XX. Act. 28. that the Holy Ghost had made them overseers to feed that is to rule and govern the Church of God which he hath purchased with his own Blood. And if they knew this why were they not so honest as to interpret the later by the former for there is no difference between S. Paul's words and the counterfeit S. Ambrose's S. Paul saith the Elders of Ephesus were appointed to rule the Church of God for that 's the office of a Shepherd that feeds the Flock the other saith Damasus was the ruler of God's Church If the Vniversal Church be thereby meant and not his part of it only why should it not be so expounded in the words of S. Paul and then Damasus his title to this office is crackt for there were Rulers then set over the Church Vniversal by the Holy Ghost before he or his Church of Rome perhaps was in being But if S. Paul's words must have a more limited meaning then with what conscience do they give their S. Ambrose's words an unlimited and not restrain them as they must do S. Paul's to the particular See committed to his Government And it was not easie for them to be ignorant that S. Paul in these words to Timothy speaks of the Church of Ephesus and not of Rome and was so far from having any thought of S. Peter whom these Annotators make the Ruler at that time of this House of God that it is evident Timothy was the person who presided in it and was the chief Pillar and Ground of Truth here spoken of as I doubt not I have proved in the insuing Discourse Wherein I have also shewn that other succeeding Bishops in other Churches had the same title nay many persons in the Church that were no Bishops who were far from thinking themselves or being thought by others infallible as these Annotators imagine they must needs be who are the Pillar and establishment of the Truth That 's an inference from these words for which they had no more warrant than they had to intitle S. Ambrose to those Commentaries The Author of which also did so little dream of the Infallibility of the Church when he glossed upon these words that he doth not so much as make the Church the Ground or establishment of the Truth But saith in plain terms Firmamentum as the Vulgar Latine translates 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 hujus veritatis signa sunt prodigia the establishment of this Truth left in the Church are signs and wonders which the Apostles that is wrought to bring Men to the firm belief of that truth which they preached Which doth not rely therefore upon the credit of the Church but upon the credit of the Apostles and of those Divine Works whereby God bare Witness to them which are recorded in the Holy Scriptures From whence alone we ought to derive our knowledge of the Truth the Apostle here speaks of as is most clearly resolved by S. Cyril of Hierusalem in these memorable words (l) Catech. IV. Sect. de Spirito Saycto Concerning the Divine and Holy Mysteries of the Faith we ought not to deliver any thing though never so small without the Divine Scriptures c. neither shouldst thou believe me barely saying these things to thee unless thou receivest the demonstration of the things published out of the Divine Scriptures For this is the safety or security of our Faith which depends not upon words that we invent but upon the demonstration of the Divine Scriptures In which we hear our Lord Christ himself speaking to us who is more to be believed than the Church For the Church as S. Paul speaks is subject unto Christ they are the words of S. Augustine (m) Tom. VII Coura Crisconium Gram. l. 2. c. 21. and therefore the Church ought not to set her self above Christ so as to think that they who are condemned by him may be baptized but they that are condemned by the Church may not be baptized when he always judges truly but Ecclesiastical Judges being Men are oft-times deceived From them therefore who are fallible we appeal to Him who is infallible and hath delivered his sentence in the Holy Scriptures or from a Church particular we appeal to the Church Catholique nay from the New Church of Rome to the Old. For we are not as they would make the World believe affrighted with the Name of the Church whose judgment we truly honour as will appear in this Treatise while they dishonour it by confining the Church to themselves and then exalting it above the Scriptures of Truth and making its mere Name serve to dazzle the eyes of their own People and to keep them in profound ignorance teaching them (n) 〈…〉 in XII Luke 11. to oppose the Name of a Catholique Man and the Catholique Church as a sufficient answer to all that we most reasonably object against them Thus in their own conceit it is a kind of Gorgon's head which they fansie will immediately stupify us when it is opposed to us but blessed be God we are still in our Wits and understand very well that this is no better than his old Artifice who invented this cheat as S. Cyprian (o) L. de Vnitate Ecclesie speaks of deceiving unwary Souls by the very Title of the Christian Name For just so they now abuse the Name of Church and the name of Catholique and by good words and fine speeches as S. Paul writes XVI Rom. 18. deceive the hearts of the simple Whom I have endeavoured in this small Treatise to undeceive and direct in the way of that TRVTH of which every Church ought to be the Pillar and Ground If any one be not but in stead of the certain constant universally received Christian Truth set up uncertain nay false lately invented and particular conceits of its own it is not to be relied on but rejected though it hath been formerly a Church of never so great Authority Such the Church of Rome once was but now ceases so to be having by taking upon her too much lost that regard which otherwise it might have had in the Christian World. It is not the same Church it was in the Apostles times no nor in the days of Gregory the Great as hath been unanswerably demonstrated by Bp. Morton heretofore (p) Catholique Appeal L. 1. cap. 2. and lately by the Author of the Vindication of the Answer of some late Papers to which there will never be an ingenuous Reply Great and many alterations have been made therein to the manifest prejudice of the Christian Faith of which that Church should have been as well as others a Pillar and Establishment but hath notoriously failed in her duty by inventing another Faith which undermines and endangers that Faith which was once delivered to the Saints Of this I have given so full and so clear an account in these Papers that I fear not to expose them to the examination of them that are of
Austin when he was yet in part an Infidel being a Manichee to believe the Gospel according to that famous Discourse of his in answer to the Epistle of Manichaeus which contained in a manner the whole Belief of that party Ego non crederem Evangelio nisi me Ecclesiae Catholicae authoritas commoveret (m) Tom. VI. contra Epistolam Fandamenti Cap. 5. which is to be thus translated according to the Phrase of the Asricans I had not believed the Gospel unless the Authority of the Catholique Church had moved me thereunto For it is evident as hath been shown by our Writers since the beginning of the Reformation * D. Whitakeram de saâ—â—a Scâ—iâ—t Q. 3. cap. 8. he speaks of himself when a Manichee as the words immediately following declare Those whom I obeyed when they said Believe the Gospel why should I not obey when they say Do not believe Manichaeus Which doth not signifie that the credit of the Gospel is founded upon the Churches Authority but that this was the first motive to incline him to look into the Gospel and consider it as a Divine Book which would inform him in the way of Salvation Thus he explains himself in the very foregoing Chapter where setting aside the sincere Wisdom taught in the Church which they would not believe he reckons up abundance of other things which might serve to keep him in the Catholique Church viz. the consent of People and Nations c. and then thus concludes These numerous and great and most dear tyes of the Christian name may very well hold a Man that believes in the Catholique Church although by reason of the slowness of his understanding or the defects of his life the truth do not yet show it self most openly unto him Whereas among the Manichees there were none of these things to invite or to hold him but a bare promise of Truth wherewith they made a noise which if they could have shown so manifestly that it could not be doubted he confesses it was to be preferred before all those things whereby he was held in the Catholique Church Which words are an evident proof that he speaks of the Authority of the Church as only moving and inducing him to believe the Scriptures and to joyn himself to their Society before the TRUTH was manifested to him which he was to sind there in the Scriptures and which he preferred before the Authority of the Church Which he elsewhere tells the Donatists was not to be believed upon its own credit L. de unitate Ecclesie cap. 16. But whether they hold the Church let them not show but from the Canonical Books of the Divine Scriptures for we neither do not say that we ought to be believed because we are in Christ's Church because that Church which we hold was commended to us by Optatus or Ambrose or other innumerable Bishops of our Communion or because it is approved by Councils or because Miracles are every where wrought in it These and such like things are therefore to be approved because they are done in the Catholique Church but it is not therefore manifested to be the Catholique Church because these things are done in it Our Lord Jesus himself when he rose from the dead and offered his Body to be toucht as well as seen by his Disciples lest they should think there was any fallacy in it judged it meet rather to confirm them by the testimonies of the Law and the Prophets and Psalms showing how all things were fulfilled which were predicted And so he commanded his Church saving that repentance and remission of sin should be preached in his Name beginning at Hierusalem This he testified was written in the Law the Prophets and Psalms this we hold commended from his Mouth These are the Documents these the Foundations these the strong Grounds of our Cause We read in the Acts of the Apostles of some Believers that they sought the Scriptures daily whether those things were so What Scriptures but the Canonical Books of the Law and the Prophets to which are added the Gospels the Apostolical Epistles the Acts of Apostles and the Revelation of S. John. Search all these and bring forth something manifest whereby ye may demonstrate the Church either to have remained only in Africa or to be to come out of Africa c. This is an illustrious Testimony he thought the Church it self was to be warranted by the Scriptures which did not therefore receive their Authority from the Church but give it all the Authority it hath And after all it was not the Authority of the present Church barely that moved him when he was a Manichee but of the Catholique Church from the beginning Occham * Fr White 's Answer to Fisher's second Conference p. 24. thinks he speaks of the Church in the Apostles times alone which moved him to Believe And others as Gabriel Biel confess he speaks of the Authority of the Church à tempore Christi Apostolorum c. from the time of Christ and of the Apostles down to his days Such Authority cannot but weigh 〈◊〉 much even with those that do not yet believe if 〈…〉 â—eriously pondered but much more with those that are already Christians Whether they be Novices and weaklings who are as yet doubtful in the Faith though in the Church the Testimony and Authority of it ought to confirm and quiet their minds as it did S. Austin's it appears by the place before-named and keep them close to the Christian Society till they may themselves come better acquainted with the Truth and more fully understand the Holy Scriptures which the Church delivers to them and puts into their hands as the Word of God. Or whether they be more grown Christians and indeed all sorts of Persons in the Church who ought to be so far wrought upon even by its Authority as to be perswaded thereby to read constantly to consider and ponder seriously and to practise those plain Lessons faithfully which the Holy Scripture teaches them till it work effectually upon their hearts and purge them so throughly from all bad affections that they may more perfectly understand the Truth Thus much is indisputable for God hath appointed outward means for the conveying Divine Truth to our Belief and this means is ordinarily the Church to which we ascribe these two great things in this business (p) Answer to Charity mistaken Sect. V. First the office of a Witness testifying the Authority of Holy Scripture to us Secondly of an Instrument in Gods Hand to lead us into the understanding of the Scriptures and by its Ministry in preaching and expounding them to beget a Divine Faith in us But further than this we cannot we must not go For the last resolution of our Faith is not into the Testimony of the Church but into the Testimony of God himself which we find recorded in the Holy Scripture delivered by the Church unto us Thus S. Austin most admirably
discourses in that very Book against Manichaeus (q) Cap. XIV contra Epist quam vocant Fundamenti his Letter from whence the fore-named saying I had not believed the Gospel unless the Churches Authority had moved me to it is wont at every turn to be objected to us by those of the Romish perswasion Thou dost nothing but praise what thou believest and deride what I believe Now since I can be even with thee and do the very same praise what I believe and deride what thou believest what is to be done but that we leave and relinquish those who invite us to know things certain and afterwards require us to believe things uncertain let those of the Roman Church mark this and that we follow them who invite us first to believe that which we cannot yet see into that being made stronger in the Faith it self we may come to understand what we believe NOT MEN NOW BUT GOD HIMSELF INWARDLY ESTABLISHING AND ILLUMINATING OUR MIND It is impossible to read this passage and not see that this Father thought our Faith is not ultimately resolved into the Testimony of the Church but by that being invited to believe the Holy Scriptures we are established upon the serious reading of them in the Christian Faith and Knowledge of the Truth by God himself Upon whose Word in the Holy Scripture and not upon Men we bottom our Faith. Upon the Testimony and Authority of God the Father Son and Holy Ghost and the Testimony of divine Men inspired by them who by Miracles and Signs and mighty Deeds and a prophetical Spirit proved themselves to be sent of God and have left his Mind and Will upon Record in the Scriptures of Truth Which the Church indeed in all parts of the World hath kept and preserved and faithfully transmitted down to us and now propounds to our Faith but it is not merely what the Church saith that makes us believe but what God himself saith in the Holy Scriptures concerning his Son Jesus Christ and what Jesus Christ saith concerning his rising from the Dead and sending the Holy Ghost upon the Apostles Which being fulfilled evidently proved him to be the Son of God the Saviour of the World and them to be his Apostles and Ministers who declared to Men the true way of Salvation So the Church directs and guides us to the Scriptures of Truth but they resolve and assure our Faith being the very Word of God. The authority of God's Church is the first motive which leads us to esteem the Scriptures but being led thither we find in the matter of them that which gives us full satisfaction by bestowing our pains in reading or hearing and considering the Mysteries contained therein The Church holds out this light to us but it is by this light that we see what is the mind and will of God. To this the Church points us and bids us attend to it for this it disposes and prepares us it leads us by the hand to this as the only sure foundation of our Faith because herein we find God himself speaking to us and moreover by the Ministery of the Church we are assisted in understanding the sence of the Holy Scriptures but they contain in themselves that Divine Authority and Truth whereby we come to a certain Faith. The Church tells us such and such things are true and we find them to be so by examining the Scriptures Which the Beraeans searched daily whether those things were so which the Apostles preached and therefore many of them believed not merely because the Apostles told them they ought so to do but because they found what they said in the Holy Scriptures XVII Act. 11 12. And so far as any Church speaks according to the truth contained therein it is to be believed and followed But if it bring no Divine word for its warrant if it propound other Doctrines which are not there it hath no authority to make such Doctrines the matter of our Faith much less to set up its own authority above the Scriptures as they do who say The Scriptures receive their authority from the Church Which is the Doctrine of no less Men than Baronius and Bellarmine to name no more The former of (r) Ad Annum 53 〈◊〉 X XI which argues that because we receive these Holy Books to be writings of the Apostles and Evangelists and not forged under their Names upon the testimony of the Church therefore all the writings of the New Testament received their authority from the Churches tradition which is fundamentum Scripturarum as he ventures to say the foundation of the Scriptures The other (s) L. 2. de Sacrament C. 25. Tertium is no less positive that if we take away the authority of the present Church and the present Council we call in doubt the whole Christian Faith. For the firmness of all ancient Councils and of all Doctrines depends upon the authority of the present Church This is very presumptuous talk for by the Church they mean themselves and then by the testimony of the Church that is their own testimony they mean such a Divine witness as assures us by its own authority without any other proof Which are the great points of difference between us in this matter For we assert first that the office of leading Men to the Holy Scriptures and so to Faith belongs to every Church as much as to them and secondly that no Church can bring People to Faith by its own testimony and authority but by the Doctrine of the Holy Scriptures nor is any Church whatsoever to be heard in matters of Divine Truth further than it can prove its Doctrines by the authority of God's Word and teaches things agreeable thereunto II. Which leads to the Second thing briefly to shew what power and authority the Church cannot pretend unto in matters of Faith. 1. And first it appears by what hath been said that it hath not a Soveraign Absolute Prophetical authority independent upon the Rule of the Holy Scriptures so that we must take whatsoever it saith for true without consulting them This is the ambitious pretence of the great Doctors of the Roman Church who give the Church meaning thereby the present Roman Church an authority over all things not depending on the Scriptures but upon which the Scriptures themselves depend So that without the authority of this Church all truth is doubtful Which is a manifest principle of Infidelity making all Religion stand to the courtesie of a company of Men who in such matters are the least to be trusted of all other Christians that we are acquainted withall 2. The Church hath no authority to propound any Doctrine as necessary to Salvation which is not delivered in the Holy Scriptures but depends solely on the authority of its own Tradition This is another of their ambitious attempts who having arrogated to themselves alone the whole power of the Church make that power so unlimited that it can supply the
defects of the Scripture and make things unwritten to become matters of Faith. Which is such an unbounded Prerogative that we may have a new Faith as often as they please to pretend a Tradition for it though they cannot prove it For we must rest in the authority of the present Church which affirms it and that against the very Scripture it self which tells us it is able to make a Man of God perfect and against the testimony of the Universal Church which I have shown forbids the producing of any other Faith but that which was evidently delivered by the Apostles there 3. We cannot allow the Church an Infallible authority that is such an assistance in her Doctrines and proposals that she cannot err in any thing she defines In Controversies indeed arising about matters of Faith we own and reverence the authority of the Church (t) Artic. XX. so as not to contest the publique judgement but to prefer it before our own private conceits in doubtful things But as it ought to proceed in its determinations by the Rule of Gods word So we think it possible it may mistake in the application of this Rule and therefore we do not blindly resign our selves to its authority without all regard to the Holy Scriptures unto which the Church ought to have a respect in all its determinations No that 's another proud pretence of the present Roman Church that they cannot mistake in their definitions and therefore we must submit unto them without examination From whence this intollerable mischief hath insued that it hath made them both insensible of their errors and careless to seek any cure of them nay utterly incapable of a remedy For as one of our own Divines excellently speaks (u) Dr. Petter's Answer to Charity mistaken Sect. 5. whose words those are this conceit of their Infallibility is to them both a sufficient reason for that which is most unreasonable and a sufficient answer to that which is most unanswerable To this they retreat upon all occasions when they are not able to maintain their ground they have no other way to defend their errors when they are plainly set before their eyes but to tell us confidently they cannot err Which is a very strange boldness for we demonstrate in manay instances that they have erred erred most grosly particularly in this that they have added new Articles to the old Creed to be believed under pain of Damnation and added a new Canon of Scripture to the Old Testament against the clearest evidence in the Records of the Universal Church that the Books they have newly received were never acknowledged for Canonical Scripture If by the Church indeed they would understand the Church truly Catholique the whole Body of Christ in all times places and ages and if by matters of Faith they would understand those grand Articles which I have mentioned in the first part of this Discourse and if by being Infallible they would understand not an absolute impossibility of erring which humane nature is not capable of but not actual error there are none of us make any question but the Church is Infallible That is the whole Church hath not erred nor shall not err in the whole Faith or in any necessary part thereof for such error would cut Men off from Christ the head and so leave him no Church at all which is impossible It hath been the very scope of first my Discourse to show that the Church hath always kept the great fundamental truths of our Religion and not erred in them but transmitted them down to us whole and undefiled till the Church of Rome in the Council of Trent corrupted the Faith by their errors which they have mixed with it For to a particular Church such as that of Rome is we cannot allow this priviledge of not erring because we know they have erred even in fundamental Truths and thereby ceased to be Churches Witness those glorious Churches to which Christ himself sent his Letters by S. John the Apostle These Prerogatives therefore not belonging to any Church every one must be content with those two Offices before mentioned which are sufficient First The Office of a Witness testifying the authority of the Holy Scriptures unto its members Secondly of Gods instrument by whose Ministry in opening expounding and urging the Holy Scriptures the Holy Ghost begets a divine Faith in us And by performing these Offices it supports and continues and propagates the Truth and so may be called the Pillar and Ground thereof The meaning of which I shall now distinctly set before the Readers eyes that I may give a short account of the fourth and last thing propounded in the beginning IV. How the Church may appropriate to it self this Title 1. First Every Church and every person in it especially the Bishops and Pastors are the Pillar and Ground of Truth officio by Duty and Office whereby they are obliged to keep maintain and uphold the Truth This always was and always will be incumbent on them which is sufficient to fill up the sense of such attributes as these which do not always note performance of Duty but only obligation to it As when our Saviour saith to his Disciples Ye are the salt of the Earth it doth not signifie that they were necessarily so for he supposes immediately the salt might lose its savour but that they ought to be so and if they were not so would be good for nothing but to be cast out and trodden under foot Matth. V. 13. 2. But Secondly The first Churches of Christ in the Apostles times were actu effectu actually and effectually the Pillar of Truth that is they faithfully discharg'd this Office and perform'd their Duty constantly maintaining the Truth as it is in Christ in its purity and simplicity For the Apostles were a part of those Churches whom God led into all Truth which they taught sincerely and intirely while they lived and do at this day instruct us in the Holy Scriptures in the whole Truth necessary to our Salvation 3. But we cannot say the same of all succeeding Churches that they did faithfully perform this office though in duty they also were bound so to do No some of them were so far from being Pillars of the Truth that they let it fall to the ground We have strange instances of it with which I shall not fill these Papers in the History of the Church which show us that if we take not heed to our selves and the Doctrine that is delivered to us we have no security that we or any other particular Church shall continue firm and stedfast supporters of the Truth For Pillars themselves may decay and if they be not well lookt after will go to ruin and fall to the Earth 4. Even this very Church of Ephesus which was a Pillar and Ground of Truth while Timothy presided in it afterward began before all the Apostles were dead to remit its first love and zeal for
common the Philosophers he tells him had their abstruse Doctrines as well as Christians To this purpose we meet with a notable passage in Epiphanius in the succeeding Age which shows that the substance of the Christian Faith concerning our Saviour was commonly known even by those who did not profess it and understood to be this which Origen mentions For a Jew coming to see an eminent Man of his Nation who was sick whispered this in his Ear when they despaired of his life * Hares XXX n. 9. Believe in Jesus who was crucified under Pontius Pilate the Governor being the Son of GOD and afterward born of Mary the Christ of GOD and raised from the dead and that He shall come to judge the quick and the dead S. Cyprian (o) Epist ad Magnum de bapt Novat edit Rig. p. 152. also plainly shows there was no other Faith in his Church when he answers those who said the Novatians held the same Law that the Catholick Church held and baptized into the same Creed believing the same God the Father the same Christ the Son the same Holy Ghost that this would not avail them for Chore and Dathan and Abiram believed the same God with Moses and Aaron and besides they did not believe remission of sins and eternal life by the holy Church since they had left the Church Lucianus also a famous Presbyter of the Church of Antioch and a Martyr for the Faith of Christ left a form of believing written with his own hand * Sozomen L. III. c. 5. if we may believe the Bishops assembled at Antioch who sent it about in the time of the Arian Controversie to prove they were none of his followers but held 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Faith which had been set forth from the beginning and it is this as Socrates reports it (q) L. II. Eccles Hist c. 10. We have learnt from the beginning to believe in one God of the whole World the maker and preserver of all things intelligible and sensible and in one Only begotten Son of God subsisting before all Worlds and being together with the Father who begot him by whom all things were made whether visible or invisible who in the last days came down by the good pleasure of the Father and took flesh of the Holy Virgin and having fulfilled the whole Will of his Father suffered and rose again and returned to Heaven and sitteth at the right Hand of the Father and shall come to judge the quick and dead and remaineth King and God for ever And if it be needful to add it we believe the Resurrection of the flesh and life everlasting I will not trouble the Reader with a larger Creed of theirs which there follows more fully explaining the Doctrine of the Trinity because it belongs to the following Age Cent. IV. In which it is known the Nicene Fathers met to settle the Controversie about the Son of God but did not make any new Creed or add one Article to what had been believed before but only explain'd one Article the sense of which the Arians perverted No they were so far from inlarging the Christian Faith that when they met together they recited no other Creed but that of the Apostles as Laurentius Valla affirms he had read in some ancient Books of Isidore who collected the Canons of old Councils And accordingly when they had drawn up that Creed which they published they did not think they had made the least change in the matter of Faith but declared that this (r) Epiphanius in Anchorat was the Creed delivered by the Holy Apostles Which S. Ambrose (s) Serm. 38. Hieron Epist ad Pammach in that Age calls clavem the key S. Hierom indicium the mark or sign of Faith in which after the confession of the Trinity and of the Vnity of the Church the whole Mystery of the Christian Religion is concluded in the Resurrection of the flesh And which Greg. Nazianzen in his second Letter to Cledonius calls * Orat. L. II. beginning 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a short boundary and rule of our sense or judgment i. e. of the Faith of Christians S. Austin especially in a great number of places declares that this is the only Faith required to make a Man a Christian Particularly in his (t) L. de Fid Symbolo Tom. III. Book he wrote on purpose about this matter which he begins thus Since the just live by Faith the greater care must be taken that Faith be not corrupted and then adds Now the Catholique Faith is made known to the faithful in the Creed Which having explained he concludes his Book in these words which few words are known to the faithful that believing they may be subdued to God and being brought under his Yoke may live aright and living aright may cleanse their Heart and their Heart being cleansed they may understand what they believe In like manner before he begins the Explication of the Book of Genesis (u) De Genesi ad literam L. imperfectius he sets down what the Catholique Faith is because Hereticks were wont to draw the Scriptures to their own sense against the Catholique Faith. And the Catholique Faith by which he considers all things is nothing else but that in the Nicene Creed beginning with the belief of God the Father Almighty and concluding with the belief of eternal Life and the promise of the heavenly Kingdom Which is agreeable to the direction he gives to others in his Book of Christian Doctrine (x) L. III. c. 2. that in all ambiguous things the rule of Faith be consulted lest any sense that is contrary thereunto be admitted Which he elsewhere saith * Epist LVII is the rule of Faith common to little and great in the Church It is needless to add any more out of that Father and I shall but briefly mention the Creed of Pope Damasus in the same Age among S. Hierom's Works †Tom. IV. which is only a confession of the blessed Trinity with the rest of the Articles concerning the Conception Birth Death Resurrection Ascension Exaltation and coming again of our blessed Saviour to raise us from the Dead and to give to every Man according to his works concluding with these observable words Read these things believe these things retain these things subjugate thy Soul to this belief and thou shalt obtain life and reward from Christ But the words of the great Athanasius alone are sufficient to this purpose in the Letter which he and the Bishops with him sent to the Emperor Jovinian (z) Tom. I. pag. 245. 〈…〉 where they tell him the Faith confessed by the Nicene Fathers is that which was preached 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 from the very beginning unto which all the Churches every where consent whether they be in Spain or Britain or France or all Italy with those in Dalmatia Dacia Mysia Macedonia and all Greece all Africk Sardinia
Cyprus Crete Pamphylia Lycia Isauria Egypt Lybia Pontus Capadocia and their next Neighbours with all the Churches of the East a few excepted who were Arians whose minds they knew and whose Writings they had to produce And then having set down the Nicene Creed they conclude In this Faith it is necessary for all to remain as Divine and Apostolical and not to change it For which he gives this reason in another account of it to Epictetus (a) Tom. I. pag. 582. Bishop of Corinth because it is sufficient for the overthrow of all ungodliness and for the establishment of a pious Faith in Christ Which is a plain declaration that this Faith is not defective and that in the Creed commonly ascribed to him there was no intention to add any new Article of Faith but only to explain the old For a whole Synod viz. that at Sardis forbad he tells us in another place (b) Epist ad Antioch p. 576. any other Faith to be written but this with which all should rest contented 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. because there was nothing wanting in it but it was full of godliness and that there ought no new Faith to be set forth lest this should seem to be imperfect and occasion should be given to them that had a mind to be often writing and defining concerning Faith. I omit that Confession of Faith which S. Basil makes in his Book of the true Faith (c) Tom. II. pag. 354. and two others in Epiphanius of both which he saith that the Faith of the Holy Church (d) In Anchor and that they were delivered by the Apostles Which is a further confirmation that though they added many more words to the Apostles Creed yet they added no new Article of Faith but only expounded more largely the meaning of some part of it upon the occasion of some Heresies which troubled the Church in those times When it was so far from their thoughts to add any new thing to the first Creed that among the numerous Creeds we find in Athanasius (e) Epist de Sâ—â—â—dâ—s Arim. Selâ—â—ciae in Eusebius and others there is not one of them that makes any such attempt Nor did the Second General Council of Constantinople design any more but only 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to strengthen and confirm the Nicene Faith as Socrates * L. V. cap. 8. speaks Which Constantinopolitan Creed or one very like Cyril of Hierusalem expounded in his Church and saith it was the only Faith delivered by the Church and fortified by all the Scripture (g) Cateches V. p. 44. For since all are not able to read the Scriptures and some by their want of understanding others by their business are hindred in acquiring that knowledge therefore lest Mens Souls should be lost by ignorance we have comprehended in a few sentences 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the whole Doctrine of Faith. Which he carnestly presses them to have written not in Paper but in their Heart and to carry it about with them as their Viaticum in the whole course of their life and besides this to receive no other No saith he if I should change my mind and teach the contrary do not believe me no nor an Angel from Heaven as the Apostle speaks if he should Preach any other Gospel but that you have received For these Articles of Faith were not as it seems composed by Men but the principal things being gathered together out of the SCRIPTVRE they fill up one Doctrine of Faith. But it is more than time to proceed to the Fifth Age in which we find them so stedfast in this perswasion that the ancient Creed contained all things necessary to be believed that the Fathers assembled in the Third General Council (h) Can. VII at Ephesus expresly decreed that it should not be lawful for any Man to produce or write or compose 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 any other Faith besides that defined by the Nicene Fathers And that if any durst be so bold as either to compose or offer any other Faith to those that would be converted from Heathenism or Judaism or whatsoever Heresie if they were Bishops or Clergy-men they should be deposed if Lay-men they should be anathematized By which we may learn what would have become of the Pope himself if he had attempted then what his Successors in these latter times have done For so sacredly did they keep to this that S. Cyril of Alexandria (i) Tim. V. pars 2. p. 103. tells Joh. Antiochenus they could not indure that the Faith defined at Nice or the Symbol of Faith there made should by any means be shaken nor do we suffer our selves or others to change one word of what is there or to go besides it so much as in one syllable remembring him that said remove not the ancient Land-marks which thy Fathers have set thee for it was not they that spake but the Spirit it self of God and the Father Which he confirms by the fore-mentioned Letter of Athanasius to Epictetus which some he saith had set forth adulterated and depraved and therefore he transmits it to him sincere and uncorrupted out of ancient Copies And he had the greater reason to say they could not alter one word of it because the Council of Ephesus it self though it decreed against Nestorius that the blessed Virgin was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Mother of God yet they would not add that word to the ancient Creed but thought it sufficient to determine the point against him This Cyril further declares in an Epistle to Acacius (k) Ib. p. 112. where he confutes those who accused him of receiving a new Creed in these words None ever required of us a new Exposition of Faith nor do we admit of any from others 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. for the divinely-inspired Scripture sufficeth us and the vigilance of the Ancient Fathers and the Symbol of Faith which is exactly conformed to all right opinions And it is well known that the next General Council at Chalcedon renewed this Canon of the Council of Ephesus Decreeing in the very same words with very little alteration that no Man should produce or write any other Faith nor think or teach otherways under the penalties before-mentioned only with this difference that to Lay-men are added Monks against whom the Synod decreed an Anathema if they presumed to teach any other Faith. In the Sixth Age the same was again repeated in the Fifth General Council at Constantinople under the Emperor Justinian they solemnly professing in their Third Session that they embraced all the Four foregoing General Councils which is renewed in their Eighth Session and all their Decrees confirm'd with a particular defence of the last Council at Chalcedon concluding with the same solemn Decree that none should dare to teach or write any thing contrary to those constitutions but if he were a Bishop or Clergy-man he should be deposed if a Monk
which was the VIIIth after Christ the second Council at Nice which set up the worship of Images past the same condemnation upon him and making mention of the six (Å¿) Act. VII foregoing Councils they confirm and establish all that had been delivered from the beginning only they fraudulently add to bring in their Image worship whether written or unwritten Which made the first alteration in the Doctrine of the Church all the foregoing Councils having derived their Faith wholly from the Scriptures As the following Council at Frankfort did where as the worshipping of Images was condemned so the Holy Scriptures were highly extolled in words which signified they thought them their only safe Directors The thirtieth Chapter of the second Book of the Capitulare of Charles the Great abounds with such expressions as these the Scripture is a Treasure that wants no good but is redundant in all that Good is And in the beginning of the Third Book he and the Fathers there assembled give an account of their Faith in a Creed which they intitule A Confession of the Catholique Faith which we have received from the Holy Fathers which we hold and believe with a pure heart It is that in S. Hierom's Works inscribed Symboli explanatio ad Damasum I. which they thus subscribe This is the true integrity of the Catholique tradition of Faith which we believe and confess with a sincere heart c. This is the true Faith this confession we preserve and hold which whosoever keeps whole and undefiled he shall have everlasting Salvation Thus far therefore they were not got beyond the first Creed of which this is the explanation Nor was John Damascen himself advanced any further but confined his belief to what is contained in the Law and the Prophets Apostles and Evangelists 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 (t) L. 1. Orthod Fid. cap. 1. seeking for nothing beyond these For since God is good and envies no body he concludes that he hath revealed there all that is profitable for us and concealed only those things we are not able to bear And therefore let us love saith he these things let us abide in them not removing the Eternal Boundaries nor going beyond the Divine Tradition Which they seem to have preserved without exceeding the ancient limits in the beginning of the Ninth Age. For in a Council at Mentz (u) An. 813. Can. XLV care is taken for teaching the People the Creed which they call signaculum fidei the seal of Faith and the Lords Prayer for which end they are required to send their Children to School or to the Monasteries or their Parish Priests that they might rightly learn the Catholique Faith and the Lords Prayer Hitherto therefore the Catholique Faith was contained in the common Creed which had been from the beginning But towards the latter end of that Age the Council of (x) An. 859. Act. 10. Can. 1. Constantinople which the Roman Church calls the the VIIIth General Council began to talk of the Regulae Patrum the Rules of the Fathers in stead of the ancient word Regula fidei the Rule of Faith which is the Apostles Creed and called them the Secondary Oracles And therefore professed not only to hold all that the Catholique Church received from the Apostles and the General Councils but from any Father or great Doctor in the Church Which was the ready way to change the Faith of the Church and to turn particular Mens Opinions into matter of common belief though no new Article was as yet put into the ancient Creed The two next Ages are acknowledged to be so barbarous by the Writers of the Roman Church that they are ashamed of them and in some Collections they have made of the Councils there is not so much as one mentioned in the Tenth Age. And in the following there were so many frivolous things debated and such Corruptions crept into the Christian Doctrine that they run on very fast to the introducing a new Creed into the Church Yet this is remarkable that in the time of Thomas Aquinas who flourished in the XIIIth Century the Scripture still continued the only Rule of Faith and the Apostles Creed a sufficient summary of the Faith therein contained For in the resolution of this doubt Why should Articles of Faith be put in the Creed since the Scripture is the Rule of Faith to which it is not lawfull to add or from it to substract his Anwer is (y) Secunda 2 â—ae Q. 1. Art. IX ad primum that the Truth of Faith is diffusely and after divers manners and sometimes obscurely contained in Scripture so that long study and exercise is required to find out the truth of Faith there which they that have abundance of business have not leisure to use And therefore it was necessary that out of the sentences of Holy Scripture something manifest and clear should be summarily gathered which should be propounded unto all to be believed Which truly is not added to the Holy Scripture but rather taken out of the Holy Scripture And resolving next of all that doubt There is one Faith as the Apostle saith IV. Ephes but many Creeds his answer is (z) Ib. ad 〈◊〉 that in all the Creeds the same truth of Faith is taught But it was necessary the people should there be instructed more diligently in the truth of Faith where errors sprung up lest the Faith of the simple should be corrupted by Hereticks And this was the Cause why it was needsul to set forth more Creeds which differ in no other thing but this that those things are explained more fully in one which are contained implicitly in another To the same purpose many other of that sort of Writers declare their sense in the following Ages And this also is worthy of great remark that no longer ago than at the Council of Florence begun 1438 which the Greeks call the VIIIth General Council the Authority of the above-named Ephesine Canon about holding to the Nicene Creed was pressed with great earnestness by the Greeks upon the Latins there assembled For they said it was by no means lawful to add 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 (†) Tom. XIII Lab. Sess X. p. 162. not so much as a syllable nor a phrase nor a word and laid such a weight upon it as to affirm No man will accuse that Faith of imperfection unless he be mad * Ib. p. 163. And they likewise backt it with a passage in a Letter of Pope Celestine to Nestorius †Ib. p. 167. where he saith who is not to be judged worthy of an Anathema that either adds or takes away 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 For that Faith which was delivered by the Apostles requires neither addition nor diminution Unto which the Roman Bishops had nothing to reply but that the Canon did not forbid another exposition 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 consonant to the Truth in that Creed Ib. p. 167. but only 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉
though we should be ignorant of some of them For who can think for instance that it is of the same necessity to be able to give an account of the Genealogy of our Saviour mentioned I. Matth. III. Luke and to believe that he is the Son of God made flesh for our Salvation That foundation therefore which was laid in every Church as it was at Corinth 1 III. 11. were such Doctrines concerning Jesus Christ as every Christian was bound to learn and actually believe in other points it sufficed if they had a pious preparation of mind to learn and believe any thing revealed in the Scriptures when it was sufficiently cleared to them Now these two things that there are such fundamental truths or first principles and that they are no other than those contained in the Creed ought to be asserted and maintained for the honour and glory of God our Saviour which is much concerned herein For it tends much to the glory of the Almighty lover of Souls that it should be believed he doth not lay equall weight upon all truths nor made them alike necessary to be received for the obtaining his favour and grace and that it should be certainly known and be without Controversie and question what those truths are which he expects should be received and heartily embraced in order to our Salvation For otherwise the most of Christian people must necessarily perish who either are not capable of knowing more than these great things or have not the means of knowing more or not with any certainty but must be content to rest here As well they may for why was the Creed called by the name of the Symbol of Faith but because it was the mark or sign which might serve to distinguish true Christians who embraced it from Infidels or misbelievers who did not receive it or were defective in it This is the true reason of the name of Symbol which is as much as tessera signaculum quo inter fideles persid s secernitur (f) Maximus Taur de Trad. Synb the token mark or badge whereby the faithful were known and distinguisht from the persidious And therefore it comprehends briefly all the Fundamental points of Faith else it could not be a distinctive note or character sufficient to sever right Believers from Infidels Hereticks and Apostates But so it was that they who owned this Creed were owned for Christians they who did not confess it were rejected for by a Man's answer to this who was examined he was discovered just as a Soldier is by the Word si hostis sit an socius as both Isidore and Ruffinus before him speaks whether he were an Enemy or a fellow Souldier of Jesus Christ To this Test alone every one was brought by this touch-stone he was tried whether he were a Christian of the right Stamp or a false adulterate coyn as the Ancients speak which is a demonstration that they lookt upon this as a perfect summary of the Catholique Faith sufficient of it self as you heard Athanasius (g) 〈…〉 speaks for the overthrow of all impiety and for the establishment of piety in Christ Nay this sense of the word Symbol is owned by the Roman Catechism it self Cap. 1. Quaest 3. IV. From whence it necessarily follows that no man can justly be called an Heretick who heartily embraces and stedfastly holds to this Faith. How should he when there is no Catholique no Fundamental Article of Christian Truth but he is perswaded of it and professes it No part of that Creed which is the Sign the Mark and Note as you have heard whereby Christians are approved and discerned from misbelievers as well as unbelievers which he doubts of and doth not acknowledge It is a very lamentable thing that the imputation of Heresie should be so frequent and familiar among Christians upon the account of different Opinions only which they are passionately in love withal though no parts of the Catholique Faith. They of the Church of Rome especially are so foully guilty of this and so strangely fiery that they not only account us Hereticks but look upon us as little better than Infidels nay seem to have more kindness for Jews which they tolerate among them when they will not suffer us who believe all the Creeds that were known in the Church for above 1500 years For they call themselves Catholiques in distinction from us whom they will not allow to be members of the Catholique Church though we have a clearer title to it than themselves For I have shown that we unfeignedly believe whatsoever is truly Catholique and reject nothing but what is merely Roman We embrace that form of Faith which they themselves say (b) Catech. Rom. pars 1. cap. 1. Q. 2. was composed by the Apostles for this very end that all might think and speak the very same thing and that there might be no schisms among them whom they had called to the unity of Faith but they might be perfectly joyned together in the same mind and in the same judgment It is not our fault then that there is not this unity and perfect agreement for we stedfastly hold that which should thus link us all together but it is their fault who have forsaken this Apostolical method by making another form of Faith which instead of uniting hath broken Christians all in pieces For we cannot agree to that because it doth not contain Catholique truths which according to Vincentius his rule have been held every where always and by all but are the Tenents only of a particular Church which hath no power to lay any other Foundation than that which was long ago laid in the truly Catholique Church Which Catholique Church we believe better than themselves who appropriate the name of Catholiques to their own party and thereby restrain the Catholique Church to those of their opinion This certainly was the Heresie of the Donatists who esteemed all other Christians to be no better than Pagans (i) Optatus L. III. tait Parn. 1631. and were reproved by the true Catholiques just as we now answer for our selves in such words as these Do you call one a Pagan after the profession of the Faith Can he be a Pagan who hath believed in the name of the Father Son and Holy Ghost For that is a short Creed which comprehends all the Articles of the Christian Faith as S. Hilary (k) L. 2. de Tâ—â—â—itate discourses who not only calls this forma fidei certa the certain form of Faith but having mentioned those words Go baptize them in the Name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost asks this question what is there that is not contained in that same Sacrament of humane Salvation or what is there that remains or is obscure All things are full and perfect as coming from him that is full and perfect And thus he concludes all his Books on that Subject with this Prayer (l) L. XII
they have respect to the knowledge of God or to the Creation and government of the World or to the redemption of Mankind or belong to the rewards of the good and the punishments of the bad are contained in the Doctrine of the Creed From whence this question naturally arises how come so many new Articles to be made necessary if all things belonging to the Christian Faith be contained in the Apostles Creed I can see no reason for it but only to maintain the grandeur of the Roman Church for there is no more simply necessary for all to be believed as Bellarmine himself confesses (q) L. IV. de Verâ—o Dei C. XI but the Articles of that Creed and therefore the rest are superfluous and ought to be discarded as not so needful but that Men may be saved without them 3. And for the Third that they are mere Novelties unknown to those in old time there are the like confessions of ingenuous Men amongst them Aeneas Sylvius afterward Pope Pius II. confesses (r) Epist 288. that before the time of the Council of Nice little regard was had to the Roman Church Which is a plain contradiction to Pope Pius the fourth's Article of New Belief that she is the Mother and Mistress of all Churches for none can doubt but they understood their duty in those days and practised it also to their Betters especially to a Parent The same may be said of the Doctrine of Transubstantiation which some School-men have said not to be very ancient among which are Scotus and Gabriel Biel. They are the words of Suarez (s) Disput Tom. 3. Disp 30. unto whom many other testimonies may be added of the Doctors of that Church particularly Alphonsus à Castro who saith the ancient Writers spake very seldom of Transubstantiation he should have said Not at all for Cassander honestly acknowledges it to be a Novelty (t) See a late Treatise of Transubstantiation by an Author of the Roman Communion Part I. The like is acknowledged of the Sacrifice of the Mass which neither Thomas Aquinas nor Gabriel Biel long after him believed to be proper or propitiatory but give the same account that we do why the celebration of this Sacrament is called a Sacrifice of Christ viz. because the Images of things are called by the names of the things which they represent for which S. Austin is quoted and because by this Sacrament we are made partakers of the benefits of Christ's Passion (u) Summe Par. III. Q. 83. Artic. l. Respond That Purgatory was for a good while unknown and but lately known to the whole Church is confessed by our Bishop Fisher (x) Ross contra Lâ—tâ— Art. XVIII who by the whole Church means only the Latin Church for in the same place he saith to this day it is not believed by the Greeks The same he saith of Indulgences which began with Mens fears of Purgatory The same I might observe of the Seven Sacraments and the rest of their Articles but I will only observe the contradiction to which they swear in the very first new Article wherein they declare that they embrace Apostotical and Ecclesiastical Traditions and yet consent at the same time by swearing to all that is decreed in the Council of Trent to administer the Holy Communion but in one kind which for a thousand Years and more in some places for 1300 Years was administred in both kinds every where even in the Roman Church by an undoubted Apostolical Tradition and Ecclesiastical custom and practice which continues in all other Churches to this day Which observation evidently convinces them to be guilty of the most fearful sin in cursing and damning those who do not receive these Novel Doctrines though they faithfully embrace all the Doctrines of the truly Catholique Faith and had rather die than deny any part thereof But let us be of good comfort we are safe enough notwithstanding all these Anathema's which they thunder out against us For I have proved that were these Doctrines true as they are certainly false which they press upon us yet we should not be Hereticks if we did not believe them and so not fall upon this account under the sentence of damnation Because it is only the denial of the great and fundamental Truths that can make us incur such a danger other Truths there are of which we may be ignorant without danger of perishing provided we still hold the Foundation and keep the Faith as the Apostle speaks with a life according to it They themselves therefore knew that these terrible Anathema's are but bugbear words which they use to affright Children withal For they who can read what the wisest and best of them write will find that they confess these new Articles to be superfluous while they plainly say the Apostles Creed contains all things necessary to Salvation Thus Gregory of Valentia * In secunda secundae Disp 2. Q. 7. The Articles of Faith contained in the Creed are as it were the first Principles of Christian Faith in which are comprized the summ of Evangelical Doctrine which all are bound explicitely to believe Thus the Fathers judge when they affirm this Creed was composed by the Apostles that all might have a short Summary of those things which are to be believed and are scatteredly contained in the Scriptures Thus also writes Filiucius and a great many more even the Trent Catechism it self as I have shown before So that we have nothing to do but to hold fast that which we have been taught from the beginning and to make it the Rule of our Lives as well as of our Faith. And that now I must tell you for a Conclusion of this part of my Discourse is the Grand Truth of all the main point of the Christian belief that the intention of all Divine Truths and of Faith it self is to make us truly godly They can do us no service if they do not produce this effect Whence it is that in this very Epistle of S. Paul he calls Christianity the Doctrine that is according unto godliness 1 Tim. VI. 3. and a little after calls it godliness v. 6. But Godliness that is the Christian Religion with contentment is great gain And indeed we may well be contented with the Christian Faith and Hope and think our selves happy in such glorious expectations hereafter nay look upon our selves as exceeding great gainers whatsoever we lose here upon this account if we lose not the hope of immortal life In the Epistle to Titus also in the very first Verse he calls it the truth which is after godliness which is the very Truth that is the subject of my Discourse as appears by what follows when the Apostle saith it is a mystery of godliness Not a cunning device to get Mony to advance our wordly Grandeur and Pomp much less a crafty Artifice to excuse us from living well or to palliate wickedness and show us a way how to be
shows that the Ancient Christians lookt upon the Church as the Pillar and Ground of Truth no other ways but as it professes preaches establishes and keeps up the Doctrine of Christ and of his Apostles recorded in the Holy Scriptures unto all which they indifferently apply these words of S. Paul which are thought immediately to speak of the Church which supports the Truth delivered in the Holy Scriptures from Christ and from his Apostles Upon which account the Creed also which is a comprehensive breviary of the great Scripture Doctrines is wont to have the same attribute given to it Particularly by Epiphanius (m) In Exposit fidei Cathol n. 19. who calls it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Pillar as the Greek word signifies in good Authors or prop of Truth c. our life our hope and the assurance of immortality And by S. Austin (n) De Symbolo ad Catechum L. III. C. 1. who tells the Catechumens in his Exposition of the Creed to them that it is fidei Catholicae fundamentum c. the Foundation of the Catholique Faith upon which the edifice of the Church arose built by the hands of the Apostles and Prophets Which hath made some learned Men (o) Jo. Camer Jac. Capellus refer these words of S. Paul not to what goes before but to the words following making a full stop at God and then beginning a new sentence in this manner The Pillar and Ground of the Truth and without Controversie great is the mystery of godliness c. which reading is countenanced by a Greek Edition of the New Testament at Basil 1540. where the words are so pointed as if the sence were this God incarnate and the great Truths depending thereupon ought to be the very Foundation of the Doctrine thou preachest The Doctrines of the Creed that is are the very Foundation and Pillars of the Christian Faith as the Jews it is known call the great principle of their Religion the Foundation of the Foundation the Pillar of Wisdom as Maimon speaks when he treats of this matter Stick close therefore to the Holy Scriptures and to these Articles of the Faith in the Apostles Creed which are the fundamental truths of Christianity it appears by what I have now said by which the Church maintains and defends the Truth and the Truth upholds the Church and we defend both Hold this fast as the ground of all and likewise lay up the word of God in your heart that it may setle there and take root and bring forth fruit unto Holiness that your end may be everlasting Life Make the Holy Scriptures your Rule and trust to them according to what the Son of Sirach saith of its ancient Books Ecclus XXXIII 3. A Man of understanding trusts in the Law and the Law is faithful to him as an Oracle or as the asking of Vrim That is here he may enquire and have a certain answer which will not deceive him Show your selves such Men of understanding as to enquire no where else And if any Church or Person would have you enquire of them only take that for an undoubted proof they are not to be trusted If they would not guide you by the Holy Scriptures that is by Christ the way as you have seen who hath shown us no where else that we know of what we ought to believe if they would have you follow their ungrounded Traditions whereby they would inlarge your Creed beyond the ancient bounds know that you ought not to follow them nor be led by them For such may soon cease to be the pillars and supporters of the Truth because they leave that whereby they should support it and place themselves whom they call the Church in the stead of it An evident sign they are not what they pretend for the Church it self ought to be demonstrated by the Scriptures So S. Austin (p) L. de Vnitate Ecclesiae cap. XVI tells the Donatists in those known words which are worthy to be preserved in remembrance Setting aside all such things as these which he had said they could likewise alledge let them demonstrate their Church if they can not in the discourses and rumours of the Africans not in the Councils of their Bishops not in the Letters of any disputers whatsoever not in signs and fallacious wonders for we are prepared and rendred cautious against these by the word of the Lord but in the prescript of the Law in the predictions of the Prophets in the Songs of the Psalms in the words of the SHEPHERD himself i. e. Christ in the preachings and labours of the Evangelists that is in all the Canonical authorities of the holy Books Let this be done so as not to gather and relate those things which are obscurely or ambiguously or figuratively spoken there which every one may interpret as he pleases according to his own sense For such things cannot be rightly understood and expounded unless those things which are most clearly spoken be first held by a firm Faith. This is the very sense of the Church of England which teaches all her members first to hold by a firm Faith those things which are clearly revealed in the Holy Scriptures and by them to understand and expound those things that are more obscurely delivered believing nothing to be necessary which is not read therein nor may be proved thereby nor receiving the Doctrines and Decrees of any Church unless it may be declared that they be taken from thence For haec sunt causae nostrae documenta haec fundamenta haec firmamenta as he there speaks you heard before These are the proofs of our Cause these are its foundations these are its supports And therefore as he also speaks in another Chapter of the same Book (q) Cap. III. de Vnitate Ecclesiae which he begins thus Let us not hear such speeches as these These things say I Those things sayest thou but let us hear These things saith the LORD These are certainly Books of the Lord to whose authority we both consent we both believe we both obey There let us seek the Church there let us discuss our Cause And let us not so much as think of looking after any other Articles of Faith but those which were from the beginning which our Church firmly believes in the three Creeds Nice-Creed Athanasius and that commonly called the Apostles (r) Article VIII because they may be proved by most certain warrants of Holy Scripture For after the Faith confessed and sworn in Baptism as S. Hilary (ſ) Ad Constantium August speaks we ought not quicquam aliud vel ambigere vel innovare either to doubt or innovate any other thing It is absurd that is to doubt whether this be sufficient or to add any other to it as if this were not enough So he interprets it a little after Faith is still inquired after as if there were no Faith already Faith is to be written as if it were not in the