in five senses 1. In an Army 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Officer or Captain of the host Numb 31.14 Judg. 9. 28. 2 Kings 11.15 2dly Among workmen the principal that were set over all others in the building of the Temple 2 Chron. 34.12 17. 3dly In the City the Ruler or Prince and especially of the Priests and Levites Nehem. 11. 9 10 14.22 4thly In the Ministry of the Temple Numb 3.32 Eleazar the son of Aaron who is call'd 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Ruler of the Rulers of the Levites is stiled Numb 4.16 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Bishop Eleazar or Overseer 5thly In the house of the Lord over which he that was set is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 2 Kings 11.18 the Bishop over the house of the Lord. By all which it appears that agreeable to the notion of the word in the Old Testament it will also in the New denote prefecture or ruling power in the Church Come we then with the Catechist to the New Testament And first It is much that it should scape his notice that the office of the Apostles themselves the Apostolate which must needs be granted to include preheminence is call'd from this very word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Acts 1.20 a Bishoprick His Bishoprick let another take But secondly There needs no other conviction than what his own Instances will afford us where First He acknowledgeth that Bishops are the same that are elsewhere called Elders and makes that the ground of his argument which I shall now urge against him The name Bishop then apparently is not less fit to denote a preheminence than that of Elder because he owns them equally characteristical of the same persons Let us therefore consider somewhat more distinctly the account of that name and who are the persons pointed at by it in the New Testament The word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 among the Greeks See Dr. H. on Act. 12.30 and Phil. 1.1 is used both for Rulers and Old men and accordingly it is now in use among all nations Italians French Spaniards English to call their Rulers Seniors Mayors Aldermen c. which are literally the rendring of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Among the Hebrews the same is acknowledged that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 old men which with them that want degrees of comparison is all one with Elders and generally rendred 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 denoteth dignity and prefecture in the Old Testament So Eliezer the Steward of Abraham's house Gen. 15.2 who was placed over all his servants and goods is called Gen. 24.2 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Elder of his house and Ruler of all that he had So the Elders of Pharaoh's house and of all Egypt Gen. 50.7 are the Prefects and Administrators of the King's house and of all Egypt So the Elders of the Moabites are the Princes of Moab Numb 22.7 8. So when all dominion was founded in the priviledges that belonged to the first-born the Princes of the Families or Kindreds are call'd indifferently 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Patriarchs and Elders Such were the Elders of Israel Exod. 3.16 18. and 4.29 the heads or rulers of the families or kindreds ch 6.14 rulers of the congregation ch 16.22 who are again call'd the Elders of Israel ch 17.5 6. and 18.12 and Elders of the Tribes Deut. 31.28 And when Moses appointed Judges for lighter causes Exod. 18.22 who should have power over thousands and hundreds and fifties and tens i. e. first over so many families after over greater or lesser cities these were by them call'd 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Elders and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Rulers and Judges and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Rulers of the Synagogues and the like And so when the 70 Elders were taken in to assist Moses Numb 11.16 to whom the great Sanhedrim at Jerusalem succeeded it is evident that these were so call'd because they were Princes or Prefects or Rulers of the people before they were thus chosen by Moses And so the word Elder was not a denotation of one of the Sanhedrim any otherwise than as some of those that were in the Sanhedrim had formerly been Elders or Rulers of the people And accordingly of three sorts of men of which the Sanhedrim consisted but one is call'd Elders the other Scribes and Chief Priests By all which it appears how fitly this word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Elders being made use of by the Apostles and Writers of the New Testament is affixed to the Governours of the Christian church the several Bishops of several Cities answerable to the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Rulers of thousands or Patriarchs which being first used among the Jews are in the christian church the ordinary title of Bishops And although this title of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Elders hath been also extended to a second order in the Church yet in the Scripture-times it belonged principally if not alone to Bishops there being little or no evidence that any of that second order were then instituted though soon after before the writing of Ignatius Epistles there were such instituted in all Churches When the Gospel was first preached by the Apostles and but few converted they ordained in every City and Region no more but a Bishop and one or more Deacons to attend him And accordingly when St. Paul gives directions to Timothy for the ordaining of Church-officers he names Bishops and Deacons but no second order between them 1 Tim. 3. and so to Titus And thus the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or Eldership that laid hands on Timothy and made him Bishop may well be resolved to be the Bishops or Apostolical men who with St. Paul consecrated him 1 Tim. 4.14 2 Tim. 1.6 Thus St. Peter calls himself Peter the Elder 1 Pet. 5.1 and St. John the Elder John 2 Joh. 1. 3 Joh. 1. and Ignatius ep ad Philad calls the Apostles 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Presbyterie or Eldership of the Church Thus then though it be generally resolved that the word Bishop and Elder are equivalent in the Scripture yet is not this to be understood so that either and both of them signifies indifferently those whom we now call Presbyters but that they both signifie Bishops one setled in each Church by the Apostles So Act. 20. The Bishops there are not as the Catechist saith the Elders of the particular Church of Ephesus nor is there any such thing said of them verse 17. whereto he referrs us but rather of all Asia at least those that belonged to Ephesus as their Metropolis and therefore St. Paul tells them they had known how he had been with them all the time from the first day that he came into Asia verse 18. and St. Irenaeus saith l. 3. c. 14. In Mileto convocatis Episcopis Presbyteris ab Epheso proximis civitatibus The Bishops and Elders being assembled at Miletus from Ephesus and the next Cities And so in like manner
respect of writing the Gospel for there is none that thinketh the office of preaching to be either extraordinary or temporal p. 118. As for Prophets if you mean in respect of the gift of telling things to come such as Agabus was then be they temporal but if you mean Prophets in respect of their dexterity and readiness of expounding Scriptures such as Simeon Lucius Manaen and Saul Act. 13.15 1 Cor. 14. likewise such as Judas and Silas and such as the Apostle St. Paul speaketh of 1 Cor. 14. I see no cause why the Calling should be extraordinary or the office and gift temporal except you have a liberty to make temporal and perpetual ordinary and extraordinary what you please But seeing you would have all things proved by Scripture I pray you prove this that you have said either of the Apostles Evangelists or Prophets by the Scripture seeing you teach that of them which seemeth to be contrary unto Scripture And when T. C. replyes This passeth all the Divinity that ever I read that there are now Apostles T. C. p. 41. Sect. 1. Evangelist and Prophets You shall assuredly do marvels if you prove that as you say you will if any deny it I deny it prove you it The Arch-Bishop answers thus Then have you not read much Divinity p. 229.230 for if it be true that the Apostle St. Paul in the fourth Chapter to the Ephesians doth make a perfect platform of a Church and a full rehearsal of the offices therein contained as you say he doth then can I not understand how you can make those offices rather temporal than the office of the Pastors and Doctors And forasmuch as you greatly contemn Authority and would have all things proved by Scripture let me hear one word of the same that doth but insinuate these offices to be temporal The place it self seemeth to import a continuance of these functions unto the coming of Christ for he saith Ephes 4. He therefore gave some to be Apostles and some Prophets and some Evangelists and some Pastors and Teachers for the gathering together of the Saints for the work of the ministry c. until we all meet together in the unity of faith and knowledge of the Son of God unto à perfect man and unto the measure of the age and fulness of Christ I am perswaded that you cannot shew any like place which doth so plainly import the abrogating of them as this doth make for their continuance I have beside that place to the Ephesians the twelfth of the first to the Corinthians and the fourteenth where he speaketh of Prophets as of perpetual ministers in Christ's Church I know saith he that there were certain things in the Apostles which were proper unto themselves as their calling which was immediately from God p. 231. although Matthias was not immediately called by God as it appeareth Act. 1. neither can you prove by Scripture that Barnabas was so call'd but the contrary rather doth appear Acts 11. and yet he was an Apostle their commission to go into the whole world c. but to preach the Word of God in places where need requireth or to govern Churches already planted I see no cause why it should not be perpetual Likewise the office of Evangelist if it be taken for writing of the Gospel then it is ceased being fully perfected and accomplished but if it be taken for preaching the Gospel plainly and simply as Bullinger thinketh or generally Bull. in 4. ad Ephes Musc Tit. de Verb. minist in Loc. com for preaching the Gospel as Musculus supposeth in which sense also Paul said to Timothy 2. Tim. 4. Do the work of an Evangelist or for preaching more fervently or zealously than other as Bucer saith Bucer in 4. ad Ephes then I see no cause at all why it may not still remain in the Church Moreover Prophets if they be taken for such as have the gift of foreshewing things to come then be they not in all times of the Church but if they be such as St. Paul speaketh of 1 Cor. 14 such I say as have an especial gift in interpreting the Scriptures whether it be in expounding the mysteries thereof to be learned or in declaring the true sense thereof to the people I understand not why it is not as perpetual as the Pastor or Doctor Thus you see that I have both Scripture and Reason on my side and to the end that you perceive that I am not destitute of the consent also of Learned men in this matter I will set down the opinions of one or two Ambrose upon these words ad Eph. 4. Ambrose Et ipse dedit quosdam quidem Apostolos c. saith thus The Apostles are Bishops Prophets be interpreters of the Scriptures Although in the beginning there were Prophets as Agabus and the four Virgins Prophetesses as it is in the Acts of the Apostles yet now Interpreters be called Prophets Evangelists be Deacons as Philip for although they be no Priests yet may they preach the Gospel without a chair as both Stephen and Philip before-named Bucer Bucer upon the same same place saith that there be Evangelists now T. C. and you your self fol. 42. confess that Hus Jerome of Prague Luther Zuinglius c. were Evangelists Peter Martyr Peter Martyr in his Commentaries upon 12. to the Romans saith that the Apostle there describeth those functions and gifts which are at all times necessary for the Church and in that place the Apostle mentioneth prophesying Mr. Calvin Calvin in his Institut cap. 8. doth confess that God hath stirred up Apostles and Evangelists since that time of the Primitive Church and that he hath done so likewise even now in this time Mr. Bullinger Bullinger upon 4. Ephes saith that the words be confounded and that an Apostle is also call'd a Prophet a Doctor an Evangelist a Minister a Bishop and a Bishop an Evangelist and Prophet c. To be short It is thus written in the Confession of the Churches in Helvetia Confess Helvet The Ministers of the New Testament be call'd by sundry names for they are called Apostles Prophets Evangelists Bishops c. And speaking of Prophets it saith The Prophets in time past foreseeing things to come were call'd Seers who are expounders of the Scriptures also as some be even now a dayes Evangelists were writers of the History of the Gospel and preachers also of the glad tidings of Christ his Gospel as Paul bid Timothy do the work of an Evangelist c. So that to say there are in the Church Apostles Prophets and Evangelists in such sense as I have deelared is no strange Divinity to such as be Divines indeed But enough of this distinction 'till we again meet with it Let us hear the Catechist of Ordinary Officers Q. 23. Who are the ordinary Officers or Ministers of Christ in the Church Catec p. 12◠to be
those whom he calls the many Bishops in one particular Church Philip. 1.1 are most probably the â—ishops of the Churches that belonged to Philippi the Metropolis for that Philippi was such is affirmed by S. Luke Act. 16.12 And so in the Epistles to Timothy and Titus quoted by the Catechist it is agreeable to the affirmations of the Antients as that there should be constituted â—ishops and Deacons in the several Churches as was before intimated so that the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 distinctly notes those Bishops and not those whom we now call Presbyters So that in all these places the word is fairly appliable to the single Prefects and Governours of the Churches whom we now call Bishops And then in the last place as a farther conviction that there is a preheminence included in this name of Bishop we may take notice that in three of those Scriptures Bishops are joyned with Deacons as the Catechist also notes and most undoubtedly these their Deacons were not of equal degree with them Deacons in the Christian Church are known to have been such as attended and waited on the Bishop and did what he appointed them But of these we are to discourse more afterwards Enough hath been said to shame the confidence of our Catechist We will leave names and consider of the thing it self and in that too he is no less peremptory Neither is there any mention Cat. p 122. in any place of Scripture of any such preheminence of one sort of these Church-officers or Ministers over another not in particular where the Officers of the Church are in an especial manner enumerated as 1 Cor. 12.28 Eph. 4.11 Rom. 12.5 6 7 8. Nor is there any mention of any special office that should be peculiar unto such Officers The distinct mention of Bishops and Deacons under them is a sufficient confutation unto this Add hereunto what is evident of Timothy and Titus What saith the Catechist unto them As for what is pleaded by some Cat. p. 123. from the example of Timothy and Titus it is said That when any persons can prove themselves to be Evangelists 1 Tim. 4.5 to be called unto their office by antecedent prophecie 1 Tim. 1.18 and to be sent by the Apostles and in an especial manner to be directed by them in some employment for a season which they are not ordinarily to attend unto Tit. 1.5 and 3.12 It will be granted that they have another duty and office committed unto them than those who are only Bishops or Elders in the Scripture Here the cause if we mark it well is fairly yielded Timothy and Titus are acknowledged to have had a preheminence of authority over other Ministers and that by the Apostles appointment Such authority then is not in it self Antichristian and no where mentioned or allowed of in Scripture As for the Salvo's here annexed they are familiarly enough pretended but very weakly if we look into them That Timothy was an Evangelist properly so called is not demonstrable from 1 Tim. 4.5 it should be 2 Tim. where St. Paul wills him only to do the work of an Evangelist and he might be with more evidence concluded a Deacon because in the same verse it is said 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 fulfil thy Deaconship However supposing this allegation as the Catechist understands it 't is no where said in H. Scripture that the power of ordaining Bishops and Deacons and jurisdiction over Elders ordained which is ascribed unto Timothy did appertain to him under this qualification and quà Evangelist 't is certain it did not belong to him at all the office of an Evangelist as such being only to assist the Apostles in preaching the Gospel where it was not received Timothy's being granted then to have been an Evangelist See Dr Ham. Vindic. of his Dissertat p. 55. no ways prejudgeth his being also a Bishop in the sense as we urge it for What is an Evangelist but one commission'd by any of the Apostles to preach the Gospel to any City or People And what a Bishop but one commission'd by the like Apostle to preside in and govern by way of preheminence a Church already planted What hinders therefore but that he that hath been employed in the former capacity to plant may elsewhere or in the same place be appointed to govern and so the Evangelist be also a Bishop As St. Mark the Evangelist is recorded to have been after Bishop of Alexandria and St. Luke the Evangelist Bishop of Thebais in Egypt Again as to Timothy's being commanded to do the work of an Evangelist 't is answer'd Dr. Ham. dissert 3. cap 6 p. 16â— that he being by St. Paul made Bishop of Ephesus had all Asia commended to his care and so was the Bishop not only of those that did believe but that should believe and therefore had this charge incumbent on him not only to Govern the Churches of the faithful but to preach the Gospel also unto those that did not yet believe and that is most properly 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 2 Tim. 4.2 and that is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is joyned with 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 verse 5. This therefore is no argument against his Episcopal authority but rather that the office of an Evangelist as well as Deacon was comprehended under it However had the preheminence contended for belonged to Timothy as an Evangelist yet What was that to Titus who is no where insinuated to be such That Timothy was called to his office by antecedent prophesie 1 Tim. 1.18 bespeaks no real difference in the office it self between him and other Bishops relating only to his way of admission into that office And lastly That Titus was sent by the Apostles and in an especial manner directed by them in some employment for a season which he was not ordinarily to attend unto Titus 1.5 and 3.12 is in part without any reason supposed and as to the whole nothing to the purpose Without reason is it here presumed that Titus was employed for a season only in his Episcopacy and not ordinarily to attend to it The words of the Text speak no such thing but rather the contrary Tit. 1.5 For this cause left I thee in Crete that thou should'st set in order the things that are wanting or left undone as the margin hath it and ordain Elders in every City as I appointed thee And that he is wished to come to St. Paul at Nicopolis when he sent to him chap. 3.12 is not the least prejudice to his making his usual residence in Crete as much as the moveable state of the Church then increasing amidst persecutions would suffer But be it as the Catechist will that Titus his employment was for a time and season onely yet certainly for that time and season he was an instance of Episcopal preheminence and a longer and shorter continuance alter not the nature of the thing That he was sent and directed by the Apostles to this
inseparable from every institution of Gospel-worship to represent some grace of the New-covenant which these symbolical instructions do not I would gladly be resolved Whether brotherly love and charity be not some grace of the New-covenant or What special grace of the New-covenant is represented by singing one of the Gospel-institutions hereafter enumerated To draw now towards a conclusion of this argument I have so long insisted on Let it be consider'd of how mischievous a consequence the entertainment of this general principle must needs be That nothing may be used or allowed of in or about Gospel-worship vvhich is not commanded and instituted in the Word of God There can be no observance of those general rules That all things be done in order and decency and unto edification if there be no such power lodged in the Church as to determine those outward ceremonies and circumstantials which are no where specified by God himself for either none at all will be determined and so we shall be in danger of Atheism and profaneness or every one must determine and chuse for himself and so there being as many minds almost as men we shall unavoidably run into endless Schisms and confusions In truth the main question here is only this Since God is to have an orderly and decent service kept up in the world whether private discretion and conscience or publick authority is fittest to be trusted with the management of it and then In case that that the Governours of the Church backed with the laws of Christian Princes shall interpose in these matters left by God undetermined whether it be not a sin of unaccountable frowardness and disobedience to refuse the doing that when vve are commanded by authority which we might every one chuse to do our selves though we vvere not so commanded We are not in this Kingdom to learn what mischiefs and disorders may be reasonably expected from a principle we have already seen and experimented so dismal and destructive consequences of A short remembrance may here suffice from a judicious observer Bp Sanderson Praef. to his Sermons When this gap was once opened VVhat command have you in Scripture or what example for this or that Vnà Eurusque Notusque ruunt It vvas like the opening of Pandora's box or the Trojan horse as if all had been let loose Swarms of Sectaries of all sorts broke in and as the Frogs and Locusts in Egypt overspread the face of the land nor so only but as it often happeneth these young striplings soon out-stript their leaders and that upon their own ground for as these said to others What command or example have you for kneeling at the Communion for wearing a Surplice for Lord Bishops for a penn'd Liturgie for keeping holy dayes c. and there stop'd so these to them Where are your Lay-Presbyters your Classes c. to be found in Scripture Where your Steeple-houses your National Churches your Tythes and mortuaries your Infant-sprinklings nay your Meter-Psalms your two Sacraments your observing a weekly Sabbath for so far I find they are gone and how much farther I know not already and how much farther they will hereafter God alone knoweth for erranti nullus terminus being thus far out of their way they may vvander everlastingly It may be then a kindness vvhatever they think of it to stop if possible to turn them and let them see where they first mistook It is therefore the last office propounded in this general part of my discourse to take a vievv of those several places of Scripture used shall I say or abused by the Catechist to countenance this Leading-error vvhich I have declared the falseness of Unto that therefore I proceed CHAP. VII The common abuse of Holy Scripture by the Writers of this way An explication of certain places of Scripture brought in to countenance the fore-going Principle or some appendant to it under five heads Such texts 1 which referr us to the Word of God as our rule and commend unto us the perfection of it 2 Which use the negative argument of Gods not commanding a thing as a reproof and condemnation 3 VVhich forbid the adding to or taking from the VVord of Gods 4 VVhich prohibit the worshipping of God by the commands of men and will-worship 5 VVhich require faith of us in order to the pleasing of God and impute the guilt of sin to whatsoever is not of Faith AS there is nothing more usual so nothing more detestable in the Writers of this way than horribly to wrest and dally with God's holy oracles and quote the Scriptures lamely and perversly †M. Perâ—â—ns saith well upon the occasion of the Devils temptations unto Christ and alledging Scripture in them Gods Ministers must hereby be admonished to be careful in alledging any text of Scripture that the same be fit and pertinent for to wrest the same from the proper meaning of the H. Ghost to serve their ovvn conceit is the practise of Satan Which also may serve for a good advertisement to those that use to heap up manifold allegations of Scriptures In this affected multiplicity the abuse of Scripture can hardly be escaped Park Combat betvveen Christ and the Devil Vol. 3. p. 393. as the Devil did and commit the vice which they so often falsly challenge others with and for namely the adding unto or detracting from the Word of God saying the Lord hath spoken what he hath not or the Lord hath not spoken what he hath The plainest Scriptures are least of all minded and obscurer places gloss'd upon to patronize their private doctrines fancies and imaginations yea any faint allusion or emblance will serve for an express warrant The Garment spotted with the flesh hath been quoted against the Surplice Bowing the knee to Baal against kneeling at the Sacrament The mark of the beast against the Cross c. The margins of their books are commonly faced with a multitude of Scripture-quotations little or nothing really to the purpose but to make a fair shew and deceive the credulous and simple And so it is with our Catechist who to render the number of his quotations more formidable to the eye repeats the same oftentimes over again Some difficulty there will be in marshalling them into order but I will take what care I can to leave none out that cast but the least look or glance this way I shall therefore examin them under the following Heads 1. Those Scriptures which referr us to the VVord of God as our rule and commend unto us the perfection of it John 5.39 Search the Scriptures for in them ye think ye have eternal life and they are they which testifie of me Isa 8.20 To the Law and to the Testimony if they speak not according to this word it is because there is no light in them Luke 16.19 it should be I suppose vers 29.31 They have Moses and the Prophets let them hear them If they hear not Moses and the Prophets
of another to her husband's bed when we forsake God for the cleaving to any other thing or person in his room when we deny God the worship he requires or give his worship to another Deut. 4.23 24. Make not any graven image nor the likeness of any thing that I have forbidden thee for the Lord thy God is a consuming fire even a jealous God For a close of this I will desire the Catechist's friends to peruse impartially an admirable Discourse of Bishop Andrews upon the occasion of this Commandment Bp Andr. Sermon on Act. 2.42 against the Worshipping of imaginations 11. Those Scriptures which are said to speak of the Apostacy of the Church prophetically Cat. p 81.82 set out under the name of fornication and whoredome and the innocency of those that kept themselves undefiled therewith Revel 14.4 5. These are they which are not defiled with women for they are virgins these are they which follow the Lamb whithersoever he goeth these were redeemed from among men being the first-fruits unto God and unto the Lamb and in their mouth was found no guile for they are without fault before the Throne of God Revel 17.1 2 3 4 5. And there came one of the seven Angels which had the seven Vials and talked with me saying unto me Come hither I will shew unto thee the judgment of the great Whore that sitteth upon many waters with whom the Kings of the earth have committed fornication and the inhabiters of the earth have been made drunk with the wine of her fornication So he carried me away in the spirit into the wilderness and I saw a woman sit upon a scarlet-coloured beast full of names of blasphemy having seven heads and ten horns And the woman was arrayed in purple and scarlet colour and deck'd with gold and precious stone and pearls having a golden cup in her hand full of abominations and filthiness of her fornication and upon her forehead was a name written Mystery Babylon the great the Mother of Harlots and abominations of the earth and I saw the woman drunken with the bloud of the Saints and with the bloud of the Martyrs of Jesus Rev. 18.4 And I heard another voice from heaven saying Come out of her my people that ye be not partakers of her sins and that ye receive not of her plagues That nothing so properly answers to fornication and whoredome in the sense of Scripture as Idolatry doth I have intimated under the last head and might here produce many Texts of sacred Writ to that purpose Levit. 17.7 They shall no more offer their sacrifices unto Devils after whom they have gone a whoring Psalm 106.35 36 37 38 39. They were mingled among the heathen and learned their works and served their Idols Thus went they a whoring with their own inventions Jer. 2.20 27. Upon every high hill and under every green tree thou wandrest playing the harlot saying to a Stock thou art my father and to a Stone thou hast brought me forth c. to omit other places the case is so familiar Answerably now to this notion there is nothing bids so fair to the title of the Great Whore in the Revelations as Rome-heathen and nothing so like her fornication as her Idolatries I will not now enlarge upon the special inducements unto this belief It shall suffice here to transcribe a clear paraphrase upon the quotations mentioned See Dr. Ham. Notes on the places according to this supposal Revel 14. ch 4 5 Revel 14.4 5. ver are a description of the primitive Christians purity from the uncleanness of the Gnosticks These are as virgins not defiled with women they that have kept pure from all the heretical Gnostick corruptions of uncleanness c. and that hold out constant against all the terrors of persecution and so were rescued from the sins of that wicked age the pure primitive Christians those first-fruits to God and the Lamb that never fell off to any false Idolatrous or heretical practise but served God blameless Rev. 17.1 2 1 4 5. Revel 17.1 to 5. ver contains the Vision of Rome-heathen Another vision I saw to the same purpose one of those executioners of God's wrath came unto me saying I will shew thee vengeance that is ready to befall the Imperial dignity of Rome fitly entitled the Great whore Great in it self and who for their impieties against God their worshiping of many heathen gods directly own that title as an harlot is she that takes in many others instead of the one husband sitting i. e. ruling over many waters i. e. much people having many nations under her Dominion from the power and authority whereof many other Kingdoms have been confirmed and fortified in their Idolatrous courses and had their false worship propagated to them the whole Roman Empire running mad after her vile heathen practises And in this vision me-thoughts I was in a desart fit to represent the desolation to be express'd in the Vision and there I saw what he had promised me verse 1. a woman i. e. that great whore there mentioned the Imperial power of Rome-heathen seated on an Empire in a scarlet robe a great blasphemer against the true God and a forwarder of Idolatry and he had seven heads the City of Rome built on seven hills and ten horns i. e. so many other Kings that ruled over divers countries and were confederate with the Roman Emperour And this Roman power was in prosperity much sumptuousness was bestowed on their Idol-worship and all manner of abominable filthiness was committed therein which being so srequent and ackowledged in their secreter devotions are best described by the word Mystery a word the Greeks used for their uncleanest meetings and by Babylon which of old was famous for these and so destroyed and from hence came all the Idolatry of the other cities even from this Mother of Harlots a great persecutor of the Christians c. Rev. 18.40 ver is a warning unto Christians upon the destruction coming on this great heathen City to depart Another voice Rev. 18.40 me-thought I heard warning all Christians to come out of her that is first to abstain strictly from all communication with her sins contrary to what the looser sort of Christians then did and secondly to depart out of the city as the Emperour Honorius and Bishop Innocentius did to Ravenna at the time of Alaricus's siege And thirdly to flee to the Basilica or Christian Church at the time of the plundering or destroying Rome as the Christians did as the only way of rescuing them from that destruction Catech. p. 79. 80. Lastly Scripture instances of severity alledged against persons who by ignorance neglect or regardlesness have miscarried in not observing exactly God's will and appointment in and about his Worship This was the case saith the Catechist 1. Of Nadab and Abihâ— Levit. 10.1 2. Their fault vvas Offering strange fire which the Lord commanded not i. e. as we
and that together in the Apostles Doctrine and fellowship and in breaking of bread and in prayers They persevered in hearing the Apostles teach in observing the orders of their society and all mutual offices of charity in eating the Lord's Supper and praying together So that here we are sufficiently resolved about the Christian Church namely That it is a visible company of persons thus admitted and thus continuing being once admitted And this is the Church which was daily encreased afterwards and is to be preserved and encreased to the end of the world by the continued addition and accessions of other persons received into it upon the same terms by the same door of entrance and demeaning themselves being entred after the same manner Of these 3000 it is said they were added to the Apostles and Disciples left by Christ ver 41. And To this Church the Lord added daily such as should be saved verse 47. And this is the Church which our B. Saviour promised to set up and uphold for ever in the world and that the gates of Hell should not prevail against it St. Matth. 16.18 viz. The Society of professing penitents and believers baptized into the name of the Father Son and Holy Ghost and communicating together in the Apostolical Doctrine Discipline Sacraments and Devotions Now this Society afterwards increasing by the great multitude of believers was of necessity to be sub-divided into certain particulars for the performing of joynt-service to God in an orderly communion as accordingly it was by the Apostles authority and direction And that is the ground why we sometimes read of Church in the singular number as of one and sometimes again of Churches as of many I will declare this matter somewhat more distinctly Sometimes we read of Churches as many They went through the Cities Act. 16.4 5. and deliver'd the decrees of the Apostles to be kept and so were the Churches established in the faith and increased in number daily Rom. 16 14. All the Churches of the Gentiles 1 Cor. 14 33. All the Churches of the Saints The brother 2 Cor. 8.18 19. whose praise is in the Gospel through all the Churches And Chosen of the Churches to travel with us I robbed other Churches ch 11.8 28. to do you service On me daily Act. 9.31 the care of all the Churches Gal. 1.21 22. The Churches throughout Judea Galilee and Samaria c. These Countries through the successful preaching of the Gospel had many particular Churches or congregations of the faithful united under some Minister or Bishop the lesser congregations under some inferiour minister And thus we read of a few believers convened together in the house of one single person as a Church Rom. 16.5 Greet Priscilla and Aquila likewise greet the Church in their house The Churches of Asia salute you 1 Cor. 16.19 Aquila and Priscilla salute you with the Church that is in their house Salute Nymphas Col. 4.15 and the Church in his house To Philemon Philem. 1. ver 2. our dearly beloved and fellow-labourer and to the Church in thy house This Church in their house was the baptized believers of the family with such other neighbour Christians as were admitted and received to joyn in Gods worship and service with them there Now many of these lesser congregations were united under a superiour Minister or Bishop For in and about great and populous cities there were many such little and particular Churches and yet we may observe that the Scripture speaks of such particulars as united together in one Church A pertinent instance we have in the Epistle to the Corinthians Let your women keep silence in the Churches 2 Cor. 14.34 saith St. Paul that is all the particular congregations belonging unto Corinth and yet the same Apostle dedicates this Epistle not to the Churches at Corinth in the plural 1 Cor. 1.1 but in the singular number To the Church of God which is at Corinth And thus in like manner we read of other great Cities though there were many particular and lesser Churches in them and the adjacent parts belonging to them yet are they mention'd still but as one Church So the Church of Jerusalem of Antioch of Caesarea of Ephesus of Laodicea of Smyrna c. The reason this already intimated All the particular Churches belonging to those great Cities were united under the care and circumspection of one superiour Minister or Bishop and were therefore accounted as one Church There were many particular or Parish-churches as we speak and yet all but one Diocess united under one Bishop The case is plain if we look but to the seven Churches of Asia in the Revelations They are numbred all of them according to their single Governours and Overseers according to their seven Angels though each of them was certainly subdivided into many particular Churches or Congregations Every congregation of the Saints with a Minister among them Cat. p. 117. without which it is not organically compleat that I may borrow the Catechist's phrase nor as he well calls it a Spiritual corporation attended with rule and government was a little Church and many of these doubtless there were belonging severally to Ephesus Smyrna Pergamus Revel chap. 2.3 Thyatira Sardis Philadelphia and Laodicea and yet are all these reckon'd but as seven Churches of Asia because of those seven Angels or Bishops presiding over them A collection then of several congregations every one of which may be called a Church is yet in the Scripture-propriety one Church by vertue of their subordination in government under one chief guide and ruler There are many lesser Churches which are but members of one greater Church And so in like manner many of those greater Churches united under single Bishops may be no more than members of one Provincial or National Church united under some common superiour for order sake whom we call Arch-Bishop and Metropolitan And there may be many Provincial and National churches which are yet but members of the universal church of Christ derived from the Apostles which however consisting of so many homogeneous parts and members call'd churches is yet but one Church because under one supreme governour and ruler namely Christ himself the Great Shepheard and Bishop of our Souls That whole body whereof he only is the Head Now the necessary badge of every member of Christ's visible Church or any particular Churches thereto appertaining is the profession of faith and obedience with Baptism in the Name of the Father Son and Holy Ghost whether that profession be true and in reality or no God alone judgeth For the visible Church of Christ is a communion of professors wherein good and bad sincere and hypocrites are mingled together There was a Judas a Traitor and false Apostle among the twelve and there will be false disciples mixed with the true whilst this world stands Earth is no place for unmixed communions We are here in a
others who are recorded to have Christian families as well as they Rom. 16.10 11 14 15. for so we find Aristobulus and Narcissus with their houshold saluted Asyncritus Phlegon Hermas Patrobas and the brethren which are with them Phïlologus and Julia Nereus and his Sister and Olympas and all the Saints which are with them And in another Epistle the houshold of Onesiphorus 2 Tim. 4.19 There seems therefore to be some singular thing in this singular appendix peculiarized to them before-mentioned and this probably to be it That in their houses they allotted and set apart a peculiar place for the Church to assemble in not altogether unlike some private Chappels which are yet in certain great men's Houses But I referr the Reader who desires farther satisfaction to our Learned Mede who hath collected undoubted testimonies of this same truth throughout the three first Centuries and so long before the time of Constantine the Great wherein Christianity began to flourish and to be adorned with more beautiful fabricks I will only intimate his general reason upon which the appropriation of certain places to God's publick worship and service leans and it is briefly this easily deducible from the Analogy of the Old Testament That as the Majesty of God is most sacred and incommunicable and his worship and service not be given unto any other so it is likewise a part of the honour vve owe to his sacred singular and incommunicable Eminency that the things wherewith he is served should not be promiscuous and common but appropriate and set apart to that very purpose But hitherto of Churches both persons and places so call'd The Catechist's method leads us next to consider Of Church-officers or Governours CHAP. VI. The necessity of Government in the Church intimated and that as to it 's formal constitution The Catechist's distinction of Church-officers extraordinary and ordinary without Scripture-proof Extraordinaries granted in the Apostles and yet not their office it self for a season onely Arch-Bishop Whitgift at large of this distinction against T. C. The Catechist's enumeration of ordinary Officers How politickly Deacons there left out His greâ—t argument from a community of names to an equality among Ministers disabled The name Bishop not unfit to denote preheminence whether we consider the notation of it or the use of it in the Old Testament or in the New The same demonstrated from the name Elder wherewith the Catechist matcheth it and the several instances alledged by him to the contrary A Taste by the way of the Catechist's confidence Prelacy in Church-government argued from the Scripture-instances of Deacons under Bishops and the examples of Timothy and Titus The Catechist's exceptions at the two last answered The enemies of superiority among Ministers mean it in others not themselves Q. SEing the Church is a Society Cat. p. 116. or spiritual Incorporation of persons under rule government or discipline declare who or what are the Rulers Governours or Officers therein under Jesus Christ Answ They have been of two sorts 1. Extraordinary appointed for a season only And 2. Ordinary to continue unto the end of the world Q. Who are the extraordinary Officers or Rulers or Ministers of the Church appointed to serve the Lord Jesus Christ therein for a season only Answ 1. The Apostles of our Lord Jesus Christ with 2. the Evangelists and Prophets endowed with extraordinary gifts of the Holy Ghost associated with them and employed by them in their work of Ministry 1 Mat. 10 23. Act. 1.26 1 Cor. 1.28 Eph. 4.11 2 Luke 10.1 2 Tim. 4.5 Tit. 1.5 Act. 11.27 28. 21.9 10 11. 2 Cor. 1.1 The necessity of government it self in the Church is here well supposed in that the Church is call'd a Spiritual Incorporation of persons under Rule Government or Discipline This therefore in the explition is rightly said to be evident from the nature of the thing it self p. 117. as vvell as the testimonies of Scripture but then I skill not well to reconcile this with that vvhich follovvs That yet a Church may be formally constituted without rule and government His words are these p. 117. Neither doth this rule at all belong unto it meerly as materially considered in men yielding obedience unto the Call which is the foundation of the Church not absolutely as it is formally constituted a Church by the consent and agreement described but moreover it is required that it be organically compleat with Officers or Rulers 'T is the Catechist's unhappiness here to be over Metaphysical If the Church formally considered be such a spiritual Incorporation as he defines it certainly Rule Government and Discipline belongs unto it as such and the want of such principal organs or members as Rulers are must needs spoil its formality no less than the vvant of an head that of the humane body As to the distinction of Church officers into extraordinary and ordinary it ought to have been manifested out of the Holy Scriptures vvherein 't is most certain that vve read of Apostles and Evangelists and Prophets distinctly and by name but not a vvord that the chief and substantial part of their office and power vvas extraordinary and for a season only That there vvere some extraordinaries appertaining to them is not question'd but that evinceth not the office of Apostles and Evangelists to be such The Catechist himself tells us These persons vvere in an extraordinary manner endued vvith all that povver p. 119. vvhich aftervvards vvas to reside in the Churches themselves and moreover with that which was peculiarly needful unto the discharge and performance of that special duty and work that they vvere appointed unto At least then as to that power which was to reside in the Church for ever they vvere not extraordinary For that they vvere the first and so immediately sent by Christ seems a matter of order only that doth not bespeak them of another kind from those that followed and succeeded them I vvill here annex the words of Arch-Bishop Whitgift long since in his Defence against T. C. upon occasion of the like distinction with this of the Catechist's Arch Bishop Whitgift's defence of the Answ to the Admonition Tract 4. p. 217. Although saith he you cannot vvarrant by the Scriptures this distinction of ordinary and extraordinary ecclesiastical functions yet I think the Apostolical function was extraordinary in respect that it had for the time certain especial properties as to bear witness of the Resurrection of Christ and of his Ascension which they did see vvith their eyes also to plant and found Churches likewise to go through the whole world these I say were temporal and extraordinary and so was the Apostleship in this respect but yet ordinary in respect of their chief function which was to preach the Gospel and to govern the Churches which they had planted Likewise Evangelists have an ordinary function neither is there any cause why it should be call'd a temporal office but only in
alwayes continued therein Answ Those whom the Scripture calls Pastors and Teachers Bishops Elders and Guides Acts. 14.23 20.17 18. 1 Cor. 12.28 Eph. 4.11 Phil. 1.1 1 Tim. 3.1 2. 5.17 Tit. 1.5 7. Heb. 13.7 17. 1 Pet. 5.1 It had been certainly pertinent to have added to this head of enumeration Deacons also of whom afterwards he is not unmindful Q. 32. Cat. p. 161. Is there no other ordinary office in the Church but only that of Elders Answ Yes of Deacons also But 't is possible there might be some policy in here concealing of them lest they should too palpably have confronted his beloved parity of Gospel-Ministers For thus he proceeds in the Explication Sometimes they are called Pastors and Teachers Ephes 4.11 1 Cor. 12.28 pag. 120. 121. Sometimes Bishops or Overseers Phil. 1.1 Act. 20.28 Tit. 1.5 Sometimes Elders 1 Pet. 5.1 1 Tim. 5.17 Act. 14.23 Act. 20.17 Sometimes Guides Heb 13.7 17. By all which names and sundry others whereby they are express'd the same sort order and degree of persons is intended nor is there any one of those names applyed or accommodated unto any but all the rest in like manner so that he who is a Pastor or Teacher is also a Bishop or Overseer a Presbyter or Elder a Guide or Ruler a Minister a servant of the Church for the Lord's sake Now had Deacons here been named they would not so plausibly have been referr'd to the same sort order and degree of persons it being a general belief that Deacons were certainly inferiour unto their Bishops Phil. 1.1 and such as St. Paul may seem evidently to place in a lower rank making them capable of rising to an higher degree by the good administration of their office 1 Tim. 3.13 And yet nevertheless if this argument from a community of names avail any thing these Deacons also may be advanced by it not only to an equality with their Bishops but with the Evangelists and Apostles themselves because that they are sometimes called by that name Acts 21.8 Philip the Evangelist was one of the seven Deacons and Timothy who is commanded to do the work of an Evangelist from whence 't is eagerly contended that he was an Evangelist is also bid by St. Paul to fulfil his Deaconship 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 2 Tim. 4.5 Yea he is call'd by St. Paul 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 God's Deacon 1 Thes 3.2 Yea the Apostle St. Paul too as vvell as Apollos goes by that name 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a Deacon which we English Minister 1 Cor. 3.5 By this argument in like manner he may confound his distinction of extraordinary and ordinary officers and equallize the later with the former because the Apostles are also call'd Elders 1 Pet. 5.1 2. Ep. of St. John v. 1. Yea and he might equal them all to Christ himself upon the same account because He in like manner is call'd an Apostle Heb. 3.1 and a Deacon or Minister Rom 15.8 So goodly and convincing an argument is this drawn from a community of names and Titles It were therefore more material and to the purpose to enquire if there be not such a thing plainly described in the New Testament as Prelacy in church-Government or some single persons in the Church set over other Ministers as to the exercise of certain powers both of Ordination and Jurisdiction But of this afterwards the Catechist being as likely to deny the thing as the name He proceeds Of all other names assigned to the Ministers of the Church Cat. p. 121. that of Bishop can least of all be thought to have designed any special order or degree of preheminence amongst them And again p. 121. No name could be fixed on with less probability to assert from it a special supream order or degree of men in the Ministry than this of Bishops How strangely hath the Christian world been mistaken for above these 1600 years to abuse the name Bishop as the title of Superiority in the Ministry if this man's observation be true But let us examin a little before we swallow If the name Bishop be so absurdly chosen to denote a degree of preheminence among Ministers it must be either upon the account of the notation of the name it self or the constant use and application of it in Holy Scripture As to the former the Catechist offers nothing and certain it is that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a Bishop or Overseer carrieth somewhat of Superiority along with it signifying one that is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 over others Take it in the Catechist's sense an Overseer or Bishop of the Flock then he hath certainly a preheminence Take it in the Churches sense for an overseer of particular overseers and we cannot deny the same This latter may be illustrated by an inspection into Darius his policy for the ruling of his Realm Dan. 6.1 2. It pleased Darius to set over the Kingdome an 120 Princes which should be over the whole Kingdom and over those three Presidents of whom Daniel was first that the Princes might give account to them The 120 Princes had a preheminence over their respective charges and the three Presidents set to oversee them no less a preheminence above those Princes Well but it may be the constant use of the name Bishop in the H. Scripture will justifie the Catechist in his confidence Some such thing indeed he seems to build on as his reason Cat. p. 121. 12◠For whereas it is but four times or in four places used in the New Testament as denoting any officers in the Church in each of them it is manifest that those expressed by the other names of Elders and Ministers are intended So Acts 20.28 the Bishops are the Elders of the particular Church of Ephesus ver 17. Phil. 1.1 There were many Bishops in that one Church who had onely Deacons joyned with them that is they were the Elders of it Tit. 1.8 The Bishops were the Elders to be ordained verse 5. which persons are also directly intended 1 Tim. 3.2 as is evident from the co-incidence of the directions given by the Apostle about them and the immediate adjoyning of Deacons unto them verse 8. He that would rightly understand the Original of the New Testament must also have an eye to the Greek translation of the Old whom the writers of the new do most frequently imitate Now in the Old Testament See Dr. Ham. Annot. 1. on Act. 1.20 the Hebrew word commonly rendred by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and other derivatives of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 visitavit 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 all which note a Prefect or Governour or any empowered by Commission to exercise any authority intrusted to him and as it is ordinarily rendred by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 so elsewhere also 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 all words of government or prefecture And 't is farther observable that where it is rendred 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 it is taken
was thus vested in those Angels in respect of which not only that honourable title of Angels is bestowed upon each of them by Christ himself the same that on the High-priest among the Jews Malach. 2.7 but they are also resembled to so many starrs held by Christ in his right hand Rev. 1.16 and 2.1 which is an infallible evidence that this dignity and power of theirs was approved and confirmed by Christ And to so clear a testimony of Scripture we may farther add the words of the Council of Chalcedon Concil Calced Act. 2. concerning the Church of Ephesus one of those seven that from Timothy to that time there had been 27 Bishops there to which it is consequent that either Timothy or some follower of his was this very Angel that Christ wrote to Ep. ad Victor apud Euseb Hist Eccles l. 5. c. 11. St. Iren. l 3. c. 3. And so Polycrates that was not long after St. John's time affirmeth himself to be the eighth Bishop of that City And so when Irenaeus affirms of Smyrna another of those seven Churches that Polycarp a Disciple of the Apostles was by them constituted Bishop of that City Tertull. de praeser c. 32. and when Tertullian saith of him that he was so constituted by St. John as Clemens was at Rome ordained by St. Peter 't is clear that the Apostles power was not determined in themselves Ibid. and of this Tertullians testimony is most distinct and universal that as in Smyrna and Rome perinde utique caetera Ecclesiae exhibent quos ab Apostolis in Episcopatum constitutos Apostolici seminis traduces habent The rest of the Churches in like manner exhibit those who being constituted Bishops by the Apostles were their successors spiritually begotten by them Adv. Marcion l. 4. c. 5. And again speaking of these Churches of Asia which were Johannis alumnae taken care of and fed by St. John he saith Ordo Episcoporum ad originem recensus in Johannem stabit authorem The order of Bishops being recounted to the beginning devolves to St. John the Apostle the first Author of it I forbear to add more lest what I designed for a short discourse only swell into a Volume Thus hath this controversie been sufficiently cleared by some remains in the Scriptures whereto the concordant testimonie of all antiquity most readily affords a suffrage And then as to the setling the Monarchy of the Jews the way set down in Scripture is this That God by a Prophet sent immediately from him designed first the person of Saul and after of David and after the succession or line of Dauid by Solomon and Rehoboam came down from Father to Son through all the Kings of Judah without any new revelation or mission of Prophets to anoint and constitute a new King when the former was deceased or rather as when God had first called Moses and by miracles sealed him a Commission from Heaven to be Ruler over the Jews and after taken of the Spirit that was upon him and put it upon the Elders to be his assistants for the succession to of either those offices there was no more used or thought needful but that Moses should lay his hands on Joshua and give him a charge Numb 27.19 20 21. and put some of his honour upon him and that the seventy thus created to their office should by imposition of hands admit others to the same dignity so for the setling Governours in the Church God first sent down his Son Jesus Christ to be personally the founder and head of it sent down his Spirit to demonstrate and constitute him so and after his departure this power being before his death instated on the Apostles the H. Ghost again descended on those Apostles and some the like prodigies from Heaven were used towards others for the setling them in their dignities But when that was done the wâ—ole business of a succession was provided for by a more easie and familiar course that those that were thus sent by the Apostles through imposition of their hands as they had been by Christ through the descent of his Spirit hovering over and resting on them and as Christ by his Father with the like solemnity should after the same manner communicate it to others fitly qualified for it Which that it was actually done in the several Churches as it cannot be expected to be recorded in the New Testament which can speak no farther than to those times of which it writes so to some mentions of it which are found there infinite suffrages are added from the following writers by whom it far more evidently appears that this power of the Church did not end in the Apostles persons but continued to their successors the Bishops in the several branches than by the Old Testament and other Jewish writings now extant it appears either that it was God's will that the Son should succeed the Father in the Kingdom of which yet there is no doubt when it was not countermanded by a Prophet sent from God or that in the Sanhedrim new men were received into the places of the deceased of which also there is yet no doubt made by any Having cleared the whole matter thus far there will be now no need to declare what powers they are which are thus conveyed to the Bishops or officers in the Church it being already manifest that the power of planting governing and continuing of the churches being first vested in Christ was from him derived to the Apostles and from the Apostles to the Bishops and so that the power of preaching baptizing teaching confirming consecrating the Sacrament of the Eucharist binding and loosing blessing in marriage visiting and praying over the sick and at last constituting others like themselves either in whole by communicating entirely their whole power to them or in part by giving them some limited powers for some certain offices were thus communicated Of which all that will be necessary to be added is only this which natural reason dictates to every one That no man ought to assume to himself any Office in any Society but he that is designed to it by him that hath the supreme power in it nor consequently in the church but he that is called as was Aaron i. e. hath received mission or commission from God which being not now pretended by any to be received immediately from Heaven there is but one way imaginable for any man to claim it viz. By receiving it from them who immediately have received it from Heaven And then the whole matter is devolved to a short issue That every one that thus runs is obliged to shew his commission by which he may appear to be sent and that being once produced to whatsoever acts that extends to those he will be allowed to be sufficiently authorized but to nothing else And vvhosoever will not stand to this award must not only cast off the Church of Christ from being his Mother and confess Christ
Catechist's Directory in case of their dissent and from thence how poor and weak a thing the power of church-governours appears to be made by him VVhat kind of obedience is allowed by those of the Separation as due to Ministers Dr. Jackson of the necessity and nature of true-obedience with the danger of the sin of Disobedience to their Pastors The Catechist's difference between Pastors and Teachers considered with the fond grounds of the same THe Duties of the Pastors and Teachers of the Church Cat. p. 141. 142. spoken to in the next Question are granted and I shall not therefore speak anything of them But In that which follows Q. 28. p. 143 144. concerning the authority of the Elders of the Church we meet First with very useful matter to be consider'd of 1. That all Church-power is originally vested in Jesus Christ p. 1â—4 145. the sole Head and Monarch thereof Matt. 28.18.2 That he doth communicate of this authority by way of trust to be exercised by them in his name unto persons by him appointed so much as is needful for the ordering and disposing of all things in his Churches unto the Blessed ends for which he hath instituted and appointed them For no man can have any power in his Church for any end whatever but by delegation from him What is not received from him is meer usurpation And whoever takes on himself the exercise of any rule or authority or power in the Church not granted unto them by him or not rightly derived from him is an oppressor a tâ—ief and a robber This necessarily follows upon the absolute investiture of all power in him alone c. This may well be referr'd by way of confirmation to what hath been said before chap 7. And let them look to themselves whoever they are that cannot derive their power from those whom Christ hath authorized to communicate it unto others to the end of the world the Apostles of Christ I mean and their successors the Bishops of the Christian Church 2. As to that which follows touching the consent of the Church required unto the authoritative acting of the Elders therein enough hath been already said till we see farther proof from Scripture or Reason that the authority communicated by Christ is ineffectual and to no purpose unless the people please Well but then What must the officers do in this case that the people consent not 'T is worth the while to hear him put the case and resolve it But if it be asked p. 149. 150. What then shall the Elders do in case the Church refuse to consent unto such acts as are indeed according to rule and warranted by the institution of Christ It is answered That they are 1. Diligently to instruct them from the Word in their Duty making known the mind of Christ unto them in the matter under consideration 2. To declare unto them the danger of their dissent in obstructing the edification of the body to the dishonour of the Lord Christ and their own spiritual disadvantage 3. To wait patiently for the concurrence of the grace of God with their Ministry in giving light and obedience unto the Church And 4. In case of the Churches continuance in any failure of Duty to seek for advice and counsel from the Elders and Brethren of other Churches So poor a thing is the authority derived from Christ according to this representation made of it that not one act can be put forth without their consent and liking who are to be under the discipline and will be alwayes enclined we may presume to favour themselves 'T is a pittiful power that is subjected to the peoples breath and that can only instruct and counsel and must wait patiently when that is done not extending to any act of punishment and censure where it is contemned But I need say no more than that this directory in the case supposed is framed by the Catechist without any Scripture-pattern or warrant â—aâ— p. 150. The 29th Question is of the Duty of the Church towards their Elders Pastors and Teachers And in the Answer Reverence and Obedience are well placed first But the truth is I see not much room left for any Obedience properly so called according to the Catechist's principles since the Pastor hath his authority by the peoples election and cannot exercise it without their consent so that in effect their obedience is unto themselves And then farther This obedience is thus limited by the Catechist To obey conscienciously in all things wherein they speak unto them in the name of the Lord that is in the Catechist's meaning in all things warranted by some Divine command or precept and evidently appearing so to be unto their consciences for this way all of the Separation go allowing of no obedience to authority in matters appertaining to Religion farther than they apprehend some Divine command and warrant to back it no obedience in the determination of matters indifferent or to them doubtful which are indeed the most proper matter of obedience But the Catechist having barely named this point I will not enlarge on it farther than to annex the words of a very Learned and pious man on this subject Sundry by profession Protestants in eagerness of opposition to the Papists See Dr. Jackson l. 2. c. 4. and 5. c. affirm that spiritual Pastors must then only be believed then only be obeyed when they give sentence according to the evident and express law of God made evident to the hearts and consciences of such as must believe and obey them And this in one word is to take away all authority of spiritual pastors and to deprive them of all obedience unto whom doubtless God by his written word hath given some special authority and right to exact some peculiar obedience of the flock Now if the Pastor be then only to be obeyed when he brings evident commission out of Scripture for those particulars unto which he demands belief or obedience What obedience do men perform unto him more than to any other man whomsoever for whosoever he be that can shew us the express undoubted command of God it must be obeyed of all but whilst it is thus obeyed it only not He that sheweth it unto us is obeyed And if this were all the obedience which I ow unto others I were no more bound to believe or obey any other man than he is bound to obey or believe me the Flock no more bound to obey their Pastors than the Pastors them Yet certainly God who hath set Kingdoms in order is not the Author of such confusion in the Spiritual regiment of his Church Some peculiar obedience is due unto Spiritual Governours unless we hold that when Christ ascended on high and led captivity captive his donation of spiritual authority was but a donation of bare titles without realities answering to them Conditional assent and cautionary obedience we may and must perform to our Spiritual Pastors
them after Deacons such as our Church-wardens or Vestry-men still are men trusted with the utensils and stock of the Church and employed about the ordering of Seats and Rates and such like outward affairs of the Church Of these therefore we retain not only some foot-steps but the things themselves Secondly Some light in this matter saith the Catechist may be taken from the Church of the Jews wherein the Elders of the people were joyned in Ruling with the Priests both in the Sanhedrim and all lesse Assemblies 'T is much he should not discern by this light the vanity of cavilling against the term of Lay-Elder which is but the very same with Elder of the People to whom he is now compared But as to the thing it self here referr'd to it shall suffice to annex this short observation Dr. Doughtee Vel. Polem p. 92. That the main reason of joyning Elders to the Priests Synodical Elders among the Jews was the mixt condition of the Judaical Law they had to deal with howbeit of Divine institution wholly and from God yet in regard of the drift and scope thereof partly divine and partly humane occupied in a decision of doubts hapning betwixt God and Man as likewise betwixt Man Man and accordingly the Priests and Levites besides the ordering of the Sanctuary their peculiar task 1 Chron. 24.5 2 Chron. 34.8 had principally to do in matters of it appertaining unto God and the Elders in things belonging unto Men the one over the matters of the Lord the other over the matters of the King 2 Chron. 19.8 9 10 11. In brief the Jewish Sanhedrim if so at least-wise it be to be understood in those places commonly alledged Exod. 18.25 26. Numb 11.16 17. Deut. 17.8 9. and 19.16 17. was upon the point a Civil Court and had to deal in matters of Right or Title yea of Life it self But come we Thirdly to his express Scriptures There is saith he in the Gospel express mention of persons that were assigned peculiarly for Rule and Government in the Church As 1 Cor. 12.28 Rom. 12.8 1 Tim. 5.17 I might here except First at the phrase here as well as in the general Answer Ruling-Elders are mentioned in the Scripture A phrase very distant from proving their institution by Christ inasmuch as many things are mentioned in H. Scripture which are not there allowed of much less enjoyned and prescribed Secondly That he saith there is express mention of these in the Gospel and yet brings all his proofs out of St. Paul's Epistles But these are lesser incongruities which I shall not insist on We will view impartially the places themselves which are here brought in to prove That there are such Church-officers instituted by Christ and so of perpetual necessity to be retained as Elders whose duty consists in rule and government only Elders in distinction as well from the Civil Magistrate as the Pastors of the Christian Church The first Text is 1 Cor. 12.28 God hath set some in the Church first Apostles secondarily Prophets thirdly Teachers after that Miracles then gifts of Healings Helps Governments Diversities of Tongues Well here are mentioned Helps Governments here are also Miracles gifts of Healings Diversities of Tongues now What is this to Ruling-Elders or Lay-Presbyters 'T is answer'd moreover by some That these were so many gifts and endowments appertaining to the Officers before mentioned Apostles Prophets and Teachers To which purpose it is observable that the Apostle useth the Abstract and upon an exact recapitulation made afterwards in the Concrete of the said Church-administrations he omitteth helps governments as being only appendents 't is like to the foregoing Offices and so comprized under them ver 29 30. Are all Apostles are all Prophets are all Teachers Are all Workers of Miracles have all Gifts of Healing do all speak with Tongues do all Interpret and then follows an Exhortation to the pursuit of the best gifts verse 31. So that this Exposition seems well grounded upon the Text. But what saith the Catechist It is in vain pretended that those words helps governments do denote gifts only seeing the Apostle expresly enumerates the persons in Office or Officers which the Lord Christ then used in the foundation and rule of the Churches as then planted What and were Miracles Gifts of Healings Diversities of Tongues too reckon'd in the number of those Officers But grant what is pleaded for that helps and governments import here a distinction of Offices personally different Are therefore Ruling-Lay-Elders presently the men or Dr. D. Vel. Polem p. 77. must they necessarily be understood Why not rather Deacons if there be room for guesses who were plainly taken in as helps to the Apostles in their work of Ministring to the Saints Acts 6.1 2. and had moreover some power questionless assigned them in the rule and government of the Church which makes St. Paul require before their admission a skill of governing their own houses well 1 Tim. 3.4 5 12. This then for the first Text. The second follows He that ruleth also is distinguished from him that teacheth and him that exhorteth Rom. 12.8 and is prescribed diligence as his principal qualification in the discharge of his duty Let the whole period be viewed from the 6th verse which upon another occasion we consulted once before and I demand first How it appears that the Apostle treats there of Offices subjectively distinct as to persons and not rather of a diversity of spiritual gifts co-incident to the same person since at his very entrance upon the enumeration he expresly nameth Gifts verse 6. Having then gifts differing according unto the grace that is given unto us c. And it may certainly appertain to one and the same person to prophesie be that to expounâ— Scripture or what it will and do the ministry of a Deacon and to teach and to exhort and to distribute Church-goods and to govert and to give alms which are the particulars there specified And then supposing thâ— question resolved Secondly How appears it that the Apostle here meant any distinct officer in the Church any Ruling-Elder and not rather extended his admonition unto all to whom the charge of Ruling is committed even the Civil Magistrate as well as any other of whom doubtless diligence is also required for having in the beginning of this 8 verse joyned to the two immediately precedent gone through with Church-offices he may be thought without injury to the Text to strike out into more general and common duties wherewith he holds on to the end of the Chapter As yet then we have not Ruling-Elders so much as mention'd in the H. Scripture not one word or syllable of these Ruling-Elders that are contra-distinguished to teaching-Teaching-Presbyters and Civil Magistrates It may be the third place will satisfie for all Ad Triariâ—s ventum est If this fail the Catechist must quit the field To that therefore let us bend our observation The words of the Apostle to this purpose