inquit haereses obortae sunt aut nata sūt schismata quam quod Sacerdoti Dei non obtemperatur nec vnus in Ecclesia ad tē pus Sacerdos Iudex vice Christi cogitatur teaching peruerse things to draw disciples after them wherby is euidenced that no priuat man is an infallible interpreter of holy scriptures neither can know certainly that scriptures are the word of God laying aside the Churches authority For example credence is not giuen to the canon or caralogue of scriptures because of scripture testimony which no where attestes that catalogue in so much that Luther and Caluin down from the begining of their defection to the departure out of the world contended about the number of canonicall scriptures and their adherents of these dayes respectiuely continue in the pursuance of the same dispute Moreouer there is greater reason that the christian faith should rely rather on the Church which * S. Cypri in trac de vnitate Ecclesiae adulterari inquit nō potest sponsae Christi incorrupta est pudicae is an infallible ground and piller of truth then of sole scriptures which are liable to mutations corruptions and false interpretations howeuer scriptures cōsidered in themselues precisely do chaleng equall authority with the Church the same diuine spirit that directeth the tongues of the supream pastours in speaking (o) God by his absolute and extrrordinary power can himselfe alone or by an Angel instruct men and reueale matters of faith and christian religion without the ministery of the Church And doubtless the Apostles had noe other master but God himselfe as to sundry mysteries of christian faith and Christ himselfe confesseth that S. Peter came to the knowledge of his diuine nature by reuelation from God the Father Caro Sanguic non reuelauit tibi sed Pater meus guided the pennes of the Apostles and Euangelists in writing and as the Church beareth witnesse of the scriptures infallible doctrine so the scriptures do witness the Churches infalible authority yet so as that faith in order to its acte of assent is resolued into the Church and not into the scriptures for noe man can prudently belieue any scripture to be the word of God if the Church that is the ground and piller of truth should not declare it for such howeuer Catholicks who doe infer the Churches infallibility from the testimony of scripture and the authority of scripture from the testimony of the Church are noe more guilty of committing (p) According to Euclide a mathematicall circle taken in the proper sense is the passing of one and the same line from and the repassing vnto the same point and by the same way a circle of errour then are Philosophers that assert mutuall causalities or doe argue from a cause its proper effect and from an effect its proper cause for example from the rising of the sun is proued the existence of the day and againe the existence of the day proueth the risiing of the sun wherin there is noe circle of errour which properly consisteth in the coming again of the same thing vnto the same thing from whence it came and by the same way it came but the way of one cause is not the way of an other cause nor the way of an effect is the way of the cause wherof it is the effect in like manner the way of the Church which is a cleare speaking Iudge is not the way of the scriptures which consiste in mute elements of characters and although we belieue that the Church is an infallible proposer of all matters pertaining to faith because of the scripture testimony neuertheless if the scriptures had borne noe witness therof there is euidence of credibility enough to induce vs prudently to belieue the Churches infallibility which euen before the writing of scriptures was beliued neither do we recur to scriptures to proue it (q) In disputs or conferences with such as deny holy scriptures motiues of credibility haue weight with them and that one which S. Austin vseth l. con Epis Faus cap. 4. seems of greattest moment Many things saith he keepe me fast in the bosom of the Catholick Church for example the vnanimous accord of people and nations authority confirmed by miracles .... by antiquity strengthned and the succession of Bishops dovvn from S. Peter the Apostle to vvhom our lord committed the feeding of his sheepe vnto the present Episcopacy but when we haue to doe with such as admit them and euen then we doe not alledge scriptures as the formall cause the Churches infallibility is known by for that is diuine reuelation but as witness of it only for we doe not belieue precisely that the Church is infallible because the scripturs do say it but in regard of many other motiues which do moue vs to giue our assent thereto neither was the church intended for the vse of the scriptures but scriptures for the vse of the Church besides no man without manifesting extream weakness can except against the mutuall testimony that Christ and S. Iohn Baptist gaue of one another or against the disciples of both who belieued their masters to be such as their masters reciprocally had declared theselues to bee The principall marks or tokens of the true Church * Quatuor illa signa dilucide constant ex sacra scriptura ex symbolis Apostolorum Nicae S. Athanasij expressè habentur in sym Constātinop cuius Patres voce apostolicam diuinitus addiderunt are foure set douwn in that Article of christian faith viz I belieue one holy catholick and apostolick Church Albeit that the true Church consisteth of many members yet it is but one body 1. Cor. 12. of Christ in vnity of faith and baptism One lord one faith one baptism Ep. 4. nor can Christ be an author of diuision that is a God of vnion Likwise it is holy for as much as it is the body of Christ that is the fountain of all holyness and enioyes a sacrifice and Sacraments which confer sanctity neither matters it that sundry members of his body are guilty of mortall transgressions For as such as profess any art are counted artificers though they doe not act according to the principalls or rules there-of so the said members in regard they put on Christ (r) According to S. Austin in psal 85. if all christians and true belieuers are baptized in Christ they haue put on Christ as the Apostle reacheth Gal. 3. and if they be made members of his body and say they are not holy they do an iniury to the head whose members are holy by Baptism and become the chosen people of God by faith are called holy although they doe not obserue the ordinances and lawes of either For example 1. Cor. 1. the Corinthians are said to be sanctified in Christ IESVS and holy neuertheless there were among them both the naturall and carnall men The true Church militant is (ſ) According to the Euangelist
the Idolatry of the Synagogue and the people her children After the like manner the Digbean Theology which is the product of Mr. Whites 40. yeares study to proue that outward sin doth not necessarily exclude charity from the souls nor that the soul is excluded from the kingdom of Heauen by outward sin make scripture giue an example therof Gen. 19. that is of the sweet agreement between the loue of God and outward sin in Lot and his daughters yet indeed no one place of holy scripture attestes that Lot and his daughters retained charity with their outward sin As touching Lot the holy writer seemes rather to excuse then accuse him in order to outward sin taken in the proper sense For t is expresly set down that his daughters made him drinke wine and lay with him but he perceiued not neither when they lay down neither when they rose so that lot might want knowledg of and thereby voluntary condescention to the fact and in consequence of which might not sin because sin properly taken importes of necessity (d) Sin of necessity includes a voluntary assent of the will which supposeth an act of the vnderstanding for as S Austin often inculcateth no man sinneth by doing a thing which he cannot auoid a voluntary act of the will for S. Austin teacheth that no man sinneth in a thing that he cannot * Hac propositio homo peccat damnabiliter in â—o quod necessario facit est damnata à Pio 5. Gregor 13. secundum Aug. eam asserere summae est iniquitatis ac demeÌ„tiae ait S. Hiero. vbi est necessitas ibi neque meritum neque demeritum neque laus neque vituperium neque vita aeterna neque damnatio auoid or eschew in regard wherof some of the ancient Fathers endeauour to absolue lot from all guilt albeit that the maior part and current of Catholick Doctors of these dayes doe ascribe vnto him the sin of drunkennes at least in the second bout and to his daughters the guilt of both for as much as they voluntarily procured the one and committed the other sin But as to Mr. whites assertion Author of the Digbean Theologie to witt If one should commit an outward deadly sin retaining a loue to God notwithstanding he might goe to Heauen which importes communion fellowship and a Iouing agreement between charity and outward sin a doctrine truly which hath been hid in darknes since the first age of christianity for 1660. yeares till the supream prouidence sent Mr. white to teach Christian schools that charity and deadly sin are not inconsistent together which he proues from the text set down thus God did bless the progeny that proceeded from Lot and his daughters therfore Lot and his daughters retained charity that is continued in holy society and freindshipp with God notwithstanding their externall sin of * Jn filiabus Lot propriè fuit peccatum incestus vt fusè probat Aug. l. 22. contrae faustum cuÌ„ ab illis fuerit causatum voluntariè incest but good God what a poore demonstratiue argument is this where the antecedent proposition is euidently false and the consequence suppose the antecedent were true very inconsequently deduced Falsity as to the antecedent plainly appeares for as that issue was born in horrible incest so was it and the posterity therof namely the Amonites and the Moabites vile and wicked * Aug. l. quaes in Deutro qu. 35. notat ab Abrahamo cuius frater erat Lot vsque ad Ruth quae prima ex Moabitis intrauit in Ecclesiam decem generationes inueniri in so much that euen to their tenth generation they did not enter into the Church of our Lord according to scripture testimony and the deduction is very inconsequent if the antecedent proposition were granted because the supream prouidence many times blesseth the children of wicked parents so that the diuine blessing bestowed vppon children is no infallible argument to demonstrate that their parents did adhere to God in charity and holy society at the time they got them For example God blessed the issue of Iudas and Thamar in a great measure Christ as man descending from it albeit that both were grieuous sinners in order to the bringing forth of the said issue for Iudas the Father voluntarily committed simple fornication and Thamar the mother the sin of incest But perhaps the student of 40. yeares standing will alledge that the antecedent afore mentioned That God did bless the progeny c. is meant of temporall blessings only and indeed it cannot be denyed but that the said progeny for example Moab the son of Lots elder daughter and Ammon son of the younger were heads of great nations the Moabites descending from the one and the Ammonites from the other yet this answer will auail him nothing at all as to the point of the present difficulty being it implieth manifest weaknes to infer from the worldly aduantages of Moab and Ammon that Lot and his daughters retained charity that is holy society with God in the outward sin of incest For God prospered the kings of Egypt many hundred yeares though they did not adhere vnto him in communion and holy society And S. Austin attesteth that God did extend the territories of the Roman Empire for the morall vertues practiced by the ancient Romans which notwithstanding were not endued with diuine charity Hereby plainly appeares that the holy scripture will not receiue into their sanctuary Mr. Whites Theology truly noe wonder for t is a doctrine destructiue of all morality and christian Religion in regard the excellent agreement that it setles between charity and externall sin must as it were of necessity induce fraile nature to commit outward sins of the flesh presuming that notwithstanding all outward vncleanes namely of drunkennes simple fornication adultery the loue retained to God shall bring a man so sinning outwardly to Heauen Besides it doth preiudice the Apostles Theology Neither drunkards nor fornicatours nor adulterers shall inherit the kingdom of Heauen Heb. 13 But perhaps it will be replyed that the Apostle excludes only such drunkards fornicatours and adulterers c. from the kingdom of Heauen as haue nothing of charity together with the sinns of drunkennes fornication and adultery so that though drunkards c. without charity cannot inherit the kingdom of God neuertheless charitable drunkards charitable fornicatours charitable adulterers charitable murderers shall not be excluded is this the Theology that 40. Yeares study hath brought forth But to returne vnto the matter in debate t is an article of Christian faith Trident. sess 6. can 15. can 27. that charity and deadly sin are incompatible and S. Iames the Apostle giueth euidence therof in the 2. Chapter of his canonicall Epistle saying Whosoeuer shall keep the whole law and yet offendeth in one he is guilty of all Because whosoeuer transgresseth one sole precept of the law is liable to eternall malediction enioyn'd by God to the
Pet. 10. in order to many diuine ordinances in regard they doe not shew plainly clearly and euidently all the mysterious precepts of Christian faith that require necessary obseruance wherefore it is an extream weakness to infer from the light of the written a negation of light in the vnwritten word of God as to instruction in iustice and saluation and indeed down from the begining of the Church christian religion hath in all times * Trid sess 4. cap. 1. declarat veritatem disciplinä Ecclesiae contineri in libris scriptis sine scripto traditionibus qua ex ipsius Christi ore ab Apostolic acceptae aut ab ipsis Apostolis Spiritu sancto dictāte quasi per manus traditae ad nos vsque peruenerūt huiusmodi traditionū contemptoros anathemati subiecit Sectarij vero communiter reijciuns eruditiones apostolicas affirmantes omnia qua sine dispendio sulutis possunt ignorari apertè contineri in scripturis been directed and gouerned by both of the said lights that is by the written and vnwritten word as by laws and customs which kind of gouerment is common alike to euery common wealth instituted aright That this double light (c) According to S. Irenaens p. 3. con haer c. 3. 4. Tertull. l. de coro militum cap. 3. S. Basil l. ad Amphilochium de Spiritu sancto cap. 29. S. Austin Epis ad Janua there is full parity between traditions ad scriptures warrantable authority being common alike to the one and the other Wherefore S. Chrys hom 4. in 2. ad Thess saith Est traditio nihil quaras amplius T' is tradition seeke no further of written and vnwritten Traditions is of necessary and perpetuall vse in the Church appeareth by the second Epistie to the Thesalonians where S. Paul enioyneth the keeping of both saying stand fast keepe the Traditions which you haue been taught either by word or our Epistle All the doctrines necessary to saluation which the Apostles receiued either from the mouth of Iesus-Christ or by inspiration of the holy Ghost they deliuered to the faithfull of those dayes partly in written and partly in vnwritten traditions which down from the primatiue Church to the present times haue passed as from hand to hand in a continuall line of priestly succession Moreouer it appeareth clearly by the second Chapter of S. Iohns canonicall Epistle that the Apostles thought it not expedient to set forth in writing all matters of christian religion necessary to saluation for he expresly saith although I had many things to write vnto you yet would I not write with paper and inck for I trust to come vnto you and speak mouth to mouth that your ioy may bee full which he repeateth in the end of his third canonicall Epistle saying I haue many things to write but I will not with ynck and pen write vnto thee and doubtless as Christ when he said to his Disciples Io. 16. I haue yet many things to say vnto you but ye cannot beare them now meant of many mysteries of faith distinct from those he had already taught them so S. Iohns meaning was that he had other doctrines of christian faith or manners to deliuer by word of mouth then those he had written with ynck and pen and truly the particles That your ioy may be full doe import as much being meant of spirituall ioy such as faithfull christians commonly receiue when they are instructed in things pertaining to iustice and saluation and it is not in reason probable that S. Iohn should vnderstand temperall ioy in order to wordly aduantages the intent of his Epistle being to stir vp a Mother and her son vnto a vertuous life in Iesus-Christ neither is it as to reason credible that so many things which S. Iohn purposely omitted to write were set down in writing either by himself afterward or by the other Apostles afore there being no scripture testimony wheron to ground those coniectures inuented meerly by the aduersaries of vnwritten traditions Besids it is plainly euident that sundry vnwritten doctrines of christian religion which are not contained expresly in any part of the new or old Testament are of necessary credence For example we must belieue with diuine faith the receiued catalogue or canon of both Testaments to be the true and vncorrupted word of God For otherwise those holy writings would haue nothing of weight with vs as theron to relie our saluation notwithstanding not any part of either Testament expresseth the receiued catalogue or canon for example we must belieue that the true sense of the written letter is a necessary and essentiall requisit to faith because in the sense that giueth life and not in the letter that bringeth death the true word of God consists but the true sense of the written letter that is to say how (d) The Caluinists in a publick disputation with the Antytrinitarians in the presence of Iohn the second elected king of Hungary engag'd to proue by scripture the mystery of the B. Trinity but failing in their engagement the king of a Caluinist became an Anti-trinitarian the written letter ought to be taken whether in a proper or figuratiue signification is not known but by the interpretation and tradition of the Church Again we must belieue that in one God there is a Trinity of diuine persons which be really distinct one from an other and no more yet not any writing of the Apostles or Euangelists (e) According to S. Chrys hom 4. operum imperf as in Heauen so in scripture God lies hid vnseen Wherefore as all men behold this corporall Heauen and not God that dwels within it so though many read the holy scriptures neuertheless they perceiue not the God of truth that lies hid in the inward seuse thereof expresly assertes a reall distinction or excludeth expresly a quaternity of persons and truly though S. Iohn saith in his canonicall Epistle cap. 4. that there be three which beare testimony in Heauen the Father the word and the holy Ghost neuertheless he doth not say expresly * Simplex affirmatio ternarij in aliquo non excludit vel negat ibi esse aliquod quartum cū in quaternario includatur ternarium qui asserit esse tres vbi sun◠quatuor non falsum dicit three only or that these three are really distinct one from an other for he addeth these three are one in so much that the great Sabellian heretick Praxeas taught that God was but one sole person that carried three distinct names in order to three seuerall effects naming him Father in as much as he createth all things son because be was borne of the Virgin Mary inuested with human nature and holy Ghost in regard he sanctifieth all creatures Wherfore if the Apostles had not deliuer'd to the faithfull of those days by word of mouth a reall distinction in God as to personality and a reall identity as to nature and substance and the Church
controuersies in debate for as much as they relate to faith Furthermore God who is not an accepter of persons Rom. 15. who is not God of men only but of women also and who desireth to saue all of each sex doubtless instituted a remedy against originall sin in fauour of men and women for as much as the expiation thereof is absolutely necessary vnto saluation wherfore in regard circumcision was the remedy proper to men and could not be applied to women some other expedient was ordained for their cure and although no express mention thereof be made in any part of the old Testament neuertheless that God instituted a remedy for the deliuerance of women * Quod qualeue fuerit illud remedium à Deo institutum ad subueniēdum faeminis quae nascebantur in peccato originali nullibi explicatur in sacris litteris nec porest deduci ex illis from the guilt of originall sin the Iews belieued as an article of faith necessary to saluation and indeed so it was as appeareth from the necessity of it and from the prouidence God hath ouer both men and women and truly to auerre that God was defectiue then in necessary requisits to the saluation of women is a manifest blasphemy wherby it is clear that euen the Iews in the old law held vnwritten besides written tradition as necessary vnto saluation neither is the said unwritten tradition preiudiced by the reply of some sectaries saying that the oblation of women in the Temple according to the law of Moyses did free them of originall sin For that legall offring was common alike to women and men and Christ was both circumcised and offered in the Temple nor by recurring for this deliuerance vnto the circumcision of Parents there being not any passage in the whole Testament of the old law that carrieth the least sound that way or that hath relation to the deliuerance of women from originall sin in vertu of their parents circumcision besides S. Austin and other ancient Fathers expresly teach that baptism is to Christians as circumcision was to the Iewes but no Christian sectary will say that women are sanctified and consecrated to God through their parents baptism for if it were enough for the purging out of originall sin to baptise the male there would be no need at all to baptise the female sex hereby it is clear again that the Iews of the old law allowed and professed vnwritten besides written traditions as necessary to saluation From the premises appeareth that the word of God taken precisely comprehendeth both vnwritten and written traditions in consequence of which vnwritten traditions are not additions to the word of God they being a part therof Wherfore neither Moyses Deut. 4. saying to the people of Israel Ye shall adde nothing to the word which I speake to you neither shall ye take ought from it Nor S. Paul Gal. 1. saying to the Galatians though that we or an Angel from Heauen preach vnto you (h) According to S. Austin tom 7. con liter petiliani l. 3. cap. 6. and tom 9. trac 98. in Io. the particle praeterquam besids in the cited Text imports the particle contra against or contrary so that the meaning is that nothing must be preached against or contrary to the holy scripture And truly this explication appears euidently by the Apostles arguing against those that asserted Iudaism to be consistent with christianism which assertion because it was contrary to the law of Christ the Apostle added the curse set down in the same sentence of the Text. Moreouer the Greek 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which the Latin Interpreter translateth praeterquam is vsed by the Apostle for contra not only in the Epistle alledged ad Gal. but also Rom. 4. besids what we haue preached vnto you let him be accursed condemne vnwritten traditions as sectaries do calumniate the Catholick Church besides sectaries very vnhandsomly and weakly do infer from these two scripture testimonies that no doctrines of faith ought to be receiued saue such as be contained expresly in or by euident consequence deduced from the written word of God for neither of both doe mention the written word of God The word says Moyses which I speake vnto you and that we haue preached vnto you says the Apostle but if it were granted vnto them what they cannot proue viz that Moyses then spoke what he had written afore notwithstanding they could not ouerthrow therby vnwritten traditions vnless they could proue which they can neuer doe that they be additions destructiue of or contrary to the written word of God for such additions only he meant and excluded by the cited scriptures and indeed if S. Paul had meant otherwise he should haue cursed S. Iohn the Euangelist that many yeares after his martyrdome writ reuelations which S. Paul had not preached to the Galatians likwise the Anathema had touched S. Paul himselfe that deliuered sundry passages in the acts of the Apostles which happened after his preaching to the Galatians Howeuer catholicks doe not deny but that traditions which are the vnwritten word be contained implicitly in the written word of God that is to say as in a generall principle from whence they are deducible and the whole word of God is contained in scriptutes yea in this sole Article of the Apostles Creed I belieue in the holy Catholick Church in as much as all the matters pertaining to faith and generall manners and not clearly expressed in holy scriptures are contained expresly in the doctrine of the Church which the scriptures commend vnto vs as infallible and indeed the whole word of God is expounded vnto vs in Christs command Math. 18. If he refuse to heare the Church let him be vnto thee as an heathen man and publican in regard wherof ancient Fathers do auerre all doctrines of faith to be contained in scriptures that is as in a generall principle from whence they can be deduced CHAR. XXJ. OF THE CHVRCH TRIVMPHANT THE CONTENTS Souls that remoue out of their earthly habitations cleansd from all vncleanes are instantly translated into Heauen the clear sight of God wherein consisteth heauenly beatitude is not deferd till the generall Resurrection though the office of mediation aduocation and intercession is proper to Christ alone as to the noblest manner therof neuertheless according to the Catholick Church all the Saints mediate and intercede in the sight of God for the faithfull on earth in subordination to Christ the Church of god does not nor neuer did teach that the faithfull on earth ought to mediate and intercede for the blessed in Heauen S. Paul did not mediate or intercede for Onesiphorus that he might obtaine mercy after his soule was beatifyed the ancient Liturgies of the Church approue not of prayers vnto helping of the blessed THe Church triumphant is a holy Congregation of blessed Saints reigning with Iesus-Christ innocēt souls not liable to any guilt of sin as soon (a) 2. Cor. 5. we know
vnto making it warme and therby drawes it into whatsoeuer sin he pleaseth besides * Isa 54. ecce ego creaui fabrum diabolum sufflantem in igne prunas proferentem vas in opus suum the bellowes of the deuils own mouth wherwith he blowes the coales in this sire of luxury he bringes forth other instruments to the worke for example old whores which keep a school of incontinency instruct young maides in all vnclean acts of carnall wantonnes and sell their * Ioel. 3. puellam veÌ„diderunt pro vino biberunt Virginity for wine to drink are the deuils incendiaries that worke in the furnace of luxury I * Ierâ—m 1. ollam incensam ego video id est vetulam nigram Olla enim quantumcunque alba si ad ignem frequeÌ„ter ponatur denigratur see saith the holy Prophet a seething pot that is an old harlot who boileth young women in the pleasures and lusts of the flesh vnto destruction both of body and soul As sire makes a pot black as a coal that was white afore and consumes it so at last the most beautifull men and women that frequente the fiery furnace of luxury become deformed and withered like a stock as to their bodies and in order to their souls most hatefull vnto God that * Deutro 23. Endures no whores of the daughters of his people nor no whore keepers of the sonns of his people for the one and the other is abomination in his sight Because the people of Israël began to commit whore dome with the daughthers of Moab God commanded Moses to take all the heads that is the principall among them and hang them vp against the sun in regard phinias slew Zambry fornicating with an Midianitisht woman he merited his priestly charge and dignity for euer Num. 25. and it matters not that lawes of some places namely in Italy suffer whores for the said lawes doe not consider the sin of whoredome but the peace and tranquillity of the common-wealth obtained through that indulgence in as much as adulteries and other great inconueniences tending to the disturbance therof are preuented and auoided therby to permit and to commit sin is not the same thing God permitteth wickednes which he doth not commit himselfe And though whores be exempt in regard of whore dome presisely from penall lawes of Magistratos which tollerat them neuertheless they are not deliuered therby from the tribunall of God that punisheth all wicked sinners In consequence of the premises t' is euident that no man ought (a) The common saying of two euills the lesser ought to be chosen is not meant of two sinnes which be spirituall euils but of corporall harms or dammages for according to the Apostle Rom. 8. noe man can lawfully commit the least sin although much good may come of it to commit a lesser for preuenting the doing of a greater sin wherfore S. Austin condemneth the fact of lot Gen. 19. that offered his innocent daughters to be deflowred for preuenting the filthy lusts of the Sodomits all though Lot was worthy of praise in regard of his abhorrence of so detestable a sin yet he deserued blame in seeking vnlawfull meanes to auoid it No wickednes ought to be done that good may come therby Furthermore the company * Tritum adagium est mare ignis mulier tria mala sed tamen minus tempestuosum est mare ignis minus inflammat in muliere omnia nocent oculi instar Basilisci vel solo aspectu venenant labia ora flammas vomunt vel leuis attactus inficit Et mulierem sacrae literae cum lcone vrso pardo colubro serpente comparant of wanton women is the deuils instrument that blowes the coales in this fire of luxury for through it loue is kindled as a fire vnto destruction Eccle. 9. a cat that sitteth neer the fire scorcheth her whit skin and a fly that toucheth the candle burneth its wings euen so a man that vseth (b) According to S. Hierom. à woman smiteth the conscience of a man with flams of fire and if young women dwell with men the deuil hath his snares among them the company of wanton women falleth into the snares of concupiscence and defileth his soul Besides as materiall fire is kindled by adding therto wood oyle and pitch so delicat meates * S. Hierâ— venter vino aestuans spumat in libidinem and strong wines taken immoderatly increase the flame of luxury and indeed whosoeuer eates and drinkes wantonly shewes no more willingnes to extinguish the burning coales of fiery lusts then he that castes into a house set on fire wood oyl and pitch shewes an inclination to quench it moreouer the body of man is not made for fornication or carnall vncleanes but for our lord that bought the whole man with the price of his precious blood to the end that both body and soul should serue to his glory our bodies are members of Christ and consequently a fornicatour is sacrilegious in as much as he giueth his body that is consecrated vnto God to any other likewise he is iniurious and contumelious to his body for he that committeth fornication (c) According to the Apostle 1. Cor. 6. fornication defileth the body with a peculiar kind of vncleanes so that carnall sensuality differs exceedingly from the inordinate delights of the other senses which haue nothing of brutall filthines howeuer carnall pleasure has no deformiry as to married people because of the vprightnes and integrity of conscience desire of issue holines of the Sacrament which therfore be called Bona matrimonij sinneth against his own Body where as other sins which a man doth are with out the body that is luxury defileth the body with a sordide brutall filthines which is not common a like to sinns committed by the other senses vix hearing seeing tasting smelling But notwithstanding all this euen among Christians of these daies doe rise cinick Philosophers which so flatter themselues in their carnall pleasures as to think that simple fornication hath nothing of mortall guilt Likewise the Digbean diuins so fool themselues as to beleiue that an outward sin for example outward fornication adultery incest murder doe not of necessity expell the loue of God out of the soul and in consequence therof do not obstruct the passage to Heauen and both the cinick Philosophy and the Digbean Theology lay claime to scripture testimony respectiuely for the proofe therof The cinick Philosophy alledgeth the first chapter of Osea where is mentioned that our lord said to Osea goe take vnto thee a wise of fornications and children of fornications and thence inferreth that luxury is lawfull as to simple fornication but t is a very weak inference for God commanded not the Prophet to commit fornication but matrimony with a woman that had fornicated afore that is to make an honest wife of a dishonest woman vnto representing a diuine mistery that might set forth
vnto instruction and * Hoc facite in mean coÌ„memorationem id est in memoriam passionis mortis meae Et 1. Pet. 4. Christo passo in carne vos eadem cogitatione armemini Vnde ait S. Bernardus passio Christi est vltimum resugium contra omnes illicitas voluptates visa inquit Christi passione quis tam deliciosus qui non abstineat quis taÌ„ iracundus vt non doleat quis tam malitiosus quem non poeniteat S. Augustinus nullum est ait remedium salubrius quam iugiter cogitare de passionâ— Christi full commemoration of Christ his death and passion in compliance with his own commande as it is plainly obseruable in the garments wherwith the Priest is inuested during the tyme of sacrifice as likewise in the Altar and ornament's therof for example 10. The Amice in as much as it is a linnen cloath which the Priest pulls ouer his face and fasten's in his neck doth signify the ragg of linnen wherwith the Iews blind-folded Christ in mockery when they smote and buffited him saying Prophesie to us o Christ who is he that smote thee Mat. 20.20 The Priests Albe that is a white linnen garment doth represent the rayment in which Herod inuested Christ after that he had despised and mocked him Luc. 23.30 The maniple that the Priest weareth on his left arme and the stole that hangeth about his neck doe figure the cord's and fetters with which the officers of the Iews bound Christ Io. 18. and led him from one place to an other from Annas to Caiphas from Caiphas to Pilat from Pilat to Herod and from Herod to Pilat again 40. The Chasuble that is the vppermost vestment doth express the purple garment the souldiers put on Christ Mar. 25. and the heauy cross also that Christ carried on his shouldiers to mount Caluary 50. The Priests (b) Tonsure that is a round crown made in the heads of Clergy-men is an ancient ceremony and according to S. Bede l. 5. 〈◊〉 S. Peter wore it in remembrance of the crown of thorns wherewith Christ's head was crown'd again S. Anicetus that was Chief Church-gouernour in the first 200. years in a certaine Epistle to the Bishops of France commanded all Priests to cut their haire to the end they might not appear delicate and effeminate like secular men that weare long hair for ornament sake Tonsure that is to say the crown of his head shaued in fashion of a round circle doth shew the crown of thornes which the souldiers platted and put about the sacred head of Christ Mar. 25.60 The sundry crosses that the Priest makes ouer the host and chalice before and after consecration are mysticall representations of the many greiuous torments which Christ endured in pursuance of the generall redemption 70. The eleuation of the host and chalice doth figure the lifting vp of Christ on the crosse and in as much as that ceremony is exhibited a part or seuerally it declares the seperatioÌ„ of Christ's soul from his body and his blood from his veins 80. The diuision of the host into three distinct parts doth shew the three substances in Christ vêªt videlicet the diuine of his person the spirituall of his soul and the materiall of his body and wheras one of the said parts is put into the chalice and as it were buried therin thereby is signify'd Christ's body in the sepulcher likewise the mingling therof with the blood demonstrates that the diuine personality was neuer seperated neither from his soul in his descent into Hell nor from his body lying in the sepulcher 90. The Priest's (c) According to the Decrees of Ancient Councils a Priest ought not to depart from the Altar before he giue his benediction again the people were bound to remaine in the Church till the Priest had blest them and indeed priestly benediction was euer practised In the law of nature Melchisedech blessed Abraham in the written law Moses and Aaron blessed the people of Israel and in the law of grace Christ blessed his Disciples benediction giuen in the end of the sacrifice of Mass relates vnto the peculiar recommendation whereby Christ did recommend his Church at the rendring of his soul into the hands of his diuine Father 10. The Altar representes Mount-Caluary and signifies the cross therin erected on which Christ offering as on an Altar a sacrifice of his own body and blood consummated for euer those that are sanctified Heb. 10. And truly as the name of smoak puts vs in minde of fire because of the necessary mutuall relation to each other for smoak of necessity comes from fire that is the cause therof so the name of an Altar doth relate vnto sacrifice necessarily this being included euen in the definition of an Altar taken in the proper sense for a reall Altar to sacrifice on And such is the Altar employed in the sacrifice of Mass called by the Ancient Fathers the Altar of Christ his body and so meant by the Apostle (d) The Apostle by saying Hebrae 13. that We haue an Altar vvhereof they haue no authority to eat vvich serue in the Tabernacle meant an Altar taken in the proper sense that is an Altar on which is offered the sacrifice of Christs body and blood according to the interpretation of the Ancient Fathers S. Greg. Nazian in ora desorore Gorgonia S. Chrysostom demons an Christus sit Deus S. Austin Epis 86. de ciuit l. 8. Confess c. 27. Theophy in 23. Mat. and of the sacrifice of this Altar those cannot eat which serue in the Tabernacle that is which follow the rites and custom's of the ancient Iews nor those which belieue not in the sacrifice of Christs body and blood But this holy Altar si sometymes cal'd Mensa Dominica The Table of our lord because of the heauenly meat our lords reall body and blood which is eaten and drunk there and indeed Mensa Table according to holy scripture often signifies an Altar namely Isa 65. Malach. 1. likewise S. Austin ser 103. de diuersis discoursing of S. Cyprian's Table so called in order to his holy Reliques which were put vnder the Table or Altar erected in the same place where S. Cyprian had suffered Martyrdom In the same place saith S. Austin a Table though erected to God neuertheless was nam'd S. Cyprians Table not because S. Cyprian had feasted there but in regard he had been sacrificed there and through his Martyrdom procured that Table not that he might feed or be fed at it but that vpon it sacrifice might be offered vnto God to whom himselfe had been made an oblation Haebr 13. saying Wee haue an Altar wherof such haue no authority to eate as serue the Tabernacle and for as much as Christs body is spirituall meate and his blood spirituall drink it is named also our lords Table 1. Cor. 10 you cannot say's the Apostle be partakers of our lords Table and the table of deuills
what the vniuersall Church practiseth constant and vniuersall practice that agreeth with so warrantable and euident testimonies as are set down Howeuer he produces but weake and incoÌ„sequent proof's for the establishing of his nouell doctrine for example from these words Maccab. For if he had not hoped that they which were slaine would rise again it had been superfluous and vain to pray for the dead he doth infer that the soul 's in Purgatory are not freed of their sufferings till the generall Resurrection and this inference he proueth only saying For if soul 's were released out of their pains through the prayers of the liuing before the Resurrection it would be extreame profit able to pray for the dead though no Resurrection should follow But where is the connection between the Scripture-Text and Mr. Whites inference shall it follow that good soul's must be imprisoned till the generall Resurrection because the noble and godly Iudas according to the profession of his Religion did belieue in the immortality of soul's and the Resurrection of their bodyes and indeed the true meaning of this scripture afore alledged according to all Orthodox writers is this viêªt videlicet if Iudas Maccabaeus had belieued soul 's to be mortall and to die with their bodyes which consequently should neuer rise again it had been superfluous and vain to pray for them and therfore religiously thinking of the Resurrection and fearing that the souls of his souldiers that were slaine in battell might be punished in the next life in respect of some sinnes they had committed vpon earth he commanded that prayers and sacrifice should be offered for their deliuerance from sin that is to say from temporall punishment due to their sinnes whence doubtlesse no wise and indicious man can infer the imprisonment of soul 's in Purgatory till the generall Resurrection which would neuer haue happened if souls had been mortall and died together with their bodies After the same manner he abuseth the new Testament Let the new iustrument saith he keepe time and harmony with the old let S. Paul be heard preaching to the same effect 1. Cor. 15. what shall they doe which are (n) by baptism for he dead the Apostle may mean water of tribulation and persecution wherewith primitiue Christians seem'd as it were baptised again may vnderstand voluntary afflictions for example praying fasting giuing of Almes c. which the liuing offer to God for the comfort and benefit of the dead moreouer the Apostle may mean the baptising of such as defer'd their baptism till the hower of death which Custome was vsuall in the primitiue Church and the Apostles sense is then if souls be mortall and in consequence therof no resurrection of the dead those which are baptised dying that is at the hower of their death reapo nothing of aduantage by their baptism baptised for the dead if the dead doe not rise at all From this holy text he inferreth that no benefit is obtained by baptism for the dead before the Resurrection not by so doing can soul 's till then be released But in earnest this is a pitifull deduction like vnto this God is in Heauen therfore Mr. Thomas White is at Roterdam for indeed there is nothing of connection between the antecedent and consequence and Mr. Whit's inference for it does not follow that soul's obtain nothing of profit before the Resurrection because S. Paul saith What shall they doe which are baptised for the dead meaning thereby to what purpose shall Christians pray fast giue Almes or suffer tribulation for Christ's sake if the dead rise not again Besides if Mr. Whit's inference were warrantable and vnquestionable the Apostle himself is not as yet in a capacity to obtaine that eminent benefit of being deliuered before the Resurrection For in the same Chapter he addeth to the word 's set down Why are we Apostles in icopardy euery hower if the dead rise not at all what aduantageth it me to haue prayed fasted endnred great persecution if the dead be not raised vp let us eat and drink for to morrow wee shall die that is if there be no Resurrection after death why doe wee giue our selues to any thing el's saue to eating and drinking Wherfore S. Paul himself according to Mr. White is but in the way to his blessed crowne for if his soul were already translated into Heauen his sufferings would haue aduantaged euen though no Resurrection should follow But it seemeth a strange thing that Mr. White should presume to gather from the words set downe that good souls shall not be released of the paines which they sufferin Purgatory before the generall Resurrection the said words not carrying the least sound that way for they neither speake of pain 's in order to the next life nor of releasing souls out of Purgatory and indeed the Apostles sole intent in the Chapter alledged is to proue the Resurrection of the dead and to that purpose brings sundry argument's The first whereof is that Christ our head is raised vp and therfore we his members shall rise again in regard of the fast connection that is between the head and the members thereof And what Mr. White alledgeth for the imprisonment of souls to the day of Iudgment is a secondary argument which S. Paul vseth only as a confirmation of his first argument to demonstrate the Resurrection of bodyes signifying therby that he himselfe together with the rest of the Apostles and primitiue Christians of those day 's had suffered in vain afflictions and tribulations if sou'ls had been mortall and consequently neuer to rise again for t' is clear by the very forme of the Apostles speech that he supposed the false opinion that teacheth souls to be mortall whence of necessity would follow that there should be no Resurrection at all and truly if the Apostle had not made that supposall he would haue concluded nothing for supposing souls to be immortall good works of this life would haue much aduantaged him for the obtaining of Heauenly blessedness though no Resurrection at all had followed And the same supposall is made by the holy writer of the Macchabies signisying therby if the dead were not to rise again it would follow that soul 's were mortall in consequence of which all prayers offered for them would be in vain where is obseruable that the Iewish sectaryes to wit Sadducies held that the soul 's were mortall and consequently denied the Resurrection of Bodies other Iewes which belieued aright professed immortality together with the Resurrection there being in each soul an innate desire to resume the body wherof it was the true form once and as to reason it is most consonant that God who createth nothing in vain will not frustrate that desire hence it was that the ancient Iew 's spoak of the immortality of souls and the Resurrection of bodyes alike and our Sauiour Christ Math. 22. to proue to the Sadducies the Resurrection of bodies infer's it from the
CHVRCH MILITANT THE CONTENTS God hath giuen to his Church on earth the keeping of all truth that we may not be as children wauering carryed about with euery wind of doctrine by diuine institution pastorall functiōs are of necessary and perpetuall vse in the Church vnto teaching christian faith and deciding controuersies pertaining thereto without being liable to errour God hath inuested Church-Gouernours with autority to make laws and ordinances and exacte obediēce vnto them the Church cannot lie hid priuat spirits haue nothing of power to interprete scriptures or to judge matters in debate concerning faith and religion the outward testimony of the Church is the ordinary expedient necessary to the receiuing of christian faith answeres to sundry obiections vrged by sectaries in fauour of a priuat reuealing spirit holy scriptures were neither primarily intended nor primaryly deliuered as supream Judges of controuersies in order to christian faith and religion profoundnes ' of mysteries plenteousnes and shortnes of sentences render the scriptures obscure and intricate to infer the Churches infallibility from the autority of scriptures and scriptutes infallible autority from the infallible testimony of the Church implies no circle of errour faith as to the assent thereof is resolued into the Church and not into the scriptures the four principall marks of the true Church taken joyntly agree with the Roman Church onely which is the one holy catholick and Apostolick Church that neuer deuiated from truth THe Church militant is the grownd and piller of truth 1. Tim. 3. as the foundation of an house supporteth and hindereth it from falling So the Church of God sustaineth and preserueth truth that is the doctrine of christian faith from perishing wherefore whosoeuer desireth to find out truth vnto saluation must seek it in the Church which is the certaine keeper and faithfull Guardian thereof the supream prouidence hauing put therein Some Apostles and some Prophets and some Euangelists and some Pastours and Teachers for the consummation of the Saints for the worke of the ministery and for the edification of the body of Christ vntill we all meet together in the vnity of faith and the knowledg of the son of God vnto a perfect man and vnto the measure of the age of the fulness of Christ that we henceforth be no more children wauering and carryed about with euery wind of doctrine by the wickednesse of men and crastines of Satan whereby they lie in waite to bring vs into errour Ephes 4. where the Apostle plainly asserteth pastorall function together with the office of teaching christian faith to be of necessary and perpetuall vse in the Church for the administring of Sacraments auoiding of errours and the confirming of such as shall wauer in religion and truly it cannot be conceiued as to reason probable that Christ coming into the world to be Gouernour of souls and to make vnto himselfe a glorious Church without spot or wrinckle Ephes 5. should not departing out of the world leaue necessary helps to preserue it in holynes (a) god instituted in the old law Deut. 17. à supream Tribunall consisting of Priests for the deciding of matters in debate in order to his people to the end that if inferiour Iudges should differ in iudgment or deuiate from the truth they might recur to the Council of Priests where one chief Iudge that is the high Priest was appointed to prouounce sentence and all others bound to giue obedience therto the law condemning those of pride which resisted or refused the high Priests decision in matters of controuersie again God so specially assisted the said Council with his spirit of truth that the high Priests sentence was infallible though himselfe might erre as a priuat person Wherefore Christ Mat. 23. commanded the people to doe what the Scribs and Pharisies said in regard they sate in the Chair of Moyses And S. Iohn cap. 11. ascribes not the truth of Caiphas prophesing that Christ ought to die for the safety of that nation vnto his speaking as of himselfe but to his speaking as high Priest of that same yeare which rendered him infallible in speaking in consequence of which seeing that God so directed the high Priest in the old law that he could not speake an vntruth from the Chair of Moyses it follows of necessity that Christ in his own new law of grace so specially assistes the high Priest his grand Vicar and supream head of the Church which he built on his beloued Apostle S. Peter that he cannot tell a lye from the Chair of the same S. Peter the first high Priest of the new law after Christ Wherefore the Churches supream Gouernour that succeds in that Chair cannot erre in his decrees that concerne matters of faith or generall manners notwithstanding that he were as wicked as Caiphas From hence plainly appear's the manifest weaknes of sundry sectaries which will haue the supream Priests sentence no longer to bind then hee pronounces sentence in conformity to the word of God for there is no warrantable authority saue that of the supream Pastours Tribunall which can assure vs of the diuine word for the scripture would not be belieued if it were not warranted from the infallible Chair of S. Peter Moreouer sundry sectaries say vnaduisedly that in the old law the sentence of the high Priests concerned only ciuill matters in debate and not controuersies pertaning to faith and religion for as to this point both the second book of paralipomenon and the 24. Chapter of Exodus giue clear euidence against them Besides God hath not vsed lese care in instituting the christrian Church established in a law of grace then in forming the Synagogue of the Iewes established in a law of bondage wherefore * Deus cum primum instituit Cathedrā Moysis in Deutro promisit omnes singulas eius definitiones fore veritatis infallibilis ideo Aug. l. 4. de doct chris ait Pharisaeos scribas id est Pōtisices Mosaicos iudicantes ex Cathedra Moysis non pot uisse malè definire quamuis mali essent quia ad bene definiendum cogebantur à Deo since this had diuine authority and assistance to interpret and teach the old law of Moyses as likewise to decide all controuersies concerning the Iewish religion Deut. 17. doubtless he hath not prouided in a lesser measure for the Church of Christ in order to teaching and interpreting the new law and determining all matters that might be in debate about christian religion Again Christ being about to leaue this Church in order to his visible presence for as many ages as the world shall endure was as prouident and carefull to preserue it pure from schism and heresy as was Moyses to preserue his when he was to absent himselfe from it for a shorter time but Moyses being to goe vp vnto Mount Sinai and there to abide forty dayes and forty nights onely constituted * Exod. 24. exspectate hic inquit Moyses donec reuertamur ad vos
re shall hind vppon earth shall be bound in Heauen which is meant of ecclesiasticall Censures the greatest of which is excommunication Again Act. 15. when the new christians referred their controuersie concerning circumcision and other ceremonies of the law of Moyses to the Apostles at Ierusalem sentence of iudgment was declared by one accord thus It seemed good to the holy Ghost and to vs to lay no more burthen vpon you then these necessary things c. Wherby it is cleare that the Apostles then the representatiue Church were inuested with authority to make ordinances (c) It appeares plainly by the sacred text Act. Jt seems good to the holy Ghost and to vs to lay no more burden vpon you then these that the Apostles had authority to commande and exact obedience to their ordinances For the particles it seems good to vs to lay no more burden Shew euidently that they were superiours inuested with authority to commande and exact obedience from the people who were bound to obey them But here is obseruable that as to the matter in debate mentioned in the Chapter set down viz. whether the conuerted Gentils were obliged to obserue the law of Moyses S. Peter in that Council cald to determine it was supream Iudge for t' is written that after much dispute Peter rose vp and as head of all spoke first and decided the controuersy in fauour of the said conuerted Gentils deliuering them from the bondage of the old law and all the multitude saith S. Hierom Tom. 2. Epis 89. Augus cap. 2. kept silence and into Peters sentence or definition the Apostles S. Iames and all the Priests past with one accorde and euer since the Popes of Rome as S. Peters lawfull successors haue had precedence and the deciding suffrage in all Councils which are of credit and authoritie in the Church of God and to oblige the faithfull in the obseruation of them for the words It seemed good to vs to lay no more burden vpon you doe signify the authority of superiours to commande inferiours and the obligation of inferiours to obey their superiours Thirdly that the Church is liuing visible and speaking which is the third propriety of this Iudg is clearly expressed Act. 20. take heed to your selues and the flock wherof the holy Ghost hath made you Bishops to rule the Church of god which he hath purchased with his own blood and Again Math. 5. (d) According to S. Aug. trac in 1. epis Ioan. those are blind which cannot fee so great a mountaine and shut their eyes against the clear light put on a candlestick which is the Church of God the Church is stiled a Citty that is set on a mountaine which cannot be bid but no man can conceiue how Bishops can gouerne a Church which they see not or how a Citty set on a high mountaine can lie hid Besids all the Church offices ioynt and seperate do declare it visible liuing ad speaking neither matters it that the Church is known by faith which is of things not seen for the Apostles when they conuersed with Christ vpon earth they both saw and belieued him to be Christ As the Apostles saw Christ to be aman and belieued him to be God soe wee doe see the Church to be a congregation of men outwardly professing the faith of Christ and doe belieue that it is directed by the infallible assistance of the holy Ghost and as it cannot be euinced that a man is inuisible because an inuisible soul gouerneth him soe neither can it be euinced that the Church is inuisible because the supernaturall gifts of the holy Ghost namly faith hope and charitie wherby the Church is gouerned and men made children therof be inuisible From the premises is euidently deducible (e) S. Austin li. 10. de doct christ disputing against such as pretended to the knowledge of holy scriptures by speciall reuelations dissuades euery man from so proud and dangerous a tentation as to presume that he is taught of God and not of men and this caueat he vrgeth by many examples that the priuate spirit which is to say the particular reuealing spirit wherby as many sectaries conceiue euery priuate belieuer is enabled to interpret scriptures and iudge all matters concerning faith and religion hath no good claime to the office of this suprem Iudge beeing neither seen nor heard to speak clearly nor known certainly to be infallible in what it reuealeth to each particular belieuer in priuat for it may prudently be doubted whether it be a good spirit or not since false ministers can transforme themselues into Apostles of Christ and Satan himselfe into an Angel of light 2. Cor. 11. in consequence of which no wise and iudicious man can rely his eternity on such a priuat reuealing spirit Again God according to his ordinary way doth not immediatly himselfe reueale verities of faith to euery one in particular or iudge himselfe between party and party from the begining of the creation down to these times his prouidence hath ordained men to declare his ordinances vnto men appointed men to teach men and constituted men suprem Iudges of men for the determining of all hard matters in debate concerning faith and religion In the law of nature Abraham was made Teacher of men I know speaking of Abraham that he will command his son and family after him that they keepe the way of our lord Gen. 18. In the written law Moyses was constituted to teach the people of God the diuine ordinances and to shew vnto them the way wherein they were to walke and the worke they were to doe Exod. 18. and Deut. 17. the Priests of the Leuits were deputed supreme Iudges of controuersies which might rise about religion also Malac. 2. it is written the Priests lips shall preserue knowledg and they shall seek the law from his mouth In our new law of grace the Apostles were sent into diuers parts of the world to preach christian religion Mar. vltime Act. 8. God appointed Saint Philip to teach the Eunuch of Ethiopia Act. 9. Christ sent Saul to be instructed of Ananias and Act. 10. Cornelius the Centurion was admonished by an Angel to repaire vnto Saint Peter that he might learn of him matters of câ—ristian faith wherfore Saint Paul says Rom. 10. Faith is by heating and hearing by the word of God and how shall they heare without a preacher because ordinarily God teacheth men by men the verities of faith and Gal. 1. the same Apostle doubted not to prefer the doctrine he preached before the doctrine of an Angel from Heauen that should preach otherwise and truly if it were lawfull for euery man to follow and adhere to his own priuate spirit there would rise almost as many contrary religions as there are men liuing vpon the earth and consequently in room of that peace that Christ hath promised to the Church nothing but disorder and confusion would happen wherfore both in the old and new law this
scripturae and comfort of the scripturs may haue hope Rom. 15. although they doe not define and iudge all matters of faith and religion yet they (l) The Apostle 2. Timot. 3. Saith that all scripture is giuen by inspiration from God and is profitable to teach argue correct and instruct in iustice That is according to the ancient Fathers to resiste conuince and condemne false doctrines Wherfore according to the same Apostle ad Tit. l. a Bishop must be vnreproueable embracing the faithfull word and sound doctrine that he may be able to exhort and conuince those which say against it conduce mainly therunto tending specially to christian instruction and erudition besides they stir vs vp to ioyne vertue with faith and with vertue knowledg and with knowledg temperance and with temperance patience and with patience godliness and with godliness loue 2. Epis 2. Pet. which is the consistency and plenitude of the law Scripturs are liud * S. Ambros Epis 19. vocat sacras scripturas fontes viuos qui saliunt in vitam aeternam fountains springing vp vnto euerlasting life but the keeping and dressing of them is cōmitted only to the Church of Christ that was the rock whence they sprāg it is the christian catholick Church taught of the holy Ghost that cōprehēdeth the bredth lenght depth and hight of these heauenly fountaines which is to say it is a speciall prerogatiue giuen to the Church of Christ to interpret infallibly and iuridically the holy scripturs (m) According to S. Hierom Epis ad Paulum S Chrys hom 40. in Ioa. S. Austin l. 4. de doct christ cap. 3. the hardness of holy scrpitures proceeds from the profoundnes copiousnes compendiousnes therof in consequence of which a right vnderstanding of sundry passages of necessary depends of tradition as well obserues S. Austiu l. de fide oper and S. Hierom in his scripture prologue ingeniously confesseth that he could not vnderstandand the holy Prophets Isaias Ieremy and Daniel again S. Irenaeus l. 3. cap. 7. Orig. in explic Epis ad Rom. and S. Austin l. de fide oper cap. 14. confess with one accorde that S. Paul is hard to be vnderstood and especially in regard he vseth frequent hyperboles which proceeded from the vehemency of the spirit that guided his pen. which profoundness of misteries plenteousness of senses shortness of sentences haue rendred obscure hard and intricate as plainly appeareth by the holy writers of the old law namely Isay Ieremy Ezechiel Daniel and of the new law Saint Paul especially according to the testimony of Saint Peter 2. Pet. 3. wherein he speaketh of his writings thus * S. Irenaue l. 3. cap. 7. scribens de Haereticis testatur Paulū hyperbolis vti frequenter propter impetu spiritus qui in ipso fuit Idē sentiūt Origines explicat Epistolae ad Rō Aug. de fide operibus cap. 14. 15. our Brother Paul in all his Epis mentioneth things in which Epistles some things are hard to be vnderstood which they that are vnlearned and vnstable wrest as they doe also others scripturs vnto their own perdition for further proofe of this catholick assertion may be alledged the perpetuall contention between one sectary and an other concerning the interpretation of scripture Texts in reference to controuersies of faith for example from the words This is my body Luc. 22. Lutherans doe argue the true and real presence of Christs body in the Sacrament together with the substance of bread contrariwise Caluinists infer a meer figure of Christs body Anabaptists deduce out of the commission Christ gaue vnto his Apostles Math. 18. goe and teach all nations baptizing them in the name of the Father c. That baptism ought not to be administrated but to such as are de facto apt to receiue instruction And the Arians misinterpreting that saying of Christ Io. * Apud S. Joan. dicit Christus Pater maior me est alibi ego Pater vnum sumus Posterior textus explicatur ab Arianis de vnitate consensus conformitate voluntatū My Father is greater then I denied his Godhead the holy scriptures are a great light of christian doctrine for they are the dictates of the holy Ghost yet not sufficient enough to let vs see the way to euerlasting life vnless they be set on the cādlestick of the * Vt luceat omnibus qui in domo sūt Mat. 5. Church it is not the same thing to be a light and to enlighten a light vnder a bushell is a light and shineth there howeuer it doth not giue light to all that are in the house but when it is put on the candlestick Math. 5. euen so the scripturs light put vnder a bushell that is vnder the interpretation of priuate wits continueth a shining light in it selfe neuertheless doth not enlighten vnto euerlasting life but when it is put on the candlestick of infallible authority proper to the Church of Christ Again the scripture is a booke written within and on the backside Apoc. 5. the outward writing is the letter that killeth the inward the spirit that giueth life 2. Cor. 3. as the soul quickneth the body (n) S. Austin ser 70. de tempore expounding the sacred Text Epis ad Cor. the letter killeth the spirit quikneth If saith he thou follow the true sense of scripture which is the spirit that giues life to the soule it will bring thee vnto saluation but if thou shalt neglect the true sense adhering to the outward letter presuming the true sense to be therein it will often tymes lead thee into errour And according to Tertul. l. de resur carnis Heresies spring vp in regard the scriptures are misinterpreted And he speaking of S. Pauls Epistles affirms that it ought not to seem a hard thing or any way strang that from thence errours should arise since heresies must be 1. Cor. 11. which notwithstanding would not be if the scriptures were interpreted aright Heresies must be not becaus God hath appointed that they should be but because he permitted that they might be and mans free will together with pride and malice makes them to be against Gods positiue will howeuer the supream prouidence from euil heresies draws good things soe the spirit or sense of the scriptures quickneth the letter but to come vnto the spirit of necessity there is required the opening of the booke which the Church onely can doe trusted with the key of authority that openeth it wherfore in as much as many men down from the begining of christianity to these times haue adhered rather to the letter then to the sense of scripture and thence cut out vnauthorized interpretations of their own many heresies haue sprung vp to the distruction of infinit souls wherof Christ prophesying said heresies must be He fore saw that euen of such as were incorporated into his Church would men rise * S. Cypri Epis 55. ad Cornelium Nec aliunde
S. Mat. cap. 24. the Church of God bears the name of the kingdom of Heauen And S. Hierom stileth the Church the arke of Noe that contained Leopards kids wolfes and lambs that is to say both good and wicked men dwel in the Church of God and though she is faid Eph. 4. to haue no spot or wrinckle yet that is meant in relation to faith and doctrine which are holy and without blame Howeuer S. Austin l. de perfec iustorum expounds the sacred Text set down also in order to the Church triumphant which is without spot or wrinckle the great house of God wherin are not only vessells of gold and siluer but also of wood and of earth and some for honour and some for dishonour 2. Tim. 2. howeuer no man is so irreuocably a vessell vnto dishonour but that he may be translated into a vessell vnto honour sanctified and meet for our lord IESVS if he will cast from him all his transgressions committed after baptism wherby he was incorporated into this great house which made him a vessell vnto dishonour The Church is called catholick that is vniuersall in as much as it sendeth forth the marueilous light of christian faith from the rising of the sun vnto the goeing douwn therof For Christ that redeemed vs to God by his bloud out of euery kindred and tongue and people and nation Apoc. 5. hath not confined the knowledg of his faith * Aug. ser 13. Ecclesia inquit à solis ortu vsque ad occasum vnius fidei splendore enititur within the bounds of one kingdome Moreouer the Church is rightly named catholick or vniuersall in respect of time that is to say of perpetuall succession of pastours and Teachers for the prouidence of God towards man of necessity preserueth the Church from perishing himselfe hauing prouidently instituted it as the common ordinary way to lead man vnto his kingdom Again its vniuersall because of the obligation euery man hath to embrace it that will aspire to eternall life As out of the arke of Noe there was no deliuerance from the generall deluge (t) According to S. Cyprian trac de vnit Eccle. whosoeuer hath not the Church for his Mother shall not haue God for his Father And according to S. Fulgentius who was contemporary with S. Austin l. de fide Such as are not incorporated into the Church how charitable soeuer they be cannot be saued and this Catholick assertion S. Austin professes likwise li. 4. de baptismo besids according to the holy scriptures no man that is not within the Churches bosome can obtaine heauenly benediction in consequence of which to rebell against or fall from her is execrable and damnable so out of the true Church there is no saluation and indeed the Church is the sole Mother that conceiueth bringeth forth and nourisheth children vnto heauenly blessednes Lastly the true Church is called apostolicall because it hath doth and shall preach in all times to the end of the world christian religion planted by the Apostles vpon whom as the foundation it was built Eph. 2. By the forementioned marks or tokens ioyntly the Church of Christ is shewed and distinguished from euery false congregation The Synagogue of Iews and Mahometans cannot challeng Apostolicall foundation where of Christ himselfe is the Chief corner stone nor catholick propagation from the rising of the sun to the goeing down therof for their religion is neither christian nor spread in all parts of the world and the false Churches of sectaries though they carry the name of christian neuertheless they haue nothing of vnity as to the faith of Christ nor of perpetuall succession as to pastours and Teachers down from the Apostles to these present times for they set vp a new mysticall body of Christ composed of reformed members saying that Christ in regard of sundry great scandalls and errours hath elected the old mysticall body wherof he was head afore that is the Roman Church which seemeth a strang thing because that Church according to their own confession was once in possession of the true faith and true religion * Ad Rom. 5. gratias ago Domino Deo quod fides vestra Romana annunciata Est in vniuerso mundo and the Apostle witnesseth as much writing to the Romans I thank my God through Iesus-Christ for you all because your faith Roman is published through out the whole world and no one expresse scripture testimony can be alledged to shew that the Roman Church hath deuiated from that true faith in consequence of which sectaries that will belieue nothing without express scripture ought not to belieue that the Roman Church is deuested of the true faith which it was once in possession of and therby deserted and truly it is not to reason credible that Christ after being marryed to the Roman Church for sundry ages should repudiate her especially hauing promised by the mouth of his holy Prophet that * Sponsabo te mihi in aeternum he will neuer chang the spouse of the new law saying I will espouse thee for euer it is not as to reason credible that Christ that cast out the bill of deuorce practized in the old law should be the first to bring it again into practice nor is it as to reason credible that the spouse which Christ chose without sport or wrinckle and put vnder the conduct of the holy Ghost should cast away her spousall innocence integrity and fidelity and turne to vncleaness fornication and idolatry Wherfore it is plainly euident that the Roman Church is not repudiated or deserted wherefore she and no other is the true Church of Christ that since the first age for 1660. yeares hath not deuiated from one holy catholick and Apostolick faith neither is * Apostolus scribens ad Rom. dicit fidem vestram meam sed fides S. Pau. erat vniuersalis catholica Roman Church and catholick or vniuersall Church less consistent together then christian Church and catholick Church or apostolicall and catholick Church for Christ was a singular person whence the word Christian is deriued and the Apostles were particular men whence the word Apostolicall comes and as the catholick Church is named christian because of Christ that is the supream inuisible head therof and as the catholick Church is called apostolicall in respect of the Apostles which were the foundation of it so the Catholick Church is called Roman from the Bishop of Rome that is the visible head therof subordinate to Christ * Concil Alexand loquens de Roma Eccl. sacer inquit vertex inquo omnis Ecclesia vertitur and indeed the Roman Church taken properly doth not signifie precisely and only that Church which is at Rome but cōprehendeth euery Church through out the whole world that professeth the same faith with it and acknowledgeth obedience to the same (u) According to S. Anaclete S. Anaclete S. Peters disciple and his third successor in the Pontificate
likwise defined that vnwritten Tradition the faithfull of these dayes might haue been * S. Basil dicit Sabellianismum esse queÌ„dam Iudaismum Sabellius voro qui omnibus hareticis impietate antecelluit eirca annum 260. haresim Trinitatis propagauit quod Prâ—xeas omniuÌ„ primus humo Romanae inuexit proximè accessit ad errorem Iudaeorum Sabellians or Iewes as for any clear speaking scripture to hinder them Again we belieue that the holy Ghost is not the son of God nor that his procession is generation taken in the proper sense notwithstanding without tradition and interpretation of the holy Church it cannot be proued sufficiently that is to say by express scripture-testimony nor matters it that the Euangelists doe name the second person of the blessed Trinity the only begotten son for hence it follows not by necessary consequence that the holy Ghost is no son for Salomon is styled the only begotten son Prouerb 4. Howeuer it plainly appeareth by the first booke of Paralipomenon or cronicles that he had many brothers yet he was named the only begotten son in regard he was beloued as if he had been the only begotten We must belieue that such (f) The Council of Nice hath defined that such as are baptized by hereticks must not be rebaptized And in regard the Donatists impugned this assertion which is grounded vpon tradition and the Churches definition they were counted hereticks and S. Aust I. de vtilitate credendi cap. 22. expresly affirms that the said assertion is not contained in any express scripture and indeed practice and tradition of the Church only was obiected against S. Cypri that asserted rebaptizing of such as were baptized by hereticks as appeares by his own Epistle ad Iubaian 74. ad Pompeium he conceiuing that he had scripture authority on his side left the Churches tradition and practice yet S. Austin in sundry places of his writings excuseth him from heresie because he was not obstinate in defending of his opinion neither did he break vnion with the Church Besid that controuersy rose before any generall Council defined validity of baptism conferred by Hereticks as are baptized by hereticks ought not to be baptized again wee must belieue that we are bound to keepe holy our lords day which is sunday and we must belieue that there is a necessary obligation to receiue the Apostles Creed yet for as much as none of all these doctrines be contained expresly in or can be deduced out of the holy scriptures by immodiate necessary and euident consequences they would haue nothing of weight with vs in the conuincing of our vnderstanding if the tradition and definition of the Church were laid a side Moreouer the Lutherans and Caluinists in regard they reject Church tradition adhering to the meer letter of scripture and their own interpretations thereof cannot as yet after frequent disputes euince against the Anabaptists that the SacrameÌ„t of Baptism ought to be administred vnto infants where they alledge the words of Christ set down Math. 19. suffer little children and forbid them not to come to me for of such is the kingdom of Heauen as also the practice of the Apostles that baptized whole housholds Act. 19. it is plainly euident that from neither of these testimonies they can as much as deduce by any necessary consequence what they assert as a doctrine of their faith namely that baptism ought to be applied to young children that want the vse of reason especially supposing (g) Caluin l. 4. insti c. 16. and the whole sect of Lutherans though they denyed baptism to be a requisit necessary to the saluation of children neuertheless in their conferences with Anabaptists ingeniously confessed that baptism might lawfully and indeed ought to be ministred vnto children what Lutherans and Caluinists hold as an other article of their reformed religion viz. that baptism is not absolutly necessary to saluation for as to the first testimony though by litle children Christ meant not such only as can goe and speake but also infants sucking their Mothers breasts neuertheless the words of Christ declare them only capable of blessedness without mentioning baptism at all Since then Lutherans and Caluinists doe teach that baptism is not an expedient absolutly necessary to blessedness they can infer nothing of moment and efficacy from these words of Christ to conuince the Anabaptists because the blessedness that is to say the kingdom of Heauen whereof Infants are declared capable may be obtained without baptisin according to Lutherans Caluinists and Anabaptists yet for as much as catholick faith teacheth absolute necessity of baptism out of S. Iohn Cap. 3. that except a man be borne againe of water he cannot enter into the kingdom of Heauen Catholicks can by a clear inference from the said words of Christ proue that Baptism ought euen of necessity to be administred to children because Christs words declare theÌ„ capable of the kingdom of Heauen and consequently of baptism that being an expedient absolutly necessary vnto the obtaining of it whosoeuer is capable of any end is likwise capable of the expedient or medium which is of absolute necessity in order to the purchasing of it As touching the latter scripture testimony though it containes a most pregnant coniecture or presumption that the Apostles when they baptized whole families baptised children with all neuertheless it is not sufficient enough to the grounding of an euident and necessary consequence vnto prouing that de facto they did so because experience sheweth that many whole housholds haue no children at all Wherefore it is cleare that neither of the scripture testimonyes do proue effectually the baptism of Infants laying aside the tradition and definition of the Church And truly Lutherans and Caluinists haue only meer coniectures and remote inferences drawn from the interpretation of their own priuat spirits which is the Mother of heresies to euince the foundamentall and essentiall doctrines of their reformed religion namly that faith alone iustifieth that there are but two Sacraments that no addresses of intercession ought to be made vnto Saints or prayers offered for the benefit of soules departed c. and it is a foundamentall article of Caluinism that the Sacrament of the Eucharist signifieth only the body of Christ being a meer figure thereof contrary wise it is a foundamentall article of Lutherans that the body of Christ is really contained in the Sacrament together with the substance of bread and though both Caluinists and Lutherans teach that the scriptures speake and propounde clearly doctrines of faith howeuer they haue not as yet reconciled that controuersy which notwithstanding the many conferences and disputes held about it continueth in debate Caluinists impute to the Lutherans an heresie or errour in faith for admitting and the Lutherans ascribe heresie vnto the Caluinists for denying the reall presence of Christs body and bloud in the Eucharist whereby appeareth plainly the necessity of Church tradition and interpretation for the deciding all hard