Ergo seeing a Bishop and Presbyter are the same by the word of God iurisdiction doth of right belong to both Arg. 7. All pastorall duties doe equally belong unto the Pastors but to seperate the pretious from the vile is a Pastorall duty Ier. 15. 19. as it belongeth to the shepheard to seeke that which is lost Ezek 34. 4. that is to reconcile the penitent so also to separate the uncleane to correct the obstinate Augustine saith De corrept grat cap. 15. Pastoralis necessitas habet c. The Pastoral necessity requireth lest the contagion should spread further to separate the diseased sheepe from the sound Ergo it belongeth to Presbyters which are Pastors and haue their flockes Act. 20. 17. 28. to separate ane excommunicate the vile and uncleane Arg. 8. VVhatsoever belongeth to the gathering together of the Saints the work of the Ministery the edifying of the body of Christ is to be performed by the Pastors and Doctors with other Ministers of the Church for to this end hath Christ ordained these offices Ephes 4. 11. But to separate or excommunicate and recoÌ„cile are profitable to the said purposes This authority is given for edification 2. Cor. 10. 8. Ergo it belongeth to the Pastors and Teachers of the Church Arg. 9. The discipline should bee administred by such as are more likely to haue the spirit of direction and to whom with the least perill of the Church the censures might be exercised But an assembly of Presbyters are more like to haue the spirit of Direction as the Apostles and Presbyters assembled in councell saying It seemed good to the holy Ghost and Concil Affrican can 138. epist ad Coelestium to us Act. 15. 28. Thus saith the Councell of Affrican Vnlesse there be any that thinkes God inspireth one particular person with righteousnesse and forsaketh a number of Priests assembled in Synod Again there would arise lesse danger to the Church by this means for there is a rule in the Law Excommunicatus non potest excommunicare he that is excommunicate himselfe cannot excommunicate another caus 24. q. 1. c. 4. But a Bishop or any one Ecclesiasticall person may by many occasions stand under the censure of excommunication In what cases Bishops are liable to the censures of the church as if he haue two wiues caus 24. q. 3. c. 19. or if he bee a teacher of errour hee must bee delivered to Satan caus 24. q. 3. c 13. Pelagius or if he be an usurer caus 14. q. 4. c. 4. or a blasphemer or swearer Carth. 4. cap. 61. or a player at dice. Trullan c. 50. or be negligent in preaching and so continue can Apost 57. or giue orders for money Chalced. c. 2 Or be promoted for money Constant Conc. 6. gener c. 22. or make a lay man his vicar generall Hispatiens 2. c. 9. Or take upon him any civill office as vice-presidentship Iusticiariship Decr. Greg. 3. 58. 4. or sit in causes of bloud or giue sentence for the cutting off of any meber as of ears hands c. ibid. c 5. So writeth Alexander 3. in his rescript to the Bishop of Canterbury But a Bishop or any one man may stand excommunicate where an assembly or company cannot in this case by whom should the discipline be administred Ergo it is safer that the censures of the Church should bee disposed by many then by one Arg. 10. Presbyters by the word of God and practise of the Church are interessed in the spirituall rule and government of the Church but the Excommunication belongeth to the spirituall regiment Ergo For the proofe of the proposition first in the Scriptures wee find that the Apostles called together the Presbyters for the deciding of doubtfull questions and by the Apostle the Elders that labour in the word are made rulers the Elders that rule well especially they that labour in the word 1. Tim. 5. 17. they then that laboured in the word were also ruling Elders for how else should they haue a double honour being excluded from government which is counted one of the greatest honours of the Church Now the practise of the Church is most evident Hier. saith communi presbyterorum concilio Ecclesiae regebantur â—â—â—rom in â— 1. In the beginning Churches were governed by the common advise of presbyters caus 11. q. 3 c. 106. debent 12. sacerdotes Episcopum circumstare c. twelue Priests must stand by the Bisbop when he denounceth excommunication can 108. VVhen the penitent party was to bee reconciled the Bishop must bee assisted with as many caus 12. q. 2. c. 5. The Bishop could not dispose of the temporall things of the Church much lesse of spirituall inconsulto presbyterio not hauing before consulted with his presbitery neither was the assistance of the presbytery for decency and order onely but of necessity Episcopus nullius causam audiat absque praesentia clericorum aliter erit sententia irrita The Bishop shall heare no mans cause without the presence of his Clarks otherwise let the sentence bee voyd Carth. 4. c. 23. Thus it is evident that at the beginning the presbyters did assist the Bishops in the regiment and gouernment of the Church as is confessed also by our learned writers the government of the Church at the first was so apportioned that neither the presbyters should doe any thing without the Bishop Perpetual gover p. 307. nor the Bishop dispose matters of importance without his presbytery D. Fulke thus testifieth it is manifest that the authority of binding Ans to Rhem in 2 Cor. 2. sect 4. and loosing committing and retaining pertaineth generally to all the Apostles alike and to every pastor in his cure Thus was it in the beginning but by little and little in processe of time Bishops began to encroach upon presbyters and their office 1. Bishops had at the first but a priority before their presbyters they were not How Bishops by little and litile encroached upon Presbyters to suffer a presbyter to stand before them Carth. 4. 34. and within doores Collegam se presbyterorum esse cognoscat let the Bishop take himselfe to be the presbyters collegue and fellow but now Bishops are callled Prelats Ministers subditi their subiects 2. As yet the Bishops had no speciall kind of ordayning as differing in order from presbyters as Ambrose saith Episcopi presbyteri una ordinatio there is but one ordination of a presbyter and a Bishop uterque enim sacerdos for they are both but Priests or Ministers in 1. Tim. 3. afterward the Bishops brought in a speciall kind of consecration for themselues 3. Then they went further that whereas in giuing of Orders presbyters were ioyned with Bishops Carth. 4. c. 3. cited before they did assume that office to Hier. Evag. 10. themselues quid facit excepta ordinatione Episcopus c. What doth a Bishop that a Priest cannot doe ordination onely excepted 4. But not contented to stay here
for these things to take away many a true Sheppard and to commit or leaue the flock unto many a Wolfe and blind guide which will either make havock of them or lead them into the ditch of destruction Thirdly to leaue the Papists cause wholy 1. by retaining their ceremonies 2. suppressing our best Ministers 3. by withdrawing or mis-spending the gifts of themselues and others to mutuall brawles and so to giue them rest to mischiefe the Church and increase their Synagogue 4. by opening their mouth to blaspheme the Gospell by these our mutuall brables Fourthly to driue many hereby on the rock of Schisme and lamentable Separation the plentifull experience whereof hath bred much griefe in the hearts of the well affected Fifthly to undoe so many Ministers and their families of very good desert of the meanes of their maintenance to their utter undoing being so fitted for the Ministerie and unfitted for any thing else Sixthly to cause the Sabboth a morall precept of God to bee prophaned for ceremonies of mens addition and that in so many places of the Nation Seventhly to punish the people for the fault of their Pastor if any be For it is the Minister that conformeth not but by his silencing the people are plagued Pro. 29. 18. Hosea 4. 6. This is iniustice to punish one man for the offence of another Eightly to do a thing cleane contrary to that themselues pray for at least which Christ commands to pray for For Christ commands his to pray to the LORD of the harvest that he would thrust forth labourers into his harvest which when he hath done they thrust them out Math. 9. 38. Ninthly it utterly undoeth the Minister a painfull labourer of Iesus Christ as also his wife and children and disableth them to liue which by Gods apoyntment should be maintained 1. Cor. 9. 14. yea well maintainded 1. Tim. 5. 17. This is opposite to the law of loue Iustice Whereby it doth manifestly appeare that the Authour is very grosly abused because his whole minde is not published but so much onely as best serveth the Prelates turne a trick not unusuall with them for their advantage Witnesse amongst others the English translation of Bucanus his Common places Whereout the Authours discourse touching Discipline translated by Doctor Hill yea imprinted is taken and a discourse of Bishops governement put into the roome thereof both without Doctor Hils knowledge Nay hath not this Index expurgatorius tampered with the holy Scriptures themselues Obserue for the present but two places Act. 14. 23. is thus translated not onely in the Geneva but also in the former Church translation And when they had ordained them Elders by election But the new translation with the Rhemists leaveth out these words by election Why It is not to be suffered that the people should haue any hand in chusing their ministers but papal Bishops must do all 1. Cor. 12. 28. is translated both by the Geneva and former Church translation Helpers Governors but the new translators herein worse then the Rhemists translate it Helpes in governments foisting into the Text this preposition in Why They cannot abide Elders to assist the minister in governing Christ his Church So that Curchwardens are but the Prelats promoters But we must passe by this as their natural weaknesse seeing it is sucked in with the milk of their mother scil the Church of Rome from whom they haue receiued their callings also these corruptions thus by them pleaded for together with this unscholler like nay dishonest means of upholding the same 2 The tearmes of the main conclusion of the whole Tractate are to be considesidered scil It is necessary for a Minister to conforme to the ceremonies prescribed in the Church of England rather then to suffer deprivation Where it is to be noted 1. that he speaketh not one word in defence of the subscription required and yet most if not all these that are debarred from the execution of the worke of the Ministery in our Churches whether they haue been heretofore silenced or not are debarred principally for refusall of the sayd subscription To very little purpose therefore are his foure inferences layd down in the third page of his book nay in truth to very little purpose were his whole book were he able to iustifie all he hath written which all wise men may easily perceiue that he is never able to performe 2. That he speaketh so saintly for those ceremonies that not daring to say the required conformity is necessary either in it self or in respect of the Magistrates command he sayth onely this That it is necessaty rather then to suffer deprivation So that as in the Paragraph gelded by the Prelats it is evident that extra casum deprivationis a Minister is not to bee blamed for not conforming to them in this Authors iudgement nay that the Prelats are rather utterly to be blamed for requiring Conformity thereto 3 Every of those three arguments whereby hee endevoureth to proue this conclusion falleth as much too short of proving the conclusion as the conclusion it selfe doth of condemning the silenced Ministers of sin for not conforming rather then to suffer deprivation which are not deprived for not conforming but for not subscribing which he himselfe amongst his religious friends hath often both of old and also of late professed he neither would nor could yeeld to do for any mans pleasure under heauen what losse or punishment soever he suffered therefore The first Argument drawne from the doctrine and practise of the Apostles who taught that the Iewish Ceremonies were beggerly rudiments Traditions Will-worships Doctrines of Men c. and yet did practise the same besides many other iust exceptions is guilty of the fallacy à bene divisis ad male coniuncta seeing it is altogether as false that the Apostle did so teach and yet so practise in the same Churches as it is true that they did so teach and yet so practise at all For among the Iewes and in their Churches onely did they so practise to whom those Mosaicall Ceremonies were even lately before the saving ordinances of God given by God himself for their edification training up in religion to eternall life And the Author hath utterly failed to proue that the Apostles did so teach as is abouesayd in any of those Churches but onely in the Gentile Churches to whom they were never given by God to any such end nor indeed at all and there the Apostle Paul would not by any meanes suffer the use and practise of those Ceremonies to bee brought in no not for the space of an houre Galath 2. 5. but rather sharply reproved Peter and Barnabas openly and to the face for giving way thereunto Gal. 2. 14. lest by building againe the things hee had destroyed he should make himselfe a transgresser Gal. 2. 18. And hereto agree the rest Acts 21. 25. And if hee would not giue way no not for an houre that the Mosaicall Ceremonies should
cause misiudged for the persons fault Delictum personae Reg. Iuris 37. Reg. Iuris 76. non debet in detrimentum Ecclesiae redundare 1. Enormity against Excommunication by lay persons 1. THeir first defense is that whatsoever the Chancellour doth on this case he doth it in the authority of the ordinary Answ 1. It is a question whether the Bishop himselfe the Archdeacons or any other ordinary alone haue any power to excommunicate VVe are sure that neither Scripture or example of the primitiue Church will beare them out in it Our Saviours rule is Dic Ecclesiae tell it to the Church after the contempt whereof the party is to be held as an heathen publican that is to be excoÌ„municate But never was it yet heard that one man should stand for the Church That Dic Ecclesiae in some mans constructioÌ„ should be dic Episcopo dic CaÌ„cellario dic Officiali as the Papists wrest this place dic Ecclesiae that is dic Papae dic Pontifici Romano but of this matter more shal be said in the end of this treatise Then if they haue not this power in themselues they cannot transferre it to another as the law saith Nemo potest Reg. Iuris 79. plus iuris transferre in alium quam sibi coÌ„petere dignoscatur No man can giue more to an other then hee hath himselfe As the comparison is presumptuous to compare the Bishop to the King the Chancellour to the Lord Chancellour so the case is not alike for a civill power may bee committed over to others but a spirituall power cannot be transferred but ought to bee executed in every mans person as the Apostle saith hee that hath an office let him attend upon his office Rom. 12. 7. Salomon Cant. 8. 11. 12. No substitute in duties spirituall in the Canticles sheweth the difference of the Civill and Ecclesiasticall administration Salomon gaue his vineyard to keepers but my vineyard saith Christ which is mine is alwayes before me As wee mislike that Christ should haue any vicar in earth so neither should any of Christs ministers execute their charge by their vicars S. Peter 1. Pet. 5. 2. saith Feed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the flocke which is in you that is alwayes in your sight The Canon law sayth Non potest esse Decr. Greg. lib. 5. tit 40 c. 5. Pastoris excusatio si lupus oves comedit pastor nescit It is no excuse of the shepheard if the Wolfe devoure the sheepe to say hee knowes it not It was never well with the Church since Prelates taking more upon them then in their own persons they could discharge committed their spirituall affaires to Deputies and Vicars Of this abuse Eckius a man otherwise bad enough complained in the popish Church Nostrates praelatos ordinem Apostolicum invertere c. Our Prelates invert the Apostolicke order who thinking spirituall things too heavy for them to beare doe use the helpe of Suffragans in their Pontificals of Officials in their Iudicials of Penitentiaries in absoluing sinners of Monkes in Preaching Iodocus Clictoveus in his sermons was wont thus to Hom. 2. de Stephano taunt such Adibunt per vicarios in paradysum in persona inferos Such shall by their vicars goe to heaven but in their own person to hell 3. Though the Ordinary had power to excommunicate alone and might transferre that power to another yet lay persons alone are not capable thereof For Christ when he sayd Whose sinnes yee remit are remitted whose sinnes yee retain are retained spake onely to the Apostles and Ministers Hereunto the Canons agree Indecorum est laicum esse vicarium Episcopi c. It is unfit for a lay man to be a Bishops vicar and secular â—ispel 2. c. 9 persons to iudge in the Church and a divers profession to be in one office And by the same Canon the Bishop that shall make a lay man his vicar is held to be Contemptor Canonum A contemner of the Canons But nothing is now more usuall then for lay men Civilians to be Chancellours and Vicars generall to Bishops The second defence The Chancellor Officiall Commissary decreeth the party to be excommunicate a Minister associate vnto him by exprresse authority from the Ordinary denounceth the sentence of excommunication Ans p. 22 Answ 1. This is but a new tricke and frivolous device who knoweth not the Minister assistant to the Chancellour who is for the most parte of the meanest and simplest of the Clergie is but a Cyphar he doth nothing but by his masters direction excoÌ„municateth and absolueth at his pleasure contrary to the Apostles rule to Timothy I charge thee c. that thou obserue these things without preiudice or prefering one 2 Tim. 5. 2 before another and doe nothing partially 2. By the Provincialls no sentence of Excommunication is good but in writing Linwood de senten excommun 6. sententiae latae sine specialibus literis dominorum quorum interest non ligant VVherfore this sentence of the Minister beeing not extant in writing vnder his seale and so deliuered is of no value in Law and the people vnder this colour are abused 3. It is vnlawfull for a lay Ciuilian in cases which appertayneth to correction to send out citations or to decree excommunications he must neither Investigare inquirere punire corrigere excommunicationum literas decernere And as he cannot doe it in his owne name so neither can he by the Law publish excommunications in another mans name The Law is Quod alicui suo non liceat nomine nec alieno Reg. iuris Bonif. 67. Linwood de licebit And the prouinciall is flat Ne laicus quouis exquisito colore sub suo uel alieno nomine c. that a lay person by any pretense 〈◊〉 coniug cum ex 1. vnder his owne or others name doe exercise no iurisdiction spirtual whatsoeuer And all such citations excommunications and processe are voyd not onely if the iudge bee a lay person but the Register also Thirdly they vse but the aduise and Ministrie of a wise ciuilian in decreeing who is to Ans p. 22. bee excommunicate Answ 1. If had beene to bee wished that Ecclesiasticall persons had not medled in such affaires wherein they haue no skill according to the auncient Canons Episcopus tuitionem testamentuÌ„ non suscipiat Carthag 4. 18. That the Bishop should not take vpon him the tuition of a testament Clerici ad sacrum Ministerium electi actibus saeculi renuntient Clergy-men must renounce all secular acts Auerens can 12. The Apostle saith no man that warreth entangleth 2. Tim. 2. 4 himselfe with the affaires of this life whereupon Ambrose well writeth Ecclesiasticus officium impleat quod spospondit a seculari Amb. in 2. 2. negotio alienus non enim convenit unum duplicem professionem habere a Clergie man must bee free from secular businesse for it is not fit that one should haue a
manifest but Canonicall monition going before The manner is that the apparitor cannot personally cite the party to be summoned hee useth to leaue word at his house if he come not at the day he is forthwith as contumacious excommunicate Heerein a double errour is committed for if a man never appeared in the cause before the iudge he cannot bee cited at his house unlesse he can not be personally apprehended and againe he that is not personally cited is not verè but interpretative Linwood de iudic c. item vers decernimus ibid. v. personaliter contumax in the iudgement of the sounder Canonists VVherefore it is evident by these reasons that Excommunication goeth forth often for trifles 12 peny matters not for contumacy or contempt 5. If Excommunication bee sent forth onely for contempt where the originall is but a trifle and a twelue penny matter then what needed all those cauteles by Councels ne quenquam pro parvis levibus causis c. that none should bee excommunicate for small or trifling matters Aur. 3. c. 2. Vormatiens c. 13. Avernens as it is cited caus 11. q. 3. c. 42. for by this evasion there shall be no trifling matters at all but the pretence and colour of contempt shall countenance excommunication VVherefore the request of the Petitioners is agreable to the Scriptures and Canons that none be excommunicate for trifles The 2. Enormity against Excommunication without the consent of the Pastors Reasons and arguments to proue that Excommunication ought not to proceed from one alone but by the ioynt advise of the presbyters Pastors 1. EXcommunication should bee exercised by the Church that is an assemble math 18. 11. tell the Church c. If he will not heare the Church let him bee as an heathen and publicane Origene vpon these words saith tertio coreptionem mandat ad Ecclesiam deferendam c. In the third place he will haue the correction brought to the Church In the second he will haue two or three witnesses to bee vsed So Chrisostome vnderstandeth Episcopos praesidentes Ecclesiae The Bishops or Pastors and presidents or governors of the Church in Mat. 18. But one or two make not a Church for this were a preposterous course to proceed from one to two or three then to go back agayn to one Hierome writeth well concerning Iohn Hieron pammach Patriarke of Hierusalem An tu solus Ecclesia es qui te offenderit a Christo excluditur tibi soli licet Ecclesiae iura calcare tu quicquid feceris norma doctrinae est Are you alone the Church that whosoever offendeth you is excluded from Christ is it lawfull onely for you to tread under foote the rights of the Church whatsoever you do is it a rule of doctrine Ergo one man not being the Church cannot excommunicate 2. The government of the civill and Ecclesiasticall state are unlike c. But yee sha not be so Lu. 22. 25. But they rule alone as Monarchs The Kings of the Gentiles reign over them Ergo Bishops or other officers of the Church ought not to governe alone There ought ro be no Monarchy in the spirituall regiment of the visible Chur. as Monarchs in the Church and so not excommunicate alone This place is urged by a learned VVriter against a monarchy in the visible Church Quid apertius nisi expectetis ut locum proferamus ubi dixit apertè vos monarchae Ecclesiae esse non debetis What could bee sayd more plainly D. Sutcliffe l. 1. de opt Reip. statu cap. 7. unlesse you would haue us bring forth a place where Christ should say in plaine tearmes Yee shall not be Monarches of the Church As there ought not then to be a Monarch over the universall Church so by the same reason neither should there be any Ecclesiasticall Monarch over a Province or Diocesse Arg. 3. If S. Paul who had Apostolicall power would not excommunicate the incestuous person amongst the Corinthians without the consent of the Pastors and spirituall governours much lesse ought any Bishop Archdeacon c. do so now But the first is evident that S. Paul excōmunicateth together with the Pastors of Corinth the Apostle sent not onely his mandate to the Corinthians for them to execute but that the power and right of excommunication was ioyntly with the Apostle in the Pastors of Corinth as it may appeare by these reasons Ergo. 1. The Apostle rebuketh them for that they had not put him from them already before he had written to them vers 2. 2. They which had power to reconcile had power also to excommunicate For Eiusdem est ligare soluere It belongeth to the same to binde and to loose But the Pastors of Corinth haue power to reconcile 2. Cor. 2. 10. To whom you forgiue any thing I forgiue also c. 3. It is not like that the Church of Corinth had no power to excommunicate without the Apostle for then should they haue wanted a principall poynt of discipline when the Apostle was absent in remote places from them 4. The words of the Apostle doe evidently giue unto them the iudgement of Excommunication Doe yee not iudge them that are within 1. Cor. 5. 12. Vpon the which words Augustine thus writeth Aug. hom 50. c. 12. ut citatur caus 2. q. 1. ◠1◠Quibus verbis satis ostendit non temere aut quommodo libet c. By which words hee sufficiently sheweth that not rashly or howsoever but by iudgement the evill are to be removed from the communion of the Church Arg. 4. All that haue authority to preach haue power to binde and loose as the Apostle saith Wee are the sweet savour of Christ in them that are saved and in them that perish 2. Cor. 2. 16. Our Saviour giveth one generall commission to his Apostles and all faithfull Pastors their successours Whosoever sinnes yee remit they are remitted Ambrose saith Remittuntur peccata per Dei De Cain Abel l. 2. cap. 4. verbum cujus Leuites interpres executor est Sinnes are remitted by the word of God whereof the Minister is the interpreter and executor Basil saith Confession of sinnes must necessarily he made to them to whom the dispensation of the mysteries of God is committed Our English confession saith Seeing In regal contractioribus q. 288. Horn ser 11. one manner of word is given to all and one onely key belongeth to all wee say there is but one onely power of all ministers as concerning opening and shutting But all pastors haue authority to preach Ergo to binde and loose and consequently to excommunicate It will be answered that there are two kinds of administratiō of the keys a spirirituall in remitting retayning of sins externall in releasing the outward censures of the Church The first belongeth to all Pastors and the preachers of the Church but not the other Answ 1. Our Saviour Christ comprehendeth the whole