Pope verie sharplie both of pride and ignorance read the third chapter and last conclusion The 6. Preamble ALl the Apostles had not onely the same povver and auctoritie but iurisdiction also as vvholly largely effectually and in all respectes as Peter had Read the sixt chapter and first conclusion The 7. Preamble POpish purgatorie vvas invented by Popes and Popish parasites neither vvas it ever admitted liked or beleeved of the greeke church vntil this day Read the 7. chapter and 2. conclusion and here I vvill alleage the verie vvordes of our Roffensis sometime bishop of Rochester a man so renovvmed not in England onely but through out the vvorld amongst papists as his vvords may carie credit sufficient vvith them thus he vvriteth I vvil not alter or change one vvord Sed graecis adhunc vsque diē non est creditū purgatoriū esse legat qui velit Graecorum veterum commentarios nullum quantum opinor aut quam rarissimum de purgatorio sermonem inveniet sedneque latini simul omnes ac sensim huius rei veritatem conceperunt paulo post nō absque maxima sancti spiritus dispensatione factum est quod post tot annorum curricula purgatorij fides indulgentiarum vsus ab Orthodoxis generatim sit receptus quumdiis nulla fuer at de purgatorio cura nemo quaesivit indulgentias nam ex illo pendet omnis indulgentiarum existimatio si tollas purgatorium quorsum indulgentijs opus erit his enim si nullum fuerit purgatorium nihil indigebimus contemplantes igitur aliquandiu purgatorium incognitum fuisse deinde quibusdam pedetentim partim ex revelationibus partim ex scripturis fuisse creditum atque ita tandem generatim eius fidem ab orthodoxa ecclesia fuisse receptissimam facillime rationem aliquam indulgentiarum intelligimus quum itaque purgatorium tam sero cognitum ac receptum ecclesiae fuerit vniversae quis iam de indulgentijs mirari potest quod in principio nascentis ecclesiae nullus fuerat earum vsus caeperunt igitur indulgentiae postquam ad purgatorij cruciatus aliquandiu trepidatum er at The Greekes to this day do not beleeue that there is a purgatorie read vvho vvil the commentaries of the auncient Grecians and he shal find either verie seldome mention of purgatorie or none at all for neither did the Latine Church conceive the veritie of this matter at one time but by leisure neither vvas it done vvithout the great dispensation of the holy ghost that after so manie yeares Catholikes both beleeved purgatorie and received the vse of pardons generallie so long as there vvas no care of purgatorie no mā sought for pardons for of it dependeth all the estimation that vve have of pardons if thou take avvay purgatorie to vvhat end shall vve neede pardons for if their be no purgatorie vve shall neede no pardons considering therfore hovv long purgatorie vvas vnknown then that it vvas beleeved of some by litle and litle partly by revelations and partly by the Scriptures and so at the last beleeved generally of the vvhole church vve do easilie vnderstand the cause of perdons since therefore purgatorie vvas so lately knovven and received of the vniversal church vvho can novv admire pardons that there vvas no vse of them in the primitiue Church pardons therefore began after the people stood in some feare of purgatory these are the vvords of this popish bishop vvhich vvordes if they be vvel marked vvith all the circumstances are able vvithout more adoe to persvvade anie man to detest the Romish religion for vvhich cause I have alleaged them at large 1 First therefore vvee learne here that the greeke church never beleeved purgatorie to this day 2 Secondly that the Latine church and church of Rome did not beleeve the said purgatorie for manie hundreds of yeares after S. Peters death vvhose successor the pope boasteth himself to be 3 Thirdlie that this purgatorie vvas not beleeved of all the latine church at one and the same time but by litle and litle vvhere note by the vvay that poperie crept into the church by litle and litle not all at one time vvhich is a point that galleth the papistes more then a litle I vveene 4 Fourthly that purgatorie vvas beleeved in the latter daies by speciall revelation of the holie ghost 5 Fiftlie that pardons came not vp till purgatorie vvas found out for in purgatorie resteth the life of pardons as vvhich there being no purgatorie are not worth a straw 6 Sixtly that purgatorie vvas a long time vnknovven 7 Seventhly that purgatorie could not be found in the scriptures of a long time 8 Eightlie that it vvas not vvholie found out by the scriptures but partlie by revelations 9 Ninthly that pardons vvere not heard of or knovven to the primitive church 10 Tenthly that then pardons began when men began to feare the paines of purgatorie Behold novv gentle reader vvhat a vvorthie fisher vvas my popish Lord of Rochester hee hath caught vvith his net at one draughtten goodly fishes that is to say ten vvorthy observations for Christian aedification Further then this out of the seventh and eight observations I gather three special documents by a necessarie and irrefragable consecution First that the second booke of the Machabees is not Canonical or penned by the holie ghost For if that booke vvere of canonicall authoritie vvhich the papistes purgatorie could not but haue bene knovven so soon as that booke vvas knovvn vvhich yet Roffensis denieth The reason is evidēt because purgatorie is verie effectuallie plainlie conteined therin Secondlie that the Church of Rome for of that church speaketh the Bishop reputeth the vvorkes of God vnperfect albeit Moyses avoucheth the contrarie Dei inquit perfecta sunt opera The vvorkes of God saith he are perfect I prooue this because as the Bishop saith the scriptures made purgatorie knovven to the church but vnperfectlie yet the truth is that if God make purgatorie knovven by the scriptures then purgatorie is made knovven perfectlie by them or else Gods vvorks that is the holie scriptures must be vnperfect but I vvil rather beleeue Moyses the holie prophet of God then my lord our fisher though the popes canonized martir Thirdlie this Bishop for this his doctrine must either come againe to retract his opinion or else wil he nil he condemne the pope and church of Rome This I wil proove by a most plaine and evident demonstration For the better vnderstanding vvherof I shal desire the gentle reader to observe three thinges vvith me First that the church of Rome preacheth novv and did in this Bishops time that the bookes of Machabees are canonicall scripture and penned by the holie ghost Secondlie that the church of Rome neither beleeued nor knevv purgatorie for manie years together after the receite of holie scripture and these bookes of Machabees Thirdlie that purgatorie is effectuallie and plainely conteined in the second booke of Machabees by popish
estimation in that their Latine vulgata edition vvhich their tridentine councell hath most straitlie charged all chistendome to observe as all papistes now a daies repute the same a stable bulwarke for their purgatorie the wordes are these sancta ergo salubris est cogitatio pro defunctis exorare vt à peccatis solvantur it is therefore a good and godlie consideration to pray for the dead that they may bee cleansed from their sinnes these wordes are so plaine and so easie as not onelie the vvhole church but my lord Bishop yea and euerie scholer that but meanlie knoweth the latine tongue must needes vnderstand the same And consequentlie must needes knovv purgatorie by them if hee can vse anie discourse at all as my lord of Rochester could doe right well vpon these observations then I inferre first that the church of Rome not knowing purgatorie for manie yeares after she had received the scriptures in which purgatorie was so plainlie and effectuallie conteined as they now graunt did not repute the bookes of Machabees for canonicall scriptures and consequentlie did not beleeue purgatorie mentioned therein For this indeed is most true of the old and good church of Rome as Roffensis hath proved against his vvill I inferre secondlie that the church of God never had or can haue other scriptures or other faith then the apostles had and beleeved in their time For the latter church neuer had nor ever shall haue authoritie to coine anie new scriptures or nevv faith The church of Rome therefore taught most wicked doctrine in my L. Bishops time vvhich he well perceiued and acknowledged in his ovvne conscience or els was in that point infatuated become a verie foole according to this saying of the Gospel Confiteor tibi pater domine coeli terrae quia abscondisti haec à sapientibus prudentibus revelasti ea parvulis I giue thee thankes O Father Lord of heaven and earth because thou hast hid these things from the wise and men of vnderstanding and reuealed them vnto babes The 8. Preamble ALbeit the papistes doe reproue others bitterlie when they reiect some authotities though vpon important and grounded reasons yet themselves with all libertie reiect contemne authorities at their pleasures They reiect the fourth booke of Esaias as Bellarminus confesseth They reiect the last clause of the Lords praier as Arius Montanus witnesseth They reiect the 65. canon of the Apostles as graunteth Bellarminus in these wordes Respondeo canonem istum supposititium videri solum n. quinquaginta canones apostolorum ecclesia recipit I answere that this canon is a counterfaite for the church of Rome receiveth onelie 50. canons of the apostles Marke gentle reader that this canon reproveth the practise of the Church of Rome and so the church si dijs placet will not receiue it They reiect the sixt generall councell because forsooth it prescribeth limits to the bishop of Rome and denieth his vsurped iurisdiction That they reiect this solemne and vniuersall councel Bellarminus auoucheth stoutlie but pope Adrian reputed a most graue vvriter by the learned papists received and reverenced the said councell for these are his vvords cited in their ovvne canon lavve Sextam synodum sanctā cum om nibus canonibus suis recipio I receiue the sixt holie synode vvith all the canons thereof Loe the Pope himselfe and their ovvne canon lavv confirme this councel to be of good autoritie Reade the next chapter in the said canon lavy for there is large matter vttered for the approbation of the same They reiect that part of the councell of Constance vvhich Pope Martin vvould not allovv And vvhy vvould not hee allovv that part as vvell as he approued the other parts because for sooth it denieth the Popes authoritie to be aboue the councel but because I vvill not rip vp popish licentious libertie to the bottome I vvill rest vvith recitall of that onelie libertie vvhich Bellarminus vseth in defense of popish masse these are his vvordes Porro epistolae duae quae circumferuntur de hac re Damasi ad Hieronymum Hieronymi ad Damasum supposititiae sunt Furthermore the tvvo epistles vvhich are carried about of Damasus to Hierome and of Hierome to Damasus are counterfaite But the absurdest Epistles Canons and vvritinges that euer vvere or can be are verie authentical vvith them and most currant so they make for our holie father the pope his vsurped iurisdiction For proofe of this point I vvil content my selfe vvith tvvo examples for brevitie sake For by them and the disproofe thereof the reader may haue a sufficient coniecture of the rest The former example is taken out of S. Clements epistle to S. Iames. in this and the other epistles follovving put forth in the name of S. Clement is commended vnto vs auricular confession the sacrifice of the masse the subiection of kinges to bishops the primacie of S. Peter and such like for vvhich respectes the said epistles are currant and authenticall amongst the papistes but magna est veritas praevalet great is the truth and it preuaileth for the verie vvordes of the epistle betray and bevvray the same and make it manifest vnto all the world that it is a counterfait These therefore are the vvordes Clemens Iacobo domino episcopo episcoporum regenti Hebraeorum sanctam ecclesiam Hirosolymis sed omnes ecclesias quae vbique Dei providētia fundatae sunt cum patribus diaconibus caeteris omnibus patribus pax tibi sit semper Clement to lord Iames the bishop of bishops that governeth the holy church of the Hebrevves at Hierusalem as also that governeth all churches founded by Gods providēce throughout the vvorld vvith the fathers and deacons and all other fathers peace be to thee alvvaie Novv gentle reader thou hast heard the vvords and so beholdest no doubt the vanitie thereof for if S. Iames vvere not only bishop of Hierusalem but the bishop of bishops and the governor of all Churches in the christian vvorld as this epistle affirmeth then doubtles vvas S. Iames the pope and supreme head of the church not S. Peter and yet doth the selfe same epistle avouch that S. Peter vvas the head of the church and that S. Peter lying sicke in his bed called S. Clement vnto him and told him that his houre of death vvas at hand and that therefore he appointed the said Clement to be his successour and to sit in his chaire at Rome But S. Iames succeeded Christ himselfe at Hierusalem vvho vvas indeede the head of holie Church and therefore S. Iames should rather be Pope then S. Clement if there vvere indeed anie such pope at all the latter example is taken out of that vvorke vvhich is fathered vpon S. Augustine of true and false repentance vvhich booke because it seemeth to approove confession of sinnes to priests is good and authenticall vvith papistes but as God vvould haue it the selfe
his written disputations abridged by Robert Persons his brother Iesuite defendeth and approoveth another opinion plaine opposite to all yet rehearsed and maketh in deede the Popes pardons not woorth a button which is the cause as I probably coniecture that the third and last part of his disputations is not permitted as yet to come abroade and either will never be published or wholly omitted or at least changed before it come abroad The Councell of Trent speaketh very slenderly and coldly of the Popes pardons The third Conclusion TO give pardons as the Pope doeth is a straunge and newe doctrine of a most damnable Religion which neither Christ nor his Apostles ever taught or practised This I will proove as I doe other things by the expresse testimonies of the Popes owne renowmed Doctors that so all the worlde may perceive and beholde Papistrie confuted and confounded by papistrie it selfe Sylvester reputed and as it were surnamed absolutus Theologus hath these verie wordes Indulgentia nobis per Scripturam minimè innotuit licet inducatur illud Apostoli si quid donavi vobis sednec per dicta antiquorum Doctorum sed modernorum The Popes pardons saith the Popes owne deare Doctor were never knowen to us by the Scriptures although some alleadge Saint Paul for that purpose neither were they knowen by the auncient Fathers but onely by late writers Antoninus in his first part hath the verie wordes alreadie cited and holdeth the selfe same opinion with fryer Sylvester Petrus Lombardus who with great diligence collected into one volume all worthie sentences of the auncient fathers and therefore was surnamed the Master of sentences maketh no mention of the Popes pardons at all as which he could not finde notwithstanding his painefull industrie imployed in that kinde of exercise For as Sylvester truly writeth the olde writers were not acquainted with any such thing The like may be said of S Cyprian S. Augustine S. Hierome Nazianzene and others of antiquitie for which cause Durand Caietain and sundrie other schoolemen affirme the popes manner of pardoning to be a newe thing in the Church of God Neither can Dominicus Soto deny the same indeede albeit he busieth him selfe more then a little in the Popes defence if it would be Yea the originall of popish pardoning is so very young as their famous martyr and bishop M. Fisher in his aunswere to M. Luthers articles was enforced to admit the newnesse and young age of the same and to yeeld this reason in defence thereof to wit that purgatorie was not so well knowne at that time to the Church as it is nowe which saying I weene is true indeede because purgatorie and pardous were not heard of in olde time and nowe onely knowen by vaine grosse and sensuall imaginations O worthie pardons O brave purgatorie O holy pope of Rome what stronge reasons what forcible arguments what grave authorities are alleadged in your behalfe Let us heare with attention the finall resolution hereof set down by Sylvester and Antoninus for their holy father the pope Quia inquiunt Ecclesia hoc facit servat credendum est ita esse Because the Church this doeth and thus observeth we must beleeve that it is so Loe a short and sweete conclusion as if they should say though we can proove the popes pardons neither by Scriptures nor by fathers nor by reasons yet must we beleeve them because the Church that is the pope saith so who can not erre which saying gentle Reader both hath bene and is the sole and onely foundation of all notorious Papistry The 4. Conclusion THE Popes manner of pardoning argueth aswell inordinate affection of filthie lucre as also want of charitie His want of charitie is prooved and convinced in that he can deliver as his religion teacheth all soules out of purgatorie with his word and neverthelesse suffereth them to abide most bitter torments so many yeeres in that affliction For the papistes holde that the paines of purgatorie are as great and painefull as be the torments of hell and that they differ accidentally in this only because the paines of purgatorie shall once have an ende but the paines of hell never Thus writeth Sylvester Prieras Sicut potest Papa liberare à poena peccatorum debita in hoc mundo omnes qui sunt in mundo si faciant quod mandat etiamsi essent millies plures quà m sunt it a liberare potest omnes qui sunt in purgatorio siquis pro eis faciat quod iubet As the Pope can deliver al in this world from paine due for sinne in this world if they doe that which he appointeth though they were thousands more then they be even so can he deliver all that are in purgatorie if any doe that for them which he commandeth and lest any man should thinke that impossible or a verie difficult matter which the Pope requireth to be done Sylvester in another place telleth us that it is a thing most easie These be his wordes Indulgentiae simplicitèr tantum valent quantum praedicantur modò exparte dantis sit autoritas ex parte recipientis charitas ex parte causae pietas Pardons are simply worth so much as they are preached so there be autoritie in the giver charity in the receiver piety in the cause or motive But so it is that the souls in purgatory be in charity by popish confession for else they could not be out of hel and that the pope hath authoritie as also that he graunteth his Pardons for good and godly causes I suppose no Papist will denie if they doe my argument is the stronger and my selfe shall easily agree there to Bartholomaeus Fumus confirmeth this point when he thus writeth Papa posset liberare omnes animas Purgatorij etiamsiplures essent si quis pro eis faceret quod iuberet peccaret tamen indiscretè concedendo The Pope could set at libertie all the soules of Purgatorie though never so many if any would doe that for them which he appointed marrie he should sinne by his undiscreete pardoning And the popish schole-doctor Viguerius proceedeth further and avowcheth it to be neither inconvenient nor against the justice of God these are his expresse wordes Nec est inconveniens quòd Papa Purgatorium posset evacuare non enim per hoc aliquid detraheretur Divinae iustitiae Neither is it inconvenient that the Pope can harrowe hell for that doeth nothing derogate from the iustice of God Nowe to say that he can this doe but yet doeth it not to keepe him selfe from sinne is altogether vaine and frivolous For first he should no more sinne in delivering all then he doeth in setting one onely at libertie as is alreadie prooved by Sylvester and Viguerius Againe plenarie Pardons are so common at the houre of death as none that either have friendes or money are or can be destitute thereof which yet is a poynt more undiscreete then the other by their owne
purgatorie and yet by vvay of suffrage no such thing can bee assured no more then vvhen an other devoute papist shall offer vp his prayers for them vvhich thing seemed so to trouble Bellarminus that in his written dictates hee knovveth not vvell vvhat to holde or vvrite concerning romish pardons Thirdly because the pope can not applie Christs satisfaction more effectuallie to them by his pardoning then the same is applied to them by the saying of masse as vvhich by popish religion is the selfe same sacrifice reallie that vvas offered vpon the crosse and yet doth no papist saye or thinke that our saying of masse can or vvil deliuer his friends soule from purgatory For othervvise there vvould not be so many masses said so many times for the selfe same persons as hath beene and is daily seen amongst the papists For to this end doe they celebrate and obserue yerely anniuersaries for soules departed 10. 20. 30. 40. 60. yeares before vvhich the pope cardinals and monkes had taught the people to frequent as most necessarie for their friends soules in purgatorie Fourthly because it cannot be proued that after God hath pardoned our sinnes and the eternall paine due for the same there still remaineth some temporal paine remissible by the popes pardons Fiftly because al the three thinges required of papistes in popish pardoning are most firm certaine and readie in the soules of purgatorie to vvit auctoritie in thhe giuer charitie in the receiuer and the cause of pietie For first the soules of purgatorie bee in charitie as all papistes confesse as vvho othervvise could neuer be saued 2 Secondly it is mere crueltie not to helpe the faithful in such vvofull case Thirdlie if they denie the popes auctoritie I vvill vvillinglie denie it vvith them though he accurse me as hee hath alreadie done for my paines For I nothing doubt but God of his great mercie vvill conuert his curse to my greater ioy and blisse And here because the Seminaries neuer ceasse to boast in corners amongest the simple that none in this realme dareth to dispute with them I offer publique dispute with what seminarie in England soeuer he be no one or other excepted who soeuer so it may stand vvith the honourable licence and good liking of higher povvers whose mindes I am of dutie bound to obay in that behalfe For I nothing doubt if my option may bee graunted but that it will tend to the glorie of God the service of my soveraigne the honour of my countrie the edification of the auditours and the comfort of myne owne soule The reason is for that I know verie sufficientlie the foundations groundes auctorities and reasons of both sides and vvithal behold as in a glasse of christall the euident confutation of all whatsoeuer can possibly bee said in defense of papistrie which if I had not first seene I had neuer departed from popish doctrine The 7. Conclusion IF the popes pardons be not of so great force and worth so much as they are said and preached to be then is the popes religion vaine and of no credite at all This proposition both is and must be graunted of all papistes if they will defend their now professed Romish religion Thomas Aquinas whose doctrine and bookes divers popes haue approoved for good and godly writeth thus Ecclesia praedicando indulgentias non mentitur ita tantum valent quantum praedicantur sicut enim dicit Augustinus si in sacra Scriptura deprehenditur aliquid falsitatis iam robur authoritatis sacrae Scripturae perit Et similiter si in praedicatione ecclesiae aliqua falsitas deprehenderetur non essent documenta Ecclesiae alicuius autboritatis adroborandam fidem The Church preaching pardons doth not lie and so they are worth no lesse then they are preached For as Augustine saith if in holy Scripture any falshood be found euen then the full authoritie of holy scripture perisheth utterly And in like manner if in the preaching of the Church any falshood should be found the doctrine of the Church shoulde not be of any force to establish our faith These are the wordes of their canonized saint and renowmed doctour Aquinas which shewe unto us so plainely as more plainely nothing can be told that if the Church of Rome erre in any one point as in giving pardons or such like then must we giue no credit to it in other pointes of religion Neither is this the opinion of Aquinas onely but their other great Thomist Dominicus Soto singeth the same song These be his wordes Alij dixerunt indulgentias nihil prorsus valere nisi quantum unusquisque devotione sua faciendo quodindulgentia praecipit moeretur Attamen isti seu blasphemi non sunt audiendi sanè qui authoritatem Ecclesiae infringunt si enim de hac re nos Ecclesia seduceret nulla ei esset in reliquis adhibenda fides Some said that pardons were no more woorth at all then every man doeth merite by his owne devotion But these fellowes are to be reiected as blasphemous because they infringe the authoritie of the Church for if the Church should in this point seduce us then were there no credite to be given unto it in other pointes These are the expresse wordes of the Popes owne and best Doctors Aquinas and Soto whose testimonies with that which is said in other conclusions disable altogether the authoritie and religion of the Church of Rome For if the Church of Rome deceive us in her pardons as is sufficiently prooved that she hath done then is she not to be credited in other things as both Aquinas and Soto tell us whose doctrine the pope yea sundry Popes of Rome have confirmed THE COROLLARIE FIRST therefore since the Popes pardons be foolish and repugnant to common sence Secondly since the veritie and efficacie of pardons be so uncerten as the best learned Papistes can not tell what to say or write thereof Thirdly since to give pardons as the Pope doeth is a strange and new thing as which neither Christ nor his Apostles ever taught or practised Fourthly since the Popes manner of pardoning ordinarie popish practise considered is most absurd Fiftly since the Popes pardons in Romish doctrine are reputed aequivalent with holy martyrdome Sixtly since the Popes pardons be not such nor so forcible as they are preached to be Seventhly since the foundation of Popish pardons is blasphemous and derogatorie to Christes passion Eightly since the Pope taketh upon him by his pardons to deliver soules from purgatorie which he can not perfourme Nynthly since Aquinas Soto and Sylvester his owne renowmed Doctors doe affirme that if the Pope preach falsely in his pardons all his other doctrine is false and naught I conclude that it is a sufficient motive for me to renounce the Romish religion as false erronious and pernicious doctrine Thus much of the first Motive THE THIRD CHAP ter Of the Popes maners Faith and Religion ALbeit concerning Sanctimonie of life and honest conversation
contextum scripturae si quadrare invenerit laudet deum qui non alligavit expositionem scripturarum sacrarum priscorum doctorum sensibus sed scripturoe ipsi integrae sub catholicae ecclesiae censura alioquin spes nobis ac posteris tolleretur exponendi scripturam sacram nisitransferendo vt aiunt de libro in quinternum Being now readie to write vpon the pentateuch of Moses according to the literall sense and purposing to bring now and then a new sense of the scripture vnder the censure of our holy mother the church and apostolike seate I desire all that shal read my commentaries to contemne nothing rashly but to ponder every thing with the scripture and the veritie of the christian faith and the doctrine of the catholike church And if at any time a new sense occurre which is consonant to the text and not dissonant from holy writ or doctrine of the church although it swarve from the opinion of never so manie fathers yet let the readers iudge thereof indifferently and according to equitie Let them remember to give everie one his right for this priviledge is onely graunted to the writers of the holie scriptures that wee must therefore beleeve it to be so because they haue written so Let none therefore loath a newe sense of holie scripture because it dissenteth from the old doctors but let him exactlie consider the text and context of the scripture and if he find it to agree let him praise God who hath not tied the exposition of the holy scriptures to the opinions of the old doctors but to the integritie of the scripture it selfe vnder the censure of the catholike church For otherwise neither wee nor our posteritie should have anie hope to expound the scripture but onelie to translate out of one booke into another Thus we heare the verdict of our Caietaine our Thomist our frier our Cardinall of Rome by whose resolution it is evident that no sense though never so new no exposition though never so strange no opinion though different from never so many fathers ought to bee reiected if it be agreeable to the scriptures and consequently it followeth by the said resolution that everie truth is to be tried by the scriptures and none by the fathers For first our Cardinall telleth us that he purposeth now then to bring newe senses new Glosses nevv expositions of the Scriptures Secondly he saith that such new senses must not rashly bee contemned but duely examined by the scriptures and then admitted if they be found consonant to the same Thirdly he teacheth us this golden lesson that God hath not tyed the exposition of the scripture to the iudgement of any auncient father or fathers whosoever Fourthly he telleth us that the Apostles and such as only penned the holy scriptures had this speciall prerogative that they coulde not erre All which important pointes are so learnedly so gravely so christianly observed by this Cardinall as more cannot be wished yea in the selfe same preface hee professeth constantly that hee will neither expound the Greeke nor the Latine text but the fountaine and the originall to wit the Hebrew And his reason is because the Hebrew onely is authenticall Where note by the way that the Latine edition which the papists tearme vulgata and which is so magnified by the late councell of Trent as both the Greeke and the Hebrew must give place unto the same is of small or no authoritie in respect of the Hebrew by Cardinall Caietanus his resolution Note secondly that this Cardinal did dedicate these his commentaries in which all these memorable observations are conteined to our holy father Pope Clement him selfe who perused them and difallowed no part thereof and consequently that this doctrine of Caietane is confirmed by the pope For so mightily hath God alwayes wrought for the truth of his Gospell as evident testimonies are set downe euen by the adversaries and remaine this day with them vncancelled for confirmation of the same Neither is this the opinion of the popes Cardinall onely but of Aquinas also his angelicall and best approoved doctour His wordes I will likewise alledge at large because albeit they belong yet can they not be thought tedious to such as loue the trueth as which are most significant and effectuall for the controversie now in hand Thus therefore doeth he write Licet locus ab auctoritate quae fundatur super oratione humana sit infirmissimus locus tamen ab auctoritate quae fundatur super revelatione divina est efficacissimus Vtitur tamen sacra doctrina etiam ratione humana non quidem ad probandum fidem quia per hoc tolleretur meritum fidei sed ad manifest andum aliqua aliaquae traduntur in hac doctrina Cum igitur gratia non tollat naturam sed perficiat oportet quod naturalis ratio sub serviat fidei sicut naturalis inclinatio voluntatis obsequitur charitati vnde apostolus dicit 2. Cor. 10. in captivit atem redigentes omnem intellectū in obsequium Christi Et inde est quod authoritatibus philosophorum sacra doctrina vtitur vbi per rationem naturalem veritatem cogno scere potuerunt sicut Paulus act 17. inducit verbum Arati dicens sicut quidam poetarum vestrorum dixerunt genus Dei samus sed tamen sacra doctrina huiusmodi auctoritatibus vtitur quasi extraneis argumentis probabilibus auctoritatibus autem canonicae scripturae vtitur propriè ex necessitate argumentando auctorit atibus autem aliorum doctorum ecelesiae quasi arguendo ex proprijs sed probabiliter innititur enim fides nostra revelationi apostolis prophetis factae qui canonicos libros scripserunt non autem revelationi si qua fuit alijs doctoribus facta Although the place of authoritie which is grounded vpon mans reason be most weake and infirme yet the place which is grounded vpon divine authoritie is most sure and effectuall neverthelesse sacred doctrine vseth also mans reason not indeede to establish faith for so faith should lose it merite but for the manifestation of some other thinges which are deliuered in this doctrine Since therefore grace doth not destroy nature but doth pervert the same it is expedient that naturall reason be servant vnto faith even as naturall inclination of the will is servant vnto charitie whervpon the apostle willeth vs to bring our vnderstanding captive to the obedience of Christ. And from hence commeth it that sacred doctrine vseth also the authorities of philosophers when they could by naturall reason haue knowledge of the truth as Saint Paul alledged the saying of Aratus yet sacred doctrine vseth such authorities as arguments which are externall and onely probable But vseth the authorities of canonicall scripture as argumentes that are proper and which conclude of necessitie as for authorities of the doctors of the church it vseth them as proper arguments but which are onely probable
and do not conclude necessarilie For our faith is grounded vpon revelation made to the apostles and prophets who wrote the canonical scripture but not vpon revelation of anie other writers if anie were made vnto them Thus saith Aquinas Out of whose words I gather First that the authoritie brought from man is ever insufficient 2 I gather secondly that that ground whereupon we must build as vpon an vndoubted truth is onelie and solelie the authoritie of the scriptures 3 I gather thirdlie that mans reason may never be vsed to establish any point of doctrine 4 I gather fourthlie that the fathers are to be read reverentlie and their authorities to be vsed as probable reasons but not as necessarie demonstrations 5 I gather fiftlie that feined romish revelations are not authentical And consequentlie that all revelations divulged vnder the name of Saint Bridget and others are either meereillusions or of small force and which can yeeld no sound argument in matters of faith Victoria in verie briefe wordes vttereth this point effectuallie Licet in hoc omnes conveniant non est tamen mihi certum Although saith he all agree in this yet doe not I make it certaine Navarre singeth the same song in manie places whereof I will recite onelie one Tum quod fundamentum principale ipsius est quod communis tenet oppositum quodip sum etiam ipse assero sed non obstat quia a communi recedendum quum pro contraria est textus velratio cui non potest satis bene responderi Because also his principal ground is that the common opinion is to the contrarie which thing I my selfe also graunt But that is not of force for we must renounce the common opinion when there is either text or reason which can not be sufficientlie answered In fine their owne glosse in their decrees reiecteth saint Augustine roundlie in these words Cum enim salva sua pace Augustinus non bene opponit istis it a dormit avit hic Augustinus VVhere saint Augustine by his favour doth not well obiect against this and so Augustine here was a sleepe Loe when the fathers speake not placentia everie beggerlie popish glosse reiecteth them at pleasure And yet must wee vnder paine of excommunication admit their authoritie when they seeme to make for poperie albeit they speake never so flatlie against the holie scriptures yea their late councell of Lateran chargeth all preachers vnder paine of excommunication that they expound the scriptures according to the old doctors received in the church of Rome The Corollarie 1 FIrst therefore since the ancient fathers may erre and have also erred de facto 2 Secondlie since Saint Augustine admitteth the opinion of fathers no further then they agree with the scriptures 3 Thirdlie since that which is holden of the greater part of the fathers is often false and disagreeable to the truth 4 Fourthly since the papistes them-selves preferre the opinion of one before many Fiftly since Caietanus Canus Navarrus and others doe al roundly reiect the common opinion when it disliketh them 6 Sixtly since their owne glosse maketh no accompt of S. Augustine when he speaketh not placentia I conclude that it is a sufficient motive for me to renounce the romish religion as false erroneous and pernicious doctriue Thus much of the eight Motive The X. CHAP. Of Traditions vvritten and vnwritien THe Papistes beare the world in hand that many things necessarie for mans salvation are not conteined in the written worde and consequently that none can be saved but such as beleeve their unwritten traditions VVherein that trueth may plainly shewe it selfe after mine accustomed manner I put downe conclusions The first conclusion THe written worde or holy scripture conteineth in it selfe everie thing necessary for our salvation For proofe of this conclusion S. Paul writeth unto Timothie in this manner Quia ab infantia sacras literas nosti quae te possunt instruere ad salutem per fidem in Christo Ie su Because thou hast knowne the Scriptures from thy infancie which are able to instruct thee to salvation through faith in Christ Iesus Now if the scriptures be able so to instruct one as hee may thereby attaine his salvation it can not doubtlesse be denied with reason that euerie thing necessarie for mans salvation is conteined therein For which cause the Apostle addeth these wordes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The whole scripture is given by the inspiration of God and is profitable to doctrine to redargution to correction to instruction which is in righteousnesse that the man of God may be perfect prepared to everie good worke In which wordes the holie vessell of God Saint Paul confirmeth that which he said before to wit that the holie scripture is able of it selfe to instruct vs fullie vnto salvation And the Apostle declareth this by an argument drawen from the sufficient enumeration of those partes which are required vnto our salvation and withall he commendeth the scripture of the sufficient cause end and vse thereof The cause is in that he saith the scripture is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is to say given by the inspiration of God The vse is foure fold whereof the two former pertaine to doctrine the two latter to life and manners 1 For first it is profitable to the doctrine of faith and holie obedience 2 Secondlie to the refutation of errors contradictions and false opinions 3 Thirdlie for the correction of abuses as wel publique as private 4 Fourthlie for instruction vnto righteousnes that is to leade a godlie and holie life The end is that the man of God to wit hee that is the true worshipper of God may be sounde perfect and most absolute furnished in ail kinde of goodnes which being so we must needes confesse if we will not obstinatelie denie the manifest truth that the scriptures containe all thinges necessarie for christian doctrine and for the full accomplishment of eternall life Neither will it helpe the papistes to answere as their wonted maner is that the greek vvord 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifieth everie not all so as the Apostle should say not the whole scripture but everie scripture For first everie scripture is not so copious or fruitfull as it can afford vs all those goodlie affects which saint Paul here rehearseth Againe the selfe same greeke worde 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is vsed for the whole by saint Paules owne interpretation in another place of holie scripture where he hath these expresse words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And if I have all and the whole miraculous faith so that I can remove mountaines but have not love I am nothing In which place the papistes can not possiblie interprete the selfe same greeke word though they would never so gladlie but for all the whole because otherwise the sense would be most absurd as which would prove saint Paul to speake of everie kinde of faith and consequentlie of
of the Church all the Churches of Asia together with others adioyning and very bitterly inveigheth against them by his letters Which fact of Victor Irenaeus and other Bishops sharpely reprooved in their letters to the said Victor Which thing Ruffinus plainely testifieth in these words Sed hoc non omnibus placebat Episcopis quin potius è contrario scribentes ei iubebant vt magis quae pacis sunt ageret concordiae atque vnanimitati studeret denique extant ipsorum literae quibus asperius obiurgant victorem velut invtiliter ecclesiae commodis consulentem Yet this his dealing pleased not all Bishops but contrariwise they wrote vnto him bidding him to practise rather that belonged to peace and to studie for concord and vnitie Finally their letters are also extant in the which they sharpely chide Victor as one that respected vnprofitably the good of the Church Thus saith Ruffinus In like manner though with more modestie dissented Anicetus an other bishop of Rome from S. Polycarpe bishop of Smyrna Of which variance thus writeth Eusebius Neque tamen Anicetus Polycarpo poterat persuadere vt suum observandi morem deponeret neque Polycarpus Aniceto persuasit vt consuetudinem Asiaticam vllo modo observaret Neither could Polycarpus perswade Anicetus to keepe the custome and tradition of Asia Now gentle Reader what neede more to be said for the vncertentie of traditions 1 For first these Bishops that thought thus diversly of traditions lived within one hundred yeeres of Christ at what time the Church was in good estate and stained with very few or no corruptions at all 2 Secondly the one side doubtles was seduced with false traditions 3 Thirdly S. Polycarpe and other holy bishops of that age made no more account of the bishop of Rome his opinion or authoritie then of an other mans 4 Fourthly they were so farre from acknowledging him to be the supreame head of the Church that they all reputed them selves his equals and controlled him as sharply for his doctrine as S. Paul reprooved S. Peter for his conversation 5 Fiftly if S. Polycarpe had cause in his time beeing the flourishing age of the Church to doubt of Romish traditions much more have we cause in these latter daies to stand in doubt thereof For now hath iniquitie the vpper hande nowe are corruptions more frequent no we doe errours in every place more abound Let vs therefore follow S. Augustines advise let vs admit nothing rashly let vs examine all doubtfull traditions and doctrines by the touchstone of veritie the holy Scriptures And least any man thinke S. Augustine to be of another minde these are his owne expresse wordes Non audiamus haec dico haec dicis sed audiamus haec dicit dominus sunt certe libri dominici quorum ant horitati vtrique consentimus vtrique credimus vtrique servimus ibi quaeramus ecclesiam ibi discutiamus causam nostram Let vs not heare I say this thou saiest that but let vs heare this saith the Lord for our Lord hath bookes whose authoritie we both admit we both beleeve we both obey let vs there seeke the Church let vs there decide our cause But what neede many words For either popish vnwritten traditions are repugnant to the Scriptures or consonant to the same If they be repugnant then is there great reason to reiect them if they be consonant that must be tried by comparing them to the Scriptures which is the conclusion I defend But the Papists perceiving them selves to be convinced by the Scriptures tell vs plainly that they must have their cause tried by other meanes For so writeth my L. of Rochester in these expresse tearmes Contendentibus itaque nobiscum haereiic is nos alio subsidio nostram oportet tueri causam quam Scripturae sacrae When therefore heretikes he meaneth all not Papists dispute with vs we must vse other helpe in defense of our cause then the Scripture Loe they dare not be tryed by the Scripture Which if a papist had not spoken who would haue beleeved it The Corollarie FIrst therefore since the written Word conteineth in it selfe every thing necessarie for our salvation secondly since no traditions are to be admitted but such as are consonant to the holy Scripture thirdly since Papists load vs with huge numbers of traditions without warrant of the written word fourthly since popish traditions were in old time most doubtfull and vncerten I conclude that it is a sufficient motive for me to renounce the Romish religion as false erroneous and pernicious doctrine Thus much of the ninth Motive CHAP. ix Of Popish auricular confession ALthough popish doctours doe wonderfully magnifie their auricular confession perswading the vulgar sort that they can not attaine salvation without the same yet is it in deede a meere invention of man the bitter torment of conscience and the readie way to desperation For manifest probation whereof I proceede in this manner The first Conclusion ALL Christians must confesse their sinnes to God with internall contrition of heart with full purpose to amend their lives and with stedfast hope of remission by the mercie of God through the merites of Christ his Sonne our sweete redeemer Of this kinde of confession the Scripture speaketh abundantly Delictum meum cognitum tibi feci iniustitiam meam non abscondi dixi confitebor adversum me iniustitiam meam domino tu remisisti impietatem peccati mei I have made my sinne knowne vnto thee and mine iniustice I have not hid I said I will confesse to the Lord my iniustice against my selfe and thou hast forgiven the impietie of my sinne Qui abscondit scelera sua non dirigetur quiautem confessus fuerit reliquerit ea misericordiam consequetur He that hideth his offenses shall not be directed but who shall confesse and forsake his sinnes shall attaine mercie Sidixerimus quoniā peccatum non habemus ipsi nos seducimus veritas in nobis non est si confiteamur peccata nostra fidelis est iustus vt remittat nobis peccata nostra If we say we haue no sinne we deceiue our selues and the truth is not in vs but if we confesse our sinnes c. That this confession must be ioyned with hope of remission S. Chrysostome teacheth in these words Quid proderunt lachrymae confessio sinulla adsit abolitionis fiducia What shal teares confession availe if there be no hope of forgivenes And that we must adde herevnto amendment of life S. Hilarie teacheth vs when he saith Quid aliud est confessio erroris quam confessio desinendi ab errore What other thing is the confession of errour then to confesse that we will forsake errour So then when we be wayle our sinnes confesse them and purpose to amend our former lives with stedfast hope of Gods mercie through attonement made in Christes bloode wee shall doubtlesse have remission of our sinnes Then though our
faciunt peccatum The children of God both love and doe iustice but the children of the deuil both loue and do sinne and againe Manifestum fit studium bonorum operum effectum esse preaestinationis It is manifest that studie to liue well and to doe good workes is the effect of predestination and an hundred such like places the same author hath which I let passe for brevitie sake neither doth anie other of the learned amongest vs hold contrary to this doctrine nay all the pulpets God be thanked found out and extoll the praise of good workes yea which is more to be admired of the papistes who thinke so baselie of our religion wee affirme the good workes of the regenerate to be so acceptable in Gods sight that he will not suffer the least therof to be vnrewarded further we teach affirm in our religion that the regenerat childrē of God cā not cōtinue in gods favour vnles they detest sin striue against the concupiscence of the flesh do good works yet further we auouch cōstantlie that none cā beleeùe truly in Christ which doth not love Christ which doth not emploie his whole care studie industrie to doe the will of Christ and to keepe his commaundements And that this is the faith and doctrine of the Church of England verie manie God be thanked for it haue left to their posteritie livelie testimonies of the same wherof I will onelie name one who as hee did inwardlie in his heart beleeue the gospell so did he outwardlie in his life professe it and after his death confirme the same with a most charitable and christian testimonie of immortall memorie I speake of that honourable and zealous christian Sir VValter Mildmey the late foūder of a most famous colledge in the vniuersitie of Cambridge which he tearmed not after his owne name as the greater part vseth but Emanuell that is God with vs giuing vs to vnderstand therby that as hee beleeued and loued God so he would testify the same to al posterities by that worthie act as by the effect and fruite of a liuelie faith Now then how doe we differ from the papistes herein Zanchius shall answere Atque hic est vnus ex praecipuis vsibus bonorumoperum quod ijs non tanquam salutis causis sadtanquā effectis predestinationis fidei tum nos tum proximi certiores fimus nostrae electionis eoque salutis And this is one of the chiefest vses of good works that both wee and our neighbours are assured by them of our election and salvation not as by the causes of salvation but as by the effectes of predestination and of faith But the papistes will say if good woorkes cannot merite glorie nor iustifie wherefore then must we do them I answere that we must liue well and doe good workes for the loue and dutie we owe to God and because so is his holie will and good pleasure so saith the Apostle in these words ipsius enim sumus factura creati in Christo Iesu in operibus bonis quae preparavit Deus vt in illis ambulemus for wee are his workemanship created in Christ Iesus vnto good workes which God hath ordained that we should walke in them so then we thinke as reuerentlie and esteem as worthilie of good works as doth anie papist in the world for we grant that none can be saued or sanctified without good workes and further that none is truelie iustified which hath not good works yet for all that do we constantly affirme and that by the authoritie of holie writte that no man is or can be iustifyed by vertue of his good works the error of the Papistes consisteth in this that they do not distinguish betweene sanctification and iustificatiō the truth of our doctrine which is the verity grounded in the sacred scriptures is this that sanctificatiō iustificatió are inseparably vnited in one the same subiect in eodē instanti tëporis nōnaturae as the scholes speake that is we are freelie iustified sanctifyed also in the same instāt of time but first iustified in prioritie of nature for example fire and the heate are both at one and the same time though fire be before in prioritie of nature that is though fire goe before as the cause of euerie thing is before the effect of the same and as fire is not before heate in time and yet the cause of that heate so is our iustification not before our sanctification or our inherent iustice in time and yet is it the cause of our sanctification of our inherent iustice and of all the good workes we doe which thing if the papistes would once seriouslie observe they would not differ from our opinion in this behalfe vnlesse they haue fullie resolved to oppose themselves desperatlie against the truth The 12. Preamble VVHo so euer will but euen superficiallie consider the vncertaintie of popish doctrine shall thereby without further discourse find svfficient matter to abhorre and detest the same as most friuolous most ridiculous most irreligious For example in the sacrament of the altar as they terme it if certaine questions be propounded vnto them the best learned know not what to answere but so simply and so sottishly as euerie child may espie the follie of their doctrine If anie papist can truely and without blushing say the contrarie let the same be notifyed by his ansvvere to these my briefe demaundes 1. First I demaund how they excuse the people that adore with diuine worship the thing eleuated ouer the priestes head at Masse from idolatrie from heresie from false beleefe For if either the Priest want intention to consecrate vvhich often chaunceth by reason of vvandering imaginations or of purpose meaneth not to consecrate or of negligence omitteth any vvord of consecration then by popish religion the thing adored is but pure bread so the adorers thereof become idolaters vvorshipping a peece of bread for the euerliuing God And if the people either refuse to adore or doubt if they may adore they are deemed heretiques ipso facto for their pains because as the Popes disholie canons tell vs he that but doubteth of Romish definitions concerning faith and maners is an heretike 2 Secondlie I demaund what it is that the priest receiueth and deliuereth to the communicants when he hauing 40. breads before him supposeth them to be but 38. or 39. and so intendeth to consecrate no more for beyond the priestes intention consecration cannot extend as all wise Papistes graunt neither is his intention more limited to one bread then to an other and therfore can no more consecrate one bread then another 3 Thirdlie I demaund which part of the host as they terme it is the popish made God when the sacrificer intendeth indefinitelie to consecrate the one halfe of the said host and how there in adoring they can avoid idolatrie 4 Fourthly I demaund howe many gods or how many times God is made in
purgatorie for mans sinnes as well quoad poenam as quoad culpam that is both concerning the sinne and punishment due for the same This conclusion S. Paul maketh plaine writing thus to the Hebrewes Qui cum sit splendor gloriae figura substantiae eius portan sque omnia verbo virtutis suae purgationem peccatorum faciens sedet ad dexter ammaiestatis in excelsis Who beeing the brightnes of his glorie and the figure of his substance and susteining all things by the word of his power did by him selfe purge our sinnes and sitteth on the right hand of maiestie on high And in an other place he saith thus In quo habemus redemptionem remissionem peccatorum In whome wee have redemption and remission of our sinnes Againe in an other place Hi sunt qui venerunt de tribulatione magna laverunt stolas suas dealbaverunt eas in sanguine agni These are they that came from great tribulation and washed their stoles and made them white in the bloode of the lambe Againe in an other place Sanguis Iesu Christi emundat nos ab omni peccato The blood of Iesus Christ doth purge vs from all sinne Againe in an other place Is qui non nover at peccatum peccatum pronobis fecit vt nos efficeremur iustitia dei in ipso He that knew not sinne suffered paine due for sinne for vs that we might be made the iustice of God in him Againe Ego sum ego sum ipse qui deleo iniquitates tuas propter me I even I am he that blot out thine iniquities not for thy deserts but for mine owne sake Againe in another place Ipse vulneratus est propter iniquitates nostras attritus est propter scelera nostra He was wounded for our iniquiries hee was torne in peeces for our offences Againe in another place Christus nos redemit de maledicto legis factus pro nobis male dictum Christ redeemed vs from the curse of the Law being a curse for vs. Neither will it helpe the papistes to answere that these textes of scripture are vnderstood onelie of the guilt of sinne and not of the punishment due for the same 1 For first no scripture maketh that distinction between the guilt of sinne punishment correspondent to the same 2 Secondly no ancient writer did ever so expound such textes of scripture 3 Thirdly because their owne doctor Aquinas avoucheth our redeemer to haue suffered not onely for the guilt of our sinnes but also for the punishment due vnto the same These be his words Christus dedit maximum exemplum poenitentibus dum non pro peccato proprio sed pro peccatis aliorum voluit poenam subire Christ gaue an exceeding great example to penitent sinners while his pleasure was to susteine punishment not for his owne sin which was none at all but for the sinnes of others And Saint Augustine writing vpon the Psalmes hath these words Ergo apud te est propitiatio nam-sinon esset apuate propitiatio siiudex solum esse velles misericors esse nolles siobservares omnes iniquitates nostras quaereres eas quid sustineret quis ante te staret diceret innocens sum quis staret in iudicio tuo spes ergo vna est quoapud te est propitiatio Therefore with thee is mercie for if there were not mercie with thee if thou wouldest onely be our iudge and not shew vs mercie if thou wouldest looke into our iniquities and seeke them who were able to abide it who could stand before thee and say I am innocent who could stand in thy iudgement Therefore there is one onlie hope because with thee mercie is to be found And the same Saint Augustine in another place hath yet more plaine words Dominus noster Iesus Christus mori venit peccare non venit communicando nobiscum sine culpapaenam culpam solvit paenam Our Lord Iesus saith saint Augustine came to die he came not to sinne communicating paine with vs without sinne he loosed both the sinne and paine of sinne 4 Fourthly because it would followe thereuppon that Christes workes were verie vnperfect and yet doth the scripture say Dei perfecta sunt opera The workes of God are perfect But doubtlesse hee wrought not mans redemption perfectlie if mans satisfaction must concurre to the perfection thereof and yet concurre it must perforce if another purgation be established in purgatorie fire besides that purgation which Christes bloud hath wrought 5 Fiftly because Christes satisfaction otherwise had bene in vaine For if we can satisfy for our selves or by the help of our neighbors in purgatorie fire then did Christ in vaine satisfy for vs vpon the Crosse then did not Christ loose both the sinne paine of sinne as Saint Augustine avoucheth 6 Sixtly because our satisfaction speaking of the best is not nor can be infinite and consequently cannot make compensation for infinite transgression For as Aquinas saith Peccatum contra Deum admissum quandam infinit atem habet ex infinitate divinae maiestatis tanto enim offen sa est gravior quanto maior est ille in quem delinquitur Sinne committed against God is infinite by reason of his infinite Maiestie For so much is the offence greater by how much he is greater against whom we sinne 7 Seventhly because it is flatly against the opinions of the holy fathers Thus saith Saint Augustine Primum locum fides cabolicorū divina auctoritate credit regum coelerum secundum gehennam vbi omnis apost at a vel a fide Christi alienus aeterna supplicia experietur tertium penitus ignoramus imo nec in scripturis sanctis inveniemus The faith of Catholikes by Gods auctoritie beleeueth the first place to be the kingdom of heaven the second place to be hell wher euery apostate or infidell shall bee punished euerlastingly the third place we are vtterly ignorant of neither shall we find it in the holy scriptures which assertion saint Augustine doth often inculcate in sundrie of his bookes Saint Hierome likewise teacheth vs that after the separation of the soule from the bodie there is no resting place but either heaven or hell These are his words Quum anima vinculis laxata corporis volandi quo velit sive quo iure compellitur habuerit libertatem aut adinferna ducetur de quibus scriptum est in inferno quis confitebitur tibi aut certe adcoelestia sublevabitur VVhen the soule shall bee leused from corporall bondes and shall have liberte to goe whither it will or whither it is compelled to goe either it shall bee brought to the infernall spirites of whom it is written ïn hell who will confesse vnto thee or doubtlesse it shall be exalted to heaven aboue To conclude their famous bishop and holy martyr Roffensis confessing the late originall of popish pardons among other reasons yeldeth this for one Quarum prima
sacriledge because forsooth saith Soto peradventure the other opinion is true And Iosephus exhorteth verie grauely to haue intention neither to consecrate precisely by the former wordes nor yet by the latter but to have the intention of the Church inmpe with the colier for in so doing saith he the sacrificer shall be in no daunger Now I beseech thee gentle Reader what horse would not breake his halter to heare this melodie The 27. article of dissention COncerning the formation of Eve wonderfull are the exclamations of Catharinus against Caietanus and of Antonius Fonseca against Catharinus as also of Paulus Burgensis against Lyranus of Matthias Thoring against Burgensis in many other thinges pervse their glosses vppon the old and new testament and all this will appeare The 28. article of Dissention IT is a great questiō amongst the papists what that is which a mouse eateth when she catcheth their reserved host Bonaventura their maister of sentences affirme that the mouse eateth not Christes bodie but our popes Cardinals and Iesuites defend the contrarie as a grounded article of their beleefe The 29. article of Dissention POpe Adrian Richardus and Panormitanus tell vs that a priest beeing contrite may say masse before he be confessed but by the decree of our councell of Trent this fact is a damnable sinne The 30. article of Dissention OVR pope Cardinalles and Iesuits tell vs that infidels are not bounden to their auricular confession But Richardus Gabriel and Angelus defend the contrarie The 31. article of dissention BEllarminus avoucheth that moe voices in councels must needes be of force but Canus affirmeth that the lesser part is the best if the pope hold with the same And yet in this point notwithstanding their good agreement resteth the foundation of their popish religion The 32. article of dissention THe councell of Lateran where were present 284. persons patriarkes metropolitanes bishops and abbots defined absolutelie that aungels were created at one and the selfe same time with the world and yet Basilius Nazianzenus Damascenus Hieronimus Augustinus and Aquinas denie the same to be a matter of faith Manie other like dissentions I could easilie alledge as of Cardinal Caietanes dissention about divorse and such like But because mine intent is to bee briefe these for this time may suffice For if I should touch all dissentions amongest the papistes the day would sooner faile mee then matter whereof to speake The Corollarie FIrst therefore since the papistes are at bloudie conflict concerning the popes civil regiment Secondly since they teach veniall sinnes not to dissolue amitie betweene God and man their greatest doctors impugning the same Thirdly since some of them constantlie affirme matrimonie to be a sacrament and other some deny the same with tooth and naile Fourthly since to hold the pope to be aboue the general councel is with some no article of faith nor error at all with other some an error in faith and flat heresie Fiftly since some papists maintaine romish doctrine by material succession other some bitterlie exclaime against the same Sixtlie since some do affirme that the pope may dispense for the ministrie of confirmation and other some that it is a heinous crime Seaventhlie since some hold that every of their orders is a sacramēt some zealouslie impugne the same Eightly since many papists defēd our Ladies cōceptiō without sin manie other avouch it to haue bin in sin Ninthly since it is a constant doctrine among the papistes that Constantine was baptized at Rome and that notwithstanding auncient fathers with vniforme consent repute the same a fable a lie since those manie other important dissentions bee amongst the papistes I conclude that it is a sufficient motive for mee to renounce the romish religion as false erroneous and pernicious doctrine Thus much of the seaventh motive THE NINTH CHAPTER Of credite due vnto vvriters THe papistes exclame against protestants because they reiect now and then the authoritie of man For whose better satisfaction in that behalfe if they will bee satisfyed with reason these conclusions following may suffice The first conclusion THe protestants speaking of the wiser and discreter sort do highlie reverence the holie fathers and ancient writers diligentlie reade their workes and gladly vse them as good helpes and ordinarie meanes vnder God for concerning the exact explication of holie writte Of this conclusion none can bee ignorant or stande in doubt therof that seriouslie peruse doctor Iewel the famous and worthie bishop of Saris burie against Doctor Harding Doctor VVhitgift the most reverend learned and vertuous arch bishop of Canterburie against M. Cartwright Doctor Cooper the reverend bishop of winchester against the Martinistes Doctor Reinolds Doctor Seravia Doctor Sutliue and others The second Conclusion THE Protestants although they speake and thinke reverentlie of the ancient fathers yet doe they neither repute their works of equal authoritie with the holie Scriptures neither to be free from all errours and imperfections wherein they nothing at all swerve from the modest estimation which the said holie fathers had euer of themselves For proofe of this conclusion S. Augustine writeth in this maner Ego solis eis scriptur arū libris qui iam canonici appellantur hunc timorem honorem didici deferre vt nullum eorum auctorem scribendo aliquiderrasse firmissime credam alios autem it a lego vt quantalibet sanctitate doctrinaque praepolleant non ideo verum putem quia ipsi it a censuerunt sed quia mihi velper illos auctores canonicos vel probabili ratione quod a veritate non abhorreat per suadere potuerunt I haue learned to give this feare and honour to those onely books of scripture which are called canonical that I firmly beleeue no author thereof to have erred in anie point but yet I read others so that how holie or learned soever they be I do not by by thinke it true because they say so but because they perswade me by those canonicall writers or by probable reason that that is true they say And in another place the same saint Augustine hath these wordes Ego huius epistolae authoritate non teneor quòd liter as Cypriani vt canonicas non habeo sed eas ex canonicis considero quod in eis divinarum scripturarum auctoritati congruit cum laude eius accipio quòd autem non congruit cum pace eius respuo I am not bound to the authoritie of this epistle because I take not Ciprian his writings for canonicall but consider them by the canonicall and what I finde in them agreeable to holy writ that with his praise do I receiue but what is dissonāt that with his favour I reiect And againe hee saith of him selfe in this maner Negare non possum nec debeo sicut in ipsis maioribus it a multa esse in tam multis opusculis meis quae possunt iusto iudicio et nulla
temeritate culpari I neither can nor dare denie but as in our auncestors so in my workes also are manie thinges which may iustly and without all temeritie be reproved yea the same saint Augustine opposeth only saint Pauls testimonie against all the writers Saint Hierome could alledge about the great controversie where saint Peter was reproved of saint Paul By which testimonie it is very plaine that S. Augustine did reverence the old writers but yet did think them men and to have their errors therefore would be not admit for truth what soever they wrote but only that which he fouÌ„d to be consonaÌ„t to the holie scriptures And because my L. of Roch. is so highly renowmed in the church of Rome he shal make an end of this conclusion where he writeth in this maner Nec Augustini nec Hieronimi nec alterius cuinslibet auctoris doctrinae sic ecclesia subscripsit quin ipsi locis aliquot ab ijs lice at dissentire nam in nonnullis ipsilocis se plane monstrarunt homines esse atque nonnunquam aberrasse sequitur quo fit vt tametsi propter aliquas humanas hallucinationes de multis quae dicti patre in commentarijs suis reliquerunt dubitare liceat sanctitatem tamen eorum haud licet in dubium revocare The church of Rome hath not so subscribed to the doctrine either of Augustine or of Hierome or of anie other writer but that we may dissent from their opinions in some places For themselves haue in certaine places shewed plainlie that they were men and wanted not their errours VVherefore albeit by reason of humaine frailtie we may lawfullie doubt of manie thinges which the said fathers have left behind them in their bookes yet may we not now call their holinesse into question In which wordes our great popish bishop teacheth vs three documents 1 First that their church giveth everie one libertie to dissent from Augustine Hierome and other writers whosoever 2 Secondlie that the fathers have plainlie declared themselves to be men and to haue had their imperfections accordinglie 3 Thirdlie that manie errours are to be found in the commentaries of the fathers So then our bishop is of my opinion and so also should the rest be if they would be constant in their owne doctrine which is published to the view of the world The 3. Conclusion NOt that which the greater part of the fathers or moe voices agree vnto is alwaies the vndoubted truth but often times that which the lesser part and fewer persons doe affirme For the proofe hereof Melchior Canus writeth thus Scimus frequenter vsu venire vt maior pars vincat meliorem scimus non ea semper esse optima quae placent pluribus scimus in rebus quae ad doctrinam pertinent sapientum sensum esse praeferendum sapientes sunt paucissimi cum stultorum infinitus sit numerus VVee know it often chaunceth so that the greater part prevaileth against the better vve know that those thinges are not ever the best which please the most we know that in matters of doctrine the iudge ment of the wise ought to be followed for wise men bee few and fooles infinite Iosephus Angles Thomas Aquinas and Petrus Lombardus affirme it to be the opinion of the old fathers of Basilius of Ambrosius of Chrisostomus of Hieronimus of Eusebius of Damascenus of Gregorius and of others that the world was created in 6. naturall daies successivelie as Moises recordeth the same yet this notwithstanding saint Augustine holdeth opinion against them all and saith that the 6. daies mentioned by Moises were metaphoricall not natural Moises dividing those things which were made by parts for the better capacitie of the rude and ignorant people to whom he spake which opinion of one onelie Augustine was ever preferred in the church as testifyeth Melchior Canus in these wordes At communis hic sanctorum consensus nullum argumentum certum theologis subministrat quin vnius Aug. opinio caeteris omnibus adversa probabilis semper in ecclesia est habita But this common consent of the holie fathers doth not yeeld any found argument to devines for the opinion of one onelie Augustine repugnant to the rest was ever thought probable in the church All the old writers Augustinus Ambrosius Chrisostomus Remigius Eusebius Maximus Beda Anselmus Bernardus Erhardus Bernardinus Bona ventura Thomas Hugo and all the rest without exception affirme vniformelie citing expresse textes of scripture for their opinion that the blessed virgin Marie was conceived in originall sinne yet doth the late hatched nest of Iesuits and sundrie other papistes avouche this day the contrarie for the truth Therefore saith their owne archbishop and greate canonist Panormitanus that we ought at all times to give more credite to one onelie prelate whosoever alledging the scriptures then to the resolution of the pope himselfe or of his counceil not grounded vpon the said scriptures The 4. Conclusion THe papistes themselues doe often reiect the generall and common opinion and follow their owne private iudgements never remeÌ„bring or litle regarding that they condemne the like in others This writeth their owne Melchior Canus Vbi ego si Thomistae omnes cum Scotistis existant sicum antiquis iuniores vellent contra me pugnare tamen superior sim necesse est non enim vt nonnulli putant omnia sunt in Theologorum auctoritate wherin though all the Thomistes stand with the Scotistes though the old writers with the yong fight against me yet shall I of necessity have the vpper hand ouer theÌ„ For al things rest not as some do think in the authoritie of divines Their owne Cardinal Caietain notwithstanding his zealous affection towards poperie his owne popish estate did for all that freelie acknowledge the truth in this point in so much that he preferreth a sense newly perceived but grounded vpon the scriptures before the old received opinioÌ„ of how many fathers so ever whose words because they are worthie the hearing and reading I wil alledge at large Thus doth he write Super quinque libris Mosis iuxta sesum literalem novumque scripturae sensum quandoque illaturus sub sâ—matris ecclesiae aec apostolicae sedis censura rogo lectores omnes ne precipites detestentur aliquid sed librent omnia apud sacram scripturam apudfidei christianae veritatem apud Catholicae ecclesiae documenta ac mores siquando occurrerit novus sensus textui consonus nec a sacra scriptura nec ab ecclesiae doctrina dissomus quamvis a torrente doctorum sacrorum alienus aequos se prebeant censores meminerint ius suum vni cuique tribuere solis scripturae sacrae authoribus reservata est authoritas haec vt ideo credamus sic esse quodipsiita scripserunt nullus itaque detestetur novum sacrae scripturae sensum ex hoc quod dissonat a priscis doctoribus sed scrutetur per spicacius textum ac
the iustifying faith with the rest albeit it is most cleare that he speaketh of the miraculous faith onelie which is often in the verie wicked The same greeke word in two severall places of saint Matthew is likewise taken for the whole For in the second chapter it is thus written When king Herod heard hee was troubled and the whole citie of Hierusalem with him VVhere if the greeke word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 were interpreted everie and not the whole the sense would be absurd to wit everie citie of Hierusalem being yet but one onlie Hierusalem in all but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 being taken for the whole the sense is plaine and easie to wit the whole citie of Hierusalem So in the sixt chapter it is thus written Neither was Salomon in all his glorie araied like one of these VVhere if the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 bee taken for everie the sense is not currant because Christ compareth his bountifull providence over hearbes and flowers not with a peece of Salomons glorie but with all and the whole For whosoever shal otherwise interpret the greeke word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 shall no litle derogate from the magnificence of Christ his providence as also frustrate his comparison Our holie father Abraham in matters of salvation doth not send vs to traditions but to the scriptures of Moses and the prophets For thus it is written Habent Mosen Prophetas audiant illos They have Moses and the prophets let them heare them As if he had said now the law is not studied now the prophets are contemned now God is not heard speaking in his word Some would haue angels come downe from heaven some desire miracles other some the dead to rise againe But to heare Moses and the prophets that is to read the scriptures is the true and only way to attaine eternal life And doubtlesse if the scriptures be meanes to bring vs to salvation which the papistes dare not denie then must they be sufficient for that end or else Christes workes should be vnperfect For which cause Saint Iohn writeth thus Haec autem scripta sunt vt credatis quod Iesus est Christus filius Dei vt eredentes vitam habeatis in nomine ipsius But these things are written that yee may beleeve Iesus to be Christ the sonne of God and that by beliefe yee may have life in his name Loe Saint Iohn affirmeth so much to be written as is sufficient for our beliefe through which we must be saved The popish glosse vpon the same text hath these wordes Haec quae fecit Iesus ante resurrectionem et post dicit se scripsisse vt fidem astruat qua vita habeatur The thinges that Iesus did before and after his resurrection hee caused to be written for the establishing of that faith which giveth life Nicolaus Lyranus their owne deare doctor confirmeth the same in these wordes In nomine eius i. per fidem nominis Christi quia secundum quod dicitur Act. 4. neque enim aliud nomen est sub coelo datum hominibus in quo nos oporteat salvos fieri In his name that is through faith of the name of Christ because as is said in the actes ther is no other name vnder heaven given vnto men in which we can be saved S. Hierome though so much liked of the papistes is not for all that dissonant from the rest For thus doth he write Ergo nec parentum nec maiorum error sequenáus est sed auctoritas scripturarum Dei docentis imperium Therefore we must neither follow the errour of our parents nor of our auncestours but the auctoritie of the scriptures and the commandemēt of God that teacheth vs. S. August that grave father that glistering beame that strong piller of Christs church doth avouch the same truth in words yet more manifest writing in this maner Cūmulta fecisset Dom. Iesus nō omnia scripta sunt electa sunt autem quae scriberentur quae saluti credentium sufficere videbantur where as our Lord Iesus did manie thinges all were not written but so much was appointed to be written as was thought sufficient for the salvation of the faithfull What more forceable wordes can be wished what more effectuall narration can be expected what more sensible speeches can bee vsed yet if it be possible to say more herein the selfe same Augustine will performe it in another place where he hath these expresse words In his enim quae aperte in scriptura posita sunt inveniuntur illa omnia quae continent fidem more sque vivendi spem scilicet atque charitatem For in those things which are plainely set downe in the scripture are found all those thinges which conteine our faith and maners that is hope and charitie Loe all things that concerne faith hope and charitie are plainly found in holie scripture where it is diligently to be observed that Saint Augustine doth not onelie say that all thinges conteining faith hope and charitie are to bee found in the scripture but hee doth further say that all such thinges are plainlie set downe in the scriptures VVherevpon I inferre this notable document against popish doctrine that albeit manie thinges in manie places of the scripture bee obscure and intricate which I willinglie graunt vnto the papistes consequentlie that the same surpasse the capacity and iudgement of the vulgar sort yet are all thinges concerning our beleefe concerning our maners concerning our hope concerning our charity concerning our salvation so plaine and so manifest as everie one even of the meanest iudgement may easilie perceive and vnderstande the same and this the papistes must perforce graunt vnto mee neither will I require more at their handes This is confirmed by my Lord of Rochester their learned Bishoppe and reputed martire For these bee his wordes as hee himselfe hath vttered them Scriptura sacra conclave quoddam est omnium veritatum qua Christianis scitu necessariae sunt The holie scripture is a cellar parlour or storehouse of all truthes which are needfull to be knowen of Christians NOVV gentle reader by this bishops confession it is evideut that popish vnwritten traditions are not needfull or necessarie for christians and so with no reason can they be thrust vppon vs. Dionysius Areopagita who lived in the Apostles time is of the same mind These are his wordes Omnino igitur non audendum est quicquam de summa abstrusaque divinitate aut dicere aut cogitare praeter eaquae nobis divinitus scriptae divinae enuntiarunt In no wise therefore may wee make bold to speake or thinke anie thing of the most high and ineffable divinitie but that onelie which holie writ hath revealed vnto vs from heaven Melchior Canus albeit he labour with tooth and naile to prove the consent of the fathers to yeelde vs an vndoubted argument of the truth yet can hee not denie that
the scripture is perfect and most sufficient in everierespect These are his wordes Sedquaer at hic for sit an aliquis cumsit perfectus scriptur arum canon sibique adomnia satis superque sufficiat quid opus est vt ei sanctorum intelligentia iung atur auctoritas But some man happily here will demaund that since the canon of the scripture is perfect and most sufficient of it selfe to everie end and in everie respect what neede have wee to ioine with the same either the exposition or the authoritie of the fathers Thus saith Canus not denying the sufficiencie of the holie scripture but requiring the commentaries of the fathers for the better vnderstanding of the same whose opinion in that respect I doe not whollie dislike as is alreadie declared in the ninth chapter This being so it followeth by a necessarie consequent that neither yong nor old rich nor pore men nor women learned nor vnlearned ought to be debarred from reading of the scriptures which my doctrine was altogether practicall in the auncient and primitive church For confirmation whereof no greater testimonie can be had then the old vulgar translations of the bibles In which behalfe I savv verie latelie to my great comfort in the librarie of Emmanuell colledge in Cambridge an English Bible of such antiquitie as I could not vnderstand perfectlie the greater part of the wordes vvhich is an evident demonstration that bibles were in old time translated into the vulgar tongue so as the common people might reade them Thomas Aquinas whose person the church of Rome hath canonized for a saint and his doctrine for authenticall teacheth vs not to beleeue anie thing concerning God save that onelie vvhich is conteined in the scripture expresselie or at least significantlie These be his wordes Dicendum quod de deo dicere non debemus quod in sacrae scriptur a non invenitur velperverba velper sensum vve must answere that nothing is to bee verified of God which is not conteined in holie writ either expresselie or else in sense And in another place the same Aquinas saith thus Quicquid enim ille Christus de suis factis dictis nos legere voluit hoc scribendum illis tanquam suis manibus imperauit For vvhatsoeuer Christ vvould haue vs to reade of his doinges and sayinges that he commaunded his Apostles to vvrite as if hee had done it vvith his ovvne handes In vvhich vvords Aquinas avoucheth most plainlie that al things necessarie for our salvation are conteined in the scriptures For in Christes deedes are conteined his miracles his life his conversation in his sayings are conteined his preaching his teaching hic doctrine If then this be true as it is most true for the papistes neither can nor will denie Aquinas that whatsoever Christ vvould haue vs to knovv of his miracles of his life of his conversation of his preaching of his teaching of his doctrine the same is novv vvritten in the scriptures no man doubtlesse but he that vvill cum ratione insanire can denie all thinges necessarie for our salvation to be conteined in the holie scriptures vvith Aquinas agreeth their ovvne renovvmed professor and deare frier Franciscus Victoria vvhose vvordes are these Non est mihi certum licet omnes dicant quòdin scriptur a non continetur I doe not thinke it certaine albeit all vvriters say so because I can not find it in the scripture Againe in an other place he vvriteth in this maner Propter quas opiniones nullo modo debemus discedere a regula synceritate scriptur arum For vvhich opinions we must by no meanes depart from the rule and sinceritie of the scriptures I could say much more herein but nothing can be more effectuall against the papistes then to confute them by their ovvne approved doctors And my desire also is to avoide all superfluous words The second Conclusion ALL persons ought to read the scriptures diligentlie because out of them even the simplest of all may gather so much as shall bee necessarie for their salvation This I say against that popish ridiculous vnchristian and pestilent abuse in vvhich they deliver by vvay of tradition to the people the scriptures sacramentes and church service in a strange tongue to them vnknowen vvhich their vngodlie and intollerable dealing S. Chrisostome most sharplie reprooveth in manie places vvherof I vvill onelie alledge some fevv In his commentarie vpon Saint Paul he hath these vvordes Et vos itaque silectioni cum animi alacritate volueritis attendere nullo alio preterea opus habebitis verus enim est sermo Christi cum dicit quaerite invenietis pulsate aperietur verum quia plures exijs qui huc convenere liberorum educationem vxoris curam gubernandaeque domus in sesereceperunt atque ideo non sustinent totos se labori isti addicere saltem ad percipienda quae alij collegerunt excitamini tantum ijs quae dicuntur audiendis impendite diligentiae quantum colligendis pecunijs tametsi enim turpe sit non nisi tantum a vobis exigere tamen conenti erimus sivel tantum prestetis nam hinc innumera mala nata sunt quod scripturae ignorantur hinc erupit multa illa haere seon pernicies hinc vita dissoluta hinc inutiles labores quēadmodum enim qui luce ista privati sunt recta vtique non pergunt ita qui adradios divinarum scripturarum non respiciunt multa coguntur continuo delinquere vtpote in longe peioribus tenebris ambulantes quod ne nobis vsuveniat oculos ad spelndorem apostolicorum verborum aperiamus If therefore you vvil read the scriptures vvith alacritie of minde you shall neede no other helpe at all for Christes vvord is true vvhen he saith Seeke and yeee shall finde knocke and it shall bee opened vnto yov But for that manie of you are charged vvith vviues children and domestical regiment and so cannot vvhollie addict your selves to this stndie and yet at least be readie to heare vvhat others haue gathered and bestovv so much diligence in heering vvhat is said as you doe in scraping vvorldlie goods together for although it bee a shame to aske no more of you yet vvill I bee content if yee doe so much For this is the cause of infinite evils that you are ignorant in the scriptures From hence springeth the manifold mischiefe of heresies from hence dissolute life from hence vaine and vnprofitable labours For euen as they that are deprived of this light can not goe on the right way so they that doe not behold the beames of holie scripture are enforced incontinentlie to offend in many things as walking in farre greater darkenesse This is the censure of saint Chrysostome out of which I note 1 First that whosoeuer studieth the scriptures seriouslie and with alacritie shall finde therein and vnderstand so much as is necessarie for his salvation And consequently that our disholie father the pope debarreth
vs of the ordinarie meanes of our salvation when hee vppon paine of excommunication inhibiteth vs to reade the scriptures in our vulgar tongue vnlesse we have his licence and dispensation so to doe 3 I note secondly that if it be a shame for such as are charged with wives children and families only to heare sermons not to studye the scriptures vvithall much more is it a shame for others that bee more free not to read them diligently and greatest shame of al for a bishop to approve them that wil not so doe I note thirdlie that heresies dissolute life and all other evils proceede of ignorance and not reading the scriptures Againe the said Chrysostome in another place hath these vvordes Propterea obsecro vt subinde huc veniatis divinae scripturae lectionem diligenter auscultetis nec solum cum huc venitis sed domi divina biblia in manus sumite viilitatem in illis positam magno studio suscipite paulo post tantum igitur lucrum oro ne per negligentiam amittemus sed domi vacemus divinarum scripturarum lectiooni hic praesentes non in nugis invtilibus colloquijs temporis decoquamus I beseech you therefore that you come hither novv then and attend diligently the hearing of holie scripture neither onely when ye come hither but at home also take the holie bibles into your hands with great studie receive commoditie vvhich is in them conteined I pray you therefore let vs not negligently loose so great gaine but vvhen vve are at home let vs then apply our selues to read the holie scriptures and being here let vs not spende our time idlely vainly And in another place he speaketh in this maner Hoc igitur pacto si scripturas diligenter scrutari voluerimus salutem assequi poterimus sipenitus in eis ver sabimur doctrinam rectam vitam erudiemur Et paulo posi Non enim fieri potest vt qui Deum audiat alloquatur Deū assequatur vtilitatem sequitur vacemus ergo scripturis dilectissime et saltē evangelijs ea frequēter pertractemus By this maner then if we will search the scriptures diligentlie we shall attaine salvation if we shall be wholie conversant in them we shall be taught both right doctrine and good life For it can not bee but he shall get profite that both heareth and talketh with God Let vs therfore studie the scriptures my dearest and at the least let vs often read the holie gospels In and by which words as we see most evidentlie SaInt Chrysostome greatlie lamenteth that the people in his time were so negligent in reading the holie scriptures vvhat therefore would that holie father say if he lived in these our daies when the pope burneth such scriptures as the people vnderstand when the pope commaundeth all thinges to be done in strange tongues when the pope excommunicateth all lay persons be they never so well learned that reason in matters of their faith VVhat would he say if he heard priestes pronounce absolution in their popish sacrament of penance which neither the penitents nor the priestes themselves doe oftentimes vnderstand Nay what would he say if he were this day in romish churches where they doe not onely read their church-service in Latine but also Latine homilies or sermons vnto the vulgar sort which yet they teatme an exposition of the scripture VVhich thing is done in everie festivall day of nine Lessons in the tyme of Mattins In fine what would hee say if hee knew the rude vulgar sort commaunded to heare the gospell read in Latine and withall should see them listening with their eares least anie word should not be heard though impossible to bee vnderstood vvould he not and mighte hee not iustlie say with the holie Apostle that they were madde Ves doubtlesse Origen who lived above a thousand and three hundred yeares sithence doth not onelie exhort the people seriouslie to reade the scriprures but withall sheweth plainelie that in his time they were reade in the vulgar tongue These are his words Certe si non omnia possumus saltem ea quae nunc docentur in ecclesia vel quae recitantur memoriae commendemus Doubtlesse if we can not beare away all thinges conteined in the scriptures at the least let vs remēber those things which are taught read in the Church In which words he speaketh not onely of sermons but also of the gospels epistles praiers lessons and histories of the bible For sermons are conteined in the worde decentur which are preached and the rest in the word recitantur which are read or rehearsed And if such thinges had beene read in a strange tongue the vulgar sort could not haue committed them to memorie Saint Augustine doth not onely exhort to reade the scriptures but also giveth great encouragement thereto avouching that the scriptures may be vnderstood with all facilitie Magnifice igitur salubriter spiritus sanctus ita scriptur as sanctas modificavit vt locis apertioribus fami occurreret obscurioribus autem fastidia detergeret The holie ghost hath so magnificallie and healthfullie measured the holie scriptures that in the obscure places lothsomnes is taken away and with the places that be plaine and easie our hunger is satisfyed And his reason hereof followeth in these next wordes Nihil enim fere de illis obscuritatibus eruitur quod non plani ssime dictum alibi reperiatur For almost nothing is conteined in obscure places which is not most plainelie vttered in some other place so then by the testimonie of this holie father so auncient for antiquitie so holie for vertue so grave for auctoritie so profound for his iudgement so rare for his wit so renowmed for his learning that the papistes hitherto have admired his doctrine as an oracle from heaven the holie scriptures are easie to be vnderstood and whatsoever is obscurelie spoken in one place the same is plainlie told in another To conclude the practise of those godlie Christians of whom we reade in the Actes of the Apostles decideth this controversie sufficientlie as who beeing meere lay-men did notwithstanding studie the scriptures most seriouslie The 3. Conclusion TRaditions are to be examined by the holie scriptures the true touchstone of veritie and to be admitted when they are found consonant to the same This conclusion is evidentlie proved by the iudgement practicall of saint Cyprian For he being required by Stephanus then bishop of Rome to yeelde vnto traditions did not terme the said Stephanus by the title of Pope or holinesse as now the romish maner is but by the name of fellow or brother and calling him blind byarde not Saint Peters successour who could not erre did contemne vtterlie reiect that tradition which the said Stephanus requested him to yeelde vnto His verie owne words are these Nihil innovetur inquit nisiquod traditumest vnde est istae traditio vtrumne de
pope hath given this auctoritie to the priest But alas that can not possibly be graunted For this is a constant axiome with the papists par in parem non habet potestatem When two are of equall auctoritie the one can not make a law for or against the other Well since none of these waies can content his holines let vs heare what his owne deare vassals can say in his defense Iosephus Angles vnfoldeth this great difficultie at large when he thus writeth Canus affert tres opiniones prima est S. Thomae D. Bonaventurae quibus adhasit Turrecremata Secunda opinio est Paludani asserentis habere authoritatem absolvendi non à Papa sed à Christo. Tertia est Caietani dicentis iurisdictionem quam habet sacerdos absolvendi Papam nec esse à Christo neque à Papa neque ab ecclesia sed solum ex electione per hoc scilicet quod papa se subiicit illi illumque eligit Est quarta opinio qua tenetur quod quemadmodum in receptione ordinis datur vnicuique simplici sacerdoti potest as iurisdictionis respectu venialis mortalis quae poenitens alias confessus est etiam respectu cuiuscuÌ„que peccatoris in articulo mortis ita datur tunc iurisdictio eidem sacerdoti absolvendi papam Master Canus bringeth three opinions the first is of S. Thomas and S. Bonaventure to whome agreeth Turrecremata The second is the opinion of Paludanus who avoucheth that the Priest receiveth his authoritie not from the Pope but from Christ him selfe The third opinion is Caietans who affirmeth that the Priest hath authority to absolve the Pope neither from Christ nor from the Pope nor from the Church but onely by election to wit in that the Pope submitteth him selfe to the Priest and chooseth him And there is yet a fourth opinion which holdeth that as in receiving of priesthoode power of iurisdiction is given to every simple priest in respect of veniall sinnes and of those mortalls which the penitent nath otherwise confessed and also in respect of every sinner in the point of death so is iurisdiction then given to the said Priest that he may absolve the Pope Thus saith our reverend bishop and worthie fryer Ioseph Out of whose words I note 1 First that since our Lord is the God of peace and not of dissention as recordeth his holy Apostle in many places it must needes follow that this popish doctrine is not of God which is so devided against it selfe and therefore said Caietain truely though vnwittingly and to another ende when he denied the priest to have his authoritie from Christ or from his Church 2 I note secondly that their doctrine is meere opinative as which is onely grounded vpon mans invention 3 I note thirdly that as the priestes iurisdiction is vncerten so is the Popes absolution also as which is consectarie therevnto and consequently that the Pope standeth in daunger of his salvation And so if I be not deceived the obscuritie of this conclusion is made evident The Corollarie FIRST therefore since auricular popish confession is not commaunded by Christ secondly since it was not practised by the Apostles thirdly since it was instituted onely by the positive lawe of man fourthly since the Greeke Church never admitted that lawe fifthly since it is contrarie not onely to the fathers but to popish doctours also sixtly since it bringeth the Pope him selfe to the hazard of his salvation I conclude that it is a sufficient motive for me to renounce the Romish religion as false erroneous and pernicious doctrine Thus much of the tenth and last Motive Peroratio I HAVE in this discourse gentle Reader briefly confuted ten special articles of popish faith and religion 1 First I haue shewed the insufficiencie blasphemie and absurdities of popish pardons 2 Secondly that the Pope both may erre and hath erred defacto not only as a priuate person in priuate opinion but euen as Pope and publike person in iudicial definitions 3 Thirdly that generall councels in these latter daies are nothing els but a meere mockerie sophistical subtiltie to deceiue Gods people withal 4 Fourthly that the Popes dispensations are wicked licentious and intollerable 5 Fiftly that Kings are above Popes that their power is independent that they are subiect to none but to God alone 6 Sixtly that popish dissention is of matters most important and incredible to such as are not wel acquainted with their bookes 7 Seaventhly that the writings of the auncient fathers are to be received with great reuerence yet so as we acknowledge them to be men to haue their errours and to binde vs to their authorities no further then they accord with the holy Scriptures 8 Eightly that all things necessarie for our salvation are conteined in the holy Scriptures and that popish traditions are so vncerten as the best learned papists can not agree therein 9 Ninthly that after this life there is neither merite nor demerite nor satisfaction to be made and that the booke of Machabees can not establish popish purgatorie 10 Tenthly that the specificall enumeration and confession of all our sinnes is not onely not commaunded by the Scriptures but repugnant to the same and impossible to be accomplished by the power of man All which points I have prooued not onely by Scriptures authorities and reasons but euen by the expresse testimonies of best learned papists A thing heretofore never performed by any to my knowledge and yet so forceable against the papists if I be not deceived as nothing can be more My desire was to content all to offend none to confirme the weake to instruct the ignorant to reclaime the seduced and to confound all arrogant disloyall subiects If â—ffect succeede correspondent to my option God be thanked for it who is the chiefe worker of every good act to whome with the Sonne and the holy Ghost three persons and one God be all honour power glorie and dominion nowe and ever AMEN 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Sapient 8. 1. Dionys. Arâ—â— pag. de divinis nominibus c. 4 2. Thess. 2. v. 4 5 6 7 8 9. 1 Greg. 9. lib. 1. decret tit 33. cap. 6. Glossa ibid. Gregor ubi supra Glossat lib. 1. decretat tit 7. cap. 3. Gerson de potestat eccles consider 12. part 3. Gerson ubi supra Bellarminus de Rom. Pont. lib. 5. cap. 8 1 2 3 Secundò principalitèr Bernar. ad Gaufridum epist. 125. 3 Robertus Bellarminus lib. 5. de Rom. Pontif. cap. 7. Bellarm. cod cap. Bellarm. cap. codem Bellarm. ubi supra 1 2 3 Prou. c. 8. 15. Rom. c. 13. v. 1. 4 Sylvest de papa para 2. 5 Bellar. derom pontif lib. 5. cap. 7. Luc. 12. 2. Mat. 16. 13. Mat. 23. 3. Mat. 15. 3. Mat. 15. 9. 1. Ioh. 4. 3. Roffensis cont assertion Luther art 18. prope initium Deut. cap. 2. vers 4. 2. Machab. cap. 12. vers 26. Matt. cap. 11. vers 25. Bellar. lib.