of splitting upon that Rock They might have taken warning from the Churches Confession Isa. 64. 6. We are all as an unclean thing and all our Righteousnesses are as filthy rags All the warning in the World signifies nothing to them that are resolved to interpret Our own Righteousness by Ceremony and Hypocrisie Had Christ inculcated the danger even to Tautology all may be evaded by that happy Gloss which he keeps Leiger by him True indeed he warns us to beware of our own Righteousness but he intends no more hereby than the works of the Ceremonial and external acts of the Moral Law 3. Christ had indeed given them fair warning but if they will not take it the sin must lie at their own doors and the Condemnation upon their own heads Luke 18. 9. He spake a Parable to them that trusted in themselves that they were righteous and despised others c. Now it may seasonably be here remembred 1. What was the design of this Parable And that the Evangelist tells us was to meet with them that trusted in themselves 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 men that presumed very highly upon their own Abilities to answer the Law of God and therefore despised others who made such a stir about their own Impotency to keep it and kept such a coyl about the shortness of their obedience to it like the poor Publican who being conscious to himself of both makes his retreat to and shelters himself in the free Grace and rich Mercy of God to miserable sinners 2. It will be seasonable to enquire What that Righteousness was upon which the Pharisee in the Parable so stiffly insisted as that in which he durst adventure to appear before God And that as our Saviour puts the case was a Righteousness made up of obedience to Gods Commands And those both Prohibitory he was no Extortioner no Adulterer no Unjust Person and Affirmatively he paid his Tythes exactly which will go a great way and fasted twice a-week 3. Let it be considered that however many of the Pharisees of those days were Hypocrites yet our Saviour frames his Parable of a Pharisee not according to what many of them were but what they seemed to be and were reputed for amongst men who admired their Sanctity and reverenced their Devotions and therefore he describes not a Person acting his part well upon the Stage but living up to very high Attainments of Nature For 1. The duties instanced in are only some particulars in the name of all the rest He instances in his praying to and praising of God which comprehend all the duties of the First Table His freedom from Adultery Extortion and in a word from Injustice which is the whole of the Second Table Again He instances in duties of the Iudicial Law paying Tythes and of the Ceremonial Fasting with a little touch perhaps of Supereragation Twice in the week 2. When Christ introduces a person saying he was no Adulterer we may reasonably suppose he taught him to speak in the proper sense of the word which Christ himself allows Now in Christ's Dialect to be no Adulterer is not to commit it with the heart Mat. 5. still abating for Humane Frailties And 3. This is evident because our Savióur describes not this Pharisee as praying in the corners of the streets or in the Synagogues to be seen of men but in obedience to God's Command Going up to the Temple to pray and there praying to God 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in his own heart between God and his own Soul All which evidently prove that our Saviour puts not the case of a stinking Hypocrite but of one who went as far as Natures legs would carry him But 4. The miscarriage of this Pharisee lay not in this that he was what he pretended he was not or was not what he pretended he was but that he trusted to himself for a Righteousness to be compounded out of all these Ingredients wherein he would dare to stand before God and in despising others which is the natural Product of Self-Righteousness And yet upon our Author's Principles I see not why he might not trust to himself that he was Righteous if Righteousness be to be made out of Obedience and despise others too since his own free-will exerted and natural strength improved had made him differ from another even from that Publican But yet 4. There 's one Prejudice more remaining which perhaps may stick more with him than all the rest He is apt to admire our Saviour's Sermons in the first place before the Writings of the Apostles though inspired men I should be loth to weaken his Admiration of our Saviours Sermons But he may do well to examine Whether his Aptness to admire them before other Sermons given forth by the same Spirit may not proceed from great Ignorance or a worse Principle For though our Saviour's Person had more Authority than the Persons of the Apostles yet the Writings of the Apostles are of equal Authority with those of the Evangelists to command our Faith and Obedience The Epistles of S. Iohn are indited by the same Spirit by which hepenned the Gospel 'T is the Authority of Christ in both the Infallible Spirit speaking in both which are the Reason of our Belief of both All Scripture is given by Divine Inspiration 2 Tim. 3. 18. The same Spirit of Christ that spake in the Prophets of the Old-Testament and the Apostles in the New 1 Pet. 1. 11. And such Comparisons must needs be very odious where the Spirit of God has made none But the total sum of all these Prejudices we shall have in one Dilemma Did not our Saviour instruct his Hearers in all things necessary to Salvation or have the Evangelists given us an imperfect account of his Doctrine If the first then our Saviour was not faithful in the discharge of his Prophetical Office If the latter you overthrow the Credit of the Gospel Well! I hope we may out-live this horned-Argument for all the terrour of its looks 1. Christ was faithful in his Prophetical Office he instructed his Hearers in all things necessary to Salvation But then there are some great and weighty Doctrines which it was necessary to the Salvation of the Gentile World to know wherein the Iewish Church had been sufficiently instructed already The Doctrine of Atoning God making Reconciliation for sin expiating Transgressions was abundantly clear from their Sacrifices The Theory of God's justifying a sinner was evident from thence they knew what Imputation signified by the transferring of the guilt of the sinner upon the head of the Sacrifice And therefore when Christ came his main business with the Jews was to convince them that he was the Messiah promised of old and typified in their Sacrifices His Work they knew all the Question was Whether he was the Person Matth. 11. 3. Art thou he that should come or do we look for another Joh. 10. 24. If thou beest the Christ tell us plainly Christ's Sermons
let it alone sin it seems is one of those Adiaphorous Trifles that it needs not the Blood of Christ to satisfie for it for our own repentance without any respect to the Death of Christ will stop that Gap Wherein I confess I as little admire his Divinity as he does other mens Philosophy But 5. They argue from the Essential differences of Things and what rare Feats they can do from hence is Incredible For whereas other poor Sneaks only deal with the Rinde and Bark of Beings as they are cloathed with Circumstances and crusted over with Accidents these Gyants of Reason will strip your Nature stark naked and show her for a Sight at Bartholomew-Fair in her first callous Principles Thus our Author tells us pag. 94. That Christ came not to distract us with the Inexorableness of Gods Iustice and yet p. 95. He assures us that God is an Irreconcileable Enemy to all sin For he could pry out an Essential difference between the Inexorableness of his Iustice and his Irreconcileableness to sin And pag. 82. He can shew us the difference between being astonisht and surprised with wonder which though any other might have stumbled on Yet to shew you just to a Hairs breadth where Wonder ends and Astonishment begins this was reserved for the Acumen of a Rational Divine It were tedious though useful no doubt to Instance with what Dexterity they Wire draw Discoveries out of Immutable and Unchangeable Natures how they call Fire out of Smoak but never steams out of Light At what Killing undoing Rates they Syllogize how they run their Enemies all on Heaps and perplex their Discourses all into Snicksnarles but every one would Live as long as he can This though the better half is but one part of that Design which he is driving on Incognito The other is to Besmear a sort of pittiful Fellows he has often but never with respect mentioned For it 's a very great Question whether he be a greater admirer of his own Excellencies than a dispiser of other Mens Imperfections But what is their Crime Why they Cry down Reason for such a Prophane and Carnal thing as must not presume to Intemeddle in Holy Matters I have met with some who decry Carnal Reason but never with one that affirmed Reason was Carnal I know none that are very ambitious to put on Brute and put off Man and for those who are so Pelted with empty clamour I have ever found them as much in love with and as great Improvers of Reason as their Neighbours only their unhappiness is they have not so vast a Stock to set up with and sometimes may be out of Sorts However they are not ashamed to own or disown that Thing which many vend for reason as it behaves it self and for what I understand in this Matter I shall freely confess where I had it viz. From the Ninth Article of the Church of England of Original or Birth-sin This Infection of Nature doth remain yea in them that are Regenerated whereby the Lust of the Flesh called in Greek 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which some do Expound the Wisdom some the Sensuality some the Desire of the Flesh is not subject to the Law of God I have met also with others who will not scruple to own 1. That Reason is the sole and proper Iudge within her own Iurisdiction and that as we must give unto Faith the things that are Faiths so must we yield to Reason the things that are Reasons let her move within her own Sphere and they will not Iostle her nor Enterfere with her Motions 2. They are earnest that the best Reason that can be got for Love or Money be employed in Spinning conclusions out of those Premises which are of pure revelation though for scanning the Truth of some propositions may be she 's not so good at it 3. They say that our Service and Worship of God ought to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a reasonable Service that in all our Worship of God our Actions be under the Conduct of Reason So Idle is our Authors reproach that they will not allow Reason to Intermeddle in Holy Matters Can she not meddle but she must be Lady Paramount Can she not look into the Temple but she must peep into the Holy of Holies 4. They say they never affirmed Hot nor Cold that Reason was Carnal but that there is some Carnal Reason That Carnal is not Epitheton generis as if all Reason were Carnal but only Specieâ—… that there is such a thing as Carnal Reason and they bring the Church of England for their Voucher On the other side they do affirm 1. That the Reasonings of Men as they are found in all the Sons of Adam are Vitiated and Corrupted they cannot see how Reason scaped better in the common Shipwrack than the other powers of the Soul 2. Hence they put a difference betwixt Reason in the abstract as it is in it self and as it is found Immerst in Matter and Drencht in Hyle betwixt Reason as it ran clear at first and as it now tastes of the Cask And when the Apostle Paul who passes now-a-days for an Obscure writer could give us the Hint of this Difference Rom. 1. 21. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 They became vain in their own Reasonings or Argumentations and their fool-heart was darkned Methinks they that Trade in the Essential differences of things should not have over-lookt it but Bernardus Non vidit omnia 3. Therefore where the Infallible Word of God has clearly revealed any Doctrine and propounded it to their Belief they look upon 't as their business to Believe not Dispute as owning the Reason of the Scripture to be the Supreme and Sovereign reason which is nothing but the Authority of an Infallible Revealer When therefore they cannot Grasp how some things should be with Consistence to their apprehensions they trouble not themselves much but are satisfied that Thus they are 4. That there are some Doctrines in the Scripture fairly laid down to be Faith which yet are above the most Exalted reason to give an account of any other way than by Faith's Old answer to all New Objections The Mouth of the Lord hath spoken it 5. These men are not aminded that those great Masters of Wit should have their reason to be the common standard and Assize of the Reason of all Men unless they can bring better Evidence that they are Clerks of the Market to seal all measures of Truth and Error Good and Evil then their new Lights hang out in Dark-Lanthorns If it come once to this that God must not be God unless he please their Humours If Scriptures must pass the Ordeal of their reasons before it be Canonical we humbly desire to be Excused if we rather chuse to Walk alone in the Ways of Truth than for companies-sake as well as we love them to be Seduced into their Misprisions This is the grand Crime of these men there are others not to be
when a Serpent swallows a Serpent he becomes a Dragon What then could we expect less than Legion from the Teeming Womb of such Big-bellied Monsters For though in point of Argument his Mountain is often delivered of a Mouse yet in point of Errour his Mouse alwayes brings forth a Mountain 2 It was a Spur to my duller Temper to Observe how he had raked all the Kennels and common Sewers of Friendly Debates Ecclesiastical Polities which with Martial Law and Civil War make up the Four great Soloecismes of this last Age and borrowed Auxiliaries from the Scavinger to compose an Oleo to throw in the Faces of the Innocent some of the particulars the Reader will find wiped off by these Papers and returned with that Correction and Chastisement which it became me to give them though not with what they deserved to Receive but for fouling my fingers with them all I must beg Excuse it had been a work no less irksome and tedious than the cleansing of Augaea's Stable and no otherwise to be effected than by Letting in the Thames from Billings-gate through Buttolph-lane Yet one Instance of the Many omitted and one is too much for a Taste I shall here give the Reader hoping it may not turn his stomach against the Rest Dr. Owen Com. p. 177. has said By the Obedience of Christ I intend the universal Conformity of the Lord Iesus Christ as he was or is in his being Mediator to the whole Will of God c. Now this Obedience of Christ N. B. as Mediator may be considered two ways 1. As to the habitual Root and Fountain of it 2. As to the Actual parts and Duties of it 1. The habitual Righteousness of Christ as Mediator N. B. p. 178. in his Humane Nature was the absolute complete exact Conformity of the Soul of Christ to the Will Mind or Law of God 2. The Actual Obedience of Christ was his willing chearful obediential Performance of every Thing Duty or Command that God by vertue of any Law whereto we were subject did require and Moreover to the Peculiar Law of the Mediator Hereof there are two parts 1. That whatever was required of us by the Law of Nature c. He did it all 2. There was the Peculiar Law of the Mediator which respected himself Merely and contained all those Acts and Duties which are not for our Imitation Thus far the Doctor But now what a world of wit has our Author shewn upon this Occasion or rather no Occasion Declaiming for four five or six pages together upon the Trite and Common Theme of his own Ignorance pag. 298 299 300 301 302 303. So that by the Law of Mediation sayes he He understands whatever Christ was bound to doe as our Mediator whatever was proper to his Mediatory Office All this is not imputed to us as though we had done it I hope we shall find something at last to be imputed to us but there 's nothing left now but thirdly that which concerns him in a Private Capacity as a Man subject to the Law Now had this Gentleman been pleased to have understood the Doctor a little before he had pretended to Confute him he might have seen that He supposes 1. A general Law of the Mediator whereby he gave Obedience to the Law of Nature c. in our stead 2. The peculiar Law of the Mediator which respected himself merely to this he gave not Obedience in our stead But still whatever Obedience he performed 't was as Mediator though not according to the peculiar Law of the Mediator But alas this would have spoyled a great deal of excellent Wit and dear Drollery which no man engaged in a Design of Raillery and Scolding would willingly lose for a World especially when he was practising like the great Balsac in some of his Letters to make an Experiment what The Height of forced Fancy can produce out of a barren and dry Subject or placing his Draining Engines to Recover the Boggs and Fenns upon New-Market Heath 3 His Subtle and Politick Method of venting Blasphemies was that which mainly pressed me to this Service For it 's now grown the solemn Mode of this Tribe of Men to vomit out the most opprobrious Language against the Lord and his Christ and then to wash their hands in Pilate's Innocency by saying These are the Consequences of other Mens Opinions And herein lies this Authors singular Excellency and proper Talent Thus when some affirm That God is a Holy God a Righteous Governour a Iust Iudge who will by no means clear the Guilty one that will not fail to recompense to every man according to his Works and yet in infinite Wisdom and Mercy has made Provision in the Death of his Son for securing the Glory both of his Essential and Rectoral Righteousness that he may be and appear to be just and the Iustifier of him that Believes in Iesus You shall now guess at the Lyon by his Claw and see what nasty dirty filthy stuffe he can extract out of this Doctrine Pag. 46. The Iustice of God hath glutted it self with Revenge in the Death of Christ and so henceforward we may be sure he will be very kind as a Revengefull man is when his Passion is over And pag. 47. The summe of which is this That God is all Love and Patience when he has taken his fill of Revenge as others use to say the Devil is very good when he is pleased Again whereas the Church of England Art 17. has express'd her Conceptions about Predestination in these words Predestination to life is the everlasting Purpose of God whereby before the Foundation of the World was laid he hath constantly decreed by his Councel secret to us to deliver from Curse and Damnation those whom he hath chosen in Christ out of Mankind and to bring them by Christ to Everlasting Salvation Our Author is pleased to droll upon this Tremendous Mystery at this pleasant Rate Pag. 57. This falls hard upon those miserable Wretches whose ill Fortune it was without any fault of theirs to be left out of the Roll of Election Thus when one had ventured to say by Warrant from Christs own Mouth John 3. 14. That Christ was compared to the Brazen Serpent c. he comes in with this snearing Droll p. 115. Who can forbear being smitten with so lovely a Person In all which and a hundred times more we are bound to suppose That there is Nihil bonis moribus contrarium quò minùs cum publicâ Utilitate Imprimatur Now if no Reverence of the Majesty of God no Regard to the Authority of the Holy Scriptures no Respect to the Harmonious Confessions of Faith of All Protestant Churches could oblige his Pen to observe a due Temperament yet methinks Civility to that Church whereof He is a Member which has not been Uncivil to him and may exercise more kindness to to him might have commanded more becoming Language about those things wherein she has
that he hath appointed an Atonement for us and given no less Person than his own Son for our Ransome The Reader cannot but observe that he is there giving us Another Scheme of Religion from an Acquaintance with Christs Person without Scripture and then when he comes to take the Matter in hand he can from the Person of Christ demonstrate Gods good Will his pardoning Mercy and what not when others indeed venture upon Conclusions without Scripture they give some uncertain conjectures get some feeble hints some dim appearances and smattering Iâ—…cklings of the Matter but to Us it speaks nothing less than Apodictical and great Demonstration 2. The Reader will observe how perfectly he Overthrows the very design he would exalt for undertaking to prove How unsafe it is to found Religion upon a Pretended acquaintance with Christs Person and assigning this for a Reason that this is to build Religion upon uncertain Conjectures which we acknowledge to be Cogent When he comes to wind up his bottomes he tells us Though we had seen Christ in the flesh we could never have ghess'd at the End and Design of it had not he Christ Acquainted us with it So that the short and long of this great Demonstration is this That it 's uncertain to found our Religion upon Christ's Person because we could have known nothing of Religion unless we had been Acquainted with him He will lift himself off this flatt by replying that he means nothing but Christs acquainting us in and from his Gospel and we rejoyn that that which will bring him off will bring off his Neighbours for who ever affirm'd any more 3. He has herein at unawares stabb'd his main Cause to the heart For if there be no necessary connexion between the Person of Christ his Death and Suffering and the Salvation of Mankind but that as he assures us the End and Design of Christ in dying must be known onely by Revelation then it will unavoidably follow that Christ dyed for some greater Ends than to give us an Example of Patience and Submission to the Will of God to Confirm what he Preach'd seeing we needed no Revelation to acquaint us that a holy man is to be imitated in all holy things living or dying and that he thought at least his Doctrine was true or else he would never have exposed and layd down his Life to justifie it Now it 's plain however our Author does now and then humour us with Propitiation Ransom Atonement Expiation these are all reducible by his Engine to Christs confirming what he preach'd Pag. 320. All that I can find in Scripture concerning the Influence that the Sacrifice of Christ's Death hath upon our Acceptation with God is that to this we owe the Covenant of Grace which is Nothing else in his sence but God's Promise of saving us if we obey his Laws 4. He is slipt into the very same guilt with which he loads though unjustly his Adversaries viz. The Dividing the Person and Gospel of Christ. He was of a good Mind once p. 3. if he could have kept him in 't That the Person of Christ is not at oddes with his Gospel and that Christ and his Religion were well agreed but he has quitted his Post and dogmatically asserts That whosoever would understand the Religion of our Saviour must learn it from his Doctrine and not from his Person And why not from his Person in or by his Doctrine It 's a harder matter than our Author is aware to hear a Sermon preach'd without a Preacher and almost as difficult to believe it without good warranty that the Preacher has good Authority for what he delivers All the Authority of the Scripture is resolved into the Authority of Christ and therefore it concerns us to fetch our Religion from Christ by his Word 5. I must needs observe to the Reader one piece of cleanly conveyance and Legerdemain which our Author is forced frequently at a standing pull to serve himself of to draw Dun out o' th' Mire and that is to shew you a fair round Tester and then fob you off with a Counter to shew you a Horse in the Premises and pass to an Asse in the Conclusion He has pasted and posted it up in the Title of this Section How unsafe it is to found Religion upon a Pretended acquaintance with Christs Person but when he addresses himself to prove his Thesis he falls a persecuting the old thing of Learning Religion from an Acquaintance with Christs Person He who has the famous Art of Arguing from the essential Differences of things can he find no accidental difference at least betwixt Principium essendi and Cognoscendi Betwixt the Foundation of our Religion and the Means of conveying the Knowledge thereof unto us A thing may be first in Knowledge which is last in Being there has been some such Distinction in former Ages There was a time when the old World learnt it's Religion from Angels as our Author thinks from Prophets from the Government of the World will he say that the Religion of those dayes was founded upon any thing short of God upon Angels Men Sun Moon Stars Say the same in our Case Jesus Christ has revealed what we are to know and believe of the Father Son and Spirit in his Word he has reveal'd it yet our Faith Hope Love Obedience is founded on and ultimately terminated in God alone by Christ He that believes a Promise obeyes a Precept does believe the veracity of Christ in that Promise and obey the Authority of Christ in that Precept That Credit we give to Letters Patents praemunited with the Royal Seal is resolved ultimately into the Kings 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 That Obedience we give to a Law is founded upon the Authority of the Legislator We learn our Duty from a printed Act of Parliament from a Proclamation but that which is the formal Reason of our Duty is the Relation wherein we stand to our Prince So childish is our Author in his Reasonings he begins to make a Cauldron and tinckers up a sorry kettle Amphora coepit institui currente rotâ cur urceus exit He undertook to prove the unsafeness of the Foundation of our Religion but he 's glad to come down a button-hole lower and prove onely the danger of learning of our Religion from a pretended acquaintance with Christs Person without Scripture-Revelation 6. He tells us there is not a Natural and Necessary connexion between the Person of Christ his Death c. and the Salvation of Mankind Very discreetly worded Not a natural and necessary connexion What 's matter if it be not Natural if it be Necessary Let it be owned Necessary any way that 's fair and honest and let him choose whether it shall be necessary by Nature or no. If our Author understands himself here it 's very well I am sure some others do not Does he mean therefore of all Mankind that there 's no natural connexion betwixt Christs Person
his little Glosses Why they offend against his great standing Rule Interpreting things by the sound of words For says he what better proof can you desire for all this than Express words Really the Laws upon which we must be permitted to discourse with our Author are very severe for p. 78. he laid it down as a Law of the Medes and Persians that none must dare to Draw one Conclusion from the Person of Christ which his Gospel hath not expressely taught Well we accepted the Tearms and have brought him expresse and expressely express words and do speak as Volkelius commands us dilectis luculentissimisque verbis and yet we are never the nearer for now we offend in trusting to the sound of words Just thus did Procrustes entertain his Guests wracking out them that were too short and lopping off their feet that were too long for his Bed All men I perceive are awake to their Concerns in this Rule as well as our Vigilant Author When it is urged that Christ is called expressely God the True God He that was in the beginning by whom were all things made who upholds all things by the Word of his Power the Socinians have now a compendious Answer Ay this is to interpret Scripture by the sound of words And the Atheist has an inckling of it too he can subscribe all the Scriptures as True but when you urge him that God created all things out of Nothing that he is the Owner Governour Iudge of the whole World they are provided with a short Answer Yes this is interpreting Scripture by the sound of words And whether every Drunkard Swearer Adulterer all the Rakehells and Rakeshames upon Earth may not in time make their advantage of it I cannot tell That Ministers do but fright them with a sound of words Thus have some dealt with the Sacerdotal Office of Christ He is a Priest they confess he offer'd a Sacrifice was a Propitiation made an Atonement did expiate sin but have a care you do not interpret these things as the words sound he did indeed something like a Priest offer'd something like a Sacrifice but truely and properly he was nothing did nothing of All this It had been therefore more plain-heartedly and ingenuously done had our Author written a Confutation of the Scripture proving that the Spirit did not speak intelligibly but All in good time he has Materials ready for the work P. 100. The wildest and most extravagant Opinions that were ever yet vented under the Name of Religion have pretended the Authority of Scripture for their Patronage And yet he knew how first to break its head and then make it a Playster This famous Rule of our Authors may be applyed to all things under the Sun but there are two Principles onely that he will examine by it at present 1. The spiritual Impotency of all men without grace to perform that which is Acceptable to God This says he they prove wonderfully from our being dead in trespasses and sins and therefore as a Dead man can contribute nothing to his own Resurrection no more can we towards our Conversion I wonder when the Scripture will be able to speak so plain that deaf men will understand it One would have thought the Spirit of God should never have chosen that Expression of being Dead in trespasses and sins to signifie what mighty power and abilities the Creature has to Obey But we are instructed better from this usefull Caveat not to interpret Him by the sound of his words for now we must understand by Being dead Being Alive and proportionably by Sins and Trespasses we must understand Duty and Obedience and then to keep close to our Instructions and far enough from the sound of words To be Dead in Sins and Trespasses is to be Alive to all Duty and Obedience And thus that other vexing place Rom. 5. When we were without strength in due time Christ dyed for the ungodly must be Paraphrased When we were strong and Active and had no need of Christ he dyed for the godly And this I think if that be good for ought is very remote from grating our Ears with the unpleasant sound of words Ay but says our Author This is true of Natural Death but will be hard to prove of a Moral Death Hard to prove Methinks we want his wonted out-facing Confidence But why so hard to prove Has not the Spirit of God selected those words borrowed from the Condition of one Naturally dead to instruct us in the true Condition of one Morally dead It 's true of a Natural and therefore not of a Moral Death Nay it 's therefore true of a Moral Death because it is so of a Natural Death What wild Similitudes would he impose upon the Holy Scriptures Even as one that 's Naturally dead can contribute Nothing to his Resurrection just so one that 's Morally dead can contribute something to his Conversion This is the great Illustrator of dark Metaphors But wherein doth this Morall Death consist Oh says he In the prevalency of vicious habits contracted by long Custom which was the Case of the Heathens whom the Apostle there speaks of which do so enslave the Will that it 's very difficult though not impossible for such Persons to return to the love and practice of Vertue But who can tell whether by enslaving the Will which is a Luscious Metaphor our Author would not have us understand enfranchising the Will lest we should border too near upon a sound of words But I am not illuminated with our Authors Reasonings For 1 Moral Death doth not consist in the prevalency of vicious Habits it is the general Condition of all men born into the world who are privatively Dead in respect of that Life we all once had in the first Adam and Negatively Dead in respect of that Life which is attainable by the second Adam And in those dayes when men studyed not Aequivocations to subscribe every thing and believe Nothing it was not question'd in the Church of England Art 10. The Condition of Man since the Fall is such that he cannot Turn and prepare himself by his Own Natural Strength and good Works to Faith and calling upon God wherefore we have no power to doe good works pleasant and acceptable to God without his Grace preventing us that we may have a good Will and working with us when we have that Will. But 2 Supposing that this Moral Death did consist in the Prevalency of vicious Habits contracted by long Custom yet such may be the prevalency of them into such a slavery may the Will be brought that it may be not onely diâ—…ficult but impossible without the effectual assistance of the Spirit for the Sinner to return to God Ier. 13. 23. Can the Ethiopian change his skin or the Leopard his spots then may ye also doe good that are accustomed to doe evil Whence the Prophet shews that such is the prevalency of a vicious Habit contracted by long Custom