Selected quad for the lemma: scripture_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
scripture_n	church_n	divine_a	tradition_n	5,425	5	9.4683	5	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A28839	An exposition of the doctrine of the Catholique Church in the points of controversie with those of the pretended reformation by James Benignus Bossüet, counseller in the King's counsels, Bishop and Lord of Condom, tutor to His Royal Hyghness the Dolphin of France ; translated into English by W.M.; Exposition de la doctrine de l'Eglise catholique sur les matières de controverse. English	Bossuet, Jacques Bénigne, 1627-1704.; Montagu, Walter, 1603?-1677.	1672 (1672)	Wing B3782; ESTC R30305	47,803	218

preuent all scandal They haue concluded by this regulation that both kindes were not essentiall to the Communion by the institution of CHRIST for otherwise they would haue bin bound absolutely to refuse the Sacrament to such as were not able to receaue it compleat and not to giue it them in a manner contrary to that CHRIST JESVS had commanded and in that case their disability would haue sufficiently excused them But our Aduersaries haue conceaued that such a rigour would be excessiue if they did not allow at least one of the Species to such as were not capable to receaue the other and since this condescendence hath no ground in the Scripture they must needs confesse with vs that the words whereby CHRIST IESVS hath proposed to vs the two Species are liable to some interpretation and that the right vnderstanding of them ought to be declared by the Authority of the Church But it might seeme that this Article of their Discipline which is of the Synode of Poytiers held 1560 had bin reformed by the Synode of Vertueil assembled in the year 1567 where it is said that the company is not of opinion the Bread should be giuen to those who would not receaue the Cupp These two Synodes neuerthelesse are not at all opposite to one another that of Vertueil speaketh of those who Will not receaue the Cupp and that of Poytiers of such as Can not take it And indeed notwithstanding the Synode of Vertueil that Article remaineth in their Discipline nay more hath bin approued by a Synode later then that of Vertueil namely by the Synode of Rochelle in 1571 where the Article was renewed and putt into that state which it now remaineth in But supposing the Synodes of the Pretended-Reformers had differr'd varied in their opinions that would serue only to manifest that the matter in question is not a point of Faith but of that kind which the Church may order dispose of according to their own principles There remaineth now nothing but to expose what the Catholiques hold touching the Word of God concerning the Authority of the Church CHRIST IESVS hauing lay'd the foundation of his Church vpon the Preaching of his Disciples the Vnwritten Word was the first guide rule of Christianity when the writings of the New Testament were adioyned to them the former Word did not for all that loose its Authority which causeth vs to accept with the same veneration all that was taught by the Apostles be it by writing or by word of mouth according to what S. Paul himself hath expresly inioyned And the certain proofe that a Doctrine comes from the Apostles is its being accepted and embraced by all Christian Churches whilst its beginning can not be pointed mark'd out We can not choose but receaue all that is establish'd in this manner with the submission due to the Diuine Authority and we are confident that such persons of the Pretended-Reformed Religion as are not very obstinate haue the same perswasion in the bottome of their harts it being impossible to beleeue that a Doctrine setled and receaued from the beginning of the Church can flow from any other spring then that of the Apostles Wherefore our Adversaries ought not to wonder that we being zealously carefull to inherit all that our Fathers haue left vs doe conserue the Deposite of Tradition as well as that of the Scriptures The Church being ordained by God to be the Depositary of the Scripture of Tradition we receaue from her hands the Canonicall Scriptures and we beleeue whateuer our Aduersaries say that it is principally the Church's Authority that determineth vs to reuerence as Diuine writt the song of Salomon which hath so few sensible markes of Propheticall inspiration and likewise the Epistle of S. Iames which Luther reiected and that of S. Iude which might be suspected by reason of some Apocriphall bookes cited in it in fine there can be no motiue but that Authority to perswade the receauing the whole body of the holy Scriptures which Christians accept as Diuine euen before the reading hath wrougt any feeling of the Spirit of God in those bookes Being then inseparably bound as we are to the Authority of the Church by meanes of the Scriptures which we receaue from her hand we are taught also by her Tradition and by the help of Tradition the true sense of the Scriptures So that the Church professeth to say nothing meerly of her self and likewise that she inventeth nothing new in her Doctrine that she doth but follow and declare the Diuine Reuelation by the interiour direction of the holy spirit which is giuen her for her Teacher That the holy Ghost expresseth himself by the Church the dispute raised about the Ceremonies of the Law euen in the time of the Apostles doth euidence and their Acts haue directed all succeeding ages by the manner that first contest was decided by what Authority all following differences are to be determined so that whensoeuer any dispute happens to deuide the faithfull the Church will interpose her Authority and the Pastours assembled will say after the Apostles It hath seemed good to the Holy Spirit and vs. And when the Church hath pronounced and determined her children will be taught not to examine a new the Articles resolued vpon but that they are bound to accept with all submission the Church's Decisions And in this methode we follow S. Paul and Silas who deliuered to the faithfull the first iudgment of the Apostles and were so farr from allowing a new discussion of what had bin decided as they trauell'd through the townes teaching to obserue the ordinances of the Apostles In this manner the children of God acquiesce in the iudgment of the Church beleeuing that by her mouth they hear the Oracle of the Holy Ghost and it is vpon the ground of this perswasion that after hauing profess'd in the Creed I beleeue in the Holy Ghost we ioine next to it The Holy Catholique Church by which protestation we oblige our selues to acknowledge an Infallible and Perpetuall Verity in the Catholique Church since the same Church which we beleeue perseuering throughout all ages would cease to be a Church if it left to teach the Truth reuealed by God so that such as apprehend least she should abuse her power by introducing Falsities haue little Faith in him by whose hand she is held and conducted And if our Aduersaries would consider discusse these matters in a fairer and more humane manner they would be forced to auowe that the Catholique Church is so farre from affecting to render herself Mistresse of her Faith as her Aduersaries charge her that quite contrary she hath laboured with all her power to binde her self and to exclude all means of In̄ouation since she doth not only submitt to the holy Scriptures but to banish for euer all Arbitrary interpretatiōs which would make the conceipts of men passe for Scripture declareth herself obliged

to vnderstand them in what relateth to Faith or Manners conformably to the sense of the holy Fathers from which she professeth neuer to depart declaring by all her Councells and by all her Professions of Faith already published that she admitteth no point of Doctrine which is not conformable to the Tradition of all preceeding ages Moreouer if our Aduersaries will examine their Consciences they will discerne that the name of the Church hath more authority ouer their minds then they dare auowe in their disputes and I am perswaded there is not any one prudent iudicious man amongst them who finding himself alone in his perswasion how euident soeuer it might seeme to him that would not be frightned with that Singularity so manifest it is that men haue need in these matters to be supported in their opinions by the Authority of some Society that is of the same iudgment And for this reason God who hath created vs and knoweth what is most proper for vs hath ordained for our benefit that all particular subiects should render obedience to his Church the Authority whereof is of all others vndoubtedly the best established not only by the testimony which God himself renders in proofe of it in the holy Scriptures but likewise by the euidencies of his Diuine protection which is manifested no lesse in the most inuiolable perpetuall subsistence then it was in the miraculous establishment thereof This Soueraigne Authority of the Church is so necessary to regulate the differences which arise vpon points of Faith and the right vnderstanding of the Scripture that our Aduersaries themselues after hauing discredited decryed it as an insupportable Tyranny haue bin at last necessitated to authorise establish it amongst themselues When those who are call'd Independants maintained openly that euery indiuiduall of the faithfull ought to follow the light of his conscience without being obliged to submitt his iudgment to any body or Ecclesiasticall assembly and that vpon this ground they refused to subiect themselues to Synodes that of Charenton held 1644. censured this Doctrine vpon the same reasons and in regard of the same inconueniences which moued vs to reject it That Synode obserueth in the first place that the Error of the Independants consisteth in their holding that euery single Church ought to gouerne it self by her own lawes without dependance vpon any person in Ecclesiasticall affairs and without any obligation to conforme to the Authority of Conferences and Synodes in point of their conduct regulation And in order thereunto the same Synode determineth that this Sect is as preiudiciall to the State as to the Church that it setteth open a dore to all sorts of irregularities and extrauagancies that it cutts off all means of applying any remedy and if it tooke place there might be as many Religions inuented as there are particular parishes or assemblies These last words shew cleerly that it was principally in point of Faith that this Synode intended to establish a Dependance since the great est inconuenience it obserues the faithfull would be lyable to by this independency is that there might be as many Religions formed and professed as there are parishes It followeth then of necessity by the Doctrine of this Synode that euery particular Church and much more euery priuate person ought to Depend in what belongs to Faith vpon a Superiour Authority which resides in some Assembly or Body of men to which Authority all the Faithfull subiect their priuate iudgments for the independants doe not refuse to submit vnto the Word of God in that sense they conceaue they ought to vnderstand it nor to accept the Decision of Synodes when after they haue examined them they conclude them reasonable and fitt to be obserued what they refuse to yeald vnto is to resigne vp their priuate iudgment vnto that of an Assembly vpon this ground which our Aduersaries haue lai'd for them viz that all Assemblies euen that of the Vniuersall Church is a company of Men subiect to Error vnto which consequently a Christian ought not to subiect his iudgment since he oweth his resignation but to God alone It is from this pretension of the Independants that all those inconueniences are inferr'd which the Synode of Charenton hath so well obserued for what profession soeuer be made to submit vnto the Word of God if euery one thinketh he hath right to vnderstand it according to his own iudgment though it be contrary to the sense of the Church declared in a Finall decree this pretension will open the way to all sorts of extrauagancies and exclude all means of applying any remedy since the Decision of the Church is no restraint to such as doe not conceaue themselues bound to submit vnto it and in fine it will open the way to frame as many Religions not only as there are parishes but euen as there are priuate heads For precaution against these incōueniencies from whence would ensue the ruyne of Christian Religion the Synode of Charenton is forced to constitute a Dependance in Ecclesiasticall matters and euen in points of Faith But this their designed Deference will neuer retrench those pernicious consequences they haue proposed to themselues the preuenting vnlesse they settle conformably to vs this maxime that euery particular Church and much more each single person ought to beleeue himself obliged to submit his priuate iudgment vnto the Authority of the Church And so we see likewise in the fifth chapter of the Discipline of the Pretended-Reformed Religion tit of Consistories art 31. that desiring to prescribe an expedient to determine the debates which might arise vpon any point of Doctrine or Discipline they decreed first that the Consistory shall endeauor to appease all without noise and with all the sweetnes of the Word of God and after hauing sett and rank'd the Consistory the Conference and the Prouinciall Synode as so many distinct degrees of Iurisdiction coming at last to the Nationall Synode aboue which there is no Authority amongst them they speake of it in these termes There it is that the Entier Finall resolution shall be taken according to the Word of God to which if they refuse to acquiesce in euery point and with a direct renouncing of their Errors they shall be cutt off from the Church Is it not then euident that the Pretended-Reformers doe not attribute the Authority of this Finall iudgment to the Word of God taken alone by it self and without dependance on the Authority of the Church since the Word hauing bin employ'd and consulted in the first conclusions they haue made vpō it they doe neuerthelesse admit an Apeale from it It is the Word as interpreted by the Soueraigne tribunal of the Church that frameth this last and Finall resolution vnto which whosoeuer refuseth to acquiesce from point to point though he boasteth his being authorised by the Word of God is no longer reputed but as a profane abuser and Corrupter thereof But the forme of those Letters

celebrating the Memory and applying the Virtue of that Oblation Whereby the same Church professeth that all the merit of the Redemption of mankind is annexed to the Death of the son̄e of God certainly by all that hath bin already said it ought to haue bin vnderstood that when we say to God in the celebration of the divine Mysteries We offer you this holy host we doe not pretend by this oblation to make or present to God a new payement of the price of our Saluation but to employ towards him the merits of IESVS CHRIST there present and the infinite price he hath at once pay'd for our Redemption vpon the Crosse. The Professors of the Pretended-Reformed Religion doe not beleeue that they offend CHRIST IESVS in offring him to God as present by their Faith as in case they did beleeue he were truly and Really present what repugnance could they haue to offer him as being Effectually present So that to argue ingenuously the dispute in faire dealing ought to be reduced singly to his being Present This supposed all the false images and conceptions the Pretended-Reformers frame to themselues about the Sacrifice we offer ought to be effaced they should in iustice acknowledge fairely that the Catholiques pretend not to frame for themselues a new Propitiation to appease God againe as if he were not sufficiently reconciled by the Sacrifice of the Crosse or in order to make some new supplement to the price of our Saluation as if it were imperfect All these imaginations haue no admission into our Doctrine by reason that all this is intended by way of Intercession and Application in that manner I come from deliuering explaining After this cleer explication those great obiections drawn out of the Epistle to the Hebrews which our Aduersaries seeke to enforce so much against vs will appear weake vnreasonable that it is in vaine they strayne themselues to proue by the meaning of the Apostle that we nullify the Sacrifice of the Crosse but as the most certain proof that can be had that two Doctrines are not opposite to one an other is to discouer in the expounding them that no proposition of the one is Contradictory to the proposalls of the other I conceaue my self inuited in this occasion to expose in short the Doctrine of the Epistle to the Hebrews The Apostle designed in this Epistle the teaching vs that a sinner could not escape from death other wayes then by subrogating in his place one that should dy for him that while men did supply in their stead but the Bloodshed of Beasts their Sacrifices had no other operation but the making a publick profession that they had deserued to dy and that by reason the divine Iustice could not be satisfied with so disproportionate an exchange those Bloody Victimes were euery day offer'd and repeated which was a certain proofe of the insufficiency of that exchange and subrogation but that since CHRIST IESVS had bin pleased to dy for sinners God being fully satisfyed by the voluntary substitution of so worthy a person could no more require the price of our ransome from whence the Apostle concludes that we ought not only to cease from offring any other Victime after CHRIST IESVS but that CHRIST himself was to be offer'd vp to death but one single time Let the Reader then who is sollicitous of his Saluation and is a freind to truth recolect seriously what we haue deliuered of the manner wherein CHRIST IESVS offereth himself to God for vs in the Eucharist and I am confident he will not find in it any propositions contrary to those of the Apostle which I come from delivering or any that infirme his proofes so the most can be vrged against vs is his Silence But such as will consider the wise distributions God maketh of his secrets in the many and seuerall bookes of his Scripture would not surely restraine vs to receaue from the single Epistle to the Hebrews all our instruction concerning a matter which did not necessarily relate to the subiect of that Epistle since the Apostle intendeth in it to explaine the perfection of the Sacrifice of the Crosse and not the different meanes God hath giuen vs to apply it vnto our selues And to preuent all Equiuocall sense if we take the word offer as it is vnderstood in this Epistle in that sense which implyeth the Actual death of the Victime we confesse aloud that IESVS-CHRIST is no longer offer'd so neither in the Eucharist nor any where else But as this same word hath a larger signification in other places of Scripture where it is often said that one Offereth to God what one presenteth before him the Church which doth not frame her language her doctrine by the single Epistle to the Hebrews but by the whole body of the Scriptures doth not scruple to affirme that CHRIST JESVS offereth himself to God in all places where he appeareth for our sakes before him and consequently that he offereth himself vp in the Eucharist according to the expression of the holy Fathers of the Church Now to conceaue that this man̄er wherein CHRIST IESVS presenteth himself to God can at all detract from the Sacrifice of the Crosse is what can not possibly be inferr'd vnlesse one will ouerthrow the whole Scripture and especially that Epistle which they seeke so much to straine against vs. For by the same reason we ought to conclude that when CHRIST IESVS vowed himself to God entring into the world to substitute himself instead of those Victimes which were not pleasing to him that he iniured the action by which he deuow'd himself vpō the Crosse and so when he continueth to appeare for vs before God he detracteth from the Oblation in which he appeared once by the Immolation of himself and that not ceasing to intercede for vs he accuseth that Intercession of Insufficiency which he made at his Death with so many teares and so great cryes Would not all these inferences be ridiculous We must therefore vnderstand that CHRIST IESVS who did offer vp himself once to become the humble Victime of the Diuine iustice doth continue still offering himself for vs that the infinite perfection of the Sacrifice of the Crosse consisteth in this that whatsoeuer preceded it as well as what follows it are intirely relating vnto it that as what preceded was its Preparation so what doth follow is its Consummation and Application that true it is the payment of the price of our ransome is not reiterated by reason it was fully discharged the first time but what Applieth that Redemption is incessantly continued repeated and in fine we must know to distinguish those acts which are reiterated as being imperfect from such as are perpetuated as being perfect necessary We coniure the followers of the Pretended-Reformed Religion to make some little reflection vpon what I haue said concerning the Eucharist The doctrine of the Reall Presence hath bin