much obtruded upon the people of this Nation But those times of darkness are not within the verge of this Vindication But for our present Liturgy which hath been established since the Reformation that it should be originally taken out of the said Missal and consequently transmitted to us from Rome as they would make us believe is clearly as manifest an Untruth as that we have originally received our Religion from Rome True it is that that breviary as it is called secundum Salisburiensis Ecclesiae usum doth agree in some things with our Liturgy But it will not therefore follow that our Liturgy is a poor puisne extract taken out of it Sober and discreet men would rather infer thereupon that our Liturgy and as much of that Popish Portifory as is incorrupt are taken out of the Primitive Christian Liturgies which were devoutly used in several Churches persecuted for the faith of Christ long before any Romish Superstitions were in Being whereunto if there be with us a holy desire of Conformity to shew that we are in communion and fellowship with that poor persecuted Church of old that was valiant for the Truth resisting the enemies of Christ even unto bloud and upon whose unwearied labours and sufferings we are happily entred What offense is it Now that our Liturgy is such we might alledge the faithfulness of the Compilers of it who according to the trust reposed in them as master Fox reports it in his Martyrology had in this important business as well an eye and respect unto the most sincere and pure Christian Religion taught by the Holy Scriptures as also to the usages of the Primitive Church which the Act of Parliament made for the Confirmation of it attesteth in these words 5. 6. of Ed. 6. c. 1. The Common Prayer established by Law in England is agreeable to the word of God and the Primitive Church And as the King a Zealous and Religious Prince to satisfie some of his mutinous Subjects about it saith It is altered from that the Popes of Rome for their lacre brought it unto But it may be this will not be accounted argumentative with our techy Opponents though the faithfulness of some of those very Persons is by them oftentimes proposed unto us for our imitation We shall therefore here produce somewhat that is more convincing And first that we may see it is no new thing to follow the example of the Primitive times in the forms of Divine worship let an instance be considered by us out of Eusebius an Authour of good account as he is well known in all the Churches Eccl. Hist lib. 2. cap. 17. This Eusebius having taken notice of what Philo the Jew who lived in the dayes of Claudius Caesar above 200 years before him had observed in the religious Exercises of the Christians in his time about Alexandria where Saint Mark had then newly constituted a Church how they in their 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a place set apart and dedicated to Holy uses devoted themselves with marvellous austerity to the Service of God which they celebrated with a certain Order and form peculiar unto them Omnis geneâ—s metrorum carminum rythmis Uno cum rythmo psallente reliqui quiete auscultantes posteriores hymnorum partes ad extremum una decantent and with what Gravity and reverence they sang their spiritual Songs and Hymns of all sorts of tunes He I say noting these observations of Philo addeth thereupon Quae etiamnum apud nos durant which devout Order of religious exercise is in use amongst us to this very day Et praecipuè circa salutaris Domini Passionis Festum diem in jejuniis c. especially those which we use upon the Solemn day of the Lords Passion yea the very Hymns themselves and the manner of their singing Eusebius saith A nobis recitari solebant we our selves have been accustomed to recite in our Church-Assemblies Much more to this purpose is written in the said History But from hence we may infer First that the Christians in the purest Primitive times had places set apart for divine worship which were reserved onely for that use Secondly That they had their Forms of Divine worship when they met together in those places Thirdly that there were some special times of the year as appears by the instance of our Saviours Passion wherein they had their Forms proper for those times Fourthly which is the cause of the inserting of this Story the manner of their worshipping God and the very subject matter of their Forms were taken up and continued by the Church in the following ages Furthermore it will be requisite that an apologie be premised and admitted which is this It is not to be expected that the whole Frame of our Liturgy should be found in those Historians and others that have written of the Church in the Primitive times The dispensations of Gods providence towards his people are much varied now from those of old and therefore we are not obliged precisely to follow their exemplar in the whole Form of any of their Liturgies but are to make our Supplications according to the present state and exigency of the Church wherein we are concern'd They prayed heretofore pro mora finis That the final consummation of all things might be deferred because as it is supposed they were afraid to come under the tyranny of Antichrist which they knew would make havock of the Church in the last dayes But we on the contrary have reason to pray That the end may be hastned that so Antichrist may be destroyed If therefore we can finde that that spirit of devotion which we use in our Liturgy in the order of Prayers Psalms Lessons Collects Letany Versicles Responds c. be the same with that of the antient Churches before Rome usurp'd Authority over the Churches and that in their Ecclesiastick Ministrations there be sparsim found some of the same express terms which we use in ours I hope we shall not be far from giving a clear testimony in this matter As for reading the holy Scriptures and singing of Psalms no man can deny that we therein do conform to the practice of all Churches ever since the beginning And for our Collects this we shall say of them When the order of Sarum which probably was the ancientest wherein there was a compliancy with Romish Superstitions when I say that was first framed by that Osmund aforesaid the Tradition that was then generally received concerning some forms of Prayer that were derived from Primitive Liturgies was the less regarded and so might be swallowed up by time because they were in that Ordinale collected together and brought thereby into Common and Publick use whence it came to passe that the Collects of it which we have gathered into our Liturgy though according to the significancy of the term it is like they were collected from the Catholick Prayers of the Primitive Church yet have no certain Constat for them that
needs be nauseous unacceptable and to no purpose let all that are yet unsatisfied in that point read over and peruse his late Majesties Arguing about it with those Ministers that attended the Commissioners of Parl at the Treaty in the Isle of Wight M. Marshall M. Caryll M. Vines M. Scaman and if they be disposed to a temper of accepting Reason they will finde cause enough to alter their judgement Once those very Ministers were so farre convinced thereby that though they were very shy and unwilling to discover their mindes in a matter of so great and necessary consequence as to give his Majesty satisfaction in those three Quaeries which he propounded unto them concerning Church-Government 1 Whether there be a certain Form of Government left by Christ or his Apostles to be observed by all Christian Churches pretending that the whole volume of Ecclesiastical Polity was contained therein yet they could not but acknowledge the remarkable Learning of his Reply which was clothed as they write with a singular elegancy of stile wishing that such a Pen in the hand of such Abilities might ever be employed in a Subject worthy of it Yet because it will be expected that somewhat be here also said in answer to this part of the before-mentioned objection Let us take into consideration the main Argument that is used against Episcopacy and with a refutation of it put an end to this Controversie That which is chiefly insisted upon by our Anti-episcopal men is the Identity of Denomination which they imagine the Scripture giveth to Bishops and Presbyters 2 Whether it bind perpetually or be upon occasion alterable in whole or in part from whence they will inferre the Identity of Office viz. That Bishop and Presbyter are not distinguishable in any part of their Authority which the Lord hath given them for the edification of the Church A principal instance hereof they alledge out of the Text of the Apostle Tit. 1.5.7 upon which for brevities sake we will onely fix and which being cleared will help us to interpret aright other places of Scripture of the like nature The words are these 3 Whether that certain Form of Government be the Episcopal Preâ—byterian or some other differing from them both Tit. 1 5.7 For this cause left I thee in Crete that thou shouldst set in order the things that are wanting and ordain Elders in every City as I had appointed thee For a Bishop must be blameless c. In which place say they the Apostles reasoning were altogether invalid and inconsequent if Presbyter and Bishop were not the same Office as well as they have the same Name But how justly may it be here said Bernardus non videt omnia These men that pretend to know more of the sense of the holy Ghost in Scripture then others and are apt to censure all that are not of the same judgment with them are not so omniscient but that their brethren who come after them may discern somewhat which they could not see I shall therefore take the boldness to tell them my poor judgment concerning that Scripture hoping that I may make use of my liberty as they do of theirs I know well it is no new Opinion that I am about to encounter with but because our late Writers do with a higher confidence then ordinary seem to abound in their sense concerning this matter I shall endeavour their conviction And first I shall premise a Caution by the way yielding in this Controversie as much as may be consistent with Truth I do not undertake to produce any positive Precept from the holy Ghost in this place for the establishment of Episcopacy in the Church it is enough to shew that a Divine Approbation is given of it in describing the qualification of the persons that are to employed in such an Office distinct from that of a Presbyter together with their superiority over Presbyters and how they are to exercise their power in the several parts thereof viz. Ordination and Jurisdiction Which Divine Approbation if we can here finde as I doubt not we shall I hope it will be acknowledge by all to be Tant-amount to a Divine Institution And though it have not any positive Appointment in Scripture but is onely glanced at in some certain places yet that should not create any scruple in the mindes of any about it no more then some points of Faith which we freely profess are scrupled by us though we finde them not expresly commanded in the written Word Is it meet for any to say unto God What doest thou Who alas among us hath known the minde of the Lord Or who hath been his Counsellour to know fully the reason why he doth in such a manner issue out his Precepts Are not Clouds and thick Darkness set about the Pavilion of God Let not silly man then dare to remove them It would far better become us to keep our distance and to be wise according to sobriety then to arraign the pure word of Truth before the bar of our corrupt reason or to call the holy Spirit of God to account for not giving full satisfaction forsooth to our foolish expectation What if Christ being willing to make his Regal Power the more known to the world would onely give some small intimation of his will concerning this matter as he hath done of sundry other things which we need not here mention to try the spirits of men whether they would thereby be subject unto him or no It is ordinary we know with the Princes of the earth to deal thus with their Subjects by a look or a glance of the eye or by a word of the mouth though uttered in an oblique way to give notice of their further intentions so to search into and finde out the Loyalty and ready affections of those about them And shall Jesus Christ be denyed this liberty This being premised let us now come to inquire out the meaning of the Apostle in the afore-cited place and see whether or no his words will allow of such an Identity between Bishop and Presbyter as hath been commonly conceived or rather try whether by deduction we can prove from thence the Divine Right of Episcopacy which is so much contradicted in these days onely let prejudice be forborn till such time as we have put an end to this controversie First it cannot be denied that the Apostle writeth to Titus as to one with whom he had entrusted the sole inspection of that large and spacious Island an Island containing in it an hundred Cities called therefore Hecatompolis wherein his appointed work was Not to gather a Church by converting the inhabitants thereof from their Paganisme and Judaisme to the faith of the Gospel but the manner of governing a Church which was already gathered was prescribed unto him And this is by the Apostle branched out into two things viz Setting in order things that were amiss or wanting or as it is rendred by
for the sake of Christ and his Churches And now give me leave to premise an Apology for some things in this Treatise against which especially there may seem to lie some exceptions First I may possibly be adjudged too inconsiderate in fixing the Epistle to the Hebrews upon St. Pauls account because it doth not clearly appear as it is commonly conceived that he was the Authour thereof Secondly It may be said that here are sundry things inserted which have no natural co-incidency with the principal subject that is pretended As to the first of these Exceptions I know well there hath been some doubt made concerning the Authour of this Epistle for it hath been much controverted a long time whether it was Barnabas or Clemens Romanus or Saint Luke c. But for Saint Paul few were inclinable to entitle him unto it their reason was The style and idiom hereof seems to vary much from that which the Apostle ordinarily used in his writing neither doth he own it himself by setting his mark upon the front of it as he doth in all the rest of his Epistles but chiefly because the Writer of this Epistle acknowledgeth Heb. 2.3 that he had learned the Doctrine of Salvation from others which saith he was confirmed unto us by them that heard it Whereas the Apostle with very great confidence professeth that he never received if of men nor was taught it but by the Revelation of Jesus Christ which last exception is indeed the most material Gal. 1.12 but answered sufficiently by a late Writer as may appear in the margine Doctor Hammond The word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 us is not to be restrained to the writer onely but so as to comprehend those to whom he writes uti patet Tit. 3.3 Eph. 2.5 Neither is it any new or strange thing for St. Paul to confirme the truth of the Gospel by the testimony of others and tradition from them which saw and heard See 1 Cor. 15.3 Hereupon it seems that doubts have risen concerning this matter And it is further conceived by some that it would savour of too much curiosity to resolve such doubts For so long as we believe the Holy Ghost to be the Enditer what need we perplex our selves about the Writer As When a Prince will vouchsafe to send a Letter to any of his Subjects it would ill become them to be inquisitive with what pen it was written rather we should say of this Epistle as once it was said of the Book of Job Ipse scripsit qui haec feribenda dictavit Ipse scripsit qui illius operis inspirator extitit He writ these things that dictated them unto the Writer c. Nevertheless though it be granted that it may not be of absolute necessity to make too curious inquiry after all those Pen-men and actuaries whom the Holy Ghost employed in that excellent service of being the perpetual Registers of the great Council of Heaven yet neither are they to be quite neglected We rejoyce in the message of good tidings that is brought unto us yet that hinders not but that we may make the messenger welcome and if he be missing though his presence should not add to the Authority of the message yet we would seek him out that we might gladly know him Here in an Epistle sent unto us from God and the messenger is supposed to be missing Let now the name of God be magnified and his will herein revealed be embraced by us as it is meet with all acceptation But if the knowledge of the instrument by whom it is handed to us may any whit conduce to Gods glory in the removal of prejudices against the truth herein revealed or in the conviction of the enemies of the Lord Jesus Christ such as were the Arrians of old and the Socinians of late it is not fit that we should balke it especially when it is hinted unto us by the spirit it self in the holy Scriptures To say nothing of the Title prefixed to the Epistle it being no part of the Canon neither having been generally used by the Churches of Christ therefore not argumentative though it must be confessed it hath Antiquity to plead for it To let pass also the Salutation in the close which as the Apostle Saint Paul saith 2 Thes 3.17 is his token in every Epistle so he writes which might be more material but that it may be said Others in imitation of him do use the same Valediction too we have a more sure word of testimony whereunto we should do well to take heed and that is this Saint Peter the Apostle of the circumcision in his second Epistle which he writes unto the scattered Hebrews who were of his peculiar charge though dispersed into sundry remote Regions calling them therefore Strangers in regard of the places of their abode far distant from their own Country hath by a singular providence of God positively testified that his beloved Brother Paul and no other was the Writer hereof And to this purpose he gives us a plain demonstration 2 Pet. 3.15 Where he speaks of an Epistle of Paul written unto these scattered Hebrews which Epistle was it seems at that time extant and in high estimation among the faithful and which with other of Saint Pauls Epistles he commendeth as of equal Authority being as he saith written by him according to the Wisdom given unto him Now this Epistle there mentioned is very probably the same which in the Scripture goeth under the Name of the Epistle to the Hebrews otherwise how is the Church the pillar and ground of truth in holding out all the Oracles and whole Counsel of God if she hath been negligent in so eminent a part of her Depositum commended unto her by the Authority of two chief Apostles or as one saith lose Pauls Epistle and keep Peters that makes mention of it which is not with any colour of reason to be imagined We may therefore hereupon conclude that it evidently appears Saint Paul was the writer hereof But for that he here altereth his style and doth not put his Name unto this as he doth unto the rest of his Epistles there are sundry probable conjectures commonly for it given First the Jews had conceived against him a very great prejudice and least they should thereupon have rejected his writing with indignation he changeth his wonted style and omitteth his usual Introduction of Paul an Apostle c. Not regarding himself so that the word of God might run and be glorified Moreover he was design'd to be Apostolus Gentium the Apostle of the Gentiles as appears Gal. 2.7 8. Therefore thought it best here to conceale his Name and to waive his ordinary title least he should 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 assume to himself also the Title of Apostolus Hebraeorum the Apostle of the Hebrews which properly belonged to another And therefore though he might in an extraordinary way be employed by the Holy Ghost in writing this Epistle
Text that the ground and foundation of their faith to which they did so constantly adhere was no novelty nor yet such as did fail them or expire with them but being the rock of Ages was co-equal with the Church from the beginning and would be also the only sure foundation for all the faithful to the end of the World and that is Jesus Christ the same yesterday to day and for ever Understand it thus It is as if the Apostle should have said They well knew whom they believed and you may also know him too if you will do as they did for Jesus Christ who is the unchangeable God blessed for ever as they made him their strength and their support so he never failed them Be you therefore followers of them looking unto Jesus who as he led them into all truth and preserved them in it so will he likewise do the same unto you and to all others that shall come after you who believe in his Name for he is the same Yesterday to day and for ever We may now glean up by the way some Doctrinal conclusions which shall be but named that so we may come without any further protraction to taste of the sweetness that springeth abundantly from the Fountain of the Text. 1. We learn hereby That people ought to be followers of their Teachers as they follow Christ and no otherwise 2. The way to abide stedfast in the faith is to stick to the Foundation that is Jesus Christ who is still the same 3. Whosoever they be that make a sincere profession of the Gospel of Jesus Christ shall never be ashamed of it for Christ will constantly without any change own and maintain that faith which hath once and but once been delivered by him to his Saints being first and last like himself This was Preached Decem. 26. These things premised let us now come to the Text whereof if I should undertake to speak any thing in order to this time of Solemnity which yesterday to day and some daies following is held up and continued among us as if it had reference unto it I should then indeed declare myself to be but of yesterday and to know nothing at least to know nothing of my Text as I ought to know But the words in their genuine sense will not lead us unto any such matter It is Insignis locus as Mr. Calvin calls it a most excellent and remarkable Scripture speaking out the Lord Jesus Christ in his due Altitude making the World and every creature in all Ages subject unto him It is the Argument of both the Testaments and to use the words applied by a Religious and Reverend Bishop of our times to another Scripture like unto this Dr. John King Bishop of London It is the staff and supportation of Heaven and Earth they would both sink and all their joynts be severed were it not that Jesus Christ were 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The same yesterday to day and for ever And what shall I more say as the Apostle said Hebr. 11. When he had spoken much and there was much more behind but that time failed him Rather what should I not say For our Theatre at this time is not only within the narrow bounds of the World but extends beyond it and our Meditations in handling of this Subject are to reach from Eternity to Eternity Let us then duly poize it and with the good blessing of God make use of it for our Edification A three-fold interpretation may be given First Jesus Christ may be said to be The same yesterday to day and for ever in respect of his Divine Nature Secondly This may be applied unto him with a reference to the whole Creation Thirdly It may so likewise with a more especial respect unto his Church and People And here because it may seem strange that I should give so many several interpretations of this Text Give me leave to premise an Apology for my understanding herein I would not be too vehement in forcing a Text to carry a sense which is not directly or by warrantable deduction to be found within the compass thereof And it is a great wrong that is done unto Divine Truths when Scriptures are produced for their foundation that are not Homogenial with them As for this three-fold interpretation which I have here given of this Text though the last be commonly accounted the most proper as being consonant to the scope of the Apostle yet the other two are not to be rejected as inconsistent with the sense of the Holy Ghost therein Nay is there not a greater latitude then ordinary to be allowed unto it when it is propounded as a Divine Theorem cutting asunder the thread as it were of the former Discourse that the eyes and thoughts of all men that read it may in a singular manner be fixed upon it as on a general Sentence or Proposition comprehensive of more then might alonely have reference to the preceding Verse Surely there is somewhat extraordinary to be found in it Therefore as I have already prescribed my Method so 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 I shall now prosecute it The first Interpretation of the Text. THe first sense then or interpretation that is given of the Text is this Jesus Christ is the same yesterday to day and for ever in respect of his Divine Nature that is as he is God equal with the Father begotten of him from eternity to eternity And herein I am not alone but I find the Text so rendred both by Modern and Ancient Expositours Francis Junius writeth of it to the same purpose Hoc quarto ut Logicis lâ—quamur medo proprium Deitatis est This is a most transcendent property of the Godhead to be the same yesterday to day and for ever And from this very Text saith the same Authour do the Primitive Fathers in the purest times prove Jesus Christ to be the true and eternal God 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 consubstantial and coessential with the Father and the Holy Ghost some instances of whom shall be given in the prosecution of this point Having then the concurrency of others that are sound and Orthodox whose Works praise them in the gates Let us consider how this Text may represent this great Mystery unto us in the several parts of it It is a most certain truth that the Divine Generation is that which gives unto the Son of God his personal Being which Generation is acknowledged by all that are sound in the faith to be from all eternity This is that which in the Text if it referreth at all to the eternal personality of Jesus Christ as it undoubtedly doth and will be here made to appear must be understood by Yesterday Jesus Christ is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The same or The only He yesterday that is begotten of the Father from all eternity As the word Hodie to Day Psal 2.7 Psal 2.7 is by Expositours truly rendred not only for the Day
of the world viz. the Moral Law All which Laws were enacted by him as a King over his Church and People being according to his Office provident and careful for their security and happiness both temporal spiritual and eternal Answerable to that of the Prophet Es 33.22 which place Calvin applieth to Jesus Christ The Lord is our Judge Cal. Inst lib 2. cap. 11. Sect 5. Es 33 22. the Lord is our Lawgiver the Lord is our King he will save us If this sufficeth not let us consider that as S. Paul saith 1 Tim. 2. There is one Mediatour So S. James saith Jam. 4.12 There is one Lawgiver who is able to save and to destroy 1 Tim. 2.5 Jam 4 12 Now this one Lawgiver must undoubtedly be that one Mediatour because when man had by his disobedience violated the first Law given him by God himself he was immediately thereupon become an Exlex an accursed Out-law and so should have continued given up to confusion and every evil work had not the Mediatour in whom the Father was pleased all fulness should dwell then instantly appeared exercising his Regal Authority in reducing man into some order both for his quiet and peaceable living here in this world and to make way for him into everlasting Happiness hereafter Which work I say was alwaies the proper work of the Mediatour for it was not consistent with Divine Justice to give a Law any more to such a Rebel but rather to let him alone to perish for ever in his Apostacy which must certainly have followed if Christ had not interposed his Mediation the virtue whereof as in some sort it extended to all Mankinde yea to the whole Creation so it was chiefly fixed upon that People whom God had elected to himself for his peculiar Inheritance In order hereunto did this great King the Father having Anointed him to that end shew forth his absolute and Sovereign Authority in giving Law to his People as it is said in the Second Psalm when he was set up to be King immediately follows the Publication of his Law And what Law but that whereof the Lord had said unto him Thou are my Son this day have I begotten thee Ps 2.7 That is the Law which was the efflux of his Mediation unto which Office he was begotten of the Father that day in which he first entred upon it Which Scripture being thus Interpreted that which follows will be very apposite thereunto as being the gracious Dignation of the Father unto his Son in this Office Ask of me saith he and I shall give thee the Heathen for thine Inheritance Ps 2.8.9 and the uttermost parts of the Earth for thy Possession Thou shalt break them with a Rod of Iron thou shalt dash them in pieces like a Potters Vessel That is Do thou perform the part of a Mediatour and I do promise thee that the most Refractory in the world shall be made subject unto thee yea the Scepter of thy Government shall be accompanied with such a mighty and irresistible Authority that thou shalt subdue all adverse power that riseth up against thee I am bold I confess to render these my poor Conceptions concerning this Scripture as I have done of many other in this Treatise so different from Interpretations that have been formerly given but it is with modesty and submission and therefore I hope I do not offend those that are wise and godly being desirous to cast in my Mite into the Treasury of God if it may at least be any way useful and to improve my small Talent to my Masters advantage Once It is manifest that this Scripture is not limited to a particular sense but doth carry with it a various signification To say nothing of that Application of it which is made by some especially one of very eminent note in the Church to the Birth of Christ Bishop Andrews when he took upon him our Nature deriving the Warrant thereof from Act. 4.25 c. We finde the Apostle S. Paul himself Heb. 1.5 Heb. 1.5 alledging this place to prove the Deity of Christ as one whose nature was far above far more excellent then the Angels for to which of the Angels said he at any time Thou art my Son this day have I begotten thee Signifying the Fathers eternal prepetually-constant and present Generation of his Son which sheweth him to be very God We finde also the same Apostle applying it to the Resurrection of Christ Act. 13.33 in these words He that is God hath raised up Jesus again as it is written in the Second Psalm Thou art my Son Act. 13 33 this day have I begotten thee So that in this sense the Prophet's word there Hodie to Day signifies the Day of Christ's Resurrection wherein he was begotten from the Dead for so he is denominated Col. 1.18 The first begotten from the Dead Col. 1.18 And in the other before the very same word Hodie implies that Eternity which properly hath neither beginning of Daies nor end of Time Since therefore the word of the Holy Ghost here is comprehensive of various Interpretations we may safely without relinquishing those which the Apostle hath given render this also which hath been here inserted unless we will entertain that Novel and Jeiune Opinion of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 no more but one meaning of one Text viz. That Jesus Christ was begotten of the Father to be the Mediatour the very day that he first entred upon his Office that is at that instant time when the first Promise was made viz. The Seed of the Woman shall break the Serpents head Clearly then Jesus Christ was Yesterday the King of his Church as well as to Day because he was the Lawgiver from the beginning yea upon Mount Sinai that Law which was written in Tables of stone by the Finger of God was the Act and Deed of this King himself Quid enim est digitus Dei nisi Spiritus Dei saith S. Augustine What is the Finger of God but the Spirit of God as may appear by comparing Mat. 12.28 Luke 11.20 And whatsoever was done by the Spirit to the people of God was also done by Christ as Mediatour His Act it was and in his Custody or Register was it also kept being laid up in the Ark under the Propitiatory which was a most singular and illustrious Type of Jesus Christ and so altogether under his ordering and disposing as seemed good unto him Now let me not be mistaken herein I do not say that Christ as Mediatour gave any Law at all as it may have a consonancy with the Covenant of Works which indeed the Law hath unto all those who will not be brought into the Bond of the new Covenant But this I say The Gospel of the Law which the faithful people of God have alwaies found therein that is the Doctrine of Faith and Repentance was undoubtedly as I hop-hath been made clearly to appear given by Christ
as well as the Law of the Gospel in which respect it is also called the Law of Christ Gal. 6.2 And the Prophets who were the best Expounders of the Law Gal. 6.2 did alwaies in their several Generations derive from thence the said Evangelical Doctrine Again As the Legislative Power was Yesterday in Christ so in like manner was the Punitive and Vindictive both for the correction of his People when they offended and for the punishment and cutting off his Enemies when they grew implacable in their rage and incorrigible under his Judgments A Lawgiver we know will be of no account unless he be a Judge and he that is a King unless he be a Judge and a Lawgiver both he may have an aiery style of Majesty given unto him and please himself with the sight of a Crown and Scepter but as to true and real power he shall as hath been said and we have found it by experience to our shame and misery too too true remain but the out-side but the Picture but the sign of a King If then the Lord Jesus Christ hath been the Lawgiver of his Church of old and consequently the King it must necessarily follow that he was the Judge also both to interpret the meaning and to execute the penalty of his Law Thus therefore we finde those Offices linked together as is before said with a reference to Jesus Christ under the Law Es 33.22 The Lord is our Judge the Lord is our Law-giver or Statute-maker the Lord is our King he will save us And the Apostle S. James saith There is one Lawgiver 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and Judge Jam. 4.12 as it is added in some Manuscripts and so Jerom renders it who is able to save and to destroy Now this Judge hath been no other at all times but the Lord Jesus Christ for he himself saith Joh. 5.22 Joh. 5.22 The Father judgeth no man that is immediately but hath committed all judgment unto the Son Musculus according to his usual wont observeth here It is not said judgment alone but all judgment and in that it is said all it plainly sheweth that his power is of so large an extent that it reacheth unto all that ever were in the world For when was it that the Father gave this power of Judicature unto the Son When but Quando cum genuit say some Orthodox Ancients very pertinently Chrysostom Hilarius Theophilact though they mistook in their computation of this Quando limiting it unto Eternity as Pererius noteth when he begat him which is not to be understood of his Divine Generation because in that respect the Father and the Son judge both alike after the same manner being equal in power from everlasting to everlasting But here it is said the Father judgeth no man having devolv'd that power wholly upon the Son How then It must surely be meant of the time when Christ was begotten of the Father to be Mediatour and when that was hath been before said which being so Christ was the Judge from the beginning and consequently the King of the Church from the beginning also Furthermore the exercise of this power wherewith the Lord Jesus Christ was vested from the beginning was in like manner alwaies manifested by him in the executing of judgment for as he addeth again John 5.27 The Father gave him Authority to execute judgment also John 5.27 because he is the Son of man which Scripture though it may be applied and that properly to the last judgment when Christ shall visibly appear as a Judge yet it is not to be limited to that sense but hath a measure that reacheth unto the Church in all Ages wherein Christ hath according to the Authority given him of the Father executed judgement If it be now objected that these words because he is the Son of man do imply that Christ did not execute this power till he took upon him our Nature I shall answer First If Christ was the Lamb slain from the beginning of the world though notwithstanding he was not actually slaughtered till about the eighteenth year of Tiberius what hinders but that he might be also the Son of man before his Incarnation Sure we are the Prophet Daniel speaks of him under that notion And some there are that apply that of the Psalm unto him Dan. 7.13 Ravanel Ius c. Ps 80.17 In his Acts and Monuments Let thy hand be upon the man of thy right hand upon the Son of man whom thou madest strong for thy self Secondly I answer with learned Bishop Mountague that this stile wherewith Christ was pleased very frequently to denominate himself Son of Man is to be understood with a reference to that original Promise the first of all made unto Mankinde The Seed of the Woman shall bruise the Serpents head and not unto any persons whatsoever to whom Christ might be related according to the flesh And hereby saith Epiphanius did the Lord intimate that himself was the Party meant in that Promise and that the virtue of his Merits should be and was diffused to all Nations in the world Jews and Gentiles originally alike descended of the woman who both had a like interest in the woman and her Seed though the Jews did and might challenge greater propriety in the Seed of Abraham then the Gentiles could This Title then upon this account doth rather confirm the matter in hand then in the least Iota appear against it But I do further offer to consideration Did not Christ call himself the Son of man that he might thereby intimate to the Sons of men for their comfort that there was some kinde of Affinity between him and them he being 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the essential Reason from all Eternity as is before said and they men endued with reason also through his good hand upon them in their Creation and therefore he would delight in that Appellation since he had undertaken to be their Mediatour which might even in their apprehension advance that Affinity Which if it be so Christ doth not call himself the Son of man so much for his being a Descendant from Mankinde But Son of man he is that is by an Hebraism Man per excellentiam 1 Tim. 2.5 as the Apostle also calls him as one that was Superiour to them all and from whom they all being reasonable Creatures have derived their distinction from other Species in the World about them From all which it may appear that Jesus Christ might be called the Son of man before his Incarnation and therefore as such did execute that Authority which the Father had given unto him He executed judgment on Cain when he excommunicated him out of his Church as may be gathered from the Sentence of Malediction which he pronounced upon him viz. That he should be a Fugitive and a Vagabond in the Earth Gen. 4.12 and from Cain's own desperate and dogged confession whereby he did in a sullen
inventions worthy of no value We deny not but where Antiquity is found in a way of Righteousness it is indeed a Crown of Glory among the Churches of Christ But being found in a way of Errour wandring from the righteous rule of the written word and laying inconstancy upon Jesus Christ who is this way of Righteousness as if he were not the same still in his Doctrine which he hath delivered to his Church it is fit to be despised We must here now look to be told that the written word is not the onely rule but that there are many other unwritten verities to which we are likewise bound to give heed as well as to that which is written Sess 4. Decreto de Can. Script Yea and the Council of Trent hath thundred out their Anathema against those who refuse Traditions for the rule of faith as well as against those that refuse the written word But may it not then be demanded if it be so where can faith finde a sure foundation to fix upon that which is unwritten being very uncertain whether it be from Heaven or of men If the written word be but a part of Gods revealed will and these unwritten verities as they are called the other part never can there be assurance given to any of the whole Mystery of Salvation neither can the Church know it aright in the whole series of it was God hath revealed it For when some affirm a Tradition to be Apostolical which others of as great account disdainfully reject for a spurious super-inducement and forgery thrust upon the Churches in after-times which dissenting in this case hath frequently come to pass even in the Primitive Dayes of the Gospel what a miserable maze is the faith of a believer brought into Will not our confidences be much weakned in our spiritual conflicts and our hopes of gaining Converts to our Christian Profession from among those that are without if they should make this objection unto us be utterly choaked and our endeavours in that kinde frustrated and come to nothing To let pass the great multitude of these Traditions the number of them being never yet determined whereby they must needs become a great yoke and burthen to the Church of Christ 1 Tim. 3.15 If that which is written be sufficient to make a man wise unto salvation surely that which is unwritten is not absolutely necessary to be heeded by us It is not to be denied but that the Church hath Power to appoint some certain Canons and Rules for the observation of Publick order and decency unto which so long as they are inoffensive in their own nature they that are true Children of the Church will give a ready and a chearful obedience yea we do confess that in things indifferent a respect ought to be yielded to Antiquity and to their Traditions But if an Angel from Heaven should come and tell us that all those things which are simply necessary to Salvation are not to be found in the Holy Scriptures we must hold him accursed Yet Bellarmine saith Nos asserimus in Scripturis non contineri expresse totam Doctrinam necessariam sive de fide sive de moribus Lib. 4. de verbo non scripto Ca. 3. Sect. 1. We further do willingly grant that the Lord Jesus Christ and his Apostles preached many things that were never written And what they so preached ought to be of equal Authority with us as that which is written Pari veneratione pari pietatis affictu the very words of the Council of Trent not to be disliked with as much Piety and Veneration to be received by us as the Books of Holy Scriptures if they were as certainly known But it is a strange and strong delusion which we hope shall never seise upon us to believe that they preached doctrines which are a directly contrary to what is written in the said Books as light is unto darkness Holy and Faithful Master Deering in his Commentary on the Epistle to the Hebrews expostulates this case sadly in these words Is it the word of Christ written that we should not worship Angels And is it his Word unwritten that we should pray unto them Is it his Word written that we should not be bound to our Fore-Fathers Traditions And is it his Word unwritten that our Fathers Traditions should be to us as his Gospel Is it his word written that to forbid marriage which is honourable in all estates is the Doctrine of Devils And is it his Word unwritten that Ministers should be forbidden to marry Is it his Word written that five words in a known Tongue are better in the Congregation then five thousand in a strange Language And is it his Word unwritten that in our Congregations we should pray in a Language which the people understand not Is it his Word written that the dead are blessed which die in the Lord and they rest from their labours And is it his Word unwritten that they are tormented in the fire of Purgatory In short Is it his Word written that his Ministers should be subject to Kings should attend upon their flock and not meddle more then needs must with the affairs of this World And is it his Word unwritten that the Pope shall exercise Authority over Temporal powers depose Kings at his pleasure and that his Inferiours of the Conclave should be secular Princes Hath God written it that Christ sacrificed himself once for all and made a perfect Redemption And hath he left it unwritten that a shaven Priest must sacrifice him every day and say a Mass Propitiatory for the quick and dead What perversness is this of men of Corrupt minds thus to dream of Traditions contrary to the written Word of God And what an intolerable indignity do they put upon Christ to make him thus palpably contradict himself as if he had forgotten to be still 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Same But full well did Esaias prophecy of these men Es 29.13 saying This people draweth neare unto me with their mouth and honour me with their lips but their heart is far from me But in vain do they worship me teaching for Doctrines the Commandments of men Mat. 15.8 But leaving these to their uncertain Traditions and their most certain innovations Let us look home to our selves and hearken to the Apostles advice which he giveth Phil. 2.5 viz. Phil. 2.5 To let the same minde be in us which was in Christ Jesus for he hath set us an example that we should herein also follow his steps even to be constantly the same in those things that belong to the Kingdom of God Not that we should stand at a stay and make no further progress in Knowledge Holiness Zeal for God's glory Brotherly-love self-denial Contempt of the world c. then we have already attained Rather let yesterdayes work in that sence be forgotten by us Phil. 3.13 and let us reach forth as Saint Paul said he himself
all nations as the Lord once threatned you Which being so Whether then it be better to be under his grace or under his wrath judge ye There is no avoyding it will ye nill ye one way or other you shall ever be subdued unto him either as children or as captives as subjects or as slaves for the Lord hath sworn by himself the greatest oath that ever was heard of the word is gone out of his mouth in righteousness and shall not return That unto him every knee shall bow Esa 45.23 every tongue shall swear Esa 45.23 And if ever demonstrations were found among the creatures for the confirmation of any thing there have been such that are most convincing in this matter of subjecting the world to the irresistable power of Jesus according to this oath That these Oracles of the Heathen were struck dumb at that time the writings of the Heathen do sufficiently witness Two memorable occurrents I shall mention in order hereunto that are past all gain-saying First at his birth the Oracles of the Heathen testified of him by their silence not daring once to peep or mutter out an answer to their importunate suppliants after that this 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Oracle of the Living God once appeared Secondly at his death The Sun in the firmament did also bear witness unto him by a total eclipsing of his light to the amazement of the world far and near In Egypt it was seen and admired by Dionysius Areopagita as appears in his Epistle to Polycarp wherein he desireth Polycarp to enquire of one Apolloohanes who would not it seems be reclaimed from his Gentilisme what he thought of that eclipse which he saw when he was with him at Heliopolis a city in Egypt at the time of our Saviours suffering when he could not but acknowledge that that with other remarkable wonders which they took notice of together were 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 vicissitudes or changes of Divine works Which Dionysius being at that time also a Heathen and much astonished at the unnaturalness of the said eclipse cryed out as it is reported of him 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. Either the Deity suffereth or hath sympathy with that which suffereth or the whole world is ready to be dissolved Adding withall Deus ignotus in carne patitur ideoqueVniversum hisce tenebris obscuratur concutitur that is An unknown God suffers at this time in the flesh which makes the world to shake under this obscurity But afterwards when the Apostle Saint Paul came to Athens and affirmed Jesus Christ to be the unknown God at whose death the Sun was so obscured the said Dionysius hearing him became a convert to the Christian Faith and all his life time after an eminent servant to Jesus Christ These reports possibly you will not regard howsoever the truth of the eclipse cannot be questioned by you which may let in so much light upon you to make you believe that somewhat extraordinary was then acted in the world which God would have the world to take special notice of And now to conclude What is it O ye miserably blinded people that you stick at If the Lord Jesus Christ the Son of the Blessed Virgin our Lord and our God hath not exactly fulfilled all that was Prophecied of the Messiah If he hath not done the works that no other man did or can do If you have not hitherto smarted enough under that heavy Curse which your fathers brought upon you when they crucified the Lord Jesus crying out His bloud be upon us and our children go on then still in your pertinacy deny him to be the Lord that bought you look for another that can do more for you then he hath done For us in the mean time we will bewail before the Lord your woful blindeness and hardness of heart and though we cannot converse with you as brethren because of your perversness in your present infidelity yet we will pity you as those who were once a people in whom the Lord delighted yea as those of whom we have good hope upon the return of your Captivity to see you made the glory of Nations a Praise in the earth Which hope as we may be confident it will not fail us in the time and season which the Father hath put in his own Power so may the consideration of those grounds and reasons hereafter specified whereon this hope is built in time prevail with you to bethink your selves of your long estrangement from your God and to quicken your return unto him Lastly Since it is so that Jesus Christ is the Same to day which he was yesterday then have the Churches of the Gentiles good reason to rejoyce in that they submitting themselves to Christs yoke may be sure that the same Divine Love which was of old manifested to the Jews is in as full measure according to their capacity extended towards them What high account was made of Israel heretofore the holy Scripture doth every where tell us How God entred into a Covenant with them was nigh unto them in all that they call'd upon him for esteemed them his Inheritance his Vineyard his peculiar Treasure when all other Nations were rejected as unclean 1 Cor. 9.11 proclaimed Out-laws and cast forth as dogs not suffered to intermeddle with the childrens Priviledge But now since the Holy Ghost hath not onely told us that Jesus Christ the messenger of this Covenant the parchaser of this Inheritance the planter of this Vineyard the great Lord-Keeper of this Treasury hath broken down the wall of Partition that was between Jews and Gentiles Eph. 2.14 making both one but that he is also the Same to day which he was yesterday as able now to save them to the uttermost whosoever they be that come unto God by him and as ready to do the will of the Father in being a Light to lighten the Gentiles according to the Prophecies of old as to be the glory of his people Israel we may therefore be confident in our approaches before the Lord looking for mercy and grace to help in time of need being as much interessed in all the happy Priviledges of the everlasting Covenant of Promise as ever were the Jews there is no difference now saith the Apostle between the Jew and the Greek for the same Lord over all is rich unto all that call upon him For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved Now is the true heavenly sound gone into all lands the Gospel preached to every creature which the Apostles carried about when they had their Commission given them to go into all the world their Line reached to the ends of the earth Psal 19 4 5. insomuch that the Orb or Tabernacle of the Sun so the Divine Spirit of the Psalmist is interpreted by the Apostle was bounded within the limits of their Commission Rom. 10.18 Saint Paul had his circuit from Jerusalem to Spain