own Books are witness from whence they are faithfully quoted especially that which he calls The Second Disputation of the Right to Sacraments From whence it is that Mr. Tombes fetches the twenty Arguments he wrote against Mr. Blake and improves them all against himself discovering Contradiction to his former Principles in every one of them in his Book which he calls Felo de se or The Self-Destroyer to which Mr. Baxter hath never made the least Reply that I have heard of though in the end of Mr. Tombe's said Book he provoked him to a Reply by these words viz. By the reading of this Book all Intelligent Persons may perceive Mr. Baxter's deceitfulness or heedlesness and if he persist in defending Infants Baptism his unreasonable pertinacy in his own Conceit and if he do not declare his forsaking his Doctrine in his Book of Baptism his Impenitency and unrighteous dealing with the Church of God which he hath injured Therefore how much is he concerned to give some account how such Assertions can be reconciled to his former Writings which in the apprehensions of such ignorant Creatures as we are seem to be as contrary to each other as Light to Darkness Though I doubt not but that through the Prosoundness of his Speculation and Subtilty of his Distinction having therein so much out-done Thomas Aquinas himself in his late Writings he will as soon Reconcile these seeming Contradictions as many of his former wherein he hath so much abounded none more that I know of being as you 'l find sometime a great Opposer then a great Defender of Episcopacy sometime for Non-Conformity in whose Tents he hath seemed to shelter himself in the Storm and with their Indulgence to come forth of his hole and yet at length so highly to disgrace the same Sometimes a friend to Calvin and then a greater to Arminius sometime a great Defender of the Parliament and their Cause then none more to renounce them or to betraitor them for their paines sometimes a great Opposer of Tradition and anon a great Defender thereof sometimes a violent Impugner of Popery and yet at last who hath spoke more in favour of it witness those very strange Passages in his late Book called the Christian Directory so much the talk of the Town which coming just to my hand upon the writing hereof I shall presume for the novelty of them to make a little Digression to give you an Account of some of them Popish Christenings lawful and which you may please to take as followeth viz. That it is lawful to offer ones Child to be baptised in a Popish Countrey in their way of Baptizing viz. with Eâ—orcisme Chrysme Milk Honey and White Garments rather than not have it baptized Those Ceremonies of Milk Honey White Garments and Chrysm being as he tells us so Ancient that their Original is not known called by Epiphanius and others the Tradition and Custome of the Universal Church p. 826. That Temples Fonts Utensils Church Reverence due to holy Places and things Lands much more Ministers are holy and Reverence due to them For to say as some do that they are indeed Consecrated and Separated but not holy is to be ridiculously wise by self-contradiction And that to be uncovered in the Church c. doth tend to preserve due Reverence to God and to his Worship 1. Cor. 16.20 P. 915. That the unjust Alienation of Temples Alienating holy Places Things Utensils Lands Days c. which were separated by God himself and consecrated by Man are sacrilegious P. 916. That the name Priests Sacrifices Altars may be used instead of Christs Ministers Popish Names of Priests Altars Sacrifice justified Worship Holy Temple And that sober Christians should allow each other the liberty of such Phrases without Censoriousness or breach of Charity or Peace p. 882. That the Communion-Table may be turned Altar wise and Railed in to keep Dogs and Boys from it Railing the Altar and that it is lawful to come up to the Rails and to communicate Kneeling as being indeed things that Christians ought not to censure or condemn each other for P. 882. compared with 859. That it is lawful Keeping Holy-Daies or Saints-Daies to keep Anniversary Festivals in Commemoration of Saints Departed if it be lawful to keep the fifth of November P. 762. Sect. 24. And to keep Humane Holy Days and Lent also if Abstinence be enjoyned not in imitation but Commemoration of Christs fourty days East P. 866. That Church-Musick is profitable being a Natural help to the minds alacrity And it is a Duty Church-Musick not a Sin to use the Helps of Nature and lawful Art though to institute Sacraments of our own And that as it is lawful to use the comfortable help of Spectacles in reading the Bible so is it of Musick to exhilarate the Soul towards God Jesus Christ joyned with the Jews that used it no Scripture forbiddeth it nothing can be against it that I know of And whereas some say they find it doth them harm as wise men say they find it doth them good And why should the Experience of some prejudiced self-conceited Person or of an half-man that knoweth not what Melody is be set against the Experience of all others and deprive them of all such Helps and Mercies as these People say they find no benefit by It is a great wrong that some do to ignorant Christians by putting such Whimsies and Scruples into their heads c. P. 885. That it is lawful to make Vows of Chastity Vows of Chastity and that such Vows though amongst the Papists ought not to be broke P. 488. To use Crucifixes That a Crucifix or Historical Image of Christ is lawful to excite and stir up in us Worshipping Affections And that a Crucifix well befits the imagination and mind of a Believer P. 876. That the Romish Clergy may be reputed true Ministers of Christ by vertue of their Ordination P. 775. That their erroneous saying of Mass or Preaching their erroneous Doctrines Popish Clergy Christ's Ministers doth not nullisy their office to the Church no though they derive from Antichrist the Head thereof who sits not in the Temple of God as Antichrist but as God and so not an open but a secret Deceiver p. 776. And that neither the Ordinatiâ—â— â—n Baptism that they confer are to be esteemed Nullities Page 777. That it is not necessary to believe that the Pope is Antichrist ibid. To read Apocrypha and Homelies c. That it is lawful to read the Apocrypha Homilies or any good book in the Church besides the Scriptures p. 901. to read a Prayer p. 848. That there is a Praying to Saints or Angels Praying to Saints which is Superstitions but not Idolatrous Rev. 22.8 Col. 1.18 That it is lawful to bow at the name of Jesus p. 858. To stand up at the Gospel p. 858. Romish Rites To kneel at the reading the
Eâ—glish Liturgy about 1549 the Form of Worship and Administration of the Sacraments with all their Rites and Ceremonies were held forth in the English Liturgy as it was translated out of the Latin Mass-Book concerning which we have this account from Mr. Fox in his Martyrology p. 1499. That in the Rising in Devonshire upon the translating the Latin Mass-Book into English the King writes after this manner to quiet them viz. The English Service translated out of the Latin Mass-Book As for the Service in the English Tongue perhaps it seemeth to you as New Service when indeed it is no other but the Old the self same words in English which were in Latin saving a few things taken out so fond that it hath been a shame to have heard them in English as all they can judg that list to repeat the truth And if it was good in Latin it remaineth good in English for nothing is altered but to speak with knowledg what was spoken with ignorance c. Wherein the Time Order Manner and Ceremony of Baptizing of Infants is directed and enjoyned with all the Rites appertaining thereto In the said Service-Book in the Rubrick before the Catechism it is said That Children being baptized have all things necess ry for their Salvation and be undoubtedly saved And therefore after Baptism the Priest must say We yeeld thee hearty thanks that it hath pleased thee to regenerate this Infant with thy Holy Spirit And the Child is afterwards to be instructed when he comes to understanding to say That therein he was made a Member of Christ and a Child of God and an Inheritor of the Kingdom of Heaven Just comporting length and breadth with Pope Innocents first Canons In the 27th Article of the Church of England 27. Article of the Chuâ—ch â— England it is said That the Baptizing of young Children is in any wise to be retained in the Church as most agreeable to the Institution of Christ made in Q. Eliz. time 1562. In the Scotch Service-Book Scotch Service-Book imposed in the begining of the late War it is said That as oft as new Water is put into the Font the Priest shall say Sanctifie this Fountain of Baptism Oh thou which art the Sanctifier of all things The Directory Directory in the Parliamenâ—s time leaves out Gossips and signing with the Sign of the Cross changes the Fonts into Basons And the Parliaments Ordinance May 2. 1648. made it Imprisonment to affirm Infants Baptism unlawful and that such should be Baptized again Mr. Marshal informes us out of Phocius p. 3334 That some of the Greek Churches have Laws That whatsoever baptized Person refused to bring their Children and Wives too to be baptized should be Anathamatised and punished also The wicked Decree of Zurick At Zurick as Dr. Featly tells us out of Gassius p. 68. The Senate made an Act That if any presumed to Rebaptize viz. to baptise any that had been baptised in their Infancy That they should be drowned and that at Vienna many for Baptizing such were so tyed together in Chains that they drew the other after him in the River wherein they were all drowned And that at Roplestein the Lords of that place Decreed that such should be burnt with a hot Iron and bear the base Brands of those Lords in whose Lands they had so offended And p. 182. out of Ponton Catalog through Germany Alsatia and Swedeland many Thousands of this Sect who defiled their first Baptisme by a second were baptised the third time in their wn Blood CHAP. III. Wherein the Erroneous Grounds both as to fabulous Traditions and mistaken Scriptures upon which Infants Baptism hath been both formerly and laterly founded is made manifest THe First and Principal Ground that hath been asserted for this practice hath been Ecclesiastical and Apostolical Tradition or however as hath been said the Scripture is so silent in the Case yet the clear full and uninterrupted Tradition of the Church makes up that defect to which the Church of Rome and some others have adhered Though many Protestants since the Reformation have chose to flye to some Consequential Arguments deduced as they suppose from the Scriptures to justifie the same Both which in this Chapter are brought forth and duly weighed in the Ballance of Truth The First we shall examine is the point of Tradition and therein do these two things Shew that it hath primarily been asserted to be the ground thereof Secondly The insufficiency of the Authorities that have been urged to prove the same Tradition the principal ground of Infants Baptism That Tradition hath principally been leaned upon as the main ground of the Practice you have the following Instances Austin Austin tells us That the Custome of our Mother the Church in Baptizing little Infants is not to be despised nor to be judged superfluous nor to be believed at all unless it were an Apostolical Tradition Lib. 10. de Gen. c. 23. And again in his 4th Book against the Donatists 24 Chap. saith That if there be any that do inquire for a Divine Authority for the Baptizing of Children Let them that know what the Universal Church holds nor was instituted in Councils but alwaies retained is most rightly believed to have been delivered by no other than Apostolical Authority Chrysost Chrysostom saith That Infants ought to be baptized as universally received by the Catholick Church to take away Original Sin Mag. Cent. 4. Bellarmine Tom. 1. L. 4. c. 2. saith That the Baptism of Infants is an Apostolical Tradition not written because saith he it is not written in any Apostolical Book though written he saith in the Books of almost all the Antients And which Tradition of the Apostles saith he is of no less Authority with us than the Scriptures In the Council of Trent Council of Trent after they had in the 5th and 7th Sessions made those Canons about Infants-Baptism before mentioned do conclude That their Traditions touching the same should be received Pari Pietatis affectu with the same pious affection with the Holy Scriptures as you have it p. 144. In the Council of Basil Council of Basil in the Oration of the Cardinal of Ragusi It is asserted That in the beginning of this Sacrament of Baptism they only were to be baptized who could by themselves answer Interrogatories concerning their Faith And that it was no where read in the Canon of Scripture that a new-born Infant was baptized who could neither believe with the Heart to Justification nor confess with the Mouth to Salvation Yet nevertheless saith he the Church hath appointed it Eckius Eck us against the Lutherans writes That the Ordinance concerning the Baptism of Children is without Scripture and is found to be only a Custome of the Church And in his Enchiridion calleth it a Commandment and Ordinance of Man and that it is not to be proved out of the Holy Scriptures A great Papist lately in
London going to a Dispute about Infants-Baptism told his friend He was going to hear a Miracle viz. Infants Baptism to be proved by Scripture And the Ground and Reason why they do so firmly own this Truth to the Protestants upon that subject is but the better to inforce and introduce their many other Traditions there being nothing else for that But whereas some object That Bellarmine and others do also bring Scripture for it Becan Becâ—n Lib. 1. c. 2. Sec. 24. answers That some things may be proved out of Scripture when the Churches sence is first heard about the Interpretation thereof for so he saith it is concerning Infants Baptism which is proved from John 3.5 Except a man be born of Water and the Spirit c. But the sense whereby to prove it it only manifest by Tradition And it is confirmed in the Canon Law and Schoolmen That Infants-Baptism was not reckoned perfect till the Bishop laid on hands which was called Confirmation viz. of the imperfect Baptism in Infancy and therefore saith Caistans Caistans secundum Jewel That an Infant wanting Instruction in the Faith hath not perfect Baptism Tom. prec p. 86. Dr. Field Dr. Field Lib. 4. P. 375. saith That Infants-Baptism is therefore called a Tradition because it is not expresly delivered in the Scriptures that the Apostles did baptise Infants or that they should do so The Oxford Divines Oxford Divines in a full Convocation Jan. 1647. say That without the consentaneous judgment and practice of the Universal Church they should be at a lâ—ss when they are called upon for proof in the point of Baptizing Infants Mr. Tombes Dr. Prideaux Dr. Pridâ— Controv. Theol. Sec. 392. Infants Baptism saith he rests upon no other Divine right than Episcopacy viz. Diocesan Episcopacy in use in these Nations Mr. Baxter Mr. Baxter in Defence of the Principles of Love p. 7. saith That the Anabaptists are Godly men that differ from us in a Point so difficult that many of the Papists and Prelatists have maintained That it is not determined in Scripture but dependeth upon the Tradition of the Church Though he saith he is of another mind himself To which many more might be added to prove to you That Apostolical Tradition for want of Scripture hath been urged as the principal and first ground of this Practice And not only for this but for all other Rites and Ceremonies as well those that have been already declared as Chrysme Exorcisme Consignation and innumerable more as those that have not yet been heard of or declared for as a late learned Author excellently observes That the Papists Dr. Owen in point of Tradition do herein very much exceed the Jews those old Tradition mongers who so made void the Law of God in their days by it For they tell us plainly that now their whole Oral Law is written and that they have no reserve of Authentick Traditions not yet declaâ—r'd But here the Romanists saith he fail us for although they have given us heaps upon heaps of their Traditions yet they plead that they have still an inexhaustible treasure of them laid up in their Church-stores â— breast of their Holy Father to be drawn forth at all times as occasion shall require And which Principle hath been the means of their Apostacy and is the great Engin whereby they are rendered incurable therein Dr. Owen his Proleg P. 67. Dr. Taylor D. Taylor P. 237. argues so fully and strenuously upon this point of Tradition that I cannot pass him by who saith Tradition by all means must supply the place of Scripture and there is pretended a Tradition Apostolical that Infants were baptized But at this saith he we are not much moved For we who rely upon the written Word of God as sufficient to establish all true Religion do not value the allegation of Tradition And however the world goes none of the Reformed Churches can pretend this Argument for this Opinion Because they who reject Tradition when it is against them must not pretend it in the least for them but if we allow the Topick to be good yet how will it be verified For so far as can yet appear it relies wholly upon the Testimony of Origen for from him Austin had it Now a Tradition Apostolical if it be not consigned with a fuller testimony than of one person whom all other Ages have condemned of many Errors and whos works saith Erasmus are so spurious that he that reads them is uncertain whether he read Origen or Ruffinus Therefore will obtain so little reputation amongst those who know that things have upon greater Authority been pretended to be received from the Apostles but falsly that it will be a great Argument that he is ridiculous and weak that shall be determined by so weak Probation in matters of so great concernment But besides that the Tradition cannot be proved to be Apostolical we have very good evidence from Antiquity That it was the Opinion of the Primitive Church That Infants ought not to be Baptized which saith he is clear in the Canon of the Council of Neocaesarca which he mentions at large in the original Greek Determining that none ought to be baptized without giving an account of their Faith and desiring the same That tie Traditons for Inf. Bapt. are fabulous Thus far Dr. Taylor In the next place we shall give you some account of the insufficiency and weakness if not the wickedness of those first Authorities that have been leaned upon to prove this Practice to be an Apostolical Tradition and which appearing fabulous all others depending upon the same necessarily fall to the ground whereof you have four or five of the principal of them and which may be useful to the Protestants whatever they are to the Papists viz. The first and earliest we meet with to prove Infants-Baptism to be an Apostolical Tradition is that of Dyonisius the Arâ—opagite mentioned already P. 109. quoted by Bellarmin Tom. 3. Lib. 8. Cassander in his Book de Bapt. and many other learned Papists for Authentick proof that Infants-Baptism was Apostolical out of his Ecclesiastical Hiâ—rarchy c. But that this was a piece of Forgery put upon the world may yet further more fully appear to you in that which followeth viz. This Dionysius the Areopagite living at Athens Dionysius Areopag who some will have to be Bishop of Corinth though Eusebius calls him Bishop of Athens for you must know according to Eusebius and Dorotheus all men of Name in the New Testament must be Bishops of some place or other and therefore they can tell you not only the Names of the seventy Disciples but what Bishopricks each did belong unto Now this Person being an Athenian must be supposed to be a learned Greek Philosopher and therefore upon none more fitly in this Age could be fathered all those Philosophical Tracts that are put upon him and amongst which you have two of
be baptized after Repentance and Faith according to the Commission and that there is no instance to be found of any other teaching that then such should be baptized and no other And for any to introduce another practice it is not only contrary to Christs Commission but contradictious to the Apostles teachings CHAP. III. Wherein believers Baptisme is proved the only Baptisme from the example and practise of the primitive Saints ACTS 2.41 THen they that gladly received his Word were baptized III. From the example of primative Saints Acts 8.12 But when they believed Philip Preaching the things concerning the Kingdom of God and the name of Jesus Christ they were baptized both Men and Women Verse 37.32 And Philip said if thou believest with all thy Heart thou mayst And he answered and said I believe that Iesus Christ is the Son of God And he commanded the Chariot to stand still and they went down both into the Water both Philip and the Eunuch and he baptized him Acts 18 8. And Crispus the chief Ruler of the Synagogue believed on the Lord with all his House and many of the Corinthians hearing believed and were baptized Acts 22.14 And Ananias said unto Paul the God of our fathers hath chosen thee that thou shouldest know his will and see the just fine shouldst hear the voice of his mouth And now why tarriest thou Arise and be baptized and wash away thy sins calling on the name of the Lord Acts 9.18 And he arosâ— forthwith and was baptiqed Which is also confirmed by the following Testimonies Luther Luther de Sacrament Tom. 3. fol. 168. saith That in times past it was thus that the Sacrament of Baptisme was administred to none except it were to those that acknowledged and confessed their faith and know how to rehearse the same and that it was necessary to be done because the Sacrament was constituted externally to be used that the faith be confest and made known to the Church Bulling Bullinger in his House-book 48. Sermon Baptisme saith he hath no prescribed time by the Lord and therefore it is left to the free choice of the faithfull Those that believed at the Preaching of Peter upon the day of Pentecost as also the Eunuch whom Philip baptized Cornelius the Captain Paul the Apostle at Damascus Lydia the seller of Purple a Woman that feared God the Keeper of the Prison at Philippi and other more as well Women as Men so soon as they tasted the gifts of Christ and believed his Word presently desired to be baptized Mr. Baxter further in his 16. Mr. Bax. Argument against Mr. Blake in the aforesaid 2d Disputation P. 149. saith most significantly If there can be no example given in Scripture of any one that was baptized without the profession of a saving Faith nor any precept for so doing then must we not baptize any without it But the Antecedent is true therefore so is the Consequent In proof whereof he produces the several Scripture examples of Persons that were baptized which saith he might afford us so many several Arguments but I shall put them together viz. First John as I have shewed you required the profession of true Repentance and that his Baptisme was for the remission of sin Secondly when Christ layeth down the Apostolical Commission the Nature and Order of the Apostles work is first to make them Disciples and then to Baptize them into the name of the Father Son and Holy Ghost as before That it was saving Faith that was required of the Jews Jews and professed by them Acts 2.38 is plain in the Text. The Samaritans Samaritans believed and had great Joy and were baptized into the name of Jesus Christ Acts 8.12 whereby it appeareth that it was both the Vnderstanding and Will that were both changed and that they had the profession even of a saving Faith yea even Simon himself 37. v. The Condition upon which the Eunuch Eunuch must be baptized was if he believed with all his Heart which he professed to do and that was the Evidence Philip expected Paul Paul was baptized after true conversion Acts 9.18 The Holy Ghost fell on the Gentiles before they were baptized Acts 10.44 Lydia Lydias Heart was opened before she was baptized and she was one the Apostles judged faithful to the Lord and offered to them the Evidence of her faith Acts 16.30 The example also of the Jaylor Jaylor is very full to the resolution of the Question in hand He first asketh Wrat he shall do to be saved The Apostle answereth him Believe in the Lord Jesus and thou shalt be saved and thy House So that it was a saving saith that is here mentioned He rejoyced and believed with all his House and was baptized the same hour of the night or straight way Crispus Crispus the chief Ruler of the Synagogue believed on the Lord with all his House And many of the Chrinthians hearing Corinth believed and were baptized Acts 18.8 Philip Philip. in Acts 8.37 is determining a Question and giveth this in as the decision If thou believest with all thy Heart thou mayst And to say that this is but de Bone esse meaning that it includes not the Negative otherwise thou mayst not is to make Philip to have deluded and not decided or resolved In a word saith he I know of no one word in Scripture that giveth us the least intimation that ever man was baptized without the profession of a saving Faith Thus Faâ— Mr. Baxter who to save us the labour hath himself you see given such an exact Catalogue of the Examples of the baptized in the Scripture among whom as he so well observes there is not one to be found that answered not Christs Commission and the Apostles Precept in a professed Faith and Repentance But 't is said he mentions only such as were baptized aged That is very true and the reason is because the Scripture affords examples of none other as he confesseth But Secondly By his own grant in the words beforegoing If Philips answer was decisive and not delusive all others are excluded And that none but such as are capable to give some demonstration that they believe with all their Heart ought to be admitted to Baptism CHAP. IV. Wherein believers are proved to be the only subjects of Baptisme IV. From the Spiritual ends of the Ordinance from the Spiritual ends of the Ordinance THe first End or Use we shall ment on is 1. To be a Sign of the Mysteries the Gospeâ— that the Baptized might have that represented in a Sign or Figure and preacht to his Eye in the Ordinance which had been preacht to his Ear and Heart by the Word and Spirit of God respecting the whole Mystery of the Gospel and his Duty and Obligation therein A Sign being as Paraeus observeth some outward thing appearing to the Sense through which some inward thing is at the same time
Where Peter upon Cornelius and his Companies believing and receiving the Holy Spirit said Can any man forbid Water that these should not be baptized which have received the Holy Ghost as well as We And he commanded them to be baptized Fourthly The Church of Philippi Philippi Acts 16.14 It is said That Lydia a Worshipper of God heard us whose Heart the Lord opened that she attended unto the things that were spoken by Paul and was baptized and her houshold And Verse 32. They said unto the Ialour believe in the Lord Jesus Christ and thou shalt be saved And they spake unto him the Word of the Lord and to all that were in his house 33. And he was baptized he and all his straightway 34. â—elieving in God with all his House Where you have two Families baptiâ—ed but no Child mentioned in either but only such who were capable to hear the Word of the Lord and to believe the same Fifthly The Church at Coloss Coloss Col. 2.10 11 12. Where the Apostle asserts that that Church at Coloss was buried with Christ in Baptisme wherein they were risen with him through the faith of the operation of God who hath raised him from the dead Which cannot be truly said of any but professed believers Sixthly Concerning the Church at Corinth Corinth it is said Acts 18.18 And Crispâ—â— the chief Ruler of the Synagogue believed on the Lord with all his House and that many of the Corinthians hearing believed and were baptized and in 1 Cor. 1.13 Paul tells the Church at Corinth That they were not baptized in his name And in 1 Cor. 12.13 That by one Spirit they were all baptized into one Body viz. That they were joyned to the Church by baptisme of whom it is said 1 Cor. 14.2 That they kept the Ordinances as they were delivered to them Seventhly of the Church of Rome it is written Rom. 6.3 Know ye not that so many of us as were baptized into Jesus Christ were baptized into his Death Therefore we are buried with him in Baptisme into Death Eighthly of the Church at Galatia Galatia Gal. 3.26 27. For ye are all the Children of God by Faith in Christ Jesus For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ And lastly of the Church at Ephesus Ephesus it is Recorded Acts 9.1 2 3. That Paul having past through the upper Coasts came to Ephesus and finding Disciples said unto them Have you received the Spirit since you believed and they said No c. And he said unto what were you baptized c. By which Scriptures it manifestly appeareth that the New Testament Churches were formed only of baptized believers wherein we neither find one Ignorant Babe nor one unbaptized person a Member And that Infants have as little right to be admitted into the Church and esteemed Members thereof or to partake of the spiritual Ordinances therein as they have to that initiating Ordinance Baptisme It may further appear if you do but consider how incongruous it is to Reason and sense to imagine that little Children are any way concerned as Church-Members either in the Dedications of the Epistles sent to the Churches or in the Epistles themselves Sect. 2 First In the Dedications and Directions of the Epistles as first that to the Church of Rome Rom. 1.7 Directed to the beloved of God called to be Saints and whose Faith was spoken of through the whole world But can that be said of any Infant And secondly those Epistles to the Corinthians are they not also directed to those that are sanctified in Christ Jesus called to be Saints with all that in every place call upon the name of Jesus Christ our Lord and theirs enriched with all utterance and Knowledge c. But what Ignorant Babe could be concerned therein And thirdly that Epistle written to the Church at Ephesus Is it not to the Faithful in Christ the chosen adopted abounding in Wisdome and Prudence But what poor silly Babe could be intended thereby And Fourthly In the Letter directed to the Church at Philippi Is it not to all the Saints in Christs Jesus who have had their fellowship in the Gospel from the first day till then Philip. 1.1 But how can that be said of any Child And fifthly those Epistles inscribed to the Church at Thessalonica were they not to such as did abound in Love Faith Hope Patience that received the word in much affliction and joy in the Holy Ghost c. 1 Thes 1. 2 Thes 1.3 But what Patience Love or Hope can be attributed to silly Children And lastly those seven Epistles written to the Asian Churches wherein several Graces are commended and s ns reproved and threatned and every one that had an Ear commanded to hear what the Spirit said to these Churches But how could there be one Child concerned therein The Church of England Church of England in their 19th Article do acknowledge that the Visible Church is a number of Christians by profession Dr. Owen gives a description of a Gospel-Church Dr. Owen in his Catechisme about New Testament Worship P. 89. tells us That a Gospel-Church is a society of Persons called our of the World or their Natural worldly state by the administration of the Word and Spirit unto the obedience of the Faith or the Knowledge and Worship of God in Christ joyned together in an Holy band or by special agreement for the exercise of the communion of Saints in the due observation of all the Ordinances of the Gospel Rom. 1.5 6. 1 Cor. 1.2 1 Cor. 14.15 Heb. 3.1 James 1.18 Rev. 1.20 1 Pet. 2.5 Eph. 2.21 22 23. 2 Cor. 6.16 17. And again in Page 106. As the Apostles in their Writings do ascribe unto all the Churches and the Members of them a Participation in this effectual Vocation affirming that they are Saints Called Sanctified Iustified and Accepted with God in Christ for which he again cites the foregoing Scriptures so many of the Duties which are required of them in that Relation and condition are such as none can perform to the Glory of God their own benefit and the edification of others the â—nds of all obedience unless they are partakers of this effectual Calling 1 Cor. 10.16 17. 1 Cor. 12.12 Ephes 4.16 Mr. Baxter in his 10th Argument to Mr. Blake Mr. â—ax hath these words very significant to our purpose viz. Paul calleth all the baptized Church of Corinth justified None that profess not a justified Faith are called justified therefore none such should be baptized The Major is proved out of 1 Cor. 6.11 Ye are Waâ—hed ye are Sanctified ye are Iustified in the Name of the Lord Jesus and by the Spirit of our God To which he adds I confess it is sad that good men should be so unfaithfull to the Truth which is so pretious and is not their own and which they should do nothing against but all they can for iâ— Secondly
made in Baptisme each ones own free choise is shewed from which Canon saith he Balsamon and Zoncras do infer that an Infant cannot be baptized because it hath no power to confess or choose the Divine Baptisme Dr. Taylor Dr. Tayl upon mentioning the Canon p. 238. saith It speaks Reason and it intimates a practice which was absolutely universal in the Church of interrogating the Catechemeni concerning the Articles of their Creed which is one Argument that either they did not admit Infants to Baptisme or that they did prevaricate egregiously in asking questions of them who themselves knew were not capable of giving answers And in farther assurance and confirmation of this great truth you have most remarkable Instances of several of the Most eminent Persons of this Century that were not baptized till aged though the Offspring of believing Parents viz. Basil Gregory Nazianzen Ambrose Chrysostome Ierom Austin Nectarius Constantine Theodosius c. and for proof whereof take the following Authorities Osiander Cent 4. l. 3. c. 42. 371. Basil baptized aged saith That Basil the great Bishop of Caesaria the Son of Basil Bishop of Nisen and his Wife Eumele whose Grandfather was a Martyr under the persecution of Maximinus was tenderly educated like a second Timothy under his gratious Mother became a learned man and great Preacher and after Baptized in Jordan by Maximinus the Bishop as he saith is declared by Vincentius in speculo and for which Story he also quotes Socrates l. 4. c. 26. Sozam l. 6. c. 34. Magd. Cent. 4. c. 10. p. 939. Gregory Nazian baptized after 20. years old Osiander Cent 4. l. 3. c. 43. p. 380. Tells us That Gregory Nazianzen was the Son of Gregory Bishop of Nazianzen by his Wife Nonna a very pious holy Woman and instructed this her Son as Hannah of old did Samuel who in the 20th Year of his age was baptized Hugo Grotius Anot. in Mat. 19.14 saith It was no small Evidence that Baptisme of Infants many hundred years was not ordinary in the Greek Church because not only Constantine the great Constantine baptized aged the Son of Helena a zealous Christian was not baptized till aged But also Gregory Nazianzen who was the Son of a Christian Bishop and brought up long by him was not baptized till he came to years as is saith he related in his Life Paulinus in vita Ambrosi saith That Ambrose Ambrose baptized after Bishop of Milan born of Christian Parents his fathers name was Ambrose and his Mothers Marcelina remained instructed in the Faith unbaptized till he was chosen Bishop of Millan as which time he received Baptisme Hugo Grotius farther upon Mot. 19. Chrâ—sost Baptized at 21. tells us That Chrysostome was born of Christian Parents and educated by Miletius a Bishop was not baptized till past 21. years who adds farther That many of the Greeks in every age unto this day do keep the custom of deferring the Baptisme of little ones till they could themselves make a Confession of their faith Erasmus in Vita Hieronimi Jerom Baptized in his 30. year Testifies That Jerom born in the City of Strydon of Christian Parents and brought up in the Christian Religion was baptized at Rome in the 30th year of his age Walafridus Strabo who lived about 840. in his Book de Reb. Eccles Cap. 26. saith That in the first times the Grace of Baptisme was wont to be given to them only who were come to that integrity of mind and body that they could know and understand what profit was to be gotten by Bapâ—iâ—me what was to be confessed and believed Austin Baptized about the 30th year of his Age. what lastly was to be observed by them that are new born in Christ and confirms it by Austins own Confession of himself continuing a Catachumenus long afore Baptized But afterwards Christians understanding Original sin and least their Children should perish without any means of Grace had them he saith Baptized to the decree of the Council of Affrica and then adds how God-fathers and God-mothers were invented and the superstitious and impious consequent of it c. Nauclerus Generat 14. An. 391. saith Austin the Son of the virtuous Monica being instructed in the faith was baptized when he was about 30. years of age Vossins de Baptismo Pag. 106. saith That Nectarius was made Bishop of Constantinople before he was baptized Historia Tripartita Lib. 1. affirmeth That Theodosius the Emperor Theodosius baptized aged born in Spain his Parents being both Christians was even from his youth instructed and educated in the faith who falling sick at Thessalonica was by Achalio baptized and thereupon recovered of his sickness Mounsieur Daille the learned French man a great searcher into Antiquity in his Book called theVse of the fathers saith In ancient times they often deferred the Baptisme of Infants as appeareth by the History of Constantine the great Constantinus Theodosiâ—s Valentinian Gracian and in St. Ambrose and also by the Orations of Greg. Nazianzen and St. Basil on this subject and some of the Fathers have been of opinion that it is sit it should be deferred but whence is it saith he that the very mentioning hereof is scarce to be endured at this day Lib. 2. P. 149. Dr. Field Dr. Field on the Church P. 729. saith That very many that were born of Christian Parents besides thos that were converted from Paganisme put off their Baptisme for a long time insomuch that many were made Bishops before they were baptized Beatus Rhenanus B. Rhen. in Anot. sup Tert. saith That the old Custom was that those that were come to their full growth were baptized with the Bath of Regeneration which Custom saith he was observed till the time of Charles the great and Lodwick Emperours as by the Statutes by theâ—â— established appeared c. Mr. Den Mr. Den. besides the former Instances of the Children of Christian Parents not baptized till aged adds Pancratiâ—â— Pontius Nazarius Tecia Laigerus and Erasma Tusca Dr. Tayl. Dr. Jerom Taylor in his Lib Proph. P. 239. affirms out of an Antiquity That the Parents of Austin Jerom and Ambrose although Christians did not baptize their Children till they were 30. years of Age and that it will be very considerable in the example and of great efficacy for destroying the supposed necessity of derivation of Infants Baptisme from the Apostles Dr. B. Letter Dr. B. late Dr. of the Chair a person of great learning and eminency hath these words in a Letter I have seen in Print viz. I do believe and know that there is neither Precept nor Example in Scripture for Pedobaptisme nor any just evidence for it for above 200 years after Christ that Tertullian condemns it as an unwarrantable Custom and Nazianzen a good while after him dislikes it too sure I am that in the primitive times they were Chatacumeni then Illuminati or Baptizati and that not only Pagans and Children
appear substantial Arguments for the Baptists and full and clear Evidence against themselves for is not the Commission it self fully owned the Order of it and Practice upon it viz. That Persons ought first to be taught in the faith before they are to be baptized into the same and that none in the Apostles times and for some Ages after were otherwise baptized and that it is ridiculous yea prophane for any otherwise to practice and that there was neither Precept nor Example for the baptizing of Infants who as confest are so capable either of themselves or any for them to answer the great ends thereof but owned to be a practice taken up and enjoyned several Ages after as many of the forecited Pedobaptists both Papists and Protestants have confessed and will more fully and particularly appear in the next part And what is or can be said more by the Baptists themselves in confirmation of of their way and Practice Thus we have dispatcht the first part and may it not now be recommended to the Conscience of the impartial unprejudiced Reader whether this first assertion viz That Believers Baptisme is only to be esteemed Christs Ordinance of Baptisme is not substantially made good not only from clear and undeniable Scripture and Reason But from most pregnant Authohities of learned men and most of them parties themselves End of the first Part. Infants Baptism Disproved The Second Part disproves Infants Baptism under this Head viz. That the Baptising of Infants is no Ordinance of Jesus Christ which is made good in the seven following Chapters CHAP. I. Wherein the Scriptures total silence about Infants Baptism is observed with the necessity of Scripture-warranty to authorize every Ordinance and that by the confession of Parties themselves IF Infants Baptism had been any Appointment or Ordinance of Jesus Christ No Scripture for Baptising Infants there would have been some Precept Command or Example in the Scripture to warrant the same but in as much as the Scripture is so wholly silent therein there being not one syllable to be found in all the New Testament about any such practice it may well be concluded to be no Ordinance of Jesus Christ for where the Scripture hath no tongue we ought to have no ear according to that known Maxime To practise any thing in the Worship of God as an Ordinance of his without an Institution ought to be esteemed Will-worship and Idolatry And that there is neither Precept or Example for any such thing as Infants Baptism in the Scripture The Parties themselves owning it we have the ingenuous confession of Parties themselves viz. Magdib The Magdiburgenses in Cent. 1. L. 2. p. 496. do say That concerning the baptising of the Adult both Jews and Gentiles we have sufficient proof from Acts 2.8.10.16 chapters but as to the baptising of Infants they can meet with no Example in the Scriptures Luther Luther in Pâ—still saith Young Children hear not nor understand the Word of God out of which Faith cometh and therefore if the Commandment be followed Children ought not to le baptized And again In his Epistle of Anabaptism saith We cannot prove by any place of Scripture that Children do believe neither do the Scriptures clearly and plainly with these or the like words say Baptize your Children for they believe wherefore we must needs yeeld to those that drive us to the Letter because we find it no where written Erasmus Erasmus in his Book of the Union of the Church saith It is no where expressed in the Apostolical Writings that they baptized Children And again upon Rom. 6. Baptising of young Infants was not in use saith he in St. Paul 's time And again In his 4th Book De Ratione Concio saith That they are not to be condemned that doubt whether Childrens Baptism was ordained by the Apostles Calvin Calvin in his 4th Book of Institutes Chap. 16. confesseth That it is no where expresly mentioned by the Evangelists that any one Child was by the Apostl's hands baptized Bucer Bucer upon Mat. saith That Christ no where commanded to baptize Infants Staphilus Staphilus in Epitome saith That young Children should be baptized is not expressed in the holy Scriptures Choelens Choelens De Bapt. Parvulorum saith That Jesus took a Child and placed him in the midst of them what Child was it I think it was not a young or new-born Child and that the same was not baptized For Infants were not in those dayes baptized but such as being come to their full growth confessed their sins Melancthon Melanct. in his Treatise concerning the Doctrine of Anabaptists writeth That there is no plain Commandment in the holy Scriptures that Children should be baptized Zwinglius Zwing In his Book of the Movers of Sedition speaking of baptizing of Children So it is saith he That there is no plain words of the Scripture whereby the same is commanded These latter Quotations from the Germane Doctors you have in an old Dutch Author called A very plain and well-grounded Treatise concerning Baptisme Englished 1618. Mr. Daniel Rogers Mr. Rogers in his Treatise about Baptism Part 29 confesseth himself to be unconvinced by demonstration of Scripture for it Mr. Baxter Mr. Baxter himself that wrote that Book called Plain Scripture-proof for Infants Church-Membership and Baptism yet in contradiction thereto in the same Book p. 3. confesseth That Infants Baptism is not plainly determined in the Scriptures And again in the Defence of the Principles of Love in the Epistle saith That he having had more invitation to study the Point throughly and to treat of it largly than most that are offended herein that they must give him leave to say that he knoweth it to be a very difficult Point Dr. Taylor Dr. Taylor Lib. Proph. p. 239 saith It is against the perpetual Analogy of Christ's Doctrine to baptize Infants for besides that Christ never gave any Precept to baptize them nor ever himself nor his Apostles that appears did baptize any of them All that either he or his Apostles said concerning it requires such previous dispositions to Baptism of which Infants are not capable and those are Faith and Repentance And not to instance in those innumerable places that require Faith before Baptism there needs no more but this one of our Blessed Saviour He that believes and is baptized shall be saved but he that believeth not shall be condemned Plainly thus Faith and Baptism will bring a man to Heaven but if he hath no Faith Baptism shall do him no good so that if Baptism be necessary so is Faith much more for the want of Faith dawns absolutely it is not said so of the want of Baptism The necessity of Scripture Authority to warrant every Ordinance Thus you have it acknowledged by Adversaries themselves that there is neither Precept President or Example in Scripture for baptising of Infants And in the next place you have it
Gentile must be baptized and have the Spirit given to witness that nothing must be called common or unclean where God had purified the Heart by believing 3. Circumcision initiated the Carnal Seed into the Carnal Church and gave them right to the Carnal Ordinances but Baptisme was to give the Spiritual Seed an orderly entrance into the Spiritual Church and a right to partake of the Spiritual Ordinances 4. Circumcision was to be a Bond and Obligation to keep the whole Law of Moses's but Baptisme witnessed that Moses Law was made void and that only Christ's â—aw was to be kept 5. Circumcision was administred to all Abrahams natural Seed without any profession of Faith Repentance or Regeneration whereas Baptisme to be administred to the Spiritual Seed of Abraham was only upon profession of Faith Repentance and Regeneration and which appears more fully by the following Instances compared 1. Because a Carnal Parent and a fleshly begetting by the the Legal Birth-priviledge gave right to Circumcision whereas a Spiritual begetting by a Spiritual Parent gave only a true right to Baptisme 2. Because a Legal Ecclesiastical Typical Holiness when Land Mountains Houses Birds Beasts and Trees were holy qualified for Circumcision whereas only Evangelical and Personal Holiness was a meet qualification for Baptisme 3. Because Strangers and Servants bought with Money and all ignorant Children of Eight days old yea Trees were capable of Circumcision whereas only men of understanding that were capable to believe with all their Heart and to give an account thereof with their mouths were to be esteemed capable Subjects of Baptisme 6. Circumcision was to be a sign of Temporal Blessings and Benefits to be enjoyed in the Land of Canaan whereas Baptisme was to be a sign as before of many Spiritual benefits viz. Remission of sins Justification Sanctification here and Eternal Salvation hereafter It is granted there are in some things an Analogy betwixt the one and the other both signifying Heart-Circumcision and an initiating into the Church though as a different Church so different Subjects and Church Members upon different grounds and to different ends as before and in a far different manner one to be done in a private House and by a private Hand and the other in some publick place and by the hand of some publick Minister appointed by the Church to administer the same But now because there is some Analogy in some things is there therefore ground to conclude it cometh into the room stead and use thereof by no means for by the same Argument we may as well conclude that it cometh in the room and stead of the Ark Manna Rock c. And from such like Arguments drawn from Analogies what Jewish Rites may not by our wits be introduced to the countenancing the Papists in their High Priesthood National Churches Orders of Priesthood Tythes and all other their innumerable Rites and Ceremonies that without any Institution of Christ or pretence of new Testament-authority they have intrâ—duced or imposed upon the account of Analogy with old Testament Rites and Services Concerning which you have the Lord Brooks in his Treatise of Episcopacy L Brooks P. 100 saying very well viz. That the Analogy which Baptisme now hath with Circumcision in the old Law is a fine ratiâ—nal Argument to illustrate a Point well proved before but I somewhat doubt saith he whether it be proof enough for that which some would prove by it since besides the vast difference in the Ordinance the persons to be Circumcised are stated by a positive Law so express that it leaves no place for Scruple but it is far otherwise in Baptisme where all the designation of Persons fit to be partakers for ought I know is only such as believe for this is the qualification which with exactest search I find the Scripture requires in Persons to be baptized and this it seems to require in all such Persons now how Infants can be properly said to believe I am not yet fully resolved And very full and most excellently you have to this point Dr. Taylor Dr. Tayl p. 228. Who saith That the Argument from Circumcision is invalid upon infinite considerations Figures and Types prove nothing unless a Commandment go along with them or some express to signifie such to be their purpose For the Deluge of Waters and the Ark of Noah were a Figure of Baptisme said Peter and if therefore the Circumstances of one should be drawn to the other we should make Baptisme a Prodigy rather than a Rite the Paschal Lamb was a Type of the Eucharist which succeeds the other as Baptisme doth to Circumcision but because there was in the manducation of the Paschal Lamb no prescription of Sacramental drink shall we thence conclude that the Eucharist is to be administred but in one kind And even in the very Instance of this Argument supposing a Correspondency of Analogy between Circumcision and Baptisme yet there is no Correspondence of Identity for although it were granted that both of them did consign the Covenant of faith yet there is nothing in the Circumstance of Childrens being Circumcised that so concerns that Mystery but that it might very well be given to Children and yet Baptisme only to men of Reason because Circumcision left a Character in the flesh which being imprinted upon Infants did its work to them when they came to age and such a Character was necessary because there was no word added to the Sign but Baptisme imprints nothing that remains on the Body and if it leaves a Character at all it is upon the Soul to which also the word is added which is as much a part of the Sacrament as the Sign it self for both which Reasons it is requisite that the Parties Baptized should be capable of Reason that they may be capable both of the word of the Sacrament and the impress made upon the Spirit since therefore the Reason of this Parity does wholly fail there is nothing left to infer a necessity of complying in this Circumstance of aâ—e any more then in the other Annexes of the Type then the Infants must also precisely be Baptized upon the Eighth day and Females must not be baptized because not Circumcised but it were more proper if we would understand it right to prosecute the Analogy from the Type to the Antitype by way of Letter and Spirit and signification and as Circumcision figures Baptisme so also the adjuncts of the Circumcision shall signifie something Spiritual in the adherences of Baptisme and therefore as Infants were Circumcised so spirial Infants shall be Baptized which is Spiritual Circumcision for therefore Babes had the Ministry of the Type to signifie that we must when we give our names to Christ become Children in malice and then the Type is made compleat c. Thus far the Dr. 7. Whether the not Baptizing Infants makes the priviledge under the Gospel less then under the Law who had then Circumcision 7 Not baptizing of