oâ— the Gospell Å¿ Esai 59.21 Ier. 31.31 of which promise there would be no accomplishment vnlesse the holy Scriptures which exhibite â—â—to vs the summe of the Law and that â—â—ctrine were evidently playne in all â—â—nges which are necessary vnto salâ—â—tion but as there are degrees and â—â—pediments from the flesh of the feeâ—â—â—g of this faith and promise so are â—ere of this playnenesse in the regeneâ—te whence it is that neyther all â—ings are cleare perspicuous to each â—â—rson alike nor each thing to all perâ—â—ns equally yet to all and singular perâ—â—ns sufficiently vnto saluation accorâ—ing to the measure of Fayth and diâ—â—ne illumination The second meane of Instruction is â—â—e Reading of the holy Scripture â—hich is necessary to all and singular â—odly men First for the precept seâ—ondly for our salvation thirdly for â—e edification of others the consideâ—ation of the precept is declared in the â—criptures two wayes expressiuely t Ioh. 1.39 Aâ—alogically and by consequence beâ—ause in the Scripture God speaketh vnto all therefore by the same â—ight the doctrine of the Scripture is common vnto all also the end of thâ— Scripture is to be the power vnto salvation to every one that beleeveth with many other arguments which from the force of ConsequeÌ„ce may be drawn but whreas the point of our Salvation iâ— perfectly expressed in the scripture the coÌ„mon Edification of others commendeth vnto vs the reading of the scripture as the study diligence duty of attayning the same for sith we are bound to instruct others as in life so also in doctrine wee needes must learne those thinges in which we haue a rule both in life and doctrine written down most perfectly The third meane is Interpretation whether it bee of publicke or private authority the first beginning whereof is the holy Spirite the manner is the truth the rule is the Scripture the vse is Charity now the meanes which are Principall are a continuall collation of the holy Scripture with Scripture the consideration of the Essentiall pointes of a place that is both of the intention of the Speaker and of the nature of the Word spoken The Analogy of Fayth that all thinges bee expounded according to the truth of the Principles 〈…〉 in Divinity but those which are secondary are these the practise of the Church the decrees of the founder Councels and the expositions of the Fathers to all which so farre place is to be given as they consent with the Scripture and Analogy of Fayth OF THE WORD OF GOD The Part Confuting COncerning the truth of the Scripture we haue already spoken in an explication of the Definition by causes a Analytica by way of resolution now for the truth thereof wee will briefly speake against the obiections by an Appendix or Addition of generall solutions and distinctions following the order and methode of the Causes already declared DISTINCTIONS FOR THE Authority of the Scripture against COSTERVS Ench. Lib. 2. Cap. 2. I. There is a double consideration of the Church and the Scripture the one common in respect of the Author the other singular in respect of the Authority which the Author hath put into them God is the Author of both whether mediately or immediately but the Authority from God is diverse that of the Scripture is principall and formall but the other of the Church is secondary and ministeriall II. THe Scripture is two wayes considered eyther according to the substance of the Word principally or according to the manner of Writing Secondarily in that the Scripture is more ancient then the Church as by which the Church was begotten or generated III. SOme thinges are required for the confirmation of a thing absolutely and of it selfe and some by accident and for another thing if the Scripture neede any confirmation of the Church it needeth the same by accident not of it selfe and therefore the confirmation of the Church belongeth not to the Cause Efficient but Ministeriall IIII. IN causes coordinate those which are inferior and latter cannot obtaine the force and faculty of others which are the former Now every Authority of the Church is subordinate yet the vse of both is very great of the Scripture as the meane principal to beleeue of the Church as the meane outward and ministeriall V THere is one corruption of wordes and certaine particular places through the blemish where of the principall parts cannot bee corrupted and there is an other corruption of the essentiall partes of the Scripture the former if any hath happened vnto the Scripture for the latter we vtterly deny is not the corruption of the Scripture but was caused eyther by the naughtinesse of some other or through the infirmity of the church or through the particular ignorance of them that were of the houshold The places of Scripture which COSTERVS wresteth are these Iohn 14.16 I answere that is badly transferred to the church generally which is spoken of the Apostles particularly for the testimony of these is immediate blamelesse and extraordinary but of it mediate weake and ordinary Luke 10.16 I answere that which was spoken concerning the office of the Church in respect of Ecclesiastical censure and discipline is not to be restrayned vnto the office of the same in respect of doctrine 1 Timoth. 3.15 I Answere the prayses which in the Scripture are given to the Church declare the Ministery and not the authority of the same as beeing that church which should keepe the b DeposituÌ„ pledge of the truth committed vnto it as the house of God should set it foorth as a pillar whereon it hangeth and in that pillar should keepe it vnmoueable as the ground therof Basis Distinctions for the Canon against Bellarmine 1. Tom. Lib. 1. Cap. 7. vnto the 16. THe Obiections which are wont to bee brought against the Canon are eyther those which are alleadged against all the bookes of the Canon generally or against every one particularly of all these the solutions are generall I. The Councels which haue their Canons concerning the canonicall and Apocryphal Bookes are eyther ancient or latter the ancient are eyther c Oeconomica generall the credite of which is the worthier such is that of Laodicea celebrated in the three hundred yeare after Christs birth which with vs acknowledgeth the selfe same Canon or Provinciall as that third of Carthage celebrated in the yeare fower hundreth having no authority not onely because it is particular but also because it is convinced of error by the former generall of Laodicea Againe the latter are that of Florence and of Trent of which there is no authority but because they are too late as also because they are papish and tyrannicall II. T Hese tearmes or Epithetes holy Divine and Canonicall are so called eyther properly in very deede and according to the truth or by a certaine similitude that is from the opinion and ordinance of men according to a certaine resemblance and in both significations
Notaries which went between God speaking and the Church which hee speaketh vnto for the perpetuall verity of the thing x Eph. 2.20 Secondly commeth the consent of the Cannon of the Law with the truth Thirdly the assent of the Church which hath allowed the Scripture delivered of God receyved kept and delivered the same by the vse and exercise of Gods Ministery and of Ecclesiasticall Discipline which dependeth thereon Which authority of the Church is secondary not to establish but to testifie thâ— authority of the Scripture for both are to bee acknowledged yet in theyr degree and order for that of the Scripture is Primary sound and essentiall but that of the Church is subordinate accidentall and altogether ministeriall The Materiall Cause of the holy Scripture arâ— divine matters revealed to our salvation according to our capacity and registred in the Canon Wee call the Canon the doctrine that is contayned in the Bookes of both Testaments the forme whereof internall is the vnchaungeable trueth of God but the externall is the holy Scripture the most absolute Symbole of the same for God hath vsed and sanctified the Instrument of the Scripture as it were the Index or declarer of that Essentiall Canon and the truth of the worde for the approving of the truth as it were in a certaine state or habite of an externall forme that by divine ordinance it might bee the Canon of our faith and life as a right even measure both whole and perfect The nature and office of this Canon come now to be declared The Nature for whereas even vnto this day there hath beene a threefold Canon in the Church the one divine the other Ecclesiasticall and the thirde false how the Canon properlie called divine may be distinguished from the Ecclesiasticall and both from the false it is very needefull for vs to discerne first by the partes thereof secondly by the manner of delivering thirdly by theyr proper conditions Wee devide the pattes of this Canon into the bookes of the olde and new Testament according to those two severall times of the olde and new Church The olde Canon is that which being receyved from God the auncient Church of the Iewes kept and next after delivered from hand to hand to theyr posterity by Gods appointment the bookes whereof are reckoned to be 22. by the Iewes but more distinctly by vs 39. and are divided into three rankes the first contayneth the fiue Bookes of Moses the second contayneth the bookes of the Prophets both hystoricall and propheticall whereof some were published before the Captivity to wit the booke of Ioshua Iudges Ruth two of Samuel two of Kinges being hystoricall Esay a good part of Ieremie and the nine lesser Prophets being Propheticall Others were in the time of Captivity and after as Esdras Nehemias Ester which are hystoricall some part of Ieremie Ezekiel Daniel and the three last of the smaller Prophets which are Propheticall the thirde contayneth holy writings before the Captivity Iob the greatest part of the Psalmes the Proverbes Ecclesiastes the songs of Salomon in and after the Captivity the two bookes of Chronicles The New Canon is that which the christian church had more largely since the time of Christ and the Apostles the substance of which Canon is the word by Christ vttered and the thinges which hee did the most faithfull hystory whereof is contayned in the fower Evangelists the examples in the Acts the y Exegesis exposition in one twenty Epistles the Prophesie in the booke of Revelation The manner of the delivery of both the Canons varyed according to the times of the church and persons the internall forme that is the vnchangeable word of God remayning stil the same for as for the time being the law or the bookes of Moses were the Canon in the church so also after Moses that which was added thereunto was the z Exegetica fuller exposition of that Instrument or canon The conditions of this Canon properly called divine are two the one that it contayne in it selfe the truth or haue the expresse forme of the word of truth the second that it bee delivered ruled and sanctified by divine authority to the end it might bee a Canon for vs in the church the latter of which conditions can never bee pluckt away from the former Now God hath sanctified these forsayde bookes to the ende they might be a Canon in the church partly after a generall partly after a particular manner after a Generall manner because God hath approved and confirmed the Bookes of both Canons not onely by the testimony of his spirit but also by the consent of the Canon and testification of the church after a particular manner because God hath specially sanctified the Bookes of the olde Canon to wit Moses his fiue Bookes with his speech miracles signes and events the bookes of the Prophets and holy writings before the captiuity with the extraordinary signes of a cloud and smoake in the Temple g 1. Kin. 8.10 Leu. 16.2 as also of Gods answere by the Ephod Vrim and Thumim h Exod. 28 30. after the captivity with singular testimonies of eventes the bookes also of the new Canon God hath sanctified singularly both by his sonne made manifest in the flesh as also by his wordes and deedes c Heb. 1.2 and by the Ministery of his Apostles which was most effectuall in signes powers miracles d Mat 3.5 pag. 13. And these are the partes manner and conditions of the divine Canon The other Canon is Ecclesiasticall which neyther contayneth the truth perfectly in it selfe nor was sanctified by God in the Church that it might bee a Canon of doctrine and faith and therefore is called of the Greeke fathers a second or inferiour Canon To this Canon belong the Bookes Apocryphall eyther wholy so as the thirde and fourth of Esdras Tobit Iudith the two bookes of the Machabees the booke of Wisedome Ecclesiasticus or being e Appendices additions to the canonicall as Baruch the prayer of Manasses and those which are added to Daniel and Esther these although they be taken into the Canon Ecclesiasticall yet by evident meanes that is by faith order and vse they were of the Fathers lesse esteemed then the bookes of that divine Canon whereby though abusiuely they were called Canonicall to witte by custome yet properly they were distinguished in the church from the canonicall by the name of Apocrypha The False Canon is that which after the Authority of the Apocrypha bookes grew greater was constituted by humaine opinion The office of the Canon is twofold the one is to teach the truth the other by this rule of truth to decide al controversies concerning Religion for it is the prâ—per Iudiciary voyce and sentence of the holy Ghost that soveraigne inward Iudge from which wee may not appeale The Formall Cause of the holy Scripture is twofold inward and outward the one is wherby the Scripture is proportionable
they are taken with the Fathers in generall in the former when they treate of the bookes truely canonicall in the latter when of the Apocryphal III. IT belongs vnto him only to prescribe giue and maintaine a Canon in the church who is the Author Lord and Preserver of his Church IIII. NEyther doth the Apocryphal confirme the authority of the Apocryphal nor the Councels of Florence and Trent nor the Ecclesiastical reading nor lastly the Fathers eyther by citing of places out of the Apocryphall or intitling the Apocryphal with the name of holy Scriptures for the Canon of ecclesiasticall reading is one and the Canon of saith is another Distinctions for the perfection of the Scripture VVHereas our Adversaries are wont to bring two kinde of Arguments against the perfection of the Scripture the one against the necessity the other against the sufficiency thereof wee will treate of both together Against Bellarmine 1. Tom. Lib. 4. Cap. 4. I. THere is a two-fold necessity the one absolute the other by an d Or supposition Hypothesis or something is sayed to bee necessary two wayes eyther as the Cause or the e Concausa Fellow-cause the word of God revealed is simply necessary to all men as the cause but the Scripture as the Fellow cause Now it followeth not thus to conclude the Fathers vntill Moses vsed the necessary cause without this the Fellow-cause therefore we may for a conclusion drawne from the change of time is deceitfull II. A Tradition onely is sayed to haue beene eyther b After a sort or in part Simply or Absolutely secundum quid that 〈◊〉 without the Scripture and so wee confesse a tradition to haue beene vntill Moses or simpliciter and that we denie for they had in stead of Scripture other innumerable Principles and Ruâ—diments III THe whole is sayde to be two waies eyther according to quantity or according to the perfection of the Essence thereof All the Bookes severally are sufficient in their owne Essentiall â—erfection though according to their â—ntirenesse and quantity they haue not the sufficiency of the whole but their owne IIII. THese Bookes which perished eyther were not Canonicall or their substance is found in those which are Canonicall V SOme precepts of God are expressed and manifest some other inwarde and hidden God commaunded his Word to be written downe both by the inward inspiration of the spirit generally and therefore is sayde to bee inspired i Divinitus of God as also expresly to certaine persons in particular k Reu. 1.11 Apoc. 1.11 VI. ALL thinges are contayned in the Scripture eyther expresly or Analogically so what wee are to thinkâ— of Women not circumcized of Infants dead before the eight day of the Gentiles saved we may know out of the Scripture Analogically VII A Principle of a Principle cannot be had nor ought to bee sought Now the Scripture is knowne to be divine not from Tradition but first from the inward testimony of the spirite of Christ secondly from the testimony of the Apostles as the publicke Notaries in the Church Thirdly from the testimony of the Scripture as a divine Instrument and lastly from the â—â—stimony of the Church of God openâ— and as it were in a pillar setting â—rth the testimony of the Apostles and â—f the Scripture VIII THe Scripture is not doubtfull in it selfe but vnto vs by accident and â—ther seemeth so to be through the corâ—uption of our vnderstanding but God 〈◊〉 an infallible Interpreter of the same â—y his Spirit and word written and â—f this divine tradition wee haue need â—r the vnderstanding of the Scripture or those things which it behooveth vs â—o know concerning the equality of â—â—e persons the proceeding of the Spiâ—ite originall sinne the descension of Christ into Hell are sufficiently declaâ—ed in the Scripture for our Salvation IX THose thinges which are spoken concerning the Virginity of Marie afâ—er the birth of Christ the Passeover to be celebrated on the Lords day the l Paedabaptismo Baptisme of Infantes and Purgatory eyther are not necessary as the first and the second or are found Analogically in the Scriptures as the third or are false as the fourth The Places which are cited by Bellarmine against the perfection of the Scripture 1. Tom. Lib. 4. Cap. 5. are these Ioh. 16.12 Ans The Place treateâ— of speciall thinges the knowledge oâ— which is infinite which therefore alsâ— are expressed in the Scriptures not iâ— particular and one by one but bâ— Word and in generall or else oâ— those thinges the Revelation whereof according to the dispensation oâ— time Christ would defer vntill thâ— time of that extraordinary and visiblâ— communicating of the holy Ghost 1. Cor. 11.2 Ans In the holy Supper of the Lord two things concurreâ— the very substantiall thinges of the Supper to wit the matter and forme seâ—â—ndly the meere Ceremoniall thinges the Rites Those are of themselues â—â—cessary and were most faithfully deâ—ered by the Apostles but these 〈◊〉 after a sort m SecunduÌ„ qu id for that which is morall 〈◊〉 them is necessary and therefore â—ly written downe of the Apostles â—t that which is Ceremoniall onely is 〈◊〉 Indifferent n Adiaphoâ—um and left free to the â—hurches 2. Thes 2.15 Ans The Word of â—â—adition is Equivocall for eyther in â—enerall it signifieth every doctrine â—owsoever delivered by Word or Wriâ—g or it signifieth in Particular or â—ppositely that doctrine which is not â—itten in the first signification the â—postle taketh it and not in the seâ—nd 1. Tim. 6.2 2. Tim. 1.13 Ans â—hat the pledge and patterne of wholeâ—me wordes cannot be otherwise exâ—ounded then of the Scripture it selfe â—nd the substance of christian doctrine â—ll the circumstances of the place doe teach 2 Ioh. 1.2 Ans That kinde of reasoning hath no consequence which is drawne from particulars eyther deedes or rytes which it was not needefull to expresse in writing but the case is altered concerning the very substance of the doctrine of Faith Distinctions for the playnenesse of the Scripture against Bellarmine 1. Tom. Lib. 3. Cap. 1. I. THe clearenesse or obscurity of the Scripture is two-fold the one to vs partly through the Nature of the thinges partly through our owne infirmity the other in manner and meane of the Scriptures every obscurity whereof mention is made among the Fathers is not of the Scriptures but eyther of the thinges in the Scripture for the maiesty therof or else ours who without the inward light of the spirite cannot know them those thinges which wee know wee know onely in part and after an vnperfect manner II. THe matters of the Scripture though for their maiesty they are vnto vs obscure yet as they are proposed vnto vs in the Scripture they are not obscure for the manner of speaking is every way perspicuous neyther is there in the Scriptures eyther any contrariety or ambiguity or falshood nor doe the speeches which go e
not that is the Church ambiguously so called or that which is Hypocriticall that which hath neyther these nor that is not a Church at all But because the particular Church which hath these markes eyther hath them perfectly or according to parts and againe both wayes according to the quantity and quality diversly eyther more or lesse eyther more purely or more vnpurely Hence it commeth to passe that particular Churches both diversly erre and oftentimes fayle they erre more or lesse according as they either cleaue to the truth or swerue from the same x 1. Cor. 13.9 Rom. 7.23 Mat. 6.12 they fayle partly because they are not alwayes conspicuous in order regiment and continuall succession and partly because sometimes they vtterly perish by Apostasie and corruption y Apoc. 13 4.8 The End of the Church in generall is the glory of God himselfe or the prayse of the glory of his grace but in Particular the end of the Invisible Church is the salvation of the Predestinate and of the visible the consummation fulfilling of the body of Christ out of them that were generally called OF THE CHVRCH The Part Confuting In Defence of the Invisiblenesse of the Catholicke Church against Bellarmine cap. 12. Lib. 3. THE DISTINCTIONS I. THe Church is two wayes vsually considered eyther according to the outward matter and forme thereof or according to that which concerneth the whole or vniversall and inwarde forme thereof In the former sence it is called visible but in the latter invisible even the Scripture it selfe granting or condiscending herevnto which for this end calleth the Catholicke church the church of the first borne who are written in heaven the body of Christ not naturall but mysticall the Spouse all whose glory is inward II. THe reasoning is of no validity which is drawne from the particular church to the catholicke or Vniversall because those things pertaine not to every singular part which yet are most truely spoken of the whole in generall and indivisibly Now these are particular churches whereof there is mention made Numb 20.3 King 8. Act. 20 Act 15. ver 3. 4. Act. 18. 1. Cor. 15. Gal. 1. Phil. 3. III. THe conclusion is inconsequent from the catholicke church to a Particular for neyther doe all the conditions or properties of the whole church fitte to every part therof eyther alwaies or altogether and those two propositions Mat. 16. 1. Tim. 3. are to bee vnderstood of the catholicke and invisible church as all the circumstances thereof doe evidently proue For the foundation of the church cannot bee sayde to be visible or sensible whether you vnderstand Peter according to the confession of the Adversary for it cannot bee seene or Christ for hee is the mysticall head of a mysticall body or the confession of faith for faith is onely to be perceyved by the vnderstanding Neyther treateth hee of the Church over which Timothie was chiefe in respect of the visiblenesse therof but so farre forth as it was a parte of the catholicke invisible Church and did only comprehend those which were in very deed of the houshold IIII. THe name of Church is termed properly or Figuratiuely by the exposition or opposition of the two entire parts of the Church which are the Pastors and the Flocke For properly and absolutely it signifieth the vniversall body but oppositely this or that parte of the Church but in the place cited Mat 18. it is taken oppositely for the Rulers of the Church themselues who commonly are called the Church representatiue V. THe Argument which is not grounded vpon the authority of Scripture but vpon the bad exposition of Augustine concludeth nothing Now the proper translation and natural sense of these wordes In them hee layde a tabernacle for the Sunne is that God placed Tent in the Heavens or a certaine glorious seate for the Sunne VI. ESay 2. Dan. 2. Mich. 4 Mat. 5. Ans There is no good proceeding from the Figuratiue formes of speaking by which the dignity majesty of Christs kingdome or of the Catholicke church is set foorth to the visiblenesse of the same For eyther all that Majesty of the church as it is catholicke is inwarde or if it bee outward it belongeth not to the church as it is catholicke but in regard of the diverse and particular circumstances of place time and persons Of Place because that may be true a Secundū quid after a sort or in part concerning particular churches which absolutely and simply cannot bee spoken of the Catholicke Of the Time because the maner and fashion or outward appearance of the same is divers For the church is at one time more conspicuous then at another but it was most conspicuous at the time of the first preaching of the Gospell Lastly of the Persons because of the outwarde concourse of men eyther good or bad which Augustine against the Donatists proveth to haue beene in his time most populous VII Two times onely doe not make the vniversality of the church but all times from the beginning of the world to the end of the same Neyther could the church of the ancient people either be knowne by circumcision or were the gifts of the holy Spirit visible in the new Testament Not the one for al they which were of the circumcision did not pertaine to the catholicke church Not the other because the grace of the goly Spirite is not to be perceyved by the outward sence VIII THe church is called so aequivocally either simply absolutly or after a sort as touching some particular limitation of the same the church absolutely so called comprehendeth the Angels but after a sort so called either comprehendeth the whole vniversality of men in heaven and in earth and so the Soules of the dead or onely that vniversalitie of men which is on the earth The Society of these as they are elect is mysticall and spirituall and therefore not well compared to politicke or civill societies neyther doth the outward societie of the sacraments whereof Augustine speaketh cause any man to bee a member of the catholicke Church but of a particular Church onely IX THere is no consequence eyther frō an aequivocation or from the vnlike manner of the church the aequivocation is in the word Church which signifieth eyther the catholicke church Invisible or Visible Now the manner of the Iewish and Popish Church is vnlike because God commanded the form of the one but of the Popish church not at all and they that were partakers with that Church did partake in holy things and such as pertayned to the condition of that church and not in all things promiscuously or confusedly X. THere is one necessity absolute another conditionall the necessity absolute is that if wee will bee saved we adjoyne our selues to the catholicke church out of which there is no salvation but the necessity conditionall is that wee adjoyne our selues to this or that particular church for there is a twofold condition the one
Diuinity CHAP. I. ALL Sciences haue their proper principles aboue which as being those that cannot be demonstrated and are immediately the first wee may not ascend but among many sciences that is the more perfect which is or commeth of the superiour 〈◊〉 Principles and that the most perfect which resolveth a matter into the first Principles which depend not vpon any former of which sort Divinity alone is For the principles of other sciences are not simply the first buâ— onely in their owne kinde because indeed in their owne science they haue no other Former but there ought not to bee any other Former Principles of Divinity neyther in it selfe nor out of it selfe to wit neyther any Principle of being nor any principle of knowing For there are two Principles the one of the thing the other of knowledge those out of which other things are produced these on which the knowledge of other thinges doe depend both these a Analogiâ—e proportionably are of vs to bee considered in Divinity for the true exposition of the word intimateth vnto vs those two beginnings to wit God and the Word God is the Principle of being and the first cause of Divinity from which both the end of Divinity and the means vnto his end doe spring the Word is the principle of knowing by which the end of Divinity and the meanes vnto it may be knowne Both the principles are immediatly 〈◊〉 the first God is a Principle immediately first because nothing was beâ—â—hâ—â— the word is a principle imâ—ediately first because nothing was â—poken before it which two though â—hey goe together in dignity and office of beginning yet in the course of order in the manner of doing and in â—he producing of the effect they are distinguished and are mutually each to other subordinate for God first mediately speaketh vnto vs in the worde then the Worde mediately bringeth vs vnto the knowledge of God which knowledge sith it is entended to be the principall and proper subiect of whole Divinity the meane thereunto subordinate which wee called the Word ought first to be knowne Of the Word of GOD. The parte confirming CHAP. II. THe Primary Principle of Divinity for dignity is God but for the order of better knowledge the wordâ— is the first The word we vnderstand 1. Enâ—â—tiatiue or which is vttered whereby God hath communicated with man eyther specially through Revelation by Oracles visions or dreames or generally through a liuely tradition oâ— doctrine from hand to hand or through a more excellent manner by the Scripture The same wee thus define It is at holy Instrument concerning the truth necessary a Rom. 15 4. 1 Tim 4. â— Ioh. 5.35 to salvation faithfully and perfectly written in the Canonicall b Rom. 1. 2 Pet. 1.19 2 Pet. 3.15 16. bookes by the Prophets and Apostles c 2. Tim. 3 16. as the Secretaries of God for the healthfull instruction of the Church d 2. Pet. 1 22. Psal 1 19.1 1. Tim. 4 13 16. Wee call it an Instrument both in respect of the Covenant whereof God would haue an Instrument to be made and by a renued contract publikely to be registred as also in relation to another thing as in the proper vse and office thereof because the holy Scripture is not for it selfe but as the manner of â—struments is for another thing the â—hority perfection perspicuousnes â—d vse of this Instrument shall be made â—dent by a Methodicall e Analyst resolution the causes The Cause Efficient of the Scripture God f 2 Tim. 3.16 2 Pet. 1.21 the Father in the sonne by the â—rit for the same hath the Father layed â—en to the Church by the word Enunâ—tiue and by the workes of grace â—wer generally and specially ordinaâ—y and extraordinarily g Heb. 11. the Sonne â—th both wayes confirmed it in the â—ew Testament h Heb. 1.2 the holy Ghost seaâ—th the same in the hearts of the faithâ—ll by the word inwardly testifying or 〈◊〉 an inward Testimony i Esa 59.21 Ioh. 14.26 the Scripâ—re then is diuine by originall and by â—e things thereof both Essentiall and â—aturall as also assumed By Originall because every knowâ—dge of truth is from the first truth â—hereof the Scripture is an instrumenâ—ll badge and as it were a shapened â—mage hence it is that God both â—mmediately with his own finger wrote the Decalogue in Tables and k Exod. 34 27. mediately by servants as his l Actuaâ—ios Taâ—ulaâ—ios Notaries and publicke pennemen commaunded that whole m Systema compacted body of holy scripture with every part thereof to bee written n 2. Tim. 3.16 Insitis Adsitis The scripture also is divine for the matters both put therein and put thereto for both the Essentiall parts thereof are divine in matter and forme and the end divine also as hereafter shall bee declared yea and the apparant signification and demonstration of the Spirite and presence of God very antiquity the invincible force of the truth and many other pointes doe witnesse the same to be divine now it must needes bee that the Scripture which hath God to be the author hath also divine authority Further this authority is two wayes considered first in it selfe secondly in respect of vs the authority of the Scripture in it selfe is divine if we consider the cause subiect and certainty of doctrine The Cause because the authority of the Scripture is as great as that of the holy Ghost o. 1 Ioh. 1 9. who endited both the matter and words thereof and whose Prophets and Apostles were onely the Amanuenses pennemen p Ioh. 14.16 The Subiect for whereas there is wont to be a double respect of testimonies concerning the authority of a thing one from the power or efficacy of him that witnesseth the other from the Nature and property of the Instrument the Scripture in respect of the thinges whereof it is the Instrument hath an exceeding great and infallible authority q Heb. 4 12. The certainty of doctrine which the Scripture hath from God by Vertue Verity and Complement by Vertue because he hath confirmed the same both at all times with his spirit and at convenient tyme with his workes of grace and power r 1. Thes 1.5 by Verity because it contayneth the whole truth communicable in it selfe both alone and perfectly Å¿ 2 Pet. 1.19 By Complement because as in substance so also in event all thinges are most certaine and most true in the Scripture t Mat. 24 35. Now in respect of vs or vnto vs the authority of the Scripture is divine by the testimony of God both particular and generall Particular because God hath both publikely testified that soveraigne Authority by ordinary and extraordinary meanes and privately sealed it by his everlasting spirite in the conscience of the godly u Ioh. 1.37 5.6 Generall because first God vsed the vndoubted Ministery of his servants as fiâ—te
to the divine truth and with euery part of it selfe the other is the exquisite Phrase of the holy scripture whereby all things are written with a stile fitly tempered both according to the dignity of the speaker and the nature of the word spoken and lastly according to the condition of them to whome it is spoken From both as also from the consideration of the other causes the perfection of the holy Scripture aryseth both as touching it selfe and oppositely against vnwritten traditions As touching it selfe because the scripture doth most perfectly contayne the whole truth which is communicable the perfection springeth from principle subiect and effect From principle for whereas every principle whether of the thing or of knowledge ought to bee perfect and 〈◊〉 f Apodâ—cticae demonstratiue or true conclusions are drawn from that which is vnperfect it must needes bee that the Scripture is altogether most perfect as being the first only mediat principle of all doctrine concerning the truth g Deut. 4.2 12. ver vlt. From subiect because it hath partes both Essentiall of which wee haue spoken to witte matter and forme and also Integrall which are the law and the gospell and is all or wholy perfect both absolutely and by relation Absolutely because for substance it contayneth eyther expresly or Anologically all that doctrine concerning fayth and manners which is communicable for whereas of divine matters some are communicable and some incommunicable and of those which are communicable it is not expedient that some be communicated vnto vs in this life and yet expedient that some be wee affirme that divine matters are perfectly contayned in the Scripture because they are both to bee known h 2. Tim. 3.16 profitable to bee knowne by relation because as it hath the perfection of the whole so hath it also the perfection of the partes in the whole that is called a perfection according to Essence this according to quantity yet so that considering the seueral bounds of times every part was sufficient for the proper times thereof and all the partes in the whole are for vs. From the Effect for it maketh a man wise vnto Salvation instructeth him to every good worke and maketh him blessed by beginning in this life and by perfection in the other i Ioh. 2. v vlt. Rom 15.4 Ioh. 3.59 Neyther is it onely perfect of it selfe but also as being opposed to vnwritten traditions all which by the perfection thereof it excludeth k Gal. 1.8 By the Name of Traditions we vnderstand not in a generall signification the doctrine delivered both wayes to wit by speech and writing as very often they are taken in the Scripture and with the Fathers but in a more speciall sense for every doctrine not written by the Prophets and Apostles whether it be tearmed Dogmaticall or Hystoricall or Ceremoniall for the perfect matter of Dogmaticall Traditions which pertayne to Faith and Maners is delivered vnto vs by God in the Scriptures and those tye not vs which are delivered without the Scriptures but the generall matter of those which are Hystoricall concerning the thinges eyther spoken or done by Christ or his Apostles is perfectly contayned in the Scriptures which it behooveth vs to know for our salvation those which are delivered without the Scripture are to bee reckoned for humaine writings Of those which are Ceremoniall the Essentiall part is written downe in the word of God according to their owne kinde but the Accidental part of them which is concerning the circumstances is free and changeable The Finall Cause according to the consideration of the double Obiect is twofold the highest and furthest off is the glory of God in the maintenance of his truth The second and the nearest wherof our speech is in this place is the instruction of his Church vnto salvation The necessary means of this instruction are three the plainenesse of the Scripture Reading and interpretation whereof the one hath respect vnto the Scripture the other vnto vs and thâ— last both vnto it and vs. The first meane is the Plainenesse for the doctrine of a darke and doubtfuâ— matter neyther ought to be delivered nor can be learned forasmuch as everâ— Instruction whether it bee by the oâ—der of Nature or Doctrine is beguâ— from thinges more known but whereas there is one thing better known in respect of it owne Nature and anotheâ— in respect of vs wee consider the plaiâ—nesse of the Scripture both wayes boâ—â— in respect of it owne Nature as far forth as it is inspired of God and also in respect of our selues as farre forth as we are inspired of God for the vnderstanding of the same Of the playnenesse thereof in it selfe there are two arguments first the matters delivered in the Scriptures secondly the maner of delivering them for albeit they seeme obscure in respect of their dignity and maiesty yet if you respect the truth of them agreeable with their first patterne l 2. Pet. 1 19. if the â—â—w and the Gospell wherein as in â—e partes they are contayned m Deu. 30 11. 2. Cor. 4.3 if the â—ceeding great consent of all matters â—d wordes if lastly you respect the â—ory of God the Principall n Prou. 6.21 Effect of â—em from the vnderstanding of Docâ—ne and Salvation which is offered vnâ—o vs in the holy Scriptures it must â—edes be that it is in it selfe most perâ—ect o Ioh. 20 31. The Manner or Stile of delivering â—he matters is most applyable both 〈◊〉 the thinges themselues of which â—here is speech made and to those perâ—ons for the instructing of whome the â—cripture was delivered yeelding an â—xceeding great playnenesse both in words as also in sense and signification In Wordes for the Phrases which are proper doe shine in the proâ—riety of Wordes and those which are Figuratiue are perspicuous lights of a holy speech In Sense which of it selfe â—s one onely as being that which the â—ntention of the Speaker and the Nature of the thing signified doe import for the Schoole-men say well the p Theologiam Symbolicam non esse ArgumentativaÌ„ Figuratiue Divinity is not fitte for reasoning or disputation yet it may diueâ—sly be applyed to the vse of the Hearers q Per Anagogas Allegorias Tropologias by Mysticall Allegoricall and Mâ—ralyzing Interpretations that one onely literall and Grammaticall sense 〈◊〉 the holy Scripture neverthelesse remayning whole and entire Of the Playnenesse of the Scripture in respect of our selues there aâ—â— also two reasons the one of absoluâ— necessity because indeed the Scripture is the onely meanes and Instrument oâ— Faith for whereas knowledge Asseâ—â— and full assurance are the first beginnings and degrees of Faith these threâ— can by no meanes stand without the evident playnenes of the Scripture the other is r Exothesi from a supposition of God Promises concerning the writing of hâ— Law in our hearts and the spreading abroad or clearenesse of the Doctrine
Hyperbaticae out of Grammaticall order Phrases Tropes and Figures note any obscurity of them III. THe vse of commentaries doe not simply argue the obscurity of the Scriptures but our Infirmity for wee doe not conceyue the doctrine of the Scripture in it selfe perfect after a perfect manner but according to our size or measure by meanes vnperfect and as they speake proportionated IIII. THe doctrines which are propoundeâ— in the Scriptures are three wayeâ— considered first in themselues â—â—condly so farre as they are propoâ—â—ded in the Scriptures thirdly so far 〈◊〉 they are of vs vnderstood the first anâ— third way the Scriptures in some measure are obscure but the second way they are most playne The Places which Bellarmine there doth cite are these Psal 119.18 Ans It is one thing to treate of our Internall and Naturall blindnesse which must be holpen with the Internall Illumination of the eyes of the mind but another thing of the obscurity of the Scripture in it selfe and therfore the consequence from the persons to the doctrine is a consequence of no force Luke 24.32.17 Act. 8.31 24 An. The meanes which serue for the vnderstanding and exposition of the Scripture appertayne not to the Scripture but to our infirmity which is wont and ought to bee holpen by the interpretation of the same 2. Pet. 3.16 Ans Obscurity of thinges in themselues by reason of that Maiesty they haue ought to bee distinguished from the manner of delivering them for obscure matters may bee plainely delivered Neyther is that consequence of force which is from the integral part to the whole because it is one thing that the Scripture is hard and another thing that certaine points in the scriptures are hard OF GOD AND THE Attributes of GOD the Part Confirmatiue CHAP. III. THe second Principle of holy Divinity is GOD The second wee call it not in the order of Nature for nothing is before God but of our better knowledge or vnderstanding because as the Scripture is the first Instrument of every healthfull knowledge concerning God so God is the first and supreme Principle of the being of those things which serue to this knowledge on whom all thinges immediately depend Now concerning God whom to be both nature and reason hath sufficiently taught the naturall man to make him inexcusable as also the Scripture and Faith hath sufficiently taught the Christian man to his salvation Rom. 1.19.20.21 Ioh. 17.3 we must know two things first what hee is to witte his Nature secondly who he is that is his Attributes The Nature of God according to the manner of divine Revelation and measure of our knowledge may and should bee known two wayes the one is of the Name the other of the thing or definition by which two every knowledge touching any thing is wont to bee made playne or perfect Whatsoever is spoken of God certaine it is that that thing is not God which is spoken of him because hee is Ineffable or vnable to be spoken of yet sith a Name is the signification of that thing which might be comprehended as farre as might be divers Names are attributed vnto God in the Scriptures whereby the Nature of God is not so much expressed as that thing which may bee knowne of vs concerning the same And all those are wont to be expressed and declared in a double manner the one Negatiue the other Affirmatiue or Positiue The Negatiue names which are given vnto God as Incomprehensible Infinite remoue farre from him the imperfections of the Creatures Those which are Affirmatiue are eyther vttered Essentially or Relatiuely or by a Metaphor Essentially whether it bee properly such as that proper and Essentiall name of God IEHOVA and others equivalent vnto the same which cannot bee attributed no not Analogically to any Creature or commonly which may indeede be applied to men yet are meet for God both for the manner of excellency as God King good wise c. as also by meane of the cause not depending as Creator Redeemer c. all which are distinguished in God not in respect of the Essence but of the Effects Those which are sayed to bee Relatiue are the names of the persons of which there is no commeation or confusion but are severally proper to the severall persons to witte the Father the Sonne and the holy Ghost These are vtered Metaphorically which are given to God eyther after humane affection or passion as man angrie sleeping or else by a congruency and similitude as a Lyon a Stone a River c. From the consideration of the names of God wee proceede to the explication of the thing or the description of God himselfe Now God is as the Hebrewes most briefly define IEHOVAH ELOHIM b Exod. 6.2 3.13 the Lord God that is one Essence of three persons Of this discription there are two members the one of the Essence and the Vnity of the Essence the other of the Persons and the Trinity of the persons which two can neyther bee separated from the declaration of the divine Nature nor ought to bee confounded in the same for as there is an exceeding great and indivisible vnity of the divine Essence in the plurality of the persons for the Essence of the Father is the Essence of the Sonne and the holy Ghost so is there a reall and different Distinction of the persons in the vnity of Essence for to be the Father is not to be the Sonne or the holy Ghost We discerne the vnity of the Essence two wayes first by the verity of the Essence secondly by the manner of Vnity The Essence is that wherby God both is and existeth by himselfe and of himselfe absolutely for hee alone is that thing which is and who is that is a being not leaning vpon any other The manner of vnity is not of knitting together nor of the generall nor of the speciall nor of consent but of number because there cannot be many Gods This manner of the vnity is proved by three arguments by the testimonies of Scripture both very many and evident even of the olde and new Testament c Deut. 6.4 Esa 44.6 1. Tim. 2.5 1. Cor. 8.4 by beginning which as it is the first so of necessity it ought to be but one for two or more infinite beginnings are not granted by Essentiall perfection which the persons haue in common whole in them all and whole in each one for the whole Godhead is equall in it owne perfection d Ioh. 5.26 Mat. 1.27 Through this Identitie of Essence in the persons or most single and very one vnity Christ is sayed to bee in the Father and the Father in Christ e Iohn 14 10. which thing of the Fathers is called an vnion of the persons This Essence which is one in number and individuall is improperly sayed to bee communicated from one person to another whereas that of the Essence is an Essence of it selfe and in respect of it the three persons in the
we haue more largely treated in the place concerning God The humane Nature of Christ is that whereby hee holdeth the same Essence with vs both the manner of subsisting or being a person and the vitious accidents and sinnes of the substance being excepted For neyther is the humane nature of Christ any thing by it selfe subsisting without dependance but being without subsisting was assumed in the singularnesse of person without any eyther confusion of natures or division of person c Phil. 2.6 Ioh. 1.1 Neyther could any contagion of sinne infect that humane nature of Christ the substance whereof being otherwise in it selfe corrupt originally the vnspeakable operation of the holy Spirite sanctified and most fully purged from every spot nor yet ought to infect as being that wherein the purging of our sinnes was to be performed d Luc. 1.35 Heb. 4.15 These thinges excepted Christ tooke our true and Reall Nature the same both whole and perfect according to the substance properties and infirmities thereof The Substance for Christ had both our whole Nature and the Essentiall parts of it whole Our whole Nature for hence is he called in the Scriptures The seede of the Woman e Gen. 3. 22.16 the seede of Abraham the seede of David according to the flesh or the fruite of his loynes f Act. 2.30 and very where the Sonne of man The Partes for hee had both a reasonable Soule and an Instrumentall body A reasonable Soule this the Scripture and g Ioh. 10.17 Mat. 26.38 the end of his Incarnation prooveth for that which is not assumed is incurable The Verity of Nature because the other partes of man haue their beauty by the Soule An Instrumentall Body this proued the verity of his humane Nature which requireth a limitted matter that is a fleshly and an earthly body h Luc. 22.42 the verity of satisfaction which ought to bee made in a body truly passible mortall Lastly the verity of demonstration for Christ shewed even by signes that hee had a body not phantasticall or heavenly but fleshly and earthly i Luc. 2.40 Mat. 4.2 Ioh. 11.35 Ioh. 4.6 Mat 8.24 Mat. 27.50 Iob. 19.27 The properties which Christ coassumed are eyther of the whole nature to witte to bee created and to bee finite or of the partes as of the Soule for he had vnderstanding k Mat. 26.28 and will l Luc. 22.42 the operations of both and of the body for hee had a shape quantity and circumscription and all the properties and naturall actions of a body m Luc. 2.40 Mat. 4.2 Ioh. 11.35 Ioh. 4.6 Mat. 8.24 Mat. 27.50 Iob. 19.27 Infirmities for it was behouefull for the end of his Incarnation that hee should wholy take vnto him all naturall defects sinne excepted for of defects some are simply miserable as Augustine tearmeth them and some damnable or as Damascene calleth them Detestable those Christ wholy tooke because they were no let to his perfection knowledge and grace n Ioh. 1.14 1. Tim. 3.16 Heb. 5.7 but these hee did not so because they had hindered our Redemption Of these natures the necessity and verity whereof hath beene declared there are divers operations o 1. Pet. 3.18 for there are two natures in Christ as it were two inwarde and effectuall beginninges out of which formally Actions and their manners are deduced wherefore as all thinges in Christ his subsisting onely excepted are two-fold or of two sorts to witte his Nature Properties Will Knowledge p Mat. 11.27 23.37 Ioh. 2.19 1. Cor. 15.27 Luc. 2.47 so are there two-folde operations some divine some humane distinguished by their beginninges manners of doing and the particular Actions of each of them By their beginninges because looke how many Natures there are so many formall beginnings of actions there are By the manners of doing for every beginning worketh according to it owne manner and condition the God-head after a supernaturall and divine manner the man-hoode after a Naturall and Humane manner By particular Actions for the Worde worketh that which is of the Word and the Flesh that which is of the Flesh without any confusion of Natures in the vnity of Person Thus much concerning the Natures the other thing followeth concerning their Subject that is the person and both the vnity and operations thereof Of the Person of Christ there is vsually held and declared a double respect in the Scriptures the one in regarde of the Essence of the Word the other in regard of the office and dispensation In respect of Essence Christ being considered or severally or without commixture as Nazianzene speaketh is in the divine Essence another person from the others but not another thing In respect of the dispensation which wee consider of in this place he is that second person of the God-head Incarnate that is that person who tooke mans Nature by creating it in the singularity of his subsistance immediately and by his person vnited the same with the divine nature mediately so as Christ is one of both Natures not two into both one and the same without time begotten of the Father the Sonne of God without mother and in time begotten of the Virgine the Sonne of man without Father the naturall and consubstantiall Sonne of both This Vnity of Person three things doe proue first the authorities of the Scripture for Christ is as the Prophet teacheth Emanuel r Esa 7. as the Angell teacheth the same Sonne of God which should bee borne of Mary Å¿ Luc. 1.35 as the Evangelist teacheth the Word made flesh t Ioh. 1.1 as the Apostle teacheth the same who came of the Father according to the flesh who is God aboue all things to be praysed for ever u Rom. 9.5 Secondly the end of his Incarnation because that God and man might bee made one in the Covenant It was behoofefull that one should bee made God and man in person not by participation of grace but by verity of nature not by confusion of substance but by vnity of Person Thirdly the denominations of both natures attributed to the same Subject for as those thinges are not incident to the divine nature which are proper to the humane nor those vnto the humane which are peculiar to the divine so all in common and according to truth are vttered of the person according to both Natures x Act. 20.28 1. Cor. 2.8 therefore the one and the same person is Eternal and not Eternall Infinite and Finite holding all the divine and humane properties those from everlasting as he is God these in time assumed as he is man both really yet Intransitiuely as he is man-God This Person is the common beginning of those actions which the Greeke Fathers haue called divinely Humane for the actions of Christ are not onely some humane some divine but also some of common operation which Christ effecteth both as he is Man-God by Nature and as hee is Mediator
workes whereas these are two divers propositions to bee without workes and to iustifie without workes The third Argument is taken from the removal of the Causes whereas Faith alone Iustifieth which causes are of Bellarmine referred to three heades cap. 16. The first is the authority of the word whervnto the Adversary answereth That it is no where taught in the scripture That wee are iustified by faith onely Answ Though the Particle alone be not expressed in the Scripture yet the signification of that word is expressed by Synonimall formes of speaking which are these 1. Without Workes 2. Of Grace freely by Grace 3. The exclusiue Particles which are two particulars Galat 2.16 but by Faith Luc. 8.30 By beleeving onely by which formes of speaking as all works aswell Ceremoniall as Moral are excluded so faith alone is included as the only Instrument of Iustification The second head is the will of God who will haue vs iustified with the alone condition of faith The Adversary answereth that it contradicteth the Scripture which layeth downe also the condition of Repentance Answere 1. Repentance is the condition of faith and of the person justified but not properly of Iustification 2. It is one thing to treate of the condition of Iustification but another thing of the cause and Instrument therof for a condition noteth a consequent or effect but a cause the Antecedent or Efficient 3. Neyther is our Iustification with the condition of Faith as Faith is a habite in vs but as it apprehendeth Christ out of vs. The third is the nature of faith which alone hath that property that it apprehendeth Iustification The Adversary answereth that Faith doth not properly apprehend Answ There is a double apprehensioÌ„ the one of knowledge in the vnderstanding the other of trust in the Will both these Faith includeth which in respect of the vnderstanding and the will apprehendeth Christ but the nature of the Sacramentes is otherwise which were instituted not that they might iustifie but that they might confirme the party iustified in the feeling of his Iustification The fourth Argument is from the maner of Iustifying for we affirme that faith Iustifieth not by the maner of cause worthinesse or merite but by relation onely which Bellarmine denyeth and proveth by three arguments that faith iustifieth by the manner of merite and cause cap. 13. The first is taken from testimonies which teach that faith is the cause of iustification Rom. 3. Rom. 5. Ephes 1. Answer First for Faith is one thing and by Faith is another thing The one is of the cause the other of the Instrument Secondly neyther is the maner of works the same with that of faith in opposition because workes haue the nature of righteousnesse inherent in vs but faith the nature of righteousnesse imputed vnto vs. Thirdly nor doe the places which are alleadged note the cause of Iustification but eyther the Instrument thereof or the quality and state of a man iustified The second is taken from those testimonies which testifie that faith is the beginning of righteousnesse and hereby the formall cause of Iustification Rom. 4. First there is a two-fold imputation as in that very place the Apostle noteth the one of debt the other of grace and the Apostle treaâ—eth of this and not of that Secondly â—â—th Faith is the instrumeÌ„t it is no strange â—hing if as it is vsually the manner of â—nstruments the name and the office of the thing whereof it is but the Instrument bee attributed vnto it 1. Cor. 3. First A foundation is vsually considered two wayes properly or by a Metalepsis properly Christ is so but by a Metalepsis Faith which hath respect to Christ For distinctions sake the one may bee called i Primum ad primuÌ„ the first the other to the first Secondly a foundation is eyther vnderstoode to bee as a part of a building or a ground of a building Christ and Faith are sayd to be the foundation of the Church not properly as they are a part thereof but as they are the Ground and Base of the same Act. 15. First the hearts are justified by faith not as the cause but as the Instrument not by effecting but by affecting or applying Secondly the place it selfe doth manifestly distinguish Faith which is onely the inner instrumeÌ„tal cause from the cause properly Efficient to witte the Father in the Sonne by the holy Ghost The third is taken from those Testimonies which teach that Remission of sinnes is obtayned by Faith Luke 7. Ans First men are sayde to bee saved both properly of God our onely Saviour and figuratiuely by the meanes which it hath pleased God to vse eyther inward as faith or outward as the voyce of the Gospell and the signes thereof Secondly the efficacy of faith wholy dependeth vpon the object which it apprehendeth and it is sayde to saue for that it is the effectuall and necessary Instrument of Salvation like as the Gospell is called the power to every one that beleeveth vnto salvation Rom. 4. Ans First The Particle wherefore noteth not the cause of the Consequent but of the Consequence Secondly it is there shewed not what the habite of faith deserveth sith faith and merites are opposites but what is the vse and effect of true naturall faith Rom. 10. Answ First the Apostle doth neyther make preaching the cause of faith nor faith the cause of invocation and salvation but teacheth that as that is the Instrument of the one so this is of the other SecoÌ„dly the degrees of Salvation are reckoned vppe by the Apostle which are badly confounded with the causes thereof Thirdly those things which Faith obtayneth by Invocation it obtayneth as an Instrument and not as a Cause because all the power of Faith consisteth in Relation Heb. 11. Ans First men please God by faith not for faith Secondly whatsoever examples are cited they note not the merite of Faith but the vse and effect thereof The Fift Argument is fee from two principles the first whereof is the Formal Cause of Iustification which the Adversary affirmeth to bee righteousnesse inherent in vs The second is the merite and necessity of good workes Of the former wee shall treate in the explication of the Formall Cause of the latter in the place concerning good workes DISTINCTIONS IN DEfence of the Materiall Cause I. THere is one Iustice Create and another Increate the one is of God of Christ as hee is God the other of the Creature and of Christ as hee is a creature II. THe Create righteousnesse is eyther of the Person or of the cause by that some person is judged just by this a righteousnesse of the Cause of some controversie is vnderstoode the righteousnesse of the Person to speake properly is in Christ III. OF the person there is one inherent another Imputatiue that was in Christ this is in vs by the worke of the Spirite for Christ IIII. INherent righteousnesse is eyther originall or habituall or else
actuall both of these were in Christ yet properly he imputeth this onely V. ACtuall righteousnesse is eyther perfect or imperfect this is in vs that in Christ VI. PErfect actual righteousnesse of Christ consisteth in a double obedience whereof the one is called the obedience of the Law the other obedience vnto death VII THe obedience of the law which is truely and properly the effect of the person being the mediator neyther ought nor can bee called eyther a part making the person or a quality pertayning to the making of that person VIII THe places of Scripture which treat of Christes death are not to bee taken exclusiuely or oppositely but figuratiuely or Synecdochically for the last accomplishment of the whole obedience DISTINCTIONS in defence of the Formall Cause The Arguments which Bellarmine bringeth against the truth of this cause are of two sorts for first hee endeavoureth to proue by certaine reasons that our inherent righteousnesse is the formall cause of our righteousnesse Secondly he impugneth the imputation of Christs righteousnesse The first he endeauoureth to perform by 8. Testimonies Cap. 3. Lib. 2. De Iustificatione The first is in Rom. 5. Of which wee haue treated in the explication of those places which were alleadged against the true nature of the name or word The second is in Rom. 3. Answ First the Grace of God is taken in Scripture aequivocally First for the free and eternall favour of God wherby hee made vs acceptable to him selfe in his beloved Sonne and this is the Grace that maketh acceptable Secondly for the giftes by Grace whether outward or inward whether generall or particula and that in the place cited it is taken in that signification and not in this three thinges doe proue First because the Apostle excludeth the righteousnesse of the law which is of works to the end hee might establish the righteousnesse of faith the causes whereof hee reckoneth vp Secondly because what hee called freely hee expounded by grace that not onely the workes that goe before but also those that follow after faith might bee excluded Thirdly because the Apostle opposeth the very same Grace cap. 4.2.4 against Abrahams works howsoever proceeding from the renuing of the Spirite Secondly neyther in deed doth the conjoyning of those two words Freely and by Grace sith the one expoundeth the other according to the Scripturall Phrase of speaking nor doth the force of the Preposition by which is not found in the originall Text and very often in the Scripture noteth the efficient nor doth the Efficacy of Gods grace the effect whereof ought necessarily to be distinguished from the Cause nor lastly doth it because loue in Scripture is called any Grace whereas both the loue of God towards vs is a grace making acceptable and ours towardes God is a grace freely given any way infringe that interpretation The third 1. Cor. 6. To this wee haue aboue answered The fourth Titus 3. Answ First the Effect is badly confounded with the cause to witte Iustification with Regeneration and Renovation for the matter of that is the righteousnesse of Christ but of this our Inherent righteousnesse Secondly neyther doth the Apostle call Renovation Iustification sith hee expresly distinguisheth the one from the other Thirdly the Apostle sheweth not the cause but the vse of Renovation or good workes when he sayeth that being justified by the grace of God wee might bee heyres according to the hope of everlasting life The fift Heb. 11 Ans First there is a two-folde righteousnesse Imputed and Inherent by both they are called Iust or righteous but after a divers manner by that by way of Relation and perfectly before God by this Inchoatiuely Subjectiuely and vnperfectly Secondly the perfection which is ascribed vnto the faithfull in the Scripture hath a three-fold respect the first of Gods councell from everlasting Secondly of the foundation in Christ lastly eyther of comparison and opposition vnto other mēs vnrighteousnes or of the end or tearme of perfection vnto which it tendeth besides these respects there is no perfection of the faithfull in this world Thirdly the nearest cause in deede of a righteous worke is inherent righteousnesse but the chiefe and principall cause is the Spirit of Christ imputing his righteousnes to vs and by the power of that imputed righteousnesse working this inherent righteousnesse in vs. The Sixt Rom. 8. 1. Cor. 15. Ans first our Conformity with the Image of Christ whereof mention is made in the Scripture is threefold the one vnto the image of glory being opposite to that which is vnto the image of Christs afflictions And of this the Apostle treateth in the cited places The second vnto the image of Christs obedience which in deede in this world we performe vnperfectly but Christ applyeth the same to vs as perfectly performed for vs. The third is of the death buriall and resurrection of Christ Secondly of Christs righteousnesse there is a double vse the one principall of satisfaction and merite the other exemplary and of document as touching satisfaction Christs righteousnesse is imputed to vs as touching example it is the rule of our inherent righteousnesse Thirdly the opposition which is made betweene the image of the first Adam and the second according to the sense of the Apostle in both places hath respect vnto the mortality and immortality the earthly and heavenly qualities of the body not properly vnto sinne and Christs imputed righteousnesse The seaventh Rom. 6. Ans The word Iustification is taken two wayes properly and improperly Properly when wee are sayde to bee justified by the cause Improperly when wee are sayde to bee justified by the effects Secondly the Apostle treateth of our Sanctification and the two parts therof the mortifying of the old man and the quickning of the new of both which partes hee giues vs an example in the death and resurrection of Christ Thirdl◠to bee justified signifieth to bee freede according to the proper phrase of the Hebrewes who comprehend the Consequent with the Antecedent The eight Rom 8. Answere First the degrees of our Salvation Adoption and Iustification are badly confounded together Secondly of Adoption there are two considerations the one according to the truth and foundation thereof in the eternall counsell of our Election the other according to the fruition and accomplishment thereof in the other life In that signification Adoption goeth before Iustification but in thi Adoption is the bound and end of Iustification Thirdly it is one thing to call Iustification Putatiue and another Imputatiue that as being false is falsely also faigned vnto vs this is no lesse true then if we our selues had it subiectiuely because of the truths sake both of Gods promise and our coniunction with Christ That the FORMAL CAVSE of our Iustification is not the Imputation of Christs righteousnesse Bellarmine proveth by ten Arguments Cap. 7. Lib. 2. de Iustificatione To the FIRST IT is false for whereas there are two sorts of testimonies some expressed and some by
for some are Principall Antecedent some Secondary and Consequent whereof those properly respect our Faith before God but these our confession before Men. After the first manner the end of baptisme is to signifie seale and exhibite Sacramentally the Remission of sinnes the benefite of Regeneration and our vnion with Christ The Remission of sinnes for albeit sinne by reason of the state of Nature abide as touching the disease or roote of sinne and the very matter yet it is taken away by reason of the state of the person as touching the guilt or forme which is not imputed to the faithfull Hence it is that Baptisme is sayde to bee given for the remission of sinnes f Act. 2.38 22.26 The benefite of Regeneration because we being ingraffed into Christ by baptisme are changed into his nature and are made partakers of his divine Nature for which cause it is called the Laver of Regeneration g Tit. 3.5.6 Our Vnion with Christ for hence it is that wee are sayde to be Baptized into Christ h Ga. 3.27 and into the Name of Christ i Mat. 28.19 1. Cor. 12 13. by baptisme to be buried with Christ and to be baptized into his death and resurrection k Rom. 6.3.4 After the Latter manner the end of baptisme is first that it may bee a Testimony of our godlinesse and obedience vnto God with Thanksgiving l Ioh. 4.1 Act. 2.41 Secondly that it may bee a badge discerning the Church together with her members frō prophane Nations Thirdly that it may bee the bond of the communion of the Church and their mutuall loue who are dipped in the same Lavar From this consideration of the causes two Consequents are drawn the one of the Necessity the other of the Effect and Efficacy of Baptisme The Necessity two thinges doe circumscribe or limite The Institution of God and the Condition of him that is to be baptized The Scope of Gods Institution is not to tie eyther the things signified to the Signes or the men to the Sacraments by an absolute necessity forasmuch as God by an immediate and extraordinary action when he will and on whome he will conferreth the thing signified neyther can the simple want but the contempt of the Sacrament be hurtfull which doth befall neyther vnto all Infants nor all them that are of ripe yeares but according to the liberty of his will it may seale the things signified in them who both can and should receyue the vse of the signes They that are to be baptized are persons of yeares and Infants to a person of yeares Baptisme is necessary vnto Salvation two wayes eyther by Desire and Will if liberty be not granted him to take the Layer of water or really and in very deed if liberty bee granted For faith hath alwayes joyned with it the desire of obedience To an Infant Baptisme is necessary not simply for the Invisible but after a sort for the visible ingraffing of him into Christ and the body of the Church which if the point of necessity doe bar him from that invisibly is fulfilled with out baptisme which otherwise is shewed in the visible baptisme The Effects of baptisme are not either the doing away of all guilt and punishmen or the conferring of grace by the worke done or lastly an impression of a marke that cannot bee raced out but they are the same with those which are the ends thereof aboue expounded The Efficacy of all which Effects is not ascribed to the outwarde baptisme or the Elements of water but to the bloud of Christ and the inward baptisme of the Spirit which by a hidden operation conferreth that invisible Grace which is signified in the outward Baptisme OF BAPTISME The Part Confuting I. THe Word Baptisme is taken two wayes in the Scriptures Properly and Figuratiuely Properly it signifieth two things first a dipping into the water secondly any simple washing or cleansing and in this signification by an excellency the first Sacrament of the New Testament is called Baptisme Figuratiuely it importeth foure things eyther by an Allegory the deluge of the waters the passing through the Sea and the abiding vnder the cloud or by a Metaphor the crosse or every extreame affliction or by a Metalepsis the powring out of the giftes of the Spirite or lastly by a Synechdoche the whole doctrine of Iohn and his whole Ministery II. BAptisme in kinde is but one but in the manner of considering it is two-fold Outward and Inward that is of the Water this of the Spirite and bloud which three because indeed they are the parts of the whole Baptisme from each one every of the three kindes of Baptisme doe spring to witte the Baptisme of Water Inspiration and bloud In Defence of the Efficient Cause or the Minister baptizing and first that the baptisme of Iohn Baptist and the rest of the Ministers was one and the selfe same against Bellarmine Lib. 1. de Sacra Bapt. Cap. 20.21.22 THe DISTINCTIONS I. THat baptisme cannot bee sayde to haue beene instituted of Iohn himselfe which the Scripture teacheth to haue beene a baptisme administred by Gods commaundement Luc. 3.2.3 To be from Heaven Mat. 21.25 and which the Pharisies refusing are sayd to haue despised the counsell of God Luc. 7 30.15 but in that it is called the baptisme of Iohn it distinguisheth between the Ministery of Iohn himselfe and the mastership of authority of Christ II. THe Invocation of the Trinity is expressed in the Scriptures eyther according to the very formall words or according to the sence and truth albeit those wordes be not expressed in the administration of Iohns baptisme yet the consequence of diverse Arguments doe aboundantly proue the sence truth of the Invocation for therefore is Iohn sayd to haue baptized into Christ Act. 19.4 and to haue preached the baptisme of Repentance for the Remission of sinnes Mar. 1.3 III. THe time of the Institution of baptisme ought not to bee reckoned since Christs resurrectiō from the dead or since his baptisme in Iordan but since the time of his manifestation in the flesh from which the time of the New Testament ordinarily taketh his beginning IIII. THe difference of baptisme is one Essentiall the other Accidentall That according to the substance and effect This acording to the circumstance and manner of Christs manifestation but there are two causes why he would distinguish betweene his baptisme and Christs the first that hee might note the difference betweene the outwarde Baptisme of Water and the Inwarde Baptisme of the Spirite the other that hee might distinguish between his owne person and office and betweene the person and office of Christ Adde further that the Baptisme of the spirite is taken for the visible gift of miracles powred out on the Apostles according as the conferring of places m Parallelorum the one with the other teacheth Act. 1.5 11.16 but in that it is spoken in the future tense it is an Enallage or change
taking the spirituall sealing within vs both of Christ himselfe and of his benefites by the Instrument of faith is declared The Eating and Drinking is an outward and sacramentall vse and taking of the signes according to Christes Prescription whereby the inward and spirituall eating and drinking of his body and bloud is sealed by divine ordinance for as first there are two persons administring the Supper the one of the Pastor doing that which is done outwardly and openly the other of Christ effecting by his Spirit that which is done inwardly Secondly as the whole Action of the Lords Supper consisteth in two things the one an earthly bodilie perceyuable for the senses the other heavenly spirituall and intelligible for the vnderstanding of the faithfull Thirdly as there are two partes of man the one the body the other the soule so there are two givings and eatings the one outward which is called Sacramentall the other inward which is tearmed Spirituall yet that was instituted of Christ that it might bee a certaine expresse shape or Image of this The wordes Definitiue and Sacramentall are those which declare the inward matter or thing signified and vtter the same whether it bee of the bread or of the cuppe sacramentally of the bread as This is my body which for you is delivered and broken f Luc. 22.19 but of the cuppe This is my bloud which is shed for many g Mat. 26.28 Both expositions are wont two waies to be considered eyther in each words apart and by themselues considered or in the whole exposition together Being considered apart they note eyther the Subject or the Attributes or the Copula The Subject is the Pronoune demonstratiue this not adjectiuely but substantiuely taken for it doth not signifie h Individuum vagum any singular thing but the verie bread which Christ Tooke Brake and Gaue to his Disciples and the Wine which he held in his hands according as the order of the Text i Mat. 26 26.27 the interpretation of Paul k 1 Cor. 11.24.25 and the Analogy of Faith doe demonstrate The Attribute in the first proposition is the Body of Christ not the mysticall which is the church but the proper and the true which for vs is given and broken and that as it was such a body In the second is the bloude of Christ which for vs is shedde and even that as it was such a bloud according as the other member of these Attributes which is pronounced by an Enallage of the present tense for the future Tense dooth most evidently proue The Copula whereby the Attribute is knit with the Subject is the Verbe Substantiue IS which ought not nor may bee taken Substantially wheras by no meanes at all the vnlike cannot properly and Essentially be affirmed of his vnlike but figuratiuely for a mysticall and Sacramentall Being whereby the thing which signifyeth taketh the name of that thing which it signifyeth because of the Analogy of the one with the other for by that litle word Christ taught not what the bread and wine were by nature or substance but what they were by signification office and vse for by nature they are bread and wine by signification they are the body and bloud of Christ The whole Attribution or Predication is not proper or regular whereas neyther the proposition is Identicall nor the body of Christ can properly be affirmed of the bread to witte wheras the Body of Christ is neyther the Generall nor the Speciall nor the difference nor the property nor the accident of bread but it is Figuratiue and Sacramentall Figuratiue not simply Metaphoricall and Allegoricall but Metonymycall to witte such whereby the name of the thing signified is given to the Signe which Metonymycall speaking is very familiar in the Scriptures Sacramentall because the exhibiting of the thing signified is withall promised and yet there is no swerving from the word spoken or pronounced wheras wee retaine the word spoken being Sacramentall which is altogether different from regular Predications and to bee expounded with an interpretation aunswerable to the nature of Sacraments The Expositiue wordes are these by which Christ expounded or layde open the end of this holy action to witte l 1. Cor. 11 16. the remembrance of his death which is not a naked or idle remembrance of a thing past but an effectuall and healthfull apprehension of Christs merites and an explication of the same privately with our selues or properly vnto our selues and withall a solemne Eucharisticall Thanksgiving in the vse of this Sacrament for so great a benefite and this is the manner of the Efficient Cause being principall or that which instituteth the Supper and of the Institution it selfe The Cause Efficient Administring or Instrumentall are the Ministers of the Church called by lawfull ordination by whome God as by active instruments offereth and representeth vs those things outwardly by the signes of breade and wine which by the inward operation of the holy Ghost hee effecteth in vs. Of these Instruments if you respect the Office it is to administer the Lords Supper with those rites of dispensing them in the very which Christ went before by his owne example If the Quality so they lawfully execute their office in the preaching of the Word the administration of the Sacraments it nothing addeth to or detracteth from the efficacy of a Sacrament sith the authoritie of Sacraments if they bee considered in themselues dependeth not vpon the qualitie of the Minister but vpon the Institution verity and power of Christ The Matter of the Lords Supper is two wayes vsually considered eyther as that which partaketh the Supper or as that which constituteth the Supper whereof the one hath the manner of the Subject the other of the partes The Matter or Subiect partaking the Supper are all they who being by Baptisme made the members of the Church and now being of yeares professe sound doctrine and haue the testimony of a holy life m 1. Cor. 11.20 12.13 From the circumscription of this Subiect are excluded first the dead or they that are departed this life from whome both the power of vsing the Sacrament is taken away and vnto whome all the vse thereof is in vaine ineffectuall as also the vse of the preaching of the Gospell whereof the Sacraments are appendents Secondly the Sicke like to die for Christ would haue this communion not to bee private and domesticall but ecclesiasticall and publicke neyther doth the want but the contempt of the same hurt the partie that doth not communicate though peradventure there bee another respect to bee had concerning them that haue slipped and that are Excommunicated out of the church and concerning prisoners who are to bee punished and are now penitent Thirdly Children and Infants for to speake properly the Supper is meat for the stronger and the further grown in yeares and not for Infants neyther can they yeeld a reason of their Faith nor examine themselues