if he had said Pastors that is Teachers If it be the latter then the name of Teachers must be added as that which was better known than that of Pastors and more expressive of the Office intended It is declared who are meant by Pastors in calling them Teachers or else the addition of the word is meerly superfluous But this is quite otherwise the name of Pastor being more known as unto the Indigitation of Office-Power and Care and more appropriated thereunto than that of Teacher which is both a common name not absolutely appropriated unto Office and respective of one part of the Pastoral Office and Duty only 3. NO instance can be given in any place where there is an enumeration of Church-Officers either by their Names as 1 Cor. 12.25 or by their Work as Rom. 12.5 6 7. or by the Offices themselves as Phil. 1.1 of the same Officer at the same time to be expressed under various names which indeed must needs introduce confusion into such an enumeration It is true the same Officers are in the Scripture called by several Names as Pastors Bishops Presbyters but if it had been said any where that there were in the Church Bishops and Presbyters it must be acknowledged that they were distinct Officers as Bishops and Deacons are Phil. 1.1 4. THE words in their First notion are not Synonymous for all Pastors are Teachers but all Teachers are not Pastors and therefore the latter cannot be exegetical of the former 3 dly AS these Teachers are so called and named in contradistinction unto Pastors in the same place so they have distinct Office-Works and Duties assigned unto them in the same place also Rom. 12.18 He that teacheth on teaching he that exhorteth on exhortation If they have especial Works to attend unto distinctly by virtue of their Offices then are their Offices distinctly also for from one there is an especial obligation unto one sort of Duties and to another sort from the other 4 thly THESE Teachers are set in the Church as in a distinct Office from that of Prophets Secondarily Prophets Thirdly Teachers 1 Cor. 12.28 And so they are mentioned distinctly in the Church of Antioch Act. 13.1 There were in the Church at Antioch Prophets and Teachers But in both places Pastors are comprized under the name of Prophets Exhortation being an especial branch of Prophecy Rom. 12.6 7 8. 5. THERE is a peculiar institution of Maintenance for these Teachers which argues a distinct Office Gal. 6.6 FROM all these considerations it appears that the Teachers mentioned in the Scripture were Officers in the Church distinct from Pastors For they are distinguished from them 1. By their Name declarative of the especial nature of their Office. 2. By their peculiar Work which they are to attend unto in Teaching by virtue of Office. 3. By the distinct placing in the Church as peculiar Officers in it distinct from Prophets or Pastors 4. By the especial constitution of their necessary Maintenance 5. By the necessity of their Work to be distinctly carried on in the Church Which may suffice for the removal of the Second Opinion THE Third is that Teachers are a distinct Office in the Church but such whose Office Work and Power is confined unto Teaching only so as that they have no interest in Rule or the Administration of the Sacraments And 1. I ACKNOWLEDGE that this seems to have been the way and practice of the Churches after the Apostles For they had ordinary Catechists and Teachers in Assemblies like Schools that were not called unto the whole Work of the Ministry 2. THE name of a Teacher neither in its native signification nor in its ordinary application as expressive of the Work of this Office doth extend it self beyond or signifie any thing but the meer Power and Duty of Teaching It is otherwise as unto the names of Pastors Bishops or Overseers Elders which as unto the two former their constant use in Scripture suited unto their signification includes the whole Work of the Ministry and the latter is a name of Dignity and Rule Upon the proposal of Church-Officers under these names the whole of Office-Power and Duty is apprehended as included in them But the name of a Teacher especially as significant of that of Rabbi among the Jews carries along with it a confinement unto an especial Work or Duty 3. I DO judge it lawful for any Church from the nature of the thing it self Scripture general Rules and Directions to choose call and set apart meet Persons unto the Office Work and Duty of Teachers without an interest in the Rule of the Church or the Administration of the Holy Ordinances of Worship The same thing is practised by many for the substance of it though not in due order And it may be the practice hereof duly observed would lead us unto the Original Institution of this Office. But 4. WHEREAS a Teacher meerly as such hath no right unto Rule or the Administration of Ordinances no more than the Doctors among the Jews had right to Offer Sacrifices in the Temple yet he who is called to be a Teacher may also at the same time be called to be an Elder and a Teaching Elder hath the power of all holy Administrations committed to him 5. BUT he that is called to be a Teacher in a peculiar manner although he be an Elder also is to attend peculiarly unto that part of his Work from whence he receiveth his Denomination And so I shall at present dismiss this Third Opinion unto farther consideration if there be any occasion for it THE Fourth Opinion I rather embrace than any of the other namely upon a supposition that a Teacher is a distinct Officer in the Church his Office is of the same kind with that of the Pastor though distinguished from it as unto degrees both materially and formally For 1. THEY are joined with Pastors in the same Order as their Associates in Office Ephes. 4.1 So they are with Prophets and set in the Church as they are 1 Cor. 12.28 Act. 13.1 2. They have a peculiar Work of the same general nature with that of Pastors assigned unto them Rom. 12.7 Being to Teach or Preach the Gospel by virtue of Office they have the same Office for substance with the Pastors 3. They are said 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the Church Act. 13.1 which comprizeth all Sacred Administrations WHEREFORE upon the consideration of all that is spoken in the Scripture concerning Church-Teachers with the various conjectures of all sorts of Writers about them I shall conclude my own Thoughts in some few observations and then enquire into the state of the Church with reference unto these Pastors and Teachers And I say 1. THERE may be Teachers in a Church called only unto the Work of Teaching without any farther interest in Rule or Right unto the Administration of the Sacraments Such they seem to be who are mentioned Gal. 6.6 They are there called peculiarly 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉
arrived unto those which they called general under the conduct of the Pope whose Senate they were BUT these things have no countenance given them by any Divine Institution Apostolical Example or practice of the First Churches but are a meer product of Secular Interest working it self in a Mystery of Iniquity SINCE the Dissolution of the Roman Empire Nations have been cast into distinct Civil Governments of their own whose Sovereignty is in themselves by the event of War and Counsels thereon emergent Unto each of these it is supposed there is a Church-State accommodated as the Church of England the Church of Scotland the Church of France and the like whose Original and Being depends on the First event of War in that Dissolution Unto these new Church-States whose Being Bounds and Limits are given unto them absolutely by those of the Civil Government which they belong unto it is thought meet that Ecclesiastical Synods should be accommodated But in what way this is to be done there is not yet an agreement but it is not my present business to consider the differences that are about it which are known unto this Nation on a dear account Yet this I shall say that whereas it is eminently useful unto the Edification of the Church Catholick that all the Churches professing the same Doctrine of Faith within the Limits of the same Supream Civil Government should hold constant actual Communion among themselves unto the ends of it before mentioned I see not how it can be any abridgment of the Liberty of particular Churches or interfere with any of their Rights which they hold by Divine Institution if through more constant lesser Synods for Advice there be a communication of their mutual concerns unto those that are greater until if occasion require and it be expedient there be a general Assembly of them all to advise about any thing wherein they are all concerned But this is granted only with these Limitations 1. That the Rights of particular Churches be preserved in the free Election of such as are to be Members of all these Synods 2. That they assume no Authority or Jurisdiction over Churches or Persons in things Civil or Ecclesiastical 3. That none are immediately concerned in this proper Synodal Power or Authority which what it is we shall enquire who are not present in them by their own Delegates FOR that kind of Synods which some call a Classis which is a convention of the Elders or Officers of sundry Parochial Churches distinguished for Presential Communion ordinarily in some acts of it by virtue of their Office and for the exercise of Office-Power it is the constitution of a new kind of particular Churches by a combination of them into one whose Original distinction is only in the Civil Limits of their Cohabitation which probably may be done sometimes and in some places unto Edification 4. THE Persons of whom all sorts of Ecclesiastical Synods are to consist must be enquired into And there is nothing of meer humane prudential constitution that hath longer obtained in the Church than that those should be Officers of the Churches only And whereas after the days of the Apostles we have no Record of any Synods of more Churches than one until after the distinction was made between Bishops and Presbyters they were made up of both sorts of them But afterwards those who were peculiarly called Bishops enclosed this Right unto themselves on what grounds God knows there being no one Tittle in the Scripture or the Light of Reason to give them countenance therein IT must therefore be affirmed that no Persons by virtue of any Office meerly have Right to be Members of Ecclesiastical Synods as such Neither is there either Example or Reason to give colour unto any such pretence Farther is no Office-Power to be exerted in such Synods as such neither conjunctly by all the Members of them nor singly by any of them Officers of the Church Bishops Pastors Elders may be present in them ought to be present in them are meetest for the most part so to be but meerly as such it belongs not unto them The Care Oversight and Rule of the Churches whereunto they do belong the Flock among them distinctly is committed unto them and for that they are instructed with Power and Authority by virtue of their Office. But as unto their conjunction in Synods which is a meer act and effect of the Communion of Churches among themselves it is not committed unto them in a way of peculiar Right by virtue of their Office. If it be so without respect unto the power of the Magistrate in calling them or of the Churches in choosing them then it belongs unto them all for that which belongs unto any of them as such by virtue of Office belongs equally unto all and if it belongs unto all then it belongs unto all of one sort only as for instance Bishops or unto all of all sorts as for instance Presbyters also If it be stated in the latter way then every Presbyter as such by virtue of his Office hath Right and Power to be present in all Ecclesiastical Synods equal with that of the Bishops For although it be supposed that his Office is not equal unto theirs yet it is so also that this Right doth equally belong unto his Office. If the former be avowed namely that this Right belongs unto Bishops only such as are pleaded for by virtue of their Office as such then 1. I desire that any tolerable proof of the confinement of this Right unto such an Office be produced either from the Scripture or Reason or the Example of the First Churches which as yet I have never seen 2. I fear not to say that a false presumption hereof was one principal cause and means of introducing Tyranny into the Churches and the utter ruine of their Liberty CONCERNING the composition that is made herein that some should convene in Ecclesiastical Synods by their own personal Right and in virtue of their Office and others by a kind of Delegation from some of their own Order it being a meer political constitution which I shall immediately speak unto it is not here to be taken notice of THERE is nothing therefore in Scripture Example or the Light of Natural Reason with the principles of all Societies in Union or Communion that will lead us any farther than this that such Synods are to be composed and consist of such Persons as are chosen and delegated by those Churches respectively who do act and exert their Communion in such Assemblies So was it in the First Example of them Act. 15. The Church of Antioch chose and sent Messengers of their own number to advise with the Apostles and Elders of the Church at Jerusalem at which Consultation the Members of that Church also were present And this is the whole of the nature and use of Ecclesiastical Synods It is on other accounts that they make up so great a part of the History
Order or Degree which also as unto the Scripture the most learned Advocates of Prelacy begin to grant 1. THE Apostle describing what ought to be the Qualifications of Presbyters or Elders gives this Reason of it because a Bishop must be so Tit. 1.5 6 7. Ordain Elders in every City if any be blameless c. for a Bishop must be blameless He that would prove of what sort a Presbyter that is to be Ordained so ought to be gives this Reason for it That such a Bishop ought to be intends the same Person and Office by Presbyter and Bishop or there is no congruity of Speech or consequence of Reason in what he asserts To suppose that the Apostle doth not intend the same Persons and the same Office by Presbyters and Bishops in the same place is to destroy his Argument and render the context of his discourse unintelligible He that will say that if you make a Justice of Peace or a Constable he must be magnanimous liberal full of clemency and courage for so a King ought to be will not be thought to argue very wisely Yet such is the Argument here if by Elders and Bishops distinct Orders and Offices are intended 2. THERE were many Bishops in one City in one particular Church Phil. 1.1 To all the Saints that are at Philippi with the Bishops and Deacons That the Church then at Philippi was one particular Church or Congregation was proved before But to have many Bishops in the same Church whereas the nature of the Episcopacy pleaded for consists in the Superiority of one over the Presbyters of many Churches is absolutely inconsistent Such Bishops whereof there may be many in the same Church of the same Order equal in Power and Dignity with respect unto Office will easily be granted but then they are Presbyters as well as Bishops There will I fear be no end of this contest because of the prejudices and interests of some but that the identity of Bishops and Presbyters should be more plainly expressed can neither be expected nor desired 3. THE Apostle being at Miletus sent to Ephesus for the Elders of the Church to come unto him that is the Elders of the Church at Ephesus as hath been elsewhere undeniably demonstrated Act. 20.17 18. unto these Elders he says Take heed unto your selves and to all the Flock over which the Holy Ghost hath made you Bishops to feed the Church of God ver 28. If Elders and Bishops be not the same Persons having the same Office the same Function and the same Duties and the same Names it is impossible so far as I understand how it should be expressed For these Elders are they whom the Holy Ghost made Bishops they were many of them in the same Church their Duty it was to attend unto the Flock and to feed the Church which comprize all the Duties the whole Function of Elders and Bishops which must therefore be the same This plain Testimony can no way be evaded by pretences and conjectures unwritten and uncertain the only answer unto it is It was indeed so then but it was otherwise afterwards which some now betake themselves unto But these Elders were either Elders only and not Bishops or Bishops only and not Elders or the same Persons were Elders and Bishops as is plainly affirmed in the words The latter is that which we plead If the first be asserted then was there no Bishop then at Ephesus for these Elders had the whole oversight of the Flock If the Second then were there no Elders at all which is no good exposition of those words that Paul called unto him the Elders of the Church 4. THE Apostle Peter writes unto the Elders of the Churches that they should feed the Flock 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 taking the oversight or exercising the Office and Function of Bishops over them and that not as Lords but as ensamples of Humility Obedience and Holiness to the whole Flock 1 Pet. 5.1 2 3. Those on whom it is incumbent to feed the Flock and to superintend over it as those who in the first place are accountable unto Jesus Christ are Bishops and such as have no other Bishop over them unto whom this charge should be principally committed But such according unto this Apostle are the Elders of the Church Wherefore those Elders and Bishops are the same And such were the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Guides of the Church at Jerusalem whom the members of it were bound to obey as those that did watch for and were to give an account of their Souls Heb. 13.17 5. THE substance of these and all other Instances or Testimonies of the same kind is this Those whose names are the same equally common and applicable unto them all whose Function is the same whose Qualifications and Characters are the same whose Duties Account and Reward are the same concerning whom there is in no one place of Scripture the least mention of inequality disparity or preference in Office among them they are essentially and every way the same That thus it is with the Elders and Bishops in the Scripture cannot modestly be denied I do acknowledge that where a Church is greatly encreased so as that there is a necessity of many Elders in it for its Instruction and Rule that Decency and Order do require that one of them do in the management of all Church Affairs preside to guide and direct the way and manner thereof So the Presbyters at Alexandria did choose one from among themselves that should have the preheminence of a President among them Whether the Person that is so to preside be directed unto by being first Converted or first Ordained or on the account of Age or of Gifts and Abilities whether he continue for a Season only and then another be deputed unto the same Work or for his Life are things in themselves indifferent to be determined according unto the General Rules of Reason and Order with respect unto the Edification of the Church I shall never oppose this Order but rather desire to see it in practice namely that particular Churches were of such an extent as necessarily to require many Elders both Teaching and Ruling for their Instruction and Government for the better observation of Order and Decency in the publick Assemblies the fuller Representation of the Authority committed by Jesus Christ unto the Officers of his Church the occasional instruction of the Members in lesser Assemblies which as unto some ends may be stated also with the due attendance unto all other means of Edification and Watching Inspecting Warning Admonishing Exhorting and the like and that among these Elders one should be chosen by themselves with the consent of the Church not into a New Order not into a degree of Authority above his Brethren but only unto his part of the common work in a peculiar manner which requires some kind of Precedency Hereby no New Officer no New Order of Officers no New degree of Power or
〈◊〉 Catechists and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 1 Cor. 4.15 Instructors of those that are young in the Rudiments of Religion And such there were in the Primitive Churches some whereof were eminent famous and useful And this was very necessary in those days when the Churches were great and numerous For whereas the whole Rule of the Church and the Administration of all Ordinances in it is originally committed unto the Pastor as belonging entirely unto his Office the discharge of it in all its parts unto the Edification of the Church especially when it is numerous being impossible for any one Man or it may be more in the same Office where all are obliged unto an especial attendance on one part of it namely the Word and Prayer it pleased the Lord Christ to appoint such as in distinct Offices should be associated with them for the discharge of sundry parts of their Duty So were Deacons Ordained to take care of the poor and the outward concerns of the Church without any interest in Rule or Right to Teach So were as we shall prove Elders Ordained to assist and help in Rule without any call to Preach or Administer the Sacraments And so were Teachers appointed to instruct the Church and others in the Truth who have no Right to Rule or the Administration of other Ordinances And thus although the whole Duty of the Edification of the Church be still incumbent on the Pastors yet being supplied with assistance to all the parts of it it may be comfortably discharged by them And if this Order were observed in all Churches not only many inconveniences would be prevented but the Order and Edification of the Church greatly promoted 2. HE who is peculiarly called to be a Teacher with reference unto a distinction from a Pastor may yet at the same time be called to be an Elder also that is to be a Teaching Elder And where there is in any Officer a concurrence of both these a Right unto Rule as an Elder and power to Teach or Preach the Gospel there is the same Office and Office-Power for the substance of it as there is in the Pastor 3. ON the foregoing supposition there yet remains a distinction between the Office of a Pastor and Teacher which as far as light may be taken from their Names and distinct Asscriptions unto them consists materially in the different Gifts which those to be called unto Office have received which the Church in their call ought to have respect unto and formally in the peculiar exercise of those Gifts in the discharge of their Office according unto the Assignation of their especial Work unto them which themselves are to attend unto UPON what hath been before discoursed concerning the Office of Pastors and Teachers it may be enquired Whether there may be many of them in a particular Church or whether there ought only to be one of each sort And I say 1. TAKE Teachers in the Third Sence for those who are only so and have no farther interest in Office-Power and there is no doubt but that there may be as many of them in any Church as are necessary unto its Edification and ought so to be And a due observation of this institution would prevent the inconvenience of Mens Preaching constantly who are in no Office in the Church For although I do grant that those who have once been regularly or solemnly set A part or Ordained unto the Ministry have the Right of constant Preaching inherent in them and the Duty of it incumbent on them though they may be separated from those Churches wherein and unto whom they were peculiarly Ordained yet for Men to give themselves up constantly unto the Work of Teaching by Preaching the Gospel who never were set apart by the Church thereunto I know not that it can be justified 2. If there be but one sort of Elders mentioned in the Scripture it is out of all question that there may be many Pastors in the same Church For there were many Elders in every Church Act. 14.22 Act. 20.28 Phil. 1.1 Tit. 1.5 But if there are sundry sorts of Elders mentioned in the Scripture as Pastors who peculiarly feed the Flock those Teaching Elders of whom we have spoken and those Rulers concerning whom we shall treat in the next place then no determination of this enquiry can be taken from the multiplication of them in any Church 3. It is certain that the Order very early observed in the Church was one Pastor 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Praeses quickly called Episcopus by way of distinction with many Elders assisting in Rule and Teaching and Deacons Ministring in the things of this Life whereby the Order of the Church was preserved and its Authority represented Yet I will not deny but that in each particular Church there may be many Pastors with an equality of power if the Edification of the Church doth require it 4. IT was the alteration of the state of the Church from its Primitive Constitution and Deviation from its First Order by an occasional coalescency of many Churches into one by a new form of Churches never appointed by Christ which came not in until after the end of the Second Century that gave occasion to corrupt this Order into an Episcopal Preheminence which degenerated more and more into confusion under the Name of Order And the absolute equality of many Pastors in one and the same Church is liable unto many inconveniencies if not diligently watched against 5. WHEREFORE let the state of the Church be preserved and kept unto its Original Constitution which is Congregational and no other and I do judge that the Order of the Officers which was so early in the Primitive Church namely of one Pastor or Bishop in one Church assisted in Rule and all holy Administrations with many Elders Teaching or Ruling only doth not so overthrow Church-Order as to render its Rule or Discipline useless 6. BUT whereas there is no difference in the Scripture as unto Office or Power intimated between Bishops and Presbyters as we have proved where there are many Teaching Elders in any Church an equality in Office and Power is to be preserved But yet this takes not off from the due preference of the Pastoral Office nor from the necessity of precedency for the observation of Order in all Church Assemblies nor from the consideration of the peculiar advantages which Gifts Age Abilities Prudence and Experience which may belong unto some according to Rule may give CHAP. VII Of the Rule of the Church or of Ruling Elders 1. THE Rule and Government of the Church or the execution of the Authority of Christ therein is in the hand of the Elders All Elders in Office have Rule and none have Rule in the Church but Elders As such Rule doth belong unto them The Apostles by virtue of their especial Office were intrusted with all Church-Power but therefore they were Elders also 1 Pet. 5.1 2 Joh. 1. 3 Joh. 1. See Act.
21.17 1 Tim. 5.17 They are some of them on other accounts called Bishops Pastors Teachers Ministers Guides but what belongs unto any of them in point of Rule or what interest they have therein it belongs unto them as Elders and not otherwise Act. 20.17 18. SO under the Old Testament where the Word doth not signifie a difference in Age but is used in a moral sence Elders are the same with Rulers or Governours whether in Offices Civil or Ecclesiastical especially the Rulers of the Church were constantly called its Elders And the use of the Word with the abuse of the Power or Office intended by it is traduced to signifie Men in Authority Signeiores Eldermani in all places 2. CHURCH-Power acted in its Rule is called the Keys of the Kingdom of Heaven by an expression derived from the Keys that were a sign of Office-Power in the Families of Kings Isa. 22.22 and used by our Saviour himself to denote the communication of Church-Power unto others which was absolutely and universally vested in himself under the Name of the Key of David Revel 3.7 Mat. 16.19 3. THESE Keys are usually referred unto Two Heads namely the one of Order the other of Jurisdiction 4. BY the Key of Order the Spiritual Right Power and Authority of Bishops or Pastors to Preach the Word to Administer the Sacraments Doctrinally to bind and loose the Consciences of Men are intended 5. BY Jurisdiction the Rule Government or Discipline of the Church is designed though it was never so called or esteemed in the Scripture or the Primitive Church until the whole nature of Church-Rule or Discipline was depraved and changed Therefore neither the Word nor any thing that is signified by it or which it is applied unto ought to be admitted unto any consideration in the things that belong unto the Church or its Rule it being expressive of and directing unto that corrupt Administration of things Ecclesiastical according unto the Canon Law by which all Church-Rule and Order is destroyed I do therefore at once dismiss all disputes about it as of things Foreign to the Gospel and Christian Religion I mean as unto the Institutions of Christ in his Church The Civil Jurisdiction of Supreme Magistrates about the externals of Religion is of another consideration But that these Keys do include the two-fold distinct Powers of Teaching and Rule of Doctrine and Discipline is freely granted 6. IN the Church of England as in that of Rome there is a peculiar distribution made of these Keys Unto some that is unto one special sort or order of Men they are both granted both the Key of Order and of Jurisdiction which is unto Diocesan Bishops with some others under various Canonical restrictions and limitations as Deans and Arch-Deacons Unto some is granted the Key of Order only without the least interest in Jurisdiction or Rule by virtue of their Office which are the Parochial Ministers or meer Presbyters without any additional Title or Power as of Commissary Surrogates or the like And unto a third sort there is granted the Key of Rule or Jurisdiction almost plenipotent who have no share in the Key of Order that is were never Ordained Separated Dedicated unto any Office in the Church such as are the Chancellors c. 7. THESE Chancellors are the only Lay-Elders that I know any where in any Church that is Persons entrusted with the Rule of the Church and the Disposition of its Censures who are not Ordained unto any Church-Office but in all other things continue in the Order of the Laity or the People All Church Rulers by institution are Elders To be an Elder of the Church and a Ruler in it is all one Wherefore these Persons being Rulers in the Church and yet thus continuing in the Order of the People are Lay-Elders whom I wonder how so many of the Church came so seriously to oppose seeing this Order of Men is owned by none but themselves The Truth is and it must be acknowledged that there is no known Church in the World I mean whose Order is known unto us and is of any publick consideration but they do dispose the Rule of the Church in part into the hands of Persons who have not the power of Authoritative Preaching of the Word and Administration of the Sacraments committed unto them For even those who place the whole external Rule of the Church in the Civil Magistrate do it as they judge him an Officer of the Church entrusted by Christ with Church-Power And those who deny any such Officers as are usually called Ruling Elders in the Reformed Churches to be of Divine Institution yet maintain that it is very necessary that there should be such Officers in the Church either appointed by the Magistrate or chosen by the people and that with cogent Arguments See Grot. de Jure Potestat Cap. 8. BUT this distribution mentioned of Church-Power is unscriptural nor is there any foot-steps of it in Antiquity It is so as unto the two latter Branches of it That any one should have the power of Order to Preach the Word to Administer the Seals to bind and loose the Conscience Doctrinally or Ministerially to bind and loose in the Court of Conscience and yet by the virtue of that Office which gives them this power not to have a Right and Power of Rule or Discipline to bind and loose in the Court of the Church is that which neither the Scripture nor any example of the Primitive Church doth give countenance unto And as by this means those are abridged and deprived of their power to whom it is granted by the Institution and Law of Christ as it is with all Elders duly called unto their Office so in the Third Branch there is a grant of Church-Power unto such as by the Law of Christ are excluded from any Interest therein The enormity of which constitution I shall not at present insist upon But Enquiry must be made what the Scripture directs unto herein And 1. THERE is a Work and Duty of Rule in the Church distinct from the Work and Duty of Pastoral Feeding by the Preaching of the Word and Administration of the Sacraments All agree herein unless it be Erastus and those that follow him who seem to oppose it But their Arguments lie not against Rule in general which were brutish but only a Rule by external Jurisdiction in the Elders of the Church So they grant the general Assertion of the necessity of Rule for who can deny it only they contend about the subject of power required thereunto A Spiritual Rule by virtue of mutual voluntary confederation for the preservation of Peace Purity and Order in the Church few of that opinion deny at least it is not that which they do oppose For to deny all Rule and Discipline in the Church with all Administration of Censures in the exercise of a Spiritual Power internally inherent in the Church is to deny the Church to be a Spiritual Political
Authority is constituted in the Church only the Work and Duty of it is cast into such an Order as the very light of nature doth require BUT there is not any intimation in the Scripture of the least imparity or inequality in Order Degree or Authority among Officers of the same sort whether extraordinary or ordinary The Apostles were all equal so were the Evangelists so were Elders or Bishops and so were Deacons also The Scripture knows no more of an Arch-Bishop such as all Diocesan Bishops are nor an Arch-Deacon than of an Arch-Apostle or of an Arch-Evangelist or an Arch-Prophet Howbeit it is evident that in all their Assemblies they had one who did preside in the manner before described which seems among the Apostles to have been the prerogative of Peter THE Brethren also of the Church may be so multiplied as that the constant meeting of them all in one place may not be absolutely best for their Edification Howbeit that on all the solemn occasions of the Church whereunto their consent is necessary they did of old and ought still to meet in the same place for advise consultation and consent as was proved before This is so fully expressed and exemplified in the two great Churches of Jerusalem and Antioch Act. 15. that it cannot be gain-said When Paul and Barnabas sent by the Brethren or Church at Antioch v. 1 3. were come to Jerusalem they were received by the Church as the Brethren are called in distinction from the Apostles and Elders v. 4. So when the Apostles and Elders assembled to consider of the case proposed unto them the whole multitude of the Church that is the Brethren assembled with them v. 6 12. neither were they mute Persons meer Auditors and Spectators in the Assembly but they concurred both in the debate and determination of the Question insomuch as they are expresly joined with the Apostles and Elders in the advice given ver 22 23. And when Paul and Barnabas returned unto Antioch the multitude unto whom the Letter of the Church at Jerusalem was directed came together about it ver 23.30 Unless this be observed the Primitive-Church-State is overthrown But I shall return from this Digression THE first Officer or Elder of the Church is the Pastor A Pastor is the Elder that Feeds and Rules the Flock 1 Pet. 5.2 that is who is its Teacher and its Bishop 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Feed taking the oversight IT is not my present design nor work to give a full account of the Qualifications required in Persons to be called unto this Office nor of their Duty and Work with the Qualities or Vertues to be exercised therein It would require a large Discourse to handle them practically and it hath been done by others It were to be wished that what is of this kind expressed in the Rule and which the nature of the Office doth indispensably require were more exemplified in practice than it is But some things relating unto this Officer and his Office that are needful to be well stated I shall treat concerning THE name of a Pastor or Shepherd is Metaphorical It is a Denomination suited unto his Work denoting the same Office and Person with a Bishop or Elder spoken of absolutely without limitation unto either Teaching or Ruling And it seems to be used or applied unto this Office because it is more comprehensive of and instructive in all the Duties that belong unto it than any other Name whatever nay than all of them put together The Grounds and Reasons of this Metaphor or whence the Church is called a Flock and whence God termeth himself the Shepherd of the Flock whence the Sheep of this Flock are committed unto Christ whereon he becomes the good Shepherd that lays down his Life for the Sheep and the Prince of Shepherds what is the interest of Men in a participation of this Office and what their Duty thereon are things well worth the consideration of them who are called unto it Hirelings yea Wolves and dumb Dogs do in many places take on themselves to be Shepherds of the Flock by whom it is devoured and destroyed WHEREAS therefore this Name or Appellation is taken from and includes in it Love Care Tenderness Watchfulness in all the Duties of going before preserving feeding defending the Flock the Sheep and the Lambs the Strong the Weak and Diseased with accountableness as Servants unto the chief Shepherd it was generally disused in the Church and those of Bishops or Overseers Guides Presidents Elders which seem to include more of Honour and Authority were retained in common use that though one of them at last namely that of Bishops with some elating compositions and adjuncts of power obtained the preheminence Out of the Corruption of these Compositions and Additions in Arch-Bishops Metropolitans Patriarchs and the like brake forth the Cockatrice of the Church that is the Pope BUT this name is by the Holy Ghost appropriated unto the principal Ministers of Christ in his Church Ephes. 4.11 And under that name they were promised unto the Church of old Jerem. 3.15 And the Work of these Pastors is to feed the Flock committed to their charge as it is constantly required of them Act. 20.29 1 Pet. 5.2 OF Pastoral Feeding there are two parts 1. Teaching or Instruction 2. Rule or Discipline Unto these two Heads may all the Acts and Duties of a Shepherd toward his Flock be reduced And both are intended in the term of feeding 1 Chron. 11.2 Chap. 17.6 Jer. 23.2 Mic. 5.4 Chap. 7.14 Zech. 11.7 Act. 20.28 Joh. 21.14 1 Pet. 5.2 c. wherefore he who is the Pastor is the Bishop the Elder the Teacher of the Church THESE Works of Teaching and Ruling may be distinct in several Officers namely of Teachers and Rulers but to divide them in the same Office of Pastors that some Pastors should feed by Teaching only but have no right to Rule by Virtue of their Office and some should attend in exercise unto Rule only not esteeming themselves obliged to labour continually in feeding the Flock is almost to overthrow this Office of Christs Designation and to set up two in the room of it of Mens own projection OF the call of Men unto this Office so many things have been spoken and written by others at large that I shall only insist and that very briefly on some things which are either of the most important consideration or have been omitted by others As 1. UNTO the call of any person unto this Office of a Pastor in the Church there are certain Qualifications previously required in him disposing and making him fit for that Office. The outward call is an act of the Church as we shall shew immediately But therein is required an obediential acting of him also who is called Neither of these can be Regular neither can the Church act according to Rule and Order nor the person called act in such a due Obedience unless there are in him some previous Indications
all things as they see necessary which Church they are Wherefore if that will please them it shall be granted that in skill for the management of Ecclesiastical Affairs according to the Canon Law with such other Rules of the same kind as they have framed and in the legal proceedings of Ecclesiastical Courts as they are called there are none of the people that are equal unto them or will contend with them 2. IT hence also follows that those who are called unto Rule in the Church of Christ should diligently endeavour the attaining of and encreasing in this Wisdom giving evidence thereof on all occasions that the Church may safely acquiesce in their Rule But hereunto so many things do belong as cannot in this place be meetly treated of somewhat that appertains to them shall afterwards be considered CHAP. IV. The Officers of the Church THE Church is considered either as it is Essential with respect unto its Nature and Being or as it is Organical with respect unto its Order THE constituent causes and parts of the Church as unto its Essence and Being are its Institution Matter and Form whereof we have treated IT S Order as it is Organical is founded in that communication of Power unto it from Christ which was insisted on in the foregoing Chapter THE Organizing of a Church is the placing or implanting in it those Officers which the Lord Jesus Christ hath appointed to act and exercise his Authority therein FOR the Rule and Government of the Church are the exertion of the Authority of Christ in the hands of them unto whom it is committed that is the Officers of it not that all Officers are called to Rule but that none are called to Rule that are not so THE Officers of the Church in General are of two sorts Bishops and Deacons Phil. 1.1 And their Work is distributed into Prophecy and Ministry Rom. 12.6.7 THE Bishops or Elders are of two sorts 1. Such as have Authority to Teach and Administer the Sacraments which is commonly called the power of Order and also of Ruling which is called a Power of Jurisdiction corruptly And some have only Power for Rule of which sort there are some in all the Churches in the World. THOSE of the first sort are distinguished into Pastors and Teachers THE distinction between the Elders themselves is not like that between Elders and Deacons which is as unto the whole kind or nature of the Office but only with respect unto Work and Order whereof we shall treat distinctly THE first sort of Officers in the Church are Bishops or Elders concerning whom there have been mighty contentions in the late Ages of the Church The Principles we have hitherto proceeded on discharge us from any especial interest or concernment in this Controversy For if there be no Church of Divine or Apostolical constitution none in Being in the Second or Third Centuries but only a particular Congregation the foundation of that contest which is about Preheminence and Power in the same Person over many Churches falls to the ground INDEED strife about Power Superiority and Jurisdiction over one another amongst those who pretend to be Ministers of the Gospel is full of scandal It started early in the Church was extinguished by the Lord Christ in his Apostles rebuked by the Apostles in all others yet through the Pride Ambition and Avarice of Men hath grown to be the stain and shame of the Church in most Ages For neither the sense of the Authority of Christ forbidding such ambitious designings nor the proposal of his own example in this particular case nor the experience of their own insufficiency for the least part of the work of the Gospel-Ministry have been able to restrain the minds of Men from coveting after and contending for a prerogative in Church-Power over others For though this Ambition and all the fruits or rewards of it are laid under a severe interdict by our Lord Jesus Christ yet when Men like Achan saw the wedge of Gold and the goodly Babylonish Garment that they thought to be in Power Domination and Wealth they coveted them and took them to the great disturbance of the Church of God. IF Men would but a little seriously consider what there is in that care of Souls even of all them over whom they pretend Church-Power Rule or Jurisdiction and what it is to give an Account concerning them before the Judgment Seat of Christ it may be it would abate of their earnestness in contending for the enlargement of their Cures THE claim of Episcopacy as consisting in a rank of persons distinct from the Office of Presbyters is managed with great variety It is not agreed whether they are distinct in Order above them or only as unto a certain degree among them of the same Order It is not determined what doth constitute that pretended distinct Order nor wherein that degree of preheminence in the same Order doth consist nor what Basis it stands upon It is not agreed whether this Order of Bishops hath any Church-Power appropriated unto it so as to be acted singly by themselves alone without the concurrence of the Presbyters or how far that concurrence is necessary in all Acts of Church-Order or Power There are no Bounds or Limits of the Diocesses which they claim the Rule in and over as Churches whereunto they are peculiarly related derived either from Divine Institution or Tradition or general Rules of Reason respecting both or either of them or from the consideration of Gifts and Abilities or any thing else wherein Church-Order or Edification is concerned Those who plead for Diocesan Episcopacy will not proceed any farther but only that there is and ought to be a superiority in Bishops over Presbyters in Order or Degree But whether this must be over Presbyters in one Church only or in many distinct Churches whether it must be such as not only hinders them utterly from the discharge of any of the Duties of the Pastoral Office towards the most of them whom they esteem their Flocks and necessitates them unto a Rule by unscriptural Church-Officers Laws and Power they suppose doth not belong unto their Cause whereas indeed the weight and moment of it doth lie in and depend on these things Innumerable other uncertainties differences and variances there are about this singular Episcopacy which we are not at present concern'd to enquire into nor shall I insist on any of those which have been already mentioned BUT yet because it is necessary unto the clearing of the Evangelical Pastoral Office which is now under consideration unto what hath been pleaded before about the non institution of any Churches beyond particular Congregations which is utterly exclusive of all pretences of the present Episcopacy I shall briefly as in a diversion add the Arguments which undeniably prove That in the whole New Testament Bishops and Presbyters or Elders are every way the same Persons in the same Office have the same Function without distinction in