creation of mankind and the first beginnings of the Church in paradice yea the woord is that immortall seede of which the Church was borne The Scripture is first in nature as the cause The Church therefore could not bee except the woord were first deliuered Now when wee name the holy Scripture wee meane not so much the characters of the letters and the volumes but rather the sentences which are conteined in them which they shal neuer be able to prooue to be of lesse antiquitie then the Church For albeit they were repeated and declared often after the beginning of the gathering of the Church 2. Answere The Maior is false A yonger workmā may be more skilful than an elder yet the summe of the Law Gospell was the same for euer To conclude neither is that which they assume alwaies true That the autority of the ancienter witnes is greater thā of th◠yōger For such may be the conditiō quality of the yonger witnes that he may deserue greater credit then the ancienter Christ being man bare witnes of himselfe Moses also and the Prophets had long time before borne witnes of him neither yet is the autoritie therefore greater no not of all the other witnesses then of Christ alone In like sort the Church witnesseth that the holy Scripture which wee haue is the woord of God The Scripture it selfe also doth witnes of it selfe the same but with that kinde of witnes that is more certaine and sure than all the othes of Angels and men There is alleadged also to this purpose a place 1. The pillar of truth to Timot Obiection 4 3. Where the Church is called the pillar and ground of the truth But since the Scripture doth teach otherwhere and that not once that the foundation of the Church is Christ and his word it is manifest inough that the Church is the pillar of the truth not a foundamentall or vpholding piller but a ministeriall that is a keeper and spreader of it abroad and as it were a mansion place or sure seat which might carrie the truth left with her and committed vnto her in the open face of all mankinde Acts. 9. Gal. 2. 1 Thes 2. 2 Thes 1. Tit. 1. euen as the holy Apostle Paul was called an elect vessell to beare the name of God before the gentiles and kinges neither yet did Paul get credit vnto the Gospell but the Gospell vnto Paul So likewise are the Apostles termed pillars Galat. 2. not that the Church rested on their persons but that they were the chiefe teachers of the gospell and as it were the chieftaines and maisters of doctrine For a man is not bound to beleeue those that teach on their bare woord but for the proofes which they bring of their doctrine Furthermore they alleage a sentence of Austin out of Obiection 5 his booke entituled against the Epistle of the foundation A place of Augustine 1 Answere An example maketh no rule chap. 5. I saith Augustine would not beleeue the Gospell except the authoritie of the catholicke Church did mooue mee thereunto But first if it were true that either Austin or some others did giue credence vnto the Gospell onely for the Churches autoritie yet might there not bee fashioned a rule hence of that which all men either did or ought to doe But that this is not the meaning of Austine 2 Aunswere He speaketh of himselfe as yet not cōuerted or not sufficientlie confirmed which these mē wold haue they do easily perceaue who weigh both the whole course of this place the phrase of speech which is vsual vnto Austen For Austen going about to shew that the Manichees were destitute of al proof of their doctrine first he opposeth one who as yet beleeueth not the gospel and denieth that such a one is able any way to be conuicted by the Manichaeans for he were to be conuicted either by argumentes drawen out of the doctrine it selfe of which the Manichaeans haue none or by the consent of the catholike Church from which themselues were departed for example sake he proposeth himselfe who should not haue had beleeued the Gospel except the authoritie of the catholik Church had moued him thereunto Austen therefore speaketh this not of himselfe as hee was then when hee writ these things against the Manichaeans but of himselfe before hee was yet conuerted or not sufficiently confirmed And that hee speaketh not of the present but of the time past the words that follow do manifestly declare whom then I beleeued when they said Beleeue the Gospel why should I not beleeue them when they say Beleeue not a Manichean For hence it appeareth that when he saith he was mooued especially by the authority of the Church he meaneth it of that time at which he obeied the Churches voice that is departed from the Manichaeans vnto the true Church But after that once he was conuerted and had perceaued the truth of doctrine that his faith was not now any more builded on the authoritie of the Church but on a far other foundation himselfe is a most sufficient witnes for vs whereas in the selfesame book Therefore he did beleeue the Church especially before he was able to perceiue it cap. 14. he saith on this wise Thou hast purposed nothing els but to commend that thy selfe beleeuest and to laugh at that which I beleeue And when as I of the other side shal commend that which myselfe beleeue laugh at that which thou beleeuest what dost thou thinke we must determine or do but euen to shake handes with them who bid vs to know certaine things and afterward will vs to beleeue things that are vncertain and let vs follow them who bid vs first to beleeue that which as yet we are not able to perceaue that being more enhabled by faith it self we may discerne to vnderstand that which we do beleeue not men now but God himselfe inwardly strengthning and illightning our mind Wherefore they do manifest iniury vnto Austen who draw that which himselfe confesseth of himselfe when hee was not yet conuerted or was but weake vnto that time when he affirmeth far otherwise not of himselfe onely but of al the godly For so reuerent a regard ought we to haue of the worde of God and such also is the force and efficacy of the holie spirit in confirming the harts of beleeuers that we beleeue God yea without any creatures Testimony euen as Elias forsooke not god 1. Reg. 19. The application of the answere no not when he thought that himselfe only was left aliue of the true worshippers of God If therefore either Austen or whosoeuer els being not as yet conuerted vnto religiō nor as yet hauing experiēce of the certainty of it in his hart That followeth not which they would 1 Because there is more in the Consequent than in the Antecedent 2 Because thereis a fallacy of the Accident A declaration of the like example 1 The
not knowing the scriptures neither were they the true Church though they seased vpon the name and place of it 2 Answere Vniuersallie Secondly the true Church indeede erreth not vniuersallie For alwaies the light of the truth especially concerning the foundation of doctrine is preserued in some mens minds wherupon the Church is called the pillar and ground of truth But yet neuertheles some also of the godly oftentimes fall into errors through ignorance and infirmitie yet so that they hold the foundation neither doe they defend their erronious opinions contrarie to their conscience and at length they forsake them euen as it is said If anie man builde vpon this foundation gold 1 Cor. 3. Ephes 4. 1 Cor. 12 siluer c. And Philip. 3. If ye bee otherwise minded God shal reueile euen the same vnto you Last of al there is giuen vnto euery man grace according vnto the measure of the gift of Christ And the spirit distributeth to euerie man seuerallie as he wil. The Apostles before they had receiued the holie Ghost at Whitsontide were the liuely members of the Church yet erred they concerning the kingdom office of the Messias There were of the Chiliasts opinion great men in the Church as Pasias Irenaeus Apollinarius Tertullian Victorinus Lactantius Methodius Martyr And therefore although the Church er not vniuersallie yet oftentimes some of her members erre when as they swarue from the woord which God suffereth not seldome to happen vnto them for to keepe vs beeing warned of our weakenes and blindnes in modestie and his true feare and in daily inuocating of him and withal to teach vs that the truth of doctrine is not to be measured by the title of the church but by the woord deliuered of him by the handes of the Prophets and Apostles as it is said Thy woord O Lord is a lanterne vnto my feet Psalm 119. and a light vnto my pathes Likewise 1 Tim. 6. Keepe that which is committed vnto thee and auoid profane and vaine bablinges This ground beeing once laied 7 Obiection The Church ought to obey Bishops by the commandement of God that so far foorth the Church erreth not as it doth not swarue from the written woord of God it is easy to answere to that which they make shew of to the contrarie that the Church is ruled by Bishops and therefore must obey them as it is saied Act. cap. 20. Take heede vnto all the flocke whereof the holy Ghost hath made you ouerseers to gouerne the Church of God And Mat. 18. If hee refuse to heare the Church let him bee vnto thee as an heathen man and a Publicane Luc. 10. Hee that heareth you heareth mee and hee that despiseth you despiseth mee And to the Hebrewes 13. Obey those who beare rule ouer you For both they must rule and the Church must obey them according vnto the prescript of Gods woord as it is said If any man preach any other doctrine let him bee accursed Aunswere Necessarilie in those 〈◊〉 things which belong to the ministery frely in traditions Gal. 1. Whatsoeuer therfore the ministers propound out of the woord of God vnto the Church wee must of necessity obey it that which the Lord teacheth Matt. 23.2 when hee saieth The Scribes the Pharisees sit in Moyses chaire All therefore whatsoeuer they bid you obserue that obserue and doe For they sit in Moses chaire who teach Moses doctrine in the Church If also they ordaine any thinges indifferen◠and of a middle sort which are profitable these also are to be obserued for maintaining of order and auoiding of offence But if they require vs to beleeue or obserue thinges repugnant to the woord of God or thinges that are in their owne nature indifferent with putting an opinion of necessitie in them and of woorshipping of God they sit no longer in Moses chaire but in the chaire of scorners and of them it is said Iohn 10. The sheepe heard them not Likewise 1. Tim. 4. In the latter times some shall depart from the faith and shal giue heed vnto the spirites of error And that the decrees of the Bishops also are not to bee receaued among the precepts and decrees of the Church is confirmed by the example of the ciuill magistrate whose iust good Lawes binde the cōsciences of the subiects 1 Inst For the dissimilitude of the examples consisteth in that that God himselfe by expresse woorde hath decreed a necessitie of obedience to the Lawes and commandements of the ciuil magistrate 1 Instance The magstrate doth bind the consciences therfore Bishops which are not repugnant vnto his Law but hath giuen a liberty of conscience in traditions of the Church so that he pronounceth himselfe to be angrie with him who obeieth not ciuil magistrats as long as they command nothing repugnant to his Lawes but not with them which without offence do contrarie to the constitutions of Bishops For of the magistrate it is said Rom. 13. We must obey him for conscience sake But of thinges indifferent in the Church Coloss 2. Let no man condemne you in meat or drink or in respect of a holy daie 2 Instance The higher power doth more bind 1 Answere Likewise Gal. 5. Stand fast in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made vs free Now if againe they reply that the office of Bishops is aboue the ciuil power and therefore hath greater force then that to bind men to obey first we graunt that more obedience is due vnto the superior power then to the inferiour as long as it commaundeth nothing contrarie to Gods woorde As long therefore as the ministers propound the word of God vnto the Church and for auoiding of offence commaund such thinges to be obserued as appertaine to decencie and order they do not now offend against them but against God whosoeuer obey them not But if they require their lawes concerning thinges indifferent to be obserued with putting an opinion of necessitie in them and of the worship of God and do make them necessarie when there is no danger of offence to ensue Because this charge is contrarie to the word of God no obedience is due vnto it Further we confesse that greater obedience is due vnto the superiour power in those things in which it is superiour that is in which God would haue other powers to obey it But the ministerial power is superiour vnto the ciuil in those things which belong properly vnto the ministerie that is which are of God deliuered commaunded and committed vnto the ministers that by them they may bee declared vnto the Church But of matters indifferent concerning which nothing is either commanded or forbidden of God the ciuil power is superiour by reason of the authoritie which God in these matters hath giuen vnto the ciuil magistrate and not to the ministers of the Church Obiection 8 But against this they returne againe That wee also doe alleadge the Testimonies of councels fathers in
confirming the doctrine of the Church which were but in vaine for vs to doe Fathers and councels ar cited if their sentences had not the force and authoritie of Ecclesiastical doctrine But we neither bring nor receaue the Testimonies of the ancient Church with that mind as if without the authority of the holie Scripture they were sufficient for confirmation of anie point of doctrine Neither yet is the regard had of them in vaine For both they which are rightlie minded after they are instructed by the voice of the Scriptures concerning the truth are yet more confirmed by the Church as by a Testimonie of lower degree and they which attribute more authoritie vnto them then they should or abuse their sayings against the trueth are very wel refuted by the testimonie of them whom they have made their iudges Also they say That order decencie in the Church is necessary Obiection 9 by the commandement of God according as it is said Traditions are order 1 Cor. 14. Let al thinges be done comelie and in order For God is not the author of confusion Now the order and discipline of the Church doth a great part consist in traditions Ecclesiasticall wherefore they conclude that by the violating of these mens consciences are wounded and God offended But as God commaundeth some order to be appointed and kept in the Church Answere Of mere particulars there is no concluding so hath he given a double libertie in it vnto his Church first that it be arbitrarie for the Church to appoint as may bee most commodious for it what order shal be in euerie place and at euery time obserued Then that also after any thing is certainelie ordained may be kept or not kept without hurt of conscience both of the whole Church and of euerie one of the godly if there bee no danger of offence For it is necessarie that euer a difference be put betwixt the commaundements of God by the obseruing whereof God is worshipped and offended by the breaking of them and those things which God hath left to men to appoint neither is worshipped or offended as himselfe pronounceth either by the altering or omitting of them so long as there is no cause or danger of offence And the same Apostle Gal. 5. who commandeth all things to be done comelie and in order willeth vs to stand fast in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made vs free and that we should bee condemned of no man in meate or drink or in respect of an holy day Wherefore not they who without contempt of diuine things or wantonnes or danger of offence doe something otherwise in there things then is appointed but they rather offend against the commaundement of God concerning keeping order who either woulde haue no order in the Church or trouble that which is wel appointed Obiection 10 Obscure things do not suffice without interpreration Aunswere The minor is false if they respect the ground These men find fault also with the obscuritie of the holy Scriptures which they proue both by exāples of hard places of Scripture also out of the second epistle of Peter cap. 3. where it is said That there are some thinges hard to be vnderstood in the epistles of Paul And therefore since that thinges darckly spoken without they bee expounded can not suffice to perfect and wholesome doctrine they vrge that the interpretation of the Church also is necessarily to bee receaued with the Scripture But here aboue all thinges they iniurie the holie Ghost ascribing darkenes obscuritie vnto him who of purpose endeuoured to applie himselfe in simplicitie of speech to the capacitie of the common people and the rudest For those thinges which appertaine to the ground of doctrine which is necessarie to be knowen of all as are the articles of our beleefe the tenne commaundementes they are so plainly recited so often repeated so plentifully expounded in the Scriptures that they are open and easie to any but to him who will not learne euen as the 119. Psalm teacheth Where the woorde of the Lord is called a Lanterne to our feete and a light to our pathes Againe The enterance into thy woordes sheweth light and giueth vnderstanding to the simple And 2. 1 Instance The ground of doctrine is vnknown to manie Peter 1. The woorde of the Prophets is called a light shining in a darke place To which yee doe well saith hee that yee take heede as vnto a light that shineth in a darke place vntill the day dawne and the day starre arise in your hartes And Salomon in the first of the Prouerbes affirmeth that hee writeth to giue the simple sharpnesse of witte and to the child knowledge and discretion Again that wisedome crieth without uttereth her voice in the streetes Paul also 1. Cor. 1. saith that Christ sent him to preach the Gospell not with wisedome of woordes least the crosse of Christ should be made of none effect The ground therefore and summe of doctrine is not obscure except it bee vnto the reprobates who contemne the truth or stubburnlie reiect it as the Apostle saith 2. Cor. 4. If our Gospell bee hid it is hid to them that are lost in whom the God of this world hath blinded their mindes that is of the infidels that the light of the glorious Gospell of Christ should not shine vnto thē And the prophet Esai 65. and the Apostle Rom. 10. All the day long haue I stretched foorth my handes to a disobedient and gainsaying people And Psalm 36. The woordes of his mouth are iniquitie and deceite he hath left off to vnderstand and to doe good And Mat. 11. I giue thee thankes o Father Lord of Heauen and Earth because thou hast hidde these thinges from the wise men and men of vnderstanding and hast opened them vnto babes Now if they replie againe 2 Instance Diuine matters are obscure vnto al men that diuine matters are hard and obscure to all men as it is said 1. Cor. 2. The naturall man perceiueth not the thinges of the spirit of God for they are foolishnesse vnto him neither can he know thē because they are spiritually discerned they should first haue called to mind that this ignorance and hardnes riseth not of the obscuritie of the scripture but of the blindnes of mans mind and furthermore that this obscuritie since in verie deed it is not in the Scripture but seemeth to bee the fault of our nature doth not alwaies remaine in those who are regenerate but is remoued from them by the illumination of the holie Spirite according to those sayinges Luc. 8. It is giuen vnto you to know the secrets of the kingdome of God but to others in parables that when they see they should not see when they heare they should not vnderstand And 2. Cor. 3. Vntil this day when Moses is read the vaile is laid ouer their hartes Neuerthelesse when their hart shall be turned vnto the Lord the vaile shal
withdrawen from those errors which happily we drunk in in our childhood 3. Because we are to hold the foundation vpon which we may build and vnto which we may referre those thinges which wee reade 4. Because God receaueth not into fauour those who by their iudgement cannot discerne betweene things honest and dishonest this is to be vnderstood touching those who are able to receaue instruction neither doth saluation befal to those who haue vnderstanding without agnising and profession of the truth or without faith repentance This is life eternall Iohn 17.3 Rom. 10.17 that they know thee to be the only verie God And faith commeth by hearing Now no man beleeueth in him of whom he hath neuer heard There must therefore in the Church be deliuered such a summe of doctrine of which the ruder and yonger sort also may bee capable 5. Because of order and seemlines For as the Children of the Iewes after Circumcision were instructed in the Lawe so it beseemeth vs also after Baptisme to instruct our little ones in the first principles of Religion 6 It is necessary also for the rude and yonger sort that they bee seuered and discerned from the Heathen Obiection But we may haue an implicit or confused faith Therefore no neede of instruction Aunswere No faith is without knowledge therfore there is need of instructiō Rom. 10.14 Iohn 3.36 How shal they beleeue in him of whom they haue not hard He that beleeueth not in the Sonne the wrath of God abideth on him OF THE HOLY SCRIPTVRE WE see all men who at leastwise striue not to cast off all sense of humanitie to imbrace and professe some opinion of God and his wil as also some manner of worshipping him partly drawen from nature her selfe and partly by persuasion receaued which is it that they cal Religiō Now albeit al wil easily grant that to be the true Religion which hath beene deliuered by God himselfe neither will they seem to haue come vnto that degree of impudency as not to yeeld their assent vnto God when he speaketh of himselfe and of his owne wil yet notwithstanding which maie be that Religion deliuered from aboue wil neuer be agreed vpon amongest men vntil our Lord Iesus Christ returning to iudge the quick and dead doe decide the controuersie There are two opinions of Religion The one deemeth that in euery Religion which doth leade a man towardes God saluation is to be found The iust man shal liue by his faith that is euery man as these men interpret it shall liue by his faith what maner so euer it be But this opinion is not true because there is but one true Religion others are false lying at variance with the true according as it is said He that beleeueth not in the Sonne the wrath of God abideth on him The other opinion thinketh and that rightly that that is the true Religion in which God is truely worshipped and that to be but one that in it onely men shal be saued But the Church of God doth certainly know and though all the Diuels and wicked ones stamp at it doth professe that this is the alone true and wholesome doctrine of God and his worship which God himselfe euen from the creation of man deliuered by his owne voice to our first fathers and afterwards would haue to be contained in the scriptures by the Prophets and Apostles Since then whatsoeuer we may affirme of God and the saluation of men doth depend on the written word we wil first consider these foure things as touching the Scripture before wee come to make recitall what our selues affirme 1 What the holie Scripture teacheth or how Christian doctrine is diuided 2 What Religion deliuered in the Scriptures differeth from other religions or how we ought to discerne the true Church and to disseuer her from other sects 3 From whence it appeareth this Religion alone to be true and diuine and al others to be forged 4 For what cause no doctrine besides the holy Scripture is to bee receaued into the Church OF THE FIRST QVESTION What the holy scripture teacheth THE argument and summe of the whole sacred Scripture cannot be more rightly nor more simply nor with more perspicuous breuitie comprised thē the holy Ghost hath comprised it in the ten commandements Creed in which the Articles of our Faith are rehearsed which will be manifest inough if we remēber that the whole Scripture consisteth of twoo partes the Law and the Gospell The Catechisme of Heidelberg maketh mention of three of which yet the first the third appertaine vnto the Law Others make fiue parts The Decalog or tenne commandements the Law the Creed the Sacraments and praier But the Decalog is the summe of the Law and therefore is it to be referred vnto the Law which is the former part The Creede conteineth the summe of the Gospel and therefore must it be referred vnto the Gospell which is the secōd part The Sacraments are as appurtenāces adioined vnto the doctrine of the Gospel therfore also they are referred vnto the second part Praier is a part of the worship of God and therefore to be referred vnto the Law There are also who say this doctrine of the Church is diuided 1. Into the doctrine as touching God 2. into the doctrin concerning his wil 3. into the doctrine concerning his works But these three parts are handled both in the Lawe and in the Gospel An argument from the diuision 1. For al the doctrine concerning God is either of the nature or of the will or of the workes of God Wherefore what the nature of God is is taught in the Law and Gospel His wil is seene either in his commandements or in his threatnings or in his promises Now his works either are his benefites or the iudgementes of his will which are to be beheld in the creation after the fal in the restoring of man Besides these the sinnes also of men and diuels are described And of all these wee are taught either in the Law or in the Gospel or in both Wherefore the Law the Gospel are the chiefe generall heads which comprehend al the doctrine of the Scripture 2 Christ himselfe hath made this diuision saying So it is written and so it behooued Christ to suffer Testimonies and to rise from the dead the third day and that in his name should be preached repentance and remission of sinnes Now all this is conteined in the Law and the Gospell 3 Because the Law and the Gospel doe comprehend the same which are comprehended in the writings of the Prophets and Apostles and in the doctrine of the Church in which is comprehended what God hath done vnto vs and what of vs hee requireth Therefore haue we well diuided the Doctrine of the Church into the Law and the Gospel 4 We doe gather also the self-same argument of the holy scripture by this From the definition of the subiect to wit
the couenant that the bookes of the Prophets and apostles are called the old and new Testament For it is wel known that here by the name of Testament is meant the couenant If then the couenant which is between God and the faithfull bee described in these bookes it must needes bee that in them is declared what God promiseth and what hee doth vnto vs to wit his fauour remission of sinnes his holy spirit righteousnes and life euerlasting and preseruation of his Church in this life by and for his sonne our mediatour as also what he requireth of vs that is to say faith by the which we receaue his benefits and a life framed according to his commandementes by which wee declare our thankfulnes And these are the thinges which are taught in the Law and Gospell 5 Neither is the meaning of the holy Ghost otherwise From the Subiect correlatiue of the couenaÌ„t when in a woorde he sayeth that Christ is taught in the whole Scripture and that hee alone is to be sought there For Paul truely as also the rest of the Apostles did not propose a maimed but a whole doctrine vnto the churches euen as himselfe witnesseth Act. 20. That hee kept nothing backe but shewed all the counsell of God concerning the Ephesians And yet the selfe-same Apostle 1 Cor. 2. saith That hee knew nothing but Iesus Christ and him crucifyed And Cap. 3. That the foundation of the doctrine of the Church is Christ alone And that this foundation is common to the Prophets together with the Apostles Wherefore the Doctrine concerning Christ is the summe and scope of the Scripture and the foundation laid by the Prophets and Apostles on which whosoeuer rely not they are not stones of the Temple of God that is members of Christes Church OF THE SECOND QVESTION SINCE that we do vnderstand what is the Doctrine of the Church Wherefore true religion is to be discerned from others coÌ„teined in the books of the Prophets and Apostles to wit the sound and vncorrupt voice of the Law of God and the Gospell concerning Christ easie it is necessarie for vs to discerne it from al other religions 1 Because of the commandement of God 1 Cause The commandement of God 1. Iohn 5.39 1. Cor. 10. 1 Cor 6.17 Apoc 18.4 Eâ—aâ— 52.11 â— Iohn 10. 2. â—â—me The glory of God 2. Cor. 6.15 which ought to suffice vs whether we know the cause or no. Flie Idols Depart from her my people Be not yoked with Infidels Be yee holy Touch no vncleane thing yee that beare the vessels of the Lord. Hee that bringeth not this doctrine bid him not God speede 2 For the glorie of God who as hee will not haue him-self coupled with idols and diuels So also hee will haue his truth seuered from lies and his houshold to bee separated from the enemies of the Church that is from the children of Satan It were contumelious so to thinke of God as that he would haue such Children as persecute him There is no agreement betweene Christ and Belial â— Our saluation 3 For our owne saluation and that in two respects 1. That the Church may be known that is may be beheld vnto the which the faithful may ioyne them-selues Whereas if thou canst not discern the true Church from the false thou shalt â—ot know vnto which to ioyne thy selfe and what maner of woorship thou oughtest to follow For God will that all which are to he saued be gathered vnto the Church according as it is said Out of the Church there is no saluation 2. In regard of our comfort that euery one may know of what kingdome they are and whether they be of those vnto whom God promiseth saluation This canst thou not know except thou canst discerne the true Church from false churches 4 The doctrine of other sectes 4. The confirmation and the difference is necessarie to be knowen that our faith and comfort may bee the surer when as we see that to be in our Church which â—is wanting in others likewise when as wee perceiue what is the cause why they who make profession of our doctrine he saued but all other sectes together with their sectaries be damned 5 Least wee being deceaued should embrace the doctrine of some other sect for true Religion 5. The eschuing of danger Act. 4 Iohn 10. For there is no saluation in any other neither among men is there giuen any other name vnâ—der heauen whereby wee must bee saued Therefore is it said He that is the sheepheard of the sheepe him doe the sheep follow because they know his voice and they wil not follow a stranger but they flee from him for they know not the voice of strangers It is necessarie therefore that the sheep know how to discerne the voice of the sheepherd from the voice of wolues according vnto the rule 1. Iohn 4 Beleeue not euerie spirit For Sathan is wont to transforme himselfe into an Angel of light and the most part of Heretikes doe imitate the woords of true teachers whereas their opinions are most different And wee oftentimes see that the ruder sort when as they perceaue some similitude in some either rites or opinions are easily lead to beleeue that the aduersaries of the Church do professe either the same religion with vs or not so bad as wee make it or since that they haue some thing common with vs that it is not much material whether they let passe some thinges or ad some others Wherefore least some shewe of likenes may beguile any man it is profitable that the manifest and vniuersal differences of the true and false religions may be laid open to the sight 6 Least we be partakers of the punishments which are to 6. Punishment come on such men Apoc. 18.4 Goe out of her that ye be not partakers in her sinnes and that ye receaue not of her plagues 7 That the wicked may bee left vnexcuseable 7 That the wicked may bee left vnexcuseable For albeit an acknowledging of God is neither sufficient to saluation nor true without the doctrine of the Church yet so much of God is manifested vnto al men as is sufficient to take away al excuse from them for their impiety For neither vnto these very things which may truely bee gathered concerning God by the light of nature and frame of the world do they giue their assent neither go they forward to seeke a more full knowledge of God vnto the which those thinges are as it were spurs to pricke them forward but either they doe quite and clean reiect them or they draw them vnto an other meaning and stitch their own inuentions vnto them besides and against the testimonie of the whole nature of things and their owne consciences So that they are ignorant indeed of God but that of stubbornes and of purpose And this is the very cause why at length they are oppressed with desperation because they are
conuicted by the force of the trueth to haue stubbornely sought after error and blindnes The difference of this true doctrine from others 1 This doctrine was deliuered from God other Sectes are sprung from men and haue beene inuented by Diuels 2 True Religion hath firme testimonies diuine such as quiet consciences The Law by nature known yet darckened and conuince al other Sects of error 3 In the doctrine of the Prophets and Apostles is deliuered the whole Lawe of God rightly vnderstood and vncorrupt and both the Tables of the Law are perfectly kept As for other Sects they cast away the principal parts of Gods Law that is to say the doctrine concerning the true knowledge and worshippe of God which is contained in the former Table of the Decalog as also they do reiect the inward and spirituall obedience of the second Table That little good and true which they haue is a part of the commandement concerning the discipline conteined in the second Table or concerning the outwarde and ciuile duties towardes men The Gospel by nature not knowen 4 The whole Gospel of Christ that rightly vnderstood is in the true church alone taught and in this true doctrine alone is it contained Other sects either are clean ignorant of it as the Ethnickes Philosophers Iewes Turkes who also are as very enemies of the Church or they doe patch some litle part of it out of the doctrine of the Apostles vnto their owne errors of which part yet they neither know nor perceiue the vse as the Arrians Papists Anabaptists and al other Heretikes of whom some concerning the person others concerning the office of our mediator maintaine errors Al these though they arrogate vnto themselues the title of the Church and professe the name of Christ yet since that they depart from that onely foundation of the Church which is Christ that is since they do not acknowledge Christ either to be true God or true man neither do seek for righteousnes and saluation wholy in him they are not the members of the true Church not so much as in outward profession as it is said 1. Iohn 4. Euery spirit which confesseth not that Iesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God and this is the spirit of Antichrist The difference of this true Doctrine from Philosophie It is true that wee studie Philosophie and not the Doctrine of other sectes but yet there is a very great differēce between these twoo Doctrines 1. Philosophie is whollie naturall but the principall part of this doctrine that is the Gospel is reuealed from aboue euen from God 2. Only this doctrine declareth the Gospel Philosophie is quite ignorant of it 3. The Doctrine of the Church sheweth the originals of our miseries Philosophie doth not so 4 This doctrine whereas it doth assure vs of eternal life it doth minister comfort vnto our consciences and sheweth vs the way how to wade out of dangers Philosophie teacheth vs not so much as this 5. Of this we are taught the whole Law Philosophie letteth passe the chiefest partes Indeede Philosophie conteineth two partes profitable for mans life as Logick Mathematikes others which God would not deliuer in this doctrine But as concerning this doctrine Philosophie hath but a little part of the Law that obscurely and that taken out but of a few preceptes of the Law It hath certain common comforts those that are not common it hath not as being proper vnto the Church Commō comfortes are these 1 The prouidence of God or the necessitie of obaying him 2. A good conscience 3. The woorthines of vertue 4. The final causes or the endes which vertue proposeth 5. The examples of others 6. Hope of reward 7. A comparing of euentes because a lesse euil is compared vnto a greater Those comforts which are not common but proper vnto the Church are 1. Remission of sinnes 2. The presence of God in miseries themselues 3. Our finall deliuerie Certaine notes or markes by which the Church is distinguished from others The marks which distinguish the Church or the professors of true doctrine from others are these 1. Puritie of doctrine 2. The right vse of the Sacramentes 3. Obedience towards God and his doctrine both in life and maners Many times truly great vices do grow in the Church but they are not maintained as falleth out in other Sectes For the true Church is the first her selfe that doth comprehend and condemne them before any other As long as this remaineth so long remaineth the Church OF THE THIRD QVESTION Whence it may appeare that this Religion alone was deliuered of God which is conteined in the Scripture GOD in the very creation of the woorld put this bridle in the mouth of all reasonable creatures that no man without extreme and manifest impudencie such as was the Diuels in paradise durst saie that anie thing if it were once apparantly knowen to haue beene spoken or commaunded by God might be called into question or that any man might refuse to obey it Here-hence are those things so often inculcated in the Prophets Hearken O heauens hearken O earth For the Lord hath spoken Thus saith the Lord. The woorde of the Lord came to Esaias Ieremias c. Since therefore it appeareth that the bookes of the olde and new Testament are the wordes of God there is no place left of doubting whether that bee the true Religion and doctrine which is conteined in them But whether these bookes were written by diuine instinct and by what proofes and Testimonies we are certaine of so great a matter this is a question not to be let passe of vs. Wherefore this question is necassary For except this aboue all other things remain stedfast and immoueable that whatsoeuer we read in the bookes of the Prophets and Apostles doth as truely declare the wil of God vnto vs as if wee did heare God openly speaking to vs from heauen it cannot chuse but that the very foundation and whole certainty of Christian Religion must bee weakned Wherefore it is a consideration worthy those who are desirous of the Glory of God and do seeke for sure comfort to enquire whence it may appeare vnto vs that the holy Scripture is the word of God To this question now long since answere hath bin made by the Papists that forsooth it is not otherwise certain The first part The autority of the Scripture doth not depēd of the Church then because the Church doth confirme it by her Testimonie But we as we neither reiect nor contemne the Testimony of the true Church so we doubt not but their opinion is pestilent and detestable who often saie that the holie Scriptures haue not their authoritie else-where then from the woorde of the Church For first wicked is it and blasphemous to say 1. Reason The reproch of God that the autority of Gods woord dependeth of the testimonie of man And if it be so that the chiefest cause why
wee beleeue that the scriptures were deliuered from heauen be the witnes of the church who seeth not that heerby the autoritie of mans voice is made greater then of the voice of God For he that yeeldeth his testimonie vnto an other so that he is the onely or the chiefe cause why credence is giuen vnto the other out of all doubt greater credite is giuen vnto him then vnto the other who receiueth his testimonie Wherefore it is a speech most vnwoorthy the maiestie of God that the voice of God speaking in his holie booke is not acknowledged except it bee confirmed by the witnesse of men Secondarily 2. Reason Our comfort Faith is groūded on approoued witnes therfore not on mans wheras the doctrine of the Prophets Apostles doth preach of so great matters as the certaine knowledge of thē is so greatly desired of all who are well disposed and the conflictes of doubtfulnes in all mens mindes are so great what full assurance of our faith can there bee what sure consolation against the assaultes of temptations if that that voice on which our confidence relieth bee no otherwise knowen vnto vs to bee indeed the voice of God but because men say so in whom wee see so much ignorance error and vanitie to bee that no man scarcely especially in matters of some weight doth attribute much vnto their woorde except other reasons concurre with it 3 Reason The confutation of our enemies Thirdly the truth of God and christian religion is plainly exposed vnto the mockes and scoffes of the wicked if we going about to stop their mouthes do therefore onely desire that we should be credited that our Religion is from God because our selues say so For if they bee by no other confutation repressed they will with no lesse shew of truth deny it than wee affirme it 4 Reason Witnesses Last of all the scripture it selfe in many places is against this opinion doth chalenge a far higher authoritie vnto it selfe thē which hangeth vpon mens woords For so sayth Christ himselfe Iohn 5. I receiue not the record of man signifieng thereby that his doctrine stood not no not on Iohn Baptists testimonie although yet he did alleadge it but as of lesse account that he might omit nothing by which men might be moued to beleeue Therefore he addeth But I saie these thinges that you may beleeue I haue a greater witnes then the witnes of Iohn And if Christ nowe beeing humbled said these thinges of himselfe then surely shall they be no lesse true of him being in glory and sitting in his throne And 1. Corinth 2. Paul saith My word and my preaching stood not in the entising speech of mans wisedome but in plaine euidence of the spirit and of power that your faith should not be in the wisedome of men but in the power of God If so bee then our faith must not rest no not vpon reasons wisely framed by men much lesse shal it depend on the bare word of men Eph. 2. the Church herselfe is said to bee builded vpon the foundation of the Prophets and Apostles If then the confidence and confession of the Church staieth on the doctrine of the Prophets and Apostles as on the foundation the certainty of the Scripture cannot hang on the Churches witnes For so should not the Church be vpheld by the testimonie of the Prophets and Apostles but by her owne And 1. Iohn 5. it is said If we receiue the witnes of men the witnes of God is greater If it be greater then the authoritie of it hangeth not on the record of man But wee are to giue more credence vnto God witnessing the Prophets and Apostles writings to bee indeede his voice then vnto the Church affirming the same Now that it is said of the contrary That they are true the Church alone doth witnesse Answere The minor is false That by the Churches Obiection 1 record alone it doth appeare vnto vs that the sacred bookes which wee haue were written by the Prophets and Apostles whose names they beare in their forhead and that euen vnto vs they are come vncorrupt this we grant not For God farre more certainly testifyeth both in the Scripture and in the hartes of his Saints that no fained or forged thing is in these books thē it can be by the Church and all the creatures of the world confirmed They therefore who stand vpon the Churches testimonie alone in this point shew that themselues haue not as yet felt or vnderstood the chiefest testimonies Furthermore they say that the bookes authentike The discerning of bookes Answere The Minor is false 1 The working of the holy Ghost or as they Obiection 2 terme them Canonical of both Testamentes are discerned from the Apocryphall by the Churches iudgement and therefore that the autority of holy canon doth depend on the churches wisedome But that this difference of the bookes is not determined by the churches iudgement but being imprinted into the books themselues by the Spirite of God is onely acknowledged and approoued by the Church this is easily to be vnderstood if the causes of this difference be considered For either in these which are called Apocryphall the force and maiesty of the heauenly spirit doth lesse euidently appeare in the weight and vehemency of woordes and matter then in others of which it is clear that they are the heauenly oracles therefore set downe in writing by diuine instinct that they might be the rule of our faith or it cannot be determined neither out of these books themselues 2 The certainty of authours nor out of others which are canonicall that they were written either by the Prophets or Apostles because either they were not penned by those whom God by certaine testimonies hath warranted vnto vs to be endued with a prophetical spirit or themselues do not shew any certaine authors of them or by their forme of speech or other reasons it may be gathered that they were not left of them whose names they beare Now as touching either this euidence of the spirit or certainty of the authors we builde not our iudgement on the testimonie of the Church but of the bookes themselues And therefore not for the Churches iudgement onely do we iudge some bookes to be canonicall and the foundation and rule of our faith and do therefore accept of the doctrine of other some because they agree with the canonicall but rather for the verie causes of this difference which wee finde in the bookes them-selues Obiection 3 The Church is more ancient than the Scripture 1. Answere The minor is false As for that which some men say that the Church is ancienter then the Scriptures and therefore of greater autoritie it is too trifling For the woord of God is the euerlasting wisedome in God him-selfe Neither was the knowledge of it then first manifested vnto the Church when it was committed to writing but the manifesting of it began together with the
Samaritan was moued rather by humane theÌ„ diuine Testimonies to imbrace it it caÌ„not therof be gathered that the certainty of the holy scripture depeÌ„deth on no other Testimonies or that by no other wee are assured of it because that that some are moued especially by humane voices to reuereÌ„ce it commeth not therof to passe for that the Scripture is not maintained by any other authority but it chaunceth through the fault and weaknes of them who sticking vpon humane records do not feel as yet or vnderstaÌ„d diuine An image and example of these degrees of faith is in the storie of the Samaritan woman Iohn 4. For many of the Samaritans are said to haue beleeued in Christ because of the speech of the woman who testified that he had told her whatsoeuer shee had done But after that they had had Christ with theÌ„ for two daies many more beleeued because of his owne speech and they said vnto the woman Now we beleeue not because of thy saying for we haue heard him our selues 2 The Emulation of the Iewes and know that this is indeed the Christ the Sauiour of the world Al men come not by the same occasions nor haue not the same beginninges vnto faith Rom. 11. Paul saith that saluation was come vnto the Gentiles and that he did magnifie his ministerie that the Iewes might bee prouoked to follow the Gentiles In the first of Peter cap. 3. 3 The honestie of wiues wiues are willed to be subiect vnto their husbandes that eueÌ„ they which obey not the woord may without the woord be wonne by the conuersation of the wiues while they behold their pure coÌ„uersation which is with feare Euen then as the Samaritans were moued first by the speech of the woman to beleeue in Christ but after they had seen Christ and heard him they were so confirmed that they said they would now beleeue though the woman hold her peace so also may it bee that they which are not as yet conuerted or are but weaklings may be moued especiallie by the Churches testimonie as which runneth more into their eies to giue credence vnto the Scripture who yet neuerthelesse after they are once illuminated with a more plentifull light of faith do find by experience that they are confirmed by a far superior and more certain testimonie that the Scripture is the woord of God and do know by the force and euidence of it that they must keepe their faith were all the Angels and men perswaders to the contrary as it is said by the Apostle Though we or an Angel from heauen preach vnto you otherwise theÌ„ that which we haue preached vnto you Gal. 1. The conclusion of the first part let him bee accursed By these thinges therefore it may bee vnderstood that the voice and consent of the catholicke Church may and ought amongest other testimonies to serue for our confirmation and yet the autoritie of the holy Scripture not to hang vpon it but that out of the Scripture it selfe rather wee must learn by what argumentes wee may bee brought to know that it was deliuered from God Because that God himselfe doth witnes it and also such is the force and quality of that heauenly doctrine that although all men should gainsay it yet it would not be any otherwise more manifestly certainly knowen to bee the voice of God then by it selfe The 2. part Arguments shewing the certaâ—ntie of the scripture But least any man may thinke that by any argumentes which eueÌ„ reason by a naturall light iudgeth to bee sound without the singular grace of the spirite this may bee wrought in the mindes of the wicked as either to obey the truth or to leaue off to reproch it first hee must remember that the arguments or testimonies are of two sortes which shew the certainty of Christian religion and maintaine the autority of the Scripture For there is but one onely testimonie which is appropriated vnto them alone who are regenerated by the Spirit of Christ and vnto them alone is it knowen the force of which testimonie is so great that it doth not onely abundantlie testify and seale in our mindes the truth of the doctrine of the Prophets and Apostles but it also forcibly inclineth and moueth our hartes to the embracing and following of it Other testimonies whatsoeuer may bee brought they are vnderstood indeed both of the godly and the wicked and do compell their consciences to confes that this religion rather than others is pleasing vnto God that it came from him but vnlesse that one other come also which is knoweÌ„ of the godly alone these testimonies wil neuer bring to pas that meÌ„ shal embrace the truth although it be knowen vnto them The arguments therfore which shew the truth certainty of the scripture are these 1 The puritie of doctrine 1 Puritie and perfectnes of doctrine For wee haue the pure perfect doctrine as of the Gospel so also of the Law Now other sectes haue not both the tables of the Law perfect the first many haue in part the second but in some part also and that stained with many lies 2 The Gospel it self 2 The Gospel shewing our deliuerance Because it yeeldeth sure consolatioÌ„ to mens consciences shewing the onely way of escaping sin death The nature of man was not created to destruction Wherfore that doctrine which sheweth deliuerie without violating the iustice of God is vndoubtedly true certain 3 The antiquity of this doctrine 3 Antiquity because it is found to be most auncient partly by conference For if wee confer this with other doctrines wee shall find it to be pure and most true as deliuered from God from which men afterwardes fell away Other sectes haue sprung vp at other times and again haue perished this hath continued though it hath bin mightily oppugned by her enimies 4 Miracles proper vnto the Church 4 Miracles which tend to the same end that they may declare confirme this doctrine 1 Obiection Others also haue miracles Aunswere It is not true For albeit mention is made also of some miracles of the heathen it is said of Antichrist and false prophets that they shall woorke signes and great woonders so that the verie elect themselues if it were possible should be seduced yet these neither in number nor in greatnes are equall vnto the miracles of the Church and by the ende for which they are done it may easily be discerned that they are not wrought by any diuine power Wherefore there is a double difference especially by which true miracles are seuered from false For first those miracles which are vaunted of by the enemies of the church are such They differ 1 In the substance as without changing the course and order of nature may bee done by the sleightes iuglings of men or diuels seeme therefore to others to be miracles because they perceiue not the causes of them 2
In the end and the meanes whereby they are wrought Furthermore they haue this as their chiefe end that they may confirme idols superstitions manifest errors mischiefs But the miracles with which god hath set foorth his church are works either besides or contrarie vnto the course of nature and second causes and therefore not wrought but by the power of God The which that it might be the more manifest god hath wrought many miracles for the confirming of his truth whose verie shew the diuel is neuer able to imitate or resemble as are the raising of the dead to stay or call backe the course of the Sunne to make fruitles and barrain women fruitful But especially the miracles of God are distinguished by their endes from the diuelish and fained For they confirme nothing but which is agreeing with those thinges which afore time were reuealed by God and that in respect of the glorie of the true God of godlines and holines and the saluation of men And therefore is it said of the miracles of Antichrist 2. Thessal 2. That his comming shal bee by the working of Sathan with al power and signes and lying wonders and in al deceiueablenes of vnrighteousnes among them that perish c. Now if any be so bold as to cal in question 2 Obiection They are doubtful Answere The Antecedent is false whether or no the miracles which are reported in the Scriptures were done so indeed he is out of al question of ouer great impudency For he may after the same maner giue the lie to al both sacred and profane histories But let vs first vnderstand that as other parts of the holy story so especially the miracles are recited as things not wrought in a corner but done in the publik face of the Church and mankind In vaine should the Prophets and Apostles haue had endeuored to get credit vnto their doctrine by miracles which men had neuer seen Furthermore the doctrine which they brought was strange vnto the iudegement of reason and contrarie to the affections of men and therefore their miracles except they had bin most manifest woulde neuer haue found credite Also it clearly appeareth both in the miracles themselues and in the doctrine which is confirmed by them that they who writte them sought not their owne glory or other commodities of this life but only the glory of God mens saluation To these arguments agreeth not only the Testimonie of the Church but the confession also of the verie enemies of Christ who surely if by any meanes they could woulde haue denied and suppressed euen those thinges that were true and knowen much lesse would they haue confirmed by their Testimony ought that had beene forged or obscure 5 Oracles Obiection The Heathens also haue Prophecies Answere 5 The prophecies which were fulfilled in their due time doe yeelde their testimony vnto this doctrine in like manner the foretellings of thinges to come and the correspondence of euentes which could not bee foretold but by God reuealing them And albeit the heathens also and others boast of their prophecies and oracles yet great and manifold is the difference betweene them the sacred Prophecies which sheweth euidentlie enough that these were vttered by diuine instinct but those to haue beene Leigerdemains of the Diuell going about by a fained imitation to darcken the trueth and glorie of God For they squared from the truth and iustice of God before time reuealed they countenanced wickednesse and idolatry they were poured out by Prophets who were stirred with a furious and diuelish pang they were darke or doubtful and wheras they were vncertaine oftentimes by a false hope they allured those who listened vnto them into hurt and destruction at leastwise they were vttered of such things whose euents the Diuel through his subtiltie maie after a sort coniecture by tokens going before or else because he did know that by the permission and commaundement of God hee should bring them to passe Wherefore neither do they confirme and make good the Religions of those men amongst whom they florished neither doe they diminish the authoritie of the holy Scripture in whose oracles we maie see al things contrary vnto that which hath bin now spoken of these 6 The confession of the enemies them-selues 6 The confession of the enemies because whatsoeuer is true good in other Sects that also Christian Religion hath and that more clearly and better neither can those natural principles be refelled And if other sectes haue anie thing which agreeth not with our doctrine that may easily be refuted but if they haue any thing which cannot be refuted they haue stollen that from vs which is the Diuels woont Yea our verie enemies themselues are constrained to confesse that our doctrine is true yea the Diuel himselfe too Thou art the Sonne of God Luke 4.41 For of that force and nature is the woord of God that it doth so much the more grieuously strike and wound the consciences euen of those who are not conuerted how much the more stubburnelie they kicke against the pricke Euen as it is said Heb. 4. The word of God is liuely and mightie in operation and sharper then any two edged sword and entereth through euen vnto the diuiding asunder of the soule and the spirit and of the iointes and the marrow and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the hart And Luke 21. I wil giue you a mouth and wisedom wher-against al your aduersaries shal not be able to speak or resist 7 The hatred and oppugning of the diuel the wicked Iohn 8.44 7 The hatred and oppugning of this doctrine by the diuel and the wicked which is a testimonie that it is true For the truth breedeth hatred The diuel was a lier from the beginning He endeuoureth therefore to oppresse the Law and the Gospell that faith and honestie may bee destroied He doth therefore together with his complices persecute the truth because it doth more sharply accuse him than other sectes Iohn 7.7 The world hateth me saith Christ because I testify of it that the woorkes thereof are ill 8 The marueilous preseruation 8 The maruailous preseruation of this doctrine against the furies of Satan and enemies of the Church None is so much assailed none also continueth so sure Others are not assailed and yet they perish most speedily 9 The punishments of the enemies 9 The punishmentes of the enemies as of Arius Iulian and others Albeit in the world for the most part the wicked florish and the Church is oppressed yet that it falleth not Objection 1 so out by chaunce The enemies of the church doe florish Aunswere For a short time neither because God is pleased with them the euents witnes and the Scripture very often doth iterate it For the Church is alwaies preserued euen amidst her persecutions when as the short felicity of Tyrants wicked imps hath a most dolefull and aeternall destruction
you into all truth for hee shall not speake of himselfe but whatsoeuer hee shal heare shal hee speake and hee wil shew you the things to come Hee shall glorify mee for hee shall receiue of mine and shall shew it vnto you To this witnes do the Apostles appeal as beeing the chiefe and alone sufficient The Apostle Paul 2. Cor. 1. And it is God which stablisheth vs with you in Christ who hath also sealed vs and hath giuen the earnest of the spirit in our hartes And 1. Thes 1. For our Gospel was not vnto you in word onely but also in power and in the holy Ghost and in much assurance And 1. Iohn 2. But yee haue an ointment from him that is holie and yee haue knowen al thinges Wherefore wee must euer remember this that by the alone witnes of the holy spirite wee are mooued forcibly in our harts to beleeue the Scripture and to submit our selues vnto it as vnto the voice of God and that by al the other before alleadged Testimonies al men indeed are conuicted and the godlie also profitably confirmed but no man is turned vnto God thereby without the spirit witnessing within him For whenas he once breedeth this most assured persuasion in our mindes that the doctrine which is conteined in the holy Bible is of a truth the wil of God worketh that comfort and change of our minds and harts which is promised and taught in this booke by our experience and feeling it is so confirmed that while this remaineth within vs though al Angels men should say contrarie yet we would beleeue this to be the voice of God Obiection The scripture beareth witnes of the spirit therefore the spirit not of it Answere but if that remaine not or be not in vs though al should say it yet we would not beleeue it Neither doth not the spirit therefore establish the autoritie of the Scripture because we are to examine what the spirit speaketh within vs by the rule of the Scripture for before that this is done of vs the spirite himselfe declareth vnto vs that the Scripture is the word of God and inspired by him that he wil teach vs nothing in our hartes which is not agreeable vnto that Testimonie before set downe of him in the Scripture And if this be not first most certainlie persuaded vs of the spirit himselfe we will neuer recal our opinions of God his worship to the Scripture as the onelie rule to trie them by Now then after it is declared vnto vs by diuine inspiration that the Scripture is a sufficient witnes of that diuine Reuelation in our harts then at length do we find our selues to be confirmed by the mutual Testimonie of the same spirite in the Scripture and in our harts and we beleeue the Scripture affirming of it selfe that it was deliuered by diuine inspiration to the holie men of God as it said 2 Tim. 3. and 2. Pet. 1. OF THE FOVRTH QVESTION For what cause no doctrine beside the holy Scripture is to be receaued in the Church The scripture is of God therefore the rule of faith WHEREAS it appeareth vnto vs that it is the woorde of God which the Prophets and Apostles haue left in writing there is no man which doth not see that the Scripture must bee the rule and squire by which all thinges which are taught and done in the church must be tried Now all thinges of which there vseth to arise questions in the Christian Church doe appertaine either vnto doctrine or vnto discipline and ceremonies That the word of God ought to be the rule vnto both sorts it is out of doubt But in this place wee speake of the doctrine of the church which consisteth in the sentences and decrees which wee are bound by the commandement of God to beleeue or obey and therefore they can not bee chaunged by the autoritie of any creature they are become obnoxious vnto the wrath of God whosoeuer submit not themselues in faith and obedience vnto them To these decrees and preceptes the Papists adde many sentences which not onely are no where deliuered in the Scripture but are repugnant vnto it and they contend that the Church or the Bishops haue autoritie of decreeing yea contrarie and besides the Scripture what the Church must beleeue or doe and that mens consciences are bound by those decrees no lesse than by the woordes of the holy Scripture to beleeue or obey Contrariwise wee beleeue and confesse that no doctrine is to bee proposed vnto the Church not onely if it bee repugnant vnto the holie Scripture but if it bee not conteined in it And whatsoeuer either is not by the expresse testimony of the holie Scripture deliuered The difference of the Scripture of other mens opiniōs or doth not consequently follow out of the woordes of the Scripture rightly vnderstood that wee hold may bee without any hurt or conscience beleeued or not beleeued chaunged abrogated and omitted 1 The Scripture only is of it selfe to be beleeued and the rule of faith For wee must euer hold a necessarie difference betweene the bookes of the Prophets and Apostles and the writinges and doctrine of others in the Church first that the Scripture onely neither hath nor can haue anie error in anie matter other teachers both maie erre and oftentimes also doe er when they depart from the written woord of God Againe that the Scriptures are beleeued on their own word because we know that God speaketh with vs in them others haue credit not because themselues say so but because the scripture witnesseth so neither a whit more than they can proue by the Scripture Wherefore we doe not reiect others doctrine and labors in the Church but onely setting them in their owne place we submit them vnto the rule of Gods word This doctrine first is deliuered of God himselfe and that not in one place onely of the Scripture as Deut. 4. You shal not ad vnto the word which I speak vnto you neither shal you take away frō it And in the last Chapter of the Apocalyps I protest vnto euerie man that heareth the words of the Prophesie of this book if any man shal ad vnto these things God shal adde vnto him the plagues that are written in this book And if anie man shal diminish of the words c. Neither onely by these wordes is forbidden that no false things openly repugnant to the written woord be added to the doctrine of the church but also that no vncertaine things or things not appertaining vnto it be mingled therewith For it is not in the power of any creature to pronounce what we are to thinke of God and his wil but this is onely to bee learned out of that which is disclosed in his woord And therefore the men of Beraea are commended Act. 17. Who searched the Scriptures daily whether those thinges were so 2 Faith is grounded only of the word Secondly
faith which is spoken of in the Church is a part of diuine worship that is the sure assent by which wee embrace euery word of God deliuered vnto vs because it is impossible for vs to be deceiued by it if we vnderstand it aright Further also that it may breed in vs a true woorshipping of God and comfort of our soules it must stand sure and immoueable against temptations But there is no certain doctrine cōcerning God religion besides that which is knowen to be reuealed in his woord We may not therefore giue the honor which is due vnto God vnto men neither may wee go from certain thinges vnto vncertaine but cleaue onely to the woord of God in the doctrine concerning religion and therefore humane decrees must not bee accounted amongst those preceptes which wee are to embrace by faith Faith commeth by hearing hearing by the word of God c. 3 Things necessary to be beleeued or done are part of diuine worship But things not prescribed are not part of diuine worship Therefore they are not necessarie Thirdly for so much as the woorship of God is a woorke commaunded of God perfourmed by faith to this ende principallie that God may bee honored it is manifest that to beleeue and doe those thinges which can not bee denied or omitted without offending of God is the woorship of God and contrariwise that God can not bee woorshipped but by the prescript of his will both the consciences of al men and God himselfe in his holy woord doth testify as Esai 29. and Matt. 15. In vain do they woorship mee who teach the doctrines and commaundementes of men It is as wicked therfore to number those things which are not expressed in the woord of God amongest those which are necessarie to bee beleeued and done in matters of religion as it is vnlawful for any creature to thrust vpon God that woorship which himselfe neuer required Fourthlie 4 The Scripture is sufficient there cannot be anie thing added of men vnto his doctrine without great iniurie and contumelie done vnto the holy Scripture For if other thinges besides these which are written are necessarie to the perfection of true Religion then doth not the Scripture shew the perfect maner of worshipping God of attaining to Saluation which fighteth with the plaine words of Scripture which affirme that God hath opened vnto vs in his word as much as hee would haue vs know in this life concerning his wil towards vs as Christ saith Iohn 15. Al thinges which I haue hard of my father I haue made knowen vnto you And Paul Act. 20. I haue kept nothing back but haue shewed you al the counsaile of God And 2. Tim. 3. Knowing that thou hast knowē the holie Scriptures from a Childe which are able to make thee wise vnto Saluation through the faith which is in Christ Iesus For the whole Scripture is giuen by inspiration of God and is profitable to teach to improue to correct to instruct in righteousnes Fiftly 5 Other Doctors may er the Prophets and Apostles cannot therfore they are tied to these we are to consider the degrees of them who teach in the Church For therefore is the authoritie of the Prophets and Apostles far higher then of other Ministers of the Church because God called thē immediatly to declare his will vnto other men and adorned them with Testimonies of miracles and other thinges by which hee witnessed that he did so lighten and guide their minds with his spirit that he suffered them to erre in no one point of doctrine other ministers are called by men and may erre and doe erre when they depart from the doctrine of the Prophets and Apostles Wherefore the Apostle Paul Ephe. 2. saieth That the Church is builded vpon the foundation of the Prophets and Apostles And 1. Cor. 3. That hee had laied the foundation and other then that could no man lay others build vpon it gold siluer precious stones wood hay stubble Now it is manifest that they who may err ought to be tied vnto their doctrine who are warranted by the testimonies of God that they can not erre Wherefore all other teachers in the Church must not bring any new point of doctrine but onely propound and expound those thinges vnto the Church which are deliuered by the Prophets and Apostles For these causes therefore doth the whole auncient Church with great consent submit it selfe vnto the rule of the sacred Scriptures whose autoritie yet ought of right to bee somewhat greater than these men who both in woords and deedes fight against this opinion Basil in his Sermon of the confession of saith saieth that it is a falling from the faith and a fault of pride either not to admit those thinges which are writtē in the holie Scriptures or to add any thing to them And August in his third Epistle For neither ought wee to account of euery ones discourses though they bee catholick and woorthy men as of the canonical scriptures that it may not bee lawfull for vs without impairing the reuerence which wee owe to those men to dislike and refuse any thing in their writinges if peraduenture we shal find that they haue thought otherwise thē the Scripture hath as it is by Gods assistāce vnderstood either of others or of our selues And Epist 112. If ought be confirmed by the plain autoritie of the diuine Scriptures of those which are called in the Church canonical wee must without any doubting beleeue it as for other testimonies by which any thing is mooued to bee beleeued thou maist chuse whether thou wilt beleeue thē or no. But against these testimonies of the Scriptures the auncient church the aduersaries of the truth contend that besides the doctrine which is comprised in the holy Bible other decrees also made by the autoritie of the Church are no lesse vnchangeable and necessarie to saluation then the oracles Propheticall and Apostolick Obiections of the Papistes And that they may not without some shew and pretence take vpon them this autority of decreeing what Obiection 1 they list besides and contrary vnto the Scripture they alleage places of Scripture The scripture doth not remaine perfect in which some writinges of the Prophets and Apostles are mentioned which are not come to our handes as Num. 21. is named the Book of the warres of the Lord. Ios 10. The Booke of the iust And often in the books of Kings The Booke of the Chronicles of the Kings of Iuda In the Epistle catholicke of Iude are alleaged the prophecie of Enoch and the storie of the bodie of Moses And lastly the Apostle Paul 1. Cor. 5. and Eph. 3. maketh mention of his Epistles which now the Church hath not Hence therefore these men will conclude that the doctrine of the sacred Scripture is maimed and that therefore the defect hereof must be Supplied by the Church But first of all concerning the holie Scripture we are to know that so
much thereof hath beene preserued of God for vs as was necessarie and profitable for the doctrine and comfort of the Church euen as Iohn witnesseth that Iesus did many thinges before his disciples 1 As much of the history as is sufficient doth remain Iohn 21. which are not written in the storie of the Gospel And that these thinges which are extant were written that wee might beleeue that Iesus is the Christ the Sonne of God and that beleeuing wee might haue life euerlasting in his name Furthermore 2 The holy Scripture is perfect in sense though not in words concerning doctrine and precepts albeit some thinges written by the Apostles be not extant whatsoeuer yet of necessarie doctrine was in them it is certaine that it is contained in those which we haue both because that Paul in both places doth repeate that which hee hath written in those Epistles and also because it hath bin before shewed that God hath deliuered the whole doctrine of our saluation in the Scripture which is extant and wil preserue it vnto the ende of the world They bring other places also by which they indeuour to Obiection 2 gather Some things were spoken by word of mouth that Christ his Apostles did deliuer some things vnto the Churches by mouth which are not comprised in the writings of the Apostles As Mat. 28. where Christ sendeth his Apostles to preach Iohn 16. I haue yet many things to say vnto you but you cannot beare them now Act. 16. Paul and Timothy deliuered vnto the Churches the decrees to keepe ordained by the Apostles and elders which were at Ierusalem 1. Cor. 11. I wil order other things when I come 2. Thes 2. Keepe the instructions which you haue beene taught either by word or by our Epistle And cap. 3. Withdrawe your selues from euerie brother which walketh not after the instruction which he receaued of vs. And in the 2. and 3. Epistles of Iohn I haue many things to write vnto you but I would not by paper and incke but I trust to come vnto you and speake mouth to mouth 1 Tim. 6. Tit. 1. and 2. And Paul chargeth Timothie to keep that which was committed vnto him and to commit those things which he had heard of him to men fit to teach Lastly they saie That before the bookes either of the olde or new Testament were written the doctrine was deliuered vnto the Church by mouth But neither the Prophets nor Christ nor the Apostles haue deliuered any other precepts by mouth then those which are written And if they ordained any ceremonial thinges in the Churches which they committed not to writing neither were they contrarie to these which are written neither ouer-many or vnprofitable neither put on them with an opinion of necessitie For neither was there any other Gospel from the beginning neither did Christ command anie other to be preached then that which we haue written Neither were those things any other which the Apostles then could not beare through infirmitie then the selfesame which the Lord had taught them before which the spirite should cal into their minds and expound vnto them which themselues afterwards did deliuer in writing to the church neither were they otherwise then sutable to those thinges which they had before receaued of the Lord neither olde wiues to is such as a great part of the Popish traditions are but the most authenticke doctrine of the Gospel either vnknowen or repugnant vnto the reason and wit of man But what Paul in the Acts is said to haue deliuered vnto the churches is there expressed euen the decree of the counsel of Ierusalem concerning blood strangled and thinges offered to idols Vnto the Corinthians hee promiseth that he will take order for matters of ceremonies euen such as appertained to the ministring of the Lords Supper Now by the instructions which he speaketh of to the Thessalonians he vnderstandeth not anie Lawes concerning ceremonies but the whole doctrine of the Gospel which he had taught euen the selfe same both by word and writing which hee had committed to Timothie and by the declaring of which mouth to mouth Iohn promiseth to bring true ioie vnto his auditours But bee it that Paul spake neuer so much of keeping traditions or ordinances which were not written as 1. Cor. 11. when hee saith Now brethren I command you that you keepe the ordinances as I deliuered them vnto you yet should not the aduersaries therefore obtaine that their traditions either are to be kept or are Apostolicke wheras most of them are singularly repugnant to the Apostles doctrine neither yet that there were more ordinances then in the Church then are written since that the Apostles did ordaine no rites by which the consciences of men should be bound Obiection 3 They alleadge farther the practise and examples of the Apostles That the Apostles haue decreed against and besides the Scripture Tit. 1. as if they did make anie ordinances or Lawes either besides or against the Scripture as when Paul ordaineih manie things of choosing Bishops and Deacons of widowes of weomen to be couered and to containe themselues in silence of not deuorcing the husband if he bee an infidel of controuersies betweene Christians 1 Tim. 3. 1 Cor. 11. 1 Cor. 14. 1 Cor. 7. 1 Cor. 6. But these men remember not that their authority is not equal vnto the Apostles authoritie neither consider they that there is nothing in all these thinges appointed of Paul which is not agreeable to the rest of the word of God contained in writing and that manie of those things which they alleadge is comprehended in the commandements of the Decalog More trifling is it 1 Answere that they saie the forme of Baptisme appointed by Christ was changed by the Apostles because it is reade in the Acts. 2.8 and 19 that they Baptised in the name of Iesus Christ For in those places not the forme of Baptism but the vse is declared that is that men were baptised for to testifie that they did belong to Christ Neither yet by the example of the Apostles who interdicted the Churches thinges offered to idols blood and that which was strangled is it lawful for Councels and Bishops to make decrees and Lawes to tie mens consciences For first here againe there must needs be reteined a difference betweene the Apostles by whom God opened his wil vnto men whereupon they also saie It seemed good to the holie Ghost and to vs and other ministers of the Church who are tied vnto the Apostles doctrine Further as cōcerning this decree of the Apostles they decreed nothing else then what the rule of charitie commaundeth which at all times would haue that in things indifferent men should deale without offence Now if they vrge that these ordinances are called necessary againe it doth not thereupon follow that the traditions of Bishops are necessarie especially such as are the Bishops of Rome Then that necessity whereof the Apostles speak
was neither to last continually neither did it binde consciences for feare of the wrath of God if these things were not obserued but it dured but for a time for their infirmity who were conuerted from Iudaisme to Christ or were to be conuerted as Paul doth at large teach 1. Cor. 10. To these they ad the examples of the Church whom they say Obiection 4 euen from the Apostles to these verie times to haue beleeued and obserued some thinges not onelie not deliuered in the Scripture Present examples but contrarie to the Scripture They bring forth the selfesame decree of Ierusalem concerning things offered to idols and blood which being made of the Apostles and expresly set downe in the Scripture was yet abolished by the Church But it hath bin already ready said that that constitution was made not that it should last for euer but for a time for a certaine cause euē for the infirmitie of the Church which was gathered from among the Iewes and after that cause ceased that ordinance taketh place no longer Neither yet did it at that time fetter mens consciences as if the worshipping or offending of God did lie in it wherefore the abrogating of it is not contrarie but doth verie well agree with it To these also they recken the obseruing of the Lords Daie We trulie as we doe beleeue this to be an Apostolick tradition perceaue it to be profitable and a farre other maner of one then for the most part they are which they would faine thrust vpon vs vnder the Apostles name so we doe not put anie worship of God to consist in this thing but know it to be left arbitrarie vnto the Church Euen as Coloss 2. it is said Let no man condemne you in respect of a holie daie But they affirme also that some things not written are beleeued which yet to call in question we our selues confesse to be vnlawful as That infantes are to be baptised That Christ descended into Hel That the Sonne of God is cōsubstantial vnto the eternal father But they are too impudent if they take vnto themselues a licence of hatching newe opinions because the Church for to expound the meaning of the Scripture vseth some where wordes which are not extāt in the Scripture But impious are they blasphemous if they saie the doctrine it self which the Church professeth in these wordes is not extant in the Scriptures 5 Obiection The holie Ghost is to teach the Church therfore not the Scripture They say also that the holy Ghost is promised the Church that it may teach those things which ar not deliuered in the Scriptures as Iohn 14. But the cōforter which is the holy Ghost whō the father shal send in my name he shal teach you al things And cap. 16. whē the spirit of truth shal come he shal lead you into al truth But here they maliciously omit that which is added And shal bring all things to your remembrance which I haue told you Again He shal beare witnes of me Again He wil reproue the world of sin of righteousnes of iudgement Again He shal glorify me for he shal receiue of mine shall shew it vnto you For out of these it is manifest that the holy Ghost should speake nothing but that which was writtē in the Gospel Christ himself had before time taught his disciples so far is it that he should bring any thing contrary to thē For neither can he dissent frō Christ nor frō himself So also when they alleadge that of Ier. 31. I will put my Lawe in their inward partes and in their harts will I write it And 2. Cor. 3. Ye are the Epistle of Christ written not with incke but with the spirit of the liuing God not in tables of stone but in fleshie tables of the hart they doe not marke that the spirite cannot speake in mens hearts contrarie vnto these things which he reuealed in the Scripture neither would God write anie other Law in mens harts but that which is alreadie reuealed and written and that therefore the Apostle Paul opposeth not the matter written but the manner of writing in tables and hearts one against another for because that the same was written in both but there with ink and here with the spirit of God It hath lesse colour which they goe about to builde out of that place to the Philippians cap. 3. If you be otherwise minded God shall reueile euen the same vnto you If therefore saie they the Church think anie thing different from the written woorde that proceedeth from the holie Ghost For the Apostle comforteth and cōfirmeth the godly that albeit they did not vnderstād somewhat of that which there hee had written or were of another iudgement in it yet that hereafter they should bee taught it of God and should know those things to bee true which he had written Whenas therefore it is denied that the holy Ghost reuealeth any thing diuers from that which is written the rule maistership of the spirit in the Church is not taken awaie but the same spirit is matched with him selfe that is with the rule of Scripture least those thinges should be thrust vpon vs vnder his name which are not his Further they make their boast that the Church cannot erre 6 Obiection The Church doth not er and that therefore the decrees of the Church are of equall autoritie with the holie Scripture because the Church is ruled by the same spirite by which the Scripture is inspired euen as it is promised Matth. 18. If two of you shall agree in earth vpon any thing whatsoeuer they shal desire it shal be giuen them of my Father which is in heauen For where two or three are gathered in my name there am I in the middest of them And cap. 28. I am with you alway vnto the end of the world So 1. Ioh. 2 Yee haue anointment from him that is holy and yee know all thinges Likewise The anointing which yee receaued of him dwelleth in you and yee neede not that any man teach you But as the same annointing teacheth you of all thinges and it is true and is not lying and as it taught you yee shall abide in him But first of all wee know that it is the true Church onely 1 Aunswere The true Church Mat. 13. Mar. 4. Luk. 8. which erreth not and is ruled by the holy spirite which is gathered in the name of Christ that is which heareth and followeth the voice of the Sonne of God And therefore these things doe nothing appertain to a wicked multitude which openlie maintaineth doctrine contrary to the Gospel though it neuer so much vaunt of the Churches name yea and beareth sway and rule in the Church according to that which is said To him that hath shal bee giuen But from him that hath not euen that which hee seemeth to haue shall bee taken away So did the Pharisees and Sadduces amongst the Israelits er
be taken away 3 Instance The Scripture a long time not knowen From this verie place may we easily refute that which they obiect That wee our selues in that that we say the Scripture hath not bin vnderstood for these many ages in the Popish Church do confesse the obscuritie of it For the ignorance which hath bin from the beginning of the world and shall bee to the end in the aduersaries of the truth is not to bee imputed to the obscuritie of the Scriptures but to their owne peruersnesse who haue not a desire to know and embrace the truth As the Apostle saith 2 Thes 2. Because they receiued not the loue of the truth that they might bee saued therefore God shall send them strong delusions that they should beleeue lies Whereas therefore it appeareth that the ground and summe of doctrine is not obscure 4 Instance Manie places obscure yet wee confesse that there are some places of Scripture which haue losse light more difficulty then others But first they are such that although they were not vnderstood yet the ground may both stand and be vnderstood Furthermore the interpretation of these places dependeth not of the autority of mē but the exposition of thē is to be sought by the conference of other places of Scripture which are more cleare or if we can not finde it yet least wee should affirme any vncertaine thing concerning diuine matters our conscience not satisfying vs in it wee must suspend our iudgement vntill God shal open vnto vs some certaine meaning and in the mean season wee are to hold those with thankfull mindes in which God hath left no place of doubting for vs. 5 Instance Of the necessity of interpretation Act. 20. But when wee answere thus vnto our aduersaries they rise againe vpon vs out of those thinges which wee grant them For because we confesse that some places of Scripture are harder to be vnderstood then others and that by occasion of the dulnes and slownes of mans minde in learning diuine matters neither those things which are most cleare are vnderstood of the people as the Eunuch of Queene Candaces doth complain How can I saith he except I had a guide And that the ministerie it selfe was therefore ordained of God in the Church for that it seemed good vnto the holy ghost to ad for our instruction an exposition of the Scripture which is done by the voice of the Church To be short because our selues in writing and teaching doe expound the Scriptures and do exhort al men to the reading and hearing the exposition thereof Out of these they conclude that besides the reading of the Scripture the interpretation of the Church is necessarie and that therefore what the Church doth pronounce of the meaning of the Scripture that is without controuersie to be receaued But we first confesse that the interpretation of the scripture is necessarie in the Church not for that without this to come vnto the knowledge of heauenly doctrine is simplie impossible whereas both God is able when it pleaseth him to instruct his euen without the Scripture it selfe much more then without the exposition of his ministers and the godly learne many thinges out of the Scriptures without interpreters and of the contrary side except the eies of our mindes be opened by the grace of the holie spirit heauenly doctrine seemeth alwaies alike obscure vnto vs whether it be expoūded by the word of the Scripture or of the church but for that it pleased God to appoint this ordinarie way of instructing vs and himselfe hath commanded the maintenance and vse of his ministery in the Church that it should be an instrument which the holy Ghost might most freelie vse for our saluation Againe Interpreting must not be a deprauing of the Scriptures although interpretation of scripture be necessarie yet this is so far from graunting anie licence vnto the ministers to bring new ordinances into the Church that nothing doth more tie them to this doctrine alone which is comprehended in the Scriptures then this verie function of expounding the Scriptures For to interpret another mans woordes is not to faine at our pleasure a meaning either diuers from them or repugnant vnto them but to render the same meaning and Sentence either in more words or in more plaine words or at least in such as may be more fit for their capacitie whom wee teach and withal when there is need to shew that this is the mind of the autor which we affirme to be Three points to be obserued in interpreting Now such an interpretation of Scripture is made by these meanes that first the phrase be considered and the proper sense of the woordes found out then that the order and coherence of the members or parts of the doctrine which is conteined in the text of Scripture be declared Thirdly that the doctrine be applied to the vse of the Church which it hath in confirming true opinions or refuting errors in knowing of God and our selues in exhorting in comforting and in directing of our life as Paul commaundeth 2. Tim. 2. Studie to diuide the word of truth aright And to Titus cap. 1. A Bishop must holde fast the faithful word according to doctrine that he also may be able to exhort with wholesome doctrine Lib. 2. conhaereses and improue them that saie against it And wiselie did Epiphanius aduise Not al woords of Scripture haue neede to bee allegorised or construed according to a strange sense but they must be vnderstood as they are and further they require meditation and sense for the vnderstanding of the drift and purpose of euerie argument That is Al places of scripture are not to be transformed into allegories but we must seeke out the proper sense of the words by meditation and sense that is vsing the rules of art and hauing a regard of the propriety of tongues and our own experience by which we know the nature of those things which are signified by words commonly vsed in the Church 6. Inst Concerning the diciding of a controuersie about the text and meaning thereof But here is cast in another difficultie for that in controuersies concerning the text and the meaning thereof such a iudge is required whose authoritie and testimonie may suffice for determining of the meaning of the text For when both parties saie they who striue about the meaning plead ech of them that his interpretation is true except iudgement bee giuen of such a iudge from whom it may not be lawful to make anie appeale the contention wil neuer bee decided and we shal stil remaine doubtful of the sense of the Scripture Furthermore this iudgement must needs belong vnto the Church for in the Church alone we are to seeke for an examining and determining of controuersies concerning Religion What the Church therefore doth pronounce in these matters wee must of necessitie rest vpon that as the assured meaning of the Scriptures And hereof they saie
it is manifest that the decrees of the Church are of no lesse authoritie then the expresse sentence of the Scripture But we as we willingly grant that the controuersies of the Church must bee at length determined Aun Not the Church but the holie ghost is iudge in the word and that according to the Sentence of that iudge of whom wee may bee certainlie assured that we can not be deceaued So wee acknowledge this iudge to be not the Church but the holy Ghost himself speaking vnto vs in the Scripture and declaring his owne woords For he is the supreme iudge whose iudgement the Church onely demandeth declareth and signifieth he can not bee deceaued whereas all men are subiect vnto the daunger of error in a word he being the author of the Scripture is the best and surest interpreter of his owne words And therefore the Scripture it selfe in al doubtes recalleth vs and bindeth vs vnto it selfe as 2. Pet. 1. We haue a most sure word of the Prophets to the which yee doe wel that yee take heede as vnto a light that shineth in a dark place Iohn 5. Search the Scriptures Esay 8 To the Lawe and to the Testimonie if they speake not according to this word The Church doth not alwaies speake the words of the holie Ghost it is because there is no light in them For although the holie Ghost speaketh also by the Church yet because shee doth not alwaies speak the words of the holy Ghost she can not be the supreme chiefe iudge of controuersies in Religion For this iudge must be such a one whose sentence may by no means bee called in question But wee haue none such besides the word of God registred in the Scriptures Deciding of controuersies is not taken away Neither doe we at all take away the deciding of controuersies when wee make Scripture iudge of the meaning of the scripture For although contentious persons alwaies seeke sophismes by which they may delude and shift off the testimonies of Scripture yet doe they this against their conscience and the louers of the truth require no other interpreter of the Scripture but the Scripture and doe acknowledge and confesse themselues to be plentifully satisfied by it For whereas vnto men also it is graunted to bee themselues the best interpreters of their own wordes how much more ought this honor to bee yeelded vnto the holy Scripture The way how to decide doubtful places 1 The Analogy of faith Wherefore if controuersie be mooued concerning the meaning of some place in the Scripture we ought much more to doe that here which we would doe in other writinges First of all to consider and respect the anologie of faith that is to receiue no exposition which is against the ground of doctrine that is against any article of faith or commaundement of the Decalog or against any plaine testimonie of Scripture 1 Cor. 3. 2 Examining of Antecedents Consequents euen as Paul admonisheth forbidding to build wood hey stubble vpon the foundation Secondly to weigh the thinges that goe before and follow after that place which is in question that so not onely nothing contrary to these may be faigned on it but also that that may bee set for the meaning of it which these require For these either not beeing obserued or beeing dissembled the meaning of the Scripture is not seldome depraued Psalm 91. So those words of the Psalme Hee shall giue his Angels charge ouer thee that they shall beare thee in their handes that thou hurte not thy foote against a stone The Diuell tempting Christ interpreteth them as if they serued to maintaine ouer-rash and curious attempts when yet that which is added In all thy waies doth shew that they are to bee vnderstood of men doing those thinges that are proper vnto their calling Thirdly 3 Resorting to places which teach the same more clearly wee ought to search euery where in the Scripture whether there bee extant any place where it stands for confessed or is manifest or may bee shewed that the same doctrine in other woordes is deliuered touching the same matter which is conteined in that place which is in controuersie For if the meaning of the clearer and vndoubted place be manifest vnto vs wee shall also be assured of the place which is doubted of because in both places the same is taught as when Rom. 3. it is said We conclude that a man is iustified by faith without the workes of the Lawe That in this place to be iustified by faith is not to please God for the worthines of faith but for the merit of Christ apprehended by faith and that the woorkes of the Law signifie not the ceremonies onely but the whole obedience of the Law chiefly the morall other places doe teach vs which in moe and clearer woordes deliuer the same doctrine concerning the iustification of man before God as in the same chapter By the woorkes of the Law shall no flesh bee iustified in his sight for by the Law commeth the knowledge of sinne But now is the righteousnes of God made manifest without the Law hauing witnes of the Law and of the Prophets The righteousnes of God by the faith of Iesus Christ vnto all and vpon al that beleeue for there is no difference For all haue sinned and are depriued of the glorie of God and are iustified freelie by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Iesus 4 Conferring like places togither Fourthly wee must conferre places of Scripture where though the same woords bee not spoken of the same thing yet the like woordes and formes of speaking are vsed of the like thinges For if the interpretation of the like place bee certaine and there bee the same causes for the like interpretation to bee giuen in the place that is in controuersie which are in the other then of like places wee must giue one and the same iudgement The Lord willeth Mat. 5. to put out our eie to cut off our hand if it be a cause of offence vnto vs. Now whereas the Law forbiddeth vs to maime our bodie Thou shalt not kill that therefore by this figure of speech the Lord would haue vs that wee should rather forsake thinges most deere vnto vs then that by the lust and motion of thē wee should suffer our selues to be withdrawen from God the like forme of speech otherwhere vsed to signifie things most deer and precious doth shew as Ierem. 22. If Iechoniah were the signet of my right hand yet would I plucke thee thence And Deut. 32. Hee kept him as the apple of his eie 5 The catholike Church When once according to these rules the controuersie concerning the text meaning thereof is iudged we may lawfully also descend to the consent of the Church yet putting great space betwixt not without great aduisement For least by the name of the Church we be beguiled first of all no sentence or
meaning is to bee receiued which these rules of examining and iudging which haue bin now declared doe not suffer Then must wee consider what times and whose writinges are purest what pointes of doctrine haue bin and in what ages either rightlie expounded or depraued with errors lastly whose interpretation either is of the autor or may bee of vs confirmed by the testimonie of the Scripture And to this deciding of all controuersies about the meaning of the Scripture drawen out of the Scripture it selfe do all the godlie and louers of the truth agree euen as it is said Iohn 8.47 Hee that is of God heareth the wordes of God now the testimonie of the auncient and catholicke Church so farre as they see it to accord with the Scripture they doe with glad and thankful minds embrace and are so much the more assured of the known truth But if any quarrelling men doe not yeelde vnto the Testimonies of the Scripture we must not seek because of them a iudge higher then the word of God but must leaue them vnto the iudgement of God as the Apostle counsaileth vs to Titus 3. Reiect him that is an heretik after once or twise admonition knowing that hee that is such is peruerted and sinneth being damned of his own selfe And 1. Cor. 14. If anie man be ignorant let him be ignorant And in the last of the Apocalyps Hee that is filthie let him bee more filthie Neither verilie doth hee whom the woord of God doth not satisfy rest on the autoritie of men as the truth it selfe doth shew But as these thinges are sufficient to shutte the mouthes of them who gainsay the truth 6. Prayers or at least-wise to manifest their impudencie so is there further required for the fencing of the consciences of all the godlie in debate of religion besides a care of learning the doctrine of the woord of God an ardent and daily inuocating of God by which wee may desire that wee may be taught and guided by his holy spirite This if we shal doe hee will not suffer vs to make stay in error Mat. 11.28 Esaie 57.15 which may pul vs from him but will open vnto vs the true and certaine meaning of his woord concerning all thinges necessarie to our saluation that our faith may depend not on humane but diuine autoritie euen as it is promised in the seuenth Chapter of Matthewe Aske and it shall bee giuen you seeke and ye shall finde knocke and it shall bee opened vnto you For whosoeuer asketh receiueth and hee that seeketh findeth and to him that knocketh it shall bee opened And in the eleuenth of Luke How much more shall your heauenlie Father giue the holie Ghost to them that desire him Also in the first of Iames If anie of you doe lacke wisedome let him aske of God which giueth to all men liberallie and reprocheth no man and it shall bee giuen him but let him aske in faith and wauer not To their former arguments our aduersaries adde that it Obiection 11 is a shame that the holie Ghost speaking in the Church should bee subiect to the examinatioÌ„ and iudgement of another It is vnmeet that the holy Ghost should be subiect vnto another and therefore we must not examine him by the rule of the Scripture But seeing that the same spirite speaketh in the Church and in the Scripture when wee doe examine the voice of the Church by the Scripture we doe not subiect the holy Ghost to another but we compare him with himselfe And by this means first we giue vnto him the praise of trueth and constancie while we doe acknowledge and testifie that hee is alwaies like himselfe and doth neuer square from himselfe then also we confesse that the supreme authoritie of pronouncing the wil of God belongeth vnto him while we doe not seeke whether those things be true and certaine which hee hath spoken but whether those be his words which men ascribe vnto him and this we doe euen after the selfesame manner which he hath prescribed vs and after that we finde out by the rule of the written word that any thing hath proceeded from him to that without making any controuersie we submit our minds wils Contrariwise it is easie to see that our aduersaries themselues are guiltie of that contumelie against the holie Ghost of which they accuse vs. For while they wil haue the authoritie of giuing iudgement concerning the meaning of the Scripture and of deciding controuersies not to belong vnto the Scriptures but vnto themselues by this verie thing both they imagine that the holy Ghost may dissent from himselfe and do make themselues iudges higher then the holy ghost and the word of God Obiection 12 The letter killeth the spirit quickneth Lastly whereas Paul saith 2. Cor. 3. That he is the minister of the newe Testament not of the letter but of the spirit for the letter doth kil the spirit doth quicken some men do thence gather that wee are to heare not what the written word of God soundeth but what the spirite speaketh by the Church or in our hearts Yea there hath growen an opinion heretofore that the graÌ„matical and literal meaning of the Scripture is pernâ—â—â—cus except all be transformed into allegories But a manifold paralogisme in this argument doth easily appeare if it bee considered what the letter and the spirit signifieth in Paul For that all the doctrine and knowledge touching God as also the outwarde obseruation of the Lawe in those that are not regenerate is called the letter by the Apostle and the spirit first the holy Ghost himselfe Secondly the true doctrine concerning God when the holie Ghost is of force and efficacy by it Thirdly faith and conuersion and motions pleasing God being kindled of the holy Ghost through the word it appeareth by the words going before For for that which here he saith that he was made of God a minister not of the letter but of the spirit he said before that the Epistle of Christ was ministred by him and written not with incke but with the spirit of the liuing God in tables of the hart that is that his preaching was not in vaine but of force and efficacy in the harts of men the holy Ghost woorking by it And in like manner Rom. cap. 2. hee calleth the ceremonie without conuersion circumcision in the letter but conuersion it selfe circumcision of the hart in the spirit And Rom 7. He willeth vs to walke in newnesse of spirit and not in the oldnes of the letter that is in true holines such as is begun by the spirit in the regenerate not in the sinne and hypocrisie of them who know verilie the wil of God and make practise also of outward discipline and behauiour but remaine without faith and conuersion Wherefore first as the doctrine by the fault of men 1 The letter killeth not of it selfe but by an accident and not of it remaineth only the letter so also
And this is it which they say to do any thing vpon deliberation or aduisement going before which manner of dooing is proper vnto the will For this is the difference betweene a nature agent and a voluntarie The difference betweene a naturall agent and a voluntarie that the naturall cause is ordained or appointed or fit and apt to one certaine manner of woorking neither can it forbeare working if the obiect be present whereon it should woorke as fire cannot but burne a bodie put vnto it if it bee of such matter as wil take fire But the will is able and apt to choose or refuse contrarie or diuers obiects or to forbeare and differ the choise thereof as a man may haue a will to walke or not to walke or may differ his wil of walking To doe therefore anie thing with free arbiterment and will is to doe vpon a fore-deliberation according to the will of god sometimes simplie and sometimes in some respect onelie and against it also sometimes in some respect but neuer simplie against it For the libertie of woorking is not taken away in any creature if God be said so to rule bend their wills that they be not inclined any other way than whither god will haue them inclined either simply or in some sort But free arbiterment is a faculty or power of working vpon deliberation and without constraint or rather the very wil it selfe so woorking Wherefore if the name of free arbiterment be so taken expounded as hath beene said The name of free arbitermēt may be tolerated in the Church though it be not vsed in the scriptures albeit it be not vsed in the Scriptures yet maie it be tolerated borne-with because both the description thereof such as was euen nowe deliuered agreeeth with the Scripture and the auncient writers haue also vsed the same name But if it be taken for such a will of free working which excludeth all action and woorking of the first cause guiding inuiting and bending the creatures wils whither it selfe listeth such a free arbiterment cannot bee admitted For example sake Abimelecke abstaining from Rebecca and the Iewes crucifieng Christ both did it with free arbiterment because those forealeaged conditions which make free arbiterment did agree vnto both neither yet could they at that present doe otherwise than they did God so guiding directing the ir wils 3 What is like or common and what diuerse or different in the libertie of will which is in god in Angels and man Common to men and Angels with God to wil a thing without constraint THese two things are common to God and reasonable creatures that is Angels men that they doe things vpon deliberation and aduise and will without coaction those things which they haue considered and thought of that is Their wil being by nature fit to will the contrary or diuerse from that which it doth wil or also to differre forbear the action doth incline to the other part of it owne accord and by a proper force which is within it For it is said of God Psal 115. He hath done all things which hee would And of men Mat. 23. Hierusalem how often would I haue gathered thy children and ye would not The differences of our liberty of wil and Gods 1 God knoweth al things of himselfe perfectly perpetually But the differences also of this liberty in God and in the creatures are to be considered The first is in the vnderstanding God vnderstandeth and knoweth all thinges of himselfe perfectly and perpetually neither can any ignorance of any thing or any error of iudgemēt fal into God at any time But the creatures know neither of themselues neither all things neither the same at all times but at such time and so much as is reuealed vnto them Who hath knowen the mind of the Lord Of that daie and houre knoweth us man God giueth vnderstanding Neither is there any thing which is not manifest in his sight He illighteneth euery creature To behold all things which are infinite requireth infinite power and wisedome which is proper to God alone Mention is here made of the vnderstanding because a thing not vnderstood is not either desired or refused 2 His will dependeth of none but himselfe ours of him The second difference is in the will The wil of God is gouerned or moued or depending of no other cause but of it selfe The wils of Angels and men are so the causes of their actions that neuerthelesse they are carried by the secret counsell of God his power and efficacie which is euerie-where present to the choosing or refusing of any obiect and that either immediately by God or mediately by instrumentes some good some bad which it seemeth good vnto God to vse so that it is impossible for them to doe any thing beside the eternall decree and counsail of God And therefore the woorde 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is to be absolutely his owne at his owne will and in his owne power agreeth most properly vnto God who perfectly and simply is his owne and at his owne will But of the creatures more rightly is vsed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is voluntarie and free which worde the Apostle vseth to Philemon vers 14. Heb. 10.26 1. Pet. 5.2 That God is the first cause of his actions God the first cause both of his owne actions and ours Psal 115.3 Dan. 4.52 Gen. 29.7 Exod. 3.16 Act. 2.23 and 3 17. c. and 4.17 c. the Scripture doth declare He hath done whatsoeuer he would Who according to his wil worketh in the army of heauen and in the inhabitants of the earth But that the wils and counsailes of the creatures depend of God who is aboue them these and the like speeches doe proue The Lord shal send his Angell before thee Go and gather the Elders of Israel together Him being deliuered by the determinate counsel and fore-knowledge of God yee haue slaine I know that through ignorance ye did it and But God hath fulfilled these things and Herode and Pontius Pilate gathered thēselues together to do whatsoeuer thine hand and thy counsel had determined before to be done By these and the like places it is manifest that all second causes as they were created of God so are they ruled of him as their first supreme soueraign cause But the wil of God dependeth on no one of the creatures because then a second cause should be put before the first cause And as God hath not any efficient so neither hath he any mouing or inclining cause without him Moreouer God so ruleth and guideth the wil of his creature that he doth not draw or enforce it but bend and encline it that is by obiectes represented to the mind he effectually moueth affecteth and allureth the wil to wil that which then the mind iudgeth good and refuse that which seemeth euil so that the wil it selfe also vpon deliberatiō going before
Creation adoption and regeneration When the name of the Father is opposed to the Sonne it signifieth the first person of the God-head but when it is referred to the creatures it signifieth the whole diuine nature which is the Father the Sonne and the holy ghost Or the name of Father as it is opposite to the Sonne is vnderstood personallie as heere in the Creede but as it is compared with the creatures it is taken essentially as Our father which art in heauen To beleeue in God almightie is to beleeue in such a one What is to beleeue in God Almightie 1 Who is able to doe whatsoeuer he will yea also those thinges which he will not if they be not contrarie to his nature as hee could haue kept Christ frō death but he would not 2 Who doth all thinges euen with his becke and worde onlie without anie difficultie 3 Who alone hath power to woorke al thinges and is author of that power which is in all his creatures 4 Who is also vnto me Almightie and omnipotent and both can and will direct all thinges to my safetie that is who will vse his omnipotencie to the preseruing and sauing of mee not only for that he hath nothing wanting vnto him for performance hereof to my behoofe but also for that no creature is able to stop or hinder it There is no good then so hard or full of difficultie but he is able to giue me no euil so great but he can auert it from me And this is properly to beleeue in god almightie and omnipotent Neuerthelesse those things which go before are necessarily linked with the latter For except we beleeue God to bee such that is omnipotent wee shall not be able to beleeue that God is such to vs in christ that is wee shall not bee able to apply his almightinesse and omnipotency vnto vs so also in the rest which our faith apprehendeth concerning God these two are to be ioyned to wit that God is such both in himselfe and towards vs. Obiection God is not able to make that which is once doone vndoone Therefore he is not omnipotent Answere To haue the power to ly or to be changed and the like is no part of omnipotencie but of infirmity Now a passiue power as to suffer change and defects are in creatures not in God Furder it is Gods omnipotency to be able to do whatsoeuer he will By inuerting it therefore I conclude thus Because GOD is not able to will and doe that which is against his nature and which would destroy it he is omnipotent To beleeue in the creatour is 1 To beleeue in him What is to beleeue in God the Maker or Creatour who is creator of al thinges 2 Who sustaineth and gouerneth by his prouidence those thinges which he hath created 3 Who hath created all thinges and so my selfe also to his owne glorie and to the obtaining at length of my saluation that I may be a vessel of mercie hee bringeth mee to that saluation by his especiall prouidence where-with hee embraceth his chosen 4 Who hath created all other thinges to his glorie and for vs euen to serue for the safetie of his Church More brieflie thus I beleeue in God the Creatour that is I beleeue that God who hath created all thinges and gouerneth them by his prouidence hath created mee and the faithfull in the world to celebrate and serue him and all other thinges to serue for our safetie All thinges are yours and you are Christes and Christ is Gods as if he should say All thinges are created for vs euen as wee are created for God To this first part of the Creede belong three Common places verie necessarie to be knowen 1 Of GOD. 2 Of the Creation 3 Of Gods prouidence OF GOD. THE principall questions are 1 Whether there be a God 2 What hee is or what manner of God hee is whom wee woorship and in what hee differeth from Idols 3 Whence it may appeare that there is but one God 4 What the names of Essence Person and Trinitie signifie 5 In what the Essence differeth from the person 6 Whether these names are to bee vsed in the Church and whether they are had in the Scripture 7 Howe manie persons there bee of the godheade 8 Howe these differ one from another 9 For what cause this doctrine is to bee helde in the Church 1 WHETHER THERE BE A GOD. THE great miserie of mans nature cannot bee sufficientlie thought vpon that whereas it was created to the bright knowledge and euen the verie image of god it is fallen so farre as not onely it is ignorant who and what God is but also maketh dispute whether there bee any GOD in heauen or no. The causes of this euill The causes which haue made men to doubt whether there be a God the Church alone doth vnderstand the first whereof is the blindnesse and corruption of mans nature after his fall the next the instigation of the Diuel who would haue the whole opinion of God rased out of the minds of men vnto which commeth the horrible confusion of mans life and humane affaires in that often-times the wicked florish the godly either are oppressed by them or while they perceiue not the causes of these euils and the secret gouernment of God they fall to doubting whether there bee any God who hath care ouer the world and humane affaires But that there is a God is proued by diuerse reasons 1 From the beutifull goodly order of nature The reasons which proue there is a God 1. The order of all thinges in the world 2. The nature of mans minde beheld in the world Now order is instituted but of a wise and vnderstanding nature In nature there is order Therefore there is a superiour mind or intelligent power which instituteth and maintaineth the same 2 From the nature and excellencie of mans minde For it cānot possibly be that he should bestow any thing vpon an other which himselfe hath not who should giue it that our reasonable nature must needes haue his original from an intelligent vnderstanding nature is manifest inough for that the cause is not woorser or baser than the effect it bringeth But the mind of mā is reasonable or indued with reason hath some cause Therfore it hath an vnderstanding cause which is God The Minor is proued Whatsoeuer hath a beginning is from another because it must needes be from some thing And of it selfe it cannot haue being or beginning because nothing is cause of it selfe But mans mind hath a beginning Therefore from another which other must needes be God 3 From the notions of general rules or principles in the mind 3. The general rules and principles naturallie ingendered in the minde of man as are the difference betweene honest things dishonest numbering vnderstanding of consequences in discourse reasoning other notions borne together with vs. For these notions of
order of his minde declared in the nature of thinges and in his woorde and what agreeth therewith and disagreeth and all his woorkes and the works of all creatures past present and to come all the causes and circumstances of all things And moreouer That al Angels and men haue no more knowlege of diuine and humane matters than God doth woork maintaine in their minds For among other thinges the most beutiful and sightlie order which is in the nature of thinges the endes and vses of all things the signification of future euents arts and sciences the euerting and ouerturning of those deuises which the Diuell and wicked men haue most craftily contriued against God and all the godly doe enforce all men to confesse that these things could not proceed but from a most wise artificer and author Wherefore also the scripture it selfe willeth vs to consider the wisedome of God shining in these his woorks Eccle. 3.11 God hath made euerie thing beutiful in his time Isai 44.7 Who is like me that shal cal shal declare it set it in order before me since I appointed the ancient people Ioh. 5.13 He taketh the wise in their craftinesse And of these hee concludeth that the wisedome of God is immense vnconceiueable As Ps 145 7. His wisdom is infinit Rom. 11.32 O the deepenesse of the riches both of the wisedome and knowledge of God! But here again is to be obserued a difference betweene Philosophie and the word of God First that euen in the creation the knowen or legall wisedome was darkned and maimed in men through sinne and therefore needeth a renewing by the woorde deliuered to the Church And then that men without this heauenlie doctrine are altogether ignorant of that especial wisedome of God reuealed in the gospell whereby he saueth the Church gathered from amongst mankind by the son As it is said Mat. 11. I giue thee thanks O father bicause thou hast hid these things from the wise men of vnderstanding and hast opened them vnto babes The Goodnes of God diuerslie taken in scriptures The goodnesse of God signifieth sometimes his bountifulnes as Psa 106.1 Praise the Lord because he is good sometimes all the vertues and whatsoeuer is spoken of the nature of God As Psalm 14. Let thy spirite leade mee thorough the right waie That which also is meant by the name of holines or sanctity and light 1. Iohn 1. So in this place first by the name of goodnesse are vnderstoode al those thinges which are attributed to god in his woorde and are represented and resembled in his image as those thinges which are termed good in Angels and men as life power wisedome ioy righteousnesse c. For such is the nature of God as it hath manifested it selfe in the Lawe and Gospel and the goodnesse of the reasonable creature is an image of the diuine goodnesse And therefore here also differ philosophy and the Scripture in that Philosophy attributeth onely to God that his goodnesse which was opened in the Lawe and yet neither that wholie but of his goodnesse reuealed in the Gospell it is altogether ignoraunt Secondly by reason of the great and huge difference betweene the creatour and the creature we vnderstand those good thinges to bee in GOD which are agreeing to his diuine nature and maiestie For those which are proper vnto created natures woulde not bee good in GOD but rather a diminishing of his goodnesse Thirdly By reason of the immensitie of his diuine nature those things which are finite in creatures are in GOD infinite And therefore against sundry and diuerse disputes of Philosophers concerning the chiefest good we learne in the Church that GOD is the chiefest good Fourthly because nothing is vnperfect or not subsisting by it selfe in GOD whatsoeuer is attributed vnto him is not in him as formes or accidentes in creatures but such is his essence and nature in a manner not able to bee comprehended by our knoweledge and vnderstanding Fiftly His nature and will is a rule of that goodnesse and vprightnesse which is in creatures For so farre foorth thinges are and are called good as they agree with the wil of God Sixtly GOD is the onelie fountaine of goodnesse and the first cause of all good thinges So that all thinges haue so much goodnesse as God dooth create and maintaine in them And in this sense is it said Luke 18. There is none good but God onelie euen so as hee is most perfectly good and the fountaine of goodnesse The righteousnesse of God sometimes in Scripture signifieth that which is accounted righteousnesse before him The righteousnes of God both generall and particular and whereby he maketh vs righteous that elsewhere legall which is holines of life or conformity with the law of God which God worketh in vs by his spirit begun in this life to be perfected in the life to come as Iam. 1.20 The wrath of man dooth not accomplish the righteousnesse of God Or sometimes Euangelicall which is the righteousnesse of Christ imputed to beleeuers of the free mercy of God As Roman 3.21 But now is the righteousnes of God made manifest without the Law hauing witnesse of the Lawe and of the Prophetes to witte the righteousnesse of God by the faith of Iesus Christ vnto all and vppon all that beleeue Sometimes is meant that righteousnesse whereby himselfe is righteous and then also in many places it signifieth the faithfulnesse or mercie and benignitie of GOD who according to his promises preserueth defendeth and deliuereth the faithfull as Psalm 31.1 Deliuer mee in thy righteousnesse But when it is properly spoken of the righteousnesse of GOD whereby himselfe is righteous as in this place First hee is called iust in respect of his generall iustice and righteousnesse which is the order or nature of this diuine vnderstanding and will whereby GOD will and approoueth doth himselfe and woorketh in others vnchaungeablie and vnspeakeablie such thinges as hee hath commaunded in his Lawe and neither will nor approoueth nor woorketh nor causeth nor furdereth any thing whatsoeuer disagreeth from this order but horribly hateth and detesteth them as it is said Psalm 11.17 The righteous Lord loueth righteousnesse Secondly In respect of his particular iustice and rightiousnesse which is the vnchaungeable will of God whereby God giueth to himselfe and will haue giuen him by others that glory which is due vnto the chiefe good as he saith I wil not giue my glory to another punisheth al sin with such punishment as is equall to the offence that is with eternal as in them who perish or with equiualent as in his Sonne Christ susteining the punishment for al those who are saued by him according as it is saide Thou shalt not depart thence vntill thou host paied the vtmost farding and cannot iniury anie creature whatsoeuer he determineth of him or doth vnto him because he oweth no man any thing as it is said Psa 45. God is iust in
a sonne and a man and yet the manhoode or to be a man is one thing the fatherhoode or to bee a father another but there is not one subsistent which is the father and another subsistent which is a man but one and the same subsistent is both because both manhoode and fatherhoode is in him manhood absolutely fatherhood respectiuely as in regard of his Sonne Of the worde essence also it is furder to be noted that God or the Deitie or diuine essence is not in respect of the persons the same which the matter in respect of the effect because God is vnchaungeable neither is compounded of matter and forme Therefore we cannot say wel Three persons are or consist of one essence Neither is it as the whole in respect of the parts because God is indiuisible Wherefore it is not well saide that the person is a part of the essence or the essence consisteth of three persons for euery person is the whole diuine essence one and the same Neither is it as the general to the speciall because the persons are not specials but indiuiduals Neither is it simplie as the special to the indiuiduals because the diuine essence it selfe is indiuiduall or one in number and the persons are not another or a diuerse or a separated thing from the essence but euery person is that essence Therefore it is well said God or the Diuine essence is the father is the sonne is the holy ghost Likewise The three persons are one God or in one God Againe they are one and the same essence nature diuinity wisedome c. They are of one or the same essence nature diuinitie c. Yet it cannot bee saide well they are of one God Wherefore the diuine essence is in respect of the persons as a thing after a rare and singular maner communicated in respect of those things vnto which it is common For neither is there the like example of community in any created things For a generall is a certain thing common to manie specials a general and special to manie indiuiduals but yet so that they are affirmed of those manie plurallie not singularlie as that the father and the sonne or this father and sonne are two liuing creatures two men But wee maie not speake after this sort of God and the diuine persons as to saie the father and the sonne are two Gods two spirites two omnipotentes c. Because there is but one GOD one spirite one omnipotent c. Wherefore that affirmation the father is God the Son is God the holy Ghost is God is a true affirmation affirming that which is more common of a thing which is more restrict that is affirming the essence of the indiuidual which hath in some sort an analogy and proportion only with the speciall affirmed of his indiuiduall but is not at al the same nor of the same kind 6 Whether these names are to be vsed in the Church THese names are to be vsed and reteined in the church Obiection But these names namely Essence person and Trinitie are not in the Scripture therefore they ought not to be vsed and reteined in the Church Answere These names which are not in the Scripture neither the words themselues nor the sense of them are not to be vsed but both the names them selues of essence and person are found in the Scripture and the thing also or the doctrine it selfe concerning them The name Essence is expressed by the name of Iehoua which is frequent in the Scripture Likewise by the name of Beeing which often also offereth it selfe in the Scripture Exod. 3.14 I am that I am Reuel 1.8 Which is and which was and which is to come The woorde Person is expressed by the greeke woord 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Heb. 13. which woord is there interpreted Person The ingraued forme of his person The name of Trinitie is signified 1. Iohn 5.7 There are three which beare recorde in heauen the father the woorde and the holie ghost and these three are one And this for the names themselues Now for the thing As often as is mentioned one Iehoua so often is mentioned one essence As often as the Father the Sonne and the holie ghost is called Iehoua so often the three persons of the Diuinitie are expressed that is three subsisting three vnderstanding c. And this aunswere yeeldeth the first cause why these woordes ought to bee reteined in the Church because namelie they are extant in the holie Scripture either in woordes or in sense and meaning The Second cause is because they are fit to expound the phrase and speech of the Scripture vnto the vnlearned And furder if no woordes were to bee vsed but such as are extant in the Scriptures all interpretation shoulde bee taken away For interpretation requireth that the words of Scripture bee expounded to the vnlearned by such words as being more vsual in other languages or matters doctrines are more easie for them to vnderstand paueth and maketh plaine away vnto them for the vnderstanding of the speech and phrase of Scripture The third cause is that the sleights and sophismes of heretiques which for the most part they goe about to cloake and couer with the woords of holie Scripture are more easily espied and taken heede of if the same things bee expounded in diuerse woordes and those especiallie short perspicuous and significant So the sectaries and followers of Seruetus do confesse that the Father the Sonne and the holy ghost are one God but not one in essence but by propagation that is that they are not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the same in substance but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 like in substance Likewise they graunt the Sonne to be true God but they deny him to bee the same in substance with his father But therefore is it that heretiques will none of the Churches phrase speech because they dislike the thing it selfe For if there were a consent an according in the thinges we shoulde easily come to an agreement about the woordes 7 How many persons there be of the Diuinity or God-head IN one diuine essence are subsisting three persons Three persons are one God and one God is three persons and those truely distinct one from another by their properties namely the Father the Sonne and the holy Ghost each of which three persons notwithstanding are one and the same God eternal infinit most perfect in himselfe And these persons are consubstantiall and coeternal without any confounding of their properties and respects as also without anie disparagement or inequalitie betweene them And that there are three persons each of which are that one true God creatour of all thinges is prooued first by testimonies of Scripture which are taken partly out of the olde Testament and partly out of the newe The old Testament yeeldeth vs many testimonies Gen. 1.2 The spirite of God mooued vpon the waters Then God said let there be light Exod. 3.2 The Lorde is
distinct Answere The Maior is true of finit persons but not of infinite Obiect 7. The diuine Essence is incarnate The three persons are the diuine Essence Therefore the three persons are incarnate Aunswere Here also are meere particulars whereof nothing can be concluded For the Maior speaketh not of the Diuine Essence generally but particularly as it is the Sonne Obiection 8. The Sonne is Mediatour vnto Iehoua But the Sonne is Iehoua Therefore hee is Mediatour to himselfe Aunswere Here also are meere particulars and therefore nothing concluded For not all that is Iehoua is Mediator Obiect 9. Christ hath a head aboue him Therefore hee is inferiour to GOD and by a consequent hee is not of one and the same essence with GOD. Aunswere Hee hath indeede a Head but that first in respect of his Mediatourshippe secondly in respect of his manhoode Obiection 10. This is saith Christ life euerlasting that they do know thee to bee the onelie verie God Therefore the Sonne and the holie Ghost are not true God Aunswere In this place is opposed not the father to the son and the holy ghost but God to Idoles and creatures Moreouer the particle onelie dooth not belong to the subiect thee but to the predicate God which the greeke Article sheweth Obiection 11. Iehoua is the Trinity The father is Iehoua Therefore he is the trinity Aunswere Iehoua is not taken for the same but varieth in this Syllogisme For Iehoua in the Maior is meant of all three persons in the Minor of one only Reply The father is Iehoua one in number Therefore the father is the Trinitie Heere those diuerse manners of beeing are of no force Aunswere He is one in number of essence not of persons Obiection 12. Where are three one there are four But in god are three one namelie three persons and one essence Therfore there are four in God Aunswere Where there are three and one reallie distinct there are foure But in God the persons are not really distinct from the essence for the three persons of the Diuinity are one and the same essence Obiection 13. The same works are atributed to the Father and the Sonne and the holy Ghost in the Scripture Aunswere This hindereth not the distinction of persons For mo persons may concurre to one action the distinct order of woorking beeing obserued Obiection 14. Christ saith Iohn 14. He that seeth me seeth the father Aunswere Christ meaneth not hereby that he is the father but that he sheweth and resembleth the person wisedome omnipotency goodnes and wil of the father in his doctrine and woorkes as it is saide The Sonne which is in the bosome of the father hee hath shewed Againe Who is the inuisible image of GOD. And as himselfe addeth here The father in mee and I in the father Obiection 15. The wisedome and power of the father are not distinct persons from the father but are the father himselfe as also mercie goodnesse chastitie trueth and other properties of God But the Sonne and the holie Ghost are the wisedome and power of GOD Therefore they are not persons distinct from the father but the father himselfe wise and powerful Aunswere There is an ambiguity in the woordes wisedome and power which in the Maior signifie the wisedome and power whereby not only the father but the Sonne also and holy Ghost is wise and forcible or effectuall that is the common nature or essence of the father and the Sonne and the holy Ghost But in the Minor they signifie the persons of the Sonne and the holy Ghost the Son beeing called the wisedome and the holy Ghost the power of GOD because by them the Deitie sheweth foorth and declareth the wisedome and power thereof OF CREATION NEXT vnto the Doctrine concerning God the Doctrine of the woorkes of GOD is most fitly placed as we see to be done also in the Creede The woorks of God are of two sortes Generall and Speciall The general are diuided into the works 1. Of creation the works whereof are read in Genesis to haue bin accomplished in 6. daies are by daily increase furthered and multiplied in the world 2. Of preseruation whereby God still susteineth the heauens and earth and the things that in them are that they fal not to ruine and decay 3. Of administration whereby through his immense and great wisdome he administreth and gouerneth all things These two latter are comprehended vnder the name of his prouidence And therefore next vnto creation is annexed the place concerning Gods prouidence The Special woorkes of GOD are those which are wrought in the Church and company of his elect and chosen to iustifie sanctifie and glorifie them and are either works of Reparation or restoring whereby hee repaireth al things which for the sinne of man are subiect to corruption or of perfection and accomplishment whereby hee bringeth all things to their certaine appointed end The principall questions of creation are these 1 Whether the world were created of God 2 How it was created 3 For what cause it was created 1 WHETHER THE WORLD WERE CREATED OF GOD. THE name of the world is diuerslie vsed in the Scripture 1. It signifieth the vniuersal frame of all thinges namelie Heauen and Earth and al thinges which are them visible and inuisible besides God himselfe 2. Woorldlie concupiscences 3. All mankind 4. The wicked or those that are not regenerate in the world 5. The elect Here we consider it in the first sense To create signifieth 1 to ordaine or constitute as the latines vsed it creare Consulem to create a Consul 2 To make something of nothing without any motion with a becke or woorde only So is it taken in this place 3 The continuating of creation or creation continued Which is the prouidence of God That the worlde hath not beene from euerlasting but had when it seemed best to the creatour according to his eternal counsel and wil a beginning once and was created of that only true God who hath manifested himselfe in the Church that he is the eternal Father and Sonne and Holy Ghost we know First by testimonies of holy scripture as by the whole historie of the creation set downe by Moses Likewise out of other testimonies of Scripture verie many Psalm 33 6.9 By the woorde of the Lorde were the heauens made and all the host of them by the breath of his mouth Ps 104.113.124.136.146 Isay 44. Act. 4. 17. He spake and it was doone he commaunded and it stood or was created There are other places also in the Psalmes where more largely and amply the wonderfull woorkes of God and the principall partes of the woorlde created by God are proposed to be considered of vs that through the consideration thereof wee may learne to put our trust and confidence in God For to this purpose did the Lord himselfe propose vnto Iob his marueilous and incomprehensible woorkes conspicuous in heauen Iob. 38. 39. and earth other thinges also
daie Eph. 5.27 That he might make it vnto himselfe a glorious Church not hauing spot or wrincle or anie such thing 4 Whom he saueth HE saueth all and onelie the elect and beleeuers Hee saueth the elect and beleeuers onely which haue beene are or shall bee euen from the beeginning to the ende of the woorlde and that both by his merite and by his efficacie For in them onely which embrace the benefite of Redemption with a true faith hath GOD his ende euen his worship and glorie Therefore vnto them onely it doth befall Iohn 3.16 GOD so loued the woorld that hee hath giuen his onelie begotten Sonne that whosoeuer beleeueth in him should not perish but haue euerlasting life Iohn 17.20 I pray not for these alone but for them also which shall beleeue in mee through their woorde that they all maie bee one c. Iohn 6.51 I am the liuing bread which came downe from heauen if anie man eate of this bread hee shal liue for euer Ephesians 1.4.12 Hee hath chosen vs in CHRIST that wee shoulde bee holie and without blame before him in loue and that wee shoulde bee vnto the praise of his glorie I BELEEVE IN CHRIST THe name of Iesus doth rather summarily than expressely note the office of the Mediator What is signified by the name of Christ and is as it were a proper name designing rather a certaine person But the woorde Messias or Christ or Annointed is properly an epitheton of the office which being adioyned to the former doth more significantly declare the proper and certaine office of the Mediatour For it expresseth metonymicallie the three parts thereof namely to bee a Prophet a Priest and a King For these three were wont to be annointed and so to be designed to these functions Obiection But it may bee that CHRIST was annointed but to one of these functions onelie Aunswere He is called in the Scripture a Prophet a King and a Priest And further CHRIST was signified by annointed persons whereof those three sortes were in the olde Testament And hence it commeth to passe that these two names JESVS CHRIST are often ioined For it is not inough to beleeue that there is a Sauiour and that hee is exhibited but wee must further also certainly bee perswaded that this IESVS borne of the Virgine Marie is that Sauiour and CHRIST promised in the olde Testament Furtherermore concerning the office of the Mediatour as it is designed by this name CHRIST which signifieth Annointed fower thinges especiallie offer themselues to bee considered 1 What the vnction or annointing of Christ is or in what sense he is called Annointed 2 What is Christs propheticall function 3 What his Priesthood 4 What his Kingdome 1 WHAT CHRISTS VNCTION OR ANNOINTING IS What was betokened by annointing in the old Testament ANnointing in the old testament was a ceremonie whereby according to gods ordinance Prophets Priests and Kings were annointed either with some speciall or with common oile that it might stand for a testimonie to those who were rightlie annointed that they were called of god to the administring of one of these functions and that they should be furnished from god with giftes necessarie for the performing of that whereunto they were called For Annointing signified 1. The calling and ordaining of anie to the office eyther of a Prophet or of a Priest or of a King 2. It signified the promise and bestowing of giftes necessarie thereto For to whome GOD committed anie office and whome hee caused to bee annointed to these also hee subministered the giftes of the holie GHOST necessarie for the discharging of it as knowledge wisedome strength foâ—titude industrie authority and such other 3. It signified the fragrantnesse or sweete sauour of the labours employed in that vocation that is it was a testimonie that the labours were gratefull and acceptable to GOD and that hee woulde prosper such labours as the Annointed shoulde with a true faith and cheerefullie vndergoe in exequuting the function committed vnto them of GOD. 2. Corinth 2.15 We are vnto GOD the sweete fauor of Christ in them that are saued 1. Corinth 15.58 Your labour is not vaine in the Lord. Further the outwarde annointing did as a signe represent the inwarde that is the giftes of the holy GHOST as the thinges signified by reason of a correspondent Analogie and proportion For as oile maketh the drie partes beeing annointed therewith liuely agill and able and fitte to doe their duetie and besides to send foorth a sweete fauour So the holie Ghost furnishing them with necessarie giftes which are ordained to a function giueth them strength and power whereby they being of themselues vnfit to doe any good are made fit and able to woorke and accomplish thinges gratefull vnto God that is the holie Ghost causeth them to dispatch readilie and with dexteritie the partes of that dutie which is enioined them and to doe thinges acceptable to GOD and auaileable for the preseruation of the Church Nowe the annointing of Iesus Christ is First the ordaining of the sonne of God to the office of the chiefe Prophet Priest and King of the Church Secondlie The especiall communicating of the giftes of the holie Ghost necessarie for this office Thirdlie Gods approbation and prospering of this office Isaie 53.10 The LORDE woulde breake him and make him subiect to infirmities when hee shalt make his soule an offering for sinne hee shal see his seede and shall prolong his daies and the will of the Lord shal prosper in his hand He shal see of the â—auell of his soule and shal be satisfied by his knowledge shal my righteous seruant iustifie many for he shaâ— beare their iniquities Therefore wil I giue him a portion with the great and hee shal diuide the spoile Iesus then the sonne of God and Mary is called Messias or Christ or annointed First because he was appointed of his father from euerlasting the Mediatour that is the chiefe Prophet Priest King of the Church This is confirmed by this reason He that is to be a Prophet a Priest and a King and is called annointed hee is in respect of those three called annointed But the Mediator which was called Messias or annointed was to be the chiefe Prophet Priest and King of the Church Therefore he is in respect of those three called annointed or Christ Again the same is shewed by many places of Scripture Ioh. 7.28 I came not of my selfe c. Iohn 6.38 I came downe from heauen not to doe mine owne will but his wil which hath sent me Heb. 5.5 Christ tooke not vnto himselfe this honour to bee made the High-Priest but hee that saide vnto him Thou art my sonne this day begate I thee Psalm 110.4 The Lorde swore thou art a Priest for euer after the order of Melchisedeck Hebr. 13.8 Iesus Christ yesterday and to daie the same is also for euer Reuel 13.8 The Lambe slaine from the beginning of the world 1. Corinth 130. CHRIST is
in the word annointing For in the Maior it is taken either for the whole annointing or for that part which is an ordeining to an office but in the Minor it is taken for the other part onely which is the participation of the giftes of the holie Ghost Nowe then according to which nature christ is not annointed that is neither seuerally by a designement to an office neither by both a designement to an office a receiuing of the giftes of the holie Ghost according to that nature he is not Mediatour Christ according to his Godheade is not annointed both with a designement to an office and a receiuing of giftes yet is hee according to his Godheade annointed by an ordaining or designement to an office Therefore hee is Mediatour also according to his Godhead Christ therefore is Mediatour that is the Prophet Priest Christ Mediatour according to both natures and King of the church in respect of both natures For vnto the office of a Mediatour doe mo actions concur whereof some he executeth by his Godhead some by his flesh yet so that they are don performed together the properties of both natures being as it were coÌ„municated Wherefore that we er not here nor coÌ„ceiue amisse these two rules ar to be obserued The first the properties of the one nature in the mediator are attributed to the other in the concrete that is to the person yet still in respect of that nature whose properties they are This is called the communicating of the properties it is a certaine kind of Synecdoche The second The names of the mediatorship are attributed to the whole person in respect of both natures yet reseruing still the properties of each nature and the differences of actions For to the perfourming of the Mediatourship the properties of faculties and operations both of the diuine and of the humane nature are required 2 WHAT IS CHRISTS PROPHETICALL FVNCTION The signification of the name Prophet THE worde Prophet commeth from the Grecke word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifieth to publish abroade things either present or to come A Prophet in general is a person called of god who publisheth and expoundeth vnto men the will of God concerning things either present or to come which without some reuelation from God remain vnknowne to vs as being such to the knowledge wherof men were not able by themselues to come A Prophet is either a minister or the head and chiefe of the Prophets which is Christ Of Ministerial Prophets some are of the old some of the new Testament Of the new Testament some are specially so called some only in generall What the Prophets of the old Testament were The Prophets of the olde Testament were persons immediatlie called and instructed of God himselfe either by instinct or by dreams or by diuine visions or by speeches had by God with them that they should declare to men to whom they were sent the true doctrine concerning God and his worship and cleanse and cleare it from errors and corruption that they should recount illustrate the promise of the Messias to come and his kingdome and benefits of remission of sinnes and eternal life by and for him to bee giuen to all beleeuers that they should foretell future euents good and bad and rewards and punishments that they should guide administer and order many counsels and offices politicke or ciuil hauing diuine and certaine testimonies to warrant them that they could not erre in such Doctrine precepts and counsels as they propounded in the name of God Those testimonies were especially these 1 The continuall consent of the Prophets in Israell of Moses and the Patriarcks both one with another and with those first diuine reuelations which were giuen at the creation in Paradise 2 Miracles certainly comming from God 3 The euents of things exaâ—tly aunswering to the sacred oracles and predictions of the Prophetes 4. The Testimony of the holy Ghost thoroughlie perswading and conuincing mens minds concerning the truth of Propheticall doâ—trine Such Prophets were Adam Seth Noa Abraham Isaac Iacob Ioseph and other and afterwards Moses they who succeeded him among the people of Israel A Prophet of the new testament specially so called What a Prophet of the new Testament is both in generall and in special is a person who by diuine instinct and through speciall reuelation of the holie ghost doth certainly foresee and foreshewe thinges to come As were the Apostles Agabus Acts. 11.28 cap. 21.11 and the Disciples telling Paul through the spirite that hee shoulde not goe vp to Ierusalem Acts. 21.4 c. A Prophet of the newe Testament in general is called anie whosoeuer hath the gift of vnderstanding expounding and applying the Prophecies and writinges of the Prophets who are properly so called to the present vse of the church So is this word vsed 1. Cor. 14.3.4.5.29 This function gift of prophecying that is of expounding applying the Scriptures of the Prophetes and Apostles to the vse of the Church is at al times necessary That other of foretelling things to come not so and therfore is it but temporary and for a time The great and chiefe Prophet which is Christ Christ a Prophet from the beginning of the church to all eternitie is a person immediatelie ordained of god euen from the beginning and cradel of the Church in paradise to al eternity sent of the father to declare the wil of god towards mankind to institute and appoint a ministerie to teach by the woorde and Sacramentes the holy ghost working together with him and lastlie in the fleshe to preach the gospel and to make knowen that hee is the Sonne consubstantiall and of the same substaunce with the father and author of the Euangelique doctrine kindling it in the harts of men and not only preaching it as a Minister And therefore Christ is called the WORDE not onely in respect of the father of whome in cogitation beholding himselfe and considering the image of himselfe not vanishing but subsisting consubstantial coequal coeternall to the father himselfe hee was begotten but also in respect of vs because hee is that person which spake to the fathers and brought foorth the liuing and quickening woorde or Gospell out of the bosome of the Father What Christ according to his propheticall fuâ—ction was to doe Wherefore the propheticall function of Christ is 1 To open declare vnto men God his secret will of sauing beleeuers by and for him shewed vnto him immediatly from God himselfe 2 To refine and purifie the Lawe and woorshippe of God from corruptions Mat. 5.67 he interpreteth the Lawe Ioh. 1.18 The sonne which is in the bosome of the Father he hath declared him Iohn 8.26 The things that I haue heard of the Father those speake I to the woorld 3 To open the promises of the gospell concerning himselfe to bee borne to suffer and to die concerning remission of sinnes our reconciliation vnto God
is most absurd or hee was this from the beginning of the worlde Heb. 3. Hee is made the builder of the house whereof Moses also was a part Hebr. 13. Iesus Christ yesterdaie and to daie and the same for euer Our Second aunswere is by denying their interpretation For Saint Iohn there speaketh of the first creation Which we shewe First Because he speaketh of the second afterwardes As manie as receiued him to them hee gaue power to be the Sennes of God Likewise Of his fulnesse haue all wee receiued and againe Grace and trueth came by Iesus Christ Now he therefore setteth down the first creation before because both creations are the worke of the same That therefore he might shew that the second creation was wrought by the woorde it was necessarie for him to teach that the first also was wrought by it For the same is the Creatour and repairer of the worlde Secondly Because he saith the world was made by him Reply The woorlde heere is taken for the Church Aunswere No for hee addeth And the woorlde knewe him not The same woorlde which was made by him knewe him not Therefore hee meaneth the wicked whether elect or reprobate Thirdly other places demonstrate the same Iohn 5.17 My Father woorketh hitherto and I woorke Wherefore both of them from the beginning of the woorlde woorke the workes of both creations In the same place verse 19. Whatsoeuer thinges the Father dooth the same thinges dooth the Sonne also And vers 20. The Father sheweth him all thinges whatsoeuer hee himselfe dooth Therefore not onlie the workes of the second creation but also of the first creation preseruation and administration of the world In the same place it is said As the Father quickeneth so the Sonne quickeneth whom he wil. But the Father was from the very beginning the giuer of corporal spirituall life Col. 1.16.17 By him were all things created which are in heauen and which are on earth thinges visible and inuisible whether they be thrones or dominions or principalities or powers all thinges were created by him and for him And hee is before al thinges and in him al things consist Thus farre of the first creation that which followeth speaketh of the second creation Reply 1. All these speake of the instauration of the Church Answer No. Because that comprehendeth also the Angels Reply 2. The Angels also were restored by Christ and ioined to their head Auns But the new creation is called a restoring from sinne death to righteousnesse and life this agreeth not to the Angels Reply Heb. 1.2 By whom also he made the worldes The worlds that is the new Church Aunswere 1 God made the old also by him because it is one Church hauing one head and foundation 2 The Greek word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is vsed in that place signifieth in Scripture the world not the Church And faâ—der when it is there added Bearing vp al thinges by his mighty worde those words speak of the preseruation not only of the Church but of al things And moreouer he rendereth a cause why he is the heire not only of the Church but of all Creatures namely because he is the creatour preseruer of all thinges Heb. 1.10 Thou Lord in the beginning hast established the earth the heauens are the works of thine hands Reply In these wordes he conuerteth his speach to the Father to prooue that he was able by his power to lift vp the Sonne to diuine maiestie Aunswere This is â—â—â—mpudent shift and elusion 1 Because it is saide before But vnto the Sonne which appertaineth to both places of the Psalme cited by the Apostle 2 Because the Psalme dooth entreat of Christes kingdome and therefore those words which there are spoken of the Lord are to be vnderstood next immediatly of his person secondarily and mediately of the father Reply 1. If he made all thinges then then father made them not by him Aunswere Both he made them and they were made by him Ioh. 5. Whatsoeuer things the Father dooth the same dooth the Sonne also And yet the father dooth them by him Reply 2. The creatour cannot be compared with the creatures But Christ is there compared with the Angels Therefore creation of thingeâ—â—s not attributed vnto Christ Aunswere He is not comparâ—d with the creatures in any proportion but without proportion This the place it selfe of the Psalme prooueth â—he heauens shall perish but thou doost remaine Reply 3 Iâ— hee were creatour and equall with the Father hee could not sittâ— at his right hand Aunswere Wee may inuert this and saâ— of the contrarie rather if he were not equal he could not sitte at his right hand Because none but the omnipotent and true God is able to administer the kingdome of heauen earth Phil. 2.6 who beeing in the forme of god thought it no robberie to be equal with God Isay 45.23 Thus saith the Lorde that created heauen Euerie knee shall bowe vnto me This is saide of Christ Rom. 14.11 Phil. 2 10. Againe Isay 48.12 I am I am the first and I am the last My hand hath laide the foundation of the earth and my right hand hath spanned the heauens when I call them they stand vppe together These wordes Christ applieth vnto himselfe Reuelat. 1.18 and 22.23 In it was life In the word was life and the life was the light of men Wee interpret That the sonne of God is by himselfe the life as is the Father and the fountaine giuer and maintainer of al life as wel corporall and temporall as spirituall and eternall in all from the verie beginning of the world Iohn 5. He hath giuen to the Sonne to haue life in himselfe as the father hath life in himselfe They conster it That the man Iesus is the quickener or giuer of life because in him is the life of all that no man without him and all by him are saued These are their words Vnto which we reply If hee giue eternall life to all so that no man hath is without him Therefore either no man was quickened before hee was borne of Mary which were absurd or hee was the quickner giuer of life from the beginning Euen as Ioh. affirmeth this of him as beeing verified in him also before hee was made fleshe Neither can this be vnderstood onely of his merit whereby hee deserued this life for men For that life is in him signifieth that hee is by his efficacie and effectuall woorking the quickner and reuiuer as himselfe expoundeth it Iohn 5. and 10. and the aduersaries themselues confesse So are wee also to vnderstand his illightening of men that is the knowledge of God the author whereof hee was in all euen from the beginning as himselfe saith No man knoweth the Father but the Sonne and hee to whome the Sonne will reueile him And Iohn Baptist saith No man hath seene God at ANY TIME the Sonne hath declared him And the light shineth in the darckenes
he obtaineth by his power efficacie vpon beleeuers to make the wil of god known vnto meÌ„ to institute a ministerie to collect gather preserue the church that wholy Mat. 11.27 No maÌ„ hath known the father but the son he to whoÌ„ the son wil reueil him Therfore neither did Adam knowe god but by the sonne by a consequeÌ„t the son existed at that time Hither are referred the testimonies not only which speake of Christs merit to come but of his efficacie also and power Eph. 1.22 Hee hath made all things subiect vnder his feete and hath appointed him ouer al things to be the head to the Church Eph. 2.20 Ye are built vpon the foundation of the Apostles and Prophets Jesus Christ himselfe being the chiefe corner-stone Christ therefore is the the foundation head vpholder gouernor of the Church therefore also he was before the Church was John 14.6 J am the waie the truth and the life Ioh. 10.28 J giue vnto them eternal life Ioh. 1.4 Jn it was life the life was the light of men And a little after That was the true light which lighteth euerie man that commeth into the world Eph. 2.18 Through him we both haue an entrance vnto the father by one spirit Eph. 4.11 He gaue some to be Apostles some Prophets and some Euangelists some Pastors teachers 1. Pet. 1.11 The spirit of Christ is said to haue been in the Prophets foretelling the suffrings that shoulde come vnto Christ Hebr. 3.5.6 Moses verily was faithfull in all his house as a seruaunt for a witnes of the thinges which shoulde bee spoken after But christ is as the sonne ouer his owne house Iohn 17.2 As thou hast giuen him power ouer all fleshe that hee shoulde giue eternall life to all them that thou hast giuen him Therefore it is Christ who from the beginning of the woorlde did reueile the will of God vnto men appoint and ordaine a ministerie collect gouerne and saue his Church whereof he is the builder which seeing it is apparent that he hath done from the beginning of the Churches birth it is not to be doubted of that he hath alwaies beene subsisting Ioh. 6.39 This is the fathers will that of all which hee hath giuen me I shoulde loose nothing Wherefore hee saueth his Church and therefore hath alwaies beene because the Church hath alwaies beene saued and preserued To the seuenth classe are those places referred in which both the name and propertie of Iehoua are attributed vnto the Angel who appeared in the old Testament vnto the Fathers and was the leader of the people whom to haue bin the Sonne of God Christ both the Church hath alwaies confessed and the scripture doth witnesse it The Prophet Malachie hath a notable testimonie cap. 3.1 Behold I will send my messenger and he shall prepare the way before me and the Lord whom yee seeke shall speedily come to his Temple euen the messenger of the couenaunt whom yee desire This speaketh Christ himself by the Prophet which is also confirmed by this Argument Whose way is prepared he is Christ but he that promiseth is he whose way is prepared Therefore he that promiseth is Christ The Maior is manifest for not the Father but Christ was looked for and he followed Iohn Baptist The Minor is prooued out of the text it selfe Beholde I will send my messenger and hee shall prepare the way before me Wherfore Christ was before he tooke fleshe because hee sent his messenger and was also before he tooke flesh very God For hee calleth it his Temple to which he saieth hee will come But none hath a Temple builded in worship of him but god therefore it is blasphemous to say that Christ was not before he tooke fleshe Neither doth that hinder because he speaketh in the third person The Lord will come to his Temple For he sufficiently sheweth who that Lord is namely not the Father but the sonne I the Lord who send Iohn befâ—re mee and who am the messenger of the couenant And further it may be that the prophet doth not continue in making Christ speake but representeth the Father himselfe speaking of sending the sonne Psal 45.6 and Heb. 1.8 Vnto the sonne hee saith O God thy throne is for euer and euer Heb. 3. Christ Iesus is the Apostle and high Priest the builder heire and Lord of his Church Heb. 13.8 Iesus Christ yesterday and to day the same is also for euer The Argument therefore is this The messenger or Angel sent of olde vnto the Church was a subsistent or person That messenger is the sonne of God Christ Therefore the sonne of God was before Iesus was borne of the Virgin truely existing did worke and was ruler ouer his church The Minor is proued First because to bee God and to be sent of God for to teach collect gouerne and saue the church that is to bee the Mediatour are thinges proper vnto the sonne of God Christ not to the Father or the holy Ghost But these properties of the sonne are attributed to this messenger or Angel as author and effectour Exo. 3. and 4. Gen. 32.28.30 Gen. 48.15.16 Secondly the Apostle Paul 1. Cor. 10. teacheth Christ to haue beene present with the people of Israell in the desert and to haue beene tempted and prouoked by them Therefore the Messenger or Angel GOD and CHRIST are one and the same person In the eight Classe The diuine Nature in Christ both was before the flesh and is the sonne of God are conteined those testimonies of Scripture which affirme Christ Jesus to be by nature god and the sonne of god The Argument is this Christs Diuinitie existed before Jesus borne of the Virgin Christs Diuinitie is the sonne of god Therefore the sonne of god existed before Jesus was borne The Maior of this Argument is confirmed by the reasons alreadie alleadged For first God is manifested in the flesh which hee tooke Secondly Christ is the proper or naturall sonne of god and not man onelie Thirdly Christ is the woorde Fourthly Christ is that wisedome subsisting Fiftly CHRIST is the Mediatour Sixtly CHRIST is that Messenger or Angell sent of olde to his Church And to these reasons commeth the seuenth That in Christ is not anie created god-head but that eternall Deitie which alone is true god For vnto Christ not onelie the name but all the properties also and perfections of the true god are euerie where ascribed in scripture as omnipotencie infinite wisedome omniscience or all knowledge immensitie the creation and gouernaunce of thinges the saluation of the Church the woorking of miracles Romans 9.5.1 Timothie 3.16 Isai 9.6 Ieremie 23.6 and elsewhere And the attributing and giuing vnto him of the properties of the true God yeeldeth vs a more firme proofe of his Diuinitie than dooth the attributing of the name of the true God or of the Lord. For the names of God may after a sort be expounded metaphoricallie but the Diuine propertie
is a consuming fire Fourthly That wee might know that whatsoeuer this sonne speaketh it is the will of God and the truth For whatsouer is borne of flesh which is sinful and not sanctified is flesh falshood and vanitie Obiection But he was borne of a Mother which was a sinner Why then should not Christ haue sinne Aunswere The Holy Ghost doth best know how to seuer sinne from mans nature for sinne is not of the nature of man but came else-whence euen from the Diuel Mary therefore was a sinner but that masse of flesh which was taken out of her substaunce was by the operation of the Holy Ghost at the same instant sanctified when it was taken The third thing which is signified 3 The vniting of his flesh vnto his Godhead in that Christ is saide to bee conceiued by the holie Ghost is the vnion of the humane nature with the Woorde For the fleshe of Christ was together both created or formed and also sanctified and vnited to the Sonne of the holy Ghost immediatelie but of the Father and the Sonne by the spirite It is added furder in the Creede Born of the Virgin that he was borne of the Virgine Mary that is of the Virgins substance and that cheifely for these causes 1 That we might know 1 The seede of Dauid Christ our Mediatour to be the true seede of Dauid that is to be true man and our brother who hath humane flesh made not of nothing neither else-whence but issued from the seede of Dauid Isaack and Abraham of whome also the virgine Mary hir selfe came yea of the selfe same masse of Adam whereof both they and we are 2 That it may certainly appeare vnto vs 2 Messias That this Iesus borne of the Virgine is that Messias promised vnto the Fathers For it was foretolde by the Prophets that the Messias the redeemer of mankind should be born of the stocke of Dauid and that by a miraculous conception birth hauing a Virgin for his Mother Wherefore seeing both that is both the prophecies and the miracles are in this Iesus fulfilled there can bee no doubt but that this is the Messias true Man and true God the reconciler of GOD and man 3 That this Christes birth of a Virgin might be a testimonie that he is pure and without sinne 3 Without sinne sanctified in the wombe of the Virgin by the vertue of the holy Ghost 4 That it might bee a figure of our regeneration 4 A figure of our new birth which is not of blood nor of the will of the flesh nor of the wil of man but of God Iohn 1.13 Wherefore to beleeue in Christ which was conceiued by the Holie Ghost â—â—d borne of the Virgin Mary is to beleeue That this naturaâ— Sonne of God conceiued and borne after this maner is made true man after a marueilous order and the same to bee one Christ hauing two natures vnited by personall vnion one to another which are his diuinity and his humanitie and to beleeue farther that he was holy from his mothers wombe to redeeme sanctifie me and that I for this Sonnes sake so conceiued and born haue the right of the adoption of the Sonnes of God For he cannot be Mediatour betweene God men who is not himselfe man who is not righteous who is not vnited with the Woorde that is true and by nature God man of sufficiencie and abilitie to bestowe his purchased saluation for vs on vs. Next after this article of the conception and Natiuitie of Christ for the better vnderstanding thereof followeth not vnfitly the common place Of the incarnation of the Sonne of God or Of the two natures in Christ THE COMMON PLACE OF THE TWO NATVRES IN CHRIST The Questions here to be obserued 1 Whether there be two natures in the Mediatour 2 Whether they be one or two persons 3 If they be one person what maner of vnion that is of them and how made 4 Why this personall vnion was necessarie to be made 1 WHETHER THERE BE TWO NATVRES IN CHRIST OVR MEDIATOVR Two natures in Christ WHAT there are two natures in Christ this one reason doth shewe by good demonstrance Essentiall properties which are opposite caÌ„not be in the same nor be affirmed of the same thing in respect of the same nature or cause Vigilius lib. 4. One nature dooth not receiue in it selfe a thing contrarie diuerse But in one and the same Christ are are affirmed of him properties diuerse contrarie diuine and humane finite infinite passible impassible and such like Therefore there must needes be diuerse natures in him humane and diuine And that the very diuine nature creatresse of all thinges is in Christ Christ true man and of our kinde and nature hath bin alreadie proued It remaineth that we shew a true humane nature to be in him that such as ours is and perfect consisting of a bodie and a reasonable soule of which as of essentiall parts is made a third substance to wit this particular humanitie which the Word hauing taken once into the vnity of person doth neuer laie awaie againe Which we are to holde against heretickes both oulde and newe whereof some deny Christes fleshe to haue bin formed of the Virgins substance but will haue it brought down from Heauen into the Virgin or begotten in her of the substance of the holy Ghost Others fancie Christ to haue in steede of true fleshe the likenesse semblance and appearancie of a mans bodie Others acknowledge indeede that hee hath a true bodie but not a humane soule the roome whereof is supplied by the Woord vnited vnto the body Against these the like errors the sentence doctrine of the church is confirmed First by plaine places of scripture which testify christ Maries son to haue bin made like vnto vs in al things that is in essence in properties in infirmities sin only excepted Lu. 1.31 Loe thou shalt coÌ„ceiue in thy womb bear a son Seeing then the Virgine conceiued this her sonne in her womb bare it vntil the vsual time of deliuery and was deliuered of it as other weomen vse to bee of their children it followeth that his flesh was not brought from heauen or elsewhere taken which should but passe only through the womb of the Virgin but was formed in the Virgins womb of her seed substance Heb. 2.11 He that sanctifieth and they which are sanctified are al of one wherfore he is not ashamed to cal theÌ„ Bretheren And a litle after For asmuch as the children were partakers of the flesh and blood he also himselfe likewise took part with them Again In al things it became him to be like to his brethren Therfore he hath a humane nature of the same kind wholy with ours Heereof hee is called the fruite of Maries womb Luk. 1.42 the first begotten son of Mary Luk. 2.7 made of a woman Gal. 4.4 The seed of Abraham Gal. 3.16
that vniuersall inuisible church which remaineth as yet in the field and is fighting on earth yet it is and lieth hid in the visible church And therefore there is almost the same difference betweene the vniuersal visible church and this Militant which is between the whole and a part Obiection If the whole be visible the part also is visible Aunswere That part is also visible as concerning the men Elected or as they are men and as they professe the doctrine of the visible church but it is not visible as concerning the godlinesse or faith of men or as concerning faith and repentaunce in men That this inuisible church militant here on earth is a part of the visible church is apparent euen out of this place of Paul Rom. 8.30 Whom the Lord predestinate them also he called This calling whereby the Lord calleth vs is of two sortes inward and outwarde the inwarde Sainct Paul saith was wrought according to the purpose of sauing men and the Elect are called by both Hypocrites are called onelie by the outwarde calling And in respect of this outwarde calling is the church called visible and the Church of the called wherein are hypocrits also But the inuisible is called the company or church of the Elect and chosen The Church of the old Testament and the New There is also another diuision of the Church into the Church of the olde Testament and of the newe The church of the olde testament is a companie or congregation embracing the doctrine of Moses and the Prophets and making profession that they will embrace in Iurie the Mosaicall ceremonies and keepe them and as well in Iurie as also out of Iurie embrace the thinges signified by those ceremonies that is beleeuing in the Messias which was to bee exhibited The church of the newe testament hath not these differences because all beleeue in the Messias already exhibited This Church is a companie embracing the doctrine of the Gospell vsing the Sacramentes instituted by Iesus christ beleeuing in him being exhibited the tru Messias 3 What are the tokens or marks of the Church THE markes of the true Church are 1. 1 Profession of the true doctrin Profession of the true vncorrupt rightlie vnderstood doctrin of the Law Gospell that is of the doctrine of the Prophetes and Apostles There concur withal oftentimes errors but yet notwithstanding this marke is sure if the foundation be kept albeit stubble be builded thereon yet so that those errors or stubble be not maintained 2. 2 The right vse of the sacraments 3 Profession of obedience to the doctrine The right and lawfull vse of the Sacramentes 3. Profession of obedience to the doctrine or ministerie Obiection In manie churches which professe true doctrine this third marke is not seene therefore they are no churches Aunswere 1 There are manie in them who indeed yeeld and endeuor to yeeld obedience 2. Al obey acknowledging by their profession that sinnes ought not to bee maintained But it is necessarie that this third mark should be added because they shoulde mocke God who woulde saie that they receiued this Doctrine of Christ and would not frame their liues according vnto it Matth. 28.19 Goe and teach all nations baptizing them in the name of the Father and the Sonne the holy Ghost Teaching them to obserue all thinges whatsoeuer I haue commaunded you In these woordes of Christ are all those three markes of the Church conteined Obiection 2. Not all that challenge these markes are the Church because all haue them not though they challenge them But those which all Schismatiques and heretiques doe challenge vnto them are not the markes of the true Church But all of them do challenge these vnto them therefore they are not the markes of the true Church Ans I denie the Maior For we are not to see whether they chalenge theÌ„ but whether they haue them So also woulde it follow that the heauenly blessings which are proper to the true Church are theirs also because they challenge them Obiect 3. Without which the church cannot bee that is a marke thereof But without the ordinarie succession of Bishops the church cannot be Therefore it is a marke thereof Ans By ordinarie succession in the ministerie The ordinarie succession of Bishops no necessarie marke of the Church is meant the succession of ministers in the same true doctrine and administration of Sacramentes And if the proposition bee so vnderstoode it is true for such a succession is nothing else than those notes which wee haue put But in the conclusion of this obiection is vnderstoode that there shoulde bee an ordinarie succession into the same place whether they teach the same doctrine or a diuerse from it And so also it should be a tying of the Church to a certaine Citie Region and so foorth Saint Augustine against Manichaeus his Epistle cap 5. sheweth how he was brought to the faith of the Catholique Church For hee saith That hee obeied the catholiques when they said Beleeue the gospell and there he bringeth forth that common saieng I woulde not beleeue the gospell except the autoritie of the catholique church mooued mee thereunto By the testimonie therefore of the church he was mooued to reade the gospell and to beleeue that heauenlie doctrine was conteined therein But doth hee after hee beleeued the gospell promise that hee would beleeue the church more than the gospel if the church determine or propound anie thing which is either contrarie to the gospell or can bee prooued by no testimonie of Scripture This doubtles Augustine neuer meant Naie elsewhere he denounceth Anathema and biddeth a curse come to them who declare any thing besides that which wee haue receiued in the writings of the Lawe and Gospell And in the selfe-same place he witnesseth That he because he beleeueth the Gospell cannot beleeue Manichaeus for that hee readeth nothing in the Gospell of Manichaeus Apostleship Therefore traditions or ordinances of the church bring vs vnto the scripture and ty vs to that voice which soundeth in the Scripture The Papistes wrâ—ngling about Traditions But here it must bee obserued howe honestly and fairely the Papistes deale For wheresoeuer they meete with the word Tradition that by and by they wrest to their traditions which can not bee proued out of the worde of god As when Paul saieth 1. Cor. 15.3 J deliuered vnto you that which J receiued straight waies they crie out heare you traditions I heare but reade on there in the woordes folowing Paul him-selfe by writing declaring what those traditions are J deliuered vnto you how that Christ died for our sinnes according to the scriptures And that hee was buried and that hee arose the third day according to the scriptures Pauls traditions written verities and registred scriptures Heare you heare Pauls traditions to bee doublie thinges written For first they were taken out of the scripture of the old Testament Secondly they were committed to
woord of God is the instrumental cause Now the cause of the difference beeing known let vs in a woorde see what that difference is Three sorts of men Wee are to obserue therefore that there are three sortes of men verie much different one from another For some men are euen in profession estraunged and aliants from the church as who deny faith or repentance and therefore are openly enemies of the Church others are called but not effectuallie which are al hypocrits Others lastly are called effectually which are the Elect who are but a little portion according to that of Christ Matt. 20.16 Many are called but few are chosen 7 Whether anie one maie bee saued out of the Church None saued out of the church NO man can bee saued out of the Church For whomsoeuer God hath chosen and elected to the ende which is eternal life them he hath chosen to the means which is the inward and outwarde calling Obiection Therefore Election is not free Aunswere It is free because God chose freely both to the end and to the meanes But after he hath once destined and ordeined men to meanes hee neuer changeth Wee are here also to holde against the Anabaptistes That infantes which are borne in the church are also of the church OF PREDESTINATION THIS common place of Predestination or election and reprobation ariseth out of the former place Of the Church is ioyned with it The special questions are 1 Whether there be Predestination 2 What it is 3 What is the cause thereof 4 What are the effectes thereof 5 Whether it be vnchangeable 6 How far it is knowen vnto vs. 7 Whether the Elect bee alwaies members of the church and the reprobate neuer 8 Whether the Elect fal from the church and the reprobate remaine euer in the church 9 What vse there is of this Doctrine 1 WHETHER THERE BE PREDESTINATION Predestination proued by Testimony of scripture THAT there is predestination testimonies of scripture do confirme Mat. 20.16 Many are called but few are chosen Ioh. 15.16 Yee haue not chosen mee but I haue chosen you Iohn 10.16 Other sheep haue I also which are not of this foulde Eph. 1.5 Predestinate according to the good pleasure of his will Acts. 18.10 J haue much people in this citie Eph. 1.4 Hee hath chosen vs in him Rom. 8.30 Whom he predestinate them also hee called By these and the like places wee learne that some are elected some not and therefore there is predestination When the Question is whether there be predestination theÌ„ this is in Question Whether there bee any such counsell of God which hath seuered some to bee saued and others to bee reprobate Some say that Election when mention is made thereof in scripture is taken for some excellencie for which a man is worthy to bee elected or chosen as wee may say a Choise and gallant horse So also they interpret reprobation but falsely for it is the eternall counsell and purpose of God That there is Reporbation is apparent by diuerse places Reprobation proued by scripture S. Paul saieth Rom. 9.22 That god doth shew his iustice on the vessels of wrath Mat. 13.11 It is giueÌ„ vnto you to know the secrets of the kingdome of heauen but to them it is not giuen Iud. vers 4. who were before of old ordeyned to this condemnation Mat. 14.25 â—hou hast had these thinges from the wise Iohn 10.26 Ye are not of my sheepe Pro. 16.4 He hath made al things for his own sake euen the wicked for the day of euill 1 Obiection But the promise of grace is vniuersall Aunswere It is vniuersall in respect of the faithfull that is it belongeth to all those who beleeue But it is particular in respect of al men Our aduersaries say that those which are conuerted maie fal awaie Which is to weaken and diminish the general promise Reply But it is said 1. Tim. 2.4 That God will that al men be saued But contrarie Matth. 20.16 Places of scripture reconciled concerning gods wil to saue and not to saue men Manie are called but fewe chosen Matth. 13.15 This peoples heart is waxed fat saith the Lorde least they shoulde returne that J might heale them And heere it is saide that God will that some bee not saued Therefore these testimonies are contrarie one to another Aunswere 1. God wil that al be saued as he is delited with the saluation of all Albeit elsewhere it is saide That hee reioiceth at the destruction of the wicked Prou. 1.26 yet hee reioiceth not thereat as it is a vexation or destruction of his creature but as it is an execution of his iustice 2. Hee wil that all bee saued in as much as he inuiteth al to repentance But he wil not haue all saued in respect of the force and efficacie of calling Actes 17.27 He dooth good vnto al if so be they might haue groped after him and found him Rom. 11.7 The Elect obtaine it the rest are hardened He saith verily vnto all Honesty of life pleaseth me yee owe it vnto me But he saith not to al I wil worke it in you but to the elect onely because from euerlasting it hath so pleased him 2 Obiection He that giueth vnequallie to those that are equal is an accepter of persons Aunswere It is true First if hee giueth to those which are equall vnequallie for anie outward causes or respectes that is for such causes as are not that condition in respect of which equall rewardes or punishmentes were to be giuen or not to be giuen that is when the cause which is common to both is neglected and other thinges regarded which are not the cause as riches honours and the like But here God respecteth the receiuing of this benefite and conuersion and giueth eternall life to them which haue these Secondly he that giueth vnto those which are equall vnequallie beeing bound to anie were an acceptour of persons But God giueth most freely of his meere mercy and grace Hee is bound to no man because we were his enemies therefore he might most iustly haue excluded all And if vniustice shoulde any waie fal into God which God forbid that we should think he should be vniust an acceptour of persons in that he giueth any thing at all But if thou beeing moued with pittie and compassion shouldst giue a farthing to one begger and a pennie to another thou art not therefore an acceptour of persons Matth. 20.15 Js it not lawfull for mee saith Christ to doe as I will with mine own Js thine eie euil because J am good Rom. 11.35 Who hath giuen first vnto the Lord To knowe this is behoouefull for the glory of God 3 Obiection Jt is meete and iust that he who hath taken a sufficient ransome for all sins should receiue al men into fauor God hath receiued a sufficient ransome for the sins of the whole worlde Therefore he should receiue al into fauor Christs ransome though
are good which wee doe but the manner after which wee doe them is not good OF SACRAMENTS THE Sacraments are a part of Ecclesiastical ministerie And as touching Ecclesiastical ministerie the questions are 1. What is the vse of the ministerie 2. What are the partes thereof 3. In what those partes agree and accord 1. The chiefe and last vse of the ministerie of the Church is that we beeing brought to Christ may be confirmed and assured of Gods will that is that it teach vs the will of God exhort vs to embrace Gods blessinges and benefites and ascertaine vs of the continuance of the same 2. The parts of the ministerie are the Sacraments and the word 3. The Sacraments so accord and agree with the word that whatsoâ—uer is promised vs in the word of the obteining of our saluation by Christ the same the sacraments as signes and seales annexed to the word as it were vnto a Charter or letters patent confirme vnto vs more and more thereby to help and relieue our infirmitie Whereby also it is apparent that the chiefe vse of the sacramentes to is in respect of God the confirmation of our faith like as also the ministers themselues whatsoeuer they doe in respect of their ministerie that they especiallie doe to declare and confirme gods will vnto vs. Obiection Jt is saide That the spirit and the Word worke faith in vs and the sacraments nourish it being wrought These three therefore differ nothing one from an other Aunswere First The Holy Ghost worketh and confirmeth faith in vs as the efficient cause thereof the Word sacraments as Instrumental causes 2. The Holy Ghost also can work faith in vs without them But the Word Sacraments without the holie Ghost can woorke nothing 3. The holy ghost wheresoeuer he dwelleth is effectuall in woorking The word Sacraments are not so These things brieflie were first to be spoken in general concerning the ministerie It remaineth that we now in fewe woordes entreat Of the Sacraments which are the other part of the ministerie of the Church The right and direct methode of interpreting this doctrine of the Sacraments requireth that first wee speake of the Sacramentes in generall And this way may wee not vnfitly entreat in speciall of the Supper and Baptisme to wit if wee take in declaring each Sacrament in special the same questions and that course and order of the same questions which wee must obserue and follow concerning the Sacramentes in generall and lastly if wee applie those testimonies which speake of the Sacraments in generall to the handling and declaring of the Sacraments in special The chiefe Questions concerning the Sacraments 1 What Sacraments are 2 What are the ends of Sacraments 3 Jn what Sacraments differ from Sacrifices 4 Jn what they agree with the Word in what they differ from it 5 How the SacrameÌ„ts of the old new TestameÌ„t agree 6 What Sacramental vnion is 7 What the things differ from their signes 8 What forms of speaking of the Sacraments are vsual to the Church and Scripture 9 What is the lawful vse of the Sacraments 10 What the wicked receiue in the vse thereof 11 Howe manie Sacramentes there are of the newe Testament 1 WHAT SACRAMENTS ARE. The originall of the word Sacrament THAT we may know what Sacramentes properly are the name it selfe of Sacrament is first to be considered Among the auncient Romanes this word Sacrament signified a solemne forme of an oath taken in warre which they called a militarie Sacrament so called of Sacrando that is of sacring or consecrating them because by that oath euerie one was consecrated or destined to this captaine and not to any other to serue him Heereof it is that some will haue these ceremonies instituted by God therefore to be so called for that as souldiours did oblige and binde themselues by that military Sacrament vnto their captaine so wee bind our selues vnto our captaine Christ by a solemne oath in the presence of god Angels and men This truely is not vnapt or vnmeete metaphor but yet I thinke rather that the original of this name came from the olde Latine Translations in which wheresoeuer the worde mysterie is vsed in the new Testament for the same they commonly in Latine put the woorde Sacramentum Now mysterie commeth from a Greeke verbe 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifieth to institute instruct or initiate one in holy matters or matters of religion But that Greeke verb 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is deriued from another which is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifieth to shut because as Eustathius saith they who were initiated or entred in holy rites were to shut their mouth not to vtter those thinges which were secret Nowe a mystery is said to be either a secret thing it selfe or the signe of a secret thing or that which hath a secret signification which none vnderstand but they who are initiated in holy rites By a signe wee vnderstand an externall and corporall thing and action or a ceremony instituted and ordained by God which betokeneth a certaine internall thing and spirituall Which the Grecians call a mysterie and is otherwise called of Diuines a Sacrament And some such signes god alwaies would haue to bee extant in his Church whereby the good will of God towardes men might be recorded and made knowen that men of the other side might declare and shewe their faith towardes God and other duties of piety and godlinesse Sacramentes therefore are so called mysteries because they haue a secret signification which none vnderstand but they who are initiated and instructed concerning the substaunce of sacred matters or the pointes of Christian Religion HAuing seene now what the name of Sacrament signifieth it resteth that wee consider the thing it selfe and define what Sacramentes are The definition whereof is this Sacramentes are sacred signes and seals obiect to our eies The Definition of sacramentes ordained and instituted by God that by them he might the more declare and seal the promise of his gospel vnto vs. The partes of this definition are in number three The first part apperteineth to the kinde of Sacramentes the latter two to their difference To the kind whereof they are it apperteineth that they are sacred signes seals that is diuine The sacraments are sacred seals signifieng or betokening sacred things such as belong to gods worship and the saluation of men A signe and a seale differ one froÌ„ the other as a general thing froÌ„ a thing more special For euerie seale is a signe but not euery signe a seal A seale certifieth and confirmeth a thing A signe onely sheweth it A sign is a thing signifieng somewhat else than that which it sheweth to the senses or a signe is that whereby the vnderstanding vnderstandeth some thinges else besides the signe it selfe So wordes are the signes of thinges Moreouer signes are of two sortes some are onely signifieng others are confirming also that is such signes
correlatiue As therefore the things cannot be without the signe so if you take away the signe from the thing it remaineth no more a signe because the relation consisteth in the ioining of things As the master is no more a master if he haue no seruaunt Wherefore the thinges and their signes are distinguished but not sundered and separated Briefer thus Jn euery sacrament are the signe and the thing signified The thing is christ himselfe and his benefits or the communion and participation of christ and his benefites The thing and the sacrament differ in this The thing is not properly the sacrament neither are the signes sacramentes The signe is not the thing but if you take away the signe the thing remaineth no longer neither the signe if you take away the thing Therefore they are to be discerned not to be sundered Wherefore these two must be together so that if one be takeÌ„ awaie the other remaineth no longer that which before it was said to be Of all this which hath been said we conclude that there is a sacramentall vnion and coÌ„iunction of the things signes in sacraments and it consisteth â— Jn a similitude whereby the thing is signified shadowed and reâ—â—â—sented For if the signes haue not a resemblaunce and similitude with the things they are nowe no longer signes 2 In the ioint-receiuing of the things and signes In these consisteth the coniunction of the things and signes 7 In what the things differ from the signes THE signes differ from the things signified 1. In substauncâ—â— The signes are corporeall visible earthly the thinâ—â—â—â—â—uenly inuisible spiritual Obiection But the body of 〈◊〉 is a corporeall thing Aunswere By spirtuall things are here meant those which are through the woorking of the holy ghost receiued by faith onely and not by any part of our body 2. They differ in the maner of receiuing the signes are receiued by the hand mouth and partes of the body and therefore also of vn◠〈…〉 are receiued by faith onely and the spirit and therefore of the faithful only 3 In the end or vse The things are giuen for the possessing of eternal life they are eternal life it selfe or some part thereof The signes are receiued for the sealing confirming of our faith concerning the things theÌ„selues promised 4. The things signified are necessary are necessarily receiued of all the members of the true church The signes are receiued of them only who are able to receiue them The signes are diuerse the rites and ceremonies variable the things are perpetual and the same in al sacramentes 8 What phrases and formes of speaking of the sacramentes are vsual vnto the Church and scripture THe forms of speaking of sacraments are partly proper Proper formes of speaking partly figuratiue The proper are 1. When the sacraments ar called tokens signs seals those sealing confirming vnto vs that God wil giue those things which he hath promised So CircuÌ„cision is a seal of the righteousnes of faith And it shal be a signe in thy flesh 2. When vnto the signes are expresly adioined promises namely that we shall receiue the things signified by theÌ„ as when it is said Mar. 16 16. He that shal beleeue be baptized shall bee saued A figuratiue or sacramentall kind of speaking is Figuratiue forms of speaking 1. When the names of the things are giuen vnto the signes as the Paschall Lambe called the Passeouer 2. Contrariwise when the names of the signes are attributed to the things 3. When the properties belonging to the things are attributed to the signs As the bread which we brake is it not the communion of the body of christ so baptism is said to wash away sins to saue to regenerate 4. When coÌ„trariwise the properties of the signs are attributed to the things themselues As The rocke was christ We are washed by the bloud of Christ Al these phrases of speech signifie the same thing which is the promise of god adioined to the ceremony this therefore 1. Because the signs represent and seale the things Baptism is the washing of regeneratioÌ„ 2. Because the things the signs are together receiued by the faithful in the right vse therof 9 What is the right and lawful vse of Sacraments THE right vse of Sacraments is In the right vse of sacraments is respected 1 The institution of Christ which must be pure 2 The persons receiuing who must be beleeuers 1. When the rites ordained by God are obserued and not corrupted The institution of Christ is to bee retained pure and vncorrupt the additions of Antichrist are to be taken away and those things which he tooke away are againe to be added 2. When those persons vse those rites for whom God hath ordained them Wherefore the houshold of Christ onely that is Christians who by profession of faith and repentance are the Citizens of the Church must vse these rites Act. 8 37. If thou beleeuest with all thine heart thou maist bee baptized So also they are baptized of Iohn Matth. 3.6 who confesse their sinnes 3 The end for which they were instituted 3. When the rites and Sacraments are vsed to that end for which they were instituted For it is not lawfull to transforme the rites to any other ende or vse besides that whereunto they were ordained 1. Because that is not to obey Gods commandement 2. Because if the signs be changed or conuerted to another vse or the couenaunt not kept the consent of him that promiseth is lost without which the signe or earnest confirmeth nothing Wherefore the Sacraments without their right vse are no Sacraments but rather vain and fruitles spectacles neither haue they the nature of Sacramentes But the right and lawfull vse of them consisteth especiallie in faith and repentance They who haue not this vnto them the Sacraments are no Sacramentes Wherefore they are besides themselues who say that vnbeleeuers and infidâ—ls receiue together with the signes the things signified by the signes 10 What the wicked receiue in the vse and administration of the Sacraments The wicked receiue the bare signe without the things thereby signified THE wicked receiue the bare signes onelie and those to their iudgement and condemnation 1. Because the benefits of Christ are receiued onelie in the right vse of the Sacraments But they neglect the right vse of them who receiue them vnworthily Wherefore Paul also saith 1. Cor. 11.27 Whosoeuer shall eate this bread and drinke the cup of the Lord vnworthilie shall bee guiltie of the bodie and bloude of the Lorde But the wicked eate and drinke it vnworthily because they prophane the sacramentes and transforme God into the Diuel and the sonnes of God into the sonnes of the Diuel 2. Vnto whom nothing is promised in the Woorde to him the sacraments seale nothing For after what manner and vnto whom a Charter promiseth any thing after the same maner and to the same men doth the signe and seale annexed vnto
signifie Christ which hereafter shoulde bee exhibited the newe Christ who alreadie was exhibited is apparant by the interpretation deliuered of them in holy writ whereof wee spake in the definition Now they differ in clearenes because in the newe Testament the ceremonies are purer signifiyng things complete and perfect In the old were moe rites shadowing thinges to come all the circumstances whereof were not as yet declared The confirmation of the 15. conclusion What the Ministers doe in Gods name in the administration of the sacraments also that God by the sacramentes signifieth that is teacheth offereth promiseth vs the communion of Christ was declared in the second confirmation Hereof followeth the next which is that the holie ghost dooth mooue our heartes by them to beleeue For seeing the sacraments are a visible promise they haue the same authoritie of confirming faith in vs which the promise it selfe hath which was made vnto vs. Of this followeth the third For that which serueth for the kindling or raising of faith in vs the same also serueth for the receiuing of the cōmunion of Christ his benefits And because we attaine vnto this by faith Therefore it is said The bread is the communion of the bodie of Christ Baptisme doth saue vs. Neither yet doth the holy Ghost alwaies confirme and establish faith by them as the examples of Simon Magus and of infinite others doe shewe That the vse of them hurteth without faith hath beene prooued in the second Conclusion The confirmation of the 16. conclusion The sacraments without the word going before doe neither teach nor confirme our faith because the meaning and signification of them is not vnderstood except it be declared by the woorde neither can the signe confirme anie thing except the thing bee first promised An example hereof are the Iewes who obserued and nowe doe obserue the ceremonies but adioine thereto the not vnderstoode promise of the grace and benefites of Christ Without the Word those who are of vnderstanding are not saued either by doctrine as by ordinarie means or by an internal and extraordinarie knowledge Joh. 3.18 Hee that beleeueth not in the sonne is alreadie condemned Rom. 3.17 Faith commeth by hearing and hearing by the woorde of god But they may bee saued without the sacramentes because although by some necessitie they bee depriued of these yet they may beleeue as the theefe did on the Crosse Or if they be infants according to the condition of their age they are sanctified as Iohn in the wombe and many infants also in the wombe who died before the day of circumcision The Woord also is to bee preached vnto the wicked because it is appointed to conuert them But the sacraments are to bee administred vnto them who are acknowledged for members of the church because they are instituted for the vse of the church onely Act. 8.37 Thou maiest be baptized if thou beleeuest The confirmation of the eighteenth conclusion The confirmation thereof is manifest by the Passeouer and other sacrifices as also by the sabboth which all were commaunded by God that the godly might celebrate and worship God and shew themselues gratefull vnto him and might withall take the signes and tokens of those benefits of God which they receiued by the Messias So Baptisme is a confession of christianity and a signe whereby Christ testifieth that wee are washed by his bloode The supper of the Lord is a thankesgiuing for the death of Christ and an aduertisement that we are quickened reuiued by his death are made his members shall remaine continue with him for euer OF BAPTISME THE principall questions are 1 What Baptisme is 2 What are the ends of Baptisme or for what it was instituted 3 What is the sense and meaning of the words of the institution thereof 4 What are the formes and kindes of speaking of Baptisme 5 Who are to be baptized 6 The lawful and right vse of Baptisme 7 In place whereof Baptisme did succeede 8 Howe Baptisme agreeth with circumcision and in what is differeth from it WHAT BAPTISME IS BAptisme is an externall washing instituted by the sonne of God with the pronouncing of these words I baptize thee in the name of the Father and the Sonne and the holy Ghost to bee a testimonie that he who is so washed or dipped is reconciled through Christ by faith and is sanctified by the spirite vnto eternall life Goe saith Christ and teach all nations baptizing them in the name of the Father and the son the holy ghost It may also be fitly defined on this wise Baptisme is a ceremony instituted by Christ in the new testament whereby wee are washed with water in the name of the Father the sonne and the holy ghost to signify that we are receiued into fauor for the bloode of Christ shed for vs and are regenerated by his spirite and also to bind vs that hereafter we endeuour in our actions and deedes truly to testifie newnesse of life We are said to be receiued into fauour for the blood of Christ shed for vs to wit on the crosse that is for christs whole humiliation applied vnto vs by faith Baptism no bare signe onely Obiection Baptisme is said to be an external washing of water therefore baptisme is a bare signe onelie Aunswere This is a fallacy of diuisiō diuiding those things which are to be ioined Because when wee say that Baptisme is an externall signe we ioine with the signe the thing signified Moreouer there is no particle added which excludeth the thing And Baptisme is in it owne nature a bare signe but the promise commeth thereto and is ioined with this signe The differences betweene Baptisme and the washings of the olde Testament 2 Obiection There were washinges also in the oulde testament Baptisme is a washing Baptisme therefore is a sacrament of the old testament Aunswere The washings in the oulde testament were not a signe of the receiuing into the church as is Baptisme They signified Christ to come They did bind the Iewes only Baptisme extendeth and belongeth to al nations or to the whole church They were also instituted to wash away a ceremoniall vncleannesse Baptisme to wash away a morall vncleannesse and hence is it that Baptisme is called in the scripture a lauour or washing to wit in respect of that washing of the morall vncleannesse that is in respect of that inward or spiritual washing wherby we are washed or cleansed from our sinnes Nowe this washing is of two sortes The washing of Baptisme is of two sorts 1 The washing of bloud 2 The washing of the spirite 1. The washing of blood when we are washed by the bloode of Christ which is the remission of sinnes for the bloudshed of christ 2. The washing of the spirit when we are washed by Christs spirite which is our renewing by the holy Ghost that is the chaunging of euill inclinations into good which is wrought by the vertue of the holy Ghost in our
required 1. That they who vse the sign shew forth the death of the lord 2. That they trie thēselues whether they haue faith repentance or no. And seeing the age of Infants can not doe these things Infants are for good cause excluded frō the Supper 6 What is the right and lawfull vse of Baptisme The drosse which the Papistes blend with the simplicity of Christes institution in baptisme is to be reiected THE right and lawfull vse of baptisme is when the ceremonies or rites instituted by Christ in baptisme are not changed Whence it is manifest that the drosse and filth of Papists as oile spettle and exorcisme or coniuration is to bee throwen away Obiection But these appertaine and belong to order and comlinesse Aunswere The Holy Ghost knew well enough what did appertain thereunto Reply But they appertaine to the signifieng of some thing Ans It belongeth not to men to Institute any sign of Gods wil. This also we are to thinke iudge of others of the same hatching 2. The vse of baptisme is right when baptism is giuen to them for whom it was instituted which are al the cōuerted or mēbers of the church 3. When baptisme is vsed to that ende whereunto it was instituted not for the healing of cattle but when the true endes thereof are respected Briefly the lawful and right vse of Baptisme is when hee that is conuerted is baptized according to the lawfull rite and end Now Baptisme may not be reiterated 1 Because it dependeth not on the person of him that baptizeth And further he that is once engraffed into Christ shal neuer bee cast out or reiected and therefore it sufficeth to be once receiued 2 Saluation doth not depend on baptisme 7 In place whereof baptisme succeeded Baptisme succeeded in the roome of circumcision BAptisme succeeded in the place of circumcision which is prooued first by the woord of the Apostle before alleadged For he saith That we are circumcised in Christ with circumcision made without handes by putting off the sinful body of the flesh through the circumcision of Christ The Apostles purpose is by this speech to shew that there is no fruit or vse now Of the circūcision which was made with hands because that was accomplished fulfilled in christ which was by it prefigured and shadowed Now to declare expound these words he presently addeth that they are buried together with christ by baptisme by which words he sheweth that the complement truth of baptism is the cōplement truth of circumcision seeing baptism signifieth one the selfe same thing to vs which circumcision signified of old time vnto the Fathers which is that spiritual circumcisiō which christ accomplisheth performeth in vs. This only is the difference that baptisme is the signe of the thing exhibibited which circūcision prefigured when it was yet absent not exhibited Wherefore wee are taught by this place of Paul that baptism is the same to Christians which circumcision was before to the Iewes 2. That baptism was substituted in the place of circumcision this also conuinceth for that as circumcision so also baptisme is a signe of admission and receiuing into the Church For as the infantes of Iewes and Proselytes beeing borne citizens of the church were thorough grace circumcised but those who were of elder yeares were then first admitted vnto circumcision when they professed Iudaisme so also the infantes of christians are presently baptized but the elder sort are not vntill they haue made profession of true christian doctrine insteede of which profession it serueth the infantes that they were born in the church There are other reasons also besides the testimonies of holy scriptures drawen especially from the vse of Baptisme whereby it may be confirmed that Baptisme succeeded circumcision Now to succeed any sacrament is the former being abolished to be substituted in place thereof and that so as to haue the same vse and end which the former sacrament had and to haue also the same thing signified So is there the same thing signified by baptisme which was before by circūcision Moreouer the citizens of the church are no lesse receiued by baptisme and are discerned from al other men than in times past by circumcision Obiect If baptisme succeeded circumcision then now also only the males are to be baptized if the circumstances of circumcision be kept Answere The circumstances are not now determined as then because also these were peculiar special which maie be omitted without breach of the commandement But this is general agreeing to both that the children of the godly ought by this sign to be engraffed into the church whether that be doone on the eight day or presentlie after their birth 8 How baptisme agreeth with circumcision and wherein it differeth from it CIrcumcision and baptisme agree Baptisme circumcisiō agree 1 In the end which they respect 2 In the thing which they woorke 3 In the thing which they signifie The differences of Circumcision and baptisme 1. In the chiefe and principal end whereas in both is sealed the promise of grace by christ which is alwaies one and the same 2. By both of them is wrought our receiuing into the Church 3 By both is signified regeneration Ye are circumcised in christ with circumcision made without hands Circumcision and baptisme differ 1. In rites For the same are not the rites of circumcision and of baptisme 2. Circumcision on gods behalfe promised grace for the Messias to come baptism for the Messias exhibited The circumcised were receiued into fauour for christ which was to be exhibited the baptised are receiued for christ exhibited 3. Circumcisiō had a promise also of a corporal benefite that is it was a testimonie also that god would giue a certain place for the church in the land of Canaan vntill the comming of the Messias Baptisme hath no promise in particular of any temporall benefite 4. Circumcision on our behalfe did binde to the obseruing of the whole Law ceremonial iudicial and moral Baptisme bindeth vs onely to faith and amendment of life that is to obserue only the morall law 5. Circumcision was instituted for the Jsraelites Baptisme was instituted for all nations that are desirous and willing to come vnto the society of the church 6. Circumcision was to last vntil the comming of the Messias baptisme shal continue vntil the end of the world CERTAINE CONCLVSIONS OF BAPTISME 1 BAptisme is a sacrament of the newe testament whereby christ testifieth vnto the faithful which are baptised in the name of the Father and the Sonne and the holie Ghost remission of all their sinnes the giuing of the holy Ghost and their engraffing into the church and his bodie and they of the other side professe that they receiue these benefites from God and therefore wil and ought hereafter to liue vnto him and to serue him And further the same baptisme was begun by Iohn Baptist and continued by the Apostles because he
Church he must also publikely be corrected by the Church accordong as his trespasse is if neither yet he will repent being admonished and chastised by the Church whether it be he that committed a priuate trespasse or he that coÌ„mitted a publicke offence at length excommunication must bee inflicted by the church as the extremâ— and last remedie to correct men obstinate and impenitent euen as also Christ himselfe commaundeth in these woordes next following the place before alleaged Jf he refuse to heare the church also let him be vnto thee as an heathen man and a publicane In these wordes Christ expressely commaundeth all whosoeuer being after this sort admonished by the church wil not repent to be by the common consent of the church excommunicated vntill they repent It remaineth now that we see what Excommunication is Excommunication is the banishing of a grieuous transgressour or an open vngodly and obstinate person from the fellowshippe of the faithfull by the iudgement of the Elders by the consent of the church and by the authoritie of christ and by the holy Scripture When the Church therefore pronounceth of any that they are not godly they must be excommunicated and not admitted vnto the sacrament And whosoeuer are excommunicated they againe professing shewing in their actions amendmeÌ„t ar altogether in like sort receiued into the church as they were exiled froÌ„ it namely by the iugedmeÌ„t of the Elders by the consent of the Church the autority of Christ and the Scripture Furthermore the chiefe and principall part in excommunication is denunciation whereby is denounced that hee which denieth faith and repentance is no member of the church as long as hee cotinueth such how euer he make boast of the name of christians because the Scripture dooth not acknowledge him for a christian who although he professe himself in word to be a christian yet in deedes sheweth the contrary And this denunciation whereby one is excommunicated is not in the power of the minister of the Church but in the power of the Church and is doone in the name of the Church because this commandement was giuen by christ vnto the church For hee saith expressely tell the Church And verily this commaundement hee gaue vnto the church not for the destruction of the sinner which is to be excommunicated but for his edification oâ— saluation Neither ought this denunciation of the church to be vsed without effect for as was before saide of whome the church denounceth that they are not godly the church is bound to excommunicate them and not admitte them to the vse of the Sacramentes Now who are to be excommunicated is knowen sufficientlie by that which hath beene said before namelie such as either deny some article of faith or shewe that they wil not repent or submitte not them-selues to the will of God according to his commandements neither make any doubt of persisting stubbornly in manifest wickednesse Al such are not to be admitted into the Church or if they haue beene admitted into the Church in Baptisme yet we must not goe forwarde in offering them the Lordes sacred Supper but contrariwise such as professe faith and repentance the church is bound to admitte There remaine obiections of the aduersaries whereunto we will in few woords make answere 1 Obiection The charge and office of the keies is no where commaunded Therefore is not to be ordained in the Church by consequent no man ought to be excluded from the sacraments Ans The Antecedent is false because frequently in Scripture manifest testimonies of this charge and commission are extant Mat. 16.19 J will giue vnto thee the keies of the kingdome of heauen and whatsoeuer thou shalt binde vpon earth shall be bound in heauen Here in plaine wordes is expressed the power of the keies committed to all ministers of the word Moreouer what this office of charge of the keies committed to the Church is and how the Church must discharge this charge and funâ—tion Christ likewise plainly aduertiseth and declareth Mat. 18.17 18. If he will not vâ—â—â—safe to heare them tell it vnto the Church and if he efuse to heare the Church also let him bee vnto thee as an heathen man and a publicane Verily J say vnto you whatsoeuer yee shall binde on earth shall bee bound in Heauen and whatsoeuer yee loose on earth shall bee loosed in Heauen These thinges giuen thus in precept by Christ Paul also dooth in the thing it selfe confirme 1. Cor. 5.5 Let such a one be deliuered vnto Satan for the destructioÌ„ of the flesh that the spirit may be saued in the day of the Lord Jesus 1. Cor. 11.20 When ye come together into one place this is not to eate the Lords Supper 2. Thes 3.14 Jf any man obey not our sayings note him by a letter and haue no companie with him that hee may bee ashamed 1. Tim. 1.20 Of whom is Hymenaeus and Alexander whom I haue deliuered vnto Satan that they might learne not to blaspheme In the Prophets also are manifest testimonies in which this is apparent to haue beene commaunded by God Isai 1.11 What haue I to doe with the multitude of your sacrifices saith the Lord I am full of the burnt offerings of rams and of the fat of fed beastes and I desire not the bloud of bullockes nor of lambs nor of goates Isai 66.3 He that killeth a bullock is as if he slue a man he that sacrificeth a sheepe as if he cut off a dogs necke hee that offereth an oblation as if hee offered swines bloud he that remembreth incense as if he blessed an Jdoll Ier. 7.22 J spake not vnto your Fathers nor commaunded them when J brought them out of the land of Aegypt concerning burnt offerings and sacrifices Psal 50.16 Vnto the wicked said God What hast thou to doe to declare mine ordinaunces that thou shouldest take my couenant in thy mouth Wherefore Christ also saith Matt. 5.24 Leaue there thine offering before the Altar and goe thy waie first bee reconciled to thy brother and then come and offer thy gift There are other places also of Scripture besides these where it is coÌ„manded that all professed wicked persons be excluded from the church the vse of the sacraments as wheresoeuer is reprehended the vnlawfull vse of the sacraments Likewise wheresoeuer the ministers are commaunded to receiue only such for members of the church as professe faith repentaÌ„ce Reply God indeed forbiddeth the vngodlie to come vnto the sacraments but he willeth not that the church should forbid them Ans What god forbiddeth to be done in the church that wil he haue to be auoided by the Discipline of the church that God hath willed the church to forbid exclude professed vngodly persons is manifestly prooued by the fore alleadged places 2 Obiect Men are not able to discerne the woorthie from the vnworthie they cannot know who truelie repent who persist in impietie neither can they cast anie man into hell fire
which are written in the booke of the Law to doe them Now that the Law dooth not take away the intercession of Christ is apparant out of the gospell which teacheth that it is correspondent and agreeable vnto the iustice and Lawe of God that sinners should be receiued into fauour a sufficient satisfaction and their conuersion being interposed and comming between For god is not at variance with himselfe in the doctrine of the Law and the gospel The Ceremonial or lawes deliuered of god by Moses concerning Ceremonies binding the Iewes vntill the comming of the Messias that they should distinguish this people the church from others and should be signes symboles types or shadowes of spirituall thinges to be fulfilled in the New Testament by Christ That this definition may be vnderstood we must know what ceremonies are to wit solemne externall actions that is often to bee after the same maner with the same circumstances reiterated ordained of God or of men also to be vsed in the seruice and woorshippe of God for order or signification sake But the Ceremonies which are ordained of God are simple absolutely diuine worship The ceremonies which are ordained and instituted of men if they be good are a woorship onely seruing for diuiuine worship The Judicial or Lawes concerning the ciuill order or ciuil gouernement that is of the offices of Magistrates iudgementes punishments contractes and of the distinguishing and bounding of dominions deliuered of God by Moses for the settling and preseruing of the Jewes common wealth binding al Abrahams posteritie vntil the comming of the Messias and furder that they should be the bond of the preseruation and gouernment of this Mosaicall common wealth vntill the Messias was manifested and certaine markes whereby this people which was bound vnto them should be discerned from al others and should withall bee kept in honest discipline and good order lastlie that they might be types of that order which should be in Christs kingdome that is of the spiritual regiment of the Messias Ceremoniall and ciuill Lawes whether they be diuine or humane so that they be good are verily agreeable vnto the Decalogue But yet are they deduced thence onely by a necessary consequence and serue thereto as certaine prescriptions of circumstances Hereby plainly appeareth the difference of these Lawes which yet is diuerse because there is not one and the same gouernement of the common-wealth and of the church neither is there the same end of al these Lawes neither are al these Lawes after the same maner abrogated But the chiefe and especiall difference of these lawes is drawen frō the binding time knowledge or manifestation 1. The Moral ordinances are knowen by nature The ceremonial and ciuil are not knowen by nature but are instituted according to the diuersity of causes and circumstaunces 2. The Moral bind al men and euen the Angels also The ceremonial and ciuill were onely prescribed vnto the people of Israel And therefore Iob Iethro Naaman the Cyrian and others who are recounted for religious men that is such as were borne of Paynims and liued amongest them but yet worshipped the God which was manifested among the people of Israell they did not obserue the Leuiticall ceremonies and yet did neuerthelesse please God And the verie ordinaunces themselues concerning the ceremonies and the forme of ciuill gouernement shewe that they bind Abrahams posteritie onelie whom God woulde by this fourme of gouernment and worshippe distinguish from other nations 3. The Lawes of the Decalogue are perpetual in this life and after this life The ceremonial and ciuill were deliuered of God at a certaine time and againe abolished 4. The Moral Lawes speak of both internall and external obedience The ceremoniall and ciuil speak of externall obedience only albeit neither doth this please God without the internall and morall obedience 5. The moral Lawes are not limited by certain circumstances but are general as that there is a time to bee granted for the ministery and seruice of God and that the ministery is to be preserued that adulterers and theeues are to be punished But the ceremonial and ciuil Lawes are special or a limitation of circumstances which are to be obserued in external rites or actions both ecclesiastical and ciuil as that the seuenth daie is to be alotted for the ministery and seruice of God that the Tenths and first-fruits are to bee giuen to the Priestes that adulterers are to be stoned that theeues are to be amerced with a four-fold restitution 6. The ceremonial and the ciuil Lawes also are types or figures of other things for whose cause they were ordained The moral signifie or prefigure nothing but are signified by the rites and ceremonies 7. The morall are the end for which other causes are to bee made or they are the principal seruice and worshippe of god The ceremonial and ciuil serue for the moral ordinances that to them obedience might be rightly and duely perfourmed that a certain time and certain rites may be obserued in the publique ministery of the church that the ministery it selfe maie bee maintained and preserued 8. The ceremoniall giue place vnto the Morall The Morall giue not place vnto the Ceremoniall The Morall Lawe the Naturall and the Decalogue differ The Decalogue is the summe of the morall Lawes which are scattered throughout the whole Scripture of the olde and new Testament The Naturall lawe dooth not differ from the Morall in nature not corrupted but in nature corrupted a good part of the natural law is darkened by sins and but a little part only concerning the obedience due to god was left remaining after the fall For which cause also God hath in his church repeated againe and declared the whole sentence and doctrine of his Lawe The distinctions of these Lawes are to bee knowen both in respect of the differences of the same and also in respect of their aborgating and lastly for the knowing and vnderstanding of their vse 3 What the vse of the Lawe is THE first and principall vse of the ceremoniall and iudiciall Lawes of Moses was to serue as a schoolemaster vnto Christ and his kingdome that is to bee a signification of spirituall and Heauenly things in Christs kingdome namely the benefites of Christ towardes his Church and the duty of the Church towardes God and christ Gal. 3.24 The Law was our Schoolmaster to bring vs vnto Christ This S. Paul prouounceth of the whole Lawe of Moses But that it is true concerning the forme of ceremoniall worshippe and ciuill gouernment for a type and signification of christs kingdome the Epistle to the Hebrues doth purposely teach from the beginning of the fourth chapter to the end of the tenth all places of Scripture which referre the ceremonies and kingdome of the old people vnto Christ as Coloss 2.11 Wee are circumcised with circumcision made without hands 1. Cor. 5.7 Christ our passeouer is sacrificed for vs. Psal 110. Thou art a Priest for euer Dan. 9. The
and ouerthrow of the Citie Aunswere They er that restraine Christs benefit to those things or promises only without the performance whereof the promise made vnto Dauid concerning the Messias could not haue beene kept For all the benefits blessings of god both corporall and spirituall both before and after the Messias was exhibited as well those without which the promise of the Messias could as those without which it could not be fulfilled are all perfourmed vnto the Church for the Messias sake 2. Cor. 1.20 For all the promises of god in him are Yea are in him Amen And so doth the Scripture expound the like kinds of speaking as 2. Kings 13. Deut. 7. Lastly the benefits which god also performeth vnto the wicked posterity of the godly are attributed vnto the godlinesse of their godly parents not of merit but of mercy for the truth of gods promises As Exod. 20. 32. Deut. 4.16 Gen. 48.16 Iacob saith of Iosephs sons Let my name be named vpon them and the name of my fathers Abraham and Jsaacke Here Iacob willeth himselfe and his fathers to be called vpon after his death Therefore it is lawfull to call vpon the Saints departed Aunsw It is an Hebrue phrase which signifieth an adopting of Sons so that the sense is let them be called by my name or let them take their name from mee that is let them be called my Sonnes hauing the dignitie title of Patriarks that two tribes of Israell may come therein The like phrase is in Isaiah Cap. 4.1 In that daie shal seuen weomen saie to one man * According to the old Latin LET THY NAME BE CALLED VPON VS Let vs be called by thy name that is let vs bee called thy wiues 17 Iob 5. Call now if anie will aunswere thee and to which of the Saints wilt thou turne Heere Elephas exhorteth Iob to craue the aid of some Saint Aunswere The words which go before doe shewe that these wordes belong to a comparison of men with Angels whom he saith so farre to excell men in purity that they doe not so much as make aunswere or appeare being called by men Wherefore this place doth more make against than pleade for the inuocation of Angels 18 * This is translated according to the old Latin translation the words whereof the Papists vrge Iob 33. Jf there be an Angel one of a thousand to speake for him to declare mans righteousnesse He will haue mercie vpon him and will saie Deliuer him that he go not downe into the pit J haue found one in whom I am reconciled vnto him Ans Here the old translation speaketh vnproperly For the woordes are thus Jf there be an Angel with him or an interpreter one of a thousand to declare vnto man his righteousnesse Then will hee haue mercy vpon him and will say Deliuer him that hee go not downe into the pit for I haue found a reconciliation Now then albeit this were the sense that Angels pray for men distressed and in affliction yet this made nothing for their inuocation But it is manifest that this is the sense If a man diseased or afflicted be in his calamitie instructed of the will iustice and goodnesse of god either by an Angell or by a Prophet or by some teacher for these also are called Angels and repenteth him of his sinnes and assenteth vnto the Doctrine and comfort ministred vnto him him will God deliuer by their ministerie by whom he doth instruct him 19 Matth. 25.40 Jn as much as saith Christ ye haue done it vnto one of the least of these my brethren yee haue done it to me Therefore what honour of inuocation we giue vnto the Saints the same is also giuen vnto Christ himselfe Answere That honour of the creature maie and ought to bee referred vnto God which God willeth to bee done vnto him but that honour of the creature which God forbiddeth to bee giuen vnto the creature is not honourable but reprochful and contumelious vnto god Now the reason is sottish whereas they wil seem to draw it from the words of Christ when Christ speaketh of the duties of charitie which god willeth vs to perfourme in this life towardes those that stand in neede of our aide and help 20 Jf the Angels vnderstanding our necessities praie for vs and so are to be praied vnto it is lawful also to praie vnto Saints But that the Angels pray for vs is confirmed by the woords of Zacharie 1.12 The Angel of the Lord aunswered and said O Lorde of hostes how long wilt thou be vnmerciful to Ierusalem and to the citties of Judah Aunswere The Maior is not wholy to bee graunted namely that all the Angels vnderstand all the wantes and necessities of al men For the calamities of Iurie were open not onely to the sight of Angels but also to the sight of men 2. We denie the consequence which they frame from the Angels vnto the Saintes departed For vnto the Angels god committeth the care and protection of his Church in this life Therefore they beeing also here on earth see and know our miseries which the Saints see not vnto whom this charge is not committed they pray particularly for many which we cannot affirme of the Saints by any testimonies of Scripture 3. There is another fault in the consequence in concluding that wee must pray to them because they pray for vs because not euerie one who praieth for vs is straight waies to be inuocated as was before declared The same is to be answered of the dreame of Iudas Maccabeus 2. Macab 15. Wherein hee sawe Onias the High-Priest and Ieremias the Prophet praying for the people As for that which is said in the booke of Baruch cap. 3.4 Hear now the praier of the dead Israelites the Israelites are there said to be dead which were yet liuing and inuocating on god in this life but by reason of their calamities like vnto those that are deade Wherefore this sentence standeth true and certaine that the inuocation of whatsoeuer thing besides the true God manifested in the church is idolatrous and is repugnaunt vnto the honour of Gods name which God in true inuocation will haue exhibited and done vnto him THE FOVRTH COMMANDEMENT REmember thou keepe holy the sabboth day six daies shalt thou labour and doe all that thou hast to do but the seuenth daie is the sabboth of the Lorde thy God in it shalt thou doe no manner of work thou and thy Sonne and thy daughter thy man-seruaunt and thy maide-seruaunt thy cattel and the straunger that is within thy gate For in six daies the Lord made heauen and earth the sea and al that is in them and rested the seuenth day wherefore the Lord blessed the seuenth day and hallowed it The parts of this fourth commaundement are in number two A commaundement and a reason of the commaundement The parts of the commandement are also two The first is Moral That the sabboth be sanctified that
selfesame particle betokeneth a certaintie or confirmation of our faith whereby we trust that we shal be heard Wherefore Amen signifieth 1. So be it and sure and certaine be that which wee desire and let God condiscend and aunswere vnto our request 2. So God being not vnmindful of his promise truly and certainly heare vs. FINIS ¶ A TABLE OF THE COMMON PLACES AND PRINCIPALL QVESTIONS HANDLED IN THIS SVMME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION THE PREAMBLE A THREEFOLD order or three parts of the study of Diuinity 2 Of a Catechism or Catechising doctrine What a Catechisme is 2 In the Primitiue Church two sorts of Catechumeny 3 Catechising as the Doctrine of Baptisme of laying on of hands euer hath beene vsed in the Church and the reasons why still it ought 3. 4 Of the holy Scriptures Two opinions of religion but one alone true 5 What the holy Scripture teacheth or how Christian religion is diuided 6. 7 True religion ought to bee discerned from others and why 8 The difference of the true Doctrine of the Scriptures from others 10 The difference of true Doctrine from Philosophy 11 Certain notes whereby the tru church is distinguished from others 12 Whence it may appeare that this religion was once deliuered from god which is contained in the Scriptures 12 The authority of the Scriptures dooth not depend of the Church with reasons for proofe aunsweres to the contrarie obiections 13. 14. 15. 16. 17 Reasons for proofe of the certaintie truth of the holy Scriptures 20. 21 The difference betweene the prophecies of the heathen and them contained in the holy Scriptures 23 The spirit of Christ a sufficient witnesse of his Doctrine 27 No doctrin besides the holy Scripture is to be receiued into the church and the reasons why with answers to the contrary obiections 28. 29. 30 The obseruing of the Lords day left arbitrary to the Church 36 How controuersies doubtfull places are to be decided 46 Of the true comfort of the Godly The way to attaine to this comfort and the parts thereof 53 Why the knowledge of our misery deliuery and thankfulnesse is necessary to this comfort 55. 56. 57 THE FIRST PART OF THE MISERY OF MAN HOWE a man commeth to the knowledge of his misery 60 Of Sinne. Whether sin be or whence it appeareth to be in vs. 63 What sinne is 65 How many kinds of sin there are 67 Of Orginall sinne Whether there be Original sinne 6◠What Originall sinne is 68 Whether the souls of the children bee deriued from the souls of the Parents 71 What Actuall sinne is 78 Raigning sinne 78 Sinne not raigning or veniall 79 Sinne against the conscience not against the conscience 86 Sinne pardonable vnpardonable 87 Sin of itselfe sin by an accident 94 The workes of the regenerate vnregenerate differ seuen maner of waies 98 What are the causes of Sinne. 99 What are the effects of sinne 115 Of the creation of man What man was created of God 124 For what man was created 125 Of the image of God in man What the image of God in man is 128 How far foorth the image of God was lost how far it remaineth 130 How it is repaired in vs. 131 How the image of God is in Christ and how in vs. 132 Of the first sinne What that first sinne of Adam Eue was 134 What were the causes of the first sinne 135 What are the effects of the first sin 135 Why GOD permitted the first sin 136 Of free-will The causes of diuers controuersies risen about free-will 138 Of the word Liberty 140 What is the Liberty of will 141 What is like or common and what is different in the liberty of will which is in God in Angels and men 144 Whether there be any liberty in vs what it is 157 There are foure degrees of freewill 159 Of euils of punishment Of the euils of punishment 192. Howe many kinds of afflictions there be 194 What be the causes of them 198 What are the comforts that are to be opposed against them 200 THE SECOND PART OF MANS DELIVERY WHAT mans deliuery is 226 Whether any deliuery might bee wrought after the fall 227 Whether deliuerie bee necessarie and certaine 231 What manner of deliuerie this is 231 By what meanes mans deliuery may be wrought 233 Of the Mediatour What a Mediatour is 238 For what cause a Mediatour is necessarie 239 What is the office of a Mediator 241 What maner of Mediatour ours ought to be 243 Who is may be that Mediator 250 That there is but one Mediatour 252 Of the couenant What a couenaunt is 253 Howe a couenaunt may bee made betweene God and men 255 whether there be but one couenāt 255 In what the old and new couenaunt agree and in what they differ 256 Of the Gospel What the Gospel is 159 Whether the Gospel hath bin alwaies knowen 261 Howe the Gospell differeth from the Law 264 What are the proper effectes of the Gospel 267 Whence the trueth certainty of the Gospel may appeare 267 Of faith The necessitie of the true doctrine of faith 268 What faith is in general 270 What are the kinds of faith 272 How those kindes differ 275 How faith hope differ agree 278 What are the causes of faith 276 What are the effects of faith 280 Vnto whom faith is giuen 281 Conclusions comprising the summe of faith 285 Of the Creede or Symbole of the Apostles VVhat a Symbole is 287 What are the parts of the Apostolick Symbole 288 The first part of the Creede of God the Father Creatour The sense and meaning of the words I beleeue in God the father Almighty Creatour 291 Of God VVhether there be a God 294 VVho and what God is 301 An explication of the description of God deliuered by the church 305 VVhence it may appeare that there is but one God 336 VVhat these woordes Essence Person Trinity betoken and signifie 340 VVhat difference betweene Essence and Person 341 VVhether these names are to bee vsed in the church 345 How many persons there be of the Diuinity or Godhead 347 How the three persons of the godhead are distinguished 349 VVherefore this doctrine is to be held and maintained in the church 351 Of Creation VVhether the woorld were created of God 355 How God made the world 362 For what cause god created the world 367 Of Angels VVhat good Angels are 369 Of euil spirits or Angels 375 Of Gods prouidence Errors concerning Gods prouidence 379 Whether there bee any prouidence of God 380 VVhat the prouidence of God is 385 A confutation of certaine Sophismes or cauils which are wont to be obiected against the prouidence of God moouing and gouerning all and euery particular whether good or bad great or smal most iustly 405 VVhy the knowledge of this doctrine concerning Gods prouidence is necessarie 426 The second part of the Creed of God the redeemer VVhat is signified by the word Iesus 430
From what euils he saueth vs 433 How he saueth 434 VVhom he saueth 437 Of Christ What is signified by the name of christ 437 What Christes vnction or annointing is 438 What his Prophetical function 444 VVhat his Priesthood 448 VVhat his kingdome 451 Of the communion of the faithful with Christ vvhat the Annointing of Christians is 452 In what sense christians are called prophets 456 vvhat is the Priesthoode of christians 456 vvhat is the kingdom of christians 458 Of Christ the Sonne of God How manie waies men are called sons 461 How christ is the son of God 463 vvhy christ is called the only begotten and first begotten sonne of God 464 Of Christs Diuinitie The sonne of God is a subsistent in the flesh borne of the virgin and before the flesh 467 The sonne of God Christ is a person reallie distinct from the Father and the holy Ghost 498 The Worde is equall consubstantial with the Father 500 503 Other rules whereby the obiections of the Arrians are dissolued 507 The principall arguments against the Diuinitie of the Sonne and the Holie Ghost with the answeres vnto them 509 Of Christ our Lord. In what sense christ is called Lord 514 For what causes he is our Lorde 515 Of christs conception by the holy ghost and birth of the Virgin Marie 518 The common place of the two natures in Christ vvhether there be two natures in christ our Mediatour 520 vvhether christ be one person or moe 525 vvhat maner of vnion this is of the two natures in christ and how made 529 A rule to bee obserued touching the proprieties of both natures in christ 536 A rule to bee obserued touching the proprieties of christ the Mediatour 544 vvhy it was necessary that two natures should bee vnited in the person or subsistence of the sonne of God 550 Of Christs humiliation that is of his Passion vvhat Christ suffered 554 According to which nature christ suffered 556 The causes impellent or motiues of christes Passion 55â— The final causes oâ— ends of his Passion 558 Of Christs death How christ is said to haue beene dead 561 vvhether it was requisite and necessary that christ should die 562 The fruit of christs death 564 His burial 566 His descension into hel 567 Of Christs glorification that is of his Resurrection vvhether christ rose againe 571 How christ rose 571 For what cause he rose 572 vvhat are the fruits of christes Resurrection 576 Of Christs Ascension into heauen vvhither christ ascended 580 How wherefore christ ascended into heauen 582 587 vvhat is the difference between christs Ascension and our 588 vvhat are the fruits of christs AscensioÌ„ 589 Of Christs sitting at the right hand of GOD. vvhat the right hand of God signifieth 591 vvhat is to sit at Gods right hand 591 vvhether christ did alwaies fitte at the right hand of God 595 vvhat are the fruites of christes sitting at the right hand of the father 597 Of Christs comming to iudgement vvhether there shal be any iudgement 599 vvhat the last iudgement is 601 vvho shal iudge 603 vvhence and whither christ shal come 604 Howe christ shall come to iudgement 605 vvhom christ shal iudge 605 vvhat shall be the senteÌ„ce executioÌ„ 606 For what cause that iudgemeÌ„t shal be 607 vvhen it shal be 608 vvherefore God woulde haue vs certaine of the last iudgement 608 For what causes God would not haue vs certain of the time of iudgement 609 For what cause GOD differreth that iudgement 609 Whether the last iudgement be to bee wished for 610 The third part of the Creede of the Holie Ghost the sanctifier What the name spirite signifieth 610 Who and what the holie Ghost is 611 What the office of the holy gost is 617 Of whom the holie Ghost is giuen and wherefore 621 To whom the holie Ghost is giuen 622 How he is giuen receiued 624 How the holie Ghost is reteined 625 Whether and how the holie ghost may be lost 625 wherefore the Holie Ghost is necessarie 626 Howe wee may knowe that the holie ghost dwelleth in vs. 627 Of the Church What the Church is 627 How many waies the Church is taken 629 What are the tokens and markes of the church 631 Why the church is called Holy Catholicke 633 In what the church differeth from the common weale 634 Whence ariseth the difference of the church from the rest of mankinde 635 Whether any one may be saued out of the church 636 Of Predestination Whether there be Predestination 636 What Predestinâ—tion is 641 What are the causes of Predestination or Election and of Reprobation 642 What are the effects of Predestination 644 Whether Predestination be vnchangeable 645 How far forth Predestination Election and Reprobation are known vnto vs. 645 Whether the elect be alwaies meÌ„bers of the church the reprobate neuer 646 Whether the elect may fall from the church and the reprobate abide alwaies in the church 648 What is the vse of this doctrine 649 Of the communion of Saints 649 Of the remission of sinnes What remission of sinnes is 651 Who giueth remission of sinnes 652 For what remission of sinnes is graunted 653 Whether remission of sinnes agreeth with Gods iustice 653 Whether remission of sinnes be freely giuen 654 To whom remission of sins is giuen and how 655 Of the Resurrection of the flesh What the Resurrection is 656 The Errours concerning the Resurrection 656 Whence it may appeare that the Resurrection shall certainely be 657 For what end the Resurrection shall be 659 By whom the Resurrection shal be 660 How the Resurrection shal be 660 When the Resurrection shal be 661 What bodies shal rise 661 Whether the soule be immortall 662 Of euerlasting life What euerlasting life is 670 VVho giueth euerlasting life 672 To whom euerlasting life is giuen 673 For what cause euerlasting life is giuen 673 VVhen how euerlasting life is giuen vnto vs 674 675 VVhether wee can bee assured in this life of euerlasting life 675 Of Justification VVhat iustice or righteousnes is in generall how manifold it is 677. 678 In what iustice differeth from iustification 679 VVhat is our iustice 680 How Christs satisfactioÌ„ is made our iustice and righteousnes 681 VVhy Christs satisfaction is made ours 683 VVhy Christs satisfaction is made ours by faith onely 684 Obiections against this doctrine of iustification aunswered 685 Of Sacraments VVhat sacraments are 694 VVhat are the ends of sacraments 697 In what sacraments differ from sacrifices 699 In what sacramentes agree with the word and in what they differ from it 700 How the sacraments of the old new Testament agree how they differ 702 VVhat the sacramentall vnion is 703 In what the thinges differ from the signes 704 VVhat phrases and formes of speaking of the sacraments are vsuall vnto the church and scripture 705 VVhat is the right and lawful vse of sacraments 705 VVhat the wicked receiue in the vse administration of the sacraments 706 How
science of casting caruing and painting is reckoned among those artes and craftes which are profitable for mans life Exod. 31.3 35.30 c. Syrac 38.28 and are the gifts of god Neither is the reason hereof hard or obscure because writing and painting are profitable for the memoriall of thinges doone for ornaments and for an ingenuous and liberall delight of mans life Wherefore the Law forbiddeth not the vse of Images but the abuse namely it forbiddeth that Images be made as by them to represent or woorship god For we ought not neither can we any way paint or graue or represent god much lesse must we tie gods woorshippe vnto carued or grauen Images This Doctrine doth the end scope of the commandement declare which is the obseruation of the vncorrupt worship of god And because god is incorporeall and infinite vnpossible is it that he should bee expressed or represented by any corporeall or finite image without an impairing of his diuine maiesty Esay 40.18 Rom 1 23. Deut. 4.15 To whome will ye liken God Or what similitude will ye set vp vnto him Moreouer as god will not haue himselfe to be engrauen or painted or anie Image or semblance of him to bee câ—â—ued and framed so also doth it not at all profit or auaile vs as being a cause an occasion of Idolatry 2 Why Images are to be abolished in the Churches of Christians Exod 23.24 34.13 Numb 33 25. Deut 7.5 1. Reg. 15.13 2. Reg 10.30 2. Reg. 18.4 Deut. 17 23. c. 1. Cor. 10.20 1 THey are to be abolished because of the commaundement of god who will haue Idoles to be abolished and all the corruptions of the true worshippe of god of true doctrine as his wrath anger against Idolatrie dooth testifie And hereof is it that for the taking away abolishing of Idols Iehu Ezechias and Iosias are praised in Scripture Jn respect of our confession of the syncere worship of god and of our hatred against Idolatrie 1. Iohn 5.21 This confession whereby we professe our selues not to be Idolaters consisteth not only in words but also in actions and in outward shew and signes 3 They are to be abolished for auoiding of offence superstition least by retaining of ancient Images or by substituting adding new the same daÌ„ger come to the church to the ignoraÌ„t people therby which in times past we see to haue issued hence and so the enimies of the Church be by this spectacle hauing so great a shew of Idolatry the more alienated from the Church so that they despite and reproch therefore the trueth of god So the Iewes because they see Images in the Churches of those which professe Christianity are greatly offended And wee see that Images neuer brought any good to them which had them but euen gods own people was seduced thereby as we may see often in the sacred storie especially in the booke of Iudges the Kings in the Prophets So prone and readie is our nature vnto this euill which hath after ensuing it most grieuous punishments as are those which the Lord reciteth by Moses besides many others I wil destroy saith he your high places and cut awaie your Jmages and cast your carkasses vpon the bodies of your Idoles and my soule shal abhor you In like manner also the Angel of the Lord vpbraiding the Israelites that they had made a league with the Idolatrous Cananites saith Wherefore I will not cast them out before you but they shall bee as thornes vnto your sides and their gods shall be your destruction It is no ceremony therefore to abolish Images seeing they are the instruments signes causes and occasions of Idolatry Neither are the causes of this commandement any way chaunged or diminished as namelie that the glory of god be maintained against Idolaters and the enemies of the church and that god bee not tempted through offering an occasion of superstition and of conceiuing false and corrupt opinions of gods worship vnto men which are of their owne accord inclining and prone vnto idolatry Wherefore this commaundement of taking away and abolishing images made for the representing of god or for diuine worshippe is Moral and dureth perpetuallie 3 Howe images are to be abolished IN abolishing and banishing Images two things are to be obserued 1. That the doctrine concerning the true woorship of God bee preached before the abolishing of Idols So wee read that Iosias did Let the woord therefore go before the idoles wil fal to the grouÌ„d 2. The images their altars the like instruments of idolatrie must be taken away not by priuat men but by publick autoritie For so hath god commanded the Israelites so likewise hath godly Kings put it in practise so also Paul disliking the Idoles of the Athenians Ephesians did not yet pul them downe or abolish them Certaine obiections of the Papists 1 VVE worship not the Jmages but God of whom those are signs and tokens Wherefore there is no cause why images shoulde bee abolished and taken out of churches Answere It is impiety to place and ordaine such signes as whereby God neither can bee truly signified neither at all ought to be signified And albeit they were such signes as whereby God might bee truely signified yet is it not in the power of any creature to ordain or establish them but only in the wil and pleasure of God 2 The bookes of Lai-men or the vnlearned are profitable Jmages are the bookes of the vnlearned Therefore they are profitable Aunswere 1. Such bookes of Lay-men are profitable as are deliuered vnto them by God 2. The Minor is false For the Prophetes teach far otherwise as Haba 2.18 An image is a teacher of lies Zacha. 10.2 The Jdoles haue spoken vanitie Whence we maie thus reason We ought not to speak vain things or to lie of God either in words or in gestures But wood or grauen Jmages are lies of God because they cannot represent God yea because they swarue so farre and carrie vs with them from God at their figure and shape is vnlike god so consequently they cause vs also to lie of God If then we wil not lie of god we must needs neither make nor haue anie Images or grauen semblances For as Ieremie saith 10.8 The stock is a doctrine of vanitie Nowe in this sense we graunt Images to be the books of the vnlearned to witte because partly they teach and signifie false things of God and partly because through the reuerence of the thing signified and the place when as they stand to the open view in churches and elsewhere they easily draw away others vnto superstition and teach the people Idolatry as experience sufficiently beareth witnes 3. It followeth not if it were so that Images did teach the vnlearned that therefore they should be reteined in the church as profitable books For God wil not haue his church to be taught by these but by his
word and sacraments 3 The Scripture attributing the partes of mans bodie vnto God doth signifie thereby his nature and propertie Therefore it is lawfull also to signifie the nature and propertie of God by Jmages Aunswere 1 There is a dissimilitude betweene metaphors or translations of wordes and Images because vnto them is annexed an exposition of them in the worde which hindereth and stoppeth al error 2. When by an anthropopathy that is when the Scripture applieng it selfe to speake vnto men after the manner of men doth attribute the partes of mans bodie vnto God the worshippe of God is not at all woont to bee tied vnto them 3 Lastly God spake these thinges after the manner of men to help our infirmity but he for-bad Images 4 God of oulde presented himselfe to be seene in mans shape Therefore we may also follow the like signes and semblances Auns God indeed mooued by certaine reasons thereunto did so but he hath forbidde vs to followe it For it is lawfull for God to manifest himselfe what way soeuer he will but it is not lawfull for any creature to represent god by any such signe as himselfe hath not commaunded And those visible shapes had god present with them to commaund promise and heare them vnto whom he manifested himselfe which cannot bee saide of such Images as imitate those shapes without flat Idolatry and therefore the saints did well in adoring god at them or in them as beeing after a speciall manner there present which to doe in these is impious and Idolatrous because it is done through the boldnesse and vanity of man without any commaundement or promise from god Lastly those visible shapes continued so long as it pleased the Lord to vse them for to manifest and shew himselfe and therefore could they not bee drawen to Idolatry But Images and pictures which men make to represent the manifestations of god were neither ordained to manifest god nor to represent or resemble those auncient manifestations of god and therefore are they an obiect and an occasion of Idolatry 5 It was lawfull for the Israelites to haue resemblances figures Cherubin Seraphin Palm-trees and diuerse pictures in Salomons Temple Therefore it is lawful also for Christians to haue Images in their Temples Aunswere The figures resemblances of diuerse thinges and liuing creatures as Oxen Lions Palm-trees Cherubins and such like painted in the temple of Salomon were warranted by the word of god But the word of god is flat against those Images which the Papistes haue in their Churches 2 The Images which were painted in Salomons temple were such as could not easilie be drawen by anie man into abuse 3. God had this cause for which he would haue those Images to bee painted in the temple that namelie they should be types of spiritual thinges but this cause is now taken away by Christ THE SECOND PART OF THE SECOND COMMANDEMENT THIS part forbiddeth any worshippe to be giuen vnto Images not only that which is giuen thereby or referred to creatures but that also which is referred vnto god himselfe Obiection 1. The honour which is giuen vnto the sign is the honour of the thing signified Images are a signe of God Therfore the honor which is giuen vnto Images is also giuen vnto God Ans The honour of the signe is also the honour of the thing signified namely when the sign is a true sign that is ordained by him who hath autority to ordain it whē also that honour is giuen vnto the sign which the right and lawfull author of it willeth to be doone vnto the signe For not the will of him that honoureth but of him that is honoured is the rule which must prescribe the due honour Now God hath forbidden any Images to be erected vnto him and therefore Images are no true signes of god 2 Obiection Whatsoeuer contumelie is done vnto the signe that redoundeth on God although the signe bee not instituted by his commaundement Therefore the honor also that is giuen to the signe redoundeth on God although that honour bee not commaunded to be giuen vnto the signe Aunswere This reason doth not folowe because then are contrary thinges rightly attributed vnto contraries when the contrariety of the attributes dependeth of that according to which the subiect is opposed not of some other thing So we grant that contumely against God followeth indeede the contumely against the signe albeit the signe were not instituted by God but not simply in respect of the signe it selfe vnto which that contumely was done but in respect of his corrupt and bad wil who by shewing contumely against the signe which is thought to represent God purposeth himselfe and is minded to despite with contumely and reproch God himselfe For to the shewing of despite and contumely against god it sufficeth if there bee any intent or purpose of departing from his commaundement But if through a desire that we haue to auoide Idolatry we detest Images and other false reputed signes of god by this contumely doone vnto the signes we rather promote further aduaunce gods glory But the honor of god doth not folow the honor of the sign except both the honor and the signe be ordained by God 3 Obiection Jf it bee lawfull to haue the Jmages of noble and renowmed men much more is it lawful to haue the Jmages of Angels and Saintes Aunswere 1. The lawfull hauing of the Images of noble and worthie men and the giuing of honour vnto them must bee warily and rightly vnderstood 2. The Images or monuments of notable men must bee such as may not bee drawen into Idolatrie 3. Where the antecedent proposition is taken in this sense in which it may be grounded the consequent also may be graunted of the like monuments or the like honour But if in the sequel or consequent that bee transferred to Images and superstitious honour which might haue beene granted in the antecedēt being rightly vnderstood the consequence is to be denied in respect of that ambiguity and diuersitie of meanings and in respect of the dissimilitude vnlikenesse of the honour and monuments That honour of monuments is lawfull which is a gratefull and honorable memorie of those whose monuments they are and also that which is applied to that vse which themselues would haue it and not to the worship of them or to the woorshippe of God by their monuments And such lawfull monuments which cānot be drawen into Idolatry we must not deface through a desire of despiting or reproching them whose monuments they are The obedience of this second commaundement consisteth as we haue seene in the true woorship of God The vices which are repugnant vnto this second commandement are 1 Jdolatrie which is a false or superstitious worship of God Idolatry is of two sorts 1 When a false God is worshipped that is when in place of the true god or besides him that honor or worship is giuen to some either imaginary or existent thing which
nothing vnto his words least he reproue thee and thou bee found a liar And 1. Timoth. 1. Commaund some that they teach none other doctrine 2 The ciuill ordinances of men which are determinations and prescriptions of circumstances necessarie and profitable to the keeping of the morall commandements of the second Table Such are the positiue Lawes of magistrats parents masters of al who bear rule ouer others in the ciuil state The obedience of these Lawes as touching the generall is the worshippe of God because the generall thereof is morall and commaunded by God himselfe namely obedience towards magistrates and others which beare rule in the common-wealth But as concerning the special of the action or as touching the circumstances it is no diuine worship because those woorkes are diuine woorshippe which must necessarilie be doone in respect of Gods commaundement although no commandement or respect of any creature were adioined but these except they were commanded by the magistrates might be done or omitted without any offence against god but yet notwithstanding such ciuil ordinances of magistrates and other gouernours binde the consciences of men that is we must necessarily perfourme them neither are they neglected without the displeasing of God and therefore by reason of these commandements of Magistrates we are bound also to performe the works enioined vs by these commandements euen although wee could omit them without giuing any offence if wee meane to reteine our obedience pure and sound So to carrie weapons or not to carry weapons to pay a lesser or greater tribute or subsidie is not in it selfe the worship of God but the obedience which is in these and the like matters due to bee rendered vnto the Magistrate is Gods worshippe Therefore if the Magistrate neither command nor forbid either it is free to be either but if he command any one thing he sinneth whosoeuer doth the contrarie although he coulde keepe it neuer so close neither offend any man thereby The reason is because the generall namelie obedience towardes the Magistrate which is gods worshippe is violated Wherefore these specials and particulars are by an accident made the worship of god to wit by the commaundement of the Magistrate 3 The Ecclesiastical or Ceremonial ordinances of men which are determinations or prescriptions of circumstances necessarie or profitable for the keeping of the commaundementes of the first table For they belong either to the keeping and maintaining of order and comelines in Church-assemblies and in the Ecclesiastical administration of the ministerie or to externall exercises of godlines both publique and priuate or to auoide the giuing of offence vnto the weaker to bring them vnto the Church and knowledge of the truth Of which kind are the time place form course of sermons prayers readings in the Church likewise fastes the manner of proceeding in election of ministers in gathering and distributing almes and such like whereof god hath commaunded nothing in speciall The generall also of these Lawes as of the ciuil is moral if they be rightlie profitably made and therefore is it the worship of God as it is gods worship to heare the woord of god to pray vnto god as wel publiquely with the company of the faithfull as priuately to bestowe almes vpon our poore brethren to receiue the sacramentes But the Ceremonies themselues are not onelie no worship of God but neither doe they binde mens consciences neither is the obseruation of them necessarie except the omitting of them breede offence So it is no worship of god but a thing indifferent and not binding mens conscience to vse this or that forme of praier at this or that time at this or that houre in this or that place to heare the woorde of god to pray to receiue the sacraments Neither hath the Church onely this right and power to constitute or abrogate or alter by her owne authoritie these ordinances as she iudgeth it to be most expedient for her common edification but the consciences also of particular men reteine this libertie so that they may either omit these or doe otherwise without any offence against god if there arise no scandal or offence thereby among men that is if they doe it neither of contempt or neglect of the ministerie nor of wantonnes or ambition or of a desire of contention noueltie nor with the offending of weake ones The reason is because then lawes are rightlie obserued when they are obserued according to the mind and purpose of the law-giuer But the Church ought to will that such ordinances and statutes as are made concerning thinges indifferent bee obserued not in respect of her owne authoritie or commaundement but onely for the maintenance of order and comlinesse and for the auoiding of scandals and offences Wherefore as long as comlinesse or order is not violated neither offence giuen it leaueth euerie mans conscience free to himselfe For not in respect of the Churches or ministers commandement but in respect of the iust causes of commaunding thinges indifferent are necessarily sometimes to be done or to bee omitted and the conscience is hurt not by the neglect of any humane commaundement as in ciuill matters but by the neglect of the causes for which they are commaunded Hither belongeth the precept of Saint Paul 1. Cor. 10.27 Jf anie of them which beleeue not call you vnto a feast and if yee will goe whatsoeuer is set before you eate asking no question for conscience sake But if anie man saie vnto you this is sacrificed vnto Jdoles eate it not because of him that shewed it and for the conscience for the earth is the Lords and all that therein is And the conscience I saie not thine but of that other For why should my libertie be condemned of another mans conscience For if J thorough Gods benefite bee partaker why am I euill spoken of for that wherefore J giue thankes Likewise the Decree of the councell of the Apostles Acts. 15. Of thinges sacrificed to Jdols of bloude and that which was strangled Likewise the precept giuen concerning women to be couered 1. Cor. 11. Likewise the Lordes daie substituted by the Church in place of the Sabboth for the exercise of the ministerie c. Reply If the edictes of Magistrates binde mens consciences why then doe not the traditions of the Church bind them also Answere God gaue this power and authority of making ciuill lawes vnto the Magistrate and hath strengthened it with this band in that hee threatneth and denounceth his anger against them which breake these lawes but vnto the Church and to his Ministers hee hath not giuen any such authoritie but yet notwithstanding hee would haue these lawes and constitutions to bee obserued which the Ministers the Church of their own authoritie command not for any necessity that there is of obeying these lawes commaunded by the Church but according to the rule of charitie that is for a desire of auoiding offence This aunswere is deliuered in these
places of scripture Matth. 20.25 Yee knowe that the Lordes of the Gentiles haue domination ouer them and they that are great exercise authoritie ouer them But it shall not bee so among you but whosoeuer will bee great among you let him be your seruaunt 1. Pet. 5.3 Not as if ye were Lordes ouer Gods heritage but that yee maie be ensamples to the flocke Colos 2.16 Let no man condemne you in meate and drinke or in respect of an Holie-daie or of the newe Moone or of the Sabboth daies Gal. 5.1 Stand fast in the libertie wherewith Christ hath made vs free Neither are the causes obscure or harde to come by for which God made this difference namely that there might bee an euident difference betweene the ciuill Magistrate vnto whom it belongeth to beare rule ouer his subiects and to constrain by corporall force such as obeie not and the Ministers of the Church vnto whom no such rule and power is graunted but vnto them is committed the charge and office of teaching and instructing men concerning the will of GOD. Againe because by the breach of Ecclesiasticall lawes if it bee done without giuing of offence the first table of the Decalogue for which they are to serue is not broken but by the breach of ciuil lawes albeit no offence be giuen thereby the second table is broken in as much as either some thing is taken frō the common wealth or some occasion is giuē of iniurying it Neither is this replie of force That vnto the greater and worthier office greater obedience is due And therefore the constitutions of the Ministers of the Church are no lesse necessarilie to bee kept than the lawes of the ciuil Magistrate For vnto the worthier greater obedience is due in those thinges which are properly belonging vnto his office Now the proper office of the ciuil Magistrate is to make lawes which are for the commaundement it selfe to bee obserued but the proper office of the ministerie of the Church is to sound foorth Gods commaundements And the proper office of the Church is to ordaine Ceremoniall decrees which must bee kept not for the commaundement of man but for auoiding of offences 4 Humane ordinances which are repugnant vnto the ordinances of God These God forbiddeth vs to obey whether the ciuil Magistrate commaunde them or the Church or the Ministers of the Church Acts. 5.29 We ought rather to obey God than Men. Matth. 15.3 Why transgresse yee the commaundement of god by your tradition Hauing now considered these foure kindes of ordinances deliuered by men it is easie to make aunswere vnto that first obiection God commaundeth vs to obey the commandementes of men He doth so first Such as bee good that is not repugnant vnto his woorde Secondly such as hee himselfe hath commaunded by men that worship maie be giuen him Thirdly Ciuil ordinances which depend on the authoritie of men not obeiing them for diuine worshippe but for conscience sake Fourthly Ecclesiasticall or Ceremonial ordinances obeying them but not respecting therein anie diuine worshippe or conscience neither of which they import but onelie the auoiding of offence 2 Obie What things the church commandeth by the instinct of the holie ghost those are diuine ordinances belonging to the worship of god But the church decreeth good and profitable constitutions being guided by the guiding of the holie ghost Therefore good constitutiōs decreed by the church appertaine to the worship of god Aunswere The general indeede of those commandements which the church prescribeth by the instinct of the holie Ghost appertaineth to the worship of God This general compriseth the diuine Lawes of God of not breaking charity and of auoiding offence of keeping order and comelinesse in the church And in respect of this general the constitutions which the church decreeth by the instinct and motion of the holy Ghost are also diuine or the constitutions of God as namely they are a part of these diuine Lawes the care and keeping whereof is commended vnto vs by god himselfe in his word But those good constitutions of the church are humane or the constitutions of men as they doe in speciall designe that which was in generall by these diuine Lawes signified rather than expounded Wherefore those ordinances are no worship of god which the church aduiseth decreeth receiueth or commaundeth for the countenaunce of mutual charity among vs and for the preseruation of order and comelinesse or for the auoiding of offences albeit in the choosing and constituting of these shee be directed by the instinct of the holy ghost For the holy ghost declareth both vnto the church both what is profitable for the auoiding of offences and also that those things which are commaunded for the auoiding of offences are neither the worship of god nor necessary to be obserued but in case of auoiding offence and therefore that the church reteineth her libertie of deliberating of them or of chaunging of them or of omitting them if there be no feare of offence This doth Saint Paul manifestly declare when as 1. Corinth 7. counselling them to single life which haue the gift of continency yet hee addeth further But I speak this by permission not by commandement Again This J speake for your owne commoditie not to tangle you in a snare but that yee followe that which is honest and that ye cleaue fast vnto the Lord without separation Here he affirmeth both both that hee wisheth them that are continent to leade a single life that so they may the more fitlie serue god and that also hee leaueth it free vnto them to marry and hee speaketh both by the instinct of the holie ghost 3 Obiection God is worshipped by those thinges which are done to Gods glory The things that the Church doth decree are don to Gods glorie Therefore these also are the worship of God Aunswere Those thinges that are done to the glory of god by themselues that is which are commaunded by god to this end as that by these workes wee should declare our obedience towardes him they are the worshippe of god but not those thinges which serue for the glorie of god but by an accident that is which serue sometimes for the perfourming of those thinges which are commanded by god vpon some accidental respectes and causes which if they do not concur god yet may be honored both of those that do thē and of those that doe them not so that they be done or left vndoone of faith which is assured and resolueth that the person is not reconciled vnto god and that the action or omitting of the action doth agree with the word of god 4 Obiection The examples of those who haue worshipped God without his direct commandement confirme that it is permitted to men to worship God with that worship which themselues ordaine Auns The example of Samuel sacrificing in Ramoth cannot at al establish Wil-worship For as touching the sacrifices they were the worship of god because they were commaunded by god and as