they speake not according to this word it is because there is no light in them Truely God revealeth not his will the Prophets the Apostles teach it not but by his word wee haue this word what can wee aske more would wee know what the judgement of God is what the testimony of the Prophets and Apostles are concerning that doctrine ought not God himselfe to declare it should not the Prophets and Apostles Publish it Wee haue this declaration wee haue no Christian doubteth thereof the authentique coppy of this publication haue we not then what wee neede what we seeke and aske so earnestly to wit a sentence and a finall decree on our controversies Truely it is not necessary that the King the Secretary the Court the Register bee all present wheresoever it is requisite that the Kings will be knowne if wee haue the order of the Court wee are assured of the Edict and decree Wee stand at this day on these termes wee haue not to do with the Iewes neither with the Turkes who denie the authority the one of a part the other of the whole Scripture Wee are Christians wee beleeue wee all protest that we haue in the Canonicall booke of the Scripture of the old and new Testament the declaration of the will of God We acknowledge on both sides that whatsoever is there contained is the word of God which is able to make vs wise vnto salvation and throughly furnished vnto all good workes Why do we then so earnestly demand the corporall presence of our judge why do wee desire that he should giue vs a Vicar a substitute since wee haue his decree and acknowledge that hee hath pronounced it CHAP. 2. The demand and proposall of those who desire a holy reformation This is the complaint of them who at this day grieue and sigh lamenting the desolation of Israel and Iuda who wish and demand that as good Iosiah caused the book of the Law to be read before him as Esdras and Nehemiah did the like before the congregation when they endeavoured to reforme the Church and restore it to her first integrity so the like may be practised at this day If in Christendome all things be foūd conformable to this law in matters of Religion there will be no neede of changing any thing therein but to punish rather those vnquiet spirits those troublesome and schismaticall heretickes which trouble and marre by their novelties the peace of the Church and repose of the whole world But if this conformitie be not there to bee found but on the contrary a difference disagreeing why should not Gods truth be preferred before humaine inventions the law before there customes and the kingdome of Iesus Christ before the tyranny and dominion of him who hath vsurped both over the living and the dead over soule and body prince and people an authority in effect wholy soueraigne And here let every soule in which there is left any touch of conscience let every man in whom there is found the least sparke of manhood remaining in such a division of the Church in such a disagreeing especially about things of so great importance judge which of the two doth rather practise the craft of Alcibiades in shunning and declining whether they who demand that their proceedings be examined by the rule of this word which we all avouch to be inspired dictated and registred by the spirit of God or else those who shunne nothing more then the censure of this word of this Scripture so farre as to charge it with defects vnsufferable even in humaine writings accusing it of obscurity ambiguity and imperfections which truly are the proprieties of the Oracles of Apollo of the leaues of Sybil's but little agreeable to the the law of the Almighty the which the kingly Prophet so much magnifieth as beeing perfect pure sure and giving wisdome to the simple CHAP. 3. Wherein the objections against the foresaid demand are set downe and that which is framed against the person of those which require it is refuted Since then wee are brought to this poynt that instead of pleading the cause throughly there is a question made whether wee ought to come so farre they stand much vppon the quality of the accuser they conteste against the sufficiencie of the Iudge to whom hee appeales Wee are constrayned first of all to examine the equity or injustice of this manner of proceeding And first as touching the quality of the accusers they terme them new start-vps they aske them what calling they haue thereunto by what authority they haue made so bold an attempt as to protest they desire the reformation of the Church The thing then objected to them is noveltie and rashnesse But both of these objections are but a recrimination the which cannot be verified but that first their accusation be convinced of vntruth and therefore ought not neither can it be receiued before that point of their accusation be cleared They vndertake to proue that the doctrine of our Lord and of the Apostles hath beene altered and changed in that Church which termeth it selfe Catholique they vrge that every other doctrine is to be rejected no other admitted but that alone They protest then not that they will bring in but that their meaning is to banish novelties for which cause Noveltie cannot bee obiected vnto them so long as it cannot be proved that they are innovatours which is the chiefe point of the controversie the question beeing not here of the Nouelty of the persons but of that of faith and doctrine according to which we ought to iudge of the persons and not of it according to the persons As learnedly Tertullian Seing then that the summe of their accusations consist in this that they accuse the Church falsely called Catholique to haue innovated so long as it doth not appeare whether their accusation be true or no novelty cannot be obiected to them As for the rashnesse of the accusation no more can it be obiected vnto them vntill that the accusation bee retorted by a direct and just defence for even as in an estate and commonwealth every man is admitted to accuse in case of high treason and none is reiected but vpon a manifest falsity of his accusation neither is he accounted to accuse rashly who accuseth truly so in the Church whosoeuer accuseth of high treason against God is to bee heard without objecting vnto him rashnesse vntil it be prooued that his accusation is false In an armie in a besieged towne whē there is questiō of treasō no advise whatsoever is neglected but they rather duly weigh consider not so much from whom it proceedeth as the importance of it the accusers are not punished if their accusation be not found false but if it be true they are applauded rewarded advanced and often promoted in the offices and places of the accused In the Church of God in matter of conscience wee ought not to stoppe any mans mouth but to
intricate ought rather oblige him to produce them then oppose or hinder that hee should make vse of them For hee that accuseth and for proofe of his accusation alleageth reasoÌ„s too hard to be vnvnderstood that hee may seeme to speake Welch or Irish both iustifies the party accused and makes himselfe worthy to be laughed at CHAP. 6. The verification of the first meanes of Nullitie against the third and fourth allegation 3 BVt if as by the third allegation it seemes the Scripture bee ambiguous and capable of divers interpretations wherefore and with what reason is it that the Doctors that terme themselues Catholickes doe make more account of one expression of Scripture then of another grounding themselues either vpon the circumstances of the very text which is expounded or vpon some other passage of the Scripture the sense whereof is cleare manifest and certaine and not simply vpon the authority of the Church If the Scripture be as they say a nose of waxe Theramenes buskin a shoe for both feete a wethercock which turnes with the winde wherefore do they refute by Scripture the interpretations nay rather the false glosses of heretiques Wherefore do they not barely alleage vnto them the authority of the Church Verily according to their reckoning for the prooueing of transubstantiation they neede no more vrge the words of the Scripture hoc est corpus meum neither to say that they must be taken as they sound as being words of a last will and testament seing that this passage being a part of the Scripture is according to the nature of the Scripture if their allegation be true ambiguous and capable of divers interpretations and therefore they ought not to beleiue transubstantiation by reason of this place of Scripture but because it hath pleased the Church so to interpret it and so the beliefe of the Church of Rome will not bee grounded vpon the Scripture nor ruled according to it but quite contrary the sence of the Scripture is ruled and grounded vpon the knowledge of the Church so that the foundation is builded vpon the house and the building is the levell and the square And to conclude how commeth it to passe that they say that the Scripture proueth so distinctly so clearely so evidently the pretended authority of the Church that they wonder how those that do but read the Scripture can admit it if so bee that the Scripture bee ambiguous and of a double meaning as hath beene pretended by the third allegation 4 Touching the fourth defect objected against the Scripture to wit that it is imperfect and doth not sufficiently furnish vs with reasons for to proue or refute what is to be beleeued in matters of controversie betwixt vs. If this objection bee received how haue the Doctors of the Church which is called Catholique vndertaken to proue all the points of the Romish Religion by the Scripture Haue they taken vpon them rashly a thing impossible would they shew themselues in this sophisters and cavilling disputers seeking in the Scripture that which is not there to be found and prouing a truth by a lye or are there some points of doctrine beleeued in the Church termed Catholique which are not contained in the Scripture who amongst them all dare vndertake to make a catalogue of any such points what may those points of doctrine be that are not handled in the Scripture for being silent in which the Scripture is termed imperfect They are not points touching the Trinity the incarnation of the Sonne of God the redemption of mankind or of faith in Iesus Christ of hope charity and repentance of the necessity and practise of good workes of life eternall of Baptisme of the preaching of the word of the holy supper these points and those that depend on them are without doubt retained in the Scripture What then can these articles of faith bee of which the Prophets the Apostles nay God himselfe hath spoken in the Scripture Is it the article of the popes authority not only now to excommunitate but also to depose Kings his authority of dispeÌ„cing with mariages with which God dispenceth not in his word to make eating of flesh in Lent a thing of it selfe indifferent to bee a sinne and that an incestious mariage be not incestious or else the article of his imperiall dominion so soveraigne and supreme that although hee should lead whole troupes of silly soules into hell none may presume to say vnto him my Lord why do you so and of so large extent that it reacheth vnto the soules both of the liuing and the dead Or are they the articles of worshipping of Images of invocation of Saints of the fier of purgatory as hote as that of hell of workes of supererogation of merit ex congruo ex coÌ„digno that Iesus Christ hath sacrificed himselfe vpon earth twice to wit when he celebrated the holy Supper with his disciples and not once alone vpon the crosse that divine service ought to be sayd in an vnknowne tongue that Christ hath not saued by his death the litle children which dye without baptisme And if there be any other article of this sort of which the holy Ghost hath made no mention and the Prophets and Apostles haue written nothing No the holy Ghost hath dictated the Prophets and Apostles haue written the cleane contrary That the temporall authority of Kings is immediatly from God That every man is subiect to and not aboue the law of God That the very Apostles are the servants but not the lords of the Church That the soules of them which dye in Christ rest from their labours That wee must not call on him in whom we have not beleeued That wee must not bowe downe to images That when we haue done all wee can wee are vnprofitable servants That Christ hath not offered himselfe oftentimes but once That the vse of an vnknowne tongue in the Church is a curse That Christ receiued the litle Children yea before baptisme CHAP. 7. A verifying of the first meanes of nullity against the fift and sixt â—llegation AND for the fifth reproach cast vpon the Scripture to wit that those who make profession to end their controversies by its determination are disagreeing in opinion if this consideration should make that God speaking in the Scripture or by the Scriptures were not a competent Iudge to determine our controversies it would follow also from thence that neither the Church should be our Iudge since in this respect there is no difference For in the times of the Primitiue Church both Arrians and Orthodoxes Donatistes Catholiques did pretend to follow the judgement of the Church The Arrians did reject the Councell of Nice required a new Councell yea many Arrians in effect protested that they would hold themselues to the Councell of Nice so that by this account the Church it selfe shall not be the Iudge if from the discord of them who professe to referre themselues to the decision of a
whatsoeuer things haue beene written afore time haue beene written for our learning and therefore by the same reason clearely plainely there being no greater enemy to learning then obscurity It was the Scripture which he termed to be giuen by inspiration of God and profitable to teach and instruct how can this be if it be obscure likewise he sayth that Timothy had knowne the holy Scriptures from his child hood nay 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 from his very infancie do we vse to reade darke obscure authors vnto little children It was the Scripture which the Apostle Saint Peter calleth a light that shineth in a darke place And what difference is there betweene darknesse and light a lanthorne and obscurity And to be breife it was the scripture the reading of which hath beene so much recommended by the Ancient Fathers namely by Saint Chrysostome whose exhortation so patheticall and pithy so often reiterated and inculcated shew plainly that this abuse of not reading the Scriptures vnder a colour of their obscurity did long agoe in his time begin to creepe into the Church but was neither receiued nor approued by it as now it is And here it may be some will say vnto vs that it cannot be denyed but the Scripture is obscure otherwise to what end serue so many cōmentaries homelies and sermons But the answere is very easie that we deny not that the Scripture is in many places very obscure God hauing so ordained it of his infinite wisdome for to beate downe the presumption of man and to rouse vp his lazinesse to a holy studie and diligent reading of it as S◠Augustine hath very well observed But wee say with the same Father That in those things that are most plainly sette downe in the Scripture are contained all things which concerne faith and good manners For as touching what is over and aboue that the whole militant Church were it vnited in one were not able to expound all the obscure places in the Scripture otherwise she would not haue beene so vncharitable as not to haue taken care to haue furnished her children with an ample and authenticke conmentary which might make all the Scripture cleare and without obscurity And as touching preaching and commentaries they serue not alwayes to illustrate and explaine but oftentimes to delate and amplifie and when they do illustrate they do it not by any light borrowed elsewhere then from the Scripture itselfe interpreting the Scriptures by the Scriptures themselues following therein the Councell of the Fathers and the practice of the Levites of whom it is written that they did read in the booke of the law of God expounding it and rendring the true sense of it causing it to be vnderstood by the Scripture So that we way iudge of the sense of that which is obscure by the sense of that which is cleare likewise discerne whether the interpretatiō be agreable to the place of the Scriptures by that which goeth before and followeth after whereas in a place that is difficult to speake properly when the interpretation of it is given cannot be receiued but vpon credit and with relation to the authority of the interpretors because in such a case wee cannot see the correspondence that is betweene the Text and the commentary the words and the sense which cānot be said of good whole some interpretation of the Scripture which therefore ought not to bee condemned of obscurity CHAP. 11. The verification of the second meanes of Nullity against the third and fourth allegation The third accusation of ambiguitie is as vniust as the two former for if the Scripture had beene ambiguous and capable of divers interpretations how had it bin possible for the Apostle S◠Paul to convince the Iewes by the Scriptures can one by any saying having an ambiguous and double meaning force the vnderstanding and the conscience of an obdurate and obstinate enemy how could the Iewes of Berea examine by the Scripture the doctrine of the same Apostle S. Paul That which is ambiguous and may bee bent too and fro can it serue for a rule the question not beeing of a Lesbian rule which is rather ruled then doth rule and measured then it selfe a measure which is bowed and bended whither soever wee list but of a certaine and constant rule which is alwayes the same And how did our Lord imploy not only his authority as the sonne of God but the Scripture it selfe when he would proue the resurrection of the dead against the Sadduces and so pregnantly that even the Deuill himselfe with all his sophistry could not answere the argument shall we thinke hee proued a truth which he vndertooke to cleare and put out of all doubt by a passage the sense whereof was doubtfull and vncertaine And what for we also alleage the Fathers are not both Athanasius and S. Augustine of this opinion that by a due consideration had of what goeth before and what followeth after and by the consent and agreement it hath with the Principall scope of the matter which is there treated of the Scriptures are to be interpreted against hereticks How could it be showne by the same Scriptures which is yet dayly practised that a false and hereticall interpretation doth not agree to the Scripture And finally is it in conscience seemly in calling the Scriptures ambiguous to brand them and disgrace them so farre as to fasten vpon them the marke of Satans Oracles If they had beene such if Tertullian had beleeued them to be such the hereticks had never given them occasion to call them hee himselfe had never called them Lucifugas Scripturarum such as shunne and flie the Scripture as the oule or batte doth the cleare sun-shine The fourth accusation of the imperfection of the Scripture is noe lesse grevious and vnjust for since the Scripture hath beene ordained of God to make men wise unto saluation and perfect vnto every good worke It must without doubt containe all doctrine necessary to salvation otherwise it could not attaine its end And since Scripture it selfe doth promisse this so exact and perfect doctrine either its witnesse is not of God or what it testifies of it selfe is true Nay which is more God hath expressely prohibited to adde to it or to diminish any thing from it And if this hath had place in the old Testament shall it not in the new which is much more full and perfect it is not to bee beleeued Let vs then adore as Tertullian speaketh the fulnesse of the Scriptures and let vs not heare as Athanasius speaketh neither receiue any thing besides or aboue thē in that which concernes the doctrine of faith For touching the policy ceremonies vsed in the Church it is another matter wee avouch that the Fathers did not thinke themselues bound to giue an accompt of them by the Scripture But a great part of those ceremonies vsed in their times hath bin quite abolished so that they are
those to whom the spirit hath suggested them how wicked and detestable soever otherwise they may bee So that the question is brought to matter of fact to witte who proposeth that which is contained in the Scripture which question is cleared in examining the Doctrine proposed by the Scripture as the proportion of a building is knowne by applying of the square and levell For example the Iewes of Boerea did not directly and à priori inquire whether Saint Paul when hee preached vnto them was inspired of the holy spirit or no it had beene an impossible thing for them seeing it is the property of God alone to bee the searcher of hearts But they made inquirie for all that whether Saint Paul did speake according to the Scriptures and hauing by conferring of Saint Pauls doctrine with the Scriptures discovered the conformity and how they answered the one to the other they judged truly as indeed it was to wit that Saint Paul spake not of himselfe but by the holy spirit Yea the Ancients themselues hauing to do with heretickes who made shew to hold the Scripture for their rule haue not refused to dispute before a Pagan Iudge who although by reason of his vnbeliefe hee was not capable to judge whether of two parties maintained the truth pronounced neverthelesse and very happily which of the two concluded most conformably to the Scripture which both the one and the other alleaged for their purpose but the same sufficeth vs at this day in our controversies for if it be apparant who speake according to the Scriptures no man who maketh profession of Christianity doubting of the Scripture the conclusion will bee plaine and evident that whosoever hee be speakes according to truth and by the spirit of truth There is much difference betweene beleeuing the Principles of Christian Religion and judging who teach most conformably to those principles To the first faith and the illumination of the holy spirit are absolutely necessary for the second common sense is sufficient To beleeue that the Scripture is true when it teacheth vs that there is but one God that the Father is God the Sonne God and the holy Ghost also that the Father is not the Sonne nor the holy Ghost neither the one nor the other for this faith onely is required But to inferre from thence that the nature of God is one in number that the persons of the Trinity are distinct yet not divided that they communicate in one and the same nature for this I say common sense alone sufficeth which cannot deny the consequent the truth of the antecedent once granted which without all doubt cannot bee comprehended but by faith It is then in vaine to aske who shall judge of the consequences as if a man hauing learned in a historie how many companies and how many souldiers in every company were in an army how many troopes of horse and how many horsemen in every troope one should demand who shall judge whether the number of the souldiers of which the army did consist be rightly collected frō thence In like manner if we can proue by the Scripture that that which Christ gaue to his disciples was bread broken and if wee proue by the same Scripture that the body of Christ is not broken in the Eucharist and that yet much lesse the bread brokē is Christs body to demād here who shall judge whether a man may inferre from hence that the Lord gaue not vs externally his own body in the Eucharist is all one as to aske who hath common sense Likewise when the Apostle sayth that wee are saued by grace through faith and that not of our selues it is the gift of God not of workes least any man should Boast If it bee asked here who shall judge whether it can be gathered from hence that wee are not saved by the merit of our workes but by faith wholly relying vpon this grace without hauing merited it our selues by any workes of ours is not this to aske how a man might know that hee is in his senses But if the consequence bee so obscure that it is harde to judge of it this is an argument that there is no consequence at all the nature of which is such that in a manner it forceth our vnderstanding to yeeld vnto it and to allow of it albeit we had studied in no other logicke then that of nature CHAP. 16. The verifying of the second meanes of Nullity against the eight allegation by declaring the vntrueth thereof BVT if wee proceede so farre as to demand how we may know whether the Scripture bee the coppy of the declared will of God since a man cannot know neither who hath nor whether hee himselfe hath the spirit of God or no the answere is very easie hee who knoweth not whether he hath the spirit or no belongs not to Christ and therefore it is not strange if he knowes not the voyce of Christ but all those who belong to Christ are made partakers of his spirit If any man hath not the spirit of Christ hee is none of his As many as are led by the spirit of God they are the sonnes of God they haue not receiued the spirit of bondage againe to feare but the spirit of adoption which cryeth Abba Father in their hearts The spirit it selfe beareth witnesse to their spirit that they are the children of God They are sealed vntill the redemption of the purchased possession hee is vnto them a spirit of wisdome and reuelation They are the sheepe of Christ they heare and know the voyce of their sheepheard They follow him and the voice of a stranger they will not follow but will flie from him for they know not his voyce The Father driues them to Christ they are taught of God they haue learned of the Father they are spirituall and therefore comprehend the things that are of God because the spirit hath revealed thē vnto them they are spiritually discerned They haue receiued the anoynting by the holy spirit and know all things God hath written his lawes in their hearts Christ dwels there by faith Their bodies are the temples of the holy Ghost And those who are adorned and enriched so sumptuously can they bee ignorant of the excellencie of the diamond and the magnificencie of the riches which they possesse Those who are enlightened with such a light vpon whom the Lord causeth the day to spring from on high to shine and the light of his countenance to airse to whom he is the sun and buckler the sunne of righteousnesse bearing health vnder his wings whose eyes hee hath enlightened can they doubt whether they walke in his light Shall the naturall man by his reason comprehend that he discourseth and the spirituall man shall not hee discerne by the spirit that hee hath the spirit And here some man may say vnto vs But how many may bee found who boast nay who thinke verily they haue the spirit
and yet are grossely deceiued how many haue the spirit and yet erre oftentimes in their iudgements and indeede it is so but is it not either a strange perversity or indiscretiō to inferre from thence that none can know that none can judge and discerne assuredly to salvation the spirituall things which God hath revealed outwardly to his by his word inwardly by his spirit For do we not see amōgst men how many there are who glory and deceiue themselues with a false opinion of wisdome being indeed imprudent foolish yet whosoever would conclude from thence that hee who is truly wise cannot know that hee is so should bring into the world not that of the Academiques but even the Pyrronian suspence of judgment If then the boasting and vanity of a foole cannot prejudice the assured knowledge which hee who is wise can and ought to haue of wisdome no more can the false perswasions of hypocrites which proceede from the illusiō of Satan shake the certainty of that assurāce which proceedeth from the sense and feeling of the spirit dwelling in the heart of the spirituall man and giuing as wee haue said testimony to his spirit Yea the conformity of his motions with the word of the Scripture assures and strengthens him and putteth a difference betweene the sence and feeling he hath and that which ariseth from the false illusion of Satan which hath no other rule then it selfe From the same fountaine either of malice or vnadvisednesse it proceedes that vnder pretence that those who haue receiued the spirit do erre sometimes they would conclude that in that which is necessary to salvation they cannot passe any certaine judgement for the wisest in the knowledge of worldly businesses may offend against the rules of wisdome and yet who will deny for all this but they can giue advise and sure counsell Wee say sure according to the rules of wisdome For no man can answere for the event which is oftentimes contrary to the wisedome of Counsell and favoureth rash attempts The learned are ignorant of many things but not of such without which they cannot deserue that name As then the prudent differ not from fooles in this that they never commit any follies but in this that their follies are not grosse are not ordinary and as the difference that is between the learned the ignorāt cōsists in that which is the Principall in the Science which he professeth The ignorāt on the contrary is either ignorant of all or knowes very little and even that little which hee knowes to speake properly hee knowes not So the difference that is betweene the man spiritually wise him that is ignorant according to the spirit it is not in this that the Spirituall man never but in that hee erres not grossely and ordinarily Not in that hee knowes all but in that hee knowes all that which is necessary in his profession whereas hee that is spiritually foolish and ignorant erres almost alwayes erres ordinarily is ignorant of that which is necessary that he should know for the making of himselfe such as hee professeth himselfe to bee And euen as there is a great disproportion betweene fooles and wisemen in the ordinary course and cariage of their liues betweene the learned and ignorant in the knowledge of good arts and yet all the wise in that kind are not equally wise nor all the learned equally learned nay in that very humane and secular wisedome and learning there is no one perfectly wise perfectly learned so great is the difference betweene those whom God hath enlightned with his knowledge and those whom the eyes of their vnderstanding the God of this world hath blinded and yet there is no one amongst them all who hath attained to the highest degree of perfection Wee conclude then that as those that belong not to the Lord cannot assure themselues of his spirit and by consequent cannot discerne his word vnto saluation so all those that are his do feele the efficacie of his spirit in their hearts euen as they feele and finde in themselues by experience the vse of reason and judge by the spirit of spirituall things proposed in the word after the same manner as by reason they judge of things that canne bee comprehended by it It sufficeth vs to haue proued that the faithfull haue an assured and certaine rule in the Scripture CHAP. 17. The verifying of the third meanes of nullity against the allegations And by these reasons wee thinke wee haue made good the two first meanes of Nullity proposed against the eight allegations It remaineth that wee verifie the third to wit that they tend to the subversion of Christian Religion To come then to the point let vt first of all consider that their ayme is to proue that a Christiā can haue no assurance of his Religion of that which he ought to beleeue by the Scripture because it is dumbe obscure ambiguous imperfect which cannot assure those who depend on it and may bee alleaged in favour of heretickes If that detestable opinion bee once engrafted in the heart as it is set forth and maintained by word and writing what will become I pray you of the authority of the Church which is grounded vpon the Scripture if the foundation of it be so falty is it not to bee feared that the building will sinke If a Christian cannot yea ought not to ground himselfe vpon the Scripture by reason of these pretended imperfections with what confidence shall hee ground himselfe vpon the authority of the Church which hath no other foundation then this foundation so imperfect if the foresaid allegations be true But if the one and the other proppe of faith faile this of the scripture and consequently that of the authority of the Church grounded on the Scripture as of necessity when the foundation is vndermined those that leane vpon the wall must fall together with the wall what will become of the authority of the assurance of Christian Religion The right of the Church is called in question and shee either as a daughter produces the scripture the coppy of the Testament of her Father or as a spouse brings forth the Scripture the cōtract of her marriage and this Testament is foūd dumbe obscure ambiguous of a double meaning being not able to cleare the night of the Church nay which may bee imployed against her In this case what shall bee the foundation what the title what the proofes of the right of the Church will they not be found if we beleeue the allegations to be dumbe ambiguous obscure imperfect proofes and consequently shall not the right instead of being confirmed become invalide and of no force And who will not judge that the Church proceeds not fairely attributing to her self so great authority and maintaining it by proofes fo defectiue or who will beleeue that the same is the true Church the true people of God who shew a Testament a couenant of God cōtracted with her which
she confesseth to be set downe in dumbe words obscure ambiguous applyable to every sense and which may be produced and vrged against her selfe How will the Atheists laugh at this how alas will the consciences of them bee shaken that beleeue and receiue this opinion of the obscurity ambiguity and insufficiencie of the Scriptures Let vs consider in the second place that their ayme is to cast all Christians into incertainty striuing to proue by these allegations that a man in what concernes Religion ought to mistrust his owne judgement which being once granted how shall a man know whether hee deceiues not himselfe in beleeving that there is a Church Here the Scripture cannot succour or helpe for it is presupposed that it cannot afford any certainty It is laid for a foundation that a Christian hearing reading meditating on the Scripture may coozen and deceiue himselfe Neither can a man in this straight haue recourse to the testimony of the holy Ghost for the allegation presupposeth that it cannot be knowne neither who hath neither whether a man himselfe hath the holy spirit or no. And as for the authority of the Church it cannot bee alleaged for question may bee made whether there be any Church at all As then to him who should doubt whether there ought to be a Pope in the world it would seeme strange far frō the purpose to alleage the testimony of the Pope for to perswade him that there ought to bee one Even so when we are to proue that there is a Church it is in vaine to alleage the testimony of the Church If then Christian Religion hath no foundation either in the Scripture or in the testimony of the holy Ghost or in the authority of the Church as it followeth from the allegation where shall shee seeke where shall shee finde where-vpon to vphold her selfe shall it bee in Philosophie there much lesse for if a Christian man cannot judge whether there be a Church by the spirit as not being able to assure himselfe whether hee hath the spirit much lesse able shall hee be to do it by his reason which without the spirit is starke blinde in spirituall things Let vs in the third place consider that in the disputes touching the markes and notes of the Church it is questioned what they are one is of one opinion another of another whence may a certaine knowledge of them bee had shall it bee from the Scripture but the allegation presupposeth that it is impossible shall it bee from the Church never the nearer for it so litle appeares which is the Church that it is controversed what are her markes by which she is knowne Let vs in the fourth place consider that grant wee had found the markes of the Church according to the allegation which casts men into incertitude it could not be discerned to what congregation to apply them amongst so many and divers assemblies who challenge them for it is supposed as granted according to the allegation that the Scripture cannot here guide vs that wee may deceiue our selues in making the choyce and the testimony of the Church can as little helpe vs if first of all it bee not presupposed that it hath the markes of the Church which is the point in question for wee seeke in what Church the markes of the Church are to bee found and to rely herein vpon the testimony of the Church doth presuppose that wee know already in what Church the markes of the Church are found Let vs in the fift place consider that according to the allegations there is no meanes how a man converted to the Church canne bee assured of his Religion For if hee hath not beene convinced by lawfull arguments neither his profession which followed the conviction of his conscience shall be lawfull It is very certaine that if the foundation of his faith who hath beene converted bee the authority of the Church the foundation of his conuersion hath not beene lawfull for there was no meanes to perswade him that the Church hath any such authority in alleadging to him the testimony of the Church And the allegation of Scripture and of reason according to their supposition is not a lawful meanes to resolue the conscience Having bin then brought to acknowledge the authority of the Church founded vpon these arguments it cannot be but weake and vnlawfull and consequently the beleefe of all that hee hath beleeued as depending vpon the authority which hee giveth vnto the Church And indeede if such a one whom wee would convert doth question the authority of the Church shall we proue vnto him that whereof he doubteth by alleaging vnto him that whereof hee maketh likewise doubt the argument then of his conuersion to the acknowledgment of the Church cannot haue beene the authority of the Church If then no man can bee assured of the foundation of his conversion no more neither can hee bee which is builded vpon the foundation In the sixt place let vs obserue that the Church which is called Catholique never speaketh by word of mouth they are the particulars that are her Heralds It may bee demanded then by what meanes a man may bee assured that they discharge their place faithfully since they may erre in proposing doctrine contrary to the meaning of the Church This cannot bee by the Scripture for according to the allegation truth and falsehood cannot be discerned by it no nor by the testimony of the Church for he speaketh not but by particular men of whom it is doubted whether they haue faithfully reported the determination of the Church In the Seaventh place let vs consider that if the authority of the Church bee the foundation of faith every one shall beleeue because his companion hath beleeued and so christian religion shall bee made ridiculous for seeing the Church is a congregation of persons in which every one grounds his faith vpon the authority of the whole congregation of which they are Members it will necessarily follow that every one of them shall beleeue apart because all haue beleeued together In the eight place let vs weigh this horrible inconvenience that we shall not beleeue the mysteries of the Trinit of the incarnation of the redemption of mankinde but by heare-say because our Ancestours our Parents our fellow burgesses haue beleeued so and shall not beleeue that they haue beene the Church of God but because they haue left this testimony of themselues which the Iewes may vsurpe with the like appearance of right if we renounce the authority of Scriptures Now haue wee verified this last meanes of Nullity not to incense any God is our witnesse but to shew if it bee possible into what and how many execrable absurdities some amongst them vnadvisedly precipitate themselues who by the meanes of these allegations endeavour to draw vs from the judgement of God speaking in the Scripture to the judgement of men pretending the title of the Church being most certaine that he who vrged principally this