together with vs yet are deadly enemies to the effectuall operation thereof denying the power of it and deriding such as striue to liue strictly and would expresse the liuely vertue and force of it What diuisions what varietie of sects and schismes haue and doe yet hinder the growth of our Religion And lastly these last Enemies of it the Papists vnder that Antichrist of Rome against whom if God himselfe had not fought and vpheld our Religion they had ere this vtterly extinguished it And who will denie this that seriously considereth our simplicitie and their deepe policie our too much distractions their strong combination our small strength their great power our meane estates their abundance of wealth and treasures our more then supine carelesnesse their continuall watchfulnesse and daily endeuours which possibly Satan can put into their hearts to root out our holy profession as by their cruell Inquisition mercilesse persecution barbarous Massacres horrible Treasons vniust Inuasions bloody Warres the neuer to be forgotten Gunpowder plot killing of Kings faithlesse and treacherous dealings playing fast and loose with vs by lying Equiuocations and mentall Reseruations in all couenants promises and oathes besides their shamelesse belying our persons foule and false taxing vs of errours and heresies imputed to our doctrine and Religion Libertinisme Atheisme and other abominations their flattering of Kings and suggestion of falshoods of disloyaltie against such as they find best affected to our Religion their politike framing of their religion for worldly respects to euery mans humor to entangle the sooner mens minds to get the more to them besides all those hellish deuices before mentioned in the first argument among which is the corrupting of Fathers and the Writings of learned men both old and new that so we might be altogether destitute of all humane testimonies to witnesse with vs or any helpe of man but to be left to stand as indeed wee doe by the hand of God the onely Author of our Faith and Religion and the onely blessed Preseruer of the same hitherto before Luther was borne who now also euen in these troublesome times doth keepe it on foote against all the power and policie of our Enemies praysed bee his holy Name for euer and euer Amen If our Aduersaries thinke that here is all that can be said for vs or that onely we can thus prooue our Religion they are much deceiued for much more may bee said and also otherwise euen by Historie may our Religion and the Professours be shewed at large This for the present is onely to confirme such as in our Church truly feare God and make conscience of their wayes for such doers of Gods will shall know whether this doctrine be of God or no Ioh. 7.17 THE AVTHORS FARTHER HELPE TO stay the honest-hearted Protestant from Apostacie WEl-disposed Reader thou hast an answer to the question Where our Religion was before Luther If yet further they aske thee Where were the Professors thereof also before this time Thou mayst thence shape them this answere Euen where the Apostles and Apostolicall men did teach it and where Saints professed it and Martyrs dyed for it It is not so difficult a matter as they would make the world beleeue to bring forth in euery Age the Professours of this our Christian Faith A harder and a more impossible taske is it for them to prooue from Christ and his Apostles who and where the persons were that in euery Age made an intire profession of euery point which now this their present Romish Church teacheth and practiseth We will doe the former if they will faithfully performe this latter They haue set out as they call it a Catalogue of chiefe Pastors Generall Councels and Catholike Professors of which they much glory seducing therewith the simple and vnaduised They doe begin with Christ then follow they on with Saint Peter and other Bishops of Rome on the one side on the other they place the Virgin Marie Iohn Baptist Saint Iohn the Apostle with other Apostles and Euangelists then they reckon vp Christian Churches as the Romans Corinthians Galatians and the rest to whom Saint Paul and Saint Peter wrote and so they run on along to the end Now this is it that thou shouldest demand of them and put them to proue whether Christ and his Apostles taught and all the rest there mentioned did learne and practise all that the Church of Rome now doth If they can shew this but in the first hundred of yeeres professe thou to be satisfied and not to require farther after a continuall succession in the Ages following Presse this home to them stand onely vpon this this is plaine dealing to begin with them where they begin And if they will not indeuour to satisfie thee in this certainely the Catalogue of the names of Christ of his Apostles and the rest in the Primitiue Church are put onely in the forefront to coozen thee if they can For will they begin it with Christ Saint Peter and the rest and yet not proue them of their present Religion If they can why doe they it not Why doe they seeke to put it off If they cannot why claime they these for the authors and maintainers of this their present Romish Religion I say their present Romish Religion because there is a great difference betweene the Religion once at Rome in the Apostles dayes and the Religion of Rome now that of the Church then this of the Court and faction there now And here I pray thee wel vnderstand this one thing to wit what they meane by their Religion as we also doe by our Religion we neither side took it only for that wherein we both do agree but chiefely because of the distinct differences thereof either from the other this obserue that thou mayst not be deceiued by the Catalogue And the better to cleare thy iudgement therein let them shew thee that Iesus Christ that also his Apostles with the rest in the first hundred of yeeres taught not onely that wherein wee and they doe agree for so they gaine nothing to themselues but the Catalogue therein serues for vs aswell as for them but also that they taught and obserued all their now present differences from vs as for example let them shew that then was taught and the Churches learned I. To picture the holy Trinitie to make Images to worship them to adore the Virgin Marie as our Lady and the Queene of Heauen also to pray vnto other Saints and Angels and to adore their Images and Reliques II. To hold the Scriptures to be imperfect and obscure that the Apocryphall bookes were of diuine Authoritie the Latine Translation was to bee authenticall that Traditions were to be added to perfit the Scriptures concerning necessarie matters of saluation that the authoritie of the holy Scriptures doth depend vpon the authoritie of the Church that they are not to be made so free as to be read and studied of all without licence III.
the Scriptures receiue authoritie from the Church and the sense thereof onely subiect vnto her That the Vulgar Latin translation is only to be admitted as authenticall That the Scriptures be imperfect and are not the certaine rule of faith That there are traditions besides for perfecting the Scriptures and to bee receiued with equall authoritie with Scriptures III. Of the Church That the Catholike Church is not the company onely of Gods elect people That the Church of Rome cannot erre IV. Of the Pope Where is Scripture to proue that Peter was at Rome and Bishop there twenty fiue yeeres That he was to be appointed Vicar of Christ That the Pope is the vniuersall Bishop That he onely is Peters successour and Christs Vicar That he cannot erre è Cathedra That he is aboue Councels That hee may depose Kings from their temporall estates and dispose of their Kingdomes That he can dispense with sinnes against the plaine Law of God That he can set soules free out of torments after this life V. Of the Clergie and Ecclesiasticall persons In what place of Scripture is it taught that there be Popes Cardinals and Popish Prelates like Princes That there are now Priests to whom a speciall Office of Priesthood is assigned That there bee seuen degrees thereof That a man is now appointed in the time of the Gospell to offer sacrifices daily for the quicke and the dead That all Churchmen so called are to liue vnmarried That a Monasticall life is the best estate That Ecclesiasticall persons are exempt from secular authority VI. Of the Sacraments Where doth the Scripture teach that Baptisme is to bee administred with Chrisme Oyle Coniuring Salt Spittle That there is such a spirituall kindred betweene the Witnesses and the party baptized as also betwixt the Parents and Children of those Witnesses as it hindreth marriage without a dispensation betwixt one another though there be otherwise no kindred either of affinity or consanguinity That Iesus Christ is bodily and wholly as he is Man borne of the Virgin Mary in the Sacrament the Bread being turned into his Flesh That it is a sacrifice for the quick and the dead That the Cake is to bee reserued and carryed about in pompe and that all are to fall downe to it and worship it That it is to bee administred but in one kind That the Lay people must not take it but gape and eate it That the Priest that saith Masse must haue a shauen Crowne haue his Amice Girdle Aube Manuple Stole Chesible and other pretended holy vestments That he must vse such crossings turning duckings liftings whisperings gapings minglings of wine and water such lickings and other variety of stagelike gestures VII Of Prayer That it must be in Latine That not God onely but Saints may be prayed vnto That the dead are to be prayed for That it is lawfull to pray by number to say the same 150. times and to pray vpon Beades VIII Of Worship What written Word teacheth that Diuine Seruice is to bee said onely in the Latine Tongue That Saints and their Reliques are to be adored That Images and Pictures are to be in Churches for adoration sake and to be Lay-mens bookes IX Of the Virgin Mary That she was borne without sinne That she is the Queene of Heauen the Lady of the World That she is diuinely to be worshipped That shee is to haue her proper seruice and her Aue Maries X. Of the Church or Temple the place of publike worship What Scripture that Belles are to bee baptized That there must bee Altars Veiles Holy-water Holy-ashes Palmes and many such trumperies That children dying without Baptisme are not to be buried in the Church-yard and that there is for their soules a Limbus Infantium XI Of dayes Where doe the Apostles teach that there are such a number of Holy-dayes as be in that Religion That a speciall Holinesse is to be put in the obseruation of dayes That dayes and times are to bee set apart to the worship of Saints XII Of meates Where in Scripture reade they that there is such a difference of meates as the obseruation of such a difference at some times is more holy then at other some times All these differences are humane inuentions without warrant of Scriptures Now let them shew that any of these sorts of Martyrs beleeued and professed these differences if they cannot then the conclusion is good that they were not their Martyrs by these differences but in common still ours as well as theirs III. If these differences be but a very patchery of Heresies Iudaisme and Paganisme then in respect thereof they cannot be their Martyrs for Martyrs suffered for none of these three but in detestation thereof were grieuously persecuted by Iewes Pagans and Heretikes But the anticedent is most true as our learned men haue made it manifest For Heresies Bish Morton Doct. Whitacres Gab. Powel and Doctor Willet For Iudaisme Doctor Raynolds hath sufficiently manifested it and somewhat of Paganisme But for this reade Thom. Moresin Doctor of Physick his whole booke called Papatus printed at Edenburgh and Gab. Powel on the first Chapter to the Romanes For all three see a late published booke called The three Conformities And therefore in respect of these differences being hereticall Iewish and Paganish these Martyrs are none of their Martyrs neither did their sufferings make good any whit this their now present Religion IV. If these differences from our Religion doe offer violence to the three Offices of Christ and make their publike worship in many things blasphemous and idolatrous then in respect of such differences they are not their Martyrs But the antecedent is true Ergo the consequent To proue the antecedent Doctor Fownes hath lately of purpose set forth his Trisagion wherein he hath sufficiently confirmed it out of their publike Missaes Breuiaries Portuses Rosaries Liturgies Psalters Primers and Manuals of prayers to which I referre the Reader for full satisfaction And doe conclude therefore that these blessed Martyrs were none of theirs by vertue of these differences V. If many of these differences of theirs be not only besides Scripture without warrant from thence as before is shewed but also flat against Scripture and against our common tenents agreed vpon betweene vs and them then in respect of these differences they are not their Martyrs For they did not suffer for those things which were against Scripture and the common tenents of Christianity wherein we and our Aduersaries doe agree If they dare affirme this let them giue instances thereof But many of these their differences are against Scripture and against the common tenents of Christianity in which we both agree Which being so these their differences can be no part of Christianity because they be against both the rule and also against the grounds of Christianity Therefore the consequence is true That there are such differences betweene vs I instance for proofe in these ensuing That the Scriptures are
the people vpon the King as a Father to looke to his children to call them to the Faith and Law of Christ and to the holy Church hereby acknowledging the King to bee the supreme Head and Gouernour in all causes aswell Ecclesiasticall as Ciuill and to be Gods Vicar in his owne Realme which title that Bishop twice nameth in that Epistle Thus we see out of this short Epistle what we may thinke of the Religion then at Rome and how agreeing to ours now and differing from theirs at this present The third conuersion for which they magnifie so much this Austin but very falsely was in Gregorie the Great his dayes In which time though many corruptions were crept into the Church of Rome yet the maine points of our differences wherein we differ from this present Romish superstition were then taught in that Church as may appeare out of the writings of Gregorie as he did then teach concerning holy Scriptures the grace of God of Freewill of the Law of iustification of Faith of good Workes also concerning the not worshipping of Images likewise of the acknowledging of the two Sacraments also his iudgement of the Church of the head of the Church of Antichrist of an vniuersall Bishop of secular power ouer Bishops of Marriage of soules departed and whither they went Gregorie was no Patrone of the Romish Masse nor of the corporall and transubstantiated bread nor of merit nor of Papall supremacy nor of temporall iurisdiction ouer Kings and Emperours nor of the necessitie of Ceremonies alike in euery Church Gregorie held not the Machabees canonicall but taught the perfection of Canonicall Scripture he exhorted Lay men to the studie of them and in his time the Scriptures were allowed and prayers were said in a knowne and vulgar tongue he held the Catholike Church to be the elect and the reprobate out of it and was against marriages within degrees forbidden Leuit. 18. Thus we see that at the three conuersions our Religion now and that at Rome then was one and the same Neither can our aduersaries shew the contrary from Scripture from the vniforme consent of ancient Fathers either Greeke or Latine or from generall Councels within those times no nor from the Bishops of Rome themselues for that space if they will make conscience to deale squarely plainly and honestly in their proofes And that they may so doe I would entreate to lay aside first all counterfeite Decretall Epistles such as those be which are ascribed to the Bishops of Rome in the first 300 yeeres as our learned men haue prooued both by reasons and from the testimonie of the learned among them Secondly those partly corrupted and partly also counterfeit Decretall Epistles in the next 300. yeeres Thirdly all the counterfeite and corrupt Canons of Councels Fourthly all the bastard writings put vpon the ancient Fathers Fifthly the places corrupted in any of their writings If they will cast off this great and wicked deceite in alleaging these for themselues the truth of my assertion That this our Religion was then at Rome and not this their present Romish faith will manifestly appeare to all men not wilfully blinded for by and worldly respects Lastly the Christian Religion first planted in Ireland was before Austins comming in hither For as is afore spoken Scottish and Irish Christian Bishops withstood him at his comming But that which was then receiued and professed by the ancient Irish was for substance the very same which is now here in England by publike authoritie maintained as is substantially proued by a godly learned Father in all Antiquities of the Church the Lord Bishop of Meeth to which I referre euery Reader which desireth to bee satisfied in theirs and our agreement about Scripture translations predestination freewill the Law sinne free remission of sins iustification by faith onely imperfection of sanctification merit purgatory and soules departed about Gods worship Images the Masse communicating in both kinds and the mysticall receiuing of the Sacrament That Learned man doth shew how wee and they doe agree in all these things which are the most maine points of faith betwixt our aduersaties and vs. And therefore I conclude from this and all that formerly hath been produced in this fifth Argument that this our present Religion was heere in this Iland before Austines time VI. Argument From God the Author and continuall Preseruer of our Religion against all oppositions THat Religion which is of God was before Luthers time for that which is of God cannot bee ascribed to man nor so new as the late dayes of Luther For the true Religion is the most ancient and this is the good way to be found in the old wayes and not in new inuentions and new by-paths But our Religion is of God which I thus prooue It was taught by the Prophets and Apostles messengers of God the Prophets were sent by him 2. Chron. 36.16 2. King 17.13 Ier. 25.4 by whom God spake Heb. 1.1 and they taught and wrote as the holy Ghost directed them 2. Pet. 1.21 2. Tim. 3.25 The Apostles were sent of God Matth. 10.5 Mark 16.16 Gal. 1.1 12. and spake as God by his Spirit directed them Matth. 10.20 Ioh. 14.26 These were the publishers of our Religion both in the common truthes of our Christianitie as also in the differences from our aduersaries And for proofe wee appeale to the Apostles and Prophets extant writings Our Religion is written in those holy Scriptures the Booke of God as before is prooued It is propagated and preserued by such meanes as be ordained of God of which also before It is receiued beleeued conscience made of it onely by the operation of the Spirit of God It bringeth men to the true knowledge of God to beleeue onely in God to worship onely God onely to honour God and to be ruled onely after the will of God It s onely vpheld and preserued by Gods and not by mans power This will easily bee granted if men consider what weake meanes in mans iudgement hath spred it abroad and brought it into esteeme with such as professe it truly to wit onely preaching praying and constantly suffering in the defence thereof Also the small number and meanenesse of the persons for the most part which haue from the dayes of Iesus Christ made profession thereof and withall the little worldly policy vsed for helpe to support it But on the other side if the enemies thereof be well considered who haue continued from the beginning of the Gospell perpetually endeuouring to vndermine our Religion euery one will yeeld it to be the very hand of God that maintaineth it The multitude of them out of the Church are infinite as Iewes Gentiles Saracens Turkes and a world of other Infidels The Heretikes which haue risen vp and gone out from the true Church and haue laboured to shake the very foundation of our Christian Faith very many The Hypocrites and prophane are too many which professing the same
lawfull and free generall Councell which the Conuenticle of Trent was not till then we are not to be condemned of obstinacy and so as yet no Heretikes Thirdly we neither haue neglected nor yet doe neglect the true Catholike Churches authority into which wee are receiued by Baptisme For we very willingly desire to heare her sentence but where can that bee except in a generall Councels determination therein to heare the Catholike Church speaking to vs from the Scriptures we greatly long for we readily submit vnto Let her thus speak that we may know her Iudgement and we will hearken thereunto As for the Church of Romes authoritie we doe not acknowledge it ouer vs because it is not nor euer was in her best estate the Catholike Church but onely a particular Church which now also is a party questioned And therfore her authoritie for her selfe against vs is no more of vs to be regarded then by them our Churches authority for her selfe against them Seeing then that by their definition wee are not conuinced of heresie wee are not out of the Church as Heretikes II. Not as Schismatikes For albeit we haue no departed from this Romish Church yet are we no Schismatikes First for that we keepe communion with the Catholike Church into which we by Baptisme were admitted which is the body of Christ and wee truly members thereof in faith and loue through the worke of Gods Spirit being built vpon the foundation of the Apostles and Prophets Iesus Christ himselfe being the Corner-stone Secondly because this Church of Rome hath falne from the faith and obedience commended by S. Paul to be in the Church at Rome in his time as appeareth in many particulars before named which the Church first planted at Rome neuer taught neuer beleeued nor practised Therefore are we no Schismatikes for leauing her in those things wherein she hath left the true and Apostolike Church at the beginning Thirdly for that wee doe not breake off from her simply but in some respect that is as farre foorth as she hath forsaken her former selfe so that if shee would returne to the Catholike Faith and Religion and forsake her Trentisme Iesuitisme and Popery the inuentions of her owne added to that which first she did professe wee want not charitie towards her to vnite our selues vnto her againe For otherwise neither our true loue to God nor true loue to his Church will suffer vs to liue with her so defiled as she is in the spirituall bond of sacred loue which knits the true members of Christ one to another Heauenly charity which maketh this vnitie admitteth not of such things into the vnitie of faith as bee taught and practised in that Church both sinfull against God and pernicious to mens soules yea vtter destruction to them without hearty repentance Fourthly wee haue a warrant yea a commandement from God to separate our selues from her for that she is become the great Whore and spirituall Babylon Reuel 18.4 This charge of God freeth vs from Schisme for there is no sin no Schisme in that which God commandeth to be done Fifthly we by leauing this Romish Church doe not deuide our selues from the true Catholike and Apostolike Church but by this separation doe we indeed returne to the vnitie of it and to our first blessed estate therein when first the Gospell was here planted in this Iland by Apostles or Apostolicall men which came hither not from Rome but from Ierusalem our Mother Church where the Lord and his blessed Apostles first began to teach and erect a Church which is the Church we returne vnto in doctrine and worship of God from which Holy Catholike and Apostolike Church wee were drawne by the vsurping and tyrannical power and iurisdiction of the Pope and his faction and the generall backsliding of this his Church So as this which they call Schisme is no Schisme in vs but a forsaking of schisme in them and is only a returning vnto and a recouerie of our selues againe to our former vnion with Christs true Church beginning at Ierusalem and planted here many hundred yeeres before the Monke Austin euer came into England Sixthly They are properly called Schismatikes saith Aquinas which of their owne accord and will separate themselues from the vnitie of the Church If this be true in the iudgement of this their owne so greatly honoured Doctor then certainely wee are no Schismatikes First of our owne accord and will we make not a separation but are inforced therto by the power of Gods commandement to come out of this Babylon to auoyde her sinnes to escape thereby her punishments She her selfe hath caused deuision and offences contrary to the doctrine which shee once receiued as the Epistles of S. Paul and S. Peter do in many particulars witnesse against her The Apostle S. Paul therefore wils vs to auoyde her and such as cause deuision and offences contrary to the Apostles doctrine Rom. 16.17 It may seeme from hence that a faction begun euen then among you Secondly we doe not separate from the Church that is from the vniuersall Catholike Church but from a Church that is the particular Church of Rome for Thomas doth not say He is a Schismatike which separateth from a Church but from the vnitie of the Church to wit the Church vniuersall which is but one For indeed no reason can bee giuen why any should deuide themselues from the true Catholike Church but good reasons may be giuen why a particular Church may be and ought to bee forsaken as wee doe giue for our departing from the Church of Rome for we are commanded to forsake Idolaters 1. Cor. 5.11 Heretikes Tit. 3.10 such as bring not the doctrine of Christ and doe not abide therein 2. Ioh. 10. and her that is called Babylon Reuel 18.4 Thirdly before we can be Schismatikes we must forsake the vnitie of the Church Now wherein stands this vnitie Standeth it only in affection of loue or also in the faith of the truth For both these graces the Apostle commendeth the Churches Ephes 1.15 2. Thes 1.3 and faith is preferred to the first place in both Scriptures We haue not forsaken the vnitie of the Faith of which S. Paul speakes Eph 4.13 For we teach the doctrine of the Apostles and no other in any thing when we differ from this present Church of Rome which hath lost her first faith of truth in many things Now can true diuine loue be there kept where faith is lost or can there be charitie to vnite where doctrine doth deuide Can light and darkenesse truth and falsehood cohabite in loue Truth and loue onely dwell together and for truths sake loue separateth from falshood wheresoeuer she finds it And therefore except they can proue that we haue lost the vnitie of faith wee haue not forsaken the vnitie of the Church in loue as the former reasons shew To conclude were the Priests and Leuites Schismatikes which left
will abusiuely now and then alleage Scripture yet is he a deadly enemie to the Scriptures he will not leade to the right vse of them nor perswade men to frame their Religion and life after them but rather doth suggest the cleane contrarie as the storie of the Scriptures witnesseth and our owne temptations tell vs. For as a Father saith The Deuill cannot endure to haue any to studie the Scriptures that is torment and paine aboue all paines to him He hath euer been a raiser vp of persecution against such as serue God in a Religion onely grounded vpon the Scriptures as hee was in the Iewes against the Apostles and the beleeuing Gentiles so in Gentiles Infidels against Christians in the Heretikes against the Orthodoxall in our Antichristian Aduersaries against vs and in all lewde liuers the children of disobedience in whom he beareth rule and whose hearts he stirreth vp to doe his will against all such as in a more strict manner endeuour to frame their liues after Gods Word though in general together they professe one God and haue receiued the same Baptisme and doe liue together in the same Church Therefore wee see that it cannot be the spirit of Satan that perswadeth to our so holy a Religion by the Scriptures vpon which onely it is settled seeing he so deadly hateth such a Religion and the sound and zealous Professours thereof III. It is not the spirit of man and Satan together as may appeare first in Heretikes who are led by Satan and their owne spirit These being not able to iustifie their heresies by holy Scripture they fall to weaken the authoritie of the Scriptures they will not rest on them but doe flie the light of them as Tertullian and other ancient Fathers witnesse of Heretikes in their times who left the Scriptures and ran to Traditions as did the Manichees Cerynthians Basilidians Carpocratians Marcionists Valentinians Arians and others Secondly In all will-worshippers which framing a seruice to God out of their owne braines cannot away to make holy Scriptures their guide but doe leaue them assoone as they bee addicted to their owne inuentions of which God by his Prophets in Scripture often complaines Thirdly In Heathen Idolaters who haue been set on worke by the Deuill to burne the Scriptures as did that wicked Dioclesian also here in Brittaine the Infidell Saxons and in Ierusalem that vngodly Iehoiakim who burnt the Prophecie of Ieremiah which Baruch writ from his mouth at that time Fourthly In our Aduersaries now who cannot rest with the Scriptures nor will admit them as the only Iudge in controuersies nor as the onely Rule of Religion And the very reason is because they teach and practise many things out of their owne spirit euen the doctrine of Deuils which the Scripture vtterly condemneth Their Sainted will-worshippers in their Heremeticall life and their world of Monkish Orders cannot abide the rule of Scripture their holy course of life so much admired and extolled yet onely of such as know not the power of Satan in the deceiueable wayes of his vnrighteousnesse dares not stand to be iudged ruled and squared after the rule of holy Scriptures yea as holy as they pretend to bee yet neither can they nor wil they wholly frame their seruice and deuotion and life after the Word of life And therefore we see that it cannot be the spirit of Man and Satan whether apart considered or conioyned that doth perswade mooue and further to the embracing of that Religion which is wholly grounded vpon the Scriptures as ours is And therefore not being either of these it followeth that it must needs bee the Spirit of God that thus perswadeth men to our Religion by the Scriptures wherein it is contained III. Our Religion appeareth to be written in and iustified by the Scriptures for that in those places it getteth entrance and thriueth where they are permitted to be studied and read of all and to be taught as the onely rule of Religion The Scriptures are the very life and strength of our Religion as is sufficiently knowne by experience to our very Aduersaries Now how could this be if our Religion were not that which is taught in the Scriptures For the Scripture as is aforesaid doth condemne Heretikes Heresies will-worship and will-worshippers idolatry and idolaters and is the Sword of the Spirit the breath of Christs mouth that consumeth the Man of Sinne. If our Religion were heresie or wil-worship or idolatrie or the inuention of that Man of sin the Scriptures could not be the life and strength thereof seeing they oppose and vtterly condemne those things IV. Our Religion standeth and is vpheld by such holy and heauenly meanes onely as the Scriptures allow and prescribe and which we find there to bee the onely meanes vsed at the first planting of Christian Religion by the Apostles in the Primitiue Church which were these that follow I. There was then the preaching of Gods Word This meanes was prescribed by our Sauiour Christ to make Disciples vnto him Mat. 28.19 20. and the same obserued by his Apostles Mark 16.15 20. Acts 2.14 10.34 11.19 So preaching of Gods Word is the meanes by which our Religion through Gods blessing is planted in mens hearts As also it was foretold and appointed that it should bee the meanes to regaine people from vnder Antichrist Reuel 10.11 14 6. II. There was the teaching of the grounds and principles of Christianitie then called milke now commonly called the Catechisme Heb. 6.1 5 12. 1. Cor. 3.2 This hath greatly furthered our Religion euen by the testimony of our Aduersaries and is a speciall meanes to informe the minds of the ignorant in the truth of our Religion that they may not be deceiued III. Then was teaching and preaching altogether out of the Scriptures of the Prophets The Apostles taught the Gospell onely out of them Rom. 1.2 Acts 26.22 28.23 the Scriptures they cited Acts 1.16 2.16 17. by them they confuted the Aduersaries Acts 17.2 18.28 So our teaching and preaching is out of the Scriptures of the Prophets and Apostles by these we confirme our doctrine and by these chiefely doe we confute our Aduersaries IV. Then was allowed the vse of the holy Scriptures indifferently to all sorts without restraint or exception they were free to all of the Laity both men and women The Apostles neuer forbade them to any nor euer reprooued any for reading or studying of them but commended them to all sorts 2. Tim. 3.15 16. 2. Pet. 1.19 20 21. and left it written as a matter worthy prayse in religious men the Eunuch and the Noble Baereans that they read and searched the Scriptures so also in godly women for training vp their children herein Acts 8.30 17.11 2. Tim. 1.5 3.15 Yea Peter whom our Aduersaries make their Rocke in generall telleth all Christian beleeuers that they should do well to take heed thereunto as to a sure Word 2.
Pet. 1.19 So is there here with vs the free vse of the Scriptures this wee commend to all sorts forbid them to none but rather hold them most religious who delight in the holy and reuerent studie of the Scriptures according to the practice of the ancient Primitiue Church in the Apostles dayes V. Then were there publike Assemblies where they met together 1. Cor. 11.18 19. Acts 1.13 2.46 and that vpon the first day of the weeke Acts 20.7 1. Cor. 16.2 These Assemblies none might forsake but all were mutually to exhort to the frequent vse of them Heb. 10.25 to beware of causing diuisions and offences contrary to the receiued doctrine of the Apostles Rom. 16.17 So haue wee publike Assemblies where wee meete on the first day of the weeke and at other times which all are bound to come vnto and none ought to forsake to preuent diuisions contrarie to the Apostolicall doctrine and to preserue the publike profession and exercise of our Religion VI. Then was there set ouer euery seuerall Assembly and Congregation such as might be able to teach hauing the ouersight of the people and care of their soules Acts 14.23 Tit. 1.5 Acts 20.28 Heb. 13.7 17. 1. Pet. 5.2 3. So is this in our Church a most excellent meanes to vphold our Religion VII Then was God onely worshipped and he onely prayed vnto in those Assemblies not Saints nor Angels nor the Virgin Marie In them prayers were made with one accord Acts 1.14 2.42 4.24 the Word read 1. Thes 5.27 Col 4.16 the Word preached Act. 20.7 the Sacraments administred Act. 2.42 1. Cor. 11.18 20 23 26. and the Lords Supper in both kinds deliuered 1. Cor. 10.16 Collections were also made for the poore 1. Cor. 16.12 and al things were performed to edification in a known tongue 1. Cor. 14. In our Assemblies God is onely worshipped to him onely we make our prayers and neither to Saint nor Angell nor to the Virgin Mary though wee honour them duly as we ought In our Assemblies Prayer is made with one accord the Word read and preached the Sacraments administred and the Lords Supper in both kinds deliuered Almes as need requires giuen to the poore and all done to edification and in a knowne tongue as in the Apostles dayes VIII Then was preached against and forbidden all will-worship though neuer so faire in shew all seruice to God after the doctrine and cōmandements of men Col. 2.20 23. also the worship of Angels Col. 2.18 the worship of Idols 1. Ioh. 5.21 and fellowship with Idolaters 1. Cor. 8.10 and 5.11 2. Cor. 6.14 18. So with vs are forbidden all these things and condemned by our Religion as is euident by our booke of Homilies booke of Articles the publike authorized larger Catechisme and other publike Records yea the forbidding abolishing and preaching against these things is an excellent meanes to vphold the purity of our Religion which in it selfe is so contrary to all will-worship humane inuentions superstition and idolatry IX Then was the exercise of Ecclesiasticall discipline for the preseruation of order for the punishing and casting out of obstinate Heretikes 1. Tim. 1.20 6.3 Tit. 3.10 as also of notorious offenders which would not otherwise bee reformed 1. Cor. 5.7 2. Thes 3.14 and those the people were to auoyd 1. Cor. 5.10 2. Thes 3.6 2. Tim. 3.5 Ephes 5.7 This godly discipline duly obserued is of great force to preserue our Religion and to keepe it in honour and estimation X. Then was there vrging and pressing to a holy conuersation both in Pastors Tit. 2.7 8. 1. Tim. 4.12 and in the people Rom. 12.1 2. Eph. 5. 6. This Christian-like conuersation adorneth our Religion which is onely powerfull in them which liue well for it condemneth all Libertinisme and requireth very strict obedience to God and his Word XI Then was suffering of persecution for the truth and the same foretold to accompany the godly Acts 14.22 1. Thes 3.3 2. Tim. 3.12 1.8 Phil. 1.19 which greatly furthered Religion taught by the Apostles Phil. 1.12 And so hath it done ours in these parts of Christendome as the World knoweth XII Then was taught subiection both of Pastors and people vnto Principalities and Powers as to Kings so to inferiour Magistrates sent by them All sorts without exception were taught obedience to them and for conscience sake were they bound to render to them dues tribute custome honour They were commanded to make prayers for them with thanksgiuing which was a meanes to further Religion for the Apostle telleth them that thus to doe is well-doing and a meanes to stop the mouthes of the Aduersaries that so they might leade a quiet and peaceable life in al godlinesse and honestie Rom. 13.1 7. T it 3.1 1. Pet. 2.13 17. 1. Tim. 2.1 2. This is hath bin an excellent meanes to aduance our Religion for Kings and Princes seeing that our true and Apostolicall Religion did not derogate from their lawfull authoritie did not draw subiects from their allegeance nor exempt any from their true obedience but rather maintained the right which God by his holy Word in Scriptures had giuen them they submitted to the truth and embraced our Religion shaking off the yoake of Antichrist and so tooke vpon them the authoritie giuen them of God to reforme Religion according as they were taught and had learned the doctrine of Christ in the Scriptures Thus wee see first the ordinarie meanes which the holy Scriptures prescribe and euidently shew to haue been vsed in the Primitiue Church for the planting and vpholding of Christian Religion And secondly that the very selfe-same haue been and yet are the meanes for planting and preseruing of our Religion in euery Country where it hath been receiued Which meanes are so powerfull and effectuall for this purpose that looke by how much these meanes are put in execution by so much doth our Religion prosper in spite of all worldly oppositions and gaine-sayings whatsoeuer and on the contrarie looke as these meanes either wholly or but in part are neglected or faile to bee performed so doth our Religion lose of its strength and decay amongst the people what policie soeuer men otherwise vse to vphold the same For our Religion stands by holy and heauenly meanes and not by meere worldly policie or humane deuices faire shewes to the eyes delights to the eare pleasurable obiects to delight the carnally-minded Neither can it be held by any Satanicall delusions fabulous narrations feigned miracles deceitfull iugglings nor by pretended apparitions of Angels or of soules departed nor by the bare authoritie of mens sayings Decrees of corrupt Councels Popes sentences wrangling Canonists Sophisticall distinctions of Schoolemen humane Traditions Apocryphall writings old and idle customes examples of ignorant forefathers estimation of mens persons for learning and shew of holinesse nor by any deceitfull wicked and corrupt dealing as by counterfeite and bastard writings corrupting of Councels and Fathers expunging words and
sentences out of learned mens workes or altering them from the true meaning to beguile the simple Reader No nor by furious and forcible meanes as by fire and fagot massacres treasons poysons and stabbing of Kings and Gun-powder-plots nor by any such hellish practices such as the Apostles neuer spake of the Primitiue Church neuer knew of nor in holy Scripture were euer spoken of for all these our Religion doth vtterly condemne It is vpheld only by those holy and heauenly meanes which the Apostles taught and practised and which they haue left written in the Scriptures for direction of Gods Church that she may know which be the onely effectuall meanes that God hath appointed to vphold his true Religion By these meanes onely ours is preserued And therefore it is that true Religion which the holy Scripture teacheth Which being so I conclude this first argument That this our present Religion wherein we differ from our Aduersaries was before Luthers time II. Argument From the blessed Martyrs in all Ages THat Religion which was written by God in the hearts of his Martyrs and which from the beginning to this day they all suffered for was before Luthers time This cannot bee denied But our Religion now present was written by God in the hearts of his Martyrs and is that which from the beginning to this day they all suffered for And therefore this our now present Religion was before Luthers time The Minor is thus confirmed both for the writing of it in their hearts and for suffering for it The latter manifesteth the former for they that faithfully and constantly obey the truth euen vnto suffering persecution and death for it without doubt haue it written in their hearts For if Religion be not imprinted in the hearts of the Martyrs in whose hart is it written For the Martyrs had the Spirit of the liuing God sauing-knowledge and remission of sinnes they walked in Gods Statutes and kept his Iudgements sincerely all which are the euident signes that Gods truth was written in their hearts as these places of Scripture witnesse 2. Cor. 3.3 Ier. 31.33 34. Ezech. 36.27 This is not to bee doubted of But the question is Whether all the Martyrs did suffer for this our Religion or no To answere to this wee must consider that all the Martyrs of Christ may be ranked into foure sorts euery of which suffered for such truths as are in our Religion which we doe at this day professe I. Sort of Martyrs were those who suffered by the Iewes whereof the first was Stephen then Iames with many more Act 7. 12.2 4. All these did suffer for that Religion which Christ and his Apostles taught but they taught out of the Scriptures and not out of Traditions as the Euangelists and Acts shew But to suffer for that Religion which is onely taught in the Scriptures is to suffer for ours as by the former argument is prooued Therefore they suffered for our Religion II. Sort of Martyrs were such as suffered by and amongst the Heathen especially vnder the Romane Tyrants during the ten bloody persecutions among which Martyrs were most of the Apostles for we reade not in Scripture that any of the Apostles suffred martyrdome amongst the Iewes but onely Iames Iohns brother Acts 12. the rest suffered among the Heathen Now the Apostles being the planters of our Religion as by their writings doth appeare and also Martyrs for the same among this second sort they must needs be our Martyrs suffering for our Religion and so all the rest which followed the Apostles in the same faith III. Sort of Martyrs were such as suffered by the furie and rage of Heretikes when the Arians had god an ouerswaying power through Arian Emperours and Kings But those Orthodoxall Martyrs and Confessors suffered for no other doctrine then our Religion teacheth For wee hold and professe the faith of the Councell of Nice and Athanasius Creed for in our common Prayer-booke they are appoynted publikely to be read in our Assemblies And therefore these also suffered for our Religion and were our Martyrs But heere our Aduersaries will say that all these three sorts were their Martyrs for they brag and boast of these to silly people as if they had suffered for their religion now professed and practised among them But that the truth may appeare whether these Martyrs bee theirs or ours wee must consider them both as Martyrs and also as beleeuers properly they were Martyrs in those things for which they did suffer Now their suffering was for the common truths receiued both by our Aduersaries and vs. So the cause making the Martyrs and it equally held of both they are our Martyrs aswell as theirs Yea if we consider them also as Beleeuers holding other points of faith for which they were not questioned neither suffered for wee may more rightly claime them then our Aduersaries For of which Religion they held and most agreed vnto of that Religion must they be iudged to be That this may bee knowne it must be wel conceiued what they and we meane by saying Our Religion We either side stand vpon our Religion not as wee agree in points of Christianitie one with the other but as wee haue our differences also to our selues one from the other So vpon this resteth the point to trie the Martyrs whose they bee theirs or ours by their more or lesse agreeing or disagreeing with either side in our said differences But in respect of the maine differences of their Religion from ours that they cannot claime the Martyrs I thus proue by these ensuing reasons I. If these maine differences in their Religion be such as none of these Martyrs which suffered by and amongst the Iewes or by and amongst the Heathen or by and amongst the wicked Heretikes euer made profession of much lesse suffered for then in respect of these differences are they not their Martyrs they cannot appropriate them to themselues as they vse to doe but are still Martyrs in common But the antecedent is true as shall be prooued by my third reason next following for sixe hundred yeeres space after Christ in which space were all three sorts of Martyrs And therefore the consequence cannot be denied II. If these differences in their Religion bee nothing else but humane inuentions without sound authoritie from holy Scriptures and that the Martyrs professed and beleeued those things onely which expressely or by necessarie conclusions are contained in the Scriptures then in respect of these differences they are not their Martyrs But the former part is true Ergo the latter must needes be granted For the truth of the antecedent touching the vnwarrantablenesse of these their differences and without all ground of Scripture I demand of Papists what Scripture haue they for these things wherein we and they doe differ I. Of God What Scripture for the picturing of the holy Trinitie forbidden by Moses to be any way represented Deut. 4 15 16. II. Of the Scriptures Where is it written that