my self my Being is absolutely necessary every way perfect altogether pure single and infinite I do therefore conclude as Hierome That the very nature of God is being it selfe and therefore he ever was and cannot cease to be he cannot borrow his Being from any thing who gives Being and wel-being to all things The absolute and independent necessity of the Divine-Being doth demonstrate its eternity and therefore all the differences of time are untied by the Talmudists to connote the Eternity of God in that text Exod. 3. 14. according to that excellent Commentary made by the Apostle Rev. 1. 8. God is the Almighty which is and which was and which is to come Hence it is that some have thought fit to translate that text Exod. 3. 14. according to the full scope of the Future amongst the Hebrews I am that I am that I was and that I will be For the Future amongst the Hebrews points at all differences of time past present and to come but others observing the strict and proper signification of the Future translate it thus I will be that I will be The Angel of the waters doth unite all differences of time in that gratefull acknowledgement Rev. 16. 5. Thou art righteous O Lord which art and wast and shalt be because thou hast judged thus And Iesus Christ who is one and the same God with his father is the same yesterday and to day and for ever Heb. 3. 8. The Rabbines upon Exod. 3. 14. expresse themselves after this manner The blessed God said unto Moses say unto them I that have been and I the same now and I the same for time to come c. or as others more agreeable to the Chaldee Paraphrase I he that is and was and hereafter will be hath sent me unto you But enough of that it is now time to conclude that this first and independent Being cannot be measured in it self because it is infinite nor in its causes for it hath no causes but is from it self of it self by it self and for it self for as the Apostle saith All things are of him and through him and to him to him be glory for ever Amen CHAP. III. God hath sufficiently and graciously revealed himself in his holy word for our edification and salvation THis incomprensible God who is of himself and for himself cannot be made known to his creatures but by himselfe Men and Angels cannot know him any further then he is pleased to reveale himself unto them The word of God is pure and perfect it doth fully discover Gods mind and our duty The Scriptures direct us in all points of faith in all parts of worship and in all passages of our life and conversation there is the whole body of Religion and the only right way to salvation sufficiently and graciously revealed unto us by God himself for God is the Author Object End of true Religion and is the only happinesse and salvation of his chosen People and therefore God alone can direct us how to serve and enjoy his own blessed self in an acceptable and comfortable way for his glory and our own everlasting satisfaction The Jesuites tell us that the Scriptures are but a partiall Rule and that we must be beholding to some unwritten word or tradition for the proofe of some points which are necessary to be known and beleeved for our everlasting salvation Some instance in the Doctrine of the Trinity others in the Worship of the Holy Ghost The Papists do generally acknowledge that it is necessary for the attainment oâ— salvation to beleeve the number of the Persons of the Trinity and their consubstantiality because no man can be saved who doth not believe in the Father Son and Holy Ghost in all three as in the only true God one and the self same God blessed for ever but some of them deny that this mystery is sufficiently revealed in the written word and therefore I shall make it my businesse to confute them and all that adhere unto them in the following Treatise The saving knowledge of God in Christ is revealed by the Spirit speaking in the Scriptures of truth nay Father Son and Holy Ghost do all joyne in revealing to us the saving mystery of faith and godlinesse that by the grace of Christ the love of God and Communion of the Holy Ghost we may have a glorious fellowship with all three as one God the only true God whom to know is life eternall John 17. 3. we are taught by the father to come to Christ for salvation John 6. 45. we are taught by the son Iohn 1. 18. Heb. 1. 2. we are taught by the Spirit Heb. 3. 7. Rev. 2. 29. and 1 Iohn 5. 6. the Spirit doth beare witnesse after an especiall manner to this saving truth it is the spirit that beareth witnesse because the Spirit is truth yet all three and therefore the whole Trinity the Father the Son and the Holy Spirit do joyn in bearing record and their record is written for it stands upon Record in the Gospel and their Record is a saving Record and there can be no other Record produced to prove that Christ is our Saviour 1 Iohn 5. 7 11 12 13 20. Iohn 20 31. if we study the Scriptures beleeve apply them worship and act according to them we shall be saved by our faith in the written Trinity in Father Son and Holy Ghost without the help of any unwritten tradition whatsoever for the holy Scriptures are able to furnish the Man of God unto Perfection and make the simple wise unto salvation 2 Tim. 3. 15 16 17. Cyrill in his Book of the Trinity and Person of Christ put forth not long since by Wegeline saith that he would not speak or think any thing of God but what is written in his Word Clemens Alexandrinus saith that we ought to make good every point in question by the Word of God because that is the surest nay that 's the only Demonstration he speaks of Theologicall Demonstration nothing can be embraced with a divine faith but that which is delivered to us upon Divine Testimony and we are to seek for the Testimony of God nowhere but in the written Word of God and therefore Basil disputes after this manner Whatsoever is not in the written Word of God is not of faith and whatsoever is not of faith is sin and therefore it is a sin to obtrude any Doctrine upon the conscience as an Article of faith which is not written in the Word of God Putean is bold to say that if Basil his meaning was according to his words he was a Hugonot that is as we use to say a Puritane When I read what the Papists write on this Argument I stand amazed at their blasphemies and am unwilling to stain my paper with the repetition of them they who have read Canus Hosius Costerus Eckius Gautierus Charronaeus Stapleton and the rest of that
is the Author of Faith he gives us supernaturall light and spirituall eyes 1 Cor. 2. 8 9 10. Ephes. 1. 17 18. He that beleeveth on the Son of God hath the witnes in himselfe The Spirit is called the witnesse 1 Ioh. 5. 6. 10. And the Apostle assures us that none can say with faith and full perswasion of heart that Iesus is the Lord till he hath been taught to say so by the Holy Ghost 1 Cor 12. 3. They who are sensuall and have not the Spirit Iude ver 19. do slight the testimony of the Spirit because the world cannot receive the Spirit or the things of the Spirit It is a naturall mans pride and folly to account those things below him which are above him for he doth account spirituall wisedome foolishnesse wheras indeed it is too excellent for him to understand because he is a meer naturall sensual man but these spirituall things are spiritually discerned he doth not receive them he cannot know them 1 Cor. 2. 14. This is the true reason why men do not beleeve in the Spirit and adore the Spirit because he is the Spirit of Truth whom the world cannot receive because it seeth him not neither knoweth him Ioh. 14. ver 17. But saith Christ to his Disciples ye know him for he dwelleth with you and shall be in you Ioh. 14. in the selfe-same ver and Act. 5. 32. 5. The Spirit is the Supream Judge of truth even of controverted truths in matters of Religion we need not speake of a Private judgement of Discretion such as spirituall men may passe by the help of the Spirit and word of truth nor of that Publick and ministeriall judgement which may be passed in greater or lesser Synods where Pastors and Elders are assembled by the Ordinance of Christ and therefore may pray in faith for the direction and assistance of the Holy Ghost in all their Ministeriall determinations But I speak of the supremacy and Soveraignty of Iudgement which belongs to the Holy Ghost True it is that Christ is King and head of the Church and therefore he is our master Doctor Lawgiver Mat. 23. 10. Iam. 4. 12. But the Father hath sent the Spirit in the name of Christ to teach us the meaning of the Word of Christ and to lead us into all truth and holinesse by the holy Scriptures of truth The Spirit did indite the whole Scripture and it is agreeable to the light of nature that he who made the Law should expound it This Holy Spirit is a publick Spirit he governes the whole body of Christ the whole Church and speaks in the whole body of the Scriptures every part thereof and if we do compare one place of Scripture with another we shall by comparing of Spirituall things with Spirituall come to understand the saving wisdome which the Holy Ghost teacheth which things we speak saith the Apostle not in the words which mans wisedome teacheth but which the Holy Ghost teacheth comparing spirituall things with Spirituall 1 Cor. 2. 13. The Holy Ghost speaking to us in plain places doth discover to us all that is necessary to be knowne and beleeved for our eternall salvation and doth thereby give us so much light as that we may sufficiently understand hard places if we pray as we should compare and search the Scriptures as we ought in the Spirit of Faith and modesty Iam. 1. 5. Ioh. 5. 39. Mat. 7. 7. 1 Ioh. 5. 14. Rom. 2. 2. 3. and practise what we know before Ioh. 7. 17. Phil. 3. 15 16. for we shall at least learne so much wisedom as not to expound hard places of Scripture in any sense that is contrary to the mind of the Spirit cleerly delivered in plaine places of Scripture If we expound hard places according to the Analogy of Faith cleerly delivered in other places though we should mistake in the application yet the Spirit doth so far interpose as to keep us from falling into heresie And if we meet with no plaine places to expound an hard place by there is then no danger of heresie because all things necessary to salvation are set downe cleerly in the plaine places of Scripture This conference of Scriptures is an excellent means to bring us acquainted with all Book-cases the determinations which the Spirit hath made in Scripture and left there upon Record in those sacred Rolls which are the treasury of the Church for the direction of the Saints And whether we make use of this ordinance in our private reading or in the publique ministry the spirit doth deliver his judgement authoritatively and infallibly in the holy Scriptures and we may come to be acquainted with the mind and judgment of the Spirit by both Ordinances Thine eyes shall see thy teachers And thine eares shall heare a word behind thee saying This is the way this and not that behold a cleere direction walk ye in it continue and go forward in it do not forsake it when we are wavering and even turning out of our way on one hand or the other when ye turn to the right hand and when ye turn to the left then even then doth the Spirit resolve us and put us out of doubt when we are disputing and even yielding up the truth in a controversie we have a cleer certain and infallible direction from the holy Spirit Isa 30 20 21. The Holy Ghost doth exhort the Jewes to compare the dimmer light of the Prophers with the cleerer light of the Apostles that so the Sun of righteousnesse may shine in its strength with its healing beams into their hearts and then tels them that no Prophecy of the Scripture is of private interpretation because Prophets spake as the Apostles also did not as the will of man did move or the fancy of man direct but according to the mind and will of the Holy Ghost And therefore since all the Scriptures were endited all are to be expounded by the Holy Ghost speaking in the Scriptures thus compared for the Holy Ghost did move all the Holy men Apostles as wel as Prophets to write and teach them what they should write And though we have no extraordinary revelations now by a voice from the excellent glory for our direction yet we have that which is better the writings of the Prophets and Apostles to compare together the Prophesies be darke yet they are sure more sure then those voices which may be more easily counterfeited though the Prophesies be dark yet the Spirit who did endite them will if you compare them with the writings of the Apostles give light to both and deliver his judgement as cleerly in all necessary points as if it were written with a Sun-beame this I take to be the scope of the Holy Ghost in that excellent discourse 2 Pet. 1. from the sixteenth verse to the end of the chapter
And I have consulted the most judicious and experienced writers upon that place though I cite but few in the margine because I have not time to peruse them againe True it is that we are not to beleeve every spirit and therefore are permitted to try the spirits whether they be of God or no 1 Joh. 4. 1. But in this tryall the Holy Spirit speaking in the Scriptures is the suprem Judge and the Holy Spirit doth condemn all erroneous and fantasticall spirits who forsake old truths and pretend to follow New Light The holy Spirit doth constantly teach the same truth in the holy Scriptures for he doth not change his mind or contradict himself We saith the Apostle having the same spirit of Faith according as it is written I beleeved and therefore have I spoken we also beleeve and therefore speake 2 Cor. 4. 13. The same spirit doth lead all the faithfull into all truth necessary to salvation not Absolutely and at once but by degrees For we see the Apostles themselves were for a time guilty of grosse errours Mark 10. 37 41. Act. 1. 6. But the faithfull cannot obstinately hold and continue in such odious and damnable errours as do directly overthrow the foundation of Faith And for the time in which they do erre they hearken to their own spirits so farre as they are carnall and do not as they ought search and pray and wait for the direction of the Holy Spirit It is not the Spirit of Faith which speaks in them when they dissent from such as receive the publique Testimony of the Holy Ghost speaking in the holy Scriptures And therefore the Spirit teacheth us to try the spirits and doctrines of men by the Scriptures if they speak not according to this Word it is not because they have new light from the spirit but because they have no light no morning light heavenly light conveyed unto them in that point wherein they dissent or they have not as yet received it the spirit hath not as yet sealed that portion of truth to their consciences or writ it in their hearts For the spirit doth not whisper one thing in privat to my conscience and declare the contrary in his publique Testimony delivered in the Word Behold saith the wisdome of God I will pour out my spirit unto you I will make knowen my words unto you Pro. 1. 23 For this is the Covenant of God that his Word and spirit should go together and the spirit should deliver his publique Testimony Authoritatively as it becomes his supremacy and soveraignty in the holy Scriptures This is my Covenant with them saith the Lord my spirit that is upon thee and my Word c. Isa. 59. 21. And by attendance on the ministry of the Gospel in the Church of Christ we receive the Spirit Gal. 3. 2. By hearing the doctrine of Faith preached in the Gospel they received the Spirit and therefore the ministry of the Gospel is called the ministration of the Spirit 2 Cor. 3. 8. And for these reasons we try the doctrines and Spirits of men by the word of God because the Spirit who is the Author of Scripture doth every where agree with himself and there is a friendly relation between the truth of the party witnessing the truth of the thing witnessed We do readily acknowledge that the world doth look upon this publique testimony of the Spirit in the word as a private testimony and are apt to scoffe at them who receive it as at men led by their own private spirit but the true reason is because this testimony of the Spirit is not manifest to them who have not the Spirit But it is so manifest to them that have had this publique testimony sealed up to their consciences that they will hold fast this testimony though it cost them their lives I saw under the Altar the soules of them that were slaine for the word of God and for the testimony which they held Rev. 6. 9. The testimony which they held is no other then that publick testimony which the Spirit delivers in the Word and had privately sealed up to their Spirits They were slaine for the Word of God and for the testimony which they held according to that Word They were Martyred because they gave testimony of that truth which they had learnt in the Word of God I am willing to dwell longer upon this subject because it is Fundamentum Fundamentorum and therefore we will for our better satisfaction descend from handling the point in Generall unto some very weighty points in particular and shew how the Spirit doth perswade the hearts and consciences of men to receive his testimony in particular controversies which have been raised and disputed by men of great wit and Spirit In the great controversies between us and the Papists they do as divers Hereticks have done before them urge visions miracles traditions successions prudentiall motives and sometimes Councels Fathers and for a fairer pretence the holy Scriptures But when they are beaten off from their pretending to Councels and Fathers by our learned Whitaker Iewel Abbot Vsher Rainolds not to name Chamier and other Worthyes what lamentable shifts do they make when they are pressed to stand to the publicke testimony and judgement of the Holy Ghost delivered in the holy Scriptures We do therefore in compassion to their poor soules intreat them to hearken to the Spirit of Christ and not to the Spirit of Antichrist because the right sense of the Scripture expounded by the Scripture is the sword of Gods Spirit where with all heresies whatsoever are overcome by all those good souldiers who add the shield of Faith to the Sword of the Spirit But when men neglect the Scriptures and idolize humane inventions they spend their strength in vaine and are like the blind men of Sodome who wearied themselves to find the doore The great point of the Popes Infallible Supremacy can never be proved by the Originall Universall and Perpetuall Tradition of the Church of Christ in all Ages no nor by the unanimous consent of all learned men now living in communion with the present Church of Rome The Sorbon Doctors cannot beleeve that the Popes of Rome are not subject to the sins and passions of other men and if the succession of Popes which they brag of were to be tryed by Fame Celebrity Antiquity Consent it is most evident to all that are acquainted with pure antiquity and impartiall History that the Supremacy of the Popes and Papacy would be sufficiently condemned but if the Popes infallible Supremacy come to be tryed by the Holy Ghost speaking in the holy Scriptures the Popes and Papacy will be infallibly condemned by the Supream Judge The learned Papists do not agree concerning the Infallible Propounder of Fundamentall points for 1. Some say that the Popes proposall ex Cathedrâ is sufficient but Gal. 1. 8. 2. Others
and laboured more abundantly then any in this service 5. Peter did never claime or exercise any such power over the Princes and Kingdomes of the world as the Pope doth Lu. 22. 25 26. Mat. 20. 25 26. 6. If Peter had desired and usurped any Supremacy over the rest of the Apostles he had thereby degraded himselfe and been last of all Mark 9. 34 35. 7. If the vices of Popes may make them Supream or their errours infallible we are able to prove that by fraud violence and such like black arts they have usurped a power over the consciences of men to lead them â—nto Heresie Antichristianisme Atheisme For by endeavouring to prove their Infallibility by the Scripture and then venting grosse errours as infallible truths upon the authority of the Pope and Church they have tempted some to beleeve neither Church nor Pope nor Scripture The Pope hath told them that they had as good beleeve nothing as not beleeve all and therefore it is to be feared that too many beleeve nothing at all Let us then to the Law and the Testimony and let Christ and his Spirit be heard speake in them and we will proceed to tryal with the Papists upon what points they please We will try all their new Tutelar Gods whether Angels or dead men or their breaden God in the Masse by the 1 Command Their picturing of God and worshipping of him by pictures by the Second Commandment Their Superstitious benedictions Magicall Incantations exorcismes and all those helps to salvation which salt wax spittle bells can afford by the third Commandement and so I might proceed to the Holy-dayes Masses c. or try their Popes usurpations the cruelty of their Inquisition their allowance of Fornication forbidding to marry their equivocations rebellious concupiscence by the Second Table We will by the Gospell of Christ try the Doctrine of Justification by workes their publick prayers in an unknowne tongue their denying of the Testament of Christs bloud to the people we will examine whether there be more sacrifices of Christ then one whether they that dye in Christ rest from their labours I might proceed to examine their Doctrine concerning the Offices and benefits of Christ concerning the nature and use of faith and the Doctrine of the Sacraments and the rest of the points in controversie between us and the Papists And truly when I do read such questions as these I cannot but thinke of those Texts 1 Tim. 4. 1. 2 3. Now the Spirit speakes expresly c. the Spirit doth so expresly condemne these seducing and erring Spirits that whosoever will be perswaded by the evident demonstrations of the Spirit and be over-ruled by his positive definitions in Scripture will confesse that the Papists were very wise in offering to be tryed by unwritten Traditions or the Pope and his adherents in all points in question It is clear that the Popes have taught for Doctrines the Commandements of men He that reades the Epistles to the Romanes and Galathians 1 Cor. 14. Chap. the second Chapter to the Colossians the second Chapter of the second Epistle to the Thessalonians and the plainer places of the Book of the Revelation will acknowledge the Spirit doth speake expresly The Pope must therefore be beholding to his School-men to defend his Doctrine and to his Canonists to keep up his Discipline and pretend no more to Scriptures or pure Antiquity for his Justification If the Anti-Scripturists would but hearken to the Spirit speaking in the Scripture they would say the Spirit hath magnified both Law and Gospel and made them honorable precious and glorious in our eyes I will not insist upon those many convincing arguments whereby the Scriptures are undeniably proved to be the word of God but humbly desire all men to consider whether the true reason why those Arguments do not effectually perswade obstinate men be not cleerly this because men do undervalue the testimony of the Holy Ghost and resist vex grieve or quench the Holy Spirit whose office it is to seale up this and all other saving truths to our consciences and hearts True it is that the law of God is written in our hearts by nature but our nature is corrupted and we are blinded with pride passion prejudice with selfe conceitednes and selfe-love and therefore it is requisite that the wrath of God should be revealed from heaven against pleasing gainfull sins nay unnaturall sins Rom 1. 18. to the end of the Chapter Moreover it is to be sadly considered that the Gospell is not written in our hearts by nature nor can it be found out by any artificiall Demonstration but it is discovered to us by Divine Revelation Rom. 1. 16 17. I know many learned men have used the testimony of humane Authors in a Secondary and subservient way to confirme our Faith in this point but it is cleer that we must rest our Faith upon the Authority of God in this and all other points or else our Faith will not be a Divine Faith God sweares by himselfe because he is the greatest and doth bear witnesse to himselfe in his word Nay to his Word in his Word because he is the truest for he is indeed the prime truth the onely Infallible Truth And hence it is that the Scriptures are called the testimonies of God and the testimony of the Spirit is so often produced 1 Pet. 1. 11. Act. 5. 32. 1 Ioh. 5. 6. It is no shame to adhere to the Testimony of God in the weightiest point Psal. 119. 31 46. Hence it is that the Penmen do so often shew their Commission and cry thus saith the Lord. And hence it is that God doth so often own the Scriptures for his word This is my word saith God this came from my inspiration saith the Spirit 2 Tim. 3. 16. 2 Pet. 1. 21. This is my writing saith Iehovah I will own it and stand to it I have written to him the great things of my Law saith God Hos. 8. 12. The Scriptures are the Oracles of God Rom. 3. 2. They contain the counsel of God Act. 20. 27. God hath given us sufficient assurance that the Law was written by his own finger and all other books by his specâ—al command and inspiration All Scripture is given by inspiration of God 2 Tim. 3. 16 Prophecyâ—ame not in old time the word is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 it came not at any time by the will of man but Holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost 2 Pet. 1. 21. Our Saviour gives a full testimony to Moses David the rest of the Penmen of the Psalms and all the Prophets Luk. 24 44. God hath sealed the testimony of the Penmen by miracles on men and divels we need not expect new miracles to confirm this Old-Testament ancient Gospel both are confirmed by the old miracles which stand upon Record in both But if any man preach a New Gospel we may
holy in life We can never understand the Presence Institution and mind of Christ in this Ordinance unless we beleeve the cursed condition of men in their naturall estate the divine nature and person of Christ the greatness of the price that was paid for the satisfaction of Gods justice and appeasing of Gods wrath who did not spare his own Co-essential Son but manifested his hatred against sin and love to his Elect in not sparing his Son but breaking his body and shedding of his bloud that we might be redeemed by the bloud of God this is the mystery which is made sensible in the Sacrament and is really evident to the eye of faith Gal. 3. 1. And whosoever looks upon these great mysteries of the Gospel as fancies and doth not beleeve them to be reall things truly exhibited really presented to beleevers in a Sacramental mystical spiritual way in this Ordinance hath not yet learnt the truth as it is in Jesus and is not prepared for such high Communion We Christians do not come with hungry and thirsty soules longing after farther Communion with Christ for mortifying of our lusts and encrease of all our graces by his spirit untill we beleeve this grand mystery of Faith and we are then experimentally acquainted with the mystery of Godliness when we have been made drink into one Spirit with Christ and his Members when we look upon him whom we have pierced by our sins and acknowledge him to be the natural and Co-essential Son of God there can be none of those fiduciall breathings after Christ Penitential meltings before him or obediential closings with him as is evident by our ninth Chapter untill we do in some measure beleeve this mystery of Faith and understand the substance of the Covenant of grace which is sealed in this Sacrament by God and must be actually renewed by every good Communicant our Meditations Faith Love Repentance Joy Thankfulness will not be rightly placed or exercised if this grand mystery of Faith and Godliness be rejected by us 6. I might argue from all the Offices of Christ they who do not beleeve the divine nature of Christ do utterly disable Jesus Christ from being a Mediatour a Priest a Prophet a King for the saving of his people to the uttermost They who deny the divine Essence and Person of Christ do deny his satisfaction to be all-sufficient in our behalf They depose Christ from that spirituall and heavenly kingdom which he hath by Nature and render him uncapable of that Mediatory Kingdom which is delegated to Christ God man by the Decree of the Co-essentiall Trinunity But I have said enough of that in the former part of this Book I pass on to enquire what civill respect is due to such as do deny the divine Nature of Christ and his holy Spirit That one Text to my apprehension 2 Ioh. 9. 10 11. containes a very full and satisfactory answer Whosoever transgresseth and abideth not in the doctrine of Christ hath not God he that abideth in the doctrine of Christ he hath both the Father and the Son If there come any unto you and bring not this doctrine receive him not into your house neither bid him God speed For he that biddeth him God speed is partaker of his evill deeds But that this point may be more clearly stated and all mistakes prevented be pleased to consider 1. That such Points of Religion and Worship as are necessary to be known and beleeved for the maintenance of Christian spirituall saving Communion with Father Son and holy Ghost are clearely delivered in the holy Scriptures of truth 2. That if men who were formerly unblameable in their life and conversation be seduced into any errour which doth contradict or subvert such Fundamentall Points they ought to be instructed with the spirit of meekness in a Christian and brotherly way 3. They are to be admonished with all faithfulness and meekness of Wisdom twice or thrice that they may understand the importance of the truth which is denyed the danger of the errour maintained the sad consequences of both that if their conscience be not feared they may return from their beloved and damned errours 4. If after all this meekness patience and forbearance all Christian instructions and brotherly admonitions they do as men that are judicially blinded for sinning against conscience 1. Persist in their errour 2 Reject and revile the truth of God in these high and necessary Points 3. Fall from the grace of God frustrate the grace and Covenant of God evacuate the death of Christ depose Christ and his Spirit from their Throne and Godhead 4. Seduce and poyson others Mat. 21. 38. 5. Deny and overthrow the foundation of divine Faith Hope Love and Justification by Faith and the Adequate object also of all Christian Faith Evangelicall Worship and sincere Obedience These bold Atheists for they deny the only true God Father Son and holy Ghost may without any scruple be rejected from Christian Communion For there is certainly some lust or other which hinders them from seeing the truth or professing that they do see it and therefore it may be taken for granted that these men are obstinate self-condemned men men that combine with their Wills and Lusts against their own conscience and cleare shining Scriptures And therefore these men cannot complaine that they are punished for their conscience when they are indeed punished for sinning against their conscience because they are condemned by their own conscience But it will be said that there are scarce any such men to be found as I have described To which I answer Be pleased but to consider what hath been delivered in this very Chapter already and compare it with the foregoing Chapters and with the many blasphemous Pamphlets which do pass up and down without controule in this licentious Age in which men adventure upon the very language of hell under pretence of exercising their Christian Liberty and speaking according to their New Light and this Point will be too cleare For we do already grant that no man ought to be troubled for following the dictates of his conscience rightly enformed but for following of pernicious errours which are contrary to his own conscience unless he be judicially blinded by God for his customary sinning against light of conscience in former times 2. Nothing is more common then for men to speak out of the abundance of that naturall Atheisme which lurkes in their hearts contrary to the dictates of their naturall conscience 3. Though conscience may be quiet whilst men are exercising their wits to maintaine some errour which is contrary to those mysteries of faith which transcend naturall reason and are repugnant to the corruption of reason especially if they are engaged in multitudâ— of business connived at by such as sit at sterne and do thrive and prosper in the world Yet conscience will find a time to speak when it may
and divers religious expressions in it The man was master of his Passions as well as Art or else he had not been such an excellent Agent and Sollicitour in so bad a cause and so compleat a Courtier as indeed he was 3. Acontius spent a great part of his time in the study of the Mathematicks he was excellent in the Art of Fortification and therefore Peter Ramus might set the higher price upon him 4. He hath many excellent passages which are of great use against the Papists But that which we admired at was that a member of our own Assembly should recommend the Book It was therefore desired that Mr Dury might be added to that Committee When Mr Dury came amongst us and saw that he had given too faire a Testimony to that subtill piece he dealt as ingenuously with us as we had dealt with him and assured us that he would be ready to make his Retractation as publike as his Recommendation had been made without his consent because he clearely saw that they practised upon his passionate love of peace to the great prejudice of truth and that he was meerly drawn in to promote a Syncretisme beyond the Orthodoxe lines of Communication For in all Syncretisms and Interimismes between Protestants and Papists or between the Reformed and the Lutherans the Socinians were ever banished out of the lines of Christian Communication And therefore Dr Voetius doth in the very same breath commend Mr Dury sor◠leaving out the Socinians in his Proposals for peace and condemn Acontius for taking of them into his Syncretisme his words are these Si percurrantur Historiae sexcenti libelli ut vocantur Pacifici quorum Catalogi editi cum consultatione Cassandri nuper cum libello Iohannis Duraei de pace Ecclesiasticât inter Evangelicos procurandâ non invenies communi pace quae petitur aut praetenditur Anti-Trinitanos comprehendi Fidem etiam faciunt illa quae anno 1635 Socinianis in Poloniâ ad Collationem de Religione oblita consilia Pacis se offerentibus Vnus solus Tractatus Acontii imprudentioribus nonnullis imposuit c. Dr Voet. de necessitate util Trin. pag. 494 495. That acute and learned Divine doth in very many places set forth Acontius in his right colours and saith the Arminians made great use of him and that he was but one remove from a Socinian or guilty of a Socinian Syncretisme at least because he doth exclude the Sabellians only and doth not obscurely include the Photinians within the còmpasse of his Catholike Creed in which there is a Snake lurkes which doth not hisse but sting for this moderate man did never say that it was necessary for our Salvation to know and beleeve that the Father Son and holy Ghost are one and the same God who is the only true God blessed for ever And yet it is his maine business and designe in his third Book which is now in English and in his seventh which I hope will never be Englished to shew what are the only points necessary to be beleeved for the attainment of Salvation But Acontius is not very modest when he comes to pass sentence upon the Ancients who were rigidly Orthodoxe and faithfully severe in requiring men to beleeve those grand Articles of Faith which are necessary to Salvation For when he discourses of the faith of the man sick of the Palsie he saith Credebat enim ut par est hominem eum qui Iesus diceretur c. For he believed in all probability saith the Translatour that that same man whose name was Jesus came from God and was in favour with God and therefore he hoped that by this meanes he might recover his health But that he knew all those things which the Church hath for a long time accounted as Articles of Faith necessary to be beleeved to salvation how likely a matter it is I leave it to every man to judge There are likewise many other Texts to the very same purpose Concerning the faith of Abraham he speakes somewhat like an Arminian and an Anabaptist but concludes like a Socinian that Abraham did beleeve 1. That he should be the Father of many Nations 2. That the Nations should be happy by his seed 3. Somewhat concerning the Land of Canaan But saith he of those points of Religion which it is judged every body is bound to know upon paine of damnation we read not a word Yea and the mystery of Salvation it self by his seed is very closely and obceurely promised I know Acontius doth acknowledge Christ to be the Son of God and to be God and so do the Socinians in some sense as we have shewn But then Acontius qualifies all with a pretty diversion Many things saith he may be reckoned up which that we might be saved ought both to be and to be performed As that our sins were to be abolished and that by a man void of all sin and of infinite vertue and power and he therefore to be the Son of God yea God and the like And then he presently mixes some things of lesse consequence and concludes thus Doubtless that it may evidently appeare to us that these things are likewise necessary to be known either we must have a plaine Text of Scripture that shall pronounce Whatsoever is necessary to be done that also to attain salvation must necessarily be beleeved But there is no Testimony of Scripture that I know which pronounces that what ever ought to be done ought to be beleeved By this one taste you may plainly see that though it should be granted necessary unto salvation that Christ should be God abolish sin c. yet Acontius will not grant that this is necessary to be beleeved for the attainment of salvation and therefore he left it out of his Catholick Creed and Syncretisme and yet condemns the Sabellians who did not deny the Godhead of Christ but said that he was one God and somewhat which they should not have said or beleeved that he was one Person with God the Father You may hereby understand the modesty of the man and cry out as he did Ein modestiam satis peorfrictam usque ad os impudentiae perfrictam But if his seventh Book which the Translatour durst not adventure to English till he saw how this would take had been translated I need not have said any more for the discovery of this subtill Sir Judicious Pareus and the Synod of Lublin were able to detect him for all his courtship and hypocrisie and D. Voetius doth assure us that if the Reformed Churches had taken Acontius his third and seventh Books into their consideration they would have rejected Acontius from Communion with them unless he would have declared himself more plainly and made it evident that coming out of Italy under pretence of Reformation he had not brought the same errours with him which Alciate Blandrate Gribald or
Socinus the Uncle and the Nephew brought from thence They who are acquainted with Ecclesiastical Writers can readily declare what difficulties they wrestled with and what persecutions they did undergo rather then they would consent to any Syncretisme with the Arians when it was obtruded or yeeld to any agreement when it was offered to them upon plausible and tempting conditions They who have read the Acts of the Nicene Syrmiensian and both the Ariminensian Councels Athanasius Hilary Epiphanius Nicetas Socrates Sozomen Theodoret Augustin know this to be as cleare as if it were written with a Sun-beame Was there not an Anathema denounced against Liberius by great Hilary for yielding to such a Syncretisme with the Arians as Acontius did propound for an Accommodation between Christians and Socinians pardon the harshness of that expression I am not in passion or in haste but follow the example of the Orthodoxe Doctors of the Church who did use the name of Christians in opposition to the Arians to shew that they did not acknowledge the Arians for to be Christians because they denied the true Christ who is God-man the only Mediatour and Saviour of his people from their sins Melancthon and Bucer were men of great prudence modesty and moderation as well as piety and learning but they never offered to conclude a peace with any of these new Arians they would not admit any into Christian Communion with them unlesse they would subscribe the Confessions of faith received in the foure first general Councels They who deny the Godhead of our Saviour and the holy Ghost are Antichristian Antispiritual men their Idolatry in worshipping Christ whom they look upon as a meere Creature their impiety in denying worship to the holy Ghost their horrid blasphemies to the dishonour of Christ and Christianity their poysoning of soules disturbing of Christian Societies should be laid to heart by all Christian Magistrates all Ministers and Members of Jesus Christ and therefore this Acontian Syncretisme is abominable Upon these and divers other considerations I was desired to make a report to the Reverend Assembly concerning the danger of translating and Printing of Acontius in English the heads of the report were briefly these The Report made to the Reverend Assembly March 8. 1647-48 By Mr Cheynell We humbly conceive THat Acontius his Enumeration of Points necessary to be known and beleeved for the attainment of Salvation is very defective 1. Because in the Creed which Acontius framed there is no mention made either of the Godhead of Iesus Christ or of the Godhead of the holy Ghost And 2. Although Acontius doth acknowledge Christ to be truly the Son of God yet he doth not in his Creed declare him to be the natural Son of God That these points are necessary to be known and believed for the attainment of salvation is in our judgement clearly expressed in the holy Scriptures 1 Joh. 5. 7 20. compared with Joh. 17. 3. We do therefore conceive that Acontius was justly condemned because he maintains that the points of Doctrine which he mentions are the only points which are necessary to be known and beleeved and did not hold forth or mention the points aforesaid as necessary to salvation And we esteeme him to be the more worthy of censure because he lived in an age when the Photinian Heresie was revived and yet spared the Photinians though he condemned the Sabellians Finally Acontius doth cautelously decline the Orthodox expressions of the Ancient Church in the foure first generall Synods and doth deliver his Creed in such general expressions that as we conceive the Socinians may subscribe it and yet retaine the worst of their blasphemous errours The promises being humbly presented we leave it to the judgement of this Reverend Assembly Whether Acontius his Stratagems was a Book fit to be translated into English and recommended to the Parliament Army and City to direct them how to distinguish truth from errour in this juncture of time Upon these few heads of the Report I discoursed somewhat affectiontely and freely according to the weight and moment of the Point in Question And thereupon the reverend Assembly did unanimously desire the Prolocutor to perswade me to print something about that Argument as soone as the heat of our employment at Oxford was over for the satisfaction of the Kingdom I am very willing to obey the Commands of that Assembly famous for learning and piety even to the admiration of those great Schollers whose hearts were once espoused to another Interest If the debates of that Reverend Assembly upon severall Articles of Faith were printed and published to the world all ingenuous enemies of piety would blush at the remembrance of those bitter censures which have been passed upon men of whom this Age is unworthy But I must hasten for my Book begins to swell beyond its just proportion and I am called away to another service which cannot be performed at any other time Acontius hath invented very pretty diversions instead of Excuses to abate our zeale against the most dangerous errours he saith that Hereticks do not intend to make Christ a lyar the controversie between them and us is not concerning the truth but concerning the meaning of the words of Christ. To which I answer that he who beleeves the words of Christ in the sense of Antichrist and rejects the sense of Christ and his Spirit is not a Christian but is indeed and truth Antichristian The sense of Scripture is the Scripture and therefore if men be permitted in these great and weighty Articles to impose a new sense upon the Church of Christ they do clearely impose a new Creed a new Gospell upon us and deserve that Anathema Gal. 1. 8 9. though they should pretend to Apostolical authority or Angelical purity Although we or an Angel from heaven preach any other Gospel unto you then that which we have preached unto you let him be accursed As we said before so say I now againe if any man preach any other Gospell unto you then that you have received let him be accursed Grotius in the daies of his modesty refused to sollicite in the behalfe of the Socinians and professed that he did not know a man in the grand Assembly in Holland that would not pronounce the Socinians accursed The distinguishing question which was then put was the old question Do you beleeve that Christ is God by nature If you do not you are an Arian and if you be an Arian you are no Christian. Acontius reckons up some things as necessary to beleeve which are expressed in Scripture some other things which are necessarily inferred from what is expressed but he doth not reckon up the Godhead of Christ or the holy Ghost in his Catalogue of things that are plainely expressed or necessarily inferred as is most evident by his whole discourse in his third Book which is now in English Finally the Socinians take away
things of God they changed the glory of God into a visible Image made like unto corruptible man and unreasonable creatures such Images are both Artificial and Real lyes for by making Images of God these learned Fools changed the truth of God into a Lye and then adored and worshipped their own lyes Rom. 1. 20 23 25. The Godhead is Infinite and the Immensity of Gods perfection cannot be measured by any created understanding God is great and his greatnesse is unsearchable Psal. 145. 3. The greatnesse of God is not a greatnesse of Bulk and Quantity but of Perfection and Excellencie he is great in Power and his understanding is Infinite Ps. 147. 5. and therefore his understanding is unsearchable Isa. 40. 28 when men and Angels search farthest into Gods perfection they do most of all discover their own imperfection for God will make them know that the secrets of his wisdome are double to that which they behold and that it is impossible by our most accurate disquisition to finde out the Almighty unto perfection Job 11. 6 7. but we may find him out unto salvation in the holy Scriptures If we sum up all that the Philosophers and Schoolmen can attain to in their discourses of this first Principle it will amount to no more then this Men and Angels can never comprehend that perfection which dwels in God for the perfection of God is Infinite and therefore â—ncomprehensible Let Schoolers examine tâ—is brief account Deus est â—ns Ens entium Essentia Essentiarum Ens purum Ens Simplex Ens simpliciter Simplex Ens Absolutum Ens Necessarium Ens Absolutè necessarium Ens Primum aeternum independens perfectum infinitum infinitè perfectum proinde immensum Let us therefore study beleeve and embrace the holy Scriptures which may satisfie and save us I confesse I have been very much taken with some discourses in Aristotle's Metaphysicks concerning the spiritual and eternal efficacy of the first Principle first mover or prime understanding whose very Essence Substance Nature and Being is a spiritual and Eternal Self-efficacy from whence it was easie to demonstrate the Self-sufficiency and All-sufficiency of this Eternal understanding and from thence to inferre that this Eternal Spirit whose very Being is Efficacy or as we say a pure Act should be effectually obeyed and sincerely worshipped with pure and spiritual worship I shall not examine those passages which are usually cited out of Plato Iamblichus Trismegistus and others upon this subject because it is clear to me that those glorious mysteries which they did either discourse or treat of were discovered to them by an Hebrew light Plato was not called the Atticising Moses in vaine Clemens Alexandrinus and divers others have said enough of that and saved me the labour of a learned Digression upon that subject and it is conceived that Christians have inserted such passages into the works of Heathens The Platonists say Lumen est umbra Dei Deus est lumen luminis The Aposile saith God is light and in him is no darknesse at all That is God is perfection it self without any imperfection at all 1 John 1. 5. God is a pure Act God is one Single Infinite Perfection And therefore as Seneca said we had need compose our whole man into an Argument of Modesty when we discourse of the nature of God lest we speak any thing rashly or affirme any thing that is untrue The works of God are great and his thoughts Decrees and Counsels very deep Psal. 92. 5. Who then is able to sound the depth of his natural perfection whose immense perfection is like a Sea if there were any such which hath neither banks nor bottome who can sound a bottomlesse depth or define an infinite perfection God is near us nay in us and yet farre off from us there is an infinite distance between his excellency and our infirmity he is far off from our senses and from our understanding and therefore instead of begging longer time as the Philosopher did I will conclude as the wise man doth Eccl. 7. 23 24. All this have I proved by Wisdom I said I will be wise but it was farre from me That which is farre off and exceeding deep who can finde it out Heraclitus put forth a pretty Riddle If you do not hope for something above hope you shall never finde out that which can never be found It is safer as the Poet said to beleeve and worship God then to pry into him Nam praeter ipsum quaerere acquires nihil How much Raymundus de Sabunde A. Steuchus Eugubinus Pacardus and others would have found without the help of the Scripture let such as are spiritually judicious judge CHAP. II. GOD is the First Eternal and Independent Being the Fountaine of all Being and Well-Being therefore cannot but Be Exist and persist in Being IT is a Rule generally received in the Schooles that all creatures have more of imperfection and nothingnes then they have of Being or Perfection But all Being the whole of being is in God God is principium totius esse the fountain of all Being and wel-being the only self-being God is the First Eternal and Independent Being and therefore can have no Cause of his Being without himself or above himself because he was before and is above all Causes Isa. 44. 6. God is the First and the Last he is everlasting and therefore can have no Efficient or Final Cause and it is utterly impossible that God should have any Matter or Form or any thing answerable to either because it is impossible that any thing should set bounds to his Boundlesse Being and infinite perfection God is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 saith the Philosopher and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 saith the Divine but we must as the Schools state the point understand both Sensu Negativo because God hath his Being not from any other but from himself and God is said to have his Being from himself because his very nature and Essence are necessary and therefore we cannot conceive the Divine Essence to be void of existence it is utterly impossible that God should not exist because the Divine Nature is a pure Act an absolute necessary eternall infinite independent single Being We must not conceive that God was first in a naked Power of Being and was afterwards reduced unto actuall Being by his own effectuall Power as if his Existence were really distinct from his Essence or did virtually flow from and consequently depend upon his Essence as its proper cause For it is manifestly absurd to conceive this pure infinite and eternall Being not to be in Act since it is a pure Act. God doth declare the incomprehensible purity of his infinite and single Being in that amazing and yet edifying text I am that I am Exod. 3. 14. as if he had said there is nothing in your God which is not God my Attributes do not differ from
rabble will not wonder that the Socinians call the Doctrine of 3. Persons and one God into question when the Papists who were baptized in the name of the Trinity professe that they beleeve the equality of three distinct Subsistences in the same divine Essence do yet notwithstanding in their writings grant as much as the Socinians need prove namely that the Doctrine of the distinction and equality of Persons in the same Divine Essence cannot be proved but by unwritten Traditions by the testimony of the Church of Rome c. and yet diverse Papists undertake to defend the doctrine of the Trinity against the Socinians though they know that the Socinians do not at all value traditions or the testimony of the Church of Rome and therefore though divers Papists write against the Socinians yet they do promote Socinianisme by their vaine doctrine of unwritten traditions Stapleton is not ashamed to deny that it can be proved out of Scripture that the Holy Ghost is God or that he is to be worshipped But Salmeron deserves commendation in this point The Scriptures saith he are therefore said to be written by divine inspiration because they instruct us in divine mysteries concerning the Vnity of God and Trinity of Persons Photius in his Bibliotheca shews that Ephraeni did not dispute of the consubstantiall Trinity out of the Testimonies of Fathers but out of the Holy Scriptures Iustin Martyr Athanasius Basil Irenaeus Cyrill Cyprian Tertullian Epiphanius Theodoret and many other of the Fathers did assert the doctrine of the Trinity and some of them did confute the Valentinians Eunomians Sabellians Photinians Arrians Macedonians Samosatenians c. out of the Holy Scriptures The Nicene Synod did urge Scripture for the maintenance of the truth which they declared in the Confession of their Faith and the Synod which met at Constantinople did the like as is most evident to such as have perused those learned and ancient Records Athanasius confounded the Arians by cleare Testimonies of Scripture and in his Book of the Decrees of the Nicene Synod he saith that the true disciples of Christ do clearly understand the doctrine of the Holy Trinity preached by divine Scripture I shall not trouble or amuse the Reader by quotations out of Cyrill Ambrose Hilary Augustine Nyssen Nazianzen or any of those Worthies but now mentioned whose labours have been ever famous in the Church of God yet I must not omit one pregnant proofe out of Augustine who appealed from the Nicene and Ariminensian Synods and challenged Maximinus to dispute with him about the great point of consubstantiality out of the Scriptures Bellarmine himself is forced to confesse that Augustine had good reason to do so because that point is cleare by Scripture but then we must likewise consider what Augustine saith upon this Argument that the thing or sense of any word may be in Scripture though the word it self be not to be found there though the words Trinity Trin-unity Consubstantial are not found in Scripture yet that which is signified by those words may be clearly proved by the holy Scriptures These three are one I and my Father are one Behold a Trinity Trin-unity Consubstantiality and all quickly proved That Rule is of great concernment and very pertinent to the point in hand which Augustine delivers in his third Book and third Chapter against Maximinus the Arian Out of those things which we read in Scripture we may collect some things which we do not read and so both understand and beleeve the thing which is delivered in other words in Scripture then those which we are now forced to use that we may confirme the Orthodox Christians and refute the gain-sayers But I am weary of this task and therefore call upon my Reader to joyne with me in searching the Scriptures that we may find out the truth for reason cannot demonstrate or comprehend these mysteries of faith and the Rule is Rationum fulcro dissoluto humana concidit authoritas CHAP. IV. This single and Eternall Godhead doth subsist in Father Son and holy Ghost without any multiplication of the Godhead WHen Gregory Nyssen undertook to confute the artificiall blasphemy of Eunomius he desired that the true God the Son of the true God and the Holy Spirit would direct him into all truth I have likewise implored the Divine assistance of the Father Son and Holy Ghost that I may open this Mystery of the single Godhead in three distinct Subsistences with faith and prudence perspicuity and reverence I consider that the Godhead is Spiritual and therefore I desire to avoid all carnal expressions in a Treatise of this nature There is a twofold knowledge of God Absolute and Relative the Absolute knowledge of the Eternal Power and Godhead is in part discovered by the works of God as hath been shewen in the first chapter but the Relative knowledge of God I speak of inward relations between the three Subsistences is not nay cannot be attained unto by the light of nature no example can illustrate no reason Angelical or humane comprehend the hidden excellency of this glorious Mystery but it is discovered to us by a Divine Revelation in the written word and therefore our faith must receive and our piety admire what our reason cannot comprehend It is fit therefore that this Grand Mystery of the Divine Trinunity should be soberly explained that it may be stedfastly beleeved and reverently applyed in all Evangelical administrations We read of the Godhead the Nature and Subsistence of God in the holy Scriptures 1. The Godhead 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Rom. 1. 20. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Coloss. 2. 9. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Acts 17. 29 I am not at leasure to play the Critique upon the words it is enough for my purpose simply to declare the truth in the most plaine and simple manner 2. The Nature of God is held forth to us in the holy Scriptures which forbid us to give Divine honour to any of those things which are not Gods by Nature Gal. 4. 8 For the Apostle in that place reproves their Idolatry and tels them that when they knew not God that is the only true God who is God by Nature because truly God they did service to them which by Nature are no Gods from whence it is easie to conclude that the only true God whom we ought to serve is God by nature and we read of the Divine Nature 2 Pet. 1. 4. of which all that are regenerate are said to be partakers because they bear his Image for else it is evident that there is an infinite distance between God grace which is not only finite but imperfect also and if it were perfected is but an accident Nay there is an infinite distance between the Nature of God and nature of man in respect of Excellency even then when the two natures are most intimately united as they are by an Hypostatical union in the person of the Lord Jesus 3.
which are two of the Affections of Ens are distinguished by their severall and peculiar relations Truth hath relation to the understanding and Goodnesse to the will The Father Son and Holy Ghost are known to be distinguished by their severall and peculiar relations and if it be not unreasonable to say that there is in Entity three affections and two relations in ente simplicissimo without any Composition in or Multiplication of the Entity why should it seem unreasonable or at least why should it seem incredible that there are three subsistences and severall relations in the Godhead without any composition in or multiplication of the Godhead 9. One affection nay all the affections in abstracto do but inadaequately represent Ens unlesse you take notice of the Entity it self as well as the three Affections One single Subsistence nay all three Subsistences in abstracto do but inadaequately represent God unlesse you take notice of the Godhead in which they subsist and therefore this praecisive abstraction of the Subsistences from the Divine nature is but an inadaequate conceit of God as hath been demonstrated above in this very Chapter for we must not dream of a Trinity of Modes but assert and believe the glorious and Coessential Trinunity The Father is truly God that God who is the only true God but the Father alone doth not adaequately represent God to us as he is described in the Holy Scriptures It is true that the Divine Essence is by the Subsistence of the Father adaequately the Father but as God is represented by that Divine subsistence only he is not Deus Trinunus he is not Father Son and Holy Ghost the Father alone is not all those three Witnesses who are one God And therefore the acute Socinians with their precise abstractions do but suggest an inadaequate conceit of God that only true God whom we worship doth not subsist only in the Person of the Father We worship God subsisting with all Absolute and Relative Perfection in Father Son and Holy Ghost for these three are that one God who is the only true God blessed for ever This is the adaequate representation of God in the Scriptures of truth And we are resolved to regulate all our Metaphysical notions by the holy Scriptures that we may make the highest of Sciences to acknowledge the supremacie of that Divine science which is nowhere to be learnt but in the Word of God for the purest reason must be elevated by the Word and Spirit of God for the discovery of this mysterie 10. These affections of Ens represent the manner of that Being which Ens hath as it is transcendently confidered and the three Divine Subsistences do represent that manner of Being which God hath as he is most transcendently considered namely as subsisting after the most glorious manner with all Absolute and Relative Perfection It is the manner of a transcendent Entity to be one and true and good and it is the manner of Gods being to be one God in three Subsistences These three are one single God there is no Composition or Multiplication imaginable in this single and infinite being I was bold to adventure upon this enquiry because so many reverend learned Orthodox and pious Doctours of the Church have declared that the Divine Essence differs from the Divine subsistences as the manner of the thing doth from the thing it self and the Persons differ from one another tanquam modi a modis I conceived that there was something more in the expression then was commonly known Moreover I considered that if there might be so great simplicity or singlenesse in a Created and finite Entity notwithstanding there are three affections and two relations which do affect that Entity it seemed to me somewhat easie to beleeve that there are three subsistences in one infinite Godhead without any composition in or multiplication of the single Godhead Finally I perceive that some youthfull towring wits are drawn away from the simplicity of the Gospel by some froathy speculations presented to them as most sublime curiosities and Metaphysicall notions and therefore I humbly submit what hath been said to the judgement of the learned and conclude this discourse with the same prayer wherewith Augustine shuts up his books of the Trinity Domine Deus unus Deus Trinitas quaecunque dixi in hoc libro de tuo agnoscant et tui si quid de meo et tu ignosce tui O Lord who art one God O God who art a whole Trinity of Persons in the Godhead what ever I have said in this discourse of thine let all that are thine acknowledge what ever I have said of mine own Lord let it be pardoned by thee and thine II. Concerning the Attributes of God we may observe that they are al perfect glorious infinite because they do signifie and declare the infinite Perfection Happinesse Majesty and glory of God and to speak higher yet these glorious Attributes though they be very many are nothing else but the single undivided indivisible Essence of God we may be instructed but are even confounded with the glory of this mystery There are three reasons why we do not readily apprehend this truth 1. The defect of words to expresse it especially in English but indeed the most rich and copious languages are onely happy in the confession of their penury when we come to treat of this argument because the mystery of the Godhead doth transcend all our eloquence and teaches us to admire and adore with silence what we cannot expresse without a manifest demonstration of our ignorance 2. The imperfect manner of signifying is easie to be observed in our most significant words and therefore we must confesse that the Excellency of God doth transcend the significancy of the most significant words in the most rich and copious tongues 3 The imperfection of our own understanding and of our manner of apprehending and judging of things whiles we are in the body If any man desire to know a reason why he cannot readily apprehend these divine Mysteries let him consider the perfection of the mystery and the imperfection of his own reason he hath a sufficient reason a reason from whence he may draw a most invincible argument against idolizing of his own reason so far as to make his reason judge of the mysteries of faith Let us then prudently consider that we are not able to apprehend the infinite and impartible Essence of God but as it were by parts by many incomplete and inadaequate conceits and apprehensions The most profound and serious schoolmen have fairely expressed this truth there are not say they many Attribut all Perfections nay there is but one Perfection in God for all the Essentiall Attributes of God are nothing else but that single and undivided Essence which is singularly and altogether the same Essence in all three subsistences Nay to speak properly the Divâ—ne
they do not consider that they themselves are finite 2. The nature of these three glorious subsistences is Independent the nature of all created subsistences is dependent and therefore it is no wonder if a dependent nature do subsist in its proper person and depend upon its proper person for sustentation but the divine Nature doth not depend upon the three subsistences for its sustentation or subsistence but all three persons do subsist in this Independent and infinite Nature Philip. 2. 6. subsisting in the Nature of God so the Scripture expresses it and we must apprehend and beleeve these holy Mysteries according to the holy Scriptures because no man hath seene God and God is the only all-sufficient Witnesse concerning his owne essence and subsistence concerning himselfe and therefore we must not think or speak otherwise of God then according to the Scriptures of truth in which God hath sufficiently and graciously revealed himself Iohn 1. 18. Matth. 16. 17. Matth. 11. 26 27. The Scriptures direct us how to distinguish uncreated persons from created persons Our finite and dependent Nature doth subsist in a created person but uncreated persons do subsist in an Infinite and Independent Nature there is a manifest difference Our nature indeed doth subsist in the divine and uncreated person of the Son of God but that is not according to the common course of nature there is a peculiar reason and another Mystery in that wonderful subsistence And yet even in that wonderfull Mystery our dependent Nature doth subsist in a person which notes its dependance and our Nature is more satisfied and quieted by subsistence in a divine then in an humane person because it hath a more glorious sustentation and is more powerfully upheld by that divine and uncreated person The divine person of Christ doth subsist in his divine Nature and the humane Nature of Christ doth subsist in his divine and onely person III. All created persons have a compounded and divisible nature but uncreated persons have a single undivided and indivisible nature The Socinians Arminians and Vorstians of this age do not love to hear any discourse of the single Nature of God in Father Son and Holy Ghost this Doctrine they say is Philosophical Scholastical Metaphysical and therefore there is nothing which concernes Faith Piety or manners in it But it is most clear and evident that all the glorious Attributes of God are united by an Eternal bond which cannot be dissolved and we have invincibly proved that they do all signifie but one single and infinite perfection If you take away the singlenesse of Gods being you take away his Incommunicable unchangable incomprehensible independent and infinite perfection This point is excellently discussed and opened by Damaseene Composition saith he doth beget strife strife may well cause a separation and separation dissolution which all who know any thing of God will acknowledge to be repugnant to the perfection of the Godhead The learned Doctours of old did consider that God is a most pure and perfect Act the first and Independent Being that he is what he is by his owne Essence and not by participation But Vorstius was bold to publish his dreames coâ—trary to the Analogy of Faith and unanimous judgment of the reverend Doctours of the Ancient Church The Socinians in their Catechisme the Arminians in their Confession and Apology are exceedingly too blame in this point The Socinians do expunge the single and infinite perfection of Gods spiritual nature out of their Catechisme that they may more securely deny the Coessentiall Trinunity of Father Son and Holy Ghost and therefore I do insist upon this difference between created and uncreated persons because if the Doctrine concerning the single and infinite perfection of Gods spirituall nature be overthrowne All the Fundamentals of the Christian Religion will be overturned God is Jehovah he is what he is by his owne Essence he can neither cease to be or to be what he is for he cannot be any other thing or any otherwise then now he is and ever was Exod. 3. 14 15. Revel 1. 8. Iames. 1. 17. Psal. 10. 2. 27. Gos is called Light and Love Life in Scripture to note the singlenesse of his being because whatsoever is in him is himself and he himself is one single infinite perfection he is light it self and in him is no darknesse at all 1 John 1. 5. God hath not such an imperfect singlenesse of being as we say is in the first matter of last difference and the like nor such a singlenesse as is in Angels or the souls of men for theirs is but a Comparative singlenesse there is some kind of composition even in the most glorious Angels God is not compounded of a Nature Atrributes and Relations as hath been shewen nor is any of the Divine Persons compounded nor can the Godhead be said to be compounded of three Persons for though the Persons be distinguished they do not compound nor can they be compounded Distinction connotes perfection because it is opposite to confusion but Composition denotes multiplicity and imperfection we must then consider that 1. The Essence of God is most perfect and therefore nothing can be added to it to make it more perfect because it is infinitely perfect 2. Whatsoever is compounded may be dissolved into the parts whereof it is compounded The Godhead cannot be dissolved because it cannot be changed 3. Whatsoever is compounded must needs be dependent both in being and in working But God is Independent Ergo. 4. The parts compounding are before the whole that is compounded but God is the Former of all things and therefore nothing can be before God The divine Essence cannot be later then it selfe or later then any thing else because it is the first and eternall being Now if neither of the Nature or Attributes of these uncreated persons nor the persons themselves be compounded nor God compounded of the Nature and Persons here is another very great difference between created and uncreated persons who have life and are life it self because they are one single perfection IV. Three created persons have three different Natures but these three uncreated Persons have the selfe same most single and singular nature Three created persons may have the same specifical nature but they have not the same singular nature created persons in respect of their specificall nature which is universall are 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of like nature but in respect of their singular nature they are 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 But now these uncreated persons are 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in respect of their singular Essence Look how many created persons there be of the same species so many singular substances there are of that species For a finite nature cannot be communicated to severall proper persons of the same species without a multiplication of
which keepeth truth for ever read and consider the six first verses of the 146. Psalme there is a great Emphasis in the sixth verse which keepeth truth for ever O let us declare it to the following generation that â—his God is our God for ever and ever and he will be our guide even unto death Psal. 48. 13 14. Happy it is for us that we are redeemed by the pretious bloud of Christ who offered up himself by by his eternall spirit his divine and eternal Nature Heb 9. 14. that he might bring in everlasting righteousnesse Dan. 9. 24. obtaine eternall redemption and purchase an eternall inheritance for us Heb. 9. 12. 15. Happy thrice happy it is for us that we are born of incorruptible seed which will abide in us for ever for we are born of the eternall spirit who will perfect his work in us and be our everlasting Comforter Finally all three uncreated Persons will be our all-sufficient and satisfactory portion and reward for ever-more IX Three Created persons have different actions and operations because they have different singular natures different powers c. as hath been shewen in this very chapter All actions of Father Son and Holy Ghost upon the creatures are undivided nay indivisible how Personall Actions ad infra differ I am to declare at large in the next chapter where I am to shew how these three glorious persons who cannot be divided are truly distinguished from one another onely before I conclude this chapter it will be requisite to note that though the Son cannot be said to beget himself yet he is not Passive in that eternall generation as hath been proved above the divine nature which is communicated to the Son by generation is the nature of the Son as well as of the Father the Father doth necessarily beget the Son in the power of that Nature and in the unity of that self-same single and indivisible Nature and that divine Nature which is communicated to the Son is not begotten by the Father but is of it self and therefore we say that Christ is God of himself though he be not a Son of himself but of the Father by eternall generation because the Father is the first principle of subsisting life I might proceed to treat of other differences that common Rule Actiones sunt suppositorum is true of divine actions and uncreated Persons but it is manifest that there are many actions of the soule of man both when it is in a state of union with and when it is in a state of separation from the body which cannot be properly and truly called actions of a person but I shall not descend so low as to take notice of such differences The nine differences which have been insisted on are all considerable And from them all we may safely conclude that the word Subsistence or Person cannot be attributed after the same maner to God Angels and men A divine Person is a Spirituall and Infinite Subsistent which must not be considered as abstracted from but as Subsisting in the Divine Nature and as related to those other Coessentiall persons from which he is sufficiently distinguished by some Personall and Incommunicable property And therefore Subsistence is attributed to God after the most excellent and glorious manner A Person signifies the most excellent kind of Subsistent an understanding subsistent as hath been shewen but then an uncreated person a divine person doth infinitely excell and transcend the person of the most glorious Angel in Heaven and therefore we must remove all those imperfections from our thoughts which are in created persons when we meditate or discouse of these divine and uncreated persons that we may think and speak according to the Analogy of faith CHAP. VII The three Vncreated Divine and Coessentiall Subsistents are sufficiently distinguished though they cannot be divided WE are now come to treat of that profound Mystery at which men and Angels stand amazed How can three be one saith the Disputer of this world or one be three Can one be distinguished again and again from himself O bold fools saith Athanasius Why do you not lay aside your curiosity and enquire no farther after a Trinity then to beleeve that there is a Trinity The Scripture saith there is but one God and the Scripture saith that the Father Son and Holy Ghost are this one God and yet the Scripture saith that the Father Son and Holy Ghost are three three and yet one three Persons and yet one God We have shewen above that the Godhead cannot be multiplyed now we are to shew that the Persons are distinguished and what kind of distinction there is between these three divine and uncreated Persons 1. These divine and uncreated Persons are sufficiently distinguished to our apprehension who ought to judge beleeve speak worship according to the Word of God 2. These uncreated Persons were truly distinguished from one another before there was any Scripture any world for the Coexistencie and distinction of these glorious Persons is eternall and therefore this distinction cannot be grounded upon the mere phrase of Scripture it is the true intent of God in severall plain expressions of Scripture to declare unto us the distinction of these divine and uncreated Persons I shall prove this point fully and clearly by certain steps and degrees 1. These uncreated Persons have distinct and proper names in the Word of God The Father the Son or the Word and the Holy-Ghost or Spirit Now that we may not be Tritheites or Sabellians let us consider that these three names do not signifie three different Natures and yet they do signifie three different Persons for it is evident that one Person cannot be praedicated of another the Father is not the Son nor is the Son the Father the Holy Ghost is not either of them nor is either of them the Holy Ghost and therefore they are three distinct Persons of the Godhead 2. These Uncreated Persons are Coequall and therefore they are distinct It is most absurd to say that the same Person is equall to himself But the Son is said to be equall to the Father Philip. 2. therefore the Son is not the Father We do usually say that the Father Son and Holy Ghost are equall in power to note a distinction of Persons but then when we speak strictly we do not say the power of the Persons is equall but we say the power of the Persons is the same to note the unity of their Essence We say the Persons are equall in power goodnesse wisdome c. to note that one person doth not exceed another in degrees of wisdom power c. because it is impossible that there should be any degrees in that which is infinite and the power wisdome c. of all the three Persons is the same infinite perfection because all three have the same infinite Essence And therefore when we look upon Power in a common notion
as referred to the divine Essence which is common to all three Persons we say it is the same power But when we look upon power in a singular notion as it is communicated after a singular manner to this or that person we say this person is equall to that in power the Father equall to the Son the Spirit equall to both to note the distinction of the Persons and not the distinction of the Power because the self-same Almighty Power is communicated to the severall persons in a severall way Power is in the Father of and from himself that is not from any other Person the same power is communicated to the Son but it is communicated to him by eternal generation and to the Spirit by eternal procession the â—ame power then is communicated to different coequall persons in a different way as we shall more fully declare before we conclude this seventh chapter 3. The Uncreated Persons are sufficiently distinguished by their number The nature of God is the first Entity the first Unity and therefore it is uncapable of number because it is most singularly single and actually infinite It is not proper if we speak strictly to say that God is one in Number we should rather say that God is one and an only one Deus non est unus Numero sed unicus But the Persons of the Godhead are three in number the Scripture speaks expressely of three These three 1 Iohn 5. 7. If any man in Athanasius his time asked how many persons subsist in the Godhead they were wont to send him to Iordan Go say they to Iordan and there you may hear and see the blessed Trinity or if you will beleeve the holy Scriptures read the third chapter of Matthew the 16 and 17. verses for there 1. The Father speaks in a voice from Heaven and owns his only begotten Son saying This is my beloved Son c. 2. The Son went down into the water and was baptized 3. The Holy Ghost did visibly descend upon Jesus Christ. In the fourteenth of Iohn we have a plain Demonstration of this truth I saith the Son will pray the Father and he shall give you another Comforter Iohn 14. 16 17. May we not safely conclude from hence that the Spirit is a distinct Person Another Person from the Father and the Son for the Text is cleare the Son will pray and the Father will give Another Comforter we know the Holy Ghost is not Another God he is the same God with the Father and the Son and therefore we must confesse that it is meant of Another Person he shall give you Another Comforter even the Spirit of truth verse 16 17. And againe in the 26. verse of the same Chapter But when the Comforter is come whom I will send unto you from the Father even the Spirit of truth What can there be more expresse or cleare The Scripture teaches us to reckon right and we see the divine Persons are reckoned three in Number One Person is not another there are diverse Persons there are three Persons the number numbred the Persons numbred are named by their distinct and proper names the number numbring is expressely set down in sacred Records We are not more exact in any accounts then we are in reckoning of witnesses whose testimony is produced in a businesse of great consequence and high concernment Now in the great question about the Messiah witnesses are produced to assure us that Iesus Christ the Son of the Virgin and the only begotten Son of God is the true Messiah the only all-sufficient Saviour of his people from their sins And there are three Witnesses named and produced for the proof of this weighty point Now one Person that hath three names or two Persons and an Attribute of one or both Persons cannot passe for three Witnesses in any fair and reasonable account we are sure God reckons right and he reckons Father Son and Holy Ghost for three Witnesses and he doth not reckon these three and the Godhead for foure as they do who dream of a Quaternity because these three are one and the same God blessed for ever Let us then be exact in observing since the Holy Ghost is so exact in making of the account In the eighth of Iohn the Pharisees object that our Saviour did bear record of himself and did conclude from thence that therefore his record was not true Iohn 8. 13. Our Saviour answers in the next verse Though I beare record of my self yet my record is true for I am not alone but I and the Father that sent me And it is written in your Law that the testimony of two men is true I am one that beare witnesse of my self and the Father that sent me beareth witnesse of me It is most clear and evident by this discourse that our blessed Lord did make a fair legall just account for he cites the Law concerning the validity of a testimony given in by two witnesses and then he reckons his Father for one witnesse and himself for another I am one saith he and my Father is Another I and my Father make two sufficient Witnesses in a just and legall account There is Another saith he that beareth witnesse of me and I know that the witnesse which he witnesseth of me is true Iohn 5 32. There is Another saith he he doth not meane another God for when he speaks of his power and Godhead he saith I and my Father are one Iohn 10. 30. Christ and his Father are one God but Christ and his Father are two distinct Persons for they are reckoned as two distinct witnesses and one Person must not be reckoned for two witnesses There is Another that bears witnesse Iohn 5. 32. and the Father himself v. 37. bears witnesse of me Well then Christ is one witness the Father is another and the Holy Ghost is a third witness 1 Iohn 5. 7. we see the Holy Ghost speaks as plainly in this point as we do when we teach a child to tell one two and three For there are three that bear record in Heaven the Father the Word and the Holy Ghost and these three are one If we peruse the Scriptures diligently as we ought we shall finde that these Witnesses are three Persons who are one and the same blessed God They are one in nature though three in subsistence to shew that these three Persons are not to be reckoned as three men are who have three distinct singular natures really divided and separated for these three glorious Persons subsist in one another and have one and the same single undivided and indivisible nature and they are three Witnesses three Persons truly distinct Iohn 1. 14 18. cap 5 3â— cap. 14 16. IV. The divine Persons are distinguished by their inward and personall actions The Father did from all Eternity communicate the living Essence of God to the Son in a
this time he sees how easie it is to retort his owne Argument and if this retortion may helpe him to answer it I shall be glad that I have retorted it His onely answer ought to be I doe beleeve that these three are three Subsistents in the same single and infinite Godhead Phil. 2. 6. Joh. 10. 30. 1 Joh. 5. 7. Heb 1. 3. Vorstius Valentinus Gentilis the Transylvanians require some more curious answer but I shall be as plaine and as briefe as the weight and depth of this Mystery will permit me to be I remember that Aristotle saith He doth make a truth sufficiently plaine who brings such proofes as the point in question will beare Now it is most evident that supernaturall Mysteries cannot be expounded according to the rules of Art Some returne this answer That if by Tres Res three reall things you meane three persons there are three Real persons in the Godhead they are not made three by a fiction of reason they are declared three by the plaine words of Scripture but they were three before any Scripture was written even from the dayes of eternity But if by Tres Res three reall things you meane three Divine Essences we do deny that three persons are three Divine Essences or three Gods for these three persons are but one God blessed for ever If you aske others they will say that these three are one Being but they are three proper and peculiar manners of being subsisting in the same God-head They have one essentiall subsistence say others but they have three Incommunicable manners of subsisting Some expresse it thus these three are Really distinct but not Essentially Modally but not separably Truly but Relatively Formally and yet but Personally Others that meane the same thing say they are distinguished Secundum esse Personale non secundum esse Quidditativum They then that say the persons are Really distinct should explain themselves warily according to some of these or the like safe expressions namely that by really 1 they doe not meane essentially 2. They do not mean separably 3. That by really they doe meane that the Relations and personall properties whereby the three persons are known to be distinguished are reall relations and reall properties and not fictions of reason The Relations are opposite the properties incommunicable and much might be said of the personall actions to the selfe-same purpose but I must hasten Some do adventure to call this distinction naturall but that is a very dangerous expression it must not passe without some favourable graines of allowance nor can it then passe unlesse it be seasoned with some graines of Salt and be mollified with some faire and Orthodox Interpretation By naturall distinction they meane Relative because say they the relations which are between these uncreated persons are not onely real but naturall also The Relation between God the Father and his owne naturall Son is a naturall relation grounded upon a naturall and personall actâ—on namely the eternall generation of the Son The Greek Fathers speake much of the Familiar and proper Emphasis of this naturall Relation between the Father and the Son By naturall distinction then they do not meane an essentiall distinction as if the three uncreated persons did differ in nature but naturall in that sound and Orthodox sense recited above I had rather leave my Margin to relate the curiosities of others then to perplex a meer English Reader with any Scholastical difficulties I have said enough for the explication of those termes which are most usuall and yet likely to give offence to such as do not understand the importance of them I shall therefore conclude this point with Fulgentius his Commentary which is an excellent Contexture of some pertinent Scriptures for the proofe of the point When you read saith he of Father Son and Spirit understand that there are three persons of one essence omnipotence eternity c. For our Saviour saith I am not alone but I and the Father that sent me Ioh. 8 16. And concerning the spirit he saith And I will pray the Father and he will give you another Comforter even the spirit of Truth Joh. 14. 16 17. Moreover he commanded his Apostles to baptize all Nations in the name of the Father Son and Holy Ghost And the equality of the Persons proves the unity of the Nature Phil. 2. 6. Iohn 5. 18. and from hence he concludes that there are three Persons and not three Natures in the blessed Trinity From what hath been said it is evident that these three uncreated Persons are truly distinguished but they cannot be divided and it is not so safe to expresse the distinction of uncreated Persons by Termes of Art They who say the distinction is Naturall Reall Absolute or Relative do deny that the distinction is Essentiall or that the Persons are separable They who speak most tenderly say it is Modall Formall Personall They who say it is Naturall in respect of Personall Relations and Naturall Actions confesse that it is Supernaturall and Mysterious because the Unity of the Godhead is unquestionable the Trinity of Persons subsisting in that Godhead admirable both put together undeniable and inexplicable and yet most necessarily and highly credible They who say the Persons are Formally distinct do mean that they are truly distinct they do not conceive that the distinction of the uncreated Persons is grounded upon a meer fiction of reason or upon the weaknesse of our apprehension as if we did conceive one Person to be three Persons because he is called by three names as Praxeas Sabellius and some others dreamt Nor do they beleeve that this distinction of these three uncreated Persons is only grounded upon the phrase of Scripture but they do acknowledge that there is a true and proper not an improper and figurative distinction between these uncreated Persons nay they all confesse that this true and proper distinction is an Eternall distinction it was from and it will last to all eternity and therefore is not grounded only upon some offices and externall dispensations which have respect unto the creature CHAP. VIII The Grand Mystery of three Divine and Coessential Subsistents in the single Godhead is not Problematicall but Fundamentall ALL points of Doctrine revealed in Scripture are profitable and precious truths and every man is obliged to receive beleeve and embrace every truth made known to him in and by the holy Scriptures Because all truths contained in Scripture are of equall credit in respect of the Authority of the Revealer but all truths are not of equall necessity weight and importance in respect of the Nature and Matter of the points revealed There is a vast difference between the nature matter weight and importance of these two Propositions 1. Paul left his Cloak Books and Parchments at Troas 2 Tim. 4. 13. 2. Jesus Christ is God and man the only Mediatour between God and man the only and All-sufficient Saviour of
his people from their sins The first of these Propositions cannot be refused because it is grounded upon clear Scripture and he who rejects a point of the least concernment which he knowes to be revealed in Scripture doth not indeed and truth beleeve and embrace any truth at all no not truths which are of the highest concernment upon the right ground and true reason namely because God hath revealed them to us in the holy Scriptures of truth A Fundamentall point is of such high concernment that whosoever is ignorant of it is condemned for his meere Negative Infidelity and whosoever doth refuse to beleeve it is condemned for his Positive Infidelity because he rejects a truth delivered upon the Authority of God and a truth so highly credible that it is necessary to be known and beleeved for his own salvation Our Faith Piety Hope Charity Salvation are all grounded upon these necessary and Fundamentall truths Those truths or points of Doctrine are Fundamentall without the plaine and expresse knowledge whereof we can neither savingly beleeve in Christ nor rightly worship God in Christ to the obtaining of eternall life The Grand Mystery of three Divine and Coessential Subsistents in the single Godhead is a Fundamentall point I desire to make this point very plain 1. For the satisfaction of the weak 2. Information of the ignorant 3. Conviction of the obstinate 4. Edification of the meek and humble It is most cleare and evident that it doth highly concerne Christians to acknowledge 1. A Deity against the Atheists 2. The Unity of this Deity against the Pagans 3. A Trinity in this Unity against Turks Jewes Heretiques both Ancient and Modern We must 1. Know 2. Beleeve 3. Acknowledge 4. Worship 5. Obey 6. Trust to and depend upon three Persons and one God Our blessed Lord in that excellent prayer of his which is most largely recorded Iohn 17. saith That this is life eternall to know the Father the only true God and Jesus Christ whom he hath sent ver 3. This Text hath been opened and vindicated at large in this Book already from the 44. page to the 54. and therefore I shall make quick work now and desire you but to compare this Text with 1 Iohn 5. 20. We are in him that is true even in his Son Jesus Christ. This is the true God and eternall life both texts tell us that it is eternall life for to beleeve that the Father and the Son are the only true God and therefore this is a fundamentall point And the Scripture speakes expresly that these three the Father the Word and the Holy Ghost are one one God for the witnesse or testimony delivered by these three is the witnesse of God 1 Joh. 5. 7. 9. But it is objected by some that the words These three are one 1 Joh. 5. 7. are not to be found in some ancient Copies and therefore it will not be safe to build a point of such weight and consequence upon such a weake foundation To which we answer It is true that these words are not to be found in the Syriack Edition but they who speake most modestly do acknowledge that the Syriack Edition is not Authentick Learned Heinsius is much offended with that Edition as appeares by his Annotations upon 1 Ioh. 5. 7. And if we consult the Scriptures and compare this Text with the following Verses and with some other places of Scripture which are more plaine and then adde the testimony and Interpretations of the ancient and Reverend Doctors of the Church concerning the words in question we shall be able to passe a right judgement upon the point in hand 1. The equality of the Number of witnesses suites very right three witnesses on earth and three in heaven 2 The opposition between the quality of the witnesses witnesses on earth and witnesses in heaven and yet their sweet harmony and agreement in one testimony all six beare witnesse to one and the same truth 3. The diversity of the very nature of those three who beare witnesse on earth and the unity of their divine nature who bear witnesse in heaven is very considerable and it is excellently expressed in the variation of the Phrase These three are one ver 7. and these three agree in one namely in one testimony ver 8. Though their Nature be different yet their Testimony is the same But it is objected that the Complutensian Bible saith of the heavenly witnesses that these three agree in one ver 7. I humbly offer this satisfaction to pious and learned men That we have good reason to beleeve that there is an imprudent addition in the Complutensian Bible rather then an omission of so many ancient and approved Bibles and therefore it is fit that that addition should be expunged out of that one Copy by the concurrent testimony of so many Copies Moreover it is cleer by the joynt testimony of other Copies that the words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 are omitted in the 7 ver and the words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 belong to the eight verse and therefore there is an inexcusable omission and an imprudent transposition in that corrupt edition But then it is farther objected that these words These three are one are wanting in some other Greek copies for answer I proceed in my observations 4. If we look upon the Scripture account in other places we shall find it exactly agreeable to the account in this place 1 Ioh. 5. 7. In the eighth of Iohn our Saviour pleads that two witnesses in Law were sufficient for the proof of any point Joh. 8. 17. and in the tenth verse saith he I am one and my Father that sent me is another they are two witnesses and yet but one God I and my Father are one Joh. 10. 30. One in power and therefore one in nature He speaks not of the spirit because Christ was not yet glorified nor was the Spirit yet manifested by that eminent and glorious mission and effusion which was to follow after the Ascension of our blessed Lord. But he did foretell that the third witnesse was to be sent from the Father by the Son Joh. 15. 26. But when the comforter is come whom I will send unto you from the Father even the spirit of truth which proceedeth from the Father he shall testifie of me I might adde to these testimonies all other places of Scripture wherin all the three witnesses are named together and then produce all the places which have been formerly cited in this booke to prove the coessential Trin-unity of those heavenly witnesses 5. The copulative And in the beginning of the verse 1 Ioh. 5. 8. doth very fitly connect the whole seventh verse with the eighth as they are printed in our ordinary translation 6. Hierome doth assure us that the words in question were expunged by the Arrians because these few words do hold forth an undeniable proofe of the divine and
brings in a Christian Catechising the heathens in the Doctrine of the Trinity 3. The forme of Baptism strictly observed in the Churches notwithstanding the great ignorance and contention in the East and the grand Apostacy in the West doth sufficiently prove that this Doctrine of the Trinity had taken deep root in the minds of men and that they were by the providence and speciall grace of God very diligent and faithfull in communicating of it to their posterity from time to time 4. The Doxology or as some call it the Hymn of glory doth evince the same and therefore the Arrians endeavoured to make an alteration in the Doxology and instead of saying Glory be to the Father and to the Son and to the Holy-Ghost they said Glory be to the Father By the Son and In the Spirit from whence we may observe by the way that if we suffer the Fundamentall Doctrine of our Faith to be corrupted we shall not be able to preserve the Fundamentals of our worship pure and uncorrupt 5. The Form of Apostolicall Benediction which stands upon record 2 Cor. 13. 14. doth cleerly hold forth the Doctrine of the Trinity to be a Fundamentall both of Faith and Worship And all who desire the grace of our Lord Iesus Christ the love of God the communion of the Holy-Ghost for their everlasting comfort salvation must beleeve and adore all three as onâ— God blessed for ever 6. All who beleeve in God are commanded to beleeve in Christ as God as one and the same God with the Father Ye beleeve in God beleeve also in me Joh. 14. 1. They are commanded to honour the Son as they honour the Father Joh. 5 23. And therfore the Doctrine of the divine person of Christ as Coessential with his Father is a Fundamentall both of Faith and worship 7. The Doctrine of the incarnation of the Word the naturall and proper Son of God the Doctrines of Christs satisfaction of our Redemption and justification by Christ as an all-sufficient Saviour are Fundamentall Doctrines necessary to be known beleeved and embraced for our eternall Salvation for we know the blood of a meere man cannot give satisfaction to the justice of God for those grosse affronts injuries and abuses which have been offered by man to the infinite Majesty of God The Church of God is purchased with the blood of God Act. 20. 28. And if Christ hath not redeemed the Church with the blood of God then the Church is not redeemed your Faith and our preaching are both vain because you and we are yet in our sins for then God hath not received satisfaction for our sins nor a sufficient ransome for our souls If the Son of God did not take flesh then was not God manifested in the flesh then the whole mystery of godlinesse which should be without controversie great and precious in the eyes of Christians will be cheap and vile and of no account for the whole mystery of godlinesse 1 Tim. 3. 16. depends upon the manifestation of God in the flesh Now the divine person of the Son took flesh the person of the Father was not incarnate 8. It is not enough to beleeve that the Son of Mary is risen from the dead we must beleeve that the Son of God is risen Rom. 1. 3 4. It is Iesus our Lord that rose for our justification Rom. 4. 24 25. Rom. 10. 9. 9. It is not sufficient to beleeve that there is a man sitting at the right hand of God we must beleeve that Iehovah sits there Psal. 110. 1. Mat. 22. 43 44 45. And the like must be said of our Advocate he must be such a one as can plead the worthinesse of his person the merit of his obedience and sufferings one who is able to save us to the uttermost Heb. 7. 25. 1 Ioh. 2. 1. 2 One who can plead with some Authority Majesty Father I will that they also whom thou hast given me be with me where I am Ioh. 17. 24. He speaks with Authority I will he speaks like a Coessentiall and Coequall person and it is for the glory of the Father to beleeve that the Father is in the Son and the Son in the Father that the Son is Lord equal to the Father Ioh. 14. 10 11. Phil. 2. 6 11. Many arguments more might be collected from divers places of Scripture cited above in the fourth chapter of this book and I shall enlarge upon this argument in the ninth Chapter 10. The Holy Ghost is the same God with the Father and Son the same object of divine Faith and Evangelical worship the same Author of the Scriptures and all-saving Grace Mat. 28. 19. 1 Cor. 12. 6. 11. 2 Cor. 13. 14. Through the Son and by the spirit we have accesse to the Father Eph. 2. 18. All Church administrations are to be performed in the power of the Holy Ghost and are made acceptable by the merit of the Lord Iesus Christ. If we will heare the Spirit speaking in the Scriptures to the Churches if we feel the Spirit Sanctifying of our hearts if we do not desire to undermine the foundation of the Christian Church and so overthrow the Church of Christ if we do not renounce our Christian Faith and our Baptisme the Sacrament thereof if we do not reject the fundamentall blessing the best portion of our selves and little ones the grace of Christ the love of God and communion of the Spirit why then I beseech you as the Apostle doth for the Lord Iesus Christs sake and for the love of the Spirit Rom. 15. 30. and for the glory of God the Father Phil. 2. 11. that you will beleeve adore embrace love and obey the Father Son and Holy Ghost as three Divine and Coessentiall Subsistents in the single God-head as one God blessed for ever the adaequate object and Authour of your Faith hope love and happinesse I do not desire to obtrude any thing upon the acutest disputant as Fundamentall that is curious or unnecessary Nay there are many things necessary for the maintenance of â—his truth and refutation of contrary errors when we are to deal with subtile Hereticks which I do not set before the common people as food fit to nourish them and for that reason I do desire them that they will look upon much of my sixth chapter and of some other chapters in this booke as â—t for the direction of young Scholers in this weighty point for I find young wits apt to be seduced by Logicall subtilities or rather fallacies Metaphysical notions Poetical raptures nice distinctions and vaine curiosities from the simplicity of the Gospel of Christ and therefore I have taken some pains in divers chapters but specially in the margine for the direction of hopefull youths who have been too often entangled and ensnared by Socinian fallacies and at last tempted into loud and hideous blasphemies We do therefore lay down these plain truths as necessary to be known and beleeved for the
maintaining of saving communion with God 1. That God is For he who commeth unto God must beleeve that God is Heb. 11. 6. 2. That there is but one God Deut. 6. 4. 3. That the Father Son and Holy Ghost are this one God because they are all three Coessentiall subsistents in this most single Godhead 1 Cor. 8. 5. 6. Phi. 2. 6. 1 Io 5. 7 Ioh. 10. 30. Mat. 3. 16 17. Mat. 28. 19. Act. 5. 4. 1 Cor. 12. 6. 11. 2 Cor. 13. 14. Ioh. 15. â—6 Rev. 1. 4. 5. Reverend Calvin was not so morose and austere in this point as to contend about unnecessary words or curious phrases so there were such words used as did fitly and fully expresse the whole mistery of Faith in this weighty point and sufficiently refute the damnable errours of Arrius and Sabellius If men will but acknowledge 1. That the Father Son and Spirit are one God and the selfe same God 2. That the Son is not the Father nor the Spirit the Son but that these three are distinguished by speciall Relations Incommunicable and unchangeable properties so that there is a Trinity of Coessentiall Subsistents in the selfe-same Divine Essence we are all agreed Arrius would acknowledge that Christ is God buâ— not Consubstantiall or Coessentiall with his Father for he did deny Christ to be the same God with his Father And in like manner the Socinians will say that they acknowledge and maintaine the true Divinity of the Son and Holy Ghost but they do deny that the Son and Spirit are one and the same God with the Father and affirme that the Reformed Churches who beleeve that all three persons have the selfe same God-head do ascribe a false and imaginary God-head to the Son and Spirit which the Holy Scriptures do no where acknowledge or declare And this is the true reason why the Orthodox Doctors of the Church have been so unanimous especially of late yeares in maintaining this Proposition Pater Filius Spiritus Sanctus sunt 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Father Son Holy Spirit are one and the self-same God On the other side Sabellius acknowledged that the Father Son and Holy Ghost are one God but if you say that the Father Son and Holy Ghost are three different subsistents then he cryed out as M. Fry doth that you acknowledge three Gods the best way to avoid these saith judicious Calvin is to say That there is a Trinity of Persons in one and the same essence of God For we must needs acknowledge the unity of the Divine nature because we read that the Father Son and Spirit are one and we must acknowledge the Trinity of these Coessentiall Subsistents or persons because we read that they are three Now the Trinity and unity make a Coessential Trinunity if the unity of the God-head and Trinity of the Subsistents or persons be acknowledged we shall not wrangle about curious phrases or unnecessary words The most judicious and moderate men amongst the Orthodox Doctors of the Church agree in this The learned and Reverend Doctor Davenant in his judicious exhortation to Brotherly Communion betweene the Protestant Churches teaches us how to distinguish between points that are fundamentall and Problems or Propositions that are not Fundamentall and when he comes to reckon up Fundamentals he instances in the Trinity and expresses himself after this manner That God is one in Essence three in Persons distinguished betwixt themselves That the Son is begotten of the Father That the Holy Spirit is the Spirit of the Father and the Son That these three persons are coeternall and coequall All these saith he are deservedly determined and ranked amongst the Fundamentall Articles Now if any should contend that all those things which are disputed of the School-men of the manner of proceeding and begetting are also fundamentall and necessary to be determined on one side verily he by this his rash judgement would gaine no favour with Christ. But it is objected by some who do acknowledge Christ to be God that they have no reason to close with us when we say That Iesus Christ is Coessentiall with God his eternall Father because we do impose a new word upon them and so make a new Fundamentall of our own Inventition to which I answer 1. That if we make an old truth plaine by a new word they ought to forgive us that injury 2. We explaine our new Terme 3. We save them the trouble of an artificiall and tedious deduction for as soon as they do but understand the word they must necessarily imbrace the sense and acknowledge that though the word seem new to them yet the Doctrine is old for if the persons be of a different Divine Essence then there would be more Gods then one 4. We doe hereby secure them against the subtilty of pernicious Hereticks who endeavour to seduce them into damnable Heresies For if the Father Son and Spirit have not the same Divine Essence then either there will be more Gods then one or else the Son and Spirit are no Gods at all but such petty inferiour Gods as the Socinians make them 5. No man that hath a sound braine and a single eye can conceive that there are divers Gods in the same Essence and therefore the expression is necessary and safe The Father Son and Spirit are three Coesential subsistents in the same single God-head they are all three one and the selfe-same God who is God by nature the only true God blessed for ever in this Faith we will live and in this we will dye as it becomes Orthodox Christians who were bâ—ptized in the Name of the Father Son and Holy Ghost CHAP. IX This Grand Mystery of Faith hath an Effectuall influence into the Practical Mystery of Godlinesse and Power of Religion IT is the great designe and faithfull endeavour of sincere Christians to attaine unto all riches of the full assurance of understanding to the acknowledgement of the Mystery of God and of the Father and of Christ Colos. 2. 2. They who have but a Forme of Godlines 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a kind of painted powerlesse shaddow of piety may look upon the Doctrine of the Trinity as a School-point a meer speculative Doctrine which men receive by Tradition from their fore-fathers but they who live in the spirit and walke in the spirit Gal. 5. 25. have a life that is hid with Christ in God Colos 3. 3. hid from formall men as colours are hid from blind men and these spirituall Christians do account the love of the Father the grace of Christ and the communion of the Spirit to be their Heaven upon earth They receive Iesus Christ so as to live by him walke in him and live to him Colos. 2. 6. Phil. 1. 21 1 Ioh. 5. 12 2 Cor. 5. 15. What is a Godly life but a life of faith and love of joy and thankfulnesse of self-denyall and devotion of patience and obedience hope
his Father loves them and â—ears good wil to them The Father himself loves you Ioh. 16. 27 and Christ gave himselfe for to deliver us from sin and the World Death and Hell according to the will of God and our Father Gal. 1. 4. And God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten Son that whosoever beleeveth c. II. God the Son is the object of our Faith Ioh. 14 1. Ye beleeve in God beleeve also in me even the very Jews did beleeve in God they who are Christians indeed beleeve in Christ also For this end the whole Gospel was written that men might be perswaded to beleeve that Iesus is the Christ the Son of God Joh. 20. 31 and that the belief of this grand point is necessary and effectual unto salvation is presently declared in the very same verse that beleeving ye might have life through his Name I0 â—0 31. And this is the record that God hath given to us eternal life this life is in his Son He that hath the Son hath life and he that hath not the Son hath not life These things have I written to you that beleeve on the name of the Son of God that ye may know that ye have eternal life and that ye may beleeve on the name of the Son of God Ioh. 5. 11 12 13. And if God give us an understanding to know this the knowing of beleeving and living in Iesus Christ the Son of God the true God will be effectuall unto life eternal And we know that the Son of God is come and hath given us an understanding that we may know him that is true and we are in him that is true even in his Son Iesus Christ. This is the true God and eternal life 1 Ioh. 5. 20. It is for want of spirituall understanding if we do not discern that all our hopes of salvation are built upon the Sonship Godhead of Iesus we must beleeve in Christ as he is the naturall proper Son of God as he is the true God the self-same God with the Father 1. We must beleeve in Christ as he is the Naturall and Proper Son of God because this is exactly answerable to that deare and fatherly relation of God the Father of which we have discoursed so largely in this chapter For as we are encouraged to beleeve in God as the Father of Christ so are we encouraged to beleeve in Christ as the naturall Son of God and therefore I have purposely insisted on such Scriptures as do evidently demonstrate this truth That we are to beleeve on the name of the Son of God and to have life through his name 1 Joh. 5. 11 12 13 20. Joh. 20. 31. We are to beleeve in Christ as a Mediatour that our faith and hope may be setled in God Who by him do beleeve in God that raised him up from the dead that your Faith and hope might be in God 1 Pet 1. 21. Now the great encouragement to beleeve in Christ as an all-sufficient Mediator is this Iesus Christ is the naturall Son of God and therefore if Christ will but present us to his Father we are confident that the Son of God his natural Son his proper Son his only begotten Son will prevaile with his Father for us his relation to God and his interest in God doth assure us that the intercession of our High-Priest will be irresistible undenyable Christ glorified not himself to be made an High-Priest but he that said unto him Thou art my Son to day have I begotten thee As he saith also in another place Thou art a Priest for ever after the order of Melchise dech Heb. 5. 5 6. We must for the understanding of this Scripture compare three places together Psa. 1â—0 1. 4. Psa. 2. 2 7 8. Heb. 7. 25 28. The Lord said unto my Lord sit thou at my right hand Thou art a Priest Psa. 110. 1. 4. The Lord said Thou art my Son ask of me Psal. 2. 7 8. Aske what thou wilt I can deny thee nothing thou art my Son it is thy birth-right to be a Priest and it is proper for a Priest to aske and intercede Other High-Priests were men of infirmity but the Son who is consecrated and perfected for evermore is able by his powerfull intercession to save those to the uttermost who come unto God by him Heb. 7. 25 28. Nay all the offices of Christ are grounded on his Sonship his kingly power Psal. 2. I have set my King c. Thou art my Son ver 6 7. His Propheticall power is grounded on his Sonship also Mat. 17. 5. And behold a voice out of the cloud which said This is my beloved Son in whom I am well pleased heare ye him I have promised that ye shall be all taught of God and therfore I send my own naturall Son to teach and instruct you he is the great Prophet and Tutor of the Church hear ye him and beleeve in him for he is the true Messiah who is to teach you all things and I haue sent him on purpose for to instruct you And this is the work of God that ye beleeve on him whom he hath sent Joh. 6. 29. But enough of this because I have spoken something of it already in the seventh chapter of this book and cleerly proved that Christ could not have gone thorough with any of his divine Offices if he had not been the Natural and Proper Son of God equal to God read Nathaniels Creed Ioh. 1. 4â— and Pauls life of Faith Gal. 2. ver 20. 2. We must beleeve in Christ as God the self-same God with the Father When we know Christ to be God we must glorify him as God by beleeving in him Now I have by many undenyable Arguments proved Christ to be God and therefore I may safely conclude that we ought to beleeve in him as God for cursed is he who beleeves in an arme of flesh When Peter preached to Cornelius he told them that Jesus Christ was Lord of all Act 10. 36. Iudge of all ver 42. And that all the Prophets gave witnesse to him that through his name whosoever beleeveth in him shall receive remission of sins ver 43. I need say no more but this He that abideth in the Doctrine of Christ he hath both the Father and the Son The second Epistle of Iohn the ninth verse Every tongue must confesse that Iesus Christ is Lord to the glory of God the Father Phil 2. 11. The Father is glorifyed in the Son Joh 14. 13. And the Son is to be glorifyed in all them whom the Father hath given him Iohn 17. 10. and Christ is to be glorified by their beleeving in him Joh. 17. 23. And the Father himselfe loves them because they beleeve in the Son Joh. 16. 27. And he who honoureth not the Son honoureth not the Father Joh.
well call upon him for new miracles Nay the very preservation of the Scriptures in despight of Tyrants Heretiques and Divels is a convincing miracle In a word the Testimony of the Penmen is sealed 1. By the Oath of God 2. By the blood of Christ 3. By the testimony of the Spirit 4. By the Efficacy of the Spirit The Testimony and Efficacy of the Spirit is that sweet Subject which I am now more especially engaged to insist upon the Testimony of the Spirit to the heart and conscience of every true beleever in particular is a convincing Testimony But it will be said that this is such an Argument as none can take notice of and therefore altogether insufficient to perswade other men to beleeve to whom no such Testimony hath been vouchsafed 1. I answer This is an Argument indeed whereby I cannot convince others but this is an Argument which makes all other Arguments effectual to convince me 2. The Efficacy of the Spirit in the word upon the hearts of enemies is very considerable Their minds are inlightned their judgements convinced their consciences awakened terrifyed their hearts smitten because the very thoughts of their hearts are strangely unexpectedly discovered their souls embowelled and their marrow as it were melted in their bones by this almighty spirit speaking testifying working in with the word the very letter kils them the very savour confounds them though bold Athiests scoffe at the word and do in their Jovial fits blaspeme the spirit yet sometimes their hearts quake their joynts tremble even as Belshazzars did at the very sight of the hand-writing when they do but glance their eye upon some startling Text. Their consciences do often joyne with the word and spirit against themselvs against their wils for though they be self-willed yet they are after some soule-searching Admonition self-confounded and selfe-condemned men Tit. 3. 10 11. And though the malice of some men bee too strong for their wit reason and conscience yet it is not too strong for the spirit in the Word all the powers of Hel in them are over-powred by this good Spirit all the strong-holds of Sathan batterd and they themselves so confounded that they seeme to be even damned already they thinke themselves in Hell above-ground when they are stung and bitten they fall into the passion of the heart and are taken with such Hellish convulsion-sits that they do even foam at mouth and gnash with their teeth they are cut to the soule and tormented in their conscience they cry and howle and fight against the Spirit but all in vain for even they are out-witted and over-powred who are not converted by this stinging Efficacy of the Almighty Spirit What shall we say to these things If Idols have been overthrown Oracles silenced Divels convinced by the Majesty of the Spirit in the holy Scriptures and so over awed by the Spirit that they have been forced to confesse nay beleeve these truths at which they tremble then surely those bold theists are worse then devils who do not tremble at the Word because they do not beleeve the Spirit 3. Look upon a soule in its Agony and Pangs in its Throws and conflicts at its first conversion or in its After-throws upon some sadrelapse and observe how the wit is captivated reason conquered conscience confounded heart broken and will turned nay all the powers of corrupt nature overpowred and overturned by the word and spirit of God And then you must needs cry out O the divine Efficacy of Scripture which turns a Lyon into a Lamb a Goat into a sheep a man a Beast a Divel into a Saint and perswades Philosophers and Courtiers Emperours and souldiers Publicans and Harlots Mariners and Politicians to embrace a Religion and run a course clean contrary to the carnall and Divelish wisdome of their proud reason contrary to the stubborn resolutions of their perverse wils in a word contrary to their very nature education custome contrary to dictates of policy and reasons of state contrary to their passions lusts interests friends CoÌ„panions O victorious spirit What aileth what aileth thee O thou man of war and pride thou Secretary of nature Advocate of the Devil to hâ—ng the head and weep to resigne thy estate lay down thy Commission and thy Armes burn thy Conjuring-books and sacrifice thy dearest life in the maintenance of that truth which thou hast formerly contemned I must cry as he did 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 This is the power of the Word Behold the Efficacy of the Spirit in the word conquering and triumphing over the subtilty and obstinacy the pride and malignity of carnal men The promises of God are better then all the proffers of Sathan the divel shewes us the glory of the world the Scripture shewes us the vanity of the world and the conscience is convinced by the word and Spirit that the reversion of Heaven is infinitly better then the possessions of earth all the kingdomes of the world and glory of them are not worth one dayes Communion with Jesus Christ nay one dayes comfort from the Gospel and Spirit of Jesus Christ. Good reason have we then to beleeve the Spirit Angels admire and Divels tremble at the Majesty of the word Saints beleeve obey adore the Majesty of the Spirit speaking in the word of truth and life of grace and glory The Familists might learn by this sad discourse to beleeve the Spirit of God speaking in the word of God and not beleeve their own natural carnal phantastical spirits which contradict the word and spirit of God The Familists did learn of the Papists to call Orthodox Protestants Scripture men to scoffe at them as Scripture-wise and to say as Stapleton and divers others do that the most diligent conference of Scriptures is the ready way to the most damnable errours That the fountains of Greek and Hebrew are neither pure nor necessary and the like And yet Howlet in his Epistle to Queen Elizabeth did lay the sin of the Family of love to the charge of the Protestants But Dr. Raynolds our learned Champion in his conference with Hart doth vindicate the Protestants and make it evident that such as were godly and learned in the Scripture did detest Harry Nicolas that imp of Sathan and master of the Family of Love therfore they could not lay the Families sinto our charge as if we did foster that venemous vipers brood I keep to the Doctors own expressions that you may see how the zeal of that meek Moses was enflamed in this contest which did march into the field with Papists to strengthen their hands against Protestants The Anabaptists likewise might learn from hence to make the spirit speaking in the word the Judge of their pretended Revelations if they were not too conceited of their own inventions and apt to fall in love with the dreams of their own feaverish brain with their weak arguments but strong delusions The
Arminians the constant enemies of the Grace of God should consider that the Pelagians the advocates of Free-wil and corrupt nature were confounded with those plain Scriptures which were urged by the Councels of Carthage Milevis Orenge and Holy Augustine in his fragrant works The Socinians the enemies of the onely true God Father Son and Holy Ghost should consider that the Arrians were overthrown by the Scriptures in the Nicene councel and by the godly Pastours of the Church who instead of broken Scriptures which the Arians urged with as much fraud as the devil did Mat. 4. produced plain Scriptures and the whole Series of both Testaments and so did invincibly refute their blasphemous errours The Libertines who claym a liberty of publishing damnable Heresies and blasphemies under pretence of Prophesying might learn that where the Spirit of the Lord is there is liberty true liberty but no where else for he who protends to speak by the Holy Ghost and yet denies Iesus to be the Lord doth at once blaspheme Christ and the Holy Spirit and is an Anti-spiritual Lyar an Antichristian Blasphemer and hath neither Father Son nor Spirit dwelling in him For he who speaks by the Spirit doth acknowledge Jesus to be the Lord 1 Cor. 12. 3. And he who denies the Son hath not the Father Who is a lyer but he who denies that Iesus is the Christ He is Antichrist who denies the Father and the Son whosoever denies the Son the same hath not the Father 1 Jo. 2. 22 23. In like manner every Spirit which confesseth not that Iesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God but of Antichrist 1 Joh. 4. 2 3. This is that Vorstian liberty which hath undone so many Nations already and is now Idolized in England under the name of Liberty of Conscience by such as have neither Conscience nor liberty Reverend Dr. Sibbs did exceedingly cry out against this kind of Liberty in his time He would not have way given to Vorstian lawlesse licencious liberty of prophesie that every one so soone as he is big of some new conceit should bring forth his abortive Monster for then the Pillars of Christian Faith will soon be shaken and the Church of God which is an house of Order will beâ—ome a Babel an house of Confusion The dolefull issues of which pretended Liberty we see in Polonia Transylvania and in Countries neerer hand I might proceed but this is sufficient for a taste and if I should but name all the errours of this age and not confute them I should abuse my Reader and therefore I desire to stop in time and beseech all that are spiritually minded to heaâ—ken to the Spirit speaking in the word Beloved beleeve not every spirit but beleeve the Holy Spirit who is the Author of the Scriptures the Author of Faith the Iudge of Controversies the interpreter of the Scriptures the Doctor and comforter of the Elect and he will lead you into all necessary truth for your present edification and everlasting Salvation The Holy Spirit will assure you that the Scriptures of truth were all written by his own Authority and you may safely set to your seale when you have received the infallible testimony of the Holy Ghost We are witnesses of these things saith the â—postle and so is the Holy-Ghost also Act. 5. 32. We shall never receive the word as the Word of God with joy reverence submission and assurance of Faith specially in times of â—ffliction and temptation unlesse we receive the witnesse of the Spirit and ground our Faith upon the wisdome and evident demonstration of the Spirit When we look upon the word of God and consider 1 The wonderfull consent of all those Holy and selfe-denying men that penned it 2. The marvellous fulfilling of all the strange Prophecies in the fullnesse of time appointed by God 3. The Admirable Providence of God in preserving the Scriptures notwithstanding all the rage and malice of Hereticks and persecutors 4. The supernaturall Miracles wrought for to confirm it 5. The Harmonious testimony that the Church Martyrs Saints have in all ages given to it 6. The Antiquity Majesty Efficacy of it 7. The divine and heavenly matter contained in it 1. Mysteries above reason 1 Cor. 2. 9. 2. Commands contrary to our corrupt nature sent to all Nations and even to the greatest and proudest of men 3. Threats beyond the strength of man to inflict or the capacity of man to comprehend an hard heart a seared Conscience and yet a trembling Spirit a reprobate mind and sense a spirit of madnesse giddinesse horrour or slumber an everlasting worm eternall fire torments with the devil and his Angels 4. Promises and rewards beyond the power of man to bestow or wisdome of Angels to comprehend 1 Pet. 1. 12. Ephes. 3. 10. 5. The fall corruption Redemption Salvation of man wonderfully declared in the Holy Scriptures the inward frame and disposition of mans heart his secret thoughts and most intimate projects his reserved wishes desires ends and purposes undenyably discovered for his conviction even to admiration and amazement 1 Cor. 14. â—5 then the reason of man is even confounded the obstinacy of mans heart subdued all the pride of humane glory stained and the Scriptures appeare to be the word of God But now all these Arguments and many more which I could name will not be effectuall for our regeneration and conversion untill the Spirit be pleased to set all home upon the heart by his own irresistible efficacy and seale this truth to the Conscience by his own infallible testimony But when the Spirit speaks to and works upon our spirits then we do assent and consent to all the proposals of God our very thoughts are captivated and subdued unto the obedience of Christ 2 Cor. 10. 5. Our Conscience is convinced swayed and undeniably obliged to beleeve what is promised allow what is commanded our will made willing to chose both the affections to embrace both our whole man to follow after both according to the directions of God for performing what is commanded and obtaining of what is promised Rom. 7. 12. 22. Psa. 119. 106 112 113 127 128 167 173 174. I must acknowledge my absolute total and universal dependance upon the infallible wisdome infinite truth power majesty greatnesse and goodnesse of the Holy Spirit and confesse that he hath soveraigne Right and divine authority to reveale and prescribe whatsoever he pleases upon the rewards and penalties of everlasting life and death And I am obliged to beleeve and embrace al that the Spirit teacheth without any contradiction though it seeme never so improbable to my carnall reason and be really contrary to my corrupt affections ends and esianes The spirit teaches me how to apprehend and judge of spirituall things after a spirituall manner for the spirit teaches me what to approve and
what I should disallow Phil. 1 9 10 19. I must choose what the Spirit approves and then prosecute what I have chosen with care hope desire and embrace what I attaine to with love and delight and in a word rest satisfyed with the love of the Father the grace of the Son and the communion of the Spirit as my al-sufficient and satisfactory portion for evermore Psal. 17. 15. Psal. 63. 5. Faith is that Grace which enables and enclines us upon the divine testimony of the Spirit to depend on Christ for righteousnesse and life according to the tenour of the Covenant of Grace The divine Testimony of the Spirit is the true ground of justifying Faith but Historicall Faith which may be in Devils Jam 2. and Temporary Faith which may be in Reprobates Luke 8. are not truly grounded on the Testimony wisdome Authority Revelation or demonstration of the Spirit We read of a Revelation of flesh and blood Mat. 16. 17. And the demonstration and Revelation of the Spirit 1 Cor. 2. 4. 10. 14 15. Ephes. 1. 17. A man who hath nothing but sense and Reason in him may have an Historicall or a Temporary Faith but he who doth upon the divine Testimony of the Spirit beleeve that Iesus is the Christ he is born of God of the Spirit of God and hath the witnesse in himself 1 Joh. 5. 1. 6 10. For the regenerate and they only have a spirituall understanding in them to know him that is true when he is revealed unto them by the Spirit of truth 1 Joh. 5. 20. 1 Cor. 2 14 15. Deut. 29. 4. For the Demonstration of the Spirit is not understood by us untill we are renewed in the spirit of our mind so that we can look upon the Divine truths testifyed by the Spirit with a spirituall eye and discern them after a spirituall manner 1 Cor. 2. 14. And therefore the Testimony of the Spirit is not received but by our renewed Spirits Rom. 8. 16. Before we are Regenerate we receive divine truths only because we judge them reasonable or because we find them in the Scriptures and we beleeve the Scriptures upon an Humane Testimony and therefore only with an Humane not a Divine Faith But the Spirituall man beleeves all upon the testimony of the Spirit and doth constantly beg the direction of the good Spirit O thy Spirit is good saith David teach me lead me quicken me by thy Spirit Ps. 143. 10 11. Finally this good spirit discovers to a man before he beleeves 1. His want of Christ 2. The worth of Christ. His want of Christ by reason of 1. His hainous sins which are inexcusable damnable 2. His Spirituall wants which are innumerable 3. His present misery and slavery which are unspeakable unsupportable The worth of Christ because he is an All-sufficient Saviour and only Saviour the Spirit discovers the treasures of Free grace the mysteries of Divine Faith which even Angels admire the unsearchable riches of Christ the fulnesse of God able to satiate the soule with heavenly glorious everlasting happinesse and even infinite content Then the soule is convinced by the Spirit of God not onely of the truth but goodnesse of the Covenant made by God with man in Christ and that there are better things laid up for beleevers in Christ then any are or can be bestowed by Sathan upon his greatest Agents and dearest favourites the darlings of the flesh and world and upon this account the soule is perswaded by this demonstration of the spirit to close with Christ and deny itself to have no ability wisdome righteousnesse will of its own but to seek wisdom Righteousnesse Sanctification and Redemption in Christ. 1 Cor. 1. 30. In a word to deny its own will and take the will of Christ for its rule and compasse to do or suffer any thing for Christ to lose or sell all for him The good spirit perswades us 1. To prize Christ highly even above all the kingdomes of the world and glory of them 2. To beleeve in Christ stedfastly 3. To love Christ deerly better then our selves or dearest friends better then worldly treasures sensuall joy or any carnall contentments whatsoever 4. To follow Christ fully that we may enjoy him eternally as our Crown our happinesse our heaven And to this end and purpose to set up the word of God in our Consciences as our only rule for to direct us 1. In all points of Faith 2. In all parts of worship 3. In all passages of our life and conversation that we may cast out the world the Devil nay flesh and self and all to make roome for Christ. Now when the Spirit hath by its own evidence testimony authority wisdome and efficacy wrought Faith in the soule to carry it into the armes of Iesus Christ Christ doth bid it welcom embraces kisses it and takes this young beleever by the hand and puts him into his Fathers bosome And when we are thus brought to beleeve in Father Son and Holy Ghost then we are fitted and prepared to worship and obey all three glorious persons as one God blessed forever And therefore I may now proceed to speak of the worship of all three and then of our obedience to all three 2. This grand Mystery of Faith hath an effectuall influence into our Gospel-worship He takes the name of Father Son and Holy Ghost in vain and doth not make that Holy use which he should of the Titles Properties workes and Ordinances of all three who doth not with Knowledge Faith Reverence sincerity and spirituall joy worship all three for this is true Gospel-worship And therefore I would intreat my Reader diligently to consider what I have delivered in the fourth and fifth chapters of this Treatise concerning the divine Nature Titles Properties works of all three in order to worship for the glory of the thrice illustrious and yet single God head and then if he will study the scope of the first Table of the Holy Law of God and the substance of Gospel-worship he will acknowledge that every one who beleeveth in all three persons will find his Faith obliging and inclining him to worship al three glorious persons as one God blessed for ever 1. God the Father is to be worshipped under the Gospel as the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ and our Father in him I have touched this point already and because it is not much controverted by our grand enemies I shall not insist long upon it All the knowledge of God which we gain by the Scriptures of truth is revealed to us on purpose for our direction in the worship of God we must not worship God according to our own devices but according to that discovery which God hath made of himselfe to us in his Holy word not onely in respect of his divine nature as when our
Tract 3. * Nos Ecclesiae Ministerium in honore habemus internas persuasiones sine externo verbo tanquam Satanae ludibria cavemus ex Scripturis sapimus cum Scripturis sentimus propter Scripturas credimus Whitaker de Authoritate Script lib. 1. cap. 10. prope finem Controv. 1. de Script interpret qu. 5. cap. 4 5. Item de Catechis rudibus cap 3 4 6 7 c. Isa. 30. 20 21. Verbum Dei est lux lucerna lumen ad Deum dirigens iâ— Agendis Credendis Sperandis amandis Psal. 19. Psal. 119. 2 Pet. 1. 16 19. Vide Chamier de Veritate Canonis Interior Magister docet Christus docet inspiratio ipsius docet Aug. Tract 3. in Epist. Iohan. Non dicit meliorem sed Certiorem Aug. de verbis Apostolâ— Serm. 27. cap. 4. Praevidens Dominus Iesus Christus impios quosdam futuros qui miraculis ejus Calumniarentur magicis artibus ea tribuendo prophetas ante praemisit Aug Tract 35. in Iohan. Vide D. Davenant de judice Norma fidei D. Gomarum Chamier de Interpret lib. Canon Dr. Reynold in his learned conference with Hart chap. 2. Divis 2. pag. 46. Mr. Hildersham in his 145 Lecture upon the 51 Psal. pag. 697. Dr. Alting Loc. com Erroneous and fantasticall spirits are condemned by the Holy Spirit Vide D. Whitak controv 1. de Script Interpret qu. 5. cap. 4 de Authoritate Scripturae lib. 1. cap. 10. in calce capitis 2 Cor. 4 13 Ingenue fatemur non esse nunc novas revelationes expectandas sive à summo pontifice sive a Concilio sive ab Ecclesiâ totâ Canus lib. 2. cap. 7. Maâ—k 10. 37 41. Act. 1. 6. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Aristot. Ethic lib. 5. cap. 7. Non eritijs matutina lux Isa. 8. 20. Judices ejus luâ—i vespertini sacerdotes ejus polluerunt sanctum injuste egerunt contra legem Soph. 3. 3. Omnis potestas judicis ministeriaâ—is Legibus adstricta est unicus autem â—ummus Judex est Isa. 32. 22. Iacobi 4. 12. qui quidem 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 solus judicat Revelatio mihi in conscientiâ meâ facta est Privata ex parte Subjecti Publica verò ex parte Objecti Pro. 1. 23. Ecclesia Instrumen taliter commovet sed non sola movet movent ipsae Scripturae movet Spiritus Principaliter movent Whitakerus Isa. 59. 21. Non potest Deus nisi per Deum intelligi sicut nec honorem a nobis Deus nisi per Deum accipit non cogitando aut dispatando veritatem homo assèqui potest sed audiendo ab eo qui solus docere potest Hilarius de Trinitate lib. 5. Vide D. Whitaker de Sacra Scriptura controv 1. qu. 3. c. 8. Judicium practicae Discretionis a dono coele sli pendet ex infuso lumine Spiritus Sancti oritur non ex privato sensu aut phantasmate ad normam verbi exigitur simul dirigitur Distinguit itaque D. Davenantius inter Iudicium Discretionis Iudicium Praecipitationis Non ad enthysiasmos itaque fanaticos vel asslatus Anabaptisticos fideles remittimus vide D. Daven de judice Normà Fidei Mr. Hildersham his Lectures upon the 51 Psal. Mr. Ball in his larger Catechism Dr. Reynolds conference with Hart. Dr. Whitaker above cited Et Rev. D. Reynold Academiae Oxon. Procancellarii in Concione de Animali homine hoc anno 1649. habitâ Aug. de unitateâ— Ecclesiae cap. 16. in Johan Tra. 13. Iren. adv haereses lib. 3. cap. 2. 12. Euseb. Hi. Eccles. lib. 5. cap. 14. Socrat. lib. 4. cap. 23. Theod. Histo. lib. 1. Cap. 16. Aug contra Max. Arian lib. 1. De Bapâ— conâ—ta Donatistas lib. 3. cap. 2. Epist 165. ad Generosun 1 Cor. 2. 13. Ephes. 6. 16. 17. The Popes Infallible Supremacy tryed by the Holy Ghost Read the Protestation of learned Protestants repeated by Bp. Jewel and Doct. Rainoldes in his conference with Hart 8 cap. first Division pag 393. * Vide FraÌ„cis Pic. Mirandul Theor. in expos Theor. 4ti Thom. Waldens Tom. 3. de Sacramentalibus Doct. 3. pag. 5. * Vide Formam juramenti prae stand ab Episcopo electo in Pontificali Romano parte primâ Reservationes provisioneâ— mandata Apostolica totis viribus observabo faciam ab alijs observari Gratian. Decret Distinct. 20. Vide Wolfgang Laz. comment Reipub Rom. â—2 cap. 2. Concil Constan. 1 cap. 2. Theodos. Valent. Epist. ad discor in Concil Chalced. Act 1. Theod. Hi. Ecel l. 5. cap. 28. Gregor Regist. l. 4. Epist. 34. D. Vsher Iewel Rainolds Whiker Abbot Davenant Bilson Chamier Gomarus Vide. Aenc Silv. de gestis Basil Concil lib. 1. laco Almain de authoritate Ecclesiae cap. 8. Summi Poncifices suas fimbrias nimis extendenâ—es alios Papas adducunt in testeâ— Aske a thief or his fellow whether he be a thiefe Vide â— nullus D. de testibus L. omnibus C co 4. 9. 2. 3. c. si testes Christ is the only Head of his whole Church Ephes. 1. 22. Col. 2. 19. Ioh. 10. 16. Per pastorem unicum intelligimus Christum non PapaÌ„ Oecumeâ—cum Ioh. 10. 9. 14. 16 26 27 28. Sic per Davidem intelligimus Christum Eze. 37. 22 23. 24. Ezek. 34. 23. 1 Pet. 2. 25. Heb. 13. 20 Cuncti claves regni Caelorù accipiant ex aequo Hieronym advers 10. vin lib. 2. Vt Plato Princeps Philosophorum ita Petrus ApostoloruÌ„ Hieron adver Pelag lib. 1. Vide Glos. extravagant Ioh. 22. Potestas summa Pap. six 4. Sac. Cerem eccles Rom. lib. 1. sect 7. Leo's Sermons Epistles Rhemish annot in Mat. 16. 18. Vide Annot Romae excus in Cyprian De aequalitate Apostolatus qui cum Apostolis morientibus cessavit nec ad Episcopos transijt Vide Comarum parte 3. Disp. 22. de Petri Apostoli Papae Romani râ—pug Dr. Raynolds in his conference with Hart Chap. 6. Division 3. pag. 209. 210 211 212. Act. 14. 23 Act. 20. 28 Tit. 1. 5 Phil. 1. 1. Pro Apostolis filij nati sunt non Pater unicus papa Oecumenicus Vide Aug. Enarrat in Psal. 34. nec non in Psal. 44. Vna vetula potest esse perfectior ac major ipso Papâ perfectione Gratiae amplitudinc Virtutum Turrecrem In Summa de Eccles. lib. 2. c. 82. The Law The First Table The Second Table The Gospel The grand Pillars both of Popery and the Papacy Anti-Scripturists The true reason why men do not beleeve the Scriptures to be the Word of God The Law The Gospel The prime and infallible Truth bears witnesse to it selfe Heb. 4. 12 13. 2 Cor. 3. 6. 2 Cor. 2. 16. Act. 7. 54. Rev. 11. 10 Act. 5. 39. The Familists H. Nicolas 〈…〉 the Gospâ—l of the â—ingdome Dr Rainolds Confeâ—â—nce with Hart cap. 1. divis 2. pag 60. 61 Hâ—â—lets Epistle in Queen Elizabeth The Anabaptists The Arminians Enemies of Grace Vide Epist. ad Innoc. inter Epist. August Epist. 90.
92 Concil Arausican secundum August Tom. 7. Contra Pelagian The Socinians memies of God Vide Theodoret Hist. lib. 1. cap. 7. Athanas. contra Arian Basil contra Eunom Nazianzen Hilar Aug. de Trinitate contra Arian Cyrill Alexand. Tom. 5. part 1. 2. Thesaurus c. The Libertines 2 Cor. 3. 17 1 Cor. 12. 3 1 Joh. 2 22 23. The Enemies of the Trinity are Antichristian Dr. Sibs his judgement concerning liberty of Prophesy Dr Sibs his Epistle before Mr. Baines his Commentary upon the Ephesians Aâ— Exhortation to beleeve the Holy Spirit The Spirit doth testifie that the Scriptures are the â—ord of God The Testimony of the Spirit supports our Faith in time of Temptation Arguments for the Holy Scriptures See Mr. Hildersham upon the 51 Psalme and the seventh verse his 145. Lecture Mr. Ball his larger Catechisme Master Hieron of the Dignity of the Scriptures Reverend Mr. White in his book newly Printed called the way to the Tree of Life the second and third chapters Ps. 119. 129 The Testimony of the Spirit makâ— all other Arguments effectuall for our conversion unto true Faith Vide Scholasticos de dono Discernendi credenda à non credendis Lombard lib. 3. dist 34. Bâ—navent sent l. 3. d. 34. qu. 1. Argentin Ib. Aquin. secund q. 8. a 4. q. 9 a. 1. ParisieÌ„s de Legibus cap. â—1 Gerson de exam Doct. p. 1. con 6. Mirandul de fide ordine credendi Vide Sententiarios passim de Dono intellectus Scientiae Consilii Our absolute dependance upon the Infallible Spirit Theologiâ— est doctrina supernaturalis divinâ revelatione non scientifica demonstratione tradita Johan 9. 29 Johan 5. 47. Spiritus Prophetis Apostolis imo sibi ipsi in eis testimonium perhibuit Vide Hen. Gandaveni Sum. part 1. ar 9. q. 3. Greg. Homil. 19. in Ezek. Aug Tract 3. in Ep. Johan Hilar. lib. 2. de Trin. prope finem p. 174. 1. Apprehension 2. Approbation 3 Election 4. Prosecution 5 Fruition 6. Satisfaction Psal. 16. 5. 6. 11. Psal. 73. 25 26. Psa. 16. 7. Iustifying saith depends upon the testimony of the Spirit Vide Origen 4. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Simplicitas nec non majestas summa Evangelii cum efficacia conjuncta Philosophos reges mundum vicit Vide Aug. l. 13. contra Fâ—ustum c. 5. Gandav sum part 1. art 9. q 3. Scotum in 3. Dist. 23. q. 1. Occham p. 1. l. 1. c. 4. Aug. l. 1. contra Ep. Fundamenti c. 5. Whitta Disp. de Sacra Script Contr. 1. q. 3. c. 8. Mr. White his way to the Tree of Life Vide Chrysostom Homil 57. in Johan 9. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Biel. 3. Sent dist 23. qu. 2. art l. Majus lumen in Scientiâ majus robur in fide Spiritus rationem dirigit voluntatem determinat fidem infunditâ—vide etiam Aqu. secundae qu. 2. art 3. pag. 1. qu. 1. Almain in 3. sent Dis. 24. qu. unica August lib. 3. contra Petiâ— cap. 6. Retract lib. 1. cap. 14. Chrysost. Homil. 46. ad Pop. Antioch Tam certo scimus novum instrumentum esse divinum ac Judaei sciebant vetus instrumentum esse Divinum Joh. 9. 29. Joh. 5. 47. Joh. 5. 39. Our want of Christ. The worth of Christ The truth and goodnesse of the Covenant of Grace Psal. 119. 103 111 112 127 128 140. Phil. 3. 8. We must prize and love Christ above all things and cleave to him for evermore Psal. 73. 26 28. Faith in all three persons 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Rom. 5. 2. Eph. 2. 18. Joh. 14. 6. Heb 7. 25. 1 Pet. 1. 21. The worship of the divine Trin-unity The fourth and fift chapters of this Treatise must be compared with this ninth chapter God the Father is to be woâ—shipped with Divine worship See learned Mr. Râ—ndoll his great Mystery of godlinesse Dr. Downham on the Lords Prayer Mr. Burroughes of Gospel-worship and Gospel-conversation Mr. Thomas Goodwin his Triumph of Faith Distinguendum est inter objectum considerationis objectum Adorationis inter objectum Adorationis materiale Formale Pater enim quà Pater abstractà ratione Deitatis non est adorandus ipsa enim Deitas est ratio Formalis Adorationis Eph. 3. 12. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 In what sense the whole Trinity is our Father Jer. 2. 27. Isa. 63. 16. Deut. 32. 6 Jer. 31. 9. Christ is our Father Isa. 9. 6. Heb. 2. 13 14. The Holy Ghost is our Father God the Father considered as our Father in a peculiar way Evangelicall encouragement to Gospell-worship Ioh. 20. 17. Eph. 3. 14. 1 Tim. 1. 2. 2 Tim. 1. 2. Tit. 1. 4. Phile. 1. 3. Rom. 1. 7. 1 Cor. 1. 3. 2 Cor. 1. 2. Gal. 1. 3. Phil. 1. 2. Col. 1. 2. 2 Cor. 1. 3. 4. Col. 1. 3. Eph. 1. 2 3. 1 Thes. 1. 2. 2 Thes. 1. 2. Joh. 16. 27. 1 Pet. 1. 3. Divine Worship is due to Iesus Christ as God The rise of this Controversie The Papists Cultus latriae duliae hyperduliae precatio est directa vel indirecta Absoluta aut relativa Suprema vel subalterna transitoria velfinalis oblatoria aut extra oblationem Card. Perron in responso ad Regem M. Britan. l. 5. c. 20. Smigl de Monstris Arrianorum c. 9. Vide sis Cajeâ—anuÌ„ Suarez Valent. in Thomam part 3. q. 25. art 1. 2. 2. The Socinians Vide â—rellium de uno Deo Patre sect 1. sect 36 37. Socin c. praeâ— Wie Volket instit l. 4. c. 11. Socin de Adorat Christi cum Christiano Franken Fran. Dav. Antithes Francisci Davidis Ostorod Instit. cap. 10. The Arminians Remonst Apolog. c. 2. 16. p. 153. Rhapsod l. 1. c. 9. Vbiquitists * Securius locuti sunt viri gravissimi ante exor tum Arrium Nestorium Pelagium c. sic nonnulli qui inter reveren dissimos merito recensentur ante enatas controversias Socinianas Remonstranticas c. Junius defens Trinit contra Samosat p. 3. pag. 190. Exam. Grat. Prosp. part 2. sect 5. Chamier tom 2. l. 1. c. 4. Polan Syntag. l. 2. c. 31. Polyand prima concert contra Socin c. 21. Paraeus Iren. c. 28. Method controv ubique c. 31. Camer tom 3. Praelect pag. 173. Maccov misc q. 5. Disp. 35 36 37. Clut Id. Disp. 3. 4. 40. Beza Col. momp part 1. pag. 196 197. Zanch. de 3. Elohim cap. 12. l. 1. Epist. 9. Voet. de Adorat Christi Roman 1. 21. ad 25. Lactant. Instit. l. 1. c. 19. Si honos idem tribuitur aliis ipse comnino non colitur cujus religio est illum esse unum ac solum Deum credere Cyprian ad Fortunat. de exhort mart c. 2. Tertul. de Idol c. 1. Idololatria Dei honorificentiam usurpat vendicat creaturae Ambros. in Epist. ad Ephes. c. 5. Grâ—g Nyss Orat. in laudem Bas. mag Gr. Naz. Orat. in Christi Nativit Aquin. in