we found it false in any one thing Nor can you evade this place by saying he gives this attribute here to a particular Church namely that of Ephesus in which Timothy was to behave himself which we will not say was infallible For that Church being then a part of the Catholick though it were not infallible yet he being immediately Pastor of it was mediately a Pastor of the Catholick whose attribute that was As he that came into any gate lane or house of Ierusalem came into the Holy City Mat. 27.53 though that gate lane or house were not so 10. Proof 2 Tim. 1.13 2.2 Tit. 1.9 1 Pet. 1.12 The means prescribed and named by the Apostle for preserving to worlds end the knowledge or doctrine of the Gospel was Tradition of the Pastors from hand to hand The things thou hast heard of me commit thou to faithful men who shall be able to teach others also A means subject indeed to corruption in tract of time if the depositaries be considered as men but not if as men assisted to the pure and uncorrupt keeping of it by the H. Ghost to that end sent down from heaven upon them Act. 2.3 with such admirable graces as even the Angels desire and are delighted to behold 11. Proof Apoc 2.1 The Pastor of a particular Church is called the Angel of it Consequently by the rule of proportion the whole company of them is the Angel of the Church universal that is the ordinary means under God to illuminate and guide them and interpret Gods will to them in spiritual things 12. Proof Apoc. 21.23 Finally the teaching of the New Ierusalem which in the first sense means without doubt the Catholick Militant Church of Christ in opposition to the Synagogue the old earthly Ierusalem is called the light in which shall walk the nations of them that are saved Acts 2.47 13.48 whose light is not the Sun or Moon any created corruptible means but God himself and the Lamb Mat. 28.20 so as there shall never be any night of error in that City because its Sun shall never set c. Esa 60.20 You see how expresly how abundantly H. Scripture from first to last sets forth our principle It had been easie to have quoted ten times more texts to the same purpose but to whom this is not enough nothing would Now let 's see what you have to object against it THE SECOND PART Defending the Catholick Tenet CHAP. I. Solving Objections against the Churche's authority THe true reason wherefore your Ministers deny unto H. Church this office of teaching Religion is because they are conscious both of their having no title to the church and of being sure to be condemned if they should submit to any judge but a mute one And yet under colour of interpreting Scripture by it self they finde a way to exercise all the same office themselves as they deny to her and with much greater arrogance The pretended reason is because forsooth she is liable to error in her teaching except when she teaches Scripture and therefore is limitted to it as to a bar-rule beside or beyond which
thy self in the Church which is the ground of truth 1 Tim. 3.15 7. Nay touching the whole Scripture universally All Scripture is given by God and is profitable for doctrine c. that the man of God c. that is The whole Scripture is given by God unto the Pastor and is profitable to this end to furnish him perfectly for doctrine reproof correction instruction of the people in righteousness as you call it and for every other good work proper or pertaining to his function 2 Tim. 3.16 17. CHAP. III. Vrging the third Argument Scripture not proper c. MY third Reason is Because it is not proper to give the first instruction vvhich is the first incomparably principal and most necessary act of Teaching As appears 1. From that of S. Paul How shall any one believe in him of whom they have not heard or hear without a Preacher Rom. 10.14 2. From that of S. Peter The unlearned wrist the Scripture to their destruction 2 Pet. 3.16 Therefore to a profitable and safe use of it it requires and supposes a reader somewhat pre-instructed in Religion 3. From the form of it because not Catechistical but Historical c. 4. From the dedication of all the books in it vvhich have any vvhich is not to any but either Pastors or Catholick Churches the Romans Corinthians c. or at least Catholick persons walking in the truth 2 Ioh. 4. 3.3 5. From the stile of it vid. inf c. 4. § 2. 6. From divers passages in it expresly supposing the reader one needing no catechising 1 Ioh. 2.20 27. Insomuch as they check some in the Churches they vvrote to for needing it Heb. 5.12 nay they suppose him one not needing necessarily any instruction Luk. 1.4 Rom. 15.14 1 Cor. 1.5 Col. 3.16 c. And therefore declare the end of their vvriting those that declare any to be not to teach Catechistical or Fundamental doctrines but the higher perfecting mysteries 1 Cor. 3.1 Heb. 6.1 to exhort admonish stir up to remembrance encourage comfort establish rectifie some errours and abuses crept in among them to give the Pastors some advices and such like ends pertaining to doctrine Concionatory or perfecting Luk. 1.4 Ioh. 20.31 1 Cor. 11.23 15.2 1 Thess 4.1 9. 2.15 1 Tim. 3.15 Heb. 13.22 2 Pet. 1.12 3.1 Iude 3. Apoc. 3.2 3.3 c. Consequently it is so far from being useful or intended to teach us Doctrinally or Catechistically the articles of our Creed the form of Church-Government VVorship Sacraments c. as it is but incidently and as it were by accident that it mentions any thing of them CHAP. IV. Vrging the fourth argument Scripture not the principal A Fourth Reason is Because it is not the principal as to the effect of teaching but onely an instrument in the hand of the Church and one of her Scholars And consequently improper but as in their hand to give any Christian yea or Divine so much as his perfecting instruction And I shall give four proofs for it §. 1. Scripture for the Church The first shall be Because the Church was not ordained for it but it for her as it 's end to be helpful and furthering to her in and for the better discharge of her office As is proved supra cap. 2. §. 2. Not proper to Catechise The second because as appears by the former Chapter it is not proper to give the first instruction Consequently nor the second but to him the first right For the first instruction gives us our first and transcendent rule notion or instrument by which we measure and judge of all things we read or hear of afterward generally speaking in Religion Consequently one false principled is in as bad nay many times worse a condition for understanding Scripture then a novice as the eye is more deceived using a false spectacle then none at all and one that hath a wrong direction given him is many times worse for finding the way then he that hath none at all Now for giving men their first instruction right no means precedent to Scripture is imaginable but the Church Or briefer thus Because it supposes its reader a Catholick And therefore cannot be proper for any one's use but a Catholicks §. 3. VVants sense and reason The third and vvhich though I name it here onely is of as much or more force in giving the first instruction because it vvants understanding and sense faculties absolutely necessary to discharge the office of teaching Because 1. Every one is of a several capacity rank or form as I may call it in knovvledge so as vvhat is plain to one is dark to another And vve are all by nature 1 Cor. 2.11 dull of hearing in spiritual things Heb. 5 11. and very apt to understand them in carnal sense as vve see in Nicodemus Ioh. 3.4 the vvoman of Samaria Ioh. 4.15 the Capernaltes Ioh. 6.52 yea after vve have been a good vvhile in Christ's School to think vve understand them as vve ought vvhen God knovvs many times very sorrily and erroneously as vve see in the Apostles themselves Mat. 13.36 Luk. 24.45 Act. 1.6 And therefore that vvhich is to teach must be able to consider the scholars need capacity and apprehensions and accordingly to fit his instruction to every one severally to one thus to another thus to babes milk to men stronger meat 1 Cor. 3.1 Heb. 5.11 And to that end must be able to be interrogated by the scholar Mat. 13.36 Lu. 2.46 Acts 2.37 8.34 yea if need be again and again until he understand the instruction aright and fully as he ought yea and to interrogate him too to see if he do 2. Again every one is of a several calling quality humor state of soul or conscience degree in vertue c. So that which is useful counsel or doctrine to one is impertinent to another nay vvhat is one mans meat is often anothers poyson For many vices are like vertues and contrarily vertues like vices so as it is very apt for men vvithout good judgement and experience in such matters Heb. 5.14 to mistake one for the other And H. Scripture relates many things done ill by Saints well by wicked men without giving judgement which was well which ill done so as it will be very easie to erre in making it a rule by it self Besides the extreams come very neer another that which parts them many times no broader then the edge of a rasor nay vertue must be many times compos'd of somewhat of each extream duty tempered Mat. 10.16 Besides cases are altered by circumstances so as what is sound doctrine in one case may in another by the alteration of some one circumstance imperceptible to an ordinary or unexperienced judgement be false and pernitious And these circumstances varying cases are of that infinite variety as they are incomprehensible within any written rule although it should consist of more volumes then the world contain And therefore that which is to
Mar. 16.16 6. Did Christ send some to search it as a witness to his person He sent all to hear her as the Teacher of his Gospel 7. Is he blessed that reads it So is he that hears her word Lu. 11.28 And no reader of it but he that is also her hearer Apoc. 1 3. 8. Is it able to make some Christians wise to salvation by faith in Christ Her vvord is able to save all creatures souls by receiving it Mar. 16.19 1 Tim. 4.16 Iam. 1.21 9. Is it profitable for doctrine c. that the man of God may be perfect throughly furnished to every good work She is necessary and sufficient for doctrine c. that every creature may be perfect throughly furnished to every thing pertaining to faith or holiness 10. In a word is it profitable in any kinde to any use vvhatsoever It is only as an instrument in the hand of her or her Scholars So whatsoever can be said of it the same or more excellent may be said of her or the word by her preached But then there are abundance of glorious things spoken of her Psal 87.3 none whereof can be said of it namely all those named supra pag. 13 14 15. The House of God the Angel of the Lord the Light of the VVorld the Power of God unto Salvation the Ground of Truth the Rule of Faith c. VVhich I say not of any intent to extoll her above it absolutely but to beget in you a due esteem of her as in some respects excelling it as it does her in many other 4. Is it because it vvarnes you of some danger possible in making her your guide not a syllable in it to any such sense it doth of danger in making it so 2 Pet. 3.16 5. Is it because it tells you you need not believe or obey her further then she teaches out of or consonantly to it It tells you no such thing but the quite contrary when it calls her the ground of truth For if she the ground of truth we are not to judge of the truth of her doctrine by it but contrarily of its true sense by her doctrine It being possible for it to have divers senses but not possible for it to have any true one repugnant to her doctrine as neither possible for her being the ground of truth to misunderstand it so as to teach any thing repugnant to it Would then any of your Ministers undertake to prove to me by it that she may yea hath at sometime or other since the Apostles death yea at this present does erre in her teaching I would ask him if he would prove it by the express words of it or no. If nay would tell him no implications or deductions though never so evident to reason were to be of force against such express promises as are made to her and those not conditional only so much as implicitely but Prophetical such as that Day and night shall not cease while the earth remains Gen. 8.22 for so saith it If you can break my Covenant of the day and my Covenant of the night and that there should not be day and night in their season then may also my Covenant be broken with David my servant that he should not have a Son to sit upon his throne and you will not I hope say that Christ's throne was to judge errors and with the Levites the Priests my Ministers c. Ier. 33.20 Nay God Almighty for our greater assurance in this point expressely declares that no default or wickedness of the Pastors of the Church should ever defease his Covenant with her If his children forsake my law in practice of life c. I will visit their transgressions with the rod c. But my loving kindeness will I not utterly take from him nor suffer my faithfulness to fail c. Psalme 89.30 Such expresse promises are made to her for her immunity from all error in doctrine so long as the world endures Namely for instance these My spirit which is upon thee and my words which I have put into thy mouth shall not depart out of thy mouth nor out of the mouth of thy seed nor out of the mouth of thy seeds seed saith the Lord from henceforth and for ever Esa 59.21 Again The spirit of truth shall abide with you for ever therefore he spake not to the Apostles but the Church Ioh. 16.3 and guide you into all truth Ioh. 14.16 Now all truth excludes any one least error If he say yea and should which is impossible bring a Text in expresse words against some doctrine or avowed practice of hers I would ask him if those vvords were to be understood in their proper literal grammatical or ordinary Ecclesiastical sense If he say yea afore I admitted him for an Interpreter I vvould ask him for his token vvithout vvhich not our Lord Christ himself vvould desire any one to submit to his Interpretation of it against the Synagogue Ioh. 5.31 15.24 And if which is also impossible he should shew it I mean not a sign Deut. 13.1 Mat. 24.24 but a true miracle Psal 136. 4. Ioh. 3.2 Ioh. 9.31 I would answer him that from thenceforward I would neither believe her nor it Not her because teaching contrary to that which she told me was the word of God Not it because teaching contrary to her who it told me was the ground of truth and her preaching the word of God Weigh then vvell as I said with your self dear Christian Brother what reason you have to make it your guide Nay what an absurd senseless thing it will be in you after this admonition and demonstration to you to leave the fountain of living water for a broken cistern the ground of truth for a quick-sand of errour I mean the Church for the Scripture not in its due nature or use God forbid any such thing in the mouth or thought of a Christian but in its abuse as interpreted to you by your self a man not onely subject to all kinde of error but false principled or by Ministers or Synods such as yours as subject to error and false principled as your self to leave the Teacher unto which our B. Saviour said Do you teach the Gospel to every creature and of which he said to you and me and every creature He that believes her or her teaching and is baptized shall be saved that not believes her or her teaching shall be damned Mar. 16.16 for a book of which he never spake syllable unto Christians or in order to teaching his Law nay of which it appears not that as Pastor of his Church or according to his humane nature he ever intended or so much as foresaw the writing of one tittle of it and of which he to whom he committed for ever after the feeding of his flock Ioh. 21.15 speaking unto Christians purposely of some part of the New Testament then written and by that occasion of the Scripture in general as in the
soon after him he left or at least designed they should leave something to remaine as the ordinary or perpetual means to teach it to others What is meant by the means Where by the means of teaching it I mean not any sort of meanes humanely authorized onely or fallible in its teaching or instrumentall only to some other creature or profitable only or necessary in some respects onely or sufficient to teach some part of it onely or to some creatures onely but the proper principall necessary and sufficient to teach every creature every particular of it and divinely authorized and assisted to that end and so deserving to be stiled in absolute and simple sense the Angel of the Lord or interpreter of his will to humane creatures the guide of mankind in the way to heaven the light of the world the Pillar or ground of the truth the Judge of the Christian Law the Chaire of Christ the Schoole of the Gospell the steward depositary or dispenser of the mysteries of faith the store-house or treasury of divine knowledge wisedome or truth the power or powerfull instrument of God unto salvation of all that believe or use it and its voice doctrine or teaching the word law oracles doctrine or Gospell of God Christ truth grace life or salvation c. the faith the truth the seed of grace the faithful word the sword of the spirit the forme of sound words or doctrine the depositum or treasure of heavenly truth left by Christ or his Apostles the whole revealed will or counsell of God the guide of faith the rule of religion c. Or of which it is or may be said it shall teach you religion if there arise a matter too hard for thee thou shalt goe to it to enquire ask or seek the Law of God at it or its mouth in controversie it shall stand in judgement it shall preserve knowledge it shall shew thee what thou oughtest to doe follow it make it your rule or guide prove all things by it by it we know the spirit of truth and spirit of error it is able to make you wise to salvation or to save your soules or to shew you the way to eternal life he that believes or followes it shall be saved or unto which God Almighty ever said Teach people or teach the Gospell To whatsoever creature these attributes offices properties phrases speeches or any one of them or any other to the same sense is rightfully given or appertaines that 's the meanes I speak of 8. Ground This meanes what ever it be is somewhere or other in H. Scripture set forth and named to us in most plain and expresse manner as being the fundamental of all fundamentals as to us within the Christian religion without which first known and certaine it is in vain for any man to talk of religion or to presume to judge of what is true or false pious or superstitious necessary or not necessary in any matter pertaining to it and which when it is known and certaine no more remaines for any man to doe that desires to know what he is to believe doe or avoid to obteining eternall salvation but only to find it out and hear believe and practice what it teaches comands or forbids as Gospell §. 2. The Question to he handled proposed Hither to you and we agree in our principles as rational men and Christians But then the Question is What is that means And it lies betwixt two The Church and H. Scripture For either he left them in quality of a Society or Community such as our Lawyers call a body corporate to have a permanency by succession and then the Church will be it or they were to leave some writing to teach in their stead or office at their death and then the Scripture will be it or he left them in quality of a Society as to some part of the office and they were to leave the Scripture in the other part and then both will be it By the Church then throughout this treatise What is meant by the Church I meane nothing els but a company or some company of men For this is description sufficient for the intent of this Treatise which is onely to distinguish her from the Scripture and the persons of the Apostles Nor do I mean by her the whole society so called nor any part of her as to any effect of justifying grace or salvation but properly and immediately that part by which she teacheth as I speak by my mouth and a University teaches by her Professors In which sense our B. Saviour used the name when he said Tell the Church Mat. 18.17 and S. Paul the Church is the pillar of truth 1 Tim. 3.15 And so in fine the quaestion is Whether the Church or the Scripture or both be the meanes left by Christ or his order for teaching his Gospell §. 3. The importance of it And it is as appeares sufficiently by what is said already the most transcendently-fundamental one possible to be within the Christian religion seeing by this meanes it is to be taught and all questions in it to be resolved And consequently it is of most transcendent importance what wee hold in it as you will quickly see if you but reflect on the consequences of it For 1. If H. Scripture be it 1. All reading of other books consulting Ministers or Divines going to Church to hear their Catechising or Sermons conferring or arguing one with another or any other acts or meanes whatsoever to this end to instruct or direct our selves in religion will be vain and superfluous yea improper but every one is to goe to the Bible and it alone and by it self alone For supposing it left in this office there will be no denying but it is as plain and intelligible by it self alone to any child or other novice having the use of reason as to the learnedst Divine in the world 2. No creature using it for his guide can offend God by any heresie superstition or prophanesse unlesse he believe or practice contrary to what it teacheth him according to his understanding of it 3. It will be out of the power of the Church to hinder or restraine any creature from reading and using it at his pleasure in any language 2. On the other side if the Church be it 1. all reading of Scripture by the people unto this end will be vain and superfluous yea improper but every one is to seek the Gospel at her mouth and hers onely 2. It will be in the power of the Church to permit or restrain the use of the Bible unto the people more or lesse thereafter as she in her prudence all things considered and not some only and in her charity to their souls shall judge it most expedient for them to their salvation 3. No man though baptized in Christs faith though believing never so humbly and firmly and practising never so fervently all that he finds in Scripture may
hope to see the face of God if he pertinaciously refuse to believe do approve or avoid any one least thing taught or commanded by the Church as necessary to salvation to be believed done approved or avoided although in Scripture not mentioned and die in that state of soule 3. If both be it the part or share of each in the office is to be set out and certainly known by every creature that they may have recourse to each for that which pertaines to its office to the Scripture for its to the Church for its §. 4. The Protestants Tenet in it In the answer to this Question you and we as near as some imagine the two religions to be one to the other differ extreamly For albeit you grant that Christ left a Church to continue for ever in some office of teaching religion and that office of hers proper and in some respects sufficient and necessary yet you will not allow it to be either simply necessary or sufficient or any other then a meer ministery to the Scripture or so much as that with divine authority Consequently your Tenet is Christ left or appointed the Scripture for the meanes to teach us his Gospell This is the prime and maine principle of your religion in proper or as it is distinguished against ours by the name of Protestant or Reformed upon the truth therefore and certainty whereof depends in fine the whole truth and certainty of your religion and consequently of your hope of salvation in or by it as the firmnesse of any whole building does upon the firmnesse of its foundation § 5. What Catholicks acknowledge to H. Scripture We are as forward as any of you can be to give unto H. Scripture what is its Namely 1. That some of the Apostles wrote the New Testament which and the Old make up that holy book called the Scripture or Bible 2. That it is all and every word of it given by inspiration of God and therefore the very word of God of truth most infalible of authority most supreme as to all creatures even the Church her selfe yea in quality and degree of the authority superiour to that of the Church and the only divine written rule now being or ever to be 3. That they left it unto or with the Church as a sacred depositum in the nature following Viz. 1. A rule which she is bound to have an eye unto in all her doctrines and lawes and not only that they be not repugnant to it in more or lesse either by adding to or taking from either the words sense or law of it any one least tittle for supposing that possible and her a Church all of Apostles or heavenly Angels she were instantly to be detested by all as a Synagogue of Satan and all such her doctrines and lawes to be abhorred as will-worship and traditions of men but that they be consonant to it as neer as she may judge of the sense or intent of the H. Ghost as we find the Apostles had such an eye to it in theirs Acts 1.20 15.15 And in acknowledgement hereof in all her Generall Councels she placeth it in the most sumptuous throne at the uppermost end of the assembly above Pope and all as that which is to have the chiefest regard and swaying vote in all her debates and resolutions 2. A meanes excellent proper yea the incomparably principall in the sort and order of inanimate instruments as it is unto the ends for which it was ordained Namely 1. To corroborate by its concurring testimony the authority and doctrine of the Church and our faith to it 2. To preserve in way of a record a world of most admirable truths rules examples admonitions exhortations motives histories genealogies prophecies formes of prayer c. perteining to faith and holines In respect whereof it is a meanes profitable superlatively beyond all that can be said of it by tongues of men or Angels to furnish the man of God or Divine perfectly for doctrine yea of faith for reproof of the adversaries for correction for instruction in righteousnesse and for every other good work proper or perteining to his function 2. Tim. 3.16 And therefore not only doe our Divines give diligent attendance to the reading and study of it and make use of it incomparably for above any other meanes to all these ends yea and to the instructing and guiding themselves for and in the knowledge of truth and resolving cases of conscience and our Bishops in and for the making lawes or determining causes Ecclesiasticall but the Church her self in all General Councells makes her first and chief repaire to it for light and direction nay all her debate and search into former Councells Fathers Schoolmen tradition practice and sense of the Church is to no other end generally speaking then the better to find out and determine its true sense or intent 3. A meanes not only as in the hand of the man of God but as in the hand of every Christian rightly principled firme in faith 2. Pet. 3.16 and reading it in obedience to them that are over him in the Lord Heb. 13.7 with the humble spirit of the Eunuch Acts 8.31 unto the ends for which it was ordeined if ordeined as to him to wit to confirm advance and perfect himself in faith Joh. 20.31 saving wisedome 2. Tim. 3.15 hope Rom. 15.4 charity 1. Th. 4.9 and other Christian vertues singularly proper unto those ends as having from its divine author speciall force and vertue beyond all possible enditings of humane brain to inlighten the eyes and convert the heart of the simple And therefore speaking of it per se or as in the hands of such a one blessed is he that reades and meditates in it day and night Ps 1.1 and makes it a lanthorne to his feet and a light unto his paths Ps 119.105 4. A meanes since its writing necessary unto the Church as by which God will guide her into the truths there recorded without it when it may be had not 5. A meanes perfectly sufficient unto the ends for which it was ordained which is all the perfection of an instrument 6. A record conteining all that man is to believe doe or avoid to the obteining eternall salvation and expresly all the principall In regard of which many and admirable properties and uses of it it is the same in a manner to us as the pillar of cloud by day and fire by night was to the Israelites guiding Moses in the way to Canaan and by him them In a word it deserves to be called by way of excellency the Word Law doctrine oracles or Gospell of God Christ salvation c. the guide of faith the rule of religion the light of the world c. §. 6. The Catholick tenett But then we deny it to be either a proper principall necessary or sufficient meanes to teach religion And so to give unto the Church also what is hers our tenett is that The Church was
Mount Sinai So she Mother of us Christians vvas called Mount Zion Gal. 4.26 And this must of necessity be granted to the truth of this and divers other places which all agree in this that the Church and publique preaching of the Gospel by her was to begin on that Mount Psa 2.6 48. per totum 110.3 c. So this for certain is one of those Prophecies of which our Saviour said Thus it is written and thus it behoves that the Gospel be preached in all Nations beginning at Ierusalem Lu. 24.43 The sense of the place thus opened it yeelds four points most plainly and fully to my purpose viz. 1. That the Church was to be the ordinary meanes for teaching mankind the Gospell They shall say Come let us go up to the house of God and he in or by that house will teach us his wayes c. 2. That her teaching was to be Gods teaching he to be the principall teacher though invisible she but his mouth He shall teach us According to what is elswhere assured to all her children or scholars they shall be al taught of God Esa 54.13 3. That the word by her taught is heere called 1. Gods word and Law therefore it of divine authority and she a teacher divinely authorised 2. In simple sense the Law and the word of the Lord 4. That she is to continue in all the same office and authority of teaching wherein she began at Mount Zyon untill she have taught the Gospel to all nations which will not be till neare the worlds end Mat. 24.14 Second proof Esay 59.20 Again Esay The Redeemer shal come to Zion And this is my covenant with them of Zion saith the Lord My Spirit which is upon thee and my words which I have put in thy mouth shall not depart out of thy mouth nor out of the mouth of thy seed nor out of the mouth of thy seeds seed saith the Lord from henceforth and for ever Not possible to be understood of any person or company but the Church Consequently assuring unto Gods Elect under the Gospel that he will teach them unto the worlds end all the same word of his by the mouth of the same Church with all the same divine authority and assistance as he did the primitive Saints at Mount Zion on Whitsonday when he first put his Spirit upon her and his words into her mouth Act. 2.5 Third Proofe Ezek. 44.23 To the same effect Ezekiel Sadoc and his sons shall teach my people c. in controversie they shall stand in judgement c. This Sadoc was he upon whom the High-Priesthood was transferred from Eleazars line 1 Kin. 2.27 And so here the typical name of the Apostles upon whom it was transferred from Aarons line Consequently this place assures unto Gods people under the Gospel a race of faithful Pastors therefore teaching no errors in the office of teaching Religion unto the worlds end according to that I will raise me up a faithfull Priest and will build him a sure house and he shall walk afore my Christ for ever 1 Sam. 2.35 Fourth Proofe Mal. 2.4 Most plainly Malachy Ye shall know by the wonderfull performance of it that I have sent this Commandement unto you that my Covenant of teaching might be with Levi the Apostles and their Successors The Law of truth was in his mouth the Priests lips should it is their office preserve knowledge and they shall seek the Law at his mouth for he is the Angel or as yours prophanely the Messenger of the Lord of Hoasts See more if you please to the same purpose Psa 19.1 unto v. 7. compared with Rom 10.18 and Mat. 5.14 and Psalm 68.11 16 18. compared with Eph. 4.11 Esa 30.20 and 60.11 and 62.6 Ier. 3.14 and 33.15 to the end and 50.5 Ezek 37.21 all assuring unto the Church a race of Teachers divinely authorized unto worlds end Nor can you say these places meant the Church as preaching Scripture or her doctrine as consonant to it when you cannot shew that any of the Prophets foresaw that any one tittle of the Gospel was ever to be written CHAP III. Proving it from the Gospels ACcording to the exigence of these types and Prophecies as our Saviour himself saith S. Lu. 24.44 he instituted the office of teaching the Gospel in his Church as is manifest First Proofe S. Mat. 5.14 First from that attribute given by him to his Apostles as Pastors and consequently to his Pastors for the time being for ever Ye are the light of the world as much as to say the Sun or fountain of spiritual light unto mankind which therefore if it should once lose its light by teaching any error in faith the whole world must necessarily remain in darknesse and oh how great darknesse Mat. 6.23 ever after For wherewith should the Sun be enlightened Second Proofe S. Mat. 7.24 13.19 24 14. 26.13 S. Lu. 8.11 11.28 S. Ioh. 8.47 10.16 12.47 Secondly from those titles ordinarily given by him to his word as preached calling it in simple sense the word his word his voice the word of God the Gospel the seed of all grace in the soul whereof faith the first and constantly naming preaching as the ordinary means on his part of teaching it and hearing on the peoples part of coming to the knowledge of it Nor can you say by these titles he meant the Scripture preached or the Churches doctrine as consonant to Scripture when you cannot find he ever intended or as man foresaw that any one tittle of his Gospel should ever be written Third Proofe S. Mat. 18.17 Thirdly from that rule of his to all his for ever Tell the Church c. plainly implying he meant to leave her as the ordinary Supreame Iudge in all causes pertaining to his Court and a Judge divinely authorized for else none could be bound absolutely to hear her under pain of eternal damnation which is here implicitely threatened to such as neglect to hear her for no lesse is due to heathen and he would not have such refractory persons worse to us then they are to himselfe nay he saith it shall be more tolerable in the day of Iudgement for Heathen then for them S. Mat. 10.14 Fourth Proofe S. Mat. 28.19 Mar. 16.15 Fourthly most plainly and fully from the Charter it self for the founding of this office recorded by two of the Evangelists Iesus said to them his Apostles Goe ye into all the world teach all Nations preach the Gospel to every creature baptizing them teach them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you He that believes you or your teaching or the Gospell by you taught and is baptised shall be saved but he that beleeves not shall be damned In which words I am sure your self will not say but he left them as the first and temporary meanes of teaching his Gospell and baptizing And if for the first for the ordinary or perpetuall by vertue of those incorporating
words you to worlds end Consequently as the present Church baptises with all the same office and authority as the Apostles did so she teaches also with all the same as they did in vertue of this Commission For whatsoever other powers or priviledges they had of infallibility in more then one the gift of miracles authority of writing Canonicall Scripture c. in any one was not in vertue of this Commission A more plain and full proof H. Scripture hath not for any point of Christian faith nor am I able to devise what other answer you can give to it then this what need any more witnesses But for more aboundant confirmation let 's hear more CHAP. IV. Proving it from the Acts. THe best interpreter of figures and prophesies is their fulfilling and the best comment upon Christ's commission is the practice and proceeding in the execution of it registred in the History of the Primitive Church In which as there is no doubt but the H. Ghost recorded the things of most importance for the knowledge and direction so nor but that he recorded those he did for the patterne and imitation of future ages Consequently what it sets forth to have been then the means for teaching the Gospell is to be supposed to have been left by them in that office Now that the Church was that means is manifest from aboundance of passages in it whereof I shall name some 1 Proofe Act. 2.3 5. The gift conferred from heaven on the Apostles on the day of Pentecost as necessary and sufficient to enable them to their office of teaching the Gospell was not penns though none of them were any great Scribes and the greater part of them for ought appeares not able to write a word but tongues A signe they were to teach religion not by their writing but their speech or utterance 2 Proofe Act 2.14 c. 1. The first and all the means taken notice of in this History used by them in their own persons for bringing Infidells to faith was preaching Peter with the eleven standing up c. v. 14. 2. Such as were moved by it to embrace the Christian Law sought it at their mouth Men and brethren what shall we doe v. 37. 3. Peter taught them their Catechisme Repent and be baptized c. v. 38. without bringing any Scripture proofe as he did afore when he taught them as Infidels v. 16 25 34. 4. The rule afterward of faith worship discipline c. unto the believing people was the doctrine and institutes of their Pastors They continued stedfastly in the Apostles doctrine and felowship and in breaking of bread and in prayer v. 41. Loe here the Church settled and compleated in all her forme of doctrine Worship Sacraments c. afore any syllable of the Gospell was written or for ought appeares intended to be Loe here in the Mother-Church Mount Zyon Gal. 4.26 the assembly of the first-borne Heb. 12.22 the pattern according to which all Churches afterward were to be gathered setled and governed to worlds end 3 Proofe Act. 6.6 7. 8.4 c. All the meanes taken notice of in this History besides their own persons provided used settled declared and left by them for teaching the Gospell was the preaching of others whom they took into their body to that end and sent them abroad over the world Act. 11.19 13.4 and placed some one or more of them in every City and Towne where the Gospell took roote Act. 9.10 13.1 14.22 to instruct and guide the people of those Townes in all things pertaining to religion in the same manner as a sheapheard doth his flock Act. 20.28 4 Proofe Act. 8.4 14 25. 13.4 20.28 These others were Teachers divinely authorised as well as the Apostles they being sent to preach and set over the flock to feed it by the same H. Ghost the Apostles were and their teaching Gods word in the substance of it no lesse then that of the Apostles only with this difference accidentall that in the Apostles mouth it was so originally supreamly absolutely and infallibly in the others subordinately fallibly and no longer or further then they taught what they received from the Church Act. 15.24 Nor therefore can you say that the teaching of these other was called the word of God because they preached Scripture or consonantly to it being here called so Act. 8.14 many years afore a word of the new Testament was written and they could not ground Evangelicall doctrine Christ is come Iesus is he is risen c upon the Old Testament 5 Proofe Act. 8.29 9.6 10.6 16.9 18.9 When God Almighty would have any taught the Gospell he either sent them to the Church or the Church to them Nor was there any difference in the meanes whether Apostles or other Pastors Saul being sent in all the same manner to Ananias as Cornelius to S. Peter and S. Philip to the Eunuch as S. Paul to the Macedonians 6 Proof Act. 11.14 The word thus preached by the Church in which it was by accident if any Scripture were cited to believers was sufficient to save the soules of the people 7 Proofe Act. 15.2 c. 16.4 5. 1. In case the Teachers differed the peoples remedy was to have recourse not to the Scripture then being albeit it conteined rules proper to have decided the question viz. VVhether circumcision was necessary to all that were to be within the covenant of grace made with Abraham and one party of the Teachers founded their doctrine upon the expresse words of it viz. that it was a law given to him for all generations for ever Gen. 17.13 Psal 105.9 and the other party were no lesse then Apostles in extraordinary but to the Church or eminent body of the Pastors in ordinary then by accident residing at Ierusalem 2. These coming together to consider of and decide it founded the decision not upon scripture though in a very fundamentall point of faith but meerly upon their own illumination and guidance by the H. Ghost It seemed good to the H. Ghost and to us v. 28. So their decree his decree theirs as his mouth his as the principall Law-giver and consequently to resist it no lesse sin then to resist the H. Ghost Nor can you say they intitled it to him because part of the assembly were Apostles For as it were purposely to preclude you from this evasion the H. Ghost took care to note 1. That the Apostles sate and voted there in quality of Presbyters as it was a name common then to Priests and Bishops only they the chief therefore named first and singularly 2. That there was much disputing upon the point v. 7. Consequently the Apostles proceeded not to the sentence as Apostles or taught by inspiration but as Pastors or by the ordinary authority of the Church as it was to continue in their successors 3. S. Paul and Barnabas though Apostles thought it an honour to themselves to be officers
to the Church in publishing and dispersing her decrees and to their doctrine that it was by her approved 16.4 4. As they went through the Churches they delivered them the decrees of the Councell for to keep Act. 16.4 which was more then we finde they did any book of Scripture 5. When the good Christians heard what the Councell had decreed they rejoyced for the consolation of being certain now what was true doctrine in that point 15.31 6. And thus were the Churches established in the saith 16.5 8 Proofe Act. 20.20 27 32. 1. The Apostles by word of mouth committed unto the Church all things needfull nay but profitable only for them to know for the full discharge of their office unto salvation of themselves and their flock And so made her the depositary of what Christ had committed to them 2. That which they thus committed by word of mouth to the Church was in simple sense the word of grace nay expressely the whole counsell of God 3. This forme of doctrine thus taught by tradition was left and expressely recommended by the Apostles unto rhe Church for her sufficient rule and guide And now brethren I commend you to the word of Gods grace which is able to establish you c. v. 32. 4. And this at their death or as good as their death when they were never like to see one anothers faces more in this world I know that after my departure c. 5. So at their deaths they left the Church to continue for ever in all the same office and authority for feeding and ruling the flock of Christ wherein they then were or had been at any time afore and namely afore the writing of the New Testament Take heed to your selves and to the flock over the which the H. Ghost hath made you Bishops or as yours prophanely overseers to feed the Church c. CHAP. V. Proving it from the Epistles TO the practice and proceedings of the Apostles in their History accord the rules instructions exhortations and admonitions in their Epistles all setting forth and recommending unto us the Church for our guide and her teaching for our rule in such manner as if there were no such book as Scripture nor to be To name a few of the principal for instance 1 Proofe Rom. 1.1 Gal. 6.6 Eph. 1.13 Heb. 5.12 Iude 3.2 Io. 9. 1. It is their ordinary language to call the Churche's doctrine the word doctrine oracles Gospell c. of God Christ life salvation c. the faith the truth c. in simple sense 2. And not that preached by the Apostles only but by the Pastors among whom it was by accident if any were an Apostle Rom. 10.8 17. Heb. 13.7 Iam. 1.21 3. Nay that which was preached by Pastors of whom the Apostles none for certaine Col. 1.5 3.16 Nor can you say it was so called because it was the Scripture preached or in regard of its consonancy to it For 1. The Old Testament could give neither the matter nor rule for Evangelicall doctrine and very little of the New was written when S. Paul called it so in the first Epistle by him written 1 Th. 2.13 and S. Peter in the first that was written 1 Pet. 1.12 25. 2.2 2. Many Evangelicall doctrines then revealed were not written then to wit those mentioned in S. Iohn's Gospells and Epistles more then are in the other namely the institution of the Sacrament of Priestly absolution Ioh. 20.21 Christ's committing his flock to S. Peter Ioh. 21.15 3. The Epistles themselves expressly require all Traditions to be held unwritten as well as written and not those onely taught by the Apostles but by their Pastors Timothy Silvanus c. among whom it was by accident that S. Paul was one Hold the traditions which you have been taught whether by word or our Epistle 2 Thess 2.15 2. Proof Ro. 1.16 12.6 Eph. 6.16 1 Tim. 3.9 6.20 2 Tim. 1.13 2.2 Tit. 1.9 Iam. 1.21 Iude 23. The Churches teaching or doctrine by her taught is called also in simple sense the power i.e. powerful instrument of God unto salvation of all that believe it the rule or as you call it proportion of faith the sword of the Spirit the mysterie of faith the good thing depositum or treasure of heavenly truth the form of sound words or doctrine committed by the Apostles to the Church the faith once delivered to the Saints the faithful word able to save the souls of all that follow it 3. Proof Rom. 10.14 17. The Apostle expressely averrs he knows no means wherby men may come to faith but the word preached and thereupon concludes absolutely Faith comes by hearing and hearing by the word of God As much as to say the ordinary means of faith is hearing the word preached 4. Proof Rom. 12.6 1 Tim. 1.3 3.9 2 Tim. 1.13 3.14 Tit. 1.7 9. The rule of teaching to the Pastors was the doctrine they had received And it was the rule even to Prophets to If any man prophecy according to the analogie rule or as you render it proportion of faith Rom. 12.6 that is the known doctrine of the Church For that it could not mean the Scripture see the reasons given sup pag. 59. 5. Proof Ro. 16.17 2 Th. 3.6 Heb. 13.7 17. Iud. 3.1 Ioh. 2.24 4.2 6. 2 Ioh. 6 9. The rule of belief and holy practice to the people was the doctrine wherein they had been Catechised called by S. Iohn the unction of the H. Ghost 1 Ioh. 2.20 and generally the doctrine or institutes of the Church Hereby know we the spirit of truth and the spirit of error He that knows God hears us he that is not of God heareth not us 1 Ioh. 4.6 This doctrine of our Catechisme is given unto all Christians supposed catechised by a lawfull Pastor as the Galatians were as a rule of that supream authority and infallible certainty as by it we are to try the spirits of Prophets 1 Thes 5.21 yea even of Apostles or heavenly Angels Gal. 1.8 if possible for them to teach repugnant to it And if a rule whereby to judge of the Apostles preaching of their writing also it being as impossible for them to write as to preach repugnantly to it and their writing being of no greater authority then their preaching Consequently this text Gal. 1.8 which your men use to urge against Traditions gives so great authority to them as it implicitely warnes us on perill of our soul not to beleive or receive any text of H. Scripture it self in any sense repugnant if possible for it to have any as it is not to the doctrine of our Catechisme suppose it given by a lawfull Pastor Nor can you say that this subsists not with what we teach that any particular Pastor yea Pope and all as such may teach false doctrine for we will not say that any lawfull Pastor can doe it which who is we shall see in next Treatise 6 Proofe 1 Cor. 4.1
were written namely 1. Divers we meet withal in the New Testament 2 Tim. 3.8 Heb. 9.19 11.37 Iud. 6 9 14. 2. All those given by the High-Priest viva voce from Adam's time until Christ's to them that consulted him he being a constant or ordinary oracle Gen. 25.22 Iudg. 1.1 1 Sam. 23. 2. Ioh. 11.51 6. Argu. Rom. 15.4 The Scripture was written for our instruction Answer No doubt of it and it is an excellent means thereunto But this is none of the things you are to prove 7. Argu. 2 Th. 2.15 VVhich you have been taught by our Epistle Answer But he doth not say nor mean which it hath taught you but onely which you have been taught by us whether by word or epistle 8. Argu. 2 Tim. 3.15 VVhich are able to make thee wise to salvation by faith c. Answer But he doth not say which are able to make you wise meaning Christians in general nor which are able to make thee wise to salvation absolutely but by faith in Christ That is by bringing thee to faith or confirming or perfecting thee in it Better proofs then these I am sure you have not and the best of these as you may see a little alreadie will more anon is verie short of a proof And no wonder when the Scripture cannot contradict it self in sense as it would if in one place as I have named an hundred it should set forth the Church for our Teacher Guide or Rule and in another it self CHAP. II. Examining the proofs of Scripture's having the four requisites to the office And first in this Chapter VVhether a proper means TO shew you more manifestlie the falseness of your Tenet by giving you larger scope of proof I named above four requisites to the means we speak of proper principal necessary sufficient Whereof therefore if Scripture vvant but any one it cannot possibly be it See if you can prove it hath I do not say all but so much as any one of them And first that it is proper useful or intended to give the first instruction Which as it is the first so the incomparably principal and most necessary act of the office of Teaching 1. Argu. Deut. 31.11 Thou shalt read this law afore the children that have not known any thing that they may hear and learn to fear the Lord. Therefore proper to give no vices their first instruction Answer It follows not 1. Because this place speaks not of novices but of the ignorant sort of people young or old For those words any thing are not Moses's but an addition of your Translators confessed in some editions by a smaller character to help the sense when they mar it as they do in divers other places and instead of the H. Ghost's give their own sense for Scripture which is properly that adding to it as is forbidden and accursed Apoc. 21.22 the text being no more then this children c. that have not known that is are ignorant of the dreadful majestie sanctity power justice and other perfections of God Almighty and of the great awe and obedience due to him from his creatute set forth in that Book 2. Nor therefore by learning to fear God did he mean the first but the perfecting knowledge And it is the more probable because this reading of the Law was appointed to be but once in seven years whereas children were to be instructed touching God Almighty assoon as two or three year old 2. Argu. Psal 19.7 119.30 The law of God gives light to the simple and little ones Answer True but impertinent For 1. He doth not name the Scripture nor I think mean it but the Gospel as preached by the Church among the Gentiles to the conversion of Nations spoken of from the first ver of this Psalm S. Paul himself being the interpreter Rom. 10.18 2. Nor had he meant it do those simple or little ones mean novices but humble upright souls such as himself was Psal 131.11 Iacob Gen. 25.27 Iob Iob 1.1 the Apostles Mat. 11.25 and as all Christians yea the greatest Divines in the world must be ere God reveal his mysteries to them either by Scripture or any other means Mat. 18.3 1 Pet. 2.1 3. Argu. S. Ioh. 20.31 These are written that ye may believe that Iesus is the Christ. Implying his Gospel was proper to give instruction in that point the first principle of Christian faith Answer Short still For he spake not that either 1. to novices but to Christians catechised 2. or touching any doctrines in his Gospel but the miracles of Christ related in it Many other signs he did which are not written but these i.e. signs are c. 3. or of instructing in that point but confirming in the belief of it these are written that ye may believe c. 4. Argu. 2 Tim. 3.14 Timothy knew the Scriptures of a childe Sure then profitable to instruct him in his childehood Answer No doubt singularly profitable but not to give him his first instruction 5. Argu. 5. 1 Ioh. 2.13 S. Iohn wrote to little children Answer Such children as knew the Father nay needed no man to teach them the doctrine of the Catechisme ver 20 27. CHAP. III. Examining the proofs for Scripture's being a principal means SEcondly that which is call'd the meanes to any end must be the principal means to it as principal opposes instrumental Now H. Scripture we say is a most superlatively excellent proper means and in its kind the principal to give the perfecting instruction but we will not say it is at all proper to it as principal that is of or by it self or as in the hand of any one the profoundest Divine but only as an instrument in the hand of the Church or one of her Schollars As a pen is proper to write but not as a principal means but as an instrument onely in the hand of one that hath strength and skill to use and guide it to its end You say or must renounce your principle it is self-proper to this end as in the hand of any or every understanding Christian. See if you can prove it 1. Argu. Deut. 17.19 He shall read therein that he may learn to fear the Lord that is that by it he may instruct and direct himself in his duty to God Answer True if you understand it of the King in the discharge of his civil office But if you will understand it of him as one of the faithful in the discharge of his duty to God in matters of faith and holiness it was not meant of every or any one but one trained up in the true Religion by or under Orthodox Pastors 2. Argu. Deut. 30.11 This commandment is not hidden from thee c. Implying the Scripture is not dark to any one in matters necessary Answer It implies no such thing For 1. It speaks not of Scripture but of the words by him commanded viva voce And so was a figure of the Gospel to be preached Rom.
10.8 which indeed is hid to none but the Reprobates 2 Cor. 4.3 2. Grant he had spoken of Scripture and by name of that book of Deuteronomy the plainest in the Bible and consisting of nothing els in a maner but moral precepts written in our hearts by the light of nature exhortations admonitions motives c. to piety and obedience yet it was so unprofitable yea dangerous for ignorant people as it was neither intended for their reading Deu. 31.9 nor to be so much as read to them without an interpreter authorized Neh. 8.7 2 Chron. 17.9 Acts 15.22 3. Argu. Deut. 31.11 Thou shalt read this law before the people that have not known any thing that they may learn to fear God c. Implying it was so self-plain as the sole hearing it read was sufficient to instruct ignorant people in the knowledge and fear of God Answer No such thing as appears from what is said in the answer last afore And now I shall illustrate and confirm it to you by giving some of the reasons of it in an instance In that Book of Deuteronomie are sundry passages most admirably setting forth the great perfections of God for which we ought to fear him proposing effectual motives to it c. and so most excellent proper to inform and perfect the reader or hearer in that duty But then withal there are intermixed such expressions sometimes so descending to the vulgar capacity of God's eyes hands anger glittering sword c. Chap. 32.40 41 c. sometimes so dark e.g. Iesurun waxed fat I lift up my hand to heaven c. Chap. 32.15 40. c. sometimes so repugnant in words for example calling God sometimes by a name of the singular number Iehovah as if but one person generally of the plural Elohim which your Translators ought to have rendred Gods or the Gods sometimes setting him forth as an infinitely dreadful otherwhiles as an infinitely gentle power c. as they would be apt to beget or confirm in ignorant people erroneous apprehensions of him either too little or too great a dread of him unless heard or read by one that had been taught some rules for the right understanding of them which rules cannot be given with certainty but by the Church 4. Argu. Psal 19.8 119.105 The law of the Lord is a light enlightning the eyes of the simple Now a light is a self-sufficient or principal means to guide a man in his way Answer 1. Most certain the Law of God is in its kinde a most excellent light yea the principal in this world to guide us even Church and all in the way to heaven But David speaks not here of the Scripture nor doth he mean it necessarily much less solely 2. Grant he meant it light is not a self-sufficient means to direct a traveler in his way no not the Sun it self to one that hath a filme over his eyes or is ignorant of his way or is drunk or mad but shall light him as well out of his way as into it yea instead of his way shall light him into a pit to break his neck Now such men with a filme over their eyes are all not instructed in Religion by the Church and such drunk or mad men are all pertinacious Sectaries 5. Argu. Psal 199.99 I have more understanding then all my Teachers for thy Testimonies are my meditation Implying that a man by studying the Scripture may come to more knowledge in divine things then is in his Teachers and consequently to understand Scripture better then they and therefore without their help Answer It implies no such thing For 1. He spake not of the Scripture nor perhaps meant it 2. Nor did he perhaps speak this of himself in quality of a Believer but of a Prophet taught by inspiration 3. Nor did he prefer his understanding to all Teachers but to all his 4. Nor did he perhaps speak of wisdom speculative but practical or experimental only wherein many times simple people by devout meditation and ferverous practice of what is taught them by the Church or read by them in Scripture come to exceed their Teachers 6. Argu. S. Luke 10.26 When one demanded of our Saviour the way to heaven he sent him to the Scripture How is it written How readest thou Implying that it by it self alone is enough to shew any reader of it the way to heaven Answer Still wide For that one did not demand the way absolutely whereof himself was a Teacher but that particular new perfecter way as Christ professed to teach which favour he not thinking him worthy of sent him to Moses whose disciple he was Ioh. 9.28 And in the same manner he did at first with the other Pharisee that came to him with the same question Mar. 10.19 but when by his answer he saw cause to love him he taught him the perfect way to happiness as he did Nicodemus at first asking the necessary Ioh. 3.3 by his new Law and without sending either of them to the Scripture for either way where indeed it was not to be found 7. Argu. S. Luke 16.29 When the glutton in hell begged of Abraham a Teacher from the dead for his brethren on earth the answer was They have Moses and the Prophets let them hear them Implying Scripture alone was a means proper to teach them piety sufficient to escape hell Answer Not a tittle to any such sense For 1. He begged not a Teacher but only a witness to the doctrine of the Synagogue touching the grievousness of hell-torments c. nor therefore did Abraham remit them to Moses and the Prophets as Teachers but onely as witnesses more competent then he who was desired a Ghost from the dead 2. Nor by Moses and the Prophets did he perhaps mean their writings but the Teachers then living upon earth those in ordinary sitting in his Chair by Moses those in extraordinary which that Nation was seldom without by the Prophets And it is the more probable 1. Because it were more proper where a living witness was desired to send them to a living witness more credible then the other 2. Because it is improper to say of writings Let them hear them 3. Grant he meant the Scripture and as a means of instruction yet not as read much less interpreted by the people but as read and interpreted to them by their Pastors Therefore he said Let them hear them 8. Argu. S. Ioh. 5.39 Search the Scriptures they are they that testifie of me As who should say They are the proper principal sufficient means to teach people Religion Answer Far from any such sense For 1. He spake not this to the people but the Teachers as you will see anon cap. 6. § 1. argu 6. 2. Nor perhaps did he say to them Search but you do search the Greek word being indifferent to either and the later as agreeable to the scope and coherence of the Text as the former 3. Nor did he send any to it
as a Teacher of any thing but onely as a witnesse to his person 4. Nor as the proper principal necessary or sufficient witness for those he had newly afore urged ver 35 c. but as a witness he was compelled to by their obstinacy to the other and esteem of it Him whom the Father hath sent ye believe not Search the Scriptures for in them ye think c. 5. Nor did he send them to it by it self alone but as his maner was Luke 24.27 32 45 alledged the texts and opened them 6 Nay nor then neither were they a testimony sufficient to weigh against those brought by his adversaries out of the same Scripture to the contrary without putting into the scale the authority of his person the interpreter as you will see anon par 4. c. 4. § 5. 9. Argu. Acts 18.28 Apollos mightily convinced the Iews shewing by the Scriptures that Iesus was Christ He a lay-man by scripture alone convinced shewed or made clear even to infidels the first one of the highest mysteries of Christian faith much more could he shew it to himself and if that point any other Answer An argument somewhat specious indeed but wanting soliditie For 1. Though a lay-man yet he had been taught by the Church how to alledge and open the Scripture to that point 3. His convincing or shewing meant no more then bringing proofs or arguments for it for we do not read he converted anie and it is certain not all that he disputed with 3. It was not possible for him to prove by the Scripture there spoken of more then one of his propositions For his argument from the old Scripture could be no other but this Christ was to suffer death and rise again c. Iesus hath suffered death is risen again c. Therefore he is Christ The former proposition he was able to convince by Scripture the later not 10. Argu. Rom. 15.4 VVhat things were written were written for our learning or instruction Answer Most certain and are singularly proper to that end in the hand of an Orthodox Teacher alledging and interpreting them in their right sense unto the people as he did then to them 11. Argu. 2 Cor. 4.3 If our Gospel be hid it is hid to them that perish As much as to say Scripture is plain to all but reprobates Answer 1. He spake not nor dreamt of Scripture but of the Gospel preached by the Church 2. Grant he spake of Scripture he meant it as preached by himself Silvanus and Timothy their Pastors Consequently no wilful Protestant or other Sectary whatever to whom the Scripture as preached to him by his present lawful Pastors is hid may hope of himself that he is one of the predestinate if he dye in that state of soul 12. Argu. 2 Tim. 3.15 The Scriptures are able to make thee wise to salvation Spoken to Timothy as a Christian to encourage him to be diligent in reading them as a means proper by it self alone to instruct him in Religion sufficiently to his salvation Answer Not a syllable in it to any such purpose For 1. He spake not to him as a meer Christian but as a Catholick trained up in the Church under himself v. 14. 2. Nor perhaps did he here incourage him to reading the Scripture but onely to continue firm in the things himself had taught him out of it not so much for the evidence of their consonancy with it as for the authority of his person the interpreter knowing of whom thou hast learned them v. 14. 3. Nor therefore did he recommend it to him as an instructer in Christian faith but as a witness to it 4. Nor therefore did he say wise to salvation absolutely as if salvation were attainable by the knowledge and belief of the Scriptures there spoken of but wise to salvation by faith in Christ that is by confirming and perfecting you in Christs faith And so wise to salvation means no more then wise in saving wisdom Consequently the uttermost sense of this place is no more then this The old Scriptures are able to make a Catholick wise in saving wisdom by confirming or improving him in faith which is nothing to what you are to prove 13. Argu. 2. Tim. 3.16 All Scripture is profitable for doctrine c. Answer Superlatively beyond all that can be said of it by tongues of men or Angels being given to that end by inspiration from an infinite VVisedome But it makes nothing to your purpose For 1. He doth not say sufficient 2. No nor self-profitable 3. No nor profitable in the hand of every Christian no nor of every Christian Divine suppose him the profoundest ever lived but of the man of God that is the Orthodox or Catholick Divine or Teacher For 1. That by the man of God he meant not a meer Christian or believer is manifest 1. Because that name is never found in Scripture used of any but in whom there was some higher excellency then ordinary 2. Because it was a proper name in that Nation of Prophets 1 Sam. 2.27 9 6 c. 3. Because Timothy to whom he then wrote this was a Pastor and called by him by this name thou O man of God 1 Tim. 6.11 4. Because all these works here named as to which it is profitable doctrine reproof correction and instruction are the proper works of a Divine or Preacher 2. That he meant a Catholick Divine is as certain For a Heretick he would never call a man of God but a limb instrument or factor of the Devil Gal. 5.20 Tit. 3.10 Apoc. 2.9 15. 4. Grant by that name he meant a lay-Christian yet not any other but a Catholick one for the Scripture would be far from calling a heretick a man of God which alone is enough to render this place of no use to you 13. Argu. 2 Pet. 1.19 To which you do well to take heed as to a light c. Answer In the hand of your Pastors alledging and expounding it to you we have a light to which you do well to take heed 14. Argu. Apoc. 1.3 Blessed is he that reads this Book Sure then profitable in the hand of any Christian reader to instruct and guide him to his souls health Answer No such thing For 1. I do not think he spake here of lay-Christians but the Pastor of the several Churches to whom that Epistle was directed Chap. 2.1 c. and immediately delivered for him to read it himself and preach it to the people My reason is 1. Because it was fit he should have his encouragement as well as the people 2. Because the people in quality of hearers are spoken of in the very next words in the plural number He that reads and they that hear Now let him that saith in both places he meant the people give a reason why he should so suddenly change the number 3. Because when none of the writers nor he himself encouraged the people to the reading of any Book
3. And how many how tempting occasions had he to have mentioned the Scripture if to be as you say at least in some kinde or other If not as the means of reaching or the matter to be taught or the rule or condition of it yet as a part of the means matter or rule at least as a Record helpful to the office namely when giving the Commission and Instructions to his Church for the teaching of his Gospel when naming the matter to be taught and the means by which he intended for ever to guide her into all truth Ioh. 14.16 16.13 when charging all creatures absolutely to believe and obey her teaching denouncing hell to them that should not assuring heaven to them that thould Mat. 16.16 4. And how easilie how soon had a word been spoken of it in some one or other of these occasions For example to have said write the Gospel or Teach Scripture or it shall guide you into truth or he that believes you or the Church teaching out of or according to it c. Nor can you say he did or might mean that condition though he named it not For besides that this is properlie that adding to and taking from Gods word written which S. Iohn denounces that heavy curse to Apoc. 22.18 by this no greater authoritie is given to the Church that City or House of God of which such glorious things are spoken in Scripture then must be given to any Tinker Woman Childe Heretick nay to the verie Devil himself for we ought to believe him teaching according to Scripture And certainlie any man considering the multiplicitie of Sects in these parts of Christendom and all grounding themselves in Scripture when he the author and finisher of our faith Heb. 12.2 never so much as mentioned it in order to Christians or his Law may wel ascribe it to his singular wisdom and goodness that he waved all mention of it for what would have been had he ever referrd us to it in any kinde whatsoever Surely had he ever mentioned it in any of those kindes abovenamed and the New Testament in the form wherein it is and the people judges of the sense of it he had left his Church in a more defective and miserable condition then ever any Prince or Law-giver left Common-wealth §. 3. Of the Acts. No lesse strange is the silence of the Historie of the Primitive Church 1. It was written purposely for a record of what the Apostles did in order to the good of religion most importing posterity to be recorded Among which certainly nothing can import us more then what they did in planting settling and declaring the means for teaching it after their decease throughout all future ages 2. Nor could any thing more or more early deserve and require their industry and sollicitude then the providing and settling the means considering among other reasons their own mortality It cannot be therefore but if a VVriting or Book were to be it one of their first cares and diligences would have been imployed in procuring it to be written the old Scripture being improper to this purpose declaring and recommending it for such to Pastors and people causing copies of it to be transcribed and dispersed over the world securing some original of it in Ierusalem Antioch Rome or other safest City translating it into vulgar Languages for the use of the common people delivering it to Presbyters at their Ordination as the Matter and Rule of their teaching finally causing record to be made of what they did in it either within the book it self or in the history of their Acts nothing possibly to be written of them being of the thousand part of that concernment for the knowledge of future ages as this 3. If they neglected or deferred the doing any thing in it for some years at first whiles together in health at liberty and the Teachers all of one minde yet afterward when they saw S. Iames beheaded and S. Peter without a miraculous rescue like to have been so too Acts 22.1 when they saw Sects springing up apace so as there was need of holding a Council to decide the controversie Act. 15.2 when that was like to be the last time of their ever meeting together in the world when admonished by that example how seasonable and necessary it then was for them to settle and declare the judge and guide of faith if to be any other then the Church how could they delay any longer to do something in it or if they did the Historian not thinking it worth the writing 4. He could note the great zeal and pains of Peter and Paul in visiting the Churches confirming them leaving among them the decrees of the Church to keep ordaining Pastors to feed and guide them instructing those Pastors for the discharge of their office after their death recommending and naming to them the proper and sufficient means to that end Acts 8.32 14.21 23. 15.36 16.4 20 20 28.32 what occasions were these for him to have said something of what they did in writing Scripture or distributing it to the Churches for to keep or recommending it to the Pastors for to teach especially when they came so neer to it as to recommend them the word of God's grace Acts 20.32 5. And yet afore the finishing of this History there were written beside S. Luke's own two of the Gospels S. Mathew's and S. Mark 's most of S. Paul's Epistles and some of them written in that very City and at that very time when he was with S. Paul Col. 4.14 2 Tim. 4.11 and as is likely writing this History yet he takes no notice at all of them §. 4. Of the Epistles Most strange of all is the Apostles own silence in their Epistles 1. They were vvritten some to the Pastors some to the people to give them the best advices and instructions they could either for them in present or to be left upon record for all Pastors and people in future ages Among which none could be more important then to declare and recommend to them the Guide and Rule of Religion after their own decease 2. And how frequent how proper occasions had they to have named the Scripture for it if it were to be Namely when advising the Pastors to teach the Word naming the matter they were to teach the rule they vvere to teach by and coming so neer the Scripture as to cal it the word of truth c. 1 Tim. 1.3 2 Tim. 1.13 2.15 4. 2. Tit. 2.1 c. when describing and enumerating the qualifications of the Teachers 1 Tim. 2.2 Tit. 1.7 what was to be committed to them in their Ordination to teach 2 Tim. 2.2 when monishing the people touching false Teachers and giving the marks whereby to know them Rom. 16.17 2 Thess 3.6 1 Ioh. 4.2.6 when charging them absolutely to obey their Pastors follow their faith receive their teaching as God's word with the meekness of new born babes
Heb. 13.7 Iam. 1.21 1 Pet. 2.2 when naming the rule of faith Rom. 12.6 the ground of truth 1 Tim. 3.15 the means left by Christ for the perfecting of the Saints Ephes 4.11 finally when naming the end vvherefore Scripture vvas given by God and to which it is profitable 2 Timoth. 3.16 3. And how easily how soon had it been named in one or other of these occasions For example to have said to Timothy or Titus Teach Scripture or according to it c. or to the people Prove all things by Scripture or Make it your rule or guide or Obey your Pastors teaching out of or according to it or it was given or is profitable that the Christian man may be perfect c. 4. At least they might have given the people some advice or encouragement in plain words to read to sometimes or the Pastors some charge to read it sometimes to them 5. Nor was it of forgetfulness that they balked the giving these instructions For in their Epistles to the Pastors they could well remember to advise and encourage them to give diligence to the reading it 1 Tim. 4.13 2 Tim. 3.16 and in some Epistles to some Churches to charge the reading of some particular Epistles in some particular Congregations once 1 Thess 5.27 Col. 4.16 and S. Peter could once take occasion to speak of his brother Paul's Epistles and by that occasion of Scripture in general but what he saith of it is so far from encouraging people to read it much less to make it their guide or rule as it is enough to scare any one either people or Divines from meddling with it without a good interpreter 2 Pet. 3.16 6. Some of these Epistles were written by them when now ready to be offered 2 Tim. 4.6 2 Pet. 1.14 by S. Iohn when now 100. year old and all the other Apostles dead and perhaps rotten long afore and he saw the Churches round about him swarming with Sects and wrote to that end chiefly to confirm Catholicks in faith and nourish them against Sects and shew them the best means and way to discern and avoid them Nor could he but know in what a sad condition the sacred writings were like to be left by him Some corrupted by Hereticks Apoc. 22.18 some counterfeit 2 Thess 2.1 some uncertain Luk. 1.1 some lost vid. infr c. 5. arg 9. § 4. some in one Countrey some in another perhaps 500. miles asunder not so much as a Catalogue of their names or number c. yet he left the world as the rest had done afore him without any least mention of the New Testament or any part of it more then what he wrote himself or that as to any office of teaching Religion CHAP. II. Vrging the second Argument Scripture not for the people MY second reason is because it was never ordained or meant so much as for the peoples reading further then the Church should see expedient to permit it but given into the hand of the Church for her to teach it to them and to be an instrument helpful to her in her office of teaching As is manifest For 1. When God Almighty had written the ten Commandments the first piece of Scripture that was written though it were the plainest both for stile and matter and most proper and useful for the people and to be the principal part of their Catecism yet he delivered it not to them but to Moses with these words expressely declaring the whole intent of it as to the people I give thee the Law which I have written that thou maist teach it to them Exod. 24.12 2. In like manner when Moses had written the Law he delivered it not to the people though the whole Nation were then present afore him in Assembly but finally or supremely unto Iosuah or Eleazar the one chief Ruler or Pastor in ordinary the other in extraordinary with these words expressely declaring the whole intent of it as to the people and the right they were to have to it At the end of every seven years thou shalt read this c. Deut. 31.9 3. This copy delivered by Moses into the High-Priests hand was there to remain without any one to have a copy of for ought appears until there should be a King who was to share the supream office with the High-Priest who was not to be in 500. years after and he was to write him a copy of it out of that which was before the Priests Deut. 87.19 4. In their custody it remained 2 Chron. 17.9 Neh. 8.1 without any copy of it for certain in all the land of Israel after Ieroboam's schism 2 Chr. 15.3 and if not after most likely nor afore for we do not finde that he meddled at all with the Bible and but one in the Church of Iudah until after the Captivity to wit that in the Priests custody in the Temple as should seem by the great matter was made of the finding it when it had been lost some years and by Iosiah's proceeding thereupon to a Reformation by it which afore it seems he could not for want of it 2 Chron. 34.14 c. The same may be said for the New Testament For 1. S. Iohn's Apocalypse the onely book of it written by command was expressely written to the Angel or Pastor of the Churches to which it was to be sent and to him alone immediately Apoc. 2.1 c. 2. His Gospel was likewise without all question delivered by him to some Pastors to be by them taught and published as appears by their testimony to it Ioh. 21.24 3. Three of S. Pauls Epistles for certain were written to Pastors alone the first and second to Timothy and that to Titus and very probably a fourth to Philemon whom he calls his fellow labourer Phil. 1. 4. So were also probably S. Lukes Gospel and Acts Theophilus to whom they were dedicated being by some ancient Writers said to have been a Bishop 5. Two other of S. Paul's Epistles though dedicated to Churches yet were delivered immediately into the hand of the Pastor to be by him read to the people or else that charge of reading them to them had been superfluous Col. 4.16 1 Thess 5.27 So in his hand they remained also after the reading and at his discretion whether he would read them the second time and much more whether permit any of the people copies of them And by parity of reason the same is to be presumed of the other Gospels and Epistles dedicated to Churches or without dedication But what need I prove it thus by inferences and presumptions When the text affirms it expressely that the Scripture was written purposely for the Church and immediately for her alone to be an instrument in her hand for teaching the people and furthering and helpful to her for the better discharge of her office 6. So saith S. Paul touching his Epistle to Timothy These things write I unto thee that thou maist know how thou oughtest to behave
guide or direct us in matters of practice or conscience must be able to consider and judge of the person and case in all its circumstances and apply his counsel and resolution to every one severally which S. Paul calls rightly dividing the word 2 Tim. 2.25 To Souldiers one counsel to Merchants another S. Lu. 3.10 To new vessels one sort of wine to old another Mat. 19.17 To tender souls one sort of doctrine the Lord is sweet to all c. Psal 145.9 to presumptuous ones another It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God Heb. 10.31 In one case to say thou maist not bow down to or afore any Idol in another thou maist 2 King 5.18 In one case to say thou maist not do any work on the Sabbath in another thou maist Mat. 12.5 And to this end must be able to be interrogated by his consulter Mat. 19.3 22.17 1 Cor. 7.1 yea again and again if need be Mat. 19.7 For many times the resolution to one question begets more and new doubts yea and to interrogate him too to see if he understand the resolution aright and to proceed with him till he do For we are apt through passion interest self-love c. to mistake not onely the cases but their resolution too 3. Again every one hath different principles or notions in his understanding whereby he judges of things differently from another and is apt to interpret the Scripture or doctrine of the Church to be for his opinion or sense and hence arise Sects When therefore any controversie is on foot needing decision the judge must of necessity be able to hear and weigh what is alledged proved on both sides and thereupon to give sentence in such manner as the parties litigant and all other concerned may and until they do without their own pervicacy be in fault know and understand for which side it is given and so cease further strife touching it Nay many times the very sentence it self will beget new controversies touching its sense requiring another sentence and that another c. and so the judge must be able from time to time as there is occasion to explicate even his own sentence Other teaching then this is a meer Chymaera devised by the Devil and his instruments to delude souls Now this therefore the Scripture is no way proper of or by it self alone because it is void of these faculties for it saith nothing in speech properly so called and what it saith in its kinde of speech Rom. 4.3 or God in or by it is no more then mute letter or word and so one and the same to every reader And so the reader without some one to interpret that mute word may easily think it speaks to him or his case when it is to another or saith such a thing in sense when it doth the contrary §. 4. Not Plain Proved first from 2 Pet. 3.16 The fourth reason because it is not plain no not in fundamentals as you call them without the Church for its interpreter And for this needs no other proof but to shew you the Sects now afore your eyes in England and betwixt Divines even your learnedst and in points fundamental if any may be called so but these that there is a God a Christ a Scripture But I shall give you three proofs for it out of Scripture it self The first shall be that speech of S. Peter The unlearned wrest Paul's epistles as they do other Scriptures also unto their own destruction 2 Pet. 3.16 Spoken no doubt of Christians and at least past their Catechisme nay its very probable of Divines and them alone My reason is because it is not like he would have called them whose duty or calling it is not to be learned the unlearned but rather the simple or ignorant And it is in charity and reason to be supposed they whoever he spake of if Christians read it with a love of the truth and desire to finde it there and of a godly intent to promote themselves in knowledge and piety and not without humble and hearty prayer to God to give them his H. Spirit to illuminate them to the understanding of it Yet presuming to expound it to themselves without the means apponted by God for its interpteter their prayer and diligence was abominable to him and therefore they left by him to strong illusions of the Devil in misunderstanding of it and that in points fundamental for in no other can damnable error be committed Nor will it help to say he speakes not of all things in Scripture but some onely For there being no Catalogue given of those some nor rule or mark for discerning them from the other and all people being apt to think those things true and plain in Scripture which they have been bred up in the belief of his speech is in effect as if he had said indefinitely The things in Scripture are hard to be understood but by the learned As if a Physician should say of a book of pills In this are some pills which the unskilful mistake to the poysoning themselves it would be in effect as to say The pills in it are dangerous to be used but by the skilful §. 5. Causes in the stile The second shall be a demonstration from the causes not all but a few of the principal and most common and obvious which are partly in the stile partly in the form Those I shall name in the stile are 1. That the sense of it is sometimes proper sometimes figurative and often without an interpreter unevident whether in fundamental points or importing to salvation for I shall be careful not to instance in any other For instance in these speeches This is my body VVhose sins ye for give 2. It hath oftentimes divers proper senses to wit literal and mystical and sometimes unevident whether e.g. in this speech Esau have I hated Rom. 9.13 3. It hath oftentimes divers literal senses to wit prophane or grammatical and Ecclesiasticial And sometimes unevident whether e.g. in this speech Not as Lords over cleron 1 Pet. 5.3 whether cleron signifie Clergie or Heritage 4. It hath oftentimes divers grammatical senses and sometimes unevident whether be it e.g. in this speech Thou art Petros Mat. 16.18 whether Petros signifie Peter or a rock And in this Esau have I hated whether hated mean a positive aversion or onely a not or less loving as it sometimes means Deut. 21.15 5. It abounds with phrases proper to the H. Ghost and terms of Art in Theologie which therefore without some Master in that science to interpret them to us are no better then so much Greek or Gibrish especially because the writers supposing the reader a Catholick understanding the language of the Church took no care to explicate them or annex a Dictonary Nor can you say their sense may be found out in time by it alone and an understanding reader by considering the occasion scope coherence of the
place comparing it with the other c. Because 1. In some there is neither occasion scope nor coherence visible e.g. in these Shall he finde faith Luk. 18.8 Quench not the Spirit 1 Thess 5.20 2. Some are never used but once e.g. these He shall be in danger of a Councel Mat. 5.22 The sin against the Son of man and the H. Ghost Mat. 12.31 The word was made flesh Ioh. 1.14 Retaining sins Ioh. 20.23 Saving by fire 1 Cor. 3.15 c. 3. Some are alike dark in all places e.g. Binding and losing Mat. 16.19 18.18 Delivering to Satan 1 Cor. 5.5 1 Tim. 2.20 4. Few of them but in divers places have divers senses and many times unevident whether or no and if whether be it e.g. Faith in these Mat. 17.19 Lu. 18.8 Act. 19.9 Rom. 14.23 1 Cor. 13.2 Baptism Mat. 3.6 11 Mar. 10.38 Acts 1.5 1 Cor. 15.29 Imposition of hands Mat. 19.15 Act. 8.17 9.17 13.3 1 Tim. 4.14 5.22 Heb. 6 1. Bishop Act. 20.28 Phi. 1.1 Tit. 1.7 Presbyter Act. 11.30 15.2 20.20 1 Tim. 4.14 5.1 22. 1 Pet. 5.1 Election or elect Mat. 20.16 24.24 1 Pet. 1.1 Sin Rom. 5.12 7.17 1 Ioh. 1.8 3.8 Iustification Rom. 2.13 8.33 VVorks Rom. 4.2 Iam. 2.21 5. Some of them seem to some Divines to have divers senses in divers places to others but one in all e.g. this name the Church upon the true sense whereof depends in fine all faith religion consequently the salvation of all mankinde and yet there among your learnedst Teachers as many differing definitions of it almost as there are Teachers to speak sadly as many as are deviseable by the wit of man and all pretending to Scripture 6. Finally and which is of greatest difficulty to the Interpreter and danger to the not Catholick reader the words of it in their proper and Grammatical sense are often times repugnant to themselves so as it is necessary in the one place to forsake it for another improper to the end to reconcile it with other and many times unevident whether of them is to give the law of sense to the other and what that sense is which is to reconcile them Instances hereof you will see divers anon mean time these may serve God hardned Pharaoh's heart Gen. 7.3 God tempts no man Iam. 1.13 Again The sin against the H. Ghost shall never be forgiven Mat. 12.31 Come unto me all that are heavy laden and I will refresh you Mat. 11.28 §. 6. The first cause in the form's Stragling Those I shall name in the form shall be but two The one that often times it delivers the rule incompleatly and straglingly part in one place part in another and so one must be made up by or with the other And sometimes unevident even to the learnedst Divines without the Churche's shewing which and how many texts appertain to the compleating of it For instance One place relates how Abraham was justified by faith Gen. 15.6 another how by offering his son Gen. 22.16 now supply as S. Iames saith you render it fulfil the one Scripture with the other as he there shews you the art of it Iam. 2.23 and they give you the true doctrine of justification otherwise taken apart but a part of it Again in one place our sweet Saviour promises he will refresh all penitent sinners that come to him Mat. 11.28 In another he institutes and declares the means by which he vvill refresh them to vvit the word of Priestly absolution Ioh. 20.21 Now supply the former place vvith the latter and they will give you the true ground of hope of remission of sins upon your going to Christ vvith sorrovv and confession of them othervvise in stead of hope delude you into damnable presumption §. 7. The scond cause repugnancy The other and mainest of all is that ordinarily vvhat it saith in one place it gain-saith in another in words taken in their proper Grammar sense and in all sense imaginable so seemingly as the best Divines have many times their hands full to reconcile them and the comparing places considering the scope coherence c. is often times so unserviceable to that end as it rather inflames the difficulty Nay it creates works enough sometimes for the Church her self to do it and in one age she gets one step tovvard it perhaps three or four ages more ere she get another so as she hath not yet done it in all in that perfect manner as perhaps she may hereafter vvhen God shall give her more light And in those she hath reconciled the certainty as to us of the truth of the reconcilement comes not from any evidence of the thing but onely from the authority of the Interpreter Nor is it always possible to be done no not by her by any means rule or help of interpretation to be found in Scripture but she must pray in aid from her own sense or practice To name a few instance among many 1. In one place The Lord he is God one Lord no Lord beside him Deut. 4.45 6.4 In other The Gods Elohim said Let us make man Gen. 1.27 The Lord rained from the Lord c. Gen. 19.24 Thee the onely God and whom thou hast sent Iesus Christ Ioh. 17.3 But one God the Father and one Lord Iesus Christ 1 Cor. 8.6 In the name of the Father the Son and the H. Ghost Mat. 28.19 2. In one place My Father and I are one Ioh. 10.30 In another My Father is greater then I Ioh. 14.28 you will say that was meant in respect of his divers natures True but where 's that said in Scripture 3. In one If we say we have no sin we lye 1 Ioh. 1.8 In other They were both righteous before God walking in all the commandments of the Lord blameless Luk. 1.6 I know nothing by my self 1 Cor. 4.4 The childe of God sinneth not 1 Ioh. 3.9 4. In one He that is not with me is against me Mat. 12.30 In another He that is not against us is for us Luk. 9.50 5. In one If I bear record of my self my record is not true Ioh. 5.31 In another It is Ioh. 8.14 6 In one Paul took Timothy and circumcised him Acts 16.3 In another He that is circumcised Christ shall profit him nothing Gal. 5.2 7. In one If Abraham was justified by works c. Rom. 4.2 In another VVas not Abraham justified by works Iam. 2.21 8. In one My loving kindeness will I not utterly take from him my covenant will I not break for any wickedness of his children c. Psal 89.33 In the very next verse Thou hast cast off and abhorred thine Anointed thou hast made void thy covenant with him thou hast prophaned his crown c. 9. In one There was given him a kingdom that all nations should serve him his dominion is an everlasting dominion c. Dan. 2.44 7.14 In another VVhen the Son of man comes shall he finde
faith on the earth Lu. 18.8 All the world worshipped the Dragon c. Apoc. 13.4 8. 10. In some Call upon me in the day of trouble and I will deliver thee Psal 50.15 Every one that askes receives knock and it shall be opened unto you Mat. 7.7 8. Come unto me all c. and I will refresh you Mat. 11.28 VVhosoever calls upon the name of the Lord shall be saved Rom. 10.13 In other In the day of trouble they shall call upon me and I will laugh at them Pro. 1.28 They came knocking saying Lord open unto us But he said Away from me I know you not Mat. 25.11 Ye know how that afterward when Esau would have inherited the blessing he was rejected finding no place of repentance in his father though he sought it carefully with tears Heb. 12.17 12. In some Come unto me all c. Mat. 11.28 The blood of Iesus Christ cleanses us from all sin 1 Ioh. 7.9 In other All manner of sin shall be forgiven unto men upon their repentance but the blasphemy against the H. Ghost never Mat. 12.31 It is impossible for those who were enlightned c. if they shall full away to renew them again unto repentance Heb. 6.4 To them that sin wilfully after knowledge of the truth there remains no more sacrifice for sin c. Heb. 10.26 13. In some To you it is given to know the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven but to them it is not given Mat. 13.11 Many are called but few chosen Mat. 20.16 The Lord added daily to the Church such as should be saved Act. 2.47 As many as were ordained to eternal life believed Act. 13.48 VVhom he did predestinate them he called c. Rom. 8.30 Before the children had done either good or evil c. Rom. 9.11 In other Preach the Gospel to every creature he that believes and is baptized shall be saved Mar. 16.15 God will have all men to be saved and come to the knowledge of the truth 1 Tim. 2.4 Give diligence to make your calling and election sure for if c. 2 Pet. 1.8 §. 8. Third proof from instances The third and last proof shall be from instances 1. The old Testament was not so plain for that which we by reason we were taught it in our childehood think it to be most plain for that there are Angels and Spirits and a Resurrection to be but that the Sadduces great Divines then denied them all Acts 23.8 and had objections out of Scripture against them Master Moses said c. Mat. 22.24 2. It was not so plain with S. Mathews Gospel added to it for a resurrection to be at the end of the world but that some and no doubt Divines for at that time few others were broachers of heresies Acts 15.24 20.32 Apoc. 2 2 6. said it was past already 2 Tim. 2.18 An opinion so monstrously absurd as were it not in Scripture affirmed one would think it incredible any should be so stupid And we may be sure they fetched their proofs for it out of Scripture For else neither could they have had any colour for such a wilde opinion nor the impudence to broach it among Christians much less the success to overthrow the faith of any as they did of some Which example no doubt God Almighty put there on purpose to shew unto us how that there is no conceit possible to enter into mans brain so absurd or non-sensical but Sectaries will be able to alledge Scripture for it yea and with success too Whereof we have an instance at present in another almost as non-sensical a fancy as that was viz. that Anti-Christ is come already and is a Christian nay sits in S. Peter's Chair 3. The 53. Chapter of Esay was not so plain that Christ ought to suffer for our sins but that the Eunuch reading it and no doubt with a very humble and pious heart lifted up to God to enlighten him was glad to ask one who seemed to him an authorized interpreter of Scripture I pray thee of whom speaks the Prophet this c. And being before asked by him in the general if he understood what he read readily answered How can I except some man should guide me Act. 8.31 34. wherein the H. Ghost would in that first and onely express example of a lay-man reading the Bible insumate unto all lay-readers of it with what disposition of soul they ought to read it to attain the true sense of it 4. It was not so plain notwithstanding all S. Paul could urge out of it for the abolitition of the Mosaical Law but that divers of the primitive Divines yea as is probable of them upon whom the H. Ghost came down at Penticost found it as seemed to them plain to the contrary Act. 15.1 And for certain so it was in express words vid. inf some of the texts named in § 9. n. 2. nor were the Christians of Antioch after they had heard all that could be alledged from S. Paul for it out of Scripture able to know what to believe in it without sending to the supreme Interpreter the Church Act. 15.2 §. 9. Instance in the question touching Christ I shall conclude with one notable instance which I shall set forth a little more particularly and at large because it shews most lively not onely how improper H. Scripture is to determine any the most fundamental points of faith in the hand of any but a Catholick Teacher but how pernicious an instrument it is in the hand of others too much addicted to it with neglect of the Church to lead them into and confirm them in most damnable errors The grand Controversie of faith at the time of our Saviours being upon earth was VVhether he were the Christ He sent them who doubted of it and were obstinate against all other testimonies to search the Scriptures which they believed as testifying of him Ioh. 5.39 His adversaries the Rulers in like maner sent people to them as testifying against him They said to him Nicodemus when they perceived him hang that way Art thou also of Galilee Search the Scripture c. Ioh. 7.52 Nay they were not able to bring any other arguments against him but what they brought out of Scripture Insomuch as it is certain there was no one thing whereby they more steeled their own and the peoples hearts against believing in him then Scripture as they understood it For instance Some said This is the Christ. Others said Hath not the Scripture said c. Ioh. 7.41 Again said they to the Officers when they saw them staggered with the devineness of his doctrine Have any of the Rulers or Pharisees believed on him Why not they O forsooth because they knew the Law the Scripture But this people that know not the Law are accursed that is miserably deceived by believing in him to their eternal perdition Ioh. 7.49 Just the same as you say now of our people for their ignorance in Scripture Again
the man that was cured of his blindness by Iesus said to them VVil ye also be his disciples they reviled him and said Thou art or be thou his disciple Why not they O forsooth we are Moses disciples we know by Scripture that God spake unto Moses c. Ioh. 9.27 See the veil of Moses Law that lay upon and blinded their hearts against believing in him 2 Cor. 3.15 and so does to and at this day VVill you see the causes of it One was because they saw him teach command and practice some things evidently repugnant to the expresse words of Scripture For instance 1. It said Thou shalt do no manner of work upon the Sabboth Particularly Thou shalt not bear any burthen thorow the city Ier. 17.21 He commanded one whom he cured to carry no less a burthen then the bed he lay upon thorow the City on that day Ioh. 5.9 When therefore they saw him afterward work a manifest miracle in proof that he was the Christ what had they to choak the mouth of that evidence with but this This man is not of God for all his miracles because he keeps not the Sabboth day Iust the same as your men say sometimes of our Church She cannot be of God notwithstanding all her miracles because the worships images prays to Saints c. 2. Again it said Thou shalt keep these ordinances as everlasting statutes through all generations for ever Gen. 17.7 Exo. 17.10 31.17 Deut. 12.5 c. He said He was Lord of the Sabboth Mat. 12.8 discovered an intent to change it and all the ordinances of Moses and introduce others in their place viz. in stead of worshipping God by a carnal and figurative sacrifice in the Temple of Ierusalem onely the spiritual true pure worship that God longed for to be celebrated all the world over Ioh. 4.2 Mal. 1.11 in stead of the Passover the Sacrament of his Body and Blood Ioh. 6.32 53. instead of Circumcision Baptism Ioh. 3.3 Now how abominable a design they apprehended this in him may be guessed at from their charge against one of his disciples This man ceases not to speak blasphemous words against this holy place and the Law For we have heard him say that this Iesus of Nazareth shall destroy this place and change the customes which Moses delivered us c. Acts 6.13 3. Again it said There is but one God and he a pure simple Being Eternal Infinite Omnipotent c and appointed that if any one yea though a Prophet giving a sign of his Mission or Doctrine should entice them to the worship of any thing visible or created they should stone him to death as a false Prophet and Blasphemer Deut. 13.1 He a visible man cloathed with flesh and blood and all infirmities of humane nature born but the other day of a Carpenter c. said he was God or his Son equal to him and required to be worshipped as such And this they supposed to be evident blasphemy Ioh. 10.33 and that according to the express words of Scripture he ought as such to be put to death VVe have a Law and by our Law he ought to dye because he made himself the Son of God Ioh. 19.7 And this seemed so evident to them in Scripture as no doubt for that cause principally if not onely they vvould rather attribute his miracles as you do ours unto the Devil then entertain a doubt of his being the Christ Mat. 12.24 Another cause was because the prophecies touching the properties signs of the Messiah were not onely dark and in that respect needing an Interpreter to expound them Acts 8.34 17.3 yea even to Christians Lu. 24.27 45. 2 Pet. 1.9 but repugnant in express words and therefore needing an Interpreter to reconcile them And thence it was that they were able to urge it as plainly and aboundantly yea perhaps I should say true if I said more against his being the Messiahs as he for it For instance 1. In some he was to be Davids Lord Psal 110.1 yea God 's Son Psal 2.6 yea the everlasting God c. Esa 9.6 In other a visible mortal man like unto Moses Deut 18.15 God's servant Psal 78.70 Davids son Psal 132.11 now that one and the same person should be all these though it be easie now to us that are taught it by the Church in our childehood was such a riddle then to them Mat. 22.46 and still is to any creature in state of nature Mat. 16.17 1 Cor. 2.8 14. as is incomprehensible by any humane brain without special light and by any light in Scripture's self without an interpreter or any interpreter of less authority then Divine 2. In some He was not to bruise a broken reed c. Esa 42.3 In other to break in pieces the Potentates of the earth like a potsheard and rule them with a rod of iron Psal 2.9 3. In some he was to be the contempt of the common sort Psal 22.6 In other all Kings of the earth to lick the dust of his feet Psal 72.11 4. In some to have no form nor comelinesse in him Esa 53.3 In other to be the fairest among the children of men Psal 45.2 5. In some to be slain for us Dan. 9.27 In other to live and reign a glorious King for ever Psal 72.15 Dan. 7.14 And therefore when the people heard him talk of his being lift up meaning upon a cross or gibbet they were not able to reconcile that with his being the Messiah seeing they had been alwayes taught out of Scripture that Christ abides for ever Ioh. 12.34 No doubt but he answered their texts and explicated his own so as to reconcile them one with the other But no doubt also they did the same with his and their own as they verily thought Nor can you say of all that it was only pride vain-glory malice or obstinacy of will that hindred them from seeing the truth of his sense For no question but multitudes of them Act. 13.27 compared with 1 Cor. 2.8 namely S. Paul Act. 26.9 were purely ignorant and sought the truth in Scripture according as it was alledged and opened on both sides with a love of the truth and a desire to finde it and with many a prayer and bitter tear to God Almighty for light to see it And yet were confirmed and by Scripture principally which they had known from children 2 Tim. 3.15 that they ought to do things contrary to the name of Iesus till God Almighty by some other means then it shew'd them the truth If you say Wherefore did he then send them to Scripture for it the answer hath been given already that it was not as to a Teacher of that point but a VVitness onely nor a witness of his choice but which they compelled him to by their obstinacy to the other nor as a witnesse proper or sufficient by it self alone but in company with the other for corroboration and as by him alledged and expounded and
his Exposition warranted evidently to sense and reason from God Almighty by the token of miracles beyond all that appeared then in the Synagogue Acts 2.22 10.38 And without that signe he desired not any one much less vvould he oblige him to believe him or his Interpretation of Scripture Iohn 5.31 15.24 Consequently for all the same reasons it is as improper at this day to decide any controversie or resolve any case of conscience c. but in the hand of one credited for an Interpreter of it by the same token from God Almighty either in his person as he was if he pretend to mission extraordinary or Prophetical or in the Church that sends him if he pretend to ordinary mission And I pray mark this well CHAP. V. Vrging the fift Argument Scripture not simply necessary MY fift Reason is Because neither was it written of any necessity nor since its writing is it necessary to the teaching of faith where by not written of any necessity I mean not to exclude the necessity of command for the writing some few pieces in the Old and the Apocalypse in the New Testament For 1. There were as great believers and holy Saints afore Scripture was Heb. 11 4 c. as any were after 2. After Moses Law was written we finde not it was read either by or so much as to the people in 700. years together Nor was there for the first 1000. years any more then one copy of it and that too once lost and God knows for how many years together 2 Chron. 34.14 and yet the people were taught the good knowledge of the Lord 2 Chro. 30.22 3. In the Church there were as great believers and holy Saints afore any new Scripture was Acts 2.46 4.32 9.36 c. as any since 4. After its writing you cannot finde it was ever read by or so much as to the people or intended it should be more then some epistles once to the particular Church they were written to and one neighbour-Church 1 Thess 5.27 Col. 4.16 5. The Church was compleatly settled in all her form essential of doctrine worship discipline c. and in the means for preserving that form uncorrupt unto world's end divers years afore any tittle of the New Testament was written and neer 70. afore it was all written vid. sup par 1. c. 4 5. 6. The writers of it expressely say they wrote what they did not of any command but of their own charity prudence or discretion because it seemed good or meet to them Lu. 1.3 2 Pet. 1.13 upon particular occasions reasons or motives hapning as it were by accident 1 Tim. 3.15 2 Pet. 3.1 1 Ioh. 5.13 Iud. 3. Nay S. Iohn saith plainly He had many things to write which he would not 2 Ioh. 12. 3. Ioh. 13. Sure then both he wrote at his own discretion and what he wrote was not necessary to be written 7. When S. Paul wrote to the Corinthians there were two Gospels of S. Mathew and Mark extant and had been twelve or thirteen years afore yet he being to urge to them the words used by our Saviour in the institution of the B. Eucharist would not urge them out of either of those Gospels but onely from tradition 1 Cor. 11.23 By that example giving all Christians for ever to understand how it suffices to their faith and practice in the highest mysteries of Religion if they hear from their Pastor I have received from the Lord what I deliver or have delivered unto you Nor is the case different as to substance because they cannot mean receiving it from Christ immediately For 1. Perhaps neither did he For though he received some doctrines by inspiration Gal. 11.2 yet not all perhaps and namely not those of the Catechism as this was he being taught them by the ordinary means and as is like by Ananias afore he was baptized Act. 9.6 at least afore he had any vision or revelation 2 Cor. 12.1 2. Grant he meant it as received immediately as Pastors succeed to him in the office of teaching with divine authority so their receiving their doctrine from Christ by the mouth of his Church which H. Scripture sometimes calls Christ 1 Cor. 1.13 12.12 succeeds to his receiving it by inspiration 8. For ought appears 1. Seven of the Apostles were not able to write 2. If they were left nothing in writing with the Churches of their planting which was a very considerable part of Christendom 3. Nor did any of those that wrote dedicate their writings unto the whole Church but unto particular persons or Churches only or at most the faithful indefinitely and without any intimation of intent or desire to those they wrote to to disperse or impart them to other Churches So as at the Apostles death the New Testament was not extant or perhaps heard of but in a small part of Christendome in which the two chief Apostles laboured viz. in the lesser Asia from Ierusalem westward and in the South of Europe from Rome eastward Rom. 15.19 1 Pet. 1.1 9. It hath ever been and now is subject to all sorts of casualties as all other books are I mean not the parts onely but the whole which could not be if it simply necessary For 1. The Book of the Law and it 's probable all the copy then was of it was lost for divers years 2 Chron. 34.14 2. All the copy that was of a considerable part of Ieremie's Prophecy was burnt by Iehoiakim Ier. 36.23 3. So were all the copies of the Old Testament that could be found by Antiochus 1 Mac. 1.50 4. Divers pieces of the Old Canon are utterly lost that we know of 1 Sam. 10.25 2 Chron. 9.29 26.22 c. and perhaps that Prophet quoted by S. Mathew Mat. 2.23 5. So are divers of the New namely a former Epistle of S. Paul to the Corinthians 1 Cor. 5.9 Ephesians Ephes 3.3 Philippians Phil. 3.1 that from Laodicea Col. 4.16 and of S. Iohn to some Church in Asia 3 Ioh. 9. 6. There is not for ought I can hear at this present in the world any original yea or perhaps perfectly authentical copy of any one sacred Book 10. Finally it self assures us that the new Ierusalem shall have no need of Sun or Moon any created means of light though naturally incorruptible because the Lamb is to be her light according to his promise Mat. 28.20 Apoc. 21.23 And that to believe and follow what is taught us by our Pastors is sufficient to any ones salvation Lu. 11.28 Act. 11.14 Rom. 1.16 1 Tim. 4.20 Iam. 1.21 CHAP. VI. Vrging the last Argument Scripture not sufficient c. MY sixth and last Reason is Because it contains not expressely every particular of the Gospel For 1. It contains not every particular 1. Of the things commanded by our Saviour to his Apostles to be taught all creatures as his Gospel Mat. 28.20 Mar. 16.15 2. Much less of those he reserved the teaching of unto the
hand of the people yea it's more like Divines all that he saith of it is so far from encouraging or directing them unto it as their guide or rule as it is rather to the contrary 2 Pet. 3.16 in a word to leave that of which it is certain out of Scripture's own mouth that it is most proper by it self alone to teach every creature every thing pertaining to the Gospel for that which is not proper by it self alone to teach any creature any thing Suppose God Almighty should do you the favour he did S. Stephen to let you see the heavens open and Iesus sitting at his right hand and teaching some person standing by and you should hear him say to that party Teach this man meaning you what I have taught you If he believe he shall be saved if not damned and anon after you should see him deliver to him a book saying to him I give thee this that thou maist teach it to him Exod. 24.12 and afterward some one should snatch that book from him and give it to you saying Do not believe him further then is here written he will teach you errors read this your self and guide your self and judge of his doctrine by it c. would you not think it a brainsick act to follow such counsel Sure you would in reason Such very same Counsel is that of your Ministers Neglect the Church follow the Scripture Nay it is more certain to you that Christ spake those words to her concerning you from that record of them Preach the Gospel to every creature Mar. 16.15 then if you should hear or see it now in such a vision by how much the word of Scriture is a more sure word then any sensible vision can be Lu. 16.31 2 Pet. 1.19 Nor therefore may you think or hope God Alm. will upon your prayer to him though never so humble never so fervent by his Spirit direct or inlighten you in the right understanding of Scripture sufficiently to your salvation without the Churche's ministery For he having placed that office in her in the same maner as the office of baptizing Teach all baptizing them Mat. 28.19 he will no more give you the one grace without her ministery then he will the other and therefore to begg of him to teach you himselfe would be an act of as damnable presumption as to begg of him to baptise you himselfe And therefore when S. Paul not knowing then who els he was to goe to begged it of him he sent him to the Church for that grace Act. 9.6 See the reason sup p. 8. VVhat needs any more to be said to such a good soul as I suppose you to be Let it suffice you have hitherto embraced this false principle out of ignorance and beguiling of hereticall Teachers After this admonition you have great cause to fear God will not wink at your ignorance any longer but expects from you exact obedience to this his commandement or ordinance Mal. 2.4 of hearing and following the Church as your Guide in Religion This doing you will soon finde that Rest of soul the Title of this Book promised If you neglect it neither this Book nor the Church will have need to accuse you to your Iudge at the dreadful day there are others to accuse you Moses Mathew Paul c. in whom you trust for had you believed them as you ought you would have believed her for they write of her and much more plainly then any Prophet did of Christ Ioh. 5.45 Nor may you flatter your self with hope upon your faith baptism innocency or holiness great and sensible particular favours of God to you as may seem to you in interior lights consolations assurances of your being one of his c. for unless you be an humble child or scholar of his Church no hope can be built upon them And two reasons among many other might be given are 1. Because without divine faith it is not possible to please God Heb. 11.6 Now your faith cannot be supposed divine because not grounded finally on the Church the ground of all truth and if of all truth of all faith also 2. Because not to hear or believe the Churche's teaching is a mortal sin Mat. 18.17 Mar. 16.16 and consequently inconsistent with holiness without which no man shall see God Heb. 12.14 See more places if you please to the same purpose Mat. 10.14 Lu. 10.16 Acts 2.47 13.48 Gal. 5.20 Heresies Apoc. 21.24 And therefore you may be certain the spirit that guids you to a neglect of her and flatters and comforts in you in it is not God's but the evil spirit 2 Cor. 4.3 What remains then but as you desire to see the blissful face of God and avoid eternal torments you in the first place seriously search the Scriptures or otherwise enquire and resolve your self well touching this first Question VVhat Christ left for your Guide That done to enquire VVhich is she That having found her you may seek his Law at her mouth that if you find they whom you learned your first principles from was not she you may learn them anew of her that is And then you will have some competent rule whereby to judge aright of doctrines and teachers and of the true sense of Scripture which not only you now want but in stead of it use a false one God Alm. of his goodness open your eyes to see in this your day this truth which belongs so much unto your peace The next Treatise by Gods help shall follow as soon as I am able ERRATA Pag. l. read 122 12 barely 127 25 presignified 141 8 that 143 1 think 145 1 c. 1. 147 17 admonish 160 11 duely 166 8 box 171 1 forme 179 19 insinuate 140 12 left 143 27 some 150 4 it 157 7 that hath 160 25 would 163 12 for 166 25 and that 170 1 are 183 15 Joh. 9.16 Pag. 3.20 del 1 King 17 24 pag. 32. lin 26. del unto these words if any c.