Linguistic DNA - Concept Modelling Demonstrator

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
scripture_n	authority_n	church_n	depend_v	6,335	5	9.7549	5	true

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A16078	A harmonie vpon the the three Euangelists, Matthew, Mark and Luke with the commentarie of M. Iohn Caluine: faithfully translated out of Latine into English, by E.P. Whereunto is also added a commentarie vpon the Euangelist S. Iohn, by the same authour.; Harmonia ex tribus Evangelistis composita	Calvin, Jean, 1509-1564.; Calvin, Jean, 1509-1564. In Evangelium secundum Johannem. aut; Pagit, Eusebius, 1547?-1617.; Fetherston, Christopher.	1584 (1584)	STC 2962; ESTC S102561	1,583,711	1,539

that hee may tryumph ouer them and their head Satan But in this answere the speciall purpose of Christ was to set forth his owne glory while he compelleth them to depart with shame Math. 22 Mark 12 Luk. 20. 23. The same daye the Saduces came to hym which say there is no resurrection and asked him 24. Saying maister Moses said if a man dye hauinge no children let his brother mary his wife raise vppe seede vnto his brother 25. Now there were with vs seauen brethren and the first married a wife and deceased and hauing no issue left his wife vnto his brother 26. Likewise also the seconde and the thirde vnto the seauenth 27. And last of all the woman died also 28. Therfore in the resurrection whose wife shal she be of the seauen for al had her 29. Then Iesus answered said vnto them ye are deceiued not knowing the scriptures nor the power of God 30. For in the resurrection they neither marye wiues nor wiues are beestowed in marriage but are as the Angels of God in heauen 31. And coÌ„cerning the rerection of the dead haue ye not read what is spoken vnto you of God saying 32. I am the God of Abraham and the God of Isaac and the god of Iacob God is not the God of the dead but of the liuing 33. And when the people heard it they were astenyed at his doctrine 18 Then came the Saduces vnto him which saye there is no resurrection and they asked him saying 19. Maister Moses wrote vnto vs if anye mans brother die and leaue his wife and leaue no children that his brother shoulde take his wife and rayse vp seed vnto his brother 20. There were seauen brethren and the first tooke a wife and when hee dyed left no issue 21. Then the second took her and he died neither did he yet leaue issue and the third likewise 22. So seauen hadde her and left no issue last of all the wife died also 23. In the resurrection then when they shall ryse againe whose wife shall she be of them for seauen had her to wife 24. Then Iesus aunswered and saide vnto them are yee not therefore deceiued because ye know not the scriptures neither the power of God 25. For when they shal rise againe from the dead neyther men mary nor wiues are maried but are as the Aungels which are in heauen 26. And as touchinge the dead that they shal rise again haue ye not read in the booke of Moses howe in the bushe God spake vnto him saying I am the God of Abraham and the God of Isaac and the God of Iacob 27 Hee is not the God of the dead but of the lyuing yee are therefore greatly deceiued 27. Then came to him certeine of the Saduces which deny that there is any resurrection and they asked him 28. Sayinge Mayster Moses wrote vnto vs if anye mans brother dye hauing a wife and hee die without children that his brother shoulde take his wife and raise vppe seede vnto his brother 29 Now there were seauen brethren and the first tooke a wife and he died without children 30. And the seconde tooke the wife and he died chidlesse 31. Then the third tooke her and so likewise the seauen died and left no children 32. And last of all the woman died also 33. Therefore at the resurrection whose wife of them shall shee bee for seauen hadde her to wife 34. Then Iesus aunswered and said vnto them the children of this world marrie wiues and are married 35. But they which shall bee counted worthye to enioye that worlde and the resurrection from the dead neither marrye wyues neither are married 36. For they can dye no more for asmuch as they are equall vnto the Aungels and are the sonnes of God since they are the children of the resurrection 37. And that the dead shal rise againe euen Moses shewed it besides the bushe when hee sayd the Lord is the GOD of Abraham and the God of Isaac and the God of Iacob 38. For hee is not the God of the dead but of them which liue for all lyue vnto him 39. Then certeine of the Pharises aunswered and sayde Mayster thou haste well sayde 40. And after that durste they not aske him any thing at all Heere we see how Sathan gathereth all the wicked together to ouerthrow the trueth of God which men in other thinges coulde not agree amongst themselues For though there was great dissention betweene these two â—ectes yet they conspire together against Christe so that the Pharises were not displeased that theyr doctrine was oppugned in the person of Christ. So at this day we see al the bandes of Satan though otherwise some of them are against others yet they ryse from al places against Christ. And the Papistes do beare so great hatred against the gospell that they doe gladly nourish Epicures Libertines and suche other monsters so that they may haue their helpe to ouerthrowe the Gospell In summe we see that they came out of diuers fortes to assault Christ and this came so to passe because that all menne generally hated the lyght of sounde doctrine But the Saduces moue the question to Christ so as vnder the colour of an absurditie they might eyther drawe hym into an errour or if hee shoulde dissente they myght dyffame him and bringe him into contempte amongste the rude and vnlearned multitude And it maye bee that they were woonte to trouble the Pharises before with the same obiection but now they lay the same snare for Christ. 23. VVhich say that there is no resurrection I haue shewed before of the beginning of the Saduces They did not onely deny the last resurrection of the slesh but also the immortalitye of the soule as Luke declareth Act. 29. 8. And truely if the doctrine of the scripture be wel considered without the hopeof the resurrection the life of the soule shall seeme to bee a very dreame For God doth not say that the soules do so liue after death as if they should now enioy the present glory and blessednes but he suspendeth theyr hope vnto the latter day I graunt that the Phylosophers which were ignoraunt of the resurrection of the flesh spak many things of the immortall essence of the soule but they speake so fondlye of the estate of the life to come that theyr writinges are to no purpose But sith the scripture saieth that the spirituall lyfe dependeth of the hope of the resurrection and that the soules separated from the bodyes haue respect to that whosoeuer denyeth the resurrection doth also deny the immortalyty of soules But here is to be seene the horryble confusion of the Iewish Church that the chiefe maisters of theyr relygion tooke awaye the hope of the lyfe to come so that after death there should be no difference betweene men and beastes They did not deny a holy righteous lyfe neither were they so prophane as to account the worship of GOD a needelesse matter but

if wee being terrified either with threatninges or daungers we depart from the profession of that doctrine which God hath sealed in our heartes by his spirit Furthermore we must note how detestable the papisticall tiranny is which driueth away the common people from reading the Gospell and al the whole scriptures Pilat being a reprobate and otherwise an instrument of Satan was yet by secrete inspiration appoynted to bee a preacher of the Gospell that he might publish a briefe summe thereof in three laÌ„guages Therfore what account ought we to make of those men who study so much as in them lyeth to suppresse the knowledge thereof wheÌ„ they proue themselues to be worse theÌ„ Pilate 23. Therefore when the soldiours had crucified Christ they tooke his garments and made foure partes to euery soldiour a part and his coate The coate was without seame wouen from the toppe throughout 24. Therefore they said amongest themselues let vs not cut it but let vs cast lots for it who shal haue it that the scripture might be fulfilled saying they parted my garments to themselues and on my ceate did they caste lâ—ttes And these thinges didde the souldiours 23. Therefore the soldiours There is mention made likewise in the other Euangelistes of the deuiding of Christes garmentes amongste the soldiours There were foure soldiours which parted the residue of his raiment amongst them The coate which was without seame remained which sithence it could not be deuided they did cast lots vpon the same To the end the Euangelistes may retaine our mindes in considering the intent and purpose of God they teach that the scripture was also fulfilled euen in this poynte Notwithstandinge it seemeth that the place which they bring out of the Psa. 22. 19. is applied vnto this present matter out of season For seeing that Dauid complaineth in that place that he was a pray vnto his enemies he comprehendeth metaphorically vnder the word Garmentes all that he had as if hee shoulde briefly say that he was spoyled robbed by the wicked which figure whilest the Euangelists doe neglect they depart from the naturall sense But we must first of all vnderstand that the Psalme must not be restrained vnto Dauid as it appeareth by many sentences and especially by that clause where it is saide I will praise thy name amongst the Gentiles which muste needes be expounded of Christ. And now it is no meruaile if that were more darkly shadowed in Dauid which appeareth more plainely in Christ to witte how much more excellent the trueth ought to be then the figure therof Furthermore let vs know that Christ was stript out of his clothes that he might cloath vs with his righteousnes that his naked bodye was laid open to the reproches of men that we may appeare with glory before Gods iudgement seate VVheras some do wrest this place allegorically vnto the scripture which the heretiks pull in peeces it is too much racked I doe not mislike the comparison that like as the prophane souldiours did once deuide Christ his garments so at this day peruerse men doe pull in peeces with straunge inuentions the scripture wherewith Christ is cloathed that we may see him But wee must in no case suffer the wickednes of the Papists which is ioyned with the horrible blasphemye of God They say that the Heretikes doe pull the scripture in peeces but the coate that is the Church remaineth whole and sound to the end they may proue reiecting the autoritie of the scripture that the vnitie of y â— faith consisteth in the only title of the Church As if the vnitie of the Church were grounded any where els saue onely in the faith of the scripture Therefore when as they pull faith from the scripture that it may be subiect to the Church alone they do not now dispoile Christ by such a diuorcement but they pull in peeces his body by cruell sacriledge Although we graunt vnto them that the coat which was without seame was a signe figure of the Church yet shal they not obteine that which they hunt after because it shall remaine that they proue that the Church is with them whereof they shew no token at all 25 And there stoode beside the crosse of Iesus his mother and his mothers sister Mary the daughter of Cleopas and Mary Magdalen 26 Therfore when Iesus had seene his mother and the disciple standing by whome he loued he said vnto his mother woman behold thy sonne 27 Then said he to the disciple behold thy mother And from that houre the disciple tooke her home vnto him 25. And there stoode The Euangelist telleth here by the way that Christ did so obey God the father that he did not neglect the duetie of humane godlynes toward his mother Hee forgate himselfe and all thinges so farre forth as it was necessary for him to obey his father but when hee had done thus he would not omit the dutie which he did owe vnto his mother And hereby we learne how we must obey God and men It falleth out oftentimes that when God calleth vs any whither our parents wife or children do call vs vnto the contrary so that we cannot satisfie them altogether If we make men equall with God we deale wickedlye Therefore we must preferre Gods commaundement wee must preferre his honour and worship afterward we must giue men their right so far forth as it shal be lawfull for vs. Neither doe the commaundementes of the firste and seconde Table of the lawe euer disagree as it appeareth at the firste sighte but wee muste beeginne with Gods woorshyppe afterwarde wee muste giue menne the lower place To whiche ende these sentences tende he that shall not hate father and mother for me he is not woorthy of me Math. 10. 37. Luke 14. 26. Therefore we must so obey men that they doe not hinder vs and keepe vs backe from woorshipping and obeying God VVhen we haue obeyed GOD then shall we thinke rightly and orderly vppon our parents wife and children As Christe taketh care for his mother but being vppon the crosse whereunto he was called by the decree of his father But if wee weighe the circumstaunce of the place and time the godlinesse whiche Christe shewed towardes his mother was woonderful I omit the extreeme torments of his body I omitte his rebukes but althoughe horrible blasphemies against God did make him woonderfull sorrowfull and hee dyd suffer an horrible conflicte with eternall death and the deuill yet none of all these things doeth hinder him from being carefull for his mother VVe may likewise gather out of this place what honour that is whiche God commaundeth vs to giue to our parentes in the lawe VVhen as Christe committeth the charge of his mother to the disciple hee deliuereth her vnto him to be nourished and cared for Therefore it followeth that honour due to parents consisteth not in the ceremonie but in all necessary dueties Nowe we must on the other side consider the faith of the

of this present life That Mathew saith that Christ healed all diseases the meaning is of what kinde soeuer they were For it is certeine that al were not healed of their diseases but there was no kind of diseases that were offered him that he healed not And hee reckoneth the chiefe kindes of diseases wherein Christe shewed his power The scripture calleth not all generally that were vexed of the deuill men possessed with deuils but those that with a secret vengance of God are deliuered bound to Sathan that hee might possesse their mindes and senses They are called Lunatiks in whom the force of the desease encreaseth or decreaseth after the inclination of the moone as they that are sick of the falling sicknes and such like when we knowe that suche diseases are not curable by naturall remedies it foloweth that the deitie of Christ is here witnessed sith that he cured them wonderfully Matth. Mar. 1. Luke 4. Â 21. So they entred into Capernaum and straightwaye on the Sabbâ—th day he entred into the Synagogue and taught 22. And they were astonyed at his doctrine for he taught them as one that had auctoritie and not as the Scribes 23. And there was in their synagogue a man which had an vncleane spirit and he cryed 24. Saying ah what haue we to doe with thee O Iesus of Naâ—areth Art thou come to destroy vs I knowe thee what thou art euen that holy one of God 25. And Iesus rebuked him saying hold thy peace and come out of him 26. And the vncleane spirit tare him and cryed with a loude voyce and came out of him 27. And they were all amased so that they demaunded one of an other saying what thing is this what now doctrine is this for hee commaundeth the fowle spirites with auctoritie and they obey him 31. And he came down into Capernaum a citie of Galileâ— and there taught them on the Saboth dayes 32. And they were astonied at his dâ—ctrine for his worde was with aucthoritie 33. And in the Synagogue there was a man which had a spirit of an vncleane diuell whiche cryed with a loud voyce 34. Saying oh what haue we to doe with thee thou Iesus of Naâ—areth Art thou come to destroy vs I know who thou arte euen the holy one of God 35. And Iesus rebuked him saying hold thy peace and come out of him Then the deuil throwing him in the middes of them came out of him hurt him nâ—t 36. So feare came on them all and they spake amonge themselues saying what thing is this for with aucthoritie and power â—ee commaundeth the fowle spirites and they come out It is to be thought that this manne possessed with a deuill was one of that company which Matthew made mention of somwhat before But the narration of Mark and Luke is not in vaine because they shew certeine circumstances which do not onely make the miracle more manifest but also doe containe profitable doctrine For the deuill doth craftilye graunt that Christ is the holy one of God that he might make men suspect that he hath some familiaritie with Christe by which subtilty hee also endeuored to bring the gospel into suspitioÌ„ at this day he ceaseth not to atteÌ„pt the same This is the cause why Christ causeth him to hold his peace And it may be that this confession was violently wrested out of him but these two do not differ betweene themselues that hee being enforced to giue place to the power of Christ that he might proclayme him to be the holy one of God and yet subtilly he endeuoureth to couer the glorye of Christe with his darknes It is also to be noted that hee doth so flatter Christ that hee might craftely conuey himselfe from his hand And after this maner he fighteth with himselfe for to what purpose is Christ sanctified of the Father but that delyuering menne from the tyrannie of the Deuill hee might ouerthrowe his kingdome but because Sathan cannot abyde that power whiche hee perceyueth to bee prepared for his destruction hee desires to make Christe quiet and to be content with a vaine title MAR. 22. They were astonied at his doctrine The Euangelists do meane that the power of the spirit did appeare in the wordes of Christe which caused euen the prophane and colde hearers to wonder at them Luke faith that his word was with aucthoritie that is full of dignitie Marke setteth it out more fully and addeth an Antithesis that it was vnlike to the wordes of the Scribes But when they were adulterous interpreters of the scripture their doctrine was literall and dead which shewed no force of the spirite and there was no maiestie in it but such colde stuffe as may at this daye be seene in the speculatiue dignitie of popery Those maysters doe imperiously thunder out what soeuer they thinke good But wheÌ„ they in prophane maner do brabble of diuinitie so that no religioÌ„ appeareth in their disputations whatsoeuer they bring is filthy and toyish for Paule hath not sayd in vaine the kingdome of God standeth not in word but in power In summe the Euangelystes doe shewe that when the maner of teaching was degenerate and verye corrupte which touched the mindes of men with no reuerence of God then the diuine power of the spirit was euidently seene in the words of Christ which gate him credit This is the power or rather dignitie and aucthoritie whereat the people was astonyed LV. 33. A man which had an vncleane spirit This speach auayleth asmuch as if Luke should haue sayd that he was stirred vp by the motion of the deuill For by the permission of God Sathan possessed the powers of the soule so that hee woulde enforce them aswell to speake as to other motions at his pleasure Therefore when menne possessed with diuelles doe speake the diuelles doe speake in them and by them whom they haue aucthoritie to rule It is probable that the tytle of the holy one of God was taken out of the common and accustomed maner of speaking and therefore they so called the Messias because he was seperate from al other as one endued with a singular grace and the head of al the Church MAR. 26. The vncleane spirit tare him Luke vseth a more gende word yet in sense they agree very well because they both would teache that the departure of the diuell was violent and forcible Therefore hee so threw down the wretched maÌ„ as if he he wold haue torn him in sunder yet Luke saith that his purpose was in vaine not that that force was altogeather without ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ or at the leaste without some payne but that hee was after delyuered a hole and a founde manne from the diuell LV. 36. So feare came on them all The fruit of the myracle is that they are enforced to thinke that there is in Christe somewhat more then appertaineth to men And they wisely referre the glorye and power of the myracle to the doctrine VVhat doctrine is this say

that with stayed mindes they should depend of God alone but because they binde not their life nor make it subiecte to aboundaunce of riches but they rest in the prouidence of God who onely both sustayneth vs by his power and giueth vs as much as is meete 16. Hee put forth a similytude This similytude proposeth vnto vs as in a glasse a lyuely shew of that sentence that menne lyue not by the abundaunce of their riches For sith the richest doe also lose their lyfe in a moment what helpeth it to gather vppe great heapes of riches Al men graunt this to be true so that Christe speaketh nothing but that which is vsuall and common and which is in al mens tongues but in the meane season how doth euery man apply and giue his minde Doe not all men rather so frame theyr lyues and so mixe their counselles and theyr reasons that they may depart furthest of from God placeing their lyfe in the present aboundaunce of theyr riches Therefore all menne haue neede to waken themselues least they imagining themselues to be blessed by reason of their riches should entangle themselues in the snares of couetousnesse Also in this parable is sette forth vnto vs the vncerteine shortnes of this life Further how riches do profit nothing for the lengthening of the life There is a third thing to bee added which is not expressed but may be easilye gathered out of the former that this is a notable helpe to the faythful that seeking their daily bread from the Lord whether they be rich or poore their only rest is in his prouidence 17. VVhat shall I doe The wicked are therefore doubtfull in theyr counselles because they knowe not the lawefull vse of their riches then because they being dronken in theyr peruerse hope doe forgette themselues So this rich manne setting the hope of his lyfe in his great aboundaunce shaketh the remembraunce of death farre away And yet is dystrust annexed to this pride for couetousnes which neuer is filled doth yet neuerthelesse vexe these rich menne as this rich manne enlargeth his barnes as though his belly being stuffed with his former barnes had not yet enough Yet Christ doth not expresly condemne this that hee dooth the parte of a diligent and carefull housholder in laying vp prouision but because that as a bottomlesse deepe he would swallowe vp and deuoure many barnes in his greedy couetousnes whereof it foloweth that hee knewe not the true vse of plentifull prouision Nowe when he exhorteth himselfe to eating and to drinking he remembreth himself no longer to be a manne but becommeth proud in his aboundaunce And wee doe dayly see euident examples of this insolencie in prophane men which set the heap of their riches as brasen fortresses against death VVhen he saith my soule eate and be mery in this speach there is great force after the phrase of the Hebrewes for he so speaketh vnto himself that yet he would declare that he hath aboundance to fil the desire of his minde and all his senses 20. O foole this night will they fetch away thy soule from thee There is an allusion in this word soule The rich man spake first to his soule as the seat of al his affections but now it is spoken of the life it selfe or of the vital spirit The verbe they wil fetch though it be the plural number yet because it is indefinite it signifieth nothing else then that the life is in the power of an other which the rich manne accounted to be in his owne hande which I doe therefore giue warning of because that some doe without cause imagine this to be spoken of the Aungelles And in this is the rich manne reproued of follye that hee knew not that his lyfe depended of an other 21. So is hee that gathereth riches to himselfe Sith it appeareth that there is here a comparison the exposition of one parte of the sentence muste be gathered out of the other Let vs therefore define what the meaning of this is to be rich in God or toward God or in respecte of God They which are but meanely exercised in the scripture doe knowe that the Greekes doe vse ofte one of these prepositions for an other But it is no matter which of the two wayes soeuer be taken for this is the sum they are rich toward God which truste not in earthly thinges but depende of his onely prouidence Neyther is it of anye waight whether they haue aboundaunce or be in wante so that both sortes doe sincerelye aske theyr daily bread from the Lord. For that which is opposed against it to gather riches to himselfe signifieth as much as to neglecte the blessing of God and carefully to heape vp great aboundance as if theyr hope were shutte vppe in their barnes Of this may the end of the parable be gathered that vayne are their counselles and ridiculous are theyr labours which trusting to the aboundaunce of their riches do not repose themselues in God alone nor are not content with his measure ready to beare both estates and at length they shal beare the iudgement of theyr owne vanity Matth. Mark Luke 13. Â Â 1. There were certeine â—men present at the same season that shewed him of the Galileans whose bloud Pilate had mingled with their owne sacrifices 2. And Iesus answered and saide vnto them suppose yee that these Galileans were greater sinners then al the other GalileaÌ„s because they haue suffered such things 3. I tell you nay but except yee amend your liues yee shall al likewise perish 4. Or think you that those eighteene vpon whome the tower in Sileam fell and slew theÌ„ were sinners aboue al men that dwell in Hierusalem 5. I tell you nay but except you amend your liues yee al shal likewise perish 6. He spake also this parable A certeine manne had a figtree planted in his vineyarde and hee came and sought fruit thereon and found none 7. Then said he to the dresser of his vineyard behold this three yeares I haue come and sought fruite of this figtree and finde none cut it downe why keepeth it also the ground barren 8. And he answered and saide vnto him Lorde let it alone this yeare also till I digge rounde about it and doung it 9. And if it beare fruit wel if not then after shalt thou cut it downe 2. Suppose yee that these This place is verye profitable euen for this cause for that this disease is engrafted almost in vs all that beeing too sharpe seuere Iudges against others we flatter our selues in our own sinnes So it falleth out that we doe not onely exaggerate the sinnes of our brethren more sharply then is meete but also if any aduersitie come vnto them we condemne them as wicked men and reprobates In the meane while whosoeuer is not touched with the hand of God sleepeth carelesly in his owne sinnes as if he had God fauourable and mercifull wherein there is a double fault For as

that they offer Christ in the supper proceedeth from a contrary autour And certeinely this is a merueilous chaunge that a mortall manne who is commaunded to take the bodye of Christe shoulde take vppon hym the office to offer vppe the same and so a Priest made of himself should offer vnto God his sonne I goe not presently about to proue with how many sacriliges their faigned oblation dooth abounde it is sufficient for me to proue that it is so far from being any thing like to Christs institution that it is rather directly contrary to the same This is my bodye They saye that the breade was consecrated by these woordes to bee a figure or token of the fleshe of Christe I doe not disallowe so that this woord be rightly and truely vnderstoode So the bread which was ordained to nourish the body Christe doth chuse sanctifie to an other vse that it may beginne to be a spirituall meate And this is that alteration and chaunge whereof the auncient writers of the church do make mention But yet it must be noted that the bread is not consecrated by whispering and breathing ouer it but by the euident doctrine of fayth And truely it is a magicall inchauntment when the consecration is directed to the dead element for the bread is not made a figure of the body of Christ to it selfe but to vs. In summe the consecration is nothing else but a solemne testimony to vs whereby the Lord appointeth an earthly and corruptible signe for a spiritual vse which cannot be except that his commandement and promise be openly declared for the edifying of fayth VVhereby it appeareth againe how wickedly this mistery is prophaned by the Papistes by their secrete whispering and breathing If that Christ doth consecrate the bread when hee telleth vs that it is his body there is no chaunge of substaunce to be imagined but onely to be noted an alteration of the vse If that the worlde had not beene now a long time bewitched by the subtilty of the deuil so that the monstrous opinion of transubstantiation being once brought in it will admitte at this day no light of true interpretatioÌ„ of these words it shuld be in vayn to stand longer in searching out the sense Christe saieth the bread is his body He speaketh of the Sacrament But it must of necessity bee confessed that the Sacrament consisteth of a visible sign wherunto the thing signified is conioyned which is the trueth of the same And this also it well knowne of olde that the signe is often called by the name of the thing signified VVherfore no man that is but meanely exercised in the scriptures will deny but that this sacramentall phrase of speach must bee taken metonymically that is the one for the other I omitte the generall figures which are read euery where in the scripture I doe only say this that so oft as the outward signe is saide to be that which it dooth represent all menne doe consent that it is by the figure Metonymia VVhere Baptisme is called the lauar of regeneration Tit. 3. 5. where the rocke which yeelded water to the fathers in the wildernesse is called Christe 1. Corin. 10. 4. where a Doue is called the holy Ghost Iohn 1. 32. No man will deny but that the signes are called by the name of the things which they signifie Therefore how commeth it to passe that they which regard the wordes of the Lorde will not suffer that which is common to all the Sacraments to be applyed to the Supper But they wil haue the simple the litteral sense Then why doth not the same rule hold in all the Sacraments Certeinely except they wil graunt that the rocke was substantially Christ the obiection is but weak wherewith they vrge vs. If we interpret it that the bread is called the body because it is the figure of the body they pretend that the whole doctrine of the scripture is ouerthrown Neither haue we forged now of late this rule for this manner of speache but al men do imbrace the same as deliuered by Augustin from the authority of the auncient fathers that the names of spirituall thinges are improperly ascribed to the signes and that all the places of scripture shuld be so expounded where there is mention made of the Sacramentes Sith wee doe then hold a general rule receiued euery where to what purpose doe they make such outcryes as at a straunge matter not hearde of before But let those mased men cry as they lyst this shall be accepted of men that are wise and modest that there is a sacramentall forme of speaking in these wordes of Christ. VVherof it followeth that the bread because it is the figure of the body of Christ is called the body But there are two kindes of men which doe arise against vs the Papistes being bewitched with their Transubstantion deny that there is any bread because that there remayneth onely a shewe without the substaunce But Paule refuteth their fancy affirming the bread which we breake to be the communion of the body of Christ 1. Corint 10. 16. Then the very nature of the Sacrament abhorreth this their deuise for that it cannot remain perfecte if there should not be a true and perfect outwarde signe For howe shall we learne that our soules are fedde with the flesh of Christ if there were not very bread sette before our eyes but a vaine shewe Further what wil they say of the other sign For Christ said not this is my bloud but This cuppe is Therfore by their rule not onelye the wine but also the substaunce whereof the Cuppe was made should necessarily be transubstantiated into bloud Now that which is sette downe by Matthewe I will not henceforth drinke of the fruit of the vine dooth euidently declare that it was wine which he delyuered to be drunke Therefore the follye of the Papistes is plainely confuted euery way But there are others which doe reiect the figure and presently as frantike men they do receiue the same The bread according to their opinions is truely and properlye the body For they account not of transubstantiation as a matter without all colour of reason But when they are demaunded whether the bread and wine be christ they do answer that the bread is therfore called the body because that vnder this and with this it is receiued And by this answer it is easie to gather that the name of the body is vnproperlye transferred to the bread which is the signe of it And it is meruaile sith these menne doe so oft say that Christ spake this in respect of the sacramentall vnyon that they doe not marke what they saye For what manner of sacramentall vnion is there of the thing signified and of the signe Is it not because the Lord by the secret power of his spirit performeth that which he promyseth So these latter masters of the letter are no lesse to be derided then the Papistes Hytherto I haue

Selected quad for the lemma: scripture_n

Text snippets containing the quad