is this There is no medium between Men's judging for themselves and giving up their Judgments to others We grant it but what then His Inference is this If the first be their Duty the Press ought not to be restrained But why not His Reason is again the same because it debars Men from seeing those Allegations by which they are to inform their Judgments That 's his Argument to which I answer thus We must distinguish betwixt Man and Man betwixt such as can judge for themselves and such as cannot where the Scripture is express the Words plain and the Sense easie every Man who hath a competent use of Reason and can read his Bible may judge for himself But when several Interpretations are given of any Texts when Doubts are raised when Arguments are produced to defend both Parts of a Contradiction there is a vast number of Men who are no more able to judge which is true and which is false than a blind Man is to distinguish betwixt a good Colour and a bad one 'T is the great unhappiness of such Persons that in matters of Controversy they cannot rely upon their own weak Reason but must either suspend their Judgments or else give it up to the Conduct of some other Person and who is so fit to be trusted with it as their own Ministers provided they be as every Minister should be Men of Piety and Parts able to satisfie Doubts remove Scruples and convince Gainsayers But if Men give up their Reason to the Clergy this Author who vilifieth our Clergy as much as possible he can gives our People an intimation that by so doing they make us the Lords of their Faith But how doth that follow suppose two Persons are engaged in a doubtful Controversie about an Estate claimed by both these Persons being of themselves unable to determine the Case appeal to the King's Judges but do they thereby make those Judges the Lords of that Estate which is contended for surely no the Judge doth no more than according to Evidence and Law declare to which Person that Estate doth justly belong So it is in our present Case several Parties of Men lay Claim to Truth as theirs and produce Evidences for it Now a Man unable to satisfie himself which side Truth is to be found consults his Minister who by Evidence of Scripture which in this case is the only Law assures his Neighbour the Truth lieth here or there And indeed that the Minister is the most proper Judge in Controversies relating to Religion we cannot doubt if we dare believe the Prophet who saith The Priest's lips should preserve knowledge and they should seek the Law at his mouth for he is the messenger of the Lord of Hosts This Text doth not constitute us nor do we pretend to be Lords of our People's Faith but as the Apostle speaks Helpers to the Truth We do not require any weak Believer's assent to any one Article of Faith whereunto God requires it not though the Church of Rome doth so And how unjustly then without Modesty or Truth doth this Man stigmatize us as Lords of our People's Faith But beside those weak Christians who in controverted Points cannot judge for themselves there are some other of clearer Heads and more improved Understandings that can and for their sakes this Author saith that the Press ought not to be restrained and his Reason is this Because the Restraint of the Press debars them from seeing those Allegations by which they are to confirm their Judgments This Argument in effect hath already been offered once and again and hath as often been replied to but for the greater satisfaction of my Reader I shall again consider and enlarge my Answer to it and this it is Not knowing and intelligent Christian who is well able to judge for himself can want any new Allegations from the Press to confirm his Judgments in any disputed Points of Faith or Worship because we have already sufficient Rules to judge by For 1. We have the Scripture preached in our publick Churches and if we please we may read and consider them in our private Families and Closets And here I do again affirm that all matters of revealed Religion must be examined proved and determined by the written Word of God This is the only sure balance to weigh and touch stone to try all Matters of Faith and Worship To this our Lord sent his hearers Search the Scriptures and again How readest thou And which is remarkable the ignorance of Scripture did he make the only occasion and ground of Error in Points of Faith so he told the Sadducees Ye err but why not knowing the Scriptures by which our Lord himself proved that great Doctrine of the Resurrection which they denied And when our Lord would prove himself to be a greater Person than David he did it by that Text The Lord said unto my Lord c. This course took our blessed Saviour and so did his Apostles too and so must we we must take the Scripture for our Guide in Matters of Religion for that is the only and infallible Rule and unalterable Standard to measure all the Doctrines and Practices which such or such a Church doth teach recommend or require from us But if it shall be again demanded who must be the Judg whether amongst different Interpretations of Holy Writ this or that be the true one whether in controverted Points such or such a Text do certainly warrant such or such a Doctrine as is grounded thereon I answer again 2. We have the united Judgment and Decrees of several Councils those I mean that were convened in the first and purest times before the Superstitions and Idolatries of Rome had crept in by degrees thro' carelesness vice and ignorance and over-spread the Church The grand Controversie now on foot amongst us concerns the Divinity of Christ the Personality and Deity of the Holy Ghost that Christ in the most strict and proper Sense of that Notion is truly God that the Holy Ghost is a Person and a Divine Person we affirm but our Socinians who are the spawn of old Arius make bold to deny To justifie our Doctrine we cite such and such Texts and to establish their Opinions as well as they can they do the same thing as for the Scripture which we produce to prove the Doctrine of the Trinity because humane Reason cannot comprehend it they do either question the Authority of such Texts or else they wrest them to such an intolerable Sense as every sober Man's Reason may justly abhor Now the Question is Who must judge betwixt us and them Who must determine whether the Scripture be on their side or ours I answer That Heterodox Opinion now much contended for which we call Socinian did appear under some other Names very early in the Christian Church In the first Age the Godhead of Christ was denied by the Jews and particularly by Ebion in the Third Century by
one Theodatus Artemon and Beryllus and Sabellius in the Fourth Century by Arius Eunomius and some others And in the same Age the Personality and Divinity of the Holy Ghost was denied by Macedonius and some others who were there branded by a particular Name and called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Oppugners of the Holy Ghost These Heterodox Opinions beginning to spread and disturb the Peace of the Christian Church and some other ill Opinions arising too several General Councils were summoned by several Christian Emperors the Nicene Council by Constantine the Great whose main work was to examine the Opinion of Arius the Council of Constantinople called by Theodosius the First to debate the Opinion of Macedonius the Council of Ephesus called by Theodosius the Second to consider the Opinion of Nestorius and the Council of Chalcedon summoned by the Emperor Martian to consult about the Opinion of Eutyches These Councils consisting of some Hundreds of Bishops having the Glory of God in their Hearts the Settlement of the Church in their Eyes and the Bible in their Hands did after a mature deliberation pronounce the Opinions of these Men to be contrary to the Doctrine of the Gospel and the obstinate defenders of them to be Hereticks And certainly the determinations of these General Councils which were made up of Persons exemplary for their Piety and eminent for their Learning who resolved on nothing without mature Advice and Deliberation are of as great Authority and afford as much Satisfaction in Matters of Religion as any thing of Man can be or do For the Truths of God once taught the World by Christ and his Apostles being unchangeable for ever and our Bibles which are the only Rule to measure Religions by continuing one and the same for ever that which was an Error in those early days must needs be an Error still and that which was a Truth then must needs be a Truth now And if we cannot think of any more proper means for the right understanding of Scripture and the discovery of Truth and Error than the deliberate and unanimous Judgment of so many hundred pious learned and unbiassed Men assembled together then certainly the determinations of those antient Councils are very considerable Evidences for Truth and against Error And the rather because they consisted of such Persons who besides their eminent Piety and Learning had the great Advantage of living nearer the Apostles age and thereby were the better able to inform themselves and us what was certainly believed and done in the very infancy of the Christian Church SECT IX 3. THE Writings of the Antient Fathers those especially that lived within the first six Centuries where-ever they agree and are not since corrupted or maimed by the Frauds and Forgeries of the Roman Church are of singular use in this Matter too That Ignatius Clemens Origen Athanasius Cyril Nazianzene Basil Chrysostom Hierom Austin and many others both in the Eastern and Western Churches were indeed Persons of great Piety and excellent Parts our Socinians without breach of Modesty cannot deny And although some of these great Names in some particular Matters had their peculiar mistakes and shewed themselves to be but Men yet in all Points where we find an unanimous Consent amongst them we are to have so much Veneration for their Authority as not easily to suspect or contradict it True it is if we take these Fathers singly Man by Man where we find any of them alone in their Opinions as Origen in reference to the Punishments of Hell and St. Austin in reference to Infants that die unbaptised we are not in this case much more obliged to accept their Judgment than the Judgment of some single Person yet alive But if we take All the Fathers who lived within six hundred Years after Christ together and in a lump where we find them One in Judgment they are enough to make a wiser Council than any hath been since their time they are enough to inform us what is Error and what is Truth But SECT X. 4. BEcause Learned Men whose Fortunes are Mean cannot purchase and unlearned Men whose Intellectuals are weak cannot read and understand the voluminous Writings of the Fathers we have several Systems of Divinity Confessions of Faith short Abridgments of Christian Religion which are especially to unlearned Persons great helps in this matter too And here methinks those antient Creeds of the Apostles Nice and Athanasius which are so generally received by the Church of God are of great Authority to settle our Judgment in the main and most necessary Points of Faith Besides we have many Choice and Excellent Catechisms composed by Men that were Pious Judicious acquainted with Scriptures well versed in the Primitive Councils and Fathers These short Catechisms compiled by Persons of singular Endowments and approved by the Church are little less than contracted Bibles containing in them whatever Man is obliged to know and delivering enough in easie Terms to inform us in Matters of Practice to secure us from Errors and confirm our Judgments in all the great Points of Faith In short the substance of my Answer to this Argument is this since we have the written Word of God to be our Rule and since this Word in some material Cases according to the different Fancies and Interests of Men hath different Interpretations given concerning its true Sense and Meaning 't is our safest way for our better Satisfaction to betake our selves to the most able faithful and unbiassed Judges and they are the most antient Councils and the Primitive Fathers whose Judgments are declared in our several Creeds in other publick Confessions of Faith and Orthodox Catechisms set forth or approved by the Church of God And since we are very well stored with these excellent Helps I do once more conclude that no Man whether learned or unlearned can need any new Arguments from the Press to confirm his Judgment in Matters of Religion SECT XI 7. THis Author's seventh Allegation against the Restraint of the Press runs thus If it be unlawful to let the Press continue free lest it furnish Men with the Reasons of one Party as well as the other it must be as unlawful to examine those Reasons To this I answer thus We must distinguish between Party and Party between one who is Orthodox and one who is Heretical this distinction being premised I shall resolve this Hypothetical Proposition into these two Categorical ones That it is not lawful for many Orthodox Christians to Examine those Reasons which Hereticks may urge in defence of their ill Opinions And therefore that the Press should not be permitted to furnish such Christians with any such Reasons 'T is notoriously known that there are amongst us vast numbers of Persons who are of weak Judgments not firmly established in their Faith not able to distinguish Truth from Falshood in a fallacious Argument and therefore are apt to be Tossed up and down by every wind of doctrine now for such
convinced as well he may be by such Texts of Scripture as cannot with any tolerable Sense be otherwise interpeted that our Blessed Saviour is truly God and truly Man What need such a Person to see the Opinions and weigh the Arguments of Arians and Socinians against this fundamental Point of our Christian Faith To him whose Belief is already grounded upon the infallible Word of God being rightly understood the sight of different Opinions and the Arguments for them signifieth nothing such a Man doth not need the confutation of heretical Cavils to confirm that Faith of his which is already bottomed upon a Rock which is immoveable And as the sight of different Opinions and the examination of Arguments pleaded for them is not needful to confirm a strong and well grounded Faith so it is dangerous and tends to impair and shake a weak one For well meaning Christians bred up in the true Religion being of too easie Belief of slender Judgments and not well acquainted with the Word of God may probably be perverted by heretical Books as being unable to discern the Fallacies contained in them and to cite such Texts as might confute them But here it may be demanded Who must judge whether such or such an Opinion be justified or condemned by such or such a Text I answer where Texts are plain and obvious every discreet and intelligent Person may judge for himself but when Texts are somewhat abstruse and difficult when knotty Questions and Controversies are raised about them then the Judge must be no single Person no nor any small Party of Men who are byassed prejudiced and wedded to their own Opinion but the Judge must be the Catholick Church I mean its Representative in the four first general Councils which consisted of Men not over-aw'd by Authority nor tempted by Interest but Men as Religious as they were Learned as well Versed in Holy Writ as able Interpreters of Scripture as any sort of Men born since those early days And this I think to be the greatest human Authority to warrant the Sense of such and such Texts and prove the Doctrins grounded on them Now Since we of the Church of England are blest with the free use of our Bibles and favoured with the judgment of the best Expositors about the sense of those Texts which tend most to determine those Disputes which have arose betwixt Protestants and Papists betwixt Trinitarians and Anti-Trinitarians we can have no need of any search for Truth to consult the printed Papers of this Age many of which do tend to promote Error much rather than discover Truth And verily when the Licenser of Books doth reject and suppress Heretical Papers he doth good service both to God and Men and if such Papers chance to Steal the Press they ought to be treated like other Thieves who to prevent their doing any future mischiefs are Apprehended Condemned and Executed And so I quit this Argument and proceed to the next SECT V. 3. THIS Authors third Allegation against the restraint of the Press runs thus The Restraint of the Press hinders Truth from having any great influence on the minds of Men which is owing chiefly to examination because that which doth not convince the Understanding will have but little or no effect upon the Will I answer thus What this Author doth here assert in relation to the influence of the Understanding upon the Will and Affections is true in general nor can it be justly denied that a strict examination of Religion is the proper means to convince the Understanding of its Truth But although the subject matter of this Allegation be true in the general yet here it is misapplied and very impertinent to the Case now in hand For this Argument as the former did doth proceed upon a false Hypothesis for it supposeth that if the Press should chance to be restrained for time to come Men would be deprived of all sufficient means for the due examination of their Religion 'T is St. Paul's Command Prove all things 'T is St. John's Command Try the Spirits whether they are of God These Commands must needs suppose that in those days there was a certain Rule by which Religions might be tried and the same Rule in its full force and vertue is standing still Tell me then are our Bibles out of Print or taken from us Have we no Catechisms no Systems of Divinity left amongst us Nay are there not Books of Controversies exposed to Sale in our Cities greater Towns and both our Universities Nay more are there not Popish and Socinian Catechisms to be had in England Do not these Books already Extant contain the strongest Arguments which the most learned Men of all Parties were able to urge in favour of their respective Opinions And may not Men by weighing these Reasons which are already made publick give a judgment which Religion is true and which is false as well as by any new Papers yet to be printed But although there be a great variety of Books which may help to guide us in our searching after Truth yet I must still mind my Reader that the Scripture is the only Adequate and Authentick Rule whereby the Truth or falshood of any Religion must be determined And certain it is that those Convictions of Man's Understanding which arise from the Immediate word of God are like to have a more powerful influence upon the Will and Affections than any other Convictions arising from any such Arguments as are no more than the Dictates and Collections of humane Reason which is fallible and may deceive us whereas the word of God well understood cannot do so And this I think is a sufficient answer to this Authors third Allegation SECT VI. 4. THE Fourth is this The Restraint of the Press is that which tends to make Men hold the Truth if they chance to light on any Guilty and the Reason which he gives is this Because that will not be accepted if it be not the effect of an impartial Examination To which I answer thus I cannot pass by this without observing that this Author hath hitherto much harped upon the same thing and hath hitherto bottomed all his Arguments upon the same Ground and a very slippery one too he hath proposed his Allegations as distinct in their Number but in their Proof there is little or no difference to be found For he tells First That the Restraint of the Press tends to make Men blindly submit to the Religion they chance to be educated in Secondly That it deprives Men of the most proper and best means to discover Truth Thirdly That it hinders Truth from having any great influence upon the minds of Men. Fourthly That it tends to make Men hold the Truth if they chance to light on any guiltily These indeed are very considerable Objections against the Restraint of the Press were they true But how doth our Author prove them so to be To prove them all he hath yet made use