of Spirituall courage in not daring effectually to aspire to so glorious an Attempt 68. Wee must not here forget two Notable Saints which as the Doctour confidently pretends have given him sufficient advantage so to denigrate their persons as by them to cast an aspersion on the Church These are a Holy Widow and a Virgin S. Brigit and S. Catharine of Siena Both these had Supernaturall Revelations therefore says the Doctour they were Fanaticks But moreover their Revelations touching the Conception of our Blessed Lady do contradict one the other and the Revelations of both are allowed and of one confirmed by the Church in a Councill and by consequence the Doctour with assurance pronounces the Church to be a favourer not only of Fanaticism but Errour also To this purpose the Doctour 69. Hereto I answer 1. That all Catholicks acknowledge both these to have been Saints 2. And that each of them hath been favoured with Supernaturall Revelations the publick Office of the Church testifyes Thus much is confessed but it is utterly denyed that the Church does so approve them as to forbid any one to make iust exceptions against them as wee see many Writers on both sides have done she judges they may in generall be usefull to stirr up devotion in Readers minds but she does not confirme them as infallible For how could it be known to the Pope or Councill that any Speciall Revelation made or pretended to be made to another was from God unles the person also testify them by Miracles And it is observable that when examination is made of Miracles in order to the Canonization of any Saint the testimony of women will not be received Naturally imagination is stronger in them then judgement and whatsoever is esteemed by them to be pious is easily concluded by them to be true This I say upon supposition that such Revelations were not pretended by persons interessed on both sides of the Controversy about the Immaculate Conception And particularly touching S. Catharine of Siena Suares affirms That not any who have written her life have made mention of this Revelation It will suffise therefore to set down here what two illustrious Catholick Writers have declared touching this Point The former is S. Antoninus mentioned by the Doctour If you say saith he that some Saints have had a Revelation of these things as S. Brigit it is to be observed that other Saints who have wrought Miracles as S. Catharin of Siena have had a Revelation of the contrary And since true Prophets doe sometimes think that a thing proceeds from Divine Revelation which they utter of themselves there is not inconvenience to say that such Revelations were not from God but human dreames An example hereof may be found in the Prophet Nathan speaking to David proposing to him his dessign to build a Temple to God For David though he answered him by a Spirit of Prophecy the contrary hereof after wards appeared The other is Cardinal Baronius who treating of certain Revelations of S. Brigit and S. Mathildis hath these words I doe indeed honour and Venerate as is due those two Saints but touching the Revelations had by them or rather ascribed to them I receive only those which the Church receives which we know cannot approve things so repugnant 70. I am sorry I cannot impute it to so harmles a Principle as ignorance that the Doctour speaking of two Writers who both of them rejected these pretended Revelations of both these Saints as illusions and fancies adds What becoms then of the Popes and Councills Infallibility who have approved both By which words an unwary Reader will not doubt but that an Oecumenical Councill had made a Canon with an Anathema against all those who should not acknowledge all the Revelations of S. Brigit to have been Divine and the belief of them necessary to Salvation Whenas all that was done by the Councill was upon occasion of Invectives made against those Revelations by many Catholicks to require Ioannes a Turrecremata to peruse and give his judgment of them which being favourable the Councill saith he approved them that is freely permitted them to be read as contayning nothing contrary to Faith and good Manners Notwithstanding which kind of approbation we see liberty taken and with leave enough from the Church by many Writers to decry both the one and the other and there is scarce a Catholick alive that thinks he has an obligation to believe either of them §. 4. Visions c. no grounds of believing Doctrines among Catholicks 71. THe Doctour thinks it advantageous to his cause against the Catholick Church that it should be believed that Visions Revelations c. are made by Catholicks grounds of believing Severall points of Doctrin as Purgatory Transsubstanciation and Auricular Confession Indeed if he could prove that any such Points of Doctrine have been or the Point of the Conception of our B. Lady should hereafter be declared Articles of Faith upon no surer grounds than modern Miracles or Revelations it would have been the Maister-piece of all that he has or ever shall write But this he durst not say explicitely though perhaps he is willing his Readers should understand that to have been his meaning For then almost all the Councils of Gods Church would have confuted him since they professe that the only ground of their Faith is Divine Revelation made to the Church by Christ and his Apostles and conveyed to posterity in Scripture and Tradition 72. Now this the Doctour being I am sure not able to contradict is it to be esteemed a preiudice to Catholick Faith that Almighty God to confound Hereticks and establish the belief of Catholicks should in severall succeeding ages afford particular Revelations or enable his servants to work Miracles And that he has done so we have such a Cloud of Witnesses that credit must be denyed to History in generall if none of such Witnesses must be admitted As for the Doctour the only expedient made use of by him to invalidate their testimony is to produce it in a stile of Raillery 73. As for the instituting Festivalls for example of the Conception of our Blessed Lady c. it cannot be denyed but it is a Lawfull Church-institution and might at any time on any occasion be appointed And if on some Revelation supposed Divine an occasion was given to the Pope to ordain it this can be no prejudice to it being a Glorifying of God for the Blessed Virgin the Mother of our Lord her being either preserved as some Catholicks say or at least Cleansed as others from the common pollution of Originall Sin at her Conception without any determining which of these two hapned to her and so the Festivall is equally observed by Catholicks of either Opinion The like may be said of the Feast of Corpus Christi of S. Michael the Archangëll c. by none of which the least alteration was made in the Common Faith 74.
the contrary saying That because there was no King in Israel everyone went severall ways doing what was good in his own eyes So that by the Doctours way of proceeding one would almost believe that his meaning was that our Saviour had no intention that his Church should be one and consequently that Generall Councills which took great paines to procure Vnity transgressed therein our Saviours order 103. But all Protestants are not of the Doctours mind for though they generally make Scripture not only the Rule but judge also of Faith when controverted Yet they do not so neglect Vnity but that they profess a willingnes to submit their judgments for the sence of Scripture to a Lawfull generall Councill This the Doctour cannot doe now that he has sett forth his Principles unless he will confess the foundation of his Protestant Religion to be unsound He might well enough have done it before whilst he was a Defender of Archbishop Lawd but now it appears that the Archbishops Principles and his are not the same nor probably ever were and I doe assure my self that if the Archbishop were alive none could be more ready to condemn them 104. Other Protestants therefore refuse not submission to Councells as may appear by their confident demanding them For Gesner speaking in their name thus writes We with the loudest voice we can cry out again and again and with all our power we humbly and earnestly beg of Christian Kings and Emperours that a free Christian and Lawfull Councill may be convâ—ked in which the Scripture may be permitted to be the Iudge of Controversies And our Countreyman Sutcliff confidently cryes out that Catholicks are afraid of Councills Yet all the world sees that if a Lawfull Generall Councill were called according to the order of all past lawfull Councills even those received by Protestants they must necessarily be condemned 105. This some others more wise then these loud Sollicitours for Councills saw and therefore when a Councill was ready to be called they providing for themselves would not permit any Point to be decided by Catholick Bishops alone but euery Minister yea Lay-men must have votes in them and a plurality of Suffrages was not to prevayle but an equall number on both sides must dispute and Lay Judges decide that is declared Hereticks must enioy greater Priviledges then Catholicks and instead of a Councill there must be an Assembly of wild beasts consulting to establish Unity in Gods Church which it seems was only to be procured by confusion and not by Order Therefore a certain Lutheran said well of Calvinists calling for a Lawfull Councill that they did imitate a well known Buffon calld Marcolphus who was wont to say That after all his search he could never find a fitt tree upon which he could willingly be content to be hanged Such a tree would a Legitimate Councill prove to the Doctours Principled Protestants 106. Yet there is one expedient for producing Unity which the Doctour may doe well to advise upon for if it take it will certainly have that effect even the Quakers themselves and Fifth Monarchists will not refuse to be of the Doctours Church if they be not already Nay which is more the Catholicks will come in too This is no invention of mine but was many years since suggested by one of the Doctours Protestants Robert Robertson an English Anabaptist of Amsterdam This surely well meaning man perceiving how litle success Scripture alone had to vnite Sects agreeing only in opposing Popery in the year sixteen hundred and two printed a Book in Holland in which he proposed to them all this means of Vnity viz. That they should all ioyn in a common Petition to the States to give them leave to assemble themselves in some Town or field and there each Sect severally to pray to God one after another that he would shew some evident Miracle for decision of their Controversies and declaring which among them had the Truth which he supposed vndoubtedly was not among Catholicks And to the end the Devill might not enter in and deceive them with a false Miracle the man told them he had thought of one allowed by Scripture and which he was sure the Devill could not work namely to make the Sun stand still for a certain considerable time not doubting but that God of his great Goodnes would not refuse to condescend to the Petition of such devout servants of his in a matter so iust and necessary 107. I suppose the Doctour will not deny this design if succesfull to be a most powerfull and unfaileable Mean of producing Vnity which his Principles have utterly destroyed and rendred impossible if not unlawfull And let him with all his wit and invention devise any other more probable since the Catholick Churches Authority is reiected by him and them 108. Notwithstanding all this the Doctour according to his custom and nature is confident that he has demonstrated that the Church of Rome can have no advantage in Point of Vnity above his medley Church Now to the end any impartiall Reader may be a competent Judge between us I will briefly set down the Instruments and Means of Vnity left by our Lord to his Church to 〈◊〉 end the Truth of this Article of our Faith I believe one Catholick Church may remain to the worlds end unalterable 1. Catholicks do ground their Faith on Gods revealed Will in Scripture interpreted by Tradition 2. They believe that God according to his Promise will lead and preserve his Church in all necessary Truth or in the true sense of Scripture 3. That for this purpose he foreseeing that Heresies and Schisms grounded on a false sense of Scripture would in after times come has established in his Church an unfaileable succession of Teachers of his Truth with whom he will continue till the worlds end 4. It is his Will and Command that all Christians should obey these Teachers who are to give an account of their soules 5. These Teachers constitute the Churches Hierarchy 6. The Vniversall Church is represented by these Teachers assembled in a Lawfull Generall Councill 7. Such a Councill therefore is the Supreme Tribunall of the Church from whose Decisions there must be no Appeale 8. But because the difficulties of making such Assemblies are extreamly great therefore it is necessary there should be a standing Authority with power to prevent Heresies and Schisms in the intervalls of Councills arising and disturbing the Church 9. This ordinary Authority is established in the Supreme Pastour the Bishop of Rome 10. His Iurisdiction therefore as to such an end extends it self to the whole Church and is exercised in taking care that the Ordinances of Generall Councills be not by any transgressed and also in case any Heresies arise or that any Controversies in Causis Majoribus can not be otherwise ended either to determine the Points of Catholick Truth opposed or at least to impose Silence upon disputants and Litigants till he can assemble a
woman in the Doctours Parish can conferr as well and validly as himself But who are these Wee who mean no more then this by Priestly Absolution I am sure not the Prelats of his Church But I must not say his Church when I mean the Church of England who all hitherto have justified this as one essentiall Character of the order of Priesthood and Episcopat unles since the New Reformation not yet ten years old they have been content that this Character should be wiped out by the Doctour and that instead of the Fathers of Gods Church Maister Calvin should be the universall authentick Teacher of their Clergy But I believe the Doctour will in vain expect this compliance from them And I am sure the now highest and worthiest of his Prelats will not be of the number of the Doctours Wee who has solidly asserted this Primitive Doctrin and to confute whom perhaps the Doctour has published so pittifull a sense of Absolution to their preiudice ingratiating himself with all other Sects enemies to all Ecclesiasticall Orders and Ordinations and making every one of them as before Iudges of the Scriptures sense so now Vsurpers of their Offices and as they hope ere long of their Revenues 118. The Church then is manifestly free from the charge here imputed to Catholicks by the Doctour and by him made use of to deterr any one from ioyning themselves to her because in her not by her Doctrins are by some taught destroying the necessity of a good life All the Doctour can say is Some reach some such Doctrins which some also refute and the whole Church disavows This being so with what conscience can the Doctour pretend danger upon this account in being members of the Catholick Church whenas in his own Protestant Churches for which he has layd grounds and Principles every Christian is allowed by himself in these Principles to chuse not only what opinions but what Articles of Faith after using a sober enquiry into the Scriptures they like best And what most horrid Doctrins he has thereby excused and defended all Christendom at this time sees with amazement and detestation 119. Surely when the Doctour wrote this passage he conceived himself quarrelling not with Catholicks who constantly assert against Protestants the necessity of good works to Salvation and their Efficacy in it upon Supposition of our Lords gracious Promise to reward them but with some of his own Protestants perhaps with himself who exclude all Merit of good works from a Christians Salvation or with his Patriarch Luther who said that good Works did more harme then good Therefore he may doe well to ask them pardon after Contrition and Confession of his fault 120. Certainly if he could bring himself to a willingnes of informing himself in true Catholick Doctrins he would find that the way to Salvation there taught is much strayter then that which is chosen by Protestants and Holines of Life far more strictly required For proof of which it were sufficient only to repeat what was even now cited out of the Councill of Trent touching the Doctrin of Pennance But a proof visible of late to all our eys are so many Apostats from the Catholick Church Apostats first from Obedience and Chastity and next from Faith For doe not they declare to all the world that Carnall Liberty and Carnall Lusts drove them first out of their Monasteries and next out of the Church As soon as they come into the aire of Protestancy a woman becoms necessary to them and Fasting insupportable and if they can ravish from Christ a Spouse consecrated to him they promise to themselves a more gainfull and honorable reception But if they will needs have Women because the woman is handsom and attractive is therefore the Pope presently turned Antichrist does our Lord cease to be present in the Sacrament is Purgatory presently extinguished doe Angells and Saints no longer deserve to be acknowledged our Protectours in a word have they forgotten what they formerly beleived and are they in a moment inspired to answer to a new Catechism full of new Articles of Faith gravely proposed to them by a Patriarch and Pandar for impure Apostats out of the Pulpitt What influence has the woman upon them to make all this change Truly the very same the Woman had from the Creation She presents an Apple to them which wonderfully delights them to look upon Especially if growing in England where they heare the fairest are to be had But if besides seeing it they get a tast of the Apple their eys are presently opened and as it were in uno radio solis they see all good and evill and nothing appears good but what the woman approves and without which they can not enjoy and maintain the Woman nor make a companion and Mistress to our noblest young Ladyes 121. But leaving these putrid Carcinomata of the Catholick Church and infamous stains to the Protestant is it not apparent that the Doctrin of Pennance and Mortification hath been rejected by Protestants not because they are hindrances of good life as the Doctour says and I dare say not one understanding person in his own Parish beleives him but for the Severity of them and contradiction to Flesh and Blood Besides this where doe we hear of Restitution of goods got by Usury and deceit among Protestants there being among them no obligation of confessing such sins and by consequence of making Satisfaction without which Absolution cannot be granted The Doctour will not allow me here to name those Schooles of Holiness and Devotion Monasteries though from the Primitive times esteemed a principall Ornament of Gods Church because he will esteem them nothing but Schooles of Fanaticism 122. But in generall most certain it is that among Catholicks the Study of ways promoting Holiness and Piety is incomparably greater but withall more painfull then among Protestants 123. But this satisfies not the Doctour who brings in Bishop Taylour using the same argument with him in his Disswasive from Popery viz the no-necessity of forsaking sins in the Catholick Church since if a man commits them again and again he knows a present remedy toties quoties it is but confessing with Sorrow or Attrition and upon Absolution he is as whole as if he had not Sinned Yea if after Sixty or eighty years together of a wicked life he shall doe this in the Article of his death this instantly passes him into a state of Salvation Yea moreover the Doctour afterwards taxes the Indulgence of the Roman Church because in her Rituall she ordains that Extreme-Vnction should be conferred on persons unable to confess as being under a delirium or wholly insensible if before it be but probable that they desired it or gave any signs of Contrition And hereby saith he if any sins have remained upon them they are taken of by vertue of this Sacred Vnction 124. As touching the too great facility allowed by some Catholick Writers in giving Absolution toties
Tradition they know not how to iudge If any of the Doctours Parishioners should be thus troublesom then must he be angry and with a frown tell them Will ye be Papists Is it not fitter ye should believe me then like blind Papists pin your soules vpon the Authority of the present Vniversall Church This stops their mouths Now they are fully satisfied and ask pardon for presuming to doubt hauing such an Oracle to teach them that they ought to be their own Teachers Thus it is that ordinary people even boyes and girles are to be fooled and made to believe that they see all their Religion in Scripture whenas in very truth they may as well be told that they Smell it out with their noses as I once heard Sir Francis Wenman say in a discourse on a subiect like this 156. Howeuer the whole Stress of the Doctours Religion lying vpon it that euery Christian is to be a judge of the sence of Scripture hence it was necessary for his ends to contend Manibus pedibusque that none should be discouraged from reading Scripture Yet I hope he will excuse those who are not able to read 157. To make this good he employes the vtmost of his invention Subtilty and reading He who cannot find out one single short sentence in Antiquity to help to support the main Pillar of his Religion Yea moreouer he who has not alledged one probable argument of reason for strengthning that tottering Pillar except only a Negatiue one which is this That Christians haue no obligation to belieue any Church or Teacher expounding the sence of Scripture therefore they must if they will be believers believe themselues alone In this miserable exigence this same Doctour notwithstanding to proue that Christians in all times were indulged and exhorted to read the Scriptures flourishes in a Luxuriant stile with demonstrations a priori a posteriori per reductionem ad absurdum impossible which demonstrations also he backs with an army of Ancient Fathers teaching as he himself does viz. S. Clement S. Ignatius S. Policarpus Clemens Alexandrinus Tertullian Origen S. Basill S. Hierome S. Chrisostome S. Augustin c. and moreouer that this was their Doctrin is saith he acknowledged by late Catholick Diuines Espenceus and Alphonsus a Castro and one more I will add by the vnworthy Writer of this Treatise also 158. But this being granted no Catholick and J think no man in his right witts will grant that euery Porter Cobler or Landresse is capable to instruct themselues by reading the Scripture alone or if they cannot read them by hearing them read in this Point of main importance that Scriptures are Gods Scriptures or to clear the Doctrine of the Mystery of the Holy Trinity the Incarnation of our Saviour the Procession of the Holy Ghost or the Point of Iustification as determined by S. Paul and S. Iames c. I have so much confidence now in the Doctours ingenuity that he will also acknowledge thus much yea by his experience in teaching ignorant people J am assured he has found no small difficulty in making such and other like necessary Doctrins of Christianity sink into the minds of the rude people though sett down in the simplest plainest Catechisms for infants though also those Catechisms were with all his skill explained by himself 159. Now taking this for granted till he contradict it J would ask him Does he in his conscience think that the forecited Fathers when they exhorted the Christians of their times to the reading of Scriptures did not suppose that for the sence of them in things any way difficult or controverted they would submitt their judgements to the Church which had they not supposed they would haue been less liberal in putting the Scriptures into their hands For hence it is that the Bible is called by S. Ambrose liber Sacerdotalis because to be dispensed to the people according us Bishops and Priests iudged it might proue beneficiall to them and in all ambiguities to be interpreted by the same Pastours Besides this the art of Printing being then vnknown it was not every ordinary Mechanick who could purchase so costly a Manuscript as the Bible was every groom or Chamber-maid could not carry it vnder their arms to Church vnles they could spare at least two years wages to buy it and hire also a litle Asse to carry it so great was the bulk considering the largenes of Letters writen in these Ancient times The persons invited therefore by these Holy Fathers to the frequent reading of Scriptures were for the most part those of the higher rank of more ingenuous education and so Prudence and discretion and especially such as they knew to be firm to the teaching of the Church Now to such persons the Roman Church freely allows the reading of Scriptures and on the other side for such as the Doctour qualifies with the name of Protestants according to his new Mode that is Independents on any Authority the Fathers most certainly would more strictly then they are now have pro-prohibited the reading of them 160. Neither is it much to his purpose his alledging that though in the time of the first four Generall Councills the Fathers had tryall enough of the mischief of Heresies yet notwithstanding they did not on that account forbid the people to read the Scriptures For who knows not the vast difference between the ancient and our Modern Heresies Anciently the In ventours of Heresies were great learned Prelats and subtile Philosophers and the obiect of their Heresies were Sublime Mysteries of Faith examined and framed by them according to the grounds of Plato's or Aristole's Philosophy far above the reach of Vulgar capacities from whence it is that Tertullian calls the Ancient Philosophers the Patriarchs of Hereticks And moreover their applications of Texts of Scriptures for confirming such Heresies were so Speculatively nice and acroamaticall that both great sharpnes of witt and learning too were necessary to the discovering and unridling the fallacy Hence it came to pass that in those dayes the Scriptures might freely enough be read by ordinary Christians without danger especially considering their intention in reading them was not to find out a New Religion but to instruct themselves in Piety and inflame their hearts in the Divine Love 161. Thus stood matters in the Church during the times of the first four Generall Councills But our Modern Heresies are of a quite different Complexion They are conversant about matters obvious to the weakest capacities as the external administration of Sacraments the Iurisdiction of Superiours Civill and Ecclesiasticall the manner of mens Devotions the Institution of Religious Orders the Obligation of Vows the Ordonnances of the Church teaching Fasting Matrimony Celibacy Paying of Tithes c. Or if about Sublime Mysteries Men are taught to examine such Mysteries by naturall Reason and the Verdict of their outward Senses Hence it is come to pass that our late Heresiarcks have not been profound Subtle Philosophers but
at the best a few Sensuall incestuous Fryars abroad and Popular Preachers at home yea as we have lately seen even Mechanicks Souldiers or any other ignorant persons actuated by the Spirit of Pride and Licentiousness to begin a Sect fitt for the palats and complexions of Seekers after Novelties 162. Matters therefore standing thus in these later times can any rationall man be perswaded that if any of those Holy Fathers cited by the Doctour had lived among us or if such Heresies had been spred among their Disciples and pretended to have been evidently deduced from Gods Word they would have been so zealous in their Exhortations to a promiscuous reading of Scriptures But how much think we would such their zeale have been cooled in case such an Architect of Principles as the Doctour is had been in Vogue in their times For Principles they are which evidently contain the most pernicious Soule-destroying Heresy that ever assaulted Gods Church Principles which banish Peace Charity Humility and Obedience vtterly from the Church and State Principles which if through Gods judgment they should generally prevaile what think you would become of our Saviours Promise for there would not be left in the world one Church at all true or false Since where every one is acknowledged the only inventer and Iudge of his own Faith there may meet a Multitude but it is no Church none having right over another errour and truth vertue and vice being equally Iustifiable Lastly these are Principles the admirable vanity of which I think was never paralleld by any Heresiarch but a certain Rhetorius mentioned by Philastrius who taught That all Heresies were in their precepts of life innocent and in their Doctrins true Omnes Hereses rectê ambulare vera docere 163. Non sum ambitiosus in malis I may with a good conscience protest that it is only Truth and a Charitable compassion to soules miserably seduced by so Comprehensive a Heresy as is contained in the Dostours Principles which hath moved mee to fix such a brand upon them Not that I suspect that he would approve such consequences but I am confident with all his skill he cannot avoyd them 164. Now I must acquaint the Doctour that my iust indignation against these Principles is heightned from my own unhappines if not guilt in being the first who gave occasion that they should be known and received into the Church of England This I am sure neither he nor perhaps any one now alive does know and therefore I will acquaint him with the true Story concerning them 165. As I remember it was in the year 1638. that I had occasion to accompany a Noble freind in a iourney from Dublin to London When we were ready to return I went to a Booksellers shop to search out some bâ—oks to be carried back into Ireland and among others I bought Daillé du vray usage des Peres a Book at that time not at all taken notice of That Book the same night I shewd to my Noble dear Lord Lucius Lord Falkland who perusing and liking the Contents of it desired me to give it him which I willingly did About a month after my return into Ireland he sent me a most civill letter full of thanks both in his own but especially in M. Chillingworths name for that small present telling me that that litle Book had saved him a most tedious labour of reading almost twenty great Volumes 166. This Mysterious speech I easily understood For M. Chillingworth a litle before was returned out of Flanders where he had professed himself a Catholick and being sent for by Archbishop Laud was strictly examined by him touching his Religion And whether he went to Masse or Common Prayer to whom he gaue this account That he had entertained such scruples touching Catholick Religion and withall was as yet so vnsatisfyed with the grounds of the English Protestant Religion that at the present his conscience would not permitt him to goe either to Masse or to Common Prayer And therefore with his Graces leaue he was resolued to spend a year or two in a solitude and the Study of Greek and Latin Fathers fully purposing to embrace that Religion which appeared to him most consonant to what the Fathers generally taught The Archbishop much commended his design and dismissed him with his blessing and a promise also that he should enioy entire liberty to prosecute so laudable a Study Very busy in this Study I found and left him in England But it was presently after interrupted by that vnlucky Book of Daillé which perswaded him to a light esteem of the Holy Fathers vpon whose authority he would no longer rely But yet this did not bring him into the Church of England so as to think himself obliged to belieue her Doctrins and whose authority he saw was much inferiour to the other and from all subordinate but diuided English Sects he had a horrible aversion and contempt Therefore without any long demurr he fixed his mind vpon Socinian grounds which he afterwards shewed in a litle Book of one of them which was an Answer to certaine Theses Posnanienses which Theses as J remember asserted the Authority of the Catholick Church in opposition whereto the Socinian reiecting all Externall Authority layd these very grounds of his Religion That in all necessary Doctrins the Scripture was clear Therefore euery sober Enquirer might with ease find them in it without any help of a Teacher or at least any obligation to believe him Vpon these grounds M. Chillingworth dilated his Discourses with much art and gracefullness of Stile in his Book against a learned Catholick writer And the same grounds so discoursed on Doctour Stillingfleet has contracted Methodically into his Principles And both these Books though manifestly destroying all Authority in the English or any other Church haue been patiently and quietly suffred yea commended by Superiours here to their infinit dammage as is seene at this day which dammage is J belieue more sensible to them since they see no considerable prejudice to Catholicks by them for J doe not remember to haue heard of any one Established Catholick Shaken in his Faith by such grounds Though I confess they obctructed a good while my entrance into the Catholick Church 167. Now it being certain that these Princi ples came originally into England from the Socinians a Sect maintaining a Fundamentall Heresy it is of small edification and less glory to the English Church in case as the Doctour pretends his Faith and hers are built on the same Principles that she should consequently acknowledge herself forced to desert the grounds vpon which she proceeded since the Reformation as being grounds by M. Chillingworths discovery found to be Sandy and ruinous and consequently acknowledge all her Articles of belief all her Laws Constitutions Canons c. misgrounded The consideration of this besides disreputation cannot but raise great Scruples in the minds of her Disciples and Subiects till she not only disavow
Councill to declare un-appealably the Truth and to do iustice upon the guilty parties Thus the Catholick Church is furnished against Schisms and none of these Defensive arms will the Doctour allow to any of his Protestant Churches and yet he confidently avows that Catholicks have no advantage 109. But let us consider what argumēts an over-weening witt can alledge to prove so strange an affection for he might as well have said That Goverment and such Government as obliges the conscience has not so much force to preserve men in Vnity as Anarchy has 110. As touching his Proofs which take up above an hundred pages our answer to them must be that we may yield him in a manner all the Premises of his faulty Sillogisms and must deny the Consequence of the Conclusions he would draw from them He tells us many Tragicall Stories of miscarriages of Popes how they revolted from the Empire and upon such revolting layd the foundation of greatnes to their See How afterward challenging to themselves a Supreme Temporall Dominion over the whole world they quarrelled with Emperours and other Christian Princes from whence followed rebellions massacres and a whole Iliad of all sorts of mischiefs Well this being granted what follows Therefore says he Papall authority in Gods Church is no good mean to produce peace and order nor consequently Kingly authority in the common wealth since notwithstanding it many Kings have exercised Tyranny and could not always prevent rebellions But S. Peter and S. Paul never thought of such an argument when the most abominable Monster that ever lived governed the Roman world It was to Nero that they commanded Christians to be subiect to pay taxes to yeeld honour c. and this not only out of feare of his power but also for conscience sake It was such an argument as this as the Doctour has reason to remember that was made use of to the destruction of the best King that ever governed this Island Be it therefore granted that after a thousand years of excellent order produced in the Christian world by the government of Popes some of their Successours for about an age or two caused intolerable disorders in the Church and Empire What follows Therefore a Supreme authority in Gods Church is of no good use at all Nay more all manner of Authority is useles for if any authority then Subordination and if Subordination then of necessity a Supreme 111. From hence the Doctour descends to a way of arguing yet less reasonable then this for he tells his Reader of I know not how many Schisms yet all of them after the Church was above twelve hundred years old for before there were scarce any and of yet later disorders since S. Bernards time by reason of quarrels between Bishops and Monastick orders about Exemptions and Priviledges likewise between Regulars and Seculars the other day in England and much more such stuff which Popes either would not or rather could not compose for feare of greater disorders by endangering Schisms yet more pernicious to the Church then the former And what would he conclude from hence The very same as before for his argument in brief is this Subiects are oft times rebellious to their Superiours therefore it were better there were no Superiours at all But might he not as rationally argue that God is Governour of the world yet notwithstanding this the far greatest part of the world not in one or two but in all ages from the beginning hath been rebellious to him therefore his Government is of small benefitt 112. As touching certain truly scandalous quarrells between Bishops and some Regulars concerning Episcopacy and the Churches Government the Doctour ought to have taken notice that never any Regular pretended Episcopacy to be Antichristian as the Doctours freinds the Presbyterians Independents and other later Sects have done Neither have they declared a Government by Bishops to be in it self indifferent or that Ordination and Consecration of Bishops and Priests is a meere Ceremony and conferred as well and Legally by Lay Magistrates as by Ecclesiasticks as the Doctour himself has done The whole controversy consisting among Catholicks about restraining some part of Episcopall Iurisdiction and maintaining Priviledges granted by some Popes to certain Regulars A vast difference therefore there is between Catholicks and Protestants in Disputes touching Church Government and utterly irremediable on the Protestants side whereas wee see it ended or at least silenced among Catholicks 113. But differences of this Nature are not considerable compared to those obiected by the Doctour in the last place which are touching Matters of Doctrin and as he pretends of Faith in which regard he says that the Church of Rome can have no advantage in point of Vnity above others And further he not content with this adds That the Popes Authority being acknowledged by Catholicks the fountain of Vnity and all Catholicks not agreeing in the Popes Infallibility Whereas both Catholicks and Protestants agree in the Infallibility of Scripture which is to Protestants a more certain way of ending Controversy therefore he concludes that Protestants have a more certain and safe way of Vnity then Catholicks For that the Pope has not a sufficient power to reduce to Vnity parties dissenting in Doctrinall Points of weight such as are the Controversies between the Iesuits and Dominicans about Grace and Free Will between the Dominicans and Franciscans about the Immaculate Conception c. is he saith evident since those quarrels have to this day continued many ages and are prosecuted with great eagernes 114. In this manner argues the Doctour whereto the Answer is obvious For. 1. he trifles with and abuses an unskilfull Reader in telling him that the Scripture being acknowledged on both sides to be infallible is a more certain way of ending Controversies then the Popes determination who is not by many Catholick believed to be infallible For how can a Writing the sense whereof is controverted end a Controversy And to say that a writing is of it self a surer mean to end debates then when interpreted by a Iudge to say this and to think to be believed is to call his Readers brutish irrationall creatures and to make all Tribunalls ridiculous 2. It is not the Popes Infallibility but his Authority which ends the Controversies either by Determining the Point in Controversy so as his Determination is accepted by the Church or at least by imposing Silence among Disputants till himself in a Councill unappealeably decide it By which way of imposing Silence severall eager Disputes have been ended by Popes as this age can witness 3. Though all Catholicks do in thesi acknowledge that they are obliged at least to silence when imposed by the Pope Yet it cannot be denyed but that some have not complied with this Obligation But this is not to be imputed to want of Authority in the Pope but to the unrulines of mens passions and pride And the same fault we see in Secular Tribunalls
which yet does not hinder but that Iudges are reputed fitt and proper to end Law suits 4. That neither the Pope nor the Councill of Trent have decided the fore mentioned Controversies we are to ascribe either to the inconsiderablenes of them or to the want of Sufficient clearness of Scripture or Tradition for either party or to a just and prudent care of preventing Schisms in the Church by such Determinations wherein so considerable parties in the Church are divided in opinion 5. Whereas the Doctour says that the Points in Controversy among Catholicks being many of them the same agitated among Protestants are Points of Faith he is manifestly mistaken For there are among Catholicks no Points controverted but such Doctrins where the sense of Scriptures being variously expounded by the two Parties the Church as yet hath determined nothing which sense of them is de Fide though the Parties themselves would each of them have their own to be so not determined I say so clearly as that both sides are agreed that such is the Churches Decision As for Protestants what Doctrins are esteemed Points of Faith and what School Disputes I think no Oedipus can resolue Doctour Stillingfleet elsewhere saith down right That the Church of England holds no Points to be Articles of her Faith but those wherein the Church of Rome also agrees with her and holds the same to be such His words are There is a great deale of difference between the owning of some Propositions in order to Peace and the believing of them as necessary Articles of Faith The Church of England makes no Articles of Faith but such as have testimony and approbation of the whole Christian world of all ages and are acknowledged to be such by Rome it self and in other things she requires Subscription to them not as Articles of Faith but as inferiour Truths which she expects Submission to in order to her Peace and Tranquillity Thus the Doctour But here I cannot well understand why he saith her Subiects Subscribe them as inferiour Truths and yet maintains the Church of England to require no Subscription to her Articles as Truths for that surely is a requiring of assent to them but a Subscription of non-contradiction or non-opposition of them which consists with the parties holding them Errours Now methinks this the Church of England believing nothing as of Faith but what the Popes and the Roman Churches Faith also secures to them to be so should sound somewhat harsh in the ears of many of his Disciples Again it necessarily follows that the Church of Rome notwithstanding its Idolatry Fanaticism c. yet failes in no necessary Point of Faith 6. Lastly that which makes Disputes among Christians about Dostrinall Points pernicious is not the heynousnes of the Errours themselves on either Party but the refusall to submitt to the Churches Authority when condemning them from whence Schisms are inevitable and such Refusers then truly stiled Hereticks No man will deny but that the Errour of the Photinians or Socinians called anciently Homuncionists for affirming Christ to be meer man is a most grievous Errour incomparably exceeding any among Catholicks Yet if one living in the Commuâ—ion of Gods Church should hold this most pernicious Errour not knowing that the Church had condemned it and being ready to renounce it assoon as he knew this S. Augustin professes he durst not call such a man an Heretick How the Doctour would call such an one I know not But this I will iustify that according to the Doctours Principles he ought to pass for as good and as well grounded a Protestant as himself and therefore especially Orthodox for not submitting his judgment to the Church §. 7. The Doctrin of Pennance Vindicated from the Doctours mistakes 115. NOw notwithstanding what hath hitherto been said I do nothing doubt but those popular Readers for whom only I conceive the Doctour wrote his Book will still resolutely judge every line of it unanswerable The like they will say concerning the other Points of accusation charged by him on the Roman Church as 1. many obstructions of a Holy Life 2. Endless Divisions How happy are we will they think who have escaped out of such a Babel were Frantick Subiects are governed by more Frantick Superiours where mens ears are deafned with endless quarrels and where Lawes are made against Piety In the former regards Papists may deserve our pitty or contempt but in the last our hatred For what cruelty is not too Mercyfull against the Professours of a Religion which teaches so many Doctrins hindring a good life necessary to Salvation that it is scarce possible any of them should be an honest man The Doctour has told them that these wicked men make the Sacrament of Pennance ioynd with Contrition that is as he interprets a remoâ—se of mind for sin sufficient for Salvation But his Adversary in effect bids him with Contrition to ioyne Confession and Absolution He is contented but he will needs have one condition more added which is forsaking of sin which they of the Church of the Rome not requiring notwithstanding all their Confessions and Absolutions a thousand times repeated they destroy the necessity of a good life 116. Here if the Doctour were asked Does the Catholick Church held the Doctrin here by him reproved He could not say she did because then the express Decision of the Councill of Trent disproves him Where three parts of the Sacrament of Pennance are declared Contrition Confession and Satisfaction Now in two of these the forsaking of sin are contained For Contrition implies a sorrow for sin proceeding from a love of God victorious over sin and consequently a detestation of sin And Satisfaction signifies yet more viz A holy revenge taken by the Penitent upon himself for offending God by denying to himself even Lawfull pleasures because unlawfull ones have tempted him to sin which is a great deale more then Protestants require 117. A disposition one may say inferiour to this required by the Councill served Davids turne who says I said I will confess my sins unto the Lord and thou forgivest the iniquity of my sin I cannot now believe the Doctour will acknowledge that a Sinner repentant of his sins out of a love of God Victorious over the Devill the world and the flesh and weho tstifies that sorrow and that Love by submitting to severe Pennances and Mortifications willing also to declare to his own Confusion his most secret sins with a serious purpose of amendment will thereby be put in a state of pardâ—n and Salvation Especially having received from Gods Authorised Ministers Absolution from his sins Absolution I say pronounced by Commission and Iurisdiction from Christ himself and not such an aery Phantosme of an Absolution as the Doctour interprets to be the applying the Promises of pardon in Scripture to the particular case of dying persons for this saith he is that we mean by Absolution and which say I the Silliest
Devotions in their Natiue Tongues which are for the most part taken out of the Publick Liturgy and moreouer has commanded all Pastours to interpret to the people in the administring of Sacraments especially the most Holy Eucharist whatsoever they are capable of vnderstanding by which means there is scarce a Rustick so ignorant but well vnderstands what the Priest does through the whole course of the Masse 149. Matters standing thus the Church esteems it more prudent and more conducing also to edification in generall that all Catholick Churches should serve God vniformly in a language which cannot be corrupted especially such provisions being made for the peoples good then to haue the Service of God exposed to Corruptions and continuall Changes But if the Doctour think himself wiser then the whole Western and most Eastern Churches much ioy may he take in his great humility 150. But after all how can the people say Amen will the Doctour say from S. Paul I answer S. Paul in that place Speaks not of the Common Divine Service which was celebrated then in a language well vnderstood and at Corinth doubtles in the Greek tongue but of these Spirituall Hymns and Praises of God extraordinary that were delivered by some in a tongue vnknown And all that can be deduced from it and applied to the Publick Divine servcie is this that either this be performed in a known Tongue or when the Church hath reasonable Motives which she not we must judge of not to change the formerly vsed language of it so much as is necessary for the common people to vnderstand and say Amen to be interpreted as the Apostle saith there ouer and over again Now such Prayers Collects Psalms Hymns Litanies c. as are thought necessary for the common people are interpreted by the Churches order and they have them ready in their Primers Manuels c. Euen all the parts also of the Service of the Masse necessary to be known by them 151. Jt is certain that it is not out of a desire that the people should be ignorāt that the Church thinks not meet to change the language of her Liturgy And I would to God that were the only hindrance of reuniting England to her once beloued Mother for then the breach would not last long §. 12. Of the Churches denying the Reading of the Bible indifferently to all 152. BUt the last and greatest Hindrance of piety and which is wonderfull of Vnity likewise in the Doctours opinion is the Roman Church her denying the reading of Scripture to all persons promiscuously without exception This fault the Doctour will neuer forgiue Her And the truth is if euer there should be a restraint of such liberty in England all the Principles of his Religion would vtterly goe to wrack For how then should euery Sober Enquirer into Scripture frame a Religion to himself How much would the number of Sects be diminished which is great pitty Then Pastours and Teachers would perswade the people that it is their duty to believe and obey them and not to be their own Directours which is intolerable Therefore in so great a concern the Doctours zeale in this Point aboue others may well be forgiuen him 153. How much would the Doctour be beholden to that freindly man who could furnish him with but one line out of any Ancient Ecclesiasticall Writer Father or Councill to iustify the Fundamentall Principle of his and as he pretends of all Protestants Religion viz. That euery sober enquirer may be a Iudge infallible of the sense of Scripture in all Points necessary to Saluation But I can assure him such a freind is not to be found Nay I believe he would thank that man who could shew any Ancient Heretick an Authour of that enormous Doctrin for as he cannot but know that he embraces seuerall Points condemned by the Ancient Church in Hereticks he would no doubt with ioy adopt this Point so beneficiall and necessary to the fabrick of his Protestant Churches 154. To descend to our Modern times Though Luther Calvin Zuinglius c. those disturbers of the world to gain the affections of the Common rabble were very earnest to put the Bible into their hands yet does the Doctour think that they would patiently haue suffred any of their followers to chuse any other Religion out of it but what they as Prophets sent from God had taught them Nay would the Doctour take it well of his own Parishioners if they should doe so Yet he is angry with Catholicks because we rather trust the Churches iudgment then our own a strange quarrell certainly But it is a folly to think that any of the Common sort of people seek into the Bible to find their Religion there not one in ten thousand among us but for his whole Faith relyes vpon the credit and supposed honesty of some zealous Lecturer or reputed learned Doctour Now J would fain know of Doctour Stillingfleet with what conscience he can suffer a whole Congregation of well meaning men who can rely vpon nothing but authority to prefer his authority before that of the whole Church For nothing can be more contrary to the Rules of Common reason in them and for their sinning against Reason he must be answerable to God How does one of the Doctours Parishioners find his whole Religion in Scripture Thus The Doctour will bid him read the last verse of the 6. chap. to the Romans or he will read the words to him The Gift of God is eternall life Here says he the Papists are plainly confuted who say that God rewards our good works with Heaven He will tell him again that the Papists hold that our Lords body is in the Sacrament How shall they be confuted Christ indeed says This is my Body What then this must be vnderstood as if he had sayd This is the figure of my Body Then plain Scripture interpreted by the Doctour is against them Again Look out the first Chapter to Titus you will find that those who are called Elders or Presbiters in the fifth verse are called Bishops in the Seaventh Here our Antichristian Prelats are plainly confuted who exalt themselues aboue Elders c. 155. But one Point there is of main importance to these who will find all things in Scripture which is A Proof that these Books which they are taught to call Scripture are the same which were Anciently written by men inspired by God That they have not been corrupted and that they are rightly interpreted None of all these things they can find in Scripture what remedy therfore for this None in the world but the Doctours own authority He will tell them perhaps that the Vniversall Tradition of all Ages which is of it self credible testifies this and therefore they ought to belieue it But if they should reply and tell the Doctour that for all necessary Points of belief they were according to his Principles to be Iudges for themselues but of that which they call